Article Open Access

Statistical inferences with jointly type-II censored samples from two Pareto distributions

  • EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 10, 2017

Abstract

In the several fields of industries the product comes from more than one production line, which is required to work the comparative life tests. This problem requires sampling of the different production lines, then the joint censoring scheme is appeared. In this article we consider the life time Pareto distribution with jointly type-II censoring scheme. The maximum likelihood estimators (MLE) and the corresponding approximate confidence intervals as well as the bootstrap confidence intervals of the model parameters are obtained. Also Bayesian point and credible intervals of the model parameters are presented. The life time data set is analyzed for illustrative purposes. Monte Carlo results from simulation studies are presented to assess the performance of our proposed method.

1 Introduction

To be more accurate, we suppose manufactured products are taken from two separate lines with the same conditions and choose two samples of sizes m and n from these two lines, to test in a life testing experiment. Under the considerations of cost and time, the experimenter stopped the experiment after a prior fixed number of failures. The unit type and it is failure time is recorded until a prior fixed number of failures is obtained. Different authors have dealt with this type of censoring and its statistics earlier such as, Rao et al. Rao et al. [1], Basu [2], Johnson and Mehrotra [3], Mehrotra and Johnson [4], Bhattacharyya and Mehrotra [5], Mehrotra and Bhattacharyya [6]. Balakrishnan and Rasouli [7], Rasouli and Balakrishnan [8], and recently Shafay et al. [9]. Recently, Kundu [10] prsented new type-II progressive censoring scheme for two samples.

Suppose that product from two lines Ω1 and Ω2, from a product Ω1, m (i.i.d) lifetimes random variables T1, T2, …, Tm belong to population with CDF F1(t) and PDF f1(t) distribution and density functions, respectively. Also, n (i.i.d) lifetimes random variables Y1, Y2, …,Yn belong to population with CDF F2(y) and PDF f2(y) of product Ω2. Furthermore, suppose Z1Z2 ≤ … ≤ Zr are the order sample of the (m + n) random variables {T1, T2, …, Tmr, Y1, Y2, …,Ynr}. Hence, from the jointly type-II censored sample described above, the observed data set (Z, δ) consists of Z = (Z1, Z2, …,Zr) with 1 ≤ r < m + n and δ = (δ1, δ1, …, δr) with δi = 1 or 0 depending on whether Zi is an T

f(z,δ)=m!n!(mmr)!(nnr)!i=1rf1(zi)δif2(zi)1δi×[1F1(zr)]mmr[1F2(zr)]nnr.(1)

Pareto distribution is used to describe the distribution of wealth among individuals because it seemed to show rather well the method that a larger portion of the wealth of any society is owned by a smaller percentage of the people in that society. Also, the Pareto distribution is used to describe a distribution of income. In reliability studies Pareto distribution is used in life tests to analyse life time data in reliability studies. Ref. [11] considered constant-stress partially accelerated life testing under Pareto distribution with type-I censoring. More recently, researchers have discussed different application of the Pareto distribution for many types of data sets. For example, for new characterizations of the Pareto distribution see Nofal and El Gebaly [12] and for the odd Pareto families of distributions for modeling loss payment data see Mdziniso and Cooray [13].

The Pareto distribution is a power probability distribution, which is used in the description of geophysical, scientific, social, actuarial, and many other types of observable phenomena. Pareto distribution applied in different cases of life testing. The two-parameter Pareto distribution has the density function (PDF) and distribution function (CDF) respectively, given by

fj(x;αj,θj)=αjθjαj(θj+x)(αj+1),x>0,αj>0,θj>0,j=1,2,(2)
Fj(x;αj,θj)=1θjαj(θj+x)αj,x>0.(3)

And reliability function (RF), and hazard rate function (HF) are given, respectively, by

Rj(t)=θjαj(θj+t)αj,t>0,(4)
Hj(t)=αj(θj+t)1,t>0.(5)

The Pareto distribution is used in different branches such as in analysing business failure data and economic studies. Many authors have studied the Pareto distribution such as Balkema and Haan [14], Arnold [15], Vidondo et al. [16], Childs et al. [17], Al-Awadhi and Ghitany [18], Howlader and Hossain [19]. Abd-Elfattah et al. [20] discussed Bayesian inferences with Pareto distribution. Hassan and Al-Ghamdi [21] used the Pareto distribution to determine the optimal test times of changing stress level under a simple stress scheme with cumulative exposure model.

In this paper we discuss a joint type-II censoring scheme and its properties for obtaining the estimators of the Pareto distribution parameters, although the results can be extended for other lifetime distributions and other censoring schemes. We obtain the MLEs of the unknown parameters. It is also observed that MLEs with normal approximation the approximate confidence interval is obtained. For comparison purposes we proposed to use bootstrap confidence intervals. Bayesian point and interval estimators are presented with the help of MCMC method and results are compared with MLEs and bootstrap confidence intervals.

In this article, The maximum likelihood estimators for the unknown parameters are derived, and the corresponding approximate confidences intervals are presented in Section 2. The two bootstrap confidence intervals are discussed in Section 3. Under SE and MCMC method of Bayesian estimation based on jointly type-II censoring Pareto distribution samples are developed in Section 4. A numerical example for illustration to the results obtained in this paper is presented in Section 5. An assessment and a comparison of the results by Monte Carlo studies are presented in Section 6. Finally comment about the result of simulation studies is shown in Section 7.

2 Maximum likelihood estimation

Suppose that (Z1, Z2, …, Zr) be the r-first order statistics of {T1, T2, …, Tmr, Y1, Y2, …,Ynr}, and each of a sample Ts and Ys are independent random samples from the two distributions (2). Also let q = (α1, α2), η = (θ1, θ2), s = (m, n), l = (mr, nr) and ω = (δi, 1 − δi). Then the likelihood function with the jointly samples and distributions is presented by equations (2) and (3), is given by

Lq,η|z_j=12qjljηjsjqjexp(qj+1)i=1rωjlog(ηj+zi)qj(sjlj)log(ηj+zr).(6)

So the natural logarithm of the likelihood function is presented by

(q,η|z_)j=12ljlogqj+sjqjlogηj(qj+1)×i=1rωjlog(ηj+zi)qj(sjlj)log(ηj+zr).(7)

2.1 MLE’s

The likelihood equations are obtained from the first partial derivatives of (7) with each qi and ηi, i = 1, 2 as

q,η|z_qj=ljqj+sjlogηji=1rωjlog(ηj+zi)(sjlj)log(ηj+zr)=0

and

q,η|z_ηj=sjqjηj(qj+1)i=1rωjηj+ziqj(sjlj)ηj+zr=0,

hence

qj(ηj)=ljTj,(8)

and

ηj=sji=1rωjηj+zi+(sjlj)ηj+zr+Tjlji=1rωjηj+zi1,(9)

where

Tj=i=1rωjlog(ηj+zi)+(sjlj)log(ηj+zr)sjlogηj,(10)

From the likelihoods equations, we obtained the two nonlinear equations (9) solved numerically with respect to θ1 and θ2 with any numerical methods such as quasi-Newton Raphson or fixed point, to obtain the MLE, θ^1 and θ^2,, and hence α^1 and α^2 by using (8).

2.2 Observed Fisher information

Under obtaining the second partial derivatives of the log-likelihood function in (7), we have

2q,η|z_qj2=ljqj2,j=1,2,(11)
2q,η|z_ηj2=sjqjηj2+(qj+1)i=1rωjηj+zi2+qj(sjlj)ηj+zr2,(12)
2q,η|z_qjηj=2q,η|z_ηjqj=sjηji=1rωjηj+zi(sjlj)ηj+zr,(13)
2q,η|z_q1q2=2q,η|z_q2q1=2q,η|z_η1η2=2q,η|z_η2η1=0,(14)

and

2q,η|z_q1η2=2q,η|z_η2q1=2q,η|z_q2η1=2q,η|z_η2q1=0.(15)

The Fisher information matrix I(α1, θ1, α2, θ2) is then obtained by taking expectation of minus eq. (11-15). Under some mild regularity conditions, (α^1,θ^1,α^2,θ^2) is approximately bivariately normal with mean (α1, θ1, α2, θ2) and covariance matrix I−1(α1, θ1, α2, θ2). In practice, we usually estimate I−1(α1, θ1, α2, θ2) by I01(α^1,θ^1,α^2,θ^2). A simpler and equally valued procedure is to use the approximation

(α^1,θ^1,α^2,θ^2)Nα1,θ1,α2,θ2,I01(α^1,θ^1,α^2,θ^2),

where I0(α1, β1, α2, β2) is observed information matrix given by

2(.|z_)α122(.|z_)α1θ12(.|z_)α1α22(.|z_)α1θ22(.|z_)θ1α12(.|z_)θ122(.|z_)θ1α22(.|z_)θ1θ22(.|z_)α2α12(.|z_)α2θ12(.|z_)α222(.|z_)α2θ22(.|z_)θ2α12(.|z_)θ2θ12(.|z_)θ2α22(.|z_)θ22,(16)

where (.|z) = (α1, θ1, α2, θ2|z). From the bivariately normal distributed with mean (α1, θ1, α2, θ2) and covariance matrix I01(α^1,θ^1,α^2,θ^2), the approximate confidence intervals of parametrs α1, θ1, α2 and θ2 can be obtained. Thus, the 100(1-2γ)% approximate confidence intervals for α1, θ1, α2 and θ2 are

α^1zγv11, θ^1zγv22,α^2zγv33and θ^2zγv44,(17)

where v11, v22, v33, and v44 are the elements presented by main diagonal of I01(α^1,θ^1,α^2,θ^2) in (17) and zγ is the tabulated value of the N(0, 1) distribution with significant level equal 2γ.

3 Bootstrap confidence intervals

The bootstrap is a commonly used method not only to estimate confidence intervals, but is also used in estimation bias, variance of an estimator and calibration of hypothesis tests. Parametric and nonparametric bootstrap methods are exposed in [22] and [23]. The parametric bootstrap methods are used to present two confidence intervals, percentile and t bootstrap confidence intervals (see [24] and [25]) with respect to the following algorithm:

  1. For given original data set (z, δ) = {(zi, δi), i = 1, 2, …, (r, 1 ≤ r < N}, δi = 1 or 0 depending on whether zi is an T- or Y-failure the MLEs of parameters say α^1,θ^1,α^2, and θ^2 are obtain.

  2. From Pareto distribution with parameters α^1,θ^1,α^2, and θ^2 and the same values of m, n and r, generate a random sample (z,δ)={(zi,δi),i=1,2,...,r,1r<N}.

  3. With respect to z, δ, (m, (n, r the bootstrap sample estimations α^1,θ^1,α^2,andθ^2 are obtained.

  4. Steps 2 and 3 repeated M times to represent the different bootstrap samples.

  5. Arrange the different bootstrap samples in an ascending order as (ψ^k[1],ψ^k[2],...,ψ^k[M]),k=1,2,3,4 where (ψ1=α^1,ψ2=θ^1,ψ3=α^2,ψ4=θ^2).

Percentile bootstrap confidence interval

The CDF of ψ^k defined by W(z) = P( ψ^tz) then boot-pψ^k = W−1(z) for given z. Then the approximate bootstrap 100(1 − 2γ)% confidence interval of φ^k given by

bootpψ^k(γ),bootpψ^k(1γ).(18)

Bootstrap-t confidence interval

define the order statistics ζk[1]<ζk[2]<...<ζk[M], where

ζk[j]=ψ^k[j]ψ^kvarψ^k[j],j=1,2,...,M,k=1,2,3,4,(19)

Let W(z) = P( ζ^t < z) be the CDF of ζ^t. For a given z, define

boottψ^k=ψ^k+Var(ψ^k)W1(z).(20)

The approximate 100(1 − 2γ)% confidence interval of ψ^k is given by

boottψ^k(γ),boottψ^k(1γ).(21)

4 Bayes estimation of the model parameters

Consider that each of the parameters α1, θ1, α2, and θ2 are unknown, and have independent gamma priors with prior density as

hk(ψk)=bkakΓ(ak)ψkak1exp(bkψk),ψk>0,(ak,bk>0),k=1,2,3,4,(22)

where ψ = (α1, θ1, α2, θ2). Then the joint prior density of vector ψ, can be written as

h(ψ_)=i=14hi(ψi).(23)

Using the joint prior density (24) and the likelihood function, the joint posterior density given the data h(ψ|z), given as

h(ψ_|z_)=L(ψ_|z_)×h(ψ_)ψL(ψ_|z_)×h(ψ_)dψ.(24)

Hence, the Bayes estimation for a given function of ψ say g(ψ), under squared error loss function (SEL) is

g^B(ψ_)=Eψ|_z_(g(ψ_))=ψg(ψ_)h(ψ_|z_)ψ=ψg(ψ_)L(ψ_|z_)×h(ψ_)dψψL(ψ_|z_)×h(ψ_)dψ.(25)

In several cases, the ratio of the two integrals (26) can not be obtained in a closed form. Different approximate methods can be used, the important one which used in this paper is the MCMC method. In this method, the parameters samples generated from posterior distributions are used to computing the Bayes estimate of any function g(ψ) of parameters.

MCMC Approach

Different classes of MCMC metod, an important one is Gibbs technique and another more general technique is Metropolis within-Gibbs. The empirical posterior distribution obtained from MCMC can be used to obtain different interval estimate of the parameters or which often do not exist in maximum likelihood technique. Also, the MCMC method can be used to obtain the empirical posterior of any function of the parameters (see Soliman et al. [26] and Abd-Elmougod et al [27]).

The joint posterior density function of the vector ψ can be written as

h(ψ_|z_)α1a1+mr1θ1a2+mα11α2a3+nr1θ2a4+nα21×expb1α1b2θ1b3α2b4θ2(α1+1)i=1rδilog(θ1+zi)α1(mmr)log(θ1+zr)α2(nnr)log(θ2+zr)(α2+1)i=1r(1δi)log(θ2+zi).(26)

Then the conditional posterior PDF’s of α1, θ1, α2, and θ2 are as follows

α1|(θ1,α2,θ2,z_)Gamma(a1+mr,X1),(27)
θ1|(α1,α2,θ2,z_)exp[b2θ1(α1+1)i=1rδilog(θ1+zi)+(a2+mα11)log(θ1)α1(mmr)log(θ1+zr)(28)
α2|(α1,θ1,θ2,z_)Gamma(a3+nr,X2),(29)

and

θ2|(α1,θ1,α2,z_)expb4θ2(α2+1)i=1r(1δi)×log(θ2+zi)+(a4+nα21)×log(θ2)α2(nnr)log(θ2+zr),(30)

where

X1=b1mlogθ1+i=1rδilog(θ1+zi)+(mmr)×log(θ1+zr),(31)

and

X2=b3nlogθ2+i=1r(1δi)log(θ2+zi)+(nnr)log(θ1+zr).(32)

The plots of (29) and (31) show that the generation from these distributions under similarity with the normal distribution, we use the MH method Metropolis et al. [28] with normal proposal distribution as the following algorithm.

The algorithm of Metropolis–Hastings under Gibbs sampling

  1. Set I = 1 and start with intial values parameters vector ψ_(0)=(α^1,θ^1,α^2,θ^2).

  2. Generate α1(I) from Gamma(a1 + mr, X1) and α2(I) from Gamma(a3 + nr, X2).

  3. Generate θ1(I) and θ2(I) by using Metropolis-Hastings, with the N(θk(I1),σk) proposal distribution, k = 1, 2. Where σk is obtained from variances-covariances matrix.

  4. The parameters vector ψ_(I)=(α1(I),θ1(I),α2(I),θ2(I)) are obtained and set I = I + 1.

  5. Repeat steps from 2 – 4, NMC times.

  6. The Bayes estimate of ψ = (α1, θ1, α2, θ2) under the MCMC methods as

    E(ψk|z_)=1NMCMMCi=MMC+1NMCψk(i),k=1,2,3,4.(33)

    where MMC is the number of iterations, we need to get to stationary distribution. The posterior variance of ψk given by

    V(ψk|z_)=1NMCMMCi=MMC+1NMCψk(i)E(ψk|z_)2.

    The credible intervals of ψk, afeter order ψk(MMC+1),ψk(MMC+2),...,ψk(NMC) as ψk(1), ψk(2),…,ψk(NMC − MMC). Then the 100(1 − 2γ)% symmetric credible interval is

    (ψk(γNMCMMC),ψk(1γNMCMMC)).(35)

5 Illustrative example

In this section, we adopted a simulated data set from the two Pareto distributions to illustrate the application of our proposed method, the joint type-II censoring data generated from two pareto distributions with the parameters vectors ψ = (α1, θ1, θ2, β2) = (0.8, 2.0, 0.5, 1.5) and m = n = 20 and r = 30. The two data set T and Y, the corresponding joint type-II censored data Z and the corresponding indicator δ are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Joint type-II censored sample from two Pareto distributions

with ψ = (0.8, 2.0, 0.5, 1.5), m = n = 20 and r = 30.
T0.1520.5480.7590.7780.9160.9761.0171.4331.5581.822
1.8882.3953.0663.9015.4895.80917.88621.82943.23990.793
Y0.0060.3830.4890.9251.251.3371.4481.9762.4265.484
8.6119.43016.12037.36041.09049.276152.313442.91512510.90063621.000
zi0.0060.1520.3830.4890.5480.7590.7780.9160.9250.976
δi0100111101
zi1.0171.2501.3371.4331.4481.5581.8221.8881.9762.395
δi1001011101
zi2.4263.0663.9015.4845.4895.8098.6119.43016.12017.886
δi0110110001

Based on the data presented in Table 1, point and 95% interval estimation of ML, bootstrap % and Bayes are presented in Table 2 and 3. In Bayesian MCMC method, the informative proior with hyper parameters {a1 = 1, a2 = 2, a3 = 1, a4 = 3, b1 = 1, b2 = 1, b3 = 2, b4 = 2} is used. Also, we run the chain for 11, 000 times and cut the first 1000 values as NMC‘burn-in’. Fig. 1-8 show simulation number of parameters generated by MCMC method and the corresponding histogram.

Figure 1 Simulation number of α1 obtained by MCMC method
Figure 1

Simulation number of α1 obtained by MCMC method

Figure 2 Histogram of α1 obtained by MCMC method
Figure 2

Histogram of α1 obtained by MCMC method

Figure 3 Simulation number of β1 obtained by MCMC method
Figure 3

Simulation number of β1 obtained by MCMC method

Figure 4 Histogram of β1 obtained by MCMC method
Figure 4

Histogram of β1 obtained by MCMC method

Figure 5 Simulation number of α2 obtained by MCMC method
Figure 5

Simulation number of α2 obtained by MCMC method

Figure 6 Histogram of α2 obtained by MCMC method
Figure 6

Histogram of α2 obtained by MCMC method

Figure 7 Simulation number of β2 obtained by MCMC method
Figure 7

Simulation number of β2 obtained by MCMC method

Figure 8 Histogram of β2 obtained by MCMC method
Figure 8

Histogram of β2 obtained by MCMC method

Table 2

The MLEs, Bootstrap and Bayes MCMC estimates of parameters

Ex. Pa.MLBootMCMC
α1 = 0.80.91621.01610.9351
θ1 = 2.02.13792.74502.2895
α1 = 0.50.35370.40190.4120
θ1 = 1.50.95911.20141.3978

Table 3

95% asymptotic, Bootstrap-p, Bootstrap-t and credible intervals

Pa.sMLBootstrap-pBootstrap-tBaye MCMC
α1 = 0.8(0.0326, 1.7998)(0.1245, 2.1564)(0.1356, 2.0001)(0.4416, 1.7257)
θ1 = 2.0(-1.1022, 5.3779)(0.2354, 5.5471)(0.2541, 5.009)(0.7202, 5.0201)
α1 = 0.5(0.0249, 0.6826)(0.0986, 1.1542)(0.1852, 1.1118)(0.1957, 0.7362)
θ1 = 1.5(-0.8732, 2.7915)(0.7145, 3.0254)(0.7724, 3.1005)(0.4100, 2.9863)

6 Simulation studies

To assess the theoretical results obtained from estimation problem, we adopted simulation studies under different sample sizes for the two Pareto populations and different sample size r. The performance of the point estimations measured in terms of their average (AVG) and mean square error (MSE), where

AVGψk=1SNi=1SNψ^ki, and MSEψk=1SNi=1SNψ^kiψk2,(36)

where SN is the simulation number. Interval estimation, intervals obtained by using property distributions of the MLEs, the two different bootstrap confidence intervals or credibility intervals parented by MCMC method can be measured in average terms of interval widths (AW) and probability coverage (PC). We supposed values of the vectors parameters ψ = (α1, θ1, α2, θ2) = (1.0, 3, 1.5, 5). The non-informative priors (priors 0) for the parameters, which the joint posterior distribution of the parameters is proportional to the likelihood function and informative prior ( prior 1: a1 = 1.0, a2 = 3.0, a3 = 3.0, a4 = 5.0, b1 = 1.0, b2 = 1.0, b2 = 2.0, b2 = 1.0) are used. In all cases, we used the squared error loss function to compute the Bayes estimates. For these cases, we computed the MLEs and the 95% CIs for parameters and two bootstrap (BP and BT) with M = 500 also Bayes etimates with the help of MCMC method with NMC = 11000 and MMC = 1000. We repeated this process SN = 1000 times and computed the AVG values of estimates and corresponding MSE which presented in Table 4, the coverage probabilities (CP) and the average widths (AW) of 95% CIs for all the methods presented in Table

Table 4

The CPs and the AWs for the confidence interval of parameters

α1,θ1,α2,θ2) = (1.0, 3.0, 1.5, 5).(1.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0).
(n,m)rPa.MLBootstrap-pBootstrap-tMCMCproir 0MCMCproir 1
CPAWCPAWCPAWCPAWCPAW
(20,20)20α10.882.20120.892.33190.902.85470.892.19980.902.3336
θ10.895.45220.865.75990.904.48650.905.48210.914.3254
α20.892.51400.892.78510.912.49870.902.48620.922.2014
θ20.878.09920.888.32650.898.08930.908.10020.905.7475
30α10.902.14520.892.22400.912.85470.902.13250.932.0012
θ10.915.33250.905.52140.914.22070.925.30240.914.1128
α20.912.47210.892.53260.902.30210.912.46980.932.0985
θ20.907.09950.918.11010.906.99930.926.99500.915.2145
(30,30)30α10.912.12190.902.21140.922.10890.932.00050.912.0012
θ10.905.32890.915.45520.914.39250.925.28470.944.0154
α20.892.39900.922.49920.912.28540.922.38240.932.0238
θ20.917.10020.917.99280.936.88250.976.98930.945.1584
45α10.922.08540.932.18540.942.00290.931.99920.931.8214
θ10.915.14260.955.24520.954.22740.935.11280.944.0001
α20.902.30140.922.43120.972.26090.902.12870.942.0019
θ20.966.63250.937.48520.926.60120.966.60990.964.1224
(40,40)50α10.902.06250.912.18540.951.99720.951.96520.951.7420
θ10.935.12290.955.21190.944.12840.955.13360.923.429
α20.922.21540.932.41870.962.21190.932.10020.942.0002
θ20.896.42510.947.46240.916.42980.966.41110.954.1008
65α10.931.85200.932.10040.931.88740.931.82920.941.4890
θ10.925.00820.925.11890.914.11020.964.99300.903.2965
α20.922.14750.972.21810.962.18890.912.19300.951.8970
θ20.916.08520.917.33210.926.12840.956.18520.974.0958

7 Concluding remarks

The object of this study is to obtain the relative merits of two competing duration of different life products, so the comparative lifetime experiments are important. In this paper, we have discussed different estimation methods such as MLE, bootstrap and Bayesian estimation of unknown parameters of two Pareto distributions with the help of the MCMC method based on a jointly type-II censoring samples. A numerical example and simulation study are presented to stand on and compare the performance of the suggested methods developed in this paper. From the results, we observe the following.

  1. Numerical example and results in Tables 4 and 5 show that results of estimations problem of two Pareto distributions under jointly type-II censored scheme are acceptable.

  2. The Bayes estimation performs better than the MLEs and bootstrap.

  3. The results of MLE are close to one Bayes estimation under non-informative prior.

  4. When the effective sample size r increases, the MSEs of the estimators, reduces significantly for a fixed n1, m2.

Acknowledgement

This Project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no.(G-260-363-37). The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR for technical and financial support.

References

[1] Rao U.V.R., Savage I.R., Sobel M., Contributions to the theory of rank order statistics: the two-sample censored case, Ann. Math. Stat., 1960, 31, 415.10.1214/aoms/1177705904Search in Google Scholar

[2] Basu A.P., On a generalized savage statistic with applications to life testing, Ann. Math. Stat., 1968, 39, 1591.10.1214/aoms/1177698140Search in Google Scholar

[3] Johnson R.A., Mehrotra K.G., Locally most powerful rank tests for the two-sample problem with censored data, Ann. Math. Stat., 1972, 43, 823.10.1214/aoms/1177692548Search in Google Scholar

[4] Mehrotra K.G., Johnson R.A., Asymptotic sufficiency and asymptotically most powerful tests for the two sample censored situation, Ann. Stat., 1976, 4, 589.10.1214/aos/1176343464Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bhattacharyya G.K., Mehrotra K.G., On testing equality of two exponential distributions under combined type-IIcensoring, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1981, 76, 886.10.1080/01621459.1981.10477737Search in Google Scholar

[6] Mehrotra K.G., Bhattacharyya G.K., Confidence intervals with jointly type-II censored samples from two exponential distributions, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1982, 77, 441.10.1080/01621459.1982.10477830Search in Google Scholar

[7] Balakrishnan N., Rasouli A., Exact likelihood inference for two exponential populations under joint type-II censoring, Comput. Stat. Data. Anal., 2008, 52, 2725.10.1016/j.csda.2007.10.005Search in Google Scholar

[8] Rasouli A., Balakrishnan N., Exact likelihood inference for two exponential populations under joint progressive type-II censoring, Commun. Stat. Theory. Methods., 2010, 39, 2172.10.1080/03610920903009418Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ashafaya R., Balakrishnanbc N., Abdel-Atyd Y., Bayesian inference based on a jointly type-II censored sample from two exponential populations, J. Stat. Comp. Simul., 2014, 84, 242710.1080/00949655.2013.813025Search in Google Scholar

[10] Kundu D., A new two sample type-II progressive censoring scheme, arXiv:1609.05805v1, stat.ME., 2016,19.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ismail A., Abdel-Ghaly A.A., El-Khodary A.H., Optimum constant-stress life test plans for Pareto distribution under type-I censoring, J. Stat. Comp. Simul., 2011, 81, 1835.10.1080/00949655.2010.506440Search in Google Scholar

[12] Nofal Z.M., El Gebaly Y.M., New Characterizations of the Pareto Distribution, P. J. S. O. R., 2017, 13, 63.10.18187/pjsor.v13i1.1742Search in Google Scholar

[13] Mdziniso N.C.K., Cooray K., Odd Pareto families of distributions for modeling loss payment data, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2017.1280527, 2017.10.1080/03461238.2017.1280527Search in Google Scholar

[14] Balkema A.A., Haan L., Residual life time at great age, Ann. Probab., 1974, 2, 792.10.1214/aop/1176996548Search in Google Scholar

[15] Arnold B.C., Pareto distributions. Fairland, MD, International Cooperative Publishing House,1983.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Vidondo B., Prairie Y.T., Blanco J.M., Duarte C.M., Some aspects of the analysis of size spectra in aquatic ecology, Limnol Oceanogr, 1997, 42, 184.10.4319/lo.1997.42.1.0184Search in Google Scholar

[17] Childs A., Balakrishnan N., Moshref M., Order statistics from non-identical right truncated Lomax random variables with applications, Statist Papers, 2001, 42, 187.10.1007/s003620100050Search in Google Scholar

[18] Awadhi S.A., Ghitany M.E., Statistical properties of Poisso–Lomax distribution and its application to repeated accidents data, J. Appl. Statist. Sci., 2001, 10, 365.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Howlader H.A., Hossain A.M., Bayesian survival estimation of Pareto distribution of the second kind based on failurecensored data. Comput Stat Data, Comput. Stat. Data. Anal., 2002, 38.10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00039-1Search in Google Scholar

[20] Abd-Elfattah A.M., Alaboud F.M., Alharby A.H., On sample size estimation for Lomax distribution, Aust. J. Basic. Appl. Sci., 2007, 1, 373.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Hassan A.S., Al-Ghamdi A.S., Optimum step stress accelerated life testing for Lomax distribution, J. Appl. Sci. Res., 2009, 5, 2153.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Davison A.C., Hinkley D.V., Bootstrap Methods and their Applications, Cambridge University Press, 1997.10.1017/CBO9780511802843Search in Google Scholar

[23] Efron B., Tibshirani R.J., An introduction to the bootstrap, New York Chapman and Hall, 1993.10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9Search in Google Scholar

[24] Hall P., Theoretical comparison of bootstrap confidence intervals, Annals of Statistics, 1988, 16, 927.10.1214/aos/1176350933Search in Google Scholar

[25] Efron B., Censored data and bootstrap, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1981, 76, 312.10.1080/01621459.1981.10477650Search in Google Scholar

[26] Soliman A.A., Abd Ellah A.H., Abou-Elheggag N.A., Abd-Elmougod G.A. , A simulation-based approach to the study of coefficient of variation of Gompertz distribution under progressive first-failure censoring, Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2011, 42, 335.10.1007/s13226-011-0022-8Search in Google Scholar

[27] Abd-Elmougod G.A., El-Sayed M.A., Abdel-Rahman E.O., Coefficient of variation of Topp-Leone distribution under adaptive Type-II progressive censoring scheme: Bayesian and non-Bayesian approach, Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 2015, 12, 4028.10.1166/jctn.2015.4314Search in Google Scholar

[28] Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A.W., Rosenbluth M.N., Teller A.H., Teller E., Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines, J. Chem. Phys., 1953, 21, 1087.10.2172/4390578Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-1-3
Accepted: 2017-4-18
Published Online: 2017-8-10

© 2017 Hanaa H. Abu-Zinadah

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Analysis of a New Fractional Model for Damped Bergers’ Equation
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Optimal homotopy perturbation method for nonlinear differential equations governing MHD Jeffery-Hamel flow with heat transfer problem
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Semi- analytic numerical method for solution of time-space fractional heat and wave type equations with variable coefficients
  7. Regular Articles
  8. Investigation of a curve using Frenet frame in the lightlike cone
  9. Regular Articles
  10. Construction of complex networks from time series based on the cross correlation interval
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Nonlinear Schrödinger approach to European option pricing
  13. Regular Articles
  14. A modified cubic B-spline differential quadrature method for three-dimensional non-linear diffusion equations
  15. Regular Articles
  16. A new miniaturized negative-index meta-atom for tri-band applications
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Seismic stability of the survey areas of potential sites for the deep geological repository of the spent nuclear fuel
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Distributed containment control of heterogeneous fractional-order multi-agent systems with communication delays
  21. Regular Articles
  22. Sensitivity analysis and economic optimization studies of inverted five-spot gas cycling in gas condensate reservoir
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Quantum mechanics with geometric constraints of Friedmann type
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Modeling and Simulation for an 8 kW Three-Phase Grid-Connected Photo-Voltaic Power System
  27. Regular Articles
  28. Application of the optimal homotopy asymptotic method to nonlinear Bingham fluid dampers
  29. Regular Articles
  30. Analysis of Drude model using fractional derivatives without singular kernels
  31. Regular Articles
  32. An unsteady MHD Maxwell nanofluid flow with convective boundary conditions using spectral local linearization method
  33. Regular Articles
  34. New analytical solutions for conformable fractional PDEs arising in mathematical physics by exp-function method
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Quantum mechanical calculation of electron spin
  37. Regular Articles
  38. CO2 capture by polymeric membranes composed of hyper-branched polymers with dense poly(oxyethylene) comb and poly(amidoamine)
  39. Regular Articles
  40. Chain on a cone
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Multi-task feature learning by using trace norm regularization
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Superluminal tunneling of a relativistic half-integer spin particle through a potential barrier
  45. Regular Articles
  46. Neutrosophic triplet normed space
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Lie algebraic discussion for affinity based information diffusion in social networks
  49. Regular Articles
  50. Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in helical CT for pulmonary tuberculosis infections
  51. Regular Articles
  52. A comparison study of steady-state vibrations with single fractional-order and distributed-order derivatives
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Some new remarks on MHD Jeffery-Hamel fluid flow problem
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Numerical investigation of magnetohydrodynamic slip flow of power-law nanofluid with temperature dependent viscosity and thermal conductivity over a permeable surface
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Charge conservation in a gravitational field in the scalar ether theory
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Measurement problem and local hidden variables with entangled photons
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Compression of hyper-spectral images using an accelerated nonnegative tensor decomposition
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Fabrication and application of coaxial polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan nanofiber membranes
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Calculating degree-based topological indices of dominating David derived networks
  67. Regular Articles
  68. The structure and conductivity of polyelectrolyte based on MEH-PPV and potassium iodide (KI) for dye-sensitized solar cells
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Chiral symmetry restoration and the critical end point in QCD
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Numerical solution for fractional Bratu’s initial value problem
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Structure and optical properties of TiO2 thin films deposited by ALD method
  75. Regular Articles
  76. Quadruple multi-wavelength conversion for access network scalability based on cross-phase modulation in an SOA-MZI
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Application of ANNs approach for wave-like and heat-like equations
  79. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  80. Study on node importance evaluation of the high-speed passenger traffic complex network based on the Structural Hole Theory
  81. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  82. A mathematical/physics model to measure the role of information and communication technology in some economies: the Chinese case
  83. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  84. Numerical modeling of the thermoelectric cooler with a complementary equation for heat circulation in air gaps
  85. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  86. On the libration collinear points in the restricted three – body problem
  87. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  88. Research on Critical Nodes Algorithm in Social Complex Networks
  89. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  90. A simulation based research on chance constrained programming in robust facility location problem
  91. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  92. A mathematical/physics carbon emission reduction strategy for building supply chain network based on carbon tax policy
  93. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  94. Mathematical analysis of the impact mechanism of information platform on agro-product supply chain and agro-product competitiveness
  95. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  96. A real negative selection algorithm with evolutionary preference for anomaly detection
  97. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  98. A privacy-preserving parallel and homomorphic encryption scheme
  99. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  100. Random walk-based similarity measure method for patterns in complex object
  101. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  102. A Mathematical Study of Accessibility and Cohesion Degree in a High-Speed Rail Station Connected to an Urban Bus Transport Network
  103. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  104. Design and Simulation of the Integrated Navigation System based on Extended Kalman Filter
  105. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  106. Oil exploration oriented multi-sensor image fusion algorithm
  107. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  108. Analysis of Product Distribution Strategy in Digital Publishing Industry Based on Game-Theory
  109. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  110. Expanded Study on the accumulation effect of tourism under the constraint of structure
  111. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  112. Unstructured P2P Network Load Balance Strategy Based on Multilevel Partitioning of Hypergraph
  113. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  114. Research on the method of information system risk state estimation based on clustering particle filter
  115. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  116. Demand forecasting and information platform in tourism
  117. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  118. Physical-chemical properties studying of molecular structures via topological index calculating
  119. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  120. Local kernel nonparametric discriminant analysis for adaptive extraction of complex structures
  121. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  122. City traffic flow breakdown prediction based on fuzzy rough set
  123. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  124. Conservation laws for a strongly damped wave equation
  125. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  126. Blending type approximation by Stancu-Kantorovich operators based on Pólya-Eggenberger distribution
  127. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  128. Computing the Ediz eccentric connectivity index of discrete dynamic structures
  129. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  130. A discrete epidemic model for bovine Babesiosis disease and tick populations
  131. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  132. Study on maintaining formations during satellite formation flying based on SDRE and LQR
  133. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  134. Relationship between solitary pulmonary nodule lung cancer and CT image features based on gradual clustering
  135. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  136. A novel fast target tracking method for UAV aerial image
  137. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  138. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of interuniversity collaborative learning based on network
  139. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  140. Conservation laws, classical symmetries and exact solutions of the generalized KdV-Burgers-Kuramoto equation
  141. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  142. After notes on self-similarity exponent for fractal structures
  143. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  144. Excitation probability and effective temperature in the stationary regime of conductivity for Coulomb Glasses
  145. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  146. Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image
  147. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  148. Research on identification method of heavy vehicle rollover based on hidden Markov model
  149. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  150. Classifying BCI signals from novice users with extreme learning machine
  151. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  152. Topics on data transmission problem in software definition network
  153. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  154. Statistical inferences with jointly type-II censored samples from two Pareto distributions
  155. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  156. Estimation for coefficient of variation of an extension of the exponential distribution under type-II censoring scheme
  157. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  158. Analysis on trust influencing factors and trust model from multiple perspectives of online Auction
  159. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  160. Coupling of two-phase flow in fractured-vuggy reservoir with filling medium
  161. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  162. Production decline type curves analysis of a finite conductivity fractured well in coalbed methane reservoirs
  163. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  164. Flow Characteristic and Heat Transfer for Non-Newtonian Nanofluid in Rectangular Microchannels with Teardrop Dimples/Protrusions
  165. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  166. The size prediction of potential inclusions embedded in the sub-surface of fused silica by damage morphology
  167. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  168. Research on carbonate reservoir interwell connectivity based on a modified diffusivity filter model
  169. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  170. The method of the spatial locating of macroscopic throats based-on the inversion of dynamic interwell connectivity
  171. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  172. Unsteady mixed convection flow through a permeable stretching flat surface with partial slip effects through MHD nanofluid using spectral relaxation method
  173. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  174. A volumetric ablation model of EPDM considering complex physicochemical process in porous structure of char layer
  175. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  176. Numerical simulation on ferrofluid flow in fractured porous media based on discrete-fracture model
  177. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  178. Macroscopic lattice Boltzmann model for heat and moisture transfer process with phase transformation in unsaturated porous media during freezing process
  179. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  180. Modelling of intermittent microwave convective drying: parameter sensitivity
  181. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  182. Simulating gas-water relative permeabilities for nanoscale porous media with interfacial effects
  183. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  184. Simulation of counter-current imbibition in water-wet fractured reservoirs based on discrete-fracture model
  185. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  186. Investigation effect of wettability and heterogeneity in water flooding and on microscopic residual oil distribution in tight sandstone cores with NMR technique
  187. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  188. Analytical modeling of coupled flow and geomechanics for vertical fractured well in tight gas reservoirs
  189. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  190. Special Issue: Ever New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  191. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  192. The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
  193. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  194. Erratum to: The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
  195. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  196. Rhetoric, logic, and experiment in the quantum nonlocality debate
  197. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  198. What If Quantum Theory Violates All Mathematics?
  199. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  200. Relativity, anomalies and objectivity loophole in recent tests of local realism
  201. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  202. The photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments: computer models with single-wing selection
  203. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  204. Bohr against Bell: complementarity versus nonlocality
  205. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  206. Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell tests?
  207. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  208. Bell’s “Theorem”: loopholes vs. conceptual flaws
  209. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  210. Nonrecurrence and Bell-like inequalities
  211. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  212. Three-dimensional computer models of electrospinning systems
  213. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  214. Electric field computation and measurements in the electroporation of inhomogeneous samples
  215. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  216. Modelling of magnetostriction of transformer magnetic core for vibration analysis
  217. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  218. Comparison of the fractional power motor with cores made of various magnetic materials
  219. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  220. Dynamics of the line-start reluctance motor with rotor made of SMC material
  221. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  222. Inhomogeneous dielectrics: conformal mapping and finite-element models
  223. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  224. Topology optimization of induction heating model using sequential linear programming based on move limit with adaptive relaxation
  225. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  226. Detection of inter-turn short-circuit at start-up of induction machine based on torque analysis
  227. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  228. Current superimposition variable flux reluctance motor with 8 salient poles
  229. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  230. Modelling axial vibration in windings of power transformers
  231. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  232. Field analysis & eddy current losses calculation in five-phase tubular actuator
  233. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  234. Hybrid excited claw pole generator with skewed and non-skewed permanent magnets
  235. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  236. Electromagnetic phenomena analysis in brushless DC motor with speed control using PWM method
  237. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  238. Field-circuit analysis and measurements of a single-phase self-excited induction generator
  239. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  240. A comparative analysis between classical and modified approach of description of the electrical machine windings by means of T0 method
  241. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  242. Field-based optimal-design of an electric motor: a new sensitivity formulation
  243. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  244. Application of the parametric proper generalized decomposition to the frequency-dependent calculation of the impedance of an AC line with rectangular conductors
  245. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  246. Virtual reality as a new trend in mechanical and electrical engineering education
  247. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  248. Holonomicity analysis of electromechanical systems
  249. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  250. An accurate reactive power control study in virtual flux droop control
  251. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  252. Localized probability of improvement for kriging based multi-objective optimization
  253. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  254. Research of influence of open-winding faults on properties of brushless permanent magnets motor
  255. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  256. Optimal design of the rotor geometry of line-start permanent magnet synchronous motor using the bat algorithm
  257. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  258. Model of depositing layer on cylindrical surface produced by induction-assisted laser cladding process
  259. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  260. Detection of inter-turn faults in transformer winding using the capacitor discharge method
  261. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  262. A novel hybrid genetic algorithm for optimal design of IPM machines for electric vehicle
  263. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  264. Lamination effects on a 3D model of the magnetic core of power transformers
  265. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  266. Detection of vertical disparity in three-dimensional visualizations
  267. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  268. Calculations of magnetic field in dynamo sheets taking into account their texture
  269. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  270. 3-dimensional computer model of electrospinning multicapillary unit used for electrostatic field analysis
  271. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  272. Optimization of wearable microwave antenna with simplified electromagnetic model of the human body
  273. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  274. Induction heating process of ferromagnetic filled carbon nanotubes based on 3-D model
  275. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  276. Speed control of an induction motor by 6-switched 3-level inverter
Downloaded on 12.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2017-0064/html
Scroll to top button