Home Physical Sciences The collinear equilibrium points in the restricted three body problem with triaxial primaries
Article Open Access

The collinear equilibrium points in the restricted three body problem with triaxial primaries

  • , and EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 6, 2018

Abstract

The perturbed restricted three body problem has been reviewed. The mass of the primaries are assumed as triaxial. The locations of the collinear points have been computed. Series forms of these locations are obtained as new analytical results. In order to introduce a semi-analytical view, a Mathematica program has been constructed to graph the locations of collinear points versus the whole range of the mass ratio μ taking into account the triaxiality. The resultant figures have been analyzed

1 Introduction

The restricted three-body problem (RTBP) is defined as a system where an infinitesimal mass, m3, is attracted gravitationally by two finite arbitrary masses called primaries, m1 and m2, but their motion is not influenced. The term restricted comes from the fact that all masses are assumed to move in the same plane defined by the two revolving primaries which revolve around their center of mass in circular orbits. This definition is widely used in almost all classical books of celestial mechanics, e.g. Szebehely [1] and Murray and Drmott [2]. For a more generalized version of the problem many authors have amended the potential function with some relevant perturbing forces; e.g. considering oblate primaries instead of spherical masses. Or even more generalized as triaxial bodies, inclusion of the relativistic effects, assuming the primaries are emitters, and/or move in a resisting medium. Even if the RTBP is not integrable, a number of special solutions can be found in the rotating frame where the third body has zero velocity and zero acceleration. These solutions correspond to equilibrium positions in the rotating frame at which the gravitational forces and the centrifugal force associated with the rotation of the synodic frame all cancel, with the result that a particle located at one of these points appears stationary in the synodic frame. There are five equilibrium points in the circular RTBP, three of them are collinear points, namely L1, L2, L3 and the another two are triangular points, namely L4, L5. The position of the infinitesimal body is displaced a little from the equilibrium point due to the some perturbations. If the resultant motion of the infinitesimal mass is a rapid departure from the vicinity of the point, we can call such a position of equilibrium point an “unstable” one, if however the body merely oscillates about the equilibrium point, it is said to be a “stable position” (in the sense of Lyapunov), Abd El-Salam [3]. In general, the dynamics of a circular and/or elliptical three-body problem is widely applicable toastrophysics, for example stellar/solar system dynamics and Earth-Moon system.This problem consequently received more attention from astronomers and dynamical system scientists. In spite of it, the solutions of this problem has been developed over the past centuries.

The literature concerning RTBPis extensive and it is worth highlighting here some relevant and recent studies dealingwith RTBP, with and without considering different perturbations: Sharma [4], Tsirogiannis et al. [5], Kushvah and Ishwar [6], Vishnu Namboori et al. [7], Mital et al. [8], Kumar and Ishwar [9], Rahoma and Abd El-Salam [10] and references therein. Ammar [11] analyzed solar radiation pressure effect on the positions and stability of the libration points in elliptic RTBP. Singh [12] formulated the triangular librationpoints nonlinear stability under the Coriolis effect and centrifugal forces as small perturbations in addition to the effect of primaries oblateness and radiation pressures. Singh and Umar [13] investigated the effect of luminous and oblate spheroids primaries on the locations and stability of the collinear libration points. In another work, Singh and Umar [14] studied the effect of the big primary’s triaxial and spherical shape of the companion on the locations and stability of the collinear libration points. They found that the position of collinear libration points and their stability are affected with their considered perturbations in addition to the eccentricity and the semi-major axis of the primaries orbit.

Katour et al. [15], Singh and Bello [16, 17], Abd El-Salam and Abd El-Bar [18], Abd El-Bar et al. [19] and Bello and Singh [20] were concerned with the relativistic RTBP in addition to some different perturbations—the primaries oblateness andradiation from one of the primaries—upon the equilibrium points locations and stability. They noticed that the stability regions of the concerned equilibrium points are varied (expanding or shrinking) related to the critical mass value and depending upon the value of their considered perturbations.

The fundamental structure in nature and science such as RTBP, plasma containment in tokamaks and stellarators for energy generation, population ecology, chaoticbehavior in biological systems, neural networks and solitonicfibre optical communication devices can be expound by nonlinear partial differential equations [21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37].

The aim of this study is the determination of the locations of the collinear equilibrium points, taking into consideration the fact that both primaries are triaxial. This paper will be organized as follows: Section 1 is an historical introduction, the equations of motion in an RTBP with triaxial primaries are formulated in Section 2, the computations related to the location of equilibrium points with the considered perturbations are introduced in section 3. Section 4 highlightssomenumerical simulations with a discussion and forthcoming works. The paper finishes with a conclusion in Section 5.

2 Equations of motion

We shall adopt the notation and terminology of Szebehely [1]. As a consequence, the distance between the primaries m1 and m2 does not change and is taken equal to one; the sum of the masses of the primaries is also taken as one. The unit of time is also chosen as to make the gravitational constant unity.

The equations of motion of the infinitesimal mass m3 in the RTBP in a synodic co-ordinate system(x, y)in dimensionless variables in which the primary coordinates on the x-axis (–μ, 0), (1 – μ, 0) are given by Brumberg (1972).

x¨2ny˙=UxddtUx˙,y¨+2nx˙=UyddtUy˙(1)

where U is the potential–like function of the RTBP, which can be written as composed of two components (compound), namely the potential of the classical RTBP potential U are given by:

U=n22(1μ)r12+μr22+(1μ)r1+μr2+(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2r133(1μ)(σ1σ2)2r15y2+μ(2γ1γ2)2r233μ(γ1γ2)2r25y2

with

r=x2+y2,r1=(x+μ)2+y2r2=(x+μ1)2+y2,μ=m2m1+m212,

m1, m2(m1m2) being the masses of the primaries,

σ1=a12c125R2,σ2=b12c125R2,σ1,σ21,γ1=a22c225R2,γ2=b22c225R2,γ1,γ21,

ai, bi, ci, i = 1, 2 are the semi-axes of the triaxial of two primaries respectively and R the distance between the primaries.

The mean motion n of the primaries is given by

n2=1+322σ1σ2+322γ1γ2

Remark

The oblateness case of the primaries can be deduced directly from applying the condition ai = bi, i = 1, 2 or alternatively σ1 = σ2.

The libration points are obtained from equations of motion after setting = ÿ = = = 0. These points represent particular solutions of equations of motion

Ux=Uy=0,(2)

The explicit formulas are

Ux=n2x+(x+μ)(1μ)r133(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2r15+15(1μ)(σ1σ2)2r17y2+(x+μ1)μr233μ(2γ1γ2)2r25+15μ(γ1γ2)2r27y2(3)

and

Uy=n2y(1μ)r13+3(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2r15+3(1μ)(σ1σ2)2r15y(4)

3 Location of collinear libration points

Any point of the collinear points must, by definition, have z = y = 0, and the solution of the classical RTBP satisfies the conditions of Abd El-Bar and Abd El-Salam [38]

B1r1+B2r2=1,r1=B1x+μ,r2=B2μ+x1(5)

where, we have (see Figures 1, 2, 3):

Figure 1 The location of L1 and its corresponding parameters
Figure 1

The location of L1 and its corresponding parameters

Figure 2 The location of L2 and its corresponding parameters
Figure 2

The location of L2 and its corresponding parameters

Figure 3 The location of L3 and its corresponding parameters
Figure 3

The location of L3 and its corresponding parameters

L1:B1=1,B2=1,L2:B1=1,B2=1,L3:B1=1,B2=1

4 Location of L1

The location geometry of L1 can be visualized as given by Figure 1.

Substituting from (5) with the corresponding values of 𝓑1 = 𝓑2 = 1, we get r1 + r2 = 1, r1 = x + μ, r2 = 1 – μx and noting that r1x=r2x=1 , equation (3) becomes:

Ux=n2(1μr2)(1μ)r13+3(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2r1515(1μ)(σ1σ2)2r17y2+μr23+3μ2γ1γ22r2515μγ1γ22r27y2(6)

Then it may be reasonable in our case to assume that positions of the equilibrium points L1 are the same as given by classical RTBP but perturbed due to the triaxial primaries

r1=a1+ε1,r2=b1ε1,a1=1b1(7)

from which we have

r1=1b11+ε11b1r2=b11ε1b1(8)

where a1 and b1 are unperturbed positions of r1 and r2 respectively, and b1 is given after some successive approximation by

b1=α1α3α29+227α3+281α4,α=μ3(1μ)3(9)

Substituting from equations (7) into equation (6)

Ux=n21μb1+ε11μ(1b1)212ε11b13(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2(1b1)4(14ε11b1)+15(1μ)(σ1σ2)2(1b1)616ε11b1y2+μb121+2ε1b1+3μ(2γ1γ2)2b141+4ε1b115μ(γ1γ2)2b161+6ε1b1y2

Since y = 0, then the above equation may be written as

Ux=n2(1μb1+ε1)1μ(1b1)212ε11b13(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2(1b1)414ε11b1+15(1μ)(σ1σ2)2(1b1)616ε11b1y2+μb121+2ε1b1+3μ(2γ1γ2)2b141+4ε1b1=0

which can be solved for ε1 yielding

ε1=n2+21μ1b132μb136μ2γ1γ2b15+61μ2σ1σ21b151n2+n2μ+1μ1b12μb12+n2b13μ2γ1γ22b14+31μ2σ1σ221b14(10)

Setting

d1=n2+21μ1b132μb136μ2γ1γ2b15+61μ2σ1σ21b151;e1=1b12,f1=1b14,g1=1(1b1)2,h1=1(1b1)4

Using the above relations, equation (10) can be written in the form

ε1=d1(n2(1+μ+b1)+1μg1μe13μ2γ1γ22f1+31μ2σ1σ22h1)(11)

where b1, d1, e1, f1, g1 and h1 are function of μ and they are given by

b1=μ31/313μ32/319μ3+2927μ34/35281μ35/313μ32+6227μ37/312581μ38/3μ33+Oμ310/3d1=i=09Ni1μ3i/3e1=59+233μ13+3μ23169μ3135081μ32310243μ3608729μ343148243μ3539476561μ322204819683μ3732104419683μ38387034177147μ33+f1=7327+331/3μ4/3+4μ+14331/3μ2/368932/3μ1/3500μ1/324331/3+4μ2/3332/3+1324μ6561434μ4/31968331/3+35180μ5/35904932/3+13294μ259049+339800μ7/3159432331/3+2601328μ8/3478296932/3+3598016μ314348907g1=1+2μ313+73μ323+169μ3+7627μ343+38281μ353+469μ32+58081μ373+97681μ383+10882729μ33+h1=1+4μ1/331/3+26μ2/3332/3+116μ27+161μ4/32731/3+740μ5/38132/3+3316μ2729+1540μ7/324331/3+2188μ8/324332/3+84460μ319683

where the coefficients 𝓝i1 are given appendix (D-L1)

Substituting back into equation (11), r2 is being a function of b1, d1, e1, f1, g1 and h1. It can be written in the form

r2=b1d1(n21+μ+b1+1μg1μe13μ2γ1γ22f1+31μ2σ1σ22h1)(12)

since the location of L1 is given by

ξ0,L1=1μ+r2(13)

from equation (12) and (13) we get

ξ0,L1=1i=39Ni1μ3i/3(14)

where the coefficients Ni1 are given appendix (B-L1)

4.1 Location of L2

The geometry of L2 can be visualized as given by Figure 2.

Follow the same procedure as with L1, with the corresponding values of𝓑1 = 1, 𝓑2 = −1. Substituting into (5) we get

r1r2=1,r1=x+μ,r2=x+μ1,r1x=r2x=1(15)

Substituting from (15) into (3) we get

Ux=n2(1μ+r2)(1μ)r12+3(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2r1415(1μ)(σ1σ2)2r16y2μr22+3μ2γ1γ22r2415μγ1γ22r26y2(16)

Then it may be reasonable in our case to assume that position of the equilibrium point L2 is the same as given by classical (RTBP) but perturbed due to the triaxial primaries

r1=a2+ε2,r2=b2+ε2,a2=1+b2.(17)

where a2 and b2 are the unperturbed positions of r1 and r2 respectively, and b2 is given after some successive approximation by the relation

b2=α1+α3α29227α3+281α4,α=μ3(1μ)3(18)

Substituting from equations (17) into equation (16) we get

Ux=n2(1μ+b2+ε2)1μ(1+b2)212ε21+b23(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2(1+b2)414ε21+b2+15(1μ)(σ1σ2)2(1+b2)616ε21+b2y2μb2212ε2b23μ(2γ1γ2)2b2414ε2b2+15μ(γ1γ2)2b2616ε2b2y2

Since y = 0, then the above equation may be written as

Ux=n2(1μ+b2+ε2)1μ(1+b2)212ε21+b23(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2(1+b2)414ε21+b2μb2212ε2b23μ(2γ1γ2)2b2414ε2b2=0(19)

Equation (19) can be solved for ε2 yielding

ε2=n2+2μb23+21μ1+b23+6μ2γ1γ2b25+61μ2σ1σ21+b251×n2(μb21)+μb22+1μ(1+b2)2+3μ(2γ1γ2)2b24+3(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2(1+b2)4(20)

Setting

d2=n2+2μb23+21μ1+b23+6μ2γ1γ2b25+61μ2σ1σ21+b251,e2=1b22,f2=1b24,g2=1(1+b2)2,h2=1(1+b2)4.

Using the above relations, equation (20) can be written in the form

ε=d2[n2(μb21)+(1μ)g2+μe2+9(1μ)A12h2+9μA22f2+3μ(2γ1γ2)2f2+3(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2h2](21)

where the coefficients 𝓝 are given appendix (D-L2) and where, d2, e2, f2, g2 and h2 are functions of μ andare given by

b2=μ313+13μ32319μ3+2527μ343+5681μ35313μ32+4627μ373+14581μ383μ33+d2=i=09Ni2μ3i/3e2=59233μ1/3+3μ2/3209μ31/3+5881μ32/3+10243μ3932729μ34/3+196243μ35/3+6736561μ323929619683μ37/3+3079619683μ38/3+42916177147μ33+f2=14327+3μ4/34μ+1493μ2/3148273μ1/31012243μ31/310538μ26561μ3245687253144μ37/3+3600328531441μ37/32258600531441μ32g2=12μ31/3+73μ32/3169μ33227μ34/3+34781μ35/3509μ325281μ37/3+1049μ38/312826729μ33+h2=14μ31/3+263μ32/311699μ3+899μ34/3+19627μ35/3294881μ32+146027μ37/353227μ38/364588729μ33

Substituting back into equation (21), r2 is a function of b2, d2, e2, f2, g2 and h2 and can be written in the form

r2=b2+d2[n2(μb21)+(1μ)g2+μe2+3μ(2γ1γ2)2f2+3(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2h2](22)

since the location of L2 is given by

ξ0,L2=1μ+r2(23)

from equation (22) and (23) we get

ξ0,L2=1i=39Ni2μ3i/3

where the coefficients Ni2 are given appendix (A-L2)

4.2 Location of L3

The geometry of L3 can be visualized as given by Figure 2.

Follow the same procedure as in L1, with the corresponding values of 𝓑1 = – 1, 𝓑2 = 1, substituting into (5) we get

r2r1=1,r1=(x+μ),r2=1μx,r1x=r2x=1(24)

Hence substituting from equation (24) into (5), we get

Ux=n2(1μr2)+(1μ)r12+3(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2r1415(1μ)(σ1σ2)2r16y2+μr22+3μ2γ1γ22r2415μγ1γ22r26(25)

Then it may be reasonable in our case to assume that position of the equilibrium point L3 is the same as given by classical restricted three-body problem but perturbed due tothe triaxial primaries

r1=a3+ε3,r2=b3+ε3,a3=b31.(26)

where a3 and b3 are the unperturbed values of r1 and r2 respectively, and b3 is given after some successive approximation by the relation

b3=27μ12161μ31728+(27)

Substituting from equations (26) into equation (25) and retaining terms up to the first order in the small quantities ε3 we get

Ux=n21μb3ε3+1μ(b31)212ε3b31+3(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2(b31)414ε3b3115(1μ)(σ1σ2)2(b31)616ε3b31y2+μb3212ε3b3+3μ(2γ1γ2)2b3414ε3b315μ(γ1γ2)2b3616ε3b3y2

Since y = 0, then the above equation may be written as

Ux=n21μb3ε3+1μ(b31)212ε2b31+3(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2(b31)414ε3b31+μb3212ε3b3+3μ(2γ1γ2)2b34(14ε3b3)=0(28)

Equation (28) can be solved for ε3 to yield

ε3=n221μb3132μb336μ2γ1γ2b3561μ2σ1σ2b3151×n2+n2μ1μ1+b32μb32+n2b33μ2γ1γ22b3431μ2σ1σ221+b34(29)

now, letting

d3=n22(1μ)b3132μb336μ(2γ1γ2)b356(1μ)(2σ1σ2)b315e3=1b32,f3=1b34,g3=1(b31)2,h3=1(b31)4

Using the above relations, equation (29) can be written in the form

ε3=d3(n2(1μ)+n2b3(1μ)g3μe33μ(2γ1γ2)2f33(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2h3)(30)

where d3, e3, f3, g3 and h3 are functions of μ. They are given by

d3=i=29Ni3μ3i/3e3=14+7μ48+49μ2768+665μ313824+f3=116+7μ96+245μ24608+2359μ355296+g3=19+7μ162+49μ23888+2135μ3209952+h3=181+7μ729+245μ252488+791μ3236196+

where the coefficients 𝓝i1 are given appendix (D-L3).

Substituting back into equation (29) to yield r2 as a function of b3, d3, e3, f3, g3 and h3. It can be rewritten in the form

r2=b3+d3(n2(1μ)+b3(1μ)g3μe33μ(2γ1γ2)2f33(1μ)(2σ1σ2)2h3)(31)

since the location of L3 is given by

ξ0,L3=1μr2(32)

from equation (31) and (32) we get

ξ0,L3=1i=39Ni3μi/3(33)

where the coefficients Ni3 are given Appendix (A-L3)

5 Numerical representations

In the following section, we will draw the locations of collinear points Li, i = 1, 2, 3 versus the mass ratio μ ∈ (0, 0.1) taking into account the effect oftrixial primaries.In all casesthe black curve represents the classical unperturbed RTBP in which the primaries are considered spheres. The blue and the red curves represent the increasing magnitude in the perturbing parameters.

5.1 Analysis of L1 location

Considering the massive primary as oblate, it can be seen in Figure 4a that the location of is shifted towards the massive primary, i.e. towards the barycenter. Since any equilibrium point emerges from the balance between the gravitational field and the rotational field of the primaries, we can conclude that the resultant of these forces is to perturb the location of L1 towards the massive primary. This is very logical dynamical effect, since the additional mass bulge due to oblateness of the massive primarycauses gravitational attraction towards the center. The effect is noticeable for a relatively higher mass ratio. In view of Figure 4b, and considering the less massive primary as oblate, the location of L1 is largely shifted towards the less massive primary, i.e. away from the barycenter. The effect of perturbation is much bigger than that in Figure 4a due to the close proximity of the point to the less massive primary.

Figure 4a The location of  against μ under the effect of an oblate less massive primary and sphere massive primary
Figure 4a

The location of against μ under the effect of an oblate less massive primary and sphere massive primary

Figure 4b The location of against μ under the effect of an oblate less massive primary and sphere massive primary
Figure 4b

The location of against μ under the effect of an oblate less massive primary and sphere massive primary

In view of the Figure 4c and Figure 4d, the dynamical effects are towards and away from the barycenter, respectively. The size of perturbation is small comparedto the effects of oblateness due to the magnitude of the perturbing parameter.

Figure 4c The location of L1 against μ under the effect of triaxial massive primary and sphere less massive primary
Figure 4c

The location of L1 against μ under the effect of triaxial massive primary and sphere less massive primary

Figure 4d The location of L1 against μ under the effect of an oblate massive primary and sphere less massive primary
Figure 4d

The location of L1 against μ under the effect of an oblate massive primary and sphere less massive primary

5.2 Analysis of L2 location

From Figure 4e, considering the massive primary as oblate, the location of L2 is shifted towards the barycenter for mass ratios larger that the classical critical mass ratio, namely the Routian value μc = 0.03841. In Figure 4f, considering the less massive primary as oblate, the location of L2 is also largely shifted towards to thebarycenter. The effect of perturbation is much bigger than that shown in Figure 4e due to the close proximity of the point to the less massive primary.

Figure 4e The location of L2 against μ under the effect of an oblate massive primary and sphere less massive primary
Figure 4e

The location of L2 against μ under the effect of an oblate massive primary and sphere less massive primary

Figure 4f The location of L2 against μ under the effect of an oblate less massive primary and sphere massive primary
Figure 4f

The location of L2 against μ under the effect of an oblate less massive primary and sphere massive primary

Referring to Figure 4g and Figure 4h, the dynamical effects are towards and away from the barycenter respectively. These effects could be easily interpreted by considering balancing between the gravitational and rotational fields. The size of perturbation is small comparedto the effects of oblateness due to the magnitude of the perturbing parameter.

Figure 4g The location of L2 against μ under the effect of triaxial massive primary and sphere less massive primary
Figure 4g

The location of L2 against μ under the effect of triaxial massive primary and sphere less massive primary

Figure 4h The location of L2 against μ under the effect of an oblate massive primary and sphere less massive primary
Figure 4h

The location of L2 against μ under the effect of an oblate massive primary and sphere less massive primary

5.3 Analysis of L3 location

The Figures 4i-4l show the locations of L3 considering the massive primary as oblate in 4i and the less massive primary as oblate in Figure 4j. Figure 4k and 4l show the perturbed location of L3 due to the triaxiality of the primaries. It is very clear that the dynamics are dominated by the massive primary.

Figure 4i The location of L3 against μ under the effect of an oblate massive primary and sphere less massive primary
Figure 4i

The location of L3 against μ under the effect of an oblate massive primary and sphere less massive primary

Figure 4j The location of L3 against μ under the effect of an oblate less massive primary and sphere massive primary
Figure 4j

The location of L3 against μ under the effect of an oblate less massive primary and sphere massive primary

Figure 4k The location of L3 against μ under the effect of triaxial massive primary and sphere less massive primary
Figure 4k

The location of L3 against μ under the effect of triaxial massive primary and sphere less massive primary

Figure 4l The location of L3 ratio μ under the effect of an oblate massive primary and sphere less massive primary
Figure 4l

The location of L3 ratio μ under the effect of an oblate massive primary and sphere less massive primary

6 Conclusion

We have treated the perturbed RTBP with the triaxiality of both primaries up to the terms of order 𝓞 1/r1,27 perturbations. As expected, these perturbations bring deviations of the locations of the equilibrium points from classical RTBP. In this work, we computed and illustrated these deviations in collinear points explicitly as functions in the mass ratio. We analyzed the oblate RTBP as special cases of a triaxialproblem. All the dynamical effects could be properly interpreted in view of balancing between the gravitational and rotational fields. It is observed that the dynamics of L3 are clearly dominated by the massive primary, while the dynamics of L1 and L2 are dominatedby the less massive primary due to their close proximity to it. When investigating the triaxiality effects, it is noticed that the size of perturbation is small compared to the effects of oblateness due to the magnitude of the perturbing parameter.

References

[1] Szebehely V., Theory of Orbits, 1967, Academic Press, New YorkSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Murray C., Dermott S., Solar System Dynamics, 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9781139174817Search in Google Scholar

[3] Abd El-Salam F.A., Stability of triangular equilibrium points in the elliptic restricted three body problem with oblate and triaxial primaries, Astrophys. Space Sci. 2015, 357(1), 1510.1007/s10509-015-2308-5Search in Google Scholar

[4] Sharma R.K., The linear stability of libration points of the photogravitational restricted three-body problem when the smaller primary is an oblate spheroid, Astrophys. Space Sci., 1987, 135, 27110.1007/BF00641562Search in Google Scholar

[5] Tsirogiannis G.A., Douskos C.N., Perdios E.A., Computation of the Liapunov orbits in the photogravitational RTBP with oblateness, Astrophys. Space Sci., 2006 305, 38910.1007/s10509-006-9171-3Search in Google Scholar

[6] Kushvah B.S., Ishwar B., Triangular Equilibrium Points in the Generalized Photogravitational Restricted Three Body Problem with Poynting-Robertson drag, Review Bull. Cal. Math. Soc., 2004, 12 (1&2), 109-114.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Vishnu Namboori N.I., Reddy D.S., Sharma R.K., Effect of oblateness and radiation pressure on angular frequencies at collinear points, Astrophys. Space Sci., 2008, 318, 161.10.1007/s10509-008-9934-0Search in Google Scholar

[8] Mital A., Ahmad I., Bhatnagar K.B., Periodic orbits in the pho togravitational restricted problem with the smaller primary an oblate body, Astrophys. Space Sci., 2009, 323, 65-73.10.1007/s10509-009-0038-2Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kumar S., Ishwar B., Solutions of generalized photogravitational elliptic restricted three body problem, In: Proceedings of the International Conference onModelling and Engineering and Technological Problems, ICMETP ’09, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2009, 1146, 456-461.10.1063/1.3183564Search in Google Scholar

[10] Rahoma W.A., Abd El-Salam F.A., The Effects of Moon’s Uneven Mass Distribution on the Critical Inclinations of a Lunar Orbiter, J. Astro. Space Sci., 2014, 31(4), 285-294.10.5140/JASS.2014.31.4.285Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ammar M.K., The effect of solar radiation pressure on the Lagrangian points in the elliptic restricted three-body problem, Astrophys. Space Sci. 2008, 313(4), 393-408.10.1007/s10509-007-9709-zSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Singh J., Combined effects of perturbations, radiation, and oblateness on the nonlinear stability of triangular points in the restricted three-body problem, Astrophys. Space Sci., 2011, 332(2), 331-339.10.1007/s10509-010-0546-0Search in Google Scholar

[13] Singh J., Umar A., Application of binary pulsars to axisymmetric bodies in the Elliptic R3BP, Astrophys. Space Sci., 2013, 348(2), 393-402.10.1007/s10509-013-1585-0Search in Google Scholar

[14] Singh J., Umar A., On motion around the collinear libration points in the elliptic R3BP with a bigger triaxial primary, New Astron. 2014, 29, 36-41.10.1016/j.newast.2013.11.003Search in Google Scholar

[15] Katour D.A., Abd El-Salam F.A., Shaker M.O., Relativistic restricted three body problem with oblatness and photogravitational corrections to triangular equilibrium points, Astrophys. Space Sci., 2014, 351(1), 143-149.10.1007/s10509-014-1826-xSearch in Google Scholar

[16] Singh J., Bello N., Motion around L4 in the perturbed relativistic R3BP., Astrophys. Space Sci., 2014, 351(2), 491-497.10.1007/s10509-014-1870-6Search in Google Scholar

[17] Singh J., Bello N., Effect of radiation pressure on the stability of L4,5 in the relativistic R3BP, Astrophys. Space Sci., 2014, 351(2), 483- 490.10.1007/s10509-014-1858-2Search in Google Scholar

[18] Abd El-Salam F.A., Abd El-Bar S.E., On the collinear point L3 in the generalized relativistic R3BP, Phys. J. Plus., 2015, 130, 23410.1140/epjp/i2015-15234-xSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Abd El-Bar S.E., Abd El-Salam F.A., Rassem M., Perturbed Location of L1 point in the photogravitational relativistic restricted three-body problem (R3BP) with oblate primaries, Can. J. Phys., 2015, 93(3), 300-311.10.1139/cjp-2014-0346Search in Google Scholar

[20] Bello, N., Singh, J.: On the stability of triangular points in the relativistic R3BP with oblate primaries and bigger radiating. Advances in Space Research. 57(2), 576-587 (2016). 10.1016/j.asr.2015.10.044.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Khater A.H., Callebaut D.K., Malfliet W., Seadawy A.R., Nonlinear Dispersive Rayleigh-Taylor Instabilities in Magnetohydrodynamic Flows, Phys Scrip., 2001, 64, 533-547.10.1238/Physica.Regular.064a00533Search in Google Scholar

[22] Khater A.H., Callebaut D.K., Seadawy A.R., Nonlinear Dispersive Kelvin-Helmholtz Instabilities in Magnetohydrodynamic Flows, Phys. Scrip., 2003, 67, 340-349.10.1238/Physica.Regular.067a00340Search in Google Scholar

[23] Khater A.H., Callebaut D.K., Helal M.A., Seadawy A.R., Variational Method for the Nonlinear Dynamics of an Elliptic Magnetic Stagnation Line, Europ. Phys. J. D, 2006, 39, 237-245.10.1140/epjd/e2006-00093-3Search in Google Scholar

[24] Khater A.H., Callebaut D.K., Helal M.A., Seadawy A.R., General Soliton Solutions for Nonlinear Dispersive Waves in Convective Type Instabilities, Phys. Scrip., 2006, 74, 384-393.10.1088/0031-8949/74/3/015Search in Google Scholar

[25] Helal M.A., Seadawy A.R, Benjamin-Feir-instability in nonlinear dispersive waves, Comp. Math. Appl., 2012, 64, 3557-3568.10.1016/j.camwa.2012.09.006Search in Google Scholar

[26] Seadawy A.R, Stability analysis for Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation of weakly nonlinear ion-acoustic waves in a plasma, Comp. Math. Appl., 2014, 67, 172-180.10.1016/j.camwa.2013.11.001Search in Google Scholar

[27] Seadawy A.R, Stability analysis for two-dimensional ion- acoustic waves in quantum plasmas, Phys. Plasmas, 2014, 21, 05210710.1063/1.4875987Search in Google Scholar

[28] Seadawy A.R, Nonlinear wave solutions of the three dimensional Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burgers equation in dusty plasma, Phys. A, 2015, 439, 124-131.10.1016/j.physa.2015.07.025Search in Google Scholar

[29] Seadawy A.R, El-Rashidy K., Rayleigh-Taylor instability of the cylindrical flow with mass and heat transfer, Pramana J. Phys., 2016, 87, 2010.1007/s12043-016-1222-xSearch in Google Scholar

[30] Seadawy A.R, Three-dimensional nonlinear modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation of ion-acoustic waves in a magnetized plasma, Comp. Math. Appl., 2016, 71, 201-212.10.1016/j.camwa.2015.11.006Search in Google Scholar

[31] Yang X.-J., A new integral transform operator for solving the heat-diffusion problem, Appl. Math. Lett., 2017, 64, 193-197.10.1016/j.aml.2016.09.011Search in Google Scholar

[32] Yang X.-J., Teneiro Machado J.A., Baleanu D., Exact traveling-wave solution for local fractional Boussinesq equation in fractal domain, Fractals, 2017, 25(04), 174000610.1142/S0218348X17400060Search in Google Scholar

[33] Yang X.-J., Gao F., Srivastava H.M., Exact travelling wave solutions for the local fractional two-dimensional Burgers type equations, Comp. Math. Appl., 2017, 73(2), 203-210.10.1016/j.camwa.2016.11.012Search in Google Scholar

[34] Gao F., Yang X.-J., Srivastava H.M., Exact traveling wave solutions for a new non-linear heat transfer equation, Therm. Sci., 2016, 21(4), 1833-1838.10.2298/TSCI160512076GSearch in Google Scholar

[35] Yang X.-J., Teneiro Machado J.A., Baleanu D., Cattani C., Travelling-wave solutions for Klein-Gordon and Helmholtz equations on cantor sets, Proceedings of the Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, 2017, 43(1), 123-131.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Yang X.-J., Baleanu D., Gao F., New analytical solutions for Klein-Gordon and Helmholtz equations in fractal dimensional space, Proc. Rom. Acad., Ser. A: Math. Phys. Tech. Sci. Inf. Sci., 18(3), 231-238.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Yang X.-J., Gao F., Srivastava H.M., A new computational approach for solving nonlinear local fractional PDEs, J. Comp. Appl. Math., 2018, 339, 285-296.10.1016/j.cam.2017.10.007Search in Google Scholar

[38] Abd El-Bar S.E., Abd El-Salam F.A., Analytical and Semianalytical Treatment of the Collinear Pointsin the Photogravitational Relativistic RTBP, Math. Problems Engineering, 2013, 79473410.1155/2013/794734Search in Google Scholar

Appendix (D-L1)

N01=2n24+305γ1305γ223σ1+3σ22+3μ1/375γ1+752γ2+3μ2/39γ192γ2N11=15+5n222515γ13+2515γ26+15σ1152σ2N21=59145n212+15865γ1915865γ21835σ1+35σ22N31=287318+335n2978860γ127+39430γ227+172σ1386σ23N41=288493154n2+301145γ181301145γ2163215σ13+215σ26N51=857518+108n2790940γ1243+395470γ2243+502σ19251σ29N81=462913729+26615n25431442824γ16561+15721412γ26561+704σ19352σ29N91=28068072187145255n2243+56532350γ15904928266175γ2590492320σ1243+1160σ2243

Appendix (D-L2)

N02=1n24305γ1+305γ223σ1+3σ22+3μ1/375γ1+752γ2+3μ2/39γ1+92γ2N12=125n222245γ13+2245γ2615σ1+152σ2N22=59145n21210465γ19+10465γ21835σ1+35σ22N32=299918335n2929450γ127+14725γ227118σ13+59σ23N42=27573335n2444105γ181+44105γ216335σ13+35σ26N52=2217554469n2380030γ1243+40015γ2243+128σ1964σ29N62=1231272433305n212690895γ1729+690895γ2145885σ127+85σ254N72=59750814360n293651725γ12187+3651725γ24374215σ19+215σ218N82=83107172944755n25412965156γ16561+6482578γ2656144σ19+22σ29N92=36518452187332240n224355392640γ159049+27696320γ2590492270σ1243+1135σ2243

Appendix (D-L3)

N03=1423n212σ1+6σ2N33=16484+560n218γ1+9γ2+2256σ11128σ2N63=71536(4032+10000n2810γ1+405γ2+34680σ117340σ2)N93=724576(384932+491120n265610γ1+32805γ2+1090560σ1545280σ2)

Appendix (A-L1)

N01=29n24+n44+494γ1805n2γ12+5139γ12247γ2+805n2γ24+75γ2σ22+5139γ224+3σ1+9n2σ14+150γ1σ175γ2σ19σ129σ2243σ229n2σ2875γ1σ2+9σ1σ25139γ1γ2N11=102γ1+3454n2γ11971γ12+51γ23458n2γ2+1971γ1γ219714γ2290γ1σ1+45γ2σ1+45γ1σ2452γ2σ2
N21=(9γ19n2γ1+567γ1292γ2+92n2γ2567γ1γ2+5674γ22+27γ1σ1272γ2σ1272γ1σ2+274γ2σ2N31=81γ12+81γ1γ281γ224N11=18+79n2411n444720γ13+15319n2γ11211556γ12+2360γ2315319n2γ224+11556γ1γ22079γ223σ1272n2σ1361γ1σ1N21=75268n23+44n43+70511γ11828270n2γ19+22125γ1270511γ236+14135n2γ2922125γ1γ2+221254γ222σ1+1534n2σ1+2155γ1σ13N31=407318+1121n231831n436217631γ127+337225n2γ15436168γ12+217631γ254337225n2γ2108+36168γ1γ29042γ22+9σ12327n2σ148372γ1σ19+4186γ2σ19+53σ129σ24+327n2σ28+4186γ1σ292093γ2σ2953σ1σ2+53σ224N41=327192006n23+4571n436+2253133γ11621630015n2γ1162+154879γ123154σ222253133γ2324+1630015n2γ2324154879γ1γ23+154879γ221255σ13+49n2σ1+15σ1σ2
N51=2824727+33547n22724991n41084893158γ1243+3138185n2γ1243572404γ129+2446579γ22433138185n2γ2486+572404γ1γ29143101γ229+641σ118797n2σ14130655γ1σ1108+130655γ2σ1162+12σ12641σ236+797n2σ28+130655γ1σ2162130655γ2σ232412σ1σ2+3σ22N61=787937486854033n2486+22696n481+35047541γ114589005530n2γ1729+15905525γ1224335047541γ22916+4502765n2γ272915905525γ1γ2234+15905525γ229728557σ1162+589n2σ13+589n2σ13+350242γ1σ1243175121γ2σ124378σ12+8557σ2324589n2σ218175121γ1σ2243+175121γ2σ2486+78σ1σ214σ22
N71=954265486+271853n21621273n41249027529γ12187+59331695n2γ1874812948929γ12243+49027529γ2437459331695n2γ217496+12948929γ1γ224312948929γ22972+2923σ154257n2σ12799070γ1σ1729+399535γ2σ1729+15σ122923σ2108+257n2σ24+399535γ1σ2729399535γ2σ21812215σ1σ2+15σ224N81=240245914581313483n2291611426n427+17992143γ113122+12927712n2γ165561+20836592γ12729177992143γ2262446463856n2γ26556120836592γ1γ2729+5209148γ2272914753σ1486+461n2σ1368007568γ1σ12187+4003784γ2σ121876σ12+14753σ2972461n2σ272+4003784γ1σ221872001892γ2σ22187+6σ1σ23σ222N91=11914273940255n22187+1084129n4972164982886γ119683626757695n2γ178732+223007333γ126561+82491443γ219683+626757695n2γ2157464223007333γ1γ26561+223007333γ2226244913σ11458+5333n2σ181+188329745γ1σ16561188329745γ2σ113122+913σ229165333n2σ2162188329745γ1σ213122+188329745γ2σ226244

Appendix (A-L2)

N02=13n24n44+479γ1727n2γ12+3681γ12479γ22+727n2γ243681γ1γ2+3681γ224+6σ19n2σ14+348γ1σ1174γ2σ13σ2+9n2σ28+9σ224174γ1σ2+87γ2σ29σ1σ2+9σ12N12=93γ13274n2γ1+1971γ12932γ2+3278n2γ21971γ1γ2+19714γ22+144γ1σ172γ2σ172γ1σ2+36γ2σ2N22=9γ19n2γ1+567γ1292γ2+92n2γ2567γ1γ2+5674γ22+27γ1σ1272γ2σ1272γ1σ2+274γ2σ2N32=81γ1281γ1γ2+81γ224N12=1241n2411n44+4354γ1311617n2γ112+82832/3γ122177γ23+11617n2γ2242484γ1γ2+621γ22+42σ1272n2σ1+283γ1σ1283γ2σ12+274n2σ2283γ1σ22+9σ1221σ2+283γ2σ249σ1σ2+94σ22
N22=71170n2344n43+48017γ11814182n2γ19182331/3γ1248017γ236+7091n2γ29+5469γ1γ254694γ22+110σ11534n2σ11649γ1σ13+1649γ2σ16+3σ1255σ2+1538n2σ2+1649γ1σ261649γ2σ2123σ1σ2+34σ22N32=4133186377n2361777n436+65279γ12768593n2γ15416752γ1265279γ254+68593n2γ2108+16752γ1γ24188γ22+757σ19201n2σ1416360γ1σ19+8180γ2σ1955σ12757σ212+201n2σ28+8180γ1σ294090γ2σ29+55σ1σ255σ224
N42=271161019n234229n436166043γ1162+63197n2γ116255721γ123+166043γ232463197n2γ2324+55721γ1γ2355721γ221244σ13n2σ150278γ1σ127+25139γ2σ12715σ12+22σ2+3n2σ22+25139γ1σ22725139γ2σ254+15σ1σ2154σ22N52=151152710601n22723497n41081449466γ1243+453517n2γ124327212γ129+724733γ2243453517n2γ2486+27212γ1γ296803γ2291951σ16+349n2σ14+15743γ1σ18115743γ2σ116212σ12+1951σ212349n2σ2815743γ1σ2162+15743γ2σ2324+12σ1σ23σ22
N62=177809486122333n248628960n48110534933γ11458+538370n2γ1729+3877025γ12243+10534933γ22916269185n2γ27293877025γ1γ2243+3877025γ2297262437σ1162+281n2σ13+563392γ1σ1243281696γ2σ1243+84σ12+62437σ2324281n2σ26281696γ1σ2243+140848γ2σ223484σ1σ2+21σ22N72=814116280365n248621469n4366513922γ1218722227281n2γ18748+4233653γ12243+3256961γ22187+22227281n2γ2174964233653γ1γ2243+4233653γ2297219063σ116257n2σ12+1420652γ1σ1729710326γ2σ1729+45σ12+19063σ2324+57n2σ24710326γ1σ2729+355163γ2σ272945σ1σ2+45σ224
N82=10010514581357369n2291627773n427+13081537γ11312229852018n2γ16561+3497408γ1272913081537γ236244+14926009n2γ265613497408γ1γ2729+874352γ22729+16265σ11624037n2σ13611987038γ1σ12187+5993519γ2σ12187+6σ1216265σ2324+4037n2σ272+5993519γ1σ221875993519γ2σ243746σ1σ2+3σ222N92=9693742187730099n27291680113n4972429534110γ1196831932138199n2γ173732269045573γ126561+214767055γ219683+1932138199n2γ2157464+269045573γ1γ26561269045573γ22262442665σ114584963n2σ181282835739γ1σ16561+282835739γ2σ113122+2665σ22916+4963n2σ2162+282835739γ1σ213122282835739γ2σ226244

Appendix (A-L3)

N03=2+182+3n2+12σ16σ2(2+2n26σ1+3σ2)N33=54164(84+560n218γ1+9γ2+2256σ11128σ2)1+n23σ1+3σ221128(23n212σ1+6σ2)(40+40n218γ1+9γ2384σ1+192σ2)N63=71536(4032+10000n2810γ1+405γ2+34680σ117340σ2)1+n23σ1+3σ22+637686γ13γ2+88σ144σ223n212σ1+6σ212048(84+560n218γ1+9γ2+2256σ11128σ2)×(40+40n218γ1+9γ2384σ1+192σ2)N93=749152(593128+20824n2+595488n4+174420γ117100n2γ110692γ1287210γ2+8550n2γ2+10692γ1γ22673γ221543128σ1+367008n2σ1+367308γ1σ1183654γ2σ1+1230336σ12+771564σ2183504n2σ2183654γ1σ2+91827γ2σ21230336σ1σ2+307584σ22)
Received: 2018-01-11
Accepted: 2018-04-22
Published Online: 2018-09-06

© 2018 S. Z. Alamri et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A modified Fermi-Walker derivative for inextensible flows of binormal spherical image
  3. Algebraic aspects of evolution partial differential equation arising in the study of constant elasticity of variance model from financial mathematics
  4. Three-dimensional atom localization via probe absorption in a cascade four-level atomic system
  5. Determination of the energy transitions and half-lives of Rubidium nuclei
  6. Three phase heat and mass transfer model for unsaturated soil freezing process: Part 1 - model development
  7. Three phase heat and mass transfer model for unsaturated soil freezing process: Part 2 - model validation
  8. Mathematical model for thermal and entropy analysis of thermal solar collectors by using Maxwell nanofluids with slip conditions, thermal radiation and variable thermal conductivity
  9. Constructing analytic solutions on the Tricomi equation
  10. Feynman diagrams and rooted maps
  11. New type of chaos synchronization in discrete-time systems: the F-M synchronization
  12. Unsteady flow of fractional Oldroyd-B fluids through rotating annulus
  13. A note on the uniqueness of 2D elastostatic problems formulated by different types of potential functions
  14. On the conservation laws and solutions of a (2+1) dimensional KdV-mKdV equation of mathematical physics
  15. Computational methods and traveling wave solutions for the fourth-order nonlinear Ablowitz-Kaup-Newell-Segur water wave dynamical equation via two methods and its applications
  16. Siewert solutions of transcendental equations, generalized Lambert functions and physical applications
  17. Numerical solution of mixed convection flow of an MHD Jeffery fluid over an exponentially stretching sheet in the presence of thermal radiation and chemical reaction
  18. A new three-dimensional chaotic flow with one stable equilibrium: dynamical properties and complexity analysis
  19. Dynamics of a dry-rebounding drop: observations, simulations, and modeling
  20. Modeling the initial mechanical response and yielding behavior of gelled crude oil
  21. Lie symmetry analysis and conservation laws for the time fractional simplified modified Kawahara equation
  22. Solitary wave solutions of two KdV-type equations
  23. Applying industrial tomography to control and optimization flow systems
  24. Reconstructing time series into a complex network to assess the evolution dynamics of the correlations among energy prices
  25. An optimal solution for software testing case generation based on particle swarm optimization
  26. Optimal system, nonlinear self-adjointness and conservation laws for generalized shallow water wave equation
  27. Alternative methods for solving nonlinear two-point boundary value problems
  28. Global model simulation of OH production in pulsed-DC atmospheric pressure helium-air plasma jets
  29. Experimental investigation on optical vortex tweezers for microbubble trapping
  30. Joint measurements of optical parameters by irradiance scintillation and angle-of-arrival fluctuations
  31. M-polynomials and topological indices of hex-derived networks
  32. Generalized convergence analysis of the fractional order systems
  33. Porous flow characteristics of solution-gas drive in tight oil reservoirs
  34. Complementary wave solutions for the long-short wave resonance model via the extended trial equation method and the generalized Kudryashov method
  35. A Note on Koide’s Doubly Special Parametrization of Quark Masses
  36. On right-angled spherical Artin monoid of type Dn
  37. Gas flow regimes judgement in nanoporous media by digital core analysis
  38. 4 + n-dimensional water and waves on four and eleven-dimensional manifolds
  39. Stabilization and Analytic Approximate Solutions of an Optimal Control Problem
  40. On the equations of electrodynamics in a flat or curved spacetime and a possible interaction energy
  41. New prediction method for transient productivity of fractured five-spot patterns in low permeability reservoirs at high water cut stages
  42. The collinear equilibrium points in the restricted three body problem with triaxial primaries
  43. Detection of the damage threshold of fused silica components and morphologies of repaired damage sites based on the beam deflection method
  44. On the bivariate spectral quasi-linearization method for solving the two-dimensional Bratu problem
  45. Ion acoustic quasi-soliton in an electron-positron-ion plasma with superthermal electrons and positrons
  46. Analysis of projectile motion in view of conformable derivative
  47. Computing multiple ABC index and multiple GA index of some grid graphs
  48. Terahertz pulse imaging: A novel denoising method by combing the ant colony algorithm with the compressive sensing
  49. Characteristics of microscopic pore-throat structure of tight oil reservoirs in Sichuan Basin measured by rate-controlled mercury injection
  50. An activity window model for social interaction structure on Twitter
  51. Transient thermal regime trough the constitutive matrix applied to asynchronous electrical machine using the cell method
  52. On the zagreb polynomials of benzenoid systems
  53. Integrability analysis of the partial differential equation describing the classical bond-pricing model of mathematical finance
  54. The Greek parameters of a continuous arithmetic Asian option pricing model via Laplace Adomian decomposition method
  55. Quantifying the global solar radiation received in Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal to motivate the consumption of solar technologies
  56. Sturm-Liouville difference equations having Bessel and hydrogen atom potential type
  57. Study on the response characteristics of oil wells after deep profile control in low permeability fractured reservoirs
  58. Depiction and analysis of a modified theta shaped double negative metamaterial for satellite application
  59. An attempt to geometrize electromagnetism
  60. Structure of traveling wave solutions for some nonlinear models via modified mathematical method
  61. Thermo-convective instability in a rotating ferromagnetic fluid layer with temperature modulation
  62. Construction of new solitary wave solutions of generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony and simplified modified form of Camassa-Holm equations
  63. Effect of magnetic field and heat source on Upper-convected-maxwell fluid in a porous channel
  64. Physical cues of biomaterials guide stem cell fate of differentiation: The effect of elasticity of cell culture biomaterials
  65. Shooting method analysis in wire coating withdrawing from a bath of Oldroyd 8-constant fluid with temperature dependent viscosity
  66. Rank correlation between centrality metrics in complex networks: an empirical study
  67. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  68. Modeling of electric and heat processes in spot resistance welding of cross-wire steel bars
  69. Dynamic characteristics of triaxial active control magnetic bearing with asymmetric structure
  70. Design optimization of an axial-field eddy-current magnetic coupling based on magneto-thermal analytical model
  71. Thermal constitutive matrix applied to asynchronous electrical machine using the cell method
  72. Temperature distribution around thin electroconductive layers created on composite textile substrates
  73. Model of the multipolar engine with decreased cogging torque by asymmetrical distribution of the magnets
  74. Analysis of spatial thermal field in a magnetic bearing
  75. Use of the mathematical model of the ignition system to analyze the spark discharge, including the destruction of spark plug electrodes
  76. Assessment of short/long term electric field strength measurements for a pilot district
  77. Simulation study and experimental results for detection and classification of the transient capacitor inrush current using discrete wavelet transform and artificial intelligence
  78. Magnetic transmission gear finite element simulation with iron pole hysteresis
  79. Pulsed excitation terahertz tomography – multiparametric approach
  80. Low and high frequency model of three phase transformer by frequency response analysis measurement
  81. Multivariable polynomial fitting of controlled single-phase nonlinear load of input current total harmonic distortion
  82. Optimal design of a for middle-low-speed maglev trains
  83. Eddy current modeling in linear and nonlinear multifilamentary composite materials
  84. The visual attention saliency map for movie retrospection
  85. AC/DC current ratio in a current superimposition variable flux reluctance machine
  86. Influence of material uncertainties on the RLC parameters of wound inductors modeled using the finite element method
  87. Cogging force reduction in linear tubular flux switching permanent-magnet machines
  88. Modeling hysteresis curves of La(FeCoSi)13 compound near the transition point with the GRUCAD model
  89. Electro-magneto-hydrodynamic lubrication
  90. 3-D Electromagnetic field analysis of wireless power transfer system using K computer
  91. Simplified simulation technique of rotating, induction heated, calender rolls for study of temperature field control
  92. Design, fabrication and testing of electroadhesive interdigital electrodes
  93. A method to reduce partial discharges in motor windings fed by PWM inverter
  94. Reluctance network lumped mechanical & thermal models for the modeling and predesign of concentrated flux synchronous machine
  95. Special Issue Applications of Nonlinear Dynamics
  96. Study on dynamic characteristics of silo-stock-foundation interaction system under seismic load
  97. Microblog topic evolution computing based on LDA algorithm
  98. Modeling the creep damage effect on the creep crack growth behavior of rotor steel
  99. Neighborhood condition for all fractional (g, f, n′, m)-critical deleted graphs
  100. Chinese open information extraction based on DBMCSS in the field of national information resources
  101. 10.1515/phys-2018-0079
  102. CPW-fed circularly-polarized antenna array with high front-to-back ratio and low-profile
  103. Intelligent Monitoring Network Construction based on the utilization of the Internet of things (IoT) in the Metallurgical Coking Process
  104. Temperature detection technology of power equipment based on Fiber Bragg Grating
  105. Research on a rotational speed control strategy of the mandrel in a rotary steering system
  106. Dynamic load balancing algorithm for large data flow in distributed complex networks
  107. Super-structured photonic crystal fiber Bragg grating biosensor image model based on sparse matrix
  108. Fractal-based techniques for physiological time series: An updated approach
  109. Analysis of the Imaging Characteristics of the KB and KBA X-ray Microscopes at Non-coaxial Grazing Incidence
  110. Application of modified culture Kalman filter in bearing fault diagnosis
  111. Exact solutions and conservation laws for the modified equal width-Burgers equation
  112. On topological properties of block shift and hierarchical hypercube networks
  113. Elastic properties and plane acoustic velocity of cubic Sr2CaMoO6 and Sr2CaWO6 from first-principles calculations
  114. A note on the transmission feasibility problem in networks
  115. Ontology learning algorithm using weak functions
  116. Diagnosis of the power frequency vacuum arc shape based on 2D-PIV
  117. Parametric simulation analysis and reliability of escalator truss
  118. A new algorithm for real economy benefit evaluation based on big data analysis
  119. Synergy analysis of agricultural economic cycle fluctuation based on ant colony algorithm
  120. Multi-level encryption algorithm for user-related information across social networks
  121. Multi-target tracking algorithm in intelligent transportation based on wireless sensor network
  122. Fast recognition method of moving video images based on BP neural networks
  123. Compressed sensing image restoration algorithm based on improved SURF operator
  124. Design of load optimal control algorithm for smart grid based on demand response in different scenarios
  125. Face recognition method based on GA-BP neural network algorithm
  126. Optimal path selection algorithm for mobile beacons in sensor network under non-dense distribution
  127. Localization and recognition algorithm for fuzzy anomaly data in big data networks
  128. Urban road traffic flow control under incidental congestion as a function of accident duration
  129. Optimization design of reconfiguration algorithm for high voltage power distribution network based on ant colony algorithm
  130. Feasibility simulation of aseismic structure design for long-span bridges
  131. Construction of renewable energy supply chain model based on LCA
  132. The tribological properties study of carbon fabric/ epoxy composites reinforced by nano-TiO2 and MWNTs
  133. A text-Image feature mapping algorithm based on transfer learning
  134. Fast recognition algorithm for static traffic sign information
  135. Topical Issue: Clean Energy: Materials, Processes and Energy Generation
  136. An investigation of the melting process of RT-35 filled circular thermal energy storage system
  137. Numerical analysis on the dynamic response of a plate-and-frame membrane humidifier for PEMFC vehicles under various operating conditions
  138. Energy converting layers for thin-film flexible photovoltaic structures
  139. Effect of convection heat transfer on thermal energy storage unit
Downloaded on 1.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2018-0069/html
Scroll to top button