Home Mathematics On new strong versions of Browder type theorems
Article Open Access

On new strong versions of Browder type theorems

  • José Sanabria EMAIL logo , Carlos Carpintero , Jorge Rodríguez , Ennis Rosas and Orlando García
Published/Copyright: April 2, 2018

Abstract

An operator T acting on a Banach space X satisfies the property (UWΠ) if σa(T)∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T), where σa(T) is the approximate point spectrum of T, σSF+(T) is the upper semi-Weyl spectrum of T and Π(T) the set of all poles of T. In this paper we introduce and study two new spectral properties, namely (VΠ) and (VΠa), in connection with Browder type theorems introduced in [1], [2], [3] and [4]. Among other results, we have that T satisfies property (VΠ) if and only if T satisfies property (UWΠ) and σ(T) = σa(T).

MSC 2010: 47A10; 47A11; 47A53

1 Introduction and preliminaries

Throughout this paper, L(X) denotes the algebra of all bounded linear operators acting on an infinite-dimensional complex Banach space X. We refer to [5] for details about notations and terminologies. However, we give the following notations that will be useful in the sequel:

  1. Browder spectrum: σb(T)

  2. Weyl spectrum: σW(T)

  3. Upper semi-Browder spectrum: σub(T)

  4. Upper semi-Weyl spectrum: σSF+(T)

  5. Drazin invertible spectrum: σD (T)

  6. B-Weyl spectrum: σBW(T)

  7. Left Drazin invertible spectrum: σLD (T)

  8. Upper semi B-Weyl spectrum: σSBF+(T)

  9. approximate point spectrum: σa(T)

  10. surjectivity spectrum: σs(T)

In this paper, we introduce two new spectral properties of Browder type theorems, namely, the properties (VΠ) and (VΠa), respectively. In addition, we establish the precise relationships between these properties and others variants of Browder’s theorem have been recently introduced in [1], [2], [3] and [4].

Denote by iso K, the set of all isolated points of K ⊆ ℂ. If TL(X) define

E0(T)={λisoσ(T):0<α(λIT)<},Ea0(T)={λisoσa(T):0<α(λIT)<},E(T)={λisoσ(T):0<α(λIT)},Ea(T)={λisoσa(T):0<α(λIT)}.

Also, define

Π0(T)=σ(T)σb(T),Πa0(T)=σa(T)σub(T),Π(T)=σ(T)σD(T),Πa(T)=σa(T)σLD(T).

Recall that TL(X) is said to satisfy a-Browder’s theorem (resp., generalized a-Browder’s theorem) if σa(T)∖ σSF+(T)=Πa0(T) (resp., σa(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Πa(T)). From [6, Theorem 2.2] (see also [7, Theorem 3.2(ii)]), a-Browder’s theorem and generalized a-Browder’s theorem are equivalent. It is well known that a-Browder’s theorem for T implies Browder’s theorem for T, i.e. σ(T)∖σW(T) = Π0(T). Also by [6, Theorem 2.1], Browder’s theorem for T is equivalent to generalized Browder’s theorem for T, i.e. σ(T) ∖ σBW(T) = Π(T).

Now, we describe several spectral properties introduced recently in [8], [2], [3], [9] and [10].

Definition 1.1

An operator TL(X) is said to have:

  1. property (gab) [8] if σ(T) ∖ σBW(T) = Πa(T).

  2. property (az) [9] if σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T)=Πa0(T).

  3. property (gaz) [9] if σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Πa(T).

  4. property (ah) [10] if σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T)=Πa0(T).

  5. property (gah) [10] if σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Πa(T).

  6. property (Sb) [2] if σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Π0(T).

  7. property (Sab) [3] if σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T)=Πa0 (T).

According to [9, Corollary 3.5], [10, Theorem 2.14] and [10, Corollary 2.15], we have that the properties (az), (gaz), (ah) and (gah) are equivalent. It was proved in [3, Corollary 2.9], that properties (Sb) and (Sab) are equivalent.

2 Properties (VΠ) and (VΠa)

According to [1], TL(X) has property (WΠ) (resp. property (UWΠa)) if σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = Π(T) (resp. σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Πa(T)). It was shown in [1, Theorem 2.4] (resp. [1, Theorem 2.2]) that property (WΠ) (resp. (UWΠa)) implies generalized Browder’s theorem (resp. property (WΠ)) but not conversely. Following [1], an operator TL(X) is said to have property (UWΠ) if σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T). It was shown in [1, Theorem 3.5] that property (UWΠ) implies property (WΠ) but not conversely. According to [4], TL(X) has property (ZΠa) if σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = Πa(T). In this section, we introduce and study two equivalent spectral properties that are stronger than the properties (UWΠa), (UWΠ) and (ZΠa).

Definition 2.1

An operator TL(X) is said to have property (VΠ) if σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T).

Example 2.2

  1. Let TL(2(ℕ)) be defined by

    T(x1,x2,x3,)=x22,x33,.

    Since σ(T) = σSF+(T) = {0} and Π(T) = ∅, then σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T) and hence T has property (VΠ).

  2. Consider the Volterra operator V on the Banach space C[0, 1] defined by V(f)(x) = 0xf(t)dt for all fC[0, 1]. Note that V is injective and quasinilpotent. Thus, σ(V) = {0} and Π(V) = ∅. Since the range R(V) is not closed, thenσSF+(V) = {0}. Therefore, σ(V) ∖ σSF+(V) = Π(V), that means V has property (VΠ).

According to [11], an operator TL(X) is said to have property (VE) if σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = E(T).

The next result gives the relationship between the properties (VE) and (VΠ).

Theorem 2.3

For TL(X), the following statements are equivalent:

  1. T has property (VE),

  2. T has property (VΠ) and E(T) = Π(T).

Proof

(i)⇒(ii). Suppose that T satisfies property (VE), i.e. σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = E(T). Since by [11, Theorem 2.10], we have E(T) = Π(T), it follows that T has property (VΠ) and E(T) = Π(T).

(ii)⇒(i). Suppose that T satisfies property (VΠ) and E(T) = Π(T). Then, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T) = E(T) and T has property (VE). □

Remark 2.4

By Theorem 2.3, property (VE) implies property (VΠ). However, the converse is not true in general. Consider the operator T in Example 2.2, then T satisfies property (VΠ) and as E(T) = {0}, it follows that T does not satisfy property (VE).

Theorem 2.5

For TL(X), the following statements are equivalent:

  1. T has property (VΠ),

  2. T has property (UWΠ) and σ(T) = σa(T),

  3. T has property (UWΠa) and σ(T) = σa(T).

Proof

(i)⇒(ii). Suppose that T satisfies property (VΠ) and let λ ∈ σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T). Since σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) ⊆ σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T), we have λ ∈ Π(T) and so, σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) ⊆ Π(T).

To show the opposite inclusion Π(T) ⊆ σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T), let λ ∈ Π(T). Then, λ ∈ Ea(T), it follows that λ ∈ iso œa(T) and αIT) > 0, so λ ∈ σa(T). As T satisfies property (VΠ) and λ ∈ Π(T), it follows that λ IT is upper semi-Weyl. Therefore, λ ∈ σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T). Thus, Π(T) ⊆ σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) and T satisfies property (UWΠ). Consequently, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T) and σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T). Therefore, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) and σ(T) = σa(T).

(ii)⇒(i). Suppose that T satisfies property (UWΠ) and σ(T) = σa(T). Then, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T). Thus, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T) and T satisfies property (VΠ).

(ii)⇔(iii). Obvious. □

The next example shows that, in general, property (UWΠa) does not imply property (VΠ).

Example 2.6

Let R be the unilateral right shift operator on ℓ2(ℕ) and UL(2(ℕ)) be defined by

U(x1,x2,x3,)=(0,x2,x3,).

Define an operator T on X = 2(ℕ) ⊕ 2(ℕ) by T = RU. Then, σ(T) = D(0, 1), the closed unit disc on ℂ, σa(T) = Γ ∪ {0}, where Γ denotes the unit circle ofandσSF+(T) = Γ. Moreover, Πa(T) = {0} and Π(T) = ∅. Therefore, σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Πa(T) and σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) ≠ Π(T). Thus, T satisfies properties (UWΠa), but T does not satisfy property (VΠ).

The next example shows that, in general, property (UWΠ) does not imply property (VΠ).

Example 2.7

Let R be the unilateral right shift operator on ℓ2(ℕ). Define an operator T on X = 2(ℕ) ⊕ 2(ℕ) by T = 0⊕R. Then, σ(T) = D(0, 1), σa(T) = σSF+(T) = Γ∪{0} and Π(T) = ∅. Therefore, σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T) and σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) ≠ Π(T). Thus, T satisfies property (UWΠ), but T does not satisfy property (VΠ).

The next result gives the relationship between the properties (VΠ) and (WΠ).

Theorem 2.8

Let TL(X). Then T has property (VΠ) if and only if T has property (WΠ) andσSF+(T) = σW(T).

Proof

Sufficiency: Suppose that T satisfies property (VΠ), then by Theorem 2.5, T satisfies property (UWΠ). Property (UWΠ) implies by [1, Theorem 3.5] that T satisfies property (WΠ). Consequently, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T) and σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = Π(T). Therefore, σSF+(T) = σW(T).

Necessity: Suppose that T satisfies property (WΠ) and σSF+(T) = σW(T). Then, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = Π(T), and so T satisfies property (VΠ). □

The next example shows that, in general, property (WΠ) does not imply property (VΠ).

Example 2.9

Let R be the unilateral right shift operator on ℓ2(ℕ). Since σ(R) = σW(R) = D(0, 1), σSF+(R) = Γ andΠ(R) = ∅, then

σ(R)σW(R)=Π(R),σ(R)σSF+(R)Π(R).

Hence, R satisfies property (WΠ), but R does not satisfy property (VΠ).

Theorem 2.10

Suppose that TL(X) has property (VΠ). Then:

  1. T has property (ZΠa),

  2. Πa0(T) = Πa(T) = Π0(T) = Π(T).

Proof

  1. Property (VΠ) implies by Theorem 2.5 that σ(T) = σa(T), and also implies by Theorem 2.8 that σSF+(T) = σW(T). Hence, σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T) = Πa(T) and so T satisfies property (ZΠa).

  2. Follows from (i) and [4, Lemma 2.9]. □

The next example shows that, in general, property (ZΠa) does not imply property (VΠ).

Example 2.11

Let R be the unilateral right shift operator defined on ℓ2(ℕ). Since σ(R) = σW(R) = D(0, 1), Π(R) = Πa(R) = ∅ andσSF+(R) = Γ, then R satisfies property (ZΠa), but does not satisfy property (VΠ).

Remark 2.12

By [4, Lemma 2.9], property (ZΠa) implies that Πa(T) = Π(T). Hence, if TL(X) satisfies property (ZΠa), then σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = Πa(T) = Π(T) and follows that T satisfies property (WΠ). However, the converse is not true in general. For this, consider the operator T in Example 2.7, since σ(T) = σW(T) = D(0, 1), Π(T) = ∅ and Πa(T) = {0}, then T satisfies property (WΠ), but T does not satisfy property (ZΠa).

Theorem 2.13

For TL(X), the following statements are equivalent:

  1. T has property (VΠ),

  2. T has property (gah) andσSF+(T) = σSBF+(T),

  3. T has property (gaz) andσSF+(T) = σSBF+(T),

  4. T has property (ah) andσSF+(T) = σSBF+(T),

  5. T has property (az) andσSF+(T) = σSBF+T).

Proof

The equivalences (ii)⇔(iii), (iv)⇔(v) and (ii)⇔(iv) were shown in [10, Corllary 2.15], [10, Theorem 2.14] and [10, Theorem 2.10], respectively.

(i)⇒(ii). Assume that T satisfies property (VΠ). By Theorem 2.5, T satisfies property (UWΠa). Property (UWΠa) implies by [1, Theorem 2.6] that T satisfies generalized a-Browder’s theorem and σSF+(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = ΠaΠa0, but by Theorem 2.10, it follow that ΠaΠa0 = ∅ and hence, σSF+(T) = σSBF+(T). Consequently, Π(T) = σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T), and hence T satisfies property (gah).

(ii)⇒(i). Suppose that T satisfies property (gah) and σSF+(T) = σSBF+(T). Then σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Π(T), and hence T satisfies property (VΠ). □

The following example shows that, in general, property (gah) (resp. (ah)) does not imply property (VΠ).

Example 2.14

Consider the operator T = 0 defined on the Hilbert space ℓ2(ℕ). Then, σ(T) = σSF+(T) = {0}, σSBF+(T) = ∅ and Π(T) = {0}. Therefore, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) ≠ Π(T) and T does not satisfy property (VΠ). On the other hand, σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Π(T), that means T satisfies property (gah), in consequence T also satisfies property (ah).

The next result gives the relationship between the properties (VΠ) and (Sb).

Corollary 2.15

For TL(X), the following statements are equivalent:

  1. T has property (VΠ),

  2. T has property (Sab),

  3. T has property (Sb).

Proof

Follows directly from Theorem 2.13, [3, Theorem 2.4] and [3, Corollary 2.9]. □

The next result gives the relationship between the property (VΠ) and generalized Browder’s theorem.

Theorem 2.16

For TL(X), the following statements are equivalent:

  1. T has property (VΠ),

  2. T satisfies generalized Browder’s theorem andσSF+(T) = σBW(T),

  3. T satisfies Browder’s theorem andσSF+(T) = σBW(T).

Proof

(i)⇒(ii). Property (VΠ) implies by Theorem 2.8 that T satisfies property (WΠ), and property (WΠ) implies by [1, Theorem 2.4] that T satisfies generalized Browder’s theorem. Consequently, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T) and σ(T) ∖ σBW(T) = Π(T). Therefore, σSF+(T) = σBW(T).

(ii)⇒(i). Assume that T satisfies generalized Browder’s theorem and σSF+(T) = σBW(T). Then, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = σ(T) ∖ σBW(T) = Π(T), that means T satisfies property (VΠ).

(ii)⇔(iii). It follows from the equivalence between generalized Browder’s theorem and Browder’s theorem. □

Remark 2.17

From Theorem 2.16, property (VΠ) implies generalized Browder’s theorem. However, the converse is not true in general. Consider the operator R in Example 2.9, since R satisfies property (WΠ), then it also satisfies generalized Browder’s theorem, but does not satisfy property (VΠ).

Definition 2.18

An operator TL(X) is said to have property (VΠa) if σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Πa(T).

Example 2.19

Let L be the unilateral left shift operator on ℓ2(ℕ). It is well known that σ(L) = σSF+(L) = D(0, 1), the closed unit disc onand Πa(L) = ∅. Therefore, σ(L) ∖ σSF+(L) = Πa(L), and so L satisfies property (VΠa).

Theorem 2.20

Let TL(X). Then T has property (VΠa) if and only if T has property (UWΠa) and σ(T) = σa(T).

Proof

Sufficiency: Assume that T satisfies property (VΠa). Then σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) ⊆ σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Πa(T) and so σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) ⊆ Πa(T).

To show the opposite inclusion Πa(T) ⊆ σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T), let λ ∈ Πa(T). Then, λ ∈ Ea(T) and hence λ ∈ σa(T). As T satisfies property (VΠa) and λ ∈ Πa(T), it follows that λ IT is upper semi-Weyl. Therefore, λ ∈ σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T). Thus, Πa(T) ⊆ σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) and T satisfies property (UWΠa). Consequently, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Πa(T) and σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Πa(T). Therefore, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) and σ(T) = σa(T).

Necessity: Suppose that T satisfies property (UWΠa) and σ(T) = σa(T). Then, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Πa(T), in consequence T satisfies property (VΠa). □

Corollary 2.21

For TL(X), the following statements are equivalent:

  1. T has property (VΠa),

  2. T has property (VΠ),

  3. T has property (Sab),

  4. T has property (Sb).

Proof

(i)⇒(ii). Suppose that T satisfies property (VΠa). By Theorem 2.20, σ(T) = σa(T), it follows that σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Πa(T) = Π(T), hence T satisfies property (VΠ).

(ii)⇒(i). Assume that T satisfies property (VΠ). By Theorem 2.5, σ(T) = σa(T) and so, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T) = Πa(T). Therefore, T satisfies property (VΠa).

The rest of the proof follows from Corollary 2.15. □

The next result gives the relationship between property (VΠa) (or equivalently (VΠ)) and property (ZΠa).

Theorem 2.22

Let TL(X). Then T has property (VΠa) if and only if T has property (ZΠa) andσSF+(T) = σW(T).

Proof

Sufficiency: Assume that T satisfies property (VΠa). By Corollary 2.21, property (VΠa) is equivalent to property (VΠ), and by Theorem 2.8, property (VΠ) implies that σSF+(T) = σW(T). Consequently, σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Πa(T). Therefore, T satisfies property (ZΠa).

Necessity: Assume that T satisfies property (ZΠa) and σSF+(T) = σW(T). Then, σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = Πa(T), that means T satisfies property (VΠa). □

Similar to Theorem 2.22, we have the following result.

Theorem 2.23

Let TL(X). Then T has property (VΠa) if and only if T has property (gab) andσSF+(T) = σBW(T).

For TL(X), define Π+0 (T) = σ(T) ∖ σub(T). The following theorem describes the relationship between a-Browder’s theorem and property (VΠ).

Theorem 2.24

For TL(X), the following statements are equivalent:

  1. T has property (VΠ),

  2. T satisfies a-Browder’s theorem andΠ+0(T) = Π(T).

  3. T satisfies generalized a-Browder’s theorem andΠ+0(T) = Π(T).

Proof

(i)⇒(ii) Assume that T satisfies property (VΠ). Then T satisfies property (UWΠ) and Π(T) = Πa0(T) by Theorems 2.5 and 2.10, respectively. Hence σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T) = Πa0(T). Consequently, T satisfies a-Browder’s theorem and Π+0(T) = σ(T) ∖ σub(T) = σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T).

(ii)⇒(i) If T satisfies a-Browder’s theorem and Π+0(T) = Π(T), then σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = σ(T) ∖ σub(T) = Π+0(T) = Π(T). Therefore, T satisfies property (VΠ).

(ii)⇔(iii). It follows from the equivalence between generalized a-Browder’s theorem and a-Browder’s theorem. □

Remark 2.25

By Theorem 2.24, property (VE) implies a-Browder’s theorem. However, the converse is not true in general. Indeed, the operator R defined in Example 2.9, does not satisfy property (VΠ), butσa(R) = σSF+(R) = Γ andΠa0(R) = ∅, it follows that R satisfies a-Browder’s theorem.

Recall that an operator TL(X) is said to have the single valued extension property at λ0 ∈ ℂ (abbreviated SVEP at λ0) if for every open disc 𝔻λ0 ⊆ ℂ centered at λ0, the only analytic function f : 𝔻λ0X which satisfies the equation

(λIT)f(λ)=0for all λDλ0

is f ≡ 0 on 𝔻λ0 (see [12]). The operator T is said to have SVEP, if it has SVEP at every point λ ∈ ℂ. Evidently, every TL(X) has SVEP at each point of the resolvent set ρ (T) := ℂ ∖ σ (T). Moreover, T has SVEP at every point of the boundary ∂σ (T) of the spectrum. In particular, T has SVEP at every isolated point of the spectrum. (See [13] for more details about this concept).

Corollary 2.26

If TL(X) has SVEP at each λ ∉ σSF+(T), then T has property (VΠ) if and only if Π(T) = Π+0(T).

Proof

By [14, Theorem 2.3], the hypothesis T has SVEP at each λ ∉ σSF+(T) is equivalent to T satisfies a-Browder’s theorem. Therefore, if Π(T) = Π+0(T), then σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = σ(T) ∖ σub(T) = Π+0(T) = Π(T). □

The following three tables summarizes the meaning of various theorems and properties that are related with property (VΠ).

Theorem 2.27

Suppose that TL(X) has property (VΠ). Then:

  1. σSBF+(T) = σBW(T) = σSF+(T) = σW(T) = σLD(T) = σD(T) = σub(T) = σb(T) and σ(T) = σa(T).

  2. Π0(T) = Πa0(T) = Π(T) = Πa(T), E0(T) = Ea0(T) y E(T) = Ea(T).

  3. All properties given in Table 1 are equivalent, and T satisfies each of these properties.

  4. All properties given in Table 2 are equivalent.

  5. All properties given in Table 3 are equivalent.

Table 1
(WΠ) [1]σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = Π(T)𝓑 [15]σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = Π0(T)
(ZΠa) [4]σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = Πa(T)(ab) [8]σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = Πa0(T)
g𝓑 [16]σ(T) ∖ σBW(T) = Π(T)(Bb) [17]σ(T) ∖ σBW(T) = Π0(T)
(gab) [8]σ(T) ∖ σBW(T) = Πa(T)(Bab) [18]σ(T) ∖ σBW(T) = Πa0(T)
(gah) [10]σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Π(T)(Sb) [2]σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Π0(T)
(gaz) [9]σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Πa(T)(Sab) [3]σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T)=Πa0(T)
(UWΠ) [1]σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T)(b) [19]σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π0(T)
(UWΠa) [1]σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Πa(T)a𝓑 [20]σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T)=Πa0(T)
(gb) [19]σa(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Π(T)(Bgb) [17]σa(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Π0(T)
ga𝓑 [16]σa(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Πa(T)(SBab) [21]σa(T) ∖ σSBF+(T)=Πa0(T)
(VΠ)σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π(T)(ah) [10]σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Π0(T)
(VΠa)σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Πa(T)(az) [9]σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T)=Πa0(T)

Table 2
𝓦 [22]σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = E0(T)
(aw) [8]σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = Ea0(T)
(Bw) [23]σ(T) ∖ σBW(T) = E0(T)
(Baw) [18]σ(T) ∖ σBW(T) = Ea0(T)
(v) [5]σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = E0(T)
(z) [9]σ(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Ea0(T)
(Sw) [2]σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = E0(T)
(Saw) [3]σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Ea0(T)
(w) [24]σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = E0(T)
(a𝓦) [25]σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Ea0(T)
(Bgw) [17]σa(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = E0(T)
(SBaw) [21]σa(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Ea0(T)

Table 3
(WE) [26]σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = E(T)
(ZEa) [4]σ(T) ∖ σW(T) = Ea(T)
g𝓦 [16]σ(T) ∖ σBW(T) = E(T)
(gaw) [8]σ(T) ∖ σBW(T) = Ea(T)
(gv) [5]σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = E(T)
(gz) [9]σ(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Ea(T)
(UWE) [1]σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = E(T)
(UWEa) [26]σa(T) ∖ σSF+(T) = Ea(T)
(gw) [27]σa(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = E(T)
ga𝓦 [16]σa(T) ∖ σSBF+(T) = Ea(T)

Proof

Since property (VΠ) is equivalent to property (Sab), then (i) and (ii) follows from [3, Theorem 2.31].

(iii) By Theorem 2.5, T satisfies property (UWΠ), and the equivalence between all properties given in Table 1 follows from (i) and (ii).

(iv) and (v) Follows directly from (i) and (ii). □

In the following diagram the arrows signify implications between the Browder type theorems defined above. The numbers near the arrows are references to the results in the present paper (numbers without brackets) or to the bibliography therein (the numbers in square brackets).

(WΠ)[1](gB)[6](B)2.12[8][8](ZΠa)[4](gab)[8](ab)2.10[8][8](WΠ)[1](UWΠ)2.5(VΠ)(gb)[8](b)[1]2.15[10][10](b)(UWΠa)2.19(VΠa)2.20(Sb)(gah)[10](ah)[19][1][3][10][10](aB)[21](SBab)[21](Bgb)[3](Sab)[3](gaz)[9](az)[6][21,17][3](gaB)[19](gb)(Bb)[18](Bab)[4](ZΠa)[16][21][1][18](gB)(Bgb)(WΠ)(ab)

Acknowledgement

Research Partially Suported by Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Universidad del Atlántico.

References

[1] Berkani M., Kachad M., New Browder and Weyl type theorems, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 2015, 52, 439–452.10.4134/BKMS.2015.52.2.439Search in Google Scholar

[2] Rashid M. H. M., Prasad T., Property (Sw) for bounded linear operators, Asia-European J. Math., 2015, 8, [14 pages] 10.1142/S1793557115500126.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Sanabria, J., Carpintero C., Rosas E., García O., On property (Saw) and others spectral properties type Weyl-Browder theorems, Rev. Colombiana Mat., 2017, 51 (2), 153–171.10.15446/recolma.v51n2.70899Search in Google Scholar

[4] Zariouh H., On the property (ZEa ), Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2), 2016, 65, 323–331, 10.1007/s12215-016-0236-z.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Sanabria J., Carpintero C., Rosas E., García O., On generalized property (v) for bounded linear operators, Studia Math., 2012, 212, 141–154.10.4064/sm212-2-3Search in Google Scholar

[6] Amouch M., Zguitti H., On the equivalence of Browder’s theorem and generalized Browder’s theorem, Glasgow Math. J., 2006, 48, 179–185.10.1017/S0017089505002971Search in Google Scholar

[7] Aiena P., Biondi M. T., Carpintero C., On Drazin invertibility, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 2008, 136, 2839–2848.10.1090/S0002-9939-08-09138-7Search in Google Scholar

[8] Berkani M., Zariouh H., New extended Weyl type theorems, Mat. Vesnik, 2010, 62, 145–154.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zariouh H., Property (gz) for bounded linear operators, Mat. Vesnik, 2013, 65, 94–103.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zariouh H., New version of property (az), Mat. Vesnik, 2014, 66, 317–322.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Sanabria J., Vásquez L., Carpintero C., Rosas E., García O., On Strong Variations of Weyl type theorems, Acta Math. Univ. Comenian. (N.S.), 2017, 86, 345–356.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Finch J. K., The single valued extension property on a Banach space, Pacific J. Math., 1975, 58, 61–69.10.2140/pjm.1975.58.61Search in Google Scholar

[13] Aiena P., Fredholm and Local Spectral Theory, with Applications to Multipliers, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Aiena P., Carpintero C., Rosas E., Some characterization of operators satisfying a-Browder’s theorem, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 2005, 311, 530–544.10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.03.007Search in Google Scholar

[15] Harte R., Lee W. Y., Another note on Weyl’s theorem, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 1997, 349, 2115–2124.10.1090/S0002-9947-97-01881-3Search in Google Scholar

[16] Berkani M., Koliha J., Weyl type theorems for bounded linear operators, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged), 2003, 69, 359–376.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Rashid M. H. M., Prasad T., Variations of Weyl type theorems, Ann Funct. Anal. Math., 2013, 4, 40-52.10.15352/afa/1399899835Search in Google Scholar

[18] Zariouh H., Zguitti H., Variations on Browder’s theorem, Acta Math. Univ. Comenian. (N.S.), 2012, 81, 255–264.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Berkani M., Zariouh H., Extended Weyl type theorems, Math. Bohem., 2009, 134, 369–378.10.21136/MB.2009.140669Search in Google Scholar

[20] Djordjević S. V., Han Y. M., Browder’s theorems and spectral continuity, Glasgow Math. J., 2000, 42, 479–486.10.1017/S0017089500030147Search in Google Scholar

[21] Berkani M., Kachad M., Zariouh H., Zguitti H., Variations on a-Browder-type theorems, Sarajevo J. Math., 2013, 9, 271–281.10.5644/SJM.09.2.11Search in Google Scholar

[22] Coburn L. A., Weyl’s theorem for nonnormal operators, Michigan Math. J., 1966, 13, 285–288.10.1307/mmj/1031732778Search in Google Scholar

[23] Gupta A., Kashayap N., Property (Bw) and Weyl type theorems, Bull. Math. Anal. Appl., 2011, 3, 1–7.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Rakočević V., On a class of operators, Mat. Vesnik, 1985, 37, 423–426.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Rakočević V., Operators obeying a-Weyl’s theorem, Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl., 1989, 34, 915–919.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Berkani M., Kachad M., New Weyl-type Theorems - I, Funct. Anal. Approx. Comput., 2012, 4 (2), 41–47.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Amouch M., Berkani M., On the property (gw), Mediterr. J. Math., 2008, 5, 371–378.10.1007/s00009-008-0156-zSearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-04-27
Accepted: 2017-10-12
Published Online: 2018-04-02

© 2018 Sanabria et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Algebraic proofs for shallow water bi–Hamiltonian systems for three cocycle of the semi-direct product of Kac–Moody and Virasoro Lie algebras
  3. On a viscous two-fluid channel flow including evaporation
  4. Generation of pseudo-random numbers with the use of inverse chaotic transformation
  5. Singular Cauchy problem for the general Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation
  6. Ternary and n-ary f-distributive structures
  7. On the fine Simpson moduli spaces of 1-dimensional sheaves supported on plane quartics
  8. Evaluation of integrals with hypergeometric and logarithmic functions
  9. Bounded solutions of self-adjoint second order linear difference equations with periodic coeffients
  10. Oscillation of first order linear differential equations with several non-monotone delays
  11. Existence and regularity of mild solutions in some interpolation spaces for functional partial differential equations with nonlocal initial conditions
  12. The log-concavity of the q-derangement numbers of type B
  13. Generalized state maps and states on pseudo equality algebras
  14. Monotone subsequence via ultrapower
  15. Note on group irregularity strength of disconnected graphs
  16. On the security of the Courtois-Finiasz-Sendrier signature
  17. A further study on ordered regular equivalence relations in ordered semihypergroups
  18. On the structure vector field of a real hypersurface in complex quadric
  19. Rank relations between a {0, 1}-matrix and its complement
  20. Lie n superderivations and generalized Lie n superderivations of superalgebras
  21. Time parallelization scheme with an adaptive time step size for solving stiff initial value problems
  22. Stability problems and numerical integration on the Lie group SO(3) × R3 × R3
  23. On some fixed point results for (s, p, α)-contractive mappings in b-metric-like spaces and applications to integral equations
  24. On algebraic characterization of SSC of the Jahangir’s graph 𝓙n,m
  25. A greedy algorithm for interval greedoids
  26. On nonlinear evolution equation of second order in Banach spaces
  27. A primal-dual approach of weak vector equilibrium problems
  28. On new strong versions of Browder type theorems
  29. A Geršgorin-type eigenvalue localization set with n parameters for stochastic matrices
  30. Restriction conditions on PL(7, 2) codes (3 ≤ |𝓖i| ≤ 7)
  31. Singular integrals with variable kernel and fractional differentiation in homogeneous Morrey-Herz-type Hardy spaces with variable exponents
  32. Introduction to disoriented knot theory
  33. Restricted triangulation on circulant graphs
  34. Boundedness control sets for linear systems on Lie groups
  35. Chen’s inequalities for submanifolds in (κ, μ)-contact space form with a semi-symmetric metric connection
  36. Disjointed sum of products by a novel technique of orthogonalizing ORing
  37. A parametric linearizing approach for quadratically inequality constrained quadratic programs
  38. Generalizations of Steffensen’s inequality via the extension of Montgomery identity
  39. Vector fields satisfying the barycenter property
  40. On the freeness of hypersurface arrangements consisting of hyperplanes and spheres
  41. Biderivations of the higher rank Witt algebra without anti-symmetric condition
  42. Some remarks on spectra of nuclear operators
  43. Recursive interpolating sequences
  44. Involutory biquandles and singular knots and links
  45. Constacyclic codes over 𝔽pm[u1, u2,⋯,uk]/〈 ui2 = ui, uiuj = ujui
  46. Topological entropy for positively weak measure expansive shadowable maps
  47. Oscillation and non-oscillation of half-linear differential equations with coeffcients determined by functions having mean values
  48. On 𝓠-regular semigroups
  49. One kind power mean of the hybrid Gauss sums
  50. A reduced space branch and bound algorithm for a class of sum of ratios problems
  51. Some recurrence formulas for the Hermite polynomials and their squares
  52. A relaxed block splitting preconditioner for complex symmetric indefinite linear systems
  53. On f - prime radical in ordered semigroups
  54. Positive solutions of semipositone singular fractional differential systems with a parameter and integral boundary conditions
  55. Disjoint hypercyclicity equals disjoint supercyclicity for families of Taylor-type operators
  56. A stochastic differential game of low carbon technology sharing in collaborative innovation system of superior enterprises and inferior enterprises under uncertain environment
  57. Dynamic behavior analysis of a prey-predator model with ratio-dependent Monod-Haldane functional response
  58. The points and diameters of quantales
  59. Directed colimits of some flatness properties and purity of epimorphisms in S-posets
  60. Super (a, d)-H-antimagic labeling of subdivided graphs
  61. On the power sum problem of Lucas polynomials and its divisible property
  62. Existence of solutions for a shear thickening fluid-particle system with non-Newtonian potential
  63. On generalized P-reducible Finsler manifolds
  64. On Banach and Kuratowski Theorem, K-Lusin sets and strong sequences
  65. On the boundedness of square function generated by the Bessel differential operator in weighted Lebesque Lp,α spaces
  66. On the different kinds of separability of the space of Borel functions
  67. Curves in the Lorentz-Minkowski plane: elasticae, catenaries and grim-reapers
  68. Functional analysis method for the M/G/1 queueing model with single working vacation
  69. Existence of asymptotically periodic solutions for semilinear evolution equations with nonlocal initial conditions
  70. The existence of solutions to certain type of nonlinear difference-differential equations
  71. Domination in 4-regular Knödel graphs
  72. Stepanov-like pseudo almost periodic functions on time scales and applications to dynamic equations with delay
  73. Algebras of right ample semigroups
  74. Random attractors for stochastic retarded reaction-diffusion equations with multiplicative white noise on unbounded domains
  75. Nontrivial periodic solutions to delay difference equations via Morse theory
  76. A note on the three-way generalization of the Jordan canonical form
  77. On some varieties of ai-semirings satisfying xp+1x
  78. Abstract-valued Orlicz spaces of range-varying type
  79. On the recursive properties of one kind hybrid power mean involving two-term exponential sums and Gauss sums
  80. Arithmetic of generalized Dedekind sums and their modularity
  81. Multipreconditioned GMRES for simulating stochastic automata networks
  82. Regularization and error estimates for an inverse heat problem under the conformable derivative
  83. Transitivity of the εm-relation on (m-idempotent) hyperrings
  84. Learning Bayesian networks based on bi-velocity discrete particle swarm optimization with mutation operator
  85. Simultaneous prediction in the generalized linear model
  86. Two asymptotic expansions for gamma function developed by Windschitl’s formula
  87. State maps on semihoops
  88. 𝓜𝓝-convergence and lim-inf𝓜-convergence in partially ordered sets
  89. Stability and convergence of a local discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for the general Lax equation
  90. New topology in residuated lattices
  91. Optimality and duality in set-valued optimization utilizing limit sets
  92. An improved Schwarz Lemma at the boundary
  93. Initial layer problem of the Boussinesq system for Rayleigh-Bénard convection with infinite Prandtl number limit
  94. Toeplitz matrices whose elements are coefficients of Bazilevič functions
  95. Epi-mild normality
  96. Nonlinear elastic beam problems with the parameter near resonance
  97. Orlicz difference bodies
  98. The Picard group of Brauer-Severi varieties
  99. Galoisian and qualitative approaches to linear Polyanin-Zaitsev vector fields
  100. Weak group inverse
  101. Infinite growth of solutions of second order complex differential equation
  102. Semi-Hurewicz-Type properties in ditopological texture spaces
  103. Chaos and bifurcation in the controlled chaotic system
  104. Translatability and translatable semigroups
  105. Sharp bounds for partition dimension of generalized Möbius ladders
  106. Uniqueness theorems for L-functions in the extended Selberg class
  107. An effective algorithm for globally solving quadratic programs using parametric linearization technique
  108. Bounds of Strong EMT Strength for certain Subdivision of Star and Bistar
  109. On categorical aspects of S -quantales
  110. On the algebraicity of coefficients of half-integral weight mock modular forms
  111. Dunkl analogue of Szász-mirakjan operators of blending type
  112. Majorization, “useful” Csiszár divergence and “useful” Zipf-Mandelbrot law
  113. Global stability of a distributed delayed viral model with general incidence rate
  114. Analyzing a generalized pest-natural enemy model with nonlinear impulsive control
  115. Boundary value problems of a discrete generalized beam equation via variational methods
  116. Common fixed point theorem of six self-mappings in Menger spaces using (CLRST) property
  117. Periodic and subharmonic solutions for a 2nth-order p-Laplacian difference equation containing both advances and retardations
  118. Spectrum of free-form Sudoku graphs
  119. Regularity of fuzzy convergence spaces
  120. The well-posedness of solution to a compressible non-Newtonian fluid with self-gravitational potential
  121. On further refinements for Young inequalities
  122. Pretty good state transfer on 1-sum of star graphs
  123. On a conjecture about generalized Q-recurrence
  124. Univariate approximating schemes and their non-tensor product generalization
  125. Multi-term fractional differential equations with nonlocal boundary conditions
  126. Homoclinic and heteroclinic solutions to a hepatitis C evolution model
  127. Regularity of one-sided multilinear fractional maximal functions
  128. Galois connections between sets of paths and closure operators in simple graphs
  129. KGSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm for Multimodal Optimization based on K-Means Niching Technique and a Novel Elitism Strategy
  130. θ-type Calderón-Zygmund Operators and Commutators in Variable Exponents Herz space
  131. An integral that counts the zeros of a function
  132. On rough sets induced by fuzzy relations approach in semigroups
  133. Computational uncertainty quantification for random non-autonomous second order linear differential equations via adapted gPC: a comparative case study with random Fröbenius method and Monte Carlo simulation
  134. The fourth order strongly noncanonical operators
  135. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  136. Review of Cryptographic Schemes applied to Remote Electronic Voting systems: remaining challenges and the upcoming post-quantum paradigm
  137. Linearity in decimation-based generators: an improved cryptanalysis on the shrinking generator
  138. On dynamic network security: A random decentering algorithm on graphs
Downloaded on 10.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2018-0029/html
Scroll to top button