Home Physical Sciences Enhancement of mechanical, thermal and water uptake performance of TPU/jute fiber green composites via chemical treatments on fiber surface
Article Open Access

Enhancement of mechanical, thermal and water uptake performance of TPU/jute fiber green composites via chemical treatments on fiber surface

  • Tuffaha Fathe Salem , Seha Tirkes , Alinda Oyku Akar and Umit Tayfun EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 21, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Chopped jute fiber (JF) surfaces were modified using alkaline, silane and eco-grade epoxy resin. Surface characteristics of jute fibers were confirmed by FTIR and EDX analyses. JF filled polyurethane elastomer (TPU) composites were prepared via extrusion process. The effect of surface modifications of JF on mechanical, thermo-mechanical, melt-flow, water uptake and morphological properties of TPU-based eco-composites were investigated by tensile and hardness tests, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), melt flow index (MFI) test, water absorption measurements and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques, respectively. Mechanical test results showed that silane and epoxy treated JF additions led to increase in tensile strength, modulus and hardness of TPU. Glass transition temperature (Tg) of TPU rose up to higher values after JF inclusions regardless of treatment type. Si-JF filled TPU exhibited the lowest water absorption among composites. Surface treated JFs displayed homogeneous dispersion into TPU and their surface were covered by TPU according to SEM micro-photographs.

Graphical Abstract

1 Introduction

Economic and environmental reasons force research efforts towards to development of natural fiber filled composites, namely environmentally friendly (green or eco-) composites, because of their ability for replacing man-made fiber composites (1, 2, 3). Eco-composites have several advantages such as having low density, bio-degradability, recyclability, and low cost. These distinctive properties make green composites favorable in various application fields including packaging, textile, transportation and construction (4, 5, 6, 7). However, these applications of eco-composites are limited since the existence of incompatibility between hydrophilic natural fiber and hydrophobic polymer phase (8). Several chemical treatment methods for natural fibers are performed in order to drawback this limitation which effects their application in wide range. The most commonly preferred method is the alkaline treatment in which roughness on fiber surface is improved physically (9). Silane treatment is another effective technique that reactive and compatible fiber surface can be achieved (10). These modifications increase compatibility of natural fiber with polymeric matrix by introducing adhesive layer between two phases (11,12).

Polyurethane elastomer (thermoplastic polyurethane-TPU) is a fully recyclable polymer which provides ease of processability thanks to its excellent flexibility and good stability against various environments. Eco-grade TPU is a new class of elastomer which is produced from renewable source with a content of 46% of total mass. The novel polyurethane based eco-composites can be fabricated using natural fibers with this new grade of polyurethane elastomer (13, 14, 15, 16).

Jute fiber (JF) is traditionally produced by extraction of jute plant using retting process by steeping in water. Cementing materials in JF undergo bacterial decomposition during retting technique. The retted JF is composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin constituents. JF found wide range of application fields mainly in roof tiles, panels, containers and tanks due to it is one of the strongest agricultural fibers. JF shows remarkable changes in diameter along with length of individual fibers, which is similar with other lignocellusics. The quality of this natural fiber is related with the parameters such as size, density and maturity (17, 18, 19, 20, 21).

There have been several research attempts towards to investigate the basic properties of JF reinforced polymer eco-composites. Rahman et al. prepared JF filled polypropylene (PP) composites using compression molding. They treated JF surface by various acrylic monomers for improvement of interfacial interactions between fiber and polymer matrix (22). Haydaruzzaman et al. also fabricated PP based composites containing hydroxyl ethylmethylacrylate and starch treated JF fabrics. They investigated that treated JF filled PP gave higher mechanical parameters such as tensile strength, tensile modulus, bending strength, bending modulus, impact strength as compared to untreated JF (23). Bulut et al. performed several surface treatments for JF including potassium dichromate, potassium permanganate and sodium perborate trihydrate. They found that the highest compatibility with PP matrix was achieved by sodium perborate trihydrate treated JF (24). Cabral et al. investigated the water uptake, mechanical and dielectric properties of JF loaded PP composites. Their findings showed that tensile strength and modulus increased with filling ratio of JF where, water absorption and dielectric properties of composites were varied according to JF content (25). Khan et al. studied the effect of hydroxy ethylmethylacrylate and 2-ethylhexylacrylate treatments of JF on their PP based composites and they found that treated JF samples exhibited higher tensile properties and bending modulus than untreated ones (26). Liu et al. tried to enhance performance of JF/PP composites by the treatments of alkaline and maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene emulsion. They postulated that these treatments caused increments in interfacial shear, flexural and tensile strengthes, however reductions for impact strength were observed (27). Baykus et al. examined the influence of pre-impregnation of JF with maleated coupling agents on mechanical and water uptake properties of JF filled PP and polyethylene (PE) composites. They observed that tensile strength of untreated JF containing PP and PE composites enhanced at about 90% and 40%, respectively. They also found that the highest reduction in water absorption was reached as alkaline and pre-impregnation treatments were used together for both PE and PP (28). Karmaker and Hinrichsen performed to produce PE and PP films containing JF. They reported that mechanical properties of films decreased with higher molding temperature and pressure due to damage of JF took place (29). Das et al. used silane coupling agent for the treatment of waste JFs and they mixed them with recycled PP matrix. They investigated that thermal and mechanical properties were improved for silane treated JF containing PP composites (30). Dogan et al. postulated the new route to modify JF surfaces with fatty acids. They produced low density polyethylene (LDPE) based composites with these JF samples. They found that tensile strength and modulus were enhanced using stearic acid modified JF and stearoyl azide treated JF showed decrease in the degree of crystallinity with respect to alkaline treated JF (31). Mohanty et al. studied the suitability of maleic anhydride grafted PE modified JF as an additive in high density polyethylene (HDPE) matrix. According to thermo-mechanical analysis they conducted, treated JF addition caused increments in storage modulus of HDPE (32). Islam et al. performed to fabricate JF reinforced polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and PP hybrid composites using compression molding. They showed that tensile strength and modulus, bending strength and modulus parameters of composites were varied with PP content (33). Hu et al. examined the hydrothermal aging behaviour of JF filled polylactide (PLA) composites and they investigated that tensile strength of composites showed reduction after aging process due to the formations of microcracks, pores and delamination in the microstructures (34). Huq et al. studied the effect of soil degradation on JF loaded polyethylene terephthalate (PET) based composites. Their findings exhibited that tensile strength and bending strength of composites decreased drastically after 6 weeks’ period of soil degradation test (35). Sarkhel and Choudhury investigated the mechanical, thermal and viscoelastic properties of JF filled ternary composites based on ethylene–propylene– diene terpolymer (EPDM) blends of LDPE and HDPE. In their study, HDPE gave higher storage and loss modulus than LDPE and mechanical properties of composites increased with JF and compatibilizer contents (36). Khan and Hassan treated the JF surface with silane and they prepared JF reinforced polycarbonate (PC) composites. According to their test results, silane treated JF showed improvement for mechanical properties as well as increase in storage and loss modulus (37).

The novelty of this research work lies in the investigations of basic properties of JF reinforced TPU based eco-composites by increasing interfacial interactions between fiber and polymer matrix thanks to applied eco-friendly chemical treatments to JF surface. Enhancement of mechanical, physical and water resistance performance of green composites leads to potential use including outdoor applications with low cost and practical processing methods. For these reasons, short JF samples were surface treated using alkaline, silane and eco-grade epoxy resin. Surface characteristics of fibers were examined by infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. Polyurethane elastomer-based composites were prepared via extrusion process. Eco-grade TPU was used in this study having biomass content of 46% of total mass. JF loadings were kept constant at 30% by weight in all composites. Test samples were shaped by injection molding process. The influence of surface modification of JF on mechanical, thermo-mechanical, melt-flow, water ageing and morphological properties of TPU based eco-composites were investigated by tensile and Shore hardness tests, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), melt flow index test, water absorption test and SEM technique, respectively.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

The commercial thermoplastic polyurethane was purchased from FKA Merquinsa, Barcelona, Spain under a trade name of Pearlthane® ECO D12T85. This eco-grade TPU consists of biomass with 46% content and it has a density of 1.15 g/cm3 according to producer. Bangladesh oriented jute fibers (JFs) used in this study and they were obtained from the local supplier in rowing form. JFs were chopped into 3-4 mm length before surface treatments and compounding steps. Reagent grade sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and ether solvent were supplied by Sigma Aldrich, Missouri, USA. Silane coupling agent was γ-aminopropyl triethoxy silane (APTES) and solvent was ethanol were purchased from Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany. Eco-grade epoxy resin was supplied from Ferrer Dalmau SA, Barcelona, Spain under the trade name of Super Sap CPM. It has bio-content of 47.5% and a density of 1.09 g/cm3 indicated by producer.

2.2 Surface treatments of JF

JF were washed to remove impurities and dried at 80°C for 24 h using vacuum oven (FN 055/120, Nuve AS, Ankara, Turkey). The neat JF sample was named as JF. Alkaline treatment was applied to JF by continuous mixing in 2 wt% water solution of NaOH for 2 h. The excess of NaOH was eliminated after washings 3 times with water. This portion was dried at 80°C in vacuum oven overnight and named as Na-JF. Silanization of JF was applied using similar modification routes in literature (38, 39, 40). During silane treatment, Na-FF was mixed in 2 wt% solution of APTES/ethanol for 2 h. The excess of silane contamination was removed by washing 3 times with ethanol. Silane modified JF was named as Si-JF. Another portion of Na-JF was subjected to epoxy modification via mixing in 4 wt% solution of epoxy/ether for 1 h. After washings 3 times with ether, sample was air-dried at room temperature. Epoxy treated portion was named as EP-JF.

2.3 Preparation of composites

TPU and JF samples were dried at 100°C for a period of 8 h to avoid possible moisture before extrusion process. Composites were fabricated using lab-scale twin screw extruder (15 mL micro-compounder, DSM Xplore, Netherlands) at constant loading level of 30 wt%. Processing temperature, screw speed and mixing time parameters were 200°C, 100 rpm and 5 min, respectively. The unfilled TPU was also mixed under the same processing conditions. Test samples of composites were shaped using injection molding instrument (Micro-injector, Daca Instruments, UK) in which barrel temperature of 205°C and injection pressure of 5 bar were applied. Injection molded dog-bone shaped specimens with the dimensions of 7.4 × 2.1 × 80 mm3 according to ASTM D-638 standard (41) were obtained from injection molding process.

2.4 Characterization methods

Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measurements in attenuated total reflectance (ATR) mode were performed using IR-spectrometer (Bruker VERTEX 70, Massachusetts, USA). The measurements were done at a resolution of 2 cm-1 with 32 scans from 600 cm-1 to 3800 cm-1 wavenumbers. Elemental analysis was studied with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) technique during examination of selected SEM microphotographs (JSM-6400 Electron Microscope, JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) of JF samples. Tensile test measurements of TPU and TPU/JF composites were performed by using Lloyd LR 30 K (West Sussex, UK) universal tensile testing machine in accordance with the ASTM D-638 standard. 5 kN load cell and 5 cm‧min-1 crosshead speed were applied during tensile test. Tensile strength, elongation at break and tensile modulus parameters were recorded as an average of five samples. Digital Shore hardness tester (Zwick R5LB041, Ulm, Germany) was utilized in order to evaluate A-type Shore hardness values of TPU and composites. Measurements were carried out according to ASTM D2240 standard (42). DMA analyses were done by conducting DMA 8000 (Perkin Elmer, Massachusetts, USA) dynamic mechanical thermal analyser at temperature range between -120°C and 120°C in dual cantilever bending mode at a constant frequency of 1 Hz and heating rate of 5°C‧min-1. MFI values of TPU and its composites were measured by Coesfield Meltfixer LT, Dortmund, Germany. Test measurements were conducted under the standard specified load of 2.16 kg at process temperature of 200°C. Melt flow rate results represent an average value of at least ten weighted samples with standard deviations. The characterization of water uptake values of TPU and composites was performed by immersing samples in a water bath at room temperature according to ASTM D570 procedure (43). Test samples were periodically taken out from the water, wiped with tissue paper to avoid their surface water, weighed and put back into the water repeatedly during 30 days period. Morphological characterizations of composites were examined by JSM-6400 field emission scanning electron microscope, JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan. Surfaces of cyro-fractured samples were coated with a thin layer of gold in order to obtain conductive surface. SEM micrographs were taken at various magnifications from ×250 to ×5000.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 EDX and FTIR analyses of JF surface

The elemental analysis data and SEM micrographs of fibers obtained from the SEM/EDX analysis are represented in the Table 1 and Figure 1, respectively. It can be seen from the Table 1 that oxygen content of unmodified JF increased by 9.58% after alkaline treatment due to formation of hydroxyl groups on the surface of Na-JF. Silicon content also rose with 3.46% at the surface of Si-JF attributed to the silane coupling agent. Carbon concentration of EP-JF observed as 6.13% higher compared to JF which indicates the presence of epoxy groups on the fiber surface. As can be seen from Figure 1, alkaline treatment caused fibrillation for untreated JF. Surface of JF became smoother after epoxy treatment.

Figure 1 SEM images of JF samples.
Figure 1

SEM images of JF samples.

Table 1

SEM/EDX data of JF samples.

SamplesCOSi
wt%/at%wt%/at%wt%/at%
JF54.53/62.9640.15/34.810.93/0.46
Na-JF45.64/53.7349.73/43.962.19/1.10
Si-JF54.05/62.6239.04/33.954.39/2.18
EP-JF60.66/68.4235.41/29.981.12/0.54

FTIR spectra of pristine JF and surface treated JF samples are given in Figure 2. The characteristic absorption bands from 400 cm-1 to 1800 cm-1 range display the oxygen functionalities, which owing to C–O stretching at broad peak between 900 cm-1 and 1200 cm-1, COO– asymmetric stretching and C=O stretching vibrations around 1620 cm-1 and 1730 cm-1, respectively (44,45). Increments on absorption of these oxygen related peaks for Na-JF were clearly observed. Intensities of these peaks were relatively lower in the case Si-JF which indicates the chemical modification of silane coupling agent with the surface hydroxyl groups. The intensity of band at 1420 cm-1 which stem from COO– group slightly increases after alkaline treatment. The band at 1270 cm-1 assigned to C–O and COO– groups of hemicellulose which was observed as remarkably more intense for untreated JF (46,47). Broad band that centered at 3300 cm-1 is attributed the stretching hydroxyl group (48). Si-JF and EP-JF exhibited lower transmittance for that band due to the modification of hydroxyl groups of cellulose and lignin portions of JF with silane coupling agent and epoxy resin, respectively. The peak around 870 cm-1 is stem from the characteristic Si-O vibration which is observed in the spectrum of Si-JF samples (49, 50, 51). These findings proved that chemical changes were taken place on the surface of JF during chemical treatments.

Figure 2 FTIR spectra of neat and modified JF samples.
Figure 2

FTIR spectra of neat and modified JF samples.

3.2 Tensile properties

Tensile test data of composites before and after water immersion including tensile strength, percentage strain and tensile modulus are listed in Table 2 and representative strength-strain curves of TPU and its composites are shown in Figure 3. Tensile test results of samples water absorption test applied are indicated with (WA) in Figure 3. According to Table 2, additions of JF and Na-JF caused reduction for tensile strength of neat TPU with the contents of 4.8% and 3.2%, respectively. On the other hand, Si-JF and EP-JF inclusions yield slight improvements in tensile strength values by displaying 0.3% and 0.6% increase, respectively. Percent elongations of composites were found to be much lower than that of TPU. Almost identical tensile modulus values were obtained for Na-JF and unmodified JF filled composites with modulus of neat TPU. On the other hand, silane and epoxy treated JF containing composites showed remarkable increase in tensile modulus. Enhancements of tensile parameters by the inclusion of surface modified natural fiber to TPU matrix were also reported in the literature (38,40,52). It can be clearly seen from Figure 3 that, TPU/JF and TPU/Na-JF composites showed necking behavior.

Figure 3 Stress-strain curves of TPU and composites.
Figure 3

Stress-strain curves of TPU and composites.

Table 2

Tensile test data of composites before and after absorption test.

SamplesTensile strength (MPa)Elongation at break (%)Tensile modulus (MPa)
TPU24.9 ± 1.4 / 24.8 ± 1.0*333.7 ± 8.0 / 433.3 ± 8.7 *57.8 ± 2.9 / 53.4 ± 4.1*
TPU/JF20.1 ± 1.0 / 14.4 ± 1.9*121.3 ± 6.4 / 263.2 ± 6.0*62.9 ± 3.5 / 132.1 ± 5.3*
TPU/Na-JF21.7 ± 1.2 / 15.8 ± 1.3*144.3 ± 7.1 / 273.1 ± 5.6*50.5 ± 3.2 / 119.7 ± 6.2*
TPU/Si-JF25.2 ± 1.5 / 21.1 ± 1.8*63.5 ± 5.3 / 90.2 ± 4.4*231.0 ± 7.6 / 103.2 ± 5.7*
TPU/EP-JF25.5 ± 1.1 / 20.1 ± 1.6*61.3 ± 5.8 / 121.3 ± 6.3*225.6 ± 6.3 / 106.9 ± 4.0*
  1. * Test results of samples water absorption test applied.

In the case of tensile test data obtained after water uptake test, the immersion of unfilled TPU into water caused no remarkable change in its mechanical properties. On the other hand, relatively lower strength values were observed for composites after water immersion. This reduction trend may due to the hydrophilic nature of JF which is common for all of the natural fibers (53,54). Percentage strain of composites displayed increase by water immersion which indicates the plasticizing effect. Based on the comparison of tensile test parameters before and after water ageing, silane treated JF containing composite exhibited the lowest changes thanks to JF gained hydrophobic character after silanization process (55).

3.3 Shore hardness test

Shore hardness is a characteristic parameter for elastomers and related composites. According to the A-type Shore hardness values displayed in Table 3, all of the composites gave around 10 points higher values than that of unfilled TPU. Si-JF addition led to the maximum improvement for shore hardness values among all of the composites by exhibiting 12 points higher value. The similar finding was obtained from the recent study in the literature that surface modification of natural additive led to increase in Shore hardness of TPU (56).

Table 3

Shore A hardness values of TPU and composites.

TPUTPU/JFTPU/Na-JFTPU/Si-JFTPU/EP-JF
8391949594

3.4 Thermo-mechanical performance

Storage modulus and Tan δ curves as a function of temperature were shown in Figures 4a and 4b, respectively. Storage modulus curve of TPU became broadened after Si-JF and EP-JF additions. Relatively lower storage modulus values were observed for Na-JF and JF containing composites. Silane treated JF containing composite gave the highest storage modulus stem from the restriction of chain motions after inclusion of Si-JF into polymer phase (57, 58, 59, 60). The peak point of Tan δ curve corresponds to glass transition temperature (Tg) of polymer. According to Figure 4b, incorporations of JF caused increase in the peak value of Tan δ regardless of treatment types. As a similar with previous results, silane and epoxy treated JF containing composites exhibited enhancement of Tg values. As indicated in Figure 4b, Tg of unfilled TPU shifted to 17°C higher after Si-JF inclusion.

Figure 4 DMA curves of TPU and composites.
Figure 4

DMA curves of TPU and composites.

3.5 Melt-flow behaviors

MFI parameter provide processing related information of polymeric material in the case of melt blending technique. MFI values of TPU and relevant composites shown in Figure 5. All of treatments resulted in increase for MFI value of neat TPU. The highest improvement was observed on TPU/Si-JF composites with 8.42 points increase since enhanced surface interactions between silane covered surface of JF and TPU were established by the help of the treatment process (61, 62, 63).

Figure 5 MFI values of TPU and composites.
Figure 5

MFI values of TPU and composites.

3.6 Water absorption measurements

The water absorption test was conducted for composite samples in time interval of 30 days in order to evaluate their potential use for out-door applications. Water uptake values of TPU and composites can be seen in Figure 6. Nearly 1% water uptake was achieved for unfilled TPU within a few days and it remained constant throughout the test. This result is found to be in accordance with the single phase diffusion model described by Fick’s law since the diffusion of water yield weight gain of material (64,65). The pristine JF loaded composite sample reached nearly 7% water absorption value at the end of the test. Additions of alkaline and epoxy treated JF yield slightly lower water uptake values compared to unmodified JF. On the other hand, the reduction of water uptake for silane modified JF containing sample was found to be the most distinctive among composites. Silane layer donated the hydrophobic character on the JF surface (66,67). For this reason, higher water repellency was obtained for TPU/Si-JF with respect to other composites.

Figure 6 Water uptake curves of TPU and composites.
Figure 6

Water uptake curves of TPU and composites.

3.7 Morphological characterization

Morphological properties of composites were examined by representative SEM micrographs of selected samples which are shown in Figure 7. According to SEM micrograph of neat JF filled composite, large gaps were formed between JF and TPU phase due to their incompatibility. Alkaline treated JF showed fibrillation and relatively better adhesion to polymer matrix. It can be clearly seen from Figure 7 that silane and epoxy treated JF surfaces were covered by TPU because of the improved adhesion. Si-JF displayed excellent adhesion to polymer matrix thanks to the increase of interfacial interaction between two phases after treatment process. Improvement adhesion between natural fiber and polymer matrix after surface treatments have been indicated in similar studies in the literature (37,52,60,67,68). These findings proved the enhancement for related properties of composites described in earlier sections.

Figure 7 SEM micro-images of composites.
Figure 7

SEM micro-images of composites.

4 Conclusion

In this current study, the effect of surface modifications of JF on the mechanical, thermo-mechanical, melt-flow, water absorption and morphological properties of TPU-based eco-composites were reported. Comparisons were made based on effect of surface treatments of JF. According to test results silane and epoxy treatments led to higher mechanical performance due to increase for interfacial interactions between fiber surfaces and TPU matrix. Silane treated JF containing sample exhibited the lowest water absorption among composites thanks to hydrophobic character of silane layer. Enhanced adhesion between Si-JF and TPU matrix as well as EP-JF was confirmed by SEM investigations. It was concluded that silane and epoxy modifications were suitable for TPU/JF composite system. TPU-based composites filled with silane treated JF can be considered for out-door applications since they displayed the highest water uptake performance among composites.


tel. +90 232 765 9091, fax. + 90 232 7659093

Acknowledgements

This study was represented in International Conference on Materials and Nanomaterials MNs-19, which was held on 17-19 July 2019 at Paris, France.

References

1 Mohanty A.K., Misra M., Drzal L.T. (Eds.), Natural fibers, biopolymers, and biocomposites (1st ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005.10.1201/9780203508206Search in Google Scholar

2 Bledzki A.K., Gassan J., Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibers. Prog. Polym. Sci., 1999, 4, 221-274.10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5Search in Google Scholar

3 Sahari J., Sapuan S.M., Natural fibre reinforced biodegradable polymer composites. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci., 2011, 30, 166-174.Search in Google Scholar

4 Saheb D.N., Jog J.P., Natural fiber polymer composites: a review. Adv. Polym. Technol., 1999, 18(4), 351-363.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199924)18:4<351::AID-ADV6>3.0.CO;2-XSearch in Google Scholar

5 Monteiro S.N., Lopes F.P.D., Barbosa A.P., Bevitori A.B., Silva I.L.A., Costa L.L., Natural lignocellulosic fibers as engineering materials. Metall. Mater. Trans. A., 2011, 42, 2963-2974.10.1007/s11661-011-0789-6Search in Google Scholar

6 Beach E.S., Weeks B.R., Stern R., Anastas P.T., Plastics additives and green chemistry. Pure Appl. Chem., 2013, 85(8), 1611-1624.10.1142/9789814327503_0075Search in Google Scholar

7 Dicker M.P., Duckworth P.F., Baker A.B., Francois G., Hazzard M.K., Weaver P.M., Green composites: a review of material attributes and complementary applications. Compos. Part A-Appl. S., 2014, 56, 280-289.10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.014Search in Google Scholar

8 Zhou Y., Fan M., Chen L., Interface and bonding mechanisms of plant fibre composites: an overview. Compos. Part B-Eng., 2016, 101, 31-45.10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.055Search in Google Scholar

9 Pickering K.L., Efendy M.A., Le T.M., A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos. Part A-Appl. S., 2016, 83, 98-112.10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038Search in Google Scholar

10 Kabir M.M., Wang H., Lau K.T., Cardona F., Chemical treatments on plant based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: an overview. Compos. Part B-Eng., 2012, 43, 2883-2892.10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.053Search in Google Scholar

11 Hon D.N.S. (Ed.), Chemical modification of lignocellulosic materials. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

12 Kaila S., Kaith B.S., Kaur I., Pre-treatments of natural fibers and their application as reinforcing material in polymer composites: a review. Polym. Eng. Sci., 2009, 49(7), 1253-1272.10.1002/pen.21328Search in Google Scholar

13 Tayfun U., Influence of surface treatment of fillers on the mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane composites. Ph.D thesis, Polymer Science and Technology, METU, Ankara, Turkey, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

14 Fernandes I.P., Barbosa M., Amaral J.S., Pinto V., Rodrigues J.L., Ferreira M.J., et al., Biobased additives as biodegradability enhancers with application in TPU-based footwear components. J. Renew. Mater., 2016, 4(1), 47-56.10.7569/JRM.2015.634126Search in Google Scholar

15 Agrawal A., Kaur R., Walia R.S., PU foam derived from renewable sources: perspective on properties enhancement: an overview. Eur. Polym. J., 2017, 95, 255-274.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.08.022Search in Google Scholar

16 Atiqah A., Mastura M.T., Ali B.A.A., Jawaid M., Sapuan S.M., A review on polyurethane and its polymer composites. Curr. Org. Synth., 2017, 14(2), 233-248.10.2174/1570179413666160831124749Search in Google Scholar

17 Mohanty A.K., Misra M., Studies on jute composites-a literature review. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng., 1995, 34(5), 729-792.10.1080/03602559508009599Search in Google Scholar

18 Maity S., Singha K., Gon D.P., Paul P., Singha M., A review on jute nonwovens: manufacturing, properties and applications. Int. J. Text. Sci., 2012, 1(5), 36-43.Search in Google Scholar

19 Dhanasekaran S., Balachandran G., Structural behavior of jute fiber composites-a review. Soc. Automot. Eng. Tech. Pap. Ser., 2008, 1, 2653.10.4271/2008-01-2653Search in Google Scholar

20 Gupta M.K., Srivastava R.K., Bisaria H., Potential of jute fibre reinforced polymer composites: a review. Int. J. Fiber. Text. Res., 2015, 5(3), 30-38.Search in Google Scholar

21 Das B., Chakrabarti K., Tripathi S., Chakraborty A., Review of some factors influencing jute fiber quality. J. Nat. Fibers, 2014, 11(3), 268-281.10.1080/15440478.2014.880103Search in Google Scholar

22 Rahman S.M.M.A., Mustafa A.I., Khan M.A., Jute reinforced polypropylene composite: effect of surface pre-treatment by photocuring with acrylic monomers. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 2009, 28(14), 1733-1745.10.1177/0731684408090371Search in Google Scholar

23 Haydaruzzaman A.H., Khan M.A., Hossain M.A., Khan R.A., Hakim M.A., Fabrication and characterization of jute reinforced polypropylene composite: effectiveness of coupling agents. J. Compos. Mater., 2010, 44(16), 1945-1963.10.1177/0021998309356604Search in Google Scholar

24 Bulut Y., Aksit A., A comparative study on chemical treatment of jute fiber: potassium dichromate, potassium permanganate and sodium perborate trihydrate. Cellulose, 2013, 20(6), 3155-3164.10.1007/s10570-013-0049-6Search in Google Scholar

25 Cabral H., Cisneros M., Kenny J.M., Vazquez A., Bernal C.R., Structure-properties relationship of short jute fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites. J. Compos. Mater., 2005, 39(1), 51-65.10.1177/0021998305046434Search in Google Scholar

26 Khan M.A., Hinrichsen G., Drzal L.T., Influence of novel coupling agents on mechanical properties of jute reinforced polypropylene composite. J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 2001, 20(18), 1711-1713.10.1023/A:1012489823103Search in Google Scholar

27 Liu X.Y., Dai G.C., Surface modification and micromechanical properties of jute fiber mat reinforced polypropylene composites. Express Polym. Lett., 2007, 1(5), 299-307.10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.43Search in Google Scholar

28 Baykus O., Mutlu A., Dogan M., The effect of pre-impregnation with maleated coupling agents on mechanical and water absorption properties of jute fabric reinforced polypropylene and polyethylene biocomposites. J. Compos. Mater., 2015, 50(2), 257-267.10.1177/0021998315573288Search in Google Scholar

29 Karmaker A.C., Hinrichsen G., Processing and characterization of jute fiber reinforced thermoplastic polymers. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng., 1991, 30(5), 6609-6629.10.1080/03602559108019223Search in Google Scholar

30 Das K., Adhikary K., Ray D., Bandyopadhyay N.R., Development of recycled polypropylene matrix composites reinforced with waste jute caddies. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 2010, 29(2), 201-208.10.1177/0731684408096929Search in Google Scholar

31 Dogan S.D., Tayfun U., Dogan M., New route for modifying cellulosic fibres with fatty acids and its application to polyethylene/jute fibre composites. J. Compos. Mater., 2016, 50(18), 2477-2485.10.1177/0021998315604706Search in Google Scholar

32 Mohanty S., Verma S.K., Nayak S.K., Dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of MAPE treated jute/HDPE composites. Compos. Sci. Technol., 2006, 66(3-4), 538-547.10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.014Search in Google Scholar

33 Islam R., Islam T., Nigar F., Saha S., Tapash A., Sharmin N., et al., Fabrication and mechanical characterization of jute fabrics: reinforced polyvinyl chloride/ polypropylene hybrid composites. Int. J. Polym. Mater., 2011, 60(8), 576-590.10.1080/00914037.2010.531822Search in Google Scholar

34 Hu R.H., Sun M.Y., Lim J.K., Moisture absorption, tensile strength and microstructure evolution of short jute fiber/polylactide composite in hygrothermal environment. Mater. Design, 2010, 31(7), 3167-3173.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.02.030Search in Google Scholar

35 Huq T., Khan A., Akter T., Noor N., Dey K., Sarker B., et al., Thermo-mechanical, degradation, and interfacial properties of jute fiber-reinforced PET-based composite. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., 2011, 24(6), 889-898.10.1177/0892705711401846Search in Google Scholar

36 Sarkhel G., Choudhury A., Dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of PE‐EPDM based jute fiber composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2008, 108(6), 3442-3453.10.1002/app.28024Search in Google Scholar

37 Khan M.A., Hassan M.M., Effect of γ‐aminopropyl trimethoxy silane on the performance of jute–polycarbonate composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2006, 100(5), 4142-4154.10.1002/app.23441Search in Google Scholar

38 Tayfun U., Dogan M., Bayramli E., Influence of surface modifications of flax fiber on mechanical and flow properties of thermoplastic polyurethane based eco-composites. J. Nat. Fibers, 2016, 13, 309-320.10.1080/15440478.2015.1029191Search in Google Scholar

39 Shokoohi S., Arefazar A., Khosrokhavar R., Silane coupling agents in polymer-based reinforced composites: a review. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 2008, 27, 473-485.10.1177/0731684407081391Search in Google Scholar

40 Kilinc K., Kanbur Y., Tayfun U., Mechanical, thermo-mechanical and water uptake performance of wood flour filled polyurethane elastomer eco-composites: influence of surface treatment of wood flour. Holzforschung, 2019, 73(4), 401-407.10.1515/hf-2018-0116Search in Google Scholar

41 ASTM D638, Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

42 ASTM D2240, Standard test method for rubber property-durometer hardness. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

43 ASTM D570, Standard test method for water absorption of plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

44 Roy A.K., Sen S.K., Bag S.C., Pandey S.N., Infrared spectra of jute stick and alkali‐treated jute stick. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1991, 42(11), 2943-2950.10.1002/app.1991.070421111Search in Google Scholar

45 Tayfun U., Dogan M., Bayramli E., Investigations of the flax fiber/thermoplastic polyurethane eco‐composites: influence of isocyanate modification of flax fiber surface. Polym. Compos., 2017, 38, 2874-2880.10.1002/pc.23889Search in Google Scholar

46 Corrales F., Vilaseca F., Llop M., Girones J., Mendez J.A., Mutje P., Chemical modification of jute fibers for the production of green-composites. J. Hazard. Mater., 2007, 144(3), 730-735.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.103Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47 Kasyapi N., Chaudhary V., Bhowmick A.K., Bionanowhiskers from jute: preparation and characterization. Carbohyd. Polym., 2013, 92(2), 1116-1123.10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

48 Mukherjee A.C., Mukhopadhyay U., Infrared spectra of jute fibers at different stages of growth. Text. Res. J., 1983, 53(8), 473-475.10.1177/004051758305300805Search in Google Scholar

49 Bouchet J., Pax G.M., Leterrier Y., Michaud V., Månson J.A., Formation of aminosilane-oxide interphases. Compos. Interface., 2006, 13, 573-588.10.1163/156855406778440721Search in Google Scholar

50 Natalia S., Hatsuo I., Study of the role of silane-treated filler on the compatibility of polypropylene/polystyrene blends at different ratios. J. Adhesion, 1997, 64, 203-228.10.1080/00218469708010540Search in Google Scholar

51 Yang R., Liu Y., Wang K., Yu J., Characterization of surface interaction of inorganic fillers with silane coupling agents. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 2003, 70, 413-425.10.1016/S0165-2370(02)00200-0Search in Google Scholar

52 El-Shekeil Y.A., Sapuan S.M., Khalina A., Zainudin E.S., Al-Shuja’a O.M., Influence of chemical treatment on the tensile properties of kenaf fiber reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane composite. Express Polym. Lett., 2012, 6(12), 1032-1040.10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.108Search in Google Scholar

53 Eselini N., Tirkes S., Akar A.O., Tayfun U., Production and characterization of poly (lactic acid)-based biocomposites filled with basalt fiber and flax fiber hybrid. J. Elastom. Plast. (in press), DOI:10.1177/0095244319884716.10.1177/0095244319884716Search in Google Scholar

54 Le Duigou A., Davies P., Baley C., Seawater ageing of flax/ poly(lactic acid) biocomposites. Polym. Degrad. Stabil., 2009, 94, 1151-1167.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.03.025Search in Google Scholar

55 Briteher L., Kehoe D., Matisons J., Swincer G.J., Siloxane coupling agents. Macromolecules, 1995, 28(9), 3110-3118.10.1021/ma00113a013Search in Google Scholar

56 Sismanoglu S., Tayfun U., Kanbur Y., Effect of alkali and silane surface treatments on the mechanical and physical behaviors of date palm seed-filled thermoplastic polyurethane eco-composites. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. (in press), DOI:10.1177/0892705719890904.10.1177/0892705719890904Search in Google Scholar

57 Alghadi A.M., Tirkes S., Tayfun U., Mechanical, thermo-mechanical and morphological characterization of ABS based composites loaded with perlite mineral. Mater. Res. Express, 2020, 7, 015301.10.1088/2053-1591/ab551bSearch in Google Scholar

58 Mészáros L., Elastic recovery of polyamide 6 matrix nanocomposites and their basalt fiber co-reinforced hybrids. e-Polymers, 2017, 17, 349-354.10.1515/epoly-2016-0310Search in Google Scholar

59 Sarkhel G., Choudhury A., Dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of PE‐EPDM based jute fiber composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2008, 108(6), 3442-3453.10.1002/app.28024Search in Google Scholar

60 Atiqah A., Jawaid M., Sapuan S.M., Ishak M.R., Mechanical and thermal properties of sugar palm fiber reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane composites: effect of silane treatment and fiber loading. J. Renew. Mater., 2018, 6(5), 477-492.10.7569/JRM.2017.634188Search in Google Scholar

61 Kanbur Y., Tayfun U., Development of multifunctional polyurethane elastomer composites containing fullerene: mechanical, damping, thermal, and flammability behaviors. J. Elastom. Plast., 2019, 51, 262-279.10.1177/0095244318796616Search in Google Scholar

62 Arias A., Sojoudiasli H., Heuzey M.C., Huneault M.A., Wood-Adams P., Rheological study of crystallization behavior of polylactide and its flax fiber composites. J. Polym. Res., 2017, 24(3), 46.10.1007/s10965-017-1210-ySearch in Google Scholar

63 Balasuriya P.W., Ye L., Mai Y.W., Mechanical properties of wood flake-polyethylene composites. Part I: effects of processing methods and matrix melt flow behavior. Compos. Part A-Appl. S., 2001, 32(5), 619-629.10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00160-3Search in Google Scholar

64 Espert A., Vilaplana F., Karlsson S., Comparison of water absorption in natural cellulosic fibres from wood and one-year crops in polypropylene composites and its influence on their mechanical properties. Compos. Part A-Appl. S., 2004, 35(11), 1267-1276.10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.004Search in Google Scholar

65 Crank J., Park G.S. (Eds.), Diffusion in polymers. Academic Press, London, UK, 1968.Search in Google Scholar

66 Tayfun U., Dogan M., Bayramli E., Effect of surface modification of rice straw on mechanical and flow properties of TPU-based green composites. Polym. Compos., 2016, 37, 1596-1602.10.1002/pc.23331Search in Google Scholar

67 Haghighatnia T., Abbasian A., Morshedian J., Hemp fiber reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane composite: an investigation in mechanical properties. Ind. Crop. Prod., 2017, 108, 853-863.10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.07.020Search in Google Scholar

68 Radzi A.M., Sapuan S.M., Jawaid M., Mansor M.R., Effect of alkaline treatment on mechanical, physical and thermal properties of roselle/sugar palm fiber reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid composites. Fibers Polym., 2019, 20(4), 847-855.10.1007/s12221-019-1061-8Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-12-21
Accepted: 2020-01-27
Published Online: 2020-03-21

© 2020 Salem et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. The regulatory effects of the number of VP(N-vinylpyrrolidone) function groups on macrostructure and photochromic properties of polyoxometalates/copolymer hybrid films
  3. How the hindered amines affect the microstructure and mechanical properties of nitrile-butadiene rubber composites
  4. Novel benzimidazole-based conjugated polyelectrolytes: synthesis, solution photophysics and fluorescent sensing of metal ions
  5. Study on the variation of rock pore structure after polymer gel flooding
  6. Investigation on compatibility of PLA/PBAT blends modified by epoxy-terminated branched polymers through chemical micro-crosslinking
  7. Investigation on degradation mechanism of polymer blockages in unconsolidated sandstone reservoirs
  8. Investigation on the effect of active-polymers with different functional groups for EOR
  9. Fabrication and characterization of hexadecyl acrylate cross-linked phase change microspheres
  10. Surface-induced phase transitions in thin films of dendrimer block copolymers
  11. ZnO-assisted coating of tetracalcium phosphate/ gelatin on the polyethylene terephthalate woven nets by atomic layer deposition
  12. Animal fat and glycerol bioconversion to polyhydroxyalkanoate by produced water bacteria
  13. Effect of microstructure on the properties of polystyrene microporous foaming material
  14. Synthesis of amphiphilic poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(methyl methacrylate) containing trityl ether acid cleavable junction group and its self-assembly into ordered nanoporous thin films
  15. On-demand optimize design of sound-absorbing porous material based on multi-population genetic algorithm
  16. Enhancement of mechanical, thermal and water uptake performance of TPU/jute fiber green composites via chemical treatments on fiber surface
  17. Enhancement of mechanical properties of natural rubber–clay nanocomposites through incorporation of silanated organoclay into natural rubber latex
  18. Preparation and characterization of corn starch/PVA/glycerol composite films incorporated with ε-polylysine as a novel antimicrobial packaging material
  19. Preparation of novel amphoteric polyacrylamide and its synergistic retention with cationic polymers
  20. Effect of montmorillonite on PEBAX® 1074-based mixed matrix membranes to be used in humidifiers in proton exchange membrane fuel cells
  21. Insight on the effect of a piperonylic acid derivative on the crystallization process, melting behavior, thermal stability, optical and mechanical properties of poly(l-lactic acid)
  22. Lipase-catalyzed synthesis and post-polymerization modification of new fully bio-based poly(hexamethylene γ-ketopimelate) and poly(hexamethylene γ-ketopimelate-co-hexamethylene adipate) copolyesters
  23. Dielectric, mechanical and thermal properties of all-organic PI/PSF composite films by in situ polymerization
  24. Morphological transition of amphiphilic block copolymer/PEGylated phospholipid complexes induced by the dynamic subtle balance interactions in the self-assembled aggregates
  25. Silica/polymer core–shell particles prepared via soap-free emulsion polymerization
  26. Antibacterial epoxy composites with addition of natural Artemisia annua waste
  27. Design and preparation of 3D printing intelligent poly N,N-dimethylacrylamide hydrogel actuators
  28. Multilayer-structured fibrous membrane with directional moisture transportability and thermal radiation for high-performance air filtration
  29. Reaction characteristics of polymer expansive jet impact on explosive reactive armour
  30. Synthesis of a novel modified chitosan as an intumescent flame retardant for epoxy resin
  31. Synthesis of aminated polystyrene and its self-assembly with nanoparticles at oil/water interface
  32. The synthesis and characterisation of porous and monodisperse, chemically modified hypercrosslinked poly(acrylonitrile)-based terpolymer as a sorbent for the adsorption of acidic pharmaceuticals
  33. Crystal transition and thermal behavior of Nylon 12
  34. All-optical non-conjugated multi-functionalized photorefractive polymers via ring-opening metathesis polymerization
  35. Fabrication of LDPE/PS interpolymer resin particles through a swelling suspension polymerization approach
  36. Determination of the carbonyl index of polyethylene and polypropylene using specified area under band methodology with ATR-FTIR spectroscopy
  37. Synthesis, electropolymerization, and electrochromic performances of two novel tetrathiafulvalene–thiophene assemblies
  38. Wetting behaviors of fluoroterpolymer fiber films
  39. Plugging mechanisms of polymer gel used for hydraulic fracture water shutoff
  40. Synthesis of flexible poly(l-lactide)-b-polyethylene glycol-b-poly(l-lactide) bioplastics by ring-opening polymerization in the presence of chain extender
  41. Sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) functionalized polysilsesquioxane hybrid membranes with enhanced proton conductivity
  42. Fmoc-diphenylalanine-based hydrogels as a potential carrier for drug delivery
  43. Effect of diacylhydrazine as chain extender on microphase separation and performance of energetic polyurethane elastomer
  44. Improved high-temperature damping performance of nitrile-butadiene rubber/phenolic resin composites by introducing different hindered amine molecules
  45. Rational synthesis of silicon into polyimide-derived hollow electrospun carbon nanofibers for enhanced lithium storage
  46. Synthesis, characterization and properties of phthalonitrile-etherified resole resin
  47. Highly thermally conductive boron nitride@UHMWPE composites with segregated structure
  48. Synthesis of high-temperature thermally expandable microcapsules and their effects on foaming quality and surface quality of foamed ABS materials
  49. Tribological and nanomechanical properties of a lignin-based biopolymer
  50. Hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone nanocomposites for selective laser sintering: Thermal and mechanical performances
  51. Synthesis of a phosphoramidate flame retardant and its flame retardancy on cotton fabrics
  52. Preparation and characterization of thermoresponsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) copolymers with enhanced hydrophilicity
  53. Fabrication of flexible SiO2 nanofibrous yarn via a conjugate electrospinning process
  54. Silver-loaded carbon nanofibers for ammonia sensing
  55. Polar migration behavior of phosphonate groups in phosphonate esterified acrylic grafted epoxy ester composites and their role in substrate protection
  56. Solubility and diffusion coefficient of supercritical CO2 in polystyrene dynamic melt
  57. Curcumin-loaded polyvinyl butyral film with antibacterial activity
  58. Experimental-numerical studies of the effect of cell structure on the mechanical properties of polypropylene foams
  59. Experimental investigation on the three-dimensional flow field from a meltblowing slot die
  60. Enhancing tribo-mechanical properties and thermal stability of nylon 6 by hexagonal boron nitride fillers
  61. Preparation and characterization of electrospun fibrous scaffolds of either PVA or PVP for fast release of sildenafil citrate
  62. Seawater degradation of PLA accelerated by water-soluble PVA
  63. Review Article
  64. Mechanical properties and application analysis of spider silk bionic material
  65. Additive manufacturing of PLA-based scaffolds intended for bone regeneration and strategies to improve their biological properties
  66. Structural design toward functional materials by electrospinning: A review
  67. Special Issue: XXXII National Congress of the Mexican Polymer Society
  68. Tailoring the morphology of poly(high internal phase emulsions) synthesized by using deep eutectic solvents
  69. Modification of Ceiba pentandra cellulose for drug release applications
  70. Redox initiation in semicontinuous polymerization to search for specific mechanical properties of copolymers
  71. pH-responsive polymer micelles for methotrexate delivery at tumor microenvironments
  72. Microwave-assisted synthesis of the lipase-catalyzed ring-opening copolymerization of ε-caprolactone and ω-pentadecanolactone: Thermal and FTIR characterization
  73. Rapid Communications
  74. Pilot-scale production of polylactic acid nanofibers by melt electrospinning
  75. Erratum
  76. Erratum to: Synthesis and characterization of new macromolecule systems for colon-specific drug delivery
Downloaded on 8.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/epoly-2020-0015/html
Scroll to top button