Home Mathematics The transfer ideal under the action of orthogonal group in modular case
Article Open Access

The transfer ideal under the action of orthogonal group in modular case

  • Zeng Lingli EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 16, 2022

Abstract

In this paper, we study the structures of the invariant subspaces under the action of orthogonal group O 2 ν ( F q , S ) . In particular, we give a detailed description of 2-codimensional invariant subspaces. Moreover, we show that the height of transfer ideal Im ( Tr O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ) is 2 and give a primary decomposition for the radical ideal of this transfer ideal.

MSC 2010: 47A15; 20M12

1 Introduction

Let V be a vector space of dimension n over a field F of characteristic p and let F [ V ] be the symmetric algebra of V (the dual of V ). If { x 1 , , x n } is a basis for V , then F [ V ] can be identified with the polynomial ring F [ x 1 , , x n ] . Let G G L ( V ) be a finite group. Then the elements of G act on F [ V ] as algebra automorphisms and we form the subring

F [ V ] G { f F [ V ] g f = f , g G }

of G -invariant polynomials. The image of transfer map

Tr G : F [ V ] F [ V ] G ; f g G g f

is an ideal of F [ V ] G . We call it the transfer ideal under the action of G and denoted by Im ( Tr G ) . If the order of G is invertible in F , then the transfer map Tr G is a surjection onto F [ V ] G . When the characteristic of F divides the order of G , the transfer ideal is a proper, nonzero ideal in F [ V ] G . The transfer ideal is of considerable interest in modular invariant theory.

In 1999 Shank and Wehlau [1] proved that Im ( Tr G ) is a principal ideal if G is a p -group defined over F p and F [ V ] G is a polynomial ring. They also showed that Im ( Tr G ) are principal for G = SL n ( F q ) and GL n ( F q ) with natural actions. Later, Neusel [2,3] studied the transfer ideal Im ( Tr G ) for permutation group. In addition, she proved that the ideal Im ( Tr G ) is a prime ideal for cyclic p -groups and determined an upper bound of its height. Moreover, Kuhnigt and Smith studied the transfer ideal for the symplectic group Sp 2 ν ( F q ) and showed that the radical ideal of transfer is a principal ideal. These detailed proofs can be found on page 276 of [4].

Along this research route, we focus on the transfer ideal for the orthogonal groups. Let q = p t be a positive odd prime power, F q be the Galois field with q elements. Let S be an n × n nonsingular symmetric matrix over F q . Then the set of all matrices A such that ASA = S forms a group with respect to matrix multiplication, where A denotes the transpose of A . We call it the orthogonal group of degree n with respect to S and denote it by O n ( F q , S ) , i.e.,

O n ( F q , S ) = { A GL n ( F q ) ASA = S } .

By [5, Theorem 6.4] we know that the nonsingular symmetric matrix S is one of the following forms:

S 2 ν = I ( ν ) I ( ν ) ; S 2 ν + 1 , 1 = 0 I ( ν ) I ( ν ) 0 1 ; S 2 ν + 1 , z = 0 I ( ν ) I ( ν ) 0 z ; S 2 ν + 2 = 0 I ( ν ) I ( ν ) 0 1 0 0 z ,

where I ( ν ) is a ν × ν identity matrix and z is a non square element in F q . Then, up to isomorphism, the orthogonal groups are four types. In this paper, we shall focus attention on the orthogonal group O 2 ν ( F q , S ) with respect to the nonsingular symmetric matrix S = S 2 ν . The other cases are similar and are omitted.

The paper is organized as follows. After this introductory section, in Sections 2 and 3 we discuss the structures of invariant subspaces under the action of the orthogonal group O 2 ν ( F q , S ) . In Section 4, we determine the structures of the transfer variety Ω O 2 ν ( F q , S ) and give a primary decomposition for the radical ideal of transfer ideal, and show that the height of this transfer ideal is 2. In addition, we give a detailed example for q = 3 and ν = 2 in Section 5.

2 Types of 2-codimensional invariant subspaces

Let e 1 , e 2 , , e 2 ν be the standard basis of the vector space V = F q 2 ν . For each v = k 1 e 1 + k 2 e 2 + + k 2 ν e 2 ν V , k i F q , there is an action of O 2 ν ( F q , S ) on V defined as

V × O 2 ν ( F q , S ) V ( ( k 1 , k 2 , , k 2 ν ) , A ) ( k 1 , k 2 , , k 2 ν ) A .

Then the vector space V together with this action is called the 2 ν -dimensional orthogonal space over F q with respect to S .

Let P be an m -dimensional vector subspace of V . We use the same symbol P to denote the matrix representation of the vector subspace P , i.e., P is an m × 2 ν matrix whose rows form a basis of the vector subspace P . Two n × n matrices A and B are said to be cogredient, if there is a n × n nonsingular matrix Q such that QAQ = B . It is well known that PSP is cogredient to one of the following normal forms [5]:

M ( m , 2 s , s ) = 0 I ( s ) I ( s ) 0 0 ( m 2 s ) , M ( m , 2 s + 1 , s , 1 ) = 0 I ( s ) I ( s ) 0 1 0 ( m 2 s 1 ) , M ( m , 2 s + 1 , s , z ) = 0 I ( s ) I ( s ) 0 z 0 ( m 2 s 1 ) , M ( m , 2 s + 2 , s ) = 0 I ( s ) I ( s ) 0 1 z 0 ( m 2 s 2 ) .

We use the symbol M ( m , 2 s + γ , s , Γ ) to represent any one of these four normal forms, where s is its index, γ = 0 , 1 , or 2, and Γ represents the definite part in these normal forms. If PSP is cogredient to M ( m , 2 s + γ , s , Γ ) , then P is called a subspace of type ( m , 2 s + γ , s , Γ ) with respect to S in V . Subspaces of type ( m , 2 s , s ) , ( m , 2 s + 1 , s , 1 ) , ( m , 2 s + 1 , s , z ) , and ( m , 2 s + 2 , s ) are also called subspace of the hyperbolic type, the square type, the nonsquare type, and the elliptic type, respectively.

By the proof of Theorem 6.3 in [5], we have the following lemma

Lemma 2.1

[5] Subspaces of types ( m , 2 s + γ , s , Γ ) exist in the 2 ν -dimensional orthogonal space V = F q 2 ν with respect to the nonsingular symmetric matrix S if and only if

2 s + γ m ν + s .

Then, we can determine the types of 2-codimensional subspaces.

Lemma 2.2

There are five types of 2-codimensional subspaces of the 2 ν -dimensional orthogonal space V = F q 2 ν .

Proof

Let m = 2 ν 2 . By Lemma 2.1, 2 s + γ m ν + s , it follows that if r = 0 then s = ν 2 or ν 1 ; if r = 1 then s = ν 2 ; if r = 2 then s = ν 2 . Hence, we obtain the following five types of 2-codimensional subspaces: ( 2 ν 2 , 2 ( ν 2 ) , ν 2 ) , ( 2 ν 2 , 2 ( ν 1 ) , ν 1 ) , ( 2 ν 2 , 2 ( ν 2 ) + 1 , ν 2 , 1 ) , ( 2 ν 2 , 2 ( ν 2 ) + 1 , ν 2 , z ) , and ( 2 ν 2 , 2 ( ν 2 ) + 2 , ν 2 ) .□

Remark 2.3

For convenience, let type I of 2-codim, type II of 2-codim, type III of 2-codim, type IV of 2-codim, and type V of 2-codim denote the subspaces of type ( 2 ν 2 , 2 ( ν 2 ) , ν 2 ) , ( 2 ν 2 , 2 ( ν 1 ) , ν 1 ) , ( 2 ν 2 , 2 ( ν 2 ) + 1 , ν 2 , 1 ) , ( 2 ν 2 , 2 ( ν 2 ) + 1 , ν 2 , z ) , and ( 2 ν 2 , 2 ( ν 2 ) + 2 , ν 2 ) , respectively.

The following two lemmas celebrated Witt’s transitivity theorem will be often used.

Lemma 2.4

([5], Theorem 6.4) Let P 1 and P 2 be two m -dimensional subspaces of V . Then there is an A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) such that P 1 = B P 2 A , where B is an m × m nonsingular matrix, if and only if P 1 and P 2 are of the same type with respect to S. In other words, O 2 ν ( F q , S ) acts transitively on each set of subspaces of the same type.

Lemma 2.5

[5, Lemma 6.8] Let P 1 and P 2 be two m × m matrices of rank m. Then there exists an element A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) such that P 1 = P 2 A if and only if P 1 S P 1 = P 2 S P 2 .

Now, let us study the structures of the type I of 2-codim subspaces.

Definition 2.6

([6], Section 9.2 Definition) An element T O 2 ν ( F q , S ) is called a 2-transvection if T = I + N , where I is the identity matrix, the rank of N is 2 and NSN = 0 .

Lemma 2.7

([6], Section 9.2 Theorem 1) In the orthogonal group O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , each 2-transvection is similar to

I ( ν ) K I ( ν ) , where K = 0 1 1 0 0 ( ν 2 ) .

Let V A = { v V v A = v } where A GL 2 ν ( F q ) . Then it is easy to check that V A is a subspace of vector space V and V A 1 B A = V B A for each B GL 2 ν ( F q ) .

Lemma 2.8

Let T O 2 ν ( F q , S ) . Then T is a 2-transvection if and only if the invariant subspace V T is a type I of 2-codim subspace.

Proof

Suppose that T is a 2-transvection. Let T 0 = I ( ν ) K I ( ν ) in Lemma 2.7. Then T 0 is also a 2-transvection and A T A 1 = T 0 for some A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) . For each v = k 1 e 1 + + k 2 ν e 2 ν V , we have

v T 0 = k 1 e 1 + + k ν e ν + ( k ν + 1 k 2 ) e ν + 1 + ( k ν + 2 + k 1 ) e ν + 2 + k ν + 3 e ν + 3 + + k 2 ν e 2 ν .

If v V T 0 , then v T 0 = v , whence k 1 = k 2 = 0 . Therefore,

V T 0 = { k 3 e 3 + k 4 e 4 + + k 2 ν e 2 ν k i F q }

and dim V T 0 = 2 ν 2 . We denote the vector invariant subspace V T 0 as the ( 2 ν 2 ) × 2 ν matrix

T ˆ 0 = e 3 , e 4 , , e 2 ν .

By computing, it follows that

T ˆ 0 S T ˆ 0 = 0 2 × ( ν 2 ) I ( ν 2 ) 0 ( ν 2 ) × 2 I ( ν 2 ) is cogredient to 0 I ( ν 2 ) I ( ν 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 .

Then the type of V T 0 is ( 2 ν 2 , 2 ( ν 2 ) , ν 2 ) . This implies that V T 0 is a type I of 2-codim subspace. Since V T = V A 1 T 0 A = V T 0 A , the invariant subspace V T has the same type with V T 0 by Lemma 2.4. Consequently, V T is also a type I of 2-codim subspace.

Conversely, suppose that V T is a type I of 2-codim subspace. With the preceding discussion, the invariant subspace V T 0 is a type I of 2-codim subspace and { e 3 , e 4 , , e 2 ν } V T 0 . By Lemma 2.4, there exists an element A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) such that V T 0 = V T A = V A 1 T A . Let T 1 = A 1 T A . Then T 1 O 2 ν ( F q , S ) and the elements e 3 , e 4 , , e 2 ν are invariants under the action of T 1 . Therefore, we may assume that

T 1 = a 11 a 12 H 11 a 1 ν + 1 a 1 ν + 2 H 12 a 21 a 22 H 21 a 2 ν + 1 a 2 ν + 2 H 22 0 0 I ( ν 2 ) 0 0 0 ( ν 2 ) I ( ν ) ,

where H i j , i , j = 1 , 2 , are 1 × ( ν 2 ) matrices over F q . Since T 1 O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , it must satisfy T 1 S T 1 = S , then we get the following equations:

(2.1) a 11 = a 22 = 1 a 1 ν + 2 + a 2 ν + 1 = 0 a 12 = a 21 = a 1 ν + 1 = a 2 ν + 2 = 0 H i j = 0 , i , j = 1 , 2 .

Hence,

T 1 = I ( ν ) a 1 ν + 2 K I ( ν ) ,

where a 1 ν + 2 F q .

It is easy to check that ( T 1 I ) S ( T 1 I ) = ( 0 ) and rank ( T 1 I ) = 2 , thus T 1 is a 2-transvection. Consequently, T = A T 1 A 1 is also a 2-transvection.□

Next, we are going to study the structures of the type II of 2-codim subspaces.

Definition 2.9

([6], Section 9.3 Definition) Let ν 1 . A subspace P of V is called a hyperbolic place if dim ( P ) = 2 and P has a basis { u , v } such that u S u = v S v = 0 , u S v = 1 . An element R O 2 ν ( F q , S ) is called hyperbolic motion taking the place P as axis, if v R = v , v P , and v R P , v P . Furthermore, we call R a hyperbolic rotation if R O 2 ν + ( F q , S ) .

Lemma 2.10

([6], Section 9.3 Theorem 1) Let ν 1 . In O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , each hyperbolic motion R is similar to one of the following forms:

R 1 = a I ( ν 1 ) a 1 I ( ν 1 ) or R 2 = 0 a I ( ν 1 ) 0 ( ν 1 ) a 1 0 0 ( ν 1 ) I ( ν 1 ) , a F q .

If R is a hyperbolic rotation, then R must be similar to R 1 .

Lemma 2.11

If R is a hyperbolic rotation, then R p , i.e., the order of R is not p.

Proof

By Lemma 2.10, R = R 1 = a . Since a F q , it implies that a p .□

Lemma 2.12

Let R O 2 ν ( F q , S ) . Then R is a hyperbolic rotation if and only if the invariant subspace V R is a type II of 2-codim subspace.

Proof

The following proof is similar to Lemma 2.8, thus we just give the main idea. Suppose that R is a hyperbolic rotation. Let R 1 = a I ( ν 1 ) a 1 I ( ν 1 ) , 1 a F q . We have that V R 1 = { k 2 e 2 + + k ν e ν + k ν + 2 e ν + 2 + + k 2 ν e 2 ν k i F q } and dim V R 1 = 2 ν 2 . Then V R 1 is a type II of 2-codim subspace. By Lemma 2.10, A R A 1 = R 1 for some A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , hence V R = V R 1 A is also a type II of 2-codim subspace by Lemma 2.4.

Conversely, suppose that V R is a type II of 2-codim subspace. Then there exists A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) such that V R 1 = V R A by Lemma 2.4. Let R 3 = A 1 R A . We have that V R 1 = V R 3 , R 3 O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , and the elements e 2 , , e ν , e ν + 2 , , e 2 ν are invariant under the action of R 3 . Hence, consider the equations

R 3 S R 3 = S and e i R 3 = e i , i = 2 , , ν , ν + 2 , , 2 ν ,

we obtain that

R 3 = a 11 I ( ν 1 ) a 11 1 I ( ν 1 ) , a 11 0 ,

and so R 3 is a hyperbolic rotation. Consequently, R = A R 3 A 1 is also a hyperbolic rotation.□

Now, we shall consider the cases of the type III and type IV of 2-codim subspaces.

Let

H = H = 1 0 0 b a 1 b a b I ( ν 2 ) 0 ( ν 2 ) 1 a 0 1 I ( ν 2 ) a , b F q

be a set. The construction of this set is motivated by combining two 2-transvections.

Definition 2.13

An element A GL 2 ν ( F q ) is called a H 1 -type (resp. H z -type) matrix if there exists a B GL 2 ν ( F q ) such that B A B 1 H and 2 a b 1 corresponding with B A B 1 is a square (resp. nonsquare) element in F q .

Lemma 2.14

  1. H O 2 ν ( F q , S ) .

  2. If H H , then H = p .

  3. H is a H 1 -type (resp. H z -type) matrix if and only if the invariant subspace V H is a type III (resp. type IV) of 2-codim subspace.

Proof

It is easy to check (1) and (2). The proof of (3) is similar to Lemma 2.8, so we just give the main idea. Suppose that H is an H 1 -type (resp. H z -type) matrix. Then we have that V H = { k 1 ( a b 1 e 1 + e ν + 1 ) + k 3 e 3 + + k ν e ν + k ν + 2 e ν + 2 + + k 2 ν e 2 ν k i F q } and dim V H = 2 ν 2 . Thus, the type of the matrix corresponding with V H is I ( ν 2 ) I ( ν 2 ) 2 a b 1 0 0 0 . Consequently, if 2 a b 1 is a square (resp. nonsquare) element in F q , then V H is a type III (resp. type IV) of 2-codim subspace.

Conversely, we give only the proof for the type III of 2-codim subspace. Suppose that the invariant subspace V A is a type III of 2-codim subspace. Then there exists an element B O 2 ν ( F q , S ) such that V H = V A B = V B 1 A B = V C by Lemma 2.4. Let C = B 1 A B . We have that V C = V H , C O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , and dim ( V C ) = 2 ν 2 . Moreover, the elements e 3 , , e ν , e ν + 2 , , e 2 ν , and a b 1 e 1 + e ν + 1 are invariants under the action of C . Hence, consider the equations

C S C = S , e i C = e i , i = 3 , , ν , ν + 2 , , 2 ν , ( a b 1 e 1 + e ν + 1 ) C = a b 1 e 1 + e ν + 1 ,

we obtain that

C = 1 0 0 a 2 ν + 1 a 21 1 a 2 ν + 1 a 21 a 2 ν + 1 I ( ν 2 ) 0 ( ν 2 ) 1 a 21 0 1 I ( ν 2 ) .

Next, we claim that a 21 0 and a 2 ν + 1 0 . If a 21 = a 2 ν + 1 = 0 , then C = I ( 2 ν ) , contradicting dim V C = 2 ν 2 . If a 21 = 0 and a 2 ν + 1 0 , then C is a 2-transvection. By Lemma 2.8, V C is a type I of 2-codim subspace, which contradicts that V C = V H is a type III of 2-codim subspace. If a 21 0 and a 2 ν + 1 = 0 , then C is also a 2-transvection, a contradiction. Therefore, a 21 0 and a 2 ν + 1 0 , thus C H . Since V C = V H is a type III of 2-codim subspace, it follows that 2 a 21 a 2 ν + 1 1 is a square element in F q . Hence, A = B C B 1 is a H 1 -type matrix.□

Finally, we shall show the structures of the type V of 2-codim subspaces.

Lemma 2.15

If the order of the matrix A ¯ = A B C D is not p , where A , B , C , D are n × n matrices over F q , then the order of matrix A ¯ ¯ = A B 0 I 0 0 C D 0 0 0 I is not p either, where I is an m × m identity matrix, and each is an arbitrary n × m matrix over F q .

Proof

If A ¯ i = A B C D i = A i B i C i D i , then A ¯ ¯ i = A i B i 0 I 0 0 C i D i 0 0 0 I . Therefore, if A ¯ p I ( n ) , then we conclude that A ¯ ¯ p I ( n + m ) .□

Let

Q = 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 b I ( ν 2 ) 0 ( ν 2 ) a 1 0 0 0 0 b 1 0 0 0 ( ν 2 ) I ( ν 2 ) ,

where a , b F q , 2 a is a square element, and 2 b = z . The construction of this element is motivated by combining two hyperbolic motions. It is easily seen that Q O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , and

V Q = { k 1 ( e 1 + a e ν + 1 ) + k 2 ( e 2 + b e ν + 2 ) + k 3 e 3 + + k ν e ν + k ν + 3 e ν + 3 + + k 2 ν e 2 ν k i F q } .

Then the type of the matrix corresponding with the invariant subspace V Q is I ( ν 2 ) I ( ν 2 ) 1 0 0 z . Hence, V Q is a type V of 2-codim subspace.

Lemma 2.16

If A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) and the invariant subspace V A is a type V of 2-codim subspace, then A p .

Proof

Since the invariant subspaces V A and V Q are both the type V of 2-codim subspaces, there exists an element B O 2 ν ( F q , S ) such that V Q = V A B by Lemma 2.4. Let C = B 1 A B . Then C O 2 ν ( F q , S ) and the elements e 3 , , e ν , e ν + 3 , , e 2 ν , e 1 + a e ν + 1 , and e 2 + b e ν + 2 are all invariants under the action of C . Therefore, we may assume that

C = a 11 a 12 H 11 a 1 ν + 1 a 1 ν + 2 H 12 a 21 a 22 H 21 a 2 ν + 1 a 2 ν + 2 H 22 0 0 I ( ν 2 ) 0 0 0 ( ν 2 ) a ν + 1 1 a ν + 1 2 H 31 a ν + 1 ν + 1 a ν + 1 ν + 2 H 32 a ν + 2 1 a ν + 2 2 H 41 a ν + 2 ν + 1 a ν + 2 ν + 2 H 42 0 0 0 ( ν 2 ) 0 0 I ( ν 2 ) ,

where H i j , i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , j = 1 , 2 , are 1 × ( ν 2 ) matrices over F q .

Now we consider the sub-block of matrix C , i.e.,

C ¯ = a 11 a 12 a 1 ν + 1 a 1 ν + 2 a 21 a 22 a 2 ν + 1 a 2 ν + 2 a ν + 1 1 a ν + 1 2 a ν + 1 ν + 1 a ν + 1 ν + 2 a ν + 2 1 a ν + 2 2 a ν + 2 ν + 1 a ν + 2 ν + 2 . .

Since e 1 + a e ν + 1 and e 2 + b e ν + 2 are invariants under the action of C , we have

(2.2) a 11 = 1 a a ν + 1 1 a 12 = a a ν + 1 2 a 1 ν + 1 = a a a ν + 1 ν + 1 a 1 ν + 2 = a a ν + 1 ν + 2 a 21 = b a ν + 2 1 a 22 = 1 b a ν + 2 2 a 2 ν + 1 = b a ν + 2 ν + 1 a 2 ν + 2 = b b a ν + 2 ν + 2

Since C O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , it must satisfy C S C = S , then C ¯ satisfies

C ¯ 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 C ¯ = 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 .

And adding (2.2), we can obtain the following equations:

(2.3) a ν + 1 ν + 1 = 1 a a ν + 1 1

(2.4) a ν + 1 ν + 2 = b a ν + 1 2

(2.5) a ν + 2 ν + 1 = a a ν + 2 1

(2.6) a ν + 2 ν + 2 = 1 b a ν + 2 2

(2.7) a ν + 1 1 ( 1 a a ν + 1 1 ) = b a ν + 1 2 2

(2.8) a ν + 2 2 ( 1 b a ν + 2 2 ) = a a ν + 2 1 2

(2.9) a ν + 2 1 ( 2 a a ν + 1 1 1 ) + a ν + 1 2 ( 2 b a ν + 2 2 1 ) = 0 .

Next, we have to consider the following situations: Whether or not a ν + 1 1 , a ν + 1 2 , a ν + 2 1 , and a ν + 2 2 are 0, respectively. We only give the proof of the most difficult case when a ν + 2 1 0 and a ν + 2 2 2 1 b 1 .

Since a ν + 2 2 2 1 b 1 , 1 2 b a ν + 2 2 0 . So by (2.9), we obtain

(2.10) 1 2 a a ν + 1 1 1 2 b a ν + 2 2 = a ν + 1 2 a ν + 2 1 .

Combining (2.7) with (2.8), we have

(2.11) a ν + 1 1 ( 1 a a ν + 1 1 ) a ν + 2 2 ( 1 b a ν + 2 2 ) = b a ν + 1 2 2 a a ν + 2 1 2 .

Combining (2.11) with the square of (2.10), we conclude that

(2.12) a a ν + 1 1 ( 1 a a ν + 1 1 ) b a ν + 2 2 ( 1 b a ν + 2 2 ) = 1 = a ν + 1 2 2 a ν + 2 1 2 ,

then a ν + 1 2 = ± a ν + 2 1 .

If a ν + 1 2 = a ν + 2 1 , then it follows that a ν + 1 1 = a 1 b a ν + 2 2 according to 2.9. Thus, adding (2.2)–(2.6), we have

C ¯ = 1 b a ν + 2 2 a a ν + 2 1 a b a ν + 2 2 a b a ν + 2 1 b a ν + 2 1 1 b a ν + 2 2 a b a ν + 2 1 b 2 a ν + 2 2 a 1 b a ν + 2 2 a ν + 2 1 1 b a ν + 2 2 b a ν + 2 1 a ν + 2 1 a ν + 2 2 a a ν + 2 1 1 b a ν + 2 2 .

Let

P 1 1 0 a 0 0 1 0 b 0 0 a a ν + 2 1 b a ν + 2 2 0 0 0 1

and

P 2 P 1 C ¯ P 1 1 I = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ν + 2 2 0 2 b a ν + 2 2 a ν + 2 1 a ν + 2 2 2 4 b a ν + 2 2 .

If we denote E = 0 a ν + 2 2 a ν + 2 1 a ν + 2 2 , F = 0 2 b a ν + 2 2 2 4 b a ν + 2 2 , then P 2 i = 0 0 F i 1 E F i . Since det ( F ) = 4 b a ν + 2 2 , a ν + 2 2 0 by (2.8), we have det ( F ) 0 , thus P 2 p ( 0 ) . Therefore, P 1 C ¯ P 1 1 p , C ¯ p .

If a ν + 1 2 = a ν + 2 1 , then it follows that C ¯ = 2 p according to (2.2)–(2.9).

Using the same method, we finally prove that C ¯ p for all situations. Hence, C p by Lemma 2.15. Since A = B C B 1 , it follows that A p .□

We have totally described the structures of all types of 2-codimensional invariant subspaces. We summarize the results so far obtained as follows:

Theorem 2.17

Let A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , A = p , and the codimension of the invariant subspace V A be 2. Then the invariant subspace V A is a type I of 2-codim, type III of 2-codim, or type IV of 2-codim subspace, but neither a type II of 2-codim nor a type V of 2-codim subspace.

Proof

By Lemma 2.2, the 2-codimensional subspaces of orthogonal space V have five types. According to Lemmas 2.11 and 2.12, V A cannot be a type II of 2-codim subspace since A = p . Also, V A cannot be a type V of 2-codim subspace by Lemma 2.16. Consequently, V A is a type I of 2-codim, type III of 2-codim, or type IV of 2-codim subspace.□

Remark 2.18

By Lemmas 2.8 and 2.14, the invariant subspaces whose types are type I of 2-codim, type III of 2-codim, and type IV of 2-codim are not empty. And the type of an invariant subspace V A and the type of an element A can be determined by each other.

3 Embedding of 3-codimensional subspaces

In this section, we shall consider the invariant subspaces under the action of the elements of order p in O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , i.e., the set E = { V A A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , A = p } . First, if A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) and the codimension of the invariant subspace V A is 1, then, by Section 9 of Chapter 7 in [6], A is a quasi-symmetry transformation and its order is 2 p . So we know that the set E cannot contain any 1-codimensional invariant subspace. Furthermore, the invariant subspaces V A whose codimensions are 2 have been studied in Section 2 and every m -codimensional subspace with m 4 can be embedded into a 3-codimensional subspace. Hence, the remainder work is to study the 3-codimensional subspaces of the orthogonal space V .

Proposition 3.1

Let W be a 3-codimensional subspace of the orthogonal space V . Then W U , where U is a type I of 2-codim, type III of 2-codim, or type IV of 2-codim subspace.

Proof

According to Lemma 2.1, there are seven types of the 3-codimensional subspaces in the orthogonal space V . Now we shall choose the most complex type whose corresponding matrix is

M = I ( ν 3 ) I ( ν 3 ) 1 0 0 0 z 0 0 0 0

to prove. Let P be the corresponding matrix of subspace W . Suppose that P S P = M .

If z is a square (resp. nonsquare) element, then z is cogredient to 1 (resp. z ). Let W 1 be a type III (resp. type IV) of 2-codim subspace. The corresponding matrix P 1 of subspace W 1 satisfies

P 1 S P 1 = I ( ν 3 ) I ( ν 3 ) 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 z 0 0 0 0 0 .

Let A 1 = I ( ν 3 ) I ( ν 3 ) 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 . Then A 1 P 1 S P 1 A 1 = I ( ν 3 ) I ( ν 3 ) 1 0 0 1 0 z 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 . Suppose that A 1 P 1 = v 1 v 2 ν 3 v 2 ν 2 . Let A 1 P 1 ¯ = v 1 v 2 ν 3 be the matrix obtained by deleting the last row vector of A 1 P 1 . Then the corresponding subspace of A 1 P 1 ¯ is embedded in the corresponding subspace of A 1 P 1 , and A 1 P 1 ¯ S A 1 P 1 ¯ = M . By Lemma 2.5, there exists an A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) such that P = A 1 P 1 ¯ A , thus, the subspace W is embedded in the corresponding subspace of A 1 P 1 . Since A 1 is an invertible matrix, the corresponding subspace of A 1 P 1 is the corresponding subspace of P 1 , i.e., subspace W 1 . Hence, the subspace W is embedded in the type III (resp. type IV) of 2-codim subspace W 1 .

The proofs of the other six types are similar to the above type and are omitted. We summarize all situations that if W be a 3-codimensional subspace, then W is embedded in a type I of 2-codim, type III of 2-codim, or type IV of 2-codim subspace.□

4 Transfer ideal

In this section, we shall determine the structures of the transfer variety and transfer ideal. First, we recall some notations. If J is an ideal of F [ x 1 , , x n ] , then

V ( J ) = { ( a 1 , , a n ) F n f ( a 1 , , a n ) = 0 , f J }

is called the variety defined by an ideal J . Consider a collection, S , of points of the affine space F n . We define the set I ( S ) of polynomials in F [ x 1 , , x n ] by

I ( S ) = { f F [ x 1 , , x n ] f ( a 1 , , a n ) = 0 , ( a 1 , , a n ) S } .

It is easy to verify that the set I ( S ) is an ideal in F [ x 1 , , x n ] and V ( I ( S ) ) = S .

Lemma 4.1

([7, Hilbert Nullstellensatz]) Let F be an algebraically closed field. If J is an ideal of F [ x 1 , , x n ] , then I ( V ( J ) ) = J .

Let ρ : G G L ( n , F ) be a faithful representation of a finite group over the field F . The transfer variety, denoted by Ω G , is defined by ([4, Section 6.4])

Ω G = { v V Tr G ( f ) ( v ) = 0 , f Tot ( F [ V ] ) } .

Since Im ( Tr G ) is an ideal of F [ V ] G , F [ V ] G F [ V ] is a ring extension, we have

Ω G = { v V f ( v ) = 0 , f ( Im ( Tr G ) ) e } = V ( ( Im ( Tr G ) ) e ) ,

where ( Im ( Tr G ) ) e denotes the extension ideal of Im ( Tr G ) in F [ V ] .

Lemma 4.2

([Corollary 2.6] and [4, Corollary 6.4.6]) Let ρ : G G L ( n , F ) be a representation of a finite group over the field F of characteristic p . Then

Ω G = g G , g = p V g ,

i.e., transfer variety is the union of the fixed-point sets of the elements in G of order p .

By Theorem 6.4.7 in [4] and its proof, we have

Lemma 4.3

[4] Let ρ : G G L ( n , F ) be a representation of a finite group over the field F of characteristic p . Then

Im ( Tr G ) = ( Im ( Tr G ) ) e F [ V ] G ,

and ht ( Im ( Tr G ) ) = ht ( Im ( Tr G ) ) = n max { dim F ( V g ) g G and g = p } < n .

Now we can obtain the main results for the transfer variety.

Theorem 4.4

The transfer variety Ω O 2 ν ( F q , S ) of the orthogonal group O 2 ν ( F q , S ) is

Ω O 2 ν ( F q , S ) = U 1 is type I of 2-codim U 1 U 2 is type III of 2-codim U 2 U 3 is type IV of 2-codim U 3 ,

i.e., Ω O 2 ν ( F q , S ) is the union of all type I of 2-codim, type III of 2-codim, and type IV of 2-codim subspaces (the same notations in Remark 2.3).

Proof

Let U be the right side of the above equality. For each U 1 , let T O 2 ν ( F q , S ) be a 2-transvection. By Lemmas 2.8 and 2.4, there exists an element A 1 O 2 ν ( F q , S ) such that U 1 = V T A 1 = V A 1 1 T A 1 and A 1 1 T A 1 = T = p . For each U 2 (resp. U 3 ), let H ¯ 1 (resp. H ¯ z ) be a H 1 -type (resp. H z -type) matrix. By Lemmas 2.14 and 2.4, there exists an element A 2 (resp. A 3 ) O 2 ν ( F q , S ) such that U 2 = V H ¯ 1 A 2 = V A 2 1 H ¯ 1 A 2 and A 2 1 H ¯ 1 A 2 = H ¯ 1 = p (resp. U 3 = V H ¯ z A 3 = V A 3 1 H ¯ z A 3 and A 3 1 H ¯ z A 3 = H ¯ z = p ). So we have U A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , A = p V A . On the other hand, according to Theorem 2.17 and Section 3, it follows that A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , A = p V A U . Hence, U = A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , A = p V A . Then Ω O 2 ν ( F q , S ) = U by Lemma 4.2.□

Remark 4.5

By the discussions in Section 3, we deduce that the whole space V is contained in transfer variety. Then Ω O 2 ν ( F q , S ) = V over F q . Let F q ¯ be the algebraic closure of F q and Ω ¯ O 2 ν ( F q , S ) be the transfer variety over F q ¯ . By the similar argument, we have that

Ω ¯ O 2 ν ( F q , S ) = U 1 is type I of 2-codim U 1 F q F q ¯ U 2 is type III of 2-codim U 2 F q F q ¯ U 3 is type IV of 2-codim U 3 F q F q ¯ V F q F q ¯ .

Now, we shall determine the structures of radical ideal of transfer. Let T = I ( ν ) K I ( ν ) , where K = 0 1 1 0 0 ( ν 2 ) . By the proof of Lemma 2.8, T is a 2-transvection. Moreover, the invariant subspace V T is a type I of 2-codim subspace and

V T = { k 3 e 3 + + k 2 ν e 2 ν k i F q } .

Thus, the ideal

I ( V T ) = x 1 , x 2 F q [ V ] ,

where x 1 , x 2 F q [ V ] is the ideal generated by x 1 and x 2 in the polynomial ring F q [ V ] .

Let H = 1 0 0 b a 1 b a b I ( ν 2 ) 0 ( ν 2 ) 1 a 0 1 I ( ν 2 ) . By the proof of Lemma 2.14, we see that

V H = { k 1 ( a b 1 e 1 + e ν + 1 ) + k 3 e 3 + + k ν e ν + k ν + 2 e ν + 2 + + k 2 ν e 2 ν k i F q } .

When a = 1 , b = 2 , let H ¯ 1 = H . Then the invariant subspace V H ¯ 1 is a type III of 2-codim subspace and the ideal

I ( V H ¯ 1 ) = x 2 , 2 x 1 x ν + 1 F q [ V ] .

When a = 1 , b = 2 z , let H ¯ z = H . Then the invariant subspace V H ¯ z is a type IV of 2-codim subspace and the ideal

I ( V H ¯ z ) = x 2 , 2 z x 1 x ν + 1 F q [ V ] .

Remark 4.6

For convenience, we denote

J 0 = x 2 F q [ V ] F q [ V ] O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ; J 1 = x 1 , x 2 F q [ V ] F q [ V ] O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ; J 2 = x 2 , 2 x 1 x ν + 1 F q [ V ] F q [ V ] O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ; J 3 = x 2 , 2 z x 1 x ν + 1 F q [ V ] F q [ V ] O 2 ν ( F q , S ) .

Theorem 4.7

The radical ideal of transfer is

Im ( Tr O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ) = J 1 J 2 J 3 .

Moreover, it is a primary decomposition of Im ( Tr O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ) and J i , i = 1 , 2 , 3 are all prime ideals.

Proof

From Lemma 2.4, we know that O 2 ν ( F q , S ) acts transitively on each set of subspaces of the same type. Thus, by Remark 4.5,

Ω ¯ O 2 ν ( F q , S ) = ( A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) V T A F q F q ¯ ) ( A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) V H ¯ 1 A F q F q ¯ ) ( A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) V H ¯ z A F q F q ¯ ) = V ( A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) A x 1 , x 2 F q [ V ] F q 1 ) V ( A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) A x 2 , 2 x 1 x ν + 1 F q [ V ] F q 1 ) V ( A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) A x 2 , 2 z x 1 x ν + 1 F q [ V ] F q 1 ) .

