Home Physical Sciences On topological properties of block shift and hierarchical hypercube networks
Article Open Access

On topological properties of block shift and hierarchical hypercube networks

  • Juan Luis García Guirao EMAIL logo , Muhammad Kamran Siddiqui and Asif Hussain
Published/Copyright: December 26, 2018

Abstract

Networks play an important role in electrical and electronic engineering. It depends on what area of electrical and electronic engineering, for example there is a lot more abstract mathematics in communication theory and signal processing and networking etc. Networks involve nodes communicating with each other. Graph theory has found a considerable use in this area of research. A topological index is a real number associated with chemical constitution purporting for correlation of chemical networks with various physical properties, chemical reactivity. The concept of hyper Zagreb index, first multiple Zagreb index, second multiple Zagreb index and Zagreb polynomials was established in chemical graph theory based on vertex degrees. In this paper, we extend this study to interconnection networks and derive analytical closed results of hyper Zagreb index, first multiple Zagreb index, second multiple Zagreb index, Zagreb polynomials and redefined Zagreb indices for block shift network (BSN − 1) and (BSN − 2), hierarchical hypercube (HHC − 1) and (HHC − 2).

PACS: 02.10.Ox

1 Introduction

Multiprocessor interconnection networks are often required to connect thousands of homogeneously replicated processor-memory pairs, each of which is called a processing node. Instead of using a shared memory, all synchronization and communication between processing nodes for program execution is often done via message passing. Design and use of multi processor interconnection networks have recently drawn considerable attention due to the availability of inexpensive, powerful microprocessors and memory chips. The mesh networks have been recognized as versatile interconnection networks for massively parallel computing. Mesh/torus-like low-dimensional networks have recently received a lot of attention for their better scalability to larger networks, as opposed to more complex networks such as hypercubes. In particular the failure of cooperation on dependent networks has been studied a lot recently in [1].

A number of hierarchical inter connection network (HIN) provide a framework for designing networks with reduced link cost by taking advantage of the locality of communication that exist in parallel applications. HIN employ multiple level. Lower level network provide local communication while higher level networks facilitate remote communication. The multistage networks have long been used as communication networks for parallel computing [2].

The topological properties of certain networks are studied in [3]. Molecules and molecular compounds are often modeled by molecular graphs. A molecular graph is a graph in which vertices are atoms of a given molecule and edges are its chemical bonds. Since the valency of carbon is four, it is natural to consider all graphs with maximum degree ≤ 4, as a molecular graph. A graph G(V, E) with vertex set V and edge set E is connected, if there exists a connection between any pair of vertices in G. A network is simply a connected graph having no multiple edges and no loops. Throughout this article, the degree of a vertex v ∈ V(G), denoted by deg(v), is the number of edges incident to v.

A topological index is a numeric quantity associated with a graph which characterizes the topology of a graph and is invariant under graph automorphism. In more precise way, a topological index Top(G) of a graph G, is a number with the property that for every graph H isomorphic to graph G, Top(H) = Top(G). The concept of topological index came from work done by Wiener [4], while he was working on a boiling point of paraffin. He named this index as the path number. Later on, the path number was renamed as the Wiener index. The Wiener index is the first and the most studied topological index, both from theoretical point of view and applications, and defined as the sum of distances between all pairs of vertices in G, see for details [5, 6].

One of the oldest topological indices is the first Zagreb index introduced by I. Gutman and N.Trinajstic based on degree of vertices of G in 1972 [7]. The first and the second Zagreb indices of a graph G are defined as:

(1)M1(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]
(2)M2(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]

In 2013, G. H. Shirdel, H.R. Pour and A. M. Sayadi [8] introduced a new degree based on Zagreb index named “ hyper Zagreb index" as:

(3)HM(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]2

M. Ghorbani and N. Azimi defined two new versions of Zagreb indices of a graph G in 2012 [9]. These indices are the first multiplicative Zagreb index PM1(G) and the second multiplicative Zagreb index PM2(G) and are defined respectively as:

(4)PM1(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]
(5)PM2(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]

The properties of PM1(G) and PM2(G) indices for some chemical structures have been studied in [10]. The first Zagreb polynomial M1(G, x) and the second Zagreb polynomial M2(G, x) are defined as:

(6)M1(G,x)=uvE(G)x[deg(u)+deg(v)]
(7)M2(G,x)=uvE(G)x[deg(u)×deg(v)]

The properties of Zagreb polynomials for some chemical structures have been studied in [11].

Ranjini et al. [12] reclassified the Zagreb indices, to be specific, the redefined first, second and third Zagreb indices for a graph G as;

(8)ReZG1(G)=uvE(G)deg(u)+deg(v)deg(u)×deg(v)
(9)ReZG2(G)=uvE(G)deg(u)×deg(v)deg(u)+deg(v)
(10)ReZG3(G)=uvE(G)[[deg(u)×deg(v)]×[deg(u)+deg(v)]]

Nowadays, there is an extensive research activity on HM(G), PM1(G), PM2(G) indices and M1(G, x), M2(G, x) polynomials and their variants, see also [13, 14, 15].

For further study of topological indices of various graph families, see [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30].

2 Methods

For the calculation of our outcomes, we used a methodology for combinatorial enlisting, a vertex segment procedure, an edge parcel procedure, diagram theoretical instruments, logical frameworks, a degree-tallying technique, and degrees of neighbors system.

3 Results for block shift network (BSN − 1)n×n

In this section, we compute certain degree based topological indices for block shift network (BSN), see Figure 1(a). The Randic type indices for hierarchical interconnection networks is computed by Haider et. al in [31]. We compute first and second Zagreb indices, hyper Zagreb index HM (G), first multiple Zagreb index PM1(G), second multiple Zagreb index PM2(G) and Zagreb polynomials M1(G, x), M2(G, x) for (BSN − 1)n×n.

Figure 1 (a) block shift network (BSN − 1)3×3 (b) block shift network (BSN − 2)1×1
Figure 1

(a) block shift network (BSN − 1)3×3 (b) block shift network (BSN − 2)1×1

Let G be a block shift network. The number of vertices and edges in (BSN − 1)n×n is 16n2 and 24n2 − 2, respectively. There are two types of edges in (BSN − 1)n×n based on degrees of end vertices of each edge. The edge set of (BSN − 1)n×n can be divided into two partitions based on the degree of end vertices. The first edge partition E1((BSN −1)n×n) contains 8 edges uv, where deg(u) = 2, deg(v) = 3. The second edge partition E2((BSN − 1)n×n) contains 24n2 − 10 edges uv, where deg(u) = deg(v) = 3.

  • The first and second Zagreb indices of (BSN − 1)n×n

Now using Eqs. (1),(2), we have

M1(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]M1(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]+uvE2(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]=5|E1(G)|+6|E2(G)|=5(8)+6(24n210)=144n220.
M2(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]M2(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]+uvE2(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]=6|E1(G)|+9|E2(G)|=6(8)+9(24n210)=216n242.
  • Hyper Zagreb index of (BSN − 1)n×n

The hyper Zagreb index using Eq. (3) is computed as:

HM(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]2HM(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]2+uvE2(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]2=52|E1(G)|+62|E2(G)|=25(8)+36(24n210)=864n2160.
  • Multiplicative Zagreb indices of (BSN − 1)n×n

The multiplicative Zagreb indices using Eqs. (4), (5) are computed as:

PM1(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]PM1(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]×uvE2(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]=5|E1(G)|×6|E2(G)|=58×6(24n210).
PM2(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]PM2(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]×uvE2(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]=6|E1(G)|×9|E2(G)|=68×9(24n210).
  • The first and second Zagreb polynomials of (BSN − 1)n×n

Now using Eqs. (6),(7), we have

M1(G,x)=uvE(G)x[deg(u)+deg(v)]M1(G,x)=uvE1(G)x[deg(u)+deg(v)]+uvE2(G)x[deg(u)+deg(v)]=uvE1(G)x5+uvE2(G)x6=|E1(G)|x5+|E2(G)|x6=8x5+(24n210)x6.
M2(G,x)=uvE(G)x[deg(u)×deg(v)]M2(G,x)=uvE1(G)x[deg(u)×deg(v)]+uvE2(G)x[deg(u)×deg(v)]=uvE1(G)x6+uvE2(G)x9=|E1(G)|x6+|E2(G)|x9=8x6+(24n210)x9.
  • The redefined first, second, and third Zegreb index of (BSN − 1)n×n

Now using the edge partition of the block shift network G, and Eq. (8), we have:

ReZG1(G)=uvE(G)deg(u)+deg(v)deg(u)×deg(v)=uvE1(G)deg(u)+deg(v)deg(u)×deg(v)+uvE2(G)deg(u)+deg(v)deg(u)×deg(v)=8(2+32×3)+(24n210)(3+33×3)=48n23.

By using Eq. (9), the second redefined Zagreb index is computed as below:

ReZG2(G)=uvE(G)deg(u)×deg(v)deg(u)+deg(v)=abE1(G)deg(u)×deg(v)deg(u)+deg(v)+abE2(G)deg(u)×deg(v)deg(u)+deg(v)=8(2×32+3)+(24n210)(3×33+3)=485+36n215.

Now by using Eq. (10), the third redefined Zagreb index is computed as:

ReZG3(G)=uvE(G)[[deg(u)×deg(v)]×[deg(u)+deg(v)]]=uvE1(G)[[deg(u)×deg(v)]×[deg(u)+deg(v)]]+uvE2(G)[[deg(u)×deg(v)]×[deg(u)+deg(v)]]=8((2×3)×(2+3))+(24n210)((3×3)×(3+3))=1296n2300.

4 Results for block shift network (BSN − 2)n×n

The number of vertices and edges in (BSN −2)n×n are 16n2 and 32n2 − 2 respectively see Figure 1(b). There are two types of edges in (BSN − 2)n×n based on degrees of end vertices of each edge. The edge set of (BSN − 2)n×n can be divided into two partitions based on the degree of end vertices. The first edge partition E1((BSN − 2)n×n) contains 12 edges uv, where deg(u) = 3, deg(v) = 4. The second edge partition E2((BSN − 2)n×n) contains 32n2 − 14 edges uv, where deg(u) = deg(v) = 4.

  • The first and second Zagreb indices of (BSN − 2)n×n

Now using Eqs. (1),(2), we have

M1(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]M1(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]+uvE2(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]=7|E1(G)|+8|E2(G)|=7(12)+8(32n214)=512n2+12.
M2(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]M2(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]+uvE2(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]=12|E1(G)|+16|E2(G)|=12(12)+16(32n214)=512n280.
  • Hyper Zagreb index of (BSN − 2)n×n

The hyper Zagreb index using Eq. (3) is computed as:

HM(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]2HM(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]2+uvE2(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]2=72|E1(G)|+82|E2(G)|=49(12)+64(32n214)=2048n2308.
  • Multiplicative Zagreb indices of (BSN − 2)n×n

The multiplicative Zagreb indices using Eqs. (4), (5) are computed as:

PM1(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]PM1(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]×uvE2(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]=7|E1(G)|×8|E2(G)|=712×8(32n214).
PM2(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]PM2(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]×uvE2(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]=12|E1(G)|×16|E2(G)|=1212×16(32n214).
  • The first and second Zagreb polynomials of (BSN − 2)n×n

Now using Eqs. (6),(7), we have

M1(G,x)=uvE(G)x[deg(u)+deg(v)]M1(G,x)=uvE1(G)x[deg(u)+deg(v)]+uvE2(G)x[deg(u)+deg(v)]=uvE1(G)x7+uvE2(G)x8=|E1(G)|x7+|E2(G)|x8=12x7+(32n214)x8.
M2(G,x)=uvE(G)x[deg(u)×deg(v)]M2(G,x)=uvE1(G)x[deg(u)×deg(v)]+uvE2(G)x[deg(u)×deg(v)]=uvE1(G)x12+uvE2(G)x16=|E1(G)|x12+|E2(G)|x16=12x12+(32n214)x16.
  • The redefined first, second, and third Zegreb index of (BSN − 2)n×n

Now using Eq. (8) and the edge partition of the block shift network (BSN − 2)n×n, we have:

ReZG1(G)=uvE(G)deg(u)+deg(v)deg(u)×deg(v)=abE1(G)deg(u)+deg(v)deg(u)×deg(v)+abE2(G)deg(u)+deg(v)deg(u)×deg(v)=12(3+43×4)+(32n214)(4+44×4)=16n2.

By using Eq. (9), the second redefined Zagreb index is computed as below:

ReZG2(G)=uvE(G)deg(u)×deg(v)deg(u)+deg(v)=uvE1(G)deg(u)×deg(v)deg(u)+deg(v)+uvE2(G)deg(u)×deg(v)deg(u)+deg(v)=12(3×43+4)+(32n214)(4×44+4)=1447+64n258.

Now by using Eq. (10), the third redefined Zagreb index is computed as:

ReZG3(G)=uvE(G)[[deg(u)×deg(v)]×[deg(u)+deg(v)]]=uvE1(G)[[deg(u)×deg(v)]×[deg(u)+deg(v)]]+uvE2(G)[[deg(u)×deg(v)]×[deg(u)+deg(v)]]=12((3×4)×(3+4))+(32n214)((4×4)×(4+4))=4096n22800.

5 Results for hierarchical hypercube network (HHC − 1)n×n

In this section, we compute certain degree based topological indices of hierarchical interconnection networks see Figure 2(a). The Randic type indices for hierarchical interconnection networks is computed by Haider et. al in [31]. We compute first and second Zagreb indices, hyper Zagreb index HM (G), first multiple Zagreb index PM1(G), second multiple Zagreb index PM2(G) and Zagreb polynomials M1(G, x), M2(G, x) for hierarchical hypercube network (HHC − 1)n×n and hierarchical hypercube network (HHC − 2)n×n.

Figure 2 (a) Hierarchical hypercube network (HHC − 1)1×1 (b) Hierarchical hypercube network (HHC − 2)1×1.
Figure 2

(a) Hierarchical hypercube network (HHC − 1)1×1 (b) Hierarchical hypercube network (HHC − 2)1×1.

The numbers of vertices and edges in (HHC −1)n×n are 16n + 16 and 24n + 20, respectively. There are two types of edges in (HHC − 1)n×n based on degrees of end vertices of each edge. The edge set of (HHC − 1)n×n can be divided into two partitions based on the degree of end vertices. The first edge partition E1((HHC −1)n×n) contains 16 edges uv, where deg(u) = 2, deg(v) = 3. The second edge partition E2((HHC − 1)n×n) contains 24n + 4 edges uv, where deg(u) = deg(v) = 3.

  • The first and second Zagreb indices of (HHC − 1)n×n

Now using Eqs. (1),(2), we have

M1((HHC1)n×n)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]M1(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]+uvE2(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]=5|E1(G)|+6|E2(G)|=5(16)+6(24n+4)=216n+104.
M2(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]M2(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]+uvE2(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]=6|E1(G)|+9|E2(G)|=6(16)+9(24n+4)=216n+132.
  • Hyper Zagreb index of (HHC − 1)n×n

The hyper Zagreb index using Eq. (3) is computed as:

HM(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]2HM(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]2+uvE2(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]2=52|E1(G)|+62|E2(G)|=25(16)+36(24n+4)=864n+544.
  • Multiple Zagreb indices of (HHC − 1)n×n

The multiple-zagreb indices using Eqs. (4), (5) are computed as:

PM1(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]PM1(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]×uvE2(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]=5|E1(G)|×6|E2(G)|=516×6(24n+4).
PM2(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]PM2(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]×uvE2(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]=6|E1(G)|×9|E2(G)|=616×9(24n+4).
  • The first and second Zagreb polynomials of (HHC − 1)n×n

Now using Eqs. (6),(7), we have

M1(G,x)=uvE(G)x[deg(u)+deg(v)]M1(G,x)=uvE1(G)x[deg(u)+deg(v)]+uvE2(G)x[deg(u)+deg(v)]=uvE1(G)x5+uvE2(G)x6=|E1(G)|x5+|E2(G)|x6=16x5+(24n+4)x6.
M2(G,x)=uvE(G)x[deg(u)×deg(v)]M2(G,x)=uvE1(G)x[deg(u)×deg(v)]+uvE2(G)x[deg(u)×deg(v)]=uvE1(G)x6+uvE2(G)x9=|E1(G)|x6+|E2(G)|x9=16x6+(24n+4)x9.
  • The redefined first, second, and third Zegreb index of (HHC − 1)n×n

Now using Eq. (8) and the edge partition of the block shift network (HHC − 1)n×n, we have:

ReZG1(G)=uvE(G)deg(u)+deg(v)deg(u)×deg(v)=uvE1(G)deg(u)+deg(v)deg(u)×deg(v)+uvE2(G)deg(u)+deg(v)deg(u)×deg(v)=16(3+23×2)+(24n+4)(3+33×3)=403+48n2+83.

By using Eq. (9), the second redefined Zagreb index is computed as below:

ReZG2(G)=uvE(G)deg(u)×deg(v)deg(u)+deg(v)=uvE1(G)deg(u)×deg(v)deg(u)+deg(v)+uvE2(G)deg(u)×deg(v)deg(u)+deg(v)=16(3×23+2)+(24n+4)(3×33+3)=965+36n+6.

Now by using Eq. (10), the third redefined Zagreb index is computed as:

ReZG3(G)=uvE(G)[[deg(u)×deg(v)]×[deg(u)+deg(v)]]=uvE1(G)[[deg(u)×deg(v)]×[deg(u)+deg(v)]]+uvE2(G)[[deg(u)×deg(v)]×[deg(u)+deg(v)]]=16((3×2)×(3+2))+(24n+4)((3×3)×(3+3))=1296n+576.

6 Results for hierarchical hypercube network (HHC − 2)n×n

The number of vertices and edges in (HHC−2)n×n are 16n2 and 32n2 − 2, respectively (see Figure 2(b)). There are two types of edges in (HHC − 2)n×n based on degrees of end vertices of each edge. The edge set of (HHC − 2)n×n can be divided into two partitions based on the degree of end vertices. The first edge partition E1((HHC −2)n×n) contains 24 edges uv, where deg(u) = 3, deg(v) = 4. The second edge partition E2((HHC−2)n×n) contains 32n+4 edges uv, where deg(u) = deg(v) = 4.

  • The first and second Zagreb indices of (HHC − 2)n×n

Now using Eqs. (1),(2), we have

M1(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]M1(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]+uvE2(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]=7|E1(G)|+8|E2(G)|=7(24)+8(32n+4)=512n+200.
M2(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]M2(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]+uvE2(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]=12|E1(G)|+16|E2(G)|=12(24)+16(32n+4)=512n+352.
  • Hyper Zagreb index of (HHC − 2)n×n

The hyper Zagreb index using Eq. (3) is computed as:

HM(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]2HM(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]2+uvE2(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]2=72|E1(G)|+82|E2(G)|=49(24)+64(32n+4)=2048n+1432.
  • Multiple Zagreb indices of (HHC − 2)n×n

The Multiple-Zagreb indices using Eqs. (4), (5) are computed as:

vPM1(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]PM1(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]×uvE2(G)[deg(u)+deg(v)]=7|E1(G)|×8|E2(G)|=724×8(32n+4).
PM2(G)=uvE(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]PM2(G)=uvE1(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]×uvE2(G)[deg(u)×deg(v)]=12|E1(G)|×16|E2(G)|=1224×16(32n+4).
  • The first and second Zagreb polynomials of (HHC − 2)n×n

Now using Eqs. (6),(7), we have

M1(G,x)=uvE(G)x[deg(u)+deg(v)]M1(G,x)=uvE1(G)x[deg(u)+deg(v)]+uvE2(G)x[deg(u)+deg(v)]=uvE1(G)x7+uvE2(G)x8=|E1(G)|x7+|E2(G)|x8=24x7+(32n+4)x8.
M2(G,x)=uvE(G)x[deg(u)×deg(v)]M2(G,x)=uvE1(G)x[deg(u)×deg(v)]+uvE2(G)x[deg(u)×deg(v)]=uvE1(G)x12+uvE2(G)x16=|E1(G)|x12+|E2(G)|x16=24x12+(32n+4)x16.
  • The redefined first, second, and third Zegreb index of (HHC − 2)n×n

Now using Eq. (8) and the edge partition of the block shift network (HHC − 2)n×n, we have:

ReZG1(G)=uvE(G)deg(u)+deg(v)deg(u)×deg(v)=uvE1(G)deg(u)+deg(v)deg(u)×deg(v)+uvE2(G)deg(u)+deg(v)deg(u)×deg(v)=24(3+43×4)+(32n+4)(4+44×4)=16n+16.

By using Eq. (9), the second redefined Zagreb index is computed as below:

ReZG2(G)=uvE(G)deg(u)×deg(v)deg(u)+deg(v)=uvE1(G)deg(u)×deg(v)deg(u)+deg(v)+uvE2(G)deg(u)×deg(v)deg(u)+deg(v)=24(3×43+4)+(32n+4)(4×44+4)=2887+64n+8.

Now by using Eq. (10), the third redefined Zagreb index is computed as:

ReZG3(G)=uvE(G)[[deg(u)×deg(v)]×[deg(u)+deg(v)]]=uvE1(G)[[deg(u)×deg(v)]×[deg(u)+deg(v)]]+uvE2(G)[[deg(u)×deg(v)]×[deg(u)+deg(v)]]=24((3×4)×(3+4))+(32n+4)((4×4)×(4+4))=4608n+2596.

Conclusion

In this paper we determined first Zagreb index M1(G), second Zagreb index M2(G), hyper Zagreb index HM(G), first multiple Zagreb index PM1(G), second multiple Zagreb index PM2(G), Zagreb polynomials M1(G, x) and M2(G, x), and redefined Zagreb indices for block shift networks and hierarchical hypercube networks. In future, we are interested in designing some new architectures/ networks and then studying their topological indices which will be quite helpful in understanding their underlying topologies.

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions that improved this paper.

References

[1] Gutman I., Tošović J., Radenković S., Marković S., On atom–bond connectivity index and its chemical applicability, Indian J. Chem., 2012, 51A, 690-694.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Konstantinidou, S., The selective extra stage butterfly, IEEE. Trans., Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst., 1992, 1, 502–506.10.1109/ICCD.1992.276326Search in Google Scholar

[3] Shao Z., Siddiqui M. K., Muhammad M. H., Computing Zagreb Indices and Zagreb Polynomials for Symmetrical Nanotubes. Symmetry, 2018, 10, 1-20.10.3390/sym10070244Search in Google Scholar

[4] Wiener H., Structural determination of paraffln boiling points, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1947, 69, 17-20.10.1021/ja01193a005Search in Google Scholar

[5] Dobrynin A.A., Entringer R., Gutman I., Wiener index of trees: Theory and applications, Acta Appl. Math., 2001, 66, 211-249.10.1023/A:1010767517079Search in Google Scholar

[6] Gutman I., Polansky O. E., Mathematical Concepts in Organic Chemistry, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.10.1007/978-3-642-70982-1Search in Google Scholar

[7] Gutman I., Trinajstic N., Graph theory and molecular orbitals total π-electron energy of alternant hydrocarbons, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1972, 17, 535–538.10.1016/0009-2614(72)85099-1Search in Google Scholar

[8] Shirdel G.H., Pour H.R., Sayadi A.M., The Hyper-Zagreb Index of Graph Operations, Iran. J. Math. Chem., 2013, 4(2), 213-220.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ghorbani, M., Azimi, N., Note on multiple Zagreb indices, Iran. J. Math. Chem., 2012, 32, 137-143.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Eliasi M., Iranmanesh A., Gutman I., Multiplicative versions of first Zagreb Index, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 2012, 68, 217-230.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Gutman I., Das K.C., Some Properties of the Second Zagreb Index, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 2004, 50, 103-112.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Ranjini P.S., Lokesha V., Usha A., Relation between phenylene and hexagonal squeez using harmonic index, Int. J. Graph. Theory., 2013, 1, 116-21.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Gao W., Siddiqui M.K., Naeem M., Imran M., Computing multiple ABC index and multiple GA index of some grid graphs, Open Physic, 2018, 161, 588-598.10.1515/phys-2018-0077Search in Google Scholar

[14] Liu J. B., Siddiqui M.K., Zahid M. A., Naeem M., Baig A.Q., Topological Properties of Crystallographic Structure of Molecules. Symmetry, 2018, 10, 1-21.10.3390/sym10070265Search in Google Scholar

[15] Siddiqui M. K., Gharibi W., On Zagreb Indices, Zagreb Polynomials of Mesh Derived Networks, J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci., 2016, 13, 8683-8688.10.1166/jctn.2016.6030Search in Google Scholar

[16] Gao W., Siddiqui M.K., Naeem M., Rehman N.A., Topological Characterization of Carbon Graphite and Crystal Cubic Carbon Structures, Molecules, 2017, 22, 1496-1507.10.3390/molecules22091496Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Imran M., Siddiqui M. K., Naeem M., Iqbal M. A., On Topological Properties of Symmetric Chemical Structures, Symmetry, 2018, 10, 1-20.10.3390/sym10050173Search in Google Scholar

[18] Siddiqui M. K., Naeem M., Rahman N. A., Imran M., Computing topological indicesof certain networks, J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater., 2016, 18, 884-892.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Gao W., Siddiqui M.K., Molecular Descriptors of Nanotube, Oxide, Silicate, and Triangulene Networks, J. Chem., 2017, 2017, 654-664.10.1155/2017/6540754Search in Google Scholar

[20] Basavanagoud B., Gao W., Patil, S., Desai V.R., Mirajkar K.G., Pooja, B., Computing First Zagreb index and F-index of New C-products of Graphs, Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 2017, 21, 285-298.10.21042/AMNS.2017.1.00024Search in Google Scholar

[21] Basavanagoud B., Desai V.R., Patil S., βα) Connectivity Index of Graphs, Applied. Math. Nonlin. Sci., 2017, 21, 21-30.10.21042/AMNS.2017.1.00003Search in Google Scholar

[22] Gao W., Siddiqui M.K., Imran M., Jamil M.K., Farahani M.R., Forgotten Topological Index of Chemical Structure in Drugs, Saudi Pharm. Jou., 2016, 24, 258-267.10.1016/j.jsps.2016.04.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Gharibi W., Ahmad A., Siddiqui M.K., On Zagreb Indices, Zagreb Polynomials of Nanocone and Nanotubes, J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci., 2016, 13, 5086-5092.10.1166/jctn.2016.5386Search in Google Scholar

[24] Idrees N., Naeem M.N., Hussain F., Sadiq A., Siddiqui M.K., Molecular Descriptors of Benzenoid System, Quimica Nova, 2017, 40(2), 143-145.10.21577/0100-4042.20160173Search in Google Scholar

[25] 2. Kang S.M., Siddiqui M.K., Rehman N.A., Naeem M., Muhammad M.H., Topological Properties of 2-Dimensional Silicon-Carbons" IEEE Access, 2018, 6(1), 59362-59373.10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2874461Search in Google Scholar

[26] Gao W., Imran M., Siddiqui M.K., Naeeme M., Jamil F., Molecular Description of Copper (I) Oxide and Copper (II) Oxide, Quimica. Nova. 2018, 41(8), 874-879.10.21577/0100-4042.20170257Search in Google Scholar

[27] 3. Imran M., Siddiqui M.K., Ahmad A., Ali U., Hanif N., On the Degree-Based Topological Indices of the Tickysim SpiNNaker Model, Axioms, 2018, 7, 1-13.10.3390/axioms7040073Search in Google Scholar

[28] Randić M., Characterization of molecular branching, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1975, 97 6609-6615.10.1021/ja00856a001Search in Google Scholar

[29] Ramane H.S., Jummannaver R.B., Note on forgotten topological index of chemical structure in drugs, Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sciences., 2016, 12, 369-374.10.21042/AMNS.2016.2.00032Search in Google Scholar

[30] Siddiqui M.K., Imran M., Ali A., On Zagreb indices, Zagreb polynomials of some nanostar dendrimers, Appl. Math. Comput., 2016, 280, 132-139.10.1016/j.amc.2016.01.041Search in Google Scholar

[31] Ali H., Baig A.Q., Shafiq M.K., On topological properties of hierarchical interconnection networks, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 2017, 55, 313-334.10.1007/s12190-016-1038-3Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-10-24
Accepted: 2018-11-14
Published Online: 2018-12-26

© 2018 J. L. García Guirao et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A modified Fermi-Walker derivative for inextensible flows of binormal spherical image
  3. Algebraic aspects of evolution partial differential equation arising in the study of constant elasticity of variance model from financial mathematics
  4. Three-dimensional atom localization via probe absorption in a cascade four-level atomic system
  5. Determination of the energy transitions and half-lives of Rubidium nuclei
  6. Three phase heat and mass transfer model for unsaturated soil freezing process: Part 1 - model development
  7. Three phase heat and mass transfer model for unsaturated soil freezing process: Part 2 - model validation
  8. Mathematical model for thermal and entropy analysis of thermal solar collectors by using Maxwell nanofluids with slip conditions, thermal radiation and variable thermal conductivity
  9. Constructing analytic solutions on the Tricomi equation
  10. Feynman diagrams and rooted maps
  11. New type of chaos synchronization in discrete-time systems: the F-M synchronization
  12. Unsteady flow of fractional Oldroyd-B fluids through rotating annulus
  13. A note on the uniqueness of 2D elastostatic problems formulated by different types of potential functions
  14. On the conservation laws and solutions of a (2+1) dimensional KdV-mKdV equation of mathematical physics
  15. Computational methods and traveling wave solutions for the fourth-order nonlinear Ablowitz-Kaup-Newell-Segur water wave dynamical equation via two methods and its applications
  16. Siewert solutions of transcendental equations, generalized Lambert functions and physical applications
  17. Numerical solution of mixed convection flow of an MHD Jeffery fluid over an exponentially stretching sheet in the presence of thermal radiation and chemical reaction
  18. A new three-dimensional chaotic flow with one stable equilibrium: dynamical properties and complexity analysis
  19. Dynamics of a dry-rebounding drop: observations, simulations, and modeling
  20. Modeling the initial mechanical response and yielding behavior of gelled crude oil
  21. Lie symmetry analysis and conservation laws for the time fractional simplified modified Kawahara equation
  22. Solitary wave solutions of two KdV-type equations
  23. Applying industrial tomography to control and optimization flow systems
  24. Reconstructing time series into a complex network to assess the evolution dynamics of the correlations among energy prices
  25. An optimal solution for software testing case generation based on particle swarm optimization
  26. Optimal system, nonlinear self-adjointness and conservation laws for generalized shallow water wave equation
  27. Alternative methods for solving nonlinear two-point boundary value problems
  28. Global model simulation of OH production in pulsed-DC atmospheric pressure helium-air plasma jets
  29. Experimental investigation on optical vortex tweezers for microbubble trapping
  30. Joint measurements of optical parameters by irradiance scintillation and angle-of-arrival fluctuations
  31. M-polynomials and topological indices of hex-derived networks
  32. Generalized convergence analysis of the fractional order systems
  33. Porous flow characteristics of solution-gas drive in tight oil reservoirs
  34. Complementary wave solutions for the long-short wave resonance model via the extended trial equation method and the generalized Kudryashov method
  35. A Note on Koide’s Doubly Special Parametrization of Quark Masses
  36. On right-angled spherical Artin monoid of type Dn
  37. Gas flow regimes judgement in nanoporous media by digital core analysis
  38. 4 + n-dimensional water and waves on four and eleven-dimensional manifolds
  39. Stabilization and Analytic Approximate Solutions of an Optimal Control Problem
  40. On the equations of electrodynamics in a flat or curved spacetime and a possible interaction energy
  41. New prediction method for transient productivity of fractured five-spot patterns in low permeability reservoirs at high water cut stages
  42. The collinear equilibrium points in the restricted three body problem with triaxial primaries
  43. Detection of the damage threshold of fused silica components and morphologies of repaired damage sites based on the beam deflection method
  44. On the bivariate spectral quasi-linearization method for solving the two-dimensional Bratu problem
  45. Ion acoustic quasi-soliton in an electron-positron-ion plasma with superthermal electrons and positrons
  46. Analysis of projectile motion in view of conformable derivative
  47. Computing multiple ABC index and multiple GA index of some grid graphs
  48. Terahertz pulse imaging: A novel denoising method by combing the ant colony algorithm with the compressive sensing
  49. Characteristics of microscopic pore-throat structure of tight oil reservoirs in Sichuan Basin measured by rate-controlled mercury injection
  50. An activity window model for social interaction structure on Twitter
  51. Transient thermal regime trough the constitutive matrix applied to asynchronous electrical machine using the cell method
  52. On the zagreb polynomials of benzenoid systems
  53. Integrability analysis of the partial differential equation describing the classical bond-pricing model of mathematical finance
  54. The Greek parameters of a continuous arithmetic Asian option pricing model via Laplace Adomian decomposition method
  55. Quantifying the global solar radiation received in Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal to motivate the consumption of solar technologies
  56. Sturm-Liouville difference equations having Bessel and hydrogen atom potential type
  57. Study on the response characteristics of oil wells after deep profile control in low permeability fractured reservoirs
  58. Depiction and analysis of a modified theta shaped double negative metamaterial for satellite application
  59. An attempt to geometrize electromagnetism
  60. Structure of traveling wave solutions for some nonlinear models via modified mathematical method
  61. Thermo-convective instability in a rotating ferromagnetic fluid layer with temperature modulation
  62. Construction of new solitary wave solutions of generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony and simplified modified form of Camassa-Holm equations
  63. Effect of magnetic field and heat source on Upper-convected-maxwell fluid in a porous channel
  64. Physical cues of biomaterials guide stem cell fate of differentiation: The effect of elasticity of cell culture biomaterials
  65. Shooting method analysis in wire coating withdrawing from a bath of Oldroyd 8-constant fluid with temperature dependent viscosity
  66. Rank correlation between centrality metrics in complex networks: an empirical study
  67. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  68. Modeling of electric and heat processes in spot resistance welding of cross-wire steel bars
  69. Dynamic characteristics of triaxial active control magnetic bearing with asymmetric structure
  70. Design optimization of an axial-field eddy-current magnetic coupling based on magneto-thermal analytical model
  71. Thermal constitutive matrix applied to asynchronous electrical machine using the cell method
  72. Temperature distribution around thin electroconductive layers created on composite textile substrates
  73. Model of the multipolar engine with decreased cogging torque by asymmetrical distribution of the magnets
  74. Analysis of spatial thermal field in a magnetic bearing
  75. Use of the mathematical model of the ignition system to analyze the spark discharge, including the destruction of spark plug electrodes
  76. Assessment of short/long term electric field strength measurements for a pilot district
  77. Simulation study and experimental results for detection and classification of the transient capacitor inrush current using discrete wavelet transform and artificial intelligence
  78. Magnetic transmission gear finite element simulation with iron pole hysteresis
  79. Pulsed excitation terahertz tomography – multiparametric approach
  80. Low and high frequency model of three phase transformer by frequency response analysis measurement
  81. Multivariable polynomial fitting of controlled single-phase nonlinear load of input current total harmonic distortion
  82. Optimal design of a for middle-low-speed maglev trains
  83. Eddy current modeling in linear and nonlinear multifilamentary composite materials
  84. The visual attention saliency map for movie retrospection
  85. AC/DC current ratio in a current superimposition variable flux reluctance machine
  86. Influence of material uncertainties on the RLC parameters of wound inductors modeled using the finite element method
  87. Cogging force reduction in linear tubular flux switching permanent-magnet machines
  88. Modeling hysteresis curves of La(FeCoSi)13 compound near the transition point with the GRUCAD model
  89. Electro-magneto-hydrodynamic lubrication
  90. 3-D Electromagnetic field analysis of wireless power transfer system using K computer
  91. Simplified simulation technique of rotating, induction heated, calender rolls for study of temperature field control
  92. Design, fabrication and testing of electroadhesive interdigital electrodes
  93. A method to reduce partial discharges in motor windings fed by PWM inverter
  94. Reluctance network lumped mechanical & thermal models for the modeling and predesign of concentrated flux synchronous machine
  95. Special Issue Applications of Nonlinear Dynamics
  96. Study on dynamic characteristics of silo-stock-foundation interaction system under seismic load
  97. Microblog topic evolution computing based on LDA algorithm
  98. Modeling the creep damage effect on the creep crack growth behavior of rotor steel
  99. Neighborhood condition for all fractional (g, f, n′, m)-critical deleted graphs
  100. Chinese open information extraction based on DBMCSS in the field of national information resources
  101. 10.1515/phys-2018-0079
  102. CPW-fed circularly-polarized antenna array with high front-to-back ratio and low-profile
  103. Intelligent Monitoring Network Construction based on the utilization of the Internet of things (IoT) in the Metallurgical Coking Process
  104. Temperature detection technology of power equipment based on Fiber Bragg Grating
  105. Research on a rotational speed control strategy of the mandrel in a rotary steering system
  106. Dynamic load balancing algorithm for large data flow in distributed complex networks
  107. Super-structured photonic crystal fiber Bragg grating biosensor image model based on sparse matrix
  108. Fractal-based techniques for physiological time series: An updated approach
  109. Analysis of the Imaging Characteristics of the KB and KBA X-ray Microscopes at Non-coaxial Grazing Incidence
  110. Application of modified culture Kalman filter in bearing fault diagnosis
  111. Exact solutions and conservation laws for the modified equal width-Burgers equation
  112. On topological properties of block shift and hierarchical hypercube networks
  113. Elastic properties and plane acoustic velocity of cubic Sr2CaMoO6 and Sr2CaWO6 from first-principles calculations
  114. A note on the transmission feasibility problem in networks
  115. Ontology learning algorithm using weak functions
  116. Diagnosis of the power frequency vacuum arc shape based on 2D-PIV
  117. Parametric simulation analysis and reliability of escalator truss
  118. A new algorithm for real economy benefit evaluation based on big data analysis
  119. Synergy analysis of agricultural economic cycle fluctuation based on ant colony algorithm
  120. Multi-level encryption algorithm for user-related information across social networks
  121. Multi-target tracking algorithm in intelligent transportation based on wireless sensor network
  122. Fast recognition method of moving video images based on BP neural networks
  123. Compressed sensing image restoration algorithm based on improved SURF operator
  124. Design of load optimal control algorithm for smart grid based on demand response in different scenarios
  125. Face recognition method based on GA-BP neural network algorithm
  126. Optimal path selection algorithm for mobile beacons in sensor network under non-dense distribution
  127. Localization and recognition algorithm for fuzzy anomaly data in big data networks
  128. Urban road traffic flow control under incidental congestion as a function of accident duration
  129. Optimization design of reconfiguration algorithm for high voltage power distribution network based on ant colony algorithm
  130. Feasibility simulation of aseismic structure design for long-span bridges
  131. Construction of renewable energy supply chain model based on LCA
  132. The tribological properties study of carbon fabric/ epoxy composites reinforced by nano-TiO2 and MWNTs
  133. A text-Image feature mapping algorithm based on transfer learning
  134. Fast recognition algorithm for static traffic sign information
  135. Topical Issue: Clean Energy: Materials, Processes and Energy Generation
  136. An investigation of the melting process of RT-35 filled circular thermal energy storage system
  137. Numerical analysis on the dynamic response of a plate-and-frame membrane humidifier for PEMFC vehicles under various operating conditions
  138. Energy converting layers for thin-film flexible photovoltaic structures
  139. Effect of convection heat transfer on thermal energy storage unit
Downloaded on 11.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2018-0101/html
Scroll to top button