Home Enhancing the ability of rice to adapt and grow under saline stress using selected halotolerant rhizobacterial nitrogen fixer
Article Open Access

Enhancing the ability of rice to adapt and grow under saline stress using selected halotolerant rhizobacterial nitrogen fixer

  • Tualar Simarmata EMAIL logo , Mieke Rochimi Setiawati , Betty Natalie Fitriatin , Diyan Herdiyantoro and Fiqriah Hanum Khumairah EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 3, 2023

Abstract

Salinity stress has become the major devastating constraint for rice growth. Halotolerant rhizobacterial nitrogen fixer (HRNF) was investigated for increasing the nitrogenase activity (NA), organic acid (OA), gibberellic acid (GA), and indole 3-acetic acid (IAA) productions, seedling growth, and rice yield. Six N fixers were isolated using Ashby’s (Ab1, Ab2, and Ab3) and Okon’s media (Az1, Az2, and Az3). Furthermore, bioassay was carried out using rice seedling grown on nitrogen-free medium. The Ab3 and Az2 isolates were selected and biomolecularly identified as Pseudomonas stutzeri and Klebsiella pneumoniae, respectively. These selected bacteria were used as active ingredients for Halotolerant rhizobacterial inoculant (HRI) dosage trials (0, 500, 1,000, and 1,500 g ha−1) on simple pot experiments. The Az group isolates had 3–5 times higher ability in fixing N and producing OA, GA, and IAA than the Ab group isolates. Furthermore, N-uptake, number of panicles, filled grain, and the rice yield of HRI treated pots were significantly increased. Application of 1,000–1,500 g HRI ha−1 had resulted in a significant increase in the yield of rice grain (26.10–28.27 g plant−1 or 15.4–25.09%) which was higher than the control. This result concludes that HRI could contribute in enhancing the ability of rice to adapt and grow under saline stress.

1 Introduction

Salinity stress is one of the most devastating problems for rice cultivation in coastal areas and causes major significant reduction in their growth and yield along with decreased crop yield and soil quality [13]. The tolerance of rice variety to salt stress differs; however, most of the high yielding ones are generally intolerant to saline conditions [4,5]. Rice fields in Indonesia that are affected by salinity stress are increasing continuously and to some extent have become unproductive soils, particularly in dry season [6]. Furthermore, the increasing salinity level could inhibit plant photosynthesis, protein synthesis, and lipid metabolism which leads to a reduction in crop yield [79]. High salt content in the soil produces a negative effect on the nutrient balance and uptake by plants which causes osmotic stress [1012]. Therefore, agricultural practices are forced to be more intensive in producing enough food for the rapidly growing population by combating soil degradation, salinization, and desertification of agricultural soils. Such circumstances require suitable biotechnology not only to improve crop yield but also soil health through interactions between plant roots and soil microorganisms [13,14].

New strategies have been developed to alleviate the salinity and other toxic effects on crop growth and yield, including the application of environmentally friendly fertilizers, known as beneficial microorganism [8,15,16]. Recent studies have revealed promising results on the application of the plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for alleviating both biotic and abiotic stress [1720]. Moreover, the PGPR is one of the best alternatives in reducing salinity stress on crop growth [2123]. PGPR is a group of free living saprophytic bacterial microorganisms that live in the plant rhizosphere and colonize their root system. Furthermore, these microbes colonize the seeds or roots and gain support from the root exudates that are rich in carbohydrates, amino acids, and other growth substances. The PGPR generally provides the plant with a compound that is synthesized by the bacterium for facilitating the uptake of nutrients from the environment [2426]. In addition, it increases germination rates, root length, growth characteristic (leaf area, chlorophyll content), nutrient uptake, and yield. Protein content and the tolerance to drought and salt stress were also increased significantly. Furthermore, the presence of this PGPR that has tolerance to the saline ecosystem and improves the growth of the crop also belongs to different genera bacteria (Rhizobium, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Pantoea, Paenibacillus, Burkholderia, Achromobacter, Azospirillum, Microbacterium, Methylobacterium, Variovorax, Enterobacter) [8,27,28]. The use of these microorganisms could alleviate saline stress and open different new and emerging applications.

Nitrogen is one of the most important elements for rice farming, and its application is directly proportional to the yield of this crop. However, intensive use of inorganic N fertilizer would accelerate the decomposition of soil organic matter. In addition, this crop is less responsive to the increased use of fertilizers which is also known as levelling off [29,30].

The aim of this study is to find the superior potential halotolerant N fixer PGPR that has the ability to fix nitrogen, produce organic acid (OA) and phytohormone (gibberellic acid; GA and indole 3-acetic acid; IAA), and also to increase the growth and yield of rice. The selected superior potential isolates of Halotolerant rhizobacterial nitrogen fixer (HRFN) were meant to be used as consortia of halotolerant rhizobacteria inoculant (HRI), and as bioagent (BA) or microbial fertilizers (MFs) for increasing the growth and yield of rice under salinity stress.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Isolates of HRNF PGPR

The composite soil samples were taken for the isolation of HRNF from paddy rhizosphere at different salinity levels in Muara Baru Village, Karawang District, West Java Province, Indonesia. Furthermore, the isolation of HRNF was carried out using a series of plate dilution and salinized Ashby’s nitrogen free media at 6 dS m−1 (moderately saline) which was modified from that reported by Rao [31]. It consists of 20 g mannitol, 0.2 g K2HPO4, 0.2 g NaCl, 0.2 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.1 g K2SO4, and 5.0 g CaCO3 [32]. Afterwards, it was diluted in 1 L distilled water to obtain HRNF isolates of Az1, Az2, and Az3 (Table 1).

Table 1

HRNFs isolated from different salinity levels

Isolates Electrical conductivity (dS m−1) Soil salinity
Ab1 and Az1 <2 dS m−1 Low
Ab2 and Az2 4–6 dS m−1 Medium
Ab3 and Az3 >6–8 dS m−1 High

Subsequently, the biochemical activity of all isolates was analyzed to measure the nitrogenase activity (NA), the production growth substance IAA, GA, and OA. The highest NA of isolate from each group was chosen for biomolecular identification in the Laboratory of Biotechnology Research Center in Bogor. Furthermore, the selected isolates were used as active ingredient for the formulation of HRI in the form of powder with the base ingredients being 50% peat + 17.5% compost + 17.5% biochar + 5% dolomite + 5% guano + 5% nutrition.

2.2 Activity of enzyme nitrogenase

The acetylene reduction assay method was used to measure the NA [33] and all isolates were cultured in a nutrient broth. 0.5 ml culture of each isolate were added to vials individually and incubated for 48 h at 22°C in a thermostatic incubator. A gastight syringe was used to exchange 10% of the air volume from the respective assay vessel with acetylene. Five minutes after the addition of acetylene, subsequently 500 µL of gas sample was taken and injected into the gas chromatography (Model DS 6200). Furthermore, the determination of the calibration curve was carried out by injecting 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 µL of ethylene standard into the gas chromatography. The concentration of ethylene was measured with a calibration curve.

2.3 Production of OA, GA, and IAA

OA, GA, and IAA production were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [34]. OA determination was analyzed by reversed phase chromatography using a GraceSmart RP 18.5 μ column, and was read at λ = 210 nm. Quantification was done by comparing the peak heights of the standard compound of lactate, pyruvate, succinate, and malate [35]. GA and IAA analysis used a nutrient broth for culturing the isolates which was then incubated at 28°C for 3 days. Subsequently, isolate suspension (20 mL) was taken and centrifuged at 8,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C and about 1 L of supernatant was extracted with 100 μL of ether for three times. Finally, the extracted samples were added with 60% methanol and 10 μL of extract solution was taken and injected into a column chromatograph that is equipped with a different ultraviolet detector (280 nm). Furthermore, the quantification of the measured parameter was calculated by comparing peak heights.

2.4 Rice seedling growth

The bioassay on the growth of the rice seedling of Mekongga variety was conducted from 30th May to 15th June 2017 in the biofertilizers production unit, Arthauly in Bandung. The experiment was arranged as a completely randomized design consisting of six N-fixer bacterial isolates (Ab1, Ab2, Ab3, Az1, Az2, and Az3) and replicated three times. Furthermore, the Yoshida-free N medium was used for the experiment [36]. About 5 mL of Yoshida medium that contains 10 ppm of phosphorus (P), 40 ppm of potassium (K), 40 ppm of calcium (Ca), 40 ppm of magnesium (Mg), and enriched with micronutrient (B, Fe, Mn, Cu) were filled in a tube (100 mL vol) and sterilized at 121°C and 15 Psi in autoclave. Subsequently, the medium was inoculated with 1 mL of isolate suspension (109 CFU). The rice seeds were sterilized with 0.02% HgCl2 for 1 min and then washed with aquadest and germinated in a Petri dish for 5 days. Furthermore, they were then planted in the Yoshida medium in the tube. The observed responses consist of the shoot height which was measured from the base of the stem to the tip of the leaf, the root length which was measured from the base to the tip of the root, and the plant dry weight which was measured on the 14th day after sowing.

2.5 Bioassay of HRI on N uptake and rice grain yield

Simple bioassay consisting of four dosages of inoculant consortia of Ab3 and Az2 (0, 500, 1,000 and 1,500 g ha−1) such as MF or BA with three replications was carried out to investigate the contribution of selected HRI in improving the growth and yield of rice at the Agricultural Extension Station in Cilamaya Wetan in Karawang District (6°.15′44″, 107°34′24″, located about 0.5 m above sea level). The selected isolates were active ingredient of HRI and were identified biomolecularly. The HRI was prepared by 35 mL of the inoculant suspension containing about 109 CFU mL−1 of HRI into an aluminum sachet containing 65 g of powder organic based carrier (45% peat soil, 25% biochar, 25% compost, 5% additive). In addition, the final weight of the inoculant was 100 g sachet−1. The experimental pots (10 L) were filled with 8 kg of soil media and the water content was maintained at a saturated condition. The treatments (100 g of inoculant) which were diluted in 10 kg of fine compost and mixed homogeneously were placed at the planting area. Subsequently, two rice seedlings (21 days old) of Inpari 34 variety were planted and the water levels were maintained at 2 cm high. Furthermore, all the experimental pots were placed under field condition. 500 kg ha−1 of compost was applied together with bacterial inoculant, while the mixed inorganic fertilizer (200 kg urea, 100 kg SP-36, and 100 kg of KCl ha−1) applications were placed 3–5 cm into the soil with about 10 cm from the rice plant on the 15th and 42nd days after planting. The water level of the pots was maintained at 2 cm high, and the factors that were observed include nitrogen uptake [37], percentage of filled grain, and grain yield pot−1.

2.6 Statistical analysis

The completely randomized design or simple bioassay of the pot experiment was arranged for the observed data and statistically analyzed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS; SAS Institute, North Carolina State University). Furthermore, the F-Test was carried out to show the significant effects on the tested variables. Finally, the Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT) or least significant difference (LSD) at P < 0.05 were also carried out [38].

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Biochemical activity and selected isolates molecular identification

The results showed that the selected indigenous N-fixer isolates had the ability to fix N2 (Table 2). Furthermore, the relatively high NA (117–121 µM mL−1 h−1) was recorded from the isolates of Az1, Az2, and Az3. The NA ranged from 24 to 29 µM mL−1 ha−1 in the isolates of Ab1, Ab2, and Ab3, which was significantly lower. Moreover, Table 2 showed that the Az isolates had the ability to produce relatively high OA (lactate, pyruvate, succinate, and malate), GA, and IAA compared to the Ab isolates group.

Table 2

NA, OA, GA, and IAA of HRNF isolates

Isolates NA (µMmL−1 ha−1) OA (µMmL−1 ha−1) GA (ppm) IAA (ppm) Method
Lactate Pyruvate Succinate Malate
Ab1 24 0 1 2 4 1 10 HPLC
Ab2 26 0 2 4 2 1 12 HPLC
Ab3 29 0 1 5 2 2 11 HPLC
Az1 117 11 17 11 24 16 96 HPLC
Az2 119 21 56 70 96 28 112 HPLC
Az3 121 34 24 21 19 11 75 HPLC

The results showed that the biochemical activity of Az isolates was higher and more superior than the Ab isolates. Therefore, for further research based on the ability to fix nitrogen (NA), the Ab3 and Az2 isolates were chosen as representative ingredient for each group to formulate HRI or PGPR bioagent for alleviating the salinity stress. Subsequently, isolates of Ab3 and Az2 have been identified biomolecularly as Pseudomonas stutzeri (98.88% similarity) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (99.63% similarity), respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1 
                  Molecular identification and nucleotide sequences of Halotolerant NFB isolates (Ab3 – Pseudomonas stutzeri) and Az2 – (Klebsiella pneumonia).
Figure 1

Molecular identification and nucleotide sequences of Halotolerant NFB isolates (Ab3Pseudomonas stutzeri) and Az2 – (Klebsiella pneumonia).

3.2 Salinity effect on the growth of rice seedlings

The growth of rice seedling (shoot height, root length, and biomass) of the Mekongga variety was decreased due to the increase in the salinity (Tables 35).

Table 3

Effect of HRNF isolates on shoot height (cm) of Mekongga rice seedlings under different salinity stress

Isolates of HRNF ECe
s 1 ≤ 2 dS m−1 s 2 = 4 to <6 dS m−1 s 3 ≥ 6–8 dS m−1
Ab1 29.27 a 29.27 a 15.73 b
Ab2 30.40 a 25.70 a 12.53 ab
Ab3 31.90 a 28.73 a 11.73 ab
Az1 31.33 a 28.10 a 16.50 b
Az2 31.77 a 26.30 a 15.76 b
Az3 30.77 a 27.83 a 9.67 a

Mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at DMRT of 5% (p = 0.05). ECe – electrical conductivity.

Table 4

Effect of HRNF isolates on root length (cm) of Mekongga rice seedlings under different salinity stress

Isolates of HRNF ECe
s 1 ≤2 dS m−1 s 2 = 4 to <6 dS m−1 s 3 ≥6–8 dS m−1
Ab1 5.90 b 5.17 ab 3.03 ab
Ab2 4.33 ab 5.00 ab 2.80 a
Ab3 5.33 ab 5.93 b 2.73 a
Az1 3.07 a 4.40 ab 4.37 b
Az2 4.00 ab 4.03 a 2.13 a
Az3 4.60 ab 3.47 ab 1.83 a

Mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at DMRT of 5% (p = 0.05). ECe – electrical conductivity.

Table 5

Effect HRNF isolates on the dry weight (biomass) of Mekongga rice seedlings under different saline stress at 14 days after sowing

Isolates of HRNF ECe
s 1 ≤2 dS m−1 s 2 = 4–6 dS m−1 s 3 ≥6–8 dS m−1
Ab1 92.33 a 83.33 b 60.00 b
Ab2 110.00 a 126.67 b 36.67 ab
Ab3 126.67 a 160.00 c 83.33 b
Az1 106.67 a 136.67 b 60.00 b
Az2 130.00 a 63.33 a 53.33 b
Az3 103.33 a 110.00 b 20.00 a

Mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at DMRT of 5% (p = 0.05). ECe – electrical conductivity.

The shoot height of the rice seedling was not significantly different due to the inoculation of N-fixer at 2–4 dS m−1 of electrical conductivity (ECe), while the lowest shoot height at 6 ECe was recorded due to the inoculation of Az3 (9.67 cm). Furthermore, the high shoot height of the rice seedling occurred due to the inoculation of Ab1, Az1, and Az2 at higher salinity (ECe = 6 dS m−1). Furthermore, the root length was affected differently by the inoculation of N-fixers. From low to medium salinity levels (2–4 dS m−1), the lowest root length was recorded in Az1 and the resulted highest root length was about 4.37 cm at the high salinity levels (ECe = 6 dS m−1) but not significantly different with Ab1.

Either Ab (Ab1, Ab2, and Ab3) or Az isolates (Az1, Az2, and Az3) resulted in indifferent biomass (dry weight) during the 14 days seedling period at lower salinity level (ECe = 2 dS m−1). Furthermore, the different effects of N-fixer inoculation were found at the higher salinity level (4–6 dS m−1). The highest biomass was recorded by inoculation with the isolates of Ab3 and the lowest was found with Az2 at the medium salinity level (ECe = 4–6 dS m−1). At the higher salinity level (ECe ≥ 6–8 dS m−1), the high biomass was obtained by the inoculation of the isolates of Ab1, Ab3, and Az1 and the lowest was obtained by Az3. This result indicated that the presence of N-fixers as PGPR could enhance the ability of rice seedling to adapt and grow under salinity stress.

The ability of HRNF to fix nitrogen from the atmosphere is seen in the NA and the production of OA, IAA, and GA. However, this activity is affected by the increasing level of salinity which is seen in the reduction in rice development.

The presence of PGPR isolates in the growth medium alleviates the effects of salinity on Mekongga by producing enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase. Furthermore, ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting bacteria have been documented to facilitate the growth of a variety of plants under high salinity conditions.

3.3 Bioassay of HRI on rice grain yield

Consortia of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas stutzeri as HRI had a significant effect on the increasing N uptake (content and total uptake, number of panicles, filled grain, and rice grain yield) (Table 6). The performance of rice growth was better visually than control (the leaf was greener and the performance was more healthy or robust). Furthermore, the increasing dosage of HRI had enhanced all the observed responses significantly. The highest results were obtained by the application of 1,000–1,500 g inoculant of HRI which resulted in the rice grain yield of about 26.10–28.27 g plant−1 (15.4–25.09% higher than control). This result was supported by the N uptake (4.75–5.26 g plant−1), number of panicles (22.92–26.92 plant−1), and filled grain (65.68–69.75%) or about 37.8–52.5%, 15.8–41.1%, and 15.1–39.3% higher than control, respectively. The soil physical-chemical properties were soil texture, namely, silty clay, acid soil (pH = 5.04), medium organic carbon content (2.44% Org-C), medium total nitrogen (0.25% N), high content of exchangeable Na (2.01 cmol kg−1), high salinity (ECe = 6.64 dS m−1), very low base saturation (14.24%).

Table 6

Effective dosage of HRI on N uptake (50 days old), number of panicles, filled grain and rice grain yield on saline soils in Cilamaya Wetan

Dosage of HRI (ha−1) N-uptake Panicle Nr. (panicle plant−1) Filled g rain (%) Rice grain yield
(%) g plant−1 g plant−1 Increment (%)
D 0 = 0 g 2.77 a (±0.07) 3.45 a (± 0.48) 19.08 a (±2.47) 57.08 a (±5.8) 22.60 a (±0.38)
D 1 = 500 g 2.82 a (±0.11) 4.44 b (± 0.53) 21.58 a (±2.04) 61.66 a (±6.21) 23.63 a (±0.34) 4.5
D 2 = 1,000 g 2.95 a (±0.11) 4.75 b (±0.62) 22.92 b (±1.63) 65.68 b (±2.71) 26.10 b (±0.93) 15.4
D 3 = 1,500 g 3.01 b (±0.08) 5.26 b (±0.75) 26.92 b (±1.01) 69.75 b (±1.22) 28.27 b (±1.00) 25.09

Mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at LSD of 5% (p = 0.05).

4 Discussion

4.1 Biochemical activity

The presence of bacteria isolated in rice rhizosphere could contribute to the availability of nitrogen, production growth substances (GA and IAA), and OA that are important for the increase in plant growth and to improve the health of rhizobiome [13,14,19,39]. Furthermore, the capacity to fix N is highly dependent on the NA [30]. The biological nitrogen fixation by bacteria are dominant in the rice rhizosphere particularly in flooded soil ecosystem [40]. The amount of soil microbes in rhizosphere are usually affected by the root exudates (sugars and amino acids), and this leads to the reduction in N2 to NH3 catalyzed by nitrogenase enzyme. Consequently, it is highly affected by the O2 concentration. The high respiration activity in rhizosphere and the protection of nitrogenase enzyme in the cells might possibly lead to the higher activity of nitrogenase enzyme [41]. In addition, the six isolates had the ability to synthesize enzyme nitrogenase, OA, GA, and IAA (Table 2). Therefore, this N-fixer bacterial isolates could increase plant growth, thereby, promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) [28,42].

The presence of IAA, gibberellins, and other growth factors produced by the PGPR increases the root length and tip numbers which contribute to the increase in the nutrients uptake and the health of the plant [7,26]. Furthermore, the PGPR contributed in improving the growth of various crops (tomato, pepper, canola, bean, lettuce, and other food crops) under saline ecosystem [4345]. Pseudomonas stutzeri and Klebsiella pneumoniae are well known as N-fixer rhizobacteria or PGPR [4648].

4.2 Salinity effect on the growth of rice seedling

The existence of PGPR of HRNF as functional microbes are undoubtedly placed under saline soil stress. Generally, most rice seeds, such as Mekongga, are usually salt sensitive especially in their early growth stage [49].

Salinity increases the osmotic potential of growth medium and as a result, seeds require more energy to absorb water, resulting in decreased germination [2,9,50,51]. However, when the seeds were inoculated with the PGPR suspension, their growth continued to increase even at a lower rate. Nia et al. [52] studied the effect of inoculation of PGPR isolated from saline or non-saline soil on yield components of wheat and they observed that inoculation with the two isolates increased salinity tolerance of wheat plants. Furthermore, the saline-adapted isolate significantly increased the shoot dry weight under severe water salinity. Plant homoeostasis was regulated by ethylene phytohormone endogenously and caused the reduction in root and shoot growth under high salinity.

The plant ACC deaminase was sequestered and degraded by bacterial cells to supply nitrogen. Moreover, removing ACC deaminase is good for plants because it reduces the harmful effects from ethylene, alleviating stress and improving the crops’ growth [22,25]. Higher K+/Na+ ratio also has an effect on the reduction in electrolyte leakage and a decreased uptake of Na+ in order to prevent plants from being exposed to high salt salinity [42,53].

4.3 Effect of HRI on rice grain yield

Pseudomonas stutzeri and Klebsiella pneumoniae played a significant role in alleviating salinity stress, growth, and crop yield [4648,54,55]. In addition, the application of ameliorant combined with HRI as a BA could increase the effectiveness of the inoculant and the growth of rice significantly [14].

5 Conclusion

The isolates of Az1, Az2, and Az3 have a high ability to fix N, produce OA and phytohormone (IAA and GA) compared to the isolates of Ab group (Ab1, Ab2, and Ab3). The highest biomass of rice seedling with about 160 and 83.3 g tube−1 was obtained from treated seeds with the inoculation of Ab3 at a medium–high salinity level, respectively. The consortia application of HRI (Pseudomonas stutzeri and Klebsiella pneumoniae) was able to increase the N-uptake, number of panicles, filled gain, and rice grain yield significantly. Furthermore, the application of 1,000–1,500 g ha−1 of HRI was able to produce rice grain yield of about 26.10–28.27 g plant−1 (15.4–25.09% higher than control). This result concludes that the presence of HRI as BA or MFs could enhance the ability of rice to adapt and grow under saline field conditions. HRI could contribute to enhance the rice ability to adapt and grow on saline soils.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful for financial support of Academic Leadership Grant (ALG) program of Padjadjaran University and to late Mr. Sudjana Brilyan for his excellent work and contribution for this research.

  1. Funding information: The study was financed with sources from Academic Leadership Grant (ALG) program of Padjadjaran University.

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Arora NK, Fatima T, Mishra J, Mishra I, Verma S, Verma R, et al. Halo-tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for improving productivity and remediation of saline soils. J Adv Res [Internet]. 2020;26:69–82. 10.1016/j.jare.2020.07.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] Nadeem SM, Ahmad M, Zahir ZA, Javaid A, Ashraf M. The role of mycorrhizae and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving crop productivity under stressful environments. Biotechnol Adv [Internet]. 2014;32(2):429–48. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Saghafi D, Delangiz N, Lajayer B, Ghorbanpour M. An overview on improvement of crop productivity in saline soils by halotolerant and halophilic PGPRs. 3 Biotech. 2019;9(7):1–4.10.1007/s13205-019-1799-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Backer R, Rokem JS, Ilangumaran G, Lamont J, Praslickova D, Ricci E, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2018;871(October):1–17.10.3389/fpls.2018.01473Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Kormanik P. Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots. Methods and principles of mycorrhizal research; 1982. p. 37–46.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Setiawati MR, Suryatmana P, Hindersah R, Fitriatin BN, Nurbaity A, Herdiyantoro D, et al. Characteristic and capability of plant growth promoting endophytic bacteria of rice plant tissue in saline ecosystem. Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Env Sci. 2018;20(3):791–7.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Egamberdieva D, Kucharova Z. Selection for root colonising bacteria stimulating wheat growth in saline soils. Biol Fertil Soils. 2009;45(6):563–71.10.1007/s00374-009-0366-ySearch in Google Scholar

[8] Li X, Xu M, Christie P, Li X, Zhang J. Large elevation and small host plant differences in the arbuscular mycorrhizal communities of montane and alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau. Mycorrhiza. 2018;28(7):605–19.10.1007/s00572-018-0850-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Panda A, Parida AK. Saline soil-based agriculture by halotolerant microorganisms. Saline soil-based agric by halotolerant microorg; 2019. p. 75–101.10.1007/978-981-13-8335-9_4Search in Google Scholar

[10] Khumairah FH, Setiawati MR, Fitriatin BN, Simarmata T, Alfaraj S, Ansari MJ, et al. Halotolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from saline soil improve nitrogen fixation and alleviate salt stress in rice plants. Front Microbiol. 2022;13(June):1–14.10.3389/fmicb.2022.905210Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Setiawati MR, Al-Azmiya NU, Khumairah FH, Simarmata T. Halotolerant N-fixing bacteria isolates for increasing the biochemical activity, total bacteria population, N-uptake and rice seedling growth. First Asian PGPR Indonesian Chapter International e-Conference 2021 [Internet]; 2022. p. 1–12. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Chaudhary DR, Rathore AP, Sharma S. Effect of halotolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria inoculation on soil microbial community structure and nutrients. Appl Soil Ecol [Internet]. 2020;150(November):103461. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103461.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Athallah FN, Dinar U, Fitriatin B, Simarmata T. Synergism bioassay of selected indigenous halotolerant phosphorizobacteria from rice rhizosphere on saline soil ecosystem. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. vol. 205, Issue 1, 2018. p. 012014.10.1088/1755-1315/205/1/012014Search in Google Scholar

[14] Simarmata T, Turmuktini T, Fitriatin B, Setiawati M. Application of bioameliorant and biofertilizers to increase the soil health and rice productivity. HAYATI J Biosci. 2016;23(4):181–4.10.1016/j.hjb.2017.01.001Search in Google Scholar

[15] Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta. 2003;218(1):1–14.10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Mukherjee P, Mitra A, Roy M. Halomonas rhizobacteria of Avicennia marina of Indian sundarbans promote rice growth under saline and heavy metal stresses through exopolysaccharide production. Front Microbiol. 2019;10(May):1–18.10.3389/fmicb.2019.01207Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Dimkpa C, Weinand T, Asch F. Plant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Env. 2009;32(12):1682–94.10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02028.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Setiawati M, Prayoga M, Stöber S, Adinata K, Simarmata T. Performance of rice paddy varieties under various organic soil fertility strategies. Open Agric. 2020;5(1):509–15.10.1515/opag-2020-0050Search in Google Scholar

[19] Simarmata T, Fitriatin B, Setiawati MR, Herdiyantoro D, Suryatmana P, Hindersah R, et al. Development and formulation of beneficial rhizobacteria consortia to improve soil health and agricultural practice sustainability in Indonesia. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Prospects for sustainable agriculture; 2019. p. 63–74.10.1007/978-981-13-6790-8_4Search in Google Scholar

[20] Orhan F. Alleviation of salt stress by halotolerant and halophilic plant growth-promoting bacteria in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Braz J Microbiol. 2016;47:621–7.10.1016/j.bjm.2016.04.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Yao L, Wu Z, Zheng Y, Kaleem I, Li C. Growth promotion and protection against salt stress by Pseudomonas putida Rs-198 on cotton. Eur J Soil Biol. 2010;46(1):49–54.10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.11.002Search in Google Scholar

[22] Albdaiwi RN, Khyami-Horani H, Ayad JY, Alananbeh KM, Al-Sayaydeh R. Isolation and characterization of halotolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from durum wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum) cultivated in saline areas of the dead sea region. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;10(July):1–16.10.3389/fmicb.2019.01639Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Abbas R, Rasul S, Aslam K, Baber M, Shahid M, Mubeen F, et al. Halotolerant PGPR: A hope for cultivation of saline soils. J King Saud Univ - Sci [Internet]. 2019;31(4):1195–201. 10.1016/j.jksus.2019.02.019.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Sunita K, Mishra I, Mishra J, Prakash J, Arora NK. Secondary metabolites from halotolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for ameliorating salinity stress in plants. Front Microbiol. 2020;11(October):1–12.10.3389/fmicb.2020.567768Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Glick BR, Todorovic B, Czarny J, Cheng Z, Duan J, McConkey B. Promotion of plant growth by bacterial ACC deaminase. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2007;26(5–6):227–42.10.1080/07352680701572966Search in Google Scholar

[26] Egamberdieva D, Wirth S, Bellingrath-Kimura SD, Mishra J, Arora NK. Salt-tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for enhancing crop productivity of saline soils. Front Microbiol. 2019;10(December):1–18.10.3389/fmicb.2019.02791Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] Grover M, Ali SZ, Sandhya V, Rasul A, Venkateswarlu B. Role of microorganisms in adaptation of agriculture crops to abiotic stresses. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;27(5):1231–40.10.1007/s11274-010-0572-7Search in Google Scholar

[28] Arya CK, Singh B, Purohit RC, Singh J. Socio-economic status of the farmers in canal command area of Som-Kagdar irrigation project of Udaipur, Rajasthan. Int J Agric Stat Sci. 2012;8(1):63–72.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Nungkat P, Kusuma Z, Handayanto E. Effects of organic matter application on methane emission from paddy fields adopting organic farming system. J Degrad Min Lands Manag 2(2):303. 2015;2(3):361–7.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Simarmata T, Setiawati M, Herdiyantoro D, Fitriatin B. Managing of organic-biofertilizers nutrient based and water saving technology for restoring the soil health and enhancing the sustainability of rice production in Indonesia. IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environmental Science. vol. 205; 2018. p. 012051.10.1088/1755-1315/205/1/012051Search in Google Scholar

[31] Rao NSS. Soil microorganisms and plant growth (No. Ed. 3). Science Publishers, Inc; 1995.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Okon Y, Albrecht SL, Burris RH. Methods for growing Spirillum lipoferum and for counting it in pure culture and in association with plants. Appl Env Microbiol. 1977;33(1):85–8.10.1128/aem.33.1.85-88.1977Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[33] Hackl E, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Kandeler E. Nitrogen dynamics in different types of pasture in the Austrian Alps. Biol Fertil Soils. 2000;32(4):321–7.10.1007/s003740000255Search in Google Scholar

[34] Shahab S, Ahmed N, Khan NS. PSB tested in plant growth. Afr J Agric Res [Internet]. 2009;4(11):1312–6. https://academicjournals.org/article/article1380959702_Shahab et al.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Khumairah FH, Nurbaity A, Setiawati MR, Fitriatin BN, Simarmata T. The ability of phosphorhizobacteria isolates to produce organic acid and promote phosphatase activity to increase the growth of maize (Zea mays L.) in selected medium. IOP Conf Ser Earth Env Sci. 2019;334(1).10.1088/1755-1315/334/1/012023Search in Google Scholar

[36] Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH. Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice; 1971.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Bremner M. Chapter 37: Nitrogen-Total. Methods Soil Anal Part 3. 1996 (5):1085–121. Chem Methods-SSSA B Ser 5.10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c37Search in Google Scholar

[38] Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd edn. John Wiley Sons; 1984.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Sharma S, Kulkarni J, Jha B. Halotolerant rhizobacteria promote growth and enhance salinity tolerance in peanut. Front Microbiol. 2016;7(Oct):1–11.10.3389/fmicb.2016.01600Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[40] Shrestha RK, Maskey SL. Associative nitrogen fixation in lowland rice. Nepal Agric Res J. 1970;6:112–21.10.3126/narj.v6i0.3373Search in Google Scholar

[41] Gadhave PP, Dighe NS, Pattan SR, Deotarse P, Musmade DS, Shete RV. Scholars Research Library Current biological and synthetic profile of Triazoles: A review. Sch Res Libr Ann Biol Res. 2010;1(1):82–9.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Bhat MA, Kumar V, Bhat MA, Wani IA, Dar FL, Farooq I, et al. Mechanistic insights of the interaction of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) with plant roots toward enhancing plant productivity by alleviating salinity stress. Front Microbiol. 2020;11(August):1–20.10.3389/fmicb.2020.01952Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[43] Barassi CA, Ayrault G, Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Sobrero MT. Seed inoculation with Azospirillum mitigates NaCl effects on lettuce. Sci Hortic (Amst). 2006;109(1):8–14.10.1016/j.scienta.2006.02.025Search in Google Scholar

[44] Yildirim E, Taylor AG, Spittler TD. Ameliorative effects of biological treatments on growth of squash plants under salt stress. Sci Hortic (Amst). 2006;111(1):1–6.10.1016/j.scienta.2006.08.003Search in Google Scholar

[45] Benaissa A, Djebbar R, Abderrahmani A. Antagonistic effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria associated with Rhus tripartitus on gram positive and negative bacteria. Analele Univ din Oradea Fasc Biol. 2019;26(2):67–72.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Sapre S, Gontia-Mishra I, Tiwari S. Klebsiella sp. confers enhanced tolerance to salinity and plant growth promotion in oat seedlings (Avena sativa). Microbiol Res [Internet]. 2018;206(September 2017):25–32. 10.1016/j.micres.2017.09.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Shilev S. Plant-growth-promoting bacteria mitigating soil salinity stress in plants. Appl Sci. 2020;10(20):1–20.10.3390/app10207326Search in Google Scholar

[48] Lami M, Adler C, Caram-Di Santo M, Zenoff A, de Cristóbal R, Espinosa-Urgel M, et al. Pseudomonas stutzeri MJL19, a rhizosphere‐colonizing bacterium that promotes plant growth under saline stress. J Appl Microbiol. 2020;129(5):1321–36.10.1111/jam.14692Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Saboora A, Kiarostami K, Behroozbayati F, Hajihashemi S. Salinity (NaCl) tolerance of wheat genotypes at germination and early seedling growth. Pak J Biol Sci. 2006;9(11):2009–21.10.3923/pjbs.2006.2009.2021Search in Google Scholar

[50] Khan MH, Meghvansi MK, Gupta R, Chaudhary KK, Prasad K, Siddiqui S, et al. Combining application of vermiwash and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for effective plant disease suppression. 2015;479–93.10.1007/978-3-319-23075-7_23Search in Google Scholar

[51] Jalili F, Khavazi K, Pazira E, Nejati A, Rahmani HA, Sadaghiani HR, et al. Isolation and characterization of ACC deaminase-producing fluorescent pseudomonads, to alleviate salinity stress on canola (Brassica napus L.) growth. J Plant Physiol. 2009;166(6):667–74.10.1016/j.jplph.2008.08.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Nia SH, Zarea MJ, Rejali F, Varma A. Yield and yield components of wheat as affected by salinity and inoculation with Azospirillum strains from saline or non-saline soil. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci [Internet]. 2012;11(2):113–21. 10.1016/j.jssas.2012.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

[53] Shultana R, Kee Zuan AT, Yusop MR, Saud HM. Characterization of salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and the effect on growth and yield of saline-affected rice. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020;15(9 september):1–16. 10.1371/journal.pone.0238537.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[54] Singh R, Jha P, Jha P. The plant-growth-promoting bacterium Klebsiella sp. SBP-8 confers induced systemic tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under salt stress. J Plant Physiol. 2015;184:57–67.10.1016/j.jplph.2015.07.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[55] Singh RP, Jha PN. A halotolerant bacterium Bacillus licheniformis HSW-16 augments induced systemic tolerance to salt stress in wheat plant (Triticum aestivum). Front Plant Sci. 2016;7(December 2016):1–18.10.3389/fpls.2016.01890Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2021-02-08
Revised: 2023-02-04
Accepted: 2023-04-01
Published Online: 2023-05-03

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on business risks and potato commercial model
  3. Effects of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)–Mucuna pruriens intercropping pattern on the agronomic performances of potato and the soil physicochemical properties of the western highlands of Cameroon
  4. Machine learning-based prediction of total phenolic and flavonoid in horticultural products
  5. Revamping agricultural sector and its implications on output and employment generation: Evidence from Nigeria
  6. Does product certification matter? A review of mechanism to influence customer loyalty in the poultry feed industry
  7. Farmer regeneration and knowledge co-creation in the sustainability of coconut agribusiness in Gorontalo, Indonesia
  8. Lablab purpureus: Analysis of landraces cultivation and distribution, farming systems, and some climatic trends in production areas in Tanzania
  9. The effects of carrot (Daucus carota L.) waste juice on the performances of native chicken in North Sulawesi, Indonesia
  10. Properties of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and its effects on plants and soil
  11. Factors influencing the role and performance of independent agricultural extension workers in supporting agricultural extension
  12. The fate of probiotic species applied in intensive grow-out ponds in rearing water and intestinal tracts of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei
  13. Yield stability and agronomic performances of provitamin A maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes in South-East of DR Congo
  14. Diallel analysis of length and shape of rice using Hayman and Griffing method
  15. Physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of various stem bark extracts of Hopea beccariana Burck potential as natural preservatives of coconut sap
  16. Correlation between descriptive and group type traits in the system of cow’s linear classification of Ukrainian Brown dairy breed
  17. Meta-analysis of the influence of the substitution of maize with cassava on performance indices of broiler chickens
  18. Bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance (BLIS) produced by Enterococcus faecium MA115 and its potential use as a seafood biopreservative
  19. Meta-analysis of the benefits of dietary Saccharomyces cerevisiae intervention on milk yield and component characteristics in lactating small ruminants
  20. Growth promotion potential of Bacillus spp. isolates on two tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) varieties in the West region of Cameroon
  21. Prioritizing IoT adoption strategies in millennial farming: An analytical network process approach
  22. Soil fertility and pomelo yield influenced by soil conservation practices
  23. Soil macrofauna under laying hens’ grazed fields in two different agroecosystems in Portugal
  24. Factors affecting household carbohydrate food consumption in Central Java: Before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
  25. Properties of paper coated with Prunus serotina (Ehrh.) extract formulation
  26. Fertiliser cost prediction in European Union farms: Machine-learning approaches through artificial neural networks
  27. Molecular and phenotypic markers for pyramiding multiple traits in rice
  28. Natural product nanofibers derived from Trichoderma hamatum K01 to control citrus anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
  29. Role of actors in promoting sustainable peatland management in Kubu Raya Regency, West Kalimantan, Indonesia
  30. Small-scale coffee farmers’ perception of climate-adapted attributes in participatory coffee breeding: A case study of Gayo Highland, Aceh, Indonesia
  31. Optimization of extraction using surface response methodology and quantification of cannabinoids in female inflorescences of marijuana (Cannabis sativa L.) at three altitudinal floors of Peru
  32. Production factors, technical, and economic efficiency of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) farming in Indonesia
  33. Economic performance of smallholder soya bean production in Kwara State, Nigeria
  34. Indonesian rice farmers’ perceptions of different sources of information and their effect on farmer capability
  35. Feed preference, body condition scoring, and growth performance of Dohne Merino ram fed varying levels of fossil shell flour
  36. Assessing the determinant factors of risk strategy adoption to mitigate various risks: An experience from smallholder rubber farmers in West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia
  37. Analysis of trade potential and factors influencing chili export in Indonesia
  38. Grade-C kenaf fiber (poor quality) as an alternative material for textile crafts
  39. Technical efficiency changes of rice farming in the favorable irrigated areas of Indonesia
  40. Palm oil cluster resilience to enhance indigenous welfare by innovative ability to address land conflicts: Evidence of disaster hierarchy
  41. Factors determining cassava farmers’ accessibility to loan sources: Evidence from Lampung, Indonesia
  42. Tailoring business models for small-medium food enterprises in Eastern Africa can drive the commercialization and utilization of vitamin A rich orange-fleshed sweet potato puree
  43. Revitalizing sub-optimal drylands: Exploring the role of biofertilizers
  44. Effects of salt stress on growth of Quercus ilex L. seedlings
  45. Design and fabrication of a fish feed mixing cum pelleting machine for small-medium scale aquaculture industry
  46. Indicators of swamp buffalo business sustainability using partial least squares structural equation modelling
  47. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on early growth, root colonization, and chlorophyll content of North Maluku nutmeg cultivars
  48. How intergenerational farmers negotiate their identity in the era of Agriculture 4.0: A multiple-case study in Indonesia
  49. Responses of broiler chickens to incremental levels of water deprivation: Growth performance, carcass characteristics, and relative organ weights
  50. The improvement of horticultural villages sustainability in Central Java Province, Indonesia
  51. Effect of short-term grazing exclusion on herbage species composition, dry matter productivity, and chemical composition of subtropical grasslands
  52. Analysis of beef market integration between consumer and producer regions in Indonesia
  53. Analysing the sustainability of swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis carabauesis) farming as a protein source and germplasm
  54. Toxicity of Calophyllum soulattri, Piper aduncum, Sesamum indicum and their potential mixture for control Spodoptera frugiperda
  55. Consumption profile of organic fruits and vegetables by a Portuguese consumer’s sample
  56. Phenotypic characterisation of indigenous chicken in the central zone of Tanzania
  57. Diversity and structure of bacterial communities in saline and non-saline rice fields in Cilacap Regency, Indonesia
  58. Isolation and screening of lactic acid bacteria producing anti-Edwardsiella from the gastrointestinal tract of wild catfish (Clarias gariepinus) for probiotic candidates
  59. Effects of land use and slope position on selected soil physicochemical properties in Tekorsh Sub-Watershed, East Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia
  60. Design of smart farming communication and web interface using MQTT and Node.js
  61. Assessment of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seed quality accessed through different seed sources in northwest Ethiopia
  62. Estimation of water consumption and productivity for wheat using remote sensing and SEBAL model: A case study from central clay plain Ecosystem in Sudan
  63. Agronomic performance, seed chemical composition, and bioactive components of selected Indonesian soybean genotypes (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)
  64. The role of halal requirements, health-environmental factors, and domestic interest in food miles of apple fruit
  65. Subsidized fertilizer management in the rice production centers of South Sulawesi, Indonesia: Bridging the gap between policy and practice
  66. Factors affecting consumers’ loyalty and purchase decisions on honey products: An emerging market perspective
  67. Inclusive rice seed business: Performance and sustainability
  68. Design guidelines for sustainable utilization of agricultural appropriate technology: Enhancing human factors and user experience
  69. Effect of integrate water shortage and soil conditioners on water productivity, growth, and yield of Red Globe grapevines grown in sandy soil
  70. Synergic effect of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and potassium fertilizer improves biomass-related characteristics of cocoa seedlings to enhance their drought resilience and field survival
  71. Control measure of sweet potato weevil (Cylas formicarius Fab.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in endemic land of entisol type using mulch and entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana
  72. In vitro and in silico study for plant growth promotion potential of indigenous Ochrobactrum ciceri and Bacillus australimaris
  73. Effects of repeated replanting on yield, dry matter, starch, and protein content in different potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes
  74. Review Articles
  75. Nutritional and chemical composition of black velvet tamarind (Dialium guineense Willd) and its influence on animal production: A review
  76. Black pepper (Piper nigrum Lam) as a natural feed additive and source of beneficial nutrients and phytochemicals in chicken nutrition
  77. The long-crowing chickens in Indonesia: A review
  78. A transformative poultry feed system: The impact of insects as an alternative and transformative poultry-based diet in sub-Saharan Africa
  79. Short Communication
  80. Profiling of carbonyl compounds in fresh cabbage with chemometric analysis for the development of freshness assessment method
  81. Special Issue of The 4th International Conference on Food Science and Engineering (ICFSE) 2022 - Part I
  82. Non-destructive evaluation of soluble solid content in fruits with various skin thicknesses using visible–shortwave near-infrared spectroscopy
  83. Special Issue on FCEM - International Web Conference on Food Choice & Eating Motivation - Part I
  84. Traditional agri-food products and sustainability – A fruitful relationship for the development of rural areas in Portugal
  85. Consumers’ attitudes toward refrigerated ready-to-eat meat and dairy foods
  86. Breakfast habits and knowledge: Study involving participants from Brazil and Portugal
  87. Food determinants and motivation factors impact on consumer behavior in Lebanon
  88. Comparison of three wine routes’ realities in Central Portugal
  89. Special Issue on Agriculture, Climate Change, Information Technology, Food and Animal (ACIFAS 2020)
  90. Environmentally friendly bioameliorant to increase soil fertility and rice (Oryza sativa) production
  91. Enhancing the ability of rice to adapt and grow under saline stress using selected halotolerant rhizobacterial nitrogen fixer
Downloaded on 5.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/opag-2022-0195/html
Scroll to top button