Home Stepanov-like pseudo almost periodic functions on time scales and applications to dynamic equations with delay
Article Open Access

Stepanov-like pseudo almost periodic functions on time scales and applications to dynamic equations with delay

  • Chao-Hong Tang and Hong-Xu Li EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 25, 2018

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the concept of Sp-pseudo almost periodicity on time scales and present some basic properties of it, including the translation invariance, uniqueness of decomposition, completeness and composition theorem. Moreover, we prove the seemingly simple but nontrivial result that pseudo almost periodicity implies Stepanov-like pseudo almost periodicity. As an application of the abstract results, we present some existence and uniqueness results on the pseudo almost periodic solutions of dynamic equations with delay.

MSC 2010: 42A75; 34N05

1 Introduction

The theory of time scales was established by S. Hilger in 1988 (see [1]). This theory unifies continuous and discrete problems and provides a powerful tool for applications to economics, populations models, quantum physics among others, and hence has been attracting the attention of many mathematicians (see [2, 3] and the references therein). In 2011, Li and Wang [4, 5] introduced the concept of almost periodic functions on time scales. Since then, many generalized forms of almost periodicity have been introduced on time scales, such as pseudo almost periodicity [6], almost automorphy[7], weighted pseudo almost periodicity [8] etc.

To consider the almost periodicity of integrable functions on the real line, Stepanov [9] and Wiener [10] introduced Stepanov almost periodicity in 1926. Then this concept was extended to Stepanov-like pseudo almost periodicity by Diagana [11] in 2007. On the other hand, Li and Wang [12] extended Stepanov almost periodicity on time scales in 2017. Motivated by the above works, the main purpose of this paper is to consider Stepanov-like pseudo almost periodicity on time scales.

The definition and some basic properties of Stepanov-like pseudo almost periodicity are given in Section 3, including the translation invariance, uniqueness of decomposition, completeness and composition theorem. Moreover, we prove the seemingly simple but nontrivial result that pseudo almost periodicity implies Stepanov-like pseudo almost periodicity. As an application of the abstract results, we present some results on the existence and uniqueness of pseudo almost periodic solutions of dynamic equations with delay in Section 4.

2 Preliminaries

The concepts and results in this section can be found in [2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15] or deduced simply from the results given there. Throughout this paper, we denote by ℕ, ℤ, ℝ and ℝ+ the sets of positive integers, integers, real numbers and nonnegative real numbers, respectively. 𝔼n denotes the Euclidian space n or ℂn with Euclidian norm ‖⋅‖, and n×n the space of all n × n real-valued matrices with matrix norm ‖⋅‖.

Let 𝕋 be a time scale, that is, a closed and nonempty subset of ℝ. The forward and backward jump operators σ, ρ:𝕋 → 𝕋 and the graininess μ:𝕋 → ℝ+ are defined, respectively, by

σ(t)=inf{sT:s>t},ρ(t)=sup{sT:s<t},μ(t)=σ(t)t.

If σ(t) > t, we say that t is right-scattered. Otherwise, t is called right-dense. Analogously, if ρ(t) > t, then t is called left-scattered. Otherwise, t is left-dense. We always denote 𝕋 a time scale from now on.

Let a, b ∈ 𝕋 with ab, [a,b], [a,b), (a,b], (a,b) being the usual intervals on the real line. The intervals [a,a),(a,a], (a,a) are understood as the empty set, and we use the following symbols:

[a,b]T=[a,b]T,[a,b)T=[a,b)T,(a,b]T=(a,b]T,(a,b)T=(a,b)T.

Note that in this paper we use the above symbols only if a, b ∈ 𝕋.

Denote

C(T;En)={f:TEn:f is continuous},C(T×D;En)={f:T×DEn:f is continuous},BC(T;En)={f:TEn:f is bounded and continuous},Llocp(T;En)={f:TEn:f is locallyLpΔintegrable}.

It is easy to see that BC(𝕋;𝔼n) is a Banach space with supremum norm.

If 𝕋 has a left-scattered maximum m, then 𝕋κ = 𝕋 {m}; otherwise 𝕋κ = 𝕋.

Definition 2.1

For f : 𝕋 → 𝔼n and t ∈ 𝕋κ, fΔ(t) ∈ 𝔼nis called the delta derivative of f(t) if for a given ε > 0, there exists a neighborhood U of t such that

|f(σ(t))f(s)fΔ(t)(σ(t)s)|<ε|σ(t)s|

for all sU. Moreover, f is said to be delta differentiable on 𝕋 if fΔ(t) exists for all t ∈ 𝕋.

We note that the integral abf(t)Δt always means ∫[a,b)𝕋f(t)Δ t in this paper, and all the theorems of the general Lebesgue integration theory also hold for the Δ-integrals on 𝕋. For more details of continuity, differentiable, Δ-measure and Δ-integral on 𝕋, Jordan Δ-measure and multi-Riemann Δ-integrable on 𝕋2, we refer the readers to [2, 3, 13, 15, 16].

2.1 Almost periodicity and pseudo almost periodicity on 𝕋

Definition 2.2

([5, 7]). A time scale 𝕋 is called invariant under translations if

Π:={τR:t±τT,tT}{0}.

From now on, we always assume that 𝕋 is invariant under translations.

Definition 2.3

([5, 14])

  1. A function fC(𝕋;𝔼n) is called almost periodic on 𝕋 if for every ε > 0, the set

    T(f,ε)={τΠ:|f(t+τ)f(t)|<ε,tT}

    is relatively dense in Π. T(f, ε) is called theε-translation set of f, τ is called the ε-translation number of f. Denote by AP(𝕋;𝔼n) the set of all almost periodic functions.

  2. Let Ω ⊂ 𝔼n be open. The set AP(𝕋 × Ω; 𝔼n) consists of all continuous functions f : 𝕋 ×Ω → 𝔼nsuch that f(⋅, x) ∈ AP(𝕋;𝔼n) uniformly for each xS, where S is any compact subset of Ω. That is, for ε > 0, ⋂xST(f(⋅,x),ε) is relatively dense in Π.

Let fBC(𝕋;𝔼n). Then set

PAP0(T;En)=fBC(T;En):limr+12rt0rt0+r|f(s)|Δs=0, where t0T,rΠ.

Definition 2.4

([6]). A function fBC(𝕋;𝔼n) is called pseudo almost periodic if f = g + ϕ, where gAP(𝕋;𝔼n) and ϕPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n). We denote by PAP(𝕋;𝔼n) the set of all pseudo almost periodic functions.

Proposition 2.5

f(𝕋) is relatively compact if fAP(𝕋;𝔼n).

Proof

It follows from [17, Theorem 3.4] that for fC(𝕋;𝔼n), fAP(𝕋;𝔼n) if and only if there exists gAP(ℝ;𝔼n) such that f(t) = g(t) for t ∈ 𝕋. Meanwhile, it is well known that g(ℝ) is relatively compact if g ∈ AP(ℝ;𝔼n). Therefore f(𝕋) is relatively compact if fAP(𝕋;𝔼n). □

Proposition 2.6

([6]).

  1. If fPAP(𝕋;𝔼n) and ϕPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n), then for any τΠ, f(⋅ + τ) ∈ PAP(𝕋;𝔼n) and ϕ(⋅ + τ) ∈ PAP0(𝕋;𝔼n).

  2. PAP(𝕋,𝔼n) and PAP0(𝕋,𝔼n) are Banach spaces under the sup norm.

2.2 Sp-almost periodic functions on 𝕋

We always assume that p ≥ 1 afterwards without any further comments. Let

K:=inf{|τ|:τΠ,τ0}, if TR,1, if T=R.

Define ‖⋅‖Sp: Llocp(𝕋;𝔼n) → ℝ+ as

fSp:=suptT1Ktt+K|f(s)|pΔs1pfor fLlocp(T;En).

fLlocp(𝕋; 𝔼n) is called Sp-bounded if ∥fSp < ∞. Denote by BSp(𝕋;𝔼n) the space of all these functions.

Definition 2.7

  1. ([12]). A function fBSp(𝕋;𝔼n) is called Sp-almost periodic on 𝕋 if for every ε > 0, the ε-translation set of f

    T(f,ε)={τΠ:f(+τ)fSp<ε}

    is relatively dense in Π. Denote the set of all these functions by SpAP(𝕋,𝔼n).

  2. A function f: 𝕋 × Ω → 𝔼nwith Ω ⊂ 𝔼n is called Sp-almost periodic in t ∈ 𝕋 if f(⋅, x) ∈ SpAP(𝕋;𝔼n) uniformly for each xS, where S is an arbitrary compact subset of Ω. That is, for ε > 0, ⋂xST(f(⋅,x),ε) is relatively dense in Π. Denote the set of all such functions by SpAP(𝕋 ×Ω;𝔼n).

Proposition 2.8

  1. ([12, 18]). If fSpAP(𝕋;𝔼n), then for any τΠ, f(⋅ + τ) ∈ SpAP(𝕋;𝔼n).

  2. BSp(𝕋;𝔼n), SpAP(𝕋,𝔼n) are Banach spaces under the Sp-norm ∥⋅∥Sp.

  3. Let 1 ≤ qp < ∞. Then BSp(𝕋;𝔼n)⊂ BSq(𝕋;𝔼n), SpAP(𝕋;𝔼n)⊂ SqAP(𝕋;𝔼n) andfSq ≤ ∥fSpfor fBSp(𝕋;𝔼n).

  4. AP(𝕋;𝔼n)⊂ SpAP(𝕋;𝔼n).

3 Sp-pseudo almost periodic functions

Now we introduce the concept of Sp-pseudo almost periodicity on time scales and present the main properties of it.

3.1 Definitions

We define the norm operator 𝓝 on BSp(𝕋;𝔼n) as follows:

N(f)(t):=1Ktt+K|f(s)|pΔs1pfor fBSp(T;En),tT.

Lemma 3.1

The norm operator 𝓝 maps BSp(𝕋;𝔼n) into BC(𝕋;ℝ+) and maps SpAP(𝕋;𝔼n) into AP(𝕋;ℝ+). Moreover, for f,gBSp(𝕋;𝔼n), t ∈ 𝕋,

N(f)||=||f||Sp,|N(f)(t)N(g)(t)|N(f±g)(t)N(f)(t)+N(g)(t).(1)

Proof

It is obvious that ∥𝓝(f)∥ = ∥fSp. Then 𝓝(f) is bounded when fBSp(𝕋;𝔼n). The second part of (1) can be got from Minkowski inequality immediately.

Let fBSp(𝕋;𝔼n). Then fLlocp(𝕋;𝔼n), and the absolute continuity of integral follows that for ε > 0, there exists δ = δ(ε) > 0 such that for any Δ-measurable set e with μΔ(e) < δ,

e|f(s)|pΔs<Kε2.

Thus, for t1, t2 ∈ 𝕋, t1 < t2, |t1t2| < δ,

|(N(f))p(t1)(N(f))p(t2)|1Kt1t2|f(s)|pΔs1Kt1+Kt2+K|f(s)|pΔs1Kt1t2|f(s)|pΔs+1Kt1+Kt2+K|f(s)|pΔs<ε.

This implies that (𝓝(f))p is continuous, and 𝓝(f) is continuous. So 𝓝:BSp(𝕋;𝔼n) → BC(𝕋;ℝ+).

Let fSpAP(𝕋;𝔼n). Then 𝓝(f) ∈ BC(𝕋;ℝ+) by the proof above. For τT(f,ε), by (1),

N(f)(+τ)N(f)||=suptT|N(f)(t+τ)N(f)(t)|=suptT|N(f(+τ))(t)N(f)(t)|suptTN(f(+τ)f)(t)=||N(f(+τ)f)||=||f(+τ)f||Sp<ε,

which implies that T(f,ε)⊂ T(𝓝(f),ε). Hence 𝓝(f) ∈ AP(𝕋;ℝ+). □

Definition 3.2

A function fBSp(𝕋;𝔼n) is said to be ergodic if 𝓝(f) ∈ PAP0(𝕋;ℝ+), i.e.

limr+12rt0rt0+r1Ktt+K|f(s)|pΔs1pΔt=0,wheret0T,rΠ.

We denote by SpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n) the set of all ergodic functions from 𝕋 to 𝔼n.

Definition 3.3

  1. A function fBSp(𝕋;𝔼n) is called Stepanov-like pseudo almost periodic (Sp-pseudo almost periodic) iff = g + ϕ, where gSpAP(𝕋;𝔼n) and ϕSpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n). g and ϕ are called the almost periodic component and the ergodic perturbation of f, respectively. We denote by SpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n) the set of all such functions f.

  2. A function f: 𝕋 × Ω → 𝔼n with Ω ⊂ 𝔼n is called Stepanov-like pseudo almost periodic (Sp-pseudo almost periodic) in t ∈ 𝕋 if f(⋅,x) = g(⋅,x) + ϕ(⋅,x) ∈ SpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n) for each xΩ and g(⋅,x) ∈ SpAP(𝕋;𝔼n) uniformly for each xS, where S is an arbitrary compact subset of Ω. Denote the set of all these functions by SpPAP(𝕋 ×Ω;𝔼n).

Remark 3.4

  1. We note that Definition 3.3 is a generalization of Sp-pseudo almost periodicity on ℝ introduced by Diagana [19].

  2. It is easy to check that SqPAP(𝕋;𝔼n)⊂ SpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n) for 1 ≤ pq.

3.2 Some basic properties

From now on, we write f = g + ϕSpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n) implies gSpAP(𝕋;𝔼n) and ϕSpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n). In this subsection, we give some basic properties of Sp-pseudo almost periodicity, including the uniqueness of decomposition, the translation invariance and the completeness.

Proposition 3.5

The decomposition of Sp-pseudo almost periodic functions is unique.

Proof

If f = g1 + ϕ1 = g2 + ϕ2SpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n), then g1g2 = ϕ2ϕ1. This implies 𝓝(g1g2) = 𝓝(ϕ1ϕ2). Note that 𝓝(ϕ1ϕ2) ≤ 𝓝(ϕ1) + 𝓝(ϕ2) by (1), it follows that 𝓝(ϕ1ϕ2) ∈ PAP0(𝕋;ℝ+), and then 𝓝(g1g2) ∈ PAP0(𝕋;ℝ+). Meanwhile, g1g2SpAP(𝕋;𝔼n) since g1, g2SpAP(𝕋;𝔼n). Thus 𝓝(g1g2) ∈ AP(𝕋;ℝ+) by Lemma 3.1. Now it follows from [6, Theorem 3.5] that 𝓝(g1g2) = 0. This yields that g1 = g2 in SpAP(𝕋;𝔼n), and consequently, ϕ1 = ϕ2 in SpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n). □

By Proposition 2.6 (i), Proposition 2.8 (i) and Lemma 3.1, we can easily obtain the following translation invariance of Sp-pseudo almost periodic functions. Here we omit the details.

Proposition 3.6

Let fSpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n). Then f(⋅+τ) ∈ SpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n) for τΠ.

Proposition 3.7

(SpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n), ∥⋅∥Sp) is a Banach space.

Proof

By Proposition 2.8 (ii), we only need to prove the closedness of SpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n) in BSp(𝕋;𝔼n). In fact, let {ϕk} ⊂ SpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n) and ϕBSp(𝕋;𝔼n) with ∥ϕkϕSp → 0 as k → ∞. By Lemma 3.1, {𝓝(ϕk)} ⊂ PAP0(𝕋;ℝ+) and

||N(ϕk)N(ϕ)||||N(ϕkϕ)||=||ϕkϕ||Sp0 as k.

This implies 𝓝(ϕ) ∈ PAP0(𝕋;ℝ+) since PAP0(𝕋;ℝ+) is a Banach space by Proposition 2.6 (ii). Hence ϕSpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n) and SpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n) is closed. □

To prove the completeness of the space SpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n) we need the following lemma.

Lemma 3.8

If f = g + ϕSpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n), thengSp ≤ ∥fSp.

Proof

Let Q(t) := 𝓝(g)(t) – 𝓝(ϕ)(t), t ∈ 𝕋. Then by (1),

|Q(t)|N(g+ϕ)(t)=N(f)(t),tT.

This implies that ∥Q ≤ ∥𝓝(f)∥. On the other hand, 𝓝(g) ∈ AP(𝕋;ℝ+) by Lemma 3.1, and clearly, – 𝓝(ϕ) ∈ PAP0(𝕋;ℝ). Then Q = 𝓝(g) – 𝓝(ϕ) ∈ PAP(𝕋;ℝ). Thus, by [6, Theorem 4.2] and (1),

||g||Sp=||N(g)||||Q||||N(f)||=||f||Sp.

Proposition 3.9

(SpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n), ∥⋅∥Sp) is a Banach space.

Proof

It suffices to prove that SpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n) is closed in BSp(𝕋;𝔼n). Let {fk} = {gk + ϕk} ⊂ SpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n) and fBSp(𝕋;𝔼n) with ∥fkfSp → 0 as k → ∞. Then ∥fkfjSp → 0 as k, j → ∞. It follows from Lemma 3.8 that ∥gkgjSp ≤ ∥fkfjSp → 0 as k, j → ∞. This together with Proposition 2.8 (ii) implies that there exists gSpAP(𝕋;𝔼n) such that ∥gkgSp → 0 as k → ∞.

Meanwhile, by Lemma 3.8,

||ϕkϕj||Sp=||fkfj+gjgk||Sp||fkfj||Sp+||gkgj||Sp0 as k,j,

which implies that ϕkϕ as k → ∞ for some ϕSpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n) by Proposition 3.7. Let f = g + ϕ. Then fSpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n) and fkf as k → ∞. That is SpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n) is closed in BSp(𝕋;𝔼n). □

3.3 PAP(𝕋;𝔼n)⊂ Sp PAP(𝕋;𝔼n)

We prove the seemingly simple but nontrivial result that PAP(𝕋;𝔼n)⊂ Sp PAP(𝕋;𝔼n) in this subsection.

For t0 ∈ 𝕋, let

EP={(t,s)T×T:t0t<t0+K,ts<t+K},

Lemma 3.10

  1. EP is Jordan Δ-measurable.

  2. If f : EP → ℝ is bounded continuous, then f is Riemann Δ-integrable over EP, and

    t0t0+Ktt+Kf(t,s)ΔsΔt=t0t0+Kt0sf(t,s)ΔtΔs+t0+Kt0+2KsKt0+Kf(t,s)ΔtΔs.(2)

Proof

By a fundamental calculation, we can prove that EP is Jordan Δ-measurable and f is Riemann Δ-integrable over EP. Here we omit the details, and we only prove that (2) holds. Let R = [t0,t0 + 𝓚)𝕋 ×[t0,t0 + 2𝓚)𝕋 and F : R → ℝ be defined as

F(t,s)=f(t,s),if (t,s)EP,0,if (t,s)REP.

Then for t ∈ [t0,t0+𝓚)𝕋,

F(t,s)=f(t,s),if s[t,t+K)T,0,if s[t0,t)T[t+K,t0+2K)T,

and F(t,⋅) can only be discontinuous at t and t + 𝓚 since f : EP → ℝ is bounded continuous. It follows from [20, Theorem 5.8] that F(t,⋅) is Δ-integrable on [t0,t0 + 2𝓚)𝕋. Thus, by [21, Theorem 2.15],

RF(t,s)ΔtΔs=t0t0+Kt0t0+2KF(t,s)ΔsΔt=t0t0+Ktt+Kf(t,s)ΔsΔt.(3)

On the other hand, for s ∈ [t0,t0 + 𝓚)𝕋,

F(t,s)=f(t,s),if t[t0,s)T,0,if t[s,t0+K)T,

and for s ∈ [t0+𝓚,t0 + 2𝓚)𝕋,

F(t,s)=0,if t[t0,sK)T,f(t,s),if t[sK,t0+K)T.

Similarly, we can get that for every s ∈ [t0,t0 + 2𝓚)𝕋, F(⋅,s) is Δ-integrable on [t0,t0 + 𝓚)𝕋. Thus, by [21, Remark 2.16],

RF(t,s)ΔtΔs=t0t0+2Kt0t0+KF(t,s)ΔtΔs
=t0t0+Kt0sf(t,s)ΔtΔs+t0+Kt0+2KsKt0+Kf(t,s)ΔtΔs.

This together with (3) leads to the conclusion. □

Proposition 3.11

PAP(𝕋;𝔼n)⊂ Sp PAP(𝕋;𝔼n).

Proof

Let f = g + ϕPAP(𝕋;𝔼n) with gAP(𝕋;𝔼n) and ϕPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n). Then fBSp(𝕋;𝔼n), AP(𝕋;𝔼n)⊂ SpAP(𝕋;𝔼n) by Proposition 2.8 (iii), and we need only to prove that ϕPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n), i.e. 𝓝(ϕ) ∈ PAP0(𝕋;ℝ). In fact, let q > 0 with 1/p + 1/q = 1, for fixed t0 ∈ 𝕋 and m ∈ ℕ,

1mKt0t0+mKN(ϕ)(t)Δt(mK)1q1t0t0+mK(N(ϕ)(t))pΔt1p=1mK2t0t0+mKtt+K|ϕ(s)|pΔsΔt1p||ϕ||p1p1mK2t0t0+mKtt+K|ϕ(s)|ΔsΔt1p=||ϕ||1q1mK2i=0m1t0t0+Ktt+K|ϕ(s+iK)|ΔsΔt1p.

Meanwhile, by Lemma 3.10 and the fact that |ϕ| + |ϕ(⋅ + 𝓚)| ∈ PAP0(𝕋;n),

1mK2i=0m1t0t0+Ktt+K|ϕ(s+iK)|ΔsΔt=1mK2i=0m1t0t0+Kt0s|ϕ(s+iK)|ΔtΔs+t0+Kt0+2KsKt0+K|ϕ(s+iK)|ΔtΔs1mKi=0m1t0t0+K|ϕ(s+iK)|Δs+t0+Kt0+2K|ϕ(s+iK)|Δs=1mKt0t0+mK(|ϕ(s)|+|ϕ(s+K)|)Δs0as m+.

Then

1mKt0t0+mKN(ϕ)(t)Δt0as m+.

This implies that 𝓝(ϕ) ∈ PAP0(𝕋;ℝ). □

3.4 Composition theorems

We will use the following Sp-Lipschitz condition for fSpAP(𝕋 ×𝔼n;𝔼n):

(H) There exists a constant Lf > 0 such that for any x,yBSp(𝕋;𝔼n) and t ∈ 𝕋,

N(f(,x())f(,y()))(t)LfN(xy)(t).

Remark 3.12

Obviously, (H) implies thatf(⋅, x(⋅))– f(⋅, y(⋅))∥SpLfxySp. Moreover, f satisfies (H) if f(t,x) is Lipschitz continuous in x ∈ 𝔼n uniformly in t ∈ 𝕋, i.e.|f(t,x) – f(t,y)| ≤ L|xy| for every x,y ∈ 𝔼n, t ∈ 𝕋 and some constant L.

Theorem 3.13

Assume that fSpAP(𝕋 ×𝔼n;𝔼n) satisfies (H), and uSpAP(𝕋;𝔼n) withu(𝕋)compact. Then f(⋅,u(⋅)) ∈ SpAP(𝕋;𝔼n).

Proof

By (H),

||f(,u())f(,0)||SpLf||u||Sp.

Then

||f(,u())||Sp||f(,0)||Sp+Lf||u||Sp<.

That is

f(,u())BSp(T;En).(4)

Since u(𝕋) is compact, for ε> 0, there exist finite open balls Ok, k = 1, 2, …, m, with center uku(𝕋) and radius ε8Lf such that u(𝕋)k=1mOk. Set Bk:= {s ∈ 𝕋: u(s) ∈ Ok}, k = 1,2,…, m. Then 𝕋 = k=1mBk. Moreover, let E1 := B1, Ek := Bk(i=1k1Bi),k = 2, …, m. Then EiEj = ∅ for ij and 𝕋 = k=1mEk. Define a step function û:𝕋 → 𝔼n by û(s) := uk, sEk, k = 1,2,…, m. It is clear that |u(s) – û(s)| < ε8Lf for all s ∈ 𝕋. Then by (H), for τk=1mT(f(⋅,uk),ε4m),

||f(+τ,u())f(,u())||Sp||f(+τ,u())f(+τ,u^())||Sp+||f(+τ,u^())f(,u^())||Sp+||f(,u^())f(,u())||Sp2Lf||uu^||Sp+suptT1Ktt+K|f(s+τ,u^(s))f(s,u^(s))|pΔs1p<ε4+suptT1Kk=1m[t,t+K)TEk|f(s+τ,uk)f(s,uk)|pΔs1pε4+k=1m||f(+τ,uk)f(,uk)||Spε4+mε4m=ε2.

Notice that 𝒢 := k=1mT(f(,uk),ε4m)T(u,ε2Lf) is relatively dense by [22, Lemma 4.9]. Thus, for τ𝒢, by (H),

||f(+τ,u(+τ))f(,u())||Sp||f(+τ,u(+τ))f(+τ,u())||Sp+||f(+τ,u())f(,u())||Sp<Lf||u(+τ)u||Sp+ε2<ε.

This implies that 𝒢T(f(⋅,u(⋅)), ε), and T(f(⋅,u(⋅)), ε) is relatively dense. Therefore, f(⋅,u(⋅)) ∈ SpAP(𝕋;𝔼n). □

Theorem 3.14

Let f = g + ϕSpPAP(𝕋 ×𝔼n;𝔼n) and u = x + ySpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n) withx(𝕋)compact. Assume that f and g satisfy (H) with Lipschitz constants Lf and Lg, respectively. Then f(⋅,u(⋅)) ∈ SpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n).

Proof

Let I1(t) = g(t,x(t)), I2(t) = f(t,u(t))–f(t,x(t)) and I3(t) = ϕ(t,x(t)), t ∈ 𝕋. Then

f(t,u(t))=I1(t)+I2(t)+I3(t),tT.

By Theorem 3.13, we have I1SpAP(𝕋;𝔼n). So it suffices to prove that I2,I3SpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n).

Since f satisfies (H) with Lf,

||I2||Sp=||f(,u())f(,x())||SpLf||ux||Sp=Lf||y||Sp<.

which implies that BSp(𝕋; 𝔼n). Moreover, since ySpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n), for given t0∈𝕋,

12rt0rt0+rN(I2)(s)Δs=12rt0rt0+rN(f(,u())f(,x()))(s)ΔsLf2rt0rt0+rN(y)(s)Δs0, as r+.

This shows that I2SpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n).

By the same arguments as to get (4), we can get I3BSp(𝕋;𝔼n). Since x(𝕋) is compact, for any ε>0, as the proof of Theorem 3.13, we can find xix(𝕋), Ei⊂𝕋, i = 1,2,…,l and :𝕋→𝔼n such that (s): = xi, sEi, i = 1,2,…, l, EiEj = ∅ for ij, 𝕋 = i=1lEi, and |x(s)–(s)|< ε2(Lf+Lg) for all s ∈𝕋. Since ϕ(⋅,x)∈ SpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n) for every x∈𝔼n, there exists r0 >0 such that for r>r0, 1≤ il,

12rt0rt0+rN(ϕ(,xi))(s)Δs<ε2l.(5)

Note that ϕ satisfies (H) with Lf+Lg since f and g satisfy (H) with Lf and Lg, respectively, then by (H) and (5), for r>r0,

12rt0rt0+rN(ϕ(,x()))(t)Δt12rt0rt0+rN(ϕ(,x())ϕ(,x^()))(t)Δt+12rt0rt0+rN(ϕ(,x^()))(t)Δt12rt0rt0+r(Lf+Lg)N(xx^)(t)Δt+12rt0rt0+r1Ki=1l[t,t+K)TEi|ϕ(s,xi)|pΔs1pΔtε2+i=1l12rt0rt0+rN(ϕ(,xi))(t)Δt<ε.

This yields that I3SpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n).□

By Proposition 2.5, x(𝕋) is compact for xAP(𝕋;𝔼n). Then by Theorem 3.11 and 3.14, we have the following corollary.

Corollary 3.15

Let f = g + ϕSpPAP(𝕋×𝔼n;𝔼n) and uPAP(𝕋;𝔼n). Assume that f and g satisfy (H). Then f(⋅,u(⋅))∈ SpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n).

4 Dynamic equations

4.1 Exponential functions

A function p:𝕋→ℝ is called regressive provided 1+μ(t)p(t)≠0 for all t ∈𝕋κ. The set of all regressive and rd-continuous functions p :𝕋 → ℝ will be denoted by 𝓡 = 𝓡(𝕋) = 𝓡(𝕋;ℝ). We define the set 𝓡+ = 𝓡+(𝕋;ℝ) = {p ∈𝓡: 1+ μ(t)p(t)>0 for t ∈𝕋}. The set of all regressive functions on time scales forms an Abelian group under the addition ⊕ defined by pqp +q + μ(t)pq. Meanwhile, the additive inverse in this group is denoted by ⊖pp1+μ(t)p.

Definition 4.1

([2]).If p ∈ 𝓡 then the exponential function is defined by

ep(t,s)=expstξμ(τ)(p(τ))Δτ,

for s,t ∈ 𝕋, with the cylinder transformation

ξh(z)=1hLog(1+hz),ifh0,z,ifh=0,

where Log is the principal logarithm.

Definition 4.2

[2] A matrix-valued function A: 𝕋 → ℝ n×nis called regressive if I + μ(t)A(t) is invertible for all t ∈𝕋 κ, and the class of all such regressive and rd-continuous functions is denoted, similarly to the scalar case, by 𝓡 =𝓡(𝕋) = 𝓡(𝕋;ℝn×n).

Definition 4.3

([2]). Let t0 ∈𝕋 and A ∈𝓡(𝕋;ℝn×n). The unique matrix-valued solution of the initial value problem (IVP)

XΔ(t)=A(t)X(t),X(t0)=I,(6)

where I denotes the n ×n identity matrix, is called the matrix exponential function (at t0), which is denoted by eA(⋅,t0).

We note that the existence and uniqueness of IVP (6) can be obtained by [2, Theorem 5.8].

Lemma 4.4

([2]) Let t,s ∈ 𝕋.

  1. ep(t,t) = 1, eA(t,t) = I.

  2. ep(σ(t),s) = (1+μ(t)p(t))ep(t,s).

  3. ep(t,s)ep(s,r) = ep(t,r), eA (t,s)eA(s,r) = eA(t,r).

Lemma 4.5

Let a >0 be a constant and t,s ∈ 𝕋.

  1. ea(t,s)≤ 1 if ts.

  2. ea(t +τ,s + τ) = ea(t,s) for τΠ.

  3. There exists N >0 such that(ts)ea(t,s)≤ N for ts.

  4. For t0 ∈ 𝕋, ea(t0,⋅) is increasing on (–∞,t0]𝕋.

  5. The seriesj=1ea(t,σ(t)–(j1)𝓚) converges uniformly for t ∈ 𝕋. Moreover, for all t∈ 𝕋,

    j=1ea(t,σ(t)(j1)K)λa:=11eaK,T=R,2+aμ¯+1aμ¯,TR,

    where μ¯:=suptTμ(t).

Proof

(i) is obvious. (ii) can be readily obtained by the fact that μ(t + τ) = μ(t) for all t ∈ 𝕋 and τΠ. If 𝕋 = ℝ, (ts)ea(t,s) = (ts)ea(ts)≤ 1ae. That is (iii) holds with N = 1ae. If 𝕋≠ ℝ, let {ti}i∈I, I ⊆ℝ, be all right-scattered points in 𝕋. By [13, Theorem 5.2],

ea(t,s)=exp[s,t)T(a)dτti[s,t)TLog(1+aμ(ti))=eaμL([s,t)T)ti[s,t)T11+aμ(ti)ti[s,t)T11+aμ(ti),(7)

where μL denotes the Lebesgue measure. For t> s, there exists a unique nts ∈ ℝ such that t ∈[s + (nts-1)𝓚,s + nts 𝓚)𝕋. Let t0∈ 𝕋 be right-scattered, then for every n ∈ℤ, t0 + n 𝓚 is right-scattered and μ(t0 + n𝓚) = μ(t0). Moreover, for s ∈ 𝕋, [s,s + (nts–1)𝓚)𝕋 contains nts –1 right-scattered points with form t0 + n 𝓚. Denote Γ = 1 + (t0) for the convenient of writing. Then by (7),

(ts)ea(t,s)ntsKti[s,s+(nts1)K)T11+aμ(ti)ntsK11+aμ(t0)nts1=ntsKΓ1ntsKΓ11/lnΓlnΓ.

So (iii) holds with N = 𝓚 Γ1–1 /lnΓ/lnΓ.

(iv) can be verified easily by the definition.

If 𝕋 = ℝ, for t ∈ 𝕋,

j=1ea(t,σ(t)(j1)K)=j=1ea(j1)=11ea.

That is (v) holds for 𝕋 = ℝ. If 𝕋 ≠ ℝ, then 𝓚 ≥ μ = suptTμ(t) >0, and it is easy to see that there exists a right-scattered point t0 such that μ(t0) = μ. In addition, for t ∈ 𝕋 and j ≥3, [t, σ(t)-(j–1)𝓚)𝕋 contains at least j–2 right-scattered points with forms t0 + nt 𝓚, nt ∈ℤ, μ(t0 + nt 𝓚) = μ(t0) = μ, and

ea(t,σ(t)(j1)K)(ea(σ(t0),t0))j2=(1+aμ¯)2j.

Then for any t ∈ 𝕋,

j=1ea(t,σ(t)(j1)K)ea(t,σ(t))+ea(t,σ(t)K)+j=3(1+aμ¯)2j(1+aμ¯)+1+1aμ¯=2+aμ¯+1aμ¯.

That is (v) holds for 𝕋 ≠ ℝ.

Lemma 4.6

Assume that A ∈𝓡(𝕋;ℝn×n) is almost periodic and

eA(t,s)Ceα(t,s),ts,(8)

where C and α are positive real numbers. Let M = (1 + α 𝓚)C2N with N the constant in Lemma 4.5 (iii), and for ε >0,

Υ(ε)={rΠ:eA(t+r,σ(s)+r)eA(t,σ(s))<ε,t,sT,tσ(s)}.

Then T(A, ε/M) ⊂ Υ(ε), which implies that Υ(ε) is relatively dense in Π.

Proof

For ε>0, let rT(A, ε/M) and U(t,σ(s)): = eA(t + r,σ(s) + r)–eA(t,σ(s)). Differentiate U with respect to t and denote by ΔUΔt the partial derivative, then

ΔUΔt=A(t+r)eA(t+r,s+r)A(t)eA(t,σ(s))=A(t)U(t,σ(s))+(A(t+r)A(t))eA(t+r,σ(s)+r).

Note that U(σ(s),σ(s)) = 0, then by the variation of constants formula ([2, Theorem 5.24]),

U(t,σ(s))=σ(s)teA(t,σ(τ))(A(τ+r)A(τ))eA(τ+r,σ(s)+r)Δτ.

Therefore, by (8), Lemma 4.4, 4.5 and the fact that μ(τ)≤ 𝓚, τ∈ 𝕋, for t,s ∈ 𝕋 with tσ(s),

U(t,σ(s))σ(s)teA(t,σ(τ))(A(τ+r)A(τ))eA(τ+r,σ(s)+r)ΔτεMC2σ(s)teα(t,σ(τ))eα(τ+r,σ(s)+r)Δτ=εMC2eα(t,σ(s))σ(s)teα(τ,σ(τ))Δτ=εMC2eα(t,σ(s))σ(s)t(1+αμ(τ))ΔτεMC2(1+αK)(tσ(s))eα(t,σ(s))εMC2(1+αK)N=ε.

This implies that T(A, ε/M) ⊂ Υ(ε), and Υ(ε) is relatively dense in Π. □

4.2 Dynamic equations with delay

As an application of the results obtained in the above sections, we consider the following nonlinear dynamic equation with delay:

xΔ(t)=A(t)x(t)+f(t,x(tω)),tT,(9)

where A(t) is an n×n almost periodic matrix function, ωΠ, ω>0 and fSpPAP(𝕋×𝔼n;𝔼n)∩ C(𝕋×𝔼n;𝔼n).

To consider (9), we first consider its corresponding linear equation:

xΔ(t)=A(t)x(t)+f(t),tT,(10)

where f = g + ϕSp PAP(𝕋;𝔼n)∩ C(𝕋;𝔼n).

Lemma 4.7

Assume that A∈ 𝓡(𝕋;ℝn×n) with(8)satisfied. Then(10)admits a unique bounded continuous solution u(t) given by

u(t)=teA(t,σ(s))f(s)Δs,tT.(11)

Proof

For t ∈ 𝕋, j≥1, by Hölder inequality,

tjKt(j1)K|f(s)|ΔsK1/qtjKt(j1)K|f(s)|pΔs1/p=KN(f)(tjK)KfSp.(12)

Then by (8), (11) and Lemma 4.5 (iv), (v), for t ∈ 𝕋,

|u(t)|j=1tjKt(j1)KeA(t,σ(s))|f(s)|ΔsCj=1tjKt(j1)Keα(t,σ(s))|f(s)|ΔsCj=1eα(t,σ(t)(j1)K)tjKt(j1)K|f(s)|ΔsCλαKfSp.

Thus u is well defined and bounded continuous. Moreover, by Lemma 4.4, fix t0 ∈𝕋,

u(t)=teA(t,σ(s))f(s)Δs=eA(t,t0)teA(t0,σ(s))f(s)Δs.

Then by Lemma 4.4 and [2, Theorem 5.3 (iii)],

uΔ(t)=A(t)eA(t,t0)teA(t0,σ(s))f(s)Δs+eA(σ(t),t0)eA(t0,σ(t))f(t)=A(t)u(t)+f(t),

which implies that u is a solution of (10). Assume that v:𝕋→𝔼n is another bounded solution of (10). For r∈𝕋, by the variation of constants formula ([2, Theorem 5.24]),

v(t)=eA(t,r)v(r)+rteA(t,σ(s))f(s)Δs,tT.

Since v is bounded, (8) implies that eA(t,r)v(r)→0 as r→–∞. Letting r →–∞,

v(t)=teA(t,σ(s))f(s)Δs=u(t).

That is the bounded solution of (10) is unique.□

Theorem 4.8

Assume that A∈ 𝓡(𝕋;ℝn×n) is almost periodic and(8)holds. Then(10)admits a unique pseudo almost periodic solution u(t) given by(11).

Proof

By Lemma 4.7, it suffices to prove that uPAP(𝕋;𝔼n). In fact, for t ∈ 𝕋, let

u(t)=teA(t,σ(s))f(s)Δs=j=1uj(t),

where

uj(t)=tjKt(j1)KeA(t,σ(s))f(s)Δs=tjKt(j1)KeA(t,σ(s))g(s)Δs+tjKt(j1)KeA(t,σ(s))ϕ(s)Δs=φj(t)+ψj(t),jN.

For ε> 0, it follows from [22, Lemma 4.9] that TA,ε2MK(1+gSp)Tg,ε2CK is relatively dense in Π. Denote

G1=Υε2K(1+gSp)Tg,ε2CK,

where Υ the one given in Lemma 4.6. Then 𝒢1 is relatively dense in Π by Lemma 4.6. Let τ𝒢1, t,s ∈ 𝕋 with tσ(s),

|eA(t+τ,σ(s+τ))g(s+τ)eA(t,σ(s))g(s)|eA(t+τ,σ(s)+τ)eA(t,σ(s))|g(s+τ)|+eA(t,σ(s))|g(s+τ)g(s)|ε|g(s+τ)|2K(1+gSp)+Ceα(t,σ(s))|g(s+τ)g(s)|ε|g(s+τ)|2K(1+gSp)+C|g(s+τ)g(s)|.

Now by the same calculation of (12), we can get for j∈ℕ,

|φj(t+τ)φj(t)|=tjKt(j1)KeA(t+τ,σ(s+τ))g(s+τ)eA(t,σ(s))g(s)Δsε2K(1+gSp)tjKt(j1)K|g(s+τ)|Δs+CtjKt(j1)K|g(s+τ)g(s)|ΔsεKgSp2K(1+gSp)+CKg(+τ)gSp<ε2+CKε2CK=ε.

This implies that 𝒢1T(φj,ε). Then T(φj,ε) is relatively dense in Π and φj is almost periodic for j ∈ ℕ. Meanwhile, by Lemma 4.5 (iv), for j∈ℕ and t ∈ 𝕋,

eα(t,σ(t)(j1)K)eα(t,σ(t))=1+αμ(t)1+αμ¯.

Then by (8) and the same calculation of (12),

|ψj(t)|tjKt(j1)KeA(t,σ(s))|ϕ(s)|ΔsCtjKt(j1)Keα(t,σ(s))|ϕ(s)|ΔsCeα(t,σ(t)(j1)K)tjKt(j1)K|ϕ(s)|ΔsC(1+αμ¯)KN(ϕ)(tjK),

which implies that ψjBC(𝕋;𝔼n). Notice that ϕSpPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n). Thus for a fixed t0∈𝕋,

limr+12rt0rt0+r|ψj(t)|ΔtC(1+αμ¯)Klimr+12rt0rt0+rN(ϕ)(tjK)Δt=0.

Hence ψjPAP0(𝕋;𝔼n) and uj = φj + ψj∈ PAP(𝕋; 𝔼n). Consequently, uPAP(𝕋;𝔼n).□

Remark 4.9

When 𝕋 = ℕ, μ(t) = 0 for all t ∈ 𝕋 and hence A𝓡 automatically. Then Theorem 4.8 is an extension of [19, Theorem 3.2] to time scales.

For nonlinear dynamics equation (9), we have the following result.

Theorem 4.10

Assume that A ∈ 𝓡(𝕋;ℕn×n) with(8)satisfied, and f = g + ϕSpPAP(𝕋×𝔼n;𝔼n)∩ C(𝕋×𝔼n;𝔼n) with f and g satisfying (H) with Lipschitz constants Lf and Lg, respectively. Then(9)has a unique pseudo almost periodic solution u satisfying

u(t)=teA(t,σ(s))f(s,u(sω))Δs,tT,(13)

provided that C 𝓚 Lfλα<1, where λ αis as in Lemma 4.5.

Proof

Let φPAP(𝕋;𝔼n). It follows from Proposition 2.6 (i) and Corollary 3.15 that f(⋅, φ(⋅–ω))∈ SpPAP(𝕋;𝔼n). Let

T(φ)(t):=teA(t,σ(s))f(s,φ(sω))Δs,tT.

Then T(φ)∈ PAP(𝕋;𝔼n) by Theorem 4.8. That is T: PAP(𝕋;𝔼n)→ PAP(𝕋;𝔼n). By (H), (8), Lemma 4.5 and the same calculation of (12), for φ, θPAP(𝕋;𝔼n), t ∈ 𝕋,

|T(φ)(t)T(θ)(t)|teA(t,σ(s))|f(s,φ(sω))f(s,θ(sw))|ΔsCj=1tjKt(j1)Keα(t,σ(s))|f(s,φ(sω))f(s,θ(sω))|ΔsCj=1eα(t,σ(t)(j1)K)tjKt(j1)K|f(s,φ(sω))f(s,θ(sω))|ΔsCKj=1eα(t,σ(t)(j1)K)N(f(,φ(ω))f(,θ(ω)))(tjK)CKLfj=1eα(t,σ(t)(j1)K)N(φ(ω)θ(ω))(tjK)CKLfλαφθ.

This implies that

T(φ)T(θ)CKLfλαφθ.

Thus T is a contraction operator since C 𝓚 Lfλα <1, and then T has a unique fixed point uPAP(𝕋;𝔼n). This means that (9) has a unique pseudo almost periodic solution u satisfying (13).□

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China ( Grant No. 11471227, 11561077).

References

[1] Hilger, S., Ein Maβkettenkalkül mit Anwendung auf Zentrumsmanningfaltigkeiten, PhD thesis, Universität Würzburg, 1988Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bohner, M., Peterson, A., Dynamic Equations on Time Scales: An Introduction with Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston, 200110.1007/978-1-4612-0201-1Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bohner, M., Peterson, A., Advances in Dynamic Equations on Time Scales, Birkhäuser, Boston, 200310.1007/978-0-8176-8230-9Search in Google Scholar

[4] Li, Y.K., Wang, C., Almost periodic functions on time scales and applications, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2011, Article ID 72706810.1155/2011/727068Search in Google Scholar

[5] Li, Y.K., Wang, C., Uniformly almost periodic functions and almost periodic solutions to dynamic equations on time scales, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2011, Article ID 34152010.1155/2011/341520Search in Google Scholar

[6] Li, Y.K., Wang, C., Pseudo almost periodic functions and pseudo almost periodic solutions to dynamic equations on time scales, Adv. Difference Equ., 2012, Article No. 7710.1186/1687-1847-2012-77Search in Google Scholar

[7] Lizama, C., Mesquita, J.G., Almost automorphic solutions of dynamic equations on time scales, J. Funct. Anal., 2013, 265, 2267–231110.1016/j.jfa.2013.06.013Search in Google Scholar

[8] Li, Y.K., Zhao, L.L., Weighted pseudo-almost periodic functions on time scales with applications to cellular neural networks with discrete delays, Math. Methods Appl., 2017, 40, 1905–192110.1002/mma.4107Search in Google Scholar

[9] Stepanov, V. V., Über einigen Verallgemeinerungen der fastperiodischen funktionen, Math. Ann., 1926, 95, 473–49810.1007/BF01206623Search in Google Scholar

[10] Wiener, N., On the representation of functions by trigonometrical integrals, Math. Z., 1926, 24, 575–61610.1007/BF01216799Search in Google Scholar

[11] Diagana, T., Mophou, G.M., N’Guérékata, G.M., Existence of weighted pseudo-almost periodic solutions to some classes of differential equations with Sp-weighted pseudo-almost periodic coefficients, Nonlinear Anal., 2010, 72, 430–43810.1016/j.na.2009.06.077Search in Google Scholar

[12] Li, Y.K., Wang, P., Almost periodic solution for neutral functional dynamic equations with Stepsnov-almost periodic terms on time scales, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 2017, 10, 463–47310.3934/dcdss.2017022Search in Google Scholar

[13] Cabada, A., Vivero, D.R., Expression of the Lebesgue Δ−integral on time scales as a usual Lebesgue integral. Application to the calculus of Δ−antiderivatives, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 2006, 43, 194–20710.1016/j.mcm.2005.09.028Search in Google Scholar

[14] Wang, C., Agarwal, R. P., Relatively dense sets, corrected uniformly almost periodic functions on time scales, and generalizations, Adv. Difference Equ. 2015, Article No. 31210.1186/s13662-015-0650-0Search in Google Scholar

[15] Bohner, M., Guseinov, G.S., Multiple Lebesgue integration on time scales, Adv. Difference Equ., 2006, Article No. 2639110.1155/ADE/2006/26391Search in Google Scholar

[16] Bohner, M., Guseinov, G.S., Multiple integration on time scales, Dynam. Systems Appl., 2005, 14, 579–60610.1155/ADE/2006/26391Search in Google Scholar

[17] Lizama, C., Mesquita, J.G., Ponce, R., A connection between almost periodic functions defined on timescales and ℝ, Appl. Anal. 2014, 93, 2547–255810.1080/00036811.2013.875161Search in Google Scholar

[18] Wang, Q.R., Zhu, Z.Q., Almost periodic solutions of neutral functional dynamic systems in the sense of Stepanov, Difference Equations, in: Discrete Dynamical Systems and Applications, Springer International Publishing, 2015, 393–39410.1007/978-3-319-24747-2_10Search in Google Scholar

[19] Diagana, T., Stepanov-like pseudo-almost periodicity and its applications to some nonautonmous differential equations, Nonlinear Anal., 2008, 69, 4277–428510.1016/j.na.2007.10.051Search in Google Scholar

[20] Guseinov, G.S., Integration on time scales, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 2003, 285, 107–12710.1016/S0022-247X(03)00361-5Search in Google Scholar

[21] Bohner, M., Guseinov, G.S., Double integral calculus of variations on times scales, Comput. Math. Appl., 2007, 54, 45–5710.1016/j.camwa.2006.10.032Search in Google Scholar

[22] Tang, C. H., Li, H. X., Bochner-like transform and Stepanov almost periodicity on time scales with applications, submitted for publication10.3390/sym10110566Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-02-13
Accepted: 2018-05-22
Published Online: 2018-07-25

© 2018 Tang and Li, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Algebraic proofs for shallow water bi–Hamiltonian systems for three cocycle of the semi-direct product of Kac–Moody and Virasoro Lie algebras
  3. On a viscous two-fluid channel flow including evaporation
  4. Generation of pseudo-random numbers with the use of inverse chaotic transformation
  5. Singular Cauchy problem for the general Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation
  6. Ternary and n-ary f-distributive structures
  7. On the fine Simpson moduli spaces of 1-dimensional sheaves supported on plane quartics
  8. Evaluation of integrals with hypergeometric and logarithmic functions
  9. Bounded solutions of self-adjoint second order linear difference equations with periodic coeffients
  10. Oscillation of first order linear differential equations with several non-monotone delays
  11. Existence and regularity of mild solutions in some interpolation spaces for functional partial differential equations with nonlocal initial conditions
  12. The log-concavity of the q-derangement numbers of type B
  13. Generalized state maps and states on pseudo equality algebras
  14. Monotone subsequence via ultrapower
  15. Note on group irregularity strength of disconnected graphs
  16. On the security of the Courtois-Finiasz-Sendrier signature
  17. A further study on ordered regular equivalence relations in ordered semihypergroups
  18. On the structure vector field of a real hypersurface in complex quadric
  19. Rank relations between a {0, 1}-matrix and its complement
  20. Lie n superderivations and generalized Lie n superderivations of superalgebras
  21. Time parallelization scheme with an adaptive time step size for solving stiff initial value problems
  22. Stability problems and numerical integration on the Lie group SO(3) × R3 × R3
  23. On some fixed point results for (s, p, α)-contractive mappings in b-metric-like spaces and applications to integral equations
  24. On algebraic characterization of SSC of the Jahangir’s graph 𝓙n,m
  25. A greedy algorithm for interval greedoids
  26. On nonlinear evolution equation of second order in Banach spaces
  27. A primal-dual approach of weak vector equilibrium problems
  28. On new strong versions of Browder type theorems
  29. A Geršgorin-type eigenvalue localization set with n parameters for stochastic matrices
  30. Restriction conditions on PL(7, 2) codes (3 ≤ |𝓖i| ≤ 7)
  31. Singular integrals with variable kernel and fractional differentiation in homogeneous Morrey-Herz-type Hardy spaces with variable exponents
  32. Introduction to disoriented knot theory
  33. Restricted triangulation on circulant graphs
  34. Boundedness control sets for linear systems on Lie groups
  35. Chen’s inequalities for submanifolds in (κ, μ)-contact space form with a semi-symmetric metric connection
  36. Disjointed sum of products by a novel technique of orthogonalizing ORing
  37. A parametric linearizing approach for quadratically inequality constrained quadratic programs
  38. Generalizations of Steffensen’s inequality via the extension of Montgomery identity
  39. Vector fields satisfying the barycenter property
  40. On the freeness of hypersurface arrangements consisting of hyperplanes and spheres
  41. Biderivations of the higher rank Witt algebra without anti-symmetric condition
  42. Some remarks on spectra of nuclear operators
  43. Recursive interpolating sequences
  44. Involutory biquandles and singular knots and links
  45. Constacyclic codes over 𝔽pm[u1, u2,⋯,uk]/〈 ui2 = ui, uiuj = ujui
  46. Topological entropy for positively weak measure expansive shadowable maps
  47. Oscillation and non-oscillation of half-linear differential equations with coeffcients determined by functions having mean values
  48. On 𝓠-regular semigroups
  49. One kind power mean of the hybrid Gauss sums
  50. A reduced space branch and bound algorithm for a class of sum of ratios problems
  51. Some recurrence formulas for the Hermite polynomials and their squares
  52. A relaxed block splitting preconditioner for complex symmetric indefinite linear systems
  53. On f - prime radical in ordered semigroups
  54. Positive solutions of semipositone singular fractional differential systems with a parameter and integral boundary conditions
  55. Disjoint hypercyclicity equals disjoint supercyclicity for families of Taylor-type operators
  56. A stochastic differential game of low carbon technology sharing in collaborative innovation system of superior enterprises and inferior enterprises under uncertain environment
  57. Dynamic behavior analysis of a prey-predator model with ratio-dependent Monod-Haldane functional response
  58. The points and diameters of quantales
  59. Directed colimits of some flatness properties and purity of epimorphisms in S-posets
  60. Super (a, d)-H-antimagic labeling of subdivided graphs
  61. On the power sum problem of Lucas polynomials and its divisible property
  62. Existence of solutions for a shear thickening fluid-particle system with non-Newtonian potential
  63. On generalized P-reducible Finsler manifolds
  64. On Banach and Kuratowski Theorem, K-Lusin sets and strong sequences
  65. On the boundedness of square function generated by the Bessel differential operator in weighted Lebesque Lp,α spaces
  66. On the different kinds of separability of the space of Borel functions
  67. Curves in the Lorentz-Minkowski plane: elasticae, catenaries and grim-reapers
  68. Functional analysis method for the M/G/1 queueing model with single working vacation
  69. Existence of asymptotically periodic solutions for semilinear evolution equations with nonlocal initial conditions
  70. The existence of solutions to certain type of nonlinear difference-differential equations
  71. Domination in 4-regular Knödel graphs
  72. Stepanov-like pseudo almost periodic functions on time scales and applications to dynamic equations with delay
  73. Algebras of right ample semigroups
  74. Random attractors for stochastic retarded reaction-diffusion equations with multiplicative white noise on unbounded domains
  75. Nontrivial periodic solutions to delay difference equations via Morse theory
  76. A note on the three-way generalization of the Jordan canonical form
  77. On some varieties of ai-semirings satisfying xp+1x
  78. Abstract-valued Orlicz spaces of range-varying type
  79. On the recursive properties of one kind hybrid power mean involving two-term exponential sums and Gauss sums
  80. Arithmetic of generalized Dedekind sums and their modularity
  81. Multipreconditioned GMRES for simulating stochastic automata networks
  82. Regularization and error estimates for an inverse heat problem under the conformable derivative
  83. Transitivity of the εm-relation on (m-idempotent) hyperrings
  84. Learning Bayesian networks based on bi-velocity discrete particle swarm optimization with mutation operator
  85. Simultaneous prediction in the generalized linear model
  86. Two asymptotic expansions for gamma function developed by Windschitl’s formula
  87. State maps on semihoops
  88. 𝓜𝓝-convergence and lim-inf𝓜-convergence in partially ordered sets
  89. Stability and convergence of a local discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for the general Lax equation
  90. New topology in residuated lattices
  91. Optimality and duality in set-valued optimization utilizing limit sets
  92. An improved Schwarz Lemma at the boundary
  93. Initial layer problem of the Boussinesq system for Rayleigh-Bénard convection with infinite Prandtl number limit
  94. Toeplitz matrices whose elements are coefficients of Bazilevič functions
  95. Epi-mild normality
  96. Nonlinear elastic beam problems with the parameter near resonance
  97. Orlicz difference bodies
  98. The Picard group of Brauer-Severi varieties
  99. Galoisian and qualitative approaches to linear Polyanin-Zaitsev vector fields
  100. Weak group inverse
  101. Infinite growth of solutions of second order complex differential equation
  102. Semi-Hurewicz-Type properties in ditopological texture spaces
  103. Chaos and bifurcation in the controlled chaotic system
  104. Translatability and translatable semigroups
  105. Sharp bounds for partition dimension of generalized Möbius ladders
  106. Uniqueness theorems for L-functions in the extended Selberg class
  107. An effective algorithm for globally solving quadratic programs using parametric linearization technique
  108. Bounds of Strong EMT Strength for certain Subdivision of Star and Bistar
  109. On categorical aspects of S -quantales
  110. On the algebraicity of coefficients of half-integral weight mock modular forms
  111. Dunkl analogue of Szász-mirakjan operators of blending type
  112. Majorization, “useful” Csiszár divergence and “useful” Zipf-Mandelbrot law
  113. Global stability of a distributed delayed viral model with general incidence rate
  114. Analyzing a generalized pest-natural enemy model with nonlinear impulsive control
  115. Boundary value problems of a discrete generalized beam equation via variational methods
  116. Common fixed point theorem of six self-mappings in Menger spaces using (CLRST) property
  117. Periodic and subharmonic solutions for a 2nth-order p-Laplacian difference equation containing both advances and retardations
  118. Spectrum of free-form Sudoku graphs
  119. Regularity of fuzzy convergence spaces
  120. The well-posedness of solution to a compressible non-Newtonian fluid with self-gravitational potential
  121. On further refinements for Young inequalities
  122. Pretty good state transfer on 1-sum of star graphs
  123. On a conjecture about generalized Q-recurrence
  124. Univariate approximating schemes and their non-tensor product generalization
  125. Multi-term fractional differential equations with nonlocal boundary conditions
  126. Homoclinic and heteroclinic solutions to a hepatitis C evolution model
  127. Regularity of one-sided multilinear fractional maximal functions
  128. Galois connections between sets of paths and closure operators in simple graphs
  129. KGSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm for Multimodal Optimization based on K-Means Niching Technique and a Novel Elitism Strategy
  130. θ-type Calderón-Zygmund Operators and Commutators in Variable Exponents Herz space
  131. An integral that counts the zeros of a function
  132. On rough sets induced by fuzzy relations approach in semigroups
  133. Computational uncertainty quantification for random non-autonomous second order linear differential equations via adapted gPC: a comparative case study with random Fröbenius method and Monte Carlo simulation
  134. The fourth order strongly noncanonical operators
  135. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  136. Review of Cryptographic Schemes applied to Remote Electronic Voting systems: remaining challenges and the upcoming post-quantum paradigm
  137. Linearity in decimation-based generators: an improved cryptanalysis on the shrinking generator
  138. On dynamic network security: A random decentering algorithm on graphs
Downloaded on 5.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2018-0073/html
Scroll to top button