Antitumor activity of RUNX3: Upregulation of E-cadherin and downregulation of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

Ruo-Nan Yang; Fu-Rong Zhou; Hong-Yang Wang; Qing-Hai Wang; Jian-Lei Ji; Tao Huang; Chen Guo; Zhen Dong; Yan-Wei Cao

doi:10.1515/biol-2022-0494

Article Open Access

Antitumor activity of RUNX3: Upregulation of E-cadherin and downregulation of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

Ruo-Nan Yang , Fu-Rong Zhou , Hong-Yang Wang , Qing-Hai Wang , Jian-Lei Ji , Tao Huang , Chen Guo , Zhen Dong and Yan-Wei Cao

Published/Copyright: December 2, 2022

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Open Life Sciences Volume 17 Issue 1

Abstract

RUNX3 is a transcription factor and tumor suppressor that is silenced or inactivated in diverse tumors. The effect of RUNX3 on the epithelial–mesenchymal transition in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) remains unclear. We determined the expression of RUNX3 and E-cadherin in tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues of 30 CCRCC patients; established cultured CCRCC cells with the overexpression of RUNX3; and examined the in vivo tumorigenic function of RUNX3 in a nude mouse xenograft model of CCRCC. RUNX3 and E-cadherin were downregulated in human CCRCC samples. Cell lines with RUNX3 overexpression had reduced cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, a prolonged cell cycle, increased apoptosis, and increased expression of E-cadherin. In the nude mouse xenograft model of CCRCC, tumors with the overexpression of RUNX3 had smaller volumes and weights and had increased expression of E-cadherin. In conclusion, RUNX3 overexpression increased the level of E-cadherin and inhibited the proliferation, invasion, and migration of CCRCC in vitro and in vivo. RUNX3 has potential use as a biomarker for prognostic monitoring of CCRCC and as a therapeutic target for the treatment of this cancer.

Keywords: E-cadherin; enEMT; clear-cell renal cell carcinoma; RUNX3

1 Introduction

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) originates from the parenchymal cells of the renal tubular epithelium and is the most common malignant tumor of the kidney. Globally, RCC accounts for 2.4% of all cancers and 1.7% of all cancer-related deaths [1]. Clear-cell RCC (CCRCC) is the most common histological type of RCC in adults, and it accounts for 90% of all RCCs [2]. A recent study of the incidences of different cancers reported that CCRCC had the sixth highest incidence among men and the tenth highest among women, accounting for 5 and 3% of all tumor diagnoses, respectively [3,4]. The incidence of CCRCC has continued to increase over time. This cancer is generally not sensitive to chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and surgery is the main treatment. Patients with early-stage CCRCC often lack specific clinical manifestations, and 20–30% of these patients receive diagnoses only after the development of local or distant metastasis. However, surgery is usually unsuitable for patients with advanced CCRCC, and there is therefore an urgent need for new treatments for these patients. To improve the early diagnosis and treatment of CCRCC, it is necessary to analyze the mechanisms of its onset and progression to identify new biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Proteins in the runt-related transcription factor family – RUNX1, RUNX2, and RUNX3 – play important roles in the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling pathway [4]. Early studies concluded that RUNX3 functioned as a tumor suppressor and is located on human chromosome 1 at 1p36.11, a region that is missing in many types of cancers [5]. This led to speculation that this region contains an important tumor suppressor gene. Recent studies examined the role of RUNX3 in tumor suppression and the prevention of metastasis in cervical cancer [6], endometrial cancer [7], and gastric cancer [8]. A 2002 study reported that RUNX3 functioned as a tumor suppressor in gastric epithelial cells and that this gene was inactivated in up to 80% of primary gastric tumors [9]. Other research reported the presence of gastric hyperplasia and tumors in RUNX3-knockout mice, and this was related to decreased apoptosis and sensitivity to TGF-β [4,10]. Although many studies showed that RUNX3 can inhibit cell migration, invasion, and apoptosis, a few studies examined its function in the onset and progression of CCRCC.

The epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a physiological process in which epithelial cells lose their polarity and develop the characteristics of stromal cells. Researchers first recognized the EMT as a normal physiological process during embryonic growth [11]. During this process, epithelial cells become immature and can no longer differentiate, and they lose their cell adhesion properties, leading to increased plasticity, invasiveness, motility, and anti-apoptotic activities. Researchers now recognize the EMT as an essential event in the pathogenesis of many cancers and other diseases [12]. During tumor formation, increased EMT activity is contributed to tumor invasion, metastasis, and development of drug resistance. There is now evidence that the EMT plays an important role in the occurrence and development of liver cancer [13], melanoma [14], colorectal cancer [15], breast cancer [16], and other cancers. Downregulation of epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) is associated with decreased cell adhesion, an important event in the EMT that is necessary for tumor invasion and metastasis.

In the present study, we examined the function of RUNX3 as a tumor suppressor gene in CCRCC. In particular, we examined the effect of RUNX3 overexpression on apoptosis and inhibition of tumor migration and invasion. Our general aim was to examine the use of RUNX3 as a prognostic indicator of CCRCC and its potential use as a target for the treatment of this cancer.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Tissue collection and immunohistochemistry

Thirty human specimens of CCRCC and adjacent non-cancerous tissues were collected from the pathology department of our hospital. Immunohistochemistry was performed using the Histostain-Plus SP kit (Bioss Antibodies, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.
Ethical approval: The research related to human use has been complied with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University.

2.2 Cell culture and transfection

Two cell lines of human CCRCC (ACHN and 786-O) were obtained from Genechem (Shanghai, China) and cultured in the Central Laboratory of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. The 786-O cells were cultured in RPMI1640 (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Ausbian, Australia). The ACHN cells were cultured in dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (Corning, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Ausbian, Australia).

Lentivirus LV-RUNX3 (21371-1) with a green fluorescent protein (GFP) tag were used to transfect cells and construct RUNX3-overexpressing cells (OE cells). Lentivirus CON220 (negative control) with a GFP tag was used to establish normal control (NC) cells. Both of these lentiviruses were obtained from Genechem (Shanghai, China). At 18 h after transfection, the medium was replaced with complete medium. At 72 h, the transfection was complete and cells were viewed under a fluorescence microscope.

2.3 Western blotting

Proteins were extracted into a buffer with detergent, separated by electrophoresis in sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gels, and then blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were incubated at 4°C with antibodies against RUNX3 (ab135248, 1:1,000 dilution, Abcam) and GAPDH (sc-32233, 1:1,000 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). After washing, the membranes were incubated with a secondary Mouse IgG antibody (sc-2005, 1:2,000 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 2 h at room temperature. Blots were visualized using electrochemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The molecular weights of RUNX3 and E-cadherin were 44 and 120 kDa, respectively.

2.4 Clone formation and MTT assays

The cell suspension was diluted and different numbers of cells were placed into prepared dishes (50, 100, 200, and 500 cells per dish). Then, the cells were placed in a humidified incubator at 37°C. Cloning was terminated when cell clumps were observable after 2–3 weeks. Then, the cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde for 15 min, stained with crystal violet for 30 min, and then washed and stained.

Before culture termination, 20 μL of 5 mg/mL MTT (Sigma, USA) was added for 4 h, and the cells were then lysed with 100 μL dimethylsulfoxide to dissolve the formazan crystals [17,18,19]. The sample was oscillated for 2–5 min, and the absorption was then measured at 490 nm. The number of living cells was measured after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days.

2.5 Transwell and cell scratch assays

For cell migration experiments, growth medium was added to a 24-well plate, and a cell suspension was added to the upper chamber of the Transwell. After 24 h, the medium was removed, fixed with paraformaldehyde for 10 min, stained with crystal violet for 20 min, rinsed with PBS, and then photographed for observation.

For cell invasion experiments, matrix gelatin was dripped into the upper chamber of the Transwell. After standing for 1 h, it was transferred into a 24-well plate. The rest of the procedures were the same as in the cell migration experiments.

For the cell scratch assay, a cell suspension was added dropwise into a 6-well plate and incubated at constant temperature and humidity. When the cell density was 90%, a scratch mark was made using a pipette tip that was perpendicular to the previous marking line. The previously streaked cells were then washed with PBS, and images were recorded at 0, 12, and 24 h.

2.6 RNA extraction and RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from cells and enriched using the TRIzol miRVana isolation protocol (Invitrogen, USA). When the RNA precipitate was transparent, RNase-free water was added until it was completely dissolved, and the concentration and quality of the extracted RNA were determined using a Nanodrop 2000C spectrophotometer. A Promega M-MLV kit was used for the reverse transcription of total RNA into cDNAs. The mRNA levels were evaluated using qRT-PCR with following primers: GAPDH-forward: 5′-TGACTTCAACAGCGACACCCA-3′, GAPDH-reverse: 5′-CACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAAA-3′; RUNX3-forward: 5′-GCCTTCAAGGTGGTGGCATT-3′, RUNX3-reverse: 5′-TCAGCGGAGTAGTTCTCGTCATT-3′.

2.7 Flow cytometry

The cell cycle assay was performed using propidium iodide fluorescence-activated cell sorting (PI-FACS). After the cell suspension was prepared, the cells were washed with D-Hanks solution, centrifuged, and fixed with 75% alcohol. The fixative was removed, the cells were washed again with D-Hanks, a cell staining solution was added, and cells were then detected using flow cytometry. The cell staining solution consisted of 40× PI (2 mg/mL; Sigma, YSA):100× RNase (10 mg/mL; Fermentas, China):1× D-Hanks = 25:10:1,000.

Apoptosis was detected by Annexin V-APC staining with flow cytometry using an apoptosis detection kit (Bestbio, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.8 Tumorigenicity

The tumorigenicity of 4-week-old female BALB/c nude mice (GemPharmatech, Jiangsu, China) was determined as described previously [20]. Sixteen mice were randomly assigned into two groups (8 per group), and the animals then received subcutaneous injections of ACHN cells that were transfected with the RUNX3 OE vector or the NC vector. After 14 days, tumors at the injection site were palpated, and tumors were visually scored weekly when they were observable. Tumor size and weight were determined by measuring excised tumors after euthanasia, at 56 days after cell injection. These experiments were performed according to the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institutes of Health and were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University.

2.9 Statistical methods

GraphPad Prism version 9.0, ImageJ-FIJI, and SPSS version 24 were used for statistical analysis. Student’s t-test was used for comparisons when variables had normal distributions, and the Mann–Whitney test was used when variables had non-normal distributions. A P-value of below 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Each measurement was performed three times, and average values and standard deviation were presented.

3 Results

3.1 Human CCRCCs have downregulation of RUNX3 and E-cadherin and upregulation of EZH2

We examined the carcinoma tissues and adjacent normal tissues of 30 patients with CCRCC (Table 1). There were 17 males and 13 females, the average age was 54.8 ± 2.4 years old, and the mean tumor diameter was 6.5 ± 2.3 cm. Measurements of the expression of RUNX3 mRNA in these patients indicated a significantly lower level in cancer tissues than in adjacent tissues (Figure 1a). Because of the small sample size, we could not draw meaningful conclusions regarding the relationship of RUNX3 expression with tumor stage. Then, we performed the immunostaining of these samples for four proteins that have established roles in carcinogenesis (Figure 1b and Table 1). The expression of RUNX3 and E-cadherin was lower in CCRCC tissues, the expression of EZH2 was higher in CCRCC tissues, but the expression of β-catenin was similar in CCRCC and normal tissues. RT-PCR of these tissues showed that EZH2 had greater expression in tumor tissues, E-cadherin had decreased expression in tumor tissues, and β-catenin had similar expression in tumor and normal tissues (Figure 1c)

Table 1

Characteristics and outcomes of CCRCC tissue and adjacent normal tissue

Clinical feature	RCC tissue (n = 30)	Adjacent tissue (n = 30)	P
Characteristics
Age (years)	54.8 ± 2.4	54.8 ± 2.4
Sex (%)
Female	13 (43.4%)	13 (43.4%)
Male	17 (56.6%)	17 (56.6%)
Tumor diameter (cm)	6.5 ± 2.3
Tumor stage (%)
T1	6 (20.0%)
T2	11 (36.7%)
T3	8 (26.6%)
T4	5 (16.7%)
Market proteins (%)
E-Cadherin (+)	7 (23.3%)	18 (60.0%)	<0.001
EZH2 (+)	21 (70.0%)	5 (16.7%)	<0.001
RUNX3 (+)	4 (13.3%)	18 (60.0%)	<0.001
β-Catenin (+)	28 (93.3%)	20 (66.6%)	>0.05

Figure 1

Human CCRCCs have downregulation of RUNX3 and E-cadherin and upregulation of EZH2. (a) RUNX3 expression in CCRCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues (RT-PCR). (b) Expression of marker proteins in CCRCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues (immunohistochemistry, scale bars on the bottom left of each image). (c) Expression of marker mRNAs in CCRCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues (RT-PCR). Each assay was performed at least three times, and values are means ± standard errors of the means (SEMs), ***P < 0.001, ns P > 0.05.

3.2 Construction of CCRCC cells with RUNX3 overexpression

We used lentivirus transfection to construct ACHN and 786-O cells that had overexpression of RUNX3 (OE) or NC expression of RUNX3 (NC). Fluorescence microscopy indicated successful transfection of these cells (Figure 2a). RT-PCR indicated that both types of OE cells had increased expression of RUNX3 mRNA (Figure 2b), and we confirmed this by western blotting (Figure 2c). Thus, we successfully established CCRCC cells with overexpression of RUNX3 in vitro.

Figure 2

Successful transfection of two CCRCC cell lines with a RUNX3 vector. (a) Phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy of ACHN and 786-O cell lines with RUNX3 OE and NC cells with a control vector. GFP fluorescence of both groups indicated successful transfection (scale bar: 10 µm). (b) Expression of RUNX3 in the two groups (RT-PCR). (c) Expression of RUNX3 in the two groups relative to GAPDH (western blotting). ImageJ was used to invert the western blot bands and measure the gray value, and data were presented as histograms. Scale bar: 10 µm, each assay was performed at least three times, and values are means ± SEMs, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.

3.3 RUNX3 overexpression in CCRCC cells inhibits proliferation

We measured cell proliferation of the OE and NC groups using the MTT assay (Figure 3a). For both cell lines, the cell viability of the OE group was lower than that of the NC group after 5 days. We also determined the proliferation of 786-O and ACHN cells using a clone formation assay. In both cell lines, more cell clusters formed in the OE group (Figure 3b). Thus, overexpression of RUNX3 inhibited the proliferation of CCRCC cells in vitro.

Figure 3

RUNX3 overexpression inhibited the proliferation of CCRCC. (a) Cell viability of the two cell lines in the OE and NC groups (MTT assay). (b) The number of cell clusters in the OE and NC groups (Cloning forming). Each assay was performed at least three times, and values are means ± SEMs, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.

3.4 RUNX3 overexpression in CCRCC cells inhibits invasion and migration

We then examined cell invasion and migration using the Transwell assay and cell scratch assay. The results of the Transwell assay indicated that the NC groups had greater staining for migration and invasion and the OE groups had reduced cell migration and invasion (Figure 4a). The results of cell scratch assay showed that cell spacing in the OE groups did not change significantly at 0 and 24 h, but cell spacing was significantly reduced in the NC groups (Figure 4b). Thus, overexpression of RUNX3 led to reduced migration and invasion of CCRCC cells in vitro.

Figure 4

RUNX3 overexpression inhibited the migration and invasion of CCRCC. (a) Cell migration and invasion of the two cell lines in the OE and NC groups. (b) Cell migration of the two cell lines in the OE and NC groups (Cell scratch). Scale bar: 10 µm, each assay was performed at least three times, and values are means ± SEMs, ***P < 0.001.

3.5 RUNX3 overexpression in CCRCC cells alters the cell cycle and induces apoptosis

Our cell cycle analysis of ACHN and 786-O cells indicated that the OE groups had more cells in the G1 phase and fewer cells in the S phase (Figure 5a). Our measurements of apoptosis indicated the OE groups had more apoptotic cells than the NC groups (Figure 5b). Thus, RUNX3 disrupted the cell cycle of CCRCC cells and increased the apoptosis of CCRCC cells in vitro.

Figure 5

RUNX3 overexpression affects cell cycle and induces tumor cell apoptosis of CCRCC. (a) Cell cycle progression of the two cell lines in the OE and NC groups (flow cytometry). (b) Apoptosis of the two cell lines in the OE and NC groups (flow cytometry). Each assay was performed at least three times, and values are means ± SEMs, ***P < 0.001, *P < 0.05, ns P > 0.05.

3.6 RUNX3 overexpression in CCRCC cells upregulates the expression of E-cadherin

Our qRT-PCR results showed that E-cadherin mRNA was highly expressed in the two OE groups (Figure 6a). We confirmed these results using western blotting (Figure 6b). Thus, overexpression of RUNX3 by CCRCC cells increased the expression of E-cadherin mRNA.

Figure 6

RUNX3 overexpression upregulates the expression of E-cadherin. (a) RUNX3 expression in the OE and NC groups of the two cell lines (qPT-PCR). (b) Expression of E-cadherin in the OE and NC groups of the two cell lines (western blotting). ImageJ was used to invert the western blot bands and measure the gray value, and then the resulting data were made into histograms. Each assay was performed at least three times, and values indicate means ± SEMs, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.

3.7 Cells with the OE vector have decreased tumorigenicity in mice

We then performed in vivo experiments in which nude mice received subcutaneous injections of ACHN cells that were transfected with the RUNX3 OE vector or the NC vector. After 6 weeks, the tumor volume and tumor weight of mice that received NC cells were significantly greater than those of mice that received OE cells (Figure 7a and b). Measurements of the expression of RUNX3 and E-cadherin mRNAs in mouse tumor tissues also indicated greater expression of these genes in mice that received the OE cells (Figure 7c). Thus, in vivo overexpression of RUNX3 in CCRCC xenografts led to reduced tumor volume and weight and increased expression of E-cadherin.

Figure 7

Cells with the OE vector have decreased tumorigenicity in mice. (a) Mice and tumors after injection of tumor cells in the OE group (top rows) and NC group (bottom rows). (b) Tumor volume and weight of mice in the OE and NC groups. Calipers were used to measure the length (L), width (W), and height (H) of the tumor tissue, and volume (V) was then calculated: V = π/6 × L × W × H. (c) Expression of RUNX3 and E-cadherin in mouse tumor tissues after 56 days (qRT-PCR). Each assay was performed at least three times, and values are means ± SEMs, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.

4 Discussion

CCRCC is the most common pathological type of RCC and it also has a high rate of recurrence. In particular, Dabestani et al. studied European patients with CCRCC, and found that 286 of 1,265 of them had recurrence [21]. Therefore, further research is needed to examine possible causes of proliferation, metastasis, and recurrence of CCRCC. For example, new biomarkers that can be used to monitor tumor progression or as drug targets may be particularly useful. The EMT is an important biological process that functions in fibrosis and tumor metastasis. At the cellular level, the EMT is associated with enhanced cell migration and cell invasion, reduced apoptosis, and increased production of extracellular matrix [22,23]. E-cadherin has a key function in the EMT, and a reduced expression of this protein is related reduced cell adhesion and increased metastasis [24].

In this study, we first examined the expression of RUNX3 in cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues of 30 patients with CCRCC. Our results indicated that RUNX3 expression was significantly lower in CCRCC tissues than in adjacent normal tissues of the same patient. This result is consistent with studies of other malignant cancers and indicates that RUNX3 functions as a tumor suppressor gene in CCRCC [25,26]. We also measured the expression of E-cadherin, β-catenin, and EZH2. Our results showed that the expression of E-cadherin was lower in CCRCC tissues than in non-cancerous tissues. EZH2 is a highly expressed protein in tumor tissues and promotes tumor formation by downregulating E-cadherin [27]. In agreement, we also found overexpression of EZH2 in CCRCC. To examine the specific function of RUNX3 and its role in the EMT process during the progression of CCRCC, we further examined RUNX3 and E-cadherin as target proteins.

Thus, we validated the proliferation of CCRCC cells using the MTT and clone formation assays. The results indicated that two lines of CCRCC cells that overexpressed RUNX3 had lower proliferation. Previous studies demonstrated that RUNX3 overexpression inhibited the proliferation of non-small-cell lung cancer cells [28], consistent with our results. Metastasis is a tumor-specific biological behavior, and cell migration and invasion are critical for this process. The results of our cell scratch assay and Transwell assays on 786-O and ACHN cells showed that cell lines with the overexpression of RUNX3 had enhanced cell invasion and migration. Thus, our findings demonstrated that RUNX3 inhibited the invasion and migration of CCRCC, similar to its function in other cancers.

Our examination of the effect of RUNX3 on the cell cycle and apoptosis of CCRCC cells indicated that cells with overexpression of RUNX3 had an accumulation of cells in the G1 phase, and a fewer cells in the S phase. These results indicated that overexpression of RUNX3 prolonged the cell cycle of CCRCC cells. We also measured apoptosis using Annexin V-APC single staining and TUNEL staining. In agreement, these results showed there was increased apoptosis in cells that had overexpression of RUNX3. As above, these results are also consistent with previous research that examined the function of RUNX3 in ovarian cancer, gastric cancer, colon cancer, and other cancers [29,30,31].

Our measurements of the expression of E-cadherin in two lines of CCRCC cells (786-O and ACHN) showed that this protein had greater expression when RUNX3 was overexpressed. E-cadherin has an essential function during the EMT, and the EMT plays an important role in tumor invasion and metastasis. Our in vitro results thus lead to the conclusion that RUNX3 functions in the EMT by promoting the expression of E-cadherin. We also examined the function of RUNX3 by performing in vivo experiments using a nude mouse xenograft model of CCRCC. The results showed that mice that received CCRCC cells with RUNX3 overexpression had a slower rate of tumor formation and reduced tumor size and weight. Our measurements of the expression of E-cadherin in mouse tumor tissue confirmed that E-cadherin expression and RUNX3 expression were positively correlated. These results, which are consistent with our in vitro experiments, demonstrated that RUNX3 functioned in the EMT by upregulating E-cadherin.

In conclusion, our results confirmed that RUNX3 functioned as a tumor suppressor gene in CCRCC. More specifically, RUNX3 functions as a tumor suppressor by upregulating the expression of E-cadherin, a protein that has a key function in the EMT. We therefore believe that RUNX3 expression may be useful for predicting the recurrence or metastasis of this tumor, and it also has potential use as a novel target in future studies that examine drug therapies for CCRCC.

tel: +86-18661805812

Funding information: This study was funded by Natural Science of Shan Dong Province (ZR2014HM059) and the Qingdao Municipal Science Foundation (196140-nsh).
Author contributions: Cao YW and Dong Z conceived and designed research; Zhou FY, Wang HY, and Wang QH collected data and conducted research; Ji JL, Huang T, and Guo C analyzed and interpreted data; Yang RN and Cao YW wrote the initial article; Dong Z and Cao YW revised the article; and Cao YW had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Cao YW, Liu Y, Dong Z, Guo L, Kang EH, Wang YH, et al. Monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT4 are independent prognostic biomarkers for the survival of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma and those receiving therapy targeting angiogenesis. Urol Oncol. 2018;36(6):311.e15.10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.03.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Capitanio U, Montorsi F. Renal cancer. Lancet. 2016;387(10021):894–906.10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00046-XSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Gao J, Xu Q, Fu Y, He K, Zhang C, Zhang Q, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT parameters for discriminating pathological characteristics in primary clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(2):561–9.10.1007/s00259-020-04916-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Hanai J, Chen LF, Kanno T, Ohtani-Fujita N, Kim WY, Guo WH, et al. Interaction and functional cooperation of PEBP2/CBF with Smads. Synergistic induction of the immunoglobulin germline Calpha promoter. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(44):31577–82.10.1074/jbc.274.44.31577Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Weith A, Brodeur GM, Bruns GA, Matise TC, Mischke D, Nizetic D, et al. Report of the second international workshop on human chromosome 1 mapping 1995. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1996;72(2–3):114–44.10.1159/000134173Search in Google Scholar

[6] Li Z, Fan P, Deng M, Zeng C. The roles of RUNX3 in cervical cancer cells in vitro. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(6):8729–34.10.3892/ol.2018.8419Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] Jeong D, Kim H, Ryu A, Sunwoo J, Choi SD, Nam GH, et al. Loss of RUNX3 is significantly associated with advanced tumor grade and stage in endometrial cancers. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(6):8173–9.10.3892/mmr.2018.8915Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Liu B, Han Y, Jiang L, Jiang D, Li W, Zhang T, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of the RUNX3 expression in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;53:122–8.10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.041Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Li QL, Ito K, Sakakura C, Fukamachi H, Inoue K, Chi XZ, et al. Causal relationship between the loss of RUNX3 expression and gastric cancer. Cell. 2002;109(1):113–24.10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00690-6Search in Google Scholar

[10] Chi XZ, Yang JO, Lee KY, Ito K, Sakakura C, Li QL, et al. RUNX3 suppresses gastric epithelial cell growth by inducing p21(WAF1/Cip1) expression in cooperation with transforming growth factor {beta}-activated SMAD. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(18):8097–107.10.1128/MCB.25.18.8097-8107.2005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Polyak K, Weinberg RA. Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(4):265–73.10.1038/nrc2620Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Puram SV, Tirosh I, Parikh AS, Patel AP, Yizhak K, Gillespie S, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of primary and metastatic tumor ecosystems in head and neck cancer. Cell. 2017;171(7):1611–24.10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.044Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Song M, Pan Q, Yang J, He J, Zeng J, Cheng S, et al. Galectin-3 favours tumour metastasis via the activation of β-catenin signalling in hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2020;123(10):1521–34.10.1038/s41416-020-1022-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] Tang Y, Durand S, Dalle S, Caramel J. EMT-inducing transcription factors, drivers of melanoma phenotype switching, and resistance to treatment. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(8):2154. 10.3390/cancers12082154-2171.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Zhong W, Hou H, Liu T, Su S, Xi X, Liao Y, et al. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition by interacting with transgelin in colorectal cancer. Theranostics. 2020;10(19):8790–806.10.7150/thno.44456Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] AlAhmari MM, Al-Khalaf HH, Al-Mohanna FH, Ghebeh H, Aboussekhra A. AUF1 promotes stemness in human mammary epithelial cells through stabilization of the EMT transcription factors TWIST1 and SNAIL1. Oncogenesis. 2020;9(8):70.10.1038/s41389-020-00255-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Angius F, Floris A. Liposomes and MTT cell viability assay: an incompatible affair. Toxicol Vitro. 2015;29(2):314–9.10.1016/j.tiv.2014.11.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Moodley S, Koorbanally NA, Moodley T, Ramjugernath D, Pillay M. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay is a rapid, cheap, screening test for the in vitro anti-tuberculous activity of chalcones. J Microbiol Methods. 2014;104:72–8.10.1016/j.mimet.2014.06.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Stockert JC, Blázquez-Castro A, Cañete M, Horobin RW, Villanueva A. MTT assay for cell viability: Intracellular localization of the formazan product is in lipid droplets. Acta Histochem. 2012;114(8):785–96.10.1016/j.acthis.2012.01.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Freedman VH, Shin SI. Cellular tumorigenicity in nude mice: correlation with cell growth in semi-solid medium. Cell. 1974;3(4):355–9.10.1016/0092-8674(74)90050-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Dabestani S, Beisland C, Stewart G, Bensalah K, Gudmundsson E, Lam T, et al. Long-term outcomes of follow-up for initially localised clear cell renal cell carcinoma: RECUR database analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(5):857–66.10.1016/j.euf.2018.02.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Dongre A, Rashidian M, Reinhardt F, Bagnato A, Keckesova Z, Ploegh H, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to immunosuppression in breast carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2017;77(15):3982–9.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3292Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Mittal V. Epithelial mesenchymal transition in tumor metastasis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2018;13(1):395–412.10.1146/annurev-pathol-020117-043854Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Niu H, Qu A, Guan C. Suppression of MGAT3 expression and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of lung cancer cells by miR-188-5p. Biomed J. 2021;44(6):678–85.10.1016/j.bj.2020.05.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Chi X, Yang J, Lee K, Ito K, Sakakura C, Li Q, et al. RUNX3 suppresses gastric epithelial cell growth by inducing p21(WAF1/Cip1) expression in cooperation with transforming growth factor {beta}-activated SMAD. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(18):8097–107.10.1128/MCB.25.18.8097-8107.2005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[26] Qin X, Wang X, Fei J, Li F, Han J, Wang H. MiR-20a promotes lung tumorigenesis by targeting RUNX3 via TGF-β signaling pathway. J Biol Regulators Homeost Agents. 2020;34(2):487–97.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Zhao K, He J, Wang Y, Jin S, Fan Y, Fang N, et al. EZH2-mediated epigenetic suppression of EphB3 inhibits gastric cancer proliferation and metastasis by affecting E-cadherin and vimentin expression. Gene. 2019;686:118–24.10.1016/j.gene.2018.11.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Su H, Fan G, Huang J, Qiu X. YBX1 regulated by Runx3-miR-148a-3p axis facilitates non-small-cell lung cancer progression. Cell Signal. 2021;85:110049.10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.110049Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Liu W, Tan S, Bai X, Ma S, Chen X. Long non-coding RNA LINC01215 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer through RUNX3 promoter methylation. Transl Oncol. 2021;14(8):101135.10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101135Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Guo X, Dai X, Liu J, Cheng A, Qin C, Wang Z. Circular RNA circREPS2 acts as a sponge of miR-558 to suppress gastric cancer progression by regulating RUNX3/β-catenin signaling. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;21:577–91.10.1016/j.omtn.2020.06.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[31] Permana S, Putri Fityanti R, Norahmawati E, Iskandar A, Anggraini Mulyadi E, Tri Endharti A. Eisenia fetidacoelomic fluid of ameliorates cetuximab to reduce K-ras and vimentin expression through promoting RUNX3 in an AOM/DSS-induced colitis associated colon cancer. Evidence-Based Complemen Altern Med: eCAM. 2020;2020:9418520.10.1155/2020/9418520Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2022-03-22

Revised: 2022-08-04

Accepted: 2022-08-09

Published Online: 2022-12-02

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-0494

Keywords for this article

E-cadherin; enEMT; clear-cell renal cell carcinoma; RUNX3

Creative Commons

BY 4.0