Home Technology Numerical solution of two-dimensional fractional differential equations using Laplace transform with residual power series method
Article Open Access

Numerical solution of two-dimensional fractional differential equations using Laplace transform with residual power series method

  • Rajendra Pant , Geeta Arora , Brajesh Kumar Singh and Homan Emadifar EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 5, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

One of the efficient and reliable methods for resolving fractional order linear as well as non-linear differential equations is the Laplace transform with residual power series method. This approach is used in the current research to obtain the numerical solutions of the two-dimensional fractional differential equations, namely, the temporal fractional order diffusion equation and the fractional biological population equation. The unknown coefficients of the series solutions to these equations are determined using the proposed approach. The difference between exact and analytical-numerical solutions is presented for these equations in the form of errors. The advantage of the suggested method over alternative approaches is that it requires less computation to solve these two-dimensional differential equations of time-fractional order.

1 Introduction

Fractional differential equations (FDEs) have drawn the interest of researchers in the study of differential calculus due to their broad implications and wide range of applications in various types of problems arising in signal processing systems, diffusion-reaction processes, electrical network systems, and some other technical issues [1].

The extended versions of the classical differential equations are the FDEs [2,3], which have been widely applied in a variety of scientific domains during the past few decades. There are various applications in science that describe the importance of the principles of fractional calculus. Despite the fact that there are many available numerical and analytical techniques for solving FDEs mathematically, researchers are putting their efforts in developing new technique that can lead to more accurate solution of the fractional equations.

There are many trustworthy and effective numerical and analytical procedures that can be used to address time-fractional problems with greater accuracy. Time fractional differential problems have been solved using a variety of methods, including the homotopy analysis method [4], Laplace transform [5], Adomian decomposition method [6], variational iteration method [7], promoted residual power series method [8], homotopy perturbation method [9], differential transform method [10], iterative method [11], and others. Local fractional integral transforms [12] are also applied to find the solutions of such equations in numerical forms. Recently, a well-known fractional relaxation oscillation equation is solved by using residual power series method [13] and obtained highly reliable and efficient results.

One of the well-known semi-analytical methods for solving various types of systems of ordinary, fractional, and partial differential equations is the residual power series method (RPSM) [14]. While this analytical approximation generates solution in the form of a polynomial, the approach offers the solution as convergent power series with easily calculable components. There are numerous ways in which the RPSM is different from the traditional higher order Taylor series technique. One of the ways that make this method different from the Taylor’s series approximation is that the RPSM can be easily hybrid with the transform. There are various linear and non-linear equations that are solved using RPSM such as a time-fractional order Schrödinger equation [15], fractional relaxation-oscillation equation [13], time-fractional foam drainage model [16], fractional Boussinesq equation [17], fractional coupled physical equations arising in fluid flow [18], and many others. There are many other well-known equations which are solved by using transform along with RPSM such as Laplace transform with residual power series method (LRPSM) is used to solve temporal-fractional NWS equation, fractional Burger’s equation, and fractional Drinfeld–Sokolov–Wilson system [8], fractional Riccati differential equation [19], and fractional reaction–diffusion Brusselator model [20]. The Elzaki transform with residual power series method is also successfully implemented to solve fractional order equations such as the two-dimensional fractional order diffusion equation [21] and time-fractional biological population diffusion equations [22].

In the last several decades, numerous fractional generalizations of the time-fractional diffusion equation have been presented and have been the subject of significant discussion in both the academic literature and various diffusion model applications [21]. The time-fractional diffusion equation is a partial differential equation that characterizes the temporal evolution of a quantity, such as heat, mass, or particles, by adding the principles of fractional calculus. In contrast to the conventional diffusion equation that employs integer-order derivatives, the time-fractional diffusion equation incorporates fractional derivatives in the temporal domain. This feature enables the model to effectively capture non-local and memory-dependent behaviours in diffusion processes, making it particularly advantageous for modelling phenomena characterized by long-range interactions or intricate temporal dependencies. Although the fractional diffusion equations have been solved by many numerical and analytical approaches. Here an attempt is made to implement the LPRSM to solve the equation for various values of the fractional power.

Another equation which is presented in this work is a time-fractional order biological population equation. The time-fractional order biological population equation is a mathematical framework employed to elucidate the temporal dynamics of a biological population, integrating the principles of fractional calculus [22]. Within the framework of a biological population equation, the fractional order is commonly utilized to denote a level of memory or a more intricate reliance on previous occurrences compared to conventional differential equations with integer orders. The utilization of these equations in the field of ecology and population dynamics serves to effectively capture many behaviours, including but not limited to population growth, competition, predation, and the influence of environmental factors, with enhanced precision.

Consider the general FDE in two dimensions of the form,

(1) D t α Ψ ( x , y , t ) + L [ x , y ] Ψ ( x , y , t ) + NL [ x , y ] Ψ ( x , y , t ) = φ ( x , y , t ) ,

for t > 0 , 1 1 n < α 1 with initial condition,

(2) Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) = f 0 ( x , y ) ,

and

(3) f n 1 ( x , y ) = D t α 1 Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) = μ ( x , y ) ,

where D t α = α t α , L [ x , y ] is the linear function in x and y , NL [ x , y ] is the general non-linear function in x and y , and φ ( x , y , t ) is taken as a continuous function.

For LRPSM, the solutions of Eqs (1) and (2) can be written as fractional power series form regarding the primary point t = 0 .

The order in which the manuscript is given is as follows: Introduction is presented in Section 1. Preliminary definitions are covered in Section 2. The research methodology used to solve two-dimensional fractional order differential equations using LRPSM is thoroughly justified in Section 3. The numerical solutions to these equations are provided in Section 4. The explanations and results are provided in Section 5. The conclusion for the research topic is presented in Section 6.

2 Preliminaries

Laplace transform is a well-known transform or map which is helpful to obtain coefficients in the series solution of considered equations. Some of the well-known concepts for the Laplace transform are as follows:

Suppose f ( t ) be a function defined for all t > 0 , then the Laplace transform of f ( t ) denoted by L { f ( t ) } is defined as, L { f ( t ) } = 0 e pt f ( t ) d t , provided that the integral exists with parameter t . Laplace transform is a map of p and is denoted by f ̅ (p).

Therefore,

f ̅ ( p ) = L { f ( t ) } = 0 e pt f ( t ) d t .

Again, the function f ( t ) is called the inverse Laplace transform of f ̅ (p). It is useful for finding inverse Laplace transform on numerical solution of FDEs considered in this study.

Another important concept related to the series solution is its convergence. A series of the form n = 0 c n ( x x 0 ) n = c 0 + c 1 ( x x 0 ) + c 2 ( x x 0 ) 2 + is known as a general power series in x x 0 . In particular, an infinite series n = 0 c n x n = c 0 + c 1 x + c 2 x 2 + is known as power series in x . The power series n = 0 c n ( x x 0 ) n converges (absolutely) for | x | < R where R = lim n c n c n + 1 , provided that the limit exists.

3 Methodology

The following steps are used in the methodology of the LRPSM [23] for solving two-dimensional FDEs in fractional power series [24]:

Step 1: Performing Laplace transform on diffusion equation,

(4) L D t α Ψ ( x , y , t ) = L Ψ xx ( x , y , t ) + L Ψ yy ( x , y , t ) .

By property of Laplace transform,

(5) L [ D t α Ψ ( x , y , t ) ] = s α L [ Ψ ( x , y , t ) ] s α 1 Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) .

Hence, Eq. (4) can be written as

(6) s α L [ Ψ ( x , y , t ) ] s α 1 Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) = L ( Ψ ( x , y , t ) ) xx + L ( Ψ ( x , y , t ) ) yy , Ψ ( x , y , s ) = Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) s + 1 s α Ψ xx ( x , y , s ) + 1 s α Ψ yy ( x , y , s ) .

Step 2: The solutions in LRPS form can be written as

(7) Ψ ( x , y , s ) = k = 0 h k ( x , y ) s α k + 1 ,

(8) Ψ xx ( x , y , s ) = k = 0 x 2 h k ( x , y ) s α k + 1 ,

(9) Ψ yy ( x , y , s ) = k = 0 y 2 h k ( x , y ) s α k + 1 .

Again, the k th-Laplace residual function of (6) is,

(10) L Res k ( x , y , s ) = Ψ k ( x , y , s ) 1 s Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) 1 s α ( Ψ k ( x , y , s ) ) xx 1 s α ( Ψ k ( x , y , s ) ) yy = k = 0 h k ( x , y ) s α k + 1 1 s Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) k = 1 2 h k 1 ( x , y ) s α k + 1 = h 0 Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) s + k = 1 h k 2 h k 1 s α k + 1 .

Step 3: Using adopting properties of LRPS,

h 0 = Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) and h k 2 h k 1 = 0 or h k = 2 h k 1 .

Following are some useful relations which are used in LRPSM:

i ) L Res ( x , y , s ) = 0 and lim k L Res k ( x , y , s ) = L Res ( x , y , s ) , for s > 0 .

ii ) lim s s L Res ( x , y , s ) = 0 gives lim s s L Res k ( x , y , s ) = 0 .

iii ) lim s s k α + 1 L Res ( x , y , s ) = lim s s k α + 1 L Res k ( x , y , s ) = 0 for 0 < α 1 .

Step 4: At last, by performing inverse Laplace transform [25] to Ψ ( x , y , s ) , the k th-approximate solution Ψ ( x , y , t ) can be obtained.

4 Numerical examples

The numerical solutions of two-dimensional FDEs by using LRPSM are calculated in this section. In order to present the efficiency of the method, two well-known equations are considered for the numerical solution.

Example 1 The two-dimensional fractional order diffusion equation is given by

(11) D t α Ψ ( x , y , t ) = Ψ xx ( x , y , t ) + Ψ yy ( x , y , t ) with 0 < α 1 ,

with initial condition,

(12) Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) = sin x sin y ,

and exact solution is,

(13) Ψ ( x , y , t ) = e 2 t sin x sin y for α = 1 .

Also, the exact solution for 0 < α < 1 is Ψ ( x , y , t ) = E α ( z ) sin x sin y ,

where E α ( z ) = k = 0 z k ( 1 + k α ) , and z = 4 i t α .

To obtain the solution, applying Laplace transform on both sides of (1),

(14) L D t α Ψ ( x , y , t ) = L Ψ xx ( x , y , t ) + L Ψ yy ( x , y , t ) .

By property of Laplace transform, L [ D t α Ψ ( x , y , t ) ] = s α L [ Ψ ( x , y , t ) ] s α 1 Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) , then Eq. (14) can be written as

(15) s α L [ Ψ ( x , y , t ) ] s α 1 Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) = L ( Ψ ( x , y , t ) ) xx + L ( Ψ ( x , y , t ) ) yy Ψ ( x , y , s ) = Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) s + 1 s α Ψ xx ( x , y , s ) + 1 s α Ψ yy ( x , y , s ) .

The solutions in LRPS form can be written as

(16) Ψ ( x , y , s ) = k = 0 h k ( x , y ) s α k + 1 Ψ xx ( x , y , s ) = k = 0 x 2 h k ( x , y ) s α k + 1 Ψ yy ( x , y , s ) = k = 0 y 2 h k ( x , y ) s α k + 1 .

Then, we obtain

k = 0 h k ( x , y ) s α k + 1 = 1 s α k = 0 x 2 h k ( x , y ) + y 2 h k ( x , y ) s α k + 1 = k = 0 2 h k ( x , y ) s ( k + 1 ) α + 1 = k = 1 2 h k 1 ( x , y ) s α k + 1 .

Therefore, h 0 = Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) , h 1 = 2 h 0 , and h 2 = 2 h 1 .

Again, the k th - Laplace residual function of (15) is

(17) L Res k ( x , y , s ) = Ψ k ( x , y , s ) 1 s Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) 1 s α ( Ψ k ( x , y , s ) ) xx 1 s α ( Ψ k ( x , y , s ) ) yy = k = 0 h k ( x , y ) s α k + 1 1 s Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) k = 1 2 h k 1 ( x , y ) s α k + 1 = h 0 Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) s + k = 1 h k 2 h k 1 s α k + 1 .

By adopting properties of LRPSM

h 0 = Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) and h k 2 h k 1 = 0 or h k = 2 h k 1 .

Hence,

h 0 = sin x sin y , h 1 = 2 ( sin x sin y ) = 2 sin x sin y , h 2 = 2 h 1 = 2 ( 2 sin x sin y ) = 4 sin x sin y , h k = k ( 2 sin x sin y ) = ( 2 ) k sin x sin y .

Therefore, by LRPSM, the solution of the given equation in infinite form is

(18) Ψ ( x , y , s ) = sin x sin y 1 s 2 sin x sin y 1 s α + 1 + 4 sin x sin y 1 s 2 α + 1 8 sin x sin y 1 s 3 α + 1 + .

At last, by taking inverse Laplace transform in (18), we get the required solution of given equation by using LRPSM as

(19) Ψ ( x , y , t ) = sin x sin y 2 sin x sin y t α α ! + 4 sin x sin y t 2 α ( 2 α ) ! 8 sin x sin y t 3 α ( 3 α ) ! + .

