Startseite Technik Flow and irreversible mechanism of pure and hybridized non-Newtonian nanofluids through elastic surfaces with melting effects
Artikel Open Access

Flow and irreversible mechanism of pure and hybridized non-Newtonian nanofluids through elastic surfaces with melting effects

  • Hashim , Sohail Rehman EMAIL logo , Mehdi Akermi EMAIL logo und Samia Nasr
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. Februar 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The significance of nanofluid research in nanotechnology, pharmaceutical, drug delivery, food preparation, and chemotherapy employing single- and two-phase nanofluid models has drawn the attention of researchers. The Tiwari–Das model does not capture the diffusion and random movement of nanoparticles (NPs) when they are injected into complex functional fluids. In order to fix the peculiar behavior of NPs, more complex models like the Buongiorno model are coupled with the single-phase model. To examine the heat-mass transfer attributes of nanofluids, a single- and two-phase mixture model is coupled for the first time. The effect of hybrid NPs on the hemodynamic properties of the blood flow through a stretched surface with interface slip in the neighborhood of the stagnation point is examined. Due to their significance in medicinal uses and nominal toxicity, blood is loaded with zinc–iron ( ZnO F e 2 O 3 ) NPs. However, blood is speculated to have the hematocrit viscosity of the Powell–Eyring fluid. The single-phase model predicts an improvement in heat transport due to an increased volumetric friction of NPs, while the two-phase models provide closer estimates of heat-mass transfer due to Brownian and thermophoretic phenomena. Entropy evaluation predicts the details of irreversibility. The mathematical structures are effectively solved with a Runge–Kutta fourth-order algorithm along with a shooting mechanism. The Eyring–Powell parameters decrease the drag coefficient and mass/thermal transport rate. A higher estimation of the slip, material, and magnetic parameters decreases the flow behavior. The Bejan number increases with the diffusion parameter and decreases as the magnetic and Brinkman numbers increase. The effect of iron oxide ( F e 2 O 3 ) is observed to be dominant.

Nomenclature

a , b > 0

Constant ( s 1 )

x , y

Cartesian coordinates

V = ( u , v , 0 )

Velocity field

u , u w , u slip

Velocities ( m s 1 )

u

Far-field velocity ( m s 1 )

T , T w , T

Fluid, wall, and ambient temperatures ( K )

S

Cauchy stress tensor

C , T

Gradient of concentration and temperature

D B

Brownian diffusion ( m 2 s 1 )

D T

Thermophoresis diffusion ( m 2 s 1 )

( ρ c p ) f

Fluid heat capacitance

( ρ c p ) p

Nanoparticle’s heat capacitance

p

Pressure ( N m 2 )

c p

Specific heat ( J kg 1 K 1 )

k f

Thermal conductivity ( W m 1 K 1 )

D

Slip coefficient

δ

Heat potential

C s

Solid surface heat capacity ( J kg 1 K 1 )

T m

Melting temperature ( K )

f

Dimensionless velocity

Θ

Dimensionless temperature

ψ

Dimensionless concentration

N 1

Slip parameter

τ w

Stress tensor component at the wall

q w

Wall heat flux ( W m 2 )

q m

Wall mass flux ( k g m 2 s 1 )

Re

Reynold number

Pr

Prandtl number

Ω , ϵ

Material parameters

Rd

Radiation parameter

N b

Brownian diffusion parameter

N t

Thermophoresis diffusion parameter

σ

Electrical conductivity ( S m 1 )

σ *

Stephan–Boltzmann constant ( W m 2 K 4 )

φ hnf = φ 1 + φ 2

Volume friction of φ 1 and φ 2

A 1

Rivlin–Ericksen tensor

q r

Radiative heat flux

k *

Mean absorption coefficient ( c m 1 )

J

Current density ( A m 2 )

B 0

Magnetic field ( W m 2 )

β

Material parameter (1 / P a )

γ

Second material parameter (1 / s )

C

Fluid concentration ( kg m 3 )

C , C 0

Ambient and reference concentration ( kg m 3 )

ρ f

Fluid density ( kg m 3 )

ρ p

Nanoparticle’s density ( kg m 3 )

μ f

Dynamic viscosity ( kg m 1 s 1 )

η

Similarity variable

E G

Entropy generation ( W m 3 K 1 )

R

Molar gas constant ( J K 1 mol 1 )

N g

Dimensionless entropy

Br

Brinkman number

C f

Skin friction

D 1

Diffusion parameter

Nu

Nusselt number

Sh

Sherwood number

Be

Bejan number

B

Ratio parameter

M

Magnetic number

Ec

Eckert number

Le

Lewis number

M t

Melting parameter

A 1 , A 2

Temperature and concentration ratio parameters

1 Introduction

A stagnating point is a location in fluid mechanics where the prevailing fluid velocity is stationary. This point designates where the flow splits and travels on both sides of the surface as it moves towards it. When a fluid confronts an impermeable solid barrier, such as on an airplane wing or a vibrating cylinder submerged in fluid, stagnation-point flows take place. These flow patterns exhibit a fluid stagnation point, and the streamlines around it show a local resemblance to those around a saddle point. Blood flow at an arterial junction is another instance that is really intriguing. Stagnation-point flows, which describe the fluid flow near the stagnant area at the leading edge of a blunt-nosed physique, exist on all moving solid objects. The amount of pressure, energy transfer, and mass deposit rates in the stagnation area are all at their highest levels. In light of many potential applications of this subject in fields like the aviation sector, nuclear reactor cooling, and fan-cooled chilling of electronic equipment, the boundary layer dynamics around stagnation points are highly valued by researchers. Hiemenz [1], for the first time, investigated the two-dimensional fluid of a stagnant state flow of viscous liquids in 1911. Petschek et al. [2] carried out preliminary experimental studies on the stagnation point flow in 1968. They used dog ex vivo blood, which was drawn and injected into the flow cavity. Microscopically, the accumulation of blood elements was observed. The enhanced technique utilized by Reininger et al. [3] involved the leading passage of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) into the flow cavity. Homann [4] provided the precise solution of an axisymmetric flow subject to an incompressible viscous fluid model. Ishak et al. [5] refined the boundary layer flow at the stagnation point when a magnetic field is present. Van Gorder and Vajravelu [6] investigated the stagnant point flow of second-grade fluid via a flat stretched surface. Fang et al. [7] discussed the unsteady incompressible flow with mass transfer under the region of the stagnation point. Bachok et al. [8] provided a computational solution to the stagnation point boundary layer flow through the stretching surface and the assumption of nanosized particles.

The flow and heat-mass transfer mechanism of an incompressible non-Newtonian and viscous fluid flow over a stretchable surface has attracted the attention of researchers. This phenomenon exhibits wide-range applications in manufacturing and scientific processes, such as the fabrication of paper and fiberglass, wire drawing, polymer, and high temperatures such as nuclear power plants, gas turbines, thermal energy, solar power gadgets, and electrical power generation. Several investigators have focused on the investigation of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow across a stretched sheet because of its significant use in manufacturing and industrial processes. Metallurgy, MHD production, solar and stellar structures, and radio transmission via the stratosphere are a few of these potential uses. Crane [9] first explored the extensible sheet problem for the fluid flow using the closed-form solution. Munawar et al. [10] established the exact solution to the flow problem with slip effects between two extending plates. Waini et al. [11] studied the time-dependent flow behavior and heat transfer phenomena through stretched/shrunk sheets containing hybrid nanofluid. In order to investigate the effects of variable viscosity on the boundary layer flow past a stretched surface, Manjunatha et al. [12] investigated the effects of hybrid nanofluids. Devi and Devi [13] investigated the effects of Newtonian heating and the Lorentz force on the 3D flow characteristics of a hybrid nanofluid interacting with a stretched sheet. Miklavčič and Wang [14] discussed the time-independent flow behavior using a shrunk sheet. They concluded that the mass suction works to create the flow across a contracting sheet. Tie-Gang et al. [15] established the viscous time-dependent concept of fluid flow using a shrinking sheet. Fang [16] and Fang and Zhang [17] investigated the power-law importance of the boundary layer flow process. Rohni et al. [18] carried out the heat transfer and flow mechanism using a shrinking sheet under the assumption of suction effects.

The poor thermal conductivity of the functional fluid in the border layer flow and energy transfer problems restrict the improvement in the transfer of heat. However, from the perspective of energy conservation, the continued miniaturization of electronic systems necessitates further advancements in heat transmission. The nanofluid is the consequence of the mixing of the working fluid and nanoparticles (NPs) with distinctive chemical and physical characteristics. It is anticipated that the NPs will increase the thermal conductivity of nanofluid and, hence, significantly improve its ability to transmit heat. Choi and Eastman [19] originated the concept of nanofluid, which was noted for its outstanding heat transmission and cooling capabilities. Choi introduced nanotechnology as a mixture of nanomaterials ( < 100 nm in size) and discovered that the regular fluid and nanofluid treatment had significant chemical and physical characteristics. As reported in previous studies [20, 21,22], the fundamental composition of nanomaterials has the potential to influence the variation in temperature. Following the single-phase machines of the nanofluid model suggested by Tiwari and Das [23], the effect of small particle fractional volume on the hydrodynamic migration within two perpendicular permeable surfaces advancing in reverse directions was explored. They experienced a decrease in the nanoliquid temperature distribution after increasing the particle fractional volume. Buongiorno [24] addressed the use of hybridization platforms, controlling temperature, and thermal exchangers in household freezers and clarified this concept by studying the thermophoretic and Brownian movement of nanoparticles. Several frameworks for studying nanofluids have been proposed by researchers using the concept given by Buongiorno [24], and Tiwari and Das's concepts have received the utmost attention. Rafiq et al. [25] examined the effects of Hall and particle slip on the peristaltic velocity of the nanofluid using the Buongiorno nanofluid framework for biomedical purposes and discovered that when thermophoresis and Brownian motion increase, the temperature consequently increases. Mekheimer et al. [26] investigated the properties of the blood-gold transport as a third-grade nanofluid in the catheter using the Buongiorno nanofluid model and discovered that the body temperature of the nanofluid raises via a greater thermophoresis force. Ahmed and Nadeem [27] solved a blood flow model using NPs ( Cu , A l 2 O 3 , Ti O 2 ) as antimicrobial agents in sick arteries using the Cauchy–Euler technique. NPs are extremely fragile because they quickly interact with other substances, causing the size of the particles to change.

Hybridized nanofluid is one of the novel categories of nanofluids and has recently piqued the interest of researchers. Hybrid nanofluids are made in two ways: two or more types of nanomaterials are entangled with the base fluid, and composite NPs are dispersed in the base fluid. The implementation of these nanofluids can improve the heat transfer rates. Due to their lower production costs, researchers and industrialists are taking an interest in this subject. Metal NPs’ intrinsic qualities, such as zinc oxide ( ZnO ) and iron ( F e 2 O 3 ), are primarily defined by their size, content, crystallization, and shape. The physical, chemical, mechanical, functional, morphological, and spectral characteristics of materials can be altered by shrinking them to the nanoscale. These reformed properties enable NPs to interact with cell biologic molecules in a novel way, facilitating the physical transport of NPs into inner cellular structures [28]. Nanostructured materials contain a higher percentage of atoms on their surface, and they have a high surface reactivity. Thus, nanostructures have recently gained prominence in basic and applied sciences, as well as nanotechnology in biological sciences. Zinc is identified naturally as assisting molecules that aid approximately 300 enzymes associated with diverse body functions. After iron, zinc is the most important and abundant significant component of the human body, accounting for 30 mm (2–4 g) of the total body zinc content. Most zinc is found in the eye, kidneys, liver, muscles, bones, prostate gland, and brain [29]. Zinc deficiency has been linked to vision problems such as hazy cataracts and poor night vision. A lack of zinc puts patients at risk for alopecia (hair loss from the eyelids and brows), increased susceptibility to infections, and mental lethargy. In humans, zinc deficiency promotes cell damage and the development of malignancies, which can lead to cancer. Thus, zinc-accelerated cancer chemoprevention is useful in the prevention and treatment of many malignancies. Zinc insufficiency is typically caused by insufficient zinc absorption or ingestion, increased zinc losses in the body, or increased zinc plea [30]. Loss of appetite, growth retardation, and impaired immune function are symptoms of zinc deficiency [31,32]. Taste changes, weight loss, reduced cognition, delayed appetite, and prolonged wound healing are all possible causes of insufficiency of zinc [33,34,35]. Superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs, on the other hand, provide appealing potential for improving site-specific drug administration due to their transportation to selected locations by an external magnetic field [36,37]. They have also been proposed for improving the contrast of magnetic resonance imaging in cancer detection [38,39], which may be combined with localized heat treatments in a so-called theragnostic method [40]. Despite this potential advantage, only a small number of NPs containing iron centers have received clinical approval [41,42,43]. The US Food and Drug Administration licensed Ferumoxides as the first NP-based iron oxide diagnostic agents for the detection of liver lesions in 1996. Several investigations on non-Newtonian nanofluid flow may be found in previous studies [44,45,46].

Clinical and medical investigators have been attracted by the flow of blood in a blood vessel since it is important in cell tissue engineering, medication targeting, and multiple therapies such as hyperthermia and cancer. Numerous non-Newtonian rheological fluids, such as Carreau fluid, tangential hyperbolic fluid, Eyring–Powell fluid, and viscoelastic fluid, exhibit blood flow characteristics. The Powell–Eyring fundamental model is widely used to illustrate blood viscoelasticity. Blood is the most important non-Newtonian viscoelastic multi-component liquid in nature, consisting of plasma, platelets, white blood cells, red blood cells, and so on. Powell and Eyring developed a new fluid model known as the Eyring–Powell fluid model in 1944 [47]. These viscoelastic fluids play an important role in physiology and industry. The Eyring–Powell nanofluid model, among other models, can be used to obtain reliable findings for viscous nanofluid at low and high shear rates. Human blood is the greatest example of an Eyring–Powell nanofluid with low shear rates (<100 s 1 ) . The investigation of NPs subject to the Eyring–Powell fluid was avoided by many researchers due to the complicated mathematical description of this model in a stretched surface flow. Asha and Sunitha [48] conducted additional research on the mixed convection peristaltic flow of the Eyring–Powell nanofluid with a magnetic field in a non-uniform channel. Noreen and Qasim [49] investigated the peristaltic flow of the MHD Eyring–Powell fluid in a channel.

Entropy production and minimization (EGM) is regarded as a viable strategy for improving the functionality of energy devices. The thermodynamic features of any mechanical structure are demarcated utilizing the thermodynamic fundamental laws, which assert that the evolution of entropy continuously increases in thermodynamic systems. The production of entropy is connected to the conservation nature of thermodynamics, e.g., if irreversibility increases, the value of the whole system's work shrinks. The well-known emergence of tiny molecules in normally administered materials can have a profound effect on the overall foundation of entropy. As a result, using nanotechnology in controlled heat domains depresses the heat of the structure, lowering the prospective involvement of energy transfer to the overall rate of entropy. Bejan [50] initially examined the entropy in convective heat transmission. Afterward, multiple models for lowering entropy generation for various geometries have been suggested by Hayat et al. [51]. The effects of thermodynamics and Bejan on Powell–Eyring liquid were addressed by Nisar et al. [52]. This qualitative study found that the amount of entropy rate decreases as fluid variables increase. Through a divergent channel, Basha and Sivaraj [53] examined the coefficient of entropy for the peristaltic radiant Powell–Eyring nanoliquid. They found that the total entropy rate decreases as the temperature divergence parameter increases. Using electrostatic pressure and heat radiation, Guedri et al. [54] reported the peristaltic transport of a modified hybridized nanoliquid within an entangled channel. They found that the irreversibility parameter diminishes close to the walls.

The stagnation point flow of the Eyring–Powell fluid over an extensible sheet in the presence of Eyring–Powell viscous dissipation under an inclined Lorentz force and the contribution of entropy generation with single- and two-phase nanofluid models effects have not been studied so far. We took into account the Brownian motion and thermophoresis in the context of Buongiorno [24] and Tiwari and Das [23] hybrid nanofluid volume friction concept in order to fulfill the discrepancy in the existing literature. To the best of our knowledge, no research has been done on the impact of entropy production on the stagnation point flow of the Eyring–Powell fluid model through a stretched sheet with heat and mass transfer within the framework of two distinct nanofluid models. The Eyring–Powell model, resembling blood rheology, is considered as blood in this communication. Two different NPs (zinc ZnO and iron oxide F e 2 O 3 NPs) with homogenous sizes and different thermo–chemi–physical attributes are dipped in an Eyring–Powell fluid, and hence a mixture of hybrid blood nanofluid is established. The single-phase nanofluid accounts for the physical features of NPs by incorporating the density, viscosity, heat capacitance attributes, and electrical conductivity of two different NPs with precise volumetric friction in a working liquid. Meanwhile, the two-phase model accounts for the slip mechanism of NPs, including Brownian and thermophoretic phenomena. With the deployment of the stress tensor of the Eyring–Powell fluid, Lorentz force as body forces, and Buongiorno theory in the conservation equation, the governing equations are established. Realistic boundary conditions, such as the melting effect and wall slips, are considered to attain real-world applications. These equations are resolved computationally using the Runge–Kutta–Fehlberg technique together with the shooting procedure. In-depth analyses are performed on the effects of various physical quantities. The findings of this study can be interpreted with significant implications for biomedical science, the drug sector, biological product polymer amalgamated materials, environment-responsive demos, microbial lubrication extraction, biosensors, and bioengineering.

2 Problem declaration and model development

On an elongated sheet, a time-independent, incompressible flow with a stagnation region (Power–Eyring fluid) is considered. We estimate the thermal–chemical parameters of hybrid nanofluids using the renowned Buongiorno’s and Tiwari–Das models, which enables us to manipulate the appealing aspects of Brownian motion and thermophoretic diffusion and NP volumetric friction in conjunction. An inclined transverse magnetic field B 0 located at an angle ω is applied to the plate, with the influence of the induced magnetic field being ignored due to the lower magnetic Reynolds number. Figure 1(a) and (b) shows the physical framework execution. With a velocity of u = u = bx (where b is the positive constant), the surface of the sheet is stretching. Thermal and concentration transport takes place because of the utilization of the magnetic effect B 0 along the y-axis. The sheet temperature is maintained at T w while the wall temperature far away from the surface is kept at T . As illustrated in Figure 1(a) and (b), the system of Cartesian coordinates is selected so that the x-axis runs down the vertically expanding surface at y = 0 and the liquid filled area is considered at y > 0 . The velocity near the boundary is considered to be u = u w + u slip . The mainstream flow is believed to be in the direction of the y-axis, designated along the length of the moving plate, while the y -axis is perpendicular to it, and the x coordinate of the velocity components u varies in the y directions. It is assumed that the shape and size of the nanomaterials in the hybrid nanofluid are homogenous, and the impact of these particles clumping together is ignored. In this work, zinc ( ZnO ) and iron oxide ( F e 2 O 3 ) NPs are taken into account. The base fluid and the NPs are combined in a stable manner while creating hybrid nanofluids. The temperature of the blood is higher than that of the vein walls T > T w , while T w > T . The vein wall internal fats can be melt with the utilization of higher melting heat. Since the proper representation of blood flow in veins, especially in the aorta, can be scrutinized with the inclusion of stretching surfaces and stagnation points, they act as a plaque at the artery's internal interface. The main equations for continuity, the momentum, mass concentration, and heat in laminar boundary layer flow in a blood-based hybrid nanofluid can be stated as follows under these presumptions and using the model proposed by Tiwari–Das and Buongiorno model.

Figure 1 
               (a) and (b) Flow geometry and distribution of the flow.
Figure 1

(a) and (b) Flow geometry and distribution of the flow.

Starting from the conservation laws and thermodynamics principle [55,56,57],

(1) ρ hnf ( · V ) = 0 ,

(2) ρ hnf ( V · V ) = div S + J × B ,

(3) ( ρ c p ) hnf ( V · T ) = k hnf 2 T + ( ρ c p ) p D B C · T + D T T T · T + S · L · q r + J · J σ f ,

( V · C ) = D B 2 C + D T T 2 T ,

where S is the Cauchy stress tensor, p is the fluid pressure, ρ hnf is the nanofluid viscosity, and I is the unit tensor. k hnf , ( ρ c p ) hnf , and ( ρ c p ) p are the thermal conductivity and heat capacitances of hybrid nanofluid and NPs, respectively. D B and D T are the coefficients of Brownian and thermophoretic diffusion, C and T are the concentration and temperature differentials, and T , T , and C are the ambient and blood temperature and concentration, respectively. Furthermore, A 1 denotes the Rivlin–Ericksen tensor given by [58]

(5) S = pI + μ f A 1 + 1 β | A 1 | sin h 1 1 γ | A 1 | A 1 ,

(6) A 1 = grad V + grad V T r ,   | A 1 | = 1 2 tr ( A 1 2 ) ,

where V = ( u , v , 0 ) is the velocity vector. The velocity components u , v signify the flow in the x , directions. denotes the matrix transpose, μ f is the dynamic viscosity, β and γ are E-Powell fluid properties with dimensions 1 / P a and 1 / s , respectively.

Using the second-order approximations of the sin h 1 function and ignoring the upper term, we obtain

(7) sin h 1 1 γ | A 1 | | A 1 | γ | A 1 | 3 γ 3 , | A 1 | γ 1 .

J denotes the density of an electrical current in motion under the action of a magnetic field B [59].

(8) J = σ hnf ( E + V × B ) = σ hnf ( V × B ) .

Furthermore, assuming an electrical field E = 0 , the physical relations shown below apply. Thus,

(9) J × B = σ hnf B 0 2 sin ω 2 ( u u ) .

The conceptual framework of radiant heat flow can be stated using the fast-acting Rosseland estimation as follows [60]:

(10) q r = 4 σ * 3 k * T 4 y .

In the previously written equation, k * and σ * represent the absorption and Stefan–Boltzmann quantities. The preceding equation can also be expressed as follows:

(11) q r = 4 σ * 3 k * T 3 T y .

The nanofluid originated by dissolving iron F e 2 O 3 and ZnO NPs in uncontaminated blood (base fluid) with a molar volumetric friction of φ hnf . Thus, at a contact volume, friction of φ 1 , magnesium ZnO and F e 2 O 3 NPs were used. To create a hybrid nanofluid, φ 1 and φ 2 are disseminated in the fluid. The volumetric concentration coefficient of hybrid nanoliquid is demarcated as φ hnf = φ 1 + φ 2 . The P–Eyring fluid model constitutive equations originated from the molecular liquid model. The P–Eyring fluid model exhibits viscous fluid at high and low deformation rates. The power-law fluid model, on the other hand, describes an unlimited realistic viscosity at a low shear rate, restricting its applicability. The y-momentum equation is now easily simplified to p y 0 , using the traditional boundary layer approach. That is, particularly for viscoelastic fluids, the applied pressure remains constant across the boundary layer, allowing it to be calculated from the inviscid flow outside the boundary layer. Now, using the Bernoulli equation (without taking into account the hydrostatic factor) to substitute 1 ρ f p y = u d u d x , one can ignore viscoelastic effects beyond the boundary layer [61]. The resulting governing equations and realistic boundary conditions are as follows[62,63]:

(12) u x + v y = 0 ,

(13) ρ hnf u u x + v v y = u d u d x + μ hnf + 1 β γ 2 u y 2 1 2 β γ 3 u y 3 2 u y 2 σ hnf B 0 2 sin ω 2 ( u u ) ,

(14) ( ρ c p ) hnf u T x + v T y = k hnf + 16 σ * T 3 3 κ * 2 T y 2 + μ nf + 1 β γ u y 2 1 6 β γ 3 u y 4 + ( ρ c p ) P D B C y T y + D T T T y 2 + σ hnf B 0 2 sin ω 2 u 2 ,

(15) u C x + v C y = D B 2 C y 2 + D T T 2 T y 2 .

Table 1

Mathematical correlation for hybrid and working fluids

Characteristics Empirical correlations
Density of the hybrid nanofluid ρ hnf = ( 1 φ hnf ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 + φ 2 ρ s 2
Coupled relation for first and second NPs φ hnf = φ 1 + φ 2
Viscosity of the hybrid nanofluid μ hnf = μ f ( 1 φ hnf ) 2.5
Heat capacitance of the hybrid nanofluid ( ρ C p ) hnf = ( 1 φ hnf ) ( ρ C p ) f + φ 1 ( ρ C p ) s 1 + φ 2 ( ρ C p ) s 2
Electrical conductivity of the hybrid nanofluid σ hnf σ f = φ 1 ρ s 1 + φ 2 ρ s 2 φ hnf + 2 σ f + 2 ( φ 1 ρ s 1 + φ 2 ρ s 2 ) 2 φ hnf σ f φ 1 ρ s 1 + φ 2 ρ s 2 φ hnf + 2 σ f ( φ 1 ρ s 1 + φ 2 ρ s 2 ) + φ hnf σ f
Thermal conductivity of the hybrid nanofluid κ hnf κ f = φ 1 k s 1 + φ 2 k s 2 φ hnf + 2 k f + 2 ( φ 1 k s 1 + φ 2 k s 2 ) 2 φ hnf k f φ 1 k s 1 + φ 2 k s 2 φ hnf + 2 k f ( φ 1 k s 1 + φ 2 k s 2 ) + φ hnf k f

The transportation problem pertinent boundary prerequisites are [64,65]

(16) u = u w + u slip = ax + D μ f μ hnf + 1 β γ u y 1 6 β γ 3 u y 3 , v = 0 , T = T w , C = C w y 0 , k hnf T y = ρ hnf [ δ + C s ( T m T w ) ] v ( x , 0 ) y 0 , u u = bx , T T , C C } , as y .

The physical interest parameters are as follows:

2.1 Skin friction

(17) C f = τ w ρ hnf u w 2 , where τ w = μ hnf + 1 β Y 1 u y 1 6 β γ 3 u y 3 at y 0 .

2.2 Heat transport rate

(18) Nu = x q w k hnf ( T T w ) , where q w = k hnf k f + 16 σ * T 3 3 κ * T y at y 0 .

2.3 Mass transport rate coefficient

(19) Sh = x q m D B ( C C w ) , where q m = D B C y at y 0 .

Here, u is the free stream velocity, μ hnf is the density of the hybrid nanofluid, T m and T w are the melting and wall temperatures at the surface, and σ hnf is the electrical conductivity of the nanofluid. The potential heat of the fluid is represented by δ , the thermal conductivity of the nanofluid is given by k hnf , and the solid surface heat capacity is given by C s . ρ hnf is the hybrid nanoliquid density, β and γ are material properties of the Eyring–Powell fluid, and D is slip at the wall.

Including the similarity modification below to convert the aforementioned PDEs into ODEs [64,66], we have

(20) η = y a ν f , u = ax f ( η ) , v = a ν f f ( η ) , Θ ( η ) = T T w T T 0 , ψ ( η ) = C C w C C 0 .

After using the aforementioned transformations, the continuity equation (Eq. (12)) remains valid, and subsequent flow equations adopt the following form:

(21) ( H 2 + Ω ) f ϵ Ω f f 2 + H 1 f f H 1 f 2 H 3 M sin ω 2 ( f B ) + B 2 = 0 ,

(22) ( H 5 + Rd ) Θ H 4 Pr ( Θ f f Θ ) + Br H 5 ( H 2 + Ω ) f 2 1 3 Ω ϵ f 4 + H 3 M Brsin ω 2 ( f B ) 2 H 5 + Pr ( N b Θ ψ + N t Θ 2 ) = 0 ,

(23) ψ + PrLe f ψ + N t N b Θ = 0 .

(24) As η 0 : f ( 0 ) = 1 + N 1 ( H 2 + Ω ) f ( 0 ) 1 3 Ω ϵ f 3 ( 0 ) , f ( 0 ) + H 5 H 1 Pr M t Θ ( 0 ) = 0 , Θ ( 0 ) = 0 , ψ ( 0 ) = 0 .

(25) As η : f ( ) = B , Θ ( ) = 1 , ψ ( ) = 1 .

Ω = u w 2 a 2 ν f γ , ϵ = 1 β γ μ f , B = b a , N 1 = D a ν f , Pr = ( μ c p ) f k f , Rd = 16 σ * T 3 3 κ * ( ρ c p ) f , Ec = u w 2 ( ρ c p ) f ( T w T ) ,   Br = PrEc , M t = ( c p ) f ( T T 0 ) ϵ + C s ( T w T 0 ) , M = σ f B 0 2 ρ f c , N b = τ 1 D B ( C w C ) ν f , N t = τ 1 D T ( T w T ) ν f T , and Le = ν f D B

are the parametric variables in the flow equations.

(26) H 1 = ρ hnf ρ f , H 2 = μ hnf μ f , H 3 = σ hnf σ f , H 4 = ( ρ c p ) hnf ( ρ c p ) f , H 5 = k hnf k f

are the thermo–chemical–physical quantity ratios of the hybrid nanofluid vs base fluid. The mathematical formulas and numerical values of these quantities are given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

3 Entropy modeling

In the current situation, entropy development entails four processes: viscous extinction, bulk diffusion, transfer of heat, and Joule dissipation. For an Eyring–Powell nanofluid, the entropy equation is [66,67,68]

(27) E G = 1 ( T T 0 ) 2 k hnf k f + 16 σ * T 3 3 κ * T y 2 + 1 ( T T 0 ) μ hnf + 1 β Y 1 u y 2 1 6 β Y 1 3 u y 4 + 1 ( T T 0 ) σ hnf B 0 2 ( u V ) 2 + R D B ( C C 0 ) C y 2 + R D T ( T T 0 ) C y T y .

The final shape of entropy development is characterized as

(28) N g = ( T T 0 ) 2 η y k ( T T w ) 2 E G .

The dimensionless form of the entropy equation after incorporating Eq. (13) is

(29) N g = A 1 ( H 5 + Rd ) Θ 2 + Br H 5 ( H 2 + Ω ) f 2 1 3 Ω ϵ f 4 + H 3 M Br ( f B ) 2 H 5 + D 1 A 2 A 1 ψ 2 + D 1 ψ Θ .

The Bejan number is established as follows:

(30) Be = ( H 5 + Rd ) Θ 2 ( H 5 + Rd ) Θ 2 + Br H 5 ( H 2 + Ω ) f 2 1 3 Ω ϵ f 4 + H 3 M Br ( f B ) 2 H 5 + D 1 A 2 A 1 ψ 2 + D 1 ψ Θ .

A 1 = ( T T 0 ) T , A 2 = ( C C 0 ) C , D 1 = R D B ( C C 0 ) k f , Br = μ f a 2 x 2 ( T T 0 ) k f .

Table 2 displays the thermo–chemical–physical characteristics of fluids and NPs.

Table 2

Thermo–chemical–physical attributes of fluids (blood) and nanomaterial experimental values [69,70,71]

Physical characteristics Base fluid (blood) F e 2 O 3 ZnO
ρ ( kg m 3 ) 1,053 5,180 5,600
c p ( J kg 1 K 1 ) 3,594 670 0.880
k ( W m 1 K 1 ) 0.492 9.7 1.046
σ ( S m 1 ) 6.67 × 10 1 0.74 × 10 6 0.7267
ρ c p ( J K 1 m 3 ) 3.7 × 10 6 3.4 × 10 6 4.9 × 10 3
Pr 21

4 Details of the solution scheme

The conditions at the boundary equations (Eqs (24) and (25)) in conjunction with the dimensionless standard differential equations (Eqs (21)–(23)) are precisely nonlinear. Calculating the correct responses to the aforementioned boundary value problem is quite challenging. By using any suitable computational scheme, we must calculate the approximations of the acceptable solutions to the problem at hand. Here, in the current investigation, we have used the Runge–Kutta–Fehlberg technique together with the shooting procedure to find computational solutions of dimensionless differential equations (Eqs (21)–(23)) together with boundary conditions. This computational system resolves an initial value problem. In this quantitative approach, the non-dimensional differential equations (Eqs (21)–(23)) are first converted into first-order differential equations, and five initial conditions are then required. However, the missing (unknown) requirements are four initial conditions, each of Y 1 ( 0 ) , Y 2 ( 0 ) , Y 3 ( 0 ) , Y 4 ( 0 ) , and Y 6 ( 0 ) . With the help of a quantitative shooting strategy, these deficient conditions are used to develop initial estimations that are known. The selection of the appropriate meshes for η is a crucial component of this numerical technique. By using the framework of Newton–Raphson for illuminating unidentified conditions, we have made some early assumptions. The following requirements Y 2 ( ) , Y 4 ( ) , Y 6 ( ) are satisfied by these initial hypotheses. In the current investigation, we used a relative precision threshold of 1 0 5 and a step size of η = 0.01, keeping η = 10 .

Announcing new variables in order to reduce the system into first order:

(31) f = Y 1 , f = Y 2 , f = Y 3 , f = Y Y a ,

(32) Θ = Y 4 , Θ = Y 5 , Θ = Y Y b ,

(33) ψ = Y 6 , ψ = Y 6 , ψ = Y Y c .

(34) Y Y a = ( H 1 Y 1 Y 3 + H 3 M ( Y 2 B ) + H 1 Y 2 2 B 2 ( ( H 2 + Ω ) Ω ϵ Y 3 2 ) ,

(35) Y Y b = H 4 Pr ( Y 4 Y 2 Y 1 Y 5 ) ( H 5 + Rd ) PrEc ( H 2 + Ω ) Y 3 2 1 3 Ω ϵ Y 3 4 H 5 ( H 5 + Rd ) H 3 M Pr ( Y 2 B ) 2 H 5 ( H 5 + Rd ) Pr ( N b Y 5 Y 7 + N t Y 5 2 ) ( H 5 + Rd ) ,

(36) Y Y c = PrLe Y 1 Y 7 N t N b Y Y b ,

(37) Y 2 ( 0 ) = 1 + N 1 ( H 2 + Ω ) Y 3 2 ( 0 ) 1 3 Ω ϵ Y 3 4 ( 0 ) , Y 1 ( 0 ) + H 5 H 1 Pr M t Y 5 ( 0 ) = 0 ,

(38) Y 4 ( 0 ) = 0 , Y 6 ( 0 ) = 0 ,

(39) Y 2 ( ) = B , Y 4 ( ) = 0 , Y 6 ( ) = 0 .

4.1 Justification of the model

The envisioned technique validity was examined by comparing it with the previously published literature [72,73,74]. Table 3 demonstrates a high level of agreement with our intended numbering approach. The current numerical solution is found to be accurate to four significant figures. As a result, the results are dependable and numerically authentic.

Table 3

Nusselt number Nu Re x 1 2 comparison in terms of with the existence studies, when Rd = 0 , A 4 = 0 , Ec = 0, and

Ref. [72] Ref. [73] Ref. [74] Present
0.72 8.08634 × 10−9 8.0863 × 10−9 8.0863 × 10−9 8.08632 × 10−9
1 1 1 1 1
3 1.92368 × 10−9 1.92368 × 10−9 1.92368 × 10−9 1.92365 × 10−9
7 3.07225 × 10−9 3.07225 × 10−9 3.07225 × 10−9 3.07276 × 10−9
10 3.72067 × 10−9 3.72067 × 10−9 3.72067 × 10−9 3.72064 × 10−9

5 Parametric outcomes and physical explanation

The assessment of blood flow and heat-mass transfer is considered with the help of different parametric effects. The following physical data, such as Pr ( = 21 ) , c p ( = 14.65 J k g 1 K 1 ) , R e x < 500 (for laminar flow), ν f = 4 × 1 0 4 m 2 s 1 , σ f = 0.6 S s 1 , k f ( = 2.2 × 1 0 3 J m 1 s 1 K 1 ) , μ f ( = 3.2 × 10 3 k g 1 m 1 s 1 ) , for human blood at T = 36.5 ° C are accounted as suggested in previous studies [75,76,77,78]. The velocity and blood temperature are accounted for pure and nanoparticle-loaded blood, while the physical quantities are measured in the case of slip scenario.

Figure 2 highlights how the ratio parameter B affects the flow of a hybrid nanofluid f ( η ) . The ratio parameter B = b a estimates the ratio of the free stream to the sheet velocity. As the strained motion increases close to the stagnating region, the external flow accelerates more quickly, leading to the boundary layer thickness to drop as b a increases, and hence the velocity increases. The velocity-restricted layer thickness displays identical extending and receding characteristics to the open stream velocity. For B = 1 , the liquid and the surface proceed at a comparable speed; hence, there is also an insufficient boundary layer. When B < 1 ( 0 0.9 ) , the mobility is stronger at the edge of the wall, and when B > 1 ( 1.1 1.9 ) , the momentum is higher outside of the wall. It is important to note that stagnation spots occur when two coronary arteries meet or the junction where veins are partially or completely clogged by cholesterol plaques on their interior walls, which restricts blood circulation inside the vessels. On the other hand, such obstructions experience the highest pressure, which causes angina or stroke. Figure 3 shows how the strong magnetic variable M affects the apparent horizontal velocity of fluid for the nanofluid solution. The width of the outer boundary layer and the velocity contour both shrink when the magnetic factor M expands. Technically, this occurs because the Lorentz force generates delaying forces, which serve as drag forces in the contrary orientation of the flow. This can be clarified by the reality that blood, a circulating electrically conductive fluid, will produce magnetic as well as electric fields if a magnetic field is applied to it. Because of the interplay between these fields, an external force known as the Lorentz force is created, which tends to resist fluid motion and slows down blood circulation in the human artery system. The effect of inclined magnetic field parameter ω on the flow stream of a hybrid nanofluid made of blood and zinc/iron oxide is shown in Figure 4. Physically, when the degree of orientation increases, the velocity field drops, which alternately causes an elevated magnetic and Lorentz force. The Lorentz force shows resistance against blood flow and finally detracts from the blood stream. Due to the delayed transmission of the hybrid nanofluid, hypomagnesemia sufferers rehabilitate slowly. To deliver a suitable dose of zinc-iron oxide particles to the damaged area, a magnetic field can be helpful to guide the drug delivery. The volatile nature of fluid flow in relation to the viscosity parameter is shown in Figure 5 for various values of ϵ versus the normalized variable η . Increasing the estimated values of ϵ obviously reduces the fluid viscosity and fluid drift. The reliability of our numerical method is guaranteed by a similar pattern, as was revealed by Aljabali et al. [79]. Additionally, a positive variation in ϵ decreases the velocity and slows the motion of the blood. Fluid viscosity changes the strain and stress within the blood. When φ np = 0 , the boundary layer flow of the blood is higher than that of φ np = 0.01 : ( F e 2 O 3 + ZnO ) for distinct mixture of NPs. Physically, these behaviors are greatly influenced by synthetic procedures, crystallization, form, size, and composition of iron oxide NPs [80]. Figure 6 depicts the influence of the slip variable N 1 on velocity profiles. It is interesting to note from the illustration that the velocity threshold along the sheet decreases when the slip velocity exists within the boundary layer. The distribution of velocity is less close to the sheet surface than it is farther away. Physically, a velocity slip exists when the slip obstruction/plaque ( N 1 0 ) exists, which means that the flow velocity close to the sheet slows down relative to the speed of the stretching sheet. Additionally, decreasing the value of N 1 will result in a slower flow rate in the slip situation. In actuality, the magnetic force and slippage effects work as retarding forces that prevent the transit of fluid. Thus, in the presence of the magnetic flux and slip, which are severe obstructions to the blood flow. Finally, in both the cases φ np = 0.01 : ( F e 2 O 3 + ZnO ) and φ np = 0.0 , the thickness of the momentum boundary layer decreases. Additionally, magnetic parameters can be used to lower backflows whenever they occur in stretched sheets. Its participation also prevents the split.

Figure 2 
               Normalized profile of velocity 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 f
                              
                              
                                 ′
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        {f}^{^{\prime} }(\eta )
                     
                   in the perspective of flow across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           B
                        
                        B
                     
                   (ratio parameter).
Figure 2

Normalized profile of velocity f ( η ) in the perspective of flow across a stretched sheet for classified values of B (ratio parameter).

Figure 3 
               Normalized profile of velocity 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 f
                              
                              
                                 ′
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        {f}^{^{\prime} }(\eta )
                     
                   in the perspective of flow across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                        
                        M
                     
                   (magnetic parameter).
Figure 3

Normalized profile of velocity f ( η ) in the perspective of flow across a stretched sheet for classified values of M (magnetic parameter).

Figure 4 
               Normalized profile of velocity 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 f
                              
                              
                                 ′
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        {f}^{^{\prime} }(\eta )
                     
                   in the perspective of flow across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           ω
                        
                        \omega 
                     
                   (inclination parameter).
Figure 4

Normalized profile of velocity f ( η ) in the perspective of flow across a stretched sheet for classified values of ω (inclination parameter).

Figure 5 
               Normalized profile of velocity 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 f
                              
                              
                                 ′
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        {f}^{^{\prime} }(\eta )
                     
                   in the perspective of flow across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           ϵ
                        
                        \epsilon 
                     
                   (material variable of the Powell–Eyring fluid).
Figure 5

Normalized profile of velocity f ( η ) in the perspective of flow across a stretched sheet for classified values of ϵ (material variable of the Powell–Eyring fluid).

Figure 6 
               Normalized profile of velocity 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 f
                              
                              
                                 ′
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        {f}^{^{\prime} }(\eta )
                     
                   in the perspective of flow across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 N
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {N}_{1}
                     
                   (slip variable).
Figure 6

Normalized profile of velocity f ( η ) in the perspective of flow across a stretched sheet for classified values of N 1 (slip variable).

Figure 7 shows the thermophoretic effects of NPs on the temperature profile. The results demonstrate that as the thermophoresis parameter N t increases, the temperature field improves as a result. Physically, the thermal gradient in the hybrid nanofluid accelerates the migration of the particles from an elevated energy level to a low energy level with a higher estimation of N t ; as a result, the temperature field and free stream flow are enhanced. A higher N t causes a noticeable change in the convective velocity profile because the free stream flow depends on the thermophoresis process. In physical terms, the distinction in the liquid temperature across the sheet and away from it is significantly influenced by the thermophoresis parameter N t . As a result, the thermophoresis parameter increases with temperature differences, increasing the thermal field of the hybrid nanofluid flow. The effect of the Brownian motion parameter N b on the temperature profile is shown in Figure 8, as a distinctive feature of the nanofluid mixture. The temperature exhibits an improved behavior because of increasing N b concentration. The term “Brownian motion” refers to the random movement of fluid particles. Within the boundaries of the sheet, the larger the Brownian motion parameter, the higher the heat produced. As a result, the temperature profile increases. Physically, an increase in the Brownian motion parameter results in more random movement of fluid particles, which increases the generation of heat in the body's blood. Therefore, thermal distribution increases more frequently. Figure 9 demonstrates precisely how the thermal profile Θ ( η ) is increased with an increase in the radiation-related parameter Rd . In the energy equation (Eq. (22)), the radiation parameter term ( H 5 + Rd ) is aggregated using Roseland approximation. In the context of radiant energy, radiative energy causes heating and conduction to increase at each point on a horizontally extending surface; as a result, the system generates more radiation energy, which raises the temperature. Physically, the acceleration of the radiation parameter decreases the heat absorption coefficient and therefore the thermal profile increases. Similarly, Figure 10 shows the increasing impact of the magnetic component M on the temperature. On a physical level, it can be clarified that when M increases, a counterforce (the Lorentz force) is created that slows down the speed of the liquid. In reality, the presence of M slows down fluid mobility and, therefore, promotes the thermal resistance, which raises the temperature distribution. The effect of Brinkman number Br on the temperature is depicted in Figure 11. This behavior can be explained by the fact that more thermal energy is produced because of viscous dissipation, which raises the fluid temperature and, as a result, increases heat transmission. This is because greater values of Br near the wall area experience a decrease in the temperature because very rare energy is delivered by the fluid flow adjacent to the walls rather than the core area. Physically, the Brinkman number is defined as Br = PrEc . The effect of viscous dissipation is shown by the parameter Ec . Hence, with an increase in Br , the kinetic energy and enthalpy are increased that are related to one another. Physically, when dissipation increases, the thermal conductivity of the hybrid NPs increases, increasing the thickness of the thermal boundary layer for the surface.

Figure 7 
               Normalized profile of temperature 
                     
                        
                        
                           Θ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \Theta (\eta )
                     
                   in the perspective of thermal behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 N
                              
                              
                                 t
                              
                           
                        
                        {N}_{{\rm{t}}}
                     
                   (thermophoretic parameter).
Figure 7

Normalized profile of temperature Θ ( η ) in the perspective of thermal behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of N t (thermophoretic parameter).

Figure 8 
               Normalized profile of temperature 
                     
                        
                        
                           Θ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \Theta (\eta )
                     
                   in the perspective of thermal behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 N
                              
                              
                                 b
                              
                           
                        
                        {N}_{{\rm{b}}}
                     
                   (Brownian parameter).
Figure 8

Normalized profile of temperature Θ ( η ) in the perspective of thermal behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of N b (Brownian parameter).

Figure 9 
               Normalized profile of temperature 
                     
                        
                        
                           Θ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \Theta (\eta )
                     
                   in the perspective of thermal behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           Rd
                        
                        {\rm{Rd}}
                     
                   (radative parameter).
Figure 9

Normalized profile of temperature Θ ( η ) in the perspective of thermal behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of Rd (radative parameter).

Figure 10 
               Normalized profile of temperature 
                     
                        
                        
                           Θ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \Theta (\eta )
                     
                   in the perspective of thermal behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                        
                        M
                     
                   (magnetic parameter).
Figure 10

Normalized profile of temperature Θ ( η ) in the perspective of thermal behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of M (magnetic parameter).

Figure 11 
               Normalized profile of temperature 
                     
                        
                        
                           Θ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \Theta (\eta )
                     
                   in the perspective of thermal behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           Br
                        
                        {\rm{Br}}
                     
                   (Brinkman parameter).
Figure 11

Normalized profile of temperature Θ ( η ) in the perspective of thermal behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of Br (Brinkman parameter).

The effects of the thermophoresis parameter N t and the Brownian motion parameter N b on the profile of NP concentrations ψ ( η ) are depicted in Figures 12 and 13. It is anticipated that an abundance of thermophoretic body force accelerates the movement of NPs, resulting in a more uniform dispersion and higher concentration. Additionally, the increased chaotic motion caused by the Brownian motion results in more aggressive collisions, which slow down the concentration of the NPs. It should be pointed out that by enhancing the Brownian motion parameter, the erratic motions of tiny particles would be enhanced; hence, the quantity of nanomaterials in a particular domain would drop, and, as a result, the NP concentration at that region would decrease. The Lewis number Le has an impact on the characteristics of the concentration field ψ ( η ) , as shown in Figure 14. Lower fluid concentrations are related to higher levels of the Lewis number because an increased Lewis number equates to a very low Brownian diffusion factor. Thus, a low Lewis number can be used for the fluid concentration dispersion in the boundary layer.

Figure 12 
               Normalized profile of concentration 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        {\rm{\psi }}(\eta )
                     
                   in the perspective of fluid concentration behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 N
                              
                              
                                 t
                              
                           
                        
                        {N}_{{\rm{t}}}
                     
                   (thermophoretic parameter).
Figure 12

Normalized profile of concentration ψ ( η ) in the perspective of fluid concentration behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of N t (thermophoretic parameter).

Figure 13 
               Normalized profile of concentration 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        {\rm{\psi }}(\eta )
                     
                   in the perspective of fluid concentration behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 N
                              
                              
                                 b
                              
                           
                        
                        {N}_{{\rm{b}}}
                     
                   (Brownian parameter).
Figure 13

Normalized profile of concentration ψ ( η ) in the perspective of fluid concentration behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of N b (Brownian parameter).

Figure 14 
               Normalized profile of concentration 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        {\rm{\psi }}(\eta )
                     
                   in the perspective of fluid concentration behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           Le
                        
                        {\rm{Le}}
                     
                   (Lewis number).
Figure 14

Normalized profile of concentration ψ ( η ) in the perspective of fluid concentration behavior across a stretched sheet for classified values of Le (Lewis number).

The effects of D 1 on N g ( η ) and Be are depicted in Figure 15. Both N g ( η ) and Be are enhanced with increasing D 1 . The rate of nanomaterials was enhanced by a higher diffusion parameter, and, as a result, the entropy N g ( η ) and Be increase. Physically, with more substantial values of D 1 , the fluid particle diffusivity is increased, which increases disorderliness in the fluid domain. Figure 16 depicts the relation of energy loss in the context of viscous heating Br = PrEc and the production of entropy for varying the Br values. Physically, viscous heating occurs as the reaction of the mechanical friction between the fluid and the walls, raising the fluid temperature and causing energy loss through the formation of entropy. Bejan number is the ratio between the generation of entropy during heat transfer and total entropy formation, whereas the Brinkman number is the ratio between the development of viscous heat and external heating. With the enhancement in the Brinkman number, the Bejan number decreased. The Bejan number declines as the Br increases. This indicates that when viscous dissipation is taken into consideration in the energy equation, frictional irreversibility dominates less and heat transmission irreversibility contributes more as Br increases. Figure 17 illustrates the influence of the magnetic number M on the generation of entropy. The increase in magnetic properties has a favorable effect on the creation of entropy. The Lorentz forces expand as the magnetic forces increase, which causes the shear stress to increase and the creation of entropy to increase. The Bejan number decreases as the magnetic parameter increases because of the negative correlation that exists between the Bejan number and entropy development. Following the increase in M , the entropy generation is increased. The effects of radiation Rd on N g ( η ) and Be are depicted in Figure 18. For increasing magnitudes of Rd , the thermal irreversibility increases, causing system disorder and an increase in N g ( η ) . Following the description of the Be number, the Be number is raised for higher quantities of heat radiation.

Figure 15 
               Normalized profile of entropy 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 N
                              
                              
                                 g
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        {N}_{{\rm{g}}}(\eta )
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           Be
                        
                        {\rm{Be}}
                     
                   in the perspective of fluid irreversibility across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 D
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {D}_{1}
                     
                   (diffusion number).
Figure 15

Normalized profile of entropy N g ( η ) and Be in the perspective of fluid irreversibility across a stretched sheet for classified values of D 1 (diffusion number).

Figure 16 
               Normalized profile of entropy 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 N
                              
                              
                                 g
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        {N}_{{\rm{g}}}(\eta )
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           Be
                        
                        {\rm{Be}}
                     
                   in the perspective of fluid irreversibility across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           Br
                        
                        {\rm{Br}}
                     
                   (Brinkman number).
Figure 16

Normalized profile of entropy N g ( η ) and Be in the perspective of fluid irreversibility across a stretched sheet for classified values of Br (Brinkman number).

Figure 17 
               Normalized profile of entropy 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 N
                              
                              
                                 g
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        {N}_{{\rm{g}}}(\eta )
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           Be
                        
                        {\rm{Be}}
                     
                   in the perspective of fluid irreversibility across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                        
                        M
                     
                   (magnetic number).
Figure 17

Normalized profile of entropy N g ( η ) and Be in the perspective of fluid irreversibility across a stretched sheet for classified values of M (magnetic number).

Figure 18 
               Normalized profile of entropy 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 N
                              
                              
                                 g
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    η
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        {N}_{{\rm{g}}}(\eta )
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           Be
                        
                        {\rm{Be}}
                     
                   in the perspective of fluid irreversibility across a stretched sheet for classified values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           Rd
                        
                        {\rm{Rd}}
                     
                   (radiative number).
Figure 18

Normalized profile of entropy N g ( η ) and Be in the perspective of fluid irreversibility across a stretched sheet for classified values of Rd (radiative number).

The streamlined evaluation of the hybrid nanofluid φ np = 0.01 and pure blood φ np = 0.0 is shown in Figures 1921. Due to an increase in M = 0.5 (Figure 20), M = 0.7 (Figure 21), and M = 0.9 (Figure 22), the energy transit in the fluid caused by an increase in the volume fraction, the velocity components of the hybrid nanofluid are improved. When the volume proportion of the nanofluid increases, the absolute values of stream functions expand. Additionally, it is evident that as the volumetric friction of NPs increases, the thickness of the thermal boundary layer around the stretched wall expands. The streamlines only display one oscillating turbulence when the magnetic field is lower. A number of additional vortices that rotate in the opposite direction of the primary vortex form along the sheet surface as the magnetic parameter increases. Low volumetric friction has little impact on the streamline when the Lorentz force is present. Physically, when the volumetric friction of the material composed of nanomaterials expands, the highest possible frequencies of streamlines and the velocity of the stretched surface decrease. This is because the degree of concentration of the NPs in the cooling mechanism is increased. Additionally, as the volume proportion of solids increases, the maximum temperature drops. Here, we found that the magnetic field parameter inclination angle clearly affected the streamlines. The maximum streamlines increase as the magnetic field parameter and inclination angle increase, and the counter-rotating blood plasma of the streamlines are plainly visible.

Figure 19 
               Variations in the streamline contours in the scenario of the hybrid nanofluid and pure blood when 
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                           =
                           0.5
                           ,
                           Ω
                           =
                           0.5
                           ,
                           and
                           ϵ
                           =
                           0.5
                        
                        M=0.5,\Omega =0.5,{\rm{and}}\epsilon =0.5
                     
                  .
Figure 19

Variations in the streamline contours in the scenario of the hybrid nanofluid and pure blood when M = 0.5 , Ω = 0.5 , and ϵ = 0.5 .

Figure 20 
               Variations in the streamline contours in the scenario of the hybrid nanofluid and pure blood when 
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                           =
                           0.7
                           ,
                           Ω
                           =
                           0.5
                           ,
                           and
                           ϵ
                           =
                           0.5
                        
                        M=0.7,\Omega =0.5,{\rm{and}}\epsilon =0.5
                     
                  .
Figure 20

Variations in the streamline contours in the scenario of the hybrid nanofluid and pure blood when M = 0.7 , Ω = 0.5 , and ϵ = 0.5 .

Figure 21 
               Variations in the streamline contours in the scenario of the hybrid nanofluid and pure blood when 
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                           =
                           0.9
                           ,
                           Ω
                           =
                           0.5
                           ,
                           and
                           ϵ
                           =
                           0.5
                        
                        M=0.9,\Omega =0.5,{\rm{and}}\epsilon =0.5
                     
                  .
Figure 21

Variations in the streamline contours in the scenario of the hybrid nanofluid and pure blood when M = 0.9 , Ω = 0.5 , and ϵ = 0.5 .

Figure 22 
               Statistical chart for the frictional coefficient 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 C
                              
                              
                                 f
                              
                           
                        
                        {C}_{{\rm{f}}}
                     
                   history of the hybrid nanofluid and pure blood against 
                     
                        
                        
                           Ω
                        
                        \Omega 
                     
                   and the magnetic parameter 
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                        
                        M
                     
                  .
Figure 22

Statistical chart for the frictional coefficient C f history of the hybrid nanofluid and pure blood against Ω and the magnetic parameter M .

Figure 22 shows a comparison of pure blood and hybrid nanomaterials vs Ω and M on skin friction. It has been observed that the Powell–Erying material parameter has a negative correlation with skin friction. When compared to ZnO and pure blood, Ω = 0 , ϵ = 0 , the reduction in skin friction is most pronounced for F e 2 O 3 . The blood shear thinning characteristics are the cause for the increase in skin friction behavior. The comparison of hybrid materials and pure blood in a simulation with respect to the material parameter and magnetic number on the heat transfer coefficient is shown in Figure 23. Analysis shows that, in contrast to hybrid nanomaterials, the heat transmission rate is an increasing function of the material parameter. Thermal transportation and the pace of thermal transportation have different meanings in terms of physical properties. It is simple to see why the rate of heat transfer has decreased. The dispersion of NPs, which convey energy in the form of heat, physically increases the temperature. As a result, the addition of hybrid NPs will produce additional heat, which will cause the boundary layer thickness and temperature to increase quickly. In some engineering applications, the desired heat transfer rate can be achieved by carefully combining the right physical parameters with the hybrid NP composition. The properties of pure blood and hybrid materials in relation to the material parameter and magnetic number in relation to mass transfer rate are shown in Figure 24. It is obvious that the mass transfer rate and these blood parameters are directly related. In a stretching sheet flow, nanomaterials have a dominant influence. However, the influence of iron oxide is dominant in the whole flow communication, i.e., the flow, temperature, frictional coefficient, and energy transport rate. Many researchers have achieved a similar trend for thermo-mechanical performance in the scenario of hybrid and pure fluids [81,82].

Figure 23 
               Statistical chart for the energy transport coefficient 
                     
                        
                        
                           Nu
                        
                        {\rm{Nu}}
                     
                   history of the hybrid nanofluid and pure blood against 
                     
                        
                        
                           Ω
                        
                        \Omega 
                     
                   and the magnetic parameter 
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                        
                        M
                     
                  .
Figure 23

Statistical chart for the energy transport coefficient Nu history of the hybrid nanofluid and pure blood against Ω and the magnetic parameter M .

Figure 24 
               Statistical chart for the mass transport coefficient 
                     
                        
                        
                           Sh
                        
                        {\rm{Sh}}
                     
                   history of the hybrid nanofluid and pure blood against 
                     
                        
                        
                           Ω
                        
                        \Omega 
                     
                   and the magnetic parameter 
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                        
                        M
                     
                  .
Figure 24

Statistical chart for the mass transport coefficient Sh history of the hybrid nanofluid and pure blood against Ω and the magnetic parameter M .

A statistical comparison is provided in Tables 4 and 5, in order to evaluate the performance of mixture models. In Table 4, both mixture models are evaluated for heat transfer against several physical parameters, while in Table 5 only the Tiwari–Das model is kept. It is evident from both tables that the heat transfer performance of the single-phase model is significantly higher than that of the subsequent one.

Table 4

Performance of heat transfer when both mixture models are used with Pr = 21 and φ np = 0.01 : ( F e 2 O 3 + ZnO )

M N b N t Br Ω Rd Nu Re x 1 2
2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 −0.851409
4 −1.041709
6 −1.983698
2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 −0.398013
0.3 −0.398022
0.4 −0.398021
2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 −0.398090
0.5 −0.392423
0.6 −0.38693
2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 −0.784734
0.3 −1.160890
0.4 −1.526611
2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 −0.796549
0.6 −0.851409
0.7 −0.041709
2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 −0.983699
0.3 −0.398013
0.4 −0.398022
Table 5

Performance of heat transfer when the Tiwari–Das model is used with N b = 0 , N t = 0 , Pr = 21 , and φ np = 0.01 : ( F e 2 O 3 + ZnO )

M Br Ω Rd Nu Re x 1 2
2 0.2 0.5 0.2 −0.250537
4 −0.257124
6 −0.263845
2 0.2 0.5 0.2 −0.273390
0.3 −0.231267
0.4 −0.200335
2 0.2 0.5 0.2 −0.250534
0.6 −0.250924
0.7 −0.251355
2 0.2 0.5 0.2 −0.277890
0.3 −0.615412
0.4 −0.976313

6 Final observations

The main goal of this study is to demonstrate the effects of different physical factors on composite NPs and pure blood under more feasible circumstances. The Powell–Eyring fluid flow at its stagnant point in an inclined magnetic field is considered. This study examines the Powell–Eyring fluid boundary layer flow and heat-mass transfer over an elongated surface simultaneously free stream with coupled nanofluid models. Through stepping modifications, the governing equations are converted into simple nonlinear differential equations. Implementing the Keller-box approach, these algebraic equations are resolved numerically. The quantitative results lead to several crucial observations:

  • Velocity decreases for dominating incline angle ω . The thickness of momentum diffusion gradually decreases. The frictional coefficient C f decreases with the estimated value of the magnetic factor M .

  • The flow of blood decreases with ϵ and slip N 1 .

  • The frictional coefficient C f and heat transport rate Nu are reduced with the fundamental Eyring–Powell variable Ω .

  • It is discovered that the Brinkmann number Br and hybrid nanomaterials both have beneficial impacts on entropy, while the Bejan number Be exhibits the opposite tendency with an increase in Br . With an increase in the magnetic number M , the entropy number increases, whereas Be exhibits the opposite tendency.

  • The frictional drag coefficient increases with pure blood but decreases with the magnetic field and NP volume friction φ np = 0.01 .

  • The Bejan number ( Be ) exhibits an improving effect for greater D 1 and Rd , whereas M and Br exhibit a reverse behavior.

  • It may be inferred that viscous dissipation has a considerable but not dominating impact on the formation of entropy, particularly in situations with high Brinkman numbers and energy flux.

  • The juncture of stagnation is relocated through the interaction of hybrid NPs and a magnetic field by streamline patterns.

  • According to the main findings, a hybrid nanofluid model exhibits higher heat and mass transfer rates than a pure fluid model. In thermally dominant zones, the hybrid nanofluid exhibits higher heat and mass transport rates than a typical fluid (pure blood). Conversely, when employing a hybrid nanofluid for the solutal-dominated regime, the rates of heat and mass transmission are reduced. The average Nusselt and Sherwood values decrease as viscosity increases, and these changes are especially noticeable in thermally dominant flows.

  • Better thermal performance was observed for iron oxide.

  • The performance of mixture models is reviewed. One can infer that the performance of the single-phase nanofluid model is higher than that of mixture models.

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through large group Research Project under grant number RGP2/440/44.

  1. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. Conceptualization and formal analysis: Hashim. Writing – original draft and writing – review editing: Sohail Rehman. Data curation, writing – review & editing, investigation, and solution Methodology, Software: Mehdi Akermi. Re-graphical representation and Adding analysis of data: Samia Nasr.

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Data availability statement: The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the manuscript.

References

[1] Hiemenz K. Die Grenzschicht an einem in den gleichformigen Flussigkeitsstrom eingetauchten geraden Kreiszylinder. Dinglers Polytech J. 1911;326:321–48, 357.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Petschek H, Adamis D, Kantrowitz AR. Stagnation flow thrombus formation. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1968;14:256–60.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Reininger CB, Reininger AJ, Hörmann A, Steckmeier B, Schweiberer L. Quantitative analysis of platelet function using stagnation point flow aggregometry. First clinical results. Int Angiol. 1992;11:247–55.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Homann F. Der Einfluß großer Zähigkeit bei der Strömung um den Zylinder und um die Kugel. ZAMM - J Appl Math Mech/Zeitschrift Für Angew Mathematik Und Mechanik. 1936;16:153–64. 10.1002/zamm.19360160304.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Ishak A, Jafar K, Nazar R, Pop I. MHD stagnation point flow towards a stretching sheet. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl. 2009;388:3377–83. 10.1016/j.physa.2009.05.026.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Van Gorder RA, Vajravelu K. Hydromagnetic stagnation point flow of a second grade fluid over a stretching sheet. Mech Res Commun. 2010;37:113–8. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2009.09.009.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Fang T, Lee CF, Zhang J. The boundary layers of an unsteady incompressible stagnation-point flow with mass transfer. Int J Non-Linear Mech. 2011;46:942–8. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.04.007.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Bachok N, Ishak A, Pop I. The boundary layers of an unsteady stagnation-point flow in a nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2012;55:6499–505. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.06.050.Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Crane LJ. Flow past a stretching plate. J Appl Math Phys (ZAMP). 1970;21:645–7. 10.1007/BF01587695.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Munawar S, Mehmood A, Ali A. Effects of slip on flow between two stretchable disks using optimal homotopy analysis method. Can J Appl Sci. 2011;1:50–67. 10.21065/19257430.50.1.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Waini I, Ishak A, Pop I. Unsteady flow and heat transfer past a stretching/shrinking sheet in a hybrid nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;136:288–97. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.101.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Manjunatha S, Ammani Kuttan B, Jayanthi S, Chamkha A, Gireesha BJ. Heat transfer enhancement in the boundary layer flow of hybrid nanofluids due to variable viscosity and natural convection. Heliyon. 2019;5:e01469. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01469.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Devi SSU, Devi SPA. Numerical investigation of three-dimensional hybrid Cu–Al2O3/water nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet with effecting Lorentz force subject to Newtonian heating. Can J Phys. 2016;94:490–6. 10.1139/cjp-2015-0799.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Miklavčič M, Wang C. Viscous flow due to a shrinking sheet. Quart Appl Math. 2006;64:283–90. 10.1090/S0033-569X-06-01002-5.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Tie-Gang F, Ji Z, Shan-Shan Y. Viscous flow over an unsteady shrinking sheet with mass transfer. Chin Phys Lett. 2009;26:014703. 10.1088/0256-307X/26/1/014703.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Fang T. Boundary layer flow over a shrinking sheet with power-law velocity. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2008;51:5838–43. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.04.067.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Fang T, Zhang J. Thermal boundary layers over a shrinking sheet: an analytical solution. Acta Mech. 2010;209:325–43. 10.1007/s00707-009-0183-2.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Rohni AM, Ahmad S, Pop I. Flow and heat transfer over an unsteady shrinking sheet with suction in nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2012;55:1888–95. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.11.042.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Choi SUS, Eastman JA. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. Argonne (IL), USA: Argonne National Lab; 1995.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Song Y-Q, Obideyi BD, Shah NA, Animasaun IL, Mahrous YM, Chung JD. Significance of haphazard motion and thermal migration of alumina and copper nanoparticles across the dynamics of water and ethylene glycol on a convectively heated surface. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021;26:101050. 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101050.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Oke AS, Animasaun IL, Mutuku WN, Kimathi M, Shah NA, Saleem S. Significance of Coriolis force, volume fraction, and heat source/sink on the dynamics of water conveying 47 nm alumina nanoparticles over a uniform surface. Chin J Phys. 2021;71:716–27. 10.1016/j.cjph.2021.02.005.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Fei Z, Zhanguo S, Kumar NB, Singh PK, Farhan ZA, Dahari M, et al. Clean and sustainable power/fresh water/hot air production scheme based on solid oxide fuel cell feed by apricot stone biomass: A multi-attribute optimization. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2023;180:808–26. 10.1016/j.psep.2023.10.018.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Tiwari RK, Das MK. Heat transfer augmentation in a two-sided lid-driven differentially heated square cavity utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2007;50:2002–18. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.09.034.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Buongiorno J. Convective transport in nanofluids. J Heat Mass Transf. 2005;128:240–50. 10.1115/1.2150834.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Rafiq M, Yasmin H, Hayat T, Alsaadi F. Effect of Hall and ion-slip on the peristaltic transport of nanofluid: A biomedical application. Chin J Phys. 2019;60:208–27. 10.1016/j.cjph.2019.04.016.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Mekheimer KHWM, Abo-Elkhair RE, Zaher AZ. Peristaltic blood flow with gold nanoparticles as a third grade nanofluid in catheter: Application of cancer therapy. Phys Lett A. 2018;382:85–93. 10.1016/j.physleta.2017.10.042.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Ahmed A, Nadeem S. The study of (Cu,TiO2,Al2O3) nanoparticles as antimicrobials of blood flow through diseased arteries. J Mol Liq. 2016;216:615–23. 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.01.059.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Rasmussen JW, Martinez E, Louka P, Wingett DG. Zinc oxide nanoparticles for selective destruction of tumor cells and potential for drug delivery applications. Expert Opin Drug Delivery. 2010;7:1063–77. 10.1517/17425247.2010.502560.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Osredkar J. Copper and Zinc, Biological Role and Significance of Copper/Zinc Imbalance. J Clin Toxicol. 2011;s3:1–18. 10.4172/2161-0495.S3-001.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Krebs NF, Hambidge KM. Zinc metabolism and homeostasis: The application of tracer techniques to human zinc physiology. In: Maret W, editor. Zinc Biochemistry, Physiology, and Homeostasis. Dordrecht, Germany: Springer; 2001. p. 211–26. 10.1007/978-94-017-3728-9_13.Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Hambidge KM. Mild zinc deficiency in human subjects. In: Mills CF, editor. Zinc in Human Biology. London, UK: Springer; 1989. p. 281–96. 10.1007/978-1-4471-3879-2_18.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Ploysangam A, Falciglia GA, Brehm BJ. Effect of marginal zinc deficiency on human growth and development. J Tropical Pediatrics. 1997;43:192–8. 10.1093/tropej/43.4.192-a.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Heyneman CA. Zinc deficiency and taste disorders. Ann Pharmacother. 1996;30:186–7. 10.1177/106002809603000215.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Maret W, Sandstead HH. Zinc requirements and the risks and benefits of zinc supplementation. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2006;20:3–18. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2006.01.006.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Kaynar UH, Çam Kaynar S, Ekdal Karali E, Ayvacıkli M, Can N. Adsorption of thorium (IV) ions by metal ion doped ZnO nanomaterial prepared with combustion synthesis: Empirical modelling and process optimization by response surface methodology (RSM). Appl Radiat Isotopes. 2021;178:109955. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109955.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Wang YXJ. Superparamagnetic iron oxide based MRI contrast agents: Current status of clinical application. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2011;1:35–40. 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2011.08.03.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[37] Tassa C, Shaw SY, Weissleder R. Dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles: A versatile platform for targeted molecular imaging, molecular diagnostics, and therapy. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:842–52. 10.1021/ar200084x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[38] Reimer P, Balzer T. Ferucarbotran (Resovist): a new clinically approved RES-specific contrast agent for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development, and applications. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1266–76. 10.1007/s00330-002-1721-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Saha SC, Islam MS, Rahimi-Gorji M, Molla MM. Aerosol particle transport and deposition in a CT-scan based mouth-throat model. AIP Conf Proc. 2019;2121:040011. 10.1063/1.5115882.Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Pankhurst QA, Thanh NTK, Jones SK, Dobson J. Progress in applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2009;42:224001. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/22/224001.Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Yang H-W, Hua M-Y, Liu H-L, Huang C-Y, Wei K-C. Potential of magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2012;5:73–86. 10.2147/NSA.S35506.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[42] Ling D, Hyeon T. Chemical design of biocompatible iron oxide nanoparticles for medical applications. Small. 2013;9:1450–66. 10.1002/smll.201202111.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] Florence SS, Adam H, Manna C, Can N. Green approach to synthesis and strain studies of ZnO nanoparticles. AIP Conf Proc. 2018;1976:020020. 10.1063/1.5042387.Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Kumar KG, Reddy MG, Vijaya Kumari P, Aldalbahi A, Rahimi-Gorji M, Rahaman M. Application of different hybrid nanofluids in convective heat transport of Carreau fluid. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020;141:110350. 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110350.Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Rehman S, Mohamed Tag Eldin E, Bafakeeh OT, Guedri K. Coupled energy and mass transport for non-Newtonian nanofluid flow through non-parallel vertical enclosure. Ain Shams Eng J. 2022;14(9):102023. 10.1016/j.asej.2022.102023.Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Rehman S, Bouzgarrou S, Boujelbene M. Darcy-Forchheimer flow of bioconvective nanofluid over a nonaligned stretching surface with slip effects. Mater Today Commun. 2023;37:107444. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107444.Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Powell RE, Eyring H. Mechanisms for the relaxation theory of viscosity. Nature. 1944;154:427–8. 10.1038/154427a0.Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Asha SK, Sunitha G. Effect of joule heating and MHD on peristaltic blood flow of Eyring–Powell nanofluid in a non-uniform channel. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2019;13:155–68. 10.1080/16583655.2018.1549530.Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Noreen S, Qasim M. Peristaltic flow of MHD eyring-powell fluid in a channel. Eur Phys J Plus. 2013;128:91. 10.1140/epjp/i2013-13091-3.Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Bejan A. A study of entropy generation in fundamental convective heat transfer. J Heat Transf. 1979;101:718–25. 10.1115/1.3451063.Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Hayat T, Akram J, Alsaedi A, Zahir H. Endoscopy effect in mixed convective peristalsis of Powell-Eyring nanofluid. J Mol Liq. 2018;254:47–54. 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.064.Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Nisar Z, Hayat T, Alsaedi A, Ahmad B. Significance of activation energy in radiative peristaltic transport of Eyring-Powell nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2020;116:104655. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104655.Suche in Google Scholar

[53] Basha H, Sivaraj R. Entropy generation of peristaltic Eyring–Powell nanofluid flow in a vertical divergent channel for biomedical applications. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E: J Process Mech Eng. 2021;235:1575–86. 10.1177/09544089211013926.Suche in Google Scholar

[54] Guedri K, Bashir T, Abbasi A, Farooq W, Khan SU, Khan MI, et al. Hall effects and entropy generation applications for peristaltic flow of modified hybrid nanofluid with electroosmosis phenomenon. J Indian Chem Soc. 2022;99:100614. 10.1016/j.jics.2022.100614.Suche in Google Scholar

[55] Vijay N, Sharma K. Dynamics of stagnation point flow of Maxwell nanofluid with combined heat and mass transfer effects: A numerical investigation. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2023;141:106545. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106545.Suche in Google Scholar

[56] Boujelbene M, Rehman S, Alqahtani S, Alshehery S, Eldin SM. Thermal transport and magnetohydrodynamics flow of generalized Newtonian nanofluid with inherent irreversibility between conduit with slip at the walls. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech. 2023;17:2182364. 10.1080/19942060.2023.2182364.Suche in Google Scholar

[57] Hsiao K-L. Stagnation electrical MHD nanofluid mixed convection with slip boundary on a stretching sheet. Appl Therm Eng. 2016;98:850–61. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.12.138.Suche in Google Scholar

[58] Kumar PB, Suripeddi S. A note on the pulsatile flow of hydromagnetic Eyring–Powell nanofluid through a vertical porous channel. Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2021;230:1465–74. 10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00057-5.Suche in Google Scholar

[59] Makhdoum BM, Mahmood Z, Fadhl BM, Aldhabani MS, Khan U, Eldin SM. Significance of entropy generation and nanoparticle aggregation on stagnation point flow of nanofluid over stretching sheet with inclined Lorentz force. Arab J Chem. 2023;16:104787. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.104787.Suche in Google Scholar

[60] Rehman S, Hashim, Al-Yarimi FAM, Alqahtani S, Awad M. Dissipative flow features of Carreau nanofluid with thermal radiation inside plane wall channel: Jeffery-Hamel analysis. Propuls Power Res. 2023. 10.1016/j.jppr.2023.02.007.Suche in Google Scholar

[61] Sadeghy K, Hajibeygi H, Taghavi S-M. Stagnation-point flow of upper-convected Maxwell fluids. Int J Non-Linear Mech. 2006;41:1242–7. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2006.08.005.Suche in Google Scholar

[62] Hsiao K-L. To promote radiation electrical MHD activation energy thermal extrusion manufacturing system efficiency by using Carreau-Nanofluid with parameters control method. Energy. 2017;130:486–99. 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.004.Suche in Google Scholar

[63] Hsiao K-L. Combined electrical MHD heat transfer thermal extrusion system using Maxwell fluid with radiative and viscous dissipation effects. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;112:1281–8. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.208.Suche in Google Scholar

[64] Farooq M, Anjum A, Rehman S, Malik MY. Entropy analysis in thermally stratified Powell-Eyring magnesium-blood nanofluid convection past a stretching surface. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2022;138:106375. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106375.Suche in Google Scholar

[65] Hsiao K-L. Micropolar nanofluid flow with MHD and viscous dissipation effects towards a stretching sheet with multimedia feature. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;112:983–90. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.05.042.Suche in Google Scholar

[66] Alsaedi A, Hayat T, Qayyum S, Yaqoob R. Eyring–Powell nanofluid flow with nonlinear mixed convection: Entropy generation minimization. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2020;186:105183. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105183.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[67] Razaq A, Hayat T, Khan SA, Momani S. ATSS model based upon applications of Cattaneo-Christov thermal analysis for entropy optimized ternary nanomaterial flow with homogeneous-heterogeneous chemical reactions. Alex Eng J. 2023;79:390–401. 10.1016/j.aej.2023.08.013.Suche in Google Scholar

[68] Kumawat C, Sharma BK, Al-Mdallal QM, Rahimi-Gorji M. Entropy generation for MHD two phase blood flow through a curved permeable artery having variable viscosity with heat and mass transfer. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2022;133:105954. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.105954.Suche in Google Scholar

[69] Gamal M, Radwan MS, Elgizawy IG, Shedid MH. Thermophysical characterization on water and ethylene glycol/water-based MgO and ZnO nanofluids at elevated temperatures: An experimental investigation. J Mol Liq. 2023;369:120867. 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120867.Suche in Google Scholar

[70] Chereches EI, Minea AA. Experimental study on electrical conductivity of several [C4mim][BF4] ionic-liquid-based nanocolloids. Nanomaterials. 2023;13:1224. 10.3390/nano13071224.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[71] Le KQ, Nguyen HPT, Ngo QM, Canimoglu A, Can N. Experimental and numerical optical characterization of plasmonic copper nanoparticles embedded in ZnO fabricated by ion implantation and annealing. J Alloy Compd. 2016;669:246–53. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.016.Suche in Google Scholar

[72] Das S, Chakraborty S, Jana RN, Makinde OD. Entropy analysis of unsteady magneto-nanofluid flow past accelerating stretching sheet with convective boundary condition. Appl Math Mech-Engl Ed. 2015;36:1593–610. 10.1007/s10483-015-2003-6.Suche in Google Scholar

[73] Jamshed W, Akgül EK, Nisar KS. Keller box study for inclined magnetically driven Casson nanofluid over a stretching sheet: single phase model. Phys Scr. 2021;96:065201. 10.1088/1402-4896/abecfa.Suche in Google Scholar

[74] Jamshed W, Eid MR, Nisar KS, Nasir NAAM, Edacherian A, Saleel CA, et al. A numerical frame work of magnetically driven Powell-Eyring nanofluid using single phase model. Sci Rep. 2021;11:16500. 10.1038/s41598-021-96040-0.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[75] Misra JC, Sinha A. Effect of thermal radiation on MHD flow of blood and heat transfer in a permeable capillary in stretching motion. Heat Mass Transf. 2013;49:617–28. 10.1007/s00231-012-1107-6.Suche in Google Scholar

[76] Valvano JW, Nho S, Anderson GT. Analysis of the Weinbaum-Jiji model of blood flow in the Canine Kidney cortex for self-heated thermistors. J Biomech Eng. 1994;116:201–7. 10.1115/1.2895720.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[77] Chato JC. Heat transfer to blood vessels. J Biomech Eng. 1980;102:110–8. 10.1115/1.3138205.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[78] Kenjereš S. Numerical analysis of blood flow in realistic arteries subjected to strong non-uniform magnetic fields. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2008;29:752–64. 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.02.014.Suche in Google Scholar

[79] Aljabali A, Mohd Kasim AR, Arifin NS, Ariffin NAN, Ling Chuan Ching D, Waini I, et al. Two-phase flow of eyring–powell fluid with temperature dependent viscosity over a vertical stretching sheet. Mathematics. 2022;10:3111. 10.3390/math10173111.Suche in Google Scholar

[80] Darwish MSA, Kim H, Bui MP, Le T-A, Lee H, Ryu C, et al. The heating efficiency and imaging performance of magnesium iron Oxide@tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:1096. 10.3390/nano11051096.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[81] Usman M, Gul T, Khan A, Alsubie A, Ullah MZ. Electromagnetic couple stress film flow of hybrid nanofluid over an unsteady rotating disc. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2021;127:105562. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105562.Suche in Google Scholar

[82] Ahmad S, Ali K, Faridi AA, Ashraf M. Novel thermal aspects of hybrid nanoparticles Cu-TiO2 in the flow of ethylene glycol. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2021;129:105708. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105708.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-07-12
Revised: 2023-11-11
Accepted: 2023-11-19
Published Online: 2024-02-13

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Editorial
  2. Focus on NLENG 2023 Volume 12 Issue 1
  3. Research Articles
  4. Seismic vulnerability signal analysis of low tower cable-stayed bridges method based on convolutional attention network
  5. Robust passivity-based nonlinear controller design for bilateral teleoperation system under variable time delay and variable load disturbance
  6. A physically consistent AI-based SPH emulator for computational fluid dynamics
  7. Asymmetrical novel hyperchaotic system with two exponential functions and an application to image encryption
  8. A novel framework for effective structural vulnerability assessment of tubular structures using machine learning algorithms (GA and ANN) for hybrid simulations
  9. Flow and irreversible mechanism of pure and hybridized non-Newtonian nanofluids through elastic surfaces with melting effects
  10. Stability analysis of the corruption dynamics under fractional-order interventions
  11. Solutions of certain initial-boundary value problems via a new extended Laplace transform
  12. Numerical solution of two-dimensional fractional differential equations using Laplace transform with residual power series method
  13. Fractional-order lead networks to avoid limit cycle in control loops with dead zone and plant servo system
  14. Modeling anomalous transport in fractal porous media: A study of fractional diffusion PDEs using numerical method
  15. Analysis of nonlinear dynamics of RC slabs under blast loads: A hybrid machine learning approach
  16. On theoretical and numerical analysis of fractal--fractional non-linear hybrid differential equations
  17. Traveling wave solutions, numerical solutions, and stability analysis of the (2+1) conformal time-fractional generalized q-deformed sinh-Gordon equation
  18. Influence of damage on large displacement buckling analysis of beams
  19. Approximate numerical procedures for the Navier–Stokes system through the generalized method of lines
  20. Mathematical analysis of a combustible viscoelastic material in a cylindrical channel taking into account induced electric field: A spectral approach
  21. A new operational matrix method to solve nonlinear fractional differential equations
  22. New solutions for the generalized q-deformed wave equation with q-translation symmetry
  23. Optimize the corrosion behaviour and mechanical properties of AISI 316 stainless steel under heat treatment and previous cold working
  24. Soliton dynamics of the KdV–mKdV equation using three distinct exact methods in nonlinear phenomena
  25. Investigation of the lubrication performance of a marine diesel engine crankshaft using a thermo-electrohydrodynamic model
  26. Modeling credit risk with mixed fractional Brownian motion: An application to barrier options
  27. Method of feature extraction of abnormal communication signal in network based on nonlinear technology
  28. An innovative binocular vision-based method for displacement measurement in membrane structures
  29. An analysis of exponential kernel fractional difference operator for delta positivity
  30. Novel analytic solutions of strain wave model in micro-structured solids
  31. Conditions for the existence of soliton solutions: An analysis of coefficients in the generalized Wu–Zhang system and generalized Sawada–Kotera model
  32. Scale-3 Haar wavelet-based method of fractal-fractional differential equations with power law kernel and exponential decay kernel
  33. Non-linear influences of track dynamic irregularities on vertical levelling loss of heavy-haul railway track geometry under cyclic loadings
  34. Fast analysis approach for instability problems of thin shells utilizing ANNs and a Bayesian regularization back-propagation algorithm
  35. Validity and error analysis of calculating matrix exponential function and vector product
  36. Optimizing execution time and cost while scheduling scientific workflow in edge data center with fault tolerance awareness
  37. Estimating the dynamics of the drinking epidemic model with control interventions: A sensitivity analysis
  38. Online and offline physical education quality assessment based on mobile edge computing
  39. Discovering optical solutions to a nonlinear Schrödinger equation and its bifurcation and chaos analysis
  40. New convolved Fibonacci collocation procedure for the Fitzhugh–Nagumo non-linear equation
  41. Study of weakly nonlinear double-diffusive magneto-convection with throughflow under concentration modulation
  42. Variable sampling time discrete sliding mode control for a flapping wing micro air vehicle using flapping frequency as the control input
  43. Error analysis of arbitrarily high-order stepping schemes for fractional integro-differential equations with weakly singular kernels
  44. Solitary and periodic pattern solutions for time-fractional generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation
  45. An unconditionally stable numerical scheme for solving nonlinear Fisher equation
  46. Effect of modulated boundary on heat and mass transport of Walter-B viscoelastic fluid saturated in porous medium
  47. Analysis of heat mass transfer in a squeezed Carreau nanofluid flow due to a sensor surface with variable thermal conductivity
  48. Navigating waves: Advancing ocean dynamics through the nonlinear Schrödinger equation
  49. Experimental and numerical investigations into torsional-flexural behaviours of railway composite sleepers and bearers
  50. Novel dynamics of the fractional KFG equation through the unified and unified solver schemes with stability and multistability analysis
  51. Analysis of the magnetohydrodynamic effects on non-Newtonian fluid flow in an inclined non-uniform channel under long-wavelength, low-Reynolds number conditions
  52. Convergence analysis of non-matching finite elements for a linear monotone additive Schwarz scheme for semi-linear elliptic problems
  53. Global well-posedness and exponential decay estimates for semilinear Newell–Whitehead–Segel equation
  54. Petrov-Galerkin method for small deflections in fourth-order beam equations in civil engineering
  55. Solution of third-order nonlinear integro-differential equations with parallel computing for intelligent IoT and wireless networks using the Haar wavelet method
  56. Mathematical modeling and computational analysis of hepatitis B virus transmission using the higher-order Galerkin scheme
  57. Mathematical model based on nonlinear differential equations and its control algorithm
  58. Bifurcation and chaos: Unraveling soliton solutions in a couple fractional-order nonlinear evolution equation
  59. Space–time variable-order carbon nanotube model using modified Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo derivative
  60. Minimal universal laser network model: Synchronization, extreme events, and multistability
  61. Valuation of forward start option with mean reverting stock model for uncertain markets
  62. Geometric nonlinear analysis based on the generalized displacement control method and orthogonal iteration
  63. Fuzzy neural network with backpropagation for fuzzy quadratic programming problems and portfolio optimization problems
  64. B-spline curve theory: An overview and applications in real life
  65. Nonlinearity modeling for online estimation of industrial cooling fan speed subject to model uncertainties and state-dependent measurement noise
  66. Quantitative analysis and modeling of ride sharing behavior based on internet of vehicles
  67. Review Article
  68. Bond performance of recycled coarse aggregate concrete with rebar under freeze–thaw environment: A review
  69. Retraction
  70. Retraction of “Convolutional neural network for UAV image processing and navigation in tree plantations based on deep learning”
  71. Special Issue: Dynamic Engineering and Control Methods for the Nonlinear Systems - Part II
  72. Improved nonlinear model predictive control with inequality constraints using particle filtering for nonlinear and highly coupled dynamical systems
  73. Anti-control of Hopf bifurcation for a chaotic system
  74. Special Issue: Decision and Control in Nonlinear Systems - Part I
  75. Addressing target loss and actuator saturation in visual servoing of multirotors: A nonrecursive augmented dynamics control approach
  76. Collaborative control of multi-manipulator systems in intelligent manufacturing based on event-triggered and adaptive strategy
  77. Greenhouse monitoring system integrating NB-IOT technology and a cloud service framework
  78. Special Issue: Unleashing the Power of AI and ML in Dynamical System Research
  79. Computational analysis of the Covid-19 model using the continuous Galerkin–Petrov scheme
  80. Special Issue: Nonlinear Analysis and Design of Communication Networks for IoT Applications - Part I
  81. Research on the role of multi-sensor system information fusion in improving hardware control accuracy of intelligent system
  82. Advanced integration of IoT and AI algorithms for comprehensive smart meter data analysis in smart grids
Heruntergeladen am 8.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nleng-2022-0361/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen