Home Physical Sciences Application of nanoscale zero-valent iron in hexavalent chromium-contaminated soil: A review
Article Open Access

Application of nanoscale zero-valent iron in hexavalent chromium-contaminated soil: A review

  • Xilu Chen , Xiaomin Li , Dandan Xu , Weichun Yang and Shaoyuan Bai EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 24, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Chromium (Cr) is a common toxic heavy metal that is widely used in all kinds of industries, causing a series of environmental problems. Nanoscale zero- valent iron (nZVI) is considered to be an ideal remediation material for contaminated soil, especially for heavy metal pollutants. As a material of low toxicity and good activity, nZVI has been widely applied in the in situ remediation of soil hexavalent chromium (Cr(vi)) with mobility and toxicity in recent years. In this paper, some current technologies for the preparation of nZVI are summarized and the remediation mechanism of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil is proposed. Five classified modified nZVI materials are introduced and their remediation processes in Cr(vi)-contaminated soil are summarized. Key factors affecting the remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil by nZVI are studied. Interaction mechanisms between nZVI-based materials and Cr(vi) are explored. This study provides a comprehensive review of the nZVI materials for the remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil, which is conducive to reducing soil pollution.

1 Introduction

Chromium (Cr) is one of the most common heavy metals, which are widely utilized in wood preservatives, metallurgy, chromium plating, chromate manufacturing, alloys, textiles, printing, dyeing, and other industrial manufacturing sectors [1]. Nevertheless, during these industrial production processes, a large amount of Cr gets released into soils, which brings about a series of environmental problems and arouses widespread concern [2].

In soils, Cr may be soluble in the solution, exchangeable on the solid phase, bound to organic substance or oxides and clay-like mineral, and trapped in a crystal lattice core [3]. The species of Cr mentioned above is related to its chemical form and is attributed to its bioavailability and toxicity. Cr has several oxidation states in the natural environment, the most common and stable of which in the environment and biosystem are Cr(iii) and Cr(vi) [3].

Cr(iii) is an essential trace element for human nutrition and has low toxicity [4]. It is easy to be hydrolyzed in aqueous solution, usually in the form of precipitates (i.e., Cr(OH)3 and Cr2O3) in an alkaline or even in a weakly acidic environment, as shown in the Eh–pH diagram of Cr in solution (Figure 1) [5]. In contrast, Cr(vi) is soluble in water over a wide pH range, mainly in the form of hydrogen–chromate ion (HCrO 4 ) under acidic conditions or in the form of chromate ion (CrO  4 2 ) under neutral and alkaline conditions [6]. Therefore, the bioavailability of Cr(vi) is higher than that of Cr(iii) since it is hard to be precipitated or adsorbed on soil colloids. Besides, Cr(vi) is also known as a strong oxidant and has a 400-fold higher toxicity than Cr(iii) [7]. It is one of the 17 most dangerous toxic substances and a Class A carcinogen [8]. In addition, according to a document released by the United States Environmental Protection Agency [9], Cr(vi) is identified as the most important hazardous pollutant [10].

Figure 1 
               Eh–pH diagram of Cr in the solution [3].
Figure 1

Eh–pH diagram of Cr in the solution [3].

The Cr(vi) pollution in the soil is mainly caused by an unlawful leakage and illegal dumping of the chromium residue of industries. Once Cr(vi) enters the food chain through plants [11], it will be detrimental to the ecological environment, and eventually, pose a potential threat to the health of human and other living organisms, due to its mutagenicity, teratogenicity [6], and carcinogenicity [12]. Therefore, how to eliminate the Cr(vi) pollution in the soil has become a high-profile issue [13].

Several approaches have been exploited to remediate Cr(vi) contamination and they can be divided into in situ remediation and ex situ remediation. Ex situ remediation refers to the excavation and treatment of the polluted soil at the contaminated site [14]. Ex situ remediation, however, will significantly increase the transportation cost, and there is also a risk of pollutant diffusion during transportation and transfer. Technologies for in situ remediation [15], such as phytoremediation, bacterial remediation, chemical flushing, and chemical reduction [16], are more promising because of the lower cost and higher efficiency [17]. Moreover, soil disturbance can be minimized, which is better for the subsequent application of soil. Nevertheless, these in situ technologies [18] inevitably have shortcomings, such as long remediation period, difficult operation, unstable effects, and secondary pollution [19], which will limit their practical applications. Because the bioavailability and toxicity of Cr depend on its chemical form, the reduction of Cr(vi) to Cr(iii) is an important process for Cr(vi)-contaminated soil remediation, as shown in the following reaction [5].

(1) CrO 4 2 + 6e + 14 H + 2 Cr 3 + + 7 H 2 O

Experiments have proved that Cr(vi) can be reduced to Cr(iii) by the common wood preservative solution of chromate copper arsenate and three soil types (sandy soil, organic soil, and clayey soil) [20]. In addition, adding calcium polysulfide [21] or acidified hydrazine hydrate [13] can also reduce the content of hexavalent chromium in soil. Nevertheless, these materials are still not the most ideal due to various defects.

Nowadays, nanotechnology and nanomaterials have showed great potential to solve the water, air, and soil pollution problems [22,23]. In recent years, the application of nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) in the in situ remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil has attracted extensive attention [24]. nZVI is a kind of material, which is generally in powder form, and its particle size generally lies within the range of 10–100 nm [25]. The original nZVI was prepared by reducing iron [26] with NaBH4, and in the laboratory [27], the original nZVI was synthesized by reducing FeCl3 with NaBH4. Furthermore, the production of nanocomposites with controllable shapes, sizes, and surface properties is important for different practical applications [28]. nZVI is a promising in situ remediation material [29] with a flexible particle size, a large specific surface area [30], fast reaction speed, a strong reduction ability, and an ideal cost-effectiveness [31]. Moreover, nZVI can effectively overcome the shortcomings of in situ remediation, such as long repair cycle and unstable effect. Therefore, it is an ideal repair material and has been widely applied to the in situ remediation of heavy metal pollutants as a reaction medium [32]. Nevertheless, the current research works on the treatment of Cr(vi) by nZVI are mainly concentrated in the water field, and there has been little progress in research works in the soil field in recent years.

In this paper, applications of nZVI in Cr(vi)-contaminated soil remediation are comprehensively introduced. First, the synthesis and properties of nZVI are briefly introduced. Moreover, some typical methods for nZVI application in Cr(vi)-polluted soil remediation and their influencing factors are summarized and evaluated. Furthermore, the basic remediation mechanisms of nZVI application in Cr(vi)-contaminated soil are explored. Finally, some suggestions for potential remediation technologies are proposed.

2 nZVI for the remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil

2.1 Preparation and properties of nZVI

Nowadays, nanomaterials are widely applied in pollution control. Extensive studies have been carried out on nanomaterials, especially the correlation between the properties of nanomaterials and their chemical or physical properties [33]. In the past decade, nZVI has been used for the treatment of various common environmental pollutants existing in contaminated soil [34], groundwater and wastewater [35], such as chlorinated organic solvents, polychlorinated biphenyls, organochlorine pesticides [36], and heavy metal inorganic anions [37]. Due to its large surface area [38], fast reaction speed, and a strong reduction ability, nZVI can be used as the reaction medium of Cr(vi), with prospects of wide application [39].

There are many methods for preparing nZVI. Physical methods, such as grinding, abrasion, and lithography, were initially used. Currently, homogeneous solution or gas nucleation, and phase separation or high-temperature annealing are also widely used [40].

In addition to the physical methods described above, the most commonly used method to obtain nZVI is chemical reduction for its simplicity. The product obtained by this method is characterized by the uniform structure and high reaction activity. For example, sodium borohydride (NaBH4) is used as the reducing agent [41], and nZVI is obtained by the following reaction [42]:

(2) Fe ( H 2 O ) 6 3 + + 3 BH 4 + 3 H 2 O Fe 0 + 3 B ( OH ) 3 + 10.5 H 2

Besides, there are still some less commonly used methods, such as precision grinding, carbothermal reduction, ultrasonic-assisted production, electrochemical generation, and green synthesis, whereas due to their advantages, they may become popular in the future [42].

2.2 Classification and features of different modified nZVIs

In the application of nZVI, the surface quality and structure of nZVI undoubtedly play a key role in its function [43]. However, pristine nZVI is thermodynamically unstable due to its small size, large surface energy, and surface curvature [44]. nZVI particles tend to aggregate and react quickly with non-target compounds in the surrounding media, which may reduce the activity and stability of nZVI. Each particle has a magnetic field. So, it produces a magnetic field and the particles get stuck in an agglomerated form. Therefore, some nZVI-based materials have been fabricated to remove the pollutants from the environment [25]. The common modified nZVI morphologies are shown in Figure 2(a). nZVI can be divided into organic modified nZVI, bimetallic modified nZVI, and materials loaded on modified nZVI.

Figure 2 
                  TEM image of nZVI. (a) [46]; TEM image of CMC–nZVI (b) [46]; SEM image of VR–nZVI (c) [32]; TEM images of Fe0–Cu (d) [56].
Figure 2

TEM image of nZVI. (a) [46]; TEM image of CMC–nZVI (b) [46]; SEM image of VR–nZVI (c) [32]; TEM images of Fe0–Cu (d) [56].

2.2.1 Organic modified nZVI

The interaction of organic matter with nano-iron can reduce the gravity of nano-iron particles, prevent the agglomeration of nano-iron particles, and improve the dispersion performance [45].

2.2.1.1 Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)-supported nZVI

Figure 2(b) shows the TEM image of CMC–nZVI. Among the modified materials of nZVI, CMC is inexpensive and environment-friendly. The use of CMC-stabilized nZVI can improve the fluidity and diffusion of nanoscale zero-valent iron particles; thus, CMC-stabilized nZVI is especially suitable for in situ remediation of chromium-contaminated soil [46,47].

The CMC-stabilized nZVI is prepared by the sodium borohydride reduction method from steel pickling wastewater. The specific synthesis steps are as follows: first, CMC is dissolved in deionized water, the diluted waste liquid is sucked out by purging with purified nitrogen, and then the environment is kept as anaerobic. Finally, the sodium borohydride solution is added dropwise during violent mixing of the mixture to obtain the stable CMC-stabilized nZVI [48].

Some studies have observed the TEM images of CMC–nZVI [49]. It is found that the size of CMC–nZVI is large, and the particle size is generally distributed between 80 and 120 nm. The particles are not in chain structure, but are more evenly distributed. This shows that the CMC can effectively prevent the aggregation of nZVI nanoparticles [46].

2.2.1.2 Vinegar residue (VR) supported nZVI

Vinegar residue is composed of by-products and additives (rice bran, bran, and sorghum husk) produced by vinegar fermentation. According to the study of Pei et al. [32], VR is rich in such organic acids as acetic acid, malic acid, lactic acid, and tartaric acid. Figure 2(c) shows the SEM image of VR–nZVI.

The nZVI supported on a VR (nZVI@VR) is prepared in the following steps. First, ferrous sulfate and VR are stirred in rotating magnetic field at room temperature, and then the potassium borohydride (KBH4) solution is added slowly while stirring. Subsequently, nZVI@VR samples are separated from the mixture by vacuum filtration and finally dried in vacuum. It should be noted that in order to ensure that the nZVI@VR sample is not oxidized, nitrogen should be injected continuously during the process [32].

The feasibility of loading nZVI on VR composite to eliminate Cr(vi) in soil is tested by the settlement experiment. The results show that loading nZVI on VR could avoid aggregation and maintain the reactivity of particles. Furthermore, VR has a positive impact on soil properties and thus can be employed to improve soil pollution properties [32].

2.2.1.3 Rice husk-derived biochar-supported nZVI

It is a simple and economical one-step reduction method to directly use waste rice husk as the carrier of iron salt and the source of reducing agent. Using the polarity and hydrophilicity of carbon materials can reduce the energy consumption and reduce the adverse effects of biochar recarbonization [50], so that the waste rice husk can be fully reused.

The production process can be summarized as follows. First, nitrogen is introduced as the protective gas in the production process, then the rice husk is mixed with Fe2(SO4)3 solution under specific pressure. The excess iron salt is filtered and washed out under vacuum after vibration, and finally the target sample is obtained [39].

2.2.1.4 Other organics-supported nZVI

In addition, chitosan [51] can form nanocomposites with other materials through electrostatic interaction [52], covalent crosslinking, macromolecular compounding, adsorption, and hydrogen bonding. Sucrose, vegetable oil, green tea, biochar [53], MCM-41 [54], and other extracts [55] can also be used as nZVI composite materials [21]. However, these materials were rare and less successful in treating Cr(vi), so they are not described in detail here.

2.2.2 Bimetallic modified nZVI

It has been proved that an additional metal material on the surface of nZVI can accelerate its reduction rate and effectively improve its performance [57]. The reaction activity of bimetallic particles is higher than that of nZVI [58]. Bimetallic modified nano-iron can delay the oxidation rate of nZVI and accelerate the reduction rate. There are many kinds of bimetallic modified materials [59], such as nano Ni/Fe bimetallic [60], nano Cu/Fe bimetallic [56], nano Pd/Fe bimetallic [61], nano Fe/Au bimetallic [62], and so on [63]. In this paper, the nano Cu/Fe bimetallic material nZVI/Cu is introduced. The TEM image of Fe0–Cu is shown in Figure 2(d).

nZVI/Cu is synthesized by dissolving FeCl3·6H2O. At room temperature and under nitrogen gas condition, CuSO4 is put into alcohol and stirred continuously. NaBH4 is dissolved in deionized water. The mixture is added and stirred vigorously. After stirring, the black solid particles are obtained. Subsequently, they are pumped and filtered, then washed with deionized water and ethanol, and finally sent to the vacuum dryer for drying [64].

2.2.3 Materials loaded on modified nZVI

Bentonite is a nZVI-loading material. It is a kind of silicate with a sheet structure, is non-toxic, offers environmental protection, and holds abundant reserves. When the bentonite is used as the support material of nZVI, a large amount of nZVI can be adsorbed on the surface of nZVI itself, which can promote the dispersion of nZVI particles and reduce their agglomeration. Thus, the final composite nZVI has a very good adsorption performance and improves the decontamination ability of nZVI [65]. Figure 3 shows the structure and morphology of nZVI@Bent’s.

Figure 3 
                     nZVI@Bent before reaction (a); nZVI@Bent after reaction (b) [66].
Figure 3

nZVI@Bent before reaction (a); nZVI@Bent after reaction (b) [66].

The study of Leupin et al. [65] introduces the preparation method. The specific steps are as follows. Under the protection of nitrogen, the solid with the mass ratio of Fe2+ to bentonite of 1:1 is weighed and added with FeSO4·7H2O to the mixture of quantitative absolute ethanol and ultrapure water, and stirred. During continuous stirring, 2 mol/L of NaBH4 solution is added into the mixture. Finally, the target sample is prepared by vacuum filtration, fast rinsing with absolute ethanol, and drying in vacuum drying oven (Table 1).

Table 1

Summary of modified nZVI

Modified nZVI Short description Synthesis methods Advantages Side effects size
CMC-stabilized nZVI [46] Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) Sodium borohydride reduction from steel pickling wastewater Improve the fluidity and diffusion of nZVI particles CMC-stabilized nZVI achieved a target remediation effect on Cr 80–120 nm
Vinegar residue supported nZVI [32] By-products and additives produced by vinegar fermentation Stirring mixture of ferrous sulfate, VR, and KBH4 solution Avoid agglomeration and keep the activity of particles It takes a long time to be effective 400 nm
Rice husk-derived biochar-supported nZVI [39] Waste rice husk Mixed solution of rice husk and Fe2(SO4)3 Reduce energy consumption and biochar recarbonization The processes proceed slowly 100 nm
Bimetallic modified nZVI (nZVI/Cu) [56] Nano Cu/Fe bimetal material Mixture of FeCl3·6H2O, CuSO4, and NaBH4 Speed up the reduction of nZVI It is easy to form new heavy metal pollution 20–50 nm
Materials loaded on modified nZVI(Bentonite) [66] Silicate with a lamellar structure Mixture of bentonite and FeSO4·7H2O Promotingthe dispersion of NZVI particles The effect of reaction temperature is great 100 nm

3 Remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil by nZVI

In the process of remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil by nZVI, in order to prevent iron agglomeration as well as to improve the remediation efficiency of nZVI, modified materials are generally used to stabilize nZVI, including CMC-stabilized nZVI, nZVI@VR, and nZVI–RBC. Various tests were performed to evaluate the remediation effect of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil from different aspects. The Cr(vi) will adsorb on nZVI, through the surface pores and oxygen-containing functional groups, and then react directly with the surface to reduce to Cr(iii), whereas nZVI is oxidized to Fe2+ and indirectly reduced with Cr(vi) [66]. For example, toxicity characteristic leaching procedure is used to examine the leaching ability of Cr, and the immobilization and bioaccumulation of Cr in the improved soil are discussed through in vitro and plant experiments [67].

3.1 Remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil by CMC-stabilized nZVI

In vitro and plant experiments show that the application of CMC–nZVI to remove Cr(vi) from contaminated soil can significantly enhance the immobilization of Cr by converting Cr(vi) to Cr(iii) [15], thereby reducing its bioavailability, leaching ability, and plant bioaccumulation, and finally realize the remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil [46].

As suggested by Zhang et al. [46], the speciation of Cr in soil changes from relatively high availability (exchangeable) to relatively lower availability (carbonate binding and iron manganese oxide binding). The results show that Cr(OH)3 or Cr(iii)/Fe(iii) hydroxides are the main forms of Cr(OH)3 or Cr(iii)/Fe(iii) hydroxides [68]. After the application of modified nZVI, Cr(vi) are adsorbed and fixed by soil particles, so that the remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil is achieved.

The effects of biochar addition on CMC–nZVI and CMC–nZVI alone are compared. The results show that the conversion efficiency of Cr(vi) declines slightly, whereas the immobilization efficiency of total chromium increases. This is because biochar can adsorb a small amount of CMC–nZVI, which leads to a decrease in the effective contact area between nZVI and Cr, thereby further reducing the conversion efficiency of Cr(vi). However, the reduction reaction after adding biochar [69] prolongs the total remediation time and increases the immobilization efficiency of total chromium [70].

CMC–nZVI has a significant effect on the remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil. nZVI modified by CMC and addition of biochar into CMC–nZVI can realize the remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil, and also greatly reduce the leaching of Cr in a contaminated soil by more than 95%. Finally, the experimental results of Zhang et al. [46] show that when the content of Cr(vi) in soil is 800 mg/kg (w/W), the optimal dosage of CMC–nZVI/BC for remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil is 11 g/kg.

3.2 Remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil by vinegar residue supported nZVI

The specific process of Cr(vi) immobilization by nZVI with VR(nZVI@VR) as support material is as follows. First, highly toxic Cr(vi) is adsorbed on the surface of nZVI@VR through the surface pores and oxygen-containing functional groups, such as C–O, COO–, or –OH. Then the content of Cr(vi) is reduced by the zero-valent iron. Finally, (Cr x Fe1−x )(OH)3 and Cr x Fe1−x OOH are precipitated [71].

In the practical application of nZVI@VR, if the nZVI@VR powder is used as an improver, it is not easy to pack and will be blown away by the wind, which will negatively impact the health of people without a cover. Therefore, nZVI@VR powder needs to be transformed into a nZVI@VR particle.

The specific transformation process can be summarized as follows. nZVI@VR and attapulgite are mixed and water is added in proportion. The mixture is stirred until it is completely homogeneous. nZVI@VR particles are produced by a granulator at room temperature and air-dried at 50°C.

After granulation, the granular nZVI@VR is used for remediation, and it is found that the conversion rate of the available Cr to low-availability components is accelerated, significantly reducing the bioavailability of Cr.

The results of Pei et al. [27] show that the fixation efficiency of nZVI@VR without granulation is 98.68%. When the content of Cr(vi) in soil is 198.20 mg/kg, the best dosage of nZVI@VR is 50 g/kg, i.e., 5%.

3.3 Remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil by rice husk-derived biochar-supported nZVI

In recent years, biochar has also been used as the carrier of nZVI for the reuse of waste biomass.

In order to remediate Cr(vi)-contaminated soil, waste rice husk is used as an iron carrier and reductant [39]. When the main form of Cr in contaminated soil is acid soluble, it is found that during the reduction of Cr(vi) by nZVI–RBC, the redox products of Fe and Cr form, and the residual Cr in soil accounts for 47.5%, 24.6%, and 27.9%, respectively. Cr in soil is transformed into a low-bioavailability form, and the leaching of Cr is greatly inhibited. nZVI–RBC has long-term remediation ability to Cr(vi)-contaminated soil.

The final experimental results show that when the concentration of Cr(vi) in the leachate is 62.4 mg/L and the dosages of modified nZVI are 8% and 12%, respectively, in which case, the best remediation effect of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil can be achieved. Under these two dosages, nZVI–RBC could completely remove Cr(vi) in 120 and 30 min, respectively, and no Cr(vi) can be detected in the soil leachate for 6 consecutive days.

3.4 Remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil by bimetallic-modified nZVI

Copper–iron bimetallic particles can be formed by coating copper on the surface of nZVI. The study showed that compared with other oxidation pollutants, nZVI needs a higher copper content to remove Cr(vi). Under acidic conditions, Cr(vi) is further reduced by Fe2+ and Cu0 formed in the reaction of nZVI/Cu and Cr(vi). The deposition of iron oxide on the surface of the material can be effectively inhibited, and the active sites on the surface of nZVI/Cu can be exposed, and finally the reduction reaction of Cr(vi) is promoted.

The results show that when the contaminated soil contains 120 mg/kg Cr(vi), the Cr(vi) reduction exceeded 99% at a pH of 5, temperature of 303 K, and nZVI/Cu dose of 0.06 g [64].

3.5 Remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil by bentonite-supported nZVI

In the process of remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil by nZVI@Bent [32], Cr(vi) will adsorb on nZVI and react directly with the surface containing nZVI to be reduced to Cr(iii), while nZVI is oxidized to Fe2+ and indirectly reduced with Cr(vi) [72].

The experimental results of Leupin et al. [65] show that when the ratio of iron to bentonite is 1:0.5 and the dosage is 5 g/L, the removal rate of Cr(vi) in the soil suspension is the highest, which is the best reaction condition for removing Cr(vi) (Table 2).

Table 2

Remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil by nZVI

nZVI Remediation process Content of Cr(vi) in soil Optimum dosage of modified nZVI Advantages
CMC-stabilized nZVI [46] Carbonate binding and iron manganese oxide binding 800 mg/kg (w/w) 11 g/kg Enhancing the immobilization of Cr by converting Cr(vi) to Cr(iii), reducing plant bioaccumulation
Vinegar residue supported nZVI [32] nZVI@VR reduces the content of Cr(vi) through surface pores and oxygen-containing functional groups 198.20 mg/kg 50 g/kg Reducing the bioavailability of Cr
Rice husk-derived biochar-supported nZVI [39] Formation of redox products of Fe and Cr 62.4 mg/L 8–12% Long-term remediation ability to Cr(vi)-contaminated soil
Bimetallic modified nZVI (nZVI/Cu) [64] Cr (vi) is reduced by Fe2+ and Cu0 120 mg/kg 0.06 g Inhibiting the deposition of iron oxide on the surface of the material.
Bentonite-supported nZVI [66] nZVI is oxidized to Fe2+ and indirectly reduced with Cr(vi) The ratio of iron to bentonite is 1:0.5 5 g/L Avoiding secondary iron pollution, acidification of paddy fields, and high removal cost

4 Factors affecting the remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil by nZVI

In the application of nZVI, there are many factors which will affect the removal effect, including the initial pH value, temperature, nZVI dosage, the chemical composition of surrounding organic matter, etc. [73].

4.1 Effect of the initial pH value

It is found that the initial pH value has a significant impact on the removal rate of Cr(vi) in soil, no matter what kind of nZVI is wrapped by modified materials [74]. More specifically, the pH value and the Cr(vi) removal rate show a negative correlation [75], that is, with the rising pH value, the Cr(vi) removal rate declines [76].

In the experiment of remediating Cr(vi)-contaminated soil with nZVI and copper bimetallic particles, it is found that the Cr(vi) removal rate is much higher at pH 5 than at pH 7 or 9, and the reduction rate could reach 99.9% within 5 min. Due to the release of Fe2+ under acidic conditions, the deposition of iron oxide on the material’s surface is well inhibited, the active sites on the surface of nZVI/Cu are exposed, and the reduction rate of Cr(vi) is accelerated [77]. In an alkaline condition, however, owing to the precipitation of nZVI/Cu, a passivation layer is easily formed on the surface of nZVI/Cu, which hinders the contact between nZVI/Cu and Cr(vi), and meanwhile affects the formation of the codeposition of ferrochromium, thereby lowering the reduction rate [64].

The reason is due to the fact that the acidic environment will corrode the oxide layer of Fe2O3 and FeOOH attached to the surface of nZVI@Bent, thereby exposing more reaction sites. A large amount of free H+ in the soil suspension promotes the reaction direction of nZVI removal, and the removal efficiency of Cr(vi) in soil is improved. Nevertheless, the contact between nZVI@Bent and Cr(vi) in an alkaline environment is reversed [65].

To sum up, the conclusion can be drawn that the soil is acidic, which is conducive to remediating Cr(vi)-contaminated soil [78].

4.2 Effect of the reaction temperature

As a key factor, temperature has a profound influence on the Cr(vi) removal rate and chemical reaction rate [20]. It is found that the temperature and Cr(vi) removal rate are in a positive correlation, that is, the Cr(vi) removal rate increases with the rising temperature.

After describing the reaction by the Langmuir–Hinshelwood first-order kinetic model or half-life, it can be concluded that the activation of reactant molecules increases as the temperature rises. That is, the reaction rate constant increases with the rising temperature. Some studies have confirmed that the concentration of Cr(vi) in soil should be reduced to the same concentration (2 mg/L), and it should be used for 30 min at 298 K and 10 min at 303 K. When the temperature is above 303 K, the Cr(vi) removal rate continues to increase slowly [64].

In the experiment of nZVI@Bent materials mentioned above, it is found that with the increasing reaction temperature, the removal rate of Cr(vi) in soil solution by nZVI@Bent presents an ascending trend. The specific reason is that after the temperature rises, the energy in the reaction system increases correspondingly; thus, the number of reaction molecules increases and the reaction rate accelerates [66].

To sum up, with the increase of reaction temperature, the reaction will advance backward, which is conducive to accelerating the remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil [64,79].

4.3 Effect of other factors

In addition to pH and temperature, there are many other factors that affect the Cr(vi) removal rate [80]. For example, the dosage of nZVI [81], the contact time between nZVI and soil environment, the concentration of nZVI, the initial concentration of Cr(vi), and the chemical composition of surrounding organic matter, heavy metal, ion species, and other media will impact the reaction rate [82].

The results show that when the amount of nZVI increases, the active molecules will increase as well [26], and a large amount of Cr(vi) will adhere to the nZVI particles, resulting in a higher reaction rate [83].

In addition, the concentration of Cr(vi) is inversely proportional to the removal rate of Cr(vi). Under high Cr(vi) concentration, the immobilization efficiency of Cr(iii) in the reduced soil liquid phase is low, and the surface area of nZVI is limited. In this case, there isn’t enough position for excess Cr(iii), which leads to the slow removal rate of Cr(vi) [66].

It should be pointed out that there are many factors affecting the Cr(vi) removal rate, and the combination of each factor is more complex than that of the current one, which needs to be analyzed in detail [65].

5 Interaction mechanism between nZVI-based materials and Cr(vi)

In the treatment of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil, nZVI-based materials have been widely studied and show great potential and broad application, as mentioned above.

The methods and applications of various modified nZVIs for the remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil have been introduced. According to these introductions, many researchers have speculated and verified the mechanism, but the systematic summaries are few. The mechanisms of these methods can be divided into adsorption mechanism and reduction mechanism.

5.1 Reduction mechanism

In fact, the major removal mechanism of nZVI on Cr(vi) in soil is reduction [84]. It is found that the removal of heavy metal ions is generally attributed to the reduction process when nZVI is used as the repair material [85]. The reduction of Cr(vi) by zero-valent iron is a multistep process, in which the zero-valent iron acts as an electron donor of heavy metal ions [86].

According to the theme of this paper, the process of Cr(vi) reduction in soil can be classified into direct reduction and indirect reduction. The final products from reduction are Cr(OH)3 and Fe(iii)–Cr(iii) complexes [66].

First, in the process of direct reduction, Cr(vi) in soil adsorbs on the curved surface of nZVI and reacts directly with the surface containing nZVI to form Cr(iii) [87]; second, in the indirect reduction process, nZVI will be oxidized to Fe2+ first [88], and to Fe3+ subsequently [89], both with the reduction from Cr(vi) to Cr(iii). Cr(iii) will combine with OH- and Fe3+, to form Cr(OH)3 and Fe(iii)–Cr(iii) complexes [66].

In addition, when Cr(vi) is present in the curved particle system and soil suspension, the reduction process is stronger than the adsorption process. In the process of Cr(vi) reduction, most of the Cr(vi) will be removed, accordingly, the residual Cr(vi) in soil will be reduced [90].

The specific reaction is as follows [91]. (1) Cr(vi) was adsorbed on the surface of nZVI through surface pores and oxygen-containing functional groups. (2) Cr(vi) in soil was reduced by Fe0 (equations (3)–(5)). (3) Precipitation of (Cr x Fe1−x )(OH)3 and Cr x Fe1−x OOH (equations (6) and (7)):

(3) 2 HCrO 4 ( aq ) + 3 Fe 0 ( s ) + 14 H + ( aq ) 3 Fe 2 + ( aq ) + 2 Cr 3 + ( aq ) + 8 H 2 O(l)

(4) HCrO 4 ( aq ) + 3 Fe 2 + ( aq ) + 3 H + ( aq ) 3 Fe 2 + ( aq ) + Cr 3 + ( aq ) + 2 H 2 O ( l )

(5) 3 Fe 2 + ( aq ) + CrO 4 2 ( aq ) + 8 H + ( aq ) 3 Fe 2 + ( aq ) + Cr 3 + ( aq ) + 4 H 2 O ( l )

(6) ( 1 x ) Fe 2 + ( aq ) + ( x ) Cr 3 + ( aq ) + 3 H 2 O ( aq ) ( Cr x Fe 1 x ) ( OH ) 3 ( 0 < x < 1 ) ( s ) + 3 H + ( aq )

(7) ( 1 x ) Fe 2 + ( aq ) + ( x ) Cr 3 + ( aq ) + 2 H 2 O ( aq ) ( Cr x Fe 1 x ) OOH ( 0 < x < 1 ) ( s ) + 3 H + ( aq )

On the other hand, zero-valent iron and Cr(vi) can also carry out charge transfer through biochar to maintain the redox reaction, but the difference is that in this process, the removal rate of hexavalent chromium in soil is relatively low [39].

5.2 Adsorption mechanism

Compared with other methods, adsorption method is simple and efficient, thus it is the most commonly used technology for organic pollutants’ removal [92]. Due to the rich oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface of various adsorbents [93], adsorption technology is considered to be a typical reaction process for removing Cr(vi) and other heavy metal ions [94]. The adsorption performance of adsorbents depends on the morphology and structure of porous materials, such as specific surface area, pore volume, pore distribution, and special pore surface chemistry [92]. The main principle of adsorption is related to the large specific surface area of nZVI and adsorption sites on its surface [95]. It has been proved that nZVI-based materials physically [96] contain a large number of active sites or functional groups [97].

Based on the analysis of the results and material characterization of the removal of Cr(vi) by nZVI (nZVI–RBC) supported by biochar, the reaction mechanism can be inferred as follows: on the surface of biochar, when CrO 4 2 diffuses to the surface of nZVI–RBC in the reaction system, some ions unite with the function and react with nZVI [98],  CrO 4 2 . On the one hand, the electrons provided by the zero-valent iron can be directly obtained and will be oxidized into ferrous iron and trivalent iron. At this time,  CrO 4 2 combined with functional groups will be gradually reduced to trivalent chromium, so the concentration of Cr(vi) in soil will be rapidly reduced [39].

In addition, part of biochar as modified material will be dissolved to form dissolved organic carbon, and part of Cr(vi) will be reduced to Cr(iii). The dissolution of biochar also results in the lack of coating materials for nZVI; thus, nZVI is gradually exposed to the reaction system and could directly participate in the reduction of Cr(vi). Despite the fact that these processes are much slower than other processes, they are still a continuous and effective way to remediate Cr(vi)-contaminated soil [30].

In fact, the position of nZVI reaction surface may be the corrosion products of stable or metastable iron (ii), mixed iron (ii)/(iii), or iron (iii) oxide, hydroxide, or hydroxide. These iron hydroxide and oxide could enhance their adsorption capacity under natural environment [39].

During adsorption, the Cr(vi) in the soil can be directly adsorbed by nZVI, and the Cr(OH)3 and Fe (iii)–Cr(iii) complexes produced in the reduction process described later will also be adsorbed by nZVI. Through the above process, Cr(vi) pollution in the soil will be further reduced [66].

After the synthesis of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) immobilized nZVI (c-nZVI), the reductive adsorption of Cr(vi) on MCC is studied. nZVI adsorbs Cr(vi) to Fe (iii) by zero-valent iron redox. Fe(iii) is reduced and regenerated to zero-valent iron by the in situ oxidation of cellulose to cellulose dialdehyde [99].

5.3 Other interaction mechanism

More occasionally, van der Waals force, magnetic force, specific surface bonding, and electrostatic interaction control the main mechanism in some natural environmental reaction systems [100].

In addition, the coprecipitation theory can also support the remediation mechanism of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil by nZVI or nZVI-modified materials. When Fe2+ reduces Cr(vi) in the soil suspension to Cr(iii), Cr(iii) can combine with OH- in the soil suspension to form Cr(OH)3, while Fe2+ is oxidized to Fe3+, and Fe3+ combines with free OH- to form Fe(OH)3. Finally, both of them combine with Cr(iii) in the soil suspension to form a Fe(iii)–Cr(iii) complex to remediate Cr(vi)-contaminated soil [101].

6 Future prospective and conclusions

In the practical application of nZVI to repair Cr(vi), in addition to its advantages, there are some disadvantages as well. Pure nZVI is easy to agglomerate and passivate. Besides, it has poor transport capacity and can reduce electron transfer, which will weaken its remediation effect [46]. Although the modified nZVI can avoid some of the above problems, it also gives rise to some other new problems. For example, it may inhibit the reaction between nZVI and target pollutants or cause other new environmental pollution problems. Many modified materials can be prepared only under extremely strict conditions. Some of them are easy to oxidize and difficult to preserve, and the reduction selectivity of the nanoscale zero-valent iron is poor. For example, the use of sulfidation [88]-modified materials may induce corrosion of the nZVI core and increase the particle size. The application of bimetallic particles [64] as modified materials is also likely to increase corrosion, reduce the service life of nZVI, and even introduce other heavy metals, resulting in a serious environmental pollution. If borohydride is used as a common reducing agent, the cost of wet synthesis method is too high to be used on a large scale and may cause secondary pollution [32]. These are the problems that need to be addressed at present or they will hinder the further development of nZVI to a certain extent [102].

In order to make the nZVI system fully competitive, major improvements and upgrades should be carried out. First of all, the reaction between nZVI and soil pollutants is very complex [103], and its remediation efficiency needs improvement [104]. Therefore, the research work on its reaction mechanism, such as the possible properties of soil itself [105], the potential impact of nZVI on soil pollutants [106], and the influence of combined application of nZVI and biotechnology on soil remediation, should be further studied.

Second, although nZVI has been widely used, its preparation method is too complex and time-consuming, so the cost is high. Thus, in order to prepare nZVI on a large scale, it is necessary to explore new preparation methods to obtain nZVI with higher quality and performance at the lowest cost [107]. Future research works must seek to establish a sound evidence system, on which one can accurately predict the liquidity, responsiveness, fate, and ecological impact of nZVI [35].

In addition, due to the complexity and variability of the natural environment [108], most application sites of nZVI are carried out only on the laboratory scale, and field applications are lacking. Furthermore, other models are needed to detect the potential risks of nZVI to plants and microorganisms [29] in the soil during pollutant remediation [109,110,111,112].

However, in general, nZVI is a very promising and widely used reductant, which can also be used in any other heavy metal remediation. The mechanism of nZVI repair is not only limited to reduction mechanism and adsorption mechanism, but also to oxidation mechanism. The oxidation mechanism is realized by the Fenton reaction, forming various derivatives of iron, oxidizing various target pollutants, and finally realizing the separation of heavy metal ions.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Talent Special project (2019AC20023).

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Zhou X, Jing G, Lv B, Zhou Z, Zhu R. Highly efficient removal of chromium(vi) by Fe/Ni bimetallic nanoparticles in an ultrasound-assisted system. Chemosphere. 2016;160:332–41.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.06.103Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Lyu H, Tang J, Huang Y, Gai L, Zeng EY, Liber K, et al. Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions by a novel biochar supported nanoscale iron sulfide composite. Chem Eng J. 2017;322:516–24.10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.058Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ertani A, Mietto A, Borin M, Nardi S. Chromium in agricultural soils and crops: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017;228(5):190.10.1007/s11270-017-3356-ySearch in Google Scholar

[4] Balmer J. Hexavalent chromium. Workplace Health Saf. 2018;66(11):564.10.1177/2165079918805775Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Li Y, Wang W, Zhou L, Liu Y, Mirza ZA, Lin X. Remediation of hexavalent chromium spiked soil by using synthesized iron sulfide particles. Chemosphere. 2017;169:131–8.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.060Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Lyu H, Zhao H, Tang J, Gong Y, Huang Y, Wu Q, et al. Immobilization of hexavalent chromium in contaminated soils using biochar supported nanoscale iron sulfide composite. Chemosphere. 2018;194:360–9.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.182Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Tang WW, Zeng GM, Gong JL, Liang J, Xu P, Zhang C, et al. Impact of humic/fulvic acid on the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions using nanomaterials: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2014;468–469:1014–27.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.044Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Beretta G, Mastorgio A, Pedrali L, Saponaro S, Sezenna E. Support tool for identifying in situ remediation technology for sites contaminated by hexavalent chromium. Water. 2018;10(10):1344.10.3390/w10101344Search in Google Scholar

[9] Palansooriya KN, Shaheen SM, Chen SS, Tsang DCW, Hashimoto Y, Hou DY, et al. Soil amendments for immobilization of potentially toxic elements in contaminated soils: a critical review. Environ Int. 2020;134:10504.10.1016/j.envint.2019.105046Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Li X, He X, Wang H, Liu Y. Characteristics and long-term effects of stabilized nanoscale ferrous sulfide immobilized hexavalent chromium in soil. J Hazard Mater. 2020;389:122089.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122089Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Su H, Fang Z, Tsang PE, Fang J, Zhao D. Stabilisation of nanoscale zero-valent iron with biochar for enhanced transport and in situ remediation of hexavalent chromium in soil. Environ Pollut. 2016;214:94–100.10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.072Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Cheng S, Chen T, Xu W, Huang J, Jiang S, Yan B. Application research of biochar for the remediation of soil heavy metals contamination: a review. Molecules. 2020;25:14.10.3390/molecules25143167Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Ma Y, Li F, Jiang Y, Yang W, Lv L, Xue H, et al. Remediation of Cr(vi)-contaminated soil using the acidified hydrazine hydrate. Bull Env Contam Toxicol. 2016;97(3):392–4.10.1007/s00128-016-1862-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Qiu X, Fang Z, Yan X, Gu F, Jiang F. Emergency remediation of simulated chromium (vi)-polluted river by nanoscale zero-valent iron: laboratory study and numerical simulation. Chem Eng J. 2012;193–194:358–65.10.1016/j.cej.2012.04.067Search in Google Scholar

[15] Sedlazeck KP, Vollprecht D, Muller P, Mischitz R, Giere R. Impact of an in situ Cr(vi)-contaminated site remediation on the groundwater. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020;27(13):14465–75.10.1007/s11356-019-07513-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Bian X, Cui J, Tang B, Yang L. Chelant-induced phytoextraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils: a review. Pol J Environ Stud. 2018;27(6):2417–24.10.15244/pjoes/81207Search in Google Scholar

[17] Su C, Puls RW. Arsenate and arsenite removal by zerovalent iron: kinetics, redox transformation, and implications for in situ groundwater remediation. Environ Sci & Technol. 2001;35(7):1487–92.10.1021/es001607iSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Xia S, Song Z, Jeyakumar P, Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Ok YS, et al. A critical review on bioremediation technologies for Cr(vi)-contaminated soils and wastewater. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2019;49(12):1027–78.10.1080/10643389.2018.1564526Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hou S, Wu B, Peng D, Wang Z, Wang Y, Xu H. Remediation performance and mechanism of hexavalent chromium in alkaline soil using multi-layer loaded nano-zero-valent iron. Environ Pollut. 2019;252:553–61.10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.083Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Song J, Townsend T, Solo-Gabriele H, Jang Y-C. Hexavalent chromium reduction in soils contaminated with chromated copper arsenate preservative. Soil Sediment Contaminat Int J. 2006;15(4):387–99.10.1080/15320380600751751Search in Google Scholar

[21] Chrysochoou M, Johnston CP, Dahal G. A comparative evaluation of hexavalent chromium treatment in contaminated soil by calcium polysulfide and green-tea nanoscale zero-valent iron. J Hazard Mater. 2012;201–202:33–42.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Zhe Z, Yuxiu A. Nanotechnology for the oil and gas industry – an overview of recent progress. Nanotechnol Rev. 2018;7(4):341–53.10.1515/ntrev-2018-0061Search in Google Scholar

[23] Adebayo EA, Ibikunle JB, Oke AM, Lateef A, Azeez MA, Oluwatoyin AO, et al. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of silver, gold and silver-gold alloy nanoparticles phytosynthesized using extract of opuntia ficus-indica. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2019;58(1):313–26.10.1515/rams-2019-0039Search in Google Scholar

[24] Qian L, Shang X, Zhang B, Zhang W, Su A, Chen Y, et al. Enhanced removal of Cr(vi) by silicon rich biochar-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron. Chemosphere. 2019;215:739–45.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Zhou Y, Wang T, Zhi D, Guo B, Zhou Y, Nie J, et al. Applications of nanoscale zero-valent iron and its composites to the removal of antibiotics: a review. J Mater Sci. 2019;54(19):12171–88.10.1007/s10853-019-03606-5Search in Google Scholar

[26] Singh R, Misra V, Singh RP. Removal of Cr(vi) by nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) from soil contaminated with tannery wastes. Bull Env Contam Toxicol. 2012;88(2):210–4.10.1007/s00128-011-0425-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Zou Y, Wang X, Khan A, Wang P, Liu Y, Alsaedi A, et al. Environmental remediation and application of nanoscale zero-valent iron and its composites for the removal of heavy metal ions: a review. Env Sci Technol. 2016;50(14):7290–304.10.1021/acs.est.6b01897Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Das S, Srivastava VC. An overview of the synthesis of CuO–ZnO nanocomposite for environmental and other applications. Nanotechnol Rev. 2018;7(3):267–82.10.1515/ntrev-2017-0144Search in Google Scholar

[29] Sacca ML, Fajardo C, Costa G, Lobo C, Nande M, Martin M. Integrating classical and molecular approaches to evaluate the impact of nanosized zero-valent iron (nZVI) on soil organisms. Chemosphere. 2014;104:184–9.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Fang Z, Chen J, Qiu X, Qiu X, Cheng W, Zhu L. Effective removal of antibiotic metronidazole from water by nanoscale zero-valent iron particles. Desalination. 2011;268(1–3):60–7.10.1016/j.desal.2010.09.051Search in Google Scholar

[31] Chekli L, Phuntsho S, Roy M, Shon HK. Characterisation of Fe-oxide nanoparticles coated with humic acid and Suwannee River natural organic matter. Sci Total Env. 2013;461–462:19–27.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.083Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Pei G, Zhu Y, Wen J, Pei Y, Li H. Vinegar residue supported nanoscale zero-valent iron: remediation of hexavalent chromium in soil. Env Pollut. 2020;256:113407.10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113407Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Li J, Liu H, Deng Y, Liu G, Chen Y, Yang J. Emerging nanostructured materials for the catalytic removal of volatile organic compounds. Nanotechnol Rev. 2016;5(1):147–181.10.1515/ntrev-2015-0051Search in Google Scholar

[34] Nemecek J, Lhotsky O, Cajthaml T. Nanoscale zero-valent iron application for in situ reduction of hexavalent chromium and its effects on indigenous microorganism populations. Sci Total Env. 2014;485–486:739–47.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.105Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Crane RA, Scott TB. Nanoscale zero-valent iron: future prospects for an emerging water treatment technology. J Hazard Mater. 2012;211–212:112–25.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.073Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Guan X, Sun Y, Qin H, Li J, Lo IMC, He D, et al. The limitations of applying zero-valent iron technology in contaminants sequestration and the corresponding countermeasures: the development in zero-valent iron technology in the last two decades (1994–2014). Water Res. 2015;75:224–48.10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Wang C, Baer DR, Amonette JE, Engelhard MH, Antony J, Qiang Y. Morphology and electronic structure of the oxide shell on the surface of iron nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(25):8824–32.10.1021/ja900353fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Wang S, Gao B, Li Y, Creamer AE, He F. Adsorptive removal of arsenate from aqueous solutions by biochar supported zero-valent iron nanocomposite: batch and continuous flow tests. J Hazard Mater. 2017;322(Pt A):172–81.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.01.052Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Liu X, Yang L, Zhao H, Wang W. Pyrolytic production of zerovalent iron nanoparticles supported on rice husk-derived biochar: simple, in situ synthesis and use for remediation of Cr(vi)-polluted soils. Sci Total Environ. 2020;708.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134479Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[40] Shan G, Yan S, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY, Zhang TC. Applications of nanomaterials in environmental science and engineering: review. Pract Periodic Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manage. 2009;13(2):110–9.10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2009)13:2(110)Search in Google Scholar

[41] Yang F, Zhang S, Sun Y, Cheng K, Li J, Tsang DCW. Fabrication and characterization of hydrophilic corn stalk biochar-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron composites for efficient metal removal. Bioresour Technol. 2018;265:490–7.10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Stefaniuk M, Oleszczuk P, Ok YS. Review on nano zerovalent iron (nZVI): from synthesis to environmental applications. Chem Eng J. 2016;287:618–32.10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.046Search in Google Scholar

[43] Liu M, Wang Y, Chen L, Zhang Y, Lin Z. Mg(OH)2 supported nanoscale zero valent iron enhancing the removal of Pb(ii) from aqueous solution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(15):7961–9.10.1021/am509184eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[44] Burda C, Chen X, Narayanan R, El-Sayed MA. Chemistry and properties of nanocrystals of different shapes. Chem Rev. 2005;105(4):1025–102.10.1021/cr030063aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Liu X, Dong H, Zeng Q, Yang X, Zhang D. Synergistic effects of reduced nontronite and organic ligands on Cr(vi) reduction. Env Sci Technol. 2019;53(23):13732–41.10.1021/acs.est.9b04769Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Zhang R, Zhang N, Fang Z. In situ remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated soil by CMC-stabilized nanoscale zero-valent iron composited with biochar. Water Sci Technol. 2018;77(5–6):1622–31.10.2166/wst.2018.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Thompson L, Azadmanjiri J, Nikzad M, Sbarski I, Wang J, Yu A. Cellulose nanocrystals: production, functionalization and advanced applications. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2019;58(1):1–16.10.1515/rams-2019-0001Search in Google Scholar

[48] Wang Y, Fang ZQ, Liang B, Tsang EP. Remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated soil by stabilized nanoscale zero-valent iron prepared from steel pickling waste liquor. Chem Eng J. 2014;247:283–90.10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.011Search in Google Scholar

[49] Wang C, Kang J, Liang P, Zhang H, Sun H, Tadé MO, et al. Ferric carbide nanocrystals encapsulated in nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes as an outstanding environmental catalyst. Environ Sci Nano. 2017;4(1):170–9.10.1039/C6EN00397DSearch in Google Scholar

[50] Dong H, Zhang C, Hou K, Cheng Y, Deng J, Jiang Z, et al. Removal of trichloroethylene by biochar supported nanoscale zero-valent iron in aqueous solution. Sep Purif Technol. 2017;188:188–96.10.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.033Search in Google Scholar

[51] Kustov LM, Finashina ED, Shuvalova EV, Tkachenko OP, Kirichenko OA. Pd-Fe nanoparticles stabilized by chitosan derivatives for perchloroethene dechlorination. Env Int. 2011;37(6):1044–52.10.1016/j.envint.2011.05.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Zhou Y, Gao B, Zimmerman AR, Chen H, Zhang M, Cao X. Biochar-supported zerovalent iron for removal of various contaminants from aqueous solutions. Bioresour Technol. 2014;152:538–42.10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[53] Wang H, Zhang M, Li H. Synthesis of nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI) supported on biochar for chromium remediation from aqueous solution and soil. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(22):4430.10.3390/ijerph16224430Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[54] Lin Y, Xu J, Sudhakar BS, Gu J, Hong R. Preparation of spherical aminopropyl-functionalized MCM-41 and its application in removal of Pb(ii) ion from aqueous solution. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8(1):275–84.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0026Search in Google Scholar

[55] Liu X-y, Jiao C, Fan W-j, Pan J-m, Cheng Y, Lu M. Synthesis of MCM-41 stabilized NZVI and its use in removal of Cr(vi) from aqueous solution. J Water Reuse Desalinat. 2015;5(2):149–56.10.2166/wrd.2014.081Search in Google Scholar

[56] Chang C, Lian F, Zhu L. Simultaneous adsorption and degradation of γ-HCH by nZVI/Cu bimetallic nanoparticles with activated carbon support. Environ Pollut. 2011;159(10):2507–14.10.1016/j.envpol.2011.06.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[57] Wang Y, Zhou D, Wang Y, Zhu X, Jin S. Humic acid and metal ions accelerating the dechlorination of 4-chlorobiphenyl by nanoscale zero-valent iron. J Environ Sci. 2011;23(8):1286–92.10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60543-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[58] Yao Y, Chen H, Lian C, Wei F, Zhang D, Wu G, et al. Fe, Co, Ni nanocrystals encapsulated in nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes as Fenton-like catalysts for organic pollutant removal. J Hazard Mater. 2016;314:129–39.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.03.089Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[59] Zhang X, Zhang Y, Tian B, Song K, Liu P, Jia Y, et al. Review of nano-phase effects in high strength and conductivity copper alloys. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8(1):383–95.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0034Search in Google Scholar

[60] Ni H, Zhu J, Wang Z, Lv H, Su Y, Zhang X. A brief overview on grain growth of bulk electrodeposited nanocrystalline nickel and nickel-iron alloys. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2019;58(1):98–106.10.1515/rams-2019-0011Search in Google Scholar

[61] Xu D, Song X, Qi W, Wang H, Bian Z. Degradation mechanism, kinetics, and toxicity investigation of 4-bromophenol by electrochemical reduction and oxidation with Pd–Fe/graphene catalytic cathodes. Chem Eng J. 2018;333:477–85.10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.173Search in Google Scholar

[62] Akhgar BN, Pourghahramani P. Implementation of sonochemical leaching for preparation of nano zero-valent iron (NZVI) from natural pyrite mechanochemically reacted with Al. Int J Miner Process. 2017;164:1–5.10.1016/j.minpro.2017.05.002Search in Google Scholar

[63] Han W, Fu F, Cheng Z, Tang B, Wu S. Studies on the optimum conditions using acid-washed zero-valent iron/aluminum mixtures in permeable reactive barriers for the removal of different heavy metal ions from wastewater. J Hazard Mater. 2016;302:437–46.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.041Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[64] Zhu F, Li L, Ma S, Shang Z. Effect factors, kinetics and thermodynamics of remediation in the chromium contaminated soils by nanoscale zero valent Fe/Cu bimetallic particles. Chem Eng J. 2016;302:663–9.10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.072Search in Google Scholar

[65] Leupin OX, Hug SJ. Oxidation and removal of arsenic (iii) from aerated groundwater by filtration through sand and zero-valent iron. Water Res. 2005;39(9):1729–40.10.1016/j.watres.2005.02.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[66] Liu SC, Gao HJ, Cheng R, Wang YJ, Ma XL, Peng C, et al. Study on influencing factors and mechanism of removal of Cr(vi) from soil suspended liquid by bentonite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):8831.10.1038/s41598-020-65814-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[67] Wang Y, Fang ZQ, Kang Y, Tsang EP. Immobilization and phytotoxicity of chromium in contaminated soil remediated by CMC-stabilized nZVI. J Hazard Mater. 2014;275:230–7.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.04.056Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[68] Hu Y, Xue Q, Tang J, Fan X, Chen H. New insights on Cr(vi) retention by ferrihydrite in the presence of Fe(ii). Chemosphere. 2019;222:511–6.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.160Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[69] Zhu S, Huang X, Wang D, Wang L, Ma F. Enhanced hexavalent chromium removal performance and stabilization by magnetic iron nanoparticles assisted biochar in aqueous solution: mechanisms and application potential. Chemosphere. 2018;207:50–9.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.046Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[70] Diao ZH, Du JJ, Jiang D, Kong LJ, Huo WY, Liu CM, et al. Insights into the simultaneous removal of Cr(6+) and Pb(2+) by a novel sewage sludge-derived biochar immobilized nanoscale zero valent iron: coexistence effect and mechanism. Sci Total Environ. 2018;642:505–15.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.093Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[71] Li X-q, Cao J, Zhang W-x. Stoichiometry of Cr(vi) immobilization using nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI): a study with high-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HR-XPS). Ind Eng Chem Res. 2008;47(7):2131–9.10.1021/ie061655xSearch in Google Scholar

[72] Zhang Y, Li Y, Zheng X. Removal of atrazine by nanoscale zero valent iron supported on organobentonite. Sci Total Environ. 2011;409(3):625–30.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.10.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[73] Fajardo C, Gil-Diaz M, Costa G, Alonso J, Guerrero AM, Nande M, et al. Residual impact of aged nZVI on heavy metal-polluted soils. Sci Total Environ. 2015;535:79–84.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.067Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[74] Wang Y, O’Connor D, Shen Z, Lo IMC, Tsang DCW, Pehkonen S, et al. Green synthesis of nanoparticles for the remediation of contaminated waters and soils: constituents, synthesizing methods, and influencing factors. J Clean Prod. 2019;226:540–9.10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.128Search in Google Scholar

[75] Shu YR, Ji B, Cui BH, Shi YT, Wang J, Hu M, et al. Almond shell-derived, biochar-supported, nano-zero-valent iron composite for aqueous hexavalent chromium removal: performance and mechanisms. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:2.10.3390/nano10020198Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[76] Doğaroğlu ZG, Kantar C. Reductive immobilization of chromium in soils containing heterogeneous Fe-bearing minerals. Soil Sediment Contaminat Int J. 2016;25(8):857–67.10.1080/15320383.2016.1217827Search in Google Scholar

[77] Xu T, Nan F, Jiang XF, Tang YL, Zeng YH, Zhang WH, et al. Effect of soil pH on the transport, fractionation, and oxidation of chromium(iii). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;195:110459.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110459Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[78] Su H, Fang Z, Tsang PE, Zheng L, Cheng W, Fang J, et al. Remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated soil by biochar-supported zero-valent iron nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater. 2016;318:533–40.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.07.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[79] Ossai CI, Raghavan N. Nanostructure and nanomaterial characterization, growth mechanisms, and applications. Nanotechnol Rev. 2018;7(2):209–31.10.1515/ntrev-2017-0156Search in Google Scholar

[80] Choe S, Chang Y-Y, Hwang K-Y, Khim J. Kinetics of reductive denitrification by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Chemosphere. 2000;41(8):1307–11.10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00506-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[81] Sun YK, Li JX, Huang TL, Guan XH. The influences of iron characteristics, operating conditions and solution chemistry on contaminants removal by zero-valent iron: a review. Water Res. 2016;100:277–95.10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.031Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[82] Kanel SR, Manning B, Charlet L, Choi H. Removal of arsenic(iii) from groundwater by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(5):1291–8.10.1021/es048991uSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[83] Di Palma L, Verdone N, Vilardi G. Kinetic modeling of Cr(vi) reduction by nZVI in soil: the influence of organic matter and manganese oxide. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2018;101(6):692–7.10.1007/s00128-018-2394-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[84] Tran HN, Nguyen DT, Le GT, Tomul F, Lima EC, Woo SH, et al. Adsorption mechanism of hexavalent chromium onto layered double hydroxides-based adsorbents: a systematic in-depth review. J Hazard Mater. 2019;373:258–70.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[85] Lv X, Xue X, Jiang G, Wu D, Sheng T, Zhou H, et al. Nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) assembled on magnetic Fe3O4/graphene for chromium(vi) removal from aqueous solution. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;417:51–59.10.1016/j.jcis.2013.11.044Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[86] Shu HY, Chang MC, Yu HH, Chen WH. Reduction of an azo dye acid black 24 solution using synthesized nanoscale zerovalent iron particles. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2007;314(1):89–97.10.1016/j.jcis.2007.04.071Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[87] Joo SH, Feitz AJ, Sedlak DL, Waite TD. Quantification of the oxidizing capacity of nanoparticulate zero-valent iron. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(5):1263–8.10.1021/es048983dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[88] Di Palma L, Gueye MT, Petrucci E. Hexavalent chromium reduction in contaminated soil: a comparison between ferrous sulphate and nanoscale zero-valent iron. J Hazard Mater. 2015;281:70–6.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.058Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[89] Ma X, Gurung A, Deng Y. Phytotoxicity and uptake of nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) by two plant species. Sci Total Environ. 2013;443:844–9.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.073Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[90] Zhang J, Hao Z, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Xu X. Kinetics of nitrate reductive denitrification by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Proc Saf Environ Protect. 2010;88(6):439–45.10.1016/j.psep.2010.06.002Search in Google Scholar

[91] Pei G, Zhu Y, Wen J, Pei Y, Li H. Vinegar residue supported nanoscale zero-valent iron: remediation of hexavalent chromium in soil. Environ Pollut. 2020;256:113407.10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113407Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[92] Yi Z, Tang Q, Jiang T, Cheng Y. Adsorption performance of hydrophobic/hydrophilic silica aerogel for low concentration organic pollutant in aqueous solution. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8(1):266–74.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0025Search in Google Scholar

[93] Ahmadi M, Elmongy H, Madrakian T, Abdel-Rehim M. Nanomaterials as sorbents for sample preparation in bioanalysis: review. Anal Chim Acta. 2017;958:1–21.10.1016/j.aca.2016.11.062Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[94] Yusmartini ES, Ridwan, Setiabudidaya D, Faizal M. Marsi, Synthesis and characterizations of nZVI-AC composites from coconut shells and its application for the adsorption of Pb(ii) and Cr(vi) ions. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2019;509:012042.10.1088/1757-899X/509/1/012042Search in Google Scholar

[95] Khin MM, Nair AS, Babu VJ, Murugan R, Ramakrishna S. A review on nanomaterials for environmental remediation. Energy Environ Sci. 2012;5(8):8075–109.10.1039/c2ee21818fSearch in Google Scholar

[96] Li J, Chen CL, Zhu KR, Wang XK. Nanoscale zero-valent iron particles modified on reduced graphene oxides using a plasma technique for Cd(ii) removal. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2016;59:389–94.10.1016/j.jtice.2015.09.010Search in Google Scholar

[97] Wang C, Luo H, Zhang Z, Wu Y, Zhang J, Chen S. Removal of As(iii) and As(v) from aqueous solutions using nanoscale zero valent iron-reduced graphite oxide modified composites. J Hazard Mater. 2014;268:124–31.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[98] Bhowmick S, Chakraborty S, Mondal P, Van Renterghem W, Van den Berghe S, Roman-Ross G, et al. Montmorillonite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron for removal of arsenic from aqueous solution: kinetics and mechanism. Chem Eng J. 2014;243:14–23.10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.049Search in Google Scholar

[99] Sharma AK, Kumar R, Mittal S, Hussain S, Arora M, Sharma RC, et al. In situ reductive regeneration of zerovalent iron nanoparticles immobilized on cellulose for atom efficient Cr(vi) adsorption. RSC Adv. 2015;5(109):89441–6.10.1039/C5RA19917DSearch in Google Scholar

[100] De Gisi S, Lofrano G, Grassi M, Notarnicola M. Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: a review. Sustain Mater Technol. 2016;9:10–40.10.1016/j.susmat.2016.06.002Search in Google Scholar

[101] Peng Z, Xiong C, Wang W, Tan F, Xu Y, Wang X, et al. Facile modification of nanoscale zero-valent iron with high stability for Cr(vi) remediation. Sci Total Environ. 2017;596–597:266–73.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.121Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[102] Saif S, Tahir A, Chen Y. Green synthesis of iron nanoparticles and their environmental applications and implications. Nanomaterials. 2016;6(11):209.10.3390/nano6110209Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[103] Wan Z, Cho DW, Tsang DCW, Li M, Sun T, Verpoort F. Concurrent adsorption and micro-electrolysis of Cr(vi) by nanoscale zerovalent iron/biochar/Ca-alginate composite. Environ Pollut. 2019;247:410–20.10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.047Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[104] Wu Y, Pang H, Liu Y, Wang X, Yu S, Fu D, et al. Environmental remediation of heavy metal ions by novel-nanomaterials: a review. Environ Pollut. 2019;246:608–20.10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.076Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[105] Reginatto C, Cecchin I, Heineck KS, Reddy KR, Thome A. Use of nanoscale zero-valent iron for remediation of clayey soil contaminated with hexavalent chromium: batch and column tests. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3):1001.10.3390/ijerph17031001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[106] Chen P-J, Su C-H, Tseng C-Y, Tan S-W, Cheng C-H. Toxicity assessments of nanoscale zerovalent iron and its oxidation products in medaka (Oryzias latipes) fish. Mar Pollut Bull. 2011;63(5–12):339–46.10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.02.045Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[107] Liu W, Jin L, Xu J, Liu J, Li Y, Zhou P, et al. Insight into pH dependent Cr(vi) removal with magnetic Fe3S4. Chem Eng J. 2019;359:564–71.10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.192Search in Google Scholar

[108] Fajardo C, Ortiz LT, Rodriguez-Membibre ML, Nande M, Lobo MC, Martin M. Assessing the impact of zero-valent iron (ZVI) nanotechnology on soil microbial structure and functionality: a molecular approach. Chemosphere. 2012;86(8):802–8.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.11.041Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[109] Jiang DN, Zeng GM, Huang DL, Chen M, Zhang C, Huang C, et al. Remediation of contaminated soils by enhanced nanoscale zero valent iron. Environ Res. 2018;163:217–27.10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[110] Qiu X, Fang Z, Yan X, Cheng W, Lin K. Chemical stability and toxicity of nanoscale zero-valent iron in the remediation of chromium-contaminated watershed. Chem Eng J. 2013;220:61–6.10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.041Search in Google Scholar

[111] El-Temsah YS, Joner EJ. Ecotoxicological effects on earthworms of fresh and aged nano-sized zero-valent iron (nZVI) in soil. Chemosphere. 2012;89(1):76–82.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[112] Lefevre E, Bossa N, Wiesner MR, Gunsch CK. A review of the environmental implications of in situ remediation by nanoscale zero valent iron (nZVI): behavior, transport and impacts on microbial communities. Sci Total Environ. 2016;565:889–901.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2020-08-01
Accepted: 2020-08-08
Published Online: 2020-08-24

© 2020 Xilu Chen et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Generalized locally-exact homogenization theory for evaluation of electric conductivity and resistance of multiphase materials
  3. Enhancing ultra-early strength of sulphoaluminate cement-based materials by incorporating graphene oxide
  4. Characterization of mechanical properties of epoxy/nanohybrid composites by nanoindentation
  5. Graphene and CNT impact on heat transfer response of nanocomposite cylinders
  6. A facile and simple approach to synthesis and characterization of methacrylated graphene oxide nanostructured polyaniline nanocomposites
  7. Ultrasmall Fe3O4 nanoparticles induce S-phase arrest and inhibit cancer cells proliferation
  8. Effect of aging on properties and nanoscale precipitates of Cu-Ag-Cr alloy
  9. Effect of nano-strengthening on the properties and microstructure of recycled concrete
  10. Stabilizing effect of methylcellulose on the dispersion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes in cementitious composites
  11. Preparation and electromagnetic properties characterization of reduced graphene oxide/strontium hexaferrite nanocomposites
  12. Interfacial characteristics of a carbon nanotube-polyimide nanocomposite by molecular dynamics simulation
  13. Preparation and properties of 3D interconnected CNTs/Cu composites
  14. On factors affecting surface free energy of carbon black for reinforcing rubber
  15. Nano-silica modified phenolic resin film: manufacturing and properties
  16. Experimental study on photocatalytic degradation efficiency of mixed crystal nano-TiO2 concrete
  17. Halloysite nanotubes in polymer science: purification, characterization, modification and applications
  18. Cellulose hydrogel skeleton by extrusion 3D printing of solution
  19. Crack closure and flexural tensile capacity with SMA fibers randomly embedded on tensile side of mortar beams
  20. An experimental study on one-step and two-step foaming of natural rubber/silica nanocomposites
  21. Utilization of red mud for producing a high strength binder by composition optimization and nano strengthening
  22. One-pot synthesis of nano titanium dioxide in supercritical water
  23. Printability of photo-sensitive nanocomposites using two-photon polymerization
  24. In situ synthesis of expanded graphite embedded with amorphous carbon-coated aluminum particles as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries
  25. Effect of nano and micro conductive materials on conductive properties of carbon fiber reinforced concrete
  26. Tribological performance of nano-diamond composites-dispersed lubricants on commercial cylinder liner mating with CrN piston ring
  27. Supramolecular ionic polymer/carbon nanotube composite hydrogels with enhanced electromechanical performance
  28. Genetic mechanisms of deep-water massive sandstones in continental lake basins and their significance in micro–nano reservoir storage systems: A case study of the Yanchang formation in the Ordos Basin
  29. Effects of nanoparticles on engineering performance of cementitious composites reinforced with PVA fibers
  30. Band gap manipulation of viscoelastic functionally graded phononic crystal
  31. Pyrolysis kinetics and mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid)/bamboo particle biocomposites: Effect of particle size distribution
  32. Manipulating conductive network formation via 3D T-ZnO: A facile approach for a CNT-reinforced nanocomposite
  33. Microstructure and mechanical properties of WC–Ni multiphase ceramic materials with NiCl2·6H2O as a binder
  34. Effect of ball milling process on the photocatalytic performance of CdS/TiO2 composite
  35. Berberine/Ag nanoparticle embedded biomimetic calcium phosphate scaffolds for enhancing antibacterial function
  36. Effect of annealing heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of nonequiatomic CoCrFeNiMo medium-entropy alloys prepared by hot isostatic pressing
  37. Corrosion behaviour of multilayer CrN coatings deposited by hybrid HIPIMS after oxidation treatment
  38. Surface hydrophobicity and oleophilicity of hierarchical metal structures fabricated using ink-based selective laser melting of micro/nanoparticles
  39. Research on bond–slip performance between pultruded glass fiber-reinforced polymer tube and nano-CaCO3 concrete
  40. Antibacterial polymer nanofiber-coated and high elastin protein-expressing BMSCs incorporated polypropylene mesh for accelerating healing of female pelvic floor dysfunction
  41. Effects of Ag contents on the microstructure and SERS performance of self-grown Ag nanoparticles/Mo–Ag alloy films
  42. A highly sensitive biosensor based on methacrylated graphene oxide-grafted polyaniline for ascorbic acid determination
  43. Arrangement structure of carbon nanofiber with excellent spectral radiation characteristics
  44. Effect of different particle sizes of nano-SiO2 on the properties and microstructure of cement paste
  45. Superior Fe x N electrocatalyst derived from 1,1′-diacetylferrocene for oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline and acidic media
  46. Facile growth of aluminum oxide thin film by chemical liquid deposition and its application in devices
  47. Liquid crystallinity and thermal properties of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane/side-chain azobenzene hybrid copolymer
  48. Laboratory experiment on the nano-TiO2 photocatalytic degradation effect of road surface oil pollution
  49. Binary carbon-based additives in LiFePO4 cathode with favorable lithium storage
  50. Conversion of sub-µm calcium carbonate (calcite) particles to hollow hydroxyapatite agglomerates in K2HPO4 solutions
  51. Exact solutions of bending deflection for single-walled BNNTs based on the classical Euler–Bernoulli beam theory
  52. Effects of substrate properties and sputtering methods on self-formation of Ag particles on the Ag–Mo(Zr) alloy films
  53. Enhancing carbonation and chloride resistance of autoclaved concrete by incorporating nano-CaCO3
  54. Effect of SiO2 aerogels loading on photocatalytic degradation of nitrobenzene using composites with tetrapod-like ZnO
  55. Radiation-modified wool for adsorption of redox metals and potentially for nanoparticles
  56. Hydration activity, crystal structural, and electronic properties studies of Ba-doped dicalcium silicate
  57. Microstructure and mechanical properties of brazing joint of silver-based composite filler metal
  58. Polymer nanocomposite sunlight spectrum down-converters made by open-air PLD
  59. Cryogenic milling and formation of nanostructured machined surface of AISI 4340
  60. Braided composite stent for peripheral vascular applications
  61. Effect of cinnamon essential oil on morphological, flammability and thermal properties of nanocellulose fibre–reinforced starch biopolymer composites
  62. Study on influencing factors of photocatalytic performance of CdS/TiO2 nanocomposite concrete
  63. Improving flexural and dielectric properties of carbon fiber epoxy composite laminates reinforced with carbon nanotubes interlayer using electrospray deposition
  64. Scalable fabrication of carbon materials based silicon rubber for highly stretchable e-textile sensor
  65. Degradation modeling of poly-l-lactide acid (PLLA) bioresorbable vascular scaffold within a coronary artery
  66. Combining Zn0.76Co0.24S with S-doped graphene as high-performance anode materials for lithium- and sodium-ion batteries
  67. Synthesis of functionalized carbon nanotubes for fluorescent biosensors
  68. Effect of nano-silica slurry on engineering, X-ray, and γ-ray attenuation characteristics of steel slag high-strength heavyweight concrete
  69. Incorporation of redox-active polyimide binder into LiFePO4 cathode for high-rate electrochemical energy storage
  70. Microstructural evolution and properties of Cu–20 wt% Ag alloy wire by multi-pass continuous drawing
  71. Transparent ultraviolet-shielding composite films made from dispersing pristine zinc oxide nanoparticles in low-density polyethylene
  72. Microfluidic-assisted synthesis and modelling of monodispersed magnetic nanocomposites for biomedical applications
  73. Preparation and piezoresistivity of carbon nanotube-coated sand reinforced cement mortar
  74. Vibrational analysis of an irregular single-walled carbon nanotube incorporating initial stress effects
  75. Study of the material engineering properties of high-density poly(ethylene)/perlite nanocomposite materials
  76. Single pulse laser removal of indium tin oxide film on glass and polyethylene terephthalate by nanosecond and femtosecond laser
  77. Mechanical reinforcement with enhanced electrical and heat conduction of epoxy resin by polyaniline and graphene nanoplatelets
  78. High-efficiency method for recycling lithium from spent LiFePO4 cathode
  79. Degradable tough chitosan dressing for skin wound recovery
  80. Static and dynamic analyses of auxetic hybrid FRC/CNTRC laminated plates
  81. Review articles
  82. Carbon nanomaterials enhanced cement-based composites: advances and challenges
  83. Review on the research progress of cement-based and geopolymer materials modified by graphene and graphene oxide
  84. Review on modeling and application of chemical mechanical polishing
  85. Research on the interface properties and strengthening–toughening mechanism of nanocarbon-toughened ceramic matrix composites
  86. Advances in modelling and analysis of nano structures: a review
  87. Mechanical properties of nanomaterials: A review
  88. New generation of oxide-based nanoparticles for the applications in early cancer detection and diagnostics
  89. A review on the properties, reinforcing effects, and commercialization of nanomaterials for cement-based materials
  90. Recent development and applications of nanomaterials for cancer immunotherapy
  91. Advances in biomaterials for adipose tissue reconstruction in plastic surgery
  92. Advances of graphene- and graphene oxide-modified cementitious materials
  93. Theories for triboelectric nanogenerators: A comprehensive review
  94. Nanotechnology of diamondoids for the fabrication of nanostructured systems
  95. Material advancement in technological development for the 5G wireless communications
  96. Nanoengineering in biomedicine: Current development and future perspectives
  97. Recent advances in ocean wave energy harvesting by triboelectric nanogenerator: An overview
  98. Application of nanoscale zero-valent iron in hexavalent chromium-contaminated soil: A review
  99. Carbon nanotube–reinforced polymer composite for electromagnetic interference application: A review
  100. Functionalized layered double hydroxide applied to heavy metal ions absorption: A review
  101. A new classification method of nanotechnology for design integration in biomaterials
  102. Finite element analysis of natural fibers composites: A review
  103. Phase change materials for building construction: An overview of nano-/micro-encapsulation
  104. Recent advance in surface modification for regulating cell adhesion and behaviors
  105. Hyaluronic acid as a bioactive component for bone tissue regeneration: Fabrication, modification, properties, and biological functions
  106. Theoretical calculation of a TiO2-based photocatalyst in the field of water splitting: A review
  107. Two-photon polymerization nanolithography technology for fabrication of stimulus-responsive micro/nano-structures for biomedical applications
  108. A review of passive methods in microchannel heat sink application through advanced geometric structure and nanofluids: Current advancements and challenges
  109. Stress effect on 3D culturing of MC3T3-E1 cells on microporous bovine bone slices
  110. Progress in magnetic Fe3O4 nanomaterials in magnetic resonance imaging
  111. Synthesis of graphene: Potential carbon precursors and approaches
  112. A comprehensive review of the influences of nanoparticles as a fuel additive in an internal combustion engine (ICE)
  113. Advances in layered double hydroxide-based ternary nanocomposites for photocatalysis of contaminants in water
  114. Analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite structures: A review
  115. Application of nanomaterials in ultra-high performance concrete: A review
  116. Therapeutic strategies and potential implications of silver nanoparticles in the management of skin cancer
  117. Advanced nickel nanoparticles technology: From synthesis to applications
  118. Cobalt magnetic nanoparticles as theranostics: Conceivable or forgettable?
  119. Progress in construction of bio-inspired physico-antimicrobial surfaces
  120. From materials to devices using fused deposition modeling: A state-of-art review
  121. A review for modified Li composite anode: Principle, preparation and challenge
  122. Naturally or artificially constructed nanocellulose architectures for epoxy composites: A review
Downloaded on 21.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2020-0059/html
Scroll to top button