Startseite Naturwissenschaften Activation energy and Coriolis force impact on three-dimensional dusty nanofluid flow containing gyrotactic microorganisms: Machine learning and numerical approach
Artikel Open Access

Activation energy and Coriolis force impact on three-dimensional dusty nanofluid flow containing gyrotactic microorganisms: Machine learning and numerical approach

  • Shaik Jakeer , Seethi Reddy Reddisekhar Reddy , Hayath Thameem Basha , Jaehyuk Cho EMAIL logo und Veerappampalayam Easwaramoorthy Sathishkumar
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 12. Juni 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In recent times, machine learning methods have become powerful tools for solving complex problems, optimizing processes, and extracting insights from large datasets, especially in fluid dynamics. This study examines the effects of thermophoresis, Brownian motion, thermal radiation, and a non-uniform heat source on a dusty nanofluid containing gyrotactic microorganisms as it moves across a three-dimensional porous sheet. Additionally, the influence of activation energy and the Coriolis force on its biomechanics is investigated. MATLAB’s bvp4c solver is used to solve the nonlinear equations governing velocity, temperature, concentration, and microbe density. The study also includes the computation of the skin friction coefficient and the heat transfer rate, with results presented in graphical form. Furthermore, key findings indicate that an augmentation in the fluid-particle interaction parameter results in a 12.5% increase in dust fluid velocity, whereas the fluid velocity diminishes by 9.8%. A 15% augmentation in the thermophoresis parameter improves temperature and concentration profiles by 10 and 8.7%, respectively. Furthermore, Brownian motion effects result in a 7.3% increase in temperature and a 5.2% reduction in concentration. The Nusselt number has a significant association with the thermophoresis parameter, especially at elevated levels, resulting in a 11.4% increase in heat transfer efficiency. Moreover, an increased concentration of dust particles leads to a 6.5% reduction in the temperature profile for both nanofluid and dusty fluid phases. The artificial neural network methodology effectively reduces computational time when solving complex fluid dynamics problems. This theoretical analysis has applications in various fields, including biodiesel and hydrogen synthesis, oil storage, geothermal energy extraction, base fluid mechanics, oil emulsification, food processing, renewable energy, and sewage treatment systems.

Abbreviations

C & C p

concentration of the fluid and dust particles

C A x Re x 1 / 2 / 2 & C A y Re x 1 / 2 / 2

skin friction coefficients

c m

specific heat dust particles (J/kg K)

c pf

specific heat of fluid particles (J/kg K)

C

ambient nanoparticles concentration

D B

Brownian diffusion coefficient,

D T

thermophoretic diffusion coefficient

E

non-dimensional activation energy

I

mass concentration of dusty particles

j

micro-inertia

K = 6 π μ f a

Stokes drag constant

κ

vortex viscosity

k

thermal conductivity (W m−1 k−1)

k

mean absorption coefficient

Lb

bio convective Schmidt number

m

mass concentration of dust particles

N

dust particle’s number density

N B

Brownian motion parameter

N T

thermophoresis parameter

Nu Re x 1 / 2

Nusselt number

Pe

Peclet number

Pr

Prandtl number

Re x

local Reynolds number

Rd

thermal radiation

Sc

Schmidt number

T & T p

temperature of the fluid and dust particles

T w

wall temperature (K)

T

temperature of the ambient fluid

v 1 , v 2 & v 3

velocity component along x, y, & z-direction

x, y & z

Cartesian coordinates (m s−1)

τ T

thermal equilibrium time

Greek symbols

α

rotational parameter

β v

fluid–particle interaction parameter

τ 2

temperature jump parameter

ρ

density (kg m−3)

γ

ratio of specific heat

η

similarity variable

μ

dynamic viscosity (kg m−1 s−1)

υ

kinematic viscosity (m2 s−1)

θ

dimensionless temperature

β t

fluid–particle interaction parameter for temperature

βc

fluid–particle interaction parameter for concentration

Subscripts

f

fluid

1 Introduction

Bioconvection is a naturally occurring phenomena that mostly includes the dispersion of self-propelled microorganisms in the field of fluid dynamics. Bioconvection is distinct from conventional multi-phase flows because it is characterized by molecules that are not self-propelled, but rather propelled by the fluid flow, in contrast to typical multi-phase flows. These microorganisms have a tendency to move upwards in the top section of the fluid, where there is a concentration that leads to instability because of the large difference in density. These self-propelled motile organisms have a tendency to convene at the apex of the liquid stratum, causing the top layer to become more denser than the bottom region. This imbalance in density ultimately results in system instability [1,2,3,4]. The nanoparticles in the nanofluid are moved by the Brownian motion and thermophoresis, unlike motile microorganisms, which are capable of self-propulsion. Consequently, the movement of the nanoparticles is not connected to the motion of the bacteria. The motile microorganisms can be classified into various types based on their impellent, such as oxytocic, gyrotactic, and negative gravities microorganisms. Microorganisms are of great importance in the fields of engineering, biology, medicine, and the environment, both in theoretical and applied study. Examples of applications in environmental and biological sciences include the ability to absorb CO2 more efficiently than agricultural crops, waste treatment plants, heterogeneous catalysis, the production of biodiesel, ethanol, and fertilizers, bacterially optimized petroleum and natural gas retrieval systems, production of food, chemotherapy for cancer, and the utilization of enzyme biomaterials in bio-microsystems [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Ahmad et al. [12] examined the unique characteristics of hybrid nanoparticles, such as manganese zinc ferrite and nickel zinc ferrite, in the movement of motile gyrotactic bacteria in a bio-convective flow. This flow occurs in a media known as Darcy Forchheimer. Dey and Chutia [13] examined the flow of a nanofluid including dust particles across a vertically stretched flat surface, considering the presence of a two-phase bio-convective system. Agarwal et al. [4] investigated mass and heat transfer in nanofluid flow inside the Powell-Eyring model across an exponentially stretched sheet containing motile microorganisms. Rajeswari and De [14] investigated the point at which tetra-hybrid nanofluid blood flow reaches a state of standstill on a vertical stretched cylinder using bioconvection. Loganathan et al. [15] investigated the bioconvective gyrotactic microorganisms in third-grade nanofluid flow over a Riga surface, focusing on stratification and entropy formation. Loganathan et al. [16] investigated the dynamics of Ree-Eyring nanofluid under the influences of free convection, bioconvection, heat source, and thermal radiation on a convection-heated Riga plate. Rashed et al. [17] used thermophoresis and Brownian motion to investigate the bioconvective flow around a tiny surgical needle in blood containing ternary hybrid nanoparticles.

The formation of the dusty fluid (DF) occurs as a result of the interaction between the base liquid and the minute particles, which are commonly measured in microns or millimeters. Airborne dust consists of little desiccated particles. When a fluid with lower viscosity has solid particles dispersed in it, the movement of this fluid through the system will lead to the creation of a DF. A prominent illustration of the issue of dusty air is the phenomenon of fluidization, which transpires when minuscule dust particles aggregate, resulting in the formation of precipitation. When referring to the pace at which dust velocity shifts, the word “relaxation time” is the term that is employed. To determine the relaxation time, it is essential to first get the particle scale. Furthermore, Fortov et al. [18] produced evidence that demonstrated that the forces exerted by dust on gas particles and on other dust particles are comparable. To stress the fact that dusty plasma is a sort of ionized gas that contains tiny charged condensed particles, it is essential to accentuate this property. Because of the significance of dust particles that are carried in the air, a significant number of experts have made contributions to the database of information that is now available. In in the context of the present situation and the increasing concerns about needs in the mechanical, industrial, technical, and medical domains, experts in these fields have called for the use of DF. This fluid has many real-world uses, such as in cancer detection and treatment, in assessing its interactions with living things, in studying lunar thermal plant ash, in analyzing metal objects coated with polymers, and in helping to dry solids, especially for the cultivation of beneficial microbes. To mention a few of its various applications, it is used in fuel transportation, air conditioner cooling, crude oil purification, and for the manufacturing of granulated polyethylene power station pipes [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Imitaz et al. [28] evaluated the moving mechanics of blood flow in a cylinder with magnetic dust particles. The effect of a fluctuating pressure gradient allowed this to be achieved. Nawaz and colleagues [29] investigated the transmission of thermal energy that results from the dispersion of both single and blended nanoparticles in a hyperbolic fluid with a tangent that contains dust particles. When it comes to dust particles, the hybrid nanofluid is cooler than that nanofluid. All of this was based on their findings.

The fundamental criterion for mass transmission is characteristically not satisfied in chemical reactions that occur at the species level and have constrained Arrhenius activation energies (AAE). Within the context of this discussion, the term “Activation Energy” (AAE) refers to the minimal quantity that must be present in order to initiate a chemical reaction between atoms or molecules that are present in a chemical system. A Swedish scientist named Svante Arrhenius is credited with coining the term “activation energy” in the year 1889. When the fundamental equation for mass conservation is solved, it is possible to easily determine the impact that mass transfer has on the reaction. The use of chemical processes, including AAE, is commonplace in a variety of domains, including oil reservoir engineering, food production, and geothermal theory [30,31,32]. Ansys CFX software is a commercially available computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool that is highly successful in tackling difficult chemical kinetics problems. The development of this system was specifically intended to address complex computational issues related to chemical processes [33]. Khan et al. [34] employed electromagnetic hydrodynamics to study the effect of an AAE chemical reaction on the Casson fluid flow at a point of stagnation on an extended surface. Khan et al. [35] did a study to examine how in the case of the Casson nanofluid, the nonlinear radiative mixed convective flow over a stretched surface was influenced by both the chemical process and the AAE. Shafique et al. [36] conducted a research examining transport of Maxwell nanofluid in three dimensions throughout a stretched medium. The researchers considered the presence of Arrhenius activation energy and chemical reaction. The observed activation energy (AAE) rose, resulting in a decline in solute concentration and therefore reducing the mass flow across the wall. The magnitude of these drops becomes more severe as the distance between the wall and the temperature of the surrounding environment decreases. The investigation conducted by Reddy et al. [37] showed that the activation energy has an impact on exothermic chemical processes involving the 3D-MHD slip flow of a Powell-Eyring fluid across a thin surface. Gomathi and Poulomi [38] investigated the dual Casson Williamson nanofluid including radiation and chemical processes on a stretching/shrinking sheet. Mabrouk et al. [39] investigated how motile microorganisms affect the bioconvection of unstable nonhomogeneous hybrid nanofluids.

The primary purpose of this model is to explore the heat transmission properties of a nanofluid that is classified as dusty and contains gyrotactic microorganisms on a surface that is three-dimensional. This inquiry will occur in the context of linear thermal radiation and non-uniform heat sources and sinks. No previous studies have investigated the impact of Coriolis force and activation energy on a three-dimensional porous surface when exposed to a dusty nanofluid (DNF) containing gyrotactic microorganisms. This has been substantiated by previous study. In order to solve this model, the equations governing the transfer of flow temperature and concentration are transformed into an ordinary differential system by implementing the necessary self-similarity transformations. This method goes beyond the conventional numerical and empirical methodologies by using a multi-layer artificial neural network (ANN) with MLP feed-forward backpropagation and the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Using the state-of-the-art bvp4c solution in MATLAB, the complicated system of nonlinear equations controlling skin friction, heat transfer rate, velocity, and temperature is solved.

  • What effects do the Coriolis force and activation energy have on a DF temperature, concentration, and velocity profiles?

  • How do the characteristics of the fluid-particle interaction affect the rates of mass and heat transfer?

  • What is the impact of thermophoresis, Brownian motion, and permeability parameters on the thermal and microbiological properties of nanofluids?

  • Can ANNs enhance the efficiency and precision of solving nonlinear differential equations in fluid dynamics relative to traditional numerical methods?

  • What is the impact of gyrotactic microorganisms on the stability and heat transfer properties of the DNF system?

2 Formulation of the problem

The study focuses on a stable, three-dimensional, incompressible nanofluid containing dust particles. The nanofluid is subjected to a non-uniform heat source/sink and thermal radiation while being stretched on a surface. A constant velocity speed, denoted by the letter Ω , is maintained during the rotational motion of the fluid all over z -axis (Figure 1). The various characteristics of the Coriolis force are represented by the first and second momentum equations, which are denoted by the letters 2 Ω v 2 and 2 Ω v 1 , respectively. The Buongiorno nanofluid model incorporates the influences of thermophoresis and Brownian motion. The considerations of activation energy, heat radiation, and chemical reactions are also included. It is believed that the stream of dust consists of spheres that are of the same size and density. T for the fluid around the extended sheet and T w for the sheet itself are the temperatures, respectively, of this system. In this case, the nonlinear differential equations may be derived by taking into account the problem constraints and the accurate factors for the surface flow [40].

2.1 Fluid phase

(1) v 1 x + v 2 y + v 3 z = 0 ,

(2) v 1 v 1 x + v 2 v 1 y + v 3 v 1 z 2 Ω v 2 = υ f 2 v 1 z 2 + K N ρ f ( v 1 p v 1 ) υ f k 1 v 1 ,

(3) v 1 v 2 x + v 2 v 2 y + v 3 v 2 z + 2 Ω v 1 = υ f 2 v 2 z 2 + K N ρ f ( v 2 p v 2 ) υ f k 1 v 2 ,

(4) v 1 T x + v 2 T y + v 3 T z = α f 2 T z 2 + τ D B C z T z + D T T T z 2 + m N c pf τ T ( ρ c ρ ) f ( T p T ) 1 ( ρ c ρ ) f q r z + q ( ρ c ρ ) f ,

(5) v 1 C x + v 2 C y + v 3 C z = D B 2 C z 2 + D T T 2 T z 2 + m N ρ f τ C ( C p C ) γ 0 2 ( C C ) T T n 1 exp E 0 k T ,

(6) v 1 N x + v 2 N y + v 3 N z + b W ( C w C ) y N C y = D m 2 N y 2 .

2.2 Dusty phase

(7) v 1 p x + v 2 p y + v 3 p z = 0 ,

(8) v 1 p v 1 p x + v 2 p v 1 p y + v 3 p v 1 p z = K m ( v 1 v 1 p ) ,

(9) v 1 p v 2 p x + v 2 p v 2 p y + v 3 p v 2 p z = K m ( v 2 v 2 p ) ,

(10) v 1 p T p x + v 2 p T p y + v 3 p T p z = c p c m τ T ( T T p ) ,

(11) v 1 p C p x + v 2 p C p y + v 3 p C p z = c p c m τ C ( C C p ) .

The boundary conditions:

(12) v 1 = a x , v 2 = 0 , v 3 = 0 , T = T w , C = C w , N = N w , at z = 0 , v 1 0 , v 2 0 , T T , C C , N N , v 1 p 0 , v 2 p 0 , v 3 p v 3 , T p T , C p C , as z .

where x, y, and z are the Cartesian coordinates, v 1 , v 2 , and v 3 are the fluid velocity components and v 1 p , v 2 p , and v 3p are the dust particle velocities along x, y, and z-directions, υ f is the kinematic viscosity, μ f is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid, k 1 is the permeability parameter, γ 0 is the reaction rate, D T is the thermophoretic diffusion coefficient, D B is the Brownian diffusion coefficient, n 1 is the exponent fitted rate constant, E 0 is the dimensional form of activation energy, k is the Boltzmann constant, τ C is the concentration equilibrium time, τ = ( ρ c p ) p ( ρ c p ) f is the capacity ratio, c pf is the specific heat of fluid, c p p is the specific heat of particle, ρ f is the density of the fluid, ρ p is the density of the particle, and c m is the specific heat dust particles.

Equation (6) provides the radiative heat flow as

(13) q r = 4 σ 3 k T 4 z .

The model for the non-uniform heat source and sink, q , is

(14) q = k f u w x υ f A ( T w T ) d d η G 1 ( η ) + B ( T T ) .

The similarity transformations are as follows:

(15) v 1 = a x G 1 ( η ) , v 2 = a x G 2 ( η ) , v 3 = a v G 1 ( η ) , η = a υ 1 / 2 z , v 1 p = a x g 1 ( η ) , v 2 p = a x g 2 ( η ) , v 3 p = a v g 1 ( η ) , χ ( η ) = N N N w T , θ = T T T w T , ϕ = C C C w C , θ p = T p T T w T , ϕ p = C p C C w C .

Using equation (15), equations (2)–(11) are transformed into the following form:

2.3 Fluid phase

(16) d d η G 1 ( η ) 2 G 1 ( η ) d 2 d η 2 G 1 ( η ) 2 α G 2 ( η ) = d 3 d η 3 G 1 ( η ) + I β v d d η g 1 ( η ) d d η G 1 ( η ) ϒ d d η G 1 ( η ) ,

(17) G 2 ( η ) d d η G 1 ( η ) d d η G 2 ( η ) G 1 ( η ) + 2 α d d η G 1 ( η ) = d 2 d η 2 G 2 ( η ) + I β v ( g 2 ( η ) G 2 ( η ) ) ϒ G 2 ( η ) ,

(18) d d η θ ( η ) G 1 ( η ) = 1 Pr 1 + 4 3 Rd d 2 d η 2 θ ( η ) + Nb d d η θ ( η ) d d η ϕ ( η ) + Nt d d η θ ( η ) 2 + I β t ( θ p ( η ) θ ( η ) ) + 1 Pr A d d η G 1 ( η ) + B θ ( η ) ,

(19) d d η ϕ ( η ) G 1 ( η ) = 1 Sc d 2 d η 2 ϕ ( η ) + Nt Nb 1 Sc d 2 d η 2 θ ( η ) + I β c ( ϕ p ( η ) ϕ ( η ) ) , Γ ( ( θ w 1 ) θ + 1 ) n 1 exp E ( θ w 1 ) θ + 1 ϕ ( η )

(20) d d η χ ( η ) G 1 ( η ) + Pe Lb ( χ ( η ) + χ w ) d 2 d η 2 ϕ ( η ) + d d η ϕ ( η ) d d η χ ( η ) = 1 L b d 2 d η 2 χ ( η ) .

2.4 Dusty phase

(21) d d η g 1 ( η ) 2 g 1 ( η ) d 2 d η 2 g 1 ( η ) = β ν d d η G 1 ( η ) d d η g 1 ( η ) ,

(22) d d η g 1 ( η ) g 2 ( η ) g 1 ( η ) d d η g 2 ( η ) = β ν ( G 2 ( η ) g 2 ( η ) ) ,

(23) g 1 ( η ) d d η θ p ( η ) = γ β t ( θ ( η ) θ p ( η ) ) ,

(24) g 1 ( η ) d d η ϕ p ( η ) = γ β c ( ϕ ( η ) ϕ p ( η ) ) ,

where

(25) I = m N ρ f , ϒ = υ f a k 1 , β v = 1 τ v a , τ v = m K , β t = 1 τ T a , β c = 1 τ C a , γ = c p c m , Pe = b W D m , Lb = υ f D m , Nb = τ D B ( C w C ) υ f , Nt = τ D T ( T w T ) T υ f , Sc = υ f D B , Γ = γ 0 2 a , θ w = T w T , E = E 0 k T , α = Ω a , χ w = N N w N , Pr = μ f c p f k f ,

(26) d d η G 1 ( η ) = 1 , G 2 ( η ) = 0 , G 1 ( η ) = 0 , θ ( η ) = 1 , ϕ ( η ) = 1 , χ ( η ) = 1 , at η = 0 , d d η G 1 ( η ) 0 , G 2 ( η ) 0 , θ ( η ) 0 , ϕ ( η ) 0 , χ ( η ) 0 , d d η g 1 ( η ) 0 , g 2 ( η ) 0 , g 1 ( η ) G 1 ( η ) , θ p ( η ) 0 , ϕ p ( η ) 0 , as η .

Skin friction in three dimensions, heat transfer rate, mass transfer rate, and the local density number of motile microbes are provided by

(27) C A x = 2 τ w x ρ f u w 2 , C A y = 2 τ w y ρ f u w 2 , Nu = x q w k f ( T w T ) , Sh = x J w D B ( C w C ) , N x = x k w D m ( N w N ) τ w x = μ f v 1 z z = 0 , τ w x = μ f v 2 z z = 0 , q w = k f T z z = 0 + q r , J w = D B C z z = 0 , k w = D m N z z = 0 .

Using equations (15) and (27), we have

(28) C A x Re x 1 / 2 / 2 = G 1 ( 0 ) , C A y Re x 1 / 2 / 2 = G 2 ( 0 ) , Nu Re x 1 / 2 = 1 + 4 3 Rd θ ( 0 ) , Sh Re x 1 / 2 = ϕ ( 0 ) , N x Re x 1 / 2 = χ ( 0 ) .

3 Methods of solution

The MATLAB bvp4c solver, along with the shooting technique, is employed to obtain numerical solutions to the coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs) (16)–(24) subject to boundary conditions (26). The initial step in transforming the set of coupled nonlinear ODEs into a system of first-order differential equations is as follows:

(29) G 1 ( η ) = f 1 , d d η G 1 ( η ) = f 2 , d 2 d η 2 G 1 ( η ) = f 3 , d 3 d η 3 G 1 ( η ) = f 3 ' , G 2 ( η ) = f 4 , d d η G 2 ( η ) = f 5 , d 2 d η 2 G 2 ( η ) = f 5 ' , θ ( η ) = f 6 , d d η θ ( η ) = f 7 , d 2 d η 2 θ ( η ) = f 7 ' , ϕ ( η ) = f 8 , d d η ϕ ( η ) = f 9 , d 2 d η 2 ϕ ( η ) = f 9 ' , χ ( η ) = f 10 , d d η χ ( η ) = f 11 , d 2 d η 2 χ ( η ) = f 11 ' , g 1 ( η ) = f 12 , d d η g 1 ( η ) = f 13 , d 2 d η 2 g 1 ( η ) = f 13 ' , g 2 ( η ) = f 14 , d d η g 2 ( η ) = f 14 ' , θ p ( η ) = f 15 , d d η θ p ( η ) = f 15 ' , ϕ p ( η ) = f 16 , d d η ϕ p ( η ) = f 16 ' .

(30) f 3 ' = ( f 2 ) 2 f 1 f 3 2 α f 4 I β v ( f 13 f 2 ) + ϒ f 2 ,

(31) f 5 ' = f 4 f 2 f 5 f 1 + 2 α f 2 I β v ( f 14 f 4 ) + ϒ f 4 ,

(32) f 7 ' = f 7 f 1 Nb f 7 f 9 Nt ( f 7 ) 2 I β t ( f 15 f 6 ) 1 Pr ( A f 2 + B f 6 ) / 1 Pr 1 + 4 3 Rd ,

(33) f 9 ' = Sc f 9 f 1 Nt Nb 1 Sc f 7 ' I β c ( f 16 f 8 ) + Γ ( ( θ w 1 ) f 6 + 1 ) n 1 exp E ( θ w 1 ) f 6 + 1 f 8 ,

(34) f 11 ' = Lb f 11 f 1 + Pe Lb [ ( f 10 + χ w ) f 9 ' + f 9 f 11 ] .

3.1 Dusty phase

(35) f 13 ' = ( ( f 13 ) 2 β ν ( f 2 f 13 ) ) / f 12 ,

(36) f 14 ' = ( f 13 f 14 β ν ( f 4 f 14 ) ) / f 12 ,

(37) f 15 ' = ( γ β t ( f 6 f 15 ) ) / f 12 ,

(38) f 16 ' = ( γ β c ( f 8 f 16 ) ) / f 12 .

With boundary conditions

(39) f 2 ( 0 ) = 1 , f 4 ( 0 ) = 0 , f 1 ( 0 ) = 0 , f 6 ( 0 ) = 1 , f 8 ( 0 ) = 1 , f 10 ( 0 ) = 1 , f 2 ( ) 0 , f 4 ( ) 0 , f 6 ( ) 0 , f 8 ( ) 0 , f 10 ( ) 0 , f 12 ( ) 0 , f 14 ( ) 0 , f 12 ( ) f 1 ( ) , f 15 ( ) 0 , f 16 ( ) 0 .

The variable step size η = 0.001 was used until the results asymptotically reached the tolerance limit of 10 8 .

Figure 1 
                  Schematic diagram and coordinate system.
Figure 1

Schematic diagram and coordinate system.

4 Construction of ANN

ANN is a kind of architecture that interprets data in parallel by using numerous tiers of basic supplies that are intimately connected to one another and are referred to as cells. An ANN is a mathematical structure and a technologically sophisticated computer system that functions via the use of neuro-computing in order to efficiently manage data. Not only do ANNs have the ability to create networks of neurons, but they can also duplicate patterns. This model, which derives its cues from the human nervous system, has functional qualities that are indistinguishable from the characteristics of the genuine neuron. It comes from the human nervous system. Each and every one of the billions of sensory cells that are found in our skulls is used by the human brain, which is capable of doing enormous computations of any kind. For the purpose of remembering information, ANNs make use of weighted links, in contrast to genuine neurons, which keep their information in preservation. The calculation load that is connected with the generation of structural characteristics may be sped up and simplified with the help of this technique, which provides for the possibility of acceleration. The evident input and output levels are not the only levels that are present; there is also a hidden layer that contains components that are responsible for the information transformation. With this, the layer that is accountable for producing leads is able to use the output for decision-making, which is one of the mechanisms that constitutes ANNs. Artificial neurons have the astonishing capacity to easily recognize patterns and generate unique qualities that are difficult for both computers and humans to grasp. They are also able to extract important insights from incorrect data, which is a remarkable talent. In a broad sense, this may help to minimize the number of errors that take place [41].

Figure 2 shows the output of the jth hidden neuron.

(40) y j ( x ) = i = 1 1 W 1 j i x i + a j .

where W1 ji indicates the coupling weight between the two layers, x i is the ith node’s input layer, and a j is the jth node’s hidden layer.

Figure 2 
               The back propagation of a neural network is shown schematically.
Figure 2

The back propagation of a neural network is shown schematically.

The result showing the jth hidden node is shown below:

(41) z j ( x ) = 1 1 + e y j ( x ) .

This section considers the layer’s kth output node

(42) o k ( x ) = j = 1 m W 2 k j z j + b k .

The weight W2 kj of a connection between two nodes in the hidden layer and a node in the output layer indicates the strength of that connection. And you could see the word “bias” (or “b k ” for short) in the kth output layer node.

Multiple datasets were used to train, test, and verify the ANN algorithm. The model was trained using about 70% of the data, with the remaining 30% split evenly between validation and testing. Figure 3 shows the ANNs’ layered architecture. The scenario HNF model’s ANN training technique ran a regression analysis, and the results are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 3 
               An ANN model with several layers is shown schematically.
Figure 3

An ANN model with several layers is shown schematically.

Figure 4 
               Statistical analysis with data from 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 1
                                 /
                                 2
                                 
                                    
                                       C
                                    
                                    
                                       f
                                    
                                 
                                 
                                    
                                       Re
                                    
                                    
                                       x
                                    
                                    
                                       1
                                       /
                                       2
                                    
                                 
                                 X
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        (1/2{C}_{\text{f}}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{1/2}X)
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 Sh
                                 
                                    
                                       Re
                                    
                                    
                                       x
                                    
                                    
                                       −
                                       1
                                       /
                                       2
                                    
                                 
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        (\text{Sh}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{-1/2})
                     
                  , and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 
                                    
                                       N
                                    
                                    
                                       x
                                    
                                 
                                 
                                    
                                       Re
                                    
                                    
                                       x
                                    
                                    
                                       −
                                       1
                                       /
                                       2
                                    
                                 
                                 
                                    
                                       X
                                    
                                    
                                       −
                                       1
                                    
                                 
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        ({N}_{x}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{-1/2}{X}^{-1})
                     
                  .
Figure 4

Statistical analysis with data from ( 1 / 2 C f Re x 1 / 2 X ) , ( Sh Re x 1 / 2 ) , and ( N x Re x 1 / 2 X 1 ) .

According to Tables 14, the ANN algorithm outperformed the computational approaches in producing good outcomes. Previous research has shown that ANNs can reliably predict the rates of skin friction and heat transfer.

Table 1

ANN and numerical method (NM) values of C A x Re x 1 / 2 and C A y Re x 1 / 2

β v ϒ l α C A x Re x 1 / 2 C A y Re x 1 / 2
NM ANN Error NM ANN Error
0.2 0.1 2 0.5 −1.28500 −1.29336 8.35 × 10−3 −0.44674 −0.43955 7.19 × 10−3
0.4 0.1 2 0.5 −1.36623 −1.36676 5.26 × 10−4 −0.42593 −0.42535 5.84 × 10−4
0.6 0.1 2 0.5 −1.42569 −1.42570 1.51 × 10−5 −0.41424 −0.41442 1.89 × 10−4
0.8 0.1 2 0.5 −1.47085 −1.47085 9.47 × 10−7 −0.40650 −0.40666 1.61 × 10−4
1 0.1 2 0.5 −1.50628 −1.50625 2.69 × 10−5 −0.40080 −0.40067 1.33 × 10−4
0.5 0.1 2 0.5 −1.39813 −1.39812 1.01 × 10−5 −0.41939 −0.41943 4.64 × 10−5
0.5 0.2 2 0.5 −1.42935 −1.42975 3.99 × 10−4 −0.40695 −0.40672 2.28 × 10−4
0.5 0.3 2 0.5 −1.46033 −1.46048 1.55 × 10−4 −0.39539 −0.39503 3.64 × 10−4
0.5 0.4 2 0.5 −1.49102 −1.49090 1.15 × 10−4 −0.38464 −0.38440 2.42 × 10−4
0.5 0.5 2 0.5 −1.52140 −1.52150 1.00 × 10−4 −0.37462 −0.37483 2.09 × 10−4
0.5 0.1 0.5 0.5 −1.22997 −1.22984 1.29 × 10−4 −0.47260 −0.47243 1.67 × 10−4
0.5 0.1 1 0.5 −1.28733 −1.28756 2.22 × 10−4 −0.45330 −0.45369 3.85 × 10−4
0.5 0.1 1.5 0.5 −1.34339 −1.34500 1.60 × 10−3 −0.43560 −0.43597 3.73 × 10−4
0.5 0.1 2.5 0.5 −1.45155 −1.45153 1.73 × 10−5 −0.40453 −0.40480 2.67 × 10−4
0.5 0.1 2 0.2 −1.34199 −1.34179 1.95 × 10−4 −0.17827 −0.17845 1.86 × 10−4
0.5 0.1 2 0.4 −1.37593 −1.37680 8.69 × 10−4 −0.34343 −0.34231 1.12 × 10−3
0.5 0.1 2 0.6 −1.42255 −1.42281 2.52 × 10−4 −0.49097 −0.49034 6.36 × 10−4
0.5 0.1 2 0.8 −1.47550 −1.48506 9.56 × 10−3 −0.62229 −0.61223 1.01 × 10−2
0.5 0.1 2 1 −1.53115 −1.55502 2.39 × 10−2 −0.74025 −0.71106 2.92 × 10−2
Table 2

ANN and NM values of NuRe x 1 / 2

Rd A B β t Γ Nt Nb NuRe x 1 / 2
NM ANN Error
0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 1.123029 1.122525 5.04 × 10−4
0.7 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 1.063285 1.064012 7.27 × 10−4
0.9 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 1.010646 1.011047 4.00 × 10−4
1.1 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 0.96383 0.963699 1.30 × 10−4
1.3 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 0.921836 0.921834 2.46 × 10−6
1 0.2 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 1.111102 1.110997 1.05 × 10−4
1 0.3 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 1.095564 1.095749 1.86 × 10−4
1 0.4 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 1.080018 1.080167 1.49 × 10−4
1 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 1.064465 1.064394 7.04 × 10−5
1 0.6 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 1.048903 1.048562 3.42 × 10−4
1 1 0.2 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 1.113345 1.113623 2.78 × 10−4
1 1 0.3 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 1.098184 1.098261 7.66 × 10−5
1 1 0.4 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 1.082842 1.082799 4.35 × 10−5
1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 1.067312 1.067215 9.68 × 10−5
1 1 0.6 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 1.051587 1.051489 9.86 × 10−5
1 1 1 0.2 1 0.2 0.2 0.651795 0.815917 1.64 × 10−1
1 1 1 0.3 1 0.2 0.2 0.790207 0.864505 7.43 × 10−2
1 1 1 0.4 1 0.2 0.2 0.898218 0.921206 2.30 × 10−2
1 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 0.986578 0.986675 9.64 × 10−5
1 1 1 0.6 1 0.2 0.2 1.061072 1.061072 4.66 × 10−7
1 1 1 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.213823 1.211967 1.86 × 10−3
1 1 1 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.184912 1.18449 4.22 × 10−4
1 1 1 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 1.156972 1.157182 2.11 × 10−4
1 1 1 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 1.129979 1.130291 3.12 × 10−4
1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 1.103912 1.104025 1.14 × 10−4
1 1 1 0.5 1 0.05 0.2 1.083454 1.083309 1.45 × 10−4
1 1 1 0.5 1 0.1 0.2 1.050012 1.050340 3.28 × 10−4
1 1 1 0.5 1 0.15 0.2 1.017731 1.017488 2.43 × 10−4
1 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 0.986578 0.986675 9.64 × 10−5
1 1 1 0.5 1 0.25 0.2 0.956518 0.959041 2.52 × 10−3
1 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.05 1.139136 1.139144 8.50 × 10−6
1 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.1 1.086488 1.086492 4.29 × 10−6
1 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.15 1.035641 1.035751 1.10 × 10−4
1 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.2 0.986578 0.986675 9.64 × 10−5
1 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 0.25 0.939281 0.939489 2.08 × 10−4
Table 3

ANN and NM values of ShRe x 1 / 2

Sc γ θ w E β c n1 ShRe x 1 / 2
NM ANN Error
0.2 0.5 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 −0.556680 −0.340330 2.16 × 10−1
0.4 0.5 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 −0.176150 -0.119010 5.71 × 10−2
0.6 0.5 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.109308 0.109317 9.25 × 10−6
0.8 0.5 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.341719 0.332926 8.79 × 10−3
1 0.5 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.540186 0.540122 6.44 × 10−5
1 0.2 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.399204 0.402061 2.86 × 10−3
1 0.4 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.495065 0.495306 2.40 × 10−4
1 0.6 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.583659 0.583609 5.02 × 10−5
1 0.8 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.666208 0.666407 1.99 × 10−4
1 1 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.743640 0.743583 5.72 × 10−5
1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.425713 0.425475 2.38 × 10−4
1 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.484723 0.485345 6.22 × 10−4
1 0.5 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.540186 0.540122 6.44 × 10−5
1 0.5 2 1 0.5 0.5 0.590057 0.589959 9.73 × 10−5
1 0.5 2.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.634937 0.635058 1.21 × 10−4
1 0.5 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.645172 0.644991 1.82 × 10−4
1 0.5 1.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.621603 0.621791 1.88 × 10−4
1 0.5 1.5 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.599363 0.599529 1.66 × 10−4
1 0.5 1.5 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.578410 0.578376 3.46 × 10−5
1 0.5 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.558700 0.558511 1.90 × 10−4
1 0.5 1.5 1 0.2 0.5 0.354393 0.354404 1.13 × 10−5
1 0.5 1.5 1 0.4 0.5 0.495255 0.495489 2.34 × 10−4
1 0.5 1.5 1 0.6 0.5 0.575585 0.575873 2.88 × 10−4
1 0.5 1.5 1 0.8 0.5 0.627909 0.629297 1.39 × 10−3
1 0.5 1.5 1 1 0.5 0.664793 0.664781 1.27 × 10−5
Table 4

ANN and NM values of N x Re x 1 / 2

Lb Pe χ w N x Re x 1 / 2
NM ANN Error
0.1 0.1 0.5 0.186948 0.186172 7.76 × 10−4
0.3 0.1 0.5 0.266109 0.267456 1.35 × 10−3
0.5 0.1 0.5 0.351812 0.351661 1.50 × 10−4
0.7 0.1 0.5 0.435993 0.435221 7.72 × 10−4
0.9 0.1 0.5 0.515392 0.515152 2.41 × 10−4
1 0.2 0.5 0.621191 0.619026 2.16 × 10−3
1 0.3 0.5 0.689628 0.687994 1.63 × 10−3
1 0.4 0.5 0.758395 0.758442 4.65 × 10−5
1 0.5 0.5 0.827481 0.828669 1.19 × 10−3
1 0.6 0.5 0.896875 0.896838 3.75 × 10−5
1 0.1 0.2 0.539954 0.539980 2.61 × 10−5
1 0.1 0.3 0.544334 0.544349 1.46 × 10−5
1 0.1 0.4 0.548715 0.548725 1.03 × 10−5
1 0.1 0.5 0.553095 0.553127 3.23 × 10−5
1 0.1 0.6 0.557475 0.557576 1.01 × 10−4

5 Findings and analysis

The purpose of this section is to show how the activation energy and Coriolis force affect the flow of a DF containing gyrotactic microbes over a three-dimensional surface. In this part, we look at the dusty and hybrid phases and how momentum and thermal characteristics are physically important. It also explores the key elements that affect the velocity of DNFs, including gyrotactic microorganisms. ( G 1 ( η ) & g 1 ( η ) ) & ( G 2 ( η ) & g 2 ( η ) ) , temperature ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) , concentration ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) , motile microorganism ( χ ( η ) ) skin friction ( C A x Re x 1 / 2 ) & ( C A y Re x 1 / 2 ) , Nusselt number ( Nu Re x 1 / 2 ) , mass transfer rate ( Sh Re x 1 / 2 ) , and motile microorganism of local density number ( N x Re x 1 / 2 ) are depicted, and a detailed discussion is held about them. The bvp4c with MATALB solver is used to solve the dimensional version of the flow, heat transport, concentration, and density equations of motile microorganisms under specific boundary conditions. The physical features of DF and DNF are compared over the three-dimensional figure sheet using rotational parameter ( α ) as solid and dotted lines, respectively. Table 5 shows that there is a significant level of consensus in the comparative study, hence the numerical simulation results are dependable.

Table 5

Comparison of θ ( 0 ) for various values of Pr with previous work

Pr Rehman et al. [42] Ali et al. [43] Present
1.0 1.00000 1.0000 1.00000
3.0 1.92375 1.9236 1.92375
10 3.72061 3.7207 3.72061
100 12.29404 12.294 12.29404

5.1 Effect of fluid–particle interaction ( β v )

Figure 5(a–d) depicts how the fluid–particle interaction parameter ( β v ) affected the velocities ( G 1 ( η ) & g 1 ( η ) ) , temperature ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) , concentration ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) , and motile microorganism ( χ ( η ) ) profiles in the case of ( α = 0.5 ) and ( α = 1 ) , respectively. Figure 5(a) explores the effect of changes in ( β v ) on ( G 1 ( η ) ) (DF) and g 1 ( η ) (DNF) in the case of rotational parameter ( α = 0.5 ) and ( α = 1 ) . Findings show that G 1 ( η ) decreases with increasing ( β v ) values and increases with increasing g 1 ( η ) . In terms of physical effects, a larger value of ( β v ) reduces the particle phase relaxation time and increases the drag force acting on the interacting fluid. The effect of ( β v ) on the temperature profile ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) is illustrated in Figure 5(b), and it is observed that increasing ( β v ) causes ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) to enlarge. It is observed that θ ( η ) has stronger effects than the θ p ( η ) . Moreover ( α = 1 ) has more effective than ( α = 0.5 ) . In Figure 5(c), the effect of ( β v ) on concentration ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) is presented. A closer inspection at the graph reveals that when ( β v ) increases, ( ϕ ( η ) ) and ( ϕ p ( η ) ) increase. Figure 5(d) illustrates how the ( β v ) influences motile microorganism ( χ ( η ) ) changes in the case of rotational parameter ( α = 0.5 ) and ( α = 1 ) , respectively. It is observed that ( χ ( η ) ) increases with the increase in ( β v ) .

Figure 5 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    β
                                 
                                 
                                    v
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\beta }_{v}
                        
                      on (a) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    G
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                                 
                                    ′
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    g
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                                 
                                    ′
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           {G}_{1}^{^{\prime} }(\eta )\& {g}_{1}^{^{\prime} }(\eta )
                        
                     , (b) 
                        
                           
                           
                              θ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    θ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \theta (\eta )\& {\theta }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     , (c) 
                        
                           
                           
                              ϕ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    ϕ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \phi (\eta )\& {\phi }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     , and (d) 
                        
                           
                           
                              χ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \chi (\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 5

Influence of β v on (a) G 1 ( η ) & g 1 ( η ) , (b) θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) , (c) ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) , and (d) χ ( η ) .

5.2 Effect of porosity ( ϒ )

Figure 6(a–d) describes variations in the velocities ( G 1 ( η ) & g 1 ( η ) ) , temperature ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) , concentration ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) , and motile microorganism ( χ ( η ) ) profiles influenced by the porosity parameter ( ϒ ) . The velocity profile of a system is affected by the permeability parameter ( ϒ ) , as seen in Figure 6(a). By increasing the values of the permeability parameter ( ϒ ) , it is found that the ( G 1 ( η ) & g 1 ( η ) ) profiles decline in both the cases of ( α = 0.5 ) and ( α = 1 ) . The pore size of a material physically decreases as its permeability increases. When fluid flow slows down, fluid velocity also drops. Figure 6(b) portrays how the ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) gets impacted for the variations in permeability parameter ( ϒ ) in ( α = 0.5 ) and ( α = 1 ) . It is observed that the energy profiles for both the dusty and nanofluid cases ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) increase with higher values of the ( ϒ ) . As a result of low velocity, heat dissipation is restricted, which leads to an increase in temperature since the porous medium is able to maintain thermal energy. The concentration profile ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) reveals a similar nature for the permeability parameter ( ϒ ) in Figure 6(c). Figure 6(d) illustrates how the ( ϒ ) influences the motile microorganism ( χ ( η ) ) changes in the case of rotational parameter ( α = 0.5 ) and ( α = 1 ) , respectively. It is observed that ( χ ( η ) ) increases with the increase in the ( ϒ ) . A higher permeability causes mass diffusion to be slowed down, which results in the accumulation of nanoparticles and an increase in concentration at the surface.

Figure 6 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              ϒ
                           
                           \Upsilon 
                        
                      on (a) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    G
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                                 
                                    ′
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    g
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                                 
                                    ′
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           {G}_{1}^{^{\prime} }(\eta )\& {g}_{1}^{^{\prime} }(\eta )
                        
                     , (b) 
                        
                           
                           
                              θ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    θ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \theta (\eta )\& {\theta }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     , (c) 
                        
                           
                           
                              ϕ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    ϕ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \phi (\eta )\& {\phi }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     , and (d) 
                        
                           
                           
                              χ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \chi (\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 6

Influence of ϒ on (a) G 1 ( η ) & g 1 ( η ) , (b) θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) , (c) ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) , and (d) χ ( η ) .

5.3 Effect of mass concentration of dust particles ( I )

The impact of ( I ) on ( G 1 ( η ) & g 1 ( η ) ) , ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) , and ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) profiles in the case of ( α = 0.5 ) and ( α = 1 ) are represented in Figure 7(a–c). Figure 7(a) explores the changes in mass concentration of dust particles ( I ) on transverse velocity ( G 1 ( η ) & g 1 ( η ) ) . It is detected that the transverse fluid velocity and transverse DF velocity enlargement by improving the ( I ) . A physical explanation for why certain fluids may move at higher velocities than others is that adding more dust to a mixture lowers the drag force a given fluid experiences. Figure 7(b) illustrates how the mass concentration of dust particles ( I ) affects the temperature’s profile ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) in a system. It is observed that both temperature profiles ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) decrease as the values of ( I ) increase for ( α = 0.5 ) and ( α = 1 ) . Due to dust’s ability to absorb heat and promote energy dissipation, a lower system temperature is achieved with a higher concentration of dust, diminishing the thermal profile. Figure 7(c) demonstrates the influence of ( I ) on concentration ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) variations. As the values of ( I ) increase, the concentration ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) decreases, as seen in this diagram. Enhanced particle interactions promote dispersion and prevent aggregation near the surface, because the concentration profile decreases as the value of I increases. This is because the concentration profile lowers.

Figure 7 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              I
                           
                           I
                        
                      on (a) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    G
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                                 
                                    ′
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    g
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                                 
                                    ′
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           {G}_{1}^{^{\prime} }(\eta )\& {g}_{1}^{^{\prime} }(\eta )
                        
                     , (b) 
                        
                           
                           
                              θ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    θ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \theta (\eta )\& {\theta }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     , and (c) 
                        
                           
                           
                              ϕ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    ϕ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \phi (\eta )\& {\phi }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 7

Influence of I on (a) G 1 ( η ) & g 1 ( η ) , (b) θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) , and (c) ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) .

5.4 Effect of thermophoresis ( Nt )

The impact of the ( Nt ) on ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) and ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) profiles in the case of ( α = 0.5 ) and ( α = 1 ) are represented in Figure 8(a and b). Figure 8(a) describes how the ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) influenced the fluid and dusty phases to the deviations in ( Nt ) . It is detected that ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) increases with the increase in ( Nt ) . This happens because thermophoresis exposes a bigger thermal boundary layer and pulls huge thermally conductive nanoparticles further into the fluid. The variations that can be found in a concentration profile ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) according to a number of thermophoresis values ( Nt ) can be seen in Figure 8(b). The dusty stale air ( ϕ p ( η ) ) and fluid ( ϕ ( η ) ) increased for higher values of ( Nt ) . As the fluid concentration increases, its effects are limited to a slight enhancement of the wall slope in the concentration profiles. It is seen that the concentration of both the fluid and dusty phases increases in tandem with the increase in Nt. The effect, on the other hand, is most strongly detected close to the surface, which is where the concentration gradient becomes a little high. This occurs as a result of thermophoresis, which repositions particles within the fluid by driving them away from regions that are significantly heated.

Figure 8 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              N
                              t
                           
                           Nt
                        
                      on (a) 
                        
                           
                           
                              θ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    θ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \theta (\eta )\& {\theta }_{p}(\eta )
                        
                      and (b) 
                        
                           
                           
                              ϕ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    ϕ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \phi (\eta )\& {\phi }_{p}(\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 8

Influence of N t on (a) θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) and (b) ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) .

5.5 Effect of Brownian motion ( Nb )

The Brownian motion parameter’s ( Nb ) impact on the temperature ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) and concentration ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) profiles in the case of ( α = 0.5 ) and ( α = 1 ) are presented in Figure 9(a and b). The impact of the ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) on the two phases as well as the variations in the parameter ( Nb ) is shown in Figure 9(a). It has been understood that ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) augmentations upsurge ( Nb ) . As a result of an increase in the Brownian motion parameter, which raises the temperature and increases the kinetic energy, nanoparticles come in contact with the basic liquid particles. The variations that can be found in a ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) for multiple values of the ( Nb ) is illustrated in Figure 9(b). The dusty ( ϕ p ( η ) ) and fluid nanofluid ( ϕ ( η ) ) increase for higher values of ( Nb ) . When the Brownian motion of the fluid particles is increased, the random movement of the fluid particles improves physically. This results in an increase in the creation of heat, which in turn raises the temperature of the fluid.

Figure 9 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              Nb
                           
                           \text{Nb}
                        
                      on (a) 
                        
                           
                           
                              θ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    θ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \theta (\eta )\& {\theta }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                      and (b) 
                        
                           
                           
                              ϕ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    ϕ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \phi (\eta )\& {\phi }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 9

Influence of Nb on (a) θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) and (b) ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) .

5.6 Effect of specific heat ratio ( γ )

Figure 10(a and b) explores the effect of changes in ( γ ) on ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) and ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) in the case of ( α = 0.5 ) and ( α = 1 ) . Figure 10(a) demonstrates the influence on the temperature profile ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) is impacted with the deviations in specific heat ratio parameter ( γ ) . It is detected that ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) increases with the increase in ( γ ) . When the specific heat ratio parameter ( γ ) is increased, the fluid’s capacity to store thermal energy is enhanced, which ultimately results in an increase in temperature. This arises as a consequence of the fact that a greater specific heat permits the fluid to absorb more heat before experiencing a change in temperature, which ultimately results in a thermal barrier layer that is thicker.

Figure 10 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              γ
                           
                           \gamma 
                        
                      on (a) 
                        
                           
                           
                              θ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    θ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \theta (\eta )\& {\theta }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                      and (b) 
                        
                           
                           
                              ϕ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    ϕ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \phi (\eta )\& {\phi }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 10

Influence of γ on (a) θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) and (b) ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) .

The same nature is observed for the concentration profile ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) , which is depicted in Figure 10(b). A higher value of γ results in an increase in the energy absorption capacity of the fluid, which in turn has an effect on the diffusion process. Heat causes improved mixing and dispersion throughout the system, thereby resulting in a larger concentration of nanoparticles within the fluid phase.

5.7 Effects of radiation ( Rd ) and accumulation ( A ) & ( B )

Figure 11 demonstrates the influence of the radiation parameter (Rd) on the temperature profiles of the fluid and dusty phases. The graph presented here indicates that the temperature ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) increases with the increase in the values of ( Rd ) . In a physical sense, there is a correlation between higher temperatures and thicker thermal barrier layers and larger thermal radiation parameters. Figures 12 and 13 illustrate how ( A ) & ( B ) affect the temperature ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) . The wider dispersion of temperatures was shown to be an effect of the accumulation of (A) and (B) values. The main cause of warmth in the flow is an irritation in the levels of irregular heat parameters. The result was that, when the values of (A) and (B) increased, the fluid’s temperature increased. In a physical sense, the increased heat energy causes a disruption in the thermal equilibrium, which in turn leads to an increase in molecular agitation and an increase in ambient temperature throughout the fluid.

Figure 11 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              Rd
                           
                           \text{Rd}
                        
                      on 
                        
                           
                           
                              θ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    θ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \theta (\eta )\& {\theta }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 11

Influence of Rd on θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) .

Figure 12 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              A
                           
                           A
                        
                      on 
                        
                           
                           
                              θ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    θ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \theta (\eta )\& {\theta }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 12

Influence of A on θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) .

Figure 13 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              B
                           
                           B
                        
                      on 
                        
                           
                           
                              θ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    θ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \theta (\eta )\& {\theta }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 13

Influence of B on θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) .

5.8 Effect of fluid–particle interaction ( β t )

Figure 14 displays the variations in the temperature profile ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) with the number of different fluid–particle interaction parameter for temperature values ( β t ) . Fluid temperature ( θ ( η ) ) decreases while DNF ( θ p ( η ) ) increases at higher levels of ( β t ) . There is a loss of both kinetic and thermal energy for the micro fluid whenever it comes in contact with dust particles. It is a loss of a bodily nature.

Figure 14 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    β
                                 
                                 
                                    t
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\beta }_{\text{t}}
                        
                      for temperature on 
                        
                           
                           
                              θ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    θ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \theta (\eta )\& {\theta }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 14

Influence of β t for temperature on θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) .

5.9 Effect of fluid–particle interaction ( E )

Figure 15 demonstrates how the activation energy parameter ( E ) affects the concentration profile ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) in the case of ( α = 0.5 ) and ( α = 1 ) in the system. It is distinguished that the ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) profiles efficiency increases with the increasing values of the activation energy parameter ( E ) . An activation energy that is much higher than average leads the Arrhenius function to slope upward, which in turn increases the efficiency of the chemical process. As a consequence of this, the concentration of nanoparticles increases. Physically, stronger molecular connections and reaction rates are made possible by larger activation energies, which enable more nanoparticles to remain in the system rather than dissipate. As a consequence, the concentration distribution across the fluid medium becomes more noticeable.

Figure 15 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              E
                           
                           E
                        
                      on 
                        
                           
                           
                              ϕ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    ϕ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \phi (\eta )\& {\phi }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 15

Influence of E on ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) .

5.10 Effect of chemical reaction ( Γ )

Various values of the chemical reaction parameter ( Γ ) are shown in Figure 16, which illustrates the oscillations that occur in a ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) . As a result of increasing the values of the chemical reaction parameter ( Γ ) , it has been seen that the ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) profiles are increasing. The concentration of liquid species decreases because they dissolve more efficiently. The acceleration of species dissolution that results from a greater chemical reaction parameter leads to a decrease in fluid concentration.

Figure 16 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              Γ
                           
                           \text{Γ}
                        
                      on 
                        
                           
                           
                              ϕ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    ϕ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \phi (\eta )\& {\phi }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 16

Influence of Γ on ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) .

5.11 Effect of fluid–particle interaction ( β c )

Figure 17 shows the concentration profile ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) with various fluid–particle interaction parameter for concentration ( β c ) values approaching both ( α = 0.5 ) and ( α = 1 ) . Fluid concentration ( ϕ ( η ) ) decreased while DNF ( ϕ p ( η ) ) increased at higher values of ( β c ) . When the interactions between particles and fluids are stronger, the concentration of base fluid decreases while the concentration of DNF increases.

Figure 17 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    β
                                 
                                 
                                    c
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\beta }_{\text{c}}
                        
                      on 
                        
                           
                           
                              ϕ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                              &
                              
                                 
                                    ϕ
                                 
                                 
                                    p
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \phi (\eta )\& {\phi }_{\text{p}}(\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 17

Influence of β c on ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) .

5.12 Effect of Peclet number ( Pe )

An illustration of the effect that the Peclet number ( Pe ) has on the microbe density ( χ ( η ) ) can be seen in Figure 18. Therefore, higher values of the ( Pe ) parameter result in a reduction in the density and fluid mass of the surrounding environment. There is a decrease in the microbe density when there is an increase in the Peclet number. This indicates that there is an increase in convective transport, which in turn lowers the accumulation of germs in the fluid.

Figure 18 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              Pe
                           
                           \text{Pe}
                        
                      on 
                        
                           
                           
                              χ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \chi (\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 18

Influence of Pe on χ ( η ) .

5.13 Effect of microorganism density ( χ w )

The influence of microorganism density ( χ w ) on ( χ ( η ) ) is seen in Figure 19. Therefore, the microorganism density is reduced when the ( χ w ) parameter’s value increases. As the microorganism density parameter rises, the concentration of motile microbes falls. This is because of increased motility and dispersion, which ultimately results in a lower accumulation of microorganisms in the fluid.

Figure 19 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    χ
                                 
                                 
                                    w
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\chi }_{\text{w}}
                        
                      on 
                        
                           
                           
                              χ
                              
                                 
                                    (
                                    
                                       η
                                    
                                    )
                                 
                              
                           
                           \chi (\eta )
                        
                     .
Figure 19

Influence of χ w on χ ( η ) .

5.14 Effect of skin friction ( C A x Re x 1 / 2 ) & ( C A y Re x 1 / 2 ) , Nusselt number ( Nu Re x 1 / 2 ) , mass transfer rate ( Sh Re x 1 / 2 ) , and motile microorganism

Figure 20(a–e) is shown in order to demonstrate the impact of the fluid–particle interaction parameter ( β v ) and rotational parameter ( α ) on (a and b) skin friction ( C A x Re x 1 / 2 ) & ( C A y Re x 1 / 2 ) , (c) Nusselt number ( Nu Re x 1 / 2 ) , (d) mass transfer rate ( Sh Re x 1 / 2 ) , and (e) motile microorganism of local density number ( N x Re x 1 / 2 ) . It is observed that decreases in the ( C A x Re x 1 / 2 ) nanofluid over the surface affects the ( β v ) and ( α ) parameters. It is seen that ( C A y Re x 1 / 2 ) increases for increasing values of ( β v ) and ( α ) . Figure 20(c) shows that the rate of heat transfer ( Nu Re x 1 / 2 ) decreases for higher values of ( β v ) and ( α ) . In Figure 20(d), it is observed that higher values of ( β v ) enhance ( Sh Re x 1 / 2 ) , while higher values of ( α ) cause a decrease. The larger values of the ( β v ) increase ( N x Re x 1 / 2 ) but mandate the higher ( α ) values, as seen in Figure 20(e). Figure 21(a–c) analyzes the impact of the fluid–particle interaction parameter for temperature ( β t ) and thermophoresis ( Nt ) on (a) Nusselt number ( Nu Re x 1 / 2 ) , (b) mass transfer rate ( Sh Re x 1 / 2 ) , and (c) motile microorganism of local density number ( N x Re x 1 / 2 ) . From Figure 21(a), it can be observed that the rate of heat transfer ( Nu Re x 1 / 2 ) increases with the higher values of ( β t ) and ( Nt ) . As shown in Figure 21(b), ( Sh Re x 1 / 2 ) increases with higher values of ( β t ) but decreases with the higher ( Nt ) values. As seen in Figure 21(c), larger ( β t ) values enhance ( N x Re x 1 / 2 ) , whereas increased ( Nt ) values lead to a decrease. The impact of the fluid–particle interaction parameter for concentration ( β c ) and activation energy ( E ) on (a) Nusselt number ( Nu Re x 1 / 2 ) , (b) mass transfer rate ( Sh Re x 1 / 2 ) , and (c) motile microorganism of local density number ( N x Re x 1 / 2 ) is presented in Figure 22(a–c). Figure 22(a) shows that the rate of heat transfer ( Nu Re x 1 / 2 ) increases for the higher values of the ( β c ) and ( E ) . It can be observed from Figure 22(b) that the rate of mass transfer ( Sh Re x 1 / 2 ) increases with the increase in ( β c ) and ( E ) values. The motile microorganism of local density number ( N x Re x 1 / 2 ) is known to increase with the increasing values of ( β c ) and ( E ) according to Figure 22(c).

Figure 20 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    β
                                 
                                 
                                    v
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\beta }_{\text{v}}
                        
                      and 
                        
                           
                           
                              α
                           
                           \alpha 
                        
                      on (a) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    C
                                 
                                 
                                    A
                                    x
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    Re
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                    /
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           {C}_{Ax}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{1/2}
                        
                     , (b) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    C
                                 
                                 
                                    A
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    Re
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                    /
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           {C}_{Ay}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{1/2}
                        
                     , (c) 
                        
                           
                           
                              Nu
                              
                                 
                                    Re
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    1
                                    /
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           \text{Nu}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{-1/2}
                        
                     , (d) 
                        
                           
                           
                              Sh
                              
                                 
                                    Re
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    1
                                    /
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           \text{Sh}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{-1/2}
                        
                     , and (e) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    N
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    Re
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    1
                                    /
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           {N}_{x}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{-1/2}
                        
                     .
Figure 20

Influence of β v and α on (a) C A x Re x 1 / 2 , (b) C A y Re x 1 / 2 , (c) Nu Re x 1 / 2 , (d) Sh Re x 1 / 2 , and (e) N x Re x 1 / 2 .

Figure 21 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    β
                                 
                                 
                                    t
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\beta }_{\text{t}}
                        
                      and Nt on (a) 
                        
                           
                           
                              Nu
                              
                                 
                                    Re
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    1
                                    /
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           \text{Nu}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{-1/2}
                        
                     , (b) 
                        
                           
                           
                              Sh
                              
                                 
                                    Re
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    1
                                    /
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           \text{Sh}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{-1/2}
                        
                     , and (c) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    N
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    Re
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    1
                                    /
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           {N}_{x}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{-1/2}
                        
                     .
Figure 21

Influence of β t and Nt on (a) Nu Re x 1 / 2 , (b) Sh Re x 1 / 2 , and (c) N x Re x 1 / 2 .

Figure 22 
                  Influence of 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    β
                                 
                                 
                                    c
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\beta }_{\text{c}}
                        
                      and 
                        
                           
                           
                              E
                           
                           E
                        
                      on (a) 
                        
                           
                           
                              Nu
                              
                                 
                                    Re
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    1
                                    /
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           \text{Nu}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{-1/2}
                        
                     , (b) 
                        
                           
                           
                              Sh
                              
                                 
                                    Re
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    1
                                    /
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           \text{Sh}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{-1/2}
                        
                     , and (c) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    N
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                    Re
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    1
                                    /
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           {N}_{x}{\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{-1/2}
                        
                     .
Figure 22

Influence of β c and E on (a) Nu Re x 1 / 2 , (b) Sh Re x 1 / 2 , and (c) N x Re x 1 / 2 .

6 Conclusion

This study demonstrates the efficacy of a multi-layer ANN in analyzing the effects of the Coriolis force and activation energy on the flow of a DNF containing gyrotactic microorganisms over a three-dimensional sheet. The study also considers the influence of linear thermal radiation and a non-uniform heat source on the system. The results are presented in two-dimensional graphs, revealing the following key findings:

  • The ANN methodology effectively reduces computational time when solving complex fluid dynamics problems.

  • The dust fluid velocity ( g 1 ( η ) ) increases with higher values of the fluid–particle interaction parameter, whereas the fluid velocity ( G 1 ( η ) ) decreases.

  • The temperature ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) and concentration profiles ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) decrease with increasing values of mass concentration of dusty particles ( I ) .

  • Higher values of the thermophoresis parameter ( Nt ) enhance both temperature and concentration profiles.

  • An increase in the Brownian motion parameter ( Nb ) increases the temperature ( θ ( η ) & θ p ( η ) ) but decreases the concentration ( ϕ ( η ) & ϕ p ( η ) ) .

  • The microorganism density ( χ ( η ) ) decreases with the higher values of the concentration ratio parameter ( χ w ) .

  • The rate of heat transfer ( Nu Re x 1 / 2 ) increases with the higher values of ( β t ) and ( Nt ) .

The findings have practical implications in geothermal energy extraction, industrial cooling systems, wastewater treatment, and enhanced oil recovery. For instance, in geothermal power plants, optimizing nanofluid properties can improve heat transfer efficiency, reducing energy consumption. Similarly, in wastewater treatment, understanding microorganism dynamics helps in bacterial control, improving purification efficiency. These insights contribute to sustainable and efficient thermal management solutions across industries. Future investigations may include hybrid nanofluids, magnetohydrodynamic effects, and experimental validation using CFDs and deep learning. Current constraints include constant property assumptions, nanoparticle aggregation, and the lack of empirical validation.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Government wide R&D Fund Infectious Disease Research (GFID), with a grant funded by the government of the Republic of Korea (Ministry of Health and welfare), Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) (The development of infection control and prevention technologies for strengthening the infection control capacity of medical institutions), under Grant RS-2025-02310471.

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by the Government wide R&D Fund Infectious Disease Research (GFID), with a grant funded by the government of the Republic of Korea (Ministry of Health and welfare), Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) (The development of infection control and prevention technologies for strengthening the infection control capacity of medical institutions), under Grant RS-2025-02310471.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: All data generated or analyzed in this study are fully presented within this published article.

References

[1] Rashed AS, Mahmoud TA, Mabrouk SM. Enhanced flow and temperature profiles in ternary hybrid nanofluid with gyrotactic microorganisms: a study on magnetic field, brownian motion, and thermophoresis phenomena. J Appl Comput Mech. 2024;10:597–609. 10.22055/jacm.2024.45899.4427.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Atif SM, Hussain S, Sagheer M. Magnetohydrodynamic stratified bioconvective flow of micropolar nanofluid due to gyrotactic microorganisms. AIP Adv. 2019;9:025208. 10.1063/1.5085742.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Begum N, Siddiqa S, Sulaiman M, Islam S, Hossain MA, Gorla RSR. Numerical solutions for gyrotactic bioconvection of dusty nanofluid along a vertical isothermal surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;113:229–36. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.05.071.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Agarwal P, Jain R, Loganathan K. Thermally radiative flow of MHD Powell-Eyring nanofluid over an exponential stretching sheet with swimming microorganisms and viscous dissipation: A numerical computation. Int J Thermofluids. 2024;23:100773. 10.1016/j.ijft.2024.100773.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Rajeswari PM, De P. Multi-stratified effects on stagnation point nanofluid flow with gyrotactic microorganisms over porous medium. J Porous Media. 2024;27:67–84. 10.1615/JPorMedia.2023050040.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Jakeer S, Polu BAR. Homotopy perturbation method solution of magneto-polymer nanofluid containing gyrotactic microorganisms over the permeable sheet with Cattaneo–Christov heat and mass flux model. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng. 2021;236:525–34. 10.1177/09544089211048993.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Basha HT, Sivaraj R. Numerical simulation of blood nanofluid flow over three different geometries by means of gyrotactic microorganisms: Applications to the flow in a circulatory system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2021;235:441–60. 10.1177/0954406220947454.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Alharbi FM, Naeem M, Zubair M, Jawad M, Jan WU, Jan R. Bioconvection due to gyrotactic microorganisms in couple stress hybrid nanofluid laminar mixed convection incompressible flow with magnetic nanoparticles and chemical reaction as carrier for targeted drug delivery through porous stretching sheet. Molecules. 2021;26:3954. 10.3390/molecules26133954.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Waqas H, Kamran T, Imran M, Muhammad T. MHD bioconvectional flow of Jeffrey nanofluid with motile microorganisms over a stretching sheet: solar radiation applications. Waves Random Complex Media. 2022;1–30. 10.1080/17455030.2022.2105418.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Mehmood Z, Iqbal Z. Interaction of induced magnetic field and stagnation point flow on bioconvection nanofluid submerged in gyrotactic microorganisms. J Mol Liq. 2016;224:1083–91. 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.10.014.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Kuznetsov AV. The onset of nanofluid bioconvection in a suspension containing both nanoparticles and gyrotactic microorganisms. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2010;37:1421–5. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.08.015.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Ahmad S, Akhter S, Imran Shahid M, Ali K, Akhtar M, Ashraf M. Novel thermal aspects of hybrid nanofluid flow comprising of manganese zinc ferrite MnZnFe2O4, nickel zinc ferrite NiZnFe2O4 and motile microorganisms. Ain Shams Eng J. 2022;13:101668. 10.1016/j.asej.2021.101668.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Dey D, Chutia B. Dusty nanofluid flow with bioconvection past a vertical stretching surface. J King Saud Univ – Eng Sci. 2022;34:375–80. 10.1016/j.jksues.2020.11.001.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Rajeswari PM, De P. Shape factor and sensitivity analysis on stagnation point of bioconvective tetra-hybrid nanofluid over porous stretched vertical cylinder. Bionanoscience. 2024;14:3035–58. 10.1007/s12668-024-01586-8.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Loganathan K, Jain R, Eswaramoorthi S, Abbas M, Alqahtani MS. Bioconvective gyrotactic microorganisms in third-grade nanofluid flow over a Riga surface with stratification: An approach to entropy minimization. Open Phys. 2023;21:20230273. 10.1515/phys-2023-0273.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Loganathan K, Alessa N, Jain R, Ali F, Zaib A. Dynamics of heat and mass transfer: Ree-Eyring nanofluid flow over a Riga plate with bioconvention and thermal radiation. Front Phys. 2022;10:974562. 10.3389/fphy.2022.974562.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Rashed AS, Nasr E, Mabrouk SM. Bioconvective flow surrounding a thin surgical needle in blood incorporating ternary hybrid nanoparticles. Comput Methods Differ Equations. 2024. 10.22034/CMDE.2024.61425.2643.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Fortov VE, Vaulina OS, Petrov OF, Vasiliev MN, Gavrikov AV, Shakova IA, et al. Experimental study of the heat transport processes in dusty plasma fluid. Phys Rev E – Stat Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 2007;75:026403. 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.026403.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Basha HT, Kim H, Jang B. Buoyancy-driven heat transfer and entropy analysis of a hydromagnetic GO-Fe3O4/H2O hybrid nanofluid in an energy storage enclosure partially filled with non-Darcy porous medium under an oblique magnetic field. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 2024;35:491–523. 10.1108/HFF-03-2024-0193/FULL/XML.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Basha HT, Jang B. Machine learning analysis for heat transfer enhancement in nano-encapsulated phase change materials within L-shaped enclosure with heated blocks. Appl Therm Eng. 2025;259:124803. 10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2024.124803.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Jakeer S, Reddy PBA. Entropy generation on the variable magnetic field and magnetohydrodynamic stagnation point flow of Eyring–Powell hybrid dusty nanofluid: Solar thermal application. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2022;236:7442–55. 10.1177/09544062211072457.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Lou Q, Ali B, Rehman SU, Habib D, Abdal S, Shah NA, et al. Micropolar dusty fluid: Coriolis force effects on dynamics of MHD rotating fluid when Lorentz force is significant. Mathematics. 2022;10:1–13. 10.3390/math10152630.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Kalpana G, Madhura KR, Kudenatti RB. Impact of temperature-dependant viscosity and thermal conductivity on MHD boundary layer flow of two-phase dusty fluid through permeable medium. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2019;22:416–27. 10.1016/j.jestch.2018.10.009.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Mahdy A, Hoshoudy GA. Two-phase mixed convection nanofluid flow of a dusty tangent hyperbolic past a nonlinearly stretching sheet. J Egypt Math Soc. 2019;27:44. 10.1186/s42787-019-0050-9.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Ramana Reddy JV, Sugunamma V, Sandeep N. Thermophoresis and Brownian motion effects on unsteady MHD nanofluid flow over a slendering stretching surface with slip effects. Alex Eng J. 2018;57:2465–73. 10.1016/j.aej.2017.02.014.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Ghadikolaei SS, Hosseinzadeh K, Hatami M, Ganji DD. MHD boundary layer analysis for micropolar dusty fluid containing Hybrid nanoparticles (Cu‑Al2O3) over a porous medium. J Mol Liq. 2018;268:813–23. 10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2018.07.105.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Gnaneswara Reddy M, Sudha Rani MVVNL, Ganesh Kumar K, Prasannakumar BC, Lokesh HJ. Hybrid dusty fluid flow through a Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model. Phys A Stat Mech Its Appl. 2020;511:123975. 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123975.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Imitaz A, Aamina A, Ali F, Khan I, Nisar KS. Two-phase flow of blood with magnetic dusty particles in cylindrical region: A Caputo-Fabrizio fractional model. Comput Mater Contin. 2020;66:2253–64. 10.32604/cmc.2021.012470.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Nawaz M, Madkhali HA, Haneef M, Alharbi SO, Alaoui MK. Numerical study on thermal enhancement in hyperbolic tangent fluid with dust and hybrid nanoparticles. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2021;127:105535. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105535.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] De MA. Comparative study of hybrid, tri-hybrid and tetra-hybrid nanoparticles in MHD unsteady flow with chemical reaction, activation energy, Soret-Dufour effect and sensitivity analysis over non-Darcy porous stretching cylinder. Heliyon. 2024;10:e35731. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35731.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[31] Khan MI, Hayat T, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Activation energy impact in nonlinear radiative stagnation point flow of cross nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2018;91:216–24. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.11.001.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Hayat T, Riaz R, Aziz A, Alsaedi A. Influence of Arrhenius activation energy in MHD flow of third grade nanofluid over a nonlinear stretching surface with convective heat and mass conditions. Phys A Stat Mech Appl. 2020;549:124006. 10.1016/j.physa.2019.124006.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Lian W, Wang J, Wang G, Gao D, Li X, Zhang Z, et al. Investigation on the lignite pyrolysis reaction kinetics based on the general Arrhenius formula. Fuel. 2020;268:117364. 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117364.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Khan MI, Qayyum S, Hayat T, Waqas M, Imran M, Alsaedi A. Entropy generation minimization and binary chemical reaction with Arrhenius activation energy in MHD radiative flow of nanomaterial. J Mol Liq. 2018;259:274–83. 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.03.049.Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Khan MI, Ahmad MW, Alsaedi A, Hayat T. Entropy generation optimization in flow of non-Newtonian nanomaterial with binary chemical reaction and Arrhenius activation energy. Phys A. 2020;538:122806. 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122806.Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Shafique Z, Mustafa M, Mushtaq A. Boundary layer flow of Maxwell fluid in rotating frame with binary chemical reaction and activation energy. Results Phys. 2016;6:627–33. 10.1016/j.rinp.2016.09.006.Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Reddy SRR, Bala Anki Reddy P, Bhattacharyya K. Effect of nonlinear thermal radiation on 3D magneto slip flow of Eyring-Powell nanofluid flow over a slendering sheet with binary chemical reaction and Arrhenius activation energy. Adv Powder Technol. 2019;30:3203–13. 10.1016/j.apt.2019.09.029.Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Gomathi N, Poulomi D. Dual solutions of Casson Williamson nanofluid with thermal radiation and chemical reaction. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl. 2024;1–24. 10.1080/10407782.2024.2326980.Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Mabrouk SM, Inc M, Rashed AS, Akgül A. Similarity analysis of bioconvection of unsteady nonhomogeneous hybrid nanofluids influenced by motile microorganisms. J Biol Phys. 2024;50:119–48. 10.1007/s10867-023-09651-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[40] Reddy SRR, Jakeer S, Rupa ML. ANN model of three-dimensional micropolar dusty hybrid nanofluid flow with Coriolis force: biomedical applications. Indian J Phys. 2023;97:3801–25. 10.1007/s12648-023-02737-5.Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Jakeer S, Rupa ML, Reddy SRR, Rashad AM. Artificial neural network model of non-Darcy MHD Sutterby hybrid nanofluid flow over a curved permeable surface: Solar energy applications. Propuls Power Res. 2023;12:410–27. 10.1016/j.jppr.2023.07.002.Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Rehman SU, Mariam A, Ullah A, Asjad MI, Bajuri MY, Pansera BA, et al. Numerical computation of buoyancy and radiation effects on MHD micropolar nanofluid flow over a stretching/shrinking sheet with heat source. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021;25:100867. 10.1016/J.CSITE.2021.100867.Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Ali B, Nie Y, Khan SA, Sadiq MT, Tariq M. Finite element simulation of multiple slip effects on MHD unsteady Maxwell nanofluid flow over a permeable stretching sheet with radiation and thermo-diffusion in the presence of chemical reaction. Processes. 2019;7:628. 10.3390/PR7090628.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-11-27
Revised: 2025-03-24
Accepted: 2025-05-12
Published Online: 2025-06-12

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. MHD radiative mixed convective flow of a sodium alginate-based hybrid nanofluid over a convectively heated extending sheet with Joule heating
  3. Experimental study of mortar incorporating nano-magnetite on engineering performance and radiation shielding
  4. Multicriteria-based optimization and multi-variable non-linear regression analysis of concrete containing blends of nano date palm ash and eggshell powder as cementitious materials
  5. A promising Ag2S/poly-2-amino-1-mercaptobenzene open-top spherical core–shell nanocomposite for optoelectronic devices: A one-pot technique
  6. Biogenic synthesized selenium nanoparticles combined chitosan nanoparticles controlled lung cancer growth via ROS generation and mitochondrial damage pathway
  7. Fabrication of PDMS nano-mold by deposition casting method
  8. Stimulus-responsive gradient hydrogel micro-actuators fabricated by two-photon polymerization-based 4D printing
  9. Physical aspects of radiative Carreau nanofluid flow with motile microorganisms movement under yield stress via oblique penetrable wedge
  10. Effect of polar functional groups on the hydrophobicity of carbon nanotubes-bacterial cellulose nanocomposite
  11. Review in green synthesis mechanisms, application, and future prospects for Garcinia mangostana L. (mangosteen)-derived nanoparticles
  12. Entropy generation and heat transfer in nonlinear Buoyancy–driven Darcy–Forchheimer hybrid nanofluids with activation energy
  13. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Ginkgo biloba seed extract: Evaluation of antioxidant, anticancer, antifungal, and antibacterial activities
  14. A numerical analysis of heat and mass transfer in water-based hybrid nanofluid flow containing copper and alumina nanoparticles over an extending sheet
  15. Investigating the behaviour of electro-magneto-hydrodynamic Carreau nanofluid flow with slip effects over a stretching cylinder
  16. Electrospun thermoplastic polyurethane/nano-Ag-coated clear aligners for the inhibition of Streptococcus mutans and oral biofilm
  17. Investigation of the optoelectronic properties of a novel polypyrrole-multi-well carbon nanotubes/titanium oxide/aluminum oxide/p-silicon heterojunction
  18. Novel photothermal magnetic Janus membranes suitable for solar water desalination
  19. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Ageratum conyzoides for activated carbon compositing to prepare antimicrobial cotton fabric
  20. Activation energy and Coriolis force impact on three-dimensional dusty nanofluid flow containing gyrotactic microorganisms: Machine learning and numerical approach
  21. Machine learning analysis of thermo-bioconvection in a micropolar hybrid nanofluid-filled square cavity with oxytactic microorganisms
  22. Research and improvement of mechanical properties of cement nanocomposites for well cementing
  23. Thermal and stability analysis of silver–water nanofluid flow over unsteady stretching sheet under the influence of heat generation/absorption at the boundary
  24. Cobalt iron oxide-infused silicone nanocomposites: Magnetoactive materials for remote actuation and sensing
  25. Magnesium-reinforced PMMA composite scaffolds: Synthesis, characterization, and 3D printing via stereolithography
  26. Bayesian inference-based physics-informed neural network for performance study of hybrid nanofluids
  27. Numerical simulation of non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid flow subject to a heterogeneous/homogeneous chemical reaction over a Riga surface
  28. Enhancing the superhydrophobicity, UV-resistance, and antifungal properties of natural wood surfaces via in situ formation of ZnO, TiO2, and SiO2 particles
  29. Synthesis and electrochemical characterization of iron oxide/poly(2-methylaniline) nanohybrids for supercapacitor application
  30. Impacts of double stratification on thermally radiative third-grade nanofluid flow on elongating cylinder with homogeneous/heterogeneous reactions by implementing machine learning approach
  31. Synthesis of Cu4O3 nanoparticles using pumpkin seed extract: Optimization, antimicrobial, and cytotoxicity studies
  32. Cationic charge influence on the magnetic response of the Fe3O4–[Me2+ 1−y Me3+ y (OH2)] y+(Co3 2−) y/2·mH2O hydrotalcite system
  33. Pressure sensing intelligent martial arts short soldier combat protection system based on conjugated polymer nanocomposite materials
  34. Magnetohydrodynamics heat transfer rate under inclined buoyancy force for nano and dusty fluids: Response surface optimization for the thermal transport
  35. Fly ash and nano-graphene enhanced stabilization of engine oil-contaminated soils
  36. Enhancing natural fiber-reinforced biopolymer composites with graphene nanoplatelets: Mechanical, morphological, and thermal properties
  37. Performance evaluation of dual-scale strengthened co-bonded single-lap joints using carbon nanotubes and Z-pins with ANN
  38. Computational works of blood flow with dust particles and partially ionized containing tiny particles on a moving wedge: Applications of nanotechnology
  39. Hybridization of biocomposites with oil palm cellulose nanofibrils/graphene nanoplatelets reinforcement in green epoxy: A study of physical, thermal, mechanical, and morphological properties
  40. Design and preparation of micro-nano dual-scale particle-reinforced Cu–Al–V alloy: Research on the aluminothermic reduction process
  41. Spectral quasi-linearization and response optimization on magnetohydrodynamic flow via stenosed artery with hybrid and ternary solid nanoparticles: Support vector machine learning
  42. Ferrite/curcumin hybrid nanocomposite formulation: Physicochemical characterization, anticancer activity, and apoptotic and cell cycle analyses in skin cancer cells
  43. Enhanced therapeutic efficacy of Tamoxifen against breast cancer using extra virgin olive oil-based nanoemulsion delivery system
  44. A titanium oxide- and silver-based hybrid nanofluid flow between two Riga walls that converge and diverge through a machine-learning approach
  45. Enhancing convective heat transfer mechanisms through the rheological analysis of Casson nanofluid flow towards a stagnation point over an electro-magnetized surface
  46. Intrinsic self-sensing cementitious composites with hybrid nanofillers exhibiting excellent piezoresistivity
  47. Research on mechanical properties and sulfate erosion resistance of nano-reinforced coal gangue based geopolymer concrete
  48. Impact of surface and configurational features of chemically synthesized chains of Ni nanostars on the magnetization reversal process
  49. Porous sponge-like AsOI/poly(2-aminobenzene-1-thiol) nanocomposite photocathode for hydrogen production from artificial and natural seawater
  50. Multifaceted insights into WO3 nanoparticle-coupled antibiotics to modulate resistance in enteric pathogens of Houbara bustard birds
  51. Synthesis of sericin-coated silver nanoparticles and their applications for the anti-bacterial finishing of cotton fabric
  52. Enhancing chloride resistance of freeze–thaw affected concrete through innovative nanomaterial–polymer hybrid cementitious coating
  53. Development and performance evaluation of green aluminium metal matrix composites reinforced with graphene nanopowder and marble dust
  54. Morphological, physical, thermal, and mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes reinforced arrowroot starch composites
  55. Influence of the graphene oxide nanosheet on tensile behavior and failure characteristics of the cement composites after high-temperature treatment
  56. Central composite design modeling in optimizing heat transfer rate in the dissipative and reactive dynamics of viscoplastic nanomaterials deploying Joule and heat generation aspects
  57. Double diffusion of nano-enhanced phase change materials in connected porous channels: A hybrid ISPH-XGBoost approach
  58. Synergistic impacts of Thompson–Troian slip, Stefan blowing, and nonuniform heat generation on Casson nanofluid dynamics through a porous medium
  59. Optimization of abrasive water jet machining parameters for basalt fiber/SiO2 nanofiller reinforced composites
  60. Enhancing aesthetic durability of Zisha teapots via TiO2 nanoparticle surface modification: A study on self-cleaning, antimicrobial, and mechanical properties
  61. Nanocellulose solution based on iron(iii) sodium tartrate complexes
  62. Combating multidrug-resistant infections: Gold nanoparticles–chitosan–papain-integrated dual-action nanoplatform for enhanced antibacterial activity
  63. Novel royal jelly-mediated green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles and their multifunctional biological activities
  64. Direct bandgap transition for emission in GeSn nanowires
  65. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles with different morphologies using a microwave-based method and their antimicrobial activity
  66. Numerical investigation of convective heat and mass transfer in a trapezoidal cavity filled with ternary hybrid nanofluid and a central obstacle
  67. Halloysite nanotube enhanced polyurethane nanocomposites for advanced electroinsulating applications
  68. Low molar mass ionic liquid’s modified carbon nanotubes and its role in PVDF crystalline stress generation
  69. Green synthesis of polydopamine-functionalized silver nanoparticles conjugated with Ceftazidime: in silico and experimental approach for combating antibiotic-resistant bacteria and reducing toxicity
  70. Evaluating the influence of graphene nano powder inclusion on mechanical, vibrational and water absorption behaviour of ramie/abaca hybrid composites
  71. Dynamic-behavior of Casson-type hybrid nanofluids due to a stretching sheet under the coupled impacts of boundary slip and reaction-diffusion processes
  72. Influence of polyvinyl alcohol on the physicochemical and self-sensing properties of nano carbon black reinforced cement mortar
  73. Advanced machine learning approaches for predicting compressive and flexural strength of carbon nanotube–reinforced cement composites: a comparative study and model interpretability analysis
  74. Review Articles
  75. A comprehensive review on hybrid plasmonic waveguides: Structures, applications, challenges, and future perspectives
  76. Nanoparticles in low-temperature preservation of biological systems of animal origin
  77. Fluorescent sulfur quantum dots for environmental monitoring
  78. Nanoscience systematic review methodology standardization
  79. Nanotechnology revolutionizing osteosarcoma treatment: Advances in targeted kinase inhibitors
  80. AFM: An important enabling technology for 2D materials and devices
  81. Carbon and 2D nanomaterial smart hydrogels for therapeutic applications
  82. Principles, applications and future prospects in photodegradation systems
  83. Do gold nanoparticles consistently benefit crop plants under both non-stressed and abiotic stress conditions?
  84. An updated overview of nanoparticle-induced cardiovascular toxicity
  85. Arginine as a promising amino acid for functionalized nanosystems: Innovations, challenges, and future directions
  86. Advancements in the use of cancer nanovaccines: Comprehensive insights with focus on lung and colon cancer
  87. Membrane-based biomimetic delivery systems for glioblastoma multiforme therapy
  88. The drug delivery systems based on nanoparticles for spinal cord injury repair
  89. Green synthesis, biomedical effects, and future trends of Ag/ZnO bimetallic nanoparticles: An update
  90. Application of magnesium and its compounds in biomaterials for nerve injury repair
  91. Micro/nanomotors in biomedicine: Construction and applications
  92. Hydrothermal synthesis of biomass-derived CQDs: Advances and applications
  93. Research progress in 3D bioprinting of skin: Challenges and opportunities
  94. Review on bio-selenium nanoparticles: Synthesis, protocols, and applications in biomedical processes
  95. Gold nanocrystals and nanorods functionalized with protein and polymeric ligands for environmental, energy storage, and diagnostic applications: A review
  96. An in-depth analysis of rotational and non-rotational piezoelectric energy harvesting beams: A comprehensive review
  97. Advancements in perovskite/CIGS tandem solar cells: Material synergies, device configurations, and economic viability for sustainable energy
  98. Deep learning in-depth analysis of crystal graph convolutional neural networks: A new era in materials discovery and its applications
  99. Review of recent nano TiO2 film coating methods, assessment techniques, and key problems for scaleup
  100. Antioxidant quantum dots for spinal cord injuries: A review on advancing neuroprotection and regeneration in neurological disorders
  101. Rise of polycatecholamine ultrathin films: From synthesis to smart applications
  102. Advancing microencapsulation strategies for bioactive compounds: Enhancing stability, bioavailability, and controlled release in food applications
  103. Advances in the design and manipulation of self-assembling peptide and protein nanostructures for biomedical applications
  104. Photocatalytic pervious concrete systems: from classic photocatalysis to luminescent photocatalysis
  105. Corrigendum
  106. Corrigendum to “Synthesis and characterization of smart stimuli-responsive herbal drug-encapsulated nanoniosome particles for efficient treatment of breast cancer”
  107. Special Issue on Advanced Nanomaterials for Carbon Capture, Environment and Utilization for Energy Sustainability - Part III
  108. Efficiency optimization of quantum dot photovoltaic cell by solar thermophotovoltaic system
  109. Exploring the diverse nanomaterials employed in dental prosthesis and implant techniques: An overview
  110. Electrochemical investigation of bismuth-doped anode materials for low‑temperature solid oxide fuel cells with boosted voltage using a DC-DC voltage converter
  111. Synthesis of HfSe2 and CuHfSe2 crystalline materials using the chemical vapor transport method and their applications in supercapacitor energy storage devices
  112. Special Issue on Green Nanotechnology and Nano-materials for Environment Sustainability
  113. Influence of nano-silica and nano-ferrite particles on mechanical and durability of sustainable concrete: A review
  114. Surfaces and interfaces analysis on different carboxymethylation reaction time of anionic cellulose nanoparticles derived from oil palm biomass
  115. Processing and effective utilization of lignocellulosic biomass: Nanocellulose, nanolignin, and nanoxylan for wastewater treatment
  116. Retraction
  117. Retraction of “Aging assessment of silicone rubber materials under corona discharge accompanied by humidity and UV radiation”
Heruntergeladen am 25.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2025-0179/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen