Preparation and electromagnetic properties characterization of reduced graphene oxide/strontium hexaferrite nanocomposites

Shumin Du; Huaiyin Chen; Ruoyu Hong

doi:10.1515/ntrev-2020-0010

Article Open Access

Preparation and electromagnetic properties characterization of reduced graphene oxide/strontium hexaferrite nanocomposites

Shumin Du , Huaiyin Chen and Ruoyu Hong

Published/Copyright: March 12, 2020

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information

From the journal Nanotechnology Reviews Volume 9 Issue 1

Abstract

With the rapid development of electronics and information technology, electronics and electrical equipment have been widely used in our daily lives. The living environment is full of electromagnetic waves of various frequencies and energy. Electromagnetic wave radiation has evolved into a new type of environmental pollution that has been listed by the WHO (World Health Organization) as the fourth largest source of environmental pollution after water, atmosphere, and noise. Studies have shown that when electromagnetic wave radiation is too much, it can cause neurological disorders. And electromagnetic interference will cause the abnormal operation of medical equipment, precision instruments and other equipment, and therefore cause incalculable consequences. Therefore, electromagnetic protection has become a hot issue of concern to the social and scientific circles.

Keywords: Strontium hexaferrite; Reduced graphene oxide; Electromagnetic properties

1 Introduction

At present, countries around the world have increased their research on the problem of electromagnetic wave pollution, and have successively formulated relevant standards and regulations to control and purify the electromagnetic environment [1, 2]. The most effective measure to control electromagnetic radiation pollution is electromagnetic shielding to control its radiation intensity within a safe range [3, 4]. Absorbing material refers to the ability to convert electromagnetic waves into other forms of energy such as thermal energy, electrical energy, or mechanical energy through its own absorption effect so that electromagnetic waves are consumed or attenuated [5]. The frequency range of absorbing materials is very wide. The frequency band is from 100MHz to 300 GHz. The frequency range of 2 to 18 GHz is the most widely used. Therefore, the research focus of absorbing materials in recent years is in this frequency range [6]. Excellent electromagnetic matching performance and high strength loss ability are indispensable conditions for the absorbing material to effectively absorb electromagnetic waves [7]. Besides, it meets the design requirements for modern electromagnetic absorbing materials with thin thickness, absorption frequency bandwidth, strong absorbing performance, and light weight. However, single absorbing material cannot meet all the performance requirements of “thin, light, wide and strong” of absorbing materials. Therefore, two or more materials are usually compounded, and the structure is meticulously designed to maximize the electromagnetic absorption performance.

RGO has a large number of residual oxygen-containing functional groups on its surface, such as hydroxyl, carboxyl, carbonyl, and epoxy groups, which can cause defects such as defect polarization and electron dipole relaxation [8]. RGO possesses the advantages of large specific surface area, high dielectric constant, and light weight, which make it exhibit a certain microwave absorption performance [9].However, the overall attenuation effect of single RGO on electromagnetic waves is still relatively weak. Ferrite, as a dual-composite material, can generate both magnetic loss and dielectric loss, so it has good electromagnetic properties [10], but single ferrite has a higher density. The combination of RGO and ferrite to form complementary advantages: On the one hand, it has both magnetic loss and electrical loss, which is beneficial to achieve electromagnetic matching and improve absorbing performance; On the other hand, it is beneficial to reduce the density of the absorbing material [11]. Zheng et al. synthesized Fe₃O₄-graphene composites, which has hydrophobicity and superparamagnetism. The results show that the maximum reflection loss is −40 dB at a frequency of 6.8 GHz and a matching thickness of 4.5 mmis 4.6–18 GHz [12]. Shu et al. prepared RGO/MWCNTs/ZnFe₂O₄ nanocomposites by a simple one-pot hydrothermal method, which has a three-dimensional conductive network structure. When the mass ratio of GO to MWCNTs is 1:1, at a thickness of 5mm, the maximum reflection loss was −23.8 dB and the effective absorption bandwidth was 2.6 GHz [13].

In spite of many reports on composites of RGO and ferrite for microwave absorption, there have been few reports in China about RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposite as highfrequency microwave absorber up to now. SrFe₁₂O₁₉ ferrite has large saturation magnetization [14], excellent coercivity [15], high uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy [16], excellent electromagnetic properties [17], chemical stability and corrosion resistance [18] that plays an important role in hard magnetic materials. The combination of RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ maybe has great application potential in the field of microwave absorbing materials [19]. In this work, we prepared the RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites by a one-step hydrothermal reaction with the assistance of the EG. The morphology, phase structure, magnetic properties, electromagnetic properties and absorption performance of the prepared nanocomposites were investigated in detail.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl₃·6H₂O), absolute ethyl alcohol, ethylene glycol (C₂H₆O₂), hydrochloric acid (HCl) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), buy from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. Strontium chloride hexahydrate (SrCl₂·6H₂O) was purchased from Aladdin. All chemicals used during the experiment were reagent grade. Ultrapure water was used throughout the experiment.

2.2 Prepared of RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites

GO was prepared through a modified Hummers method that natural graphite flakes is oxidized by strong oxidant, then treated at high temperature [20]. 0.11 g of GO was dispersed in the mixture of ethylene glycol and deionized water (35mL of ethylene glycol+15mL of deionized water) by ultrasonication for 30 min. Then 0.49 g of SrCl₂·6H₂O and 4 g of FeCl₃·6H₂O were dissolved into GO suspension. 20 mL of NaOH aqueous solution was added to the iron salt solution by a peristaltic pump until the pH value reached to 13. The suspension of precursors was heated to 80^∘C with vigorous mechanical stirring for 30 min, and then transferred into a 100 mL teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and heated to 200^∘C in a blast drying oven, and the reaction was held for 12 hours. Cooled naturally to room temperature, magnetically separate, washed with ultrapure water until the pH reached to 13, washed with HCl (the purpose is to remove excess strontium carbonate), then washed with ultrapure water and ethyl alcohol and finally dried in a vacuum oven at 60^∘C for 24 h.

2.3 Characterization

The transmission electron microscope (TEM, TF20, Jeol 2100F) was used to characterize the micro-morphology of nanocomposites. The crystal structure was characterized by X-ray powder diffractometer (XRD, DY5261/Xpert3, CEM, USA), using a Cu target (λ = 1.5418 Å), test range is 5-80^∘. The magnetic properties of the product were tested using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM-7400, Lake Shore, USA) at room temperature with a magnetic field strength of 30,000 Oe. The vector network analyzer (VNA, PNA-A5244A) was used to measure the real (ε^′) and imaginary parts (ε^′′) of the complex permittivity and the real (μ^′) and imaginary parts (μ^′′) of the complex permeability in the frequency range of 2 to 18 GHz. The samples were prepared by mixing the RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites with paraffin in a mass ratio of 7: 3 and pressing it into a ring (φ_in = 3.04 mm, φ_out = 7 mm). Then used Matlab to calculate the reflection loss of the samples and analyze the change in electromagnetic absorption performance.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Morphological and structural characterization of samples

Figure 1 shows the TEM images of representative SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites. It can be seen from Figure 1a that SrFe₁₂O₁₉ is a flaky structure, the particle size is mainly distributed at 8-15 nm. In addition, the particles have a certain degree of agglomeration, which is related to the magnetic dipole interaction between the nanoparticles. It can be seen from Figure 1b that the SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoflakes are uniformly supported on the RGO nanosheets, and there is almost no agglomeration and exhibit better dispersibility than pure SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles. That is mainly because SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoflakes are coated with graphene with pleated structure, which hinders the volume change of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles, and prevents the detachment and agglomeration of the SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles. The prepared RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposite material has a small particle size,which has a small size effect, surface effect, lattice distortion, multiple exchange coupling effects between nanocrystals, etc., and has a large hysteresis loss, thereby exhibiting good electromagnetic wave absorption capabilities.

Figure 1

TEM images of (a) SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and (b) RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉

The phase and crystal structure of the SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoflakes and RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites were studied by XRD, confirmed by the standard JCPDS card (PDF # 84-1531) [21]. The positions of the diffraction peaks of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites are basically the same, indicating that the addition of RGO has no effect on the crystal form of the composite. The significant peaks at 2θ values of 30^∘, 33^∘, 35.4^∘, 40.9^∘, 43.6^∘, 49.5^∘, 54^∘, 57.2^∘ and 62.2^∘ were assigned to (110), (107), (114), (205), (206), (209), (217), (2011) and (220) planes [22]. The results show that all diffraction peaks correspond to the face-centered cubic structure of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ in the literature [23]. As can be seen from Figure 2, all the diffraction peaks are sharp and narrow, indicating that the SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles are highly crystalline. We can see that the characteristic peak of (001) of graphene oxide around 2θ = 10^∘ on GO completely disappeared on the RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites spectrum, indicating that the degree of reduction of GO was quite high during the entire reaction process [24]. In addition, no diffraction peak was observed around 26^∘, indicating that RGO nanosheets are dispersed uniformly and do not overlap [9]. The results provide an evidence that the composites of GO and SrFe₁₂O₁₉ have been successfully combined together to form a composite after reaction.

Figure 2

XRD patterns of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites

Figure 3

Magnetic hysteresis loops for SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites

3.2 Magnetic properties

Figure 3 displays the hysteresis loops of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites, respectively. It is clear that the two samples have the same hysteresis behavior. The SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites are superparamagnetic, indicating that the nanocrystals are small in size. The saturation magnetization (Ms) of RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites (38.8 emu/g) is smaller than that of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles (56.3 emu/ g), due to the addition of nonmagnetic RGO, which causes a magnetic dilution effect. It can be found that the remanent magnetization (Mr) and coercivity (Hc) are about 2.7 emu/ g and 31.0 Oe for SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles, 1.3 emu/g and 20 Oe for RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites, respectively. The addition of RGO has no effect on the coercive force of the SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles. The reason for the low coercive force value is the large shape anisotropy of the sample. This higher value of anisotropy energy makes the nanocomposite a good candidate for the development of electromagnetic absorption properties [25].

3.3 Analysis of electromagnetic parameters

Figure 4 shows the electromagnetic parameters of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites. The real part (ε^′) and imaginary part (ε^′′) of the complex permittivity represent the storage and consumption capacity of electric energy, and the real part (μ^′) and imaginary part (μ^′′) of the complex permeability represent the storage of magnetic energy and consumption [26]. The ε^′ and ε^′′ are shown in Figure 4. As can be seen, the ε^′ of the RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites gradually decreases from 18 to 12.6 in the range of 2-18 GHz, and the ε^′ of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles is relatively small and is almost constant at about 6.9 in the entire frequency range. The ε^′′ of RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites is also much higher than that of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles. Over the entire frequency range, the ε^′′ value of RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposite exhibited three high fluctuations from 4.0 to 5.3, while the ε^′′ value of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles increases from 0.7 to 1.0. The results indicate that SrFe₁₂O₁₉ has a poor dielectric loss ability, but the dielectric loss performance is greatly improved in the presence of RGO. From the formula ε^′′ ≈ 1/2πε₀ρf , it can be known that due to the addition of RGO, the electrical conductivity of the composite material increases, so that the resistivity of the material decreases and the dielectric loss increases [27]. As the XRD results show, the GO is reduced to RGO during the preparation process, and the conductivity increases, which enhancing its space charge polarization. In addition, the interfacial polarization is also a very important reason in that regards. SrFe₁₂O₁₉ and RGO have different intrinsic dielectric feature, thus, there are considerable charges accumulation at their interfaces [28, 29]. Under the action of an external electric field, the free charge between SrFe₁₂O₁₉ and RGO changes and jumps continuously, which results in polarization loss at the interface, thereby dissipating incident electromagnetic waves.

Figure 4

Frequency dependence of (a) real part of permittivity (ε^′); (b) imaginary part of permittivity (ε^′′); (c) real part of permeability (μ^′); (d) imaginary part of permeability (μ^′′) of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites

Figure 4c presents the real part of the relative complex permeability (μ^′). It can be seen that the values of μ^′ of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites have similar tendency for variation with frequency, and the μ^′ value decrease gradually in the range of 2-5.8 GHz, and changed little around 0.94 in the range of 5.8-18 GHz. This shows that the addition of RGO has little effect on the value of μ^′. Figure 4d gives the imaginary part of the relative complex permeability (μ^′′). Both the SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites have gradually decreased across the entire frequency range, declining from 0.35 and 0.6 to 0 and −0.06, respectively. A negative value of μ^′′ at the frequencies greater than 14GHz, is considered to be the emission of electromagnetic energy from the absorbing material to the outside, which is caused by the electrical properties of the nanocomposites. Under the action of an alternating magnetic field, free electrons form a catastrophic flow due to Lorentz force, and then an eddy current generates an induced magnetic field. SrFe₁₂O₁₉ and RGO therefore form a conductive network. Part of the electric field energy is converted into magnetic field energy and released, whch is conducive to the material’s absorbing performance.

In order to better study the electromagnetic properties of the SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/Fe₃O₄ nanocomposites, the tangent angle of dielectric loss (tan δ_ε = ε^′′/ε^′) and tangent angle of magnetic loss (tan δ_μ = μ^′′/μ^′) are calculated [30]. It can be seen from Figure 5a that the electrical loss tan δ_ε of RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites and SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles are increased from 0.24 to 0.39 and 0.09 to 0.13 in the range 2-18 GHz. Compared with the SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoflakes, the tan δ_ε of RGO/Fe₃O₄ nanocomposites are higher. The addition of a small amount of GO can greatly improve the dielectric loss capacity of the composite material, which is not only related to the conductive ability of RGO, but also related to the polarization process and electrical conductivity between the composite materials [31]. It can be clearly seen from Figure 5b that the tan δ_μ values of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites both show similar trends with frequency. The tan δ_μ values decrease sharply in the range of 2-9 GHz, and remain basically unchanged within 9-18 GHz. The tan δ_μ values of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles are larger than that of the RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites in the whole frequency range. By comparing the dielectric loss and magnetic loss of the RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites, it is found that the absorbing performance of the RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites is mainly a magnetic loss type (tan δ_μ > tan δ_ε) in the frequency range of 2-5.5 GHz; the absorbing performance of the composite mainly shows the dielectric loss type (tan δ_ε > tan δ_μ) in the frequency range of 2-5.5 GHz.

Figure 5

Frequency dependence of (a) dielectric loss factor (tan δε); (b) magnetic loss factor (tan δμ); (c) C₀ values of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites; (d) Cole-Cole semicircle (ε^′′ versus ε^′) of RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites

The effect of magnetic loss on electromagnetic wave absorption is very important. The electromagnetic energy is converted to thermal energy by magnetic loss to enhance electromagnetic wave absorption. Generally, in the low frequency range, the eddy current effect, hysteresis effect, and post-magnetism effect are the main causes of the attenuation loss of ferrites to electromagnetic waves; in the high frequency range, domain wall resonance loss, natural resonance loss, and dielectric loss is the main reason for the attenuation of electromagnetic waves by ferrites [32]. If only the eddy current loss is considered, the eddy current coefficient C₀ can be expressed as [33]:

(1) C 0 = μ ∙ ( μ ′ ) − 2 f − 1

Where the C₀ would be a constant, independent of the frequency. If the magnetic loss is generated from the eddy current effect, the C₀ will keep constant as the frequency varies [30]. Figure 5c shows the C₀ curves of RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites. while the C₀ is basically unchanged above 9 GHz, while above 9 GHz the C₀ is basically unchanged [34, 35]. This implies that the main reasons for the magnetic loss are natural resonance, hysteresis effect and exchange resonance in the range of 2-9 GHz, but eddy current loss accounts for the magnetic loss in the range of 9-18 GHz.

Dielectric relaxation has a great impact on the electromagnetic absorbing properties of nanocomposites. The relaxation phenomenon refers to a system in equilibrium, when it is affected by external force, the system shifts from its original equilibrium position. If the external force is removed. The system deviating from the original equilibrium position will return to the original equilibrium state. Debye’s equation is the simplest equation to deal with polarization relaxation [36, 37]:

(2) ε ′ − 1 2 ε s + ε ∞ 2 + ε ′ ′ 2 = 1 4 ε s + ε ∞ 2

Where ε_∞ is the limit value of the dielectric constant at high frequencies and ε_s is the static permittivity. The ε^′ and ε^′′ are two important physical quantities used to describe the relaxation process. Based on Equation 2, it can be seen that the relationship between ε^′ and ε^′′ is a semicircle with ε^′ as the abscissa and ε^′′ as the ordinate, which is called Debye semicircle, and each Debye semicircle represents a a Debye relaxation process [34]. The ε^′′−ε^′ curves of RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites are shown in Figure 5d. It can be clearly seen that there are three distinct Cole-Cole semicircles in the ε^′′ − ε^′ curve of the RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposite. The results show that there are three effective Debye relaxation processes in the RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites. There are two main reasons for the relaxation process: the first is due to the interfacial polarization between SrFe₁₂O₁₉ and RGO; the second is that the surface of RGO contains a large number of residual defects and functional groups [38]. It is worth noting that the Cole-Cole semicircle of the composite is irregular, which indicates that in addition to the Debye relaxation of the composite, there are also influencing factors, such as dipolar polarization, electron polarization, Interfacial polarization and Maxwell-Wagner relaxation [39]. Eventually lead to absorption and attenuation of electromagnetic wave energy, and improving the electromagnetic wave absorbing performance of RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites.

3.4 Analysis of absorbing properties

The ideal absorbing material can completely absorb and lose electromagnetic waves. It needs to meet the following two requirements [40]. First, the impedance matching characteristics of the absorbing material, that is, the impedance of the absorbing material and the impedance of the propagation medium are required to be as close as possible, so that the reflection coefficient of the interface between the material and the air is zero, and the electromagnetic wave energy in the air enters the material at most. On the other hand, when the electromagnetic wave enters the material as much as possible, the absorbing material should also have good attenuation characteristics, that is, the electromagnetic wave entering the material is maximized by the loss.

The absorbing material requires a low reflectivity and also requires a frequency bandwidth. Its absorption of electromagnetic waves is evaluated by reflection loss (RL), For single-layer absorbers, RL is given by the the following formula [41, 42]:

(3) R L ( d B ) = 20 log Z i n − Z 0 / Z i n − Z 0

(4) Z i n = Z 0 μ r / ε r 1 / 2 tanh j 2 π f d μ r ε r 1 / 2 / c

Where Z_in and Z₀represents the wave impedance of the absorbing material and the wave impedance of the air; μ_r and ε_r are the relative permeability and relative permittivity of the nanomaterials; f is the frequency; d represents the thickness of the absorbing material; and c represents the speed of light (3·10₈ m/s).

Figure 6a-b displays the RL of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles and RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites at 2-18 GHz, respectively. The RL of the RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites is significantly improved compared to that of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles. At thickness of 1.5 mm, the maximum RL of RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites is −48.1 dB with effective absorption bandwidth of 3.9 GHz (12.9-16.8 GHz). For SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles, the maximum RL appears at 16.4 GHz up to −13.5 dB under 5.5 mm thickness, with the bandwidth below −10 dB ranging from 16 to 17 GHz. It shows that adding a small amount of RGO greatly affects the dielectric loss and magnetic loss, and greatly improves the microwave absorption performance of RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites.

Figure 6

RL of (a) SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoflakes; (b) RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites

Figure 7 exhibits the three-dimensional presentations of the calculated RL curves and the two-dimensional image maps of RL of the RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites. According to the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA), when the RL < −10 dB, the material’s electromagnetic wave absorption rate reaches 90%, then the material has wave absorbing performance [43]. Therefore, the frequency band of the absorbing material’s reflection loss value below −10 dB should be as wide as possible in order to absorb more electromagnetic waves in the frequency range [44]. Obviously, when the thickness is changed in the range of 1.5-5.5mm,the effective absorption band reaches 16 GHz (from2 GHz-18 GHz). The results show that it is crucial to adjust the thickness of the nanocomposite for application at different frequencies. By comparing the positions of the reflection loss peaks of composite materials with different thicknesses, it can be found that as the thickness of the material increases, the position of the reflection loss peak moves to a lower frequency band and the peak value decreases. Therefore, in practical applications, different microwave absorption bands should be selected with appropriate thicknesses.

Figure 7

(a) 3D representation of RL performance of RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites; (b) Contours of the calculated RL values for RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites

The value of the attenuation constant α represents the strength of the material’s ability to lose electromagnetic waves. The larger the value of α, the stronger the material’s ability to absorb electromagnetic waves. α obeys the following formula [45, 46]:

(5) α = 2 π f c × μ ′ ′ ε ′ ′ − μ ′ ε ′ + μ ′ ′ ε ′ ′ − μ ′ ε ′ 2 ε ′ μ ′ ′ + ε ′ ′ μ ′ 2

Figure 8 shows the curve of attenuation constant α changing with frequency. It can be found that the α value of the RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites is much larger than the SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles in the entire frequency range. It shows that the material has more excellent attenuation performance, which is consistent with the dielectric loss results. Adding an appropriate amount of RGO can increase the dielectric loss of the RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposite material, thereby improving impedance matching and facilitating incident microwaves to enter the composite material. All these also help to enhance microwave absorption in composites.

Figure 8

Attenuation constant α of the as-prepared RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites

4 Conclusions

In summary, the RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ have been successfully prepared by using EG assisted hydrothermal synthesis. The results show a good synergy between the magnetic properties of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ and the dielectric properties of RGO. Compared with SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanoparticles, the RGO/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites have the characteristics of light specific gravity, absorbing frequency bandwidth, adjustable electromagnetic parameters, and large absorbing loss. The maximum RL of RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites with the thickness of 1.5 mm reached −48.1 dB at 14.7 GHz, and the bandwidth of RL less than −10 dB ranged from 12.9 to 16.8 GHz.

Tel/Wechat: 18859199060

Acknowledgement

This research was financially supported by Minjiang Scholarship of Fujian Province (No. Min-Gaojiao[2010]-117), Central-government Guided Fund for Local Economic Development (No. 830170778), R&D Fund for Strategic Emerging Industry of Fujian Province (No. 82918001), International Cooperation Project of Fujian Science and Technology Department (No. 830170771) and Teaching and Researching Fund for Young Staff of Fujian Educational Department (No. JT180040).

References

[1] Gao J., Luo J., Wang L., Huang X., Wang H., Song X., Hu M., Tang L.C., Xue H., Flexible, superhydrophobic and highly conductive composite based on non-woven polypropylene fabric for electromagnetic interference shielding, Chem. En. J., 2019, 364, 493-502.10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.190Search in Google Scholar

[2] Ali A., Phull A.R., Zia M., Elemental zinc to zinc nanoparticles: is ZnO NPs crucial for life? Synthesis, toxicological, and environmental concerns, Nanotechnol. Rev., 2018, 7(5), 413-441.10.1515/ntrev-2018-0067Search in Google Scholar

[3] Chen C., Hou X., Si J.H., Design of an integrated optics for transglutaminase conformational change, Nanotechnol. Rev., 2018, 7(4), 283-290.10.1515/ntrev-2018-0022Search in Google Scholar

[4] Zhang H., Wang B., Feng A., Zhang N., Jia Z., Huang Z., Liu X., Wu G., Mesoporous carbon hollow microspheres with tunable pore size and shell thickness as efficient electromagnetic wave absorbers, Compos. Part. B-Eng., 2019, 167, 690-699.10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.055Search in Google Scholar

[5] Zhang Y., Huang Y., Zhang T.F., Chang H.C., Xiao P.S., Chn H.H.; Huang Y., Chen Y.S., Broadband and tunable high-performance microwave absorption of an ultralight and highly compressible graphene foam, Adv. Mater., 2017, 6(6), 505-516.10.1002/adma.201405788Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Wang Y., Gao X., Lin C., Shi L., Li X., Wu G., Metal organic frameworks-derived Fe-Co nanoporous carbon/graphene composite as a high-performance electromagnetic wave absorber, J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 785, 765-773.10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.271Search in Google Scholar

[7] Wang Y.M., Pan M., Liang X.Y., Li B.J., Zhang S., Electromagnetic wave absorption coating material with self-healing properties, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2017, 38(23), 1700447.10.1002/marc.201700447Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Yu H.G., Chu C.L., Chu P.K., Self-assembly and enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity of reduced graphene oxide-Bi₂WO₆ photocatalysts, Nanotechnol. Rev., 2017, 6(6), 505-516.10.1515/ntrev-2017-0153Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zhang B., Li C.Y., Kuang W.C., Zhang J.X., Xiong Y.Q., Tan S.Z., Cai X., Huang L.H., Carboxymethyl cellulose-grafted graphene oxide for efficient antitumor drug delivery, Nanotechnol. Rev., 2018, 7 (4), 291-301.10.1515/ntrev-2018-0029Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zhang R., Huang X., Zhong B., Xia L., Wen G., Zhou Y., Enhanced microwave absorption properties of ferroferric oxide/graphene composites with a controllable microstructure, RSC Adv., 2016, 6 (21), 16952-16962.10.1039/C5RA22254KSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Zhao C., Shen M., Li Z., Sun R., Xia A., Liu X., Green synthesis and enhanced microwave absorption property of reduced graphene oxide-SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites, J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 689, 1037-1043.10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.078Search in Google Scholar

[12] Zheng X., Feng J., Zong Y., Miao H., Hu X., Bai J., Li X., Hydrophobic graphene nanosheets decorated by monodispersed superparamagnetic Fe₃O₄ nanocrystals as synergistic electromagnetic wave absorbers, J. Mater. Chem. C., 2015, 3 (17), 4452-4463.10.1039/C5TC00313JSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Shu R.W., Li W.J., Zhou X., Tian D.D., Zhang G.Y., Gan Y., Shi J.J., He J., Facile preparation and microwave absorption properties of RGO/MWCNTs/ZnFe₂O₄ hybrid nanocomposites, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 743, 163-174.10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.016Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ban I., Stergar J., Maver U., NiCu magnetic nanoparticles: review of synthesis methods, surface functionalization approaches, and biomedical applications, Nanotechnol. Rev., 2018, 7(2), 187-207.10.1515/ntrev-2017-0193Search in Google Scholar

[15] Hong R.Y., Pan T.T., Qian J.Z., Li H.Z., Synthesis and surface modification of ZnO nanoparticles, Chem. Eng. J., 2006, 119(2), 71-81.10.1016/j.cej.2006.03.003Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zhang W., Shen F.L., Hong R.Y., Solvothermal synthesis of magnetic Fe₃O₄ microparticles via self-assembly of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles, Particuology., 2011, 9(2), 179-186.10.1016/j.partic.2010.07.025Search in Google Scholar

[17] Das S., Srivastava V.C., An overview of the synthesis of CuO-ZnO nanocomposite for environmental and other applications, Nanotechnol. Rev., 2018, 7(3), 267-282.10.1515/ntrev-2017-0144Search in Google Scholar

[18] Tang X., Hong R.Y., FengW.G., Badami D., Ethylene glycol assisted hydrothermal synthesis of strontium hexaferrite nanoparticles as precursor of magnetic fluid, J. Alloys Compd., 2013, 562, 211-218.10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.02.049Search in Google Scholar

[19] Liu J.R., Hong R.Y., Feng W.G., Badami D., Wang Y.Q., Large-scale production of strontium ferrite by molten-salt-assisted coprecipitation, Powder Technol., 2014, 262, 142-149.10.1016/j.powtec.2014.04.076Search in Google Scholar

[20] Low F. W., Lai, C. W., Abd Hamid, S. B., Easy preparation of ultrathin reduced graphene oxide sheets at a high stirring speed, Ceram. Int., 2015, 41(4), 5798-5806.10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.008Search in Google Scholar

[21] Durmus Z., Kavas H., Durmus A., Aktaş B., Synthesis and microstructural characterization of graphene/strontium hexaferrite (SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2015, 163, 439-445.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.07.063Search in Google Scholar

[22] Ding Y., Zhang L., Liao Q., Zhang G., Liu S., Zhang Y., Electromagnetic wave absorption in reduced graphene oxide functionalized with Fe₃O₄/Fe nanorings, Nano Res., 2016, 9(7), 2018-2025.10.1007/s12274-016-1092-zSearch in Google Scholar

[23] Zhang T., Peng X., Li, J., Yang Y., Xu J., Wang P., Jin D., Jin H., Hong B., Wang X., Ge H., Platelet-like hexagonal SrFe₁₂O₁₉ particles: hydrothermal synthesis and their orientation in a magnetic field, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2016, 412, 102-106.10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.03.080Search in Google Scholar

[24] Yao Y., Miao S., Liu S., Ma L.P., Sun H., Wang S., Synthesis, characterization, and adsorption properties of magnetic Fe₃O₄@graphene nanocomposite, Chem. Eng. J., 2012, 184, 326-332.10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.017Search in Google Scholar

[25] Shafiu S., Sözeri H., Baykal A., Solvothermal synthesis of SrFe₁₂O₁₉ hexaferrites: without calcinations, J. Supercond. Novel Magn., 2014, 27(6), 1593-1598.10.1007/s10948-014-2490-7Search in Google Scholar

[26] Cheng Y., Cao J., Li Y., Li Z., Zhao H., Ji G., Du Y., The outside-In approach to construct Fe₃O₄ nanocrystals/mesoporous carbon hollow spheres core–shell hybrids toward microwave absorption, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 6(1), 1427-1435.10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03846Search in Google Scholar

[27] Cheng Y., Cao J., Li Y., Li Z., Zhao H., Ji G., Du Y., The outside-In approach to construct Fe₃O₄ nanocrystals/mesoporous carbon hollow-spheres core–shell hybrids toward microwave absorption, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 6(1), 1427-1435.10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03846Search in Google Scholar

[28] Chen Y.H., Huang Z.H., Lu M.M., Cao W.Q., Yuan J., Zhang D.Q., Cao,M.S., 3D Fe₃O₄ nanocrystals decorating carbon nanotubes to tune electromagnetic properties and enhance microwave absorption capacity, J. Mater. Chem. A., 2015, 3(24), 12621-12625.10.1039/C5TA02782ASearch in Google Scholar

[29] Chelliah C.R.A.J., Swaminathan R., Current trends in changing the channel in MOSFETs by III-V semiconducting nanostructures, Nanotechnol. Rev., 2017, 6(6), 613-623.10.1515/ntrev-2017-0155Search in Google Scholar

[30] Liu P.B., Huang Y., Zhang X., Cubic NiFe₂O₄ particles on graphenepolyaniline and their enhanced microwave absorptionproperties, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2015, 107, 54-60.10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.11.021Search in Google Scholar

[31] Xu D., Xiong X., Chen P., Yu Q., Chu H., Yang S., Wang Q., Superior corrosion-resistant 3D porous magnetic graphene foam-ferrite nanocomposite with tunable electromagnetic wave absorption properties, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2019, 469, 428-436.10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.09.019Search in Google Scholar

[32] Cheng Y., Li Z.Y., Li Y., Dai S.S., Ji G.B., Zhao H.Q.,Gao J.M., Du Y.W., Rationally regulating complex dielectric parameters of mesoporous carbon hollow spheres to carry out efficient microwave absorption, Carbon., 2018, 127, 643-652.10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.055Search in Google Scholar

[33] Rusly S.N.A., Ismail I., Matori K.A., Abbas Z., Shaari A.H., Awang Z., Ibrahim I.R., Idris F.M., Zaid M.H.M., Mahmood K.A., Hasan I.H., Influence of different BFO filler content on microwave absorption performances in BiFeO₃/epoxy resin composites, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2020, 46(1), 717-746.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.027Search in Google Scholar

[34] Shen W., Ren B., Wu S., Wang W., Zhou X., Facile synthesis of rGO/SmFe₅O₁₂/CoFe₂O₄ ternary nanocomposites: Composition control for superior broadband microwave absorption performance, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 453, 464-476.10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.150Search in Google Scholar

[35] Wu N., Xu D., Wang Z., Wang F., Liu J., Liu W., Shao Q., Liu H., Gao Q., Guo Z., Achieving superior electromagnetic wave absorbers through the novel metal-organic frameworks derived magnetic porous carbon nanorods, Carbon., 2019, 145, 433-444.10.1016/j.carbon.2019.01.028Search in Google Scholar

[36] Ma J., Shu J., Cao W., Zhang M., Wang X., Yuan J., Cao M., A green fabrication and variable temperature electromagnetic properties for thermal stable microwave absorption towards flower-like Co₃O₄@rGO/SiO₂ composites, Compos. Part. B-Eng., 2019, 166, 187-195.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.119Search in Google Scholar

[37] Liu P., Zhang Y., Yan J., Huang Y., Xia L., Guang Z., Synthesis of lightweight N-doped graphene foams with open reticular structure for high-efficiency electromagnetic wave absorption, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 368, 285-298.10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.193Search in Google Scholar

[38] Chen W., Liu Q., Zhu X., Fu M., One-step in situ synthesis of strontium ferrites and strontium ferrites/graphene composites as microwave absorbing materials, RSC Adv., 2017, 7(64), 40650-40657.10.1039/C7RA05700HSearch in Google Scholar

[39] Song C.Q., Yin X.W., Han M.K., Li X.L., Hou Z.X., Zhang L.T., Cheng L.F., Three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide foam modified with ZnO nanowires for enhanced microwave absorption properties, Carbon., 2017, 116, 50-58.10.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.077Search in Google Scholar

[40] Ye F., Song Q., Zhang Z.C., Li W., Zhang S.Y., Yin X.W., Zhou Y.Z., Tao H.W., Liu Y.S., Cheng L.F., Direct growth of edge-rich graphene with tunable dielectric properties in porous Si₃N₄ ceramic for broadband high-performance microwave absorption, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28(17), 1707205.10.1002/adfm.201707205Search in Google Scholar

[41] Liang K., Qiao X.J., Sun Z.G., Guo X.D., Wei L., Qu Y., Preparation and microwave absorbing properties of graphene oxides/ferrite composites, Appl. Phys. A., 2017,123(6),445.10.1007/s00339-017-1059-2Search in Google Scholar

[42] Wang Y.M., Luo Z., Hong R.Y., Microstructure and microwave absorption properties of Fe₃O₄/dextran/SnO₂ multilayer microspheres, Mater. Lett., 2011, 65 (21), 3241-3244.10.1016/j.matlet.2011.06.106Search in Google Scholar

[43] Han Q., Meng X., Lu C., Exchange-coupled Ni₀₅Zn₀₅Fe2O4/ SrFe₁₂O₁₉ composites with enhanced microwave absorption performance, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 768, 742-749.10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.310Search in Google Scholar

[44] Yang Y., Xia L., Zhang T., Shi B., Huang L., Zhon, B., Zhang X., Wang H., Zhang J., Wen G., Fe₃O₄@LAS/RGO composites with a multiple transmission-absorption mechanism and enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption performance, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 352, 510-518.10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.064Search in Google Scholar

[45] Wang Y., Wu X.M., Zhang W.Z., Luo C.Y., Li J.H., Wang Y.J., Fabrication of flower-like Ni₀₅Co0.5(OH)₂@PANI and its enhanced microwave absorptionperformances, Mater. Res. Bull., 2018, 98,59-63.10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.10.004Search in Google Scholar

[46] Liu Q.H., Gao Q., Bi H., Liang C.Y., Yuan K.P., She W., Yang Y.J., Che R.C., CoNi@SiO₂@TiO₂ and CoNi@Air@TiO₂ microspheres with strong wideband microwave absorption, Adv. Mater., 2016, 28(3), 486-490.10.1002/adma.201503149Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-12-02

Accepted: 2019-12-16

Published Online: 2020-03-12

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2020-0010

Keywords for this article

Strontium hexaferrite; Reduced graphene oxide; Electromagnetic properties

Creative Commons

BY 4.0

Preparation and electromagnetic properties characterization of reduced graphene oxide/strontium hexaferrite nanocomposites

Article

Abstract

1 Introduction

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

2.2 Prepared of RGO/SrFe12O19 nanocomposites

2.3 Characterization

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Morphological and structural characterization of samples

3.2 Magnetic properties

3.3 Analysis of electromagnetic parameters

3.4 Analysis of absorbing properties

4 Conclusions

Acknowledgement

References

Articles in the same Issue

Articles in the same Issue

Articles in the same Issue

2.2 Prepared of RGO/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ nanocomposites