Example 2 The two-dimensional time-fractional order biological population equation is given by

(20) D t α Ψ ( x , y , t ) = ( Ψ 2 ( x , y , t ) ) xx + ( Ψ 2 ( x , y , t ) ) yy + h Ψ ( x , y , t ) , where h is a constant,

with the initial condition

(21) Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) = xy ,

and the exact solution when

(22) α = 1 is Ψ ( x , y , t ) = xy e ht .

To obtain the solution, performing Laplace transform on Eq. (20) results in

(23) L ( D t α Ψ ( x , y , t ) ) = L ( ( Ψ 2 ( x , y , t ) ) xx ) + L ( ( Ψ 2 ( x , y , t ) ) yy ) + h L ( Ψ ( x , y , t ) ) .

By using the property, L [ D t α Ψ ( x , y , t ) ] = s α L [ Ψ ( x , y , t ) ] s α 1 Ψ ( x , y , 0 ) , and after simplification it becomes,

or,

(24) Ψ ( x , y , s ) = 1 s xy + 1 s α L [ ( L 1 ( Ψ ( x , y , s ) xx ) } 2 ] + 1 s α L [ ( L 1 ( Ψ ( x , y , s ) yy ) } 2 ] + h 1 s α Ψ ( x , y , s ) ,

where

Ψ ( x , y , s ) = L [ Ψ ( x , y , t ) ] .

Now the transformed function Ψ ( x , y , s ) can be written in the following expansion as

(25) Ψ ( x , y , s ) = n = 0 f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 .

The kth-truncated series of (25) can be written as

(26) Ψ k ( x , y , s ) = n = 0 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 .

Then, by the Laplace residual function of (24) is

(27) L Res ( x , s ) = Ψ ( x , y , s ) 1 s xy 1 s α L [ ( L 1 ( Ψ ( x , y , s ) xx ) } 2 ] 1 s α L [ ( L 1 ( Ψ ( x , y , s ) yy ) } 2 ] h 1 s α Ψ ( x , y , s ) .

Again the k th-Laplace residual function of (27) is

(28) L Res k ( x , s ) = Ψ k ( x , y , s ) 1 s xy 1 s α L [ ( L 1 ( Ψ k ( x , y , s ) xx ) } 2 ] 1 s α L [ ( L 1 ( Ψ k ( x , y , s ) yy ) } 2 ] h 1 s α Ψ k ( x , y , s ) .

To find the values of f k ( x , y ) , k = 1,2,3 , , substituting the k th-truncated series (26) into the k th-Laplace residual function (28), we obtain:

(29) L Res k ( x , y , s ) = n = 0 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 1 s xy 1 s α L L 1 n = 0 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 xx 2 1 s α L L 1 n = 0 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 yy 2 h 1 s α n = 0 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 = f 0 ( x , y ) s + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 1 s xy 1 s α L L 1 f 0 ( x , y ) s + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 xx 2 1 s α L L 1 f 0 ( x , y ) s + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 yy 2 h s α f 0 ( x , y ) s + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 = 1 s xy + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 1 s xy 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 xx 2 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 yy 2 h s α 1 s xy + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 = n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 xx 2 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 yy 2 h s α 1 s xy + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 . L Res k ( x , y , s ) = n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 xx 2 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 yy 2 h s α 1 s xy + n = 1 k f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 .

For k = 1 , from (29), the first Laplace residual function is

(30) L Res 1 ( x , y , s ) = f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 xx 2 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 yy 2 h s α 1 s xy + f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 .

On solving Eq. (30) and using the relation lim s ( s α + 1 L Res 1 ( x , y , s ) ) = 0 for k = 1 , it is obtained that

f 1 ( x , y ) = 1 16 x 3 y + 1 16 x y 3 + h xy .

For k = 2 , from (29), the second Laplace residual function is

(31) L Res 2 ( x , y , s ) = n = 1 2 f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + n = 1 2 f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 xx 2 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + n = 1 2 f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 yy 2 h s α 1 s xy + n = 1 2 f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 .

On solving Eq. (31) and using the relation lim s ( s 2 α + 1 L Res 2 ( x , y , s ) ) = 0 for k = 2 , it is obtained that

f 2 ( x , y ) = 3 8 x 13 2 y 3 2 3 8 x 3 2 y 13 2 + 3 16 h x 3 y + 3 16 hx y 3 + h 2 x 1 2 y 1 2 .

Hence, by LRPSM, the solution of given equation in infinite form is

(32) Ψ ( x , y , s ) = xy 1 s + 1 16 x 3 y + 1 16 x y 3 + h xy 1 s α + 1 + 3 8 x 13 2 y 3 2 3 8 x 3 2 y 13 2 + 3 16 h x 3 y + 3 16 hx y 3 + h 2 x 1 2 y 1 2 1 s 2 α + 1 + .

At last, by taking inverse Laplace transform in (32), we obtain the required solution of given equation by LRPSM as

(33) Ψ ( x , y , t ) = xy + 1 16 x 3 y + 1 16 x y 3 + h xy t α α ! + 3 8 x 13 2 y 3 2 3 8 x 3 2 y 13 2 + 3 16 h x 3 y + 3 16 hx y 3 + h 2 x 1 2 y 1 2 t 2 α ( 2 α ) ! + .

5 Explanation and results

The reliability and efficiency of the LRPSM are discussed in this section from the obtained results for the two-dimensional fractional order diffusion equation and time-fractional order two-dimensional biological population equation.

Figure 1 compares the behaviour of the solution of the fractional diffusion equation at different values of t when α = 0.5 , 0.7 , and 1.0 , with the exact solution. This shows that solutions are reliable for α ≤ 1.

Figure 1 
               Comparison of solution behaviour of fractional diffusion equation when α = 0.5, 0.7, and 1.
Figure 1

Comparison of solution behaviour of fractional diffusion equation when α = 0.5, 0.7, and 1.

The absolute errors of different number of terms of 6, 8, 10, and 12 of numerical solutions of the diffusion equation at various values of t = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0, and α = 0.7 with exact solution are presented in Figure 2. This shows that when the number of terms is increased, then the approximate solution approaches the numerical solution and hence errors are reduced.

Figure 2 
               Absolute error of fractional diffusion equation when value of α = 0.7.
Figure 2

Absolute error of fractional diffusion equation when value of α = 0.7.

The absolute errors of different number of terms of 6, 8, 10, and 12 of numerical solutions of the diffusion equation at various values of t = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 and α = 0.9 with exact solution are presented in Figure 3. This shows that when the number of terms is increased, errors are decreased.

Figure 3 
               Absolute error of fractional diffusion equation when α = 0.9.
Figure 3

Absolute error of fractional diffusion equation when α = 0.9.

In Figure 4, the absolute errors of different number of terms of 6, 8, 10, and 12 of numerical solutions of the diffusion equation at various values of t = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 and α = 1.0 with exact solution are presented. It is evident from the results that the errors are reducing with the addition of more terms in the solution.

Figure 4 
               Absolute error of fractional diffusion equation when α = 1.0.
Figure 4

Absolute error of fractional diffusion equation when α = 1.0.

Figure 5(a) and (b), respectively, show the errors for various values of t in two dimensions. The first graph is drawn for t = 0.5 and α as 0.5 while the second graph is presenting the errors in solution for α as 1 at t = 1 . This shows that when the value of α is approaching 1, the errors are improved even at higher time levels.

Figure 5 
               (a)  The absolute errors for α = 0.5 at t = 0.5 and (b) absolute errors for α = 1 for t = 1.
Figure 5

(a) The absolute errors for α = 0.5 at t = 0.5 and (b) absolute errors for α = 1 for t = 1.

Table 1 displays the numerical values of ( L ) , the maximum errors for prescribed values of t as 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.0 at various α values. This shows that maximum errors are decreasing as α is approaching 1.

Table 1

Maximum errors of fractional diffusion equation at different values of t and α

t/ α 0.5 0.7 1.0
0.25 4.5786688 × 10−8 3.2196467 × 10−15 0
0.50 6.0499380 × 10−5 8.1960438 × 10−11 0
0.75 4.0032692 × 10−3 3.0248714 × 10−8 8.3266726 × 10−17
1.0 7.7937435 × 10−2 1.9896927 × 10−6 2.6645352 × 10−14

Tables 2 and 3 display the numerical and exact solution of the diffusion equation at predetermined points in two dimensions where x varies from 0.0 to 1.0 as well as y varies from 0.1 to 0.2 and 0.3 to 0.4, respectively. From the table it is evident that both the solutions are close enough.

Table 2

Solutions of fractional order diffusion equation at prescribed points

x/y 0.1 0.2
Exact Numerical Exact Numerical
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.003419805307053 0.003419805307054 0.006805441049916 0.006805441049918
0.2 0.006805441049916 0.006805441049918 0.013542884382441 0.013542884382444
0.3 0.010123079075388 0.010123079075390 0.020145011690899 0.020145011690904
0.4 0.013339570640983 0.013339570640986 0.026545856701597 0.026545856701604
0.5 0.016422777626210 0.016422777626214 0.032681464287027 0.032681464287035
0.6 0.019341893646044 0.019341893646048 0.038490529484356 0.038490529484365
0.7 0.022067751858146 0.022067751858152 0.043915010034355 0.043915010034365
0.8 0.024573116388311 0.024573116388317 0.048900706320463 0.048900706320475
0.9 0.026832954462317 0.026832954462323 0.053397802913441 0.053397802913454
1.0 0.028824686525130 0.028824686525137 0.057361366310675 0.057361366310689
Table 3

Solutions of fractional order diffusion equation at prescribed points

x/y 0.3 0.4
Exact Numerical Exact Numerical
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.010123079075388 0.010123079075388 0.013339570640983 0.013339570640986
0.2 0.020145011690899 0.020145011690904 0.026545856701597 0.026545856701604
0.3 0.029965662008651 0.029965662008658 0.039486905336943 0.039486905336952
0.4 0.039486905336943 0.039486905336952 0.052033413866797 0.052033413866810
0.5 0.048613608559744 0.048613608559755 0.064060021725254 0.064060021725270
0.6 0.057254580675338 0.057254580675352 0.075446563022060 0.075446563022078
0.7 0.065323483946673 0.065323483946688 0.086079267200468 0.086079267200489
0.8 0.072739696559485 0.072739696559502 0.095851895795031 0.095851895795054
0.9 0.079429118168822 0.079429118168841 0.104666803931235 0.104666803931260
1.0 0.085324910285191 0.085324910285212 0.112435915960803 0.112435915960830

Tables 4 and 5 demonstrate the numerical solution and exact solution of the fractional order diffusion equation at predetermined sites in two dimensions where x ranges from 0.0 to 1.0 as well as y changes from 0.6 to 0.7 and from 0.8 to 0.9, respectively, which also verifies that both the solutions are close enough and reliable. This demonstrates the precision of the fractional order diffusion equation’s mathematical solutions using the LRPSM.

Table 4

Solutions of fractional order diffusion equation at prescribed points

x/y 0.6 0.7
Exact Numerical Exact Numerical
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.0193418936460436 0.0193418936460483 0.0220677518581463 0.0220677518581516
0.2 0.0384905294843560 0.0384905294843652 0.0439150100343549 0.0439150100343654
0.3 0.0572545806753381 0.0572545806753518 0.0653234839466726 0.0653234839466882
0.4 0.0754465630220603 0.0754465630220784 0.0860792672004680 0.0860792672004886
0.5 0.0928847082503841 0.0928847082504064 0.1059749748704190 0.1059749748704440
0.6 0.1093947801774730 0.1093947801774990 0.1248118156221340 0.1248118156221640
0.7 0.1248118156221340 0.1248118156221640 0.1424015779694540 0.1424015779694880
0.8 0.1389817726624000 0.1389817726624340 0.1585685108214060 0.1585685108214440
0.9 0.1517630697714900 0.1517630697715260 0.1731510795290120 0.1731510795290530
1.0 0.1630280004536240 0.1630280004536630 0.1860035798861000 0.1860035798861450
Table 5

Solutions of fractional order diffusion equation at prescribed points

x/y 0.8 0.9
Exact Numerical Exact Numerical
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.0245731163883113 0.0245731163883172 0.0268329544623166 0.0268329544623230
0.2 0.0489007063204629 0.0489007063204746 0.0533978029134413 0.0533978029134540
0.3 0.0727396965594849 0.0727396965595023 0.0794291181688217 0.0794291181688407
0.4 0.0958518957950313 0.0958518957950543 0.1046668039312350 0.1046668039312600
0.5 0.1180063745722180 0.1180063745722460 0.1288586935870130 0.1288586935870440
0.6 0.1389817726624000 0.1389817726624340 0.1517630697714900 0.1517630697715260
0.7 0.1585685108214060 0.1585685108214440 0.1731510795290120 0.1731510795290530
0.8 0.1765708848360650 0.1765708848361070 0.1928090209360170 0.1928090209360630
0.9 0.1928090209360170 0.1928090209360630 0.2105404783400180 0.2105404783400680
1.0 0.2071206730329640 0.2071206730330140 0.2261682848798740 0.2261682848799280

In Figure 6, the solution behaviour of two-dimensional time-fractional order biological population equation at various values of t = 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 is presented when α = 0.5 , 0.7 , and 1.0 . From the figure, it can be seen that the lines representing the numerical and the exact solution are almost overlapping; hence, there is no significant difference between the solutions at different values of α .

Figure 6 
               Comparison of solution behaviour of fractional biological population equation when α = 0.5, 0.7, and 1.0.
Figure 6

Comparison of solution behaviour of fractional biological population equation when α = 0.5, 0.7, and 1.0.

Figure 7 displays the absolute errors of the two-dimensional time-fractional biological population equation at various values of t = 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 for a fixed value of α taken as 0.7. This shows that when the number of terms is increased, then the errors of both solutions decreased.

Figure 7 
               Absolute error of fractional biological population equation when α = 0.7.
Figure 7

Absolute error of fractional biological population equation when α = 0.7.

This demonstrates how effective and innovative the LRPSM is for solving two-dimensional time-FDEs and obtaining analytical approximate of solutions.

6 Conclusion

In this study, a semi-analytical method is applied to two important equations for analytically approximating solutions of these fractional order differential equations in two-dimensional by using LRPSM. The advantage of this method is that it reduces the amount of computational work necessary to find numerical solutions in residual power series form after applying Laplace transform in a way that the coefficients of those solutions are established in the aforementioned sequential algebraic steps. Using the LRPSM, the time-fractional order two-dimensional differential equations can therefore be solved accurately and effectively. It is demonstrated that the method is capable of solving time fractional order two-dimensional differential equations with adequate accuracy. So, this method provides trustworthy solutions with fewer errors.

  1. Funding information: The authors declare that they have no funding source to acknowledge to publish in this article.

  2. Author contributions: The authors declare that they have contributed equally to this research work.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest at all.

Appendix

Annexure-1

Here is a detailed solution for the second equation that was taken into consideration for determining coefficients.

For k = 1 , from (29), the first Laplace residual function is

L Res 1 ( x , y , s ) = f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 xx 2 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 yy 2 h s α 1 s xy + f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 = f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 1 s α L ( 1 * xy + f 1 ( x , y ) t α α ! ) xx 2 1 s α L 1 * xy + f 1 ( x , y ) t α α ! yy 2 h s α + 1 xy h f 1 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 = f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 1 s α L 1 4 x 3 2 y 1 2 + { f 1 ( x , y ) } xx t α α ! 2 1 s α L 1 4 x 1 2 y 3 2 + { f 1 ( x , y ) } yy t α α ! 2 h s α + 1 xy h f 1 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 = f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 1 s α L 1 16 x 3 y 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 { f 1 ( x , y ) } xx t α α ! + [ { f 1 ( x , y ) } xx ] 2 t 2 α ( α ! ) 2 1 s α L 1 16 x y 3 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 { f 1 ( x , y ) } yy t α α ! + [ { f 1 ( x , y ) } yy ] 2 t 2 α ( α ! ) 2 h s α + 1 xy h f 1 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1

= f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 1 s α 1 16 x 3 y 1 s 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 { f 1 ( x , y ) } xx 1 α ! α ! s α + 1 + [ { f 1 ( x , y ) } xx ] 2 1 ( α ! ) 2 ( 2 α ) ! s 2 α + 1 1 s α 1 16 x y 3 1 s 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 { f 1 ( x , y ) } yy 1 α ! α ! s α + 1 + [ { f 1 ( x , y ) } yy ] 2 1 ( α ! ) 2 ( 2 α ) ! s 2 α + 1 h s α + 1 xy h f 1 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1

= f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 1 16 x 3 y 1 s α + 1 + 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 { f 1 ( x , y ) } xx 1 s 2 α + 1 [ { f 1 ( x , y ) } xx ] 2 1 ( α ! ) 2 ( 2 α ) ! s 3 α + 1 1 16 x y 3 1 s α + 1 + 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 { f 1 ( x , y ) } yy 1 α ! α ! s 2 α + 1 [ { f 1 ( x , y ) } yy ] 2 1 ( α ! ) 2 ( 2 α ) ! s 3 α + 1 h s α + 1 xy h f 1 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 .

Now the relation lim s ( s α + 1 L Res 1 ( x , y , s ) ) = 0 for k = 1 , gives that

f 1 ( x , y ) 1 16 x 3 y 1 16 x y 3 h xy = 0 .

f 1 ( x , y ) = 1 16 x 3 y + 1 16 x y 3 + h xy ,

Annexure-2

Here is a detailed solution for the second equation that was taken into consideration for determining coefficients.

For k = 2 , from (29), the second Laplace residual function is

L Res 2 ( x , y , s ) = n = 1 2 f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + n = 1 2 f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 xx 2 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + n = 1 2 f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1 yy 2 h s α 1 s xy + n = 1 2 f n ( x , y ) s n α + 1

= f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 + f 2 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 + f 2 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 xx 2 1 s α L L 1 1 s xy + f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 + f 2 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 yy 2 h s α 1 s xy + f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 + f 2 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1

= f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 + f 2 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 1 s α L L 1 1 4 x 3 2 y 1 2 1 s + ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 s α + 1 + ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 s 2 α + 1 2 1 s α L L 1 1 4 x 1 2 y 3 2 1 s + ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 s α + 1 + ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 s 2 α + 1 2 h s α 1 s xy + f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 + f 2 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1

= f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 + f 2 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 1 s α L 1 4 x 3 2 y 1 2 * 1 + ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx t α α ! + ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx t 2 α ( 2 α ) ! 2 1 s α L 1 4 x 1 2 y 3 2 * 1 + ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy t α α ! + ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy t 2 α ( 2 α ) ! 2 h s α 1 s xy + f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 + f 2 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1

= f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 + f 2 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 1 s α L 1 16 x 3 y + { ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx } 2 t 2 α ( α ! ) 2 + { ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx } 2 t 4 α ( ( 2 α ) ! ) 2 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx t α α ! 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx t 2 α ( 2 α ) ! + 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx t 3 α α ! ( 2 α ) ! 1 s α L 1 16 x y 3 + { ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy } 2 t 2 α ( α ! ) 2 + { ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy } 2 t 4 α ( ( 2 α ) ! ) 2 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy t α α ! 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy t 2 α ( 2 α ) ! + 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy t 3 α α ! ( 2 α ) ! h s α + 1 xy hf 1 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 hf 2 ( x , y ) s 3 α + 1

= f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 + f 2 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 1 s α 1 16 x 3 y 1 s + { ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx } 2 1 ( α ! ) 2 ( 2 α ) ! s 2 α + 1 + { ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx } 2 1 ( ( 2 α ) ! ) 2 ( 4 α ) ! s 4 α + 1 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 α ! α ! s α + 1 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 ( 2 α ) ! ( 2 α ) ! s 2 α + 1 + 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 α ! ( 2 α ) ! ( 3 α ) ! s 3 α + 1 1 s α 1 16 x y 3 1 s + { ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy } 2 1 ( α ! ) 2 ( 2 α ) ! s 2 α + 1 + { ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy } 2 1 ( ( 2 α ) ! ) 2 ( 4 α ) ! s 4 α + 1 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 α ! α ! s α + 1 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 ( 2 α ) ! ( 2 α ) ! s 2 α + 1 + 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 α ! ( 2 α ) ! ( 3 α ) ! s 3 α + 1 h s α + 1 xy hf 1 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 hf 2 ( x , y ) s 3 α + 1

= f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 + f 2 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 1 16 x 3 y 1 s α + 1 { ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx } 2 1 ( α ! ) 2 ( 2 α ) ! s 3 α + 1 { ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx } 2 1 ( ( 2 α ) ! ) 2 ( 4 α ) ! s 5 α + 1 + 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 s 2 α + 1 + 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 s 3 α + 1 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 α ! ( 2 α ) ! ( 3 α ) ! s 4 α + 1 1 16 x y 3 1 s α + 1 { ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy } 2 1 ( α ! ) 2 ( 2 α ) ! s 3 α + 1 { ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy } 2 1 ( ( 2 α ) ! ) 2 ( 4 α ) ! s 5 α + 1 + 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 s 2 α + 1 + 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 s 3 α + 1 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 α ! ( 2 α ) ! ( 3 α ) ! s 4 α + 1 h s α + 1 xy hf 1 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 hf 2 ( x , y ) s 3 α + 1

= f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 + f 2 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 1 16 x 3 y + 1 16 x y 3 + h xy 1 s α + 1 { ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx } 2 1 ( α ! ) 2 ( 2 α ) ! s 3 α + 1 { ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx } 2 1 ( ( 2 α ) ! ) 2 ( 4 α ) ! s 5 α + 1 + 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 s 2 α + 1 + 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 s 3 α + 1 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 α ! ( 2 α ) ! ( 3 α ) ! s 4 α + 1 { ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy } 2 1 ( α ! ) 2 ( 2 α ) ! s 3 α + 1 { ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy } 2 1 ( ( 2 α ) ! ) 2 ( 4 α ) ! s 5 α + 1 + 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 s 2 α + 1 + 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 s 3 α + 1 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 α ! ( 2 α ) ! ( 3 α ) ! s 4 α + 1 hf 1 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 hf 2 ( x , y ) s 3 α + 1

= f 1 ( x , y ) s α + 1 + f 2 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 f 1 ( x , y ) 1 s α + 1 { ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx } 2 1 ( α ! ) 2 ( 2 α ) ! s 3 α + 1 { ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx } 2 1 ( ( 2 α ) ! ) 2 ( 4 α ) ! s 5 α + 1 + 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 s 2 α + 1 + 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 s 3 α + 1 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) xx 1 α ! ( 2 α ) ! ( 3 α ) ! s 4 α + 1 { ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy } 2 1 ( α ! ) 2 ( 2 α ) ! s 3 α + 1 { ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy } 2 1 ( ( 2 α ) ! ) 2 ( 4 α ) ! s 5 α + 1 + 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 s 2 α + 1 + 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 s 3 α + 1 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy ( f 2 ( x , y ) ) yy 1 α ! ( 2 α ) ! ( 3 α ) ! s 4 α + 1 hf 1 ( x , y ) s 2 α + 1 hf 2 ( x , y ) s 3 α + 1 .

Now the relation lim s ( s 2 α + 1 L Res 2 ( x , y , s ) ) = 0 for k = 2 , gives us that,

f 2 ( x , y ) + 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) xx + 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 ( f 1 ( x , y ) ) yy hf 1 ( x , y ) = 0

or , f 2 ( x , y ) + 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 1 16 x 3 y + 1 16 x y 3 + h xy xx + 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 1 16 x 3 y + 1 16 x y 3 + h xy yy h 1 16 x 3 y + 1 16 x y 3 + h xy = 0

or , f 2 ( x , y ) + 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 ( 1 16 x 3 y + 1 16 x y 3 + h x 1 2 y 1 2 ) xx + 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 ( 1 16 x 3 y + 1 16 x y 3 + h x 1 2 y 1 2 ) yy h ( 1 16 x 3 y + 1 16 x y 3 + h x 1 2 y 1 2 ) = 0

or , f 2 ( x , y ) + 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 3 1 16 x 4 y + 1 16 y 3 + 1 2 h x 1 2 y 1 2 x + 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 1 16 x 3 3 1 16 x y 4 + h x 1 2 y 1 2 y h 1 16 x 3 y h 1 16 x y 3 h 2 x 1 2 y 1 2 = 0

or , f 2 ( x , y ) + 1 2 x 3 2 y 1 2 3 ( 4 ) 1 16 x 5 y + 0 + 1 2 1 2 h x 3 2 y 1 2 + 1 2 x 1 2 y 3 2 0 3 ( 4 ) 1 16 x y 5 + 1 2 1 2 h x 1 2 y 3 2 1 16 h x 3 y 1 16 hx y 3 h 2 x 1 2 y 1 2 = 0

or , f 2 ( x , y ) + 3 8 x 13 2 y 3 2 1 8 h x 3 y + 3 8 x 3 2 y 13 2 1 8 hx y 3 1 16 h x 3 y 1 16 hx y 3 h 2 x 1 2 y 1 2 = 0

or , f 2 ( x , y ) + 3 8 x 13 2 y 3 2 + 3 8 x 3 2 y 13 2 3 16 h x 3 y 3 16 hx y 3 h 2 x 1 2 y 1 2 = 0

or , f 2 ( x , y ) = 3 8 x 13 2 y 3 2 3 8 x 3 2 y 13 2 + 3 16 h x 3 y + 3 16 hx y 3 + h 2 x 1 2 y 1 2 .

References

[1] Vaithyasubramanian S, Kumar KV, Reddy KJP. Study on applications of Laplace transformation. A Review. Eng Technol. 2018;9(2):1–6.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ. Theory and applications of fractional differential equations. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Podlubny I. Fractional differential equations: An introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications. 1st ed. Vol. 228. San Diego (CA), USA: Academic Press; 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Yang XJ, Baleanu D, Srivastava HM. Local fractional integral transforms and their applications. 1st ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Press; 2015.10.1016/B978-0-12-804002-7.00001-2Search in Google Scholar

[5] Komashynska I, Al-Smadi M, Arqub OA, Momani S. An efficient analytical method for solving singular initial value problems of non-linear systems. Appl Math Inf Sci. 2016;10(2):647–6.10.18576/amis/100224Search in Google Scholar

[6] Zhang Y, Kumar A, Kumar S, Baleanu D, Yang XJ. Residual power series method for time-fractional Schrödinger equations. J Nonlinear Sci Appl. 2016;9(11):5821–9.10.22436/jnsa.009.11.10Search in Google Scholar

[7] Odibat ZM, Momani S. Application of variational iteration method to nonlinear differential equations of fractional order. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2006;7(1):27–4.10.1515/IJNSNS.2006.7.1.27Search in Google Scholar

[8] Alquran M, Ali M, Alsukhour M, Jaradat I. Promoted residual power series technique with Laplace transforms to solve some time-fractional problems arising in physics. Results Phys. 2020;19:103667.10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103667Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ganjiani M. Solution of non-linear fractional differential equations using homotopy analysis method. Appl Math Model. 2010;34(6):1634–1.10.1016/j.apm.2009.09.011Search in Google Scholar

[10] Yousef A, Alquran M, Jaradat I, Momani S, Baleanu D. Ternary-fractional differential transform schema: Theory and application. Adv Differ Equ. 2019;197:1–13.10.1186/s13662-019-2137-xSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Jaradat I, Al-Dolat M, Al-Zoubi K, Alquran M. Theory and applications of a more general form for fractional power series expansion. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2018;108:107–0.10.1016/j.chaos.2018.01.039Search in Google Scholar

[12] Abbasbandy S. The application of homotopy analysis method to nonlinear equations arising in heat transfer. Phys Lett A. 2006;360(1):109–3.10.1016/j.physleta.2006.07.065Search in Google Scholar

[13] Arora G, Pant R, Emaifar H, Khademi M. Numerical solution of fractional relaxation-oscillation equation by using residual power series method. Alex Eng J. 2023;73(2):249–7.10.1016/j.aej.2023.04.055Search in Google Scholar

[14] Kumar S. A new analytical modelling for fractional telegraph equation via Laplace transforms. Appl Math Model. 2014;38(13):3154–3.10.1016/j.apm.2013.11.035Search in Google Scholar

[15] Momani S, Odibat ZM. Analytical solution of a time-fractional Navier-Stokes equation by Adomian decomposition method. Appl Math Comput. 2006;177(2):488–4.10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.025Search in Google Scholar

[16] Alquran M. Analytical solutions of fractional foam drainage equation by residual power series method. Math Sci. 2014;8:153–60.10.1007/s40096-015-0141-1Search in Google Scholar

[17] Fei X, Gao Y, Yang X, Zhang H. Construction of fractional power series solutions to fractional Boussinesq equations using residual power series method. Math Probl Eng. 2016;5492535:1–12.10.1155/2016/5492535Search in Google Scholar

[18] Arafa A, Elmahdy G. Application of residual power series method to fractional coupled physical equations arising in fluids flow. Int J Differ Equ. 2018;7692849:109–7.10.1155/2018/7692849Search in Google Scholar

[19] Burqan A, Sarhan A, Saadeh R. Constructing analytical solutions of the fractional Riccati differential equations using laplace residual power series method. Fractal Fract. 2023;7(1):51–9.10.3390/fractalfract7010014Search in Google Scholar

[20] Alderremy AA, Shah R, Iqbal N, Aly S, Nonloapon K. Fractional series solution construction for nonlinear fractional reaction-diffusion Brusselator model utilizing Laplace residual power series. Funct Anal Fract Oper Symmetry/Asymmetry. 2022;14(9):78–9.10.3390/sym14091944Search in Google Scholar

[21] Arora G, Pant R. Numerical solution of two-dimensional fractional order diffusion equation by using Elzaki transform with residual power series method. J Int Acad Phys Sci. 2023;27(3):72–9.10.61294/jiaps2023.2733Search in Google Scholar

[22] Zhang J, Chen X, Li L, Zhou C. Elzaki transform residual power series method for the fractional population diffusion equations. Eng Lett. 2022;29(4):1–12.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Eriqat T, El-Ajou A, Moa’ath ON, Al-Zhour Z, Momani S. A new attractive analytic approach for solution of linear and non-linear Neutral Fractional Pantograph equations. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020;18(1):1–9.10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109957Search in Google Scholar

[24] El-Ajou A, Arqub AO, Al-Smadi M. A general form of the generalised Taylor’s formula with some applications. Appl Math Comput. 2015;256(1):851–9.10.1016/j.amc.2015.01.034Search in Google Scholar

[25] Kumar S, Yildirim A, Khan Y, Wei L. A fractional model of the diffusion equation and its analytical solution using Laplace transforms. Sci Iranica Sci Direct. 2012;19(4):1117–3.10.1016/j.scient.2012.06.016Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-06-20
Revised: 2023-09-19
Accepted: 2023-10-11
Published Online: 2024-03-05

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. Focus on NLENG 2023 Volume 12 Issue 1
  3. Research Articles
  4. Seismic vulnerability signal analysis of low tower cable-stayed bridges method based on convolutional attention network
  5. Robust passivity-based nonlinear controller design for bilateral teleoperation system under variable time delay and variable load disturbance
  6. A physically consistent AI-based SPH emulator for computational fluid dynamics
  7. Asymmetrical novel hyperchaotic system with two exponential functions and an application to image encryption
  8. A novel framework for effective structural vulnerability assessment of tubular structures using machine learning algorithms (GA and ANN) for hybrid simulations
  9. Flow and irreversible mechanism of pure and hybridized non-Newtonian nanofluids through elastic surfaces with melting effects
  10. Stability analysis of the corruption dynamics under fractional-order interventions
  11. Solutions of certain initial-boundary value problems via a new extended Laplace transform
  12. Numerical solution of two-dimensional fractional differential equations using Laplace transform with residual power series method
  13. Fractional-order lead networks to avoid limit cycle in control loops with dead zone and plant servo system
  14. Modeling anomalous transport in fractal porous media: A study of fractional diffusion PDEs using numerical method
  15. Analysis of nonlinear dynamics of RC slabs under blast loads: A hybrid machine learning approach
  16. On theoretical and numerical analysis of fractal--fractional non-linear hybrid differential equations
  17. Traveling wave solutions, numerical solutions, and stability analysis of the (2+1) conformal time-fractional generalized q-deformed sinh-Gordon equation
  18. Influence of damage on large displacement buckling analysis of beams
  19. Approximate numerical procedures for the Navier–Stokes system through the generalized method of lines
  20. Mathematical analysis of a combustible viscoelastic material in a cylindrical channel taking into account induced electric field: A spectral approach
  21. A new operational matrix method to solve nonlinear fractional differential equations
  22. New solutions for the generalized q-deformed wave equation with q-translation symmetry
  23. Optimize the corrosion behaviour and mechanical properties of AISI 316 stainless steel under heat treatment and previous cold working
  24. Soliton dynamics of the KdV–mKdV equation using three distinct exact methods in nonlinear phenomena
  25. Investigation of the lubrication performance of a marine diesel engine crankshaft using a thermo-electrohydrodynamic model
  26. Modeling credit risk with mixed fractional Brownian motion: An application to barrier options
  27. Method of feature extraction of abnormal communication signal in network based on nonlinear technology
  28. An innovative binocular vision-based method for displacement measurement in membrane structures
  29. An analysis of exponential kernel fractional difference operator for delta positivity
  30. Novel analytic solutions of strain wave model in micro-structured solids
  31. Conditions for the existence of soliton solutions: An analysis of coefficients in the generalized Wu–Zhang system and generalized Sawada–Kotera model
  32. Scale-3 Haar wavelet-based method of fractal-fractional differential equations with power law kernel and exponential decay kernel
  33. Non-linear influences of track dynamic irregularities on vertical levelling loss of heavy-haul railway track geometry under cyclic loadings
  34. Fast analysis approach for instability problems of thin shells utilizing ANNs and a Bayesian regularization back-propagation algorithm
  35. Validity and error analysis of calculating matrix exponential function and vector product
  36. Optimizing execution time and cost while scheduling scientific workflow in edge data center with fault tolerance awareness
  37. Estimating the dynamics of the drinking epidemic model with control interventions: A sensitivity analysis
  38. Online and offline physical education quality assessment based on mobile edge computing
  39. Discovering optical solutions to a nonlinear Schrödinger equation and its bifurcation and chaos analysis
  40. New convolved Fibonacci collocation procedure for the Fitzhugh–Nagumo non-linear equation
  41. Study of weakly nonlinear double-diffusive magneto-convection with throughflow under concentration modulation
  42. Variable sampling time discrete sliding mode control for a flapping wing micro air vehicle using flapping frequency as the control input
  43. Error analysis of arbitrarily high-order stepping schemes for fractional integro-differential equations with weakly singular kernels
  44. Solitary and periodic pattern solutions for time-fractional generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation
  45. An unconditionally stable numerical scheme for solving nonlinear Fisher equation
  46. Effect of modulated boundary on heat and mass transport of Walter-B viscoelastic fluid saturated in porous medium
  47. Analysis of heat mass transfer in a squeezed Carreau nanofluid flow due to a sensor surface with variable thermal conductivity
  48. Navigating waves: Advancing ocean dynamics through the nonlinear Schrödinger equation
  49. Experimental and numerical investigations into torsional-flexural behaviours of railway composite sleepers and bearers
  50. Novel dynamics of the fractional KFG equation through the unified and unified solver schemes with stability and multistability analysis
  51. Analysis of the magnetohydrodynamic effects on non-Newtonian fluid flow in an inclined non-uniform channel under long-wavelength, low-Reynolds number conditions
  52. Convergence analysis of non-matching finite elements for a linear monotone additive Schwarz scheme for semi-linear elliptic problems
  53. Global well-posedness and exponential decay estimates for semilinear Newell–Whitehead–Segel equation
  54. Petrov-Galerkin method for small deflections in fourth-order beam equations in civil engineering
  55. Solution of third-order nonlinear integro-differential equations with parallel computing for intelligent IoT and wireless networks using the Haar wavelet method
  56. Mathematical modeling and computational analysis of hepatitis B virus transmission using the higher-order Galerkin scheme
  57. Mathematical model based on nonlinear differential equations and its control algorithm
  58. Bifurcation and chaos: Unraveling soliton solutions in a couple fractional-order nonlinear evolution equation
  59. Space–time variable-order carbon nanotube model using modified Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo derivative
  60. Minimal universal laser network model: Synchronization, extreme events, and multistability
  61. Valuation of forward start option with mean reverting stock model for uncertain markets
  62. Geometric nonlinear analysis based on the generalized displacement control method and orthogonal iteration
  63. Fuzzy neural network with backpropagation for fuzzy quadratic programming problems and portfolio optimization problems
  64. B-spline curve theory: An overview and applications in real life
  65. Nonlinearity modeling for online estimation of industrial cooling fan speed subject to model uncertainties and state-dependent measurement noise
  66. Quantitative analysis and modeling of ride sharing behavior based on internet of vehicles
  67. Review Article
  68. Bond performance of recycled coarse aggregate concrete with rebar under freeze–thaw environment: A review
  69. Retraction
  70. Retraction of “Convolutional neural network for UAV image processing and navigation in tree plantations based on deep learning”
  71. Special Issue: Dynamic Engineering and Control Methods for the Nonlinear Systems - Part II
  72. Improved nonlinear model predictive control with inequality constraints using particle filtering for nonlinear and highly coupled dynamical systems
  73. Anti-control of Hopf bifurcation for a chaotic system
  74. Special Issue: Decision and Control in Nonlinear Systems - Part I
  75. Addressing target loss and actuator saturation in visual servoing of multirotors: A nonrecursive augmented dynamics control approach
  76. Collaborative control of multi-manipulator systems in intelligent manufacturing based on event-triggered and adaptive strategy
  77. Greenhouse monitoring system integrating NB-IOT technology and a cloud service framework
  78. Special Issue: Unleashing the Power of AI and ML in Dynamical System Research
  79. Computational analysis of the Covid-19 model using the continuous Galerkin–Petrov scheme
  80. Special Issue: Nonlinear Analysis and Design of Communication Networks for IoT Applications - Part I
  81. Research on the role of multi-sensor system information fusion in improving hardware control accuracy of intelligent system
  82. Advanced integration of IoT and AI algorithms for comprehensive smart meter data analysis in smart grids
Downloaded on 8.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nleng-2022-0347/html
Scroll to top button