Startseite Machine learning analysis of thermo-bioconvection in a micropolar hybrid nanofluid-filled square cavity with oxytactic microorganisms
Artikel Open Access

Machine learning analysis of thermo-bioconvection in a micropolar hybrid nanofluid-filled square cavity with oxytactic microorganisms

  • Anil Ahlawat , Shilpa Chaudhary EMAIL logo , Loganathan Karuppusamy EMAIL logo , Salman Arafath Mohammed , Thirumalaisamy Kandasamy und Hayath Thameem Basha
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 10. Juli 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Bioconvection within nanofluids originates as microbes associated with nanoparticles (NPs), triggering convective motion. This mechanism holds significance in the development of nanotechnology, biotechnological fields, and ecological engineering. Therefore, this work utilizes numerical simulations to investigate the thermo-bioconvection of a magnetohydrodynamic micropolar hybrid nanofluid (HNF), enriched with motile oxytactic microorganisms, within a lid-driven square enclosure, driving innovation in energy-efficient fluid technologies. The enclosure’s horizontal walls are adiabatic, while its left and right walls are heated (T h) and cooled (T c), respectively. Moreover, the upper wall moves steadily in the x-direction with velocity u 0. Also, a uniform magnetic field (B 0) applied along the flow direction. The TiO2-GO/H2O HNF flow is modeled as a steady, laminar, 2D, incompressible, electrically conducting, and homogeneous viscous fluid neglecting the joule heating and viscous dissipation effects. Numerical simulations utilize finite-difference approach to discretize the ensuing equations and boundary conditions, solving the resulting algebraic system iteratively via successive over-relaxation, under-relaxation, and Gauss–Seidel techniques utilizing in-house MATLAB codes. In addition, a machine learning approach was employed to accurately predict fluid transport properties using a multilayer artificial neural network structured with a feed-forward backpropagation model and optimized using the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. The results reveal that increasing the Reynolds number amplifies inertial forces, accelerating flow velocity and steepening temperature gradients, ultimately elevating Nuavg by 67.64%, while Shavg and Nnavg increase by 3.34 and 8.42%, respectively. Moreover, advancing Hartmann number strengthens Lorentz forces and compressing flow and reduces Nuavg by 3.25%. Furthermore, as Richardson number increases from 0.1 to 10, Nuavg increases by 14.03%, while Shavg and Nnavg decrease by 2.79 and 3.50%, respectively. Thus, the findings are useful for researchers working in nano-bioconvective systems, bio-microsystems, microbial fuel cells, and bioconvection applications.

Nomenclature

( ρ C p ) hnf

heat capacity of hybrid nanofluids

C p

specific isobaric heat per unit mass ( J kg 1 K 1 )

D c

diffusivity of oxygen

D m

diffusivity of microorganisms

k hnf

thermal conductivity of hybrid nanofluids

ρ hnf

density of hybrid nanofluids

Δ C

difference between oxygen concentrations ( C 0 C min )

Δ ρ

difference between the density of cells and fluid ( ρ cell ρ hnf )

B 0

magnetic field strength

C

dimensional oxygen concentration

C 0

concentration of oxygen at walls of enclosure

C min

minimum concentration of oxygen essential for microorganisms to be active

g

gravitational acceleration ( m s 2 )

Ha

Hartmann number

J

micro-inertial density ( m 2 )

k

thermal conductivity ( Wm 1 K 1 )

K 0

vortex viscosity number

n

density of motile microorganisms

N

density of motile microorganisms in dimensionless form

p, P

dimensional and dimensionless pressure

Pe

Peclet number

Pr

Prandtl number

Rab

bioconvection Rayleigh number

Re

Reynolds number

Ri

Richardson number

Sc

Schmidt number

T

temperature of the fluid

u , v

dimensional velocity components in x-y directions

U,V

dimensionless velocity components in x-y directions

κ

vortex viscosity parameter

Greek symbols

ϕ hnf

volume concentration of hybrid nanofluids

γ

mean value of microorganisms

σ

electrical conductivity

Φ

dimensionless oxygen concentration

θ

dimensionless temperature

μ

dynamic viscosity of fluid

ψ

stream function

Abbreviations

ANN

artificial neural network

BCs

boundary conditions

GO

graphene oxide

HNFs

hybrid nanofluids

MC

mixed convection

MF

micropolar fluid

MHD

magnetohydrodynamics

MLP

multilayer perceptron

MSE

mean square error

NFs

nanofluids

Nnavg

average density of motile microorganism

Nnlocal

local density of motile microorganisms

NPs

nanoparticles

Nuavg

average Nusselt number

Nulocal

local Nusselt number

R 2

regression coefficient

SOR

successive over-relaxation

SUR

successive under-relaxation

Shavg

average Sherwood number

Shlocal

local Sherwood number

TC

thermal conductivity

1 Introduction

The growing global demand for clean energy requires focus on reducing energy wastage and optimizing thermal exchange efficiency. Therefore, the mounting need for thermally effective devices has inspired researchers seeking to enhance the thermal conductivity (TC) of base liquids exhibiting poor heat transfer characteristics, employing different techniques. Choi [1] initiated a pioneering experimental study intending to enhance the TC of base liquids through the incorporation of nanoparticles (NPs) of metal/metal oxides resulting in nanofluids (NFs). The introduction of NFs offers a promising avenue for developing advanced thermal devices. Therefore, substantial work has already been attempted, both experimentally – e.g., studies by Xu et al. [2], Saghir et al. [3], Mansour et al. [4] – and computationally – e.g., studies by Khanafer et al. [5], Uddin et al. [6], and Saleem et al. [7] – highlighting NP’s size, shape, and composition affects NF behavior. Mezaache et al. [8] examined the thermal performance of a wavy channel partially embedded with granular/foam porous material structure and filled with NFs found that granular porous structures enhance thermal performance more than foam. Suresh et al. [9] initiated an experiment incorporating a minor proportion, i.e., 10% of Cu NPs into the Al2O3-H2O NF and found that this composite formulation markedly improves TC relative to the single NP NF, i.e., Al2O3-H2O. This novel approach highlights the capabilities of hybrid nanofluids (HNFs), which integrate various NPs into base liquids to enhance heat transfer efficiency. HNFs are an innovative category of NFs that offer a vast spectrum of possible applications in nearly every sector such as microelectronics, microfluidics, manufacturing, transportation, healthcare, defense, acoustics, marine systems, and propulsion. Yasmin et al. [10] explored how the stability of HNFs relies on factors such as stirring duration and speed, volume, and density of the base fluid, NP characteristics (size, type, concentration), surfactant type and amount. Recently, Madheswaran et al. [11], Olabi et al. [12], Vijayalakshmi and Sivaraj [13], Kim et al. [14], and Alktranee et al. [15] carried out numerous numerical studies on the behavior of Newtonian/non-Newtonian fluids within various cavities infused with different NPs owing to their significance and various technical applications such as melting and recrystallization procedures, fluid crystal growth, solar collectors, heat exchangers, nuclear reactors, polymer industries, and fuel cells. Mixed convection (MC) within lid-driven cavity flow presents a fascinating challenge across diverse thermal engineering applications from innovative lubrication solutions and advanced cooling techniques for optimizing electronic device performance to solar power collectors, food processing methods, glass production techniques, food processing methods, and advanced multi-layered shielding systems for nuclear reactors, etc., as illustrated by Ouertatani et al. [16]. Recently, remarkable studies on lid-driven flow within enclosures of various shapes filled with Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids, incorporating the effects of obstacles of diverse configurations such as triangular, circular, and square on heat convection were conducted by Alruwaele and Gajjar [17], Hasan et al. [18], Ahlawat et al. [19], Akter et al. [20], and Bakar et al. [21].

Non-Newtonian liquids are often utilized in different engineering processes, including polymers and paints. The micropolar fluid (MF) theory, introduced by Eringen [22,23], extends the classical Navier–Stokes theory by incorporating the microrotation of particles and coupled stresses, offering a more comprehensive model for fluid behavior at the microscale. It is widely used in liquid crystals, polymer suspensions, animal blood, colloidal suspensions, bubbly liquids, and biofluids. Additionally, it is used in clay coating, mud, vaccines, shampoo, body lotions, syrups, and emulsions. Convective heat transfer within cavities filled by micropolar NFs is used in diverse technological implementations, i.e., heat transfer control and chemical fields. Recently, considerable investigations have been conducted on the behaviors of MF enriched with NPs within the cavities. Yan et al. [24] delved into the effects of inclined Lorentz forces and thermal radiation on micropolar NF flow within a porous enclosure. Batool et al. [25] examined the flow and heat transfer of lid-driven micropolar NFs in the presence of a magnetic field. Ali et al. [26] examined the significance of mixed convective flow of micropolar NF/HNF subject to heat source and Lorentz force. They noticed that temperature and velocity profiles achieved higher values by considering an HNF. Manaa et al. [27] computationally investigated micropolar HNF flow and thermal features within a cubic cavity. They noted that mass and heat convection rates are reduced when considering the micropolar NF rather than the NF model. Ahlawat and Sharma [28] carried out numerical analysis to investigate the influence of a porous layer and heated block on heat convection and EG within an enclosure saturated with micropolar HNF. Their findings reveal that as the vortex viscosity parameter enhances, heat transfer irreversibilities become more dominant than frictional irreversibilities. Ahlawat et al. [29] conducted numerical simulations to optimize thermal convection and reduce entropy generation in steady magnetohydrodynamic flow of a micropolar HNF (Ag–Al2O3/H2O) within an annular domain featuring partially insulated and heated walls, revealing that entropy generation decreases as the vortex viscosity parameter increases. Ahlawat et al. [30] performed an investigation within a porous hexagonal enclosure containing a heated obstacle, revealing a 4.135% reduction in the heat transfer rate as the vortex viscosity parameter increased from 2 to 7.5. Riaz et al. [31] studied triple diffusion in micropolar NFs with radiation and viscous dissipation effects.

Bioconvection is a captivating phenomenon in various practical scenarios, occurring when numerous swimming motile microorganisms collectively move in a fluid domain with a slightly higher density than water, all swimming in a specific direction. Bioconvection can improve mass transport and induce mixing, especially in micro-volumes, impacting the stability of NFs crucial in various microsystems. In recent times, transport phenomena related to thermo-bioconvection have shown potential applications in microfluidic devices, medical fields, biological waste treatment, catalytic converters, thermal energy storage, and oil reservoirs. Sheremet et al. [32] computationally studied the bioconvective thermal and mass transfer analysis of NF flow containing gyrotactic microorganisms within a square cavity considering the impact of an inclined magnetic field. Mandal et al. [33] explored MHD mixed bioconvection in a Cu–water NF with oxytactic microorganisms, showing that an undulating curved surface optimizes heat transfer at specific undulation magnitudes and operating conditions. Biswas et al. [34] studied mixed thermo-bioconvection in a Cu-NP magnetized fluid with oxytactic bacteria inside a W-shaped porous cavity, revealing superior mass and heat transfer rates compared to trapezoidal and square enclosures. Biswas et al. [35] investigated bioconvective mass and heat transfer in a Cu-H2O NF with oxytactic microorganisms inside a magnetized complex wavy-porous cavity. Recently, Rahman et al. [36,37] analyzed entropy generation and heat convection in bioconvective NF flow over a rotating porous disk and stretchable cylinder. The practical interest in the thermo-bioconvective flow and thermal transfer features within the cavity by utilizing micropolar-NF with oxytactic microorganisms has significantly increased in the past few years. It has been discovered in many investigations over the deformable surface by combining micropolar-HNF with oxytactic microorganisms due to the broad range of applications. Hussain et al. [38] investigated the heat transfer features in a three-dimensional porous frame containing a micropolar-based NF with eukaryotic microbes. Yasmin et al. [39] recently explored the flow dynamics of a water-based HNF infused with Cu and Al2O3 NPs and gyrotactic microorganisms over a stretching sheet and found that enhanced magnetic effects, thermophoresis, thermal radiation, heat source, and Brownian motion boost the heat transfer rate.

