Startseite Naturwissenschaften Progress in magnetic Fe3O4 nanomaterials in magnetic resonance imaging
Artikel Open Access

Progress in magnetic Fe3O4 nanomaterials in magnetic resonance imaging

  • Hongcai Li , Shuanqiang Yang , David Hui und Ruoyu Hong EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 23. Dezember 2020
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

At present, high-sensitivity, high-penetration-depth, and accurate tissue resolution clinical imaging effect are required, while computer transverse scanning, microwave imaging, and fluorescence imaging (FL) cannot meet the requirements of clinical imaging, but the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can meet the requirements of clinical dissecting details. The effect of MRI imaging is closely related to the contrast agent (CA). As an important type of CA, Fe3O4 and its analogues have been widely concerned because of their low toxicity and relatively low price. In this review, we summarize the development and improvement of CAs based on Fe3O4 and its analogues from T 2 imaging mode and development limitation in the initial single modulus imaging mode, to T 1 imaging mode overcoming the limitations of T 2 imaging and the limitations of its own in application, to the later development of dual modulus imaging form, and to the current multi-modulus imaging form. Simultaneously, we demonstrate the research progress, preparation methods, and future trends based on Fe3O4 and its analogues CAs for MRI, the current application status is preliminarily summarized, and the future development trend is prospected.

1 Introduction

Nowadays, the early diagnosis of various difficulty and miscellaneous diseases, such as cancer and septicemia, has always been a difficult problem in medicine. Therefore, the key to solve this problem is the effective auxiliary diagnosis method [1]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most powerful medical diagnosis methods because of the images provided by MRI with excellent anatomical details based on soft tissue contrast and functional information in noninvasive, real-time monitoring manner [2]. Compared with computer transverse (CT), sonography, nuclear scintigraphy, and X-ray imaging, MRI causes no radiation damage and provides high soft tissue resolution, and hence can be applied to diagnose a variety of diseases [3]. However, conventional MRI contrast agent (CA) is expensive, low in spatial resolution, which fails to detect early tiny tumors, and cannot distinguish between benign and malignant tumors because of current CAs having only a single imaging mode [4]. The results of the MRI are determined by not only the precision instrument and different imaging methods, but also the CA, which can significantly improve the contrast of the biological targets around the tissue [5]. Therefore, the development of new CAs can effectively improve the imaging effect.

From the application point of view, CAs can be divided into two categories, one is the longitudinal relaxation T 1 signal CA (r 1) that produces the bright field as a positive CA, and the other is the transverse relaxation T 2 signal CA (r 2) that produces the dark field as a negative CA [6]. The T 1 signal is generated by the interaction between the outermost electron cloud of the magnetic element and the protons in the water to produce a bright signal, whereas the T 2 signal is a darker signal owing to the magnetic unevenness caused by the strong magnetic moment [7]. In terms of production mode, relaxation direction, and field of view, the two categories of CAs are totally different; however, the division method is generally accepted, especially for products with better circulation in the market [8].

Gadolinium has been a popular product in the market on account of its T 1 signal as an MRI CA [9]; however, the recent FDA warning about the increased risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy in patients who suffer from renal failure and are subjected to enhanced contrast MRI exams has given rise to concern [10]. Therefore, the development of new CAs to meet clinical needs has attracted much attention. Super-paramagnetic iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles (SPIONs) and uniform ferrite nanoparticles such as Fe3O4 and Fe2O3 are widely applied in magnetic nanoparticle (MNP)-based CAs because of their non-toxicity and biodegradability [11]. Different forms of ferrite MNPs have been well reported in the literature for decades because of their countless biomedical applications, including MRI [12], targeted drug delivery [13], photothermal [14], and magnetic fluid hyperthermia cancer therapy [15]. These applications are based on excellent features, such as super para-magnetism, possibility of tuning of particle size (for desired electrical, optical, and magnetic properties) [16], mono-dispersity, stability, biocompatibility, large surface areas that can be easily functionalized [17], improved magnetic sensitivity, and range of different synthesis methods [18]. In this review, the synthesis methods, outsourcing materials, and doping metal methods of ferroferric oxide nanoparticles are described. From the perspective of imaging methods, combined with the description of biological applications, a detailed discussion of the problem, current solutions, and prospects for the application of ferroferric oxide for MRI imaging were provided.

2 Single modulus imaging

Because the FDA announced the toxicity of gadolinium to the kidneys, MNPs have attracted more attention [19]. The outermost layer of iron has five electrons with strong magnetism, so can generate vivid MRI signals, allowing rapid development of MNPs.

2.1 T 2 sign imaging of Fe3O4 nanomaterials

Ferrites are crystalline iron oxides whose magnetic properties were recognized for their commercial importance as early as 1933 [20]. Ferrites have the general formula Fe3+ 2O3·M2+O, where M is a divalent metal ion such as manganese, nickel, iron, cobalt, or magnesium. Magnetite is a naturally occurring ferrite in which the metal ion (M) is a ferrous iron (Fe2+). More importantly, the outermost layer of iron atom contains five electrons similar to gadolinium, which can change the relaxation time of protons and engender greater r 1 and r 2 relaxation effects, thus showing certain potential in MRI applications [21]. So far, there are three kinds of iron CAs using the T 2 sign imaging on the market, Feridex (r 2 = 120 mM−1 s−1), Resovist (r 2 = 186 mM−1 s−1), and Combidex (r 2 = 65 mM−1 s−1), respectively [22]. The following is in introduction to the current T 2 CA study.

The stability of CAs is one of the key problems affecting the application of CA [23]. Researchers have tried various ways in which to improve the stability without changing the magnetic imaging performance. Among them, the copolymerization of an organic polymer is a relatively direct and an effective method [24]. There are two preparation methods available: (i) one is to first synthesize nanoparticles and then to modify the coating with an organic polymer, and (ii) one-pot method by thermal precipitation copolymerization method [25] (Figure 1).

Figure 1 
                  Preparation methods of iron CAs.
Figure 1

Preparation methods of iron CAs.

Certainly, there are other ways, for example, Kluenker et al. [26] presented a solution phase seed mediated synthesis of iron oxide superparticles colloidal with flower- and hedgehog-like morphologies starting at dispersible spherical maghemite and nanoplate hematite (HEX) templates to overcome the drawbacks of particle assemblies for functional nanodevices such as low mechanical stability, lack of interfacial electronic communication, and poor processability [27]. Changes in solvent, type of iron salts, and temperatures have been used to synthesize different types of nanomaterials (Figure 2; the NPs are mostly spherical and faceted, and an average particle size is 18–20 nm). As for the higher effective radius and anisotropy and inhomogeneity of the particle-generated magnetic field, both longitudinal and transversal relaxation sign effects show obvious enhancement (r 1 and r 2 values are 0.093 and 1.774 mM−1 s−1 for HEX SPs). The r 2 relaxivity could be increased by a factor 2.5–64.36 mM−1 s−1 showing the potential for application as a T 2 CA. Generally, the viability of the cells decreases with increasing Fe concentration and reaches a minimum of 70–80% at 100 μg/mL NPs, which exhibits less virulence. Certainly, this preparation method also provides a new way for industrial production.

Figure 2 
                  Flow diagram of solvent planting process [26].
Figure 2

Flow diagram of solvent planting process [26].

Early organic polymer coating with dextran, polyethylene glycol (PEG) [28], polyvinyl alcohol, and chitosan as an outer cladding has been reported [29]. These polymers can effectively improve the water solubility and stability of nanomaterials, but the size of nanoparticles is also significantly increased, relevant studies were shown below.

Hong et al. [30] coated SPIONs with dextran to stabilize monocrystalline structures to form a stable magnetic fluid, so the stability and biological properties of dextran-coated SPIONs were significantly improved, but its application was limited by the larger particle size. Mailander et al. [31] modified Resovist (generic name: ferucarbotran) with carboxydextran in Feridex (ferumoxides) and original dextran. Many studies have shown that the PEG coating of iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) improves their stability (with a mean diameter (S d) of 10 nm) [32]. Although pure PEG can improve the stability of IONPs, it will soon be removed by the RES system. Therefore, PEG can act as remedy for such defects. For example, Xie et al. [33] stabilized oleic acid/oleylamine coated NPs by PEG-dopamine, which demonstrated a remarkable abatement in nonspecific uptake by macrophage cells. Amstad et al. [34] proved the better stability of PEG compounds bound to iron oxide NPs coated by nitrocatechols compared to that with catechols. In recent years, research on other types of polyorganisms has gradually increased, such as amino acids and phosphate polymers [35].

At present, the clinical contrast medium should not only be stable enough and non-cytotoxic, but also meet the requirements of low dose, a certain degree of targeting, and so on [36]. Therefore, it is imperative to improve its magnetic properties while achieving targeted properties. Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) could distinguish malignant tumors from normal tissue and could be used for selective targeting [37]. Kubovcikova et al. [38] coated ferric material with poly-lysine (MFPLL, S d = 85 nm, and a hydrodynamic diameter (H d) of 119.2 nm) to improve the stability in aqueous solution, and then conjugated a selected specific antibody VII/20 (Ab-MFPLL, with a S d of 128 nm, and a H d of 170.1 nm), which was capable of internalization and targeting to recognize the overexpression of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) in tumors. Stability studies show that Ab-MFPLL and MFPLL are stable in acidic conditions up to pH = 6 and alkaline medium up to pH = 8, respectively. Simultaneously, MFPLL showed a notable enlargement in H d after 44 h at room temperature, and the Ab-MFPLL showed no changes throughout the 74 h experiment, proving their excellent stability. The relaxivity values r 2 and r 1 of MFPLL were 487.94 and 1.81 mM−1 s−1, respectively, and the ratio r 2/r 1 equaled to 270, which proved the potential as T 2 CA [39]. Furthermore, Ab-MFPLL samples preserve the property of magnetic hyperthermia differing from other USPIOs [40]. The specific absorption rate values of MFPLL were 14–15 W g−1 at a frequency of 190 kHz and field strength of c. 8 kA m−1, which evinces the potential for the application of magnetic hyperthermia. Yin et al. [41] used targeted peptide WSGPGVWGASVK (peptide-WSG) conjugated Fe3O4 NPs coated with dextran (SPIONs@Dex-WSG), to meet practical requirements. Preparation of SPIONs@Dex-WSG relies on use of sodium citrate as an intermediate material to connect WSG and SPIONs@Dex. The average size of SPIONPs@Dex-WSG (60.66 nm) decreased compared with SPIONPs@Dex (165.20 nm) because SPIONs@Dex-WSG can significantly improve the agglomeration of nanoparticles, avoiding their elimination by RES, and prolonging blood circulation time. Cytotoxicity experiments showed that SPIONs@Dex-WSG was only slightly toxic to SKOV-3 uterine cancer cells and non-toxic to normal cells. Simultaneously, Prussian blue staining indicates that only SKOV-3 uterine cancer cells appeared blue while normal cells were not stained, which indicated that SKOV-3 uterine cancer cells had good targeting and a weak inhibition rate. Its plasma half-life was as high as 10.6 h, which also provided support for its enrichment in tumors. The VSM and T 2 for SPIONs@Dex-WSG were 44.65 emu g−1 and 229.70 mM−1 s−1, respectively.

The outer layer is either dextran or amino acid, and its bonding mode is nothing more than a carbon–oxygen bond or a carbon–nitrogen bond [42]. When the external environment changes, it is easy to break the structure of nanoparticles and release SPIONs, resulting in reduced stability. Demin et al. [43] formed a stable P–O–Fe bond by the coordination of phosphate on PMIDA (1:1, mol/mol) with the iron of MNPs (PMIDA@Fe3O4 NPs) and obtained an optimum condition for the modification of MNPs at reaction at 40°C for 3.5 h; at the same time, PMIDA exhibits selectivity recognizing for HER-2 receptors in MCF-7 tumor cells [44]. PMIDA@Fe3O4 NPs had good colloidal stability (concentration = 0.1–2.8 mg/mL, pH = 2–11) and high magnetic properties (with values r 2 and r 1 were 341 and 102 mM−1 s−1, respectively). PMIDA@Fe3O4 NPs as a T 2 contrast agent was demonstrated in the first time for liver studies in vivo (dose of 0.6 mg kg−1).

Although the organic outer polymer cladding layer can improve the stability of IOSNPs, it is the low magnetic sensitivity that still limits their further application [45]. The ability of MNPs was affected with shape and composition engineering. Yin and colleagues [46] doped dysprosium (the magnetic moment of Dy (10.6 µ B) was 3.5 times larger than Fe) into Fe3O4 nanoparticles and coated it with polyethylene alcohol on its outermost layer to improve the sensitivity of IOSNPs. The r 2 value was 123.2 s−1 mM−1, which was nearly double than the pure IOSNPs (67.8 s−1 mM−1) and substantially surpassing that of Feridex and Resivist [47]. More importantly, low dose doping did not cause a toxic reaction, but in vivo imaging was yet to be reported. Yin and colleagues only considered the composition of the nanoparticles, without considering the influence of the shape of them. Gao et al. [48] not only considered the configuration of nanoparticles, but also studied the effect of the different metal doping ratio on the properties of nanoparticles. They manufactured zinc ferrite octapods (Zn x Fe3–x O4) with different Zn ratios, and studied an effect of the different ratios of Zn in Zn x Fe3−x O4, indicating that Zn x Fe3−x O4 (x = 0.44) with octahedral structure owns a notable M s of 89.0 emu/g and r 2 value of 989.1 mM−1 s−1. The specific production steps are as follows: FeCl3 was reacted with sodium oleate in a mixed solution of ethanol and distilled water (v/v = 1:1) for 4 h, filtered after cooling, and the red oil layer was collected and concentrated, which contains iron oleate. Zinc oleate was used in the same way (temperature increased to 100°C for 0.5 h after dissolving the metal salt, and then impurities removed). Under the protection of N2, Zn x Fe3−x O4 octapods were realized by calcination at 350°C for 2 h, where x represents the ratio of iron oleate to zinc oleate. The sensitive detection can be even 0.7 mM lower for orthotopic and metastatic hepatic tumors (1/10 for the clinical dose), which demonstrated the potential as a T 2 CA [49].

Similarly, nanomaterials mixed with other metals can improve contrast performance and have favored attentions interest recently [50]. Luminomagnetic nanoparticles that possessed core/shell structures (and Fe3O4 NPs coated with luminescent material) show some advantages [51]. Although optical imaging and magnetic imaging can be achieved because of the existence of rare earth up-conversion fluorescent nanoparticles, the imaging effect is not ideal, especially magnetic imaging [52].

Karthi et al. [53] doped Nd3+ to fluorapatite (FAP) and coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles by a hydrothermal method. The specific preparation method is as follows: adding Nd3+ droplets to Fe3O4 nanoparticles coated with FAP, while maintaining an alkaline environment and calcining at 600°C for 1 h, the final product was obtained (FFN, in rod shaped with average length 40 nm). It exhibited a superparamagnetic property (M s of FFN is 1.3 emu/g at 1.6 mT) and showed excellent optical properties (emission at 1,060 nm). Cytotoxicity results indicated that when the concentration reached 500 μg/mL, the L929 cell survival rate remained up to 84%, showing good biocompatibility, but the real imaging effect was not discussed.

Whether using doped metal or researching the outer layer, it is necessary to improve the performance of CAs and advance their clinical application. As an iron agent for the T 2 signal, such research is extensive, and its biological applications likewise [54]. To further improve the biological performance of CAs, Chandra and colleagues [55] modified amino acid (aa) into ferrite to prepare the magnetic fluid (Fe3+:Fe2+:aa = 1:2:3, particle size about 15 nm) for the first time. It can be used to image stem cells because of the coating of amino acid, so the biological toxicity of magnetic fluid is trivial. The theoretical basis is that amino acids can be used in vaccine research and development, and ideal biocompatibility makes it stable in the body; what is more interesting is that MRI is applied to MSCs imaging for the first time [56]. The imaging effect showed that its T 2 imaging effect was better than that of pure ferrite and commercial magnetic fluid, showing the amino acid-modified magnetic fluid’s relative advantage for T 2 MRI in MSCs.

Similarly, Li and colleagues [57] have also used ferrite for its magnetic properties and MRI performance to prepare a special purpose ferrite coated with CPG (forming a lecithin-like structure) and anti-CD205. Targeted CD205 and bionic CPG were used to transport ferrite to lymph nodes to achieve real-time monitoring of lymph nodes. The results showed that T 2 imaging of lymph nodes was superior to its performance in other organs and proves that ferrite has been effectively transported to the lymph nodes.

VEGF-A is a cytokine overexpressed in benign or metastatic cancer cells, such as breast, ovarian, cervical, lymphoma, and colon, as well as in other cell lines such as epithelial cells [58]. Ma et al. [59] coated oleic acid–Fe3O4 and triphenylamine-divinylanthracene-dicyano (TAC) with poly(l-lactic-coglycolic acid) by O/W method. Simultaneous modified anti-VEGF antibodies were used to form anti-VEGF/OAFe3O4/triphenylamine-divinylanthracene-dicyano@poly(l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) NPs. This system was capable of recognizing overexpressed VEGF-A at as low as 68 pg/mL in different cell lines. The r 2 reached 86.2 mM−1 s−1, and the magnetic resonance signal appeared within 30 min by intravenous injection and reached the peak at 60 min in tumors, which proved its good selectivity. At the same time, the optical properties of the TAC can be used to achieve photothermal therapy while imaging, to achieve the integration of diagnosis and treatment.

The instability of CAs in colloid and the difficulty in drug release limit its clinical application in vivo [60]. To solve the problems of unstable micelles in vivo and difficulty in drug release, Yang et al. [61] used organic thiol-based silicon as the outermost layer of micelles. Specific steps are as follows: (i) based on the self-assembly characteristics of polycaprolactone-block-poly(glutamic acid) (PCL-b-PGA) in aqueous solution, Fe3O4 nanoparticles and doxorubicin (Dox) were initially coated as the core; (ii) a thiol-containing silicone layer was formed on the outer layer with the help of 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane to form biodegradable nanoparticles (Fe3O4/Dox NPs); and (iii) PEG was modified on the outer layer of Fe3O4/Dox NPs (FDPOMs, with S d of 120 nm). The M s of FDPOMs was 7.4 emu g−1, which was lower than the pure Fe3O4 NPs (33.2 emu g−1) because of the outermost organic layer and organosilica components surrounding the Fe3O4 nanoparticles [62]. The r 2 value of FDPOMs was 192.06 mM−1 s−1 in vivo; interestingly, the tumor region showed the strongest T 2 sign after injecting FDPOMs for 4 h, which demonstrates that the FDPOMs own potential as T 2 CA. The outermost layer contains sulfhydryl, so it can be degraded by glutathione, thus releasing drugs in the tumors, making the tumor inhibitory 7.9 times higher than that of Dox alone [63], however, due to the presence of Dox, the biological toxicity is high, when the adriamycin content exceeded 25 μg/mL, the cell survival rate was less than 50%.

2.2 T 1 sign imaging of Fe3O4 nanomaterials

Defects of T 2 signal imaging are gradually exposed, the dark view produced by transverse relaxation easily causes confusion in diagnosis, and strong magnetic distance causes “bioboming effect” generating an interference magnetic area [64]. T 1 signal imaging is a bright field of vision produced by longitudinal relaxation, which can overcome the defects of T 2 signal application [65].

When reducing the effective particle size of the nanoparticles, the value of surface area/volume ratio is effectively increased, causing accumulation; in addition, the outermost layer of iron atoms contains five lone pairs of electrons, which can generate a high T 1 [66]. Based on this idea, Wei et al. [67] studied zwitterion-coated-ultra-SPIONs (ZES-SPIONs, the S d was 4 nm). Although ZES-SPIONs demonstrated excellent T 1 imaging potential and biocompatibility, the preparation process is complicated and polluting, especially the sophisticated phase transition process, and therefore its practical application is limited.

Hao et al. [68] applied zwitterion to improve the preparation method. The improved preparation has two innovations: (1) preparing amphiphilic dopamine sulfonate (ZDS) as the outer layer to improve the application of dopamine; and (2) using diethylene glycol as solution and adopting two-step method to obtain Fe3O4 NPs coated with ZDS (ZUIONs). The size of ZUIONs was only 3.3 nm and the H d was 7.0 nm; more importantly, it showed perfect stability, and above all, the program only needed one pot. The nanoparticles improve the T 1 signal (r 2 = 2.4 mM−1 s−1 and an r 2/r 1 = 2.2 at 1.0 T); meanwhile, it is exciting that it has showed enough cycle time without any immune response and metabolism. To sum up, it shows great clinical application value, but only as a T 1 CA.

Li et al. [69] also developed biodegradable Fe3O4-coated catecholate amphiphilic block to improve imaging effect and stability, but the complicated preparation is limited for its application as it requires multi-step reactions to guarantee the amphipathy. Miao et al. [70] applied α-amino acid N-thiocarboxyanhydrides (NTAs) with polysarcosine (PSar) to synthesize poly-3,4-dihydroxy-l-phenylalanine-b-polysarcosine (PDOPA-b-PSar) via controlled ring-opening polymerizations, and then PDOPA-b-PSar coated Fe3O4 NPs to get micellar nanoparticles of Fe3+@PDOPA-b-PSar, which simplifies the process of production, including phenol hydroxyl protection and deprotection and so on, so as to facilitate future industrial production. Fe3+@PDOPA-b-PSar not only shows the higher ability of T 1 MRI (3.0 T, 20°C) but also exhibits a longer circulation time (2.5 h) compared to commercial Gd3+ and DTPA-Gd3+. Simultaneously, their biocompatibility is excellent when evaluated in NIH 3T3 cells, but the release and metabolism of Fe3+ in vivo and absence of T 2 signal MRI were not considered by the authors.

The composition of the outer cladding and the length of the chain layer will affect the magnetic properties and biological properties of the final nanoparticle [71]. Fortin et al. [72] used poly[oligo(ethylene oxide) monomethyl ether methacrylate] (POEOMA) covalently connected with either poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) as an anchoring block to increase blood retention time [73]; at the same time, brushed-PEG chains were applied to ensure the branching state (straight chains become brushed chains, P2). The preparation process was designed to replace chain PEG with brushed-PEG: because of the presence of a large number of –COOH radicals, the intermolecular force was greater and the particle size is smaller, but the zeta charge was reduced to −1. There was no obvious precipitation to prove the stability of –COOH radicals in 72 h of blood compatibility experiment. In vitro T 1 imaging for P2 showed that the values of r 1, r 2, and r 2/r 1 were 5.3 mM−1 s−1, 20.7 mM−1 s−1, and 3.8, respectively, which were significantly lower than chain-like outsourcing, but higher than commercially available Supravist SHU-555C [74]. In vivo angiography showed that there was a strong signal at 2 h (blood half-lives 2–5 h), which was mainly related to the presence of more –COOH in the outer layer.

The magnetic properties are independent of the type of external coating and are widely studied. At the same time, the phenomenon of ferroptosis therapy (FT) appeared in people’s vision, conferring a huge advantage in the diagnosis and treatment, and thus received much attention [75].

Since Dixon et al. first proposed FT in 2012 [76], it has been found that the FT efficacy was low because the high concentration of iron in the treatment process was demanded (75 mg iron/kg mice, the principle is shown in Figure 3) and FT therapy has not been used in the treatment of brain tumors, which is that metallic nanoparticles are toxic to the central nervous system and difficult to penetrate the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [77].

Figure 3 
                  The principle of FT for killing cancer cells.
Figure 3

The principle of FT for killing cancer cells.

To effectively cross the BBB, Shen et al. [78] prepared Fe3O4/Gd2O3 NPs loaded cisplatin (CDDP) and modified lactoferrin (LF) and RGD dimer (RGD2) (FeGd-HN@Pt@LF/RGD2) to improve FT efficacy by synchro raising the topo-reactants’ concentrations (Fe2+, Fe3+, and H2O2) in tumor cells, and to cross the BBB and reach the tumor cells by LF receptor, RGD2 receptor, and their small size (6.6 nm). The FT mechanism is as follows: when entering the brain, Fe2+, Fe3+, and CDDP can be released from the nanoparticles after endocytosis, NADPH oxidases can be activated by CDDP to produce H2O2, and all reactants work together to generate reactive oxygen species, causing brain cancer death. These nanoparticles are a potential T 1 CA as for the high r 1 value (56.57 mM−1 s−1) and low r 2/r 1 (1.25) at 1.5 T, which can be ascribed to the special morphological results and ease of access to water. Furthermore, the cure rate for the tumor mice was nearly 100% after 18 days treatment, which exhibits an excellent FT effect.

The FT effect has a good therapeutic effect and a certain degree of targeting, and certain clinical application potential. Of course, there are other applications, such as in liposomes and vesicles. Madhuri et al. [79] cleverly coated the inner layer with polymersome and Gd nanoparticles, and simultaneously targeted the surface folate and the chemotherapeutic drug methotrexate on the surface modification to reform the magnetopolymersome (MPS). When achieving the target, the chemotherapeutic drug was released, so as to achieve the purpose of simultaneous effect of chemotherapy. Gold nanoparticles for targeted dual-mode therapy and imaging have been used. MPS has high biocompatibility because of its identical structural analogues with the cell membrane and also achieves high drug loading and targeting as well as development imaging. The r 1 and r 2 of prepared AuNFs@MPS were 60.57 and 200.0 mM−1 s−1, respectively (r 2/r 1 = 3.3), which proved that AuNFs@MPS was potential as T 1 MRI CA [80]. Although it can realize multi-mode treatment and diagnosis, the production process is cumbersome and is not suitable for further development.

3 Dual modulus imaging

The T 1 CAs can produce bright vision, but it often obscures with biomasses calcification and fat tissues, for example. However, the dark field of view produced by T 2 imaging is an indelible defect in accurate diagnosis [81], so the development of bimodal imaging can complement each other and improve the accuracy of diagnosis. In this review, the development process and trend of dual-mode imaging are described, as shown in Figure 4, and the details are shown below.

Figure 4 
               Composition and current situation of dual modulus imaging.
Figure 4

Composition and current situation of dual modulus imaging.

3.1 Application of Fe3O4 in bimodal imaging

Reducing the particle size of the nanoparticles not only produces a higher T 1 signal, but also controls the particle size to generate a simultaneous T 2 signal for dual-modulus imaging. The preparation method is mostly based on thermal decomposition [82], as shown below.

Since 2005, Chen et al. [83] used dodecanethiol-polymethacrylic acid (DDT-PMAA) to prepare 1–4 nm single-layer gold nanoparticles, providing theoretical support for preparation of ultra-small-MNPs. Cooper et al. [84] used this principle to first synthesize the ligand of trithiol-terminated poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA-PTTM), which was then used to synthesize ultra-small magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles, but it did not apply it for MRI. Who is really applied those nanoparticles to MRI is Li et al. [85], who prepared monodispersed hydrophilic ultra-small Fe3O4 NPs (UMIONs, D = 3.3 ± 0.5 nm) for detailed MRI imaging performance studies. The results showed that their longitudinal relaxivity value at 4.7 T (r 1 = 8.3 mM−1 s−1) was nearly twice as much as Gd-DTPA (r 1 = 4.8 mM−1 s−1) and the transversal relaxivity value (r 2 = 35.1 mM−1 s−1) was six times that of Gd-DTPA (r 2 = 5.3 mM−1 s−1). The results showed that the liver and kidneys signal for T 1 and T 2 values improved by at least 26% and up to 70% in vivo, which is stronger than Gd-DTPA at the same dose. Majeed et al. [86] also synthesized UMIONs (D = 4.6 ± 0.7 nm) under high magnetization (50 emu g−1) using the water-soluble ligand DDT-PMAA, and modified Dox on the outer layer to achieve the purpose of magnetic targeting therapy; however, this study only discusses cytotoxicity, loading capacity, and magnetism, and does not mention magnetic imaging performance.

There are other methods, for example, Sarlak et al. [87] first synthesized Fe3O4 NPs (10 nm) by thermal precipitation method, and then coated hydrophilic cellulose-poly citric acid to obtain the final product (CNC-PCA/Fe3O4). The most interesting thing is that the hydrated particle size after coating does not increase, and it also decreases (13.2 to 12 nm), which proves that there is no precipitation after coating, resulting in the high M s (52.2 emu g−1), so as to produce high r 1 (13.8 mM−1 s−1), r 2 (96.2 mM−1 s−1), and a considerable r 2/r 1 (7.0) at 3.0 T.

Although thermal decomposition can achieve small-scale production (typically 5 g), it does not meet the huge clinical demand; therefore, achieving large-scale and stable production of USIONs has become one of the key preconditions for its clinical application [88], whereas other methods cannot achieve large-scale production because of the constraints of particle size stability and shape constancy [89]. Starsich et al. [90] used flame aerosol technology to prepare different quantities of silica coatings with different proportions of iron(iii)acetylacetonate and hexamethyldisiloxane, and focused on structure–function relationships and cytocompatibility. This mode of production of USIONs can achieve stable, uniform, and constant production. The advantage of those prepared USIONs is that iron oxide exists in the form of monomer and its particle size is about 1.5 nm. It has good imaging effect as T 1 contract agent, however, because of silica coating causes a poor T 2 signal, the lethality of the four kinds of cells in the study of configuration and biocompatibility is not more than 15% even when the iron content reaches 1 mg/mL, which proves its potential for application in T 1 signal analysis.

Although the particles coated with ferroferric oxide alone can achieve dual-modulus imaging, their sensitivity cannot meet clinical requirements [91]; therefore, the development of highly sensitive CAs to meet the clinical needs has become one of the burning issues to be solved.

3.2 Application of Fe3O4 cladding metal in the outer layer of nanoparticles

Generally, neither Gd-based coordination complexes on the market today nor iron oxide or manganese metals can satisfy the high accuracy of diagnosis in tumor treatment [92]. The main reason is that other highly magnetic metals in the outer layer of nanoparticles can improve the sensitivity of nanoparticles, which can meet the requirements of high-precision imaging in clinical application [93].

Yang et al. [94] relied on this theory to prepare the late-model nanoparticles with cladding metal in the outer layer. The preparation process was as follows: first, polyethylenimine (PEI) coated on the synthesized of Fe3O4 NPs surface, then Gd(acac)3 forms the outermost layer at a suitable distance in the outer layer of Fe3O4@Gd2O3 NPs (YFGN) with an interstitial-hollow space forming a yolk-like structure, which ensures the formation of an ideal T 2 signal due to water molecules can pass through the porous shell and approach Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the core [95]. Besides, the special yolk-like structure owned a large specific surface area and mesopore, so that it can be used as a drug delivery system [96], so cisplatin was adsorbed to PEI by the special yolk-like structure. In addition, tumor cells in a slightly environment can produce more protons to replace platinum chelates, so as to achieve the effect of pH response, so cisplatin was released from YFGN through the special yolk-like structure. Final aminating PEG-COOH and folic acid improve the hydrophilicity and achieve the purpose of targeting, thus achieving the goal of complex (FA-PYFGN-CDDP). At 15 min post-injection, responding signal-to-noise ratio (ΔSNR) was 88.53% and 41.71% for T 1 and T 2, respectively, which testified quality targeting and imaging performance for FA-PYFGN. Concurrently, the r 1 and r 2 values of PYFGN were 7.91 and 386.5 mM−1 s−1, respectively (r 1 value of Gd2+ was 4.8 mM−1 s−1, and the r 2 value of original Fe3O4 was 268.1 mM−1 s−1); however, Gd2+ remained in other organs, especially in the kidneys. FA-PYFGN-CDDP showed advanced targeted ability and reduce the side effects of CDDP [97], and the improvement of therapeutic effect was nearly 1.5-fold; however, the retention of gadolinium in kidney and the tedious preparation process limited its practical application.

To effectively reduce the side effects of gadolinium retention, Xiong et al. [98] prepared Fe3O4 nanoparticles and coated with MnO2 to improve diagnostic accuracy and decrease aggregation in the reticuloendothelial system and its toxicity. In the acidic condition of tumors, Mn2+ was released and a T 1 signal was produced, which reduced aggregation of nanoparticles in normal tissues; at the same time, the inner Fe3O4 produced a T 2 signal, so that the CA with a double signal (in pH response terms) could be achieved. In addition, the stability of Fe3O4 coated with carbon is significantly improved, and carbon in the application can make the nanoparticles have other excellent properties in the later research, such as thermotherapy and fluorescence imaging (FL) because carbon possesses various excellent properties of chemically stable, tunable bandgap, good thermal conductivity, and stability [99].

The preparation process is as follows: the carbon shell coated Fe3O4 (Fe3O4@C, called FOC) nanoparticles were prepared by hydrothermal calcination of ferrocene and hydrogen peroxide at 240°C, and the supernatant was discarded under a magnetic field. Then the oxidative KMnO4 was added; Fe3O4@C@MnO2 (FOCMO, with S d of 130 nm) nanoparticles were prepared through the oxidation–reduction reaction [100] among the reductive FOC and the oxidative KMnO4. The r 1 was 5.33 mM−1 s−1, and r 2 = 364.20 mM−1 s−1 at pH = 5.0 in vivo (r 1 = 3.56 mM−1 s−1, r 2 = 396.57 mM−1 s−1 at pH = 6.5), which suggested sufficient sensitivity to acidic environment. After intravenous administration of FOCMONPs, T 1 value was enhanced for 127% at 24 h. Furthermore, T 2 value decreased 71% in vitro. In addition, the cell viability exhibited even a high (>85%) concentration up to 200 ppm for 24 h with HeLa and 4T1 cells, which demonstrated that FOCMO NPs can improve accuracy diagnosis.

3.3 Application of metal-doping-Fe3O4 in bimodal imaging

Metal-doping-Fe3O4 nanoparticles can be divided into two categories: one is that changing the iron valence to form new nanoparticles, and the other is that doping alone does not change the iron valence.

3.3.1 M x Fe3−x O4

To improve its magnetic sensitivity, Hu and colleagues prepared Mn x Fe3−x O4 by doping manganese into Fe3O4 by pyrolysis (MFNPs) [101]. The M s of the MFNPs gradually increased with increasing Mn2+ concentration, and reached 75.5 emu g−1 when x = 0.34. The relaxation signal increased with the increase in Mn concentration. When Mn reached 0.34, the maximum values of r 1 and r 2 were 21.5 and 67.2 mM−1 s−1, respectively. Furthermore, MFNPs showed excellent colloidal stability, including different solutions (H2O, PBS, and 1 M NaCl solution) and different pH solution (7–11), which showed good prospects for clinical application; however, the article does not cover cytotoxicity effects and in vivo imaging.

In the same way, Guldris et al. [102] coated PAA on zinc and manganese doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles by a hydrothermal method in gram-scale quantities to prepare ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (USPIOs), and then focused on the changes in their apparent properties, stability, and magnetic properties after different centrifugation time and speeds (namely, one sample (NP-ac) centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 12 h, and another sample (NP-bc) at 3,000 rpm for 10 min). Interestingly, with the increase in centrifugation time and rotation speed, the hydrated particle size decreased nearly two-fold (35 ± 17 to 18 ± 6 nm), the magnetic saturation strength decreased slightly, whereas the r 2 value increased nearly three-fold, and the r 1 value remained similar, because the nanoparticles coated on the surface were separated with the extension of rotation speed and time, resulting in the decrease in iron content and the increase in the content of the outer layer [103]. Furthermore, NP-ac and mouse stem cells can be co-cultured with rat mesenchymal stem cells for 16 h under physiological conditions without aggregation, whereas NP-bc can only remain for 1 h because of more PAA in the outer layer leading to a five-fold decrease in proteins binding [104], which proved the stability of NP-ac in vivo. At the same time, after long-term storage for 10 months, in water and agar media, the signal values of r 1 and r 2 did not decrease, but increased, again indicating NP-ac has excellent stability.

3.3.2 Metal-doping-Fe3O4

3.3.2.1 Application of Fe3O4 doping other metals in the outer layer

The effective doping of other metals in the outer layer can effectively improve the sensitivity of CA [105]. The dumbbell-hybrid nanotrimers (DB-HNTs) showed dual contrasts such as gold-doping-Fe3O4 NPs [106]; however, the preparation process was arduous and complicated. On this basis, Gong et al. [107] covered a manganese ferrite (MnFe3O4) nanoparticles enhanced dual models effect to overcome the tedious process of preparation, but Mn2+ was latent toxicity to human body. Similarly, Zhou et al. [108] showed Gd-embedded-Fe3O4 NPs as dual MR contrasts; however, the Gd2+ could lead to kidney malfunction [109]. Park et al. [110] also reported uranium-doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles (EuIO) as the novel agents. EuIO were synthesized by thermal decomposition method. The outer layer was modified by citric acid (EuIO-Cit). EuIO-Cit produced a higher r 1 value (17.2 mM−1 s−1, r 1Gd-DTPA = 4.8 mM−1 s−1) with a smaller r 2/r 1 value (5.2) as well as a high hydrophilicity and smaller size (5 nm), which showed better dual modulus development potential. The same magnetic properties are superior, but there remains the issue of the toxicity of foreign elements.

To solve the side effects caused by doping other metals, Thapa et al. [111] verified nitrodopamine-PEG coated single core truncated cubic Fe3O4 NPs (ND-PEG-tNCIOs, the average edge length was 12 nm) to enhance imaging effect. The result showed longitudinal and transverse relaxivity of 32 ± 1.29 mM−1 s−1 and 791 ± 38.39 mM−1 s−1 at 1.41 T at 30°C, respectively. As nitrodopamine-PEG owned the excellent biocompatibility, it could effectively avoid phagocytosis of the immune system so as to increase the iron content of the target local, thus improving the accuracy of T 2 imaging [112], at the same time, the inner structure of the cube makes it easier to aggregate at the tumors than a spherical structure, which makes the imaging results more accurate [113].

3.3.2.2 Application of Fe3O4 doping other metals in the inner core

Although embedding T 1 contrast metal (Gd3+, Eu3+, Ni2+, or Dy2+) into Fe3O4 NPs could not only improve the sensitivity of contrast medium, but also provide dual-mode imaging as for the fact that the internal impaction ensured the same magnetic field direction and increases mutually [114], as shown in Figure 5, rare-earth contrast materials occasionally cause nephrogenous systemic fibrosis [77]. Therefore, doping some metals as necessary elements of the body becomes an effective means.

Figure 5 
                        The influence of doping other metals in different positions on magnetic field strength: (a) outer layer; (b) inner layer [115].
Figure 5

The influence of doping other metals in different positions on magnetic field strength: (a) outer layer; (b) inner layer [115].

Based on this theory, Lu et al. [115] embedded Mn2+ into Fe3O4 NPs with hydroxyl-PEG-phosphonic acid through a one-pot reaction (Fe3O4/MnO, with a size of 20 nm) to improve synergistically imaging performance with safe and accuracy because Mn2+ was T 1-weighted CA [116]. The stability test indicated that the nanoparticles retained a single scattering peak even though their size increased to 35 nm from 21 nm after 21 days in water. The r 2 and r 1 values were 209.6 ± 0.7 and 22.8 ± 0.3 mM−1 s−1 (v. [Fe + Mn]), respectively, which was over five times than commercial Magnevist (4.4 ± 0.3 mM−1 s−1) in terms of the r 1 value and were higher than pure Fe3O4 NPs and MnO NPs in terms of the r 2 and r 1. Furthermore, the r 2/r 1 ratio was 9.2, which suggested its potential as dual-mode CA [117]. The results of T 1 and T 2 in vivo were similar: 5 min after injection, clear images of two kinds of signals could be seen in lung cancer, and 1 h post-injection, the signals could be seen in liver, which indicated that the dual-modulus could be clearly presented and maintained for sufficient time. Despite the excellent imaging results, cytotoxicity and long-term toxicity have not been studied.

4 Janus iron oxides multiple models imaging

Because of the inherent defects of a single CA, such as poor spatial-temporal resolution, low sensitivity, and shallow penetration depth, multi-mode integration of diagnosis and treatment emerged as a need [118]. To this scope, Janus nanomaterials show the potential for multi-mode integration of diagnosis and treatment as its multifaceted modifiability, drug loading ability, and so on, especially for cancer therapy [119]. In this review, Janus multi-models based on MRI imaging, combining one or more of PA, FL, and CT, are described as shown in Figure 6. Of course, there must be other types of multi-model imaging, which will not be discussed in this review.

Figure 6 
               Construction of Janus multi-model imaging.
Figure 6

Construction of Janus multi-model imaging.

4.1 FL and MRI

To meet the requirements of noninvasive, real-time, deep-seated tissue responsiveness for cell tracking technology [120], Song et al. [121] prepared Janus Fe3O4@PFODBT-COOH (S d was 51 nm) from poly[2,7-(9,9-dioctylfluorene)-alt-4,7-bis(thiophen-2-yl)benzo-2,1,3-thiadiazole](PFODBT, M w = 10,000–50,000), which exhibited fluorescence property at 680 nm, poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) (PSMA, M w = 1,700) which modified the nanoparticle surface with carboxyl groups to improve stability and prepared Fe3O4 nanoparticles by bath sonication. The r 2 signal intensity thereof seven times that commercial Feraheme at the same Fe concentration, at the same Fe concentration, at the same time, the cells were labelled and tracked by the optical properties of semiconductor material PFODPT, which was higher with a signal-to-background ratio of 2.03 at 250 labeled cells, what’s more, the FL and MRI signals only decreased by about 20% after 10 days. Although the Janus Fe3O4@PFODBT-COOH used in the present work achieved the combination of optical and magnetic imaging, it cannot meet the development needs of targeted, multi-mode imaging when it was applied only to the applied imaging after cell labeling.

To improve precise diagnostic and effective therapeutic action, Wang et al. [122] reported a simple method to direct assembly of curcumin (anticancer drug), Ce6 (photodynamic agent), and pH-sensitive molecules into polyphosphazene, and coated on Fe3O4 NPs to attain the final Janus NPs (FHCPCe NPs, the average size was 100 ± 10 nm). The M s and r 2 values of the FHCPCe NPs were 64.06 emu g−1 and 184.92 mM−1 s−1, respectively, which was higher than commercial Fericia. The anti-cancer results showed a hyperintense area for T 2-weighted MRI in vivo. More interestingly, over time, the signal at the tumor gradually increased, reaching its maximum value at 8 h, which indicated FHCPCe NPs accumulated at tumor cells because of the targeting properties of polyphosphazene. More importantly, because of Ce6 coupling to the surface of polyphosphatide, easy aggregation of Ce6 in water could be improved, and the fluorescence intensity and the yield of singlet oxygen were significantly increased. Therefore, the FL effect better complements the deficiency of MRI imaging, and a large number of singlet oxygen molecules can kill cancer cells efficiently, thus truly achieving a highly efficient integration of diagnosis and treatment.

4.2 PA and MRI

Janus imaging can facilitate the fast, effective and efficient imaging date, photoacoustic imaging (PA) was favored by researchers as its compatibility [123]. Bell and colleagues [124] developed a novel Janus model (attachment of Flammas774 to Fe3O4, with a size of 150 nm, FeO-774) for both PA and MRI. The reason for using Fe3O4-774 is that MRI offers complex anatomic details and PA provides biological- and metabolic-related information [125]. The optoacoustic absorption signal for FeO-774 (with a maximum absorption wavelength of 780 nm) showed the intensity of linear curve between concentration and absorption, which proved that FeO-774 was effective for use in suitable PA probes. The r 2 was 212 mM−1 s−1 for FeO-774, which was higher than commercial Resovist (r 2 = 151 mM−1 s−1) [126]. Although the results of in vivo imaging indicated that FeO-774 provided not only high-quality PA imaging but also excellent T 2 imaging, the results proved that FeO-774 was not aggregated in vivo; however, the author did not consider its toxicity.

To compensate for the deficiency of pure T 2 magnetic imaging, Ren et al. composed core/shell structure Fe3O4/Au NPs (of cubic structure with S d of 51.4 ± 2.8 nm) for dual-modulus imaging of MRI and PA for accurate diagnosis [127]. The magnetic saturation and r 2 values were respectively 97.8 emu g−1 and 625.1 mM−1 s−1. In vivo for MRI, the tumor area presented a darker magnetic field of vision after injection, which exhibited higher property for MRI. At the same time, PA imaging showed obvious neovascularization in the tumor area. The combination of the two methods shows a certain potential for clinical application.

4.3 CT and MRI

The combination of positron emission tomography (CT) and MRI is more popular in Janus model because MRI can provide images with excellent soft-tissue details [128], whereas CT imaging can provide a high-3D-resolution information of bone and calcification, so as to repair the defects of MRI, and it has a significant effect on early diagnosis of cancer [129].

To overcome the colloidal instability and poor biocompatibility with an organic layer of oleylamine or oleic acid coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles [104], Cui et al. [130] used an inorganic aluminum hydroxide layer to coat on the surface of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, and studied the influence of the thickness of aluminum hydroxide on MRI imaging. At the same time, bisphosphonate polyethyleneglycol (BP-PEG) was modified with the help of the phosphate radical on BP-PEG and aluminum to form the covalent coordination of hydroxide on fluoride, which can be used to realize CT and MRI imaging together and improve the accuracy of diagnosis. Interestingly, after filtering, the r 2 signal value of the sample can be increased by at least 1.5 times, which is similar to the results of José Rivas et al. [102]. When the ratio of ferric oxide to aluminum hydroxide is 1:1, the particle size can reach a minimum (21 nm); fluoride can also be effectively adsorbed, which leads to fluoride being located in the liver and spleen rather than being absorbed by bone because of the smaller particle size: this can prolong the blood circulation time [131], so that the sample will not decay in the body for at least 2 h.

To improve the accuracy of diagnosis, Shen and Shi [132] prepared superparamagnetic manganese ferrite (5 nm) using an environment-friendly solvothermal method, and then modified with PEG-dopamine and target material RGD to improve targeting and avoid phagocytosis of RES [133]. With the aid of dopamine and the RGD sulfhydryl group, a 64Cu radiolabel was adsorbed and the final product was obtained, which are targeted nanoparticles with CT and MRI effects (64Cu-NPs-dopa-PEG-DOTA/RGD, S d = 26.4 ± 7.5 nm). These 5 nm nanoparticles exhibited high M s (41.7 emu/g) at 15,000 Oe, and the r 2 was then 267.5 mM−1 s−1 (v. [Mn + Fe]), which was more than two times higher than Feridex (c.120 mM−1 s−1) [129]. In vivo imaging shows that nanoparticles can effectively gather in tumor areas, and radioactive substances are also more highly concentrated in organs than elsewhere; therefore, CT and MRI imaging effects were significantly improved, which indirectly proves that RGD can indirectly improve CT and MRI effects. In addition, because of the presence of RGD and dopamine, the blood circulation time was significantly increased.

Although MRI/CT dual imaging is realized above, MRI involves single signal imaging, which cannot achieve the accuracy needed for tissue recognition. Zhang et al. [134] wrapped GdF3 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles with PEG to form weighted T 1/T 2 signal and CT imaging capabilities to meet the high demand imposed by cancer diagnosis. In the mixed solution of ethylene glycol and water, PEG, Gd3+, Fe3+, and NH4F (as a catalyst) were added in turn to form PEG-coated GdF3:Fe nanoparticles at 100°C (length = 51.9 ± 6.1 nm, width = 31.3 ± 3.5 nm). The M s of the PEG-GdF3:Fe NPs (2.38 emu g−1 v. [Gd + Fe] at 20 kOe) was higher than that of KGdF4 NCs (1.97 emu g−1) [50]. The r 1 and r 2 relaxivity values of the PEG-GdF3:Fe NPs were 3.3 and 36.0 mM−1 s−1, respectively, and the r 2/r 1 ratio was 10.2, but PEG-GdF3:Fe NPs still be used as dual modulus imaging CA, which was analogy with FeCo NPs (r 2/r 1 = 9.2) [135]. The blood circulation time increased because of modified PEG [136], and the nanoparticles could accumulate effectively at tumor cells. After 1.5 h post-injection, dual-mode imaging could still be obtained clearly. At the same time, CT revealed that the imaging effect was still better than the clinical iobitridol at low dosage. The above results demonstrated the potential of multi-mode Janus imaging.

4.4 CT, FL, and MRI

Recently, the integration of targeted tumor diagnosis and treatment is a method that combines targeted diagnosis and treatment, which has become a powerful method to improve the cure rate. Janus nanoparticles joining three imaging mediums, CT, MRI and FL, can meet the requirements and show the great potential in imaging, diagnosis, and treatment [137].

Marco and colleagues had recently reported a new Janus NPs owning Au NPs with two enzymatic effectors and mesoporous silica coated β-cyclodextrin, which formed pH-responsive supramolecular nanovalve [138]. Dox loaded on porous structure based on the smart nanovalve successfully evaluated the anticancer effect with HeLa cancer cells in vitro, showing a significantly improved antitumor effect. However, it cannot achieve the purpose of imaging and real-time tracking simultaneously.

Then they reported again [139] on a novel Janus NPs by combining an Fe3O4 NPs/mesoporous silica@Au NPs to form core/shell structure, and modified the targeting peptide (cRGD) and a fluorescent dye. The preparation process is as follows: oleic-capped magnetic ferric oxide nanoparticles (Mag 320) were synthesized according to Liong’s method [140], involving cetyltrimethylammonium bromide in a reaction with oleic-capped magnetic ferric oxide nanoparticles in ultrapure water at 60°C under vigorous stirring. After adjusting the pH with sodium hydroxide, TEOS was added, and the magnetic ferric oxide coated with mesoporous SiO2 (Mag 320@MS) was obtained by electrostatic attraction. Mag 320@MS was emulsified by adding paraffin; after centrifugation and dilution with methanol, Mag 320@MS was reacted with (3-mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane, and the product was stirred and compounded with the prepared Au nanoparticles [141] to obtain Janus Au-Magnetic@MS NPs (Janus Au-Mag 320@MS). Catalyzed by NHS and EDAC, Alexa Fluor 647 Hydrazide was modified to Janus Au-Mag 320@MS, then cRGD was modified on the surface in a phosphate buffer by covalently linking, and finally, the fluorescent material was modified on the Janus NPs (RAM, the overall size was 163 ± 2.8 nm). The saturation magnetization value of RAM decreased to 7 emu/g (the M s of oleic-capped Fe3O4 NPs was 33.7 emu/g). Effectively, the low r 2 and r 1 values were 13 and 0.3 mM−1 s−1, respectively, and final r 2/r 1 ratio was 39, which was deemed acceptable against other reported MNPs [142]. This was mainly because of the ideal spatial structure of mesoporous silica, which could make protons pass through smoothly, thus producing resonance signal; however, because of the influence of more coating layer and other metals, the resonance signal was relatively weakened [141]. The fluorescence emission of RAM was not completely quenched, and the intensity of the fluorescence increased with the increase in concentration, which showed excellent optical tracking. The HU experimental values of RAM also increased with the concentration (linear relationship R 2 = 0.9963). No toxicity was found in HEK293, HepG2, and RAW 264.7 at 350 µg/mL of RAM in vitro. After 2 h of intravenous injection, RAM aggregation could be seen on MRI, which was mainly attributed to the effective targeting of rRGD, and the same results could still be seen on PET-CT (the PET-CT signal was more than twice as strong in terms of HU) and fluorescence tracing (no obvious weakness of fluorescence signal was observed). These results demonstrated the potential of RAM in multi-model imaging for diagnosis.

Whether using single modulus, dual modulus, or Janus-multi-modulus, it is necessary to apply ferric oxide to the accurate diagnosis of diseases. The relevant parts of the article are summarized in Table 1. From Table 1, we conclude that from the T 2 signal to T 1 signal and then to dual modulus mode, the size of nanomaterials is continuously decreasing, and M s is correspondingly reduced, which relatively reduced the r 2 signal and increased the r 1 signal according to the different imaging methods used. Of course, as the particle size and M s decrease, this also causes Fe3O4 NPs to weaken or even lose some magnetic properties, such as magnetic targeting and magnetic thermotherapy. At present, it is impossible to maintain the excellent magnetic properties on the basis of the dual modulus mode of operation, which needs further research.

Table 1

Fe3O4 NPs-related data of application in MRI

Name abbreviation Size/nm H d/nm M s (emu/g) r 2 (mM−1 s−1) r 1 (mM−1 s−1) r 2/r 1 Strength/T
Feridex [143] 4.8 58.5 127.48
HEX SPs [26] 15–20 (length), 30 (thickness) 44 1.774 0.093 19.08 4.7
Ab-MFPLL [38] 128 170.1 487.94 1.81 270.0 7
SPIONPs@Dex-WSG [41] 60.66 44.65 229.7 3.41 67.36 7
PMIDA@Fe3O4 [43] 61 64 341 102 3.34 11.7
Dy@Fe2O3 [46] 4.15 5.3 35 132.2 1.5
Zn0.44Fe2.56O4 [48] 38.9 88.9 803.5 37.2 21.6 1.5
FDPOMs [61] 120 120 7.4 192.06
ZUIONs [68] 3.3 7 2.4 1.1 2.2 1
Fe3+@PPOPA-b-Psar [70] 28.6 5.6 3
P2 [72] 4.8 9.9 20.7 5.3 3.8 1.41
FeGd-HN@Pt@LF/RGD2 [72] 6.6 14.7 8.6 70.71 56.57 1.25 1.5
AuNFs@MPS [78] 90 101 206.1 200 60.57 3.3 3
UMIONs [79] 3.3 4.6 50 35.1 8.3 4.7
CNC-PCA/Fe3O4 [85] 10 13.2 52.2 96.2 13.8 7 3
FA-PYFGN [87] 109 289 20.9 386.5 7.91 3
FOCMO [94] 114 143 26.67 364.2 5.33 3
EuIO-Cit [98] 4.9 78.3 42 89.1 17.2 5.18 1.5
ND-PEG-tNCIOs [11] 12 53 66 791 32 24.72 1.41
Fe3O4/MnO [115] 21 35 35.2 209.6 [Fe + Mn] 22.8 [Fe + Mn] 9.17 0.5
Fe3O4@PFODBT-COOH [121] 42.3 51 13 0.3 39 3
FHCPCe [122] 100 64.06 184.92 0.5
FeO-774 [124] 8 150 212 7
Fe3O4/Au [127] 51.4 97.8 625.1 7
64Cu-NPs-dopa-PEG-DOTA/RGD [132] 10 26.4 41.7 267.5 7
PEG-GdF3:Fe NPs [134] 51.9 (length), 31.3 (width) 2.38 36.0 3.3 10.2 1.5
RAM [139] 60 163 7 13 0.3 39 1.5

5 Other classes

Although the thermo-agents based on Fe3O4 NPs have been successfully cured of glioblastoma by intratumoral injection, intravenous injection is the most commonly used method in clinic; however, double ligands or magnetic targeting nanoparticles can effectively transport drugs to tumors after intravenous injection [144]. Grifantini et al. [145] reported a loading systems of Fe3O4 NPs carrying a monoclonal antibody, which was effective accumulation in tumor under the external magnetic field, thereby the dose was only one in 200 of that of MAb. Similarly, Felfoul et al. [146] studied a magnetic navigation system and demonstrated that magnetic targeting can effectively transport drugs to tumors. Similarly, Chen et al. [147] combined double ligand targeting (c(RGDyK) and DSPE-PEG2000) with magnetic targeting to meet the clinical application needs. The results showed that the nanoparticles effectively overcome the problem that magnetic fluid cannot be injected intravenously; this is because of the fact that the dual targeted ligands can effectively locate the nanoparticles to the tumor site [148].

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) were considered to be smart materials in biomedical applications and imaging because MOFs were similar to mesoporous silica, but MOF owned adjustable channel and volume [149]. Nejadshafiee et al. [150] adsorbed Fe3O4 nanoparticles and 5-fluorouracil (FU) into MOF materials using porous MOF materials, and coated them with FA modified chitosan in the outermost layer to achieve the characteristics of target and pH-responsive drug release (at pH = 5.5, FU release reached 90%). Although the magnetic saturation value decreased because of folic acid modified chitosan effects, the r 2 value increased by nearly 1.4 times because of the porous structure of MOF and the color effect of FU. In vivo imaging results showed that the magnetic imaging effect was strong in the tumor area. At the same time, the concentration of iron decreased significantly at 1 h post-injection, and the reduction reached 52.1%, which proved that it had a good metabolic rate and a certain targeting ability.

Similarly, Cong et al. [151] used MOF materials combined with Fe3O4 to achieve real-time monitoring of drug transport, targeted drug delivery, and controlled drug release. Fe3O4 nanoparticles and Dox were covered by a carton layer. The controlled release of Dox was achieved only after laser irradiation. In addition, the outer layer of MOF material was coated with FA to achieve targeted drug delivery. The magnetic saturation and r 2 values were 28.41 emu g−1 and 59.77 mM−1 s−1, respectively, which had a certain potential for magnetic imaging applications.

Fe3O4@MOF material analogues exhibit quality-drug loading, release, and self-monitoring, which offer the capacity to improve tumor therapeutic, but the preparation process is complex and difficult to industrialize.

In short, even single modulus imaging, dual modulus imaging, and Janus multi-model imaging are gradually adapting to the high requirements of clinical CAs. At present, the application of CAs has gradually introduced magnetic hyperthermia and iron death therapy from the previous simple imaging to the integration of diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, in the future, the development of contrast media will gradually develop toward the direction of multi-function, high sensitivity, and high biocompatibility.

6 Conclusion

This review summarizes the current status of iron CAs from initial application to current research, from the initial single-modulus T 1 and T 2 signals to the dual-modulus imaging format, while the dual modulus is divided into ultra-small nanoparticles of pure iron either externally or internally doped or coated with other metals, to the present Janus multimodal form, that is, combined with one or all of FL, PA, and CT, to achieve the current clinical demand imposed on CAs, such as high sensitivity, accurate imaging, and non-toxic requirements. Although single modulus imaging has inherent limitations in imaging, it shows more advantages in application, such as magnetic hyperthermia and magnetic targeting. Ultra-small Fe3O4 nanomaterials (< 5nm) can achieve the purpose of dual-mode imaging, which is complementary single modulus imaging limitations, but exposed the lack of sensitivity defects, so the introduction of other metals to make up for this defects. However, a variety of complementary methods are needed as for the complexity of clinical diseases, so Janus multi-model imaging has been gradually developed to meet the clinical needs. Similarly, it also partially describes the biological application of CAs, including single application to imaging and targeted drug delivery. Finally, the combination of CAs in other materials is described by MOF materials. The preparation method and the magnetic changes of the CA after modification were compared to provide theoretical support for the study of CAs in later generations.


These authors contributed equally to this review.


Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by Minjiang Scholarship of Fujian Province (No. Min-Gaojiao[2010]-117), Central-government Guided Fund for Local Economic Development (No. 830170778), R&D Fund for Strategic Emerging Industry of Fujian Province (No. 82918001), International Cooperation Project of Fujian Science and Technology Department (No. 830170771), and Teaching and Researching Fund for Young Staff of Fujian Educational Department (No. JT180040).

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Yang L, Sun C, Lin H, Gong X, Zhou T, Deng WT, et al. Sensitive contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of orthotopic and metastatic hepatic tumors by ultralow doses of zinc ferrite octapods. Chem Mater. 2019;31:1381–90.10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b04760Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Liu G, Hong RY, Guo L, Li YG, Li HZ. Preparation, characterization and MRI application of carboxymethyl dextran coated magnetic nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci. 2011;257(15):6711–7.10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.02.110Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Wu W, He QG, Jiang CZ. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and surface functionalization strategies. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2008;3:397–415.10.1007/s11671-008-9174-9Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Chen YL, Li M, Hong YN, Lam JWY, Zheng QC, Zhong B. Dual-modal MRI contrast agent with aggregation-induced emission characteristic for liver specific imaging with long circulation lifetime. ACS Appl Mater Inter. 2014;6:10783–91.10.1021/am502282fSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Jun YW, Huh YM, Choi JS, Lee JH, Song HT, Kim SJ, et al. Nanoscale size effect of magnetic nanocrystals and their utilization for cancer diagnosis via magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;16:5732–3.10.1021/ja0422155Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Mornet S, Vasseur S, Grasset F, Veverka P, Goglio G, Demourgues A, et al. Magnetic nanoparticle design for medical applications. Prog Solid State Ch. 2006;34:237–47.10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2005.11.010Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Kim BH, Lee N, Kim H, An K, Park YI, Choi Y, et al. Large-scale synthesis of uniform and extremely small-sized iron oxide nanoparticles for high-resolution T1 magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:12624–31.10.1021/ja203340uSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Zheng SW, Huang M, Hong RY, Deng SM, Cheng LF, Gao B, Badami D. RGD-conjugated iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles for MRI contrast enhancement and hyperthermia. J Biomater Appl. 2013;28(7):1051–9.10.1177/0885328213493486Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Gao J, Liang G, Cheung JS, Pan Y. Multifunctional yolk-shell nanoparticles: a potential MRI contrast and anticancer agent. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:11828–33.10.1021/ja803920bSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Terreno E, Castelli DD, Viale A, Aime S. Challenges for molecular magnetic resonance imaging. Chem Rev. 2010;110:3019–42.10.1021/cr100025tSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Dubravka N, Marta J, Jovana P, Danijela V, Tatjana R, Sanja RŠ, et al. Application of iron nanoparticles in contemporary physiology and cell biology research. Rev Adv Meter Sci. 2018;53:74–8.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Leung KC, Xuan S, Zhu X, Wang D, Chak CP, Lee SF, et al. Gold and iron oxide hybrid nanocomposite materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:1911–28.10.1039/C1CS15213KSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Moraes Silva S, Tavallaie R, Sandiford L, Tilley RD, Gooding JJ. Gold coated magnetic nanoparticles: from preparation to surface modification for analytical and biomedical applications. Chem Commun. 2016;52:7528–40.10.1039/C6CC03225GSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Lacroix LM, Delpech F, Nayral C, Lachaize S, Chaudret B. New generation of magnetic and luminescent nanoparticles for in vivo real-time imaging. Interface Focus. 2013;3:20120103.10.1098/rsfs.2012.0103Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Ban Q, Bai T, Duan X, Kong J. Noninvasive photothermal cancer therapy nanoplatforms via integrating nanomaterials and functional polymers. Biomater Sci. 2017;5:190–210.10.1039/C6BM00600KSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Jadhav V, Chikode P, Nikam G, Sabale S. Polyol synthesis and characterization of ZnO@CoFe2O4 MNP’s to study the photodegradation rate of azo and diphenyl type dye. Mater Today Proc. 2016;3:4121–7.10.1016/j.matpr.2016.11.084Suche in Google Scholar

[17] McNamara K, Tofail SA. Nanosystems: the use of nanoalloys, metallic, bimetallic, and magnetic nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:27981–95.10.1039/C5CP00831JSuche in Google Scholar

[18] Salihov SV, Ivanenkov YA, Krechetov SP, Veselov MS, Sviridenkova NV, Savchenko AG, et al. Recent advances in the synthesis of Fe3O4@AU core/shell nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater. 2015;394:173–8.10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.06.012Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Wang XM, Guo SW, Li ZQ, Xiao XY, Gu L, Luo Q, et al. Safe and potent MRI contrast agents by complexing gadolinium with enzyme/reduction dual-sensitive branched polymers. Appl Mater Today. 2019;17:92–103.10.1016/j.apmt.2019.07.019Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Mogul R, Getz Kelly JJ, Cable ML, Hebard AF. Synthesis and magnetic characterization of microstructures prepared from microbial templates of differing morphology. Mater Let. 2006;60:19–22.10.1016/j.matlet.2005.07.066Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Yang L, Sun C, Lin H, Gong X, Zhou T, Deng WT, et al. Sensitive contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of orthotopic and metastatic hepatic tumors by ultralow doses of zinc ferrite octapods. Chem Mater. 2019;31:1381–90.10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b04760Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Skumiel A, Kaczmarek-Klinowska M, Timko M, Molcan M, Rajnak M. Evaluation of power heat losses in multidomain iron particles under the influence of AC magnetic field in RF range. Inter J Ther. 2013;34:655–66.10.1007/s10765-012-1380-0Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Xie J, Yan C, Zhang Y, Gu N. Shape evolution of “multibranched” Mn-Zn ferrite nanostructures with high performance: a transformation of nanocrystals into nanoclusters. Chem Mater. 2013;25:3702–9.10.1021/cm402036dSuche in Google Scholar

[24] Kikuchi T, Kasuya R, Endo S, Nakamura A, Takai T, Metzler-Nolte N, et al. Preparation of magnetite aqueous dispersion for magnetic fluid hyperthermia. J Magn Magn Mater. 2011;323:1216–22.10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.11.009Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Gyergyek S, Makovec D, Jagodič M, Drofenik M, Schenk K, Jordan O, et al. Hydrothermal growth of iron oxide NPs with a uniform size distribution for magnetically induced hyperthermia: Structural, colloidal and magnetic properties. J Alloy Compd. 2017;694:261–71.10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.238Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Kluenker M, Tahir MN, Dören R, Deuker M, Komforth P, Plana-Ruiz S, et al. Iron oxide superparticles with enhanced MRI performance by solution phase epitaxial growth. Chem Mater. 2018;30:4277–88.10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01128Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Gunawan AA, Chernomordik BD, Plemmons DS, Deng DD, Aydil ES, Mkhoyan KA. Plasmonic interactions through chemical bonds of surface ligands on PbSe nanocrystals. Chem Mater. 2014;26:3328–33.10.1021/cm501254mSuche in Google Scholar

[28] Sandiford L, Phinikaridou A, Protti A, Meszaros LK, Cui XJ, Yan Y, et al. Bisphosphonate-anchored PEGylation and radiolabeling of superparamagnetic iron oxide: long-circulating nanoparticles for in Vivo multimodal (T1 MRI-SPECT) imaging. ACS Nano. 2013;7:500–12.10.1021/nn3046055Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Zhang P, Li QF, Wang J, Shi Y, Ling YF. Effect of PVA fiber on durability of cementitious composite containing nano-SiO2. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8:116–27.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0011Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Hong RY, Li JH, Qu JM, Chen LL, Li HZ. Preparation and characterization of magnetite/dextran nanocomposite used as a precursor of magnetic fluid. Chem Eng J. 2009;150:572–80.10.1016/j.cej.2009.03.034Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Mailander V, Landfester K. Interaction of nanoparticles with cells. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:2379–400.10.1021/bm900266rSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Liu D, Wu W, Ling J, Wen S, Gu N, Zhang X. Effective PEGylation of iron oxide nanoparticles for high performance in vivo cancer imaging. Adv Funct Mater. 2011;21:1498–504.10.1002/adfm.201001658Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Xie J, Xu C, Kohler N, Hou Y, Sun S. Controlled PEGylation of monodisperse Fe3O4 nanoparticles for reduced non-specific uptake by macrophage cells. Adv Mater. 2007;19:3163–6.10.1002/adma.200701975Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Amstad E, Gillich T, Bilecka I, Textor M, Reimhult E. Ultrastable iron oxide nanoparticle colloidal suspensions using dispersants with catechol-derived anchor groups. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;9:4042–8.10.1021/nl902212qSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Ye M, Qian Y, Tang J, Hu H, Sui M, Shen Y. Targeted biodegradable dendritic MRI contrast agent for enhanced tumor imaging. J Control Rel. 2013;69:239–45.10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.01.034Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Liu L, Ye Q, Wu Y, Hsieh WY, Chen CL, Shen HH, et al. Tracking T-cells in vivo with a new nano-sized MRI contrast agent. Nanomedicine. 2012;8:1345–54.10.1016/j.nano.2012.02.017Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[37] Zatovicova MM, Jelenska L, Hulikova A, Ditte P, Ditte Z, Csaderova L, et al. Monoclonal antibody G250 targeting CA IX: binding specificity, internalization and therapeutic effects in a non-renal cancer model. Int J Oncol. 2014;45:2455–67.10.3892/ijo.2014.2658Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Kubovcikova M, Koneracka M, Strbak O, Molcan M, Zavisova V, Antal I, et al. Poly-L-lysine designed magnetic nanoparticles for combined hyperthermia, magnetic resonance imaging and cancer cell detection. J Magn Magn Mater. 2019;475:316–26.10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.027Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Blanco-Andujar C, Walter A, Cotin G, Bordeianu C, Mertz D, Felder-Flesch D, et al. Design of iron oxide-based nanoparticles for MRI and magnetic hyperthermia. Nanomedicine. 2016;11:1889–910.10.2217/nnm-2016-5001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[40] Zhang HH, Chen GH, Yu B, Cong HL. Emerging advanced nanomaterials for cancer photothermal therapy. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2018;53:131–46.10.1515/rams-2018-0010Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Yin J, Yin G, Pu X, Huang Z, Yao D. Preparation and characterization of peptide modified ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxides used as tumor targeting MRI contrast agent. RSC Adv. 2019;9:19397–407.10.1039/C9RA02636CSuche in Google Scholar

[42] Louie A. Multimodality imaging probes: design and challenges. Chem Rev. 2020;110:3146–95.10.1021/cr9003538Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[43] Demin AM, Pershina AG, Minin AS, Mekhaev AV, Ivanov VV, Lezhava SP, et al. PMIDA-modified Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis and application for Liver MRI. Langmuir. 2018;34:3449–58.10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b04023Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[44] Bhattacharya D, Baksi A, Banerjee I, Ananthakrishnan R, Maiti TK, Pramanik P. Development of phosphonate modified Fe(1−x)MnxFe2O4 mixed ferrite nanoparticles: novel peroxidase mimetics in enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Talanta. 2011;86:337–48.10.1016/j.talanta.2011.09.026Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Hu Y, Mignani S, Majoral JP, Shen M, Shi X. Construction of iron oxide nanoparticle-based hybrid platforms for tumor imaging and therapy. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47:1874–900.10.1039/C7CS00657HSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Yin J, Xu F, Qu H, Li C, Liu S, Liu L, et al. Dysprosium-doped iron oxide nanoparticles boosting spin-spin relaxation: a computational and experimental study. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21:11883–91.10.1039/C9CP00463GSuche in Google Scholar

[47] Shi X, Li Z, Ge X, Yang C, Fang B, Wei J, et al. Water-soluble noncovalently engineered graphene-neutral red nanocomposite with photocurrent generating capacity. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2012;12:1792–8.10.1166/jnn.2012.5168Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] Yang L, Wang Z, Ma L, Li A, Xin J, Wei R, et al. The roles of morphology on the relaxation rates of magnetic nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2018;12:4605–14.10.1021/acsnano.8b01048Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Yang L, Zhou Z, Liu H, Wu C, Zhang H, Huang G, et al. Europium-engineered iron oxide nanocubes with high T1 and T2 contrast abilities for MRI in living subjects. Nanoscale. 2015;7:6843–50.10.1039/C5NR00774GSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Ju Q, Tu D, Liu Y, Li R, Zhu H, Chen J, et al. Amine-functionalized lanthanide-doped KGdF4 nanocrystals as potential optical/magnetic multimodal bioprobes. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:1323–30.10.1021/ja2102604Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Lapčík L, Vašina M, Lapčíková B, Hui D, Otyepková E, Richard W, et al. Materials characterization of advanced fillers for composites engineering applications. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8:503–12.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0045Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Jia FF, Li GL, Yang B, Yu B, Shen YQ, Cong HL. Investigation of rare earth upconversion fluorescent nanoparticles in biomedical field. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8:1–17.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0001Suche in Google Scholar

[53] Karthi S, Govindan R, Gangadharan A. Luminomagnetic Nd3+ doped fluorapatite coated Fe3O4 nanostructures for biomedical applications. Je Am Ceram Soc. 2019;33:2558–68.10.1111/jace.16090Suche in Google Scholar

[54] Thorat ND, Lemine OM, Bohara RA, Omri K, El Mir L, Tofail SA. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanocargoes for combined cancer thermotherapy and MRI applications. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016;18:21331–9.10.1039/C6CP03430FSuche in Google Scholar

[55] Shelat R, Bhatt LK, Khanna A, Chandra S. A comprehensive toxicity evaluation of novel amino acid-modified magnetic ferrofluids for magnetic resonance imaging. Amino Acids. 2019;51:929–43.10.1007/s00726-019-02726-1Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[56] Guo SH, Fu DW, Utupova A, Sun DJ, Zhou M, Jin Z, et al. Applications of polymer-based nanoparticles in vaccine field. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8:143–55.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0014Suche in Google Scholar

[57] Li F, Nie W, Zhang F, Lu G, Lv C, Lv Y, et al. Engineering magnetosomes for high-performance cancer vaccination. ACS Cent Sci. 2019;5:796–807.10.1021/acscentsci.9b00060Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[58] Liu G, Qi M, Hutchinson MR, Yang G, Goldys EM. Recent advances in cytokine detection by immunosensing. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;79:810–21.10.1016/j.bios.2016.01.020Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[59] Ma K, Liu GJ, Yan L. AIEgen based poly(L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) magnetic nanoparticles to localize cytokine VEGF for early cancer diagnosis and photothermal therapy. Nanomedicine-UK. 2019;12:1191–201.10.2217/nnm-2018-0467Suche in Google Scholar

[60] Mikhail AS, Allen C. Block copolymer micelles for delivery of cancer therapy: transport at the whole body, tissue and cellular levels. J Control Rel. 2009;138:214–23.10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.04.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[61] Yang T, Niu D, Chen J, He J, Yang S, Jia X, et al. Biodegradable organosilica magnetic micelles for magnetically targeted MRI and GSH-triggered tumor chemotherapy. Biomater Sci. 2019;7:2951–60.10.1039/C9BM00342HSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[62] Wei J, Shuai X, Wang R, He X, Li Y, Ding M, et al. Clickable and imageable multiblock polymer micelles with magnetically guided and PEG-switched targeting and release property for precise tumor theranosis. Biomaterials-UK. 2017;145:138–53.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.08.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[63] Ngen EJ, Wang L, Kato Y, Krishnamachary B, Zhu W, Gandhi N, et al. Imaging transplanted stem cells in real time using an MRI dual-contrast method. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13628.10.1038/srep13628Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[64] Lee DE, Koo H, Sun IC, Ryu JH, Kim K, Kwon IC. Multifunctional nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and theragnosis. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:2656–72.10.1039/C2CS15261DSuche in Google Scholar

[65] Ja-Young P. Highly water-dispersible PEG surface modified ultra small superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles useful for target-specific biomedical applications. Nanotechnology. 2008;36:365603.Suche in Google Scholar

[66] Mishra SK, Kumar SBH, Khushu S, Tripathi RP, Gangenahalli G. Increased transverse relaxivity in ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles used as MRI contrast agent for biomedical imaging. Contrast Media Mole I. 2016;350–61.10.1002/cmmi.1698Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[67] Wei H, Bruns OT, Kaul MG, Hansen EC, Barch M, Wisniowska A, et al. Exceedingly small iron oxide nanoparticles as positive MRI contrast agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:2325–30.10.1073/pnas.1620145114Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[68] Liang G, Han J, Hao Q. Gram-scale preparation of iron oxide nanoparticles with renal clearance properties for enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2018;1:1389–97.10.1021/acsabm.8b00346Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[69] Li Y, Huang Y, Wang Z, Carniato F, Xie Y, Patterson JP, et al. Polycatechol nanoparticle MRI contrast agents. Small. 2016;12:668–77.10.1002/smll.201502754Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[70] Miao Y, Xie F, Cen J, Zhou F, Tao X, Luo J, et al. Fe3+ @polyDOPA-b-polysarcosine, a T1-weighted MRI contrast agent via controlled NTA polymerization. ACS Macro Lett. 2018;7:693–98.10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00287Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[71] Chan N, Laprise-Pelletier M, Chevallier P, Bianchi A, Fortin MA, Oh JK. Multidentate block-copolymer-stabilized ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with enhanced colloidal stability for magnetic resonance imaging. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:2146–56.10.1021/bm500311kSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[72] Xiao W, Legros P, Chevallier P, Lagueux J, Oh JK, Fortin M-A. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles stabilized with multidentate block copolymers for optimal vascular contrast inT1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2018;1:894–907.10.1021/acsanm.7b00300Suche in Google Scholar

[73] Khanafer M, Izquierdo-Lorenzo I, Akil S, Louarn G, Toufaily J, Hamieh T, et al. Silver nanoparticle rings of controllable size: multi-wavelength SERS response and high enhancement of three pyridine derivatives. Chemistry Select. 2016;1:1201–6.10.1002/slct.201600035Suche in Google Scholar

[74] Simon GH, Vopelius-Feldt JV, Fu YJ, Schlegel J, Pinotek G, Wendland MF, et al. Ultrasmall supraparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of antigen-induced arthritis. a comparative study between SHU 555 C, Ferumoxtran-10, and Ferumoxytol. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:45–52.10.1097/01.rli.0000191367.61306.83Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[75] Shen Z, Song J, Yung BC, Zhou Z, Wu A, Chen X. Emerging strategies of cancer therapy based on Ferroptosis. Adv Mater. 2018;30:e1704007.10.1002/adma.201704007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[76] Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149:1060–72.10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[77] Krzysztof S, Magdalena C, Magdalena MK, Berta F, Bartłomiej D, Sylwia MW, et al. Toxicity of metallic nanoparticles in the central nervous system. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8:175–200.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0017Suche in Google Scholar

[78] Shen Z, Liu T, Li Y, Lau J, Yang Z, Fan W, et al. Fenton-reaction-acceleratable magnetic nanoparticles for ferroptosis therapy of orthotopic brain tumors. ACS Nano. 2018;12:11355–65.10.1021/acsnano.8b06201Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[79] Roy E, Patra S, Madhuri R, Sharma PK. Anisotropic gold nanoparticle decorated magnetopolymersome: an advanced nanocarrier for targeted photothermal therapy and dual-mode responsive T1 MRI imaging. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;3:2120–35.10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00089Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[80] Roy E, Patra S, Madhuri R, Sharma PK. Stimuli-responsive poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide)-co-tyrosine@gadolinium: iron oxide nanoparticle-based nanotheranostic for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Colloid Surf B. 2016;142:248–58.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.02.053Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[81] Shin TH, Choi JS, Yun S, Kim IS, Song HT, Kim Y, et al. T1 and T2 dual-mode MRI contrast agent for enhancing accuracy by engineered nanomaterials. ACS Nano. 2014;8:3393–401.10.1021/nn405977tSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[82] Shen Z, Chen T, Ma X, Ren W, Zhou Z, Zhu G, et al. Multifunctional theranostic nanoparticles based on exceedingly small magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and chemotherapy. ACS Nano. 2017;11:10992–1004.10.1021/acsnano.7b04924Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[83] Chen C, Li JG, Luo GQ, Xiong YL, Zhang QS. Size-controlled in situ synthesis and photo-responsive properties of silver/poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposite films with high silver content. Appl Sur Sci. 2012;24:10180–4.10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.06.102Suche in Google Scholar

[84] Li Z, Tan B, Allix M, Cooper AI, Rosseinsky MJ. Direct coprecipitation route to monodisperse dual-functionalized magnetic iron oxide nanocrystals without size selection. Small. 2008;4:231–9.10.1002/smll.200700575Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[85] Li Z, Yi PW, Sun Q, Lei H, Li H, Zhao HL, et al. Ultrasmall water-soluble and biocompatible magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as positive and negative dual contrast agents. Adva Funct Mater. 2012;22:2387–93.10.1002/adfm.201103123Suche in Google Scholar

[86] Majeed MI, Lu Q, Yan W, Li Z, Hussain I, Tahir MN, et al. Highly water-soluble magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles for drug delivery: enhanced in vitro therapeutic efficacy of doxorubicin and MION conjugates. J Mater Chem B. 2013;1:2874.10.1039/c3tb20322kSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[87] Torkashvand N, Sarlak N. Fabrication of a dual T1 and T2 contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging using cellulose nanocrystals/Fe3O4 nanocomposite. Eur Poly J. 2019;118:128–36.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.05.048Suche in Google Scholar

[88] Valencia PM, Farokhzad OC, Karnik R, Langer R. Microfluidic technologies for accelerating the clinical translation of nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7:623–9.10.1201/9780429399039-3Suche in Google Scholar

[89] Liu CL, Peng YK, Chou SW, Tseng WH, Tseng YJ, Chen HC, et al. One-step, room-temperature synthesis of glutathione-capped iron-oxide nanoparticles and their application in in vivo T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Small. 2014;10:3962–9.10.1002/smll.201303868Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[90] Starsich FHL, Eberhardt C, Keevend K, Boss A, Hirt AM, Herrmann IK, et al. Reduced magnetic coupling in ultrasmall iron oxide T1 MRI contrast agents. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2018;1:783–91.10.1021/acsabm.8b00244Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[91] Na HB, Song IC, Hyeon T. Inorganic nanoparticles for MRI contrast agents. Adv Mater. 2009;21:2133–48.10.1002/adma.200802366Suche in Google Scholar

[92] Lee YC, Chen DY, Dodd SJ, Bouraoud N, Koretsky AP, Krishnan KM. The use of silica coated MnO nanoparticles to control MRI relaxivity in response to specific physiological changes. Biomaterials-UK. 2012;33:3560–7.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.062Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[93] Choi JS, Lee JH, Shin TH, Song H-T, Kim EY, Cheon J. Self-confirming “and” logic nanoparticles for fault-free MRI. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:11015–7.10.1021/ja104503gSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[94] Yang M, Gao L, Liu K, Luo C, Wang Y, Yu L, et al. Characterization of Fe3O4/SiO2/Gd2O(CO3)2 core/shell/shell nanoparticles as T1 and T2 dual mode MRI contrast agent. Talanta. 2015;131:661–5.10.1016/j.talanta.2014.08.042Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[95] Kim MH, Son HY, Kim GY, Park K, Huh YM, Haam S. Redoxable heteronanocrystals functioning magnetic relaxation switch for activatable T1 and T2 dual-mode magnetic resonance imaging. Biomaterials-UK. 2016;101:121–30.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.054Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[96] Fan W, Shen B, Bu W, Chen F, Zhao K, Zhang S, et al. Rattle-structured multifunctional nanotheranostics for synergetic chemo-/radiotherapy and simultaneous magnetic/luminescent dual-mode imaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:6494–503.10.1021/ja312225bSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[97] Sun X, Du R, Zhang L, Zhang G, Zheng X, Qian J, et al. A pH-responsive yolk-like nanoplatform for tumor targeted dual-mode magnetic resonance imaging and chemotherapy. ACS Nano. 2017;11:7049–59.10.1021/acsnano.7b02675Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[98] Xiong LQ, Chen ZG, Yu MX, Li FY, Liu C, Huang CH. Synthesis, characterization, and in vivo targeted imaging of amine-functionalized rare-earth up-converting nanophosphors. Biomaterials-UK. 2009;30:5592–600.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.015Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[99] Liu YF, Jiang LY, Wang HN, Wang H, Jiao W, Chen GZ, et al. A brief review for fluorinated carbon: synthesis, properties and applications. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8(1):573–86.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0051Suche in Google Scholar

[100] Guo W, Qi Y, Zhang Y, Ma L, Yu D, Zhan J. Biocompatible caramelized carbonaceous nanospheres supported paramagnetic ultrathin manganese oxide nanosheets via self-sacrificing reduction as a MRI contrast agent for liver imaging. Carbon. 2016;110:321–9.10.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.030Suche in Google Scholar

[101] Wang L, Wu Q, Tang S, Zeng J, Qiao R, Zhao P, et al. Ultrasmall PEGylated MnxFe3−xO4 (x = 0-0.34) nanoparticles: effects of Mn(ii) doping on T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. RSC Adv. 2013;3:23454.10.1039/c3ra43985bSuche in Google Scholar

[102] Guldris N, Argibay B, Kolen’ko YV, Carbo-Argibay E, Sobrino T, Campos F, et al. Influence of the separation procedure on the properties of magnetic nanoparticles: gaining in vitro stability and T1-T2 magnetic resonance imaging performance. J Colloid Interf Sci. 2016;472:229–36.10.1016/j.jcis.2016.03.040Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[103] Walkey CD, Olsen JB, Guo H, Emili A, Chan WCW. Nanoparticle size and surface chemistry determine serum protein adsorption and macrophage uptake. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:2139–47.10.1021/ja2084338Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[104] Wang X, Niu D, Wu Q, Bao S, Su T, Liu X, et al. Iron oxide/manganese oxide co-loaded hybrid nanogels as pH-responsive magnetic resonance contrast agents. Biomaterials-UK. 2015;53:349–57.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.101Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[105] Zhou ZJ, Bai RL, Wang ZT, Bryant H, Lang LX, Merkle H, et al. An albumin-binding T1-T2 dual-modal MRI contrast agents for improved sensitivity and accuracy in tumor imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2019;30:1821–9.10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00349Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[106] Cheng K, Yang M, Zhang RP, Qin CX, Su XH, Cheng Z. Hybrid nanotrimers for dual T1 and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. ACS Nano. 2014;8:9884–96.10.1021/nn500188ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[107] Gong M, Yang H, Zhang S, Yang Y, Zhang D, Li Z, et al. Targeting T1 and T2 dual modality enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tumor vascular endothelial cells based on peptides-conjugated manganese ferrite nanomicelles. Int J Nanomed. 2016;11:4051–63.10.2147/IJN.S104686Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[108] Zhou Z, Huang D, Bao J, Chen Q, Liu G, Chen Z, et al. A synergistically enhanced T(1) -T(2) dual-modal contrast agent. Adv Mater. 2012;24:6223–8.10.1002/adma.201203169Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[109] Kanal E, Tweedle MF. Residual or retained gadolinium: practical implications for radiologists and our patients. Radiology. 2015;275:630–4.10.1148/radiol.2015150805Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[110] Park JC, Lee GT, Kim HK, Sung B, Lee Y, Kim M, et al. Surface design of Eu-doped iron oxide nanoparticles for tuning the magnetic relaxivity. ACS Appl Mater Interf. 2018;10:25080–9.10.1021/acsami.8b06569Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[111] Thapa B, Diaz-Diestra D, Santiago-Medina C, Kumar N, Tu K, Beltran-Huarac J, et al. T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance dual contrast by single core truncated cubic iron oxide nanoparticles with abrupt cellular internalization and immune evasion. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2018;1:79–89.10.1021/acsabm.8b00016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[112] Champion JA, Mitragotri S. Role of target geometry in phagocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:4930–4.10.1073/pnas.0600997103Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[113] Park JH, Von Maltzahn G, Zhang L, Schwartz MP, Ruoslahti E, Bhatia SN, et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoworms for tumor targeting and imaging. Adv Mater. 2008;20:1630–5.10.1002/adma.200800004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[114] Ban I, Stergar J, Maver U. NiCu magnetic nanoparticles: review of synthesis methods, surface functionalization approaches, and biomedical applications. Nanotechnol Rev. 2018;7(2):187–207.10.1515/ntrev-2017-0193Suche in Google Scholar

[115] Lu C, Dong P, Pi L, Wang Z, Yuan H, Liang H, et al. Hydroxyl-PEG-phosphonic acid-stabilized superparamagnetic manganese oxide-doped iron oxide nanoparticles with synergistic effects for dual-mode MR imaging. Langmuir. 2019;35:9474–82.10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00736Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[116] Zhao Z, Fan H, Zhou G, Bai H, Liang H, Wang R, et al. Activatable fluorescence/MRI bimodal platform for tumor cell imaging via MnO2 nanosheet-aptamer nanoprobe. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:11220–3.10.1021/ja5029364Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[117] Caravan P, Ellison JJ, McMurry TJ, Lauffer RB. Gadolinium(III) chelates as MRI contrast agents: structure, dynamics, and applications. Chem Rev. 1999;99:2293–352.10.1021/cr980440xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[118] Marciello M, Pellico J, Fernandez-Barahona I, Herranz F, Ruiz-Cabello J, Filice M. Recent advances in the preparation and application of multifunctional iron oxide and liposome-based nanosystems for multimodal diagnosis and therapy. Interface Focus. 2016;6:20160055.10.1098/rsfs.2016.0055Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[119] Shao D, Li J, Zheng X, Pan Y, Wang Z, Zhang M, et al. Janus “nano-bullets” for magnetic targeting liver cancer chemotherapy. Biomaterials-UK. 2016;100:118–33.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.030Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[120] Ahrens ET, Bulte JW. Tracking immune cells in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:755–63.10.1038/nri3531Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[121] Song G, Chen M, Zhang Y, Cui L, Qu H, Zheng X, et al. Janus iron oxides @ semiconducting polymer nanoparticle tracer for cell tracking by magnetic particle imaging. Nano Lett. 2018;18:182–9.10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03829Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[122] Jing X, Zhi Z, Jin L, Wang F, Wu Y, Wang D, et al. pH/redox dual-stimuli-responsive cross-linked polyphosphazene nanoparticles for multimodal imaging-guided chemo-photodynamic therapy. Nanoscale. 2019;11:9457–67.10.1039/C9NR01194CSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[123] Garcia J, Tang T, Louie AY. Nanoparticle-based multimodal PET/MRI probes. Nanomedicine-UK. 2015;10:1343–59.10.2217/nnm.14.224Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[124] Bell G, Balasundaram G, Attia ABE, Mandino F, Olivo M, Parkin IP. Functionalised iron oxide nanoparticles for multimodal optoacoustic and magnetic resonance imaging. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7:2212–9.10.1039/C8TB02299BSuche in Google Scholar

[125] Peng YK, Lui CN, Lin TH, Chang C, Chou PT, Yung KK, et al. Multifunctional silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticles: a facile four-in-one system for in situ study of neural stem cell harvesting. Faraday Discuss. 2014;175:13–26.10.1039/C4FD00132JSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[126] Wang YX. Superparamagnetic iron oxide based MRI contrast agents: current status of clinical application. IEEE Tran Magn. 2011;1:35–40.Suche in Google Scholar

[127] Kang N, Xu D, Han Y, Lv X, Chen Z, Zhou T, et al. Magnetic targeting core/shell Fe3O4/Au nanoparticles for magnetic resonance/photoacoustic dual-modal imaging. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;98:545–9.10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.013Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[128] Ni D, Zhang J, Bu W, Zhang C, Yao Z, Xing H, et al. PEGylated NaHoF4 nanoparticles as contrast agents for both X-ray computed tomography and ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging. Biomaterials-UK. 2016;76:218–25.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.063Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[129] Hwang DW, Ko HY, Lee JH, Kang H, Ryu SH, Song IC, et al. A nucleolin-targeted multimodal nanoparticle imaging probe for tracking cancer cells using an aptamer. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:98–105.10.2967/jnumed.109.069880Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[130] Cui X, Belo S, Kruger D, Yan Y, De Rosales RT, Jauregui-Osoro M, et al. Aluminium hydroxide stabilised MnFe2O4 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles as dual-modality contrasts agent for MRI and PET imaging. Biomaterials-UK. 2014;35:5840–6.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[131] Phillips MA, Gran ML, Peppas NA. Targeted nanodelivery of drugs and diagnostics. Nano Today. 2010;5:143–59.10.1016/j.nantod.2010.03.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[132] Shi X, Shen L. Integrin alphavbeta3 receptor targeting PET/MRI dual-modal imaging probe based on the (64)Cu labeled manganese ferrite nanoparticles. J Inorg Biochem. 2018;186:257–63.10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2018.06.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[133] Yang X, Hong H, Grailer JJ, Rowland IJ, Javadi A, Hurley SA, et al. cRGD-functionalized, dox-conjugated, and (64)Cu-labeled superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted anticancer drug delivery and PET/MR imaging. Biomaterials-UK. 2011;32:4151–60.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.006Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[134] Dong L, Zhang P, Lei P, Song S, Xu X, Du K, et al. PEGylated GdF3:Fe nanoparticles as multimodal T1/T2-weighted MRI and X-ray CT imaging contrast agents. ACS Appl Mater Interf. 2017;9:20426–34.10.1021/acsami.7b04438Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[135] Seo WS, Lee JH, Sun X, Suzuki Y, Mann D, Liu Z, et al. FeCo/graphitic-shell nanocrystals as advanced magnetic-resonance-imaging and near-infrared agents. Nat Mater. 2006;5:971–6.10.1038/nmat1775Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[136] Liu Z, Robinson JT, Sun XM, Dai HJ. PEGylated nanographene oxide for delivery of water-insoluble cancer drugs. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:10876–7.10.1021/ja803688xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[137] Zhang H, Alifu N, Jiang T, Zhu Z, Wang Y, Hua J, et al. Biocompatible aggregation-induced emission nanoparticles with red emission for in vivo three-photon brain vascular imaging. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5:2757–62.10.1039/C7TB00156HSuche in Google Scholar

[138] Diez P, Sanchez A, Gamella M, Martinez-Ruiz P, Aznar E, De La Torre C, et al. Toward the design of smart delivery systems controlled by integrated enzyme-based biocomputing ensembles. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:9116–23.10.1021/ja503578bSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[139] Sanchez A, Ovejero Paredes K, Ruiz-Cabello J, Martinez-Ruiz P, Pingarron JM, Villalonga R, et al. Hybrid decorated core@shell Janus nanoparticles as a flexible platform for targeted multimodal molecular bioimaging of cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interf. 2018;10:31032–43.10.1021/acsami.8b10452Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[140] Liong M, Lu J, Kovochich M, Xia T, Ruehm SG, Nel AE, et al. Multifunctional inorganic nanoparticles for imaging, targeting, and drug delivery. ACS Nano. 2008;2:889–96.10.1021/nn800072tSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[141] Zemtsova EG, Ponomareva AN, Arbenin AY, Smirnov VM. Structural organization of the magnetic part of smart material in pores of MCM-41 mesoporous silica for target drug delivery. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2018;57:175–82.10.1515/rams-2018-0062Suche in Google Scholar

[142] Zahraei M, Marciello M, Lazaro-Carrillo A, Villanueva A, Herranz F, Talelli M, et al. Versatile theranostics agents designed by coating ferrite nanoparticles with biocompatible polymers. Nanotechnology. 2016;25:255702.10.1088/0957-4484/27/25/255702Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[143] Uang J, Bu LH, Xie J, Chen K, Cheng Z, Li XG, et al. Effects of nanoparticle size on cellular uptake and liver MRI with polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated iron oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2010;4:7151–60.10.1021/nn101643uSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[144] Han W, Yin G, Pu X, Chen X, Liao X, Huang Z. Glioma targeted delivery strategy of doxorubicin-loaded liposomes by dual-ligand modification. J Biomat Sci-Polyme. 2017;28:1695–712.10.1080/09205063.2017.1348739Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[145] Grifantini R, Taranta M, Gherardini L, Naldi I, Parri M, Grandi A, et al. Magnetically driven drug delivery systems improving targeted immunotherapy for colon-rectal cancer. J Control Rel. 2018;280:76–86.10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.04.052Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[146] Felfoul O, Mohammadi M, Taherkhani S, De Lanauze D, Zhong Y, Xu D, et al. Magneto-aerotactic bacteria deliver drug-containing nanoliposomes to tumour hypoxic regions. Nat Nanotechnol. 2016;11:941–7.10.1038/nnano.2016.137Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[147] Chen L, Wu Y, Wu H, Li J, Xie J, Zang F, et al. Magnetic targeting combined with active targeting of dual-ligand iron oxide nanoprobes to promote the penetration depth in tumors for effective magnetic resonance imaging and hyperthermia. Acta Biomater. 2019;96:491–504.10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.017Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[148] Zheng SW, Liu G, Hong RY, Li HZ, Li YG, Wei DG. Preparation and characterization of magnetic gene vectors for targeting gene. Appl Surf Sci. 2012;259:201–7.10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.019Suche in Google Scholar

[149] Rojas S, Devic T, Horcajada P. Metal organic frameworks based on bioactive components. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5:2560–73.10.1039/C6TB03217FSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[150] Nejadshafiee V, Naeimi H, Goliaei B, Bigdeli B, Sadighi A, Dehghani S, et al. Magnetic bio-metal-organic framework nanocomposites decorated with folic acid conjugated chitosan as a promising biocompatible targeted theranostic system for cancer treatment. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;99:805–15.10.1016/j.msec.2019.02.017Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[151] Xu Y, Shan Y, Zhang Y, Yu B, Shen Y, Cong H. Multifunctional Fe3O4@C-based nanoparticles coupling optical/MRI imaging and pH/photothermal controllable drug release as efficient anti-cancer drug delivery platforms. Nanotechnology. 2019;30:425102.10.1088/1361-6528/ab2e40Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-08-04
Revised: 2020-09-26
Accepted: 2020-09-30
Published Online: 2020-12-23

© 2020 Hongcai Li et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Generalized locally-exact homogenization theory for evaluation of electric conductivity and resistance of multiphase materials
  3. Enhancing ultra-early strength of sulphoaluminate cement-based materials by incorporating graphene oxide
  4. Characterization of mechanical properties of epoxy/nanohybrid composites by nanoindentation
  5. Graphene and CNT impact on heat transfer response of nanocomposite cylinders
  6. A facile and simple approach to synthesis and characterization of methacrylated graphene oxide nanostructured polyaniline nanocomposites
  7. Ultrasmall Fe3O4 nanoparticles induce S-phase arrest and inhibit cancer cells proliferation
  8. Effect of aging on properties and nanoscale precipitates of Cu-Ag-Cr alloy
  9. Effect of nano-strengthening on the properties and microstructure of recycled concrete
  10. Stabilizing effect of methylcellulose on the dispersion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes in cementitious composites
  11. Preparation and electromagnetic properties characterization of reduced graphene oxide/strontium hexaferrite nanocomposites
  12. Interfacial characteristics of a carbon nanotube-polyimide nanocomposite by molecular dynamics simulation
  13. Preparation and properties of 3D interconnected CNTs/Cu composites
  14. On factors affecting surface free energy of carbon black for reinforcing rubber
  15. Nano-silica modified phenolic resin film: manufacturing and properties
  16. Experimental study on photocatalytic degradation efficiency of mixed crystal nano-TiO2 concrete
  17. Halloysite nanotubes in polymer science: purification, characterization, modification and applications
  18. Cellulose hydrogel skeleton by extrusion 3D printing of solution
  19. Crack closure and flexural tensile capacity with SMA fibers randomly embedded on tensile side of mortar beams
  20. An experimental study on one-step and two-step foaming of natural rubber/silica nanocomposites
  21. Utilization of red mud for producing a high strength binder by composition optimization and nano strengthening
  22. One-pot synthesis of nano titanium dioxide in supercritical water
  23. Printability of photo-sensitive nanocomposites using two-photon polymerization
  24. In situ synthesis of expanded graphite embedded with amorphous carbon-coated aluminum particles as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries
  25. Effect of nano and micro conductive materials on conductive properties of carbon fiber reinforced concrete
  26. Tribological performance of nano-diamond composites-dispersed lubricants on commercial cylinder liner mating with CrN piston ring
  27. Supramolecular ionic polymer/carbon nanotube composite hydrogels with enhanced electromechanical performance
  28. Genetic mechanisms of deep-water massive sandstones in continental lake basins and their significance in micro–nano reservoir storage systems: A case study of the Yanchang formation in the Ordos Basin
  29. Effects of nanoparticles on engineering performance of cementitious composites reinforced with PVA fibers
  30. Band gap manipulation of viscoelastic functionally graded phononic crystal
  31. Pyrolysis kinetics and mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid)/bamboo particle biocomposites: Effect of particle size distribution
  32. Manipulating conductive network formation via 3D T-ZnO: A facile approach for a CNT-reinforced nanocomposite
  33. Microstructure and mechanical properties of WC–Ni multiphase ceramic materials with NiCl2·6H2O as a binder
  34. Effect of ball milling process on the photocatalytic performance of CdS/TiO2 composite
  35. Berberine/Ag nanoparticle embedded biomimetic calcium phosphate scaffolds for enhancing antibacterial function
  36. Effect of annealing heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of nonequiatomic CoCrFeNiMo medium-entropy alloys prepared by hot isostatic pressing
  37. Corrosion behaviour of multilayer CrN coatings deposited by hybrid HIPIMS after oxidation treatment
  38. Surface hydrophobicity and oleophilicity of hierarchical metal structures fabricated using ink-based selective laser melting of micro/nanoparticles
  39. Research on bond–slip performance between pultruded glass fiber-reinforced polymer tube and nano-CaCO3 concrete
  40. Antibacterial polymer nanofiber-coated and high elastin protein-expressing BMSCs incorporated polypropylene mesh for accelerating healing of female pelvic floor dysfunction
  41. Effects of Ag contents on the microstructure and SERS performance of self-grown Ag nanoparticles/Mo–Ag alloy films
  42. A highly sensitive biosensor based on methacrylated graphene oxide-grafted polyaniline for ascorbic acid determination
  43. Arrangement structure of carbon nanofiber with excellent spectral radiation characteristics
  44. Effect of different particle sizes of nano-SiO2 on the properties and microstructure of cement paste
  45. Superior Fe x N electrocatalyst derived from 1,1′-diacetylferrocene for oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline and acidic media
  46. Facile growth of aluminum oxide thin film by chemical liquid deposition and its application in devices
  47. Liquid crystallinity and thermal properties of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane/side-chain azobenzene hybrid copolymer
  48. Laboratory experiment on the nano-TiO2 photocatalytic degradation effect of road surface oil pollution
  49. Binary carbon-based additives in LiFePO4 cathode with favorable lithium storage
  50. Conversion of sub-µm calcium carbonate (calcite) particles to hollow hydroxyapatite agglomerates in K2HPO4 solutions
  51. Exact solutions of bending deflection for single-walled BNNTs based on the classical Euler–Bernoulli beam theory
  52. Effects of substrate properties and sputtering methods on self-formation of Ag particles on the Ag–Mo(Zr) alloy films
  53. Enhancing carbonation and chloride resistance of autoclaved concrete by incorporating nano-CaCO3
  54. Effect of SiO2 aerogels loading on photocatalytic degradation of nitrobenzene using composites with tetrapod-like ZnO
  55. Radiation-modified wool for adsorption of redox metals and potentially for nanoparticles
  56. Hydration activity, crystal structural, and electronic properties studies of Ba-doped dicalcium silicate
  57. Microstructure and mechanical properties of brazing joint of silver-based composite filler metal
  58. Polymer nanocomposite sunlight spectrum down-converters made by open-air PLD
  59. Cryogenic milling and formation of nanostructured machined surface of AISI 4340
  60. Braided composite stent for peripheral vascular applications
  61. Effect of cinnamon essential oil on morphological, flammability and thermal properties of nanocellulose fibre–reinforced starch biopolymer composites
  62. Study on influencing factors of photocatalytic performance of CdS/TiO2 nanocomposite concrete
  63. Improving flexural and dielectric properties of carbon fiber epoxy composite laminates reinforced with carbon nanotubes interlayer using electrospray deposition
  64. Scalable fabrication of carbon materials based silicon rubber for highly stretchable e-textile sensor
  65. Degradation modeling of poly-l-lactide acid (PLLA) bioresorbable vascular scaffold within a coronary artery
  66. Combining Zn0.76Co0.24S with S-doped graphene as high-performance anode materials for lithium- and sodium-ion batteries
  67. Synthesis of functionalized carbon nanotubes for fluorescent biosensors
  68. Effect of nano-silica slurry on engineering, X-ray, and γ-ray attenuation characteristics of steel slag high-strength heavyweight concrete
  69. Incorporation of redox-active polyimide binder into LiFePO4 cathode for high-rate electrochemical energy storage
  70. Microstructural evolution and properties of Cu–20 wt% Ag alloy wire by multi-pass continuous drawing
  71. Transparent ultraviolet-shielding composite films made from dispersing pristine zinc oxide nanoparticles in low-density polyethylene
  72. Microfluidic-assisted synthesis and modelling of monodispersed magnetic nanocomposites for biomedical applications
  73. Preparation and piezoresistivity of carbon nanotube-coated sand reinforced cement mortar
  74. Vibrational analysis of an irregular single-walled carbon nanotube incorporating initial stress effects
  75. Study of the material engineering properties of high-density poly(ethylene)/perlite nanocomposite materials
  76. Single pulse laser removal of indium tin oxide film on glass and polyethylene terephthalate by nanosecond and femtosecond laser
  77. Mechanical reinforcement with enhanced electrical and heat conduction of epoxy resin by polyaniline and graphene nanoplatelets
  78. High-efficiency method for recycling lithium from spent LiFePO4 cathode
  79. Degradable tough chitosan dressing for skin wound recovery
  80. Static and dynamic analyses of auxetic hybrid FRC/CNTRC laminated plates
  81. Review articles
  82. Carbon nanomaterials enhanced cement-based composites: advances and challenges
  83. Review on the research progress of cement-based and geopolymer materials modified by graphene and graphene oxide
  84. Review on modeling and application of chemical mechanical polishing
  85. Research on the interface properties and strengthening–toughening mechanism of nanocarbon-toughened ceramic matrix composites
  86. Advances in modelling and analysis of nano structures: a review
  87. Mechanical properties of nanomaterials: A review
  88. New generation of oxide-based nanoparticles for the applications in early cancer detection and diagnostics
  89. A review on the properties, reinforcing effects, and commercialization of nanomaterials for cement-based materials
  90. Recent development and applications of nanomaterials for cancer immunotherapy
  91. Advances in biomaterials for adipose tissue reconstruction in plastic surgery
  92. Advances of graphene- and graphene oxide-modified cementitious materials
  93. Theories for triboelectric nanogenerators: A comprehensive review
  94. Nanotechnology of diamondoids for the fabrication of nanostructured systems
  95. Material advancement in technological development for the 5G wireless communications
  96. Nanoengineering in biomedicine: Current development and future perspectives
  97. Recent advances in ocean wave energy harvesting by triboelectric nanogenerator: An overview
  98. Application of nanoscale zero-valent iron in hexavalent chromium-contaminated soil: A review
  99. Carbon nanotube–reinforced polymer composite for electromagnetic interference application: A review
  100. Functionalized layered double hydroxide applied to heavy metal ions absorption: A review
  101. A new classification method of nanotechnology for design integration in biomaterials
  102. Finite element analysis of natural fibers composites: A review
  103. Phase change materials for building construction: An overview of nano-/micro-encapsulation
  104. Recent advance in surface modification for regulating cell adhesion and behaviors
  105. Hyaluronic acid as a bioactive component for bone tissue regeneration: Fabrication, modification, properties, and biological functions
  106. Theoretical calculation of a TiO2-based photocatalyst in the field of water splitting: A review
  107. Two-photon polymerization nanolithography technology for fabrication of stimulus-responsive micro/nano-structures for biomedical applications
  108. A review of passive methods in microchannel heat sink application through advanced geometric structure and nanofluids: Current advancements and challenges
  109. Stress effect on 3D culturing of MC3T3-E1 cells on microporous bovine bone slices
  110. Progress in magnetic Fe3O4 nanomaterials in magnetic resonance imaging
  111. Synthesis of graphene: Potential carbon precursors and approaches
  112. A comprehensive review of the influences of nanoparticles as a fuel additive in an internal combustion engine (ICE)
  113. Advances in layered double hydroxide-based ternary nanocomposites for photocatalysis of contaminants in water
  114. Analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite structures: A review
  115. Application of nanomaterials in ultra-high performance concrete: A review
  116. Therapeutic strategies and potential implications of silver nanoparticles in the management of skin cancer
  117. Advanced nickel nanoparticles technology: From synthesis to applications
  118. Cobalt magnetic nanoparticles as theranostics: Conceivable or forgettable?
  119. Progress in construction of bio-inspired physico-antimicrobial surfaces
  120. From materials to devices using fused deposition modeling: A state-of-art review
  121. A review for modified Li composite anode: Principle, preparation and challenge
  122. Naturally or artificially constructed nanocellulose architectures for epoxy composites: A review
Heruntergeladen am 21.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2020-0095/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen