Home Life Sciences Sorafenib inhibits ovarian cancer cell proliferation and mobility and induces radiosensitivity by targeting the tumor cell epithelial–mesenchymal transition
Article Open Access

Sorafenib inhibits ovarian cancer cell proliferation and mobility and induces radiosensitivity by targeting the tumor cell epithelial–mesenchymal transition

  • Chuntao Tian EMAIL logo , Ying Liu , Lingfei Xue , Dong Zhang , Xiaotong Zhang , Jing Su , Jiaohong Chen , Xiangke Li , Liuxing Wang and Shunchang Jiao
Published/Copyright: June 15, 2022

Abstract

Sorafenib, a pan-protein kinase inhibitor, inhibits the activity of various kinases (like vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma) and clinically has been used to treat different human cancers. This study investigated its antitumor activity in ovarian cancer and the underlying molecular events. To achieve that, ovarian cancer SKOV-3 cells were treated with or without sorafenib (10 µM), transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 (10 ng/mL), sorafenib (10 µM) + TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL), and TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL) + Ly2157299 (5 µM), followed by 8-Gy radiation. The cells were then subjected to cell viability, wound healing, Transwell, caspase-3 activity, and western blot assays. TGF-β1 treatment enhanced ovarian cancer cell epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), whereas sorafenib and a selective TGF-β1 inhibitor Ly2157299 reversed tumor cell EMT, invasion, and expression of EMT markers (E-cadherin and vimentin). Sorafenib and Ly2157299 treatment also significantly reduced the tumor cell viability. Furthermore, both sorafenib and Ly2157299 significantly enhanced ovarian cancer cell radiosensitivity, as assessed by a caspase-3 activity assay. In conclusion, sorafenib inhibited ovarian cancer cell proliferation and mobility and induced tumor cell radiosensitivity. Molecularly, sorafenib could inhibit the TGF-β1-mediated EMT. Future studies will assess sorafenib anti-ovarian cancer activity plus TGF-β1 inhibitors in ovarian cancer in vivo.

1 Introduction

Ovarian cancer is still a worldwide health burden in women, accounting for more than 295,000 new cases and 184,000 cancer-related deaths globally in 2018 [1]. In China, ovarian cancer ranked tenth in terms of cancer incidence and ninth in terms of mortality in 2015, although ovarian cancer cases have been decreasing over the last decade [2]. Clinically, ovarian cancer is usually diagnosed at the late stage as an aggressive disease [3]. Treatment for ovarian cancer depends on the stage, but surgery combined with platinum-based chemoradiotherapy is regarded as the standard therapy for ovarian cancer patients, regardless of the histological subtype. Meanwhile, radiation, hormone, and immune therapies are also used to control ovarian cancer [4,5,6,7,8,9]. However, up to 80% of the patients will eventually develop drug resistance, leading to disease relapse and progression. Effective treatments for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer are still lacking due to the low response rate to non-platinum-based drugs (such as topotecan, etoposide, and pazopanib). Moreover, targeted therapy with bevacizumab (a representative antiangiogenesis drug), poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and multidisciplinary treatment programs have shown a better control of advanced ovarian cancer [7]. For example, olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, has been demonstrated to have beneficial effects against adult BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer [10] and was approved by the US Federal Drug Administration to treat ovarian cancer in 2014 [11]. Thus, the continuous search for and identification of novel agents to control ovarian cancer as well as a better understanding of the pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms of this deadly disease are urgently needed now.

Transforming growth factors (TGFs) are polypeptide-related cell growth mediators. To date, there are two types of TGFs: TGF-α and TGF-β; each can be further classified into different subtypes, such as TGF-β1, which has different tissue distributions and functions in cells [12]. TGF-β1 is important for embryonic development, homeostasis of cell physiology, and tissue response to injury [13]. During tumorigenesis and cancer progression, TGF-β1 is considered to be an important cytokine for the induction of tumor cell epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [14]. Thus, it is frequently used as a stimulant in the EMT cell model in medical research [15,16]. EMT shows that the epithelia lose their cell polarity and adhesion capacity but gain their cell mobility ability, i.e., the mesenchymal stem cell property. EMT is also the hallmark of tumor development and progression. TGF-β1 is involved in ovarian tumorigenesis, while ovarian cancer cell EMT and metastasis have been associated with chemoresistance and poor survival of ovarian cancer patients [17,18,19,20,21]. Moreover, TGF-β can inhibit the growth of the ovarian surface epithelial cells and the early stage of ovarian cancer cells, but it also promotes the tumor growth of ovarian cancer at the later stages [17]. In addition, the expression of TGF-β1 and its receptors is associated with ovarian cancer biological features and sensitivity to paclitaxel/carboplatin treatment [22]. Thus, targeting TGF-β1 activity could be an effective means to control ovarian cancer.

Sorafenib toluene sulfonate (sorafenib) is a pan-protein kinase inhibitor that suppresses the activity of various kinases, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and RAF. This broad-spectrum antitumor drug was recently co-developed by Bayer and ONYX Pharmaceuticals Co. It not only inhibits the RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway but also activates VEGF1/2/3, PDGF, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT-3), and c-Kit [23,24,25]. Sorafenib is able to block TGF-β1-mediated tumor cell EMT; thus, it possesses a dual antitumor effect by inhibiting both tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis [26]. Since 2007 [27], sorafenib has been approved in more than 100 countries to treat thyroid, renal, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In this study, we assessed the activity of sorafenib in the regulation of TGF-β1-mediated ovarian cancer cell proliferation, mobility, and radiosensitivity in vitro. We expect that the in vitro data will support the clinical application of sorafenib for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Cell line and culture

Human ovarian cancer SKOV-3 cells were obtained from the Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology (China) and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco) in a CO2 incubator at 37°C. The cells were passed once every 2–4 days.

There were 5 cell treatment groups (n = 3 per cell treatment group), i.e., SKOV-3 cell control, TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL)-alone treatment according to previous studies [28,29,30], sorafenib (10 µM)-alone, sorafenib (10 µM) + TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL), and TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL) + Ly2157299 (a selective TGF-β1 inhibitor, 5 µM) group. Human TGF-β1 was obtained from Pepro Tech (Shuzhou, China), while sorafenib and Ly2157299 were from TargetMol (Shanghai, China).

2.2 Western blot

Western blot was performed according to a previous study [31]. The total cellular protein was extracted using a protein extraction kit (AmyJet Scientific, Wuhan, China), and the protein concentration was measured using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China), according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Next the protein samples underwent sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The membranes were first incubated in 5% skim milk solution at 4°C overnight for western blotting. Next these membranes were incubated with a primary antibody against vimentin or E-cadherin from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA), both at a dilution of 1:1,000, at room temperature for 2 h. After that, the membranes were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-Tween 20 (PBS-T) three times and then incubated with a secondary antibody (AmyJet Scientific, Wuhan, China) at room temperature for 1 h. Finally, the membranes were treated with enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham Biosciences, Shanghai, China), detected by using the Bio-Rad gel imaging system, and quantified using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.3 Cell viability assay

The cell viability assay was conducted using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, according to a previous study [32]. In brief, ovarian cancer SKOV-3 cells in the logarithmic growth phase were passaged using trypsin digestion and reseeded into a 96-well plate at a density of 5,000 cells per well and cultured overnight. Next 6 wells of cells for each treatment group (n = 3 per cell treatment group) were treated with control; TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL) alone, according to previous studies [28,29,30]; sorafenib (10 µM) alone; sorafenib (10 µM) + TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL); and TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL) + Ly2157299 (a selective TGF-β1 inhibitor, 5 µM) for up to 72 h. After that, 10 µL of MTT (Shanghai Beyotime Biological Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) was added to each well of cell culture, and the cells were further incubated for 4 h. The optical density was measured using a spectrophotometer at 560/590 nm, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.4 Tumor cell wound healing and Transwell assays

For the wound healing assay, ovarian cancer SKOV-3 cells in the logarithmic growth phase were reseeded into 6-well plates at a density of 3 × 105 cells per well and grown for 2 days to reach approximately 95% cell confluency. After that, the cells were wounded using a 200-µL pipette tip, washed with ice-cold PBS 3 times, and cultured for up to 72 h. Then, photographs of the cells were taken under an inverted microscope, and the images were quantified.

For the Transwell assay, SKOV-3 cells were seeded into Transwell chambers (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) at a density of 1 × 105 cells per chamber (the Transwell chamber filter was precoated with 50 µL of Matrigel by the manufacturer), while the bottom chambers were filled with 200 µL of DMEM containing 20% FBS. The Transwell chambers were then cultured at 37°C for 24 h. At the end of the experiment, the cells on top of the filter were wiped off using a cotton swab, while the cells that invaded the reverse side of the filter were fixed for 10 min in 10% formalin and then stained for 10 min in 0.5% crystal violet. The number of cells on the filter was counted under an inverted microscope for five randomly selected microscopic fields at a magnification of 400×. The assay was performed in duplicate and repeated three times.

2.5 Tumor cell radiosensitivity assay

SKOV-3 cells after each treatment (n = 3 per cell treatment group) were placed under a linear accelerator 6MV-X-ray (2100EX, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) at room temperature, covered with tissue glue, and subjected to full-field irradiation as uniform as possible with an irradiation dose of 8 Gy once. The absorbed dose rate was fixed at 300 cGy/min, and the irradiation distance was set at 100 cm, according to previous studies [33,34,35]. After that, the cells were collected and made into suspensions, and then 400 cells were added to 24-well culture dishes containing 1% agarose (Gibco). The cells were then grown in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37°C for 14 days, with the medium replaced with a fresh medium every 3 days. Cell colonies containing 50 cells or more were counted under an inverted light microscope, and the caspase-3 activity was assayed using a caspase-3 activity kit from Beyotime (Beijing, China), according to the kit’s instructions.

2.6 Statistical analysis

Our experiments were repeated at least three times and statistically analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) with the chi-squared test to determine the difference between two independent variables, bi-categorical variables, or nonparametric analysis to assess the difference between two groups. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 TGF-β1 enhanced ovarian cancer cell EMT, but sorafenib and Ly2157299 treatment reversed it

In the current study, we first repeated the TGF-β1-mediated ovarian cancer cell EMT model in vitro. After 48 h of cell culture, we observed the morphology under an inverted microscope. Specifically, in the control group, the SKOV-3 cells showed a normal growth pattern and tight intercellular connections with irregular polygonal morphology. In the TGF-β1 group, a portion of the SKOV-3 cells lost their normal structure by forming obvious spindles, fibroblast-like cells, while the connection between the cells was observed to be more loose and messy. Moreover, the cells after sorafenib-alone treatment showed more irregularities compared to those of the control group, but these cells did not form spindle-like cells and the intercellular connections started to be lost. However, the cells after TGF-β1 + sorafenib and TGF-β1 + Ly2157299 treatment showed a morphology that was similar to that of the control group (Figure 1).

Figure 1 
                  Effects of sorafenib on the regulation of TGF-β1-induced changes in ovarian cancer cell morphology. SKOV-3 cells were cultured and treated in triplicate with 10 µM sorafenib, 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, 10 µM sorafenib + 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, and 10 ng/mL TGF-β1 + 5 µM Ly2157299 for 48 h, and the cells were photographed under an inverted light microscope to assess the changes in cell morphology.
Figure 1

Effects of sorafenib on the regulation of TGF-β1-induced changes in ovarian cancer cell morphology. SKOV-3 cells were cultured and treated in triplicate with 10 µM sorafenib, 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, 10 µM sorafenib + 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, and 10 ng/mL TGF-β1 + 5 µM Ly2157299 for 48 h, and the cells were photographed under an inverted light microscope to assess the changes in cell morphology.

At the protein level, we assessed the levels of EMT markers (e.g., E-cadherin and vimentin) and found that compared with the control group, the protein expression of E-cadherin in the TGF-β1-treated group of cells was significantly reduced (P < 0.05), whereas the protein expression of vimentin was increased (Figure 2(a) and (b)), further confirming that TGF-β1 was able to induce EMT in SKOV3 cells. In contrast, the protein levels of E-cadherin and vimentin were reversed (P < 0.05) in the sorafenib + TGF-β1 group and in the TGF-β1 + Ly2157299 group, indicating that LY2157299 (a selective TGF-β1 inhibitor) and sorafenib were able to inhibit TGF-β1-induced SKOV-3 cell EMT in vitro.

Figure 2 
                  Effects of sorafenib on the regulation of TGF-β1-induced changes in protein expression in ovarian cancer cells. (a) and (b) SKOV-3 cells were cultured and treated in triplicate with 10 µM sorafenib, 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, 10 µM sorafenib + 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, and 10 ng/mL TGF-β1 + 5 µM Ly2157299 for 48 h and then subjected to western blot analysis. The graph shows the quantitative data of these western blots. *P < 0.05.
Figure 2

Effects of sorafenib on the regulation of TGF-β1-induced changes in protein expression in ovarian cancer cells. (a) and (b) SKOV-3 cells were cultured and treated in triplicate with 10 µM sorafenib, 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, 10 µM sorafenib + 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, and 10 ng/mL TGF-β1 + 5 µM Ly2157299 for 48 h and then subjected to western blot analysis. The graph shows the quantitative data of these western blots. *P < 0.05.

3.2 Effect of sorafenib on reduction in ovarian cancer cell viability

We then performed the cell viability MTT assay and found that there was no significant change in cell viability after TGF-β1-alone or TGF-β1 + LY2157299 treatment (P > 0.05), whereas the cell viability after sorafenib-alone or sorafenib + TGF-β1 treatment (P < 0.05) was significantly reduced (Figure 3) compared with that of the control group. These findings suggest that TGF-β1 and LY-2157299 had no effect on the SKOV3 cell viability, whereas sorafenib inhibited the tumor cell viability.

Figure 3 
                  Effects of sorafenib on the downregulation of TGF-β1-induced ovarian cancer cell viability. SKOV-3 cells were cultured and treated in triplicate with 10 µM sorafenib, 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, 10 µM sorafenib + 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, and 10 ng/mL TGF-β1 + 5 µM Ly2157299 for up to 72 h, and a change in cell viability was detected using the MTT assay.
Figure 3

Effects of sorafenib on the downregulation of TGF-β1-induced ovarian cancer cell viability. SKOV-3 cells were cultured and treated in triplicate with 10 µM sorafenib, 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, 10 µM sorafenib + 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, and 10 ng/mL TGF-β1 + 5 µM Ly2157299 for up to 72 h, and a change in cell viability was detected using the MTT assay.

3.3 Sorafenib activity in the reversal of TGF-β1-induced ovarian cancer cell mobility

Our wound healing assay data showed that the SKOV3 cell migration ability after TGF-β1-alone treatment was obvious, whereas sorafenib-alone or sorafenib + TGF-β1 treatment reduced such an ability (Figure 4 and Table 1). Moreover, our Transwell assay data revealed that there was an enhanced tumor cell invasion capacity after TGF-β1-alone treatment compared with that of the control group. However, sorafenib-alone or sorafenib + TGF-β1 treatment significantly reduced the tumor cell invasion capacity (P < 0.05; Figure 5(a) and (b)), suggesting that sorafenib was able to inhibit tumor cell invasion, especially the TGF-β1-enhanced ovarian cancer cell EMT.

Figure 4 
                  Effects of sorafenib on the downregulation of TGF-β1-induced ovarian cancer cell migration. SKOV-3 cells were cultured and treated in triplicate with 10 µM sorafenib, 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, 10 µM sorafenib + 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, and 10 ng/mL TGF-β1 + 5 µM Ly2157299 for up to 72 h, and the change in cell migration was assessed using a wound-healing assay. The data are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 4

Effects of sorafenib on the downregulation of TGF-β1-induced ovarian cancer cell migration. SKOV-3 cells were cultured and treated in triplicate with 10 µM sorafenib, 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, 10 µM sorafenib + 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, and 10 ng/mL TGF-β1 + 5 µM Ly2157299 for up to 72 h, and the change in cell migration was assessed using a wound-healing assay. The data are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Effect of sorafenib on inhibition of ovarian cancer cell wound healing capacity in vitro

Duration (h) Control TGF-β1 Sorafenib TGF-β1 + Sorafenib TGF-β1 + Ly2157299
0 646.67 ± 15.28 644.33 ± 6.43 645.00 ± 13.23 643.33 ± 22.55 643.33 ± 12.58
12 403.33 ± 20.82 385.00 ± 18.03 591.33 ± 22.59* 623.33 ± 7.64* 505.67 ± 23.00
24 307.00 ± 12.12 293.33 ± 13.58 533.00 ± 25.63* 569.67 ± 17.01* 303.00 ± 16.09
48 228.00 ± 14.73 237.33 ± 11.50 503.67 ± 23.03* 521.00 ± 11.00* 169.67 ± 15.18
72 66.00 ± 20.52 67.33 ± 19.66 450.00 ± 23.07* 472.33 ± 43.55* 97.00 ± 13.89

Note: The data are summarized as the mean value ± standard deviation from Figure 4. *P < 0.001 compared to the control group (n = 3).

Figure 5 
                  Sorafenib activity in downregulation of TGF-β1-enhanced ovarian cancer cell invasion capacity. (a) and (b) SKOV-3 cells were cultured and treated in triplicate with 10 µM sorafenib, 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, 10 µM sorafenib + 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, and 10 ng/mL TGF-β1 + 5 µM Ly2157299 for 24 h, and the change in cell invasion was assayed using a Transwell assay. *P < 0.05.
Figure 5

Sorafenib activity in downregulation of TGF-β1-enhanced ovarian cancer cell invasion capacity. (a) and (b) SKOV-3 cells were cultured and treated in triplicate with 10 µM sorafenib, 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, 10 µM sorafenib + 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, and 10 ng/mL TGF-β1 + 5 µM Ly2157299 for 24 h, and the change in cell invasion was assayed using a Transwell assay. *P < 0.05.

3.4 Sorafenib activity in the reversal of TGF-β1-enhanced ovarian cancer cell radioresistance

We assayed the caspase-3 activity to determine the level of tumor cell apoptosis. As shown in Figure 6(a) and (b), the activity of caspase-3 in the control group was 1.018 ± 0.118, whereas it was 1.648 ± 0.139 in the sorafenib group and 1.800 ± 0.158 in the sorafenib + TGF-β1 group. The caspase-3 activity was significantly increased after sorafenib-alone or sorafenib + TGF-β1 treatment vs the control group (P < 0.05). These data suggest that sorafenib could enhance radiotherapy sensitivity in terms of radiation-induced tumor cell apoptosis.

Figure 6 
                  Effects of sorafenib on the upregulation of TGF-β1-reduced ovarian cancer cell radiosensitivity in terms of apoptosis induction. (a) and (b) SKOV-3 cells were grown and treated in triplicate with 10 µM sorafenib, 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, sorafenib (10 µM) + TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL), and TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL) + Ly2157299 (5 µM), respectively, followed by 8-Gy radiation for 8 h, and the radiosensitivity was assayed by using a caspase-3 activity assay. *P < 0.05.
Figure 6

Effects of sorafenib on the upregulation of TGF-β1-reduced ovarian cancer cell radiosensitivity in terms of apoptosis induction. (a) and (b) SKOV-3 cells were grown and treated in triplicate with 10 µM sorafenib, 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, sorafenib (10 µM) + TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL), and TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL) + Ly2157299 (5 µM), respectively, followed by 8-Gy radiation for 8 h, and the radiosensitivity was assayed by using a caspase-3 activity assay. *P < 0.05.

4 Discussion

Ovarian cancer significantly contributes to female mortality worldwide [36,37,38], and the current treatment for ovarian cancer mainly relies on surgery combined with chemotherapy or targeted therapy [6,39]. Although there have been advancements in the treatment of ovarian cancer over the last few decades, the 5-year survival rate of advanced ovarian cancer is still poor, i.e., approximately 30% [40]. In this study, we assessed the antitumor activity of sorafenib in the control of ovarian cancer cell proliferation, mobility, and radiosensitivity in vitro using the TGF-β1-enhanced ovarian cancer cell EMT model. As is well known, cytokines play a major role in regulating the cellular responses between tumors and the immune system [41]. Thus, we first confirmed that TGF-β1 treatment was able to enhance the ovarian cancer cell EMT in vitro by assessing the tumor cell morphology and expression of EMT markers (E-cadherin and vimentin). In contrast, sorafenib could reverse the TGF-β1-mediated ovarian cancer cell EMT, similar to the effects of Ly2157299, a selective TGF-β1 inhibitor. Sorafenib reduced ovarian cancer cell migration and invasion, but it promoted the radiosensitivity of ovarian cancer. In addition, sorafenib reduced the tumor cell viability. The data from the current study indicate that sorafenib should be tested in clinical trials as a treatment for the control of ovarian cancer progression.

Sorafenib was originally developed and approved for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma [42,43]. The mechanism of action of sorafenib is by inhibiting the activity of various protein kinases, like VEGFR, PDGER, and RAF kinases [44]. and inducing autophagy [45]. In ovarian cancer, sorafenib has been used in combination with various chemotherapeutics and targeting therapeutics, and the results have shown some success in clinical trials [46,47,48,49] as well as a preclinical study [50]. However, contradictory findings have been observed in other clinical trials [51,52,53,54,55], and toxicity has been demonstrated to be an issue [47,48,56]. Thus, further studies are needed to evaluate the activity of sorafenib in ovarian cancer treatment [26,55]. Indeed, another previous clinical study has shown that sorafenib, in combination with topotecan and continued as a maintenance therapy, had a statistically and clinically significant improvement in progression-free survival in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer [50]. Other studies also have revealed that the antiangiogenic therapy did show promise in the treatment of ovarian cancer [57,58]. In our current study, we found that sorafenib suppressed ovarian cancer cell proliferation and mobility by targeting the tumor cell EMT, which is consistent with a previous study [59].

Ovarian cancer invasion and metastasis, like most cancers, are a multi-factorial, multi-step process and are regulated by a variety of genes and gene pathways, although the precise molecular mechanisms are, to date, not fully defined [60,61]. The ovarian cancer cell EMT is an important biological phenomenon that occurs during ovarian cancer development and progression, like all other cancers. During the EMT of tumor cells, the expression of different epithelial markers (e.g., E-cadherin and β-catenin) is reduced, whereas the expression of mesenchymal markers (like fibronectin and vimentin) is induced [62]. Indeed, the EMT was initially discovered and identified in embryonic development, which is essential for embryonic mesenchymal stem cells to differentiate into a variety of cell types and tissues [63]. Nevertheless, the tumor cell EMT leads to cancer development and progression [6466]. At the gene level, the TGF-β, MAPK, PI3K/AKT, Wnt, and nuclear factor-κB signaling pathways [67] all participate in the tumor cell EMT, and inhibition of the occurrence of the EMT is able to suppress cancer metastasis [68]. Among these signaling pathways, TGF-β is a promoter of tumor invasion and metastasis as it binds to its receptor, phosphorylates the receptor, and, in turn, activates transcription of the target genes and promotes the EMT of cells. To date, the TGF-β1-led signaling pathway is well researched and considered as a classical pathway for induction of the EMT process. It is also true that research on the role of sorafenib in cancer cell EMT has been robust. For example, Nagai et al. [69] have demonstrated that sorafenib is able to suppress hepatocyte growth factor-induced liver cancer cell EMT by downregulation of Snail expression through blockage of the RAS/RAF/MEK signaling pathway. In addition, Yuelei et al. [70] have revealed that sorafenib inhibits TGF-β1-induced mouse liver cell EMT by inhibition of TGF-β1-dependent Smad2/3 transcription. In the current study, we first established a cell model of TGF-β1-induced ovarian cancer cell EMT and found that sorafenib was able to increase the protein level of E-cadherin and suppress the protein expression of vimentin, indicating that sorafenib reversed the effect of TGF-β1. Thus, we speculated that sorafenib could be used to effectively control ovarian cancer, especially in combination with other agents or radiation. In the clinic, various antitumor agents, like bevacizumab (a VEGF inhibitor) and sorafenib, have been recognized for their anti-ovarian cancer activity [7,55,57]. Thus, further investigation of the underlying mechanisms of sorafenib could help us to improve the efficacy of this drug against ovarian cancer. It is true that many medications used to treat ovarian cancer patients do possess significant toxicities and adverse effects [71,72,73]. The current study is just a proof-of-principle study, and much more research is needed.

In conclusion, our current study demonstrated that sorafenib was able to reverse the TGF-β1-enhanced ovarian cancer cell EMT and, therefore, suppressed ovarian cancer SKOV-3 cell proliferation and mobility as well as enhanced the radiosensitivity of these cells in vitro.


# These two authors contributed equally to this work.

tel: +86-0398-3118462

  1. Funding information: This study was supported in part by a grant from the Science and Technology Huimin Plan Funds of Sanmenxia City (#2016030307).

  2. Author contributions: C.T., Y.L., and S.J. designed the experiments; X.L. and Y.L. performed the experiments; L.X., D.Z., and X.Z. performed the data analyses; and C.T., X.L., J.S., J.C., and L.W. interpreted the data and prepared the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of this manuscript and the submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.10.3322/caac.21492Search in Google Scholar

[2] Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–32.10.3322/caac.21338Search in Google Scholar

[3] Fortner RT, Kaaks R. Ovarian cancer: complicated etiology and very few preventive options. In: Wild CP, Weiderpass E, Stewart BW, editors. The world cancer report. Lyon, France: The World Health Organization; 2020. p. 411–20.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Marchetti C, Pisano C, Facchini G, Bruni GS, Magazzino FP, Losito S, et al. First-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: current research and perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2010;10(1):47–60.10.1586/era.09.167Search in Google Scholar

[5] Williams C, Simera I, Bryant A. Tamoxifen for relapse of ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2010(3):Cd001034.10.1002/14651858.CD001034Search in Google Scholar

[6] Eisenhauer EA. Real-world evidence in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl_8):viii61–65.10.1093/annonc/mdx443Search in Google Scholar

[7] Grunewald T, Ledermann JA. Targeted therapies for ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;41:139–52.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.12.001Search in Google Scholar

[8] Odunsi K. Immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl_8):viii1–i7.10.1093/annonc/mdx444Search in Google Scholar

[9] Lheureux S, Gourley C, Vergote I, Oza AM. Epithelial ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2019;393(10177):1240–53.10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32552-2Search in Google Scholar

[10] Fong PC, Boss DS, Yap TA, Tutt A, Wu P, Mergui-Roelvink M, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(2):123–34.10.1056/NEJMoa0900212Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] The United State Food and Drug Administration [Internet]. 2018. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/fda-approved-olaparib-lynparza-astrazeneca-pharmaceuticals-lp-maintenance-treatment-adult-patients.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Moses HL, Roberts AB, Derynck R. The discovery and early days of TGF-β: a historical perspective. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8(7):a021865.10.1101/cshperspect.a021865Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Sporn MB, Roberts AB. Transforming growth factor-beta. Multiple actions and potential clinical applications. Jama. 1989;262(7):938–41.10.1001/jama.262.7.938Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ikushima H, Miyazono K. TGFbeta signalling: a complex web in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(6):415–24.10.1038/nrc2853Search in Google Scholar

[15] Zhang WJ, Su XY, Li S, Zeng H. Correlation between epithelial mesenchymal transformation and cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer cells (in Chinese). Chongqing Med Medicine. 2019;48(13):2192–6.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Liang G. Research progress of EMT-related molecules and ovarian cancer. J Community Med. 2012;10(24):52–4.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Nilsson EE, Skinner MK. Role of transforming growth factor beta in ovarian surface epithelium biology and ovarian cancer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5(3):254–8.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61828-7Search in Google Scholar

[18] Qiu X, Cheng JC, Zhao J, Chang HM, Leung PC. Transforming growth factor-β stimulates human ovarian cancer cell migration by up-regulating connexin43 expression via Smad2/3 signaling. Cell Signal. 2015;27(10):1956–62.10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.07.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Chen Y, Wang DD, Wu YP, Su D, Zhou TY, Gai RH, et al. MDM2 promotes epithelial–mesenchymal transition and metastasis of ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells. Br J Cancer. 2017;117(8):1192–201.10.1038/bjc.2017.265Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Liang S, Yao Q, Wei D, Liu M, Geng F, Wang Q, et al. KDM6B promotes ovarian cancer cell migration and invasion by induced transforming growth factor-β1 expression. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(1):493–506.10.1002/jcb.27405Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Yan Z, Tian X, Wang R, Cheng X, Mi J, Xiong L, et al. Title prognosis significance of ZEB2 and TGF-β1 as well as other clinical characteristics in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27(7):1343–9.10.1097/IGC.0000000000001037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Komiyama S, Kurahashi T, Ishikawa M, Tanaka K, Komiyama M, Mikami M, et al. Expression of TGFß1 and its receptors is associated with biological features of ovarian cancer and sensitivity to paclitaxel/carboplatin. Oncol Rep. 2011;25(4):1131–8.10.3892/or.2011.1151Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Mayinuer A, Yasen M, Mogushi K, Obulhasim G, Xieraili M, Aihara A, et al. Upregulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA member 3 (PTP4A3/PRL-3) is associated with tumor differentiation and a poor prognosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(1):305–17.10.1245/s10434-012-2395-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Leconte M, Santulli P, Chouzenoux S, Marcellin L, Cerles O, Chapron C, et al. Inhibition of MAPK and VEGFR by sorafenib controls the progression of endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(9):1171–80.10.1177/1933719115592708Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Xu Y, Huang J, Ma L, Shan J, Shen J, Yang Z, et al. MicroRNA-122 confers sorafenib resistance to hepatocellular carcinoma cells by targeting IGF-1R to regulate RAS/RAF/ERK signaling pathways. Cancer Lett. 2016;371(2):171–81.10.1016/j.canlet.2015.11.034Search in Google Scholar

[26] Smolle E, Taucher V, Petru E, Haybaeck J. Targeted treatment of ovarian cancer – the multiple – kinase – inhibitor sorafenib as a potential option. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(4):1519–30.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Geschwind JF, Chapiro J. Sorafenib in combination with transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2016;14(8):585–7.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Geng F, Song K, Xing JZ, Yuan C, Yan S, Yang Q, et al. Thio-glucose bound gold nanoparticles enhance radio-cytotoxic targeting of ovarian cancer. Nanotechnology. 2011;22(28):285101.10.1088/0957-4484/22/28/285101Search in Google Scholar

[29] Zhang D, Wang B, Hu L. Radiation enhancement and induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells by arsenic trioxide. Chin J Radiation Oncol. 2003;12(1):46–9.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Arafat WO, Gómez-Navarro J, Xiang J, Barnes MN, Mahasreshti P, Alvarez RD, et al. An adenovirus encoding proapoptotic Bax induces apoptosis and enhances the radiation effect in human ovarian cancer. Mol Ther. 2000;1(6):545–54.10.1006/mthe.2000.0071Search in Google Scholar

[31] Jurisic V, Srdic-Rajic T, Konjevic G, Bogdanovic G, Colic M. TNF-α induced apoptosis is accompanied with rapid CD30 and slower CD45 shedding from K-562 cells. J Membr Biol. 2011;239(3):115–22.10.1007/s00232-010-9309-7Search in Google Scholar

[32] Vuletic A, Konjevic G, Milanovic D, Ruzdijic S, Jurisic V. Antiproliferative effect of 13-cis-retinoic acid is associated with granulocyte differentiation and decrease in cyclin B1 and Bcl-2 protein levels in G0/G1 arrested HL-60 cells. Pathol Oncol Res. 2010;16(3):393–401.10.1007/s12253-009-9241-2Search in Google Scholar

[33] Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.10.3322/caac.21262Search in Google Scholar

[34] Zheng X, Nakamura K, Tojo M, Oyama N, Nishibu A, Satoh M, et al. TGF-beta1-mediated regulation of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC/CCL17) synthesis and secretion by HaCaT cells co-stimulated with TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma. J Dermatol Sci. 2002;30(2):154–60.10.1016/S0923-1811(02)00071-3Search in Google Scholar

[35] Song Y. Role of Notch pathway in TGF-β1 induced epithelial mesenchymal transformation in epithelial ovarian cancer cells (Master thesis). Shijiazhuang, China: Hebei Medical University; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Zhang YY, Lou G, Cheng L, Sui LH. Inhibitory effect of transforming growth factor β1 on human ovarian cancer cell proliferation (in Chinese). Chin J Oncol. 2005;32(16):915–9.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Leng R, Liao G, Wang H, Kuang J, Tang L. Rac1 expression in epithelial ovarian cancer: effect on cell EMT and clinical outcome. Med Oncol. 2015;32(2):329.10.1007/s12032-014-0329-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Ren C, Li X, Wang T, Wang G, Zhao C, Liang T, et al. Functions and Mechanisms of Long Noncoding RNAs in Ovarian Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25(4):566–9.10.1097/IGC.0000000000000413Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Oronsky B, Ray CM, Spira AI, Trepel JB, Carter CA, Cottrill HM. A brief review of the management of platinum-resistant-platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. Med Oncol. 2017;34(6):103.10.1007/s12032-017-0960-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[40] Zhang H, Zhu Y, Zhang G, Huang J. Advances in research on metastasis, chemotherapy resistance and prognosis of CD44 +/MyD88 + ovarian cancer (in Chinese). Cancer Prevention Treatment. 2017;30(4):313–8.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Jurisic V. Multiomic analysis of cytokines in immuno-oncology. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2020;17(9):663–74.10.1080/14789450.2020.1845654Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Rini BI. Sorafenib. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2006;7(4):453–61.10.1517/14656566.7.4.453Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] Keating GM, Santoro A. Sorafenib: a review of its use in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Drugs. 2009;69(2):223–40.10.2165/00003495-200969020-00006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[44] Wilhelm SM, Adnane L, Newell P, Villanueva A, Llovet JM, Lynch M. Preclinical overview of sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor that targets both Raf and VEGF and PDGF receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7(10):3129–40.10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Zhang Y. Screening of kinase inhibitors targeting BRAF for regulating autophagy based on kinase pathways. Mol Med Rep. 2014;9(1):83–90.10.3892/mmr.2013.1781Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Lee JM, Sarosy GA, Annunziata CM, Azad N, Minasian L, Kotz H, et al. Combination therapy: intermittent sorafenib with bevacizumab yields activity and decreased toxicity. Br J Cancer. 2010;102(3):495–9.10.1038/sj.bjc.6605514Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[47] Matei D, Sill MW, Lankes HA, DeGeest K, Bristow RE, Mutch D, et al. Activity of sorafenib in recurrent ovarian cancer and primary peritoneal carcinomatosis: a gynecologic oncology group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(1):69–75.10.1200/JCO.2009.26.7856Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[48] Ramasubbaiah R, Perkins SM, Schilder J, Whalen C, Johnson CS, Callahan M, et al. Sorafenib in combination with weekly topotecan in recurrent ovarian cancer, a phase I/II study of the Hoosier Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;123(3):499–504.10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.033Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Schwandt A, von Gruenigen VE, Wenham RM, Frasure H, Eaton S, Fusco N, et al. Randomized phase II trial of sorafenib alone or in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel in women with recurrent platinum sensitive epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2014;32(4):729–38.10.1007/s10637-014-0078-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Huang C, Li H, Feng Y, Li X, Zhang Z, Jiang C, et al. Combination therapy with B7H3-redirected bispecific antibody and Sorafenib elicits enhanced synergistic antitumor efficacy. Theranostics. 2020;10(23):10498–512.10.7150/thno.49480Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[51] Pölcher M, Eckhardt M, Coch C, Wolfgarten M, Kübler K, Hartmann G, et al. Sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;66(1):203–7.10.1007/s00280-010-1276-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Welch SA, Hirte HW, Elit L, Schilder RJ, Wang L, Macalpine K, et al. Sorafenib in combination with gemcitabine in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20(5):787–93.10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181e273a8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[53] Bodnar L, Górnas M, Szczylik C. Sorafenib as a third line therapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer: a phase II study. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;123(1):33–6.10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.06.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[54] Herzog TJ, Scambia G, Kim BG, Lhommé C, Markowska J, Ray-Coquard I, et al. A randomized phase II trial of maintenance therapy with Sorafenib in front-line ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(1):25–30.10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[55] Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Valenzano Menada M, Venturini PL, Ferrero S. Sorafenib for ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2013;22(8):1049–62.10.1517/13543784.2013.802769Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[56] Lee JM, Annunziata CM, Hays JL, Cao L, Choyke P, Yu M, et al. Phase II trial of bevacizumab and sorafenib in recurrent ovarian cancer patients with or without prior-bevacizumab treatment. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159(1):88–94.10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.031Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[57] Duan P, Fan L, Gao Q, Silwal BM, Ren M, Shen Y, et al. Targeted therapy of ovarian cancer with angiogenesis inhibitors. Curr Drug Targets. 2017;18(10):1171–8.10.2174/1389450118666170329095807Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[58] Singh N, Badrun D, Ghatage P. State of the art and up-and-coming angiogenesis inhibitors for ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020;21(13):1579–90.10.1080/14656566.2020.1775813Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[59] Park GB, Ko HS, Kim D. Sorafenib controls the epithelial–mesenchymal transition of ovarian cancer cells via EGF and the CD44-HA signaling pathway in a cell type-dependent manner. Mol Med Rep. 2017;16(2):1826–36.10.3892/mmr.2017.6773Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[60] Davidson B, Tropé CG. Ovarian cancer: diagnostic, biological and prognostic aspects. Womens Health (Lond). 2014;10(5):519–33.10.2217/WHE.14.37Search in Google Scholar

[61] Konecny GE, Winterhoff B, Wang C. Gene-expression signatures in ovarian cancer: Promise and challenges for patient stratification. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;141(2):379–85.10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[62] De Craene B, Berx G. Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(2):97–110.10.1038/nrc3447Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[63] Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(3):178–96.10.1038/nrm3758Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[64] Wu T, Song H, Xie D, Zhao B, Xu H, Wu C, et al. Silencing of ASPP2 promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer cells via the PI3K/AKT pathway. Int J Oncol. 2018;52(6):2001–10.10.3892/ijo.2018.4331Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[65] Luo J, Chen J, Li H, Yang Y, Yun H, Yang S, et al. LncRNA UCA1 promotes the invasion and EMT of bladder cancer cells by regulating the miR-143/HMGB1 pathway. Oncol Lett. 2017;14(5):5556–62.10.3892/ol.2017.6886Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[66] Zhang T, Zhao G, Yang C, Dong P, Watari H, Zeng L, et al. Lentiviral vector mediated-ASAP1 expression promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition in ovarian cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(4):4432–8.10.3892/ol.2018.7834Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[67] Kim D, Xing T, Yang Z, Dudek R, Lu Q, Chen YH. Epithelial mesenchymal transition in embryonic development, tissue repair and cancer: a comprehensive overview. J Clin Med. 2017;7(1):1.10.3390/jcm7010001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[68] Yang J, Weinberg RA. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis. Dev Cell. 2008;14(6):818–29.10.1016/j.devcel.2008.05.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[69] Nagai H, Mukozu T, Ogino YU, Matsui D, Matsui T, Wakui N, et al. Sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(4):2269–77.Search in Google Scholar

[70] Yuelei Chen, Jing Lv, XiaoLei Ye, Ming-Yu Sun, Qin Xu, Cheng-Hai Liu. Sorafenib inhibits transforming growth factor β1-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition and apoptosis in mouse hepatocytes. Hepatology. 2011;53(5):1708–18.10.1002/hep.24254Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[71] Tian A, Lu H, Zhang J, Fu S, Jiang Z, Lam W, et al. Multikinase inhibitor sorafenib induces skin toxicities in tumor-bearing mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018;81(6):1025–33.10.1007/s00280-018-3575-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[72] Stewart C, Ralyea C, Lockwood S. Ovarian cancer: an integrated review. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019;35(2):151–6.10.1016/j.soncn.2019.02.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[73] Leitao Jr MM. Management of epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2018;16(10):656–9.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-09-17
Revised: 2022-03-14
Accepted: 2022-03-17
Published Online: 2022-06-15

© 2022 Chuntao Tian et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Biomedical Sciences
  2. Effects of direct oral anticoagulants dabigatran and rivaroxaban on the blood coagulation function in rabbits
  3. The mother of all battles: Viruses vs humans. Can humans avoid extinction in 50–100 years?
  4. Knockdown of G1P3 inhibits cell proliferation and enhances the cytotoxicity of dexamethasone in acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  5. LINC00665 regulates hepatocellular carcinoma by modulating mRNA via the m6A enzyme
  6. Association study of CLDN14 variations in patients with kidney stones
  7. Concanavalin A-induced autoimmune hepatitis model in mice: Mechanisms and future outlook
  8. Regulation of miR-30b in cancer development, apoptosis, and drug resistance
  9. Informatic analysis of the pulmonary microecology in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis at three different stages
  10. Swimming attenuates tumor growth in CT-26 tumor-bearing mice and suppresses angiogenesis by mediating the HIF-1α/VEGFA pathway
  11. Characterization of intestinal microbiota and serum metabolites in patients with mild hepatic encephalopathy
  12. Functional conservation and divergence in plant-specific GRF gene family revealed by sequences and expression analysis
  13. Application of the FLP/LoxP-FRT recombination system to switch the eGFP expression in a model prokaryote
  14. Biomedical evaluation of antioxidant properties of lamb meat enriched with iodine and selenium
  15. Intravenous infusion of the exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells enhance neurological recovery after traumatic brain injury via suppressing the NF-κB pathway
  16. Effect of dietary pattern on pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus and its clinical significance
  17. Potential regulatory mechanism of TNF-α/TNFR1/ANXA1 in glioma cells and its role in glioma cell proliferation
  18. Effect of the genetic mutant G71R in uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 on the conjugation of bilirubin
  19. Quercetin inhibits cytotoxicity of PC12 cells induced by amyloid-beta 25–35 via stimulating estrogen receptor α, activating ERK1/2, and inhibiting apoptosis
  20. Nutrition intervention in the management of novel coronavirus pneumonia patients
  21. circ-CFH promotes the development of HCC by regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, invasion, and glycolysis through the miR-377-3p/RNF38 axis
  22. Bmi-1 directly upregulates glucose transporter 1 in human gastric adenocarcinoma
  23. Lacunar infarction aggravates the cognitive deficit in the elderly with white matter lesion
  24. Hydroxysafflor yellow A improved retinopathy via Nrf2/HO-1 pathway in rats
  25. Comparison of axon extension: PTFE versus PLA formed by a 3D printer
  26. Elevated IL-35 level and iTr35 subset increase the bacterial burden and lung lesions in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected mice
  27. A case report of CAT gene and HNF1β gene variations in a patient with early-onset diabetes
  28. Study on the mechanism of inhibiting patulin production by fengycin
  29. SOX4 promotes high-glucose-induced inflammation and angiogenesis of retinal endothelial cells by activating NF-κB signaling pathway
  30. Relationship between blood clots and COVID-19 vaccines: A literature review
  31. Analysis of genetic characteristics of 436 children with dysplasia and detailed analysis of rare karyotype
  32. Bioinformatics network analyses of growth differentiation factor 11
  33. NR4A1 inhibits the epithelial–mesenchymal transition of hepatic stellate cells: Involvement of TGF-β–Smad2/3/4–ZEB signaling
  34. Expression of Zeb1 in the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cell
  35. Study on the genetic damage caused by cadmium sulfide quantum dots in human lymphocytes
  36. Association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms of NKX2.5 and congenital heart disease in Chinese population: A meta-analysis
  37. Assessment of the anesthetic effect of modified pentothal sodium solution on Sprague-Dawley rats
  38. Genetic susceptibility to high myopia in Han Chinese population
  39. Potential biomarkers and molecular mechanisms in preeclampsia progression
  40. Silencing circular RNA-friend leukemia virus integration 1 restrained malignancy of CC cells and oxaliplatin resistance by disturbing dyskeratosis congenita 1
  41. Endostar plus pembrolizumab combined with a platinum-based dual chemotherapy regime for advanced pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma as a first-line treatment: A case report
  42. The significance of PAK4 in signaling and clinicopathology: A review
  43. Sorafenib inhibits ovarian cancer cell proliferation and mobility and induces radiosensitivity by targeting the tumor cell epithelial–mesenchymal transition
  44. Characterization of rabbit polyclonal antibody against camel recombinant nanobodies
  45. Active legumain promotes invasion and migration of neuroblastoma by regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition
  46. Effect of cell receptors in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: Current insights
  47. MT-12 inhibits the proliferation of bladder cells in vitro and in vivo by enhancing autophagy through mitochondrial dysfunction
  48. Study of hsa_circRNA_000121 and hsa_circRNA_004183 in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
  49. BuyangHuanwu Decoction attenuates cerebral vasospasm caused by subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats via PI3K/AKT/eNOS axis
  50. Effects of the interaction of Notch and TLR4 pathways on inflammation and heart function in septic heart
  51. Monosodium iodoacetate-induced subchondral bone microstructure and inflammatory changes in an animal model of osteoarthritis
  52. A rare presentation of type II Abernethy malformation and nephrotic syndrome: Case report and review
  53. Rapid death due to pulmonary epithelioid haemangioendothelioma in several weeks: A case report
  54. Hepatoprotective role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α in non-cancerous hepatic tissues following transcatheter arterial embolization
  55. Correlation between peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations and primary systemic lupus erythematosus
  56. A novel SLC8A1-ALK fusion in lung adenocarcinoma confers sensitivity to alectinib: A case report
  57. β-Hydroxybutyrate upregulates FGF21 expression through inhibition of histone deacetylases in hepatocytes
  58. Identification of metabolic genes for the prediction of prognosis and tumor microenvironment infiltration in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer
  59. BTBD10 inhibits glioma tumorigenesis by downregulating cyclin D1 and p-Akt
  60. Mucormycosis co-infection in COVID-19 patients: An update
  61. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing in diagnosing Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: A case report
  62. Long non-coding RNA HOXB-AS1 is a prognostic marker and promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cells’ proliferation and invasion
  63. Preparation and evaluation of LA-PEG-SPION, a targeted MRI contrast agent for liver cancer
  64. Proteomic analysis of the liver regulating lipid metabolism in Chaohu ducks using two-dimensional electrophoresis
  65. Nasopharyngeal tuberculosis: A case report
  66. Characterization and evaluation of anti-Salmonella enteritidis activity of indigenous probiotic lactobacilli in mice
  67. Aberrant pulmonary immune response of obese mice to periodontal infection
  68. Bacteriospermia – A formidable player in male subfertility
  69. In silico and in vivo analysis of TIPE1 expression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma
  70. Effects of KCa channels on biological behavior of trophoblasts
  71. Interleukin-17A influences the vulnerability rather than the size of established atherosclerotic plaques in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice
  72. Multiple organ failure and death caused by Staphylococcus aureus hip infection: A case report
  73. Prognostic signature related to the immune environment of oral squamous cell carcinoma
  74. Primary and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the thyroid gland: Two case reports
  75. Neuroprotective effects of crocin and crocin-loaded niosomes against the paraquat-induced oxidative brain damage in rats
  76. Role of MMP-2 and CD147 in kidney fibrosis
  77. Geometric basis of action potential of skeletal muscle cells and neurons
  78. Babesia microti-induced fulminant sepsis in an immunocompromised host: A case report and the case-specific literature review
  79. Role of cerebellar cortex in associative learning and memory in guinea pigs
  80. Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing technique for diagnosing a specific case of necrotizing meningoencephalitis caused by human herpesvirus 2
  81. Case report: Quadruple primary malignant neoplasms including esophageal, ureteral, and lung in an elderly male
  82. Long non-coding RNA NEAT1 promotes angiogenesis in hepatoma carcinoma via the miR-125a-5p/VEGF pathway
  83. Osteogenic differentiation of periodontal membrane stem cells in inflammatory environments
  84. Knockdown of SHMT2 enhances the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to radiotherapy through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway
  85. Continuous renal replacement therapy combined with double filtration plasmapheresis in the treatment of severe lupus complicated by serious bacterial infections in children: A case report
  86. Simultaneous triple primary malignancies, including bladder cancer, lymphoma, and lung cancer, in an elderly male: A case report
  87. Preclinical immunogenicity assessment of a cell-based inactivated whole-virion H5N1 influenza vaccine
  88. One case of iodine-125 therapy – A new minimally invasive treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
  89. S1P promotes corneal trigeminal neuron differentiation and corneal nerve repair via upregulating nerve growth factor expression in a mouse model
  90. Early cancer detection by a targeted methylation assay of circulating tumor DNA in plasma
  91. Calcifying nanoparticles initiate the calcification process of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro through the activation of the TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway and promote the decay of echinococcosis
  92. Evaluation of prognostic markers in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2
  93. N6-Methyladenosine-related alternative splicing events play a role in bladder cancer
  94. Characterization of the structural, oxidative, and immunological features of testis tissue from Zucker diabetic fatty rats
  95. Effects of glucose and osmotic pressure on the proliferation and cell cycle of human chorionic trophoblast cells
  96. Investigation of genotype diversity of 7,804 norovirus sequences in humans and animals of China
  97. Characteristics and karyotype analysis of a patient with turner syndrome complicated with multiple-site tumors: A case report
  98. Aggravated renal fibrosis is positively associated with the activation of HMGB1-TLR2/4 signaling in STZ-induced diabetic mice
  99. Distribution characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG in false-positive results detected by chemiluminescent immunoassay
  100. SRPX2 attenuated oxygen–glucose deprivation and reperfusion-induced injury in cardiomyocytes via alleviating endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis through targeting PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis
  101. Aquaporin-8 overexpression is involved in vascular structure and function changes in placentas of gestational diabetes mellitus patients
  102. Relationship between CRP gene polymorphisms and ischemic stroke risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  103. Effects of growth hormone on lipid metabolism and sexual development in pubertal obese male rats
  104. Cloning and identification of the CTLA-4IgV gene and functional application of vaccine in Xinjiang sheep
  105. Antitumor activity of RUNX3: Upregulation of E-cadherin and downregulation of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma
  106. PHF8 promotes osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs in old rat with osteoporosis by regulating Wnt/β-catenin pathway
  107. A review of the current state of the computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for breast cancer diagnosis
  108. Bilateral dacryoadenitis in adult-onset Still’s disease: A case report
  109. A novel association between Bmi-1 protein expression and the SUVmax obtained by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma
  110. The role of erythrocytes and erythroid progenitor cells in tumors
  111. Relationship between platelet activation markers and spontaneous abortion: A meta-analysis
  112. Abnormal methylation caused by folic acid deficiency in neural tube defects
  113. Silencing TLR4 using an ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction-based shRNA system reduces ischemia-induced seizures in hyperglycemic rats
  114. Plant Sciences
  115. Seasonal succession of bacterial communities in cultured Caulerpa lentillifera detected by high-throughput sequencing
  116. Cloning and prokaryotic expression of WRKY48 from Caragana intermedia
  117. Novel Brassica hybrids with different resistance to Leptosphaeria maculans reveal unbalanced rDNA signal patterns
  118. Application of exogenous auxin and gibberellin regulates the bolting of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)
  119. Phytoremediation of pollutants from wastewater: A concise review
  120. Genome-wide identification and characterization of NBS-encoding genes in the sweet potato wild ancestor Ipomoea trifida (H.B.K.)
  121. Alleviative effects of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles on the physiological toxicity of 3-nitrophenol to rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings
  122. Selection and functional identification of Dof genes expressed in response to nitrogen in Populus simonii × Populus nigra
  123. Study on pecan seed germination influenced by seed endocarp
  124. Identification of active compounds in Ophiopogonis Radix from different geographical origins by UPLC-Q/TOF-MS combined with GC-MS approaches
  125. The entire chloroplast genome sequence of Asparagus cochinchinensis and genetic comparison to Asparagus species
  126. Genome-wide identification of MAPK family genes and their response to abiotic stresses in tea plant (Camellia sinensis)
  127. Selection and validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis of different organs at various development stages in Caragana intermedia
  128. Cloning and expression analysis of SERK1 gene in Diospyros lotus
  129. Integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic profiling revealed coping mechanisms of the edible and medicinal homologous plant Plantago asiatica L. cadmium resistance
  130. A missense variant in NCF1 is associated with susceptibility to unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion
  131. Assessment of drought tolerance indices in faba bean genotypes under different irrigation regimes
  132. The entire chloroplast genome sequence of Asparagus setaceus (Kunth) Jessop: Genome structure, gene composition, and phylogenetic analysis in Asparagaceae
  133. Food Science
  134. Dietary food additive monosodium glutamate with or without high-lipid diet induces spleen anomaly: A mechanistic approach on rat model
  135. Binge eating disorder during COVID-19
  136. Potential of honey against the onset of autoimmune diabetes and its associated nephropathy, pancreatitis, and retinopathy in type 1 diabetic animal model
  137. FTO gene expression in diet-induced obesity is downregulated by Solanum fruit supplementation
  138. Physical activity enhances fecal lactobacilli in rats chronically drinking sweetened cola beverage
  139. Supercritical CO2 extraction, chemical composition, and antioxidant effects of Coreopsis tinctoria Nutt. oleoresin
  140. Functional constituents of plant-based foods boost immunity against acute and chronic disorders
  141. Effect of selenium and methods of protein extraction on the proteomic profile of Saccharomyces yeast
  142. Microbial diversity of milk ghee in southern Gansu and its effect on the formation of ghee flavor compounds
  143. Ecology and Environmental Sciences
  144. Effects of heavy metals on bacterial community surrounding Bijiashan mining area located in northwest China
  145. Microorganism community composition analysis coupling with 15N tracer experiments reveals the nitrification rate and N2O emissions in low pH soils in Southern China
  146. Genetic diversity and population structure of Cinnamomum balansae Lecomte inferred by microsatellites
  147. Preliminary screening of microplastic contamination in different marine fish species of Taif market, Saudi Arabia
  148. Plant volatile organic compounds attractive to Lygus pratensis
  149. Effects of organic materials on soil bacterial community structure in long-term continuous cropping of tomato in greenhouse
  150. Effects of soil treated fungicide fluopimomide on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) disease control and plant growth
  151. Prevalence of Yersinia pestis among rodents captured in a semi-arid tropical ecosystem of south-western Zimbabwe
  152. Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on mitigating salt-induced Na+ toxicity and sustaining sea rice growth
  153. Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  154. Poly-l-lysine-caused cell adhesion induces pyroptosis in THP-1 monocytes
  155. Development of alkaline phosphatase-scFv and its use for one-step enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for His-tagged protein detection
  156. Development and validation of a predictive model for immune-related genes in patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma
  157. Agriculture
  158. Effects of chemical-based fertilizer replacement with biochar-based fertilizer on albic soil nutrient content and maize yield
  159. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of CPP-like gene family in Triticum aestivum L. under different hormone and stress conditions
  160. Agronomic and economic performance of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) varieties in response to rates of blended NPS fertilizer in Kindo Koysha district, Southern Ethiopia
  161. Influence of furrow irrigation regime on the yield and water consumption indicators of winter wheat based on a multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
  162. Discovery of exercise-related genes and pathway analysis based on comparative genomes of Mongolian originated Abaga and Wushen horse
  163. Lessons from integrated seasonal forecast-crop modelling in Africa: A systematic review
  164. Evolution trend of soil fertility in tobacco-planting area of Chenzhou, Hunan Province, China
  165. Animal Sciences
  166. Morphological and molecular characterization of Tatera indica Hardwicke 1807 (Rodentia: Muridae) from Pothwar, Pakistan
  167. Research on meat quality of Qianhua Mutton Merino sheep and Small-tail Han sheep
  168. SI: A Scientific Memoir
  169. Suggestions on leading an academic research laboratory group
  170. My scientific genealogy and the Toronto ACDC Laboratory, 1988–2022
  171. Erratum
  172. Erratum to “Changes of immune cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by radiofrequency ablation and hepatectomy, a pilot study”
  173. Erratum to “A two-microRNA signature predicts the progression of male thyroid cancer”
  174. Retraction
  175. Retraction of “Lidocaine has antitumor effect on hepatocellular carcinoma via the circ_DYNC1H1/miR-520a-3p/USP14 axis”
Downloaded on 13.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/biol-2022-0066/html
Scroll to top button