Startseite Influence of various class cleaning agents for prosthesis on Co–Cr alloy surface
Artikel Open Access

Influence of various class cleaning agents for prosthesis on Co–Cr alloy surface

  • Joanna Nowak EMAIL logo , Klaudia Steinberg , Jerzy Sokołowski und Kinga Bociong
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. September 2022

Abstract

Introduction

Denture cleaners should not be harmful to dental prostheses elements, but immersions in cleaner solutions during a long time of using prosthesis may cause changes on Co–Cr alloy surfaces. There are five classes of denture cleaners: alkaline hypochlorites, alkaline peroxides, disinfectants, diluted acids, and enzymes. The aim of this work was to evaluate the influence of denture cleaners solutions on the surface properties of Co–Cr alloy.

Materials and method

Specimens cast from cobalt–chromium alloy were divided into eight groups: 1 – dry; 2 – ultrapure water; 3 – 20% wt/wt sodium; 4 – 20% chlorhexidine digluconate; 5 – Correga Tabs BioFormula; 6 – 20% wt/wt citric acid; 7 – 0.5% NaOCl; and 8 – 5.0% NaOCl. After immersion in 200 mL of cleaning agent solution at 45°C in 3 years, simulation of use, surface roughness, contact angle, surface free energy (SFE), and microscopic observation was performed.

Results

For citric acid and NaOCl, roughness (R a) raised clearly. These cleaning agents also caused R q, R v, R p, and R Sm to increase the most. The observed water contact angle after using denture cleaners, especially citric acid, and NaOCl decreases, and the values of SFE increase. Under a digital microscope, the harmful effect of citric acid and solutions of NaOCl was visible.

Conclusions

Diluted acids and alkaline hypochlorites in presented concentrations influence Co–Cr surface parameters like roughness and wettability. Other classes of denture cleaning agents do not affect surface roughness parameters which make them safer for the metallic components of removable partial dentures.

1 Introduction

Dental prostheses are made of various metal alloys. Precious metal alloys such as platinum, gold, and silver have good chemical resistance and biocompatibility; unfortunately, they have a high price and lower strength. Base metal alloys such as chromium and cobalt characterized with higher hardness have better mechanical strength and other properties. Easy-to-process materials with better melting and ductility properties are also preferable for making prostheses. In the oral cavity environment, they must be highly resistant to corrosion. Resistance to oxidation and corrosion makes Co–Cr alloys suitable for use in the oral environment [1]. One of the best ways to clean dentures is a combination of mechanical and chemical cleaning like brushing or using ultrasonic cleaners, or soaking in dental cleaners solutions [2]. One challenge for these alloys is the chemical resistance to cleaning agents used for a prosthesis. Regular contact with harmful substances from prosthesis cleaners may affect alloy surface properties. The removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks can corrode or stain in contact with oxide or chlorine present in cleaners [3]. The ideal denture cleaner should not cause harmful effects to the cobalt–chromium alloy and other parts of the denture like surface pitting or surface discoloration (tarnish) [4]. It should also act quickly, be non-toxic, easy to use, cheap, have antimicrobial properties, reduce odors and discoloration [5]. There are five classes of denture cleaners: alkaline hypochlorites, alkaline peroxides, diluted acids, enzymes, and disinfectants [3]. They are available in different forms: creams, pastes, gels, solutions, tabs, or soluble powders. Denture users prefer the chemical method for cleaning because it is easier and more comfortable than brushing [6,7]. The most common denture cleaners are alkaline peroxides such as sodium perborate, potassium monopersulfate, sodium bicarbonate, and others. Due to the alkaline pH of over 8.5 and generation of active oxide in contact with water, contaminations dissolve easily [2,5,8]. Alkaline hypochlorites are very effective against biofilm compared to peroxides or enzymes. It is worth remembering that hypochlorite concentration should be below 0.5% because higher concentrations adversely affect materials such as acrylics and alloys used in the manufacture of prostheses [9]. NaOCl directly reduces biofilm and removes discoloration, food debris, or tartar [2,10]. Diluted acid denture cleaners contain at least one acid and have a pH below 7. These can be organic or inorganic acids or substances that generate acid during use. They are a good disinfectant and also good at reducing mineral contamination. The most common acid used in this cleaning agent class is citric acid. The second most popular compound is acetic acid. The decrease in the pH of the solution during cleaning kills or stops the growth of microorganisms [11]. To disinfectants as denture cleaning agents class belong to chlorhexidine acetate or digluconate, salicylates, chloroform, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, or 2% glutaric aldehyde [2,8]. The fifth class of denture cleaning agents is enzymes. They reduce food residues, bacteria plaque, and fungi. In example mutanase or protease act on glycoproteins, polysaccharides, or mucoproteins present in biofilm and have higher effectiveness than alkaline peroxides. One of the advantages of this group is that they are mild to the denture materials [7,12,13].

The average time of use of an RPD is 5 years. During this time, improper cleaning of the RPD can lead to degradation or corrosion of the prosthetic materials, especially in contact with chlorine or oxygen ions. Besides corrosion or color change, cleaners also affect the mechanical strength of Co–Cr, surface roughness and reflectance, lower hardness, loss of retention, and undesirable ion release. Side effects of this harmful acting of immersion-type cleaners may cause biofilm growth and better adhesion to prosthesis [3,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].

The study aims to compare the effect of five classes of denture cleaning agents on selected properties of the Co–Cr alloy used for RPDs. The tests assessed changes in surface roughness, wettability, and microscopic evaluation of the surface.

2 Methods

Samples of Co–Cr alloy (Wironit extrahart, BEGO, Germany) were cast according to manufacturer instructions. In the next step, they were wet ground with SiC papers (grit P180, P360, P1200, and P2400) and polished with diamond paste (grit, 6 μm). Ultrasonically cleaned isopropyl alcohol samples were divided into eight groups (Table 1).

Table 1

Description of the solution for Co–Cr immersion

Group number Class of denture cleaning solution Solution Manufacturer
1 Negative control – dry; storage in air
2 Ultrapure water (Millipore Direct Q3) Merck, Poland
3 Alkaline peroxides 20% Sodium percarbonate p.a. Biomus, Poland
4 Disinfectants 20% Chlorhexidine digluconate Amara, Poland
5 Enzymes Correga Tabs BioFormula gsk, United Kingdom
6 Diluted acids 20% Citric acid p.a. Stanlab, Poland
7 Alkaline hypochlorites 0.5% Sodium hypochlorite p.a. Chempur, Poland
8 Alkaline hypochlorites Positive control −5.0% sodium hypochlorite p.a. Chempur, Poland

Dry samples were chosen as a negative control group in order to eliminate water which may cause a corrosive environment for cobalt–chromium alloy. Ultrapure water does not act as (strong as) an electrolyte solution. 20% Chlorhexidine digluconate is a commercially used disinfectant. Corega Tabs BioFormula is a commercial denture cleaner that contains the enzyme – subtilisin (protease); 20% concentration of citric acid and sodium perborate corresponds to concentrations of these substances in commercially used denture cleaners. However, we wanted to eliminate possible reactions of other substances added to market products. Commonly used denture cleaner’s concentration is 0.5% sodium hypochlorite but it is worth knowing that minimal antibacterial concentration is 0.05% NaOCl; 5.0% concentration of sodium hypochlorite was used as a positive group because it tends to be corrosive. After preparing cleaning solutions, samples were stored in 200 mL of each cleaning agent at a temperature of 45°C for 92 h. Immersion time corresponds to 1,095 cycles of cleaning, assuming the patient put a denture into a cleaner solution once a day for 5 min during 3 years period. A five roughness parameters (μm): R a – arithmetic average height defined as the arithmetic mean of the absolute values of the evaluation profile deviations from the mean line, R q – root mean square roughness, which is the square root of the arithmetic mean of the squares of the deviations from the mean line to the evaluation profile, R v – maximum depth of valleys, when dividing the evaluation profile into segments based on the sampling length. Then for each segment, the distance of the lowest point (R vi) from the mean lines obtained. R is the mean of the R vi values that we obtained from the segments. R v (ANSI) is defined as the maximum floor depth over the evaluation length, and R p is the maximum height of peaks calculated as divided by the evaluation profile into segments based on the sampling length. Then, for each segment, the distance of the highest point (R pi) from the mean line is obtained. R p is the mean of the R pi values that were obtained from the segments, and R Sm is the mean spacing at a mean line. Portions of the evaluation profile that project upward are called profile element mountains, and portions of the profile that project downwards are called profile element valleys. A mountain followed by a valley is called a “profile element.” The value of this parameter is the arithmetic mean of the width (Xs) of each profile element. Each parameter was measured with a contact profilometer (Surftest SJ- 410, Mitutoyo, Japan). On each sample, nine measurements were made. The Owens-Wendt method was used for calculating surface free energy (SFE). According to the theory, SFE is a work needed to separate two phases from the equilibrium state to create a new surface. SFE γ is a sum of dispersive γ D and polar component γ P (equation (1))

(1) γ = γ D + γ P .

Dispersive component is calculated according to equation (2):

(2) γ D = ( γ 1 P γ 2 ( cos θ 2 + 1 ) ) ( γ 2 P ⁎γ 1 ( cos θ 1 + 1 ) ) 2 ( γ 2 D γ 1 P γ 2 P γ 1 D ) 2 ,

and polar component, as taken below (equation (3)):

(3) γ P = ( γ 1 ( cos θ 1 + 1 ) ) ( 2 γ 1 D γ D ) 2 ( γ 1 P ) 2 ,

where γ 1 P is the polar component surface energy of water, 21.6 mN/m; γ 1 D is the dispersive component surface energy of water, 51.0 mN/m; γ 1 is the overall surface energy of water, 72.6 mN/m; γ 2 P is the polar component surface energy of diiodomethane, 2.3 mN/m; γ 2 D is the dispersive component surface energy of diiodomethane, 48.5 mN/m; γ 2 is the overall surface energy of water, 50.8 mN/m; θ 1 is the water contact angle (°); θ 2 is the diiodomethane contact angle (°).

The sessile drop method was used to measure water and diiodomethane (Sigma Aldrich, USA) contact angle. Captured images of drops were analyzed by ImageJ software with Contact Angle plug-in (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA). A surface topography (2D and 3D analyses) was assessed by using a digital microscope (VHX, Keyence, Belgium) under ×1,500 magnification. To make more detailed surface observations, samples were observed under scanning electron microscope-energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM–EDS) microscope Hitachi S-4700. The images were made at a magnification of 2,000×, 5,000×, and 10,000×.

Analyzed numerical traits were depicted by their arithmetical weighted mean, standard deviation, 95% confidence interval, and minimum-to-maximum values. The normality of distribution was appraised by using the W Shapiro–Wilk test. The homogeneity of variances was tested by using Levene’s test. The Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance was fitted in order to assess the statistical significance of differences in the roughness of investigated surfaces treated with selected agents. Multiple comparisons were carried out a posteriori in search of specific pairs showing statistically meaningful dissimilarities.

A level of p < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. All the statistical procedures were performed by using IBM® SPSS® Statistics, version 28 (Armonk, New York, USA).

3 Results

3.1 Roughness

Nine measurements per sample were made with a contact profilometer. A Gaussian filter was used to separate roughness from waviness and surface errors. Six roughness parameters were calculated: R a, R q, R p, R v, R Sm, and R mr (Tables 27). After immersion in different denture cleaners, all samples have a smooth surface with R a under 0.5 µm [23]. In the case of immersion in citric acid or sodium hypochlorite, the environment increases the surface roughness. The R a parameter is around twice higher compared with other groups (Table 2). R q parameter changes also show the highest value after storage Co–Cr alloy in a citric acid or NaOCl environment, and the difference is about twice higher (Table 3). Using citric acid or sodium hypochlorite causes a slight increase in R v value (Table 5). Also, about three times higher peaks R p can be observed on sample surfaces after immersion in the solutions mentioned earlier (Table 4). In 0.05% NaOCl solution, R Sm increased more than three times, compared with the negative control group (Table 6). We do not observe any significant changes in parameters R Lo and R mr (25%) (Table 7).

Table 2

Descriptive statistics for R a measurements outcome

No. R a (µm) Statistical parameter p-Value
M SD 95% CI Min. – max.
1 Dry 0.016 0.001 0.015–0.017 0.014–0.018 <0.001
2 Ultrapure water 0.015 0.001 0.013–0.016 0.013–0.016
3 20% Sodium percarbonate 0.014 0.001 0.013–0.015 0.012–0.016
4 20% Chlorhexidine digluconate 0.017 0.001 0.016–0.018 0.015–0.019
5 Correga Tabs BioFormula 0.019 0.001 0.018–0.019 0.017–0.020
6 20% Citric acid 0.024 0.001 0.016–0.032 0.017–0.054
7 0.5% Sodium hypochlorite 0.029 0.003 0.027–0.031 0.023–0.031
8 5.0% Sodium hypochlorite 0.037 0.009 0.030–0.040 0.028–0.057

Post-hoc multiple comparisons: (1) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (2) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (3) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (4) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (5) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (6) versus (1)–(5) at p < 0.001; (7) versus (1)–(5) at p < 0.001; (8) versus (1)–(5) at p < 0.001.

Table 3

Descriptive statistics for R q measurements outcome

No. R q (µm) Statistical parameter p-Value
M SD 95% CI Min. – max.
1 Dry 0.020 0.002 0.019–0.021 0.017–0.023 <0.001
2 Ultrapure water 0.020 0.002 0.018–0.021 0.017–0.023
3 20% Sodium percarbonate 0.018 0.001 0.016–0.019 0.016–0.020
4 20% Chlorhexidine digluconate 0.022 0.002 0.020–0.023 0.019–0.024
5 Correga Tabs BioFormula 0.025 0.003 0.022–0.027 0.021–0.032
6 20% Citric acid 0.051 0.024 0.032–0.070 0.024–0.091
7 0.5% Sodium hypochlorite 0.045 0.004 0.042–0.048 0.036–0.050
8 5.0% sodium hypochlorite 0.054 0.012 0.044–0.064 0.041–0.079

Post-hoc multiple comparisons: (1) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (2) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (3) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (4) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (5) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (6) versus (1)–(5) at p < 0.001; (7) versus (1)–(5) at p < 0.001; and (8) versus (1)–(5) at p < 0.001.

