Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik #AreHashtagsWords? Structure, position, and syntactic integration of hashtags in (English) tweets
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

#AreHashtagsWords? Structure, position, and syntactic integration of hashtags in (English) tweets

  • Andreea S. Calude EMAIL logo , Maebh Long und Jessie Burnette
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 7. Juni 2024

Abstract

As social media use continues to increase its presence in our lives, so does the language of such platforms. One of the most salient features of social media discourse is the hashtag. Starting its life on Twitter (X) about 15 years ago, the hashtag has seeped from online to offline communication. Yet, it is not clear whether hashtags are words, tags, or something else altogether, nor is it clear what morphological process gives rise to them. This study presents an extensive analysis of 3,423 hashtags from 1,216 English-language tweets, each manually coded for various linguistics features, including position in the tweet, grammatical function, and syntactic integration. Our findings suggest that hashtags are extremely varied and we propose that they are indeed words, arising through a process of hashtagging (which is distinct from compounding). We also argue that some hashtags are syntactically integrated while others constitute parenthetical material.


Corresponding author: Andreea S. Calude, 3717 University of Waikato , Hamilton, New Zealand, E-mail:

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the University of Waikato ALPSS Research Fund, to David Trye for comments on the draft and for his Python code and help in extracting the data, and to the anonymous referees for their helpful comments. All remaining errors are of course our own.

References

Bauer, Laurie. 2017. Compounds and compounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108235679Suche in Google Scholar

Burnette, Jessie & Andreea S. Calude. 2022. Wake up New Zealand! Directives, politeness and stance in Twitter #Covid19NZ posts. Journal of Pragmatics 196. 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Burnette, Jessie & Maebh Long. 2022. Bubbles and lockdown in Aotearoa New Zealand: The language of self-isolation in #Covid19nz tweets. Medical Humanities 49. 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2022-012401.Suche in Google Scholar

Caleffi, Paola-Maria. 2015. The “hashtag”: A new word or a new rule? SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 12(2). 46–69.Suche in Google Scholar

Dehé, Nicole & Yordanka Kavalova. 2007. An introduction. In Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals, 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.106.03dehSuche in Google Scholar

Fiesler, Casey & Nicholas Proferes. 2018. Participants’ perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media + Society 4(1). 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366.Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45. 31–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2011.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2023. Defining the word. Unpublished manuscript. https://www.academia.edu/download/95034120/Defining_the_word.pdf (accessed 15 May 2023).Suche in Google Scholar

Long, Maebh, Andreea S. Calude & Jessie Burnette. In press. “This was never about a virus”: Perceptions of vaccination hazards and pandemic risk in #Covid19NZ tweets. Journal of Medical Humanities.Suche in Google Scholar

Maity, Suman Kalyan, Ritvik Saraf & Animesh Mukherjee. 2016. #Bieber+#Blast=#Bieberblast: Early prediction of popular hashtag compounds. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing, 50–63. New York: ACM.10.1145/2818048.2820019Suche in Google Scholar

Messina, Chris. 2007. Groups for Twitter; or a proposal for Twitter tag channels. https://factoryjoe.com/2007/08/25/groups-for-twitter-or-a-proposal-for-twitter-tag-channels/ (accessed 19 May 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Page, Ruth. 2012. The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse & Communication 6(2). 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312437441.Suche in Google Scholar

RStudio Team. 2020. RStudio: Integrated development for R. Boston: RStudio. Available at: http://www.rstudio.com/.Suche in Google Scholar

Scott, Kate. 2015. The pragmatics of hashtags: Inference and conversational style on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics 81. 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.015.Suche in Google Scholar

Scott, Kate. 2018. “Hashtags work everywhere”: The pragmatic functions of spoken hashtags. Discourse, Context & Media 22. 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.07.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Statista. 2020. LinkedIn statistics. https://www.statista.com/topics/951/linkedin/#dossierKeyfigures (accessed 7 March 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Trye, David, Andreea S. Calude, Felipe Bravo-Márquez & Te Taka Keegan. 2020. Hybrid hashtags – #YouKnowYoureAKiwiWhen your tweet contains English and Māori. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00015.Suche in Google Scholar

Venkit, Pranav, Zeba Karishma, Chi-Yang Hsu, Rahul Katiki, Kenneth Huang, Shomir Wilson & Patrick Dudas. 2021. A “sourceful” twist: Emoji prediction based on sentiment, hashtags and application source. arXiv.org. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.07833.Suche in Google Scholar

Wagh, Rashika & Payal Punde. 2018. Survey on sentiment analysis using Twitter dataset. In 2018 Second international conference on electronics, communication and aerospace technology, 208–211. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA.2018.8474783. (accessed 23 May 2023).Suche in Google Scholar

Wickham, Hadley. 2016. Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer. Available at: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org.10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9Suche in Google Scholar

Zappavigna, Michele. 2011. Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media and Society 13. 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097.Suche in Google Scholar

Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781472541642Suche in Google Scholar

Zappavigna, Michele. 2015. Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags. Social Semiotics 25(3). 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.996948.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-03-17
Accepted: 2024-02-22
Published Online: 2024-06-07

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Editorial 2024
  4. Phonetics & Phonology
  5. The role of recoverability in the implementation of non-phonemic glottalization in Hawaiian
  6. Epenthetic vowel quality crosslinguistically, with focus on Modern Hebrew
  7. Japanese speakers can infer specific sub-lexicons using phonotactic cues
  8. Articulatory phonetics in the market: combining public engagement with ultrasound data collection
  9. Investigating the acoustic fidelity of vowels across remote recording methods
  10. The role of coarticulatory tonal information in Cantonese spoken word recognition: an eye-tracking study
  11. Tracking phonological regularities: exploring the influence of learning mode and regularity locus in adult phonological learning
  12. Morphology & Syntax
  13. #AreHashtagsWords? Structure, position, and syntactic integration of hashtags in (English) tweets
  14. The meaning of morphomes: distributional semantics of Spanish stem alternations
  15. A refinement of the analysis of the resultative V-de construction in Mandarin Chinese
  16. L2 cognitive construal and morphosyntactic acquisition of pseudo-passive constructions
  17. Semantics & Pragmatics
  18. “All women are like that”: an overview of linguistic deindividualization and dehumanization of women in the incelosphere
  19. Counterfactual language, emotion, and perspective: a sentence completion study during the COVID-19 pandemic
  20. Constructing elderly patients’ agency through conversational storytelling
  21. Language Documentation & Typology
  22. Conative animal calls in Macha Oromo: function and form
  23. The syntax of African American English borrowings in the Louisiana Creole tense-mood-aspect system
  24. Syntactic pausing? Re-examining the associations
  25. Bibliographic bias and information-density sampling
  26. Historical & Comparative Linguistics
  27. Revisiting the hypothesis of ideophones as windows to language evolution
  28. Verifying the morpho-semantics of aspect via typological homogeneity
  29. Psycholinguistics & Neurolinguistics
  30. Sign recognition: the effect of parameters and features in sign mispronunciations
  31. Influence of translation on perceived metaphor features: quality, aptness, metaphoricity, and familiarity
  32. Effects of grammatical gender on gender inferences: Evidence from French hybrid nouns
  33. Processing reflexives in adjunct control: an exploration of attraction effects
  34. Language Acquisition & Language Learning
  35. How do L1 glosses affect EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance? An eye-tracking study
  36. Modeling L2 motivation change and its predictive effects on learning behaviors in the extramural digital context: a quantitative investigation in China
  37. Ongoing exposure to an ambient language continues to build implicit knowledge across the lifespan
  38. On the relationship between complexity of primary occupation and L2 varietal behavior in adult migrants in Austria
  39. The acquisition of speaking fundamental frequency (F0) features in Cantonese and English by simultaneous bilingual children
  40. Sociolinguistics & Anthropological Linguistics
  41. A computational approach to detecting the envelope of variation
  42. Attitudes toward code-switching among bilingual Jordanians: a comparative study
  43. “Let’s ride this out together”: unpacking multilingual top-down and bottom-up pandemic communication evidenced in Singapore’s coronavirus-related linguistic and semiotic landscape
  44. Across time, space, and genres: measuring probabilistic grammar distances between varieties of Mandarin
  45. Navigating linguistic ideologies and market dynamics within China’s English language teaching landscape
  46. Streetscapes and memories of real socialist anti-fascism in south-eastern Europe: between dystopianism and utopianism
  47. What can NLP do for linguistics? Towards using grammatical error analysis to document non-standard English features
  48. From sociolinguistic perception to strategic action in the study of social meaning
  49. Minority genders in quantitative survey research: a data-driven approach to clear, inclusive, and accurate gender questions
  50. Variation is the way to perfection: imperfect rhyming in Chinese hip hop
  51. Shifts in digital media usage before and after the pandemic by Rusyns in Ukraine
  52. Computational & Corpus Linguistics
  53. Revisiting the automatic prediction of lexical errors in Mandarin
  54. Finding continuers in Swedish Sign Language
  55. Conversational priming in repetitional responses as a mechanism in language change: evidence from agent-based modelling
  56. Construction grammar and procedural semantics for human-interpretable grounded language processing
  57. Through the compression glass: language complexity and the linguistic structure of compressed strings
  58. Could this be next for corpus linguistics? Methods of semi-automatic data annotation with contextualized word embeddings
  59. The Red Hen Audio Tagger
  60. Code-switching in computer-mediated communication by Gen Z Japanese Americans
  61. Supervised prediction of production patterns using machine learning algorithms
  62. Introducing Bed Word: a new automated speech recognition tool for sociolinguistic interview transcription
  63. Decoding French equivalents of the English present perfect: evidence from parallel corpora of parliamentary documents
  64. Enhancing automated essay scoring with GCNs and multi-level features for robust multidimensional assessments
  65. Sociolinguistic auto-coding has fairness problems too: measuring and mitigating bias
  66. The role of syntax in hashtag popularity
  67. Language practices of Chinese doctoral students studying abroad on social media: a translanguaging perspective
  68. Cognitive Linguistics
  69. Metaphor and gender: are words associated with source domains perceived in a gendered way?
  70. Crossmodal correspondence between lexical tones and visual motions: a forced-choice mapping task on Mandarin Chinese
Heruntergeladen am 21.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2023-0044/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen