Home Technology Solution of third-order nonlinear integro-differential equations with parallel computing for intelligent IoT and wireless networks using the Haar wavelet method
Article Open Access

Solution of third-order nonlinear integro-differential equations with parallel computing for intelligent IoT and wireless networks using the Haar wavelet method

  • Rohul Amin EMAIL logo , Muhammad Awais , Kamal Shah , Shah Nazir and Thabet Abdeljawad
Published/Copyright: November 18, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

We investigate a class of third-order nonlinear integro-differential equations (IDEs) with parallel computing of intelligent Internet of Things and wireless networks for numerical solutions. A numerical scheme based on the Haar wavelet has been established to compute the approximate solution for the problem under our consideration. By utilizing the mentioned tool, we discretize the involved derivatives and integrals. In this way, a sophisticated scheme is derived. Formulations for maximum root mean square and absolute errors have been given. Also, the convergent method has been discussed. In engineering, such as structural dynamics and control systems, third-order IDEs can improve modelling precision and solution effectiveness. Various examples have been testified by the aforementioned method. Additionally, by using different Gauss and collocation points (CPs), the aforementioned error terms were recorded. The convergence rate using distinct numbers of CPs has also been calculated, which is nearly equal to 2.

1 Introduction

Integro-differential equations (IDEs) are problems involving both the integral and derivative of a function. Researchers have found a wide range of applications of the aforementioned area in engineering [1], astronomy [2], economics [3], mechanics [4], and fluid dynamics [5]. There are three categories of IDEs: Fredholm, Volterra, and Volterra-Fredholm. Researchers in applied mathematics are interested in nonlinear IDEs. Researchers have developed many numerical schemes to solve IDEs. Hashmi et al. [6] deduced the exact solution of Fredholm IDEs using the homotopy asymptotic technique. Chandel et al. [7] developed the numerical solution of higher order Volterra IDEs via the Legendary wavelet method. The authors reduced the problem to the nonlinear algebraic equation by utilizing the Legendary wavelets method. Hemeda [8] presented an iterative technique for nth-order IDEs. Majid [9] used a reliable algorithm for solving boundary value problems of higher order IDEs. Wang [10] presented an algorithm for the solution of higher order nonlinear Volterra–Fredholm IDEs with mechanization. Shang and Han [11] used a variational iteration technique for the solution of nth-order IDEs. In the aforesaid method, the problem has been changed into a system of ordinary IDEs and then investigated by using the variational iterative method. Hou and Yang [12] computed the solution of Fredholm IDEs by utilizing a hybrid function technique. The properties of Chebyshev polynomials and block pulse functions were used to reduce the IDEs to algebraic equations in the said method. Zarebnia and Nikpour [13] computed the solution of Volterra IDEs via the sin functions method. The authors have used the properties of the Sin-collocation technique to reduce the problem to the algebraic equation. Abubakar and Taiwo [14] applied an integral approximation collocation technique for the solution of higher order Fredholm–Volterra IDEs.

Davaeifar et al. [15] used the Bernstein polynomial scheme for the numerical solution of a higher order Fredholm ID-difference equation. The authors have described that the method depends on approximation by the truncated Bernstein series that converts the equations into a system of algebraic equations. Rashidinia and Tahmeasebi [16] computed approximate solution for IDEs by using a modified Taylor expansion technique. Macdonald and Ibrahim [17] presented treatment for higher order linear Fredholm IDEs of degenerated kernels. Atabakan et al. [18] used the spectral homotopy analysis scheme to investigate the solution of nonlinear Fredholm IDEs. Qualitative analysis for a nonlinear variable order problem was investigated by Khan et al. [19]. Khan et al. [20] established essential criteria for the existence of the solution to a class of hybrid problems. Ahmad et al. [21] studied the dynamical model with sliding mode control by using the numerical method based on the wavelet technique. Matinfar and Riahifar [22] calculated the analytic solution of nonlinear Volterra IDEs. In the aforementioned scheme, the nonlinear part of IDEs was approximated by the Adomian polynomials and reduced the equations into simple equations. Kady and Mahmoud [23] investigated the solution of Volterra and Fredholm IDEs through an optimal control approach. Nejafzadeh et al. [24] computed solution of the higher order IDEs by the variational iteration method. With the help of the aforesaid method, they converted higher order IDEs to a system of integral equations, which were then solved by the variational iteration method. During the solutions of differential equations, usually we reduce the system to some integral equations first. For instance, various dynamical systems have been treated by using the mentioned tools.

Keeping in mind the usefulness of the Haar wavelet collocation (HWC) scheme, we investigate the numerical solution of third-order nonlinear Volterra–Fredholm IDEs with parallel computing of intelligent Internet of Things (IoT) and wireless networks. Our considered problem can be described as follows:

(1) w ( x ) + a ( x ) w ( x ) + b ( x ) w ( x ) + c ( x ) w ( x ) = μ 1 a x k 1 ( x , s , w ( s ) , w ( s ) , w ( s ) ) d s + μ 2 a b k 2 ( x , s , w ( s ) , w ( s ) , w ( s ) ) d s + f ( x ) ,

with initial conditions (ICs)

(2) w ( 0 ) = α , w ( 0 ) = β , w ( 0 ) = γ ,

where k 1 and k 2 are kernels of integration and μ 1 and μ 2 are constants. In addition, a , b , c C [ 0 , T ] are coefficient functions, and f C [ 0 , T ] is a source function. The unknown function w C [ 0 , T ] is to be found out.

This article is organized as follows: Section 2 contains Haar functions details. The HWC method for numerical solution of third-order nonlinear IDEs is presented in Section 3. In Section 4, some problems from the existing literature are presented for validation of the HWC scheme. Conclusion is given in Section 6.

2 Haar wavelet

The scaling function [25] on [ a 1 , a 2 ) is

(3) h 1 ( x ) = 1 if x [ a 1 , a 2 ) , 0 elsewhere .

The mother wavelet on [ a 1 , a 2 ) is

(4) h 2 ( x ) = 1 if x a 1 , a 1 + a 2 2 , 1 if x a 1 + a 2 2 , a 2 , 0 elsewhere .

The other terms except the scaling function in this series are represented as

(5) h i ( x ) = 1 if ξ 1 x < ξ 2 , 1 if ξ 2 x < ξ 3 , 0 otherwise ,

where ξ 1 = a 1 + ϱ d ( a 2 a 1 ) , ξ 2 = a 1 + ϱ + 0.5 d ( a 2 a 1 ) , ξ 3 = a 1 + ϱ + 1 d ( a 2 a 1 ) , d = 2 r , r = 0 , , r , and ϱ = 0 , , d 1 . The formula i = d + ϱ + 1 is used to obtain the value of number i . Any member of L 2 [ 0 , 1 ) is expressed as

(6) w ( x ) = k = 1 μ k h k ( x ) .

In Eq. (6), the approximation series is terminated at N terms

w ( x ) k = 1 N μ k h k ( x ) .

Using notation

(7) p i , 1 ( x ) = 0 x h i ( s ) d s

and

(8) p i , 1 ( x ) = x ξ 1 if ξ 1 x < ξ 2 , ξ 3 x if ξ 2 x < ξ 3 , 0 elsewhere .

Thus,

p i , 2 ( x ) = 0 x p i , 1 ( s ) d s ,

we have

(9) p i , 2 ( x ) = 1 2 ( x ξ 1 ) 2 for ξ 1 x < ξ 2 , 1 4 m 2 1 2 ( ξ 3 x ) 2 for ξ 2 x < ξ 3 , 1 4 m 2 for x [ ξ 3 , 1 ) , 0 elsewhere .

Also,

p i , 3 ( x ) = 0 x p i , 2 ( s ) d s ,

we obtain

(10) p i , 3 ( x ) = 1 6 ( x ξ 1 ) 3 if ξ 1 x < ξ 2 , 1 4 m 2 ( x ξ 2 ) 1 6 ( ξ 3 x ) 3 if ξ 2 x < ξ 3 , 1 4 m 2 ( x ξ 2 ) if ξ 3 x < 1 , 0 elsewhere .

For the HWC method, the interval [ α , β ] is discretized by utilizing

(11) x m = α + ( β α ) m 1 2 2 M .

Eq. (11) is called collocation points (CPs). Gauss points (GPs) are represented as

G i = h 3 3 6 + i 1 2 , G i + 1 = h 3 + 3 6 + i 1 2 .

Some of the work using the HWC scheme can be found in previous studies [2637].

3 Numerical method

In this section, we develop HWC scheme for approximate solution of Eq. (1). We use notation Θ = i = 1 N . Let w ( x ) L 2 [ 0 , 1 ) , so

(12) w ( x ) = Θ μ i h i ( x ) .

Integrating three times and using Eq. (2), we obtain

(13) w ( x ) = γ + Θ μ i p i , 1 ( x ) ,

(14) w ( x ) = β + γ x + Θ μ i p i , 2 ( x ) ,

(15) w ( x ) = α + β x + γ x 2 2 + Θ μ i p i , 3 ( x ) .

Eq. (15) is the approximate solution of Eq. (1).

Putting Haar approximations in Eq. (1), we obtain

Θ μ i h i ( x ) + a ( x ) ( γ + Θ μ i p i , 1 ( x ) ) + b ( x ) ( β + γ x + Θ μ i p i , 2 ( x ) ) + c ( x ) α + β x + γ x 2 2 + Θ μ i p i , 3 ( x ) = μ 1 a x k 1 ( x , t , γ + Θ μ i p i , 1 ( t ) , β + γ t + Θ μ i p i , 2 ( t ) , α + β t + γ t 2 2 + Θ μ i p i , 3 ( t ) d t + μ 2 a b k 2 ( x , t , γ + Θ μ i p i , 1 ( t ) , β + γ t + Θ μ i p i , 2 ( t ) , α + β t + γ t 2 2 + Θ μ i p i , 3 ( t ) d t + f ( x ) .

The integrals are approximated as

(16) a 1 a 2 f ( s ) d s a 2 a 1 N m = 1 N f ( s m ) = m = 1 N f a 1 + ( a 2 a 1 ) m 0.5 N .

So

Θ μ i h i ( x ) + a ( x ) ( γ + Θ μ i p i , 1 ( x ) ) + b ( x ) ( β + γ x + Θ μ i p i , 2 ( x ) ) + c ( x ) α + β x + γ x 2 2 + Θ μ i p i , 3 ( x ) = μ 1 a x N m = 1 N k 1 ( x , t m , γ + Θ μ i p i , 1 ( t m ) , β + γ t m + Θ μ i p i , 2 ( t m ) , α + β t m + γ t m 2 2 + Θ μ i p i , 3 ( t m ) + μ 2 b a N m = 1 N k 2 ( x , t m , γ + Θ μ i p i , 1 ( t m ) , β + γ t m + Θ μ i p i , 2 ( t m ) , α + β t m + γ t m 2 2 + Θ μ i p i , 3 ( t m ) + f ( x ) .

After simplification and putting the CPs, we obtain

Θ μ i h i ( x j ) + ( γ + Θ μ i p i , 1 ( x j ) ) a ( x j ) + ( β + γ x j + Θ μ i p i , 2 ( x j ) ) b ( x j ) + α + β x j + γ x j 2 2 + Θ μ i p i , 3 ( x j ) c ( x j ) μ 1 a x j N m = 1 N k 1 ( x j , t m , γ + Θ μ i p i , 1 ( t m ) , β + γ t m + Θ μ i p i , 2 ( t m ) , α + β t m + γ t m 2 2 + Θ μ i p i , 3 ( t m ) μ 2 b a N m = 1 N k 2 ( x j , t m , γ + Θ μ i p i , 1 ( t m ) , β + γ t m + Θ μ i p i , 2 ( t m ) , α + β t m + γ t m 2 2 + Θ μ i p i , 3 ( t m ) f ( x j ) = 0 .

Let

F x j = Θ μ i h i ( x j ) + ( γ + Θ μ i p i , 1 ( x j ) ) a ( x j ) + ( β + γ x j + Θ μ i p i , 2 ( x j ) ) b ( x j ) + α + β x j + γ x j 2 2 + Θ μ i p i , 3 ( x j ) c ( x j ) μ 1 a x j N m = 1 N k 1 ( x j , t m , γ + Θ μ i p i , 1 ( t m ) , β + γ t m + Θ μ i p i , 2 ( t m ) , α + β t m + γ t m 2 2 + Θ μ i p i , 3 ( t m ) μ 2 b a N m = 1 N k 2 ( x j , t m , γ + Θ μ i p i , 1 ( t m ) , β + γ t m + Θ μ i p i , 2 ( t m ) , α + β t m + γ t m 2 2 + Θ μ i p i , 3 ( t m ) f ( x j ) .

This is nonlinear system with unknown μ i ’s and Broyden’s scheme for solution of this system is used. Putting these coefficients in Eq. (15), we obtain numerical solution of Eq. (1). For Broyden’s scheme, the Jacobian is required, and it is computed using partial derivatives; specifically, the Jacobian of the system is calculated as:

F x j a k = h k ( x j ) + p k , 1 ( x j ) a ( x j ) + p k , 2 ( x j ) b ( x j ) + p k , 3 ( x j ) c ( x j ) m = 1 N μ 1 a x j N + μ 2 b a N × ( p k , 1 ( t m ) + p k , 2 ( t m ) + p k , 3 ( t m ) ) .

4 Numerical examples

If w a p is used for numerical solution and w e x is used for analytical solution, then maximum absolute errors E 1 at CPs and E 2 at GPs are calculated as E 1 = max w a p c w e x c and E 2 = max w a p g w e x g . Root mean square error E 3 at CPs and E 4 at GP are E 3 = 1 N i = 1 N w a p c w e x c 2 and E 4 = 1 N i = 1 N w a p g w e x g 2 . Convergence rate R 1 at CPs and R 2 at GPs is defined as [38]: R 1 = log [ w a p c ( N 2 ) w a p c ( N ) ] log 2 and R 2 = log [ w a p g ( N 2 ) w a p g ( N ) ] log 2 .

Problem 1

Consider Fredholm IDE [39]:

(17) w ( x ) = e x + 1 1 e x 2 t w 2 ( t ) d t ,

with ICs w ( 0 ) = w ( 0 ) = w ( 0 ) = 1 . Exact solution is w ( x ) = e x . We compute the convergence rate and mean square errors in Table 1 and present graphical illustration in Figure 1.

Table 1

Convergence rate and errors for Problem 1

J N = 2 J + 1 E 1 R 1 E 2 R 2 E 3 E 4
0 2 2.65641 × 1 0 03 6.04560 × 1 0 04 1.47984 × 1 0 03 3.33883 × 1 0 04
1 4 7.80322 × 1 0 04 1.7673 1.69911 × 1 0 04 1.8311 3.80282 × 1 0 04 8.31493 × 1 0 05
2 8 2.10711 × 1 0 04 1.8888 4.50182 × 1 0 05 1.9162 9.57222 × 1 0 05 2.07661 × 1 0 05
3 16 5.47051 × 1 0 05 1.9455 1.15834 × 1 0 05 1.9585 2.39711 × 1 0 05 5.19040 × 1 0 06
4 32 1.39343 × 1 0 05 1.9731 2.93781 × 1 0 06 1.9792 5.99531 × 1 0 06 1.29750 × 1 0 06
5 64 3.51604 × 1 0 06 1.9866 7.39741 × 1 0 07 1.9896 1.49900 × 1 0 06 3.24371 × 1 0 07
6 128 4.22161 × 1 0 07 2.0581 4.57160 × 1 0 08 2.0162 1.22261 × 1 0 07 2.98872 × 1 0 08
Figure 1 
               Exact and approximate solution comparison of Problem 1.
Figure 1

Exact and approximate solution comparison of Problem 1.

Problem 2

Consider

(18) w ( x ) = 1 16 0 1 e x 4 t w 2 ( t ) d t + 8 e 2 x 1 16 e x ,

w ( 0 ) = 4 , w ( 0 ) = 2 , w ( 0 ) = 1 .

Exact solution of given problem is w ( x ) = e 2 x . We compute the convergence rate and mean square errors in Table 2. In addition, we present graphical illustration in Figure 2.

Table 2

Convergence rate and errors for Problem 2

J N = 2 J + 1 E 1 R 1 E 2 R 2 E 3 E 4
0 2 4.72660 × 1 0 02 1.01470 × 1 0 02 2.60900 × 1 0 2 5.58900 × 1 0 03
1 4 1.40901 × 1 0 02 1.7461 2.82820 × 1 0 03 1.8431 6.73444 × 1 0 3 1.37621 × 1 0 03
2 8 3.83512 × 1 0 03 1.8774 7.48822 × 1 0 04 1.9172 1.69724 × 1 0 3 3.42872 × 1 0 04
3 16 9.99672 × 1 0 04 1.9397 1.92741 × 1 0 04 1.9579 4.25161 × 1 0 4 8.56451 × 1 0 05
4 32 2.55142 × 1 0 04 1.9701 4.88991 × 1 0 05 1.9788 1.06342 × 1 0 4 2.14071 × 1 0 05
5 64 6.44474 × 1 0 05 1.9851 1.23152 × 1 0 05 1.9894 2.65892 × 1 0 5 5.35142 × 1 0 06
6 128 1.61383 × 1 0 05 1.9977 3.08391 × 1 0 06 1.9976 6.62672 × 1 0 6 1.33562 × 1 0 06
Figure 2 
               Exact and approximate solution comparison of Problem 2.
Figure 2

Exact and approximate solution comparison of Problem 2.

Problem 3

Next, we have the following nonlinear Volterra IDE:

(19) w ( x ) = 3 2 e x 1 2 e 3 x + 0 x e x t w 3 ( t ) d t ,

w ( 0 ) = w ( 0 ) = w ( 0 ) = 1 . Exact solution is w ( x ) = e x . We compute the convergence rate and mean square errors in Table 3. Also, we present graphical illustration in Figure 3.

Table 3

Convergence rate and errors for Problem 3

J N = 2 J + 1 E 1 R 1 E 2 R 2 E 3 E 4
0 2 2.25254 × 1 0 03 5.67091 × 1 0 04 1.27402 × 1 0 03 3.14510 × 1 0 04
1 4 6.48080 × 1 0 04 1.7973 1.58932 × 1 0 04 1.8352 3.26311 × 1 0 04 7.84045 × 1 0 05
2 8 1.72683 × 1 0 04 1.9081 4.20332 × 1 0 05 1.9188 8.20685 × 1 0 05 1.95873 × 1 0 05
3 16 4.44951 × 1 0 05 1.9564 1.08053 × 1 0 05 1.9598 2.05490 × 1 0 05 4.89603 × 1 0 06
4 32 1.12930 × 1 0 05 1.9782 2.73901 × 1 0 06 1.9800 5.14045 × 1 0 06 1.22392 × 1 0 06
5 64 2.85092 × 1 0 06 1.9859 6.89500 × 1 0 07 1.9900 1.28655 × 1 0 06 3.05981 × 1 0 07
6 128 7.22660 × 1 0 07 1.9800 1.72981 × 1 0 07 1.9949 3.22982 × 1 0 07 7.64990 × 1 0 08
Figure 3 
               Exact and approximate solution comparison of Problem 3.
Figure 3

Exact and approximate solution comparison of Problem 3.

Problem 4

Consider Volterra IDE:

(20) w ( x ) = 1 4 ( 2 x + sin 2 x 4 cos x ) + 0 x w 2 ( s ) d s ,

w ( 0 ) = w ( 0 ) = 0 , and w ( 0 ) = 1 . The above problem has exact solution w ( x ) = sin x . We compute the convergence rate and mean square errors in Table 4. Graphical illustration is shown in Figure 4.

Table 4

Convergence rate and errors for Problem 4

J N = 2 J + 1 E 1 R 1 E 2 R 2 E 3 E 4
0 2 2.72905 × 1 0 04 4.63421 × 1 0 05 1.47455 × 1 0 04 2.48625 × 1 0 05
1 4 8.02774 × 1 0 05 1.7653 1.17992 × 1 0 05 1.9737 3.70704 × 1 0 05 5.31774 × 1 0 06
2 8 2.18071 × 1 0 05 1.8802 3.09080 × 1 0 06 1.9326 9.28092 × 1 0 06 1.27610 × 1 0 06
3 16 5.68322 × 1 0 06 1.9400 7.97540 × 1 0 07 1.9544 2.32091 × 1 0 06 3.15742 × 1 0 07
4 32 1.44983 × 1 0 06 1.9708 2.02941 × 1 0 07 1.9745 5.80081 × 1 0 07 7.87302 × 1 0 08
5 64 3.65260 × 1 0 07 1.9889 5.12081 × 1 0 08 1.9866 1.44830 × 1 0 07 1.96691 × 1 0 08
6 128 9.07884 × 1 0 08 2.0084 1.28621 × 1 0 08 1.9933 3.60165 × 1 0 08 4.91644 × 1 0 09
Figure 4 
               Exact and approximate solution comparison of Problem 4.
Figure 4

Exact and approximate solution comparison of Problem 4.

Problem 5

Consider Volterra–Fredholm IDE

(21) w ( x ) + w 2 ( x ) = 1 12 ( 398 e 3 x + 18 x + e 3 + 12 e 6 x + 114 ) 0 x w ( t ) d t 0 1 w ( t ) d t ,

w ( 0 ) = 9 , w ( 0 ) = 4 , and w ( 0 ) = 3 . Exact solution is w ( x ) = e 3 x + 3 . In addition, the convergence rate and mean square errors are given in Table 5. Further, graphical presentation is given in Figure 5.

Table 5

Convergence rate and errors for Problem 5

J N = 2 J + 1 E 1 R 1 E 2 R 2 E 3 E 4
0 2 2.79070 × 1 0 01 5.70800 × 1 0 02 1.53191 × 1 0 01 3.12333 × 1 0 0 2
1 4 8.42825 × 1 0 02 1.7273 1.58544 × 1 0 02 1.8481 3.99682 × 1 0 02 7.62382 × 1 0 03
2 8 2.29983 × 1 0 02 1.8737 4.20272 × 1 0 03 1.9155 1.01024 × 1 0 02 1.89592 × 1 0 03
3 16 5.99442 × 1 0 03 1.9398 1.08301 × 1 0 03 1.9563 2.53285 × 1 0 03 4.73371 × 1 0 04
4 32 1.52961 × 1 0 03 1.9705 2.74951 × 1 0 04 1.9778 6.33754 × 1 0 04 1.18300 × 1 0 04
5 64 3.86750 × 1 0 04 1.9837 6.92713 × 1 0 05 1.9888 1.58563 × 1 0 04 2.95742 × 1 0 05
6 128 9.76821 × 1 0 05 1.9852 1.73851 × 1 0 05 1.9944 3.97461 × 1 0 05 7.39361 × 1 0 06
Figure 5 
               Exact and approximate solution comparison of Problem 5.
Figure 5

Exact and approximate solution comparison of Problem 5.

5 Discussion

The third-order derivative in IDEs has been approximated by the Haar series. The obtained results were then used to approximate the second- and first-order derivatives by integration. Using the HWC method and putting CPs in given nonlinear IDEs, we obtain a system of nonlinear equations. Broyden’s algorithm has been utilized for solution of nonlinear system. The solution at CPs and GPs is obtained by using these coefficients. Errors E 1 , E 2 , E 3 , and E 4 for distinct number of CPs and GPs are given in Table 1 for Problem 1, Table 2 for Problem 2, Table 3 for Problem 3, Table 4 for Problem 4, and Table 5 for Problem 5. Errors can be decreased by taking more discrete CPs and GPs. R 1 has also calculated, we see that R 1 is nearly equal to 2, which confirms the results of Majak et al. [38]. An important property of the HWC method, which has been observed from all tables, is that if we take more CPs and GPs, the accuracy increases. The initial guess for Broyden’s scheme was set to zero and iterations ended when the convergent criterion was satisfied. The comparison of exact and numerical solutions at N = 32 CPs for Problem 1 is shown in Figure 1, for Problem 2 in Figure 2, for Problem 3 in Figure 3, for Problem 4 in Figure 4, and for Problem 5 in Figure 5.

6 Conclusion

In this work, solution of nonlinear IDEs with parallel computing of intelligent IoT and wireless networks using HWC techniques has been discussed. E 1 , E 2 , E 3 , and E 4 errors were calculated for different numbers of CPs and GPs for each example to demonstrate the efficiency of our adopted numerical scheme. CP R 1 and R 2 at different CPs and GPs were calculated, which is nearly equal to 2. Numerical and exact solution comparison for 32 CPs has been given for each example in various figures. The numerical results were obtained using MATLAB program. The HWC method can be applied to higher order linear and nonlinear IDEs with different types of initial and boundary conditions. In addition, the aforementioned numerical scheme can be extended to various classes of IDEs with fractional orders involving different kinds of kernels in the future.

Acknowledgement

Kamal Shah and Thabet Abdeljawad would like to thank Prince Sultan University for APC and support through TAS research lab.

  1. Funding information: No funding is available to support this study.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and consented to its submission to the journal, reviewed all the results and approved the final version of the manuscript. R.A., M.A., K.S., S.N., and T.A. wrote the main manuscript, R.A. and M.A. prepared the tables figures and reviewed the manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: No conflict of interest exists.

  4. Data availability statement: The data used in this research is included within the article.

References

[1] Saaty TL. Modern nonlinear equations. New York: Dover Publications; 1981. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Delves LM, Mohamed JL. Computational methods for integral equations. London: Cambridge University Press; 1985. 10.1017/CBO9780511569609Search in Google Scholar

[3] Rashed M. Numerical solution of functional differential, integral and integro-differential equations. Appl Numer Math. 2004;156:485–92. 10.1016/j.amc.2003.08.021Search in Google Scholar

[4] Hatamzadeh S, Naser M. An integral equation modelling of electromagnetic scattering from the surfaces of arbitrary resistance distribution. Prog Electr Res. 2008;3:157–72. 10.2528/PIERB07121404Search in Google Scholar

[5] Gulsu M, Sezer M. Approximations to the solution of linear Fredholm integro-differential difference equation of high order. J Frankl Inst. 2006;343:720–37. 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2006.07.003Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hashmi MS, Khan N, Iqbal S, Zahid MA. Exact solution of Fredholm integro-differential equations using optimal homotopy asymptotic method. J Appl Env Biol Sci. 2016;6:162–6. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Chandel R, Singh A, Chouhan D. Solutions of high order Volterra integro differential equations by Legendre wavelet. Int J Appl Math. 2015;4:377–90. 10.12732/ijam.v28i4.6Search in Google Scholar

[8] Hemeda AA. New iterative method: Application to nth-order integro-differential equations. Int Math Forum. 2012;7:2317–32. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Majid A. A reliable algorithm for solving boundary value problems for higher-order integro-differential equations. Appl Math Comput. 2001;118:327–42. 10.1016/S0096-3003(99)00225-8Search in Google Scholar

[10] Wang W. An algorithm for solving the high-order nonlinear Volterra-Fredholm integro-differential equation with mechanization. Appl Math Comput. 2006;172:1–27. 10.1016/j.amc.2005.01.116Search in Google Scholar

[11] Shang X, Han D. Application of the variation iteration method for solving nth-order integro-differential equations. J Comput Appl Math. 2010;234:1442–7. 10.1016/j.cam.2010.02.020Search in Google Scholar

[12] Hou J, Yang C. Numerical method in solving Fredholm integro-differential equations by using Hybrid function operational matrix of derivative. J Info Comput Sci. 2013;9:2757–64. 10.12733/jics20101830Search in Google Scholar

[13] Zarebnia M, Nikpour Z. Solution of linear Volterra integro-differential equations via Sinc function. Int J Appl Math Comput. 2010;2:1–10. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Abubakar T, Taiwo. Integral collocation approximation methods for the numerical solution of high-orders linear Fredholm-Volterra integro-differential equations. J Comput Appl Math. 2014;4:111–17. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Davaeifar S, Rashidinia J, Amirfakhrian M. Bernstein polynomial approach for solution of higher order mixed linear Fredholm integro-differential-difference equations with variable coefficients. J Pure Appl Math. 2016;7:46–62. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Rashidinia J, Tahmasebi A. Approximate solution of linear integro-differential equations by using modified Taylor expansion method. J Model Simul. 2013;4:289–301. Search in Google Scholar

[17] MacDonald A, Onuwe AI. Treatment for higher order linear Fredholm integro-differential equations of degenerated kernel. Gen Math Notes. 2014;23:79–88. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Atabakan ZP, Nasab AK, Kilicman A, Eshkuvatov ZK. Numerical solution of nonlinear Fredholm integro-differential equations using spectral homotopy analysis method. Math Prob Eng. 2013:1–9. 10.1155/2013/674364.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Khan H, Ahmed S, Alzabut J, Azar AT, Gómez-Aguilar JF. Nonlinear variable order system of multi-point boundary conditions with adaptive finite-time fractional-order sliding mode control. Int J Dyn Control. 2024;2024:1–17. 10.1007/s40435-023-01369-1Search in Google Scholar

[20] Khan H, Alzabut J, Gómez-Aguilar JF, Alkhazan A. Essential criteria for existence of solution of a modified-ABC fractional order smoking model. Ain Shams Eng J. 2024;15(5):102646. 10.1016/j.asej.2024.102646Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ahmed S, Azar AT, Abdel-Aty M, Khan H, Alzabut J. A nonlinear system of hybrid fractional differential equations with application to fixed time sliding mode control for Leukemia therapy. Ain Shams Eng J. 2024;15(4):102566. 10.1016/j.asej.2023.102566Search in Google Scholar

[22] Matinfar M, Riahifar A. Analytic approximate solution for nonlinear Volterra integro-differential equations. J Lin Topol Algebra. 2015;3:217–28. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Kady M, Mahmoud D. Numerical solutions of Fredholm and Volterra integro differential equations via Optimal control approach. Res. J Appl Sci. 2012;8:4296–307. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Najafzadeh N, Ayatollahi M, Effati S. Solution of higher order integro-differential equations by Variational iteration method. Aus J Basic Appl Sci. 2012;6:175–81. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Aziz I, Amin R. Numerical solution of a class of delay differential and delay partial differential equations via Haar wavelet. Appl Math Model. 2016;40:10286–99. 10.1016/j.apm.2016.07.018Search in Google Scholar

[26] Amin R, Shah K, Asif M, Khan I. A computational algorithm for the numerical solution of fractional order delay differential equations. Appl Math Comput. 2021;402:125863. 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125863Search in Google Scholar

[27] Amin R, Mahariq I, Shah K, Awais M, Elsayed F. Numerical solution of the second order linear and nonlinear integro-differential equations using Haar wavelet method. Arab J Basic Appl Sci. 2021;28:11–19. 10.1080/25765299.2020.1863561Search in Google Scholar

[28] Amin R, Shah K, Al-Mdallal QM, Khan I, Asif M. Efficient numerical algorithm for the solution of eight order boundary value problems by Haar wavelet method. Int J Appl Comput Math. 2021;7(34):1–18. 10.1007/s40819-021-00975-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Xuan Y, Amin R, Zaman F, Khan Z, Ullah I, Nazir S. Second-order delay differential equations to deal the experimentation of internet of industrial things via Haar wavelet approach. Wireless Commun Mobile Comput. 2021;5551497. 10.1155/2021/5551497.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Wu H, Amin R, Khan A, Nazir S, Ahmad S. Solution of the systems of delay integral equations in Heterogeneous data communication through Haar wavelet collocation approach. Complexity. 2021:5805433. 10.1155/2021/5805433Search in Google Scholar

[31] Amin R, Ahmad H, Shah K, Hafeez MB, Sumelka W. Theoretical and computational analysis of nonlinear fractional integro-differential equations via collocation method. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2021;151:111252. 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111252Search in Google Scholar

[32] Amin R, Shah K, Asif M, Khan I, Ullah F. An efficient algorithm for numerical solution of fractional integro-differential equations via Haar wavelet. J Comput Appl Math. 2021;3811:113028. 10.1016/j.cam.2020.113028Search in Google Scholar

[33] Amin R, Nazir S, Magarino IG. Efficient sustainable algorithm for numerical solution of nonlinear delay Fredholm-Volterra integral equations via Haar wavelet for dense sensor networks in emerging telecommunications. Trans Emerging Tele Tech. 2020;22:1–12. 10.1002/ett.3877Search in Google Scholar

[34] Amin R, Nazir S, Magarino IG. A collocation method for numerical solution of nonlinear delay integro-differential equations for wireless sensor network and internet of things. Sensors. 2020;20:1962. 10.3390/s20071962Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Zaman SS, Amin R, Haider N, Aloqaily A, Mlaiki N. Haar wavelet collocation technique for numerical solution of porous media equations. Partial Diff Equ Appl Math. 2024;10:100728. 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100728Search in Google Scholar

[36] Yasmeen S, Amin R. Higher-order Haar wavelet method for solution of fourth-order integro-differential equations. J Comput Sci. 2024;81:102394. 10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102394Search in Google Scholar

[37] Zaman SS, Amin R, Haider N, Akgul A. Numerical solution of Fisheras equation through the application of Haar wavelet collocation method. Num Heat Transfer Part B Fundam. 2024 May;1–12. 10.1080/10407790.2024.2348129.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Majak J, Shvartsman BS, Kirs M, Pohlak M, Herranen H. Convergence theorem for the Haar wavelet based discretization method. Comp Struct. 2015;126:227–32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.050Search in Google Scholar

[39] Molabahrami A. Direct computation method for solving a general nonlinear Fredholm integro-differential equation under the mixed conditions: Degenerate and non-degenerate kernels. J Comput Appl Math. 2015;282:34–43. 10.1016/j.cam.2014.12.025Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-01-17
Revised: 2024-08-24
Accepted: 2024-09-13
Published Online: 2024-11-18

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. Focus on NLENG 2023 Volume 12 Issue 1
  3. Research Articles
  4. Seismic vulnerability signal analysis of low tower cable-stayed bridges method based on convolutional attention network
  5. Robust passivity-based nonlinear controller design for bilateral teleoperation system under variable time delay and variable load disturbance
  6. A physically consistent AI-based SPH emulator for computational fluid dynamics
  7. Asymmetrical novel hyperchaotic system with two exponential functions and an application to image encryption
  8. A novel framework for effective structural vulnerability assessment of tubular structures using machine learning algorithms (GA and ANN) for hybrid simulations
  9. Flow and irreversible mechanism of pure and hybridized non-Newtonian nanofluids through elastic surfaces with melting effects
  10. Stability analysis of the corruption dynamics under fractional-order interventions
  11. Solutions of certain initial-boundary value problems via a new extended Laplace transform
  12. Numerical solution of two-dimensional fractional differential equations using Laplace transform with residual power series method
  13. Fractional-order lead networks to avoid limit cycle in control loops with dead zone and plant servo system
  14. Modeling anomalous transport in fractal porous media: A study of fractional diffusion PDEs using numerical method
  15. Analysis of nonlinear dynamics of RC slabs under blast loads: A hybrid machine learning approach
  16. On theoretical and numerical analysis of fractal--fractional non-linear hybrid differential equations
  17. Traveling wave solutions, numerical solutions, and stability analysis of the (2+1) conformal time-fractional generalized q-deformed sinh-Gordon equation
  18. Influence of damage on large displacement buckling analysis of beams
  19. Approximate numerical procedures for the Navier–Stokes system through the generalized method of lines
  20. Mathematical analysis of a combustible viscoelastic material in a cylindrical channel taking into account induced electric field: A spectral approach
  21. A new operational matrix method to solve nonlinear fractional differential equations
  22. New solutions for the generalized q-deformed wave equation with q-translation symmetry
  23. Optimize the corrosion behaviour and mechanical properties of AISI 316 stainless steel under heat treatment and previous cold working
  24. Soliton dynamics of the KdV–mKdV equation using three distinct exact methods in nonlinear phenomena
  25. Investigation of the lubrication performance of a marine diesel engine crankshaft using a thermo-electrohydrodynamic model
  26. Modeling credit risk with mixed fractional Brownian motion: An application to barrier options
  27. Method of feature extraction of abnormal communication signal in network based on nonlinear technology
  28. An innovative binocular vision-based method for displacement measurement in membrane structures
  29. An analysis of exponential kernel fractional difference operator for delta positivity
  30. Novel analytic solutions of strain wave model in micro-structured solids
  31. Conditions for the existence of soliton solutions: An analysis of coefficients in the generalized Wu–Zhang system and generalized Sawada–Kotera model
  32. Scale-3 Haar wavelet-based method of fractal-fractional differential equations with power law kernel and exponential decay kernel
  33. Non-linear influences of track dynamic irregularities on vertical levelling loss of heavy-haul railway track geometry under cyclic loadings
  34. Fast analysis approach for instability problems of thin shells utilizing ANNs and a Bayesian regularization back-propagation algorithm
  35. Validity and error analysis of calculating matrix exponential function and vector product
  36. Optimizing execution time and cost while scheduling scientific workflow in edge data center with fault tolerance awareness
  37. Estimating the dynamics of the drinking epidemic model with control interventions: A sensitivity analysis
  38. Online and offline physical education quality assessment based on mobile edge computing
  39. Discovering optical solutions to a nonlinear Schrödinger equation and its bifurcation and chaos analysis
  40. New convolved Fibonacci collocation procedure for the Fitzhugh–Nagumo non-linear equation
  41. Study of weakly nonlinear double-diffusive magneto-convection with throughflow under concentration modulation
  42. Variable sampling time discrete sliding mode control for a flapping wing micro air vehicle using flapping frequency as the control input
  43. Error analysis of arbitrarily high-order stepping schemes for fractional integro-differential equations with weakly singular kernels
  44. Solitary and periodic pattern solutions for time-fractional generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation
  45. An unconditionally stable numerical scheme for solving nonlinear Fisher equation
  46. Effect of modulated boundary on heat and mass transport of Walter-B viscoelastic fluid saturated in porous medium
  47. Analysis of heat mass transfer in a squeezed Carreau nanofluid flow due to a sensor surface with variable thermal conductivity
  48. Navigating waves: Advancing ocean dynamics through the nonlinear Schrödinger equation
  49. Experimental and numerical investigations into torsional-flexural behaviours of railway composite sleepers and bearers
  50. Novel dynamics of the fractional KFG equation through the unified and unified solver schemes with stability and multistability analysis
  51. Analysis of the magnetohydrodynamic effects on non-Newtonian fluid flow in an inclined non-uniform channel under long-wavelength, low-Reynolds number conditions
  52. Convergence analysis of non-matching finite elements for a linear monotone additive Schwarz scheme for semi-linear elliptic problems
  53. Global well-posedness and exponential decay estimates for semilinear Newell–Whitehead–Segel equation
  54. Petrov-Galerkin method for small deflections in fourth-order beam equations in civil engineering
  55. Solution of third-order nonlinear integro-differential equations with parallel computing for intelligent IoT and wireless networks using the Haar wavelet method
  56. Mathematical modeling and computational analysis of hepatitis B virus transmission using the higher-order Galerkin scheme
  57. Mathematical model based on nonlinear differential equations and its control algorithm
  58. Bifurcation and chaos: Unraveling soliton solutions in a couple fractional-order nonlinear evolution equation
  59. Space–time variable-order carbon nanotube model using modified Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo derivative
  60. Minimal universal laser network model: Synchronization, extreme events, and multistability
  61. Valuation of forward start option with mean reverting stock model for uncertain markets
  62. Geometric nonlinear analysis based on the generalized displacement control method and orthogonal iteration
  63. Fuzzy neural network with backpropagation for fuzzy quadratic programming problems and portfolio optimization problems
  64. B-spline curve theory: An overview and applications in real life
  65. Nonlinearity modeling for online estimation of industrial cooling fan speed subject to model uncertainties and state-dependent measurement noise
  66. Quantitative analysis and modeling of ride sharing behavior based on internet of vehicles
  67. Review Article
  68. Bond performance of recycled coarse aggregate concrete with rebar under freeze–thaw environment: A review
  69. Retraction
  70. Retraction of “Convolutional neural network for UAV image processing and navigation in tree plantations based on deep learning”
  71. Special Issue: Dynamic Engineering and Control Methods for the Nonlinear Systems - Part II
  72. Improved nonlinear model predictive control with inequality constraints using particle filtering for nonlinear and highly coupled dynamical systems
  73. Anti-control of Hopf bifurcation for a chaotic system
  74. Special Issue: Decision and Control in Nonlinear Systems - Part I
  75. Addressing target loss and actuator saturation in visual servoing of multirotors: A nonrecursive augmented dynamics control approach
  76. Collaborative control of multi-manipulator systems in intelligent manufacturing based on event-triggered and adaptive strategy
  77. Greenhouse monitoring system integrating NB-IOT technology and a cloud service framework
  78. Special Issue: Unleashing the Power of AI and ML in Dynamical System Research
  79. Computational analysis of the Covid-19 model using the continuous Galerkin–Petrov scheme
  80. Special Issue: Nonlinear Analysis and Design of Communication Networks for IoT Applications - Part I
  81. Research on the role of multi-sensor system information fusion in improving hardware control accuracy of intelligent system
  82. Advanced integration of IoT and AI algorithms for comprehensive smart meter data analysis in smart grids
Downloaded on 8.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nleng-2024-0039/html
Scroll to top button