This work is motivated by the mounting need to improve heat exchange as well as microbial activity in enclosed fluid structures that are significant for industrial and medical fields. Therefore, this research combines classical hydrodynamics, bio-convection mechanisms, and computational developments to provide results for designing effective and ecologically sound heat control processes in commercial sectors such as energy, medicine, and ecology. Moreover, machine learning enhances real-time analysis of complex thermophysical behaviors, optimizing fluid flow, heat transfer, and microorganism dynamics efficiently. To the best knowledge of the authors, the bioconvective micropolar HNF lid-driven flow within a square cavity under the influence of a magnetic field employing machine learning has not been previously reported. From a practical standpoint, designing this type of model presents a significant challenge. The governing equations are solved using the finite difference technique. The numerical results obtained are validated to ensure the accuracy of the present study against existing literature. This investigation is conducted for various ranges of relevant parameters, which are discussed graphically. The current study can aid in understanding the design of numerous engineering and industrial systems, such as nano-bioconvective systems, bio-microsystems, and microbial fuel cells.

2 Mathematical formulation

The present study examines the thermo-bioconvection behavior of lid-driven flow inside a square enclosure infused with MHD MF, integrating NPs (titanium dioxide and graphene oxide [GO]) and oxytactic microorganisms, as depicted in Figure 1. It is considered that the enclosure’s walls have equal length and width, denoted as “H” with no-slip boundary conditions (BCs) applied along the walls of enclosure. The upper and lower walls of enclosure are insulated while upper wall moves in the direction of positive x-axis with a uniform velocity ( u 0 ) . The enclosure’s left and right walls are supposed to be thermally heated (T h) and cooled (T c), respectively. A steady magnetic field is imposed along the direction of flow. Thermophysical characteristics of TiO 2 , GO, and water are detailed in Table 1.

Figure 1 
               (a) Physical model of the considered problem and (b) sample of grid generation.
Figure 1

(a) Physical model of the considered problem and (b) sample of grid generation.

Table 1

Thermophysical characteristics of H2O, TiO2, and GO NPs, as reported by Pal and Mandal [40] and Al-Sankoor et al. [41]

Physical parameter C p (J kg–1 K–1) ρ (kg m–3) k (W m–1 K–1) β (K–1) σ–1 m–1)
H2O 4,179 997.1 0.613 21 × 10−5 5.5 × 10−6
TiO2 686.2 4,250 8.9538 0.9 × 10−5 2.6 × 106
GO 717 1,800 5,000 2.84 × 10−4 1.1 × 10−5

Key assumptions framing the problem are as follows:

  1. Flow is considered laminar, 2D, steady, and follows the micropolar continuum theory, accounting for microrotational effects, which indicates that each particle has rotational and translational motion.

  2. Bioconvective flow and oxytactic microorganism transport are governed by the continuum models of Hillesdon and Pedley [42] and Pedley and Kessler [43].

  3. The HNF is treated as an incompressible, electrically conducting, and homogeneous viscous fluid.

  4. Thermophysical properties are considered independent of temperature, aside from density in the body force term, calculated via the Boussinesq approximation [44].

  5. Joule heating and viscous dissipation effects are deemed negligible.

  6. A state of local thermal equilibrium is assumed between the water, NPs, and oxytactic microorganisms.

2.1 Basic governing equations

Following the seminal works of Eringen [22,23], Hillesdon and Pedley [42], and Izadpanah et al. [45], the principles of conservation for total mass, momentum, angular momentum, energy, concentration, and microorganisms in cartesian coordinate system under steady-state conditions can be formulated as follows.

Continuity equation:

(1) u x + v y = 0 .

Linear momentum equations:

(2) ρ hnf u u x + v u y = p x + ( μ hnf + κ ) 2 u x 2 + 2 u y 2 + κ m y ,

(3) ρ hnf u v x + v v y = p y + ( μ hnf + κ ) 2 v x 2 + 2 v y 2 κ m x σ hnf B 0 2   v ( γ Δ ρ n ( ρ β ) hnf ( T T c ) ) g .

Angular momentum equation:

(4) ρ hnf u m x + v m y = γ hnf j 2 m x 2 + 2 m y 2 2 κ j m + κ j v x u y .

Energy equation:

(5) ( ρ C p ) hnf u T x + v T y = k hnf 2 T x 2 + 2 T y 2 .

Oxygen concentration equation:

(6) u C x + v C y = D c 2 C x 2 + 2 C y 2 δ n .

Cell concentration equation:

(7) x u n + u ˜ n D m n x + y v n + v ˜ n D m n y = 0 .

The assumption of spin-gradient viscosity is established as referenced by Ahmadi [46], Rees and Pop [47], and Ishak et al. [48]:

(8) γ hnf = μ hnf + κ 2 j .

Here, u ˜ and v ˜ , expressed as u ˜ = b W c Δ C C x   and v ˜ = b W c Δ C C y , are mean swimming velocities of the microorganisms, b is the chemotaxis constant, and W c is the maximum speed.

The dimensional BCs for the problem are outlined as follows:

(9) u = u 0 , v = 0 , T y = C y = n y = m = 0  at  y = H , u = v = m = 0 ,   T y = 0 , C = C 0 , n b W c Δ C C y D m n y = 0  at  y = 0 , u = v = m = 0 , T = T h , C = C 0 , n = n 0  at  x = 0 , u = v = m = 0 ,   T = T c , C = C 0 , n = n 0  at  x = H .

To reduce the governing equations into dimensionless form, the parameters listed in Eq. (10) are employed:

(10) X = x H ; Y = y H ; θ = T T c T h T c ; Φ = C C min C 0 C min ; N = n n 0 ; Ra b = γ ρ n 0 ρ f β f ( T h T c ) ; Ra = g β f ( T h T c ) H 3 ν f α f ; K 0 = κ μ f ; Pe = b W c D m ; Pr = ν f α f ;Sc = ν f D c ; σ 1 = δ n 0 H 2 D c C ; χ = D c D m ;Re = u 0 H ν f ; Ha = σ f B 0 2 H 2 μ f ; U = u u 0 ; V = v u 0 ; χ 1 = H 2 j ; P = p ρ f u 0 2 ; M = m H 2 α f .

The thermophysical characteristics of HNFs, dependent on ϕ GO and ϕ TiO 2 , are defined by the relationships from Ghalambaz et al. [49] as follows:

(11) ϕ hnf = ϕ GO + ϕ Ti O 2 , ρ hnf = ( 1 ϕ hnf ) ρ f + ϕ GO ρ GO + ϕ Ti O 2 ρ Ti O 2 , ( ρ β ) hnf = ( 1 ϕ hnf ) ρ f + ϕ GO ( ρ β ) GO + ϕ TiO 2 ( ρ β ) TiO 2 , ( ρ C p ) hnf = ( 1 ϕ hnf ) ρ f + ϕ GO ( ρ C p ) GO + ϕ TiO 2 ( ρ C p ) TiO 2 , α hnf = k hnf ( ρ C p ) hnf .

The TC of HNF ( k hnf ) follows the Maxwell model [50], while its viscosity ( μ hnf ) is described by the Brinkman model [51]:

(12) k hnf = ϕ GO k GO + ϕ TiO 2 k TiO 2 ϕ hnf + 2 k f + 2 ( ϕ GO k GO + ϕ TiO 2 k TiO 2 ) 2 ϕ hnf k f ϕ GO k GO + ϕ TiO 2 k TiO 2 ϕ hnf + 2 k f ( ϕ GO k GO + ϕ TiO 2 k TiO 2 ) + ϕ hnf k f k f ,

(13) μ hnf = μ f ( 1 ϕ hnf ) 2.5 .

The terms p x and p y are removed from Eqs. (2) and (3) employing U = ψ Y , V = ψ X , and the vorticity ω = V X U Y , known as the stream function approach. Using Eq. (10), Eqs. (1)–(7) are converted into their dimensionless form as follows:

(14) 2 ψ X 2 + 2 ψ Y 2 = ω .

Vorticity equation:

(15) ψ Y ω X ψ X ω Y = 1 Re ρ f ρ hnf μ hnf μ f + K 0 2 ω X 2 + 2 ω Y 2 ρ f ρ hnf K 0 Re 2 Pr 2 M X 2 + 2 M Y 2 + β hnf β f Ri θ X ρ f ρ hnf Ri Ra b N X + σ hnf σ f ρ f ρ hnf H a 2 Re 2 ψ X 2 .

Angular momentum equation:

(16) ψ Y M X ψ X M Y = 1 Re ρ f ρ hnf μ hnf μ f + K 0 2 2 M X 2 + 2 M Y 2 ρ f ρ hnf 2 K 0 χ 1 Re M + K 0 χ 1 Pr ρ f ρ hnf ω .

Energy equation:

(17) ψ Y θ X ψ X θ Y = α hnf α f 1 Re Pr 2 θ X 2 + 2 θ Y 2 .

Oxygen concentration equation:

(18) ψ Y Φ X ψ X Φ Y = 1 Re Sc 2 Φ X 2 + 2 Φ Y 2 σ 1 Re Sc N .

Cell concentration equation:

(19) ψ Y N X ψ X N Y = 1 Re Sc χ 2 N X 2 + 2 N Y 2 Pe Re Sc χ Φ X N X + Φ Y N Y + N 2 Φ X 2 + N 2 Φ Y 2 .

The dimensionless BCs of the prescribed physical model are as follows:

U = 1 , V = 0 , M = 0 , θ Y = Φ Y = N Y = 0 and ω = 2 ψ X 2 at Y = 1 ,

U = V = 0 , M = 0 , θ Y = 0 , Φ = 1 , Pe N Φ Y = N Y and ω = 2 ψ X 2 at Y = 0 ,

U = V = 0 , M = 0 , θ = N = Φ = 1 and ω = 2 ψ Y 2 at X = 0 ,

(20) U = V = 0 , M = 0 , θ = 0 , N = Φ = 1 and ω = 2 ψ Y 2 at X = 1 .

The local and average Sherwood ( Sh local , Sh avg ) , Nusselt ( Nu local , Nu avg ) , and density of motile microorganisms ( Nn local , Nn avg ) numbers determined at the hot wall are outlined as follows:

(21) Sh local = Φ X X = 0 , Nu local = k hnf k f θ X X = 0 , Nn local = N X X = 0 ,

(22) Sh avg = 0 1 Sh local d Y , Nu avg = 0 1 Nu local d Y , and Nn avg = 0 1 Nn local d Y .

3 Numerical solution and code validation

The detailed mechanism of heat transfer inside an enclosure can be explained utilizing a number of advanced numerical methods. This study employs the finite difference discretization technique to discretize the governing Eqs. (14)–(19). The resultant discretized equations are as follows:

(23) 1 h 2 ( ψ i + 1 , j + ψ i 1 , j 4 ψ i , j + ψ i , j + 1 + ψ i , j 1 ) = ω i , j ,

(24) 1 4 h 2 ( ( ψ i , j + 1 ψ i , j 1 ) ( ω i + 1 , j ω i 1 , j ) ) 1 4 h 2 ( ( ψ i + 1 , j ψ i 1 , j ) ( ω i , j + 1 ω i , j 1 ) ) = 1 Re ρ f ρ hnf μ hnf μ f + K 0 1 h 2 ( ω i + 1 , j + ω i 1 , j 4 ω i , j + ω i , j + 1 + ω i , j 1 ) ρ f ρ hnf K 0 Re 2 Pr 1 h 2 ( M i + 1 , j + M i 1 , j 4 M i , j + M i , j + 1 + M i , j 1 ) + β hnf β f Ri 1 2 h ( θ i + 1 , j θ i 1 , j ) ρ f ρ hnf Ri Ra b 1 2 h ( N i + 1 , j N i 1 , j ) + σ hnf σ f ρ f ρ hnf H a 2 Re 1 h 2 ( ψ i + 1 , j 2 ψ i , j + ψ i 1 , j ) ,

(25) 1 4 h 2 ( ( ψ i , j + 1 ψ i , j 1 ) ( M i + 1 , j M i 1 , j ) ) 1 4 h 2 ( ( ψ i + 1 , j ψ i 1 , j ) ( M i , j + 1 M i , j 1 ) ) = 1 Re ρ f ρ hnf μ hnf μ f + K 0 2 1 h 2 ( M i + 1 , j + M i 1 , j 4 M i , j + M i , j + 1 + M i , j 1 ) ρ f ρ hnf 2 K 0 χ 1 Re M i , j + K 0 χ 1 Pr ρ f ρ hnf ω i , j ,

(26) 1 4 h 2 ( ( ψ i , j + 1 ψ i , j 1 ) ( θ i + 1 , j θ i 1 , j ) ) 1 4 h 2 ( ( ψ i + 1 , j ψ i 1 , j ) ( θ i , j + 1 θ i , j 1 ) ) = α hnf α f 1 Re Pr 1 h 2 ( θ i + 1 , j + θ i 1 , j 4 θ i , j + θ i , j + 1 + θ i , j 1 ) ,

(27) 1 4 h 2 [ ( ψ I , j + 1 ψ I , j 1 ) ( Φ i + 1 , j Φ i 1 , j ) ] 1 4 h 2 [ ( ψ i + 1 , j ψ i 1 , j ) ( Φ I , j + 1 Φ I , j 1 ) ] = 1 Re Sc 1 h 2 [ ( Φ i + 1 , j + Φ i 1 , j 4 Φ i , j + Φ i , j + 1 + Φ i , j 1 ) ] σ 1 Re Sc N i , j ,

(28) 1 4 h 2 [ ( ψ i , j + 1 ψ i , j 1 ) ( N i + 1 , j N i 1 , j ) ] 1 4 h 2 [ ( ψ i + 1 , j ψ i 1 , j ) ( N I , j + 1 N I , j 1 ) ] = 1 Re Sc χ 1 h 2 [ ( N i + 1 , j + N i 1 , j 4 N i , j + N i , j + 1 + N i , j 1 ) ] Pe Re Sc χ 1 4 h 2 [ ( N i + 1 , j N i 1 , j ) ( Φ i + 1 , j Φ i 1 , j ) ] Pe Re Sc χ 1 4 h 2 [ ( N i , j + 1 N i , j 1 ) ( Φ i , j + 1 Φ i , j 1 ) ] Pe Re Sc χ 1 h 2 [ N i , j ( Φ i + 1 , j + Φ i 1 , j 2 Φ i , j ) ] Pe Re Sc χ 1 h 2 [ N i , j ( Φ i , j + 1 + Φ i , j 1 2 Φ i , j ) ] .

Here, h is the grid space in x and y directions and indices (i, j) denote a grid point in the domain. The diffusion terms are determined employing second-order central differencing, whereas the upwind scheme is employed to manage the convective terms in the governing equations. The resulting equations are tackled employing a combination of the SOR, SUR, and Gauss–Seidel iteration methods. Iterations continued until the condition i , j φ i , j k + 1 φ i , j k i , j φ i , j k + 1 10 7 was satisfied, where φ stands for any measured value from ψ , ω , N , M , Φ ,  and  θ . The desired results are obtained using self-developed MATLAB codes. The computation was performed over a maximum of 104 iterations, necessitating approximately 5 min of the CPU time, with an error threshold of 10−7 using MATLAB software. Figure 2 illustrates the steps of the computational program, providing a concise overview of the problem-solving methodology. Furthermore, the numerical technique utilized in this work was validated both qualitatively and quantitatively by comparing it with the specific results of Sheremet and Pop [52], as depicted in Figure 3 and Table 2. The strong correlation between the results further validates the accuracy of our simulation. The grid independency of the MATLAB codes was tested by calculating Nu avg , Sh avg , and Nn avg at the hot wall, as outlined in Table 3. Therefore, to achieve the desired outcomes, a grid of 181 × 181 was employed.

Figure 2 
               Stepwise representation of the computational program.
Figure 2

Stepwise representation of the computational program.

Figure 3 
               Validation of self-developed MATLAB codes with the findings of Sheremet and Pop [52] by comparing contours of oxygen concentrations, microorganism concentrations, streamlines, and isotherms at Ra = 100, Rb = 10, Le = 1, and Pe = 0.1.
Figure 3

Validation of self-developed MATLAB codes with the findings of Sheremet and Pop [52] by comparing contours of oxygen concentrations, microorganism concentrations, streamlines, and isotherms at Ra = 100, Rb = 10, Le = 1, and Pe = 0.1.

Table 2

Comparative analysis of outcomes against Sheremet and Pop [52] findings across varying parameter settings to validate our custom MATLAB algorithms

Ra Rab Le Pe Nuavg at X = 0 (Sheremet and Pop [52]) Nuavg at X = 0 (present study) Deviation in Nuavg (in %) Shavg at X = 0 (Sheremet and Pop [52]) Shavg at X = 0 (present study) Deviation in Shavg (in %)
10 10 1 0.1 1.0775 1.0753 −0.20% 0.3368 0.3347 −0.62%
10 10 1 1 1.0720 1.0706 −0.13% 0.3296 0.3301 +0.15%
10 10 10 0.1 1.0771 1.0795 +0.22% 0.2556 0.2514 −1.64%
10 10 10 1 1.0397 1.0408 +0.11% 0.2298 0.2279 −0.83%
10 100 1 0.1 1.0717 1.0745 +0.26% 0.3447 0.3458 +0.32%
10 100 1 1 1.1723 1.1715 −0.07% 0.3650 0.3638 −0.33%
100 10 1 0.1 3.0910 3.0938 +0.09% 0.2506 0.2462 −1.76%
100 10 1 1 2.6560 2.634 −0.83% 0.2270 0.2238 −1.41%
Table 3

Grid independency of self-developed MATLAB codes when Ri = 10, ϕ hnf = 4 % , Re = 50, Ha = 10, Ra b = 1, χ 1 = 0.1, χ = σ 1 = Sc = 1, K 0 = 0.5 , Pr = 6.26, and Pe = 0.1

Nuavg, Shavg, and Nnavg (expressed as consecutive percentage errors)
Grid size 141 × 141 161 × 161 181 × 181 201 × 201 221 × 221
Nu avg 5.9403 5.8834 (0.97%) 5.8466 (0.63%) 5.8465 (0.002%) 5.8466 (0.0017%)
Sh avg 0.34024 0.34045 (−0.06%) 0.34059 (−0.04%) 0.34057 (0.006%) 0.34058 (−0.003%)
Nn avg 0.035134 0.035244 (−0.31%) 0.035360 (−0.33%) 0.035358 (0.006%) 0.035362 (−0.011%)

4 Artificial neural network (ANN)

A model for processing data that draws inspiration from biological nerve systems, such as the brain, is known as an ANN. The core components of this system for solving specific problems are a large number of neuronal connections that work in tandem with one another. Neuronal networks are mathematical structures designed to perform various tasks. Neural networks are capable of data mining, classification, pattern recognition, prediction, and process modeling, among other things, depending on the configuration in which they are trained. ANNs learn, similar to humans, by seeing and imitating examples. A neural network (ANN) can be set up to do a certain job, like making predictions or sorting data, by learning how to do it. Because of their key role in the learning process, biological systems have to be fine-tuned to synaptic connections. Similar steps are taken by ANNs as well. There are two main categories of ANNs based on their topology: feed-forward networks and feedback networks. One well-known type of feed-forward network is the multilayer perceptron (MLP). Although all of the topologies have their uses, MLP is best suited for engineering applications. When coupled with the backpropagation learning technique, MLP networks can adapt their networks to fit the model.

Typically, an MLP neural network has three layers: input, hidden, and output. Neural connections in the input layer gather data, which is then processed and sent to the hidden layer, which does additional processing before delivering it to the output layer. Each layer is fully linked to every other layer, and weights are assigned to each connection. In order to activate the neurons, activation functions are used in both the hidden and output layers. To handle more complicated jobs, more hidden layers might be added as needed. The jth hidden layer neuron’s input signal X i is added together after multiplying it by the connection weight. Thereafter, an activation function is used to excite the neurons using the acquired sum. It follows the same pattern from the hidden layer to the output layer when processing data. The expression for the jth neuron’s output is as follows: y i j = A j k = 1 N j 1 w k i j y j 1 + b i j .

There is an activation function f and a weight W ji that represents the link from the ith neuron in the previous layer in the given equation. Reducing errors between the generated and required output is the main emphasis of the ANN training process. The variable f can be used to represent various types of activation functions, such as exponential, hyperbolic, or logistic functions. Neural network training frequently makes use of the error propagation algorithm. The weights between the layers of the network are adjusted during this supervised learning process. By contrasting the actual results produced by the neural network with the predicted results from the training dataset, one can ascertain the learning error rate. The configuration of the MLP network has a noticeable effect on its performance. In order to find the best network design for minimizing the error rate, iterative testing is usually employed. The procedure comprises running tests with varying values for the parameters, such as the hidden layer’s neuron count, the activation functions used in the output and hidden layers, and so on. The model’s error metric is computed for various parameter values throughout these experiments. One output parameter (Nuavg/Shavg/Nnavg) and eight input parameters make up the ANN prediction model presented in this work. To obtain he most out of an ANN model, the number of neurons is crucial. The optimal number of neurons to be included in the ANNs is not something that everyone agrees upon. Due of this, various models with variable neuron counts were tested and assessed for predictive performance throughout the design phase of both MLP networks. The study data have discovered the ideal number of neurons that provide the accurate prediction act. Neural networks are composed of basic building blocks known as neurons. An activation function is present in neurons. A vector is used to weight the input signal, and a bias is added on top of that. The activation function receives this signal and takes it to the neuron’s output. Levenberg–Marquardt, often known as damped least-squares, is the learning method used in this study.The hidden layer uses a sigmoid activation function as follows:

f ( Nu avg / Sh avg / Nn avg ) = 1 1 + e ( Nu avg / Sh avg / Nn avg ) .

5 Results and discussion

The computations were performed for the lid-driven flow of water-based micropolar HNFs containing gyrotactic microorganisms within a porous cavity. The computational results are illustrated through contours of streamlines, isotherms, and iso-concentration contours for microrotations, oxygen, and microorganisms along with local and average values of Sherwood and Nusselt numbers, as well as the density of motile microorganisms, are provided under various relevant parameters. The calculations were executed for relevant parameters, encompassing a wide spectrum of values, as follows: 10 ≤ Re ≤ 50, 0 ≤ Ha ≤ 20, 0 ≤ K 0 ≤ 7.5, 0.1 ≤ Ri ≤ 10, 0.1 ≤ Rab ≤ 10, 0.1 ≤ Pe ≤ 1, 0% ≤   ϕ hnf   ≤ 4%, and 0.3 ≤ Sc ≤ 1. The default values are K 0 = 2.5, Pr = 6.26, Ha = 10, Ri = 1, Rab = 0.1, χ 1 = 0.1; Sc = 1, σ 1   = 1, χ   = 1, Pe = 0.1, ϕ hnf = 4 % , and Re = 25.

Figure 4 displays the contours of streamlines (ψ), isotherms (θ), iso-concentrations of oxygen ( Φ ), and microorganisms (N), as well as the isolines of microrotation (M), highlighting the effects of varying Reynolds number. Physically, at a low Re value, viscous forces dominate, resulting in smooth streamlines, uniform isotherms, and homogeneous distributions of microorganisms. While an increase in Re weakens viscous forces, resulting in vortices, disrupted gradients (θ, Φ), and intensified microrotation (M) owing to shear forces. The heated left wall warms the fluid in contact with it, causing it to rise due to density differences. As this warmer fluid ascends, it is sheared by the moving top wall toward the colder right wall, cooling it, and causing it to descend. This cyclical process generates a continuous clockwise circulation within the cavity, effectively filling the entire space. At low Reynolds numbers, viscous forces exert a dominant influence over buoyancy forces, resulting in streamlines that are relatively sparse and less densely packed. The streamline contours become more pronounced with an increase in the Reynolds number due to enhanced buoyancy forces. As the Reynolds number increases from 10 to 25, the magnitudes of the circulation cells also increase, and circulation cells are pushed toward the bottom of the cavity. An additional increase in the Reynolds number from 25 to 50 leads to notable changes in the development of circulation cells, causing the inner circulation cell to diminish significantly. In analyzing the isothermal contours at Re = 10, it is evident that the isotherm lines are more widely spaced, with the highest temperature concentration found near the heated wall and the lowest temperature located in the central region of the cavity. As the Reynolds number increases from 10 to 25, the temperature contours shift toward the right wall and become more densely packed near to the heated wall. This shift suggests that the increasing wall velocity is causing the thermal boundary layer to thin, resulting in enhanced heat transfer efficiency. However, as the Reynolds number increases from 25 to 50, the thermal distribution in the upper section of the cavity shows marked improvement, resulting in elevated temperature levels in that region. Consequently, as the Re enhances from 10 to 50, the heated wall of the cavity exhibits pronounced temperature gradients, which contribute to a 67.64% increase in the Nuavg, as shown in Table 4. The distributions of isoconcentrations of oxygen and microorganisms are significantly influenced by the increasing Reynolds number. In both scenarios, the outer circulation cells remain unaffected. Notably, the influence of the inner circulation cells is particularly pronounced in the central region of the cavity and low concentration zone shifts to upper left corner of the cavity. Meanwhile, the data presented in Table 4 reveal a significant increase of 3.34% in Shavg and 8.42% in Nnavg as the Reynolds number increases from 10 to 50. Furthermore, Figure 4 illustrates the influence of Reynolds number on the isoconcentrations of microrotations. The effects observed closely resemble those of the streamlines, although with differing magnitudes. This suggests that as the Reynolds number increases, the angular momentum intensifies due to the enhanced microrotational effects.

Figure 4 
               Effect of Re on 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           ,
                           θ
                           ,
                           Φ
                           ,
                           N
                           ,
                            and 
                           M
                        
                        \psi ,\theta ,\Phi ,N,\text{ and }M
                     
                   when K
                  0 = 2.5, Pr = 6.26, Ha = 10, Ri = 1, Rab = 0.1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 χ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\chi }_{1}
                     
                   = 0.1, Sc = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 σ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\sigma }_{1}
                     
                   = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           χ
                        
                        \chi 
                     
                   = 1, Pe = 0.1, and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 ϕ
                              
                              
                                 hnf
                              
                           
                           =
                           4
                           %
                        
                        {\phi }_{\text{hnf}}=4\text{\%}
                     
                  .
Figure 4

Effect of Re on ψ , θ , Φ , N ,  and  M when K 0 = 2.5, Pr = 6.26, Ha = 10, Ri = 1, Rab = 0.1, χ 1 = 0.1, Sc = 1, σ 1 = 1, χ = 1, Pe = 0.1, and ϕ hnf = 4 % .

Table 4

Assessment of Nuavg, Shavg, and Nnavg for different parameters

Re Ha K 0 Ri Rab Pe ϕ hnf Sc Nuavg Shavg Nnavg
25 10 2.5 1 0.1 0.1 0.04 1 3.6894 0.35802 0.036456
10 2.8768 0.35713 0.035543
50 4.8226 0.36907 0.038536
25 0 3.7294 0.35725 0.036355
20 3.6083 0.3598 0.036679
10 0 3.6747 0.35609 0.036065
5 3.6925 0.35842 0.036535
7.5 3.6939 0.35859 0.03657
2.5 0.1 3.6496 0.35914 0.036605
10 4.1616 0.34849 0.035325
1 1 3.6896 0.35803 0.036455
10 3.6916 0.35809 0.036441
0.1 0.5 3.4591 0.35487 0.090413
1 3.4111 0.3502 0.17837
0.1 0 3.4719 0.35799 0.036455
0.02 3.5807 0.35801 0.036455
0.04 0.3 4.2564 0.35601 0.035678
0.7 3.7600 0.35785 0.035638

Figure 5 depicts the influence of Richardson number (Ri) on the contours of ψ, θ, Φ, and N, as well as on isolines of microrotation (M). The Richardson number quantitatively describes the relative importance of buoyancy forces compared to inertial forces in determining the convective heat transfer regime. Physically, at low Ri values, characterized by shear-dominated flows, streamlines are densely grouped, indicating significant velocity gradients, while isotherms and oxygen iso-concentrations are more widely distributed due to enhanced turbulent mixing. However, at higher Ri values, specifically in buoyancy-assisted flow, stratified layers emerge, exhibiting smoother streamlines, sharply delineated isotherms and oxygen contours, along with vertically segregated distributions of microorganisms. This study analyzes the aforementioned contour profiles across forced, mixed, and natural convective regimes. At low Richardson number (Ri = 0.1), characteristic of forced convection, the flow is predominantly driven by the motion of the top wall, causing streamlines to cluster tightly near the top wall. However, as the Richardson number increases to Ri = 10, indicative of natural convection dominance, the streamlines spread more evenly throughout the enclosure, signifying the increasing influence of natural convection across the domain, overpowering the shear forces generated by the top wall’s movement. Therefore, it is evident that the Richardson number enhances the flow velocity within the cavity. The Richardson number exerts a substantial effect on isotherm contours near the heated wall as it regulates the balance between forced and natural convection within the flow domain. However, its influence on the isotherms in the rest of the domain remains minimal. In contrast to forced and mixed convective regimes, the natural convective regime leads to a more compact isotherm lines near the heated wall. This is attributed to a reduction in the thickness of the thermal boundary layer, which in turn enhances the overall thermal distribution. Thus, as Ri boosts from 0.1 to 10, there is a 14.03% bump in Nuavg. Moreover, while the distribution of oxygen isoconcentrations is minimally affected by Ri, the contours of microorganism isoconcentrations are significantly affected as Ri enhances from 0.1 to 10. The inner circulation cells shrink when the Richardson number increases from Ri = 0.1 to Ri = 1. At higher Richardson numbers, specifically from Ri = 1 to Ri = 10, two inner eddies form within the cavity, indicating low concentration circulation zone affected with increase in Ri values. Consequently, with an increase in Ri from 0.1 to 10, both Shavg and Nnavg decrease by 2.97 and 3.50%, respectively. Additionally, the isolines of microrotation display behavior akin to that of streamlines w.r.t. Ri, despite with differing magnitudes. As Ri enhances from 0.1 to 10, the angular momentum strengthens due to augmented microrotational effects.

Figure 5 
               Effect of Ri on 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           ,
                           
                           θ
                           ,
                           
                           Φ
                           ,
                           
                           N
                           ,
                           
                           and
                           
                           M
                        
                        \psi ,\hspace{.25em}\theta ,\hspace{.25em}\Phi ,\hspace{.25em}N,\hspace{.25em}\text{and}\hspace{.25em}M
                     
                   when K
                  0 = 2.5, Pr = 6.26, Ha = 10, Re = 25, Rab = 0.1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 χ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                           
                        
                        {\chi }_{1}\hspace{.25em}
                     
                  = 0.1, Sc = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 σ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                            
                        
                        {\sigma }_{1}\text{ }
                     
                  = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           χ
                            
                        
                        \chi \text{ }
                     
                  = 1, Pe = 0.1, and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 ϕ
                              
                              
                                 hnf
                              
                           
                           =
                           4
                           %
                        
                        {\phi }_{\text{hnf}}=4\text{\%}
                     
                  .
Figure 5

Effect of Ri on ψ , θ , Φ , N , and M when K 0 = 2.5, Pr = 6.26, Ha = 10, Re = 25, Rab = 0.1, χ 1 = 0.1, Sc = 1, σ 1   = 1, χ   = 1, Pe = 0.1, and ϕ hnf = 4 % .

Figure 6 illustrates the impact of Ha on ψ, θ, Φ, N, and M when K 0 = 2.5, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, Rab = 0.1, χ 1 = 0.1, Sc = 1, σ 1 = 1, χ = 1; Pe = 0.1, and ϕ hnf = 4 % . It is well known that augmenting the magnetic field generates the Lorentz force, which leads to the suppression of flow velocity. The motion of the top wall develops a single circulating cell within the cavity. Moreover, Figure 6 demonstrates that as Ha increases from 0 to 20, the flow intensity diminishes, reflecting a significant reduction in fluid velocity and indicating a notable deceleration in flow movement. A potential explanation for this finding is that the existence of a magnetic field yields Lorentz force, consequently impeding the fluid’s velocity. An increase in Ha from 0 to 10, there is a slight reduction in the intensity of the outer circulating cell. However, at higher Hartmann number, i.e., Ha = 20, the flow intensity experiences a considerable decrease, leading to a noticeable contraction of the outer circulating cell. This indicates that increasing the uniform magnetic field strength decreases fluid flow within the cavity. Although the isotherm lines exhibit minimal variation as Ha increases from 0 to 10, a further increment from 10 to 20 induces a significant change in the isotherm lines, with reduced curvature and diminished density of the isotherms near to the heated wall. This change signifies a substantial decrease in heat convection, with conduction emerging as the leading form of heat transfer. This trend is further supported by the data presented in Table 4, which show that as the Ha enhances from 0 to 20, Nuavg experiences a decline of 3.25%. Moreover, the isoconcentration profiles of oxygen show no significant changes when applying magnetic strengths from 0 to 10. However, when the magnetic strength is further increased from 10 to 20, the intensity of the primary circulation cells is slightly enhanced, with a small primary vortex forming at the center of the cavity. This suggests that the impact of the magnetic field on mass transport is relatively weak. In the isoconcentration of microorganism profiles, without the influence of the magnetic field, two inner, weaker circulation cells are formed. Increasing the magnetic field causes these weaker circulating cells to merge, indicating an enhancement of the microorganisms. With the application of high magnetic strength, the magnitudes of the circulating cells improve throughout the cavity. Based on these observations, the impact of the magnetic field affects the weaker circulation cells in the isoconcentration of both oxygen and microorganism contours. Furthermore, Figure 6 displays a drop in the magnitude of microrotation isolines as Ha increases. The increasing Ha limits circulation by amplifying the Lorentzian force, which substantially influences flow dynamics and, in turn, affects angular momentum. Consequently, augmenting Ha intensifies the Lorentz force, thereby diminishing the angular momentum distribution within the cavity.

Figure 6 
               Effect of Ha on 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           ,
                           
                           θ
                           ,
                           
                           Φ
                           ,
                           
                           N
                           ,
                           
                           and
                           
                           M
                        
                        \psi ,\hspace{.25em}\theta ,\hspace{.25em}\Phi ,\hspace{.25em}N,\hspace{.25em}\text{and}\hspace{.25em}M
                     
                   when K
                  0 = 2.5, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, Rab = 0.1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 χ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\chi }_{1}
                     
                   = 0.1, Sc = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 σ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\sigma }_{1}
                     
                   = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           χ
                        
                        \chi 
                     
                   = 1, Pe = 0.1, and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 ϕ
                              
                              
                                 hnf
                              
                           
                           =
                           4
                           %
                        
                        {\phi }_{\text{hnf}}=4\text{\%}
                     
                  .
Figure 6

Effect of Ha on ψ , θ , Φ , N , and M when K 0 = 2.5, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, Rab = 0.1, χ 1 = 0.1, Sc = 1, σ 1 = 1, χ = 1, Pe = 0.1, and ϕ hnf = 4 % .

Figure 7 illustrates the impact of the bioconvection Rayleigh number (Rab) on ψ, θ, Φ , N, and M. Physically, the Rayleigh bioconvection number quantifies the balance between buoyancy-driven flows induced by microbial up-swimming and thermal gradients. Therefore, the enhancement of the bioconvective Rayleigh number implies the boost of the bioconvection, which occurs due to the accumulation of microorganisms on the surface, leading to the production of top-heavy density stratification. Higher Rayleigh number values promote enhanced flow within the cavity. Additionally, the deformation of isotherms remains consistent with the increase in the bioconvection Rayleigh number, with a slight intensification observed near the heated wall due to the power of bioconvection circular flow becomes adequately strong to compensate for the detrimental impact of the contraction that takes place between bioconvection and MC flows. The circulation cells show minimal changes in the isoconcentration profiles of oxygen and microorganisms. The reduced circulation cells suggest that microorganisms can swim freely within the enclosure, particularly at lower values. Moreover, increasing the Rayleigh number from 1 to 10 does not significantly influence this behavior.

Figure 7 
               Effect of Rab on 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           ,
                           
                           θ
                           ,
                           
                           Φ
                           ,
                           
                           N
                           ,
                           
                           and
                           
                           M
                        
                        \psi ,\hspace{.25em}\theta ,\hspace{.25em}\Phi ,\hspace{.25em}N,\hspace{.25em}\text{and}\hspace{.25em}M
                     
                   when Ha = 10, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, K
                  0 = 2.5, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 χ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\chi }_{1}
                     
                   = 0.1, Sc = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 σ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\sigma }_{1}
                     
                   = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           χ
                        
                        \chi 
                     
                   = 1, Pe = 0.1, and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 ϕ
                              
                              
                                 hnf
                              
                           
                           =
                           4
                           %
                        
                        {\phi }_{\text{hnf}}=4\text{\%}
                     
                  .
Figure 7

Effect of Rab on ψ , θ , Φ , N , and M when Ha = 10, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, K 0 = 2.5, χ 1 = 0.1, Sc = 1, σ 1 = 1, χ = 1, Pe = 0.1, and ϕ hnf = 4 % .

Figure 8 depicts the influence of ϕ hnf on ψ, θ, Φ, N, and M. The translation of the top wall along the x-axis induces a clockwise vortex that propagates throughout the cavity, as depicted by the streamline contours, effectively occupying the entire domain. The introduction of NPs can potentially hinder the fluid’s flow by creating resistance. Therefore, streamline contours indicate a decrease in the strength of fluid flow within the cavity as the NP volume fraction increases. In contrast, the isothermal contours remain unchanged with variations in NP concentration and consistently displaying uniform isothermal lines adjacent to the heated wall. Furthermore, raising the percentage of ϕ hnf into the conventional fluid raises the k hnf of the resulting solution, leading to enhanced heat convection. As shown in Table 5, an increase in ϕ hnf results in a significant increase of 6.26% in Nuavg. Additionally, Table 5 demonstrates that hybrid NPs outperform single NPs in terms of heat convection performance. When comparing the concentration of 4% hybrid NPs to single NPs, it is observed that the use of 4% TiO2 NPs results in an approximate 1% reduction in heat convection. In contrast, employing 4% GO NPs leads to a decrease in heat convection of about 0.16%. Additionally, isoconcentration profiles for oxygen and microorganisms display consistent contours, showing no changes even as the concentration of NPs in the base liquid increases from 0 to 4%. Consequently, the Shavg and Nnavg show negligible variation in response to changes in nanoparticle concentration as demonstrated in Table 5. The isolines of microrotation form a single circulation vortex akin to streamlines, though with differing strengths and magnitudes. Notably, as the concentration of NPs increases, the inner circulation cell diminishes, whereas the outer circulation cell remains predominantly unchanged. Consequently, ϕ hnf exerts a considerable influence on the isolines of microrotation, resulting in a notable reduction in the intensity of microrotation lines.

Figure 8 
               Effect of 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 ϕ
                              
                              
                                 hnf
                              
                           
                        
                        {\phi }_{\text{hnf}}
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           ,
                           
                           θ
                           ,
                           
                           Φ
                           ,
                           
                           N
                           ,
                           
                           and
                           
                           M
                        
                        \psi ,\hspace{.25em}\theta ,\hspace{.25em}\Phi ,\hspace{.25em}N,\hspace{.25em}\text{and}\hspace{.25em}M
                     
                   when Ha = 10, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, K
                  0 = 2.5, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 χ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\chi }_{1}
                     
                   = 0.1, Sc = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 σ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\sigma }_{1}
                     
                   = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           χ
                        
                        \chi 
                     
                   = 1, Pe = 0.1, and Rab = 0.1.
Figure 8

Effect of ϕ hnf on ψ , θ , Φ , N , and M when Ha = 10, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, K 0 = 2.5, χ 1 = 0.1, Sc = 1, σ 1 = 1, χ = 1, Pe = 0.1, and Rab = 0.1.

Table 5

Influence of mono and hybrid NPs on Nuavg, Shavg, and Nnavg when Ha = 10, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, K 0 = 2.5, χ 1 = 0.1 , Sc = 1, σ 1   = 1, χ = 1, Pe = 0.1, and Rab = 0.1

ϕ GO ϕ TiO 2 ϕ hnf Nuavg Shavg Nnavg
0.00 0.00 0.00 3.4719 0.35799 0.036455
0.01 0 0.01 3.525 0.35798 0.036453
0.02 0 0.02 3.578 0.35796 0.036451
0.03 0 0.03 3.6308 0.35794 0.036448
0.04 0 0.04 3.6834 0.35793 0.036446
0 0.01 0.01 3.517 0.35801 0.036456
0 0.02 0.02 3.5623 0.35803 0.036457
0 0.03 0.03 3.6076 0.35805 0.036458
0 0.04 0.04 3.6529 0.35806 0.036459
0.01 0.01 0.02 3.5807 0.35801 0.036455
0.015 0.015 0.03 3.6350 0.35802 0.036456
0.02 0.02 0.04 3.6894 0.35802 0.036456

Figure 9 shows the consequence of the Peclet number (Pe) on ψ, θ, Φ, N, and M. Physically, the Peclet number is a representation of the ratio between the convective and diffusive transport rates. A significant Peclet number suggests that advection predominates, signifying increased fluid flow and potentially leading to pronounced concentration gradients. Improving the Peclet number causes significant changes in the streamline profiles. As the Peclet number increases from 0.1 to 1, new contour lines emerge, shifting downwards, while the density of the streamlines also intensifies. This trend suggests that elevating the Peclet number markedly improves fluid flow. Further, insignificant changes are obtained in the isotherms and isoconcentration of the oxygen profiles. As the Peclet number (Pe) increases from 0.1 to 1, the isotherm contours exhibit a slight curvature toward the cooled wall, leading to a decrease in density of the lines adjacent to the heated wall. This phenomenon signifies a reduction in heat convection, supported by the data presented in Table 4. Consequently, as the Pe enhances from 0.1 to 1, Nuavg declines by 7.54%. In the isoconcentration profile of oxygen, the inner circulating cell exhibits a slight reduction in size, while the outer circulating cell remains unchanged across the entire domain. Consequently, a notable reduction of 2.18% in Shavg is noted as Pe increases from 0.1 to 1. In contrast, the isoconcentration lines of microorganisms are significantly influenced by the Peclet number. Raising the Pe values from 0.1 to 0.5 leads to the division of the inner weaker cell into two parts. This change results in the formation of densely packed primary and secondary cells within the cavity. As the Peclet number is further elevated from 0.5 to 1, additional inner vortices emerge, migrating toward the upper wall of the enclosure. As a result, an increase of 389.27% in Nnavg is observed when Pe decreases from 0.1 to 1. Moreover, Figure 9 illustrates that the parameter Pe does not significantly influence the isolines of microrotation.

Figure 9 
               Effect of Pe on 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           ,
                           
                           θ
                           ,
                           
                           Φ
                           ,
                           
                           N
                           ,
                           
                           and
                           
                           M
                        
                        \psi ,\hspace{.25em}\theta ,\hspace{.25em}\Phi ,\hspace{.25em}N,\hspace{.25em}\text{and}\hspace{.25em}M
                     
                   when Ha = 10, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, K
                  0 = 2.5, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 χ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\chi }_{1}
                     
                   = 0.1, Sc = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 σ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\sigma }_{1}
                     
                   = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           χ
                        
                        \chi 
                     
                   = 1, Rab = 0.1, and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 ϕ
                              
                              
                                 hnf
                              
                           
                           =
                           4
                           %
                        
                        \hspace{.25em}{\phi }_{\text{hnf}}=4 \% 
                     
                  .
Figure 9

Effect of Pe on ψ , θ , Φ , N , and M when Ha = 10, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, K 0 = 2.5, χ 1 = 0.1, Sc = 1, σ 1 = 1, χ = 1, Rab = 0.1, and ϕ hnf = 4 % .

The influence of the Schmidt number (Sc) on ψ , θ , Φ ,  and  N ,  and  M is depicted in Figure 10. The Schmidt number (Sc) is defined as the ratio of the kinematic viscosity (ν) of a fluid to its mass diffusivity (D), i.e., Sc = ν/D. Physically, Sc quantitatively characterizes the dispersion of a particle within a fluid in relation to the fluid’s momentum flow. The results indicate that the outer circulation cells of the streamlines exhibit minimal variation as the Schmidt number increases, while the inner circulation cells undergo significant changes. As the Schmidt number is increased, the intensity of the inner weaker circulation cells at the upper part of the cavity is enhanced, causing enhanced fluid flow. Moreover, substantial modifications are observed in the isotherms and the isoconcentration’s profiles of oxygen. At low Sc values, the isotherm lines are tightly packed near the heated right wall. However, as the Schmidt number increases to 1, these lines become more dispersed and migrate toward the cooled wall, reflecting a decrease in temperature distribution close to the heated wall. Consequently, as the value of Sc enhanced from 0.3 to 1, there was a significant decrease of 13.32% in Nuavg. In the oxygen isoconcentration profile, the inner, weaker circulating cell expands, signifying a growing low-concentration zone within the cavity. In contrast, the outer circulating cell remains unchanged across the entire domain. As a result, Shavg experiences an increase of 0.57% when Sc increases from 0.3 to 1. Furthermore, notable changes are observed in the isoconcentration profiles of microorganisms. A relatively small Schmidt number (Sc < 1) suggests that the diffusion of microorganism concentration takes place significantly than momentum diffusion, indicating rapid dispersion of microorganisms within the fluid. Therefore, as the Peclet number increased from 0.3 to 0.7, the inner weaker cell expands along the middle section of the cavity, although it experiences a slight contraction. Furthermore, at Sc = 1, the size of the secondary inner circulation cell increases, while it simultaneously shrinks within the cavity. As the Sc increases, signifying an increased momentum diffusion in comparison to mass diffusion, the microrotation isolines become thinner, suggesting finer and larger rotational influences.

Figure 10 
               Effect of Sc on 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           ,
                           
                           θ
                           ,
                           
                           Φ
                           ,
                           
                           N
                           ,
                           
                           and
                           
                           M
                        
                        \psi ,\hspace{.25em}\theta ,\hspace{.25em}\Phi ,\hspace{.25em}N,\hspace{.25em}\text{and}\hspace{.25em}M
                     
                   when Ha = 10, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, K
                  0 = 2.5, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 χ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\chi }_{1}
                     
                   = 0.1, Pe = 0.1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 σ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                            
                        
                        {\sigma }_{1}\text{&#x00A0;}
                     
                   = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           χ
                        
                        \chi 
                     
                   = 1, Rab = 0.1, and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 ϕ
                              
                              
                                 hnf
                              
                           
                           =
                           4
                           %
                        
                        {\phi }_{\text{hnf}}=4 \% 
                     
                  .
Figure 10

Effect of Sc on ψ , θ , Φ , N , and M when Ha = 10, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, K 0 = 2.5, χ 1 = 0.1, Pe = 0.1, σ 1   = 1, χ = 1, Rab = 0.1, and ϕ hnf = 4 % .

Figure 11 shows the profiles of Nulocal, Shlocal, and Nnlocal for varying Reynolds and Richardson numbers, respectively. An increase in Re from 10 to 50 improves the profiles of Nulocal, Shlocal, and Nnlocal. As Re increases, the motion of the upper wall boosts, resulting in a greater volume of fluid being sheared toward the cooler wall of the enclosure; consequently, the flow changes to turbulence, allowing improved mixing of the fluid layers. This mixing disturbs the thermal boundary layer, diminishing its thickness and elevating the Nulocal. Consequently, elevated Reynolds numbers typically result in increased local Nusselt numbers, enhancing convective heat transfer efficacy. Furthermore, Figure 11 illustrates that the Richardson number (Ri) substantially affects the profiles of the Nulocal, Shlocal, and Nnlocal. At a relatively small Ri = 0.1, buoyancy effects are diminished relative to inertial forces, resulting in improved convective heat and mass transfer. As Ri approaches 1, inertial and buoyancy effects become similar, resulting in a balanced convective flow regime. At a large Ri = 10, buoyancy effects prevail, diminishing convective transport and resulting in decreased Nulocal, Shlocal, and Nnlocal. The density of motile microorganisms tends to accumulate in regions where buoyancy effects are stronger, resulting in a less uniform distribution. Moreover, Figure 12 depicts the profiles of Nulocal, Shlocal, and Nnlocal for different Peclet and Schmidt numbers. Increasing the Peclet numbers from 0.1 to 1 decreases Nulocal and Shlocal, while Nnlocal increases. Increasing the Schmidt numbers from 0.3 to 1 declines the profile of Nulocal; while profiles of Shlocal and Nnlocal increase.

Figure 11 
               Variation in Nulocal, Shlocal, and Nnlocal w.r.t. Re and Ri when K
                  0 = 2.5, Pr = 6.26, Ha = 10, Rab = 0.1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 χ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\chi }_{1}
                     
                   = 0.1, Sc = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 σ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\sigma }_{1}
                     
                   = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           χ
                        
                        \chi 
                     
                   = 1, Pe = 0.1, and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 ϕ
                              
                              
                                 hnf
                              
                           
                           =
                           4
                           %
                        
                        {\phi }_{\text{hnf}}=4\text{\%}
                     
                  .
Figure 11

Variation in Nulocal, Shlocal, and Nnlocal w.r.t. Re and Ri when K 0 = 2.5, Pr = 6.26, Ha = 10, Rab = 0.1, χ 1 = 0.1, Sc = 1, σ 1 = 1, χ = 1, Pe = 0.1, and ϕ hnf = 4 % .

Figure 12 
               Variation in Nulocal, Shlocal, and Nnlocal w.r.t. Pe and 
                     
                        
                        
                           Sc
                        
                        \text{Sc}
                     
                   when Ha = 10, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, K
                  0 = 2.5, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 χ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\chi }_{1}
                     
                   = 0.1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 σ
                              
                              
                                 1
                              
                           
                        
                        {\sigma }_{1}
                     
                   = 1, 
                     
                        
                        
                           χ
                        
                        \chi 
                     
                   = 1, Rab = 0.1, and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 ϕ
                              
                              
                                 hnf
                              
                           
                           =
                           4
                           %
                        
                        {\phi }_{\text{hnf}}=4 \% 
                     
                  .
Figure 12

Variation in Nulocal, Shlocal, and Nnlocal w.r.t. Pe and Sc when Ha = 10, Pr = 6.26, Ri = 1, Re = 25, K 0 = 2.5, χ 1 = 0.1, σ 1 = 1, χ = 1, Rab = 0.1, and ϕ hnf = 4 % .

5.1 ANN prediction

Utilizing an ANN to estimate the Nu avg / Sh avg / Nn avg for the flow model was one of the goals of this study. The ANN model was developed to predict the Nusselt number, bioconvection density, and Sherwood number coefficient using a dataset comprising 84 distinct cases and 674 data points. The model’s input parameters include Re, Ha, K 0, Ri, Rab, Pe, ϕ hnf, and Sc. These variables are fed into a MLP network, which contains a single hidden layer composed of 10 neurons. Each neuron processes its inputs by multiplying them with randomly initialized weights, summing the results with a corresponding bias term, and then applying an appropriate activation function to generate the output. The network is trained to learn the relationship between the inputs and the target outputs –bioconvection density, Nusselt number, and Sherwood number coefficients – by iteratively adjusting weights and biases. For optimal performance, hyperparameter tuning was employed with the following settings: a maximum of 1,000 training epochs, a minimum gradient threshold of 10−7, and a maximum of 6 validation failures. The Adam optimization algorithm was used to refine the weight and bias values throughout the training process.

This analysis uses 16 numerical simulation data sets; 70% are devoted to training, 15% to testing, and 15% to validation. There is one output parameter and eight input parameters in the ANN prediction model presented in this study. Computing solutions to non-linear problems is the primary function of the hidden layer. The sigmoid activation(“tansig”) function is employed in this context for the hidden and output layers, respectively. To obtain the most out of an ANN model, the number of neurons is crucial. Evaluating the prediction performance of the machine learning algorithms (ANN) is an important next step after developing and predicting values. Picking the right parameters to measure prediction accuracy is crucial. To find out how well prediction algorithms work, we compare their output to real data from numerical simulations using measures like regression coefficient (R 2) and mean squared error (MSE). The R 2 and MSE can be calculated using the following equations:

MSE = k = 1 N ( Y k NM Y k pre ) N ,

R 2 = k = 1 N ( Y k NM Y ) 2 k = 1 N ( Y k NM Y k pre ) 2 ( Y k N M Y ) 2 .

Furthermore, the correlation equations for Nuavg, Shavg, and Nnavg are expressed as follows:

N u avg = 0.235873 * Re 0.016662 * Ha + 0.003728 * K 0 + 0.098562 * Ri + 0.007415 * R a b 0.064595 * Pe + 0.031036 * ϕ hnf 0.136429 * Sc + 3.729264 ,

S h avg = 0.001701 * Re + 0.000342 * Ha + 0.000215 * K 0 0.001939 * Ri 0.000039 * R a b 0.001453 * Pe + 0.000057 * ϕ hnf + 0.000289 * Sc + 0.357299 ,

N n avg = 0.000446 * Re + 0.000038 * Ha + 0.000083 * K 0 0.000116 * Ri + 0.000126 * R a b + 0.024840 * Pe 0.000127 * ϕ hnf + 0.000105 * Sc + 0.043941 .

Figure 13 shows the error plot for numerical predictions, and Figure 14 shows the same for ANN predictions. Results from numerical and ANN analyses of Nuavg, Shavg, and Nnavg show that they follow comparable trends when compared with the expected values. The results from the numerical and ANN predictions are generally in accord. Nevertheless, as can be seen from the error curve, Shavg and Nnavg consistently keep their errors inside 10−3, which suggests that they are very accurate. Furthermore, samples 29–33 exhibit a minor discrepancy in the Nuavg error plot. However, the fact that Nuavg has an MSE of 10−5 shows that this discrepancy does not substantially affect the predictions. It appears from the model’s consistency that it successfully avoids overfitting and underfitting, resulting in a satisfactory fit. Figure 15 shows how the MSEs of the four model scenarios for training, testing, and validation all converge. Epoch 10 yields the best validation performance for Nnavg when the MSE is 10−8, with the MSE ranging from 0 to 10−8. On the other hand, after 50 epochs for Nuavg and 8 epochs for Shavg, the MSEs for these variables are 10−5 and 10−6, respectively. Furthermore, the MSE indicates that training, testing, and validation have all converged, suggesting that the computation is neither overfitting nor underfitting. Figure 16 displays the linear regression plots for various instances of each situation. When R becomes close to 0, it means that the anticipated and estimated values are not very similar. This suggests that our forecasts might not be totally accurate or dependable in this specific case. Accordingly, the stronger the agreement between our predictions and the results of the experiment, the closer R is to 1. An improved answer is one with a smaller MSE.

Figure 13 
                  Comparison between numerical and ANN prediction on Nuavg, Nnavg, and Shavg.
Figure 13

Comparison between numerical and ANN prediction on Nuavg, Nnavg, and Shavg.

Figure 14 
                  The error between numerical and ANN prediction on Nuavg, Nnavg, and Shavg.
Figure 14

The error between numerical and ANN prediction on Nuavg, Nnavg, and Shavg.

Figure 15 
                  MSE performance on training, testing, and validation for Nuavg, Nnavg, and Shavg.
Figure 15

MSE performance on training, testing, and validation for Nuavg, Nnavg, and Shavg.

Figure 16 
                  Regression plot on training, testing, and validation for (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.
Figure 16

Regression plot on training, testing, and validation for (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.

To evaluate the reliability of the developed code based on the ANN, Figures 1724 illustrate a comparison between computational fluid dynamics (CFD) outcomes and ANN-predicted values for average Nuavg, Shavg, and Nnavg. As observed in these figures, the ANN predictions for Nuavg align closely with the CFD results across various parameter sets, showing only minor deviations. Specifically, both approaches indicate that Nuavg increases with increasing Rab, Re, Ri, K₀, and ϕₕₙf, while it decreases with higher values of Sc, Pe, and Ha. The CFD findings further support this increasing trend in Nuavg. When examining Nnavg, it is evident that the value drops as Ra and Ri increase, but it increases with higher Re, Ha, Sc, and Pe. Minimal changes are observed with respect to K₀ and ϕₕₙf, indicating a relatively weak influence of these parameters. In the case of Shavg, the comparison between CFD and ANN results reveals a good correlation for parameters such as Ha, K₀, Ri, Sc, and Pe. Although discrepancies in magnitude appear for Rab and ϕₕₙf, the ANN-predicted trends remain consistent with CFD outputs. Additionally, Shavg is found to decrease with increasing Ri and Pe, while it shows an upward trend for the remaining parameters. Overall, the figures demonstrate a strong resemblance between CFD-derived values and ANN predictions, with only minimal differences in magnitude – suggesting that the ANN is well-tuned and neither overfitted nor underfitted. This is further supported by the MSE values, where Nnavg shows an MSE on the order of 10−8, and other variables fall between 10−5 and 10−6. These results confirm that the ANN model offers reliable and accurate predictions for Nuavg, Shavg, and Nnavg, supporting its effective application in modeling and analysis.

Figure 17 
                  Impact of Re with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.
Figure 17

Impact of Re with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.

Figure 18 
                  Impact of Ha with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.
Figure 18

Impact of Ha with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.

Figure 19 
                  Impact of K
                     0 with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.
Figure 19

Impact of K 0 with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.

Figure 20 
                  Impact of Ri with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.
Figure 20

Impact of Ri with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.

Figure 21 
                  Impact of Rab with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.
Figure 21

Impact of Rab with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.

Figure 22 
                  Impact of Pe with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.
Figure 22

Impact of Pe with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.

Figure 23 
                  Impact of 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    ϕ
                                 
                                 
                                    hnf
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\phi }_{\text{hnf}}
                        
                      with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.
Figure 23

Impact of ϕ hnf with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.

Figure 24 
                  Impact of Sc with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.
Figure 24

Impact of Sc with numerical and ANN on (a) Nuavg, (b) Nnavg, and (c) Shavg.

6 Conclusions

This work focuses on the MHD bioconvective lid-driven flow of a micropolar HNF containing motile gyrotactic microorganisms inside a square enclosure. The impacts of different parameters on the flow profile, temperature, oxygen, motile microorganisms, microrotation isolines, Nusselt number, Sherwood number, and density of the motile microorganism number are analyzed, with key findings summarized as follows:

  • As Re increases from 10 to 50, inertial forces intensify flow velocity and temperature gradients, raising Nuavg by 67.64%, while Shavg and Nnavg increase by 3.34 and 8.42%, respectively.

  • As Ri increases from 0.1 to 10, Nuavg increases by 14.03%, while Shavg and Nnavg decrease by 2.79 and 3.50%, respectively.

  • Increasing Ha strengthens Lorentz forces, compressing flow, and redues Nuavg by 3.25%.

  • Higher Rab enhances bioconvection, causing top-heavy density stratification due to microorganism accumulation.

  • Enhancing ϕ hnf to 4% enhances k hnf , boosting heat convection and raising Nuavg by 6.26%.

  • The HNF (2% GO + 2% TiO2) achieves significantly superior heat transfer compared to 4% GO or 4% TiO2 individually.

  • A higher Peclet number signifies dominant advection, enhancing fluid flow and steepening concentration gradients. Therefore, as Pe increases from 0.1 to 1, Nuavg drops by 7.54%, Shavg by 2.18%, while Nnavg increases by 389.27%.

  • As Sc increases from 0.3 to 1, Nuavg decreases by 13.32% due to reduced mass diffusivity.

  • Increasing the vortex viscosity (K 0) leads to a noticeable upsurge in heat transfer rate.

6.1 Scientific significance of the present research model

This research, entitled “Thermo-bioconvection performance for a lid-driven flow of MHD micropolar hybrid nanofluid containing oxytactic microorganisms in a square enclosure: A machine learning approach,” exhibits significant practical implications spanning multifaceted biological and industrial fields. The present model appears to be useful in thermal energy control systems. This configuration demonstrates practical applications in heat exchangers microelectronic chips and is also pertinent to biomedical science, encompassing biomedical engineering and drug delivery, as well as industrial biotechnology and biofuel production. Furthermore, the incorporation of HNFs enhances the model’s significance to renewable energy sources, including fuel cells and solar collectors. Consequently, this model provides valuable insights to improve heat transfer technology for current engineering applications.

6.2 Limitations and future scope of the current model

This model offers valuable insights into the thermo-bioconvection performance of MHD micropolar HNF for lid-driven flow inside a square enclosure infused with oxytactic microorganisms, although it does have limitations. This model’s design focuses on two-dimensional, laminar, and steady flow, which limits its applicability to transient or turbulent conditions. Moreover, the HNF is regarded as a homogeneous, incompressible, electrically conducting viscous fluid, supposing that there are no particle interactions or agglomeration effects. The effects of viscous dissipation and Joule heating are disregarded despite their potential contribution to thermal behavior in practical applications. These constraints indicate possible study areas spanning three-dimensional effects, transient flow dynamics, and advanced thermophysical modeling. Future studies can explore various enclosure shapes with heated and cooling obstacles filled with different NFs containing various types of NPs.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the University Higher Education Fund for funding this research work under the Research Support Program for Central Labs at King Khalid University through the project number CL/CO/A/4.

  1. Funding information: This research was funded by the University Higher Education Fund under the Research Support Program for Central Labs at King Khalid University through project number CL/CO/A/4.

  2. Author contributions: Anil Ahlawat: writing – original draft, validation, software, methodology, formal analysis, and conceptualization. Shilpa Chaudhary: writing – review and editing, supervision, project administration, methodology, investigation, and data curation. Loganathan Karuppusamy: writing – review and editing, validation, software, methodology, formal analysis, and data curation. Salman Arafath Mohammed: writing – review and editing, validation, supervision, resources, project administration, formal analysis, data curation, and conceptualization. Thirumalaisamy Kandasamy: writing – review and editing, visualization, validation, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. Hayath Thameem Basha: writing – review and editing, validation, supervision, software, methodology, and formal analysis. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Choi SUS. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles in developments and applications of non-Newtonian flows. ASME J Heat Transf. 1995;66:99–105.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Xu H, Gong L, Huang S, Xu M. Flow and heat transfer characteristics of nanofluid flowing through metal foams. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2015;83:399–407.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.12.024Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Saghir MZ, Welsford C, Thanapathy P, Bayomy A, Delisle C. Experimental measurements and numerical computation of nano heat transfer enhancement inside a porous material. J Therm Sci Eng Appl. 2020;12(1):011003.10.1115/1.4041936Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Mansour MA, Gorla RS, Siddiqa S, Rashad AM, Salah T. Unsteady MHD natural convection flow of a nanofluid inside an inclined square cavity containing a heated circular obstacle. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2023;24(1):37–55.10.1515/ijnsns-2020-0138Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Khanafer K, Vafai K, Lightstone M. Buoyancy-driven heat transfer enhancement in a two-dimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2003;46(19):3639–53.10.1016/S0017-9310(03)00156-XSuche in Google Scholar

[6] Uddin MJ, Rasel SK, Rahman MM, Vajravelu K. Natural convective heat transfer in a nanofluid-filled square vessel having a wavy upper surface in the presence of a magnetic field. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 2020;19:100660.10.1016/j.tsep.2020.100660Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Saleem KB, Marafie AH, Al-Farhany K, Hussam WK, Sheard GJ. Natural convection heat transfer in a nanofluid filled l-shaped enclosure with time-periodic temperature boundary and magnetic field. Alex Eng J. 2023;69:177–91.10.1016/j.aej.2022.12.030Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Mezaache A, Mebarek-Oudinal F, Vaidya H, Ramesh K. Impact of nanofluids and porous structures on the thermal efficiency of wavy channel heat exchanger. Int J Therm Sci. 2025;210:109673.10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2024.109673Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Suresh S, Venkitaraj KP, Selvakumar P, Chandrasekar M. Synthesis of Al2O3–Cu/water hybrid nanofluids using two-step method and its thermophysical properties. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp. 2011;388(1–3):41–8.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.08.005Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Yasmin H, Giwa SO, Noor S, Aybar HŞ. Reproduction of nanofluid synthesis, thermal properties and experiments in engineering: A research paradigm shift. Energies. 2023;16(3):1145.10.3390/en16031145Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Madheswaran DK, Vengatesan S, Varuvel EG, Praveenkumar T, Jegadheeswaran S, Pugazhendhi A, et al. Nanofluids as a coolant for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Recent trends, challenges, and future perspectives. J Clean Prod. 2023;138763.10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138763Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Olabi AG, Wilberforce T, Sayed ET, Elsaid K, Rahman SA, Abdelkareem MA. Geometrical effect coupled with nanofluid on heat transfer enhancement in heat exchangers. Int J Thermofluids. 2021;10:100072.10.1016/j.ijft.2021.100072Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Vijayalakshmi P, Sivaraj R. Heat transfer analysis on micropolar alumina–silica–water nanofluid flow in an inclined square cavity with inclined magnetic field and radiation effect. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2023;148(2):473–88.10.1007/s10973-022-11758-xSuche in Google Scholar

[14] Kim H, Do Y, Ramachandran S, Sankar M, Thirumalaisamy K. Computational analysis of magnetohydrodynamic ternary-hybrid nanofluid flow and heat transfer inside a porous cavity with shape effects. Phys Fluids. 2024;36(8):082008. 10.1063/5.0222802.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Alktranee M, Al-Yasiri Q, Shehab MA, Bencs P, Németh Z, Hernadi K. Experimental and numerical study of a photovoltaic/thermal system cooled by metal oxide nanofluids. Alex Eng J. 2024;94:55–67.10.1016/j.aej.2024.03.050Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Ouertatani N, Cheikh NB, Beya BB, Lili T, Campo A. Mixed convection in a double lid-driven cubic cavity. Int J Therm Sci. 2009;48(7):1265–72.10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2008.11.020Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Alruwaele WH, Gajjar JS. Lid-driven cavity flow containing a nanofluid. Dynamics. 2024;4(3):671–97.10.3390/dynamics4030034Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Hasan MJ, Azad AK, Hossain R, Rahman MM, Karim MF. Analysis of mixed convection under radiation and magnetohydrodynamics utilizing Kerosene-CNT nanofluid in a lid-driven cavity. Int J Thermofluids. 2024;21:100528.10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100528Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Ahlawat A, Chaudhary S, Sharma MK, Loganathan K, Pattanaik B, Balaram A. Entropy optimization of lid-driven micropolar hybrid nanofluid flow in a partially porous hexagonal-shaped cavity with relevance to energy efficient storage processes. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):9712.10.1038/s41598-024-60483-ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Akter H, Parveen N, Munshi M, Islam T. MHD mixed convection of nanofluid in a lid-driven porous trapezoidal cavity with a heated obstacle. Multiscale Sci Eng. 2024;6(1):57–77.10.1007/s42493-024-00113-xSuche in Google Scholar

[21] Bakar NA, Roslan R, Sazeli ZA, Salim NR. Mixed convection in a lid-driven cavity in the presence of magnetic field with sinusoidal heating. CFD Lett. 2024;16(2):42–54.10.37934/cfdl.16.2.4254Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Eringen AC. Theory of micropolar fluids. J Math Mech. 1966;16:1–18.10.1512/iumj.1967.16.16001Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Eringen AC. Theory of thermomicrofluids. J Math Anal Appl. 1972;38(2):480–96.10.1016/0022-247X(72)90106-0Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Yan SR, Izadi M, Sheremet MA, Pop I, Oztop HF, Afrand M. Inclined Lorentz force impact on convective-radiative heat exchange of micropolar nanofluid inside a porous enclosure with tilted elliptical heater. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2020;117:104762.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104762Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Batool S, Rasool G, Alshammari N, Khan I, Kaneez H, Hamadneh N. Numerical analysis of heat and mass transfer in micropolar nanofluids flow through lid driven cavity: Finite volume approach. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2022;37:102233.10.1016/j.csite.2022.102233Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Ali B, Khan SA, Hussein AK, Thumma T, Hussain S. Hybrid nanofluids: Significance of gravity modulation, heat source/sink, and magnetohydrodynamic on dynamics of micropolar fluid over an inclined surface via finite element simulation. Appl Math Comput. 2022;419:126878.10.1016/j.amc.2021.126878Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Manaa N, Abidi A, Saleel CA, Madiouli J, Borjini MN. Three-dimensional numerical analysis on performance enhancement of micropolar hybrid nanofluid in comparison with simple nanofluid. Heat Transf Eng. 2021;42(18):1590–610.10.1080/01457632.2020.1807106Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Ahlawat A, Sharma MK. Effects of heated block comprised porous stratum and micropolar hybrid nanofluid on convective heat transfer and entropy generation in a square enclosure. Heat Transf. 2022;51(6):5320–47.10.1002/htj.22549Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Ahlawat A, Sharma MK, Rashidi MM, Sheremet MA. Entropy production minimization and heat transfer enhancement in a cavity filled with micropolar hybrid nanofluid under an influence of discrete heaters and uniform magnetic field. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2023;148(20):10803–20.10.1007/s10973-023-12415-7Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Ahlawat A, Chaudhary S, Loganathan K, Sharma MK, Abbas M, Bhavana M. Heat convection and irreversibility of magneto-micropolar hybrid nanofluids within a porous hexagonal-shaped enclosure having heated obstacle. Nanotechnol Rev. 2024;13(1):20240044.10.1515/ntrev-2024-0044Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Riaz MB, Al-Khaled K, Khan SU, Ramesh K. Bioconvective triple diffusion flow of micropolar nanofluid with suction effects and convective boundary conditions. Int J Thermofluids. 2025;26:101138. 10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101138.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Sheremet M, Grosan T, Pop I. MHD free convection flow in an inclined square cavity filled with both nanofluids and gyrotactic microorganisms. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 2019;29(12):4642–59.10.1108/HFF-03-2019-0264Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Mandal DK, Biswas N, Manna NK, Gorla RSR, Chamkha AJ. Role of surface undulation during mixed bioconvective nanofluid flow in porous media in presence of oxytactic bacteria and magnetic fields. Int J Mech Sci. 2021;211:106778.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106778Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Biswas N, Mandal DK, Manna NK, Benim AC. Magneto-hydrothermal triple-convection in a W-shaped porous cavity containing oxytactic bacteria. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):18053.10.1038/s41598-022-18401-7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Biswas N, Mandal DK, Manna NK, Benim AC. Enhanced energy and mass transport dynamics in a thermo-magneto-bioconvective porous system containing oxytactic bacteria and nanoparticles: cleaner energy application. Energy. 2023;263:125775.10.1016/j.energy.2022.125775Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Rahman MU, Haq F, Ghazwani HA, Ghazwani MH, Alnujaie A. Heat transport and entropy generation in bioconvective sutterby nanofluid flow with gyrotactic microorganisms and chemical reaction. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2024;149:14289–302. 10.1007/s10973-024-13699-z.Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Rahman MU, Haq F, Abduvalieva D. Mixed convection flow of radiated Sutterby nanofluid by stretchable cylinder with irreversibility and heat generation. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part N: J Nanomater Nanoeng Nanosyst. 2024;23977914231223820. 10.1177/23977914231223820.Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Hussain SM, Majeed A, Ijaz N, Omer AS, Khan I, Medani M, et al. Heat transfer in three dimensional micropolar based nanofluid with electromagnetic waves in the presence of eukaryotic microbes. Alex Eng J. 2024;94:339–53.10.1016/j.aej.2024.03.034Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Yasmin H, Bossly R, Alduais FS, Al-Bossly A, Saeed A. Thermally radiative water-based hybrid nanofluid with nanoparticles and gyrotactic microorganisms past a stretching surface with convective conditions and porous media. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2025;65:105644.10.1016/j.csite.2024.105644Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Pal D, Mandal G. Hydromagnetic convective–radiative boundary layer flow of nanofluids induced by a non-linear vertical stretching/shrinking sheet with viscous–Ohmic dissipation. Powder Technol. 2015;279:61–74.10.1016/j.powtec.2015.03.043Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Al-Sankoor K, Al-Gayyim H, Al-Musaedi S, Asadi Z, Ganji DD. Analytically investigating of heat transfer parameters with presence of graphene oxide nanoparticles in Williamson-magnetic fluid by AGM and HPM methods. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021;27:101236.10.1016/j.csite.2021.101236Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Hillesdon AJ, Pedley TJ. Bioconvection in suspensions of oxytactic bacteria: linear theory. J Fluid Mech. 1996;324:223–59.10.1017/S0022112096007902Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Pedley TJ, Kessler JO. Hydrodynamic phenomena in suspensions of swimming microorganisms. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 1992;24(1):313–58.10.1146/annurev.fl.24.010192.001525Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Boussinesq J. Théorie analytique de la chaleur: mise en harmonie avec la thermodynamique et avec la théorie mécanique de la lumière. Vol. 2, Gauthier-Villars; 1903.Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Izadpanah F, Sadegh Sadeghi M, Ghodrat M, Behnia M. Natural thermo-bio convection of gyrotactic micro-organisms in a square cavity with two heaters inside: application to ocean ecosystems. Int J Environ Stud. 2024;81(3):1390–412.10.1080/00207233.2022.2050578Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Ahmadi G. Self-similar solution of imcompressible micropolar boundary layer flow over a semi-infinite plate. Int J Eng Sci. 1976;14(7):639–46.10.1016/0020-7225(76)90006-9Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Rees DAS, Pop I. Free convection boundary-layer flow of a micropolar fluid from a vertical flat plate. IMA J Appl Math. 1998;61(2):179–97.10.1093/imamat/61.2.179Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Ishak A, Nazar R, Pop I. Boundary-layer flow of a micropolar fluid on a continuously moving or fixed permeable surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2007;50(23–24):4743–8.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.03.034Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Ghalambaz M, Doostani A, Izadpanahi E, Chamkha AJ. Conjugate natural convection flow of Ag–MgO/water hybrid nanofluid in a square cavity. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2020;139(3):2321–36.10.1007/s10973-019-08617-7Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Maxwell JC. A treatise on electricity and magnetism. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1873.Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Brinkman HC. The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions. J Chem Phys. 1952;20(4):571.10.1063/1.1700493Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Sheremet MA, Pop I. Thermo-bioconvection in a square porous cavity filled by oxytactic microorganisms. Transp Porous Media. 2014;103:191–205.10.1007/s11242-014-0297-4Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-01-07
Revised: 2025-04-15
Accepted: 2025-05-12
Published Online: 2025-07-10

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. MHD radiative mixed convective flow of a sodium alginate-based hybrid nanofluid over a convectively heated extending sheet with Joule heating
  3. Experimental study of mortar incorporating nano-magnetite on engineering performance and radiation shielding
  4. Multicriteria-based optimization and multi-variable non-linear regression analysis of concrete containing blends of nano date palm ash and eggshell powder as cementitious materials
  5. A promising Ag2S/poly-2-amino-1-mercaptobenzene open-top spherical core–shell nanocomposite for optoelectronic devices: A one-pot technique
  6. Biogenic synthesized selenium nanoparticles combined chitosan nanoparticles controlled lung cancer growth via ROS generation and mitochondrial damage pathway
  7. Fabrication of PDMS nano-mold by deposition casting method
  8. Stimulus-responsive gradient hydrogel micro-actuators fabricated by two-photon polymerization-based 4D printing
  9. Physical aspects of radiative Carreau nanofluid flow with motile microorganisms movement under yield stress via oblique penetrable wedge
  10. Effect of polar functional groups on the hydrophobicity of carbon nanotubes-bacterial cellulose nanocomposite
  11. Review in green synthesis mechanisms, application, and future prospects for Garcinia mangostana L. (mangosteen)-derived nanoparticles
  12. Entropy generation and heat transfer in nonlinear Buoyancy–driven Darcy–Forchheimer hybrid nanofluids with activation energy
  13. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Ginkgo biloba seed extract: Evaluation of antioxidant, anticancer, antifungal, and antibacterial activities
  14. A numerical analysis of heat and mass transfer in water-based hybrid nanofluid flow containing copper and alumina nanoparticles over an extending sheet
  15. Investigating the behaviour of electro-magneto-hydrodynamic Carreau nanofluid flow with slip effects over a stretching cylinder
  16. Electrospun thermoplastic polyurethane/nano-Ag-coated clear aligners for the inhibition of Streptococcus mutans and oral biofilm
  17. Investigation of the optoelectronic properties of a novel polypyrrole-multi-well carbon nanotubes/titanium oxide/aluminum oxide/p-silicon heterojunction
  18. Novel photothermal magnetic Janus membranes suitable for solar water desalination
  19. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Ageratum conyzoides for activated carbon compositing to prepare antimicrobial cotton fabric
  20. Activation energy and Coriolis force impact on three-dimensional dusty nanofluid flow containing gyrotactic microorganisms: Machine learning and numerical approach
  21. Machine learning analysis of thermo-bioconvection in a micropolar hybrid nanofluid-filled square cavity with oxytactic microorganisms
  22. Research and improvement of mechanical properties of cement nanocomposites for well cementing
  23. Thermal and stability analysis of silver–water nanofluid flow over unsteady stretching sheet under the influence of heat generation/absorption at the boundary
  24. Cobalt iron oxide-infused silicone nanocomposites: Magnetoactive materials for remote actuation and sensing
  25. Magnesium-reinforced PMMA composite scaffolds: Synthesis, characterization, and 3D printing via stereolithography
  26. Bayesian inference-based physics-informed neural network for performance study of hybrid nanofluids
  27. Numerical simulation of non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid flow subject to a heterogeneous/homogeneous chemical reaction over a Riga surface
  28. Enhancing the superhydrophobicity, UV-resistance, and antifungal properties of natural wood surfaces via in situ formation of ZnO, TiO2, and SiO2 particles
  29. Synthesis and electrochemical characterization of iron oxide/poly(2-methylaniline) nanohybrids for supercapacitor application
  30. Impacts of double stratification on thermally radiative third-grade nanofluid flow on elongating cylinder with homogeneous/heterogeneous reactions by implementing machine learning approach
  31. Synthesis of Cu4O3 nanoparticles using pumpkin seed extract: Optimization, antimicrobial, and cytotoxicity studies
  32. Cationic charge influence on the magnetic response of the Fe3O4–[Me2+ 1−y Me3+ y (OH2)] y+(Co3 2−) y/2·mH2O hydrotalcite system
  33. Pressure sensing intelligent martial arts short soldier combat protection system based on conjugated polymer nanocomposite materials
  34. Magnetohydrodynamics heat transfer rate under inclined buoyancy force for nano and dusty fluids: Response surface optimization for the thermal transport
  35. Review Articles
  36. A comprehensive review on hybrid plasmonic waveguides: Structures, applications, challenges, and future perspectives
  37. Nanoparticles in low-temperature preservation of biological systems of animal origin
  38. Fluorescent sulfur quantum dots for environmental monitoring
  39. Nanoscience systematic review methodology standardization
  40. Nanotechnology revolutionizing osteosarcoma treatment: Advances in targeted kinase inhibitors
  41. AFM: An important enabling technology for 2D materials and devices
  42. Carbon and 2D nanomaterial smart hydrogels for therapeutic applications
  43. Principles, applications and future prospects in photodegradation systems
  44. Do gold nanoparticles consistently benefit crop plants under both non-stressed and abiotic stress conditions?
  45. An updated overview of nanoparticle-induced cardiovascular toxicity
  46. Arginine as a promising amino acid for functionalized nanosystems: Innovations, challenges, and future directions
  47. Advancements in the use of cancer nanovaccines: Comprehensive insights with focus on lung and colon cancer
  48. Membrane-based biomimetic delivery systems for glioblastoma multiforme therapy
  49. The drug delivery systems based on nanoparticles for spinal cord injury repair
  50. Green synthesis, biomedical effects, and future trends of Ag/ZnO bimetallic nanoparticles: An update
  51. Application of magnesium and its compounds in biomaterials for nerve injury repair
  52. Micro/nanomotors in biomedicine: Construction and applications
  53. Hydrothermal synthesis of biomass-derived CQDs: Advances and applications
  54. Research progress in 3D bioprinting of skin: Challenges and opportunities
  55. Review on bio-selenium nanoparticles: Synthesis, protocols, and applications in biomedical processes
  56. Gold nanocrystals and nanorods functionalized with protein and polymeric ligands for environmental, energy storage, and diagnostic applications: A review
  57. An in-depth analysis of rotational and non-rotational piezoelectric energy harvesting beams: A comprehensive review
  58. Advancements in perovskite/CIGS tandem solar cells: Material synergies, device configurations, and economic viability for sustainable energy
  59. Deep learning in-depth analysis of crystal graph convolutional neural networks: A new era in materials discovery and its applications
  60. Review of recent nano TiO2 film coating methods, assessment techniques, and key problems for scaleup
  61. Special Issue on Advanced Nanomaterials for Carbon Capture, Environment and Utilization for Energy Sustainability - Part III
  62. Efficiency optimization of quantum dot photovoltaic cell by solar thermophotovoltaic system
  63. Exploring the diverse nanomaterials employed in dental prosthesis and implant techniques: An overview
  64. Electrochemical investigation of bismuth-doped anode materials for low‑temperature solid oxide fuel cells with boosted voltage using a DC-DC voltage converter
  65. Synthesis of HfSe2 and CuHfSe2 crystalline materials using the chemical vapor transport method and their applications in supercapacitor energy storage devices
  66. Special Issue on Green Nanotechnology and Nano-materials for Environment Sustainability
  67. Influence of nano-silica and nano-ferrite particles on mechanical and durability of sustainable concrete: A review
  68. Surfaces and interfaces analysis on different carboxymethylation reaction time of anionic cellulose nanoparticles derived from oil palm biomass
  69. Processing and effective utilization of lignocellulosic biomass: Nanocellulose, nanolignin, and nanoxylan for wastewater treatment
  70. Retraction
  71. Retraction of “Aging assessment of silicone rubber materials under corona discharge accompanied by humidity and UV radiation”
Heruntergeladen am 8.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2025-0177/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen