Home Ternary and n-ary f-distributive structures
Article Open Access

Ternary and n-ary f-distributive structures

  • Indu R. U. Churchill EMAIL logo , M. Elhamdadi , M. Green and A. Makhlouf
Published/Copyright: February 8, 2018

Abstract

We introduce and study ternary f-distributive structures, Ternary f-quandles and more generally their higher n-ary analogues. A classification of ternary f-quandles is provided in low dimensions. Moreover, we study extension theory and introduce a cohomology theory for ternary, and more generally n-ary, f-quandles. Furthermore, we give some computational examples.

MSC 2010: 20G10; 17A30; 17A40

1 Introduction

The first instances of ternary operations appeared in the nineteenth century when Cayley considered cubic matrices. Ternary operations or more generally n-ary operations appeared naturally in various domains of theoretical and mathematical physics. The first instances of ternary Lie algebras appeared in the Nambu’s Mechanics when generalizing hamiltonian mechanics by considering more than one hamiltonian [1]. The algebraic formulation of Nambu’s Mechanics was achieved by Takhtajan in [2]. Moreover, ternary algebraic structures appeared in String and Superstring theories when Basu and Harvey suggested to replace Lie algebra in the context of Nahm equations by a 3-Lie algebra. Furthermore, a ternary operation was used by Bagger-Lambert in the context of Bagger-Lambert-Gustavsson model of M2-branes and in the work of Okubo [3] on Yang-Baxter equation which gave impulse to significant development on n-ary algebras. In recent years, there has been a growth of interests in many generalizations of binary structures to higher n-ary contexts. In Lie algebra theory, for example, the bracket is replaced by a n-ary bracket and the Jacobi identity is replaced by its higher analogue, see [4]. Generalizations of quandles to the ternary case were done recently in [5]. One may also mention reference [6] where the author uses two ternary operators, providing a generalization of a Dehn presentation which assigns a relation to each crossing in terms of the regions of the diagram that surround the crossing. For example, by coloring the four regions respectively a, b, c and d (see figure 2 in [6]), the author obtains d as a ternary function T(a,b,c) = ab−1c. This example of ternary operation was also considered in Example 2.8 in [5]. The author shows under certain conditions that ternary checkerboard colorings define link invariants. The paper deals with different algebraic structures considered in [5] and in this work.

In this paper we introduce and study a twisted version of ternary, respectively n-ary, generalizations of racks and quandles, where the structure is defined by a ternary operation and a linear map twisting the distributive property. These type of algebraic structures, called sometimes Hom-algebras, appeared first in quantum deformations of algebras of vector fields, motivated by physical aspects. A systematic study and mathematical aspects were provided for Lie type algebras by Hartwig-Larsson and Silvestrov in [7] whereas associative and other nonassociative algebras were discussed by the fourth author and Silvestrov in [8] and n-ary Hom-type algebras in [9]. The main feature of all these generalization is that the usual identities are twisted by a homomorphism. We introduce in this article the notions of ternary, respectively n-ary, f-shelf (resp. f-rack, f-quandle), give some key constructions and properties. Moreover, we provide a classification in low dimensions of f-quandles. We also study extensions and modules, as well as cohomology theory of these structures. For classical quandles theory, we refer to [10], see also [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. For basics and some developments of Hom-type algebras, we refer to [8, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26].

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we review the basics of f-quandles and ternary distributive structures and give the general n-ary setting. In Section 3, we discuss a key construction introduced by Yau, we show that given a n-ary f-shelf (resp. f-rack, f-quandle) and a shelf morphism then one constructs a new n-ary f-shelf (resp. f-rack, f-quandle) and we provide examples. In Section 4, we provide a classification of ternary f-quandles in low dimensions. Section 5 gives the extension theory of f-quandles and modules. Finally, in Section 6 we introduce the cohomology of n-ary f-distributive structures and give examples.

2 f-quandles and ternary (resp. n-ary) distributive structures

In this section we aim to introduce the notion of ternary and more generally n-ary f-quandles, generalizing the notion of f-quandle given in [27].

2.1 A review of f-quandles and related structures

First, we review the basics of the binary f-quandles. We refer to [27] for the complete study. Classical theory of quandle could be found in

Definition 2.1

An f-shelf is a triple (X, *, f) in which X is a set, * is a binary operation on X, and f: XX is a map such that, for any x,y,zX, the identity

(xy)f(z)=(xz)(yz)(1)

holds. An f-rack is an f-shelf such that, for any x,yX, there exists a unique zX such that

zy=f(x).(2)

An f-quandle is an f-rack such that, for each xX, the identity

xx=f(x)(3)

holds.

An f-crossed set is an f-quandle (X, *, f) such that f: XX satisfies x * y = f(x) whenever y* x = f(y) for any x, yX.

Definition 2.2

Let (X1, *1, f1) and (X2, *2, f2) be two f-racks (resp. f-quandles). A map ϕ: X1X2is an f-rack (resp. f-quandle) morphism if it satisfies ϕ (a *1b) = ϕ(a) *2ϕ(b) and ϕf1 = f2ϕ.

Remark 2.3

A category of f-quandles is a category whose objects are tuples (A, *, f) which are f-quandles and morphism are f-quandle morphisms.

Examples of f-quandles include the following:

  1. Given any set X and map f: XX, then the operation x * y = f(x) for any x, yX gives a f-quandle. We call this a trivial f-quandle structure on X.

  2. For any group G and any group endomorphism f of G, the operation x * y = y−1x f(y) defines a f-quandle structure on G.

  3. Consider the Dihedral quandle Rn, where n ≥ 2, and let f be an automorphism of Rn. Then f is given by f(x) = ax+b, for some invertible element a ∈ ℤn and some b ∈ ℤn [16]. The binary operation x * y = f(2yx) = 2ayax + b (mod n) gives a f-quandle structure called the Dihedral f-quandle.

  4. Any ℤ[T± 1, S]-module M is a f-quandle with x * y = Tx+Sy, x,yM with TS = ST and f(x) = (S+T)x, called an Alexander f-quandle.

Remark 2.4

Axioms of Definition 2.1 give the following identity,

(xy)(zz)=(xz)(yz).

We note that the two medial terms in this equation are swapped (resembling the mediality condition of a quandle). Note also that the mediality in the general context may not be satisfied for f-quandles. For example one can check that the f-quandle given in item (2) of Examples is not medial.

2.2 Ternary and n-ary f-quandles

Now we introduce and discuss the analogous notion of a f-quandle in the ternary setting and more generally in the n-ary setting.

Definition 2.5

Let Q be a set, α be a morphism and T: Q × Q × QQ be a ternary operation on Q. The operation T is said to be right f-distributive with respect to α if it satisfies the following condition for all x,y,z,u,vQ

T(T(x,y,z),α(u),α(v))=T(T(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)).(4)

The previous condition is called right f-distributivity.

Remark 2.6

Using the diagonal map D: QQ × Q × Q = Q× 3such that D(x) = (x,x,x), equation (4) can be written, as a map from Q× 5to Q, in the following form

T(T×α×α)=T(T×T×T)ρ(id×id×id×D×D),(5)

where id stands for the identity map. In the whole paper we denote by ρ:Q× 9Q× 9the map defined as ρ = p6,8p3,7p2,4where pi,jis the transposition ith and jth elements, i.e.

ρ(x1,,x9)=(x1,x4,x7,x2,x5,x8,x3,x6,x9).(6)

Definition 2.7

Let T: Q × Q × QQ be a ternary operation on a set Q. The triple (Q,T,α) is said to be a ternary f-shelf if the identity (4) holds. If, in addition, for all a,bQ, the map Ra,b:QQgiven byRa,b(x) = T(x,a,b) is invertible, then (Q,T,α) is said to be a ternary f-rack. If further T satisfies T(x,x,x) = α(x), for all xQ, then (Q,T, α) is called a ternary f-quandle.

Remark 2.8

Using the right translation Ra,b : QQ defined as Ra,b(x) = T(x, a, b), the identity(4)can be written asRα(u),α(v)Ry,z=RRu,v(y),Ru,v(z)Ru,v.

Example 2.9

Let (Q,*,f) be a f-quandle and define a ternary operation on Q by

T(x,y,z)=(xy)f(z),x,y,zQ.

It is straightforward to see that (Q, T, α) is a ternary f-quandle where α = ff. Note that in this case Ra,b = RbRa. We will say that this ternary f-quandle is induced by a (binary) quandle.

Remark 2.10

Binary f-quandles are related to ternary f-quandles when α = ff. Also, ternary operations T lead to binary operations by setting for example x*y = T (x,y,y).

Example 2.11

Let (M,*,f) be an Alexander f-quandle, then the ternary f-quandle (M, T,α) coming from M, has the operation T(x,y,z) = Px+Qy+Rz where P, Q, R commutes with each other and α (x) = (P + Q + R)x. It is also called affine ternary f-quandle.

Example 2.12

Any group G with the ternary operation T(x,y,z) = f(xy−1z) gives an example of ternary f-quandle. This is called f heap (sometimes also called a groud) of the group G.

A morphism of ternary quandles is a map ϕ: (Q, T) → (Q′,T′) such that

ϕ(T(x,y,z))=T(ϕ(x),ϕ(y),ϕ(z)).

A bijective ternary quandle endomorphism is called ternary f-quandle automorphism.

Therefore, we have a category whose objects are ternary f-quandles and morphisms as defined above.

As in the case of the binary quandle there is a notion of medial ternary quandle

Definition 2.13

([28, 29]). A ternary quandle (Q,T, α) is said to be medial if for all a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, kQ, the following identity is satisfied

T(T(a,b,c),T(d,e,f),T(g,h,k))=T(T(a,d,g),T(b,e,h),T(c,f,k)).(7)

This definition of mediality can be written in term of the following commutative diagram

Example 2.14

Every affine ternary f-quandle, defined in Example 2.11, is medial. That is, condition (2.13) is satisfied. Indeed the left hand side (LHS) of the mediality condition is shown below to equal the right hand side (RHS):

LHS=P(Pa+Qb+Rc)+Q(Pd+Qe+Rf)+R(Pg+Qh+Rk)=P2a+PQb+PRc+QPd+Q2e+QRf+RPg+RQh+R2k=P(Pa+Qd+Rg)+Q(Pb+Qe+Rh)+R(Pc+Qf+Rk)=RHS.

We generalize the notion of ternary f-quandle to n-ary setting.

Definition 2.15

An n-ary distributive set is a triple (Q,T, α) where Q is a set, α: QQ is a morphism and T: Q× nQ is an n-ary operation satisfying the following conditions:

  1. T(T(x1,,xn),α(u1),,α(un1))=T(T(x1,u1,,un1),T(x2,u1,,un1),,T(xn,u1,,un1)),

    xi,uiQ (f-distributivity).

  2. For all a1,⋯,an − 1Q, the map Ra1,⋯,an−1:QQ given by

    Ra1,,an1(x)=T(x,a1,,an1)

    is invertible.

  3. For all xQ,

    T(x,,x)=α(x).

If T satisfies only condition (1), then (Q,T, α) is said to be an n-ary f-shelf. If both conditions (1) and (2) are satisfied then (Q,T, α) is said to be an n-ary f-rack. If all three conditions (1), (2) and (3) are satisfied then (Q,T, α) is said to be an n-ary f-quandle.

Example 2.16

Let (Q,*,f) be an f-quandle and define an n-ary twisted operation on Q by

T(x1,x2,,xn)=(((x1x2)f(x3))f2(x4)))fn2(xn)xiQ,

where i = 1, ⋯, n.

It is straightforward to see that (Q, T, α) is an n-ary f-quandle where α = fn−1.

Example 2.17

Let (M,*,f) be an Alexander f-quandle, then the n-ary f-quandle (M, T,α) coming from M has the operation T(x1, ⋯, xn) = S1x1+S2x2+ ⋯ +Sn xn, where Si, i = 1, ⋯, n commutes with each other and α (x) = (S1 + S2 + ⋯ + Sn)x.

Definition 2.18

An n-ary quandle (Q,T, α) is said to be medial if for all xijQ, 1 ≤ i,jn, the following identity is satisfied

T(T(x11,x12,,x1n),T(x21,x22,,x2n),,T(xn1,xn2,,xnn))=T(T(x11,x21,,xn1),T(x12,x22,,xn2),,T(x1n,x2n,,xnn)).

3 Yau twist

The following proposition provides a way of constructing new n-ary f-shelf (resp. f-rack, f-quandle) along a shelf morphism. In particular, given an n-ary shelf (resp. rack, quandle) and a shelf morphism, one may obtain an n-ary f-shelf (resp. f-rack, f-quandle). Recall that this construction was introduced first by Yau to deform a Lie algebra to a Hom-Lie algebra along a Lie algebra morphism. It was generalized to different situation, in particular to n-ary algebras in [9].

Proposition 3.1

Let (Q,T, α) be an n-ary f-shelf (resp. f-rack, f-quandle) and β: QQ a shelf morphism. Then (Q,βT, βα) is an n-ary f-shelf (resp. f-rack, f-quandle).

Proof

  1. LHS(I)=βT(βT(x1,,xn),βα(u1),,βα(un1))=βT(T(β(x1),,β(xn)),α(β(u1)),,α(β(un1)))=T(β(T(β(x1),,β(xn))),β(α(β(u1))),,β(α(β(un1))))=T(T(β2(x1),,β2(xn)),α(β2(u1)),,α(β2(un1)))=T[T{β2(x1),β2(u1),,β2(un1)},T{β2(x2),β2(u1),,β2(un1)},,T{β2(xn),β2(u1),,β2(un1)}]=T[T{β2(x1,u1,,un1)},T{β2(x2,u1,,un1)},,T{β2(xn,u1,,un1)}][I]=βT[T{β(x1,u1,,un1)},T{β(x2,u1,,un1)},,T{β(xn,u1,,un1)}]=βT(βT(x1,u1,,un1),βT(x2,u1,,un1),,βT(xn,u1,,un1))=RHS(I),xi,uiQ.

    Therefore, (Q, βT, βα) is an n-ary f-shelf.

  2. For all a1,⋯,an−1Q, the map Rβ(a1),⋯,β(an−1):QQ given by

    Rβ(a1),,β(an1)(x)=T(β(x),β(a1),,β(an1))=βT(x,a1,,an1)

    is invertible. Therefore, (Q, βT, βα) is an n-ary f-rack.

  3. For all xQ,

    βT(x,,x)=T(β(x),,β(x))=βα(x).

    Therefore, (Q, βT, βα) is an n-ary f-quandle. □

Example 3.2

Let (Q,*) be a quandle and define a ternary operation on Q by T(x,y,z) = (x * y) * z,∀ x,y,zQ. It is straightforward to see that (Q,T) is a ternary quandle. Let α: QQ be a morphism. Then (Q, αT, α) is a ternary f-quandle.

Example 3.3

Let (M,T) be an Alexander ternary quandle, where T(x,y,z) = t2x+t(1 − t)y+(1 − t)z. Let f: MM be a morphism. Then (M, fT, f) is a ternary f-quandle.

Example 3.4

Let M be a ℤ[t,t−1]-module. Consider the ternary quandle (M,T) defined by the operation T(x,y,z) = t2x+t(1 − t)y+(1 − t)z, where x,y,zM. For any map ϕ:MM satisfying ϕT = T ∘ (ϕϕϕ), we associate a new ternary f-quandle (M,ϕT, ϕ).

Example 3.5

Let M be any Λ-module whereΛ = ℤ[t± 1,s]. The operation T(x,y,z) = tx+sy+kz where α(x) = (t+s+k)x defines a ternary f-quandle structure on M. Let f: MM be a morphism. Then (M, fT, fα) is a ternary f-quandle.

Example 3.6

Let (Q,*) be a quandle and define a n-ary operation on Q by T(x1, x2, ⋯, xn) = ((… (x1 * x2) * x3)* x4)* …) * xn), ∀ xiQ where i = 1, ⋯, n. Let f: QQ be a morphism. It is straightforward to see that (Q, fT, f) is an n-ary f-quandle.

Example 3.7

Let (Q = ℤn,T) be a ternary quandle defined by T(x,y,z) = 2z − 2y+x. Let f: ℤn → ℤnbe a quandle morphism defined by f(x) = mx, where m ∈ ℤn. According to the previous proposition (Q, fT, f) is a ternary f-quandle, with a new operation fT (x,y,z) = m(2z − 2y+x).

4 Classification of ternary f-quandles of low orders

We developed a simple program to compute all ternary f-quandles of orders 2 and 3. The results of which we used to obtain the complete list of isomorphism classes.

For order 2, we found 6 distinct isomorphism classes, each of which can be defined over ℤ2 by one of the following maps: τ(x,y,z) = x, τ(x,y,z) = x+1, τ(x,y,z) = x+y, τ(x,y,z) = x+z, τ(x,y,z) = x+y+z, or τ(x,y,z) = x+y+z+1.

In the case of order 3, we found a total of 84 distinct isomorphism classes, including 30 ternary quandles (those such that f = idQ).

Since for each fixed a,b, the map xτ(x,a,b) is a permutation, in the following table we describe all ternary f-quandles of order three in terms of the columns of the Cayley table. Each column is a permutation of the elements and is described in standard notation, that is by explicitly writing it in terms of products of disjoint cycles. Thus for a given z we give the permutations resulting from fixing y = 1, 2, 3. For example, the ternary set τ12(x,y,z) with the Cayley Table 1 will be represented with the permutations (1),(12),(13); (12),(1),(23); (13),(23),(1). This will appear in Table 3 as shown in Table 2.

Table 1

Cayley representation of ternary quandle τ12

z = 1z = 2z = 3
123211311
212123232
331332123

Table 2

Permutation representation of ternary quandle τ12

τz = 1z = 2z = 3
τ12(1),(12),(13)(12),(1),(23)(13),(23),(1)

Table 3

Isomorphism classes of ternary quandles of order 3

z = 1z = 2z = 3z = 1z = 2z = 3
(1),(1),(1)(1),(1),(1)(1),(1),(1)(1),(1),(1)(1),(1),(1)(1),(1),(1 2)
(1),(1),(1)(1),(1),(1)(1 2),(1 2),(1)(1),(1),(1)(1),(1),(1)(1 2),(1 2),(1 2)
(1),(1),(1)(1),(1),(2 3)(1),(2 3),(1)(1),(1),(1)(2 3),(1),(1)(2 3),(1),(1)
(1),(1),(1)(2 3),(1),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(1)(1),(1),(1 2)(1),(1),(1 2)(1),(1),(1 2)
(1),(1),(1 2)(1),(1),(1 2)(1 2),(1 2),(1)(1),(1),(1 2)(1),(1),(1 2)(1 2),(1 2),(1 2)
(1),(1),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1),(1)(1),(1 2 3),(1)(1),(1),(1 3 2)(1 3 2),(1),(1)(1),(1 3 2),(1)
(1),(1),(1 3)(1),(1 3),(1)(1 3),(1),(1)(1),(1),(1 3)(1 3),(1),(1 3)(1 3),(1),(1)
(1),(1),(1 3)(1 3),(1 3),(1 3)(1 3),(1),(1)(1),(2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(1),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(1)
(1),(2 3),(2 3)(1 3),(1),(1 3)(1 2),(1 2),(1)(1),(1 2),(1 2)(1 2),(1),(1 2)(1),(1),(1 2)
(1),(1 2),(1 2)(1 2),(1),(1 2)(1 2),(1 2),(1 2)(1),(1 2),(1 3)(1 2),(1),(2 3)(1 3),(2 3),(1)
(1),(1 2 3),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 2 3),(1)(1),(1 2 3),(1 3 2)(1 3 2),(1),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 3 2),(1)
(1),(1 3 2),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1),(1 3 2)(1 3 2),(1 2 3),(1)(1),(1 3),(1 2)(2 3),(1),(1 2)(2 3),(1 3),(1)
(2 3),(1),(1)(1),(1 3),(1)(1),(1),(1 2)(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)(1 3),(1 3),(1 3)(1 2),(1 2),(1 2)
(2 3),(1 2),(1 3)(1 2),(1 3),(2 3)(1 3),(2 3),(1 2)(2 3),(1 2 3),(1 3 2)(1 3 2),(1 3),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 3 2),(1 2)
(2 3),(1 3 2),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 3),(1 3 2)(1 3 2),(1 2 3),(1 2)(2 3),(1 3),(1 2)(2 3),(1 3),(1 2)(2 3),(1 3),(1 2)

Table 4 lists the isomorphism classes, the first table lists those that such that f = idQ, and the second table lists classes with members with a non-trivial twisting.

Table 4

Isomorphism classes of ternary f-quandles of order 3

z = 1z = 2z = 3z = 1z = 2z = 3
(1),(1),(1)(1),(2 3),(1)(1),(1),(2 3)(1),(1),(1)(1),(2 3),(2 3)(1),(2 3),(2 3)
(1),(1),(1)(2 3),(2 3),(1)(2 3),(1),(2 3)(1),(1),(1)(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)
(1),(1),(1)(1 2 3),(1 2 3),(1 2 3)(1 3 2),(1 3 2),(1 3 2)(1),(1),(1)(1 3 2),(1 3 2),(1 3 2)(1 2 3),(1 2 3),(1 2 3)
(1),(1),(1 2 3)(1),(1 3 2),(1 3 2)(1 2 3),(1 3 2),(1 2 3)(1),(1),(1 3 2)(1 2 3),(1 3 2),(1 3 2)(1 2 3),(1),(1 2 3)
(1),(2 3),(2 3)(1),(2 3),(1)(1),(1),(2 3)(1),(2 3),(2 3)(1),(2 3),(2 3)(1),(2 3),(2 3)
(1),(2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(1)(2 3),(1),(2 3)(1),(2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)
(1),(2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(1 2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(1 3 2)(1),(1 2),(1 3)(1 3),(1 2 3),(1 2)(1 2),(1 3),(1 3 2)
(1),(1 2 3),(1 2 3)(1),(1 3 2),(1)(1 3 2),(1 3 2),(1 2 3)(1),(1 2 3),(1 3 2)(1),(1 2 3),(1 3 2)(1),(1 2 3),(1 3 2)
(1),(1 2 3),(1 3 2)(1 2 3),(1 3 2),(1)(1 3 2),(1),(1 2 3)(1),(1 3 2),(1 2 3)(1),(1 3 2),(1 2 3)(1),(1 3 2),(1 2 3)
(1),(1 3 2),(1 2 3)(1 3 2),(1 2 3),(1)(1 2 3),(1),(1 3 2)(1),(1 3),(1 2)(1 2),(1 2 3),(1 3)(1 3),(1 2),(1 3 2)
(2 3),(1),(1)(1),(2 3),(1)(1),(1),(2 3)(2 3),(1),(1)(1),(2 3),(2 3)(1),(2 3),(2 3)
(2 3),(1),(1)(2 3),(2 3),(1)(2 3),(1),(2 3)(2 3),(1),(1)(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)
(2 3),(1),(1)(1 2 3),(2 3),(1 2 3)(1 3 2),(1 3 2),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)(1),(2 3),(1)(1),(1),(2 3)
(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)(1),(2 3),(2 3)(1),(2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(1)(2 3),(1),(2 3)
(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)(1 2),(1 2),(1 2)(1 3),(1 3),(1 3)
(2 3),(1 2),(1 3)(2 3),(1 2),(1 3)(2 3),(1 2),(1 3)(2 3),(1 2),(1 3)(1 3),(2 3),(1 2)(1 2),(1 3),(2 3)
(2 3),(1 2 3),(1 3 2)(1),(2 3),(1 3 2)(1),(1 2 3),(2 3)(2 3),(1 3 2),(1 2 3)(1 3 2),(2 3),(1)(1 2 3),(1),(2 3)
(2 3),(1 3),(1 2)(1 2),(2 3),(1 3)(1 3),(1 2),(2 3)(2 3),(1 3),(1 2)(1 3),(1 2),(2 3)(1 2),(2 3),(1 3)
(1 2),(1),(1 3 2)(1 3 2),(2 3),(1)(1),(1 3 2),(1 3)(1 2),(2 3),(1 3)(1 2),(2 3),(1 3)(1 2),(2 3),(1 3)
(1 2),(1 2),(1 2)(2 3),(2 3),(2 3)(1 3),(1 3),(1 3)(1 2),(1 2 3),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(2 3),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 2 3),(1 3)
(1 2),(1 3 2),(1)(1),(2 3),(1 3 2)(1 3 2),(1),(1 3)(1 2),(1 3),(2 3)(1 3),(2 3),(1 2)(2 3),(1 2),(1 3)
(1 2 3),(1),(1)(1),(1 2 3),(1)(1),(1),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 2 3),(1)(1),(1 2 3),(1 2 3)
(1 2 3),(1),(1 3 2)(1 3 2),(1 2 3),(1)(1),(1 3 2),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(2 3),(1 3)(1 2),(1 2 3),(1 3)(1 2),(2 3),(1 2 3)
(1 2 3),(1 2),(1 2)(2 3),(1 2 3),(2 3)(1 3),(1 3),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 2 3),(1)(1),(1 2 3),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1),(1 2 3)
(1 2 3),(1 2 3),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 2 3),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 2 3),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 2 3),(1 3 2)(1 3 2),(1 2 3),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 3 2),(1 2 3)
(1 2 3),(1 3 2),(1)(1),(1 2 3),(1 3 2)(1 3 2),(1),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 3 2),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 2 3),(1 3 2)(1 3 2),(1 2 3),(1 2 3)
(1 2 3),(1 3 2),(1 3 2)(1 3 2),(1 2 3),(1 3 2)(1 3 2),(1 3 2),(1 2 3)(1 2 3),(1 3),(2 3)(1 3),(1 2 3),(1 2)(2 3),(1 2),(1 2 3)

5 Extensions of f-quandles and modules

In this section we investigate extensions of ternary f-quandles. We define generalized ternary f-quandle 2-cocycles and give examples. We give an explicit formula relating group 2-cocycles to ternary f-quandle 2-cocycles, when the ternary f-quandle is constructed from a group.

5.1 Extensions with dynamical cocycles and extensions with constant cocycles

Proposition 5.1

Let (X, T, F) be a ternary f-quandle and A be a non-empty set. Let α: X × X × XFun(A × A × A, A) be a function and f, g: AA are maps. Then, X × A is a ternary f-quandle by the operation T((x,a), (y,b), (z,c)) = (T(x,y,z), αx,y,z(a, b,c)), where T(x, y, z) denotes the ternary f-quandle product in X, if and only if α satisfies the following conditions:

  1. αx,x,x(a, a,a) = g(a) for all xX and aA;

  2. αx, y, z(−, b, c) : AA is a bijection for all x, y, zX and for all b, cA;

  3. αT(x, y, z), f(u), f(v)(αx, y, z(a, b, c), g(d), g(e)) = αT(x, u, v), T(y, u, v), T(z, u, v)(αx, u, v(a, d, e), αy, u, v(b, d, e), αz, u, v(c, d, e)) for all x, y, z, u, vXanda, b, c, d, eA.

Such function α is called a dynamical ternary f-quandle cocycle or dynamical ternary f-rack cocycle (when it satisfies above conditions).

The ternary f-quandle constructed above is denoted by X ×αA, and it is called extension of X by a dynamical cocycle α. The construction is general, as Andruskiewitch and Graña showed in [11].

Assume (X, T, F) is a ternary f-quandle and α be a dynamical f-cocycle. For xX, define Tx(a, b, c) := αx,x,x(a, b, c). Then it is easy to see that (A, Tx, F) is a ternary f-quandle for all xX.

Remark 5.2

When x = y = z in condition (3) above, we get

αf(x),f(u),f(v)(αx,x,x(a,b,c),g(d),g(e))=αT(x,u,v),T(x,u,v),T(x,u,v)(αx,u,v(a,d,e),αx,u,v(b,d,e),αx,u,v(c,d,e))

for all a, b, c, d, eA.

Now, we discuss Extensions with constant cocycles. Let (X, T, F) be a ternary f-rack and λ: X × X × XSA where SA is group of permutations of X.

If λT(x, y, z), F(u), F(v)λx, y, z = λT(x, u, v), T(y, u, v), T(z, u, v)λx, u, v we say λ is a constant ternary f-rack cocycle.

If (X, T, F) is a ternary f-quandle and further satisfies λx,x,x = id for all xX, then we say λ is a constant ternary f-quandle cocycle.

5.2 Modules over ternary f-rack

Definition 5.3

Let (X, T, F) be a ternary f-rack, A be an abelian group and f, g: XX be homomorphisms. A structure of X-module on A consists of a family of automorphisms (ηijk)i, j, kXand a family of endomorphisms (τijk)i, j, kXof A satisfying the following conditions:

ηT(x,y,z),f(u),f(v)ηx,y,z=ηT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)ηx,u,v(8)
ηT(x,y,z),f(u),f(v)τx,y,z=τT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)ηy,u,v(9)
ηT(x,y,z),f(u),f(v)μx,y,z=μT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)ηz,u,v(10)
τT(x,y,z),f(u),f(v)g=ηT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)τx,u,v+τT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)τy,u,v+μT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)τz,u,v(11)
μT(x,y,z),f(u),f(v)g=ηT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)μx,u,v+τT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)μy,u,v+μT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)μz,u,v(12)

In the n-ary case, we generalized the above definition as follows.

Definition 5.4

Let (X, T, F) be an n-ary f-rack, A be an abelian group and f, g: XX be homomorphisms. A structure of X-module on A consists of a family of automorphisms (ηijk)i, j, kXand a family of endomorphisms(τijki)i,j,kXof A satisfying the following conditions:

ηT(x1,x2,...,xn),f(y2),f(y3),...,f(yn)ηx1,x2,...,xn=ηT(x1,y2,...,yn),T(x2,y2,...,yn),...,T(xn,y2,...,yn)ηx1,y2,...,yn(13)
ηT(x1,x2,...,xn),f(y2),f(y3),...,f(yn)τx1,x2,...,xni=τT(x1,y2,...,yn),T(x2,y2,...,yn),...,T(xn,y2,...,yn)iηxi,y2,...,yn(14)
τT(x1,x2,...,xn),f(y2),f(y3),...,f(yn)ig=ηT(x1,y2,...,yn),T(x2,y2,...,yn),...,T(xn,y2,...,yn)τx1,y2,...,yni+j=1n1τT(x1,y2,...,yn),T(x2,y2,...,yn),...,T(xn,y2,...,yn)jτxj,y2,...,yni.(15)

Remark 5.5

If X is a ternary f-quandle, a ternary f-quandle structure of X-module on A is a structure of an X-module further satisfies

τf(x),f(u),f(v)g=(ηT(x,u,v),T(x,u,v),T(x,u,v)+τT(x,u,v),T(x,u,v),T(x,u,v)+μT(x,u,v),T(x,u,v),T(x,u,v))τx,u,v(16)

and

μf(x),f(u),f(v)g=(ηT(x,u,v),T(x,u,v),T(x,u,v)+τT(x,u,v),T(x,u,v),T(x,u,v)+μT(x,u,v),T(x,u,v),T(x,u,v))μx,u,v.(17)

Furthermore, if f, g = id maps, then it satisfies

ηT(x,u,v),T(x,u,v),T(x,u,v)+τT(x,u,v),T(x,u,v),T(x,u,v)+μT(x,u,v),T(x,u,v),T(x,u,v)=id.

Remark 5.6

When x = y = z in(8), we get

ηf(x),f(u),f(v)ηx,x,x=ηT(x,u,v),T(x,u,v),T(x,u,v)ηx,u,v.

Example 5.7

Let A be a non-empty set and (X, T, F) be a ternary f-quandle, and κ be a generalized 2-cocycle. For a, b, cA, let

αx,y,z(a,b,c)=ηx,y,z(a)+τx,y,z(b)+μx,y,z(c)+κx,y,z.

Then, it can be verified directly that α is a dynamical cocycle and the following relations hold:

ηT(x,y,z),f(u),f(v)ηx,y,z=ηT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)ηx,u,v(18)
ηT(x,y,z),f(u),f(v)τx,y,z=τT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)ηy,u,v(19)
ηT(x,y,z),f(u),f(v)μx,y,z=μT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)ηz,u,v(20)
τT(x,y,z),f(u),f(v)g=ηT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)τx,u,v+τT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)τy,u,v+μT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)τz,u,v(21)
μT(x,y,z),f(u),f(v)g=ηT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)μx,u,v+τT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)μy,u,v+μT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)μz,u,v(22)
ηT(x,y,z),f(u),f(v)κx,y,z+κT(x,y,z),f(u),f(v)=ηT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)κx,u,v+τT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)κy,u,v+μT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)κz,u,v+κT(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)(23)

Definition 5.8

When κ further satisfies κx,x,x = 0 in (23) for any xX, we call it a generalized ternary f-quandle 2-cocycle.

Recall that the quandle algebra of an f-quandle (X, ⊲, f) is a ℤ-algebra ℤ(X) presented by generators as in [11] with relations (8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14).

Example 5.9

Let (X,T, F) be a ternary f-quandle and A be an abelian group. Set ηx, y, z = τx, y, z, μx, y, z = 0, κx, y, z = ϕ(x, y, z). Then ϕ is a 2-cocycle. That is,

ϕ(x,y,z)+ϕ(T(x,y,z),f(u),f(v))=ϕ(x,u,v)+ϕ(y,u,v)+ϕ(T(x,u,v),T(y,u,v),T(z,u,v)).

Example 5.10

Let Γ = ℤ[P,Q,R] denote the ring of Laurent polynomials. Then any Γ-module M is a ℤ(X)-module for any ternary f-quandle (X, T, F) by ηx, y, z(a) = Pa,τx, y,z(b) = Qb and μx, y, z(c) = Rc for anyx, y, zX.

Definition 5.11

A set G equipped with a ternary operator T: G × G × GG is said to be a ternary group (G, T) if it satisfies the following condition:

  1. T(T(x, y, z), u, v) = T(x, T(y, z, u), v) = T(x, y, T(z, u, v)) (associativity),

  2. T(e, x, e) = T(x, e, e) = T(e, e, x) = x (existence of identity element),

  3. T(x, y, y) = T(y, x, y) = T(y, y, x) = e (existence of inverse element).

Example 5.12

Here we provide an example of a ternary f-quandle module and explicit formula of the ternary f-quandle 2-cocycle obtained from a group 2-cocycle. Let G be a group and let 0 → AEG → 1 be a short exact sequence of groups where E = AθG by a group 2-cocycle θ and A is an Abelian group.

The multiplication rule in E is given by (a, x) ⋅ (b, y) ⋅ (c, z) = (a + xb + yc + θ(x, y, z), T(x, y, z)), where xb means the action of A on G. Recall that the group 3-cocycle condition is

θ(x,y,z)+xθ(y,z,u)+θ(x,yz,u)=θ(xy,z,u)+θ(x,y,zu).

Now, let X = G be a ternary f-quandle with the operation T(x, y, z) = f(xy−1z) and let g: AA be a map on A so that we have a map F: EE given by F(a,x) = (g(a), f(x)). Therefore the group E becomes a ternary f-quandle with the operation

T((a,x),(b,y),(c,z))=F((a,x)(b,y)1(c,z)).

Explicit computations give that ηx, y, z(a) = g(a), τx, y, z(b) = −2xy−1g(b), μx, y, z = y−1g(c) and κx, y, z = g[θ(xy, y, y−1) − θ(xy−1, y, y) + θ(xy, y−1, y) + 2θ(x, y, e) − θ(x, y2, y−1) − θ(x, y−1, y2) + θ(x, y−1, y) − θ(x, y,y) − θ(x, y, y−1) + θ(x, y−1, z)].

6 Cohomology theory of n-ary f-quandles

In this section we present a general cohomology for n-ary f-quandles, and include specific examples, including the generalized ternary case, and specific examples in both the ternary and binary case.

Let (X, T, f) be a ternary f-rack where f: XX is a ternary f-rack morphism. We will define the generalized cohomology theory of f-racks as follows:

For a sequence of elements (x1, x2, x3, x4,…, x2p+1) ∈ X2p+1 define

[x1,x2,x3,x4,,x2p+1]=T(T(T(T(x1,x2,x3),f(x4),f(x5)),f2(x6),f2(x7))))fp1(x2p),fp1(x2p+1)).

More generally, if we are considering an n-ary f-rack (X,T,f), using the same notation T for the n-ary operation, we define the bracket as follows:

[x1,x2,x3,x4,,x(n1)p+1]=T(T(T(x1,,xn),f(xn+1),,f(x2n1)),fp1(xp(n2)+1),,fp1(x(n1)p+1))

Notice that for i = (p − 1)j+1 < n, we have

[x1,x2,x3,x4,,xn]=T([x1,,xi1,xi+p,,xn],fi2[xi,xi+p,,xn],fi2[xi+1,xi+p,,xn],,fi2[xi+p1,xi+p,,xn]

This relation is obtained by applying the first axiom of f-quandles pi times, first grouping the first i − 1 terms together, then iterating this process, again grouping and iterating each.

We provide cohomology theory for the f-rack

Theorem 6.1

Consider the free left ℤ(X)-module Cp(X) = ℤ(X)Xp with basis Xp. For an abelian group A, denote Cp(X,A):= Homℤ(X)(Cp(X),A), then the coboundary operators are defined as ∂ = p: Cp+1(X) → Cp(X) such that

pϕ(x1,,x(n1)p+1)=(1)p+1i=2p+1(1)i{η[A(i)],Fi2([B2(i)]),Fi2([B3(i)]),...,Fi2([Bn(i)])ϕ(A(i))ϕ(T(C1(i)),T(C2(i)),...,T(C(n1)i1(i)),F(x(n1)i),F(x(n1)i+1),...,F(x(n1)p+1))+(1)p+1j=1n1τ[B1(0)],[B2(0)],...,[Bn1(0)]iϕ(Bj(0)),

whereA(i)=x1,x2,...,x^(n1)i,x^(n1)i+1,...,x^(n1)(i+1),xn(i+1)i,...,x(n1)p+1,

Bk(i)=x(n1)i+k,x(n1)i+n+1,x(n1)i+2,...,x(n1)p+1,Ck(i)=xk,x(n1)i,x(n1)i+1,...,x(n1)i+n2.

Then the pair (C(X), ) defines a cohomology complex.

Proof

To prove that p+1p = 0, and thus is a coboundary map we will break the composition into pieces, using the linearity of η and τi.

First we will show that the composition of the ith term of the first summand of p with the jth term of the first summand of p+1 cancels with the (j+1)th term of the first summand of p with the ith term of the first summand of p+1 for ij. As the sign of these terms are opposite, we need only show that the compositions are equal up to their sign. For the sake of readability we will introduce the following, based on A and B above:

A(i,j)=x1,...,x^(n1)i,x^(n1)i+1,...,x^ni,xni+1,...,x(n1)j1,x^(n1)j,x^(n1)j+1,...,x^nj,...,x(n1)p+1,B(i,j)=x(n1)i+k,xni+1,xni+2,...,x^(n1)j,x^(n1)j+1,...,x^nj,...,x(n1)p+1.

Now, we can see that the composition of the ith term of the first summand of p with the jth term of the first summand of p+1 can be rewritten as follows:

η[A(i)],Fi2[B0(i)],Fi2[B1(i)],,Fi2[Bn2(i)]η[A(i,j+1)],Fj1[B0(j+1)],Fj1[B1(j+1)],,Fj1[Bn2(j+1)]=ηT([A(i,j)],Fj1[B0(j+1)],,Fj1[Bn2(j+1)]),T(Fi2[B0(i,j)],Fj1[B0(j+1)],,Fj1[Bn2(j+1)])T(Fi2[B1(i,j)],Fj1[B0(j+1)],...,Fj1[Bn2(j+1)]),,T(Fi2[Bn2(i,j)],Fj1[B0(j+1)],,Fj1[Bn2(j+1)])η[A(i,j+1)],Fj1[B0(j+1)],Fj1[B1(j+1)],,Fj1[Bn2(j+1)]=ηT([A(i,j)],Fi2[B0(i,j)],,Fi2[Bn2(i,j)]),Fj1[B0(j+1)],,Fj1[Bn2(j+1)]η[A(i,j)],Fi2[B0(i,j)],,Fi2[Bn2(i,j)]=η[A(j+1)],Fj1[B0(j+1)],Fj1[B1(j+1)],,Fj1[Bn2(j+1)]η[A(i,j)],Fi2[B0(i,j)],,Fi2[Bn2(i,j)].

This is precisely the (j + 1)th term of the first summand of p with the ith term of the first summand of p+1.

Similar manipulations show that the composition of τi from p with the ith term of the first sum of p+1 cancels with the composition of the (i + 1)th term of the first sum of p with τi from p+1. For the sake of brevity we will omit showing these manipulations, but the table below presents all relations which are canceled by similar manipulations.

In the table, ηi represents the ith summand of the first sum, ∘i represents the ith summand of the second sum, with order of composition determining its origin in δp or δp+1.

All these relations leave n + 1 remaining terms, which cancel via the third axiom from the Definition.

We present the ternary case below, using the convention from the previous section, so τ and μ representing τ1 and τ2 respectively.

Example 6.2

By specializing n = 2 in Theorem 6.1, the coboundary operator simplifies to:

ϕ(x1,,x2p+1)=i=1p(1)iη{A,B,C}ϕ(x1,,x^2i,x^2i+1,,x2p+1)i=1p(1)iϕ(T(x1,x2i,x2i+1),,T(x2i1,x2i,x2i+1),F(x2i+2),,F(x2p+1))+(1)2p+1τ[x1,x4,,x2p+1],[x2,x4,,x2p+1],[x3,,x2p+1]ϕ(x2,x4,,x2p+1)+(1)2p+1μ[x1,x4,,x2p+1],[x2,x4,,x2p+1],[x3,,x2p+1]ϕ(x3,x4,,x2p+1),

where A = [x1, …, 2i, 2i+1, …, x2p+1], B = F{i−1}[x2i,x2i+2, x2i+3, …, x2p+1], C = F{i−1}[x2i+1, x2i+2, …, x2p+1].

Specializing further in Example 6.2, we obtain the following result.

Example 6.3

In this example, we compute the first and second cohomology groups of the ternary Alexanderf-quandleX = ℤ3with coefficients in the abelian group3. For the ternaryf-quandle under consideration we haveP = 2, Q = R = 1, that isT(x1, x2, x3) = Px1 + Qx2 + Rx3andf(x) = (P + Q + R)x as inExample 2.11. Now, settingηto be the multiplication byP, τto be the multiplication byQ, andμto be the multiplication byR, we have the 1-cocycle condition forϕ: XA given by

Pϕ(x)+Qϕ(y)+Rϕ(z)ϕ(T(x,y,z))=0

and the 2-cocycle condition as

Pψ(x1,x2,x3)+ψ(T(x1,x2,x3),f(x4),f(x5))=Pψ(x1,x4,x5)+Qψ(x2,x4,x5)+Rψ(x3,x4,x5)+ψ(T(x1,x4,x5),T(x2,x4,x5),T(x3,x4,x5)).

A direct computation givesH1(X = ℤ3, A = ℤ3) is 2-dimensional with basis {2 χ0 + χ1,2χ0 + χ2. As such thedim(Im(δ1)) = 1, and additional calculation givesdim(ker(δ2)) = 3, thusH2is also 2-dimensional.

Lastly we consider a binary case, obtaining, as expected, a familiar result.

Example 6.4

Letηbe the multiplication byTandτbe the multiplication bySinExample 2.11. The 1-cocycle condition is written for a functionϕ: XA as

Tϕ(x)+Sϕ(y)ϕ(xy)=0.

Note that this means thatϕ: XA is a quandle homomorphism.

Forψ: X × XA, the 2-cocycle condition can be written as

Tψ(x1,x2)+ψ(x1x2,f(x3))=Tψ(x1,x3)+Sψ(x2,x3)+ψ(x1x3,x2x3).

In [27], the groupsH1andH2with coefficients in the abelian group3of thef-quandleX = ℤ3, T = 1, S = 2 andf(x) = 0 were computed. More precisely, H1(ℤ3,ℤ3) is 1-dimensional with a basisχ1 + 2 χ2andH2is 1-dimension with a basis {χ(1,2)χ(2,1)}.

References

[1] Nambu, Y., Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics, Phys. Rev. D (3), 7, 1973, 2405–2412, 0556-282110.1103/PhysRevD.7.2405Search in Google Scholar

[2] Takhtajan, L. A., Higher order analog of Chevalley-Eilenberg complex and deformation theory of n-gebras, Algebra i Analiz, 6, 1994, 2, 262–272, translation: St. Petersburg Math. J., 6, 1995, 2, 429–438Search in Google Scholar

[3] Okubo, S., Triple products and Yang-Baxter equation. I. Octonionic and quaternionic triple systems, J. Math. Phys., 34, 1993, 7, 3273–329110.1063/1.530076Search in Google Scholar

[4] Filippov, V. T., n-Lie algebras, Sibirsk. Mat. Zh., 26, 1985, 6, 126–140, 19110.1007/BF00969110Search in Google Scholar

[5] Elhamdadi, M., Green, M., Makhlouf, A., Ternary Distributive Structures and Quandles, Kyungpook Mathematical Journal., 56, 2016, 1-2710.5666/KMJ.2016.56.1.1Search in Google Scholar

[6] Niebrzydowski, M., On some ternary operations in knot theory, Fund. Math., 225, 2014, 1, 259–27610.4064/fm225-1-12Search in Google Scholar

[7] Hartwig, J. T., Larsson, D., Silvestrov, S. D., Deformations of Lie algebras using σ-derivations, J. Algebra, 295, 2006, 2, 314–36110.1016/j.jalgebra.2005.07.036Search in Google Scholar

[8] Makhlouf, A., Silvestrov, S. D., Hom-algebra structures, J. Gen. Lie Theory Appl., 2008, 2, 51–6410.4303/jglta/S070206Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ataguema, H., Makhlouf, A., Silvestrov, S., Generalization of n-ary Nambu algebras and beyond, J. Math. Phys., 50, 200110.1063/1.3167801Search in Google Scholar

[10] Elhamdadi, M., Nelson, S., Quandles—an introduction to the algebra of knots, Student Mathematical Library, 74, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 201510.1090/stml/074Search in Google Scholar

[11] Andruskiewitsch, N., Graña, M., From racks to pointed Hopf algebras, Adv. Math., 178, 2003, 2, 177–243.10.1016/S0001-8708(02)00071-3Search in Google Scholar

[12] Carter, J. S., Crans, A. S., Elhamdadi, M., Saito, M., Cohomology of categorical self-distributivity, J. Homotopy Relat. Struct., 3, 2008, 1, 13–63Search in Google Scholar

[13] Carter, J. S., Elhamdadi, M., Graña, M., Saito, M., Cocycle knot invariants from quandle modules and generalized quandle homology, Osaka J. Math., 42, 2005, 3, 499–541Search in Google Scholar

[14] Carter, J. S., Elhamdadi, M., Saito, M., Twisted quandle homology theory and cocycle knot invariants, Algebr. Geom. Topol., 2, 2002, 95–135 (electronic)10.2140/agt.2002.2.95Search in Google Scholar

[15] Carter, J. S., Elhamdadi, M., Nikiforou, M. A., Saito, M., Extensions of quandles and cocycle knot invariants, J. Knot Theory Ramifications, 12, 2003, 6, 725–73810.1142/S0218216503002718Search in Google Scholar

[16] Elhamdadi, M., Macquarrie, J., Restrepo, R., Automorphism groups of quandles, J. Algebra Appl., 11, 2012, 110.1142/S0219498812500089Search in Google Scholar

[17] Fenn, R., Rourke, C., Racks and links in codimension two, J. Knot Theory Ramifications, 1, 1992, 4, 343–40610.1142/S0218216592000203Search in Google Scholar

[18] Joyce, D., A classifying invariant of knots, the knot quandle, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 23, 1982, 1, 37–6510.1016/0022-4049(82)90077-9Search in Google Scholar

[19] Matveev, S. V., Distributive groupoids in knot theory, Mat. Sb. (N.S.), 119(161), 1982, 1, 78–88, 16010.1070/SM1984v047n01ABEH002630Search in Google Scholar

[20] Fregier, Y., Gohr, A., On Hom-type algebras, J. Gen. Lie Theory Appl., 4, 201010.4303/jglta/G101001Search in Google Scholar

[21] Larsson, D., Silvestrov, S. D., Quasi-hom-Lie algebras, central extensions and 2-cocycle-like identities, J. Algebra, 288, 2005, 2, 321–34410.1016/j.jalgebra.2005.02.032Search in Google Scholar

[22] Makhlouf, A., Silvestrov, S. D., Hom-algebras and Hom-coalgebras, J. Algebra Appl., 9, 2010, 4, 553–58910.1142/S0219498810004117Search in Google Scholar

[23] Makhlouf, A., Silvestrov, S. D., Notes on 1-parameter formal deformations of Hom-associative and Hom-Lie algebras, Forum Math., 22, 2010, 4, 715–73910.1515/forum.2010.040Search in Google Scholar

[24] Yau, D., The Hom-Yang-Baxter equation and Hom-Lie algebras, J. Math. Phys., 52, 2011, 510.1063/1.3571970Search in Google Scholar

[25] Yau, D., The Hom-Yang-Baxter equation, Hom-Lie algebras, and quasi-triangular bialgebras, J. Phys. A, 42, 2009, 1610.1088/1751-8113/42/16/165202Search in Google Scholar

[26] Yau, D., Hom-algebras and homology, J. Lie Theory, 19, 2009, 2, 409–421Search in Google Scholar

[27] Churchill, Indu R. U., Elhamdadi, M., Green, M., Makhlouf, A., f-Racks, f-Quandles, their Extensions and Cohomology, Journal of Algebra and its Applications., 16, 201710.1142/S0219498817502152Search in Google Scholar

[28] Borowiec, A., Dudek, W. A., Duplij, S., Basis concepts of ternary Hopf algebras, Journal of Kharkov National University, ser. Nuclei, Particles and Fields, 3, 2001, 1, 22–29Search in Google Scholar

[29] Duplij, S., Ternary Hopf Algebras, in "Symmetry in Nonlinear Mathematical Physics", A. G. Nikitin and V. M. Boyko, eds., Institute of Mathematics, Kiev., 2001, 25–34Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-04-28
Accepted: 2018-01-10
Published Online: 2018-02-08

© 2018 Churchill et. al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Algebraic proofs for shallow water bi–Hamiltonian systems for three cocycle of the semi-direct product of Kac–Moody and Virasoro Lie algebras
  3. On a viscous two-fluid channel flow including evaporation
  4. Generation of pseudo-random numbers with the use of inverse chaotic transformation
  5. Singular Cauchy problem for the general Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation
  6. Ternary and n-ary f-distributive structures
  7. On the fine Simpson moduli spaces of 1-dimensional sheaves supported on plane quartics
  8. Evaluation of integrals with hypergeometric and logarithmic functions
  9. Bounded solutions of self-adjoint second order linear difference equations with periodic coeffients
  10. Oscillation of first order linear differential equations with several non-monotone delays
  11. Existence and regularity of mild solutions in some interpolation spaces for functional partial differential equations with nonlocal initial conditions
  12. The log-concavity of the q-derangement numbers of type B
  13. Generalized state maps and states on pseudo equality algebras
  14. Monotone subsequence via ultrapower
  15. Note on group irregularity strength of disconnected graphs
  16. On the security of the Courtois-Finiasz-Sendrier signature
  17. A further study on ordered regular equivalence relations in ordered semihypergroups
  18. On the structure vector field of a real hypersurface in complex quadric
  19. Rank relations between a {0, 1}-matrix and its complement
  20. Lie n superderivations and generalized Lie n superderivations of superalgebras
  21. Time parallelization scheme with an adaptive time step size for solving stiff initial value problems
  22. Stability problems and numerical integration on the Lie group SO(3) × R3 × R3
  23. On some fixed point results for (s, p, α)-contractive mappings in b-metric-like spaces and applications to integral equations
  24. On algebraic characterization of SSC of the Jahangir’s graph 𝓙n,m
  25. A greedy algorithm for interval greedoids
  26. On nonlinear evolution equation of second order in Banach spaces
  27. A primal-dual approach of weak vector equilibrium problems
  28. On new strong versions of Browder type theorems
  29. A Geršgorin-type eigenvalue localization set with n parameters for stochastic matrices
  30. Restriction conditions on PL(7, 2) codes (3 ≤ |𝓖i| ≤ 7)
  31. Singular integrals with variable kernel and fractional differentiation in homogeneous Morrey-Herz-type Hardy spaces with variable exponents
  32. Introduction to disoriented knot theory
  33. Restricted triangulation on circulant graphs
  34. Boundedness control sets for linear systems on Lie groups
  35. Chen’s inequalities for submanifolds in (κ, μ)-contact space form with a semi-symmetric metric connection
  36. Disjointed sum of products by a novel technique of orthogonalizing ORing
  37. A parametric linearizing approach for quadratically inequality constrained quadratic programs
  38. Generalizations of Steffensen’s inequality via the extension of Montgomery identity
  39. Vector fields satisfying the barycenter property
  40. On the freeness of hypersurface arrangements consisting of hyperplanes and spheres
  41. Biderivations of the higher rank Witt algebra without anti-symmetric condition
  42. Some remarks on spectra of nuclear operators
  43. Recursive interpolating sequences
  44. Involutory biquandles and singular knots and links
  45. Constacyclic codes over 𝔽pm[u1, u2,⋯,uk]/〈 ui2 = ui, uiuj = ujui
  46. Topological entropy for positively weak measure expansive shadowable maps
  47. Oscillation and non-oscillation of half-linear differential equations with coeffcients determined by functions having mean values
  48. On 𝓠-regular semigroups
  49. One kind power mean of the hybrid Gauss sums
  50. A reduced space branch and bound algorithm for a class of sum of ratios problems
  51. Some recurrence formulas for the Hermite polynomials and their squares
  52. A relaxed block splitting preconditioner for complex symmetric indefinite linear systems
  53. On f - prime radical in ordered semigroups
  54. Positive solutions of semipositone singular fractional differential systems with a parameter and integral boundary conditions
  55. Disjoint hypercyclicity equals disjoint supercyclicity for families of Taylor-type operators
  56. A stochastic differential game of low carbon technology sharing in collaborative innovation system of superior enterprises and inferior enterprises under uncertain environment
  57. Dynamic behavior analysis of a prey-predator model with ratio-dependent Monod-Haldane functional response
  58. The points and diameters of quantales
  59. Directed colimits of some flatness properties and purity of epimorphisms in S-posets
  60. Super (a, d)-H-antimagic labeling of subdivided graphs
  61. On the power sum problem of Lucas polynomials and its divisible property
  62. Existence of solutions for a shear thickening fluid-particle system with non-Newtonian potential
  63. On generalized P-reducible Finsler manifolds
  64. On Banach and Kuratowski Theorem, K-Lusin sets and strong sequences
  65. On the boundedness of square function generated by the Bessel differential operator in weighted Lebesque Lp,α spaces
  66. On the different kinds of separability of the space of Borel functions
  67. Curves in the Lorentz-Minkowski plane: elasticae, catenaries and grim-reapers
  68. Functional analysis method for the M/G/1 queueing model with single working vacation
  69. Existence of asymptotically periodic solutions for semilinear evolution equations with nonlocal initial conditions
  70. The existence of solutions to certain type of nonlinear difference-differential equations
  71. Domination in 4-regular Knödel graphs
  72. Stepanov-like pseudo almost periodic functions on time scales and applications to dynamic equations with delay
  73. Algebras of right ample semigroups
  74. Random attractors for stochastic retarded reaction-diffusion equations with multiplicative white noise on unbounded domains
  75. Nontrivial periodic solutions to delay difference equations via Morse theory
  76. A note on the three-way generalization of the Jordan canonical form
  77. On some varieties of ai-semirings satisfying xp+1x
  78. Abstract-valued Orlicz spaces of range-varying type
  79. On the recursive properties of one kind hybrid power mean involving two-term exponential sums and Gauss sums
  80. Arithmetic of generalized Dedekind sums and their modularity
  81. Multipreconditioned GMRES for simulating stochastic automata networks
  82. Regularization and error estimates for an inverse heat problem under the conformable derivative
  83. Transitivity of the εm-relation on (m-idempotent) hyperrings
  84. Learning Bayesian networks based on bi-velocity discrete particle swarm optimization with mutation operator
  85. Simultaneous prediction in the generalized linear model
  86. Two asymptotic expansions for gamma function developed by Windschitl’s formula
  87. State maps on semihoops
  88. 𝓜𝓝-convergence and lim-inf𝓜-convergence in partially ordered sets
  89. Stability and convergence of a local discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for the general Lax equation
  90. New topology in residuated lattices
  91. Optimality and duality in set-valued optimization utilizing limit sets
  92. An improved Schwarz Lemma at the boundary
  93. Initial layer problem of the Boussinesq system for Rayleigh-Bénard convection with infinite Prandtl number limit
  94. Toeplitz matrices whose elements are coefficients of Bazilevič functions
  95. Epi-mild normality
  96. Nonlinear elastic beam problems with the parameter near resonance
  97. Orlicz difference bodies
  98. The Picard group of Brauer-Severi varieties
  99. Galoisian and qualitative approaches to linear Polyanin-Zaitsev vector fields
  100. Weak group inverse
  101. Infinite growth of solutions of second order complex differential equation
  102. Semi-Hurewicz-Type properties in ditopological texture spaces
  103. Chaos and bifurcation in the controlled chaotic system
  104. Translatability and translatable semigroups
  105. Sharp bounds for partition dimension of generalized Möbius ladders
  106. Uniqueness theorems for L-functions in the extended Selberg class
  107. An effective algorithm for globally solving quadratic programs using parametric linearization technique
  108. Bounds of Strong EMT Strength for certain Subdivision of Star and Bistar
  109. On categorical aspects of S -quantales
  110. On the algebraicity of coefficients of half-integral weight mock modular forms
  111. Dunkl analogue of Szász-mirakjan operators of blending type
  112. Majorization, “useful” Csiszár divergence and “useful” Zipf-Mandelbrot law
  113. Global stability of a distributed delayed viral model with general incidence rate
  114. Analyzing a generalized pest-natural enemy model with nonlinear impulsive control
  115. Boundary value problems of a discrete generalized beam equation via variational methods
  116. Common fixed point theorem of six self-mappings in Menger spaces using (CLRST) property
  117. Periodic and subharmonic solutions for a 2nth-order p-Laplacian difference equation containing both advances and retardations
  118. Spectrum of free-form Sudoku graphs
  119. Regularity of fuzzy convergence spaces
  120. The well-posedness of solution to a compressible non-Newtonian fluid with self-gravitational potential
  121. On further refinements for Young inequalities
  122. Pretty good state transfer on 1-sum of star graphs
  123. On a conjecture about generalized Q-recurrence
  124. Univariate approximating schemes and their non-tensor product generalization
  125. Multi-term fractional differential equations with nonlocal boundary conditions
  126. Homoclinic and heteroclinic solutions to a hepatitis C evolution model
  127. Regularity of one-sided multilinear fractional maximal functions
  128. Galois connections between sets of paths and closure operators in simple graphs
  129. KGSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm for Multimodal Optimization based on K-Means Niching Technique and a Novel Elitism Strategy
  130. θ-type Calderón-Zygmund Operators and Commutators in Variable Exponents Herz space
  131. An integral that counts the zeros of a function
  132. On rough sets induced by fuzzy relations approach in semigroups
  133. Computational uncertainty quantification for random non-autonomous second order linear differential equations via adapted gPC: a comparative case study with random Fröbenius method and Monte Carlo simulation
  134. The fourth order strongly noncanonical operators
  135. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  136. Review of Cryptographic Schemes applied to Remote Electronic Voting systems: remaining challenges and the upcoming post-quantum paradigm
  137. Linearity in decimation-based generators: an improved cryptanalysis on the shrinking generator
  138. On dynamic network security: A random decentering algorithm on graphs
Downloaded on 13.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2018-0006/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button