Therefore, by Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz, it follows that

( Im ( Tr O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ) ) e = ( A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) A x 1 , x 2 F q [ V ] ) ( A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) A x 2 , 2 x 1 x ν + 1 F q [ V ] ) ( A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) A x 2 , 2 z x 1 x ν + 1 F q [ V ] ) in F q ¯ [ V ¯ ] .

By flat base change [4, p. 276], we deduce that the above equation is also held in F q [ V ] , since each x i is defined over F q . Hence, by Lemma 4.3, we see that

Im ( Tr O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ) = ( Im ( Tr O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ) ) e F q [ V ] O 2 ν ( F q , S ) = ( A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) A x 1 , x 2 F q [ V ] ) ( A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) A x 2 , 2 x 1 x ν + 1 F q [ V ] ) ( A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) A x 2 , 2 z x 1 x ν + 1 F q [ V ] ) F q [ V ] O 2 ν ( F q , S ) = x 1 , x 2 F q [ V ] x 2 , 2 x 1 x ν + 1 F q [ V ] x 2 , 2 z x 1 x ν + 1 F q [ V ] F q [ V ] O 2 ν ( F q , S ) = J 1 J 2 J 3 .

The third equation is satisfied because

(4.1) ( A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) A l 1 , l 2 F q [ V ] ) F q [ V ] O 2 ν ( F q , S ) = l 1 , l 2 F q [ V ] F q [ V ] O 2 ν ( F q , S ) .

Consider the embedded mapping φ : F q [ V ] O 2 ν ( F q , S ) F q [ V ] . We have that the limit ideal l 1 , l 2 F q [ V ] F q [ V ] O 2 ν ( F q , S ) is also a prime ideal in the ring of invariant F q [ V ] O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , since l 1 , l 2 F q [ V ] is a prime ideal in F q [ V ] . Thus, J 1 , J 2 , and J 3 are prime ideals in F q [ V ] O 2 ν ( F q , S ) . Consequently, Im ( Tr O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ) = J 1 J 2 J 3 is a primary decomposition.□

Theorem 4.8

ht ( Im ( Tr O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ) ) = ht ( Im ( Tr O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ) ) = 2 . And

( 0 ) J 0 J 1 , ( 0 ) J 0 J 2 , ( 0 ) J 0 J 3

are all prime ideal chains of height 2 ( J i the same notations in Remark 4.6).

Proof

In Section 3, we know that the set E = { V A A O 2 ν ( F q , S ) , A = p } cannot contain any 1-codimensional invariant subspace. From Section 2, we have that there exist the 2-codimensional invariant subspaces in set E . Then combining Lemma 4.3, it follows that

ht ( Im ( Tr O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ) ) = ht ( Im ( Tr O 2 ν ( F q , S ) ) ) = 2 ν ( 2 ν 2 ) = 2 .

By the proof of Theorem 4.7, it is obvious that ( 0 ) J 0 J i , i = 1 , 2 , 3 are all prime ideal chains of height 2.□

5 Example

Suppose q = 3 , ν = 2 and consider the orthogonal group O 4 ( F 3 , S ) over the field F 3 with respect to the symmetric matrix S = 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 . We shall give the structures of the radical ideal Im ( Tr O 4 ( F 3 , S ) ) and the prime ideal chains of the transfer ideal Im ( Tr O 4 ( F 3 , S ) ) .

First, by Lemma 2.4, we have these orbits

o [ x 1 ] = o [ x 2 ] = { k 1 x 1 + k 2 x 2 + k 3 x 3 + k 4 x 4 k 1 x 3 + k 2 x 4 = 0 } , o [ x 1 x 3 ] = { k 1 x 1 + k 2 x 2 + k 3 x 3 + k 4 x 4 k 1 x 3 + k 2 x 4 = 1 } , o [ x 1 x 3 ] = { k 1 x 1 + k 2 x 2 + k 3 x 3 + k 4 x 4 k 1 x 3 + k 2 x 4 = 1 } .

Second, using MACAULAY, which is a kind of computer algebra systems, to compute the intersection of the ideals in the orbit o [ x 1 , x 2 F 3 [ V ] ] , we have

I 1 = A O 4 ( F 3 , S ) A x 1 , x 2 F 3 [ V ] = x 1 x 3 + x 2 x 4 , x 2 x 4 ( x 1 2 x 2 2 + x 3 2 x 4 2 ) F 3 [ V ] .

The intersection of the ideals in the orbit o [ x 2 , x 1 x 3 F 3 [ V ] ] is

I 2 = A O 4 ( F 3 , S ) A x 2 , x 1 x 3 = x 1 3 x 3 + x 1 2 x 3 2 + x 1 x 3 3 + x 2 3 x 4 x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 + x 2 2 x 4 2 + x 2 x 4 3 , x 1 3 x 2 x 1 x 2 3 + x 1 2 x 2 x 3 + x 2 3 x 3 x 1 x 2 x 3 2 x 2 x 3 3 x 1 3 x 4 x 1 x 2 4 x 4 x 1 2 x 3 x 4 + x 2 2 x 1 x 4 + x 1 x 3 2 x 4 + x 3 3 x 4 + x 1 x 2 x 4 2 x 2 x 3 x 4 2 + x 1 x 4 3 x 3 x 4 3 F 3 [ V ] .

The intersection of the ideals in the orbit o [ x 2 , x 1 x 3 F 3 [ V ] ] is

I 3 = A O 4 ( F 3 , S ) A x 2 , x 1 x 3 = x 1 3 x 3 x 1 2 x 3 2 + x 1 x 3 3 + x 2 3 x 4 + x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 2 2 x 4 2 + x 2 x 4 3 , x 1 3 x 2 x 1 x 2 3 x 1 2 x 2 x 3 x 2 3 x 3 x 1 x 2 x 3 2 + x 2 x 3 3 + x 1 3 x 4 + x 1 x 2 4 x 4 x 1 2 x 3 x 4 + x 2 2 x 1 x 4 x 1 x 3 2 x 4 + x 3 3 x 4 + x 1 x 2 x 4 2 + x 2 x 3 x 4 2 x 1 x 4 3 x 3 x 4 3 F 3 [ V ] .

And

I 0 = A O 4 ( F 3 , S ) A x 2 = x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 ( x 1 2 x 2 2 ) ( x 1 2 x 4 2 ) ( x 2 2 x 3 2 ) ( x 3 2 x 4 2 ) ( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 x 4 ) ( x 1 + x 2 x 3 + x 4 ) ( x 1 x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ) ( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ) F 3 [ V ] .

In [8], Chu found the polynomial invariants of 4-dimensional orthogonal group with the nondegenerate quadratic form Q 4 + = x 1 2 x 2 2 + x 3 2 x 4 2 . By the variable substitution, x 1 x 1 + x 3 , x 2 x 1 x 3 , x 3 x 2 + x 4 , x 4 x 2 + x 4 , we can obtain the polynomial invariants of O 4 ( F 3 , S ) with respect to the symmetric matrix S ,

F 3 [ V ] O 4 ( F 3 , S ) = F 3 Q 40 , Q 41 , Q 42 , G 1 ( Q 40 , Q 41 , Q 42 , Q 43 ) F ( Q 40 , Q 41 , Q 42 ) , G 2 ( Q 40 , Q 41 , Q 42 , Q 43 ) F ( Q 40 , Q 41 , Q 42 ) ,

where

Q 40 = x 1 x 3 x 2 x 4 , Q 41 = x 1 3 x 3 + x 1 x 3 3 + x 2 3 x 4 + x 2 x 4 3 , Q 42 = x 1 9 x 3 + x 1 x 3 9 + x 2 9 x 4 + x 2 x 4 9 , Q 43 = x 1 27 x 3 + x 1 x 3 27 + x 2 27 x 4 + x 2 x 4 27 , G 1 ( Q 40 , Q 41 , Q 42 , Q 43 ) = Q 43 Q 40 3 Q 41 Q 42 3 ( Q 42 2 Q 40 10 ) ( Q 41 Q 42 Q 40 Q 41 3 ) , G 2 ( Q 40 , Q 41 , Q 42 , Q 43 ) = Q 43 Q 41 3 Q 41 10 ( Q 42 2 Q 40 10 ) 2 , F ( Q 40 , Q 41 , Q 42 ) = ( Q 42 Q 40 3 Q 41 4 ) ( Q 41 2 Q 40 4 ) 2 .

Then, using MACAULAY, we have

J 0 = I 0 F 3 [ V ] O 4 ( F 3 , S ) = Q 40 8 + Q 40 4 Q 41 2 Q 41 4 Q 40 3 Q 42 F 3 [ V ] O 4 ( F 3 , S ) ,

J 1 = I 1 F 3 [ V ] O 4 ( F 3 , S ) = Q 40 , Q 41 , Q 42 F 3 [ V ] O 4 ( F 3 , S ) ,

J 2 = I 2 F 3 [ V ] O 4 ( F 3 , S ) = Q 40 2 Q 41 , Q 40 Q 41 2 Q 42 , Q 40 Q 41 G 1 F G 2 F F 3 [ V ] O 4 ( F 3 , S ) ,

J 3 = I 3 F 3 [ V ] O 4 ( F 3 , S ) = Q 40 2 + Q 41 , Q 40 Q 41 2 Q 42 , Q 40 Q 41 G 1 F G 2 F F 3 [ V ] O 4 ( F 3 , S ) ,

and by Theorem 4.6, we have

Im ( Tr O 4 ( F 3 , S ) ) = J 1 J 2 J 3 = Q 40 Q 41 2 Q 42 , Q 40 4 + Q 41 2 , Q 42 G 1 F Q 41 G 2 F , Q 40 2 Q 41 G 1 F Q 40 G 2 F F 3 [ V ] O 4 ( F 3 , S ) .

Moreover,

( 0 ) J 0 J 1 , ( 0 ) J 0 J 2 , ( 0 ) J 0 J 3

are prime ideal chains of height 2.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the referees for their careful reading and helpful suggestions that helped improve this paper.

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Program No. 11701449) and the Scientific Research Program Funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (No. 16JK1789).

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

[1] R. J. Shank and D. L. Wehlau, The transfer in modular invariant theory, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 142 (1999), 63–77. 10.1016/S0022-4049(98)00036-XSearch in Google Scholar

[2] M. D. Neusel, The transfer in the invariant theory of modular permutation representations, Pacific J. Math. 199 (2001), no. 1, 121–135. 10.2140/pjm.2001.199.121Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. D. Neusel, The transfer in the invariant theory of modular permutation representations II, Canad. Math. Bull. 45 (2002), no. 2, 272–283, https://doi.org/10.4153/CMB-2002-031-7. Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. D. Neusel and L. Smith, Invariant Theory of Finite Groups, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002. 10.1090/surv/094Search in Google Scholar

[5] Z. X. Wan, Geometry of Classical Groups Over Finite Fields, Science Press, Beijing, New York, 2002. Search in Google Scholar

[6] L. G. Hua and Z. X. Wan, Classical Groups, Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai, 1963. Search in Google Scholar

[7] M. F. Atiyah and I. G. MacDonald, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1969. Search in Google Scholar

[8] H. Chu, Polynomial invariants of four-dimensional orthogonal groups, Comm. Algebra 29 (2001), no. 3, 1153–1164, https://doi.org/10.1081/AGB-100001673. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-19
Accepted: 2022-02-09
Published Online: 2022-05-16

© 2022 Zeng Lingli, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A random von Neumann theorem for uniformly distributed sequences of partitions
  3. Note on structural properties of graphs
  4. Mean-field formulation for mean-variance asset-liability management with cash flow under an uncertain exit time
  5. The family of random attractors for nonautonomous stochastic higher-order Kirchhoff equations with variable coefficients
  6. The intersection graph of graded submodules of a graded module
  7. Isoperimetric and Brunn-Minkowski inequalities for the (p, q)-mixed geominimal surface areas
  8. On second-order fuzzy discrete population model
  9. On certain functional equation in prime rings
  10. General complex Lp projection bodies and complex Lp mixed projection bodies
  11. Some results on the total proper k-connection number
  12. The stability with general decay rate of hybrid stochastic fractional differential equations driven by Lévy noise with impulsive effects
  13. Well posedness of magnetohydrodynamic equations in 3D mixed-norm Lebesgue space
  14. Strong convergence of a self-adaptive inertial Tseng's extragradient method for pseudomonotone variational inequalities and fixed point problems
  15. Generic uniqueness of saddle point for two-person zero-sum differential games
  16. Relational representations of algebraic lattices and their applications
  17. Explicit construction of mock modular forms from weakly holomorphic Hecke eigenforms
  18. The equivalent condition of G-asymptotic tracking property and G-Lipschitz tracking property
  19. Arithmetic convolution sums derived from eta quotients related to divisors of 6
  20. Dynamical behaviors of a k-order fuzzy difference equation
  21. The transfer ideal under the action of orthogonal group in modular case
  22. The multinomial convolution sum of a generalized divisor function
  23. Extensions of Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequalities with two independent variables
  24. Unicity of meromorphic functions concerning differences and small functions
  25. Solutions to problems about potentially Ks,t-bigraphic pair
  26. Monotonicity of solutions for fractional p-equations with a gradient term
  27. Data smoothing with applications to edge detection
  28. An ℋ-tensor-based criteria for testing the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms
  29. Characterizations of *-antiderivable mappings on operator algebras
  30. Initial-boundary value problem of fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equation posed on half line with nonlinear boundary values
  31. On a more accurate half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality involving hyperbolic functions
  32. On split twisted inner derivation triple systems with no restrictions on their 0-root spaces
  33. Geometry of conformal η-Ricci solitons and conformal η-Ricci almost solitons on paracontact geometry
  34. Bifurcation and chaos in a discrete predator-prey system of Leslie type with Michaelis-Menten prey harvesting
  35. A posteriori error estimates of characteristic mixed finite elements for convection-diffusion control problems
  36. Dynamical analysis of a Lotka Volterra commensalism model with additive Allee effect
  37. An efficient finite element method based on dimension reduction scheme for a fourth-order Steklov eigenvalue problem
  38. Connectivity with respect to α-discrete closure operators
  39. Khasminskii-type theorem for a class of stochastic functional differential equations
  40. On some new Hermite-Hadamard and Ostrowski type inequalities for s-convex functions in (p, q)-calculus with applications
  41. New properties for the Ramanujan R-function
  42. Shooting method in the application of boundary value problems for differential equations with sign-changing weight function
  43. Ground state solution for some new Kirchhoff-type equations with Hartree-type nonlinearities and critical or supercritical growth
  44. Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays
  45. Ambrosetti-Prodi-type results for a class of difference equations with nonlinearities indefinite in sign
  46. Research of cooperation strategy of government-enterprise digital transformation based on differential game
  47. Malmquist-type theorems on some complex differential-difference equations
  48. Disjoint diskcyclicity of weighted shifts
  49. Construction of special soliton solutions to the stochastic Riccati equation
  50. Remarks on the generalized interpolative contractions and some fixed-point theorems with application
  51. Analysis of a deteriorating system with delayed repair and unreliable repair equipment
  52. On the critical fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-Poisson equations with electromagnetic fields
  53. The exact solutions of generalized Davey-Stewartson equations with arbitrary power nonlinearities using the dynamical system and the first integral methods
  54. Regularity of models associated with Markov jump processes
  55. Multiplicity solutions for a class of p-Laplacian fractional differential equations via variational methods
  56. Minimal period problem for second-order Hamiltonian systems with asymptotically linear nonlinearities
  57. Convergence rate of the modified Levenberg-Marquardt method under Hölderian local error bound
  58. Non-binary quantum codes from constacyclic codes over 𝔽q[u1, u2,…,uk]/⟨ui3 = ui, uiuj = ujui
  59. On the general position number of two classes of graphs
  60. A posteriori regularization method for the two-dimensional inverse heat conduction problem
  61. Orbital stability and Zhukovskiǐ quasi-stability in impulsive dynamical systems
  62. Approximations related to the complete p-elliptic integrals
  63. A note on commutators of strongly singular Calderón-Zygmund operators
  64. Generalized Munn rings
  65. Double domination in maximal outerplanar graphs
  66. Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the norm minimum problem on digraphs
  67. On the p-integrable trajectories of the nonlinear control system described by the Urysohn-type integral equation
  68. Robust estimation for varying coefficient partially functional linear regression models based on exponential squared loss function
  69. Hessian equations of Krylov type on compact Hermitian manifolds
  70. Class fields generated by coordinates of elliptic curves
  71. The lattice of (2, 1)-congruences on a left restriction semigroup
  72. A numerical solution of problem for essentially loaded differential equations with an integro-multipoint condition
  73. On stochastic accelerated gradient with convergence rate
  74. Displacement structure of the DMP inverse
  75. Dependence of eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems on time scales with eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions
  76. Existence of positive solutions of discrete third-order three-point BVP with sign-changing Green's function
  77. Some new fixed point theorems for nonexpansive-type mappings in geodesic spaces
  78. Generalized 4-connectivity of hierarchical star networks
  79. Spectra and reticulation of semihoops
  80. Stein-Weiss inequality for local mixed radial-angular Morrey spaces
  81. Eigenvalues of transition weight matrix for a family of weighted networks
  82. A modified Tikhonov regularization for unknown source in space fractional diffusion equation
  83. Modular forms of half-integral weight on Γ0(4) with few nonvanishing coefficients modulo
  84. Some estimates for commutators of bilinear pseudo-differential operators
  85. Extension of isometries in real Hilbert spaces
  86. Existence of positive periodic solutions for first-order nonlinear differential equations with multiple time-varying delays
  87. B-Fredholm elements in primitive C*-algebras
  88. Unique solvability for an inverse problem of a nonlinear parabolic PDE with nonlocal integral overdetermination condition
  89. An algebraic semigroup method for discovering maximal frequent itemsets
  90. Class-preserving Coleman automorphisms of some classes of finite groups
  91. Exponential stability of traveling waves for a nonlocal dispersal SIR model with delay
  92. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for second-order Dirichlet problems with nonlinear impulses
  93. The transitivity of primary conjugacy in regular ω-semigroups
  94. Stability estimation of some Markov controlled processes
  95. On nonnil-coherent modules and nonnil-Noetherian modules
  96. N-Tuples of weighted noncommutative Orlicz space and some geometrical properties
  97. The dimension-free estimate for the truncated maximal operator
  98. A human error risk priority number calculation methodology using fuzzy and TOPSIS grey
  99. Compact mappings and s-mappings at subsets
  100. The structural properties of the Gompertz-two-parameter-Lindley distribution and associated inference
  101. A monotone iteration for a nonlinear Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with indefinite weight and Neumann boundary conditions
  102. Delta waves of the isentropic relativistic Euler system coupled with an advection equation for Chaplygin gas
  103. Multiplicity and minimality of periodic solutions to fourth-order super-quadratic difference systems
  104. On the reciprocal sum of the fourth power of Fibonacci numbers
  105. Averaging principle for two-time-scale stochastic differential equations with correlated noise
  106. Phragmén-Lindelöf alternative results and structural stability for Brinkman fluid in porous media in a semi-infinite cylinder
  107. Study on r-truncated degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind
  108. On 7-valent symmetric graphs of order 2pq and 11-valent symmetric graphs of order 4pq
  109. Some new characterizations of finite p-nilpotent groups
  110. A Billingsley type theorem for Bowen topological entropy of nonautonomous dynamical systems
  111. F4 and PSp (8, ℂ)-Higgs pairs understood as fixed points of the moduli space of E6-Higgs bundles over a compact Riemann surface
  112. On modules related to McCoy modules
  113. On generalized extragradient implicit method for systems of variational inequalities with constraints of variational inclusion and fixed point problems
  114. Solvability for a nonlocal dispersal model governed by time and space integrals
  115. Finite groups whose maximal subgroups of even order are MSN-groups
  116. Symmetric results of a Hénon-type elliptic system with coupled linear part
  117. On the connection between Sp-almost periodic functions defined on time scales and ℝ
  118. On a class of Harada rings
  119. On regular subgroup functors of finite groups
  120. Fast iterative solutions of Riccati and Lyapunov equations
  121. Weak measure expansivity of C2 dynamics
  122. Admissible congruences on type B semigroups
  123. Generalized fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inclusions for co-ordinated convex interval-valued functions
  124. Inverse eigenvalue problems for rank one perturbations of the Sturm-Liouville operator
  125. Data transmission mechanism of vehicle networking based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
  126. Dual uniformities in function spaces over uniform continuity
  127. Review Article
  128. On Hahn-Banach theorem and some of its applications
  129. Rapid Communication
  130. Discussion of foundation of mathematics and quantum theory
  131. Special Issue on Boundary Value Problems and their Applications on Biosciences and Engineering (Part II)
  132. A study of minimax shrinkage estimators dominating the James-Stein estimator under the balanced loss function
  133. Representations by degenerate Daehee polynomials
  134. Multilevel MC method for weak approximation of stochastic differential equation with the exact coupling scheme
  135. Multiple periodic solutions for discrete boundary value problem involving the mean curvature operator
  136. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications (Part II)
  137. Coupled measure of noncompactness and functional integral equations
  138. Existence results for neutral evolution equations with nonlocal conditions and delay via fractional operator
  139. Global weak solution of 3D-NSE with exponential damping
  140. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part I)
  141. Ground state solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations involving the fractional p-Laplacian and potential wells
  142. A class of p1(x, ⋅) & p2(x, ⋅)-fractional Kirchhoff-type problem with variable s(x, ⋅)-order and without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition in ℝN
  143. Jensen-type inequalities for m-convex functions
  144. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis (Part III)
  145. The influence of the noise on the exact solutions of a Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation
  146. Basic inequalities for statistical submanifolds in Golden-like statistical manifolds
  147. Global existence and blow up of the solution for nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation with variable coefficient nonlinear source term
  148. Hopf bifurcation and Turing instability in a diffusive predator-prey model with hunting cooperation
  149. Efficient fixed-point iteration for generalized nonexpansive mappings and its stability in Banach spaces
Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2022-0021/html
Scroll to top button