Home The effect of guide vane type on performance of multistage energy recovery hydraulic turbine (MERHT)
Article Open Access

The effect of guide vane type on performance of multistage energy recovery hydraulic turbine (MERHT)

  • Yabin Tian EMAIL logo , Anjie Hu and Qi Zheng
Published/Copyright: July 29, 2020

Abstract

In this work, we theoretically analyzed the main factors affecting performance of multistage energy recovery hydraulic turbine (MERHT), and found that the arc radius (r) of the edge at the outlet section of the runner guide vane is the determining factor of the hydraulic efficiency of hydraulic turbines. To further improve the performance of the MERHT, a numerical model is then proposed to optimize the arc radius. The MERHT-type DCSGT250-175 × 9 was taken in the simulation. The hydraulic efficiency η h and the corresponding distributions of pressure and velocity were numerically studied with four different values of r ranging from 133.5 to 138 mm. It is found that the flow state and the flow field distribution were the best when r equals to 134 mm. With the optimum r, the external diameter of the runner guide vane (D) was further adjusted, which can lead to 3.9% increase of average efficiency according to the simulation results.

1 Introduction

Liquid residual pressure energy is a clean energy source. In many industrial systems such as petrochemical, steel metallurgy, reverse osmosis desalination, water pipeline, etc. [1,2,3], the remaining high-pressure liquid is usually discharged directly or depressurized before being utilized in subsequent processes, which leads to the waste of the residual pressure energy. To recover the energy of the high-pressure liquid, energy recovery hydraulic turbines (ERHTs) that mainly functioned by pump reversal are widely used [4]. Numbers of researches have been done to improve the efficiency of the turbine. Yang et al. [5] proposed a dimensional analysis model to predict the performance of hydraulic turbines, which provides a reference for the selection of hydraulic turbines. Qi et al. [6] developed a multistage hydraulic turbine model by referring to the design method of the turbine runner in the airfoil design. Shahram [7] conducted experimental studies on four centrifugal pumps with different specific speeds. The study found that the head coefficient (the head ratio of the hydraulic turbine to the centrifugal pump at the highest efficiency point) and the flow coefficient (the flow rate ratio the hydraulic turbine to the centrifugal pump at the highest efficiency point) decrease with the increase of the specific speed. Moreover, it is found that the power coefficient (the power ratio the hydraulic turbine to the centrifugal pump at the highest efficiency point) is little dependent on the specific speed. In addition, the author proposed a method to predict the performance of hydraulic turbines based on the performance of centrifugal pumps. Chapallaz et al. [8] proposed the conversion factor of pressure head and flow rate between pumps and turbines, and plotted the conversion factor charts based on the pump-specific speed. Punit [9] developed an optimized process for the prediction and rational selection of hydraulic turbines by experiments. Joshi et al. [10] proposed a performance prediction model for a high-specific speed pump used as a hydraulic turbine. Fernandez [11] studied the performance of hydraulic turbines at different speeds through experiments and then carried out research on the prediction of hydraulic turbine performance. Jiang et al. [12] found that the negative curvature guide vane with head modification is the most efficient for the dual-channel hydraulic turbine. These researches show that many factors can affect the performance of hydraulic turbines. Among them, the guide vane design is one of the most important factors. As a crucial component of the multistage energy recovery hydraulic turbine (MERHT), the front guide vane, in addition to draining and stabilizing fluid and introducing the fluid into the next-stage runner, converts the pressure energy of the liquid flow to the kinetic energy at the outlet. Bad hydraulic performance of the front guide vane can lead to obvious vortexes, secondary flows, or flow separation inside the next-stage runner, which eventually increases the energy loss. Therefore, the hydraulic performance of the front guide vane is the necessary condition to ensure high hydraulic efficiency and the smooth operation of the rotor system. It also has an important impact on the performance of multistage energy recovery turbines [13,14,15,16]. Compared to the front guide vane, the return guide vane only acts as a diversion, and its effect on the performance of MERHT is not so significant relative to the front guide vane. For these reasons, in this article, the influence of the front vane patterns on the performance of hydraulic turbines is studied, and the influence of the main parameter changes of vanes on the performance of hydraulic turbines is analyzed.

2 Analysis of main factors affecting the performance of guide vanes

Figure 1 shows the working principle illustration of the front guide vane. The outlet axial surface speed of the front guide vane can be written as:

(1) υ m 3 = q v 2 π R 3 b 3 ψ 3

where ψ 3 is the outlet excretion coefficient of the front guide vane.

Figure 1 
               Working principle illustration of the front guide vane.
Figure 1

Working principle illustration of the front guide vane.

The outlet peripheral speed of the front guide vane is:

(2) υ u 3 = υ m 3 cot 3 = q v 2 π R 3 b 3 ψ 3 cot 3

Since there is no other external torque acting on the fluid from the outlet of the front guide vane to the inlet of the runner, the following relationship can be obtained:

(3) υ u 1 R 1 = υ u 3 R 3 = q v 2 π b 3 ψ 3 cot 3

The velocity torque at the outlet of the runner is given by:

(4) υ u 2 R 2 = u 2 R 2 υ m 2 cot β 2 R 2 = R 2 2 ω q v A 2 cot β 2 R 2

where A 2 is axial surface flow area at the outlet of the runner.

According to the momentum theorem, we have:

(5) M = q m υ u 1 R 1 υ u 2 R 2

The torque power can then be written as:

(6) M ω = q m ω υ u 1 R 1 υ u 2 R 2

Neglecting the power loss, the above power equals to the power delivered from the fluid to the blade:

q m g H = q m ω υ u 1 R 1 υ u 2 R 2

and

(7) g H = ω υ u 1 R 1 υ u 2 R 2

Substituting equations (3) and (4) into equation (7), we have

(8) q v = R 2 2 + g H ω cot 3 2 π b 3 ψ 3 + R 2 A 2 cot β 2

The hydraulic efficiency of hydraulic turbines can then be written as:

(9) η h = M ω g q v H = M ω q v ( p in p out )

where H = p in p out ρ g + Z in Z out .

Since the inlet and the outlet of the hydraulic turbine are on the same level, we have Z in = Z out , and

(10) H = p in p out ρ g

Substituting equation (8) into equation (9), we have

(11) η h = M ω p in p out × cot 3 2 π b 3 ψ 3 + R 2 A 2 cot β 2 R 2 2 + g H ω

The outlet excretion coefficient of the front guide vane can be written as:

(12) ψ 3 = 1 δ 3 Z π D 3 sin 3

With equations (11) and (12), the hydraulic efficiency of hydraulic turbines is finally given by:

(13) η h = M ω p in p out × cot 3 2 π b 3 D 3 cos 3 2 b 3 δ 3 Z + R 2 A 2 cot β 2 R 2 2 ω + g H ω

It can be seen from equation (13) that changing the outlet angle of the front guide vane ∂3 can cause a change in hydraulic efficiency η h , and 3 is determined by the radius r of the arc (a) of the front vane airfoil. Therefore, the performance of the vane and the turbine can be optimized by adjusting r, while keeping other parameters unchanged.

3 The example parameters and guide vane design

The design parameters of the DCSGT330-175 × 9 turbine are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

The basic design parameters of the DCSGT330-175 × 9 turbine

Design head H d/(m) Design flow Q d/(m3/h) Rotating speed n/(rpm) Series N
1,500 330 3,680 9

The specific parameters are shown in Table 2, where D 3 is the base circle diameter of the front guide vane, b 3 is the front guide vane outlet width, α 3 is the outlet angle of the front guide vane, a 3 is the throat plane width, δ 3 is the outlet thickness of the front guide vane, D 4 is the outer diameter of the front guide impeller edge, φ is the spread angle of the diffusion section, and Z 1 is the number of front guide vanes. The original guide vane airfoil and the corresponding three-dimensional solid model of the radial guide vane are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively.

Table 2

Guide vane parameters (mm)

Series D 3 D 4 b 3 α 3 a 3 δ 3 φ Z 1
9 280 362 31.1 17.5° 24 2 9
Figure 2 
               Airfoil type of the front guide vane of the original radial vane.
Figure 2

Airfoil type of the front guide vane of the original radial vane.

Figure 3 
               The three-dimensional solid model of the radial guide vane.
Figure 3

The three-dimensional solid model of the radial guide vane.

4 Optimization of parameters and solutions

According to the practical design experience, the front guide vane design method of the runner vane is basically the same as that of the radial vane. The main structural parameters of the runner vanes were given by: D 3 = 272 mm, D 4 = 360 mm, Z 1 = 9 and Z 2 = 9, where Z 2 is the number of return guide vanes.

The objective function of this optimization design is η h . Four values of r were chosen within this range of 133.5 mm < r < 138 mm: r 1 = 138 mm (scheme I), r 2 = 135 mm (scheme II), r 3 = 134 mm (scheme III), and r 4 = 133.5 mm (scheme IV). The corresponding geometrical models were generated by Pro/E software [17,18,19]. Then the three-dimensional simulations are applied in entire flow channel of the MERHT under three working conditions including design flow rate, large flow rate (q v = 380 m3/h), and small flow rate (q v = 250 m3/h). The optimization scheme was then obtained according to the simulation results of the flow state and the flow field distribution in the guide vanes under these conditions.

5 Numerical simulations for two different types of guide vane

5.1 Numerical simulation for radial guide vane

The numerical simulations of the three-dimensional turbulent flow were carried out by Fluent. The simulation results under typical working conditions are shown in Table 3. To clearly show the influence of these conditions, we also presented the symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of the front guide vane region under three conditions: the large flow rate (Q = 380 m3/h), the design flow rate, and the small flow rate (Q = 250 m3/h) in Figure 4, and the flow state and flow field distribution in the guide vanes under the three working conditions was analyzed.

Table 3

Simulation results of the radial vane turbine under typical conditions

Estimated flow Q/(m3/h) Torque M n /(N m) Inlet pressure P in/(Pa) Outlet pressure P out/(Pa) Calculative mass flow Q m/(kg/s) Efficiency η h/(%) The conversion head H/(m)
150 −54.1475 6561178.5 204328.09 41.3275 668.91
200 436.6861 76,98,493 206084.56 55.1438 40.31 784.85
250 1013.9880 94,68,984 206599.94 68.9600 60.54 965.36
270 1275.9025 1,03,26,345 207082.75 74.4381 64.60 1052.76
300 1683.0528 1,16,58,906 207738.55 82.4986 68.06 1188.62
330 2443.4302 1,47,13,215 209841.91 91.3418 70.2 1500.0
360 2671.6965 1,51,17,876 209739.59 99.8922 69.0 1541.25
380 3026.4410 1,65,53,224 210712.61 104.9144 67.4 1687.59
Figure 4 
                  Symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of second stage front guide vane of optimized radial vane turbine (pressure unit: Pa; speed unit: m/s): (a) pressure distribution under large flow conditions, (b) velocity distribution under large flow conditions, (c) pressure distribution under design conditions, (d) velocity distribution under design conditions, (e) pressure distribution under small flow conditions, and (f) velocity distribution under small flow conditions.
Figure 4

Symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of second stage front guide vane of optimized radial vane turbine (pressure unit: Pa; speed unit: m/s): (a) pressure distribution under large flow conditions, (b) velocity distribution under large flow conditions, (c) pressure distribution under design conditions, (d) velocity distribution under design conditions, (e) pressure distribution under small flow conditions, and (f) velocity distribution under small flow conditions.

It can be seen from Table 3 that the turbine shaft performs negative work at a flow rate less than 150 m3/h, showing that, instead of recovering energy, the turbine becomes an energy-consuming device under the condition. The turbine recovery efficiency reaches the maximum value at the design flow rate, showing that the design point is the best operating point [20,21]. It is also shown in the table that the closer the working condition point is to the design working condition point, the higher the recovery efficiency. Specifically, when the flow rate is 330 m3/h, the recovery efficiency is above 70%. Under other conditions, the recovery efficiency is below 70%, and the average efficiency is 53.43%.

It can be seen from Figure 4 that the pressure distribution is uniform under the large flow and design conditions while uneven under small flow conditions since local high-pressure zones appears near the inlet and outlet of the front guide vane. For all these three working conditions, the local low-pressure zones appear at the outlet of the front guide vane, which is consistent with recent researches [22,23]. The outlet velocity distribution of the front guide vane is relatively uniform under the large flow and the design flow conditions, since no obvious vortexes and secondary flows appear. However, under the small flow condition, the velocity distribution is uneven, and the inlet and outlet speeds of the front guide vane are disordered, resulting in significant secondary flows and vortexes. The liquid velocity is very small at the inlet of the front guide vane, causing a large pressure. The pressure at the outlet of the working face of the front guide vane increases, generating a force pointing to the inlet of the front guide vane, resulting in a distinct secondary flow and vortex. A local low-pressure zone occurs due to the transition between the pressure energy and the kinetic energy at the outlet of the front guide vane.

5.2 Numerical simulation of the runner guide vanes before optimization

The simulations are further carried out for the performance of the original runner guide vanes with parameters given in Section 3. The pressure and the velocity distributions of the second-stage front guide vane under the design condition were obtained, as shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5 
                  The pressure and velocity distribution of the second stage front guide vane symmetry plane of the preliminary designed runner guide vane turbine (pressure unit: Pa; speed unit: m/s): (a) pressure distribution and (b) velocity distribution.
Figure 5

The pressure and velocity distribution of the second stage front guide vane symmetry plane of the preliminary designed runner guide vane turbine (pressure unit: Pa; speed unit: m/s): (a) pressure distribution and (b) velocity distribution.

It can be seen from Figure 5 that the pressure and the velocity distributions of the front guide vane region are not uniform. There is a local high-pressure zone at the outlet of the front guide vane, and the velocity distributions are uneven. These uneven distributions of pressure and velocity result in significant secondary flows and vortices within the vanes. Therefore, the MERHT vanes must be optimized to ensure good hydraulic performance inside the vanes.

5.3 The optimal guide vane according to the optimization scheme

To improve the performance of the turbine, we further numerically studied the performance with the presented values of r in Section 3. The work conditions are chosen the same as in the above simulations: large flow rate (Q = 380 m3/h), design flow rate, and small flow rate (Q = 250 m3/h). Using Fluent software, we obtained the symmetry plane pressure and velocity distributions of the second-order front guide vane region of the scheme I, as shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6 
                  The symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of the second-order front guide vane of the scheme I (pressure unit: Pa; speed unit: m/s): (a) pressure distribution under large flow conditions, (b) velocity distribution under large flow conditions, (c) pressure distribution under design conditions, (d) velocity distribution under design conditions, (e) pressure distribution under small flow conditions, and (f) velocity distribution under small flow conditions.
Figure 6

The symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of the second-order front guide vane of the scheme I (pressure unit: Pa; speed unit: m/s): (a) pressure distribution under large flow conditions, (b) velocity distribution under large flow conditions, (c) pressure distribution under design conditions, (d) velocity distribution under design conditions, (e) pressure distribution under small flow conditions, and (f) velocity distribution under small flow conditions.

As we can see from Figure 6, the pressure distribution is more uneven from the inlet to the outlet of the front guide vane under large flow and design conditions compared to the small flow condition. While the velocity distributions are all uneven for these three conditions, the disorder flow, vortexes, and secondary flows are distinct at the outlet of the front guide. Moreover, the outlet velocity is almost zero under the large flow and the small flow conditions. The reason is probably that r in scheme I is larger than the designed one, so the outlet angle is larger than that of the designed front guide vane. According to the triangle of the outlet velocity distribution of the front guide vane, (a) the increase in the outlet angle results in an increase of speed at the outlet shaft surface, (b) a larger impact can be generated on the outlet of the working surface, and (c) these effects cause an increase in pressure and a decrease in speed. The increase of the pressure at the outlet will generate a force pointing to the inlet of the front guide vane on the fluid, resulting in a distinct secondary flow and vortex. According to the requirements for the flow regime and flow field distribution of hydraulic turbine, scheme I is not suitable for this MERHT.

Figure 7 shows the symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of the second-order front guide vane of the scheme II. It can be seen from the figure that from the inlet of the front guide vane to the outlet, the pressure distributions under these operating conditions is evener than that of the scheme I. The local low-pressure zone appears at the outlet of the front vane. The velocity distribution under the three conditions is also relatively uniform. However, under small flow conditions, the individual outlet velocities of the front vane are almost zero, resulting in significant secondary flows and vortexes. The main reason for these phenomena is that in the scheme II, r 2 = 135 mm, which is smaller than the r in the scheme I. As shown in Figure 5, the outlet angle is small. According to the triangle of the outlet velocity distribution of the front guide vane, the decrease in outlet angle results in a decrease in the speed of the outlet shaft surface, which generates a small impact on the outlet working surface, these effects cause a decrease in pressure and an increase in speed. Under the small flow condition, the fluid at some outlets is subjected to forces points to the inlets of the front guide vanes, resulting in distinct secondary flow and vortexes. Due to the transition between pressure energy and kinetic energy at the outlet of the front guide vane, a local low-pressure zone occurs. According to the requirements for the flow regime and flow field distribution of the hydraulic turbine, scheme II is also not suitable for this MERHT.

Figure 7 
                  The symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of the second-order front guide vane of the scheme II (pressure unit: Pa; speed unit: m/s): (a) pressure distribution under large flow conditions, (b) velocity distribution under large flow conditions, (c) pressure distribution under design conditions, (d) velocity distribution under design conditions, (e) pressure distribution under small flow conditions, and (f) velocity distribution under small flow conditions.
Figure 7

The symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of the second-order front guide vane of the scheme II (pressure unit: Pa; speed unit: m/s): (a) pressure distribution under large flow conditions, (b) velocity distribution under large flow conditions, (c) pressure distribution under design conditions, (d) velocity distribution under design conditions, (e) pressure distribution under small flow conditions, and (f) velocity distribution under small flow conditions.

Figure 8 shows the symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of the second-order front guide vane of scheme III. It can be seen from Figure 8 that the pressure distribution under the large flow rate and the design conditions are more uniform compared with schemes I and II. In addition, the local low-pressure zones appear at the individual outlets under the small flow condition. The local low-pressure zones appear at the outlets of the front guide vanes under these three conditions. The velocity distributions under the large flow rate and the design condition are also relatively uniform, and the secondary flows and the vortexes are not obvious. The outlet speed of the guide vane is disordered under the small flow condition. As shown in Figure 5, the outlet angle of this scheme is smaller than the outlet angles in schemes I and II. According to the triangle of the outlet velocity of the front guide vane, the decrease in outlet angle results in a decrease in the outlet shaft surface speed, which generates a small impact on the outlet of the working surface, these effects result in a decrease in pressure and an increase in speed. The pressure at the outlet of the working face of the front guide vane changes evenly and does not produce significant secondary flows and vortexes. Due to the adequate transition between pressure energy and kinetic energy at the outlet of the front guide vane, a local low-pressure zone occurs. According to the requirements for the performance of MERHT, the scheme III is suitable for this MERHT.

Figure 8 
                  The symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of the second-order front guide vane of the scheme III (pressure unit Pa; speed unit: m/s): (a) pressure distribution under large flow conditions, (b) velocity distribution under large flow conditions, (c) pressure distribution under design conditions, (d) velocity distribution under design conditions, (e) pressure distribution under small flow conditions, and (f) velocity distribution under small flow conditions.
Figure 8

The symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of the second-order front guide vane of the scheme III (pressure unit Pa; speed unit: m/s): (a) pressure distribution under large flow conditions, (b) velocity distribution under large flow conditions, (c) pressure distribution under design conditions, (d) velocity distribution under design conditions, (e) pressure distribution under small flow conditions, and (f) velocity distribution under small flow conditions.

Figure 9 shows the symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of the second-order front guide vane of the scheme IV. It can be seen from Figure 9 that the pressure distribution under the three working conditions is uneven in the front guide vane. A local high pressure occurs at the joint of the arcs of a and b of the working face of the front guide vane, and a local low-pressure region appears at the outlet of the front guide vane. The speeds are also unevenly distributed under these three conditions, and the speed reaches the maximum at the joint of the arcs a and b. The velocity is disordered at the outlet of the front guide vane under small flow condition, generating obvious vortices and secondary flows. In scheme IV, r 4 = 133.5 mm which is smaller than the values in the first three schemes. As shown in Figure 5, the outlet angle is also the smallest one. According to the triangle of the outlet velocity of the front guide vane, the decrease in outlet angle results in a decrease in the outlet shaft surface speed, which generates a small impact on the outlet of the working surface, resulting in a decrease in pressure. At the joint of the arcs a and b, which locates at the outlet of the guide vane (see Figure 1), the fluid is subjected to a force points to the inlet of the front guide vane, resulting in a distinct secondary flow and vortex. Due to the transition between pressure energy and kinetic energy at the outlet of the front guide vane, a local low-pressure zone occurs. These results show that there is also a limit to the change of the arc radius and the angle of the outlet of the guide vane face. According to the performance requirements for MERHTs, scheme IV is not suitable for this MERHT.

Figure 9 
                  The symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of the second-order front guide vane of the scheme IV (pressure unit: Pa; speed unit: m/s): (a) pressure distribution under large flow conditions, (b) velocity distribution under large flow conditions, (b) pressure distribution under design conditions, (d) velocity distribution under design conditions, (e) pressure distribution under small flow conditions, and (f) velocity distribution under small flow conditions.
Figure 9

The symmetry plane pressure and velocity distribution of the second-order front guide vane of the scheme IV (pressure unit: Pa; speed unit: m/s): (a) pressure distribution under large flow conditions, (b) velocity distribution under large flow conditions, (b) pressure distribution under design conditions, (d) velocity distribution under design conditions, (e) pressure distribution under small flow conditions, and (f) velocity distribution under small flow conditions.

According to the above analysis, scheme III, with radius r 3 equals to 134 mm, is the best solution for the design of the guide vane of the MERHT. Based on these results, we can change the outer diameter D 4 in scheme III to ensure the best flow rate for the requirements. The relevant parameters of optimized front guide vane are given in Table 4, the corresponding airfoil shape is shown in Figure 10, and the three-dimensional solid model is shown in Figure 11.

Table 4

Relevant parameters of the front guide vane of the optimized runner guide vane (length unit: mm)

Series D 3 D 4 b 3 α 3 a 3 δ 3 φ Z 1
9 272 357 31.1 15.5° 24 2 9
Figure 10 
                  Airfoil type of the front guide vane of the optimized runner guide vane.
Figure 10

Airfoil type of the front guide vane of the optimized runner guide vane.

Figure 11 
                  The three-dimensional solid model of the optimized runner guide vane: (a) solid model and (b) solid model of the flow channel.
Figure 11

The three-dimensional solid model of the optimized runner guide vane: (a) solid model and (b) solid model of the flow channel.

The simulation results under typical working conditions were also obtained by the numerical simulations of three-dimensional turbulent flow by Fluent software, as shown in Table 5.

Table 5

The simulation results of the optimized runner guide vane turbine under typical working conditions

Estimated flow Q/(m3/h) Torque M n /(N m) Inlet pressure P in/(Pa) Outlet pressure P out/(Pa) Calculative mass flow Q m/(kg/s) Efficiency η h/(%) The conversion head H/(m)
135 −0.5218 4,72,832 202232.58 37.3453 761.85
150 146.7373 77,85,057 204296.28 41.3275 17.9 793.68
200 693.8386 91,24,898 204915.73 55.1438 53.8 930.28
250 1336.4696 10,990,798 206732.88 68.9600 68.5 1120.50
270 1630.8401 11,916,251 207321.31 74.4381 71.3 1214.85
300 2107.2806 13,479,565 208268.83 82.4986 73.5 1374.23
330 2579.7200 1,47,13,219 208286.98 91.3418 74.1 1500.0
360 3348.7838 1,79,28,766 209788.7 99.8922 72.6 1827.82
380 3844.3198 1,98,08,746 210606.33 104.9144 71.4 2019.49

It can be seen from Table 5 that the turbine works almost zero when the flow rate is reduced to 135 m3/h, showing that the turbine can no longer recover energy when the flow rate is reduced to below 50% of the design flow. Under the design condition, the recovery efficiency reaches the maximum value, the turbine works at the best condition. When the flow rate is greater than the design flow, its efficiency drops slightly. It can be seen that the closer the operating flow is to the design operating point, the higher the recovery efficiency. When the flow rate is greater than 270 m3/h, the recovery efficiency can reach over 70%.

6 Conclusion

  1. The efficiency of MERHT is related to the guide vane type and the radius of the guide vane arc. The performance of the runner vanes is apparently better than that of radial guide vanes. Changing the arc radius and outlet placement angle of the outlet section of the runner-type guide vane is an effective way to obtain a good guide vane, and there is an optimum value of these geometrical parameters. The outer diameter of the runner guide vanes can be optimized after obtaining the optimum arc radius and outlet placement angle, and the average efficiency of the optimized multistage ERHT model can be increased by 3.9%.

  2. The influence of the vane type on the performance of the ERHT is distinct. The solution to optimize the runner guide vane by the orthogonal test method is feasible and has achieved good results. It provides a good way for improving the performance of multistage energy hydraulic turbines. The method applied in this work can be also extend to optimize the structures, such as impeller, volute, etc., of the hydraulic turbine, which can further improve the performance of the hydraulic turbine.

Nomenclature

υ m

meridional velocity

R

radii

b

guide vane width

ψ

exclude coefficient

M

angular momentum

ω

angular velocity

u

circumferential velocity

β

established angle

settling angle

Z

number of blades

Greek symbols

Q

volume flow, m3 h−1

M n

torque, N m

H

height of water head, m

P

pressure, Pa

Q m

quality flow, kegs’−1

Acknowledgments

Project (13zx7145) supported by Research Foundation for PhD of Southwest University of Science and Technology (13zx7145). A Project Supported by Scientific Research Fund of Sichuan Provincial Education Department (18ZA0496).

References

[1] Diao WS. Study on application feasibility of hydraulic turbine in high-pressure hydrotreating unit. Petrol Refin Eng. 2008;38(7):33–5.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Waheed AR, Robert WP. Reverse running centrifugal pumps as hydraulic power recovery turbines for seawater reverse osmosis systems. Desalination. 1981;38:123–34.10.1016/S0011-9164(00)86054-3Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ramos H, Borga A. Pumps as turbines: an unconventional solution to energy production. Urban Water. 1999;1(3):261–3.10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00016-9Search in Google Scholar

[4] Punit S, Franz N. An optimization routine on a prediction model for the turbine operation of centrifugal pumps. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2010;34(2):152–64.10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2009.10.004Search in Google Scholar

[5] Yang JH, Yuan YF, Jiang YG. Performance predictions of reversed centrifugal pumps working as energy recovery turbines. J Lanzhou Univ Technol. 2010;36(1):54–6.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Qi XY, Li FC. Development of hydraulic model scheme of multistage energy recovery hydraulic turbine. J Lanzhou Univ Technol. 2011;37(4):56–60.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Shahram D, Ahmad N. Experimental study of characteristic curves of centrifugal pumps working as turbines in different specific speeds. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2008;32(3):800–7.10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2007.10.004Search in Google Scholar

[8] Chapallaz JM, Eichenberger P, Fischer G. Manual on pumps used as turbines. Berlin: Vieweg; 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Punit S, Franz N. An optimization routine on a prediction and selection model for the turbine operation of centrifugal pumps. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2010;34(2):152–64.10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2009.10.004Search in Google Scholar

[10] Joshi S, Gordon A, Holloway L. Selecting a high specific speed pump for low head hydro-electric power generation. Canadian Conf Electric Comput Eng. 2005:603–6.10.1109/CCECE.2005.1557003Search in Google Scholar

[11] Fernandez J, Blanco E, Parrondo J. Performance of a centrifugal pump running in inverse mode. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy. 2004;218(4):265–71.10.1243/0957650041200632Search in Google Scholar

[12] Jiang DJ, Yang XX. Influences of guide vanes on double-channel hydraulic turbine performance. J Gansu Agric Univ. 2012;47(2):147–51.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Golcu M, Pancar Y, Semkmen Y. Energy saving in a deep well pump with splitter biade. Energy Convers Manage. 2006;47(5):638–51.10.1016/j.enconman.2005.05.001Search in Google Scholar

[14] Tian YB, Wang J, Liang W. Optimal design schemes of centrifugal pump compound impeller at super-low specific speed. Chem Eng Trans. 2015;46:811–6.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Tian YB, Hu AJ. Study on critical speed of rotation in the multistage high speed centrifugal pumps rotors. Int J Heat Technol. 2018;36:31–9.10.18280/ijht.360105Search in Google Scholar

[16] Cao LH, Tu CY, Hu PF, Liu S. Influence of solid particle erosion (SPE) on safety and economy of steam turbines. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;150:552–63.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.172Search in Google Scholar

[17] Cao L, Tu C, Hu P, Liu S. Influence of solid particle erosion (SPE) on safety and economy of steam turbines. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;150:552–63.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.172Search in Google Scholar

[18] Han Y, Li J, Yang X, Liu W, Zhang Y. Dynamic prediction research of silicon content in hot metal driven by big data in blast furnace smelting process under hadoop cloud platform. Complexity. 2018;4:8079697.10.1155/2018/8079697Search in Google Scholar

[19] Yang A, Li S, Lin H, Jin D. Edge extraction of mineralogical phase based on fractal theory. Chaos Solit Fract. 2018;117:215–21.10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.028Search in Google Scholar

[20] Aidara S and Sagna Y. BSDEs driven by two mutually independent fractional Brownian motions with stochastic Lipschitz coefficients. Appl Math Nonlinear Sci. 2019;4(1):139–50.10.2478/AMNS.2019.1.00014Search in Google Scholar

[21] Assaye B, Alamneh M, Mishra LN, Mebrat Y. Dual skew Heyting almost distributive lattices. Appl Math Nonlinear Sci. 2019;4(1):151–62.10.2478/AMNS.2019.1.00015Search in Google Scholar

[22] Mundewadi RA and Kumbinarasaiah S. Numerical solution of Abel’s integral equations using Hermite wavelet. Appl Math Nonlinear Sci. 2019;4(1):169–80.10.2478/AMNS.2019.1.00017Search in Google Scholar

[23] Sagna Y. Multidimensional BSDE with Poisson jumps of Osgood type. Appl Math Nonlinear Sci. 2019;4(2):387–94.10.2478/AMNS.2019.2.00034Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-01-17
Revised: 2020-03-30
Accepted: 2020-04-20
Published Online: 2020-07-29

© 2020 Yabin Tian et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Model of electric charge distribution in the trap of a close-contact TENG system
  3. Dynamics of Online Collective Attention as Hawkes Self-exciting Process
  4. Enhanced Entanglement in Hybrid Cavity Mediated by a Two-way Coupled Quantum Dot
  5. The nonlinear integro-differential Ito dynamical equation via three modified mathematical methods and its analytical solutions
  6. Diagnostic model of low visibility events based on C4.5 algorithm
  7. Electronic temperature characteristics of laser-induced Fe plasma in fruits
  8. Comparative study of heat transfer enhancement on liquid-vapor separation plate condenser
  9. Characterization of the effects of a plasma injector driven by AC dielectric barrier discharge on ethylene-air diffusion flame structure
  10. Impact of double-diffusive convection and motile gyrotactic microorganisms on magnetohydrodynamics bioconvection tangent hyperbolic nanofluid
  11. Dependence of the crossover zone on the regularization method in the two-flavor Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model
  12. Novel numerical analysis for nonlinear advection–reaction–diffusion systems
  13. Heuristic decision of planned shop visit products based on similar reasoning method: From the perspective of organizational quality-specific immune
  14. Two-dimensional flow field distribution characteristics of flocking drainage pipes in tunnel
  15. Dynamic triaxial constitutive model for rock subjected to initial stress
  16. Automatic target recognition method for multitemporal remote sensing image
  17. Gaussons: optical solitons with log-law nonlinearity by Laplace–Adomian decomposition method
  18. Adaptive magnetic suspension anti-rolling device based on frequency modulation
  19. Dynamic response characteristics of 93W alloy with a spherical structure
  20. The heuristic model of energy propagation in free space, based on the detection of a current induced in a conductor inside a continuously covered conducting enclosure by an external radio frequency source
  21. Microchannel filter for air purification
  22. An explicit representation for the axisymmetric solutions of the free Maxwell equations
  23. Floquet analysis of linear dynamic RLC circuits
  24. Subpixel matching method for remote sensing image of ground features based on geographic information
  25. K-band luminosity–density relation at fixed parameters or for different galaxy families
  26. Effect of forward expansion angle on film cooling characteristics of shaped holes
  27. Analysis of the overvoltage cooperative control strategy for the small hydropower distribution network
  28. Stable walking of biped robot based on center of mass trajectory control
  29. Modeling and simulation of dynamic recrystallization behavior for Q890 steel plate based on plane strain compression tests
  30. Edge effect of multi-degree-of-freedom oscillatory actuator driven by vector control
  31. The effect of guide vane type on performance of multistage energy recovery hydraulic turbine (MERHT)
  32. Development of a generic framework for lumped parameter modeling
  33. Optimal control for generating excited state expansion in ring potential
  34. The phase inversion mechanism of the pH-sensitive reversible invert emulsion from w/o to o/w
  35. 3D bending simulation and mechanical properties of the OLED bending area
  36. Resonance overvoltage control algorithms in long cable frequency conversion drive based on discrete mathematics
  37. The measure of irregularities of nanosheets
  38. The predicted load balancing algorithm based on the dynamic exponential smoothing
  39. Influence of different seismic motion input modes on the performance of isolated structures with different seismic measures
  40. A comparative study of cohesive zone models for predicting delamination fracture behaviors of arterial wall
  41. Analysis on dynamic feature of cross arm light weighting for photovoltaic panel cleaning device in power station based on power correlation
  42. Some probability effects in the classical context
  43. Thermosoluted Marangoni convective flow towards a permeable Riga surface
  44. Simultaneous measurement of ionizing radiation and heart rate using a smartphone camera
  45. On the relations between some well-known methods and the projective Riccati equations
  46. Application of energy dissipation and damping structure in the reinforcement of shear wall in concrete engineering
  47. On-line detection algorithm of ore grade change in grinding grading system
  48. Testing algorithm for heat transfer performance of nanofluid-filled heat pipe based on neural network
  49. New optical solitons of conformable resonant nonlinear Schrödinger’s equation
  50. Numerical investigations of a new singular second-order nonlinear coupled functional Lane–Emden model
  51. Circularly symmetric algorithm for UWB RF signal receiving channel based on noise cancellation
  52. CH4 dissociation on the Pd/Cu(111) surface alloy: A DFT study
  53. On some novel exact solutions to the time fractional (2 + 1) dimensional Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky system arising in physical science
  54. An optimal system of group-invariant solutions and conserved quantities of a nonlinear fifth-order integrable equation
  55. Mining reasonable distance of horizontal concave slope based on variable scale chaotic algorithms
  56. Mathematical models for information classification and recognition of multi-target optical remote sensing images
  57. Hopkinson rod test results and constitutive description of TRIP780 steel resistance spot welding material
  58. Computational exploration for radiative flow of Sutterby nanofluid with variable temperature-dependent thermal conductivity and diffusion coefficient
  59. Analytical solution of one-dimensional Pennes’ bioheat equation
  60. MHD squeezed Darcy–Forchheimer nanofluid flow between two h–distance apart horizontal plates
  61. Analysis of irregularity measures of zigzag, rhombic, and honeycomb benzenoid systems
  62. A clustering algorithm based on nonuniform partition for WSNs
  63. An extension of Gronwall inequality in the theory of bodies with voids
  64. Rheological properties of oil–water Pickering emulsion stabilized by Fe3O4 solid nanoparticles
  65. Review Article
  66. Sine Topp-Leone-G family of distributions: Theory and applications
  67. Review of research, development and application of photovoltaic/thermal water systems
  68. Special Issue on Fundamental Physics of Thermal Transports and Energy Conversions
  69. Numerical analysis of sulfur dioxide absorption in water droplets
  70. Special Issue on Transport phenomena and thermal analysis in micro/nano-scale structure surfaces - Part I
  71. Random pore structure and REV scale flow analysis of engine particulate filter based on LBM
  72. Prediction of capillary suction in porous media based on micro-CT technology and B–C model
  73. Energy equilibrium analysis in the effervescent atomization
  74. Experimental investigation on steam/nitrogen condensation characteristics inside horizontal enhanced condensation channels
  75. Experimental analysis and ANN prediction on performances of finned oval-tube heat exchanger under different air inlet angles with limited experimental data
  76. Investigation on thermal-hydraulic performance prediction of a new parallel-flow shell and tube heat exchanger with different surrogate models
  77. Comparative study of the thermal performance of four different parallel flow shell and tube heat exchangers with different performance indicators
  78. Optimization of SCR inflow uniformity based on CFD simulation
  79. Kinetics and thermodynamics of SO2 adsorption on metal-loaded multiwalled carbon nanotubes
  80. Effect of the inner-surface baffles on the tangential acoustic mode in the cylindrical combustor
  81. Special Issue on Future challenges of advanced computational modeling on nonlinear physical phenomena - Part I
  82. Conserved vectors with conformable derivative for certain systems of partial differential equations with physical applications
  83. Some new extensions for fractional integral operator having exponential in the kernel and their applications in physical systems
  84. Exact optical solitons of the perturbed nonlinear Schrödinger–Hirota equation with Kerr law nonlinearity in nonlinear fiber optics
  85. Analytical mathematical schemes: Circular rod grounded via transverse Poisson’s effect and extensive wave propagation on the surface of water
  86. Closed-form wave structures of the space-time fractional Hirota–Satsuma coupled KdV equation with nonlinear physical phenomena
  87. Some misinterpretations and lack of understanding in differential operators with no singular kernels
  88. Stable solutions to the nonlinear RLC transmission line equation and the Sinh–Poisson equation arising in mathematical physics
  89. Calculation of focal values for first-order non-autonomous equation with algebraic and trigonometric coefficients
  90. Influence of interfacial electrokinetic on MHD radiative nanofluid flow in a permeable microchannel with Brownian motion and thermophoresis effects
  91. Standard routine techniques of modeling of tick-borne encephalitis
  92. Fractional residual power series method for the analytical and approximate studies of fractional physical phenomena
  93. Exact solutions of space–time fractional KdV–MKdV equation and Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky equation
  94. Approximate analytical fractional view of convection–diffusion equations
  95. Heat and mass transport investigation in radiative and chemically reacting fluid over a differentially heated surface and internal heating
  96. On solitary wave solutions of a peptide group system with higher order saturable nonlinearity
  97. Extension of optimal homotopy asymptotic method with use of Daftardar–Jeffery polynomials to Hirota–Satsuma coupled system of Korteweg–de Vries equations
  98. Unsteady nano-bioconvective channel flow with effect of nth order chemical reaction
  99. On the flow of MHD generalized maxwell fluid via porous rectangular duct
  100. Study on the applications of two analytical methods for the construction of traveling wave solutions of the modified equal width equation
  101. Numerical solution of two-term time-fractional PDE models arising in mathematical physics using local meshless method
  102. A powerful numerical technique for treating twelfth-order boundary value problems
  103. Fundamental solutions for the long–short-wave interaction system
  104. Role of fractal-fractional operators in modeling of rubella epidemic with optimized orders
  105. Exact solutions of the Laplace fractional boundary value problems via natural decomposition method
  106. Special Issue on 19th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  107. Joint use of eddy current imaging and fuzzy similarities to assess the integrity of steel plates
  108. Uncertainty quantification in the design of wireless power transfer systems
  109. Influence of unequal stator tooth width on the performance of outer-rotor permanent magnet machines
  110. New elements within finite element modeling of magnetostriction phenomenon in BLDC motor
  111. Evaluation of localized heat transfer coefficient for induction heating apparatus by thermal fluid analysis based on the HSMAC method
  112. Experimental set up for magnetomechanical measurements with a closed flux path sample
  113. Influence of the earth connections of the PWM drive on the voltage constraints endured by the motor insulation
  114. High temperature machine: Characterization of materials for the electrical insulation
  115. Architecture choices for high-temperature synchronous machines
  116. Analytical study of air-gap surface force – application to electrical machines
  117. High-power density induction machines with increased windings temperature
  118. Influence of modern magnetic and insulation materials on dimensions and losses of large induction machines
  119. New emotional model environment for navigation in a virtual reality
  120. Performance comparison of axial-flux switched reluctance machines with non-oriented and grain-oriented electrical steel rotors
  121. Erratum
  122. Erratum to “Conserved vectors with conformable derivative for certain systems of partial differential equations with physical applications”
Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2020-0141/html
Scroll to top button