Home The method of the spatial locating of macroscopic throats based-on the inversion of dynamic interwell connectivity
Article Open Access

The method of the spatial locating of macroscopic throats based-on the inversion of dynamic interwell connectivity

  • Aimin Lv , Xuyan Li EMAIL logo , Miao Yu , Gangzhu Li , Shoulong Wang , Ruigang Peng and Yawen Zheng
Published/Copyright: May 20, 2017

Abstract

This paper presents a practical technique to quantitatively locate macroscopic throats between injector/producer pairs in a reservoir, considering the problems of extensively developed macroscopic throats and the low sweep efficiency of waterflooding on high water cut stage. The method combines dynamic and static data, based on the results of geological research and the inversion of dynamic interwell connectivity. This technique has implemented the spatial locating of macroscopic throats, using the data of injection/production profiles and tracer test over the years, considering the sedimentary facies of each small layer and the permeability of each sand body. The results of this work show that this method is more convenient and less expensive than previous ones. It is able to locate macroscopic throats in a reservoir accurately and quantitatively. Multiple materials ensure the accuracy of results, and this method is convenient to be applied in the oilfield.

PACS: 83.50.Ha

1 Introduction

After a long waterflooding in a reservoir, permeability and pore throat radius obviously increase in waterflooding area, and macroscopic throats widely spread due to geological factors and dynamic development [1]. In this case, macroscopic throats will result in poor or even noneffective circulation of waterflooding, dramatically reducing its work efficiency and sweep efficiency [2]. Therefore, the method of the spatial locating of macroscopic throats is of great importance.

Several methods have been formed by now to identify macroscopic throats. One uses the dynamic monitor of tracer’s data to identify the formation parameters [3, 4]. This method can qualitatively judge the existence of high permeability zone in the formation. But it is of high cost and cannot monitor the reservoir at any time. The second approach builds the fuzzy-recognition model of macroscopic throats [5]. This approach figures out the values and their percentages of dynamic/static parameter which can reflect the formation of the macroscopic throats. Values obtained from the oilfield will be used to get a composite indicator value. According to that value, we can fuzzily estimate the existence of the macroscopic throats. However, this method needs abundant datum, so it is hard to ensure the integrity of each parameter. Also, the weighted value of each parameter and the division of the scope of composite indicator value need rich experience. These lead to the lack of accuracy of its result. Another approach identifies the macroscopic throats based on grey relational analysis theory [6, 7]. This method defines the apparent water injectivity index of injectors as the sequence, and defines the apparent fluid productivity index of producers as the subsequence. The existence of the macroscopic throats is judged by the degree of association between factors and sub-factors. The closer the degree of association is to 1, the greater the possibility of the existence of macroscopic throats will be.

The degree of association between factors and sub-factors is given by:

ri,0=1nt=0nLt(i,0)(1)

And the correlation coefficient between the sequence and the subsequence is given by:

Lt(i,0)=(ΔminρΔmax)/[Δt(i,0)+ρΔmax](2)

where the resolution ratio ρ is used to weaken the influence of distortion coming from large absolute deviation. And ρ can make the difference between the correlation coefficient more obvious. However, ρ cannot avoid manmade subjectivity. It is hard to ensure that the correlation coefficient does reflect the real connectivity between injectors/producers.

There have been many other approaches that identify the macroscopic throats. However, they have some disadvantages such as high cost, limited accuracy and lacking of ability for real-time monitoring. Also, these techniques can only qualitatively or semi-quantitatively identify the macroscopic throats, and fuzzily estimate the existence. Nowadays, there has been no method that can systematically identify and accurately find out the spatial location of macroscopic throats.

Recently, the method of inversion of dynamic connectivity between injector/producer pairs based on production and injection rates in the oilfield has gained wide attention [812]. In order to implement the identification and the location of macroscopic throats in terms of time and space, this paper presents an innovative technique to locate macroscopic throats between each injector-producer pair in a reservoir. The method combines qualitative and quantitative research making use of static description and dynamic testing analysis together with dynamic inversion. Ultimately, the final objective is accuracy identification and location of macroscopic throats at any time.

This paper uses the inversion model of dynamic connectivity between wells, which considers diffusivity filters, production response and stress constraints. And the model inverses the connectivity based on production/injection rates and pressure data, using the adaptive genetic algorithm. Through the analysis of quantitative dynamic connectivity between injector/producer pairs, the preferential seepage channels of injected water can be positioned in plane [13]. And then with the combination of dynamic monitoring data and static geological data obtained from the oilfield, we can identify the spatial location of macroscopic throats between injector/producer pairs.

2 The inversion of dynamic interwell connectivity

This paper views each injector/producer pair together with the interwell formation as an integrated system. In this system, injection rate is considered as stimulus signal while production rate as response signal. The changes of injection rate at injectors result in the fluctuation of liquid production rate. This fluctuation reflects the characteristics of connectivity between injector/producer pairs. Particularly, the amplitude of fluctuation of production rate is related to the connectivity degree.

There will be the attenuation of stimulus (injection)signal in the reservoir, when stimulus (injection) signal is transmitted in the formation between wells. Therefore, we need to modify injection rate. Taking this into account, we use diffusivity filter to account for the time lag and attenuation that occurs between stimulus and response. Sampling the data of injection rate, we define the filter coefficient of the discrete filter function as [10]:

αm=Δnτexp(mn)/τ(3)

where n = the time of sampling, Δn = the selected discretization interval. Usually, the filters are discretized by sweep the effects of the most recent 12 months of injection. The convoluted injection rate of injector i affecting producer j at time t is given by [8]:

iijc(t)=n0mαij(n)ii(tn)(4)

where αij(n) is the n-th filter coefficient between injector i affecting producer j, ii (tn) is the observed injection rate at (tn)-th time point.

Meanwhile, the pulse fluctuation of injection rate at injectors results in the pressure change. When pressure drop spreads to the location of producer, the production rate will change. Using the superposition principle, the pressure change can be expressed as [8]:

Δp=C1×Ei(dr2t)t1C1×Ei(dr2t)Ei(dr2(t1))t>1(5)

where C1 = a constant, Ei = the exponential function, r = the distance from the point to the well, t = time, and d = the dissipation constant of the medium where d = 1/η.

In this paper, the capacitance model is built based on a total mass balance with compressibility. Then, by making use of superposition in space, the governed material balance equation for producer j and I injectors is [10]:

CtVpdp¯dt+qj(t)=i=1i=Iλijii(t)(6)

where Ct = the total compressibility, Vp = the drainage pore volume, p¯ = the average pressure in Vp, ii(t) = the injection rate of injector i, qj(t)= the production rate at producer j and λij = the weighting factors (the connectivity coefficient).

By solving this model which consists of one producer and multiple injectors, the generalized capacitance model for producer j in a discrete form is given by [10]:

qj(t)=qj(t0)exp(tt0)τj+i=1i=Iλijexp(t/τj)τjξ=t0ξ=texp(ξ/τj)iij(ξ)dξ+Vjpwf(t0)exp[(tt0)τj]pwf(t0)+exp(t/τj)τjξ=t0ξ=texp(ξ/τj)pwf(ξ)dξ(7)

where τj = the time constant, where τj = CtVp/J, J = productivity index, qj(t0) = the initial production rate, Vj = the coefficient of bottom-hole pressure term and pwf = the bottom-hole flowing pressure (BHP).

From the Equation 7, it can be concluded that the production signal consists of three components. The first component is the response of the initial production rate. The second component is the contribution from the injection signal, which is the most important component. The last component is the output signal caused by change in the bottom-hole flowing pressure (BHP) of the producer.

In the Equation 7, many variables need solving. For each producer, characteristic parameters of λij, τj and Vj are unknown. This paper solves the model based on adaptive genetic algorithm, transforming the solution of the model to the process of continuous parameter optimization. The whole procedure of solution is shown in Figure 1. Ultimately, the final objective is to determine the coefficient of dynamic connectivity between injector/producer (λij), and then it’s the base of the spatial locating of macroscopic throats.

Figure 1 The whole procedure of solution of the model
Figure 1

The whole procedure of solution of the model

This paper compiles a relevant program based on the adaptive genetic algorithm, in order to make the inversion of dynamic connectivity more convenient. In this program, the modeled production rate can be exported. In the first step, the initial parameters that we set are the characteristic parameters of interwell formation, including the distance from the point to the well, the reservoir permeability, compressibility coefficient, etc. Then we calculate time constants (τj) using these parameters. The adaptive genetic algorithm only optimizes time constants. The injection data need pre-processing using Equation 3 and 4. The connectivity coefficient (λij) and the coefficient of bottom-hole pressure term (Vj) are both solved by multiple linear regression model. Finally, we can get the satisfied connectivity coefficients.

Comparation between the modeled production rate and the observed prodution rate can intuitively reflect the fitting degree between them in the solution of the model. Typically, in this paper, the inversion of connectivity uses both the injection/production rates and the bottom-hole flowing pressure (BHP) of the producers to ensure the accuracy of the model.

This paper compared the accuracy of inversion of production rate before and after considering the bottom-hole flowing pressure (BHP), using the data obtained from the well group E5 in JZ oilfield. Figure 2 shows the inversion results of the total production rate in the well group E5 from February, 2005 to January, 2007. The red line indicates the modeled production rate, while the blue line indicates the real one.

Figure 2 Inversion results of the total production rate in the well group E5. (a) Not considering the BHP; (b) Considering the BHP
Figure 2

Inversion results of the total production rate in the well group E5. (a) Not considering the BHP; (b) Considering the BHP

Correlation coefficient (R2) is introduced here to analyse the quality of models. R2 is determined by [11]:

R2=1m=0M(qj(m)q^j(m))2m=0M(qj(m)q¯j)2(8)

where qj(m) = the real production rate, q¯j = the average real rate, and q^j(m) = the modeled production rate.

The closer R2 is to 1, the closer the modeled production rate is to the real production rate. That is, the model is more accurate and the connectivity of inversion is closer to the real case. R2 is 0.649 before considering the BHP, while after is 0.916. Figure 2 shows that the modeled production rate is closer to the real production rate after considering the BHP. Therefore, the connectivity of inversion is closer to the real case considering the BHP.

3 The spatial locating of macroscopic throats

The existing macroscopic throats will worsen the interlayer and in-layer contradiction [12]. Taking this into account, spatial locating of macroscopic throats can be decomposed into two aspects, in plane and in vertical. First, this approach uses the dynamic inter-well connectivity model based on diffusivity filters, the response of production and the constraint of pressure. With the analysis of the interwell connectivity, we can determine the preferential channels of injected water in plane. Then, it identifies the layer of macroscopic throats based on dynamic monitoring data and static geological data. The data include injection/production profiles, tracer test data, sedimentary facies of each small layer and permeability of each sand body. Figure 3 shows the procedure of spatial locating of macroscopic throats.

Figure 3 The procedure of spatial locating of macroscopic throats
Figure 3

The procedure of spatial locating of macroscopic throats

The layers of macroscopic throats have obvious characteristics of static geology and dynamic development [1417].

3.1 Injection/production profiles

In the formation where macroscopic throats exist, the difference degree of injection/production profiles is greater. Layers with macroscopic throats have greater injection/production ability. Therefore, if the injection/production ability sharply increases and the value of the capability becomes larger, the possibility of existing macroscopic throats will be greater in the layer.

3.2 Sedimentary facies

Macroscopic throats mostly occur in distributary channels or river mouth bars where there is a long-time scouring by water flow. Besides, macroscopic throats are formed more easily following the sedimentary direction of watercourse. Therefore, if physical quality of sedimentary facies between injector/producer pairs is good and the orientation between wells follows the sedimentary orientation, the possibility of existing macroscopic throats will be greater.

3.3 Conditions of macroscopic throats forming

The thickness of formation has the influence on macroscopic throats forming. If the thickness is small and the water absorption is poor the amount of absorbed water is not enough, macroscopic throats will hardly form in the formation. Macroscopic throats are mainly distributed in the layer whose thickness is larger than 3 m and the thickness of water-absorbing section is over 2 m. Porosity of macroscopic throats should be bigger than 0.2 and permeability should be greater than 100 mD [18]. According to these characteristics, quantitatively comparing the physical properties of each layer, we can identify layers where macroscopic throats may exist.

4 Application

The method of spatial locating of macroscopic throats was applied to JZ oilfield in China. We analyzed the well group E5 of the field and chose the time period from 2005 to 2012. After long-time waterflooding development, there evidently exist macroscopic throats in this block. Overall, the dynamic injection/production rate observed in the well group E5 has a certain fluctuation and maintains continuity. The well group E5 meets the condition of using the inversion of dynamic interwell connectivity. Due to the changes of operations in E5, the 7 years need to be divided into 3 periods to analyze the dynamic connectivity. The basic data of the well group E5 is provided at the end of the article.

Figure 4 shows a map of the well group E5 in JZ oilfield and the representation of dynamic interwell connectivity in each period. In Figure 4, the connectivity coefficients (λij) are represented by inverted arrows that start from the injector i and point to the producer j. The larger the arrow, the larger the value of the connectivity coefficient between the two wells. Table 1 shows the values of the connectivity coefficients λij in each period.

Figure 4 Representation of the connectivity coefficients λij. (a) 2005.2-2007.1; (b) 2007.2-2008.11; (c) 2011.5-2012.8
Figure 4

Representation of the connectivity coefficients λij. (a) 2005.2-2007.1; (b) 2007.2-2008.11; (c) 2011.5-2012.8

Table 1

The values of the connectivity coeflcients λij in Figure 4. (a) 2005.2-2007.1; (b) 2007.2-2008.11; (c) 2011.5-2012.8

(a) 2005.2-2007.1
InjectorProducerValue
E2-30
E2-2E3-30.01
W3-20.06
E2-4E2-30
E3-40.13
E3-30
W4-4E3-40
W3-20.01
(b) 2007.2-2008.11
InjectorProducerValue
E2-30.09
E2-2E3-30.31
W3-20.06
E2-4E2-30.1
E3-40
E3-30
W4-4E3-40
W3-20
(c) 2011.5-2012.8
InjectorProducerValue
E2-30.28
E2-2E2-70
W3-20.06
E2-4E2-30.05
E3-40
E2-70
E3-3E3-40
W3-20.31
W3-2E3-40.16
W3-20.64

From Figure 4, we know there is constantly-changing interwell connectivity during the long-time waterflooding development. With the analysis of the interwell connectivity, we can identify preferential channels of injected water, and then locate the macroscopic throats in plane.

Figure 4 shows the connectivity between injector E2-2 and adjacent producers (producer E2-3, and producer W3-2). Since the values of connectivity coefficients between injector E2-2 and producer E2-3 are bigger, macroscopic throats quite possibly form between these wells.

This paper identified the spatial location of macroscopic throats between injector E2-2 and producer E2-3 as an example. Figure 5 shows the values of injection capability of injector E2-2 in each sand group over years. From Figure 5, we know that the injection capability in sand group I sharply increased from April, 2012 to January, 2013. Therefore, there were obviously formed macroscopic throats in this period. Similarly, the macroscopic throats formed in sand group II from September, 2011 to April, 2012. And then, considering more datum such as sedimentary facies and permeability, we achieved more accurate spatial location of macroscopic throats. The objective is to find the sand body where the preferential seepage channels of injected water are most easily formed.

Figure 5 The values of injection ability of injector E2-2 in each sand group
Figure 5

The values of injection ability of injector E2-2 in each sand group

Figure 6 shows the permeability distribution of injector E2-2 and producer E2-3. In Figure 6, the values of the permeability and the thickness of injector E2-2 and producer E2-3 are all greater in the sand body I31 and the sand body II21. There possibly exist a high-permeability zone or macroscopic throats.

Figure 6 The permeability distribution of injector E2-2 and producer E2-3
Figure 6

The permeability distribution of injector E2-2 and producer E2-3

Figure 7 shows the permeability distribution in the sand body I31 and the sand body II21. The purple red area has the highest permeability which is over 5000 md .The permeability of other area is lower. Comparing the sand body I31 with II21, we know that the permeability of formation between injector E2-2 and producer E2-3 is higher in the sand body I31 and its value is more than 5000 md.

Figure 7 The permeability distribution; (a) I31; (b) II21
Figure 7

The permeability distribution; (a) I31; (b) II21

Figure 8 shows the distribution of sedimentary facies in the small layer I3 and the small layer II2. The green area represents distributary channel, and the orange area represents river mouth bar.

Figure 8 The sedimentary facies distribution; (a) I3; (b) II2
Figure 8

The sedimentary facies distribution; (a) I3; (b) II2

From Figure 8, we can find that there is distributary channel between these two wells in the small layer I3, where the physical property is good. Also, the direction between wells follows the sedimentary direction. All of these are benefit for the forming of high permeability zone or macroscopic throats. However, a river mouth bar between injector E2-2 and producer E2-3 in the small layer II2 exists, together with the change of sedimentary facies and physical quality. Taken together, it can be concluded that macroscopic throats form in the sand body I31 between injector E2-2 and producer E2-3.

Based on the method above, we have achieved spatial location of macroscopic throats between other injector/producer pairs and obtained the spatial position distribution of macroscopic throats in the well group E5 in Figure 9.

Figure 9 The spatial position distribution of macroscopic throats in the well group E5.
Figure 9

The spatial position distribution of macroscopic throats in the well group E5.

In Figure 9 macroscopic throats have been developed in the most formations between injector/producer pairs in the well group E5, and they are all formed in the sand body I31. It is due to the high permeability and good physical quality in the sand body I31.

5 Conclusions

By combination of dynamic and static data, this paper can accurately identify and spatially locate the macroscopic throats. The method is based on the results of geological research, the inversion of dynamic interwell connectivity and the dynamic monitoring data. This technology is considerably simple, efficient, low-cost and adaptable. Combined with inversion of dynamic connectivity, this method can achieve the identification of macroscopic throats at any time and it can be widely used in oilfield development.

This paper adds the constraint of pressure to the model of dynamic interwell connectivity. The modeled production rate is closer to the real production rate after considering the influence of BHP. The accuracy of inversion of dynamic connectivity has been improved.

The technique was applied to the well group E5 in JZ oilfield, and our results agree with the present known oilfield features. Using this method to achieve the spatial location of macroscopic throats has the guiding significance in oilfield and provides beneficial basis for the maximization of oil recovery of existing waterfloods.

Nomenclature

ri,0 = degree of association

Lt = correlation coefficient

ρ = resolution ratio

αm = diffusivity filter coefficient

Δn = selected discretization interval

αij(n) = diffusivity filter coefficient

ii = observed injection rate (m3/d)

iijc = convoluted injection rate (m3/d)

C1 = proportionality constant

Δp = pressure change (MPa)

Ei = exponential function

r = distance from the point to the well (m)

d = dissipation constant

Ct = total compressibility (MPa−1)

Vp = drainage pore volume (m3)

p¯ = average pressure (MPa)

qj = production rate (m3/d)

λij = weighting factors

τj = time constant

J = productivity index (m3/(d⋅m))

Vj = coefficient of bottom-hole pressure term

pwf = bottom-hole flowing pressure (MPa)

Subscripts and Superscripts

i = injector index

j = producer index

m = observed data point

t = time

A Appendix-Basic data

Table 2

The basic data of the well group E5; (a) 2005.2-2007.1; (b) 2007.2-2008.11; (c) 2011.5-2012.8

(a) 2005.2-2007.1
TimeProduction rate, m3/dInjection rate, m3/dProducer BHP, MPa
YearMonthE2-3E3-3E3-4W3-2E2-2E2-4W4-4E2-3E3-3E3-4W3-2
2145.69296.48318.01153.61441.22489.85452.557.7010.9810.737.52
3141.39281.11320.31143.83493.39507.75516.327.7711.1810.797.51
4147.55301.74327.19146.23508.81548.15503.957.7011.3810.817.50
5165.76295.55313.66146.14505.02540.44503.377.7111.5110.767.51
6170.01305.67320.57140.72501.57506.74495.407.7111.5910.747.51
20057177.37289.00304.42129.09504.24509.14513.287.7011.6910.807.51
8184.81289.90311.30145.29521.23534.16507.657.7211.6810.887.51
9190.56281.71299.67140.48490.64522.24509.417.7211.7110.887.51
10193.77292.63310.07134.79506.09549.55503.037.7411.7110.877.49
11207.22296.39318.84126.68504.26543.31488.327.6811.7810.957.49
12205.82287.60306.57140.19520.38570.87500.577.6511.7610.907.48
1204.15290.23300.65156.41530.54563.64506.087.6711.7110.897.82
2213.93294.56312.44155.89521.53564.50509.977.6811.8310.897.59
3220.42308.51323.28143.14519.86563.14484.227.6511.7910.887.52
4235.71315.77324.43129.98510.03513.31500.357.6511.9410.887.52
5335.93310.58309.14133.38461.41518.51507.838.0912.0310.937.52
6385.84306.81307.72131.08545.39576.08509.868.7512.0710.977.48
20067412.07326.78329.22133.44490.07651.68510.478.6612.0410.887.47
8400.01325.91329.18128.63360.19727.66520.458.6412.0010.987.48
9418.99332.44338.02125.92321.09715.49512.818.6711.9310.957.51
10419.29320.60320.88131.32295.51771.21527.198.7612.0510.967.51
11404.87312.90313.09129.12271.06737.75506.938.8212.0210.957.59
12390.92316.08315.14147.45242.02764.70508.508.8311.9910.947.50
20071385.71290.83288.97159.35265.69765.64512.758.9011.8110.927.61
(b) 2007.2-2008.11
TimeProduction rate, m3/dInjection rate, m3/dProducer BHP, MPa
YearMonthE2-3E3-3E3-4W3-2E2-2E2-4W4-4E2-3E3-3E3-4W3-2
2337.68293.23290.12153.55558.46761.01508.178.4111.8610.937.57
3386.63302.34296.68171.50530.87774.86506.028.1211.9010.937.67
4410.18313.92312.46151.55526.70768.32507.888.1011.8810.967.67
5396.04306.85301.27157.66497.05766.34556.978.0911.9310.957.67
6369.31288.94290.78172.74497.33773.58571.598.0711.9110.947.67
20077369.39291.54287.97178.69531.92694.18583.028.0611.9910.947.67
8373.10288.69284.58169.53598.80766.06609.028.0912.0410.917.67
9361.62277.47272.21167.32565.66738.88603.638.1012.0510.877.65
10377.79274.78263.55164.89502.28726.22607.078.1312.1110.877.64
11351.19254.25245.07144.49508.49769.37614.368.1312.0810.877.64
12353.52255.80249.58155.24509.93714.06603.108.1212.1610.877.58
1384.14274.89264.23156.98581.19763.33609.248.0812.1610.887.63
2359.83271.37264.57157.40630.64676.69621.817.9412.1910.777.64
3362.04276.17268.32168.83588.18672.54449.488.0512.2110.807.65
4384.98287.67278.28164.78659.69885.51664.538.0412.2010.837.67
5370.11287.35282.52154.36688.26905.08646.748.1712.1310.837.77
20086366.71297.11292.35152.58745.61693.05784.028.2112.2210.887.76
7373.62295.8291.57156.93697.37789.79720.048.2112.3610.867.65
8363.71288.87275.85161.03693.11918.69486.798.2412.4710.847.79
9389.83257.76273.77178.45704.241027.4475.498.2612.4010.867.81
10397.25262.27276.44171.15753.93892.09480.108.1012.5210.807.81
11429.08270.51289.91178.02747.111145.2472.528.2512.5810.897.77
(c) 2011.5-2012.8
TimeProduction rate, m3/dInjection rate, m3/dProducer BHP, MPa
YearMonthE2-3E2-7E3-4W3-2E2-2E2-4E3-3W4-4E2-3E2-7E3-4W3-2
5701.85149.62382.82142.85601.411154.94608.54373.789.298.308.548.02
6678.76153.00375.05147.02652.741147.66605.93384.588.848.308.548.07
7643.47144.00364.32126.27705.491089.12615.32331.708.688.328.537.89
20118650.81134.38358.94138.71705.841013.18612.78327.358.868.328.487.27
9640.03136.77360.71132.48718.201147.72616.05348.198.678.328.548.46
10616.88131.38357.38100.27679.011165.50649.02303.148.778.328.537.67
11634.55132.35358.6199.38694.371143.00627.50301.068.908.328.497.85
12624.18119.14336.32117.59692.841190.08710.38285.118.448.328.438.21
1531.26113.33329.77112.22702.131138.99718.63274.829.088.328.438.37
2600.22130.43359.71105.89717.901101.44689.90260.729.338.348.438.24
3592.53122.27346.19107.53644.181125.05621.23310.489.188.348.298.95
20124579.57125.58356.88104.53636.921137.03530.29352.818.418.388.448.13
5551.23117.57360.63101.90603.711164.17569.91343.108.748.398.448.25
6566.88119.18358.7897.97528.921169.86610.40335.438.208.388.507.90
7566.90121.34344.73105.25545.111143.59593.36339.808.168.348.497.89
8545.90106.55329.62101.14569.421124.05597.40325.018.148.348.437.39

References

[1] Yeung K., Chakrabarty C., An approximate analytical study of aquifers with pressure-sensitive permeability, Water Resource Research, 1993, 29, 3495-350110.1029/93WR01493Search in Google Scholar

[2] Petrosa O. A., Pressure transient response in stress-sensitive formation, SPE 15115, 198610.2118/15115-MSSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Maghsood A.D., Brigham W.E., Analysis of well to well tracer flow to determine reservoir heterogeneity, SPE 10760, 1982Search in Google Scholar

[4] Deeds N.E., Pope G.A., Mckinney D.C. et al., Vadose Zone Characterization at a Contaminated Field Site Using Partitioning Interwell Tracer Technology, Environmental Science and Technology, 1999, 33, 2745-275110.1021/es9900252Search in Google Scholar

[5] Feng Q.H., The Method of Calculation of Channel Parameters Using Dynamic Data, Petroleum Geology and Recovery Eflciency, 2011, 18, 75-76Search in Google Scholar

[6] Deng J.L., The Relationl Space in Grey System Theory, Fuzzy Mathematics, 1985, 2, 1-10Search in Google Scholar

[7] Liu S.F., Guo T.B., Grey System Theory and Application, Kaifeng: Henan University Press, 1991Search in Google Scholar

[8] Alejandro A., Lake L.W., Inferring Connectivity Only From Well- Rate Fluctuations in Waterfloods, SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering Journal, 2003, 6, 6-1610.2118/83381-PASearch in Google Scholar

[9] Yousef A.A, Investigating Statistical Techniques to Infer Interwell Connectivity from Production and Injection Rate Fluctuations, The University of Texas at Austin, 200510.2118/95322-MSSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Yousef A.A., Gentil P., Jensen J.L., Lake L.W., et al., A Capacitance Model to Infer Interwell Connectivity from Production and Injection Rate Fluctuations, SPE 95322, 200510.2118/95322-MSSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Yousef A.A., Lake L.W., Analysis and Interpretation of Interwell Connectivity from Production and Injection Rate Fluctuations Using a Capacitance Model, SPE 99998, 200610.2118/99998-MSSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Anh D., Djebbar T., Inferring Interwell Connectivity from Well Bottomhole Pressure Fluctuations in Waterfloods, SPE 106881, 2007Search in Google Scholar

[13] Refunjol B.T., Reservoir characterization of North Buck Draw field based on tracer response and production/injection analysis, MS thesis, U. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 1996Search in Google Scholar

[14] Wu S.Y., The Study on Indentifuing Macropore Path and Water Plugging-Profiling Technology, Journal of East China Institute of Technology, 2006, 29, 246-248Search in Google Scholar

[15] Zeng L.F., Study on the Mechanism of Macroscopic Throats Formation and Porous Flow Theory in Unconsolidated Sandstone reservoir, University of Petroleum Press in China, 2002Search in Google Scholar

[16] He C., Li P., Wang Z.Y., The Characteristics of Large Pore Path in Gudao Oil Field and its Profile Control or Plugging Method, Petroleum drill and produce technology, 2000, 22, 63-66Search in Google Scholar

[17] Zeng L.F., Zhao G.J., Zhang Z.H. et al., The Macroscopic Throats Forming Mechanism of Unconsolidated Sand reservoir and Their Identifying Method, Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2002, 10, 268-279Search in Google Scholar

[18] Zhao Y., Wu S.H., Zhu X.M., Zhong D.K. et al., Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Large Pores, with the Middle Part of Shahejie Formation in the Hu12 Block Oilfield as an Example, 2008, 26, 57-61Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-9-30
Accepted: 2016-11-28
Published Online: 2017-5-20

© 2017 Aimin Lv et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Analysis of a New Fractional Model for Damped Bergers’ Equation
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Optimal homotopy perturbation method for nonlinear differential equations governing MHD Jeffery-Hamel flow with heat transfer problem
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Semi- analytic numerical method for solution of time-space fractional heat and wave type equations with variable coefficients
  7. Regular Articles
  8. Investigation of a curve using Frenet frame in the lightlike cone
  9. Regular Articles
  10. Construction of complex networks from time series based on the cross correlation interval
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Nonlinear Schrödinger approach to European option pricing
  13. Regular Articles
  14. A modified cubic B-spline differential quadrature method for three-dimensional non-linear diffusion equations
  15. Regular Articles
  16. A new miniaturized negative-index meta-atom for tri-band applications
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Seismic stability of the survey areas of potential sites for the deep geological repository of the spent nuclear fuel
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Distributed containment control of heterogeneous fractional-order multi-agent systems with communication delays
  21. Regular Articles
  22. Sensitivity analysis and economic optimization studies of inverted five-spot gas cycling in gas condensate reservoir
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Quantum mechanics with geometric constraints of Friedmann type
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Modeling and Simulation for an 8 kW Three-Phase Grid-Connected Photo-Voltaic Power System
  27. Regular Articles
  28. Application of the optimal homotopy asymptotic method to nonlinear Bingham fluid dampers
  29. Regular Articles
  30. Analysis of Drude model using fractional derivatives without singular kernels
  31. Regular Articles
  32. An unsteady MHD Maxwell nanofluid flow with convective boundary conditions using spectral local linearization method
  33. Regular Articles
  34. New analytical solutions for conformable fractional PDEs arising in mathematical physics by exp-function method
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Quantum mechanical calculation of electron spin
  37. Regular Articles
  38. CO2 capture by polymeric membranes composed of hyper-branched polymers with dense poly(oxyethylene) comb and poly(amidoamine)
  39. Regular Articles
  40. Chain on a cone
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Multi-task feature learning by using trace norm regularization
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Superluminal tunneling of a relativistic half-integer spin particle through a potential barrier
  45. Regular Articles
  46. Neutrosophic triplet normed space
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Lie algebraic discussion for affinity based information diffusion in social networks
  49. Regular Articles
  50. Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in helical CT for pulmonary tuberculosis infections
  51. Regular Articles
  52. A comparison study of steady-state vibrations with single fractional-order and distributed-order derivatives
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Some new remarks on MHD Jeffery-Hamel fluid flow problem
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Numerical investigation of magnetohydrodynamic slip flow of power-law nanofluid with temperature dependent viscosity and thermal conductivity over a permeable surface
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Charge conservation in a gravitational field in the scalar ether theory
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Measurement problem and local hidden variables with entangled photons
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Compression of hyper-spectral images using an accelerated nonnegative tensor decomposition
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Fabrication and application of coaxial polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan nanofiber membranes
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Calculating degree-based topological indices of dominating David derived networks
  67. Regular Articles
  68. The structure and conductivity of polyelectrolyte based on MEH-PPV and potassium iodide (KI) for dye-sensitized solar cells
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Chiral symmetry restoration and the critical end point in QCD
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Numerical solution for fractional Bratu’s initial value problem
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Structure and optical properties of TiO2 thin films deposited by ALD method
  75. Regular Articles
  76. Quadruple multi-wavelength conversion for access network scalability based on cross-phase modulation in an SOA-MZI
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Application of ANNs approach for wave-like and heat-like equations
  79. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  80. Study on node importance evaluation of the high-speed passenger traffic complex network based on the Structural Hole Theory
  81. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  82. A mathematical/physics model to measure the role of information and communication technology in some economies: the Chinese case
  83. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  84. Numerical modeling of the thermoelectric cooler with a complementary equation for heat circulation in air gaps
  85. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  86. On the libration collinear points in the restricted three – body problem
  87. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  88. Research on Critical Nodes Algorithm in Social Complex Networks
  89. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  90. A simulation based research on chance constrained programming in robust facility location problem
  91. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  92. A mathematical/physics carbon emission reduction strategy for building supply chain network based on carbon tax policy
  93. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  94. Mathematical analysis of the impact mechanism of information platform on agro-product supply chain and agro-product competitiveness
  95. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  96. A real negative selection algorithm with evolutionary preference for anomaly detection
  97. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  98. A privacy-preserving parallel and homomorphic encryption scheme
  99. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  100. Random walk-based similarity measure method for patterns in complex object
  101. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  102. A Mathematical Study of Accessibility and Cohesion Degree in a High-Speed Rail Station Connected to an Urban Bus Transport Network
  103. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  104. Design and Simulation of the Integrated Navigation System based on Extended Kalman Filter
  105. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  106. Oil exploration oriented multi-sensor image fusion algorithm
  107. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  108. Analysis of Product Distribution Strategy in Digital Publishing Industry Based on Game-Theory
  109. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  110. Expanded Study on the accumulation effect of tourism under the constraint of structure
  111. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  112. Unstructured P2P Network Load Balance Strategy Based on Multilevel Partitioning of Hypergraph
  113. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  114. Research on the method of information system risk state estimation based on clustering particle filter
  115. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  116. Demand forecasting and information platform in tourism
  117. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  118. Physical-chemical properties studying of molecular structures via topological index calculating
  119. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  120. Local kernel nonparametric discriminant analysis for adaptive extraction of complex structures
  121. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  122. City traffic flow breakdown prediction based on fuzzy rough set
  123. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  124. Conservation laws for a strongly damped wave equation
  125. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  126. Blending type approximation by Stancu-Kantorovich operators based on Pólya-Eggenberger distribution
  127. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  128. Computing the Ediz eccentric connectivity index of discrete dynamic structures
  129. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  130. A discrete epidemic model for bovine Babesiosis disease and tick populations
  131. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  132. Study on maintaining formations during satellite formation flying based on SDRE and LQR
  133. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  134. Relationship between solitary pulmonary nodule lung cancer and CT image features based on gradual clustering
  135. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  136. A novel fast target tracking method for UAV aerial image
  137. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  138. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of interuniversity collaborative learning based on network
  139. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  140. Conservation laws, classical symmetries and exact solutions of the generalized KdV-Burgers-Kuramoto equation
  141. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  142. After notes on self-similarity exponent for fractal structures
  143. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  144. Excitation probability and effective temperature in the stationary regime of conductivity for Coulomb Glasses
  145. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  146. Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image
  147. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  148. Research on identification method of heavy vehicle rollover based on hidden Markov model
  149. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  150. Classifying BCI signals from novice users with extreme learning machine
  151. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  152. Topics on data transmission problem in software definition network
  153. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  154. Statistical inferences with jointly type-II censored samples from two Pareto distributions
  155. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  156. Estimation for coefficient of variation of an extension of the exponential distribution under type-II censoring scheme
  157. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  158. Analysis on trust influencing factors and trust model from multiple perspectives of online Auction
  159. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  160. Coupling of two-phase flow in fractured-vuggy reservoir with filling medium
  161. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  162. Production decline type curves analysis of a finite conductivity fractured well in coalbed methane reservoirs
  163. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  164. Flow Characteristic and Heat Transfer for Non-Newtonian Nanofluid in Rectangular Microchannels with Teardrop Dimples/Protrusions
  165. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  166. The size prediction of potential inclusions embedded in the sub-surface of fused silica by damage morphology
  167. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  168. Research on carbonate reservoir interwell connectivity based on a modified diffusivity filter model
  169. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  170. The method of the spatial locating of macroscopic throats based-on the inversion of dynamic interwell connectivity
  171. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  172. Unsteady mixed convection flow through a permeable stretching flat surface with partial slip effects through MHD nanofluid using spectral relaxation method
  173. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  174. A volumetric ablation model of EPDM considering complex physicochemical process in porous structure of char layer
  175. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  176. Numerical simulation on ferrofluid flow in fractured porous media based on discrete-fracture model
  177. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  178. Macroscopic lattice Boltzmann model for heat and moisture transfer process with phase transformation in unsaturated porous media during freezing process
  179. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  180. Modelling of intermittent microwave convective drying: parameter sensitivity
  181. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  182. Simulating gas-water relative permeabilities for nanoscale porous media with interfacial effects
  183. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  184. Simulation of counter-current imbibition in water-wet fractured reservoirs based on discrete-fracture model
  185. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  186. Investigation effect of wettability and heterogeneity in water flooding and on microscopic residual oil distribution in tight sandstone cores with NMR technique
  187. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  188. Analytical modeling of coupled flow and geomechanics for vertical fractured well in tight gas reservoirs
  189. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  190. Special Issue: Ever New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  191. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  192. The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
  193. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  194. Erratum to: The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
  195. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  196. Rhetoric, logic, and experiment in the quantum nonlocality debate
  197. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  198. What If Quantum Theory Violates All Mathematics?
  199. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  200. Relativity, anomalies and objectivity loophole in recent tests of local realism
  201. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  202. The photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments: computer models with single-wing selection
  203. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  204. Bohr against Bell: complementarity versus nonlocality
  205. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  206. Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell tests?
  207. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  208. Bell’s “Theorem”: loopholes vs. conceptual flaws
  209. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  210. Nonrecurrence and Bell-like inequalities
  211. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  212. Three-dimensional computer models of electrospinning systems
  213. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  214. Electric field computation and measurements in the electroporation of inhomogeneous samples
  215. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  216. Modelling of magnetostriction of transformer magnetic core for vibration analysis
  217. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  218. Comparison of the fractional power motor with cores made of various magnetic materials
  219. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  220. Dynamics of the line-start reluctance motor with rotor made of SMC material
  221. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  222. Inhomogeneous dielectrics: conformal mapping and finite-element models
  223. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  224. Topology optimization of induction heating model using sequential linear programming based on move limit with adaptive relaxation
  225. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  226. Detection of inter-turn short-circuit at start-up of induction machine based on torque analysis
  227. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  228. Current superimposition variable flux reluctance motor with 8 salient poles
  229. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  230. Modelling axial vibration in windings of power transformers
  231. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  232. Field analysis & eddy current losses calculation in five-phase tubular actuator
  233. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  234. Hybrid excited claw pole generator with skewed and non-skewed permanent magnets
  235. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  236. Electromagnetic phenomena analysis in brushless DC motor with speed control using PWM method
  237. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  238. Field-circuit analysis and measurements of a single-phase self-excited induction generator
  239. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  240. A comparative analysis between classical and modified approach of description of the electrical machine windings by means of T0 method
  241. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  242. Field-based optimal-design of an electric motor: a new sensitivity formulation
  243. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  244. Application of the parametric proper generalized decomposition to the frequency-dependent calculation of the impedance of an AC line with rectangular conductors
  245. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  246. Virtual reality as a new trend in mechanical and electrical engineering education
  247. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  248. Holonomicity analysis of electromechanical systems
  249. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  250. An accurate reactive power control study in virtual flux droop control
  251. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  252. Localized probability of improvement for kriging based multi-objective optimization
  253. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  254. Research of influence of open-winding faults on properties of brushless permanent magnets motor
  255. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  256. Optimal design of the rotor geometry of line-start permanent magnet synchronous motor using the bat algorithm
  257. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  258. Model of depositing layer on cylindrical surface produced by induction-assisted laser cladding process
  259. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  260. Detection of inter-turn faults in transformer winding using the capacitor discharge method
  261. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  262. A novel hybrid genetic algorithm for optimal design of IPM machines for electric vehicle
  263. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  264. Lamination effects on a 3D model of the magnetic core of power transformers
  265. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  266. Detection of vertical disparity in three-dimensional visualizations
  267. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  268. Calculations of magnetic field in dynamo sheets taking into account their texture
  269. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  270. 3-dimensional computer model of electrospinning multicapillary unit used for electrostatic field analysis
  271. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  272. Optimization of wearable microwave antenna with simplified electromagnetic model of the human body
  273. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  274. Induction heating process of ferromagnetic filled carbon nanotubes based on 3-D model
  275. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  276. Speed control of an induction motor by 6-switched 3-level inverter
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2017-0035/html
Scroll to top button