Table 4

Descriptive statistics for R p measurements outcome

No. R p (µm) Statistical parameter p-Value
M SD 95% CI Min. – max.
1 Dry 0.070 0.008 0.064–0.077 0.060–0.082 <0.001
2 Ultrapure water 0.077 0.011 0.069–0.086 0.063–0.088
3 20% Sodium percarbonate 0.068 0.007 0.062–0.074 0.060–0.081
4 20% Chlorhexidine digluconate 0.077 0.021 0.061–0.093 0.024–0.091
5 Correga Tabs BioFormula 0.088 0.006 0.084–0.093 0.078–0.095
6 20% Citric acid 0.164 0.050 0.123–0.206 0.095–0.267
7 0.5% Sodium hypochlorite 0.250 0.043 0.218–0.283 0.183–0.317
8 5.0% Sodium hypochlorite 0.272 0.057 0.229–0.317 0.213–0.359

Post-hoc multiple comparisons: (1) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (2) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (3) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (4) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (5) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (6) versus (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), and (7) at p < 0.001; (7) versus (1), (2), (3), (4, (5), and (6) at p < 0.001; and (8) versus (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6) at p < 0.001.

Table 5

Descriptive statistics for R v measurements outcome

No. R v (µm) Statistical parameter p-Value
M SD 95% CI Min. – max.
1 Dry 0.063 0.010 0.055–0.070 0.050–0.085 <0.001
2 Ultrapure water 0.083 0.016 0.066–0.100 0.062–0.110
3 20% Sodium percarbonate 0.067 0.011 0.058–0.075 0.049–0.082
4 20% Chlorhexidine digluconate 0.067 0.013 0.057-0.076 0.042–0.085
5 Correga Tabs BioFormula 0.091 0.037 0.062–0.120 0.067–0.189
6 20% Citric acid 0.122 0.055 0.076–0.169 0.070–0.225
7 0.5% Sodium hypochlorite 0.084 0.021 0.068–0.101 0.064–0.121
8 5.0% Sodium hypochlorite 0.096 0.023 0.078–0114 0.072–0.143

Post-hoc multiple comparisons: (1) versus (5) and (6) at p < 0.001; (2) versus (6) at p < 0.001; (3) versus (6) at p < 0.001; (4) versus (6) at p < 0.001; (5) versus (1) and (6) at p = 0.030; (6) versus (1)–(5) and (7) at p < 0.001; (7) versus (6) at p = 0.006; and (8) versus (1), (3), and (4) at p = 0.027.

Table 6

Descriptive statistics for R Sm measurements outcome

No. R Sm (µm) Statistical parameter p-Value
M SD 95% CI Min. – max.
1 Dry 27.4 9.0 20.5–34.3 20.6–50.0 <0.001
2 Ultrapure water 26.1 5.3 21.2–31.0 19.3–35.7
3 20% Sodium percarbonate 29.1 10.9 20.7–37.5 19.5–49.7
4 20% Chlorhexidine digluconate 22.5 3.1 20.1–24.9 18.3–28.6
5 Correga Tabs BioFormula 33.2 22.0 16.2–50.1 21.4–90.4
6 20% Citric acid 58.2 29.0 27.7–88.7 28.2–100.9
7 0.5% Sodium hypochlorite 99.3 34.5 72.8–125.9 59.3–178.7
8 5.0% Sodium hypochlorite 62.6 14.5 51.5073.8 49.1–90.9

Post-hoc multiple comparisons: (1) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (2) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (3) versus (6)–(8) at p < 0.001; (4) versus (6)–(8) at p = 0.015; (5) versus (6)–(8) at p = 0.015; (6) versus (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (7) at p = 0.005; (7) versus (1)–(6) and (8) at p < 0.001; and (8) versus (1)–(5) and (7) at p < 0.001.

Table 7

Descriptive statistics for R mr (25%) measurements outcome

No. R mr (25%) Statistical parameter p-Value
M SD 95% CI Min. – max.
1 Dry 99.9 0.1 99.8–100.0 99.7–100.0 =0.002
2 Ultrapure water 99.3 1.1 98.4–100.1 97.2–100.0
3 20% Sodium percarbonate 99.9 0.1 99.9–100.0 99.8–100.0
4 20% Chlorhexidine digluconate 100.0 0.04 99.9–100.0 99.9–100.0
5 Correga Tabs BioFormula 99.8 0.3 99.6–100.0 99.3–100.0
6 20% Citric acid 97.0 2.8 94.8–99.1 91.9–100.0
7 0.5% Sodium hypochlorite 99.8 0.2 99.6–100.0 99.4–100.0
8 5.0% Sodium hypochlorite 99.6 0.4 99.3–99.9 99.0–100.0

Post-hoc multiple comparisons: (6) versus all the remaining compounds at p < 0.001.

3.1.1 Contact angle and SFE analysis

Table 8 shows the influence of different cleaning solutions on contact angle changes on Co–Cr samples. In both cases, when using water or diiodomethane, the contact angle between the solid and fluid phases decreases. For water, it drops from 75.5° for the dry group to 13.5° for the group stored in 5.0% sodium hypochlorite. As with changes in surface roughness, the use of a weak acid such as, for example, citric acid or a hypochlorite solution causes greater changes in the amount of SFE than with the other groups of cleaning agents. The same relationship can be observed to diiodomethane contact angle changes – it varies from 68.0° for the dry group to 14.6° for the positive control group. According to measured values, all samples have hydrophilic surfaces.

Table 8

Contact angle of water and diodomethane (mean with standard deviation) on Co–Cr surface after conditioning in dental cleaners

Group Water contact angle, θ (°) Diiodomethane contact angle, θ (°)
Dry (negative control) 75.7 ± 6.7 68.0 ± 9.4
Water 63.3 ± 6.7 56.7 ± 3.3
20% Sodium percarbonate 48.5 ± 10.8 40.1 ± 3.3
20% Chlorhexidine digluconate 40.0 ± 1.8 38.3 ± 3.6
Corega Tabs Bio Formula 28.5 ± 6.2 42.4 ± 8.2
20% Citric acid 28.9 ± 2.9 40.0 ± 9.6
0.5% Sodium hypochlorite 18.1 ± 2.8 24.5 ± 3.8
5.0% Sodium hypochlorite (positive control) 13.5 ± 2.4 14.6 ± 2.4

Calculated SFE values for each group are shown in Table 9. The SFE is the highest for the group cleaned with 5.0% NaOCl. Every denture cleaning solution causes an increase in dispersive and polar components alike. However, in the case of Corega Tabs Bio Formula (enzyme), 20% citric acid (diluted acid) and 0.5% NaOCl (alkaline hypochlorite) polar components rise more than three times. This tendency also corresponds with the increased value of roughness parameters (especially R Sm) in the same groups.

Table 9

SFE and its components of Co–Cr alloy after immersion in different denture cleaners

Group SFE (mJ/m2) γ d (mJ/m2) γ p (mJ/m2)
Dry (negative control) 30.775 17.948 12.827
Water 40.732 18.525 22.206
20% Sodium percarbonate 53.371 28.675 24.696
20% Chlorhexidine digluconate 58.651 28.174 30.477
Corega Tabs Bio Formula 64.580 24.654 39.926
20% citric acid 64.621 25.870 38.752
0.5% Sodium hypochlorite 70.742 31.359 39.384
5.0% Sodium hypochlorite (positive control) 72.781 38.937 33.844

The increasing value of SFE testifies to the increasing wettability of Co–Cr alloys after cleaning dentures, especially in weak acids and alkaline hypochlorites.

3.1.2 Microstructure

The Co–Cr alloy surface topography after storing in different denture cleaners is shown in Figure 1. Except for samples stored in NaOCl solutions, microstructures look similar. Some stains and surface discoloration on Co–Cr alloy stored in sodium hypochlorite solutions can be observed (Figure 1(7)). With increasing concentrations of NaOCl, dark structures occur in bigger areas (Figure 1(8)).

Figure 1 
                     Digital microscopy images of Co–Cr alloy after storage: (1) dry, (2) in water, (3) 20% sodium percarbonate, (4) 20% chlorhexidine digluconate, (5) Corega Tabs Bio Formula, (6) 20% citric acid, (7) 0.5% NaOCl, and (8) 5.0% NaOCl. Magnification 1,500×.
Figure 1

Digital microscopy images of Co–Cr alloy after storage: (1) dry, (2) in water, (3) 20% sodium percarbonate, (4) 20% chlorhexidine digluconate, (5) Corega Tabs Bio Formula, (6) 20% citric acid, (7) 0.5% NaOCl, and (8) 5.0% NaOCl. Magnification 1,500×.

It is worth mentioning that SEM–EDS analysis (Table 10) shows that samples’ surfaces are without visible signs of the corrosive effect of denture cleaners. The exception is for samples stored in the 5.0% sodium hypochlorite solution. However, this is a positive control because of the high concentration of NaOCl which should act harmful for Co–Cr alloy. Some stains are visible in samples stored in 20% sodium percarbonate and 20% citric acid solution; however, EDS analysis did not show any changes in elements composition. Only in the positive control group, oxygen and chlorine occurred at EDS spectrums (Figure 2). We did not observe these elements even in a group with 0.5% NaOCl (Figure 3) or in the negative control group stored in a dry environment (Figure 4). This observation suggests that all classes of denture cleaning agents are safe for Co–Cr alloy during the simulation of 3 years using RPDs.

Table 10

SEM analysis of Co–Cr samples stored in different solutions at magnifications 2,000×, 5,000×, 10,000×

Magnification 2,000× Magnification 5,000× Magnification 10,000×
Dry
Water
20% Sodium percarbonate
20% Chlorhexidine digluconate
Corega Tabs Bio Formula
20% Citric acid
0.5% NaOCl
5.0% NaOCl
Figure 2 
                     EDS analysis for a positive control group stored in 5.0% NaOCl.
Figure 2

EDS analysis for a positive control group stored in 5.0% NaOCl.

Figure 3 
                     EDS analysis for the samples stored in 0.5% NaOCl.
Figure 3

EDS analysis for the samples stored in 0.5% NaOCl.

Figure 4 
                     EDS analysis for the negative control group (dry).
Figure 4

EDS analysis for the negative control group (dry).

4 Discussion

Based on the obtained test results, it can be concluded that cleaning agents like water, alkaline peroxides, or disinfectants and their mixtures with enzymes and weak acids do not significantly affect denture surfaces cast from Co–Cr. After conditioning in the solutions of cleaning agents, the surface of the alloy did not develop to any significant degree during the time corresponding to the use of the prosthesis for 3 years. According to Curylofo et al. [18], using 20% citric acid solution or solutions of sodium hypochlorite in a concentration higher than 0.5% is harmful to Co–Cr alloy because R a increases over 0.2 μm, which cannot be clinically acceptable, due to promoting a bacteria adhesion. According to research carried out by Felipucci et al. [3] the citric acid solution and NaOCl solutions with concentrations higher than 0.05% may lead to a corrosion effect. The negative effect of using these cleaners is also discoloration and remaining stains. pH Changes (decreased value) also affect the corrosion resistance of the alloy, which may cause a roughness increase. The results from our tests for citric acid and NaOCl confirm that a more aggressive environment is harmful to metallic denture elements. According to Puscar et al.’s report [24] with increasing acidity of solution, corrosion resistance of cobalt–chromium alloy decreases. Morphological changes on the surface may be affected by Co-release. Rylska noted that in solutions with low pH values, the chemical passivation decreases susceptibility to electrochemical corrosion of Co–Cr dental alloy [25]. It is worth noting that strong acids inactivate surfaces stronger than weak acids by forming a passive layer on Co–Cr alloy surface with an oxide layer [26]. Many studies are focused only on R a measurements [27]. Arithmetic average roughness height is a widely used parameter, but as we see R a value do not fully characterize features of the surface like sharp or soft peak and valleys. Also, Zecchino [28] stated that R a is a parameter that characterizes only in general a surface topography. Different surfaces with the same R a range can have different surface morphologies, so it is necessary to use other R parameters to characterize differences in surface roughness. It should be emphasized that diluted acids develop Co–Cr surface more than other cleaning agents. The valleys (R v) on the surface become deeper. Its values rise mostly in citric acid and both NaOCl solutions to around 0.09 μm compared to 0.07 μm for dry storage samples. R v is an important parameter in the corrosive behavior of cleaning agents and Co–Cr alloy, because of its influence on the diffusion of active ions during corrosion [29]. On the corroded surface, a predominance of deep valleys is visible, and as Zecchino stated it is a correlation between a bigger R v value and greater corrosion [28]. We see that citric acid or NaOCl differs from other cleaning solutions and the negative control group and their R v values increase significantly. These classes of denture cleaning agents may affect more aggressively Co–Cr surface, than others. Surface picks (R p) are significantly higher, they rise from around 0.07 μm for dry storage Co–Cr to 0.273 μm for alloy immersed in 5.0% NaOCl, and it may affect occurring pitting on Co–Cr surfaces. Not only vertical parameters characterize surface character. Also, horizontal and hybrid parameters are important to determine surface properties like wettability, corrosion, friction, wear, and others [30]. The mean width of the profile elements R Sm also raises three times after storage in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite. Change of surface roughness influence is also on the wettability of materials. As per Uhorchuk et al.’s statement [31] surface roughness influence is on wetting characteristics, which correlate with changes in static contact angle. This is coincident with the Cassie-Wenzel theory and Nishioka et al.’s [32] results. Also, our investigation confirmed this thesis. Contact angle decreases as Co–Cr alloy surface roughness increases. The high value of SFE is undesirable due to higher bacteria adhesion. Bollen et al. [33] note that plaque accumulation increases the risk of periodontal inflammation and caries, so it is needed to keep the surface of prosthesis materials as smooth as possible. The side effect of increasing surface energy makes citric acid and sodium hypochlorite to unfavorable denture cleaners [32]. Also, Sobolewska reports that increased wettability of Co–Cr alloy may be a reason why bacteria adherer stronger. One of the factors that modulate the adhesive behaviors of bacteria proteins is SFE. Bacteria adhere stronger to surfaces with higher surface energy. On the other hand, water contact angle under 40° (highly hydrophilic surface) or over 130° (highly hydrophobic surface) seems to inhibit bacterial adhesion. Because of inconclusive results for modifying wettability and surface roughness [34], it was necessary to carry out an investigation, like SEM-EDS, but despite the positive control group, any other changes was observed.

Researchers show surface changes under microscopic observation in the case of using sodium hypochlorite solutions [35]. Dong observed also yellowish brown changes on the surface of Co–Cr alloy after immersion in weak acid [26]. There are also publications which show that other cleaning agents are safe for metal elements of the prosthesis. Curylofo et al. [18] state that the use of disinfectants like cetylpyridinium chloride is safe for metallic elements of RPDs for a period of 5 years, and in SEM–EDS analysis, any deleterious effect or changes in surfaces chemical composition was observed. The visual analysis [3] eliminates sodium hypochlorite and citric acid as safe for Co–Cr denture cleaners because of occurring tarnishes and presented stains. These observations also correspond with our results obtained from the SEM images. These side effects suggest that corrosion occurred, like pitting, but EDS analysis has shown changes in elements composition only for samples stored in 5.0% NaOCl, where chlorine and oxygen occurred.

5 Conclusions

On the basis of our measurements and their limitations (used solution of active substances not commercial cleaners with the selected concentration of the active substance), it can be concluded that as a class of denture cleaning agents, alkaline hypochlorites and diluted acids could cause deleterious effects on Co–Cr alloy surfaces in RPDs. Immersion in alkaline hypochlorites and diluted acids leads to an increased all roughness parameters compared to dry storage samples (negative control group) and growth of SFE of Co–Cr especially polar compound of SFE, which may cause better biofilm adhesion even in 3 years of simulation of use. Also, some stains and discoloration are remaining on the Co–Cr alloy surfaces, when alkaline hypochlorite or diluted acid was used. Other classes of denture cleaning agents like alkaline peroxides, enzymes, and disinfectants do not change significantly the values of the surface parameters and the SFE value. Hence, it can be concluded that the above-mentioned cleaning agents do not have harmful effects on the metallic components of RPDs, so they are suitable for RPD cleaners.


tel: +48 422725766

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding is involved.

  2. Author contributions: Joanna Nowak – conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources, writing- original draft, writing – review and editing, Klaudia Steinberg – investigation formal analysis, visualization, writing original draft, Jerzy Sokołowski – project administration, funding acquisition, Kinga Bociong – conceptualization, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing – review and editing

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

  5. Data availability statement: The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Borowicz J, Modzelewska A, Katarzyna Sarna-Boś AR. Zastosowanie stopów metali nieszlachetnych w protetyce stomatologicznej. Nowoczesny Technik Dentystyczny; n.d. https://technik.elamed.pl/artykul/zastosowanie-stopow-metali-nieszlachetnych-w-protetyce-stomatologicznej/45615 (accessed March 15, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Budtz-Jørgensen E. Materials and methods for cleaning dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;42:619–23. 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90190-2.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Felipucci DNB, Davi LR, Paranhos HFO, Bezzon OL, Silva RF, Pagnano VO. Effect of different cleansers on the surface of removable partial denture. Braz Dental J. 2011;22:392–7. 10.1590/s0103-64402011000500008.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Backenstose WM, Wells JG. Side effects of immersion-type cleansers on the metal components of dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1977;37:615–21. 10.1016/0022-3913(77)90211-6.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Anthony DH, Gibbons P. The nature and behavior of denture cleansers. J Prosthet Dent. 1958;8:796–810. 10.1016/0022-3913(58)90100-8.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Gajwani-Jain S, Magdum D, Karagir A, Pharane P. Denture cleansers: A review. IOSR J Dental Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN. 2015;14:94–6. 10.9790/0853-14249496.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Budtz‐Jörgensen E, Kelstrup J. Enzymes as denture cleansers. Scand J Dent Res. 1977;85:209–15. 10.1111/J.1600-0722.1977.TB00555.X.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Karthikeyan S, Asharaf Ali S. Denture disinfectants used in prosthodontics-a review; n.d.Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Peracini A, Regis RR, Souza RF, Pagnano VO, Silva CHL, Paranhos HD. Alkaline peroxides versus sodium hypochlorite for removing denture biofilm: A crossover randomized trial. Braz Dental J. 2016;27:700–4. 10.1590/0103-6440201600913.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Abelson DC. Denture plaque and denture cleansers. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45:376–9. 10.1016/0022-3913(81)90094-9.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Kwasowe środki czyszczące; n.d. https://www.chemiaibiznes.com.pl/artykuly/kwasowe-srodki-czyszczace (accessed March 15, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Budtz‐Jörgensen E. A 3-months’ study of enzymes as denture cleansers. J Oral Rehabil. 1978;5:35–9. 10.1111/J.1365-2842.1978.TB00389.X.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Nakamoto K, Tamamoto M, Hamada T. Evaluation of denture cleansers with and without enzymes against Candida albicans. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:792–5. 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90418-V.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Faot F, Cavalcanti YW, Pinto LD, da Silva WJ, Del Bel Cury AA. Efficacy of citric acid denture cleanser on the Candida albicans biofilm formed on poly(methyl methacrylate): Effects on residual biofilm and recolonization process. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14(1):1–7. 10.1186/1472-6831-14-77.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Felipucci DNB, Davi LR, Paranhos HFO, Bezzon OL, Silva RF, Barbosa F, et al. Effect of different cleansers on the weight and ion release of removable partial denture: An in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19:483–7. 10.1590/S1678-77572011000500008.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Vasconcelos GLL, Curylofo PA, Raile PN, Macedo AP, Paranhos HFO, Pagnano VO. Effect of alkaline peroxides on the surface of cobalt chrome alloy: An in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:e337–41. 10.1111/JOPR.12789.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Papadopoulos T, Polyzois G, Tapanli A, Frangou M. The effect of disinfecting solutions on bending properties and weight changes of Co-Cr and Ti-6Al-7Nb alloys for dentures. Odontology. 2011;99:77–82. 10.1007/S10266-010-0135-2.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Curylofo PA, Raile PN, Vasconcellos GLL, Macedo AP, Pagnano VO. Effect of denture cleansers on cobalt–chromium alloy surface: A simulated period of 5 years’ use. J Prosthodont. 2020;29:142–50. 10.1111/JOPR.12996.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] McGowan MJ, Shimoda LM, Woolsey GD. Effects of sodium hypochlorite on denture base metals during immersion for short-term sterilization. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;60:212–8. 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90318-6.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Keyf F, Güngör T. Comparison of effects of bleach and cleansing tablet on reflectance and surface changes of a dental alloy used for removable partial dentures. J Biomater Appl. 2003;18:5–14. 10.1177/0885328203018001001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Backenstose WM, Wells JG. Side effects of immersion-type cleansers on the metal components of dentures; n.d.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Rodrigues Garcia RCMM, De Souza JA, Rached RN, Del Bel Cury AA. Effect of denture cleansers on the surface roughness and hardness of a microwave-cured acrylic resin and dental alloys. J Prosthodont. 2004;13:173–8. 10.1111/J.1532-849X.2004.04028.X.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Kassapidou M, Hjalmarsson L, Johansson CB, Hammarström Johansson P, Morisbak E, Wennerberg A, et al. Cobalt–chromium alloys fabricated with four different techniques: Ion release, toxicity of released elements and surface roughness. Dental Mater. 2020;36:e352–63. 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2020.08.012.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Puskar T, Jevremovic D, Williams RJ, Eggbeer D, Vukelic D, Budak I. A comparative analysis of the corrosive effect of artificial saliva of variable pH on DMLS and cast Co-Cr-Mo dental alloy. Materials. 2014;6:6486–501. 10.3390/ma7096486.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Rylska D, Sokołowski G, Sokołowski J, Łukomska-Szymańska M. Chemical passivation as a method of improving the electrochemical corrosion resistance of Co-Cr-based dental alloy. Acta Bioeng Biomech Original Pap. 2017;19(2):73–8. 10.5277/ABB-00600-2016-04.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Dong H, Nagamatsu Y, Chen KK, Tajima K, Kakigawa H, Shi S, et al. Corrosion behavior of dental alloys in various types of electrolyzed water. Dental Mater J. 2003;22:482–93. 10.4012/DMJ.22.482.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Gadelmawla ES, Koura MM, Maksoud TMA, Elewa IM, Soliman HH. Roughness parameters. J Mater Process Technol. 2002;123:133–45. 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-2.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] amp16103p025; n.d.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Toloei A, Stoilov V, Northwood D. The relationship between surface roughness and corrosion. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE); 2014. p. 2B. 10.1115/IMECE2013-65498.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Melentiev R, Kang C, Shen G, Fang F. Study on surface roughness generated by micro-blasting on Co-Cr-Mo bio-implant. Wear. 2019;428–429:111–26. 10.1016/J.WEAR.2019.03.005.Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Uhorchuk R, Umretiya R, Anderson M, Elward B, Leon SB, Rebak R, et al. Influence of surface roughness on wettability of accident tolerant fuels cladding. Trans Am Nucl Soc. 2019;121:1813–5. 10.13182/T30895.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Nishioka M, Yamabe Y, Hisatsune K, Fujii H. Influence of polishing of denture base resin and metal surfaces on wettability with water and saliva. Dental Mater J. 2006;25:161–5. 10.4012/DMJ.25.161.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13:258–69. 10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Sterzenbach T, Helbig R, Hannig C, Hannig M. Bioadhesion in the oral cavity and approaches for biofilm management by surface modifications. Clin Oral Invest. 2020;24:4237–60. 10.1007/S00784-020-03646-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Borsa PCC, Marquezan M, May LG, Braun KO. Surface change assessment of Co-Cr alloy subjected to immersion in denture cleansers. Braz J Oral Sci. 2016;15:196–200. 10.20396/BJOS.V15I3.8649980.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-03-21
Revised: 2022-07-12
Accepted: 2022-08-11
Published Online: 2022-09-28

© 2022 Joanna Nowak et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B in aqueous phase by bimetallic metal-organic framework M/Fe-MOF (M = Co, Cu, and Mg)
  3. Assessment of using electronic portal imaging device for analysing bolus material utilised in radiation therapy
  4. A detailed investigation on highly dense CuZr bulk metallic glasses for shielding purposes
  5. Simulation of gamma-ray shielding properties for materials of medical interest
  6. Environmental impact assesment regulation applications and their analysis in Turkey
  7. Sample age effect on parameters of dynamic nuclear polarization in certain difluorobenzen isomers/MC800 asphaltene suspensions
  8. Passenger demand forecasting for railway systems
  9. Design of a Robust sliding mode controller for bioreactor cultures in overflow metabolism via an interdisciplinary approach
  10. Gamma, neutron, and heavy charged ion shielding properties of Er3+-doped and Sm3+-doped zinc borate glasses
  11. Bridging chiral de-tert-butylcalix[4]arenes: Optical resolution based on column chromatography and structural characterization
  12. Petrology and geochemistry of multiphase post-granitic dikes: A case study from the Gabal Serbal area, Southwestern Sinai, Egypt
  13. Comparison of the yield and purity of plasma exosomes extracted by ultracentrifugation, precipitation, and membrane-based approaches
  14. Bioactive triterpenoids from Indonesian medicinal plant Syzygium aqueum
  15. Investigation of the effects of machining parameters on surface integrity in micromachining
  16. The mesoporous aluminosilicate application as support for bifunctional catalysts for n-hexadecane hydroconversion
  17. Gamma-ray shielding properties of Nd2O3-added iron–boron–phosphate-based composites
  18. Numerical investigation on perforated sheet metals under tension loading
  19. Statistical analysis on the radiological assessment and geochemical studies of granite rocks in the north of Um Taghir area, Eastern Desert, Egypt
  20. Two new polypodane-type bicyclic triterpenoids from mastic
  21. Structural, physical, and mechanical properties of the TiO2 added hydroxyapatite composites
  22. Tribological properties and characterization of borided Co–Mg alloys
  23. Studies on Anemone nemorosa L. extracts; polyphenols profile, antioxidant activity, and effects on Caco-2 cells by in vitro and in silico studies
  24. Mechanical properties, elastic moduli, transmission factors, and gamma-ray-shielding performances of Bi2O3–P2O5–B2O3–V2O5 quaternary glass system
  25. Cyclic connectivity index of bipolar fuzzy incidence graph
  26. The role of passage numbers of donor cells in the development of Arabian Oryx – Cow interspecific somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos
  27. Mechanical property evaluation of tellurite–germanate glasses and comparison of their radiation-shielding characteristics using EPICS2017 to other glass systems
  28. Molecular screening of ionic liquids for CO2 absorption and molecular dynamic simulation
  29. Microwave-assisted preparation of Ag/Fe magnetic biochar from clivia leaves for adsorbing daptomycin antibiotics
  30. Iminodisuccinic acid enhances antioxidant and mineral element accumulation in young leaves of Ziziphus jujuba
  31. Cytotoxic activity of guaiane-type sesquiterpene lactone (deoxycynaropicrin) isolated from the leaves of Centaurothamnus maximus
  32. Effects of welding parameters on the angular distortion of welded steel plates
  33. Simulation of a reactor considering the Stamicarbon, Snamprogetti, and Toyo patents for obtaining urea
  34. Effect of different ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud) cultivars on the adsorption of heavy metal ions cadmium and lead in the remediation of contaminated farmland soils
  35. Impact of a live bacterial-based direct-fed microbial (DFM) postpartum and weaning system on performance, mortality, and health of Najdi lambs
  36. Anti-tumor effect of liposomes containing extracted Murrayafoline A against liver cancer cells in 2D and 3D cultured models
  37. Physicochemical properties and some mineral concentration of milk samples from different animals and altitudes
  38. Copper(ii) complexes supported by modified azo-based ligands: Nucleic acid binding and molecular docking studies
  39. Diagnostic and therapeutic radioisotopes in nuclear medicine: Determination of gamma-ray transmission factors and safety competencies of high-dense and transparent glassy shields
  40. Calculation of NaI(Tl) detector efficiency using 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K radioisotopes: Three-phase Monte Carlo simulation study
  41. Isolation and identification of unstable components from Caesalpinia sappan by high-speed counter-current chromatography combined with preparative high-performance liquid chromatography
  42. Quantification of biomarkers and evaluation of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cytotoxicity properties of Dodonaea viscosa grown in Saudi Arabia using HPTLC technique
  43. Characterization of the elastic modulus of ceramic–metal composites with physical and mechanical properties by ultrasonic technique
  44. GC-MS analysis of Vespa velutina auraria Smith and its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities in vitro
  45. Texturing of nanocoatings for surface acoustic wave-based sensors for volatile organic compounds
  46. Insights into the molecular basis of some chalcone analogues as potential inhibitors of Leishmania donovani: An integrated in silico and in vitro study
  47. (1R,2S,5R)-5-Methyl-2-(propan-2-yl)cyclohexyl 4-amino-3-phenylbutanoate hydrochloride: Synthesis and anticonvulsant activity
  48. On the relative extraction rates of colour compounds and caffeine during brewing, an investigation of tea over time and temperature
  49. Characterization of egg shell powder-doped ceramic–metal composites
  50. Rapeseed oil-based hippurate amide nanocomposite coating material for anticorrosive and antibacterial applications
  51. Chemically modified Teucrium polium (Lamiaceae) plant act as an effective adsorbent tool for potassium permanganate (KMnO4) in wastewater remediation
  52. Efficiency analysis of photovoltaic systems installed in different geographical locations
  53. Risk prioritization model driven by success factor in the light of multicriteria decision making
  54. Theoretical investigations on the excited-state intramolecular proton transfer in the solvated 2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde carbohydrazone
  55. Mechanical and gamma-ray shielding examinations of Bi2O3–PbO–CdO–B2O3 glass system
  56. Machine learning-based forecasting of potability of drinking water through adaptive boosting model
  57. The potential effect of the Rumex vesicarius water seeds extract treatment on mice before and during pregnancy on the serum enzymes and the histology of kidney and liver
  58. Impact of benzimidazole functional groups on the n-doping properties of benzimidazole derivatives
  59. Extraction of red pigment from Chinese jujube peel and the antioxidant activity of the pigment extracts
  60. Flexural strength and thermal properties of carbon black nanoparticle reinforced epoxy composites obtained from waste tires
  61. A focusing study on radioprotective and antioxidant effects of Annona muricata leaf extract in the circulation and liver tissue: Clinical and experimental studies
  62. Clinical comprehensive and experimental assessment of the radioprotective effect of Annona muricata leaf extract to prevent cellular damage in the ileum tissue
  63. Effect of WC content on ultrasonic properties, thermal and electrical conductivity of WC–Co–Ni–Cr composites
  64. Influence of various class cleaning agents for prosthesis on Co–Cr alloy surface
  65. The synthesis of nanocellulose-based nanocomposites for the effective removal of hexavalent chromium ions from aqueous solution
  66. Study on the influence of physical interlayers on the remaining oil production under different development modes
  67. Optimized linear regression control of DC motor under various disturbances
  68. Influence of different sample preparation strategies on hypothesis-driven shotgun proteomic analysis of human saliva
  69. Determination of flow distance of the fluid metal due to fluidity in ductile iron casting by artificial neural networks approach
  70. Investigation of mechanical activation effect on high-volume natural pozzolanic cements
  71. In vitro: Anti-coccidia activity of Calotropis procera leaf extract on Eimeria papillata oocysts sporulation and sporozoite
  72. Determination of oil composition of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) seeds under influence of organic fertilizer forms
  73. Activated partial thromboplastin time maybe associated with the prognosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma
  74. Treatment of rat brain ischemia model by NSCs-polymer scaffold transplantation
  75. Lead and cadmium removal with native yeast from coastal wetlands
  76. Characterization of electroless Ni-coated Fe–Co composite using powder metallurgy
  77. Ferrate synthesis using NaOCl and its application for dye removal
  78. Antioxidant, antidiabetic, and anticholinesterase potential of Chenopodium murale L. extracts using in vitro and in vivo approaches
  79. Study on essential oil, antioxidant activity, anti-human prostate cancer effects, and induction of apoptosis by Equisetum arvense
  80. Experimental study on turning machine with permanent magnetic cutting tool
  81. Numerical simulation and mathematical modeling of the casting process for pearlitic spheroidal graphite cast iron
  82. Design, synthesis, and cytotoxicity evaluation of novel thiophene, pyrimidine, pyridazine, and pyridine: Griseofulvin heterocyclic extension derivatives
  83. Isolation and identification of promising antibiotic-producing bacteria
  84. Ultrasonic-induced reversible blood–brain barrier opening: Safety evaluation into the cellular level
  85. Evaluation of phytochemical and antioxidant potential of various extracts from traditionally used medicinal plants of Pakistan
  86. Effect of calcium lactate in standard diet on selected markers of oxidative stress and inflammation in ovariectomized rats
  87. Identification of crucial salivary proteins/genes and pathways involved in pathogenesis of temporomandibular disorders
  88. Zirconium-modified attapulgite was used for removing of Cr(vi) in aqueous solution
  89. The stress distribution of different types of restorative materials in primary molar
  90. Reducing surface heat loss in steam boilers
  91. Deformation behavior and formability of friction stir processed DP600 steel
  92. Synthesis and characterization of bismuth oxide/commercial activated carbon composite for battery anode
  93. Phytochemical analysis of Ziziphus jujube leaf at different foliar ages based on widely targeted metabolomics
  94. Effects of in ovo injection of black cumin (Nigella sativa) extract on hatching performance of broiler eggs
  95. Separation and evaluation of potential antioxidant, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory activities of limonene-rich essential oils from Citrus sinensis (L.)
  96. Bioactivity of a polyhydroxy gorgostane steroid from Xenia umbellata
  97. BiCAM-based automated scoring system for digital logic circuit diagrams
  98. Analysis of standard systems with solar monitoring systems
  99. Structural and spectroscopic properties of voriconazole and fluconazole – Experimental and theoretical studies
  100. New plant resistance inducers based on polyamines
  101. Experimental investigation of single-lap bolted and bolted/bonded (hybrid) joints of polymeric plates
  102. Investigation of inlet air pressure and evaporative cooling of four different cogeneration cycles
  103. Review Articles
  104. Comprehensive review on synthesis, physicochemical properties, and application of activated carbon from the Arecaceae plants for enhanced wastewater treatment
  105. Research progress on speciation analysis of arsenic in traditional Chinese medicine
  106. Recent modified air-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction applications for medicines and organic compounds in various samples: A review
  107. An insight on Vietnamese bio-waste materials as activated carbon precursors for multiple applications in environmental protection
  108. Antimicrobial activities of the extracts and secondary metabolites from Clausena genus – A review
  109. Bioremediation of organic/heavy metal contaminants by mixed cultures of microorganisms: A review
  110. Sonodynamic therapy for breast cancer: A literature review
  111. Recent progress of amino acid transporters as a novel antitumor target
  112. Aconitum coreanum Rapaics: Botany, traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology
  113. Corrigendum
  114. Corrigendum to “Petrology and geochemistry of multiphase post-granitic dikes: A case study from the Gabal Serbal area, Southwestern Sinai, Egypt”
  115. Corrigendum to “Design of a Robust sliding mode controller for bioreactor cultures in overflow metabolism via an interdisciplinary approach”
  116. Corrigendum to “Statistical analysis on the radiological assessment and geochemical studies of granite rocks in the north of Um Taghir area, Eastern Desert, Egypt”
  117. Corrigendum to “Aroma components of tobacco powder from different producing areas based on gas chromatography ion mobility spectrometry”
  118. Corrigendum to “Mechanical properties, elastic moduli, transmission factors, and gamma-ray-shielding performances of Bi2O3–P2O5–B2O3–V2O5 quaternary glass system”
  119. Erratum
  120. Erratum to “Copper(ii) complexes supported by modified azo-based ligands: Nucleic acid binding and molecular docking studies”
  121. Special Issue on Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (ABB 2021)
  122. Study of solidification and stabilization of heavy metals by passivators in heavy metal-contaminated soil
  123. Human health risk assessment and distribution of VOCs in a chemical site, Weinan, China
  124. Preparation and characterization of Sparassis latifolia β-glucan microcapsules
  125. Special Issue on the Conference of Energy, Fuels, Environment 2020
  126. Improving the thermal performance of existing buildings in light of the requirements of the EU directive 2010/31/EU in Poland
  127. Special Issue on Ethnobotanical, Phytochemical and Biological Investigation of Medicinal Plants
  128. Study of plant resources with ethnomedicinal relevance from district Bagh, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan
  129. Studies on the chemical composition of plants used in traditional medicine in Congo
  130. Special Issue on Applied Chemistry in Agriculture and Food Science
  131. Strip spraying technology for precise herbicide application in carrot fields
  132. Special Issue on Pharmacology and Metabolomics of Ethnobotanical and Herbal Medicine
  133. Phytochemical profiling, antibacterial and antioxidant properties of Crocus sativus flower: A comparison between tepals and stigmas
  134. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of polyphenolics from Withania adpressa (Coss.) Batt. against selected drug-resistant bacterial strains
  135. Integrating network pharmacology and molecular docking to explore the potential mechanism of Xinguan No. 3 in the treatment of COVID-19
  136. Chemical composition and in vitro and in vivo biological assortment of fixed oil extracted from Ficus benghalensis L.
  137. A review of the pharmacological activities and protective effects of Inonotus obliquus triterpenoids in kidney diseases
  138. Ethnopharmacological study of medicinal plants in Kastamonu province (Türkiye)
  139. Protective effects of asperuloside against cyclophosphamide-induced urotoxicity and hematotoxicity in rats
  140. Special Issue on Essential Oil, Extraction, Phytochemistry, Advances, and Application
  141. Identification of volatile compounds and antioxidant, antibacterial, and antifungal properties against drug-resistant microbes of essential oils from the leaves of Mentha rotundifolia var. apodysa Briq. (Lamiaceae)
  142. Phenolic contents, anticancer, antioxidant, and antimicrobial capacities of MeOH extract from the aerial parts of Trema orientalis plant
  143. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils from Mentha pulegium and Rosmarinus officinalis against multidrug-resistant microbes and their acute toxicity study
  144. Special Issue on Marine Environmental Sciences and Significance of the Multidisciplinary Approaches
  145. An insightful overview of the distribution pattern of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in the marine sediments of the Red Sea
  146. Antifungal–antiproliferative norcycloartane-type triterpenes from the Red Sea green alga Tydemania expeditionis
  147. Solvent effect, dipole moment, and DFT studies of multi donor–acceptor type pyridine derivative
  148. An extensive assessment on the distribution pattern of organic contaminants in the aerosols samples in the Middle East
  149. Special Issue on 4th IC3PE
  150. Energetics of carboxylic acid–pyridine heterosynthon revisited: A computational study of intermolecular hydrogen bond domination on phenylacetic acid–nicotinamide cocrystals
  151. A review: Silver–zinc oxide nanoparticles – organoclay-reinforced chitosan bionanocomposites for food packaging
  152. Green synthesis of magnetic activated carbon from peanut shells functionalized with TiO2 photocatalyst for Batik liquid waste treatment
  153. Coagulation activity of liquid extraction of Leucaena leucocephala and Sesbania grandiflora on the removal of turbidity
  154. Hydrocracking optimization of palm oil over NiMoO4/activated carbon catalyst to produce biogasoline and kerosine
  155. Special Issue on Pharmacology and metabolomics of ethnobotanical and herbal medicine
  156. Cynarin inhibits PDGF-BB-induced proliferation and activation in hepatic stellate cells through PPARγ
  157. Special Issue on The 1st Malaysia International Conference on Nanotechnology & Catalysis (MICNC2021)
  158. Surfactant evaluation for enhanced oil recovery: Phase behavior and interfacial tension
  159. Topical Issue on phytochemicals, biological and toxicological analysis of aromatic medicinal plants
  160. Phytochemical analysis of leaves and stems of Physalis alkekengi L. (Solanaceae)
  161. Phytochemical and pharmacological profiling of Trewia nudiflora Linn. leaf extract deciphers therapeutic potentials against thrombosis, arthritis, helminths, and insects
  162. Pergularia tomentosa coupled with selenium nanoparticles salvaged lead acetate-induced redox imbalance, inflammation, apoptosis, and disruption of neurotransmission in rats’ brain
  163. Protective effect of Allium atroviolaceum-synthesized SeNPs on aluminum-induced brain damage in mice
  164. Mechanism study of Cordyceps sinensis alleviates renal ischemia–reperfusion injury
  165. Plant-derived bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloid tetrandrine prevents human podocyte injury by regulating the miR-150-5p/NPHS1 axis
  166. Network pharmacology combined with molecular docking to explore the anti-osteoporosis mechanisms of β-ecdysone derived from medicinal plants
  167. Chinese medicinal plant Polygonum cuspidatum ameliorates silicosis via suppressing the Wnt/β-catenin pathway
  168. Special Issue on Advanced Nanomaterials for Energy, Environmental and Biological Applications - Part I
  169. Investigation of improved optical and conductivity properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)–MXenes (PMMA–MXenes) nanocomposite thin films for optoelectronic applications
  170. Special Issue on Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (ABB 2022)
  171. Model predictive control for precision irrigation of a Quinoa crop
Heruntergeladen am 20.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/chem-2022-0201/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen