Home A comparison study of steady-state vibrations with single fractional-order and distributed-order derivatives
Article Open Access

A comparison study of steady-state vibrations with single fractional-order and distributed-order derivatives

  • Jun-Sheng Duan EMAIL logo , Cui-Ping Cheng and Lian Chen
Published/Copyright: December 29, 2017

Abstract

We conduct a detailed study and comparison for the one-degree-of-freedom steady-state vibrations under harmonic driving with a single fractional-order derivative and a distributed-order derivative. For each of the two vibration systems, we consider the stiffness contribution factor and damping contribution factor of the term of fractional derivatives, the amplitude and the phase difference for the response. The effects of driving frequency on these response quantities are discussed. Also the influences of the order α of the fractional derivative and the parameter γ parameterizing the weight function in the distributed-order derivative are analyzed. Two cases display similar response behaviors, but the stiffness contribution factor and damping contribution factor of the distributed-order derivative are almost monotonic change with the parameter γ, not exactly like the case of single fractional-order derivative for the order α. The case of the distributed-order derivative provides us more options for the weight function and parameters.

1 Introduction

In recent decades, fractional calculus has been applied to describe memory phenomena and hereditary properties of various materials and processes in different fields of science and engineering. These areas of application cover viscoelasticity theory, non-Newtonian flow, anomalous diffusion, control theory, image processing, capacitor theory, fitting of experimental data, and so on [1, 2, 3, 4]. In recent years, even fractional-order models of happiness [5] and love [6] have been developed, and they are claimed to give a better representation than the integer-order dynamical systems approach.

Viscoelasticity theory is one of the earliest and most active application areas of fractional calculus. The wide use of polymers in fields of engineering has promoted the development of this subject.

In fact, the introducing of the fractional calculus to viscoelastic theory is very natural [7]. Scott-Blair [8, 9, 10] suggested a fractional constitutive relation for a viscoelastic body, which reflects mechanical properties between elastic solids and viscous fluids. Such fractional model was called as the Scott-Blair model [3, 11]. In [12], the terminology “spring-pot” was introduced for the Scott-Blair model.

Fractional oscillator and related models and equations were presented and investigated by Caputo [13], Bagley and Torvik [14], Beyer and Kempfle [15], Mainardi [16], Gorenflo and Mainardi [17], and others [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. Achar et al. [18] considered response feature for fractional oscillator. Lim et al. [19] considered the relationship between fractional vibration and fractional Brownian movement. Lim and Teo [20] proposed fractional process by using a stochastic differential equation of fractional-order. Li et al. [21] investigated impulse response and system stability for a type of fractional oscillation. Shen et al. [22, 23], Huang and Duan [24] and Duan et al. [25] deliberated the dynamics and resonance phenomenon for fractional-order vibration. A fractional dynamical system and its stability problem and chaotic behaviors were analyzed by Li et al. [26], Zhang et al. [27], Wang and Hu [28], Huang et al. [29] and Wu et al. [30]. Li and Ma [31] presented a linearization and stability theorem for nonlinear fractional system.

Let us recall the basic definitions of fractional calculus. Suppose f(t) is piecewise continuous on (b, +∞) and integrable on any subinterval (b, t). The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of f(t) of order α is defined as [1, 2, 3, 4]:

bJtαf(t):=bt(ts)α1Γ(α)f(s)ds,α>0,(1)

where Γ(.) is the Euler’s gamma function and is defined as the infinite integral

Γ(z)=0+exxz1dx,z>0.(2)

Next we write down the expression for the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of f(t) of order α,

bRLDtαf(t):=dndtnbJtnαf(t),n1<α<n,(3)

Let f(n)(t) be piecewise continuous on (b, +∞) and integrable on any subinterval (b, t). The Caputo fractional derivative of f(t) of order α is defined as

bCDtαf(t):=bJtnαf(n)(t),n1<α<n,(4)

We note that existence of solution of a fractional differential equation was investigated by Podlubny [1], Baleanu et al. [32] and Baleanu and Mustafa [33]. Analytical and numerical methods for solving fractional differential equations were presented in references [1, 2, 4, 16, 17, 34, 35, 36].

In most of the above-mentioned articles, the lower limit b of integration in fractional integral and derivative was taken as zero. So the initial conditions are necessary for solving of fractional-order differential equations. In general, this kind of problem does not admit any periodic solution [16, 17, 37, 38, 39, 40].

Distributed-order derivatives, which are defined by means of integration with respect to the order of fractional derivatives, were presented and discussed in terms of filtering by Caputo [41]. In [42], distributed-order differential equations were introduced to constitutive relations of dielectric media and to a diffusion model. In [43, 44], distributed-order differential equations were solved by introducing a generalized Taylor series representation of solutions. In [45, 46], the relations of viscoelastic bodies were discussed by using distributed-order derivatives.

For the sake of convenient reference, we recall the classic integer-order one-degree-of-freedom vibration subject to a harmonic excitation,

x¨+kx+cx˙=Feiωt,(5)

where k,c,F,ω are positive constants and i is the imaginary unit. The steady response is

x(t)=Feiωtkω2+iωc=Fei(ωtφ)(kω2)2+(ωc)2,(6)

where φ is the phase difference between the excitation and the response and is determined by the following equation,

φ=arctanωckω2,kω2>0,π/2,kω2=0,π+arctanωckω2,kω2<0.(7)

For vibration responses, we are usually more interested in the steady-state response. We remark that if the lower limits b in the two definitions of fractional derivatives are taken as −∞, then (3) and (4) are identical. We denote them asDtαf(t)uniformly.

In this work, we conduct a comparative study for fractional vibration systems with single fractional-order derivative and distributed-order derivative. We consider the steady-state responses to the harmonic excitation by using the fractional-order derivative operator Dtα. In Section 2, we consider the steady-state vibration of a system with single fractional-order derivative. In Section 3, the system with distributed-order derivative is taken into account. In Section 4, two special cases belonging to two different systems in Section 2 and Section 3, respectively, are compared.

2 Steady-state vibration with single fractional-order derivative

Suppose a mass block m slides on a frictionless surface. It is attached to a spring of stiffness factor k in parallel with a dashpot of damping coefficient c and a viscoelastic rod of length l, whose constitutive relation obeys Scott-Blair law. We consider the steady-state vibration of the block under the harmonic driving Feiωt.

The one-degree-of-freedom vibration system is written as

mx¨+kx+cx˙+GταDtαx=Feiωt,(8)

where m,k,c,G,τ,F,ω are positive real constants and 0 ≤ α ≤ 1. If α = 0 or 1, Dtαx denotes x or χ̇, respectively.

Introducing the dimensionless variables and parameters

tτt,xlx,τ2kmk,τcmc,τ2GmG,τ2FmlF,τωω,

we derive the dimensionless form for the vibration system

x¨+kx+cx˙+GDtαx=Feiωt.(9)

We look for the steady-state same frequency response of the system as

x(t)=Xeiωt,(10)

where X is independent of t and is called as the complex amplitude.

Substituting the first- and second-order derivatives of x(t) and the fractional derivative

Dtαxt=Xiωαeiωt,(11)

into Eq.(9), we achieve the equation

Xkω2+iωc+G(iω)α=F.(12)

By the identity iα=cosπα2+isinπα2,Eq. (12) is written as

Xk+Gωαcosπα2ω2+iωc+Gωα1sinπα2=F.(13)

Inserting Eq. (10) results in the steady-state response

x(t)=Feiωt/k+Gωαcosπα2ω2+iωc+Gωα1sinπα2.(14)

By comparison with the results of the integer-order case in Eq. (6), we derive the equivalent stiffness coefficient and the equivalent damping coefficient and denote them as

k~=k+Gωαcosπα2,c~=c+Gωα1sinπα2.(15)

So the steady-state response is expressed as

x(t)=Feiωtk~ω2+iωc~.(16)

Making use of the exponential representation of complex number, we rewrite the steady-state response as

xt=Feiωtφ(k~ω2)2+(ωc~)2,(17)

where φ is the phase difference between the excitation and the response and is determined by the following

φ=arctanωc~k~ω2,k~ω2>0,π/2,k~ω2=0,π+arctanωc~k~ω2,k~ω2<0.(18)

2.1 The stiffness contribution factor and damping contribution factor

The equivalent stiffness factor and damping factor in Eq. (15) mean that the steady-state response of the fractional vibration system (9) is equivalent to that of the integer-order system

x¨+k~x+c~x˙=Feiωt.(19)

We call

k~k=Gωαcos(πα2),c~c=Gωα1sin(πα2),(20)

as the stiffness contribution factor and damping contribution factor of the fractional derivative term GDtαx, respectively. They are all positive. The stiffness contribution factor k is an increasing function of the driving frequency ω, while the damping contribution factor c is an decreasing function of the driving frequency ω.

Figures 1 and 2 show, respectively, the stiffness contribution factor k and damping contribution factor c versus ω for G = 1 and α = 0.25, 0.5, 0.75.

Figure 1 The stiffness contribution factor k̃−k versus α for different values of ω:  0.25 (solid line), 0.5 (dot line), 0.75 (dash line)
Figure 1

The stiffness contribution factor k versus α for different values of ω: 0.25 (solid line), 0.5 (dot line), 0.75 (dash line)

Figure 2 The damping contribution factor c̃− c versus α for  different values of  ω: 0.25 (solid line), 0.5 (dot line), 0.75 (dash line)
Figure 2

The damping contribution factor c versus α for different values of ω: 0.25 (solid line), 0.5 (dot line), 0.75 (dash line)

In order to investigate the dependence of k and c on the order α, we calculate the derivatives

d(k~k)dα=Gωαcos(πα2)ln(ω)π2tan(πα2),(21)

and

d(c~c)dα=Gωα1sin(πα2)ln(ω)+π2cot(πα2).(22)

It follows from Eq. (21) that when 0 < ω ≤ 1, k monotonically decreases as α increases, while when ω > 1, k firstly increases then decreases on the interval 0 ≤ α < 1; see Figure 3, where the curves of k versus α are shown for G = 1 and different values of ω. From Eq. (22) we deduce that if 0 < ω < 1, c increases followed by decreasing on the interval 0 ≤ α ≤ 1, while if ω ≥ 1, c is a monotonically increasing function of α; see Figure 4, where the curves of c versus α are shown for G = 1 and different values of ω.

Figure 3 The stiffness contribution factor k̃ − k versus α for different values of ω:  0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 3 (dot-dash-line) and 6 (dot-dot-dash line)
Figure 3

The stiffness contribution factor k versus α for different values of ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 3 (dot-dash-line) and 6 (dot-dot-dash line)

Figure 4 The damping contribution factor c̃ − c versus α for  different values of  ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line)and 3 (dotdash line) and 6 (dot-dot-dash line)
Figure 4

The damping contribution factor c versus α for different values of ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line)and 3 (dotdash line) and 6 (dot-dot-dash line)

2.2 Amplitude and phase difference

The amplitude of the response is obtained from Eqs. (15) and (17) as

xt=F/k+Gωαcosπα2ω22+ωc+Gωαsinπα221/2.(23)

We take k = 1.2, c = 0.1, F = G = 1, the curves of amplitudes |x (t)| versus the driving frequency ω are shown in Figure 5 for different values of the order α. The curves of amplitude |x (t)| versus the order α are shown in Figure 6 for different values of the driving frequency ω. We observe that as α increases, resonance peaks and resonance frequencies decrease. Increasing and decreasing of the amplitude with the order α depend on the frequency region.

Figure 5 The  amplitude |x (t)| versus  α for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, F = G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.1 (solid line), 0.2 (dot line), 0.4 (dash line), 0.6 (dot-dash line), 0.8 (dot-dot-dash line) and 1 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)
Figure 5

The amplitude |x (t)| versus α for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, F = G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.1 (solid line), 0.2 (dot line), 0.4 (dash line), 0.6 (dot-dash line), 0.8 (dot-dot-dash line) and 1 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)

Figure 6 The  amplitude |x (t)| versus  α for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, F = G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 1.3 (dot-dash line), 1.6 (dot-dot-dash line) and 2 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)
Figure 6

The amplitude |x (t)| versus α for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, F = G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 1.3 (dot-dash line), 1.6 (dot-dot-dash line) and 2 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)

In Figures 7 and 8, the curves of phase-difference φ in Eq. (18) versus the frequency ω and versus the order α are shown for the same parameter values as in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. As the driving frequency ω increases, the phase-difference φ increases from 0 to π, and the variation is more abrupt for small α. The changing of the phase-difference with the order α relies on the frequency region.

Figure 7 Curves of φ versus ω for k = 1.2,  c = 0.1, F = G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.1  (solid line), 0.2 (dot line), 0.4 (dash line), 0.6 (dot-dash line), 0.8 (dot-dot-dash line) and 1 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)
Figure 7

Curves of φ versus ω for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, F = G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.1 (solid line), 0.2 (dot line), 0.4 (dash line), 0.6 (dot-dash line), 0.8 (dot-dot-dash line) and 1 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)

Figure 8 Curves of φ versus ω for  k = 1.2,  c = 0.1, F = G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.3  (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 1.3 (dot-dash line), 1.6 (dot-dot-dash line) and 2 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)
Figure 8

Curves of φ versus ω for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, F = G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 1.3 (dot-dash line), 1.6 (dot-dot-dash line) and 2 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)

3 Steady-state vibration with distributed-order derivative

We suppose the acting force of the viscoelastic rod in the vibration system (8) in Section 2 is expressed as an integration of the Scott-Blair model with respect to the order, i.e. a distributed-order derivative as

01p(λ)GτλDtλxdλ,

where p(λ) is the weight distribution function of the order and satisfies the following identities,

p(λ)0,0λ1;01p(λ)dλ=1.(24)

Then the dimensionless vibration system in Eq. (9) is modified as

x¨+kx+cx˙+G01p(λ)Dtλxdλ=Feiωt.(25)

The weight distribution function of the order p(λ) can be given in infinitely many ways. Here we take it as an exponential function with the constant base μ as a parameter,

p(λ)=C(μ)μλ,0<μ<+,(26)

where the coefficient is given as

C(μ)=lnμμ1,μ1,1,μ=1.(27)

It is easy to check that p(λ) in Eq. (26) satisfies the conditions in (24). We remark that such selection of the weight distribution function is for the sake of calculation. Also we note that if we take the weight distribution function p (λ) as the Dirac delta distribution δ(λ−α), Eq. (25) is derived from the system with the distributed-order (25).

Similar to the last section, with the assumption

x(t)=Xeiωt,(28)

we derive the relation for the complex amplitude X as

Xkω2+iωc+GC(μ)01(iμω)λdλ=F.(29)

Calculating the integration yields

Xk+GC(μ)2πμω4ln(μω)4ln2(μω)+π2ω2+iωc+GC(μ)4μωln(μω)+2π4ωln2(μω)+π2ω=F.(30)

On substitution into Eq. (28) we obtain

x(t)=Feiωt/k+GC(μ)2πμω4ln(μω)4ln2(μω)+π2ω2+iωc+GC(μ)4μωln(μω)+2π4ωln2(μω)+π2ω.(31)

The equivalent stiffness factor and damping factor are derived as

k^=k+2GC(μ)πμω2ln(μω)4ln2(μω)+π2,(32)

and

c^=c+2GC(μ)2μωln(μω)+π4ωln2(μω)+π2ω.(33)

Accordingly, the steady-state response of the system is

xt=Feiωtk^ω2+iωc^=Feiωtφ(k^ω2)2+(ωc^)2,(34)

where the phase difference between the excitation and response is determined as

φ=arctanωc^k^ω2,k^ω2>0,π/2,k^ω2=0,π+arctanωc^k^ω2,k^ω2<0.(35)

For the sake of comparison and valuation, we apply the replacement

μ=tanπγ2.(36)

So we convert the infinite interval of μ: 0< μ < +∞ into the finite interval of γ: 0 < γ < 1. Since μ is a constant in the above derivation, such replacement is allowable.

We remark that there are an infinite number of ways to perform such replacement as in Eq. (36).

The weight function parameterized by γ is

p(λ)=p(λ;γ)=C(tanπγ2)tanπγ2γ,(37)

0< γ < 1. In Figure 9, the curves of the weight functions p(λ) are shown for different parameters γ.

Figure 9 The curves of p(λ) versus λ for different values of γ: 0.01 (solid line), 0.2 (dot line), 0.5 (dash line), 0.8 (dot-dash line) and 0.99 (dot-dot-dash line)
Figure 9

The curves of p(λ) versus λ for different values of γ: 0.01 (solid line), 0.2 (dot line), 0.5 (dash line), 0.8 (dot-dash line) and 0.99 (dot-dot-dash line)

3.1 The stiffness contribution factor and damping contribution factor

It follows from Eqs. (32) and (33) that the stiffness contribution factor and damping contribution factor of the distributed-order derivative term are

k^k=2GC(μ)πμω2ln(μω)4ln2(μω)+π2,(38)

and

c^c=2GC(μ)2μωln(μω)+π4ωln2(μω)+π2ω,(39)

respectively.

It is easy to prove that

πy2lny>0,2ylny+π>0,fory>0.

So the stiffness contribution factor and damping contribution factor are all positive. By substituting μ → tan πγ2, we have

k^k=2GC(tanπγ2)πωtanπγ22ln(ωtanπγ2)4ln2(ωtanπγ2)+π2,c^c=2GC(tanπγ2)2ωtanπγ2ln(ωtanπγ2)+π4ωln2(ωtanπγ2)+π2ω.(40)

In Figures 10 and 11, the curves of the stiffness contribution factor k and damping contribution factor c versus ω are shown for G = 1 and γ = 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9, respectively.

Figure 10 The stiffness contribution factork̃ − k versus ω for G = 1 and different values of γ: 0.1 (solid line), 0.25 (dot line), 0.5 (dash line), 0.75 (dot-dash line) and 0.9 (dot-dot-dash line)
Figure 10

The stiffness contribution factork versus ω for G = 1 and different values of γ: 0.1 (solid line), 0.25 (dot line), 0.5 (dash line), 0.75 (dot-dash line) and 0.9 (dot-dot-dash line)

Figure 11 The damping contribution factor c̃ − c versus ω for G = 1 and different values of γ: 0.1 (solid line), 0.25 (dot line), 0.5 (dash line), 0.75 (dot-dash line) and 0.9 (dot-dot-dash line)
Figure 11

The damping contribution factor c versus ω for G = 1 and different values of γ: 0.1 (solid line), 0.25 (dot line), 0.5 (dash line), 0.75 (dot-dash line) and 0.9 (dot-dot-dash line)

Figures 12 and 13 show, respectively, the stiffness contribution factor k and damping contribution factor c versus γ for G = 1 and ω = 0.3, 0.6, 1, 3, 6.

Figure 12 The stiffness contribution factork̃ − k versus γ for G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 3 (dot-dash line) and 6 (dot-dot-dash line)
Figure 12

The stiffness contribution factork versus γ for G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 3 (dot-dash line) and 6 (dot-dot-dash line)

Figure 13 The damping contribution factor c̃ − c versus γ for G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 3 (dot-dash line) and 6 (dot-dot-dash line)
Figure 13

The damping contribution factor c versus γ for G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 3 (dot-dash line) and 6 (dot-dot-dash line)

In contrast to Figures 3 and 4, the curves in Figure 12 are monotonic decreasing apart from a small part on the left in the case of ω = 6 , and the curves in Figure 13 are monotonic increasing.

3.2 Amplitude and phase difference

From Eq. (34), the amplitude of the response is

|xt|=F(k^ω2)2+(ωc^)2.(41)

In Figure 14 and 15, the curves of the amplitudes |x (t)| versus ω and versus γ are shown for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, F = G = 1 and different values of γ and ω, respectively. The resonance peaks descend as the parameter γ increases. This implies that increasing of γ enhances the system damping. The increasing and decreasing of the amplitudes |x (t)| with the parameter γ rely on the driving frequency ω. In the low-frequency region, the amplitudes |x (t)| is an increasing function of γ, while {in} the high-frequency region, the amplitudes |x (t)| is an decreasing function of γ.

Figure 14 The amplitude |x (t)| versus ω for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, F = G = 1 and different values of γ: 0.01 (solid line), 0.1 (dot line), 0.4 (dash line), 0.7 (dot-dash line), 0.9 (dot-dot-dash line) and 0.99 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)
Figure 14

The amplitude |x (t)| versus ω for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, F = G = 1 and different values of γ: 0.01 (solid line), 0.1 (dot line), 0.4 (dash line), 0.7 (dot-dash line), 0.9 (dot-dot-dash line) and 0.99 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)

Figure 15 The amplitude |x (t)| versus γ for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, F = G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 1.3 (dot-dash line), 1.6 (dot-dot-dash line) and 2 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)
Figure 15

The amplitude |x (t)| versus γ for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, F = G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 1.3 (dot-dash line), 1.6 (dot-dot-dash line) and 2 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)

In Figures 16 and 17, the curves of phase difference φ in Eq. (35) versus ω and versus γ are shown for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, G = 1 and different values of γ and ω, respectively. Similar behaviors to Figures 7 and 8 are displayed.

Figure 16 Curves of φ versus ω for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, G = 1 and different values of γ: 0.01 (solid line), 0.1 (dot line), 0.4 (dash line), 0.7 (dot-dash line), 0.9 (dot-dot-dash line) and 0.99 (dot-dot-dashdash line)
Figure 16

Curves of φ versus ω for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, G = 1 and different values of γ: 0.01 (solid line), 0.1 (dot line), 0.4 (dash line), 0.7 (dot-dash line), 0.9 (dot-dot-dash line) and 0.99 (dot-dot-dashdash line)

Figure 17 Curves of φ versus γ for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 1.3 (dot-dash line), 1.6 (dot-dot-dash line) and 2 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)
Figure 17

Curves of φ versus γ for k = 1.2, c = 0.1, G = 1 and different values of ω: 0.3 (solid line), 0.6 (dot line), 1 (dash line), 1.3 (dot-dash line), 1.6 (dot-dot-dash line) and 2 (dot-dot-dash-dash line)

4 A comparison of single half order and uniform distributed-order

We consider two special cases, one with the single half order derivative,

x¨+kx+cx˙+GDt1/2x=Feiωt,(42)

and another with the uniform distributed-order derivative,

x¨+kx+cx˙+G01Dtλxdλ=Feiωt.(43)

For the system (42), the equivalent stiffness and damping factors are

k~=k+Gω2,c~=c+G12ω.(44)

We denote the response amplitude and the phase difference as A(ω) and φ(ω).

For the system (43), the equivalent stiffness and damping factors are

k^=k+2Gπω2ln(ω)4ln2(ω)+π2,c^=c+2G2ωln(ω)+π4ωln2(ω)+π2ω.(45)

We denote the response amplitude and the phase difference as B(ω) and θ(ω).

We take F = G = k = 1, c = 0.1 and 1, respectively, the amplitudes A(ω) and B(ω) are plotted in Figure 18, and the phase difference φ(ω) and θ(ω) are plotted in Figure 19. The two cases display similar variation trend and dependence on the driving frequency. When c = 0.1 the case of uniform distributed-order shows a higher resonance peak than the case of single half order.

Figure 18 The amplitude A (solid line and dash line) and the amplitude B (dot line and dot-dash line) (F = G = 1)
Figure 18

The amplitude A (solid line and dash line) and the amplitude B (dot line and dot-dash line) (F = G = 1)

Figure 19 The phase difference φ (solid line and dash line) and θ (dot line and dot-dash line) (G = 1)
Figure 19

The phase difference φ (solid line and dash line) and θ (dot line and dot-dash line) (G = 1)

5 Conclusions

We considered the steady-state response to harmonic driving for two types of fractional one-degree-of-freedom systems, one with a single fractional-order derivative and another with a distributed-order derivative. The first case was examined in Section 2, where the stiffness contribution factor and damping contribution factor of the fractional derivatives, the response amplitude and phase difference were explored, especially for their relevance to the driving frequency and the order α of the fractional derivative. In Section 3, such problems were investigated for the system with a distributed-order derivative, where the weight function is parameterized by μ or γ. In Section 4, we displayed the results of systems with single half order derivative and uniform distributed-order derivative in the same figures.

The two types of systems display similar response behaviors, but the stiffness contribution factor and damping contribution factor of the distributed-order derivative are almost monotonic varying with the parameter γ on the interval (0, 1) in the weight function p(λ), not exactly like the case of single fractional-order derivative with the order α on the interval [0, 1]. The case of the distributed-order derivative provides us more options for the weight function and involved parameters.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11772203) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No.17ZR1430000).

References

[1] Podlubny I., Fractional differential equations, Academic, San Diego, 1999Search in Google Scholar

[2] Kilbas A.A., Srivastava H.M., Trujillo J.J., Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006Search in Google Scholar

[3] Mainardi F., Fractional calculus and waves in linear viscoelasticity, Imperial College, London, 201010.1142/p614Search in Google Scholar

[4] Băleanu D., Diethelm K., Scalas E., Trujillo J.J., Fractional calculus models and numerical methods – Series on complexity, nonlinearity and chaos, World Scientific, Boston, 201210.1142/8180Search in Google Scholar

[5] Song L., Xu S., Yang J., Dynamical models of happiness with fractional order, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 2010, 15, 616-62810.1016/j.cnsns.2009.04.029Search in Google Scholar

[6] Gu R., Xu Y., Chaos in a fractional-order dynamical model of love and its control, In: Li S., Wang X., Okazaki Y., Kawabe J., Murofushi T., Guan L. (Eds.), Nonlinear mathematics for uncertainty and its applications – Advances in intelligent and soft computing, Vol. 100, Springer, Berlin, 2011, 349-35610.1007/978-3-642-22833-9_42Search in Google Scholar

[7] Rossikhin Y.A., Shitikova M.V., Applications of fractional calculus to dynamic problems of linear and nonlinear hereditary mechanisms of solids, Appl. Mech. Rev., 1997, 50, 15-6710.1115/1.3101682Search in Google Scholar

[8] Scott-Blair G.W., Analytical and integrative aspects of the stress-strain-time problem, J. Scientific Instruments, 1944, 21, 80-8410.1088/0950-7671/21/5/302Search in Google Scholar

[9] Scott-Blair G.W., The role of psychophysics in rheology, J. Colloid Sciences, 1947, 2, 21-3210.1016/0095-8522(47)90007-XSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Scott-Blair G.W., Survey of general and applied rheology, Pitman, London, 1949Search in Google Scholar

[11] Bland D.R., The theory of linear viscoelasticity, Pergamon, Oxford, 1960Search in Google Scholar

[12] Koeller R.C., Applications of fractional calculus to the theory of viscoelasticity, J. Appl. Mech., 1984, 51, 299-30710.1115/1.3167616Search in Google Scholar

[13] Caputo M., Linear models of dissipation whose Q is almost frequency independent, Part II, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 1967, 13, 529-53910.1111/j.1365-246X.1967.tb02303.xSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Bagley R.L., Torvik P.J., A generalized derivative model for an elastomer damper, Shock Vib. Bull., 1979, 49, 135-143Search in Google Scholar

[15] Beyer H., Kempfle S., Definition of physically consistent damping laws with fractional derivatives, ZAMM-Z. Angew Math. Mech., 1995, 75, 623-63510.1002/zamm.19950750820Search in Google Scholar

[16] Mainardi F., Fractional relaxation-oscillation and fractional diffusion-wave phenomena, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 1996, 7, 1461-147710.1016/0960-0779(95)00125-5Search in Google Scholar

[17] Gorenflo R., Mainardi F., Fractional calculus: integral and differential equations of fractional order, In: Carpinteri A., Mainardi F. (Eds.), Fractals and fractional calculus in continuum mechanics, Springer-Verlag, Wien/New York, 1997, 223-27610.1007/978-3-7091-2664-6_5Search in Google Scholar

[18] Achar B.N.N., Hanneken J.W., Clarke T., Response characteristics of a fractional oscillator, Phys. A, 2002, 309, 275-28810.1016/S0378-4371(02)00609-XSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Lim S.C., Li M., Teo L.P., Locally self-similar fractional oscillator processess, Fluct. Noise Lett., 2007, 7, L169-L17910.1142/S0219477507003817Search in Google Scholar

[20] Lim S.C., Teo L.P., The fractional oscillator process with two indices, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 2009, 42, 06520810.1088/1751-8113/42/6/065208Search in Google Scholar

[21] Li M., Lim S.C., Chen S., Exact solution of impulse response to a class of fractional oscillators and its stability, Math. Probl. Eng., 2011, 2011, 65783910.1155/2011/657839Search in Google Scholar

[22] Shen Y.J., Yang S.P., Xing H.J., Dynamical analysis of linear single degree-of-freedom oscillator with fractional-order derivative, Acta Phys. Sin., 2012, 61, 110505-1-610.7498/aps.61.110505Search in Google Scholar

[23] Shen Y., Yang S., Xing H., Gao G., Primary resonance of Duffing oscillator with fractional-order derivative, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 2012, 17, 3092-310010.1016/j.cnsns.2011.11.024Search in Google Scholar

[24] Huang C., Duan J.S., Steady-state response to periodic excitation in fractional vibration system, J. Mech., 2016, 32, 25-3310.1017/jmech.2015.89Search in Google Scholar

[25] Duan J.S., Huang C., Liu L.L., Response of a fractional nonlinear system to harmonic excitation by the averaging method, Open Phys., 2015, 13, 177-18210.1515/phys-2015-0020Search in Google Scholar

[26] Li C.P., Deng W.H., Xu D., Chaos synchronization of the Chua system with a fractional order, Phys. A, 2006, 360, 171-18510.1016/j.physa.2005.06.078Search in Google Scholar

[27] Zhang W., Liao S.K., Shimizu N., Dynamic behaviors of nonlinear fractional-order differential oscillator, J. Mech. Sci. Tech., 2009, 23, 1058-106410.1007/s12206-009-0341-4Search in Google Scholar

[28] Wang Z.H., Hu H.Y., Stability of a linear oscillator with damping force of the fractional-order derivative, Sci. China Ser. G, 2010, 53, 345-35210.1007/s11433-009-0291-ySearch in Google Scholar

[29] Huang L.L., Wu G.C., Rashidi M.M., Luo W.H., Chaos analysis of the nonlinear duffing oscillators based on the new Adomian polynomials, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 2016, 9, 1877-188110.22436/jnsa.009.04.41Search in Google Scholar

[30] Wu G.C., Baleanu D., Xie H.P., Chen F.L., Chaos synchronization of fractional chaotic maps based on the stability condition, Physica A, 2016, 460, 374-38310.1016/j.physa.2016.05.045Search in Google Scholar

[31] Li C., Ma Y., Fractional dynamical system and its linearization theorem, Nonlinear Dynam., 2013, 71, 621-63310.1007/s11071-012-0601-1Search in Google Scholar

[32] Băleanu D., Mustafa O.G., Agarwal R.P., An existence result for a superlinear fractional differential equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 2010, 23, 1129-113210.1016/j.aml.2010.04.049Search in Google Scholar

[33] Băleanu D., Mustafa O.G., On the global existence of solutions to a class of fractional differential equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 2010, 59, 1835-184110.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.028Search in Google Scholar

[34] Kumar D., Singh J., Baleanu D., A new analysis for fractional model of regularized long-wave equation arising in ion acoustic plasma waves, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 2017, 40, 5642-565310.1002/mma.4414Search in Google Scholar

[35] Yaseen M., Abbas M., Nazir T., Baleanu D., A finite difference scheme based on cubic trigonometric B-splines for a time fractional diffusion-wave equation, Adv. Difference Equ., 2017, 2017, 27410.1186/s13662-017-1330-zSearch in Google Scholar

[36] Zeng S., Baleanu D., Bai Y., Wu G., Fractional differential equations of Caputo-Katugampola type and numerical solutions, Appl. Math. Comput., 2017, 315, 549-55410.1016/j.amc.2017.07.003Search in Google Scholar

[37] Kaslik E., Sivasundaram S., Non-existence of periodic solutions in fractional-order dynamical systems and a remarkable difference between integer and fractional-order derivatives of periodic functions, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 2012, 13, 1489-149710.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.11.013Search in Google Scholar

[38] Duan J.S., Wang Z., Liu Y.L., Qiu X., Eigenvalue problems for fractional ordinary differential equations, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 2013, 46, 46-5310.1016/j.chaos.2012.11.004Search in Google Scholar

[39] Agarwal R.P., Andrade B.D., Cuevas C., Weighted pseudo-almost periodic solutions of a class of semilinear fractional differential equations, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 2010, 11, 3532-355410.1016/j.nonrwa.2010.01.002Search in Google Scholar

[40] Liu L.L., Duan J.S., A detailed analysis for the fundamental solution of fractional vibration equation, Open Math., 2015, 13, 826-83810.1515/math-2015-0077Search in Google Scholar

[41] Caputo M., Mean fractional-order-derivatives differential equations and filters, Annali dell’Università di Ferrara, 1995, 41, 73-8410.1007/BF02826009Search in Google Scholar

[42] Caputo M., Distributed order differential equations modelling dielectric induction and diffusion, Frac. Calc. Appl. Anal., 2001, 4, 421-442Search in Google Scholar

[43] Bagley R.L., Torvik P.J., On the existence of the order domain and the solution of distributed order equations – Part I, Int. J. Appl. Math., 2000, 2, 865-882Search in Google Scholar

[44] Bagley R.L., Torvik P.J., On the existence of the order domain and the solution of distributed order equations – Part II, Int. J. Appl. Math., 2000, 2, 965-987Search in Google Scholar

[45] Atanackovic T.M., A generalized model for the uniaxial isothermal deformation of a viscoelastic body, Acta Mechanica, 2002, 159, 77-8610.1007/BF01171449Search in Google Scholar

[46] Atanackovic T.M., On a distributed derivative model of a viscoelastic body, C. R. Mecanique, 2003, 331, 687-69210.1016/j.crme.2003.08.003Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-9-6
Accepted: 2017-11-9
Published Online: 2017-12-29

© 2017 J.-S. Duan et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Analysis of a New Fractional Model for Damped Bergers’ Equation
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Optimal homotopy perturbation method for nonlinear differential equations governing MHD Jeffery-Hamel flow with heat transfer problem
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Semi- analytic numerical method for solution of time-space fractional heat and wave type equations with variable coefficients
  7. Regular Articles
  8. Investigation of a curve using Frenet frame in the lightlike cone
  9. Regular Articles
  10. Construction of complex networks from time series based on the cross correlation interval
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Nonlinear Schrödinger approach to European option pricing
  13. Regular Articles
  14. A modified cubic B-spline differential quadrature method for three-dimensional non-linear diffusion equations
  15. Regular Articles
  16. A new miniaturized negative-index meta-atom for tri-band applications
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Seismic stability of the survey areas of potential sites for the deep geological repository of the spent nuclear fuel
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Distributed containment control of heterogeneous fractional-order multi-agent systems with communication delays
  21. Regular Articles
  22. Sensitivity analysis and economic optimization studies of inverted five-spot gas cycling in gas condensate reservoir
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Quantum mechanics with geometric constraints of Friedmann type
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Modeling and Simulation for an 8 kW Three-Phase Grid-Connected Photo-Voltaic Power System
  27. Regular Articles
  28. Application of the optimal homotopy asymptotic method to nonlinear Bingham fluid dampers
  29. Regular Articles
  30. Analysis of Drude model using fractional derivatives without singular kernels
  31. Regular Articles
  32. An unsteady MHD Maxwell nanofluid flow with convective boundary conditions using spectral local linearization method
  33. Regular Articles
  34. New analytical solutions for conformable fractional PDEs arising in mathematical physics by exp-function method
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Quantum mechanical calculation of electron spin
  37. Regular Articles
  38. CO2 capture by polymeric membranes composed of hyper-branched polymers with dense poly(oxyethylene) comb and poly(amidoamine)
  39. Regular Articles
  40. Chain on a cone
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Multi-task feature learning by using trace norm regularization
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Superluminal tunneling of a relativistic half-integer spin particle through a potential barrier
  45. Regular Articles
  46. Neutrosophic triplet normed space
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Lie algebraic discussion for affinity based information diffusion in social networks
  49. Regular Articles
  50. Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in helical CT for pulmonary tuberculosis infections
  51. Regular Articles
  52. A comparison study of steady-state vibrations with single fractional-order and distributed-order derivatives
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Some new remarks on MHD Jeffery-Hamel fluid flow problem
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Numerical investigation of magnetohydrodynamic slip flow of power-law nanofluid with temperature dependent viscosity and thermal conductivity over a permeable surface
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Charge conservation in a gravitational field in the scalar ether theory
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Measurement problem and local hidden variables with entangled photons
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Compression of hyper-spectral images using an accelerated nonnegative tensor decomposition
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Fabrication and application of coaxial polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan nanofiber membranes
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Calculating degree-based topological indices of dominating David derived networks
  67. Regular Articles
  68. The structure and conductivity of polyelectrolyte based on MEH-PPV and potassium iodide (KI) for dye-sensitized solar cells
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Chiral symmetry restoration and the critical end point in QCD
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Numerical solution for fractional Bratu’s initial value problem
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Structure and optical properties of TiO2 thin films deposited by ALD method
  75. Regular Articles
  76. Quadruple multi-wavelength conversion for access network scalability based on cross-phase modulation in an SOA-MZI
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Application of ANNs approach for wave-like and heat-like equations
  79. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  80. Study on node importance evaluation of the high-speed passenger traffic complex network based on the Structural Hole Theory
  81. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  82. A mathematical/physics model to measure the role of information and communication technology in some economies: the Chinese case
  83. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  84. Numerical modeling of the thermoelectric cooler with a complementary equation for heat circulation in air gaps
  85. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  86. On the libration collinear points in the restricted three – body problem
  87. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  88. Research on Critical Nodes Algorithm in Social Complex Networks
  89. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  90. A simulation based research on chance constrained programming in robust facility location problem
  91. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  92. A mathematical/physics carbon emission reduction strategy for building supply chain network based on carbon tax policy
  93. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  94. Mathematical analysis of the impact mechanism of information platform on agro-product supply chain and agro-product competitiveness
  95. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  96. A real negative selection algorithm with evolutionary preference for anomaly detection
  97. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  98. A privacy-preserving parallel and homomorphic encryption scheme
  99. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  100. Random walk-based similarity measure method for patterns in complex object
  101. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  102. A Mathematical Study of Accessibility and Cohesion Degree in a High-Speed Rail Station Connected to an Urban Bus Transport Network
  103. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  104. Design and Simulation of the Integrated Navigation System based on Extended Kalman Filter
  105. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  106. Oil exploration oriented multi-sensor image fusion algorithm
  107. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  108. Analysis of Product Distribution Strategy in Digital Publishing Industry Based on Game-Theory
  109. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  110. Expanded Study on the accumulation effect of tourism under the constraint of structure
  111. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  112. Unstructured P2P Network Load Balance Strategy Based on Multilevel Partitioning of Hypergraph
  113. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  114. Research on the method of information system risk state estimation based on clustering particle filter
  115. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  116. Demand forecasting and information platform in tourism
  117. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  118. Physical-chemical properties studying of molecular structures via topological index calculating
  119. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  120. Local kernel nonparametric discriminant analysis for adaptive extraction of complex structures
  121. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  122. City traffic flow breakdown prediction based on fuzzy rough set
  123. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  124. Conservation laws for a strongly damped wave equation
  125. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  126. Blending type approximation by Stancu-Kantorovich operators based on Pólya-Eggenberger distribution
  127. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  128. Computing the Ediz eccentric connectivity index of discrete dynamic structures
  129. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  130. A discrete epidemic model for bovine Babesiosis disease and tick populations
  131. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  132. Study on maintaining formations during satellite formation flying based on SDRE and LQR
  133. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  134. Relationship between solitary pulmonary nodule lung cancer and CT image features based on gradual clustering
  135. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  136. A novel fast target tracking method for UAV aerial image
  137. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  138. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of interuniversity collaborative learning based on network
  139. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  140. Conservation laws, classical symmetries and exact solutions of the generalized KdV-Burgers-Kuramoto equation
  141. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  142. After notes on self-similarity exponent for fractal structures
  143. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  144. Excitation probability and effective temperature in the stationary regime of conductivity for Coulomb Glasses
  145. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  146. Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image
  147. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  148. Research on identification method of heavy vehicle rollover based on hidden Markov model
  149. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  150. Classifying BCI signals from novice users with extreme learning machine
  151. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  152. Topics on data transmission problem in software definition network
  153. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  154. Statistical inferences with jointly type-II censored samples from two Pareto distributions
  155. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  156. Estimation for coefficient of variation of an extension of the exponential distribution under type-II censoring scheme
  157. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  158. Analysis on trust influencing factors and trust model from multiple perspectives of online Auction
  159. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  160. Coupling of two-phase flow in fractured-vuggy reservoir with filling medium
  161. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  162. Production decline type curves analysis of a finite conductivity fractured well in coalbed methane reservoirs
  163. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  164. Flow Characteristic and Heat Transfer for Non-Newtonian Nanofluid in Rectangular Microchannels with Teardrop Dimples/Protrusions
  165. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  166. The size prediction of potential inclusions embedded in the sub-surface of fused silica by damage morphology
  167. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  168. Research on carbonate reservoir interwell connectivity based on a modified diffusivity filter model
  169. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  170. The method of the spatial locating of macroscopic throats based-on the inversion of dynamic interwell connectivity
  171. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  172. Unsteady mixed convection flow through a permeable stretching flat surface with partial slip effects through MHD nanofluid using spectral relaxation method
  173. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  174. A volumetric ablation model of EPDM considering complex physicochemical process in porous structure of char layer
  175. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  176. Numerical simulation on ferrofluid flow in fractured porous media based on discrete-fracture model
  177. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  178. Macroscopic lattice Boltzmann model for heat and moisture transfer process with phase transformation in unsaturated porous media during freezing process
  179. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  180. Modelling of intermittent microwave convective drying: parameter sensitivity
  181. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  182. Simulating gas-water relative permeabilities for nanoscale porous media with interfacial effects
  183. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  184. Simulation of counter-current imbibition in water-wet fractured reservoirs based on discrete-fracture model
  185. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  186. Investigation effect of wettability and heterogeneity in water flooding and on microscopic residual oil distribution in tight sandstone cores with NMR technique
  187. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  188. Analytical modeling of coupled flow and geomechanics for vertical fractured well in tight gas reservoirs
  189. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  190. Special Issue: Ever New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  191. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  192. The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
  193. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  194. Erratum to: The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
  195. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  196. Rhetoric, logic, and experiment in the quantum nonlocality debate
  197. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  198. What If Quantum Theory Violates All Mathematics?
  199. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  200. Relativity, anomalies and objectivity loophole in recent tests of local realism
  201. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  202. The photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments: computer models with single-wing selection
  203. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  204. Bohr against Bell: complementarity versus nonlocality
  205. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  206. Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell tests?
  207. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  208. Bell’s “Theorem”: loopholes vs. conceptual flaws
  209. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  210. Nonrecurrence and Bell-like inequalities
  211. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  212. Three-dimensional computer models of electrospinning systems
  213. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  214. Electric field computation and measurements in the electroporation of inhomogeneous samples
  215. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  216. Modelling of magnetostriction of transformer magnetic core for vibration analysis
  217. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  218. Comparison of the fractional power motor with cores made of various magnetic materials
  219. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  220. Dynamics of the line-start reluctance motor with rotor made of SMC material
  221. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  222. Inhomogeneous dielectrics: conformal mapping and finite-element models
  223. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  224. Topology optimization of induction heating model using sequential linear programming based on move limit with adaptive relaxation
  225. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  226. Detection of inter-turn short-circuit at start-up of induction machine based on torque analysis
  227. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  228. Current superimposition variable flux reluctance motor with 8 salient poles
  229. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  230. Modelling axial vibration in windings of power transformers
  231. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  232. Field analysis & eddy current losses calculation in five-phase tubular actuator
  233. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  234. Hybrid excited claw pole generator with skewed and non-skewed permanent magnets
  235. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  236. Electromagnetic phenomena analysis in brushless DC motor with speed control using PWM method
  237. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  238. Field-circuit analysis and measurements of a single-phase self-excited induction generator
  239. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  240. A comparative analysis between classical and modified approach of description of the electrical machine windings by means of T0 method
  241. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  242. Field-based optimal-design of an electric motor: a new sensitivity formulation
  243. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  244. Application of the parametric proper generalized decomposition to the frequency-dependent calculation of the impedance of an AC line with rectangular conductors
  245. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  246. Virtual reality as a new trend in mechanical and electrical engineering education
  247. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  248. Holonomicity analysis of electromechanical systems
  249. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  250. An accurate reactive power control study in virtual flux droop control
  251. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  252. Localized probability of improvement for kriging based multi-objective optimization
  253. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  254. Research of influence of open-winding faults on properties of brushless permanent magnets motor
  255. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  256. Optimal design of the rotor geometry of line-start permanent magnet synchronous motor using the bat algorithm
  257. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  258. Model of depositing layer on cylindrical surface produced by induction-assisted laser cladding process
  259. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  260. Detection of inter-turn faults in transformer winding using the capacitor discharge method
  261. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  262. A novel hybrid genetic algorithm for optimal design of IPM machines for electric vehicle
  263. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  264. Lamination effects on a 3D model of the magnetic core of power transformers
  265. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  266. Detection of vertical disparity in three-dimensional visualizations
  267. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  268. Calculations of magnetic field in dynamo sheets taking into account their texture
  269. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  270. 3-dimensional computer model of electrospinning multicapillary unit used for electrostatic field analysis
  271. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  272. Optimization of wearable microwave antenna with simplified electromagnetic model of the human body
  273. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  274. Induction heating process of ferromagnetic filled carbon nanotubes based on 3-D model
  275. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  276. Speed control of an induction motor by 6-switched 3-level inverter
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2017-0095/html
Scroll to top button