Startseite Kinetics and thermodynamics of SO2 adsorption on metal-loaded multiwalled carbon nanotubes
Artikel Open Access

Kinetics and thermodynamics of SO2 adsorption on metal-loaded multiwalled carbon nanotubes

  • Shaopeng Zhang , Zhuang Li EMAIL logo , Yanchun Yang , Weiwei Jian , Danzhu Ma EMAIL logo und Fengrui Jia EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 31. Dezember 2020

Abstract

To investigate the adsorption kinetics and thermodynamic adsorption mechanism and laws of dry flue gas desulfurization, we prepared a new adsorbent by loading Cr, Cu, and Zn on TiO2-loaded multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Desulfurization experiments were also carried out. In this study, three kinds of samples were used for simulation and diffusion processes in the dynamic adsorption of different SO2 volume fractions in flue gas and thermodynamic model analysis of different temperatures in flue gas. Results show that the diffusion coefficient of SO2 in three kinds of samples ranges from 10−16 to 10−14 m2 s−1, and the diffusion may be dominated by configuration diffusion. The intraparticle diffusion model predicts that the performance improves with an increase in the SO2 volume fraction and a shift of adsorption time. This finding indicates that an increase in SO2 volume fraction and a change in adsorption time increase the Kundsen diffusion specific gravity and decrease the configuration diffusion specific gravity, thereby increasing the SO2 diffusion resistance, which becomes faster than the activation energy barrier resistance in the catalytic oxidation reaction. Thus, the diffusion resistance specific gravity increases in the total resistance of the diffusion reaction. One possible mechanism of the adsorption process is the transition to surface reaction control at the early stage of adsorption to joint control of late diffusion and surface reactions. Adsorption thermodynamics studies show that SO2 adsorption by three adsorbents is a spontaneous, exothermic, and entropic reduction process, and the increase in temperature is inconducive for SO2 adsorption in three samples.

1 Introduction

SO2 produced by coal combustion causes considerable harm to the environment, such as acid rain formation in water ecosystem, terrestrial ecosystem, and buildings in cities [1,2,3,4], and results in direct or indirect damage on materials and human health. Thus, flue gas desulfurization is important. Dry flue gas desulfurization is the most effective way to control SO2 pollution [5,6]. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have attracted considerable attention from scholars locally and internationally due to their unique pore structure and excellent adsorption characteristics [7,8,9].

CNTs can be used as adsorbents to adsorb various industrial waste gases [9,10,11,12]. The adsorption capacity of CNTs for organic compounds is generally higher than that of activated carbon and other C-based adsorbents. The doping of metals, such as Fe, Cu, Mn, Ni, and Ti, is an effective method to significantly increase the oxidizing power of carbonaceous catalysts [13,14,15,16,17].

Comparing the prediction results calculated by the adsorption model with the adsorption behavior of different adsorbents under varied experimental conditions is crucial for accurately describing the adsorption process [18]. In all models, adsorption thermodynamics can predict the final state of a system from an initial nonequilibrium mode, and adsorption kinetic can determine the rate of adsorption and the time of the entire adsorption process. Therefore, in the analysis of the adsorption process, it is necessary to use both adsorption thermodynamics and adsorption kinetic to determine the model adsorption parameters. The determination of the model’s adsorption parameters permits to optimize the adsorption mechanism pathways, to express the dependence of the surface properties of the adsorbent on the sorption results, and to determine the adsorbent capacities and design effectively the adsorption systems [19]. Elasgh et al. [20] studied the adsorption equilibrium and adsorption kinetics of the basic red 46 on multiwalled CNT (MWCNT). Banerjee et al. [21] examined the adsorption effects of CNTs on rhodamine B and methyl orange and performed adsorption equilibrium and adsorption kinetics fitting. Under suitable conditions, when SO2 in the flue gas adsorbs the catalyst bed through the C-based catalyst, chemical adsorption accompanying the catalytic oxidation reaction occurs, and H2SO4 is formed and adheres to the pores of the C-based adsorption catalyst to realize SO2 removal and recover S resources during adsorbent regeneration [22,23,24]. During the chemisorption process, two physical and chemical processes, including surface reaction and diffusion, which play different roles in influencing the SO2 adsorption rate and dynamic adsorption process [25,26,27], respectively, are involved. The dynamic adsorption and diffusion behavior of SO2 on C-based adsorbents have rarely been reported by theory or model. In-depth study on the role of diffusion and surface reaction in C flue gas desulfurization and analysis of the role, laws, and mechanisms of diffusion in dynamic adsorption to provide deep insight into the physical and chemical mechanisms of adsorption is important in guiding the process of development.

In this study, three types of adsorbents, namely, MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr, MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu, and MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn, were synthesized by sol–gel method and used for SO2 adsorption. According to the fixed bed reaction system, the dynamic adsorption of samples in flue gas was studied, and the adsorption kinetics and thermodynamic analysis of these samples were systematically performed.

2 Adsorbent and experiment

The raw MWCNTs (purity: >95%, diameter: 10–15 nm, length: 10–30 mm) were provided by the Chinese Academy of Sciences Chengdu Organic Chemistry Co., Ltd. The new adsorbents, namely, MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr, MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu, and MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn, were prepared by sol–gel method by using tetrabutyl titanate and MWCNTs for SO2 adsorption experiments. The experimental device is shown in Figure 1. In this experiment, N2, 9% O2, 5% H2O, and SO2 were used to simulate the flue gas. The flow rates of N2, O2, and SO2/N2 were precisely controlled by the mass flowmeter. H2O was carried by a N2 shock constant temperature water bath. After the gas was uniformly mixed, it entered the reactor and insulated from the mixer to the reactor inlet line to ensure that H2O exists in the gas form. The experimental simulated flue gas was accurately measured via flue gas analysis (Gasboard-300) by using flue gas analyzer Testo-365 (Testo Instrument International Trading Co., Ltd., Germany). The preparation, characterization, and performance of MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr, MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu, and MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn adsorbents have been published in an earlier study detailed in ref. [28].

Figure 1 
               Experimental system. 1 – Gas cylinders (SO2, O2, N2); 2 – reducing valve; 3 – mass flowmeter; 4 – blending gas bottle; 5 – water bubbler; 6 – portable flue gas analyzer; 7 – wet flowmeter; 8 – thermometer; 9 – tube heating furnace; 10 – fix-bed reactor; 11 – flue gas analyzer; 12 – tail gas treatment bottle.
Figure 1

Experimental system. 1 – Gas cylinders (SO2, O2, N2); 2 – reducing valve; 3 – mass flowmeter; 4 – blending gas bottle; 5 – water bubbler; 6 – portable flue gas analyzer; 7 – wet flowmeter; 8 – thermometer; 9 – tube heating furnace; 10 – fix-bed reactor; 11 – flue gas analyzer; 12 – tail gas treatment bottle.

The adsorption capacity of conversion of prepared adsorbents was calculated using the following formula:

(1) q t = ( C 0 C ) M L m

(2) q e = 0 t ( C 0 C ) M L m d t

where C 0 and C are the volume fractions (mg/m3) of SO2 in inlet and outlet flue gas, respectively, M is the molar mass (g/mol) of SO2, L is the flow (L/min) of gas, m is the mass (g) of adsorbent, and t is the adsorption time (min) to reach SO2 adsorption equilibrium.

3 Adsorption kinetic models

The adsorption process usually consists of three steps. First, the adsorbate is transferred from the outside to the outer surface of the adsorbent. Then the adsorbate diffuses to the adsorption site in the adsorbent and finally the adsorption itself. Adsorption and diffusion are considered the main steps to limit the rate of adsorption. So the fitting to the models permits elucidation of the adsorption mechanism adsorbate.

3.1 Diffusion-type apparent adsorption kinetic model

In adsorption kinetics, the diffusion models assume that the diffusion is the rate-limiting step. And the diffusion models usually obtained a straight line passing through the origin. They are divided in two parts, the external mass transfer model and the internal diffusion models. According to the difference in the details of the particle, Ho divided into particle diffusion and pore diffusion models and discussed it [29]. For intraparticle diffusion, Boyd derived the Boyd intraparticle diffusion model, and Weber and Morris model was used to deduce a pore diffusion model [30].

The intraparticle diffusion model can be solved by diffusion partial differential equations and hypothesized according to different situations [31,32]. In these situations, by solving the partial differential equation describing the microspore diffusion of spherical particles [31,32], equation (3) can be obtained. At the initial stage of adsorption, equation (4) was obtained, where ierfc is expressed as the inverse function of the residual error function [33].

(3) q ¯ q 0 q q 0 = q t q e = 1 6 π 2 n = 1 1 n 2 exp n 2 π 2 D e t R 2

(4) q t q e = 6 D e t R 2 1 2 1 π + 2 n = 1 i e r f c n R D e t 3 D e t R 2

where F = q t/q e, B = πD e/R 2; and for any shape of the particle, 3 V/A can be used instead of R of the spherical particle.

When q t/q e < 0.3 [32], the Boyd–Crank–Ruthven, Weber and Morris I, and Weber and Morris II intraparticle diffusion models were applicable. Boyd et al. [30] also derived the Boyd model that describes the effects of extraparticle fluid films. For intraparticle diffusion effects, the Dumwald–Wagner intraparticle diffusion model can be used to describe the overall intraparticle diffusion effect. According to Ruthven, at the late stage of adsorption, when q t/q e > 0.7, equation (1) only retains the first term of the series expansion to meet the prediction requirements. Combined with the studies of Boyd and Ho, the Boyd–Ruthven–Ho model can be obtained [30]. Acharya et al. [32] used the Boyd–Ruthven–Ho model to investigate the internal diffusion effect of the flow–solid system over the entire adsorption range.

3.2 Theoretical expression of models

3.2.1 Boyd–Crank–Ruthven model

The Boyd–Crank–Ruthven model assumes that the adsorbent diffuses uniformly in the spherical model and that the surface diffusion rate D e at all points in the particle is constant.

(5) q t q e 6 π D e t R 2 1 2 = k i, BCK t 1 2

With the spheres initially free of solutes and the solute concentration on the surface kept constant, the Boyd–Crank–Ruthven model provides an accurate solution to this equation at any given time to resolve the average concentration in solids.

3.2.2 Weber and Morris model

Weber and Morris model has shown that the plot of q t/q e versus t 1/2 could be decomposed in two linear plots, the first one corresponding to equation (6):

(6) q t 6 π D e t R 2 1 2 q e = k i, WM I t 1 2

and the second one to equation (7):

(7) q t = k i, WMII t 1 2

3.2.3 Dumwald–Wagner model

Dumwald–Wagner model should be linear and the rate constant k i,DW can be obtained from the slope. Dumwald–Wagner model proved to be reasonable to model different kinds of adsorption systems.

3.2.4 Boyd pseudo first model

The Boyd pseudo first-order model is described by the nonreversible equation:

(8) log ( 1 F ) = k i,B 2.303 t

Boyd pseudo first model assumes that adsorption occurs only locally and the interactions between the adsorbed ions are ignored. In addition, the model also considers the energy of adsorption is not dependent on surface coverage. And maximum adsorption corresponds to a saturated monolayer of adsorbates on the adsorbent surface [30].

3.2.5 Boyd–Ruthven–Ho model

(9) B t = 0.4977 ln ( 1 F )

The assumptions are almost the same as for the Boyd pseudo first model.

4 Results and discussion

4.1 Adsorption kinetic simulation results and analyses

The SO2 equilibrium adsorption amount corresponding to different SO2 volume fractions of three different samples in the flue gas was obtained by nonlinear fitting of dq t/dt when dq t = 0. The corresponding q t is the experimental approximate estimated value and q e is the SO2 equilibrium adsorption amount, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Equilibrium SO2 adsorption capacity under different inlet SO2 volume fractions of flue gas

Φ SO 2 500 × 10−6 1,000 × 10−6 2,000 × 10−6
q e,exp/mg g−1 MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr 25.764 38.751 54.585
MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu 19.793 24.467 37.486
MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn 13.783 17.893 20.653

The adsorption behavior of different SO2 volume fractions in flue gas was simulated by diffusion-controlled apparent adsorption kinetic model. The results are shown in Figures 2–5 and Tables 2–4. Among these SO2 volume fractions, Figure 2 lists the simulation and experimental results of the Dumwald–Wagner and the Weber and Morris I models. Figure 3 lists the simulation results of the Weber and Morris II model. Figure 4 lists the simulation results of the Boyd–Crank–Ruthven intraparticle diffusion model. Figure 5 shows the simulation and experimental results of the Boyd quasi-first-order and Boyd–Ruthven–Ho intraparticle diffusion models. Among them the working condition of SO2 volume fraction of 2,000 × 10−6 in Figure 3 was the baseline, and the results simulated by the Weber and Morris II model were cited. At the same time, due to MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr, MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu, and MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn, the microspores with a pore size of 0.8 nm were mainly used in these samples. Thus, the diffusion resistance in the particles is mainly concentrated in the microspores. The configuration had a diffusion resistance, whereas the Kundsen diffusion or molecular diffusion resistance of the mesopores and microspores was small. The changes in SO2 volume fraction and adsorption time resulted in changes in the overall chemisorption behavior by affecting the diffusion and surface reactions.

Figure 2 
                  Modeling results of diffusion-controlled apparent adsorption kinetics with Dumwald–Wagner model and Weber and Morris I model under different inlet SO2 volume fractions of flue gas. (a) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cr, (b) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cu, (c) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Zn.
Figure 2

Modeling results of diffusion-controlled apparent adsorption kinetics with Dumwald–Wagner model and Weber and Morris I model under different inlet SO2 volume fractions of flue gas. (a) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cr, (b) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cu, (c) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Zn.

Figure 3 
                  Modeling results of diffusion-controlled apparent adsorption kinetics with Weber and Morris II model under different inlet SO2 volume fractions of flue gas. (a) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cr, (b) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cu, (c) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Zn.
Figure 3

Modeling results of diffusion-controlled apparent adsorption kinetics with Weber and Morris II model under different inlet SO2 volume fractions of flue gas. (a) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cr, (b) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cu, (c) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Zn.

Figure 4 
                  Modeling results of diffusion-controlled apparent adsorption kinetics with Boyd–Crank–Ruthven model under different inlet SO2 volume fractions of flue gas. (a) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cr, (b) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cu, (c) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Zn.
Figure 4

Modeling results of diffusion-controlled apparent adsorption kinetics with Boyd–Crank–Ruthven model under different inlet SO2 volume fractions of flue gas. (a) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cr, (b) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cu, (c) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Zn.

Figure 5 
                  Modeling results of diffusion-controlled apparent adsorption kinetics with Boyd pseudo first model and Boyd–Ruthven–Ho model under different inlet SO2 volume fractions of flue gas. (a) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cr, (b) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cu, (c) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Zn.
Figure 5

Modeling results of diffusion-controlled apparent adsorption kinetics with Boyd pseudo first model and Boyd–Ruthven–Ho model under different inlet SO2 volume fractions of flue gas. (a) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cr, (b) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Cu, (c) MWCNTs/TiO2 + Zn.

Table 2

Modeling results of diffusion-controlled apparent adsorption kinetics under different inlet SO2 volume fraction of flue gas for MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr

Model parameters corresponding to inlet SO2 volume fraction
Kinetic models 500 × 10−6 1,000 × 10−6 2,000 × 10−6
Weber and Morris I intraparticle diffusion model (60 min) k i,WMI/mg−1 min−0.5 0.822 0.992 1.462
R 2 0.9228 0.9394 0.9457
Weber and Morris I intraparticle diffusion model k i,WMI/mg g−1 min−0.5 2.399 1.577 1.848
R 2 0.9634 0.9682 0.9813
Weber and Morris II intraparticle diffusion model (60 min) k i,WMII/mg g−1 min−0.5 1.032 1.223 1.811
c/mg g−1 1.943 2.061 3.092
R 2 0.9774 0.9787 0.9786
Weber and Morris II intraparticle diffusion model k i,WMII/mg g−1 min−0.5 1.655 1.953 2.525
c/mg g−1 −5.123 −5.718 −6.423
R 2 0.9812 0.9834 0.9936
Dumwald–Wagner intraparticle diffusion model k i,DW/mg g−1 min−0.5 −0.002 −8.952 −7.566
R 2 0.923 0.948 0.976
Boyd–Crank–Ruthven intraparticle diffusion model k i,BCR/mg g−1 min−0.5 1.557 1.848 2.399
R 2 0.6624 0.9673 0.9811
Boyd pseudo first model k i,B/mg g−1 min−0.5 0.0029 0.0019 0.0017
R 2 0.9886 0.9982 0.9979
Table 3

Modeling results of diffusion-controlled apparent adsorption kinetics under different inlet SO2 volume fraction of flue gas for MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu

Model parameters corresponding to inlet SO2 volume fraction
Kinetic models 500 × 10−6 1,000 × 10−6 2,000 × 10−6
Weber and Morris I intraparticle diffusion model (60 min) k i,WMI/mg−1 min−0.5 0.442 0.721 1.032
R 2 0.8764 0.9155 0.9353
Weber and Morris I intraparticle diffusion model k i,WMI/mg g−1 min−0.5 1.115 0.908 1.503
R 2 0.9421 0.9862 0.9762
Weber and Morris II intraparticle diffusion model (60 min) k i,WMII/mg g−1 min−0.5 0.580 0.924 1.285
c/mg g−1 1.231 1.808 2.248
R 2 0.9498 0.9826 0.9866
Weber and Morris II intraparticle diffusion model k i,WMII/mg g−1 min−0.5 1.001 1.209 1.614
c/mg g−1 −3.089 −3.089 −3.673
R 2 0.9732 0.9904 0.9932
Dumwald–Wagner intraparticle diffusion model k i,DW/mg g−1 min−0.5 −4.108 −2.880 −2.719
R 2 0.949 0.969 0.981
Boyd–Crank–Ruthven intraparticle diffusion model k i,BCR/mg g−1 min−0.5 0.909 1.115 1.503
R 2 0.9400 0.9672 0.9753
Boyd pseudo first model k i,B/mg g−1 min−0.5 0.0015 0.0012 0.0011
R 2 0.9971 0.9962 0.9914
Table 4

Modeling results of diffusion-controlled apparent adsorption kinetics under different inlet SO2 volume fraction of flue gas for MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn

Model parameters corresponding to inlet SO2 volume fraction
Kinetic models 500 × 10−6 1,000 × 10−6 2,000 × 10−6
Weber and Morris I intraparticle diffusion model (60 min) k i,WMI/mg−1 min−0.5 0.531 0.718 0.925
R 2 0.9344 0.9412 0.9519
Weber and Morris I intraparticle diffusion model k i,WMI/mg g−1 min−0.5 0.487 0.669 0.819
R 2 0.9789 0.9806 0.9862
Weber and Morris II intraparticle diffusion model (60 min) k i,WMII/mg g−1 min−0.5 0.655 0.876 1.156
c/mg g−1 1.114 1.4093 2.060
R 2 0.9887 0.9895 0.9960
Weber and Morris II intraparticle diffusion model k i,WMII/mg g−1 min−0.5 0.707 0.856 1.414
c/mg g−1 −1.263 −1.245 −3.165
R 2 0.9914 0.9926 0.9937
Dumwald–Wagner intraparticle diffusion model k i,DW/mg g−1 min−0.5 −2.426 −1.658 −2.608
R 2 0.984 0.987 0.992
Boyd–Crank–Ruthven intraparticle diffusion model k i,BCR/mg g−1 min−0.5 0.669 0.889 1.321
R 2 0.9062 0.9762 0.9802
Boyd pseudo first model k i,B/mg g−1 min−0.5 9.996 8.993 8.327
R 2 0.9606 0.9578 0.9542

Figure 2 shows that the Dumwald–Wagner model had low prediction accuracy for MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr and MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu, but the prediction accuracy for MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn was high, and the initial simulation value of SO2 adsorption deviation of the experimental value was large. The deviation became small at the late stage of adsorption. As the SO2 volume fraction in the flue gas increased, and the SO2 volume fraction increased to 2,000 × 10−6, the prediction accuracy of the model showed an increment, and deviation decreased.

Figure 3 shows that the three simulated straight lines of the Weber and Morris II model with boundary layer effect parameters did not pass through the origin, thereby indicating that intragranular pore diffusion was not the only rapid control step for SO2 chemisorption on these samples. Among three simulated straight lines, within 60 min of the pre-adsorption period, the specific gravity (q t/q e) of the SO2 adsorption amount to the SO2 equilibrium adsorption amount was within 0.3, and the straight line generated by the simulated value of the model was still not the coordinate origin. When the q t/q e value was between 0.5 and 0.6, the simulation was predicted within the wide range of adsorption and adsorption time, the deviation between the simulated value and the experimental value was large, and the straight line obtained by the analog value was not the coordinate origin. As the adsorption time progressed, the prediction accuracy of intragranular pored diffusion II increased. This phenomenon indicated that the boundary layer effect was considerably affected at the initial stage of adsorption, and the boundary layer effects decreased with time.

Figure 4 and Tables 2–4 show that the simulated value of the Boyd–Crank–Ruthven intraparticle diffusion model evicted significantly from the experimental value, and the deviation became small with time. As the SO2 volume fraction increased, the correlation coefficient became large, and the fitting effect improved. This finding indicated that intraparticle diffusion (microporous diffusion) was not a quick-control step of SO2 adsorption on these samples.

Figure 5 shows that the simulated values of the Boyd first-order model agreed well with the experimental values when the SO2 volume fraction was low but not with the SO2 volume fraction. This condition indicated that the extragranular gas film diffusion was not the control step of adsorption. The Boyd–Ruthven–Ho model linearization curve was a straight line and passes through the origin, thereby indicating that the inner (hole) diffusion was a quick-control step, but the experimental point represented by the Boyd–Ruthven–Ho model in Figure 5 was estimated to a straight line but not the origin. This result indicated that internal diffusion was not a quick-control step for SO2 adsorption by the sample.

The phenomena and trends represented in Figures 2–5 revealed a certain degree of adsorption mechanism. As the volume fraction of SO2 in the flue gas increased, the diffusion resistance of SO2 in the particles and the energy barrier resistance against the activation energy in the catalytic oxidation reaction at the active site decreased, and the resistance against the energy barrier decreased rapidly. The proportion of diffusion resistance in the total resistance of chemisorption increased, and the proportion of the latter decreased. This result showed that the high SO2 volume fraction corresponded to an accurate prediction performance of the intraparticle diffusion model. At the same time, as the adsorption time progressed, the specific gravity of the diffusion resistance of SO2 in the particle increased in the total process resistance of the chemisorption reaction, and the proportion of the catalytic oxidation reaction resistance has to overcome the activation energy to generate a new chemical bond in total resistance. The decline increased the predictive power of several diffusion-type apparent adsorption kinetic models as the SO2 adsorption time progressed. This result indicates that the catalytic oxidation reaction of SO2 occurring on the surface of microspores in C may be a quick-control step at the early stage of adsorption, which had a considerable influence on the chemical adsorption of SO2 and may gradually transition to surface reaction and microporous diffusion at the late stage of adsorption. Hence, the combined control is the mass transfer rate control step of the adsorption reaction.

4.2 Calculation and analysis of effective internal diffusion coefficient of particles

The diffusion resistance in the particle is closely related to the diffusion coefficient. In this system, the diffusion effect was described by the effective internal diffusion coefficient of the particle, and the experimental instantaneous value and the simulated average value were investigated. Herein, the particles were assumed to be spherical; and given that the particle size ranged from 10 to 30 μm, the average diameter of the particles was 0.02 mm. The method of obtaining the effective internal diffusion coefficient of the particles is shown in Table 5.

Table 5

Solution methods of effective intraparticle diffusion coefficients

Methods Theoretical expression Coefficient equation
Transient Boyd experimental method q t 6 π D e t R 2 1 2 q e D e π R 2 36 t q t q e 2
Boyd, Crank, and Ruthven method q t q e 6 π D e t R 2 1 2 = k i,BCK t 1 2 D e π R 2 k i,BCK 2 36
Weber and Morris I method q t 6 π D e t R 2 1 2 q e = k i,WMI t 1 2 D e π R 2 k i,WMI 2 36 q e 2
Weber and Morris II method q t 6 π D e t R 2 1 2 q e + c = k i,WMII t 1 2 + c D e π R 2 k i,WMII 2 36 q e 2
Dumwald–Wagner method q t q e 1 exp π 2 D e t R 2 1 2 = 1 exp k i,DW t 1 2 D e k i,DW R 2 π 2

The effective diffusion coefficient of SO2 in the sample should be composed of molecular, Kundsen, and configurational diffusion, which can be expressed by equations (10) and (11). The diffusion resistance was dominant, followed by the Kundsen diffusion resistance, and the molecular diffusion resistance contribution was the smallest. The different diffusion resistances varied with the adsorption time and the SO2 volume fraction and were reflected by the change in the effective diffusion coefficient of SO2.

(10) 1 D SO 2 = j SO 2 n φ j φ SO 2 N j / N SO 2 D SO 2 , j + α D k,SO 2 + β D c,SO 2

(11) D e,SO 2 = D SO 2 ε p τ

where D c , SO 2 and D k , SO 2 are the Kundsen diffusion coefficient and the configuration diffusion coefficient of SO2, respectively; α and β are the Kundsen and configuration diffusion coefficient contribution rates, respectively; ε p is the particle porosity; and N j and N SO 2 are the diffusion flux of SO2 and other components, respectively. The reciprocal of the diffusion coefficient reflected the corresponding diffusion resistance. Figure 6 shows the effective intraparticle diffusion coefficients for different SO2 volume fractions in flue gas.

Figure 6 
                  Effective intraparticle diffusion coefficients under different inlet SO2 volume fractions of flue gas. (a) MNCNT/TiO2 + Cr, (b) MNCNT/TiO2 + Cu, (c) MNCNT/TiO2 + Zn.
Figure 6

Effective intraparticle diffusion coefficients under different inlet SO2 volume fractions of flue gas. (a) MNCNT/TiO2 + Cr, (b) MNCNT/TiO2 + Cu, (c) MNCNT/TiO2 + Zn.

Figure 6 shows that with the increase in SO2 volume fraction and adsorption time, the effective internal diffusion coefficient of SO2 also showed an increment. As the adsorption time elapsed, the sample microspores was continuously filled with H2SO4 molecules, the specific gravity of the configuration diffusion decreased, and the specific gravity of the Kundsen diffusion increased. This condition was manifested by a decrease in the total diffusion resistance and an increase in the effective internal diffusion coefficient. Meanwhile, the increase in SO2 content also results in an increment in the diffusion force, and the diffusion of molecular diffusion and the contribution of the Kundsen diffusion increased faster than the configuration diffusion. This phenomenon resulted in the effective internal diffusion coefficient, increasing with the increase in the SO2 volume fraction. Figure 6 shows that the instantaneous effective internal diffusion coefficient of SO2 ranged from 10−16 to 10−14 m2 s−1. The SO2 diffusion in the sample was dominated by configuration diffusion. The microporous distribution probability of the sample was 0.8 nm at the maximum; and the molecular diameters of O2, H2O, and SO2 were in the range of 0.2–0.5 nm. This result was consistent with the theory of adsorption reaction space of SO2 on C-based adsorbents [21]. Figure 6 shows the average effective internal diffusion coefficient of SO2 calculated by the model. The value was in the range of 10−16–10−14 m2 s−1, which was also dominated by configuration diffusion.

4.3 Model error and applicability analysis

The simulation results of different adsorption kinetic models were analyzed by the sum of squared errors (SSEs) [28]. The SSE expression is shown in equation (12), and the SSE analysis results are listed in Table 6. Small SSEs indicated that the analog value was close to the experimental value, and the small error between the two indicates high prediction ability and prediction accuracy of the adsorption kinetic model.

(12) SSE = q t,exp q t,theo 2 q t,exp 2

Table 6

Error analysis of modeling results

Values of SSE under different SO2 volume fractions
Kinetic models 500 × 10−6 1,000 × 10−6 2,000 × 10−6
Weber and Morris II intraparticle diffusion model MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr 154.3 104.7 44.8
MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu 173.7 130.8 49 .9
MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn 189.8 147.8 59.7
Weber and Morris I intraparticle diffusion model MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr 386.8 170.1 39.8
MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu 409.8 192.4 42.7
MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn 411.6 209.5 55.6
Dumwald–Wagner intraparticle diffusion model MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr 478.3 187.8 94.5
MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu 541.7 234.7 127.5
MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn 579.8 284.6 148.8
Boyd–Crank–Ruthven intraparticle diffusion model MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr 312.5 134.5 51.8
MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu 342.7 168.8 60.9
MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn 349.9 172.5 65.8
Boyd pseudo first model MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr 0.6398 3.89 5.89
MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu 1.36 4.56 7.65
MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn 1.78 5.23 7.98

5 Adsorption thermodynamics of SO2 on the sample

The feasibility, trend, and driving force of the adsorption can be obtained from adsorption thermodynamics studies. Adsorption thermodynamic analysis is important in explaining the adsorption characteristics, laws, and adsorption mechanism. The thermodynamic parameters are useful in determining the adsorption temperature and adsorption properties of the adsorption. Experiments were carried out at 333.15, 353.15, 373.15, and 393.15 K to determine the most favorable adsorption temperature. The changes in the thermodynamic parameters of the adsorption process were generally calculated from the Gibbs equation and the Van’t Hoff equation [34], as follows:

(13) Δ G = R T ln K

(14) ln K = ln K Δ H R T

(15) Δ S = Δ H Δ G T

where R is the gas constant (8.314 J/[mol K]), T is the thermodynamic temperature (K), ΔG is the adsorption-free change in energy (kJ/mol), ΔH is the change in adsorption enthalpy (kJ/mol), ΔS is the change in adsorption entropy (J/[mol K]), and K is the equilibrium constant. The plot was plotted as 1/T with ln K, and the results are shown in Figure 7. The calculation results of the adsorption thermodynamic parameters of SO2 for these samples are shown in Table 7.

Figure 7 
               The relationship between ln K and 1/T for SO2 adsorption on samples. (a) MNCNT/TiO2 + Cr, (b) MNCNT/TiO2 + Cu, (c) MNCNT/TiO2 + Zn.
Figure 7

The relationship between ln K and 1/T for SO2 adsorption on samples. (a) MNCNT/TiO2 + Cr, (b) MNCNT/TiO2 + Cu, (c) MNCNT/TiO2 + Zn.

Table 7

Thermodynamic parameters of SO2 adsorption on samples

Samples Temperature (K) ΔG (kJ/mol) ΔH (kJ/mol) ΔS (J/(mol K))
MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr 333.15 −6.67 −20.93 −42.81
353.15 −5.73 −20.93 −43.04
373.15 −4.96 −20.93 −42.79
393.15 −4.07 −20.93 −42.88
MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu 333.15 −2.86 −12.56 −29.12
353.15 −2.17 −12.56 −29.42
373.15 −1.86 −12.56 −28.67
393.15 −1.79 −12.56 −27.39
MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn 333.15 −2.39 −9.51 −21.37
353.15 −1.82 −9.51 −21.77
373.15 −1.17 −9.51 −22.35
393.15 −1.15 −9.51 −21.26

The table shows that the adsorption-free energy changes ΔG to a negative value, thereby indicating that the SO2 adsorption on the sample was a spontaneous process, and the absolute value of ΔG decreased with the increase in temperature. This finding indicated that the adsorption process spontaneously increased with the increasing temperature. The trend was low, and the temperature rise was inconducive to the adsorption. The ΔH was negative, indicating that the adsorption process was exothermic, which indicated that there must be a physical adsorption process in the adsorption and removal process of SO2 in flue gas by activated carbon. The ΔS was negative, thereby indicating that the SO2 adsorption on the sample reduced the degree of freedom of the adsorbate molecules and decreased the entropy of the adsorption process.

6 Conclusion

  1. The diffusion-based intraparticle diffusion model had poor prediction ability, and the prediction accuracy increased with the increase in SO2 volume fraction. According to the SSE values, the overall predictive power of the model for these samples was in descending order as follows: the Weber and Morris I model (60 min) > Weber and Morris II model (60 min) > Boyd–Crank–Ruthven model > Weber and Morris I model > Dumwald–Wagner Model > Weber and Morris II model.

  2. The simulation results of the Weber and Morris I, the Weber and Morris II, and the Boyd–Crank–Ruthven models deviated significantly from the initial stage of adsorption, and the line obtained by the Weber and Morris II model, including the boundary layer parameters, did not pass the coordinate origin. This result indicated that intragranular pore diffusion (mesoporous and microspore diffusion) was not the only chemical adsorption rate control step. The Weber and Morris I and Weber and Morris II models had better simulation effects at the early stage of adsorption than at the later stage of adsorption.

  3. Compared with MWCNT/TiO2 + Zn, the Dumwald–Wagner model had lower prediction accuracy for MWCNT/TiO2 + Cr and MWCNT/TiO2 + Cu, but the prediction performance increased with the increase in SO2 volume fraction, which was predicted at the late stage of adsorption. The increase in the SO2 volume fraction and the decrease in adsorption time shift activity resulted in the diffusion resistance of SO2 in the particles and in mesopores and microspores, respectively, which overcame more activation energy barrier resistance than in the catalytic oxidation reaction at the active sites. The increase was fast, and the proportion of diffusion resistance in total resistance of the diffusion reaction increased. One possible mechanism of the SO2 adsorption process was the transition from the surface reaction control in the early stage of adsorption to the joint control of diffusion and surface reaction at a later stage.

  4. Adsorption thermodynamics studies showed that the ΔG, ΔH, and ΔS values were negative. The adsorption process on the sample was a spontaneous, exothermic, and entropic reduction process, and the temperature rise was inconducive to SO2 adsorption.

Nomenclature

B t

Boyd–Ruthven–Ho model rate constant (min−1)

c

Weber and Morris II intraparticle diffusion model parameters (mg g−1)

D c, SO 2

configuration diffusion coefficient of SO2 (m2 s−1)

D e

effective intraparticle diffusion coefficient (m2 s−1)

D e, SO 2

effective intraparticle diffusion coefficient of SO2 (m2 s−1)

D k, SO 2

Knudsen diffusion coefficient of SO2 (m2 s−1)

D SO 2

integrated intraparticle diffusion coefficient of SO2 (m2 s−1)

D SO 2 , j

integrated intraparticle diffusion coefficient of SO2 and components j (m2 s−1)

F

Boyd dimensionless adsorption

G

adsorption-free change in energy (kJ/mol)

H

change in adsorption enthalpy (kJ/mol)

K

equilibrium constant

k i, B

Boyd pseudo first model rate constant (mg g−1 min−0.5)

k i, BCR

Boyd–Crank–Ruthven intraparticle diffusion model rate constant (mg g−1 min−0.5)

k i, DW

Dumwald–Wagner intraparticle diffusion model rate constant (min−1)

k i, WMI

Weber and Morris intraparticle diffusion model I parameters (mg g−1 min−0.5)

k i, WMII

Weber and Morris intraparticle diffusion model II parameters (mg g−1 min−0.5)

N j

diffusion flux of other components (mol m−2 s−1)

N SO 2

diffusion flux of SO2 (mol m−2 s−1)

q e

equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg g−1)

q t

adsorption capacity (mg g−1)

R

gas constant (8.314 J/[mol K]) or the particle of adsorbent (m)

S

change in adsorption entropy (J/[mol K])

T

thermodynamic temperature (K)

t

adsorption time (min)

Greek alphabet

α

Knudsen diffusion coefficient contribution rate

β

configuration diffusion coefficient contribution fraction

ε p

particle porosity

τ
φ j

volume fraction of other components

φ SO 2

volume fraction of SO2

Subscript

e

effective diffusion, adsorption equilibrium

exp

experimental value

i

intraparticle diffusion

theo

calculated value

t

time

Acknowledgments

This research work is supported by the Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering, MOE (KLIEEE-18-04), the Natural Science Foundation Guidance and Planning Program of Liaoning Province, China (2019-ZD0065), and the General Project for Higher Education Research of Education Department of Liaoning Province, China (NO. L2019026).

References

[1] Karatepe N, Orbak İ, Yavuz R, Özyuğuran A. Sulfur dioxide adsorption by activated carbons having different textural and chemical properties. Fuel. 2008;87:3207–15.10.1016/j.fuel.2008.06.002Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Cordoba P, Staicu LC. Flue gas desulfurization effluents: an unexploited selenium resource. Fuel. 2018;223:268–76.10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.052Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Tseng CC, Li CJ. Eulerian-Eulerian numerical simulation for a flue gas desulfurization tower with perforated sieve trays. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 2018;116:329–45.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.09.024Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Gao C, Gao W, Song K, Na H, Tian F, Zhang S. Spatial and temporal dynamics of air-pollutant emission inventory of steel industry in China: a bottom-up approach. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019;143:184–200.10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.032Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Mathieu Y, Tzanis L, Soulard M, Patarin J, Vierling M, Molière M. Adsorption of SOx by oxide materials: a review. Fuel Process Technol. 2013;114:81–100.10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.03.019Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Przepiórski J, Czyżewski A, Pietrzak R, Toyoda M, Morawski AW. Porous carbon material containing CaO for acidic gas capture: preparation and properties. J Hazard Mater. 2013;263:353–60.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.04.037Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Song M, Tang X, Xu J, Yu L, Wei Y. The formation of novel carbon/carbon composite by chemical vapor deposition: an efficient adsorbent for enhanced desulfurization performance. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2016;118:34–41.10.1016/j.jaap.2015.12.020Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Sabna V, Thampi SG, Chandrakaran S. Adsorption of crystal violet onto functionalised multi-walled carbon nanotubes: equilibrium and kinetic studies. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016;134:390–7.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.09.018Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Fengrui J, Zhou L, Engang W, Jicheng H, Hui D, Guangxin L, et al. Preparation and SO2 adsorption behavior of coconut shell-based activated carbon via microwave-assisted oxidant activation. China Pet Process Petrochem Technol. 2018;20:67–74.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Long RQ, Yang RT. Carbon nanotubes as a superior sorbent for nitrogen oxides. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2001;40:4288–91.10.1021/ie000976kSuche in Google Scholar

[11] Darkrim FL, Malbrunot P, Tartaglia GP. Review of hydrogen storage by adsorption in carbon nanotubes. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2002;27:193–202.10.1016/S0360-3199(01)00103-3Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Yan T, Li TX, Li H, Wang RZ. Experimental study of the ammonia adsorption characteristics on the composite sorbent of CaCl2 and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Int J Refrig. 2014;46:165–72.10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2014.02.014Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Nhut JM, Nguyen P, Pham-Huu C, Keller N, Ledoux MJ. Carbon nanotubes as nanosized reactor for the selective oxidation of H2S into elemental sulfur. Catal Today. 2004;91:91–7.10.1016/j.cattod.2004.03.015Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Nguyen TTH, Le Minh C, Nguyen NH. A theoretical study of carbon dioxide adsorption and activation on metal-doped (Fe, Co, Ni) carbon nanotube. Comput Theor Chem. 2017;1100:46–51.10.1016/j.comptc.2016.12.006Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Sampaio MJ, Silva CG, Marques RRN, Silva AMT, Faria JL. Carbon nanotube–TiO2 thin films for photocatalytic applications. Catal Today. 2011;161:91–6.10.1016/j.cattod.2010.11.081Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Lu X, Li X, Qian J, Miao N, Yao C, Chen Z. Synthesis and characterization of CeO2/TiO2 nanotube arrays and enhanced photocatalytic oxidative desulfurization performance. J Alloys Compd. 2016;661:363–71.10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.11.148Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Li W, Ma JJ, Liu P, Pan ZL, He QY. First-principles study of the adsorption sensitivity of Ni-doped single-walled zigzag (n, 0) CNTs (n = 4, 5, 6) toward SO2 molecules. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;335:17–22.10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.181Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Opila EJ. Thermodynamics and kinetics of gaseous metal hydroxide formation from oxides relevant to power and propulsion applications. Calphad. 2016;55:32–40.10.1016/j.calphad.2016.06.007Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Thompson G, Swain J, Kay M, Forster CF. The treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2001;77:275–86.10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00060-2Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Elsagh A, Moradi O, Fakhri A, Najafi F, Alizadeh R, Haddadi V. Evaluation of the potential cationic dye removal using adsorption by graphene and carbon nanotubes as adsorbents surfaces. Arab J Chem. 2017;10:S2862–9.10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.11.013Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Banerjee D, Bhowmick P, Pahari D, Santra S, Sarkar S, Das B, et al. Pseudo first ordered adsorption of noxious textile dyes by low-temperature synthesized amorphous carbon nanotubes. Phys E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct. 2017;87:68–76.10.1016/j.physe.2016.11.024Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Yoosefian M, Zahedi M, Mola A, Naserian S. A DFT comparative study of single and double SO2 adsorption on Pt-doped and Au-doped single-walled carbon nanotube. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;349:864–9.10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.088Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Lizzio AA, DeBarr JA. Mechanism of SO2 removal by carbon. Energy Fuels. 1997;11:284–91.10.1021/ef960197+Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Raymundo-Piñero E, Cazorla-Amorós D, Salinas-Martinez de lecea C, Linares-Solano A. Factors controling the SO2 removal by porous carbons: relevance of the SO2 oxidation step. Carbon. 2000;38:335–44.10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00109-8Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Gao J, Wang T, Wang G, Wang J. Kinetics of SO2 adsorption by ZL 50 activated carbon for various water vapor volume fractions. J Tsinghua Univ Sci Technol. 2010;50:434–7.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Tsuji K, Shiraishi I. Combined desulfurization, denitrification and reduction of air toxics using activated coke: 1. Activity of activated coke. Fuel. 1997;76:549–53.10.1016/S0016-2361(97)00010-0Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Liu G, Wu M, Jia F, Yue Q, Wang H. Entropy-weighted comprehensive evaluation of petroleum flow in China during 1980–2015. J Clean Prod. 2018;195:593–604.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.225Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Yang Y, Jia F, Jian W, Zhang S, Ma D, Liu G. Influence of Cr3+ concentration on SO2 removal over TiO2 based multi-walled carbon nanotubes. China Pet Process Petrochem Technol. 2019;21(1):23–35.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Ho YS, Ng JCY, McKay G. Kinetics of pollutant sorption by biosorbents. Sep Purif Methods. 2000;29:189–232.10.1081/SPM-100100009Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Boyd GE, Schubert J, Adamson AW. The exchange adsorption of ions from aqueous solutions by organic zeolites. I. Ion-exchange equilibria1. J Am Chem Soc. 1947;69:2818–29.10.1021/ja01203a064Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Ruthven DM. Principles of adsorption and adsorption processes. Canada: John Wiley & Sons; 1984. p. 86–122Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Acharya J, Sahu JN, Mohanty CR, Meikap BC. Removal of lead (II) from wastewater by activated carbon developed from Tamarind wood by zinc chloride activation. Chem Eng J. 2009;149:249–62.10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.029Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Gao J, Wang T, Shu Q, Zhang N, Wang J. Intra-particle diffusion mechanism and kinetic models of adsorptive flue gas desulphurization by ZL50activated carbon. J Chem Eng Chin Univ. 2010;24:402–9.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Anirudhan TS, Radhakrishnan PG. Thermodynamics and kinetics of adsorption of Cu (II) from aqueous solutions onto a new cation exchanger derived from tamarind fruit shell. J Chem Thermodyn. 2008;40:702–9.10.1016/j.jct.2007.10.005Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-10-29
Revised: 2020-11-06
Accepted: 2020-11-13
Published Online: 2020-12-31

© 2020 Shaopeng Zhang et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Model of electric charge distribution in the trap of a close-contact TENG system
  3. Dynamics of Online Collective Attention as Hawkes Self-exciting Process
  4. Enhanced Entanglement in Hybrid Cavity Mediated by a Two-way Coupled Quantum Dot
  5. The nonlinear integro-differential Ito dynamical equation via three modified mathematical methods and its analytical solutions
  6. Diagnostic model of low visibility events based on C4.5 algorithm
  7. Electronic temperature characteristics of laser-induced Fe plasma in fruits
  8. Comparative study of heat transfer enhancement on liquid-vapor separation plate condenser
  9. Characterization of the effects of a plasma injector driven by AC dielectric barrier discharge on ethylene-air diffusion flame structure
  10. Impact of double-diffusive convection and motile gyrotactic microorganisms on magnetohydrodynamics bioconvection tangent hyperbolic nanofluid
  11. Dependence of the crossover zone on the regularization method in the two-flavor Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model
  12. Novel numerical analysis for nonlinear advection–reaction–diffusion systems
  13. Heuristic decision of planned shop visit products based on similar reasoning method: From the perspective of organizational quality-specific immune
  14. Two-dimensional flow field distribution characteristics of flocking drainage pipes in tunnel
  15. Dynamic triaxial constitutive model for rock subjected to initial stress
  16. Automatic target recognition method for multitemporal remote sensing image
  17. Gaussons: optical solitons with log-law nonlinearity by Laplace–Adomian decomposition method
  18. Adaptive magnetic suspension anti-rolling device based on frequency modulation
  19. Dynamic response characteristics of 93W alloy with a spherical structure
  20. The heuristic model of energy propagation in free space, based on the detection of a current induced in a conductor inside a continuously covered conducting enclosure by an external radio frequency source
  21. Microchannel filter for air purification
  22. An explicit representation for the axisymmetric solutions of the free Maxwell equations
  23. Floquet analysis of linear dynamic RLC circuits
  24. Subpixel matching method for remote sensing image of ground features based on geographic information
  25. K-band luminosity–density relation at fixed parameters or for different galaxy families
  26. Effect of forward expansion angle on film cooling characteristics of shaped holes
  27. Analysis of the overvoltage cooperative control strategy for the small hydropower distribution network
  28. Stable walking of biped robot based on center of mass trajectory control
  29. Modeling and simulation of dynamic recrystallization behavior for Q890 steel plate based on plane strain compression tests
  30. Edge effect of multi-degree-of-freedom oscillatory actuator driven by vector control
  31. The effect of guide vane type on performance of multistage energy recovery hydraulic turbine (MERHT)
  32. Development of a generic framework for lumped parameter modeling
  33. Optimal control for generating excited state expansion in ring potential
  34. The phase inversion mechanism of the pH-sensitive reversible invert emulsion from w/o to o/w
  35. 3D bending simulation and mechanical properties of the OLED bending area
  36. Resonance overvoltage control algorithms in long cable frequency conversion drive based on discrete mathematics
  37. The measure of irregularities of nanosheets
  38. The predicted load balancing algorithm based on the dynamic exponential smoothing
  39. Influence of different seismic motion input modes on the performance of isolated structures with different seismic measures
  40. A comparative study of cohesive zone models for predicting delamination fracture behaviors of arterial wall
  41. Analysis on dynamic feature of cross arm light weighting for photovoltaic panel cleaning device in power station based on power correlation
  42. Some probability effects in the classical context
  43. Thermosoluted Marangoni convective flow towards a permeable Riga surface
  44. Simultaneous measurement of ionizing radiation and heart rate using a smartphone camera
  45. On the relations between some well-known methods and the projective Riccati equations
  46. Application of energy dissipation and damping structure in the reinforcement of shear wall in concrete engineering
  47. On-line detection algorithm of ore grade change in grinding grading system
  48. Testing algorithm for heat transfer performance of nanofluid-filled heat pipe based on neural network
  49. New optical solitons of conformable resonant nonlinear Schrödinger’s equation
  50. Numerical investigations of a new singular second-order nonlinear coupled functional Lane–Emden model
  51. Circularly symmetric algorithm for UWB RF signal receiving channel based on noise cancellation
  52. CH4 dissociation on the Pd/Cu(111) surface alloy: A DFT study
  53. On some novel exact solutions to the time fractional (2 + 1) dimensional Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky system arising in physical science
  54. An optimal system of group-invariant solutions and conserved quantities of a nonlinear fifth-order integrable equation
  55. Mining reasonable distance of horizontal concave slope based on variable scale chaotic algorithms
  56. Mathematical models for information classification and recognition of multi-target optical remote sensing images
  57. Hopkinson rod test results and constitutive description of TRIP780 steel resistance spot welding material
  58. Computational exploration for radiative flow of Sutterby nanofluid with variable temperature-dependent thermal conductivity and diffusion coefficient
  59. Analytical solution of one-dimensional Pennes’ bioheat equation
  60. MHD squeezed Darcy–Forchheimer nanofluid flow between two h–distance apart horizontal plates
  61. Analysis of irregularity measures of zigzag, rhombic, and honeycomb benzenoid systems
  62. A clustering algorithm based on nonuniform partition for WSNs
  63. An extension of Gronwall inequality in the theory of bodies with voids
  64. Rheological properties of oil–water Pickering emulsion stabilized by Fe3O4 solid nanoparticles
  65. Review Article
  66. Sine Topp-Leone-G family of distributions: Theory and applications
  67. Review of research, development and application of photovoltaic/thermal water systems
  68. Special Issue on Fundamental Physics of Thermal Transports and Energy Conversions
  69. Numerical analysis of sulfur dioxide absorption in water droplets
  70. Special Issue on Transport phenomena and thermal analysis in micro/nano-scale structure surfaces - Part I
  71. Random pore structure and REV scale flow analysis of engine particulate filter based on LBM
  72. Prediction of capillary suction in porous media based on micro-CT technology and B–C model
  73. Energy equilibrium analysis in the effervescent atomization
  74. Experimental investigation on steam/nitrogen condensation characteristics inside horizontal enhanced condensation channels
  75. Experimental analysis and ANN prediction on performances of finned oval-tube heat exchanger under different air inlet angles with limited experimental data
  76. Investigation on thermal-hydraulic performance prediction of a new parallel-flow shell and tube heat exchanger with different surrogate models
  77. Comparative study of the thermal performance of four different parallel flow shell and tube heat exchangers with different performance indicators
  78. Optimization of SCR inflow uniformity based on CFD simulation
  79. Kinetics and thermodynamics of SO2 adsorption on metal-loaded multiwalled carbon nanotubes
  80. Effect of the inner-surface baffles on the tangential acoustic mode in the cylindrical combustor
  81. Special Issue on Future challenges of advanced computational modeling on nonlinear physical phenomena - Part I
  82. Conserved vectors with conformable derivative for certain systems of partial differential equations with physical applications
  83. Some new extensions for fractional integral operator having exponential in the kernel and their applications in physical systems
  84. Exact optical solitons of the perturbed nonlinear Schrödinger–Hirota equation with Kerr law nonlinearity in nonlinear fiber optics
  85. Analytical mathematical schemes: Circular rod grounded via transverse Poisson’s effect and extensive wave propagation on the surface of water
  86. Closed-form wave structures of the space-time fractional Hirota–Satsuma coupled KdV equation with nonlinear physical phenomena
  87. Some misinterpretations and lack of understanding in differential operators with no singular kernels
  88. Stable solutions to the nonlinear RLC transmission line equation and the Sinh–Poisson equation arising in mathematical physics
  89. Calculation of focal values for first-order non-autonomous equation with algebraic and trigonometric coefficients
  90. Influence of interfacial electrokinetic on MHD radiative nanofluid flow in a permeable microchannel with Brownian motion and thermophoresis effects
  91. Standard routine techniques of modeling of tick-borne encephalitis
  92. Fractional residual power series method for the analytical and approximate studies of fractional physical phenomena
  93. Exact solutions of space–time fractional KdV–MKdV equation and Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky equation
  94. Approximate analytical fractional view of convection–diffusion equations
  95. Heat and mass transport investigation in radiative and chemically reacting fluid over a differentially heated surface and internal heating
  96. On solitary wave solutions of a peptide group system with higher order saturable nonlinearity
  97. Extension of optimal homotopy asymptotic method with use of Daftardar–Jeffery polynomials to Hirota–Satsuma coupled system of Korteweg–de Vries equations
  98. Unsteady nano-bioconvective channel flow with effect of nth order chemical reaction
  99. On the flow of MHD generalized maxwell fluid via porous rectangular duct
  100. Study on the applications of two analytical methods for the construction of traveling wave solutions of the modified equal width equation
  101. Numerical solution of two-term time-fractional PDE models arising in mathematical physics using local meshless method
  102. A powerful numerical technique for treating twelfth-order boundary value problems
  103. Fundamental solutions for the long–short-wave interaction system
  104. Role of fractal-fractional operators in modeling of rubella epidemic with optimized orders
  105. Exact solutions of the Laplace fractional boundary value problems via natural decomposition method
  106. Special Issue on 19th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  107. Joint use of eddy current imaging and fuzzy similarities to assess the integrity of steel plates
  108. Uncertainty quantification in the design of wireless power transfer systems
  109. Influence of unequal stator tooth width on the performance of outer-rotor permanent magnet machines
  110. New elements within finite element modeling of magnetostriction phenomenon in BLDC motor
  111. Evaluation of localized heat transfer coefficient for induction heating apparatus by thermal fluid analysis based on the HSMAC method
  112. Experimental set up for magnetomechanical measurements with a closed flux path sample
  113. Influence of the earth connections of the PWM drive on the voltage constraints endured by the motor insulation
  114. High temperature machine: Characterization of materials for the electrical insulation
  115. Architecture choices for high-temperature synchronous machines
  116. Analytical study of air-gap surface force – application to electrical machines
  117. High-power density induction machines with increased windings temperature
  118. Influence of modern magnetic and insulation materials on dimensions and losses of large induction machines
  119. New emotional model environment for navigation in a virtual reality
  120. Performance comparison of axial-flux switched reluctance machines with non-oriented and grain-oriented electrical steel rotors
  121. Erratum
  122. Erratum to “Conserved vectors with conformable derivative for certain systems of partial differential equations with physical applications”
Heruntergeladen am 2.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2020-0215/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen