Home Mathematics Extensions of Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequalities with two independent variables
Article Open Access

Extensions of Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequalities with two independent variables

  • Yihuai Xie , Yueyang Li and Zhenhai Liu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 25, 2022

Abstract

In this paper, we establish several kinds of integral inequalities in two independent variables, which improve well-known versions of Gronwall-Bellman inequalities and extend them to fractional integral form. By using these inequalities, we can provide explicit bounds on unknown functions. The integral inequalities play an important role in the qualitative theory of differential and integral equations and partial differential equations.

MSC 2010: 6D10; 34A40; 35A23

1 Introduction

It is well known that Gronwall’s inequality is an important tool in the quantitative and qualitative analysis of solutions to differential and integral equations. For example, it has been used to study the boundedness, existence, uniqueness, and stability of solutions of differential-integral equations (cf. [1,2,3, 4,5,6]). Gronwall’s original result [7] appeared in 1919, and Bellman [2] proved the integral version of Gronwall’s inequality in 1943. Since then, many researchers have spent a lot of effort studying more general Gronwall-type integral inequalities with a single variable and discussed their applications to ordinary differential equations.

Let us recall the standard Gronwall inequality, which can be found in [5,8].

Theorem 1.1

Let u ( t ) L + [ 0 , T ] satisfy

(1.1) u ( t ) u 0 ( t ) + 0 t f ( s ) u ( s ) d s , a.e. t [ 0 , T ] ,

where u 0 is nonnegative and nondecreasing, and f L + 1 [ 0 , T ] . Then,

(1.2) u ( t ) u 0 ( t ) exp 0 t f ( s ) d s , a.e. t [ 0 , T ] .

Some Gronwall inequalities for fractional order are proved in [9,10]. Alzabut-Abdeljawad [11] proved a discrete fractional version of the generalized Gronwall inequality. For convenience, we state the following version of a fractional Gronwall inequality:

Theorem 1.2

[10] Suppose β > 0 , a ( t ) is a nonnegative function locally integrable on 0 t < T (some T < + ) and g ( t ) is a nonnegative, nondecreasing continuous function defined on 0 t < T , g ( t ) M (constant), and suppose u ( t ) is nonnegative and locally integrable on 0 t < T with

(1.3) u ( t ) a ( t ) + g ( t ) 0 t ( t s ) β 1 u ( s ) d s , a.e. t [ 0 , T ) .

Then,

(1.4) u ( t ) a ( t ) + 0 t n = 1 ( g ( t ) Γ ( β ) ) n Γ ( n β ) ( t s ) n β 1 a ( s ) d s , a.e. t [ 0 , T ) .

We may also find various applications of integer and fractional Gronwall-Bellman type of inequalities to study the qualitative properties of solutions to differential and integral equations of fractional order in [12,13, 14,15,16, 17,18].

Furthermore, many authors extended one variable Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequalities to two or more independent variables (cf. [19,20,21, 22,23,24, 25,26,27, 28,29,30]). Especially papers [20,21, 22,23,24] proved some results about integral inequalities of Gronwall-Bellman type with two independent variables and presented some definite applications of their results to the boundedness, uniqueness, and continuous dependence of the solutions of some nonlinear hyperbolic partial integrodifferential equations. Recently, Boudeliou [31] considered Gronwall-type inequalities with two independent variables and applied his new theoretic results to obtain the boundedness of solutions of some integral equations successfully. For more recent developments of Gronwall-type inequalities with two independent variables, we refer the readers to [32,33, 34,35,36, 37,38] and the references therein. For example, Khan discussed several new integral inequalities of two independent variables, and one of the interesting inequalities is:

Theorem 1.3

[33] Let ϕ ( x , y ) , A ( x , y ) , B ( x , y ) , and H ( x , y ) be real-valued nonnegative, nondecreasing continuous functions, defined x , y R + , c > 0 . If

(1.5) ϕ ( x , y ) c + 0 x A ( s , y ) ϕ ( s , y ) d s + 0 y B ( x , t ) ϕ ( x , t ) d t + 0 x 0 y H ( s , t ) ϕ ( s , t ) d t d s ,

for all x , y R + . Then,

(1.6) ϕ ( x , y ) c Q ( x , y ) E ( x , y ) exp 0 x 0 y H ( s , t ) Q ( s , t ) E ( s , t ) d t d s ,

where

Q ( x , y ) = exp 0 y B ( x , t ) E ( x , t ) d t

and

E ( x , y ) = exp 0 x A ( s , y ) d s .

In this paper, we extend and generalize the main results in [10,33] and show several new types of Gronwall-Bellman inequalities, which arises from a class of integral equations with a mixture of integer-order and fractional-order integrals. The results can be used to study the boundedness of solutions of several special kinds of integral equations.

2 Main results

In this section, we shall show several new inequalities, which are more general than (1.5)–(1.6). For conveniences, we set

M ( x , y ) = c + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u q ( s , t ) d t d s ,

A ( x , y ) = 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) M ( s , y ) d s + 0 y b ( x , t ) u ( x , t ) M ( x , t ) d t .

Our first result is the following.

Theorem 2.1

Let u ( x , y ) , b ( x , y ) , h ( x , y ) , and A ( x , y ) be real-valued nonnegative, nondecreasing continuous functions, and c > 0 , 0 < q < 1 , α > 0 . If

(2.1) u ( x , y ) c + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) d s + 0 y b ( x , t ) u ( x , t ) d t + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u q ( s , t ) d t d s

for all x , y R + . Then,

u ( x , y ) W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) c 1 q + ( 1 q ) 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) ( W ( s , t ) E α ( Γ ( α ) s α ) ) q d t d s 1 1 q ,

where

W ( x , y ) = exp 0 y b ( x , t ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) d t ,

and E α ( Z ) = k = 0 Z k Γ ( k α + 1 ) stands for the Mittag-Leffler Function (cf. [39]).

Proof

Let us set

(2.2) M ( x , y ) = c + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u q ( s , t ) d t d s ,

and then, the inequality (2.1) becomes

u ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) d s + 0 y b ( x , t ) u ( x , t ) d t .

Since M ( x , y ) is positive, nondecreasing continuous function, it is easy to show that

u ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) M ( s , y ) d s + 0 y b ( x , t ) u ( x , t ) M ( x , t ) d t .

Set

A ( x , y ) = 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) M ( s , y ) d s + 0 y b ( x , t ) u ( x , t ) M ( x , t ) d t .

So, one has

(2.3) u ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) A ( x , y ) , A ( x , y ) 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 A ( s , y ) d s + 0 y b ( x , t ) A ( x , t ) d t .

Define

(2.4) B ( x , y ) = 1 + 0 y b ( x , t ) A ( x , t ) d t .

Therefore, we have

(2.5) A ( x , y ) B ( x , y ) + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 A ( s , y ) d s .

Since b ( x , y ) , A ( x , y ) are nonnegative and nondecreasing by the assumptions, B ( x , y ) is positive, nondecreasing continuous function. We infer

A ( x , y ) B ( x , y ) 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 A ( s , y ) B ( s , y ) d s .

Set

C ( x , y ) = 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 A ( s , y ) B ( s , y ) d s .

Then, we obtain

(2.6) A ( x , y ) B ( x , y ) C ( x , y ) ,

(2.7) C ( x , y ) 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 C ( s , y ) d s .

Define an integral operator:

B ϕ ( x , y ) = 0 x ( x s ) α 1 ϕ ( s , y ) d s .

Then, formula (2.7) implies that

C ( x , y ) 1 + B C ( x , y ) , C ( x , y ) k = 0 n 1 B k 1 + B n C ( x , y ) .

In the following, we prove that

(2.8) B n C ( x , y ) ( Γ ( α ) ) n Γ ( n α ) 0 x ( x s ) n α 1 C ( s , y ) d s ,

B n C ( x , y ) 0 as n + for each x , y R + .

By the use of induction, we easily obtain that relation (2.8) is true for n = 1 . Next, assume that it is also true for n = k . If n = k + 1 , one has from inductive hypothesis

B k + 1 C ( x , y ) = B B k C ( x , y ) 0 x ( x s ) α 1 ( Γ ( α ) ) k Γ ( k α ) 0 s ( s τ ) k α 1 C ( τ , y ) d τ d s .

By exchanging integration order, we have

B k + 1 C ( x , y ) ( Γ ( α ) ) k Γ ( k α ) 0 x τ x ( x s ) α 1 ( s τ ) k α 1 d s C ( τ , y ) d τ .

In virtue of the properties of the beta functions (see [39, p. 6]) and the variable substitution s = τ + u ( x τ ) , we easily obtain

B k + 1 C ( x , y ) ( Γ ( α ) ) k Γ ( k α ) 0 x 0 1 ( 1 u ) α 1 ( u ) k α 1 d u ( x τ ) ( k + 1 ) α 1 C ( τ , y ) d τ = ( Γ ( α ) ) k Γ ( k α ) 0 x Γ ( α ) Γ ( k α ) Γ ( ( k + 1 ) α ) ( x τ ) ( k + 1 ) α 1 C ( τ , y ) d τ = ( Γ ( α ) ) k + 1 Γ ( ( k + 1 ) α ) 0 x ( x τ ) ( k + 1 ) α 1 C ( τ , y ) d τ ,

which proves that the inequality (2.8) holds for n = k + 1 . And

0 B n C ( x , y ) ( Γ ( α ) ) n Γ ( n α ) 0 x ( x s ) n α 1 C ( s , y ) d s 0 as n + for all x , y R + .

Therefore, we readily obtain

C ( x , y ) k = 0 B k 1 k = 0 ( Γ ( α ) ) k Γ ( k α ) 0 x ( x s ) k α 1 1 d s = k = 0 ( Γ ( α ) ) k Γ ( k α ) x k α k α = k = 0 ( Γ ( α ) x α ) k Γ ( k α + 1 ) = E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) .

From the relation (2.6), one has

(2.9) A ( x , y ) B ( x , y ) C ( x , y ) B ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) .

Taking the partial derivative with respect to y on both sides of (2.4), we obtain

(2.10) B y ( x , y ) = b ( x , y ) A ( x , y ) .

By substituting (2.9) in (2.10), we have

B y ( x , y ) B ( x , y ) b ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) .

Integrating both sides of aforementioned inequality with respect to y from 0 to y , we obtain

B ( x , y ) exp 0 y b ( x , t ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) d t = W ( x , y ) .

Hence, we obtain from (2.9)

A ( x , y ) W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) .

Furthermore, we have from (2.3)

(2.11) u ( x , y ) A ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) M ( x , y ) .

Taking the partial derivatives with respect to x and y on both sides of (2.2), respectively, we obtain

(2.12) M x y ( x , y ) = h ( x , y ) u q ( x , y ) .

From (2.11) and (2.12), we have

M x y ( x , y ) M q ( x , y ) h ( x , y ) ( W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) ) q M x y ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) M q + 1 ( x , y ) q M x ( x , y ) M y ( x , y ) M q + 1 ( x , y ) h ( x , y ) ( W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) ) q y M x ( x , y ) M q ( x , y ) h ( x , y ) ( W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) ) q .

Then, integrating both sides of aforementioned inequality, first, integrating y from 0 to y , and then integrating x from 0 to x , we obtain

(2.13) M ( x , y ) [ c 1 q + ( 1 q ) 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) ( W ( s , t ) E α ( Γ ( α ) s α ) ) q d t d s ] 1 1 q .

By substituting (2.13) in (2.11), we obtain

u ( x , y ) W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) [ c 1 q + ( 1 q ) 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) ( W ( s , t ) E α ( Γ ( α ) s α ) ) q d t d s ] 1 1 q ,

which completes our proof.□

Theorem 2.2

Under the assumptions in Theorem 2.1, but q = 1 , if the following inequality holds

u ( x , y ) c + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) d s + 0 y b ( x , t ) u ( x , t ) d t + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u ( s , t ) d t d s

for all x , y R + . Then,

u ( x , y ) c W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) exp 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) W ( s , t ) E α ( Γ ( α ) s α ) d t d s ,

where W ( x , y ) is defined in Theorem 2.1.

Proof

Similar to the proof of Theorem 2.1, we set

M ( x , y ) = c + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u ( s , t ) d t d s .

By using the same steps as in (2.2)–(2.11), we easily have

(2.14) u ( x , y ) W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) M ( x , y ) .

Due to M x y ( x , y ) = h ( x , y ) u ( x , y ) and the inequality (2.14), we obtain

M x y ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) h ( x , y ) W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) M x y ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) M 2 ( x , y ) M x ( x , y ) M y ( x , y ) M 2 ( x , y ) h ( x , y ) W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) y M x ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) h ( x , y ) W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) .

Integrating y from 0 to y , and then integrating x from 0 to x on both sides of the aforementioned inequality, we obtain

(2.15) M ( x , y ) c exp 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) W ( s , t ) E α ( Γ ( α ) s α ) d t d s .

Then, substituting (2.15) into (2.14), we obtain

u ( x , y ) c W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) exp 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) W ( s , t ) E α ( Γ ( α ) s α ) d t d s .

Theorem 2.3

Under the assumptions in Theorem 2.1 and 0 < p < 1 , if the following inequality holds

(2.16) u ( x , y ) c + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) d s + 0 y b ( x , t ) u p ( x , t ) d t + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u q ( s , t ) d t d s ,

for all x , y R + . Then,

u ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) W 1 ( x , y ) c 1 q + ( 1 q ) 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) ( E α ( Γ ( α ) s α ) W 1 ( s , t ) ) q d t d s 1 1 q ,

where

W 1 ( x , y ) = 1 + ( 1 p ) c p 1 0 y b ( x , t ) ( E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) ) p d t 1 1 p .

Proof

Define

(2.17) M ( x , y ) = c + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u q ( s , t ) d t d s .

By substituting (2.17) into (2.16), we obtain

u ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) d s + 0 y b ( x , t ) u p ( x , t ) d t .

Since M ( x , y ) is positive and nondecreasing, one has

u ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) M ( s , y ) d s + 0 y b ( x , t ) u p ( x , t ) M ( x , t ) d t .

Set

A ( x , y ) = 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) M ( s , y ) d s + 0 y b ( x , t ) u p ( x , t ) M ( x , t ) d t .

So, we obtain

(2.18) u ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) A ( x , y ) .

Hence,

A ( x , y ) 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 A ( s , y ) d s + 0 y b ( x , t ) A p ( x , t ) M p 1 ( x , t ) d t .

By the definition of the function M ( x , y ) (see (2.17)) and 0 < p < 1 , it is easy to know that

c p 1 M p 1 ( x , y ) .

Therefore, one has

A ( x , y ) 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 A ( s , y ) d s + c p 1 0 y b ( x , t ) A p ( x , t ) d t .

Set

(2.19) B ( x , y ) = 1 + c p 1 0 y b ( x , t ) A p ( x , t ) d t .

Then, we obtain

A ( x , y ) B ( x , y ) + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 A ( s , y ) d s .

Similarly, using the same steps from (2.5)–(2.9), we obtain

(2.20) A ( x , y ) B ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) .

Now by taking the partial derivative with respect to y both sides of (2.19), we obtain

B y ( x , y ) = c p 1 b ( x , y ) A p ( x , y ) .

From (2.20), we have

B y ( x , y ) c p 1 b ( x , y ) ( B ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) ) p .

Hence,

B y ( x , y ) B p ( x , y ) c p 1 b ( x , y ) ( E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) ) p ,

which implies that

B ( x , y ) 1 + ( 1 p ) c p 1 0 y b ( x , t ) ( E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) ) p d t 1 1 p = W 1 ( x , y ) .

Therefore, we have from (2.20)

A ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) W 1 ( x , y ) .

Thanks to (2.18), we also have

(2.21) u ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) W 1 ( x , y ) .

Taking the partial derivatives with respect to x and y on both sides of (2.17), respectively, we obtain

M x y ( x , y ) = h ( x , y ) u q ( x , y ) .

By using (2.21), we have

M x y ( x , y ) M q ( x , y ) h ( x , y ) ( E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) W 1 ( x , y ) ) q .

Then using the similar steps from (2.12) to (2.13) in Theorem 2.1, we obtain

M ( x , y ) c 1 q + ( 1 q ) 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) ( E α ( Γ ( α ) s α ) W 1 ( s , t ) ) q d t d s 1 1 q ,

which implies from (2.21)

u ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) W 1 ( x , y ) c 1 q + ( 1 q ) 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) ( E α ( Γ ( α ) s α ) W 1 ( s , t ) ) q d t d s 1 1 q .

This completes the proof.□

Theorem 2.4

Under the same assumptions in Theorem 2.3, but q = 1 , if the following inequality holds,

u ( x , y ) c + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) d s + 0 y b ( x , t ) u p ( x , t ) d t + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u ( s , t ) d t d s

for all x , y R + . Then,

u ( x , y ) c E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) W 1 ( x , y ) exp 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) E α ( Γ ( α ) s α ) W 1 ( s , t ) d t d s ,

where W 1 ( x , y ) is defined in Theorem 2.3.

Proof

Define

(2.22) M ( x , y ) = c + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u ( s , t ) d t d s .

Taking the partial derivatives with respect to x and y on both sides of (2.22), respectively, we obtain

M x y ( x , y ) = h ( x , y ) u ( x , y ) .

By using the similar steps of (2.17)–(2.21), we have

(2.23) u ( x , y ) W 1 ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) M ( x , y ) .

Therefore, one easily obtain

M x y ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) h ( x , y ) W 1 ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) .

By using the similar discuss of the proof in Theorem 2.2, we easily obtain

M ( x , y ) c exp 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) W 1 ( s , t ) E α ( Γ ( α ) s α ) d t d s .

Then, the inequality (2.23) reduces to

u ( x , y ) c W 1 ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) exp 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) W 1 ( s , t ) E α ( Γ ( α ) s α ) d t d s .

The proof is complete.□

Theorem 2.5

Let u ( x , y ) and h ( x , y ) be real-valued nonnegative, nondecreasing continuous functions, and c > 0 , 0 < q < 1 , α > 0 , β > 0 . If

(2.24) u ( x , y ) c + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) d s + 0 y ( y t ) β 1 u ( x , t ) d t + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u q ( s , t ) d t d s ,

for all x , y R + . Then,

u ( x , y ) W 2 ( x , y ) c 1 q + ( 1 q ) 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) W 2 q ( s , t ) d t d s 1 1 q ,

where

W 2 ( x , y ) = E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) E β ( E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) Γ ( β ) y β ) .

Proof

Define

(2.25) M ( x , y ) = c + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u q ( s , t ) d t d s .

Then, (2.24) reduces to

u ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) d s + 0 y ( y t ) β 1 u ( x , t ) d t .

Obviously, M ( x , y ) is positive, nondecreasing continuous function. So one has

u ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) M ( s , y ) d s + 0 y ( y t ) β 1 u ( x , t ) M ( x , t ) d t .

Set

A ( x , y ) = 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) M ( s , y ) d s + 0 y ( y t ) β 1 u ( x , t ) M ( x , t ) d t .

We have

u ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) A ( x , y ) , A ( x , y ) 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 A ( s , y ) d s + 0 y ( y t ) β 1 A ( x , t ) d t .

Let

(2.26) B ( x , y ) = 1 + 0 y ( y t ) β 1 A ( x , t ) d t ,

which implies

A ( x , y ) B ( x , y ) + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 A ( s , y ) d s .

Recalling B ( x , y ) is positive, nondecreasing continuous function, we obtain

A ( x , y ) B ( x , y ) 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 A ( s , y ) B ( s , y ) d s .

Set

C ( x , y ) = 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 A ( s , y ) B ( s , y ) d s .

Therefore, we obtain

A ( x , y ) B ( x , y ) C ( x , y ) , C ( x , y ) 1 + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 C ( s , y ) d s .

By using to the same steps from (2.7) to (2.9), we have

(2.27) A ( x , y ) B ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) .

By combining (2.26) and (2.27), we obtain

(2.28) A ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) [ 1 + 0 y ( y t ) β 1 A ( x , t ) d t ] E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) + E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) 0 y ( y t ) β 1 A ( x , t ) d t .

Let B ϕ ( x , y ) = E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) 0 y ( y t ) β 1 ϕ ( x , t ) d t . Then, formula (2.28) implies that

A ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) + B A ( x , y ) , A ( x , y ) k = 0 n 1 B k E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) + B n A ( x , y ) .

By using the similar steps in (2.8) and (2.9), we obtain

B n A ( x , y ) ( E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) Γ ( β ) ) n Γ ( n β ) 0 y ( y t ) n β 1 A ( x , t ) d t , B n A ( x , y ) 0 as n + for each x , y R + .

Then,

A ( x , y ) k = 0 B k E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) E β ( E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) Γ ( β ) y β ) = W 2 ( x , y ) .

Therefore, we have

(2.29) u ( x , y ) A ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) W 2 ( x , y ) M ( x , y ) .

Taking the partial derivatives with respect to x and y on both sides of (2.25), respectively, we also have

M x y ( x , y ) = h ( x , y ) u q ( x , y ) ,

which implies from (2.29)

M x y ( x , y ) M q ( x , y ) h ( x , y ) W 2 q ( x , y ) .

By using the similar steps of (2.12)–(2.13), one has

M ( x , y ) c 1 q + ( 1 q ) 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) W 2 q ( s , t ) d t d s 1 1 q ,

and hence,

u ( x , y ) W 2 ( x , y ) c 1 q + ( 1 q ) 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) W 2 q ( s , t ) d t d s 1 1 q .

The proof is complete.□

Corollary 2.1

Under the assumptions in Theorem 2.5, but q = 1 , if the following inequality holds

u ( x , y ) c + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) d s + 0 y ( y t ) β 1 u ( x , t ) d t + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u ( s , t ) d t d s ,

for all x , y R + . Then,

(2.30) u ( x , y ) c W 2 ( x , y ) exp 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) W 2 ( s , t ) d t d s ,

where W 2 ( x , y ) is defined in Theorem 2.5.

By using the proof of Theorem 2.5, we can easily obtain the conclusion (2.30), and we omit the details here.

3 Applications

In this section, two applications are presented to demonstrate the applicability of the main results.

For conveniences, we denote by C ( R + × R + × R , R ) the set of all continuous functions from R + × R + × R into R . We first apply our Theorem 2.5 to study the boundedness of solutions for the following integral equation:

(3.1) u ( x , y ) = u 0 ( x , y ) + 0 x A ( x , s , u ( s , y ) ) d s + 0 y B ( y , t , u ( x , t ) ) d t + 0 x 0 y C ( s , t , u ( s , t ) ) d t d s , x , y R + ,

where u 0 C ( R + × R + ) , A , B , C C ( R + × R + × R , R ) . We will show the following:

Theorem 3.1

Assume that the functions u 0 , A , B , and C in (3.1) satisfy the following conditions,

(3.2) u 0 c ,

(3.3) A ( x , s , u ) ( x s ) α 1 u ,

(3.4) B ( y , t , u ) ( y t ) β 1 u ,

(3.5) C ( s , t , u ) h ( s , t ) u q ,

where c > 0 , q , α , β , and h satisfy the same conditions as those in Theorem 2.5. If u ( x , y ) is a solution of equation (3.1), then

(3.6) u ( x , y ) W 2 ( x , y ) c 1 q + ( 1 q ) 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) W 2 q ( s , t ) d t d s 1 1 q ,

for all x , y R + , where W 2 is defined as in Theorem 2.5.

Proof

By using the conditions (3.2)–(3.5) into (3.1), we obtain

(3.7) u ( x , y ) c + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) d s + 0 y ( y t ) β 1 u ( x , t ) d t + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u ( s , t ) q d t d s x , y R + .

By applying Theorem 2.5 to (3.7), we can obtain the desired result (3.6).□

In the sequel, we shall illustrate that our Theorem 2.1 can be applied to study the boundedness of solutions of a class of partial differential equations in two independent variables.

Consider the problem of the form

(3.8) u x y ( x , y ) = f ( y ) u x ( x , y ) + F ( x , y , u ( x , y ) ) , x , y R + ,

(3.9) u ( x , 0 ) = a 1 ( x ) , u ( 0 , y ) = a 2 ( y ) , a 1 ( 0 ) = a 2 ( 0 ) = 0 , x , y R + ,

where f C ( R + , R ) and F C ( R + × R + × R , R ) .

We use our result to study the boundedness of the solution of the aforementioned initial boundary value problem.

Theorem 3.2

Assume that f C ( R + , R ) L 1 ( R + , R ) , F C ( R + × R + × R , R ) , a 1 , a 2 L ( R + , R ) and

(3.10) F ( s , t , u ) h ( s , t ) u q .

If f and h are nonnegative, nondecreasing continuous functions and 0 < q < 1 , α > 0 , β > 0 , then

(3.11) u ( x , y ) W ( x , y ) E α ( Γ ( α ) x α ) c 1 q + ( 1 q ) 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) ( W ( s , t ) E α ( Γ ( α ) s α ) ) q d t d s 1 1 q ,

for all x , y R + , where W is defined as in Theorem 2.1.

Proof

If the boundary value problem (3.8) with (3.9) has a solution u ( x , y ) , then u satisfies the following integral equation:

u ( x , y ) = a 1 ( x ) + a 2 ( y ) 0 y f ( t ) a 2 ( t ) d t + 0 y f ( t ) u ( x , t ) d t + 0 x 0 y F ( s , t , u ( s , t ) ) d t d s , for all x , y R + .

By using the assumptions and (3.10), we have

u ( x , y ) c + 0 y f ( t ) u ( x , t ) d t + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u ( s , t ) q d t d s c + 0 x ( x s ) α 1 u ( s , y ) d s + 0 y f ( t ) u ( x , t ) d t + 0 x 0 y h ( s , t ) u ( s , t ) q d t d s , x , y R + ,

where c a 1 ( x ) + a 2 ( y ) + 0 f ( t ) a 2 ( t ) d t . Then, Theorem 2.1 implies the desired result (3.11).□

4 Conclusion

In this paper, we establish several kinds of integral inequalities in two independent variables, which improve well-known versions of Gronwall-Bellman inequalities and extend them to fractional integral form. Although, we only give two simple examples in the article as applications, our theoretical results can be widely used, cf. [11,33] and the references therein.

There are many issues worthy of further study in the article. On the one hand, the exponent power q of the unknown function u ( s , t ) in our theorems, we only discuss two cases, 0 < q < 1 and q = 1 . The proofs of the theorems for the two cases are not mutually included. We do not know what will happen if the exponent q > 1 . On the other hand, apart from studying the fractional integral inequality for two independent variables, we can extend our results with two independent variables to those of n independent variables. Studying those problems will be useful for us to further study the theory of fractional calculus equations in the future.

  1. Funding information: This project was supported by NNSF of China Grant No. 12071413 and NSF of Guangxi Grant No. 2018GXNSFDA138002.

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] R. P. Agarwal, S. Deng, and W. Zhang, Generalization of a retarded Gronwall-like inequality and its applications, Appl. Math. Comput. 165 (2005), no. 3, 599–612, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.04.067. Search in Google Scholar

[2] R. Bellman, The stability of solutions of linear differential equations, Duke Math. J. 10 (1943), no. 4, 643–647, https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-43-01059-2. Search in Google Scholar

[3] C. J. Chen, W. S. Cheung, and D. Zhao, Gronwall-Bellman-type integral inequalities and applications to BVPs, J. Inequal. Appl. 2009 (2009), 258569, https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/258569. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Y. Li, Positive solutions for second order boundary value problems with derivative terms, Math. Nachr. 289 (2016), no. 16, 2058–2068, https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.201500040. Search in Google Scholar

[5] B. G. Pachpatte, A note on Gronwall-Bellman inequality, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 44 (1973), no. 3, 758–762, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(73)90014-0. 10.1016/0022-247X(73)90014-0Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. R. L. Webb, Extensions of Gronwallas inequality with quadratic growth terms and applications, Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2018 (2018), no. 61, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.14232/ejqtde.2018.1.61. Search in Google Scholar

[7] H. T. Gronwall, Note on the derivatives with respect to a parameter of the solutions of a system of differential equations, Ann. Math. 20 (1919), no. 4, 292–296, https://doi.org/10.2307/1967124. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Y. Qin, Integral and Discrete Inequalities and Their Applications Volume II: Nonlinear Inequalities, Birkhäuser Basel, 2016. 10.1007/978-3-319-33301-4Search in Google Scholar

[9] D. Henry, Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg/New York/Berlin, 1981. 10.1007/BFb0089647Search in Google Scholar

[10] H. Ye, J. Gao, and Y. Ding, A generalized Gronwall inequality and its application to a fractional differential equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 328 (2007), no. 2, 1075–1081, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.05.061. Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. Alzabut and T. Abdeljawad, A generalized discrete fractional Gronwall inequality and its application on the uniqueness of solutions for nonlinear delay fractional difference system, Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 12 (2018), no. 1, 36–48, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/AADM1801036A. 10.2298/AADM1801036ASearch in Google Scholar

[12] J. Alzabut, T. Abdeljawad, F. Jarad, and W. Sudsutad, A Gronwall inequality via the generalized proportional fractional derivative with applications, J. Inequal. Appl. 2019 (2019), 101, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-019-2052-4. Search in Google Scholar

[13] X. Liu, A. Peterson, B. Jia, and L. Erbe, A generalized h-fractional Gronwall’s inequality and its applications for nonlinear h-fractional difference systems with maxima, J. Difference Equ. Appl. 25 (2019), no. 6, 815–836, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10236198.2018.1551382. 10.1080/10236198.2018.1551382Search in Google Scholar

[14] V. N. Phat and N. T. Thanh, New criteria for finite-time stability of nonlinear fractional-order delay systems: A Gronwall inequality approach, Appl. Math. Lett. 83 (2018), 169–175, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2018.03.023. Search in Google Scholar

[15] C. C. Tisdell, Improved mathematical results and simplified pedagogical approaches for Gronwalls inequality for fractional calculus, Fract. Differ. Calc. 8 (2018), no. 1, 33–41, https://doi.org/10.7153/fdc-2018-08-02. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Q. Wu, A new type of the Gronwall-Bellman inequality and its application to fractional stochastic differential equations, Cogent Math. 4 (2017), no. 1, 1279781, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311835.2017.1279781. Search in Google Scholar

[17] J. R. L. Webb, Weakly singular Gronwall inequalities and applications to fractional differential equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 471 (2019), no. 1–2, 692–711, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.11.004. Search in Google Scholar

[18] T. Zhu, New Henry-Gronwall integral inequalities and their applications to fractional differential equations, Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. 49 (2018), no. 1, 647–657, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00574-018-0074-z. Search in Google Scholar

[19] F. E. Beckenbach and R. Bellman, Inequalities, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1961. 10.1007/978-3-642-64971-4Search in Google Scholar

[20] B. K. Bondge and B. G. Pachpatte, On some fundamental integral inequalities in two independent variables, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 72 (1979), no. 2, 533–544, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(79)90246-4. 10.1016/0022-247X(79)90246-4Search in Google Scholar

[21] B. K. Bondge and B. G. Pachpatte, On some partial integral inequalities in two independent variables, Funkcial. Ekvac. 23 (1980), 327–334. Search in Google Scholar

[22] H. M. El-Owaidy, A. Ragab, and A. Abdeldaim, On some new integral inequalities of Gronwall-Bellman type in two independent variables, Kyungpook Math. J. 39 (1999), no. 2, 321–332. 10.1016/S0096-3003(98)10131-5Search in Google Scholar

[23] Z. H. Liu and N. S. Papageorgiou, Double phase Dirichlet problems with unilateral constraints, J. Differential Equations 316 (2022), no. 15, 249–269, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2022.01.040. Search in Google Scholar

[24] B. G. Pachpatte, On some fundamental partial integral inequalities, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 73 (1980), no. 1, 238–251, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(80)90030-X. 10.1016/0022-247X(80)90030-XSearch in Google Scholar

[25] R. D. Snow, Gronwall’s inequality for systems of partial differential equations in two independent variables, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 33 (1972), no. 1, 46–54, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1972-0298188-1. Search in Google Scholar

[26] X. W. Li and Z. H. Liu, Sensitivity analysis of optimal control problems described by differential hemivariational inequalities, SIAM J. Control Optim. 56 (2018), no. 5, 3569–3597, https://doi.org/10.1137/17M1162275. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Y. J. Liu, Z. H. Liu, and C. F. Wen, Existence of solutions for space-fractional parabolic hemivariational inequalities, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 24 (2019), no. 3, 1297–1307, https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2019017. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Z. H. Liu, D. Motreanu, and S. D. Zeng, Positive solutions for nonlinear singular elliptic equations of p-Laplacian type with dependence on the gradient, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 58 (2019), 28, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-018-1472-1. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Z. H. Liu, D. Motreanu, and S. D. Zeng, Generalized penalty and regularization method for differential variational-hemivariational inequalities, SIAM J. Optim. 31 (2021), no. 2, 1158–1183, https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1330221. Search in Google Scholar

[30] E. C. Young, Gronwalls inequality in n independent variables, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 41 (1973), 241–244, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1973-0320493-1. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1973-0320493-1Search in Google Scholar

[31] A. Boudeliou, On certain new nonlinear retarded integral inequalities in two independent variables and applications, Appl. Math. Comput. 335 (2018), 103–111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2018.04.041. Search in Google Scholar

[32] A. A. El-Deeb and Z. A. Khan, Certain new dynamic nonlinear inequalities in two independent variables and applications, Bound. Value Probl. 2020 (2020), 31, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-020-01338-z. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Y. J. Liu, Z. H. Liu, C. F. Wen, J. C. Yao, and S. D. Zeng, Existence of solutions for a class of noncoercive variational-hemivariational inequalities arising in contact problems, Appl. Math. Optim. 84 (2021), 2037–2059, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-020-09703-1.10.1007/s00245-020-09703-1Search in Google Scholar

[34] Y. Y. Luo and R. Xu, Some new weakly singular integral inequalities with discontinuous functions for two variables and their applications. Adv. Differential Equations 2019 (2019), 387, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2288-9. Search in Google Scholar

[35] H. D. Liu and C. C. Yin, Some generalized Volterra-Fredholm type dynamical integral inequalities in two independent variables on time scale pairs, Adv. Differential Equations 2020 (2020), 31, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-2504-7. Search in Google Scholar

[36] J. Zhao, Z. H. Liu, E. Vilches, C. F. Wen, and J. C. Yao, Optimal control of an evolution hemivariational inequality involving history-dependent operators, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 103 (2021), 105992, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105992. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105992Search in Google Scholar

[37] Z. H. Liu, S. D. Zeng, and D. Motreanu, Partial differential hemivariational inequalities, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 7 (2018), no. 4, 571–586, https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2016-0102. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Z. H. Liu and N. S. Papageorgiou, Positive solutions for resonant (p,q)-equations with convection, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 10 (2021), no. 1, 217–232, https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2020-0108. Search in Google Scholar

[39] I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, Academic Press, New York, 1999. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-09-20
Revised: 2021-02-21
Accepted: 2021-05-05
Published Online: 2022-06-25

© 2022 Yihuai Xie et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A random von Neumann theorem for uniformly distributed sequences of partitions
  3. Note on structural properties of graphs
  4. Mean-field formulation for mean-variance asset-liability management with cash flow under an uncertain exit time
  5. The family of random attractors for nonautonomous stochastic higher-order Kirchhoff equations with variable coefficients
  6. The intersection graph of graded submodules of a graded module
  7. Isoperimetric and Brunn-Minkowski inequalities for the (p, q)-mixed geominimal surface areas
  8. On second-order fuzzy discrete population model
  9. On certain functional equation in prime rings
  10. General complex Lp projection bodies and complex Lp mixed projection bodies
  11. Some results on the total proper k-connection number
  12. The stability with general decay rate of hybrid stochastic fractional differential equations driven by Lévy noise with impulsive effects
  13. Well posedness of magnetohydrodynamic equations in 3D mixed-norm Lebesgue space
  14. Strong convergence of a self-adaptive inertial Tseng's extragradient method for pseudomonotone variational inequalities and fixed point problems
  15. Generic uniqueness of saddle point for two-person zero-sum differential games
  16. Relational representations of algebraic lattices and their applications
  17. Explicit construction of mock modular forms from weakly holomorphic Hecke eigenforms
  18. The equivalent condition of G-asymptotic tracking property and G-Lipschitz tracking property
  19. Arithmetic convolution sums derived from eta quotients related to divisors of 6
  20. Dynamical behaviors of a k-order fuzzy difference equation
  21. The transfer ideal under the action of orthogonal group in modular case
  22. The multinomial convolution sum of a generalized divisor function
  23. Extensions of Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequalities with two independent variables
  24. Unicity of meromorphic functions concerning differences and small functions
  25. Solutions to problems about potentially Ks,t-bigraphic pair
  26. Monotonicity of solutions for fractional p-equations with a gradient term
  27. Data smoothing with applications to edge detection
  28. An ℋ-tensor-based criteria for testing the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms
  29. Characterizations of *-antiderivable mappings on operator algebras
  30. Initial-boundary value problem of fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equation posed on half line with nonlinear boundary values
  31. On a more accurate half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality involving hyperbolic functions
  32. On split twisted inner derivation triple systems with no restrictions on their 0-root spaces
  33. Geometry of conformal η-Ricci solitons and conformal η-Ricci almost solitons on paracontact geometry
  34. Bifurcation and chaos in a discrete predator-prey system of Leslie type with Michaelis-Menten prey harvesting
  35. A posteriori error estimates of characteristic mixed finite elements for convection-diffusion control problems
  36. Dynamical analysis of a Lotka Volterra commensalism model with additive Allee effect
  37. An efficient finite element method based on dimension reduction scheme for a fourth-order Steklov eigenvalue problem
  38. Connectivity with respect to α-discrete closure operators
  39. Khasminskii-type theorem for a class of stochastic functional differential equations
  40. On some new Hermite-Hadamard and Ostrowski type inequalities for s-convex functions in (p, q)-calculus with applications
  41. New properties for the Ramanujan R-function
  42. Shooting method in the application of boundary value problems for differential equations with sign-changing weight function
  43. Ground state solution for some new Kirchhoff-type equations with Hartree-type nonlinearities and critical or supercritical growth
  44. Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays
  45. Ambrosetti-Prodi-type results for a class of difference equations with nonlinearities indefinite in sign
  46. Research of cooperation strategy of government-enterprise digital transformation based on differential game
  47. Malmquist-type theorems on some complex differential-difference equations
  48. Disjoint diskcyclicity of weighted shifts
  49. Construction of special soliton solutions to the stochastic Riccati equation
  50. Remarks on the generalized interpolative contractions and some fixed-point theorems with application
  51. Analysis of a deteriorating system with delayed repair and unreliable repair equipment
  52. On the critical fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-Poisson equations with electromagnetic fields
  53. The exact solutions of generalized Davey-Stewartson equations with arbitrary power nonlinearities using the dynamical system and the first integral methods
  54. Regularity of models associated with Markov jump processes
  55. Multiplicity solutions for a class of p-Laplacian fractional differential equations via variational methods
  56. Minimal period problem for second-order Hamiltonian systems with asymptotically linear nonlinearities
  57. Convergence rate of the modified Levenberg-Marquardt method under Hölderian local error bound
  58. Non-binary quantum codes from constacyclic codes over 𝔽q[u1, u2,…,uk]/⟨ui3 = ui, uiuj = ujui
  59. On the general position number of two classes of graphs
  60. A posteriori regularization method for the two-dimensional inverse heat conduction problem
  61. Orbital stability and Zhukovskiǐ quasi-stability in impulsive dynamical systems
  62. Approximations related to the complete p-elliptic integrals
  63. A note on commutators of strongly singular Calderón-Zygmund operators
  64. Generalized Munn rings
  65. Double domination in maximal outerplanar graphs
  66. Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the norm minimum problem on digraphs
  67. On the p-integrable trajectories of the nonlinear control system described by the Urysohn-type integral equation
  68. Robust estimation for varying coefficient partially functional linear regression models based on exponential squared loss function
  69. Hessian equations of Krylov type on compact Hermitian manifolds
  70. Class fields generated by coordinates of elliptic curves
  71. The lattice of (2, 1)-congruences on a left restriction semigroup
  72. A numerical solution of problem for essentially loaded differential equations with an integro-multipoint condition
  73. On stochastic accelerated gradient with convergence rate
  74. Displacement structure of the DMP inverse
  75. Dependence of eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems on time scales with eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions
  76. Existence of positive solutions of discrete third-order three-point BVP with sign-changing Green's function
  77. Some new fixed point theorems for nonexpansive-type mappings in geodesic spaces
  78. Generalized 4-connectivity of hierarchical star networks
  79. Spectra and reticulation of semihoops
  80. Stein-Weiss inequality for local mixed radial-angular Morrey spaces
  81. Eigenvalues of transition weight matrix for a family of weighted networks
  82. A modified Tikhonov regularization for unknown source in space fractional diffusion equation
  83. Modular forms of half-integral weight on Γ0(4) with few nonvanishing coefficients modulo
  84. Some estimates for commutators of bilinear pseudo-differential operators
  85. Extension of isometries in real Hilbert spaces
  86. Existence of positive periodic solutions for first-order nonlinear differential equations with multiple time-varying delays
  87. B-Fredholm elements in primitive C*-algebras
  88. Unique solvability for an inverse problem of a nonlinear parabolic PDE with nonlocal integral overdetermination condition
  89. An algebraic semigroup method for discovering maximal frequent itemsets
  90. Class-preserving Coleman automorphisms of some classes of finite groups
  91. Exponential stability of traveling waves for a nonlocal dispersal SIR model with delay
  92. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for second-order Dirichlet problems with nonlinear impulses
  93. The transitivity of primary conjugacy in regular ω-semigroups
  94. Stability estimation of some Markov controlled processes
  95. On nonnil-coherent modules and nonnil-Noetherian modules
  96. N-Tuples of weighted noncommutative Orlicz space and some geometrical properties
  97. The dimension-free estimate for the truncated maximal operator
  98. A human error risk priority number calculation methodology using fuzzy and TOPSIS grey
  99. Compact mappings and s-mappings at subsets
  100. The structural properties of the Gompertz-two-parameter-Lindley distribution and associated inference
  101. A monotone iteration for a nonlinear Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with indefinite weight and Neumann boundary conditions
  102. Delta waves of the isentropic relativistic Euler system coupled with an advection equation for Chaplygin gas
  103. Multiplicity and minimality of periodic solutions to fourth-order super-quadratic difference systems
  104. On the reciprocal sum of the fourth power of Fibonacci numbers
  105. Averaging principle for two-time-scale stochastic differential equations with correlated noise
  106. Phragmén-Lindelöf alternative results and structural stability for Brinkman fluid in porous media in a semi-infinite cylinder
  107. Study on r-truncated degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind
  108. On 7-valent symmetric graphs of order 2pq and 11-valent symmetric graphs of order 4pq
  109. Some new characterizations of finite p-nilpotent groups
  110. A Billingsley type theorem for Bowen topological entropy of nonautonomous dynamical systems
  111. F4 and PSp (8, ℂ)-Higgs pairs understood as fixed points of the moduli space of E6-Higgs bundles over a compact Riemann surface
  112. On modules related to McCoy modules
  113. On generalized extragradient implicit method for systems of variational inequalities with constraints of variational inclusion and fixed point problems
  114. Solvability for a nonlocal dispersal model governed by time and space integrals
  115. Finite groups whose maximal subgroups of even order are MSN-groups
  116. Symmetric results of a Hénon-type elliptic system with coupled linear part
  117. On the connection between Sp-almost periodic functions defined on time scales and ℝ
  118. On a class of Harada rings
  119. On regular subgroup functors of finite groups
  120. Fast iterative solutions of Riccati and Lyapunov equations
  121. Weak measure expansivity of C2 dynamics
  122. Admissible congruences on type B semigroups
  123. Generalized fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inclusions for co-ordinated convex interval-valued functions
  124. Inverse eigenvalue problems for rank one perturbations of the Sturm-Liouville operator
  125. Data transmission mechanism of vehicle networking based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
  126. Dual uniformities in function spaces over uniform continuity
  127. Review Article
  128. On Hahn-Banach theorem and some of its applications
  129. Rapid Communication
  130. Discussion of foundation of mathematics and quantum theory
  131. Special Issue on Boundary Value Problems and their Applications on Biosciences and Engineering (Part II)
  132. A study of minimax shrinkage estimators dominating the James-Stein estimator under the balanced loss function
  133. Representations by degenerate Daehee polynomials
  134. Multilevel MC method for weak approximation of stochastic differential equation with the exact coupling scheme
  135. Multiple periodic solutions for discrete boundary value problem involving the mean curvature operator
  136. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications (Part II)
  137. Coupled measure of noncompactness and functional integral equations
  138. Existence results for neutral evolution equations with nonlocal conditions and delay via fractional operator
  139. Global weak solution of 3D-NSE with exponential damping
  140. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part I)
  141. Ground state solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations involving the fractional p-Laplacian and potential wells
  142. A class of p1(x, ⋅) & p2(x, ⋅)-fractional Kirchhoff-type problem with variable s(x, ⋅)-order and without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition in ℝN
  143. Jensen-type inequalities for m-convex functions
  144. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis (Part III)
  145. The influence of the noise on the exact solutions of a Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation
  146. Basic inequalities for statistical submanifolds in Golden-like statistical manifolds
  147. Global existence and blow up of the solution for nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation with variable coefficient nonlinear source term
  148. Hopf bifurcation and Turing instability in a diffusive predator-prey model with hunting cooperation
  149. Efficient fixed-point iteration for generalized nonexpansive mappings and its stability in Banach spaces
Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2022-0029/html
Scroll to top button