Home Inhomogeneous dielectrics: conformal mapping and finite-element models
Article Open Access

Inhomogeneous dielectrics: conformal mapping and finite-element models

  • Eugenio Costamagna EMAIL logo and Paolo Di Barba
Published/Copyright: December 29, 2017

Abstract

Field singularities in electrostatic and magnetostatic fields require special attention in field calculations, and today finite element methods are normally used, both in homogeneous and in inhomogeneous dielectric cases. Conformal mappings are a traditional tool in the homogeneous case, but two-stage Schwarz-Christoffel + Finite Difference procedures have been proposed for a long time to solve problems in case of inhomogeneous dielectric materials too. This allowed to overcome accuracy problems caused by convex corners in the domain boundary and relevant field singularities, and to easily apply finite difference (FD) solvers in rectangular domains. In this paper, compound procedures Schwarz-Christoffel + Finite Elements Method procedures are suggested, to improve both the accuracy and the speed of second stage calculations. The results are compared to Schwarz-Christoffel + Finite Difference and to direct finite-element calculations, and the small differences analyzed considering a well know case study geometry, i.e., a shielded dielectric-supported stripline geometry.

1 Introduction

Due to the accuracy of recent tools for Schwarz-Christoffel (SC) numerical mapping and numerical inversion (SCNI) [1, 2], two-stage SC+FD procedures have been already proposed to map the analysis domain to a rectangle, avoiding field singularities and providing a close boundary, and then to cope with the inhomogeneous dielectric in the rectangular domain: see for instance [3, 4, 5] for both plane and axially symmetrical geometry, where comparison is made to finite element (FEM) direct calculations in the original domain. Nowadays, the standard tool to solve plane field problems are FEM codes, though SC maps maintain some utility, looking for reference and comparison data, mainly in a homogeneous medium. Nevertheless, it appears that compound SC+FEM procedures can be worth of attention, taking again advantage of the SC stage to avoid singularity problems, but using a FEM stage to solve the Laplace or Poisson equations with inhomogeneous mediums in the SC-transformed domain. In the paper, after providing accurate SC+FD calculations, we compare the results with those obtained from direct FEM calculations in the original domain, using the half cross-section of a shielded dielectric-supported stripline as case study, both for the thin and for the thick strip cases. Then, we introduce a significant comparison with SC+FEM results, showing possible benefits. Due to the severe field singularity at the π-angle corner at the end of the half thin strip, this geometry is representative of many boundary shapes, and represent a simple but significant test of accuracy, even though it is normally linked to the old thin film technology, golden copper on alumina substrate, when it allowed to calculate capacitances and characteristic impedances in the quasi-transverse electromagnetic propagation mode.

2 Results

2.1 SC+FD and FEM thin strip results

The geometry is shown in Figure 1, and its SC conformal map is shown in Figure 2, left hand. In air, the aspect ratio base/height of the rectangle provides by inspection the capacitance of the line, C0sc= 1.92249066·10–11 F/m. In Figures 1 and 2, solid lines represent conductor sides, the strip at the upper side and the metal case at the bottom, thick dashed lines Neumann sides, and thin dashed lines the two interfaces between different dielectrics (air, ϵr = 1, and alumina, ϵr = 9.5): plot1 maps the interface at the bottom plane of the dielectric, and plot2 maps that at the upper plane of it. To solve the Laplace equation in inhomogeneous dielectric, FD successive over-relaxation (SOR) procedures can be easily written using five-point equations.

Figure 1 A shielded dielectric-supported stripline, thin conductor: left: geometry with potential lines (from FEMs); right: the analyzed geometry
Figure 1

A shielded dielectric-supported stripline, thin conductor: left: geometry with potential lines (from FEMs); right: the analyzed geometry

Figure 2 Left, the SC map of the half cross section of the thin strip geometry in Figure 1; right, the SC map for the thick strip geometry
Figure 2

Left, the SC map of the half cross section of the thin strip geometry in Figure 1; right, the SC map for the thick strip geometry

Square meshes are used here for the sake of simplicity and speed, but the final results are corrected according to the aspect ratios of SC map and of the FD mesh outer rectangle.

The accuracy of direct FEM calculations on the original strip geometry and in vacuum can be preliminarily appreciated making comparison of the results in Table 1 with the SCNI capacitance C0sc = 1.92249066·10–11 F/m, to be considered virtually exact. Direct FEM capacitances (from the energy) agree with C0sc within a 0.5% error with 6,308 nodes, and a 0.1% error with a locally dense mesh of only 1,856 nodes but geometrical progression, with rate 6 and 20 elements along the half stripline. The saving of degrees of freedom between case A and case B is impressive but it can be justified by the severe singularity at the end of the stripline. The capacitance value for case A computed in vacuum from the dielectric flux on the outer conductor was C0FEM = 1.9227·10–11 F/m, and this seems to be the best result, with a percent error of about 0.01%.

Table 1

Accuracies derived in vacuum from FEMs

FEM case# of trianglesMesh nodes1011 ·C0 [F/m]C0/C0sc % err.
ALocally dense mesh18561.925060.134
C307963081.931990.449
D97320301.938120.813

Table 1 suggests that, proceeding with care, the effect of the singularity can be modest in inhomogeneous dielectric too, and Table 2 is obtained with the same meshes as above.

Table 2

Thin conductor dielectric-supported stripline, εr = 9.5

FEM case# of trianglesMesh nodes1011 · C [F/m]C/CA % diff.
ALocally dense mesh18563.296540
BVery dense mesh238003.3010.135
C307963083.308520.363
D97320303.317560.634

Therefore, we assume the value CFEMA = 3.29654·10–11 F/m obtained from a locally dense mesh as a reliable FEM reference in inhomogeneous dielectric. A very dense mesh of 23,800 nodes leads to CFEMB = 3.301·10–11 F/m, different from CFEMA of about 0.13%, and a mesh of 6,308 nodes leads to CFEMC = 3.30852·10–11 F/m. We note that following one of the first proposed variational calculations [6], the capacitances in air, 1.9177·10–11 F/m, and in inhomogeneous dielectric, 3.2828610–11 F/m, agree within some 0.25% with C0sc and with CFEMA.

Considering Table 1 and Table 2, we see that probably an uncertainty of about 0.1% can be considered the accuracy limit for the FEM results, both in the homogeneous and in the inhomogeneous dielectric cases. As for the dielectric interfaces in SC+FD calculations, experience shows that, using predictor-corrector (P-C) routines with suitable numbers of steps, the related errors can be made almost negligible. In the present case, they differ for less than some 0.02% using 4,000 instead of the 8,000 steps, the last leading to Figure 3.

Figure 3 Differences between SC+FD capacitance values and the reference FEM value for various dimensions of the FD mesh. Solid line: thin strip, 8000 P-C steps; dashed line: thick strip, 1000 P-C steps and, a little more oscillating, 8000 P-C steps
Figure 3

Differences between SC+FD capacitance values and the reference FEM value for various dimensions of the FD mesh. Solid line: thin strip, 8000 P-C steps; dashed line: thick strip, 1000 P-C steps and, a little more oscillating, 8000 P-C steps

To apply the suitable five-point equation to any mesh node neighboring a dielectric interface, they are placed on suitable staircases obtained from the P-C traces, with minimum steps of one mesh cell both in the horizontal and the vertical directions. Table 3 and 4 show SC+FD results for various numbers of mesh cells and for 8,000 and 4,000 P-C steps, with various percent errors and differences.

Table 3

SC+FD Results compared to the FEM cases A and B

SC+FD mesh cells1011 · CSC+FD [F/m], 8000 P-C stepsCSC+FD %error, Ref.to CFEMACSC+FD %error, Ref.to CFEMBCSC+FD %error, Ref. to row 1
1200 × 5533.29061–0.180–0.3150
1000 × 4613.29030–0.189–0.324–0.009
800 × 3683.29091–0.171–0.3060.009
400 × 1843.28766–0.270–0.404–0.090
200 × 1923.28383–0.386–0.520–0.206
100 × 483.27477–0.660–0.795–0.481

Table 4

Differences in SC+FD capacitances due to a different step number in the predictor-corrector interface mapping routine

SC+FD mesh cells1011 · CSC+FD [F/m], 4000 P-C stepsCSC+FD %error, Ref. to CFEMACSC+FD %error, Ref. to CFEMBCSC+FD %error, Ref.Table III, row l
1200x5533.28955–0.212–0.347–0.032
1000 × 4613.29010–0.196–0.330–0.016
800 × 3683.29059–0.180–0.315–0.001
400 × 1843.28583–0.325–0.460–0.145
200 × 1923.28383–0.386–0.520–0.206
100 × 483.27477–0.660–0.795–0.481

Considering Figure 2, Table 2 and Table 3 shows that 4,000 or 8,000 P-C steps are well enough. Moreover, the differences between the corresponding values with large numbers of cells exhibit magnitudes analogous to CFEMA-CFEMB. However, and this is perhaps the most important evidence, a small but persistent difference from CFEMA is found in the SC+FD values for large numbers of mesh cells, with a somewhat oscillating behavior.

In particular, with a large FD mesh, exhibiting 2,200·1,013 = 2286 cells, and with 8,000 P-C steps dielectric interfaces, the SC+FD capacitance was CSCFD = 3.29106·10–11 F/m, with differences from CFEMA and CFEMB of about –0.17% and –0.31%. This suggests that, despite of refined mesh discretization, the major cause of these errors remain discretization effects related, more than to the absolute dimensions of the meshes, to ratios of discretized lengths derived from the original geometries. In the current case, these appear unsuitable in particular to deal with the severe concentration of the dielectric flux lines in the short region of the bottom conductor facing the high permittivity dielectric. It was precisely this to suggest considering the SC+FEM procedures proposed in the following.

2.2 SC+FD and FEM thick strip results

When the stripline model exhibits a finite thickness, the geometry of the problem is slightly different, although hardly perceived at the scale of Figure 1, being the ratio between the total height and the thickness equal to 130. The field singularities at the left end of the conductor are now two, but the effect on the overall capacitance is milder because of the different exponent at the π/2 corners. The SC+FD procedure leads (Figure 2, right hand) to a rectangle with a slightly smaller aspect ratio than the thin strip, i.e., to a slightly large capacitance in vacuum, and the maps of the dielectric interfaces are something more complex.

The SC capacitance in vacuum is now C0scT = 1.97509295·10–11 F/m and two FEM capacitance values have been provided, both in vacuum and in inhomogeneous dielectric, with two meshes having both triangle densities matched to the needs in proximity of the end of the stripline. Accordingly, Table 5 and Table 6 report the same evaluations as Tables 1 and 2 did for the thin stripline case, and we note immediately that the FEM accuracy seems to be somewhat better than with the more severe singularity of Figure 1. Due to the matched mesh densities, we can immediately appreciate the good uniformity and accuracy of these results, despite of the modest number of triangle for the case TB.

Table 5

Accuracies of FEM calculations in vacuum

FEM case# of trianglesMesh nodesC0 [F/m]C0/C0SCT %error
TA11758238591.97644·10–110.068
TB113223691.97658·10–110.075

Table 6

Accuracy of FEM calculations in dielectric, εr = 9.5

FEM case# of trianglesMesh nodesC[F/m]C/CFEMTA % diff.
TA11758238593.33427·10–110
TB113223693.33478·10–110.015

Table 7 shows the comparison of the SC+FD calculations in inhomogeneous dielectric with the capacitance of the FEM case TA.

Table 7

Accuracy of SC+FD results compared to FEM case TA

SC+FD mesh cells1011·CSC+FD [F/m], 4000 P-C stepsCSC+FD %err., Ref.to CFEMTACSC+FD %error., Ref. to SC+FD, row 11000 P-C steps, %error, Ref. col.2, row 1
1200 × 5383.32810–0.1850–0.008
1000 × 4483.32816–0.1830.002–0.013
800 × 3593.32718–0.213–0.027–0.040
400 × 1793.32465–0.288–0.104–0.061
200 × 903.32992–0.1300.0550.046
100 × 453.32185–0.373–0.188–0.133

It is analogous to the previous Table 3, but the last column reports the differences in the SC+FD capacitances obtained with 1000 instead of 4000 steps in the P-C mappings of the dielectric interfaces, instead of the comparison of a second FEM values. As in vacuum, the accuracies are perhaps somewhat better than in Table 3, but show in Figure 3 (dashed line) a similar behavior, leading again to the proposal of SC+FEM calculations, although limited to smaller numbers of FD cells and perhaps less worrying.

2.3 The SC+FEM procedure and its accuracy

To make it easier to represent the details of Figure 1 at the input of FEM codes, we will continue the discussion using a second stage map analogous to Figure 2, but in which plot1 was replaced with a perfect circle, and plot2 by a vertical straight segment, being unchanged the boundary vertices and the end points of the interfaces. Of course, the new geometry is no longer the map of a strip, but this is unimportant when discussing the possible accuracy of second stage calculations. This trial geometry is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4 A second stage trial geometry simulating that obtained from the thin stripline geometry but with simpler interface shapes
Figure 4

A second stage trial geometry simulating that obtained from the thin stripline geometry but with simpler interface shapes

The FEM second stage results, with number of nodes ranging from 276 to 6351, ranged from 3.32221·10–11 to 3.32187·10–11 F/m, showing immediately differences of the order of only 0.01%, provide good reference values. In contrast, the behavior of the FD capacitances was again unsatisfactory. As for the thin strip, oscillatory differences are found for large numbers of cells ranging from zero to some –0.2%. Therefore, we find the same conditions we had when comparing direct FEM and SC + FD results.

This suggested a new step of analysis. Starting from the same geometry, the lengths of the various segments of the boundary have been replaced by numbers with integer ratios among them, to secure the possibility of positioning any vertex or interface ending point on the nodes of the FD mesh. This was possible with special care of the segments of the bottom conductor and with modest errors in regions of negligible influence.

This time, a reliable FEM reference was CFEMstage2 = 3.3224·10–11 F/m, from the energy, with 25,884 nodes, locally dense mesh with nonlinear rule of the second order (and, with a very similar value, C = 3.32270·10–11 F/m with a linear rule). The equipotential lines and field magnitudes are shown in Figure 5. The FD results have been very satisfactory too, as the results were, for instance, CFDstage2 = 3.32176·10–11 F/m with the quarter circle modeled with 8,000 P-C segments, and 3.32200·10–11 F/m with 4000. The maximum difference among these second stage FEM or FD values is of about 0.03%.

Figure 5 Equipotential lines and field magnitudes for the geometry in Figure 4
Figure 5

Equipotential lines and field magnitudes for the geometry in Figure 4

This allows us to draw important conclusions. Assuming FEM results on the original geometry as the reference, we can expect that the results obtained from a FEM second stage geometry, i.e., a virtually exact rectangular boundary and very accurate maps of the dielectric interfaces, will be very similar to the reference. At the same time, it was shown that the FD results for the same second stage geometry can be good in general and in addition that they are very good, and very similar to the FEM results, if the details of the maps of the interfaces are well represented by the FD mesh.

3 Discussion

A well-known case study has been used to enlighten the different behaviors of FEM and two step SC+FD procedures in presence of strong field singularities both in vacuum and in inhomogeneous dielectric structures. Of course, the dominant role of FEMs in engineering calculation is confirmed, but care must be taken to secure suitable mesh densities in critical regions, near to the same source of field singularities to which the SC+FD calculations are instead insensitive by nature. The major sources of errors are in this case the discretization processes of the conductor segments bordering different dielectrics and of the dielectric interfaces. However, the discrepancy between the results with different number of cells in the FD second calculation stage can be easily reduced to some 0.1%, of the same order of the difference with the best FEM results with reasonable number of nodes. Therefore, two-stage calculations can be recommended to confirm or compare FEM results, to exploit the capabilities of the SC maps in case of geometry with severe corner singularities, or when in presence of open domain boundaries.

The behavior of the differences between SC+FD and FEM results suggested the advantage of performing the second stage calculations by means of FEMs instead of FDs, to better cope to discretization problems when significant length ratios observed in the SC maps cannot be accurately represented in the second stage FD mesh. Probably, this would allow a faster computation too. Defining a second stage FD map analogous to that obtained for the stripline geometry, we have shown that the differences among SC+FEM and direct FEM results can be reduced to some 0.01%, i.e., about an order of magnitude better than with SC+FD calculation. Unfortunately, representing the second stage by means of general purpose FEM codes are not always easy or even possible.

References

[1] Driscoll T.A., Trefethen L.N., Schwarz-Christoffel Mapping, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002, 9-30, 70-74.10.1017/CBO9780511546808Search in Google Scholar

[2] Costamagna E., Di Barba P., Mognaschi M.E., Savini A., Fast algorithms for the design of complex-shape devices in electromechanics, in Wiak S., Napieralska-Juszczak E. (Eds.), Computational Methods for the Innovative Design of Electrical Devices, Springer, Berlin, 2010, 59-86.10.1007/978-3-642-16225-1_4Search in Google Scholar

[3] Costamagna E., Fanni A., Conductor-backed and upper-shielded coplanar waveguide with finite ground planes, Microwave and Optical Technol. Lett., 1993, 6, 16, 879-882.10.1002/mop.4650061604Search in Google Scholar

[4] Costamagna E., Fanni A., Computing capacitances via the Schwarz-Christoffel transformation in structure with rotational symmetry, IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, 1998, 34, 5, 2497-2500.10.1109/20.717575Search in Google Scholar

[5] Alfonzetti S., Costamagna E., Fanni A., Computing capacitances of vias in multilayered boards, IEEE Trans. On Magnetics, 2001, 37, 5, 3186-3189.10.1109/20.952573Search in Google Scholar

[6] Gish D.L., Graham O., Characteristic impedance and phase velocity of a dielectric-supported air strip transmission line with side walls, IEEE Trans. on MTT, 1970, 3, 131-148.10.1109/TMTT.1970.1127173Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-11-2
Accepted: 2017-11-12
Published Online: 2017-12-29

© 2017 E. Costamagna and P. Di Barba

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Analysis of a New Fractional Model for Damped Bergers’ Equation
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Optimal homotopy perturbation method for nonlinear differential equations governing MHD Jeffery-Hamel flow with heat transfer problem
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Semi- analytic numerical method for solution of time-space fractional heat and wave type equations with variable coefficients
  7. Regular Articles
  8. Investigation of a curve using Frenet frame in the lightlike cone
  9. Regular Articles
  10. Construction of complex networks from time series based on the cross correlation interval
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Nonlinear Schrödinger approach to European option pricing
  13. Regular Articles
  14. A modified cubic B-spline differential quadrature method for three-dimensional non-linear diffusion equations
  15. Regular Articles
  16. A new miniaturized negative-index meta-atom for tri-band applications
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Seismic stability of the survey areas of potential sites for the deep geological repository of the spent nuclear fuel
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Distributed containment control of heterogeneous fractional-order multi-agent systems with communication delays
  21. Regular Articles
  22. Sensitivity analysis and economic optimization studies of inverted five-spot gas cycling in gas condensate reservoir
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Quantum mechanics with geometric constraints of Friedmann type
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Modeling and Simulation for an 8 kW Three-Phase Grid-Connected Photo-Voltaic Power System
  27. Regular Articles
  28. Application of the optimal homotopy asymptotic method to nonlinear Bingham fluid dampers
  29. Regular Articles
  30. Analysis of Drude model using fractional derivatives without singular kernels
  31. Regular Articles
  32. An unsteady MHD Maxwell nanofluid flow with convective boundary conditions using spectral local linearization method
  33. Regular Articles
  34. New analytical solutions for conformable fractional PDEs arising in mathematical physics by exp-function method
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Quantum mechanical calculation of electron spin
  37. Regular Articles
  38. CO2 capture by polymeric membranes composed of hyper-branched polymers with dense poly(oxyethylene) comb and poly(amidoamine)
  39. Regular Articles
  40. Chain on a cone
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Multi-task feature learning by using trace norm regularization
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Superluminal tunneling of a relativistic half-integer spin particle through a potential barrier
  45. Regular Articles
  46. Neutrosophic triplet normed space
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Lie algebraic discussion for affinity based information diffusion in social networks
  49. Regular Articles
  50. Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in helical CT for pulmonary tuberculosis infections
  51. Regular Articles
  52. A comparison study of steady-state vibrations with single fractional-order and distributed-order derivatives
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Some new remarks on MHD Jeffery-Hamel fluid flow problem
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Numerical investigation of magnetohydrodynamic slip flow of power-law nanofluid with temperature dependent viscosity and thermal conductivity over a permeable surface
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Charge conservation in a gravitational field in the scalar ether theory
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Measurement problem and local hidden variables with entangled photons
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Compression of hyper-spectral images using an accelerated nonnegative tensor decomposition
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Fabrication and application of coaxial polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan nanofiber membranes
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Calculating degree-based topological indices of dominating David derived networks
  67. Regular Articles
  68. The structure and conductivity of polyelectrolyte based on MEH-PPV and potassium iodide (KI) for dye-sensitized solar cells
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Chiral symmetry restoration and the critical end point in QCD
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Numerical solution for fractional Bratu’s initial value problem
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Structure and optical properties of TiO2 thin films deposited by ALD method
  75. Regular Articles
  76. Quadruple multi-wavelength conversion for access network scalability based on cross-phase modulation in an SOA-MZI
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Application of ANNs approach for wave-like and heat-like equations
  79. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  80. Study on node importance evaluation of the high-speed passenger traffic complex network based on the Structural Hole Theory
  81. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  82. A mathematical/physics model to measure the role of information and communication technology in some economies: the Chinese case
  83. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  84. Numerical modeling of the thermoelectric cooler with a complementary equation for heat circulation in air gaps
  85. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  86. On the libration collinear points in the restricted three – body problem
  87. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  88. Research on Critical Nodes Algorithm in Social Complex Networks
  89. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  90. A simulation based research on chance constrained programming in robust facility location problem
  91. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  92. A mathematical/physics carbon emission reduction strategy for building supply chain network based on carbon tax policy
  93. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  94. Mathematical analysis of the impact mechanism of information platform on agro-product supply chain and agro-product competitiveness
  95. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  96. A real negative selection algorithm with evolutionary preference for anomaly detection
  97. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  98. A privacy-preserving parallel and homomorphic encryption scheme
  99. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  100. Random walk-based similarity measure method for patterns in complex object
  101. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  102. A Mathematical Study of Accessibility and Cohesion Degree in a High-Speed Rail Station Connected to an Urban Bus Transport Network
  103. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  104. Design and Simulation of the Integrated Navigation System based on Extended Kalman Filter
  105. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  106. Oil exploration oriented multi-sensor image fusion algorithm
  107. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  108. Analysis of Product Distribution Strategy in Digital Publishing Industry Based on Game-Theory
  109. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  110. Expanded Study on the accumulation effect of tourism under the constraint of structure
  111. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  112. Unstructured P2P Network Load Balance Strategy Based on Multilevel Partitioning of Hypergraph
  113. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  114. Research on the method of information system risk state estimation based on clustering particle filter
  115. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  116. Demand forecasting and information platform in tourism
  117. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  118. Physical-chemical properties studying of molecular structures via topological index calculating
  119. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  120. Local kernel nonparametric discriminant analysis for adaptive extraction of complex structures
  121. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  122. City traffic flow breakdown prediction based on fuzzy rough set
  123. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  124. Conservation laws for a strongly damped wave equation
  125. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  126. Blending type approximation by Stancu-Kantorovich operators based on Pólya-Eggenberger distribution
  127. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  128. Computing the Ediz eccentric connectivity index of discrete dynamic structures
  129. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  130. A discrete epidemic model for bovine Babesiosis disease and tick populations
  131. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  132. Study on maintaining formations during satellite formation flying based on SDRE and LQR
  133. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  134. Relationship between solitary pulmonary nodule lung cancer and CT image features based on gradual clustering
  135. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  136. A novel fast target tracking method for UAV aerial image
  137. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  138. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of interuniversity collaborative learning based on network
  139. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  140. Conservation laws, classical symmetries and exact solutions of the generalized KdV-Burgers-Kuramoto equation
  141. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  142. After notes on self-similarity exponent for fractal structures
  143. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  144. Excitation probability and effective temperature in the stationary regime of conductivity for Coulomb Glasses
  145. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  146. Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image
  147. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  148. Research on identification method of heavy vehicle rollover based on hidden Markov model
  149. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  150. Classifying BCI signals from novice users with extreme learning machine
  151. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  152. Topics on data transmission problem in software definition network
  153. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  154. Statistical inferences with jointly type-II censored samples from two Pareto distributions
  155. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  156. Estimation for coefficient of variation of an extension of the exponential distribution under type-II censoring scheme
  157. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  158. Analysis on trust influencing factors and trust model from multiple perspectives of online Auction
  159. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  160. Coupling of two-phase flow in fractured-vuggy reservoir with filling medium
  161. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  162. Production decline type curves analysis of a finite conductivity fractured well in coalbed methane reservoirs
  163. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  164. Flow Characteristic and Heat Transfer for Non-Newtonian Nanofluid in Rectangular Microchannels with Teardrop Dimples/Protrusions
  165. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  166. The size prediction of potential inclusions embedded in the sub-surface of fused silica by damage morphology
  167. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  168. Research on carbonate reservoir interwell connectivity based on a modified diffusivity filter model
  169. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  170. The method of the spatial locating of macroscopic throats based-on the inversion of dynamic interwell connectivity
  171. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  172. Unsteady mixed convection flow through a permeable stretching flat surface with partial slip effects through MHD nanofluid using spectral relaxation method
  173. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  174. A volumetric ablation model of EPDM considering complex physicochemical process in porous structure of char layer
  175. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  176. Numerical simulation on ferrofluid flow in fractured porous media based on discrete-fracture model
  177. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  178. Macroscopic lattice Boltzmann model for heat and moisture transfer process with phase transformation in unsaturated porous media during freezing process
  179. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  180. Modelling of intermittent microwave convective drying: parameter sensitivity
  181. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  182. Simulating gas-water relative permeabilities for nanoscale porous media with interfacial effects
  183. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  184. Simulation of counter-current imbibition in water-wet fractured reservoirs based on discrete-fracture model
  185. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  186. Investigation effect of wettability and heterogeneity in water flooding and on microscopic residual oil distribution in tight sandstone cores with NMR technique
  187. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  188. Analytical modeling of coupled flow and geomechanics for vertical fractured well in tight gas reservoirs
  189. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  190. Special Issue: Ever New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  191. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  192. The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
  193. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  194. Erratum to: The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
  195. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  196. Rhetoric, logic, and experiment in the quantum nonlocality debate
  197. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  198. What If Quantum Theory Violates All Mathematics?
  199. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  200. Relativity, anomalies and objectivity loophole in recent tests of local realism
  201. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  202. The photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments: computer models with single-wing selection
  203. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  204. Bohr against Bell: complementarity versus nonlocality
  205. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  206. Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell tests?
  207. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  208. Bell’s “Theorem”: loopholes vs. conceptual flaws
  209. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  210. Nonrecurrence and Bell-like inequalities
  211. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  212. Three-dimensional computer models of electrospinning systems
  213. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  214. Electric field computation and measurements in the electroporation of inhomogeneous samples
  215. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  216. Modelling of magnetostriction of transformer magnetic core for vibration analysis
  217. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  218. Comparison of the fractional power motor with cores made of various magnetic materials
  219. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  220. Dynamics of the line-start reluctance motor with rotor made of SMC material
  221. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  222. Inhomogeneous dielectrics: conformal mapping and finite-element models
  223. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  224. Topology optimization of induction heating model using sequential linear programming based on move limit with adaptive relaxation
  225. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  226. Detection of inter-turn short-circuit at start-up of induction machine based on torque analysis
  227. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  228. Current superimposition variable flux reluctance motor with 8 salient poles
  229. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  230. Modelling axial vibration in windings of power transformers
  231. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  232. Field analysis & eddy current losses calculation in five-phase tubular actuator
  233. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  234. Hybrid excited claw pole generator with skewed and non-skewed permanent magnets
  235. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  236. Electromagnetic phenomena analysis in brushless DC motor with speed control using PWM method
  237. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  238. Field-circuit analysis and measurements of a single-phase self-excited induction generator
  239. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  240. A comparative analysis between classical and modified approach of description of the electrical machine windings by means of T0 method
  241. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  242. Field-based optimal-design of an electric motor: a new sensitivity formulation
  243. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  244. Application of the parametric proper generalized decomposition to the frequency-dependent calculation of the impedance of an AC line with rectangular conductors
  245. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  246. Virtual reality as a new trend in mechanical and electrical engineering education
  247. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  248. Holonomicity analysis of electromechanical systems
  249. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  250. An accurate reactive power control study in virtual flux droop control
  251. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  252. Localized probability of improvement for kriging based multi-objective optimization
  253. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  254. Research of influence of open-winding faults on properties of brushless permanent magnets motor
  255. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  256. Optimal design of the rotor geometry of line-start permanent magnet synchronous motor using the bat algorithm
  257. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  258. Model of depositing layer on cylindrical surface produced by induction-assisted laser cladding process
  259. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  260. Detection of inter-turn faults in transformer winding using the capacitor discharge method
  261. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  262. A novel hybrid genetic algorithm for optimal design of IPM machines for electric vehicle
  263. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  264. Lamination effects on a 3D model of the magnetic core of power transformers
  265. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  266. Detection of vertical disparity in three-dimensional visualizations
  267. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  268. Calculations of magnetic field in dynamo sheets taking into account their texture
  269. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  270. 3-dimensional computer model of electrospinning multicapillary unit used for electrostatic field analysis
  271. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  272. Optimization of wearable microwave antenna with simplified electromagnetic model of the human body
  273. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  274. Induction heating process of ferromagnetic filled carbon nanotubes based on 3-D model
  275. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  276. Speed control of an induction motor by 6-switched 3-level inverter
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2017-0099/html
Scroll to top button