Startseite Production of the Future
Artikel Open Access

Production of the Future

AI Meets Software-Defined Automation
  • Steven Vettermann

    Dr. Steven Vettermann studied mechanical engineering at the Technical University of Darmstadt, where he also earned his doctorate in IT Security in Collaborative Product Data Management. Since 2022, he has been leading research activities at Ascon Systems with full responsibility. He is an author and speaker, dedicated to establishing solutions for AI, software-defined automation, and the industrial metaverse within the industry.

    EMAIL logo
    und Marcus Röper

    Marcus Röper studied computer science and physics at the University of Bonn and was involved in developing an award-winning AI product before assuming responsibility for AI strategy and innovations at Ascon Systems in 2024. His technical focus is on LLM agent systems in complex domains. He is committed to integrating the latest developments in AI into industrial applications and creating innovative solutions for complex challenges.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 27. März 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The integration of software-defined automation with artificial intelligence (AI) holds the potential to revolutionize production. Software-defined automation can be characterized by its flexible, service-oriented architecture, enabling real-time monitoring and control of production processes. Combined with AI capabilities, it offers new levels of efficiency, flexibility, and safety for industry. This article provides practical insights into how these technologies can be applied in production together to enhance resilience, sustainability, and competitiveness.

Abstract

Die Verbindung von Software-definierte Automatisierung und Künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) bietet das Potenzial, die industrielle Produktion zu revolutionieren. Die Software-definierte Automatisierung besticht durch ihre flexible, Service-orientierte Architektur, die das Monitoring und Steuern von Anlagen in Echtzeit ermöglicht. Das mit den Möglichkeiten der KI kombiniert kann der Industrie neue Dimensionen an Effizienz, Flexibilität und Sicherheit erschließen. Der Artikel zeigt praxisnah, wie diese Technologien zusammen in der Produktion eingesetzt werden und dabei auch die Resilienz, Nachhaltigkeit und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit gefördert werden können.

Motivation

To shape the future of production, we must rethink it fundamentally. Both process and manufacturing industries often face significant challenges: Automation solutions insufficiently match digitalization possibilities [1], shortage of skilled labor [2], and increasing demands for flexibility, efficiency, and sustainability [3].

These requirements are driving the digital transformation of the industrial sector. However, traditional automation technologies have their limitations when it comes to fully taking advantage of the possibilities of modern information technologies to realize seamless and flexible information flows and location-independent interactions between humans and systems. Software-defined automation offers an alternative. It aims to replace the rigid automation pyramid with flexible, networked services [4]. By decoupling hardware and process control and shifting control to the software level, processes can be adapted and expanded in real-time, similar to apps on a smartphone.

AI integration, in particular, offers enormous potential: predictive fault detection, process optimization, and intuitive user assistance are just a few examples [4]. Software-defined automation structures and provides production-related data so the AI can derive valuable insights and optimizations. Simultaneously, software-defined automation enables the direct implementation of AI-driven insights into production processes. Thus, the combination of AI and software-defined automation is an essential lever for realizing the production of the future.

State of the Art

The following section briefly overviews the current state of AI and software-defined automation.

Principles of Software-Defined Automation

Given the growing complexity of production processes and labor shortages (in Germany alone, shortages of engineers and IT specialists cost an estimated 13 billion Euro annually [2]), it is increasingly important to efficiently network machines and systems, integrate AI-supported services, and create transparency across all corporate systems. Traditional automation technologies are reaching their limits, even when hardware, such as programmable logic controllers (PLC), is virtualized [5].

Decoupling Hardware and Process Control

As with software-defined networks (SDN), software-defined automation abstracts hardware, and production capabilities are controlled exclusively through software [4]. Decoupling hardware and software significantly increases flexibility. For instance, a welding robot only needs to know how to weld; the exact place of the welding point can be determined dynamically via IT services. Tasks such as welding, screwing, or transporting can be orchestrated flexibly – independent of the specific machine and without specialized on-site personnel [5].

Implementing IT Security

Software-defined automation creates a flexible network of IT services, replacing the rigid automation pyramid. When implementing this, the necessary cybersecurity protections must be addressed rigorously. Traditionally, production environments have been largely self-contained, with IT security applied selectively. Thus, additional exposure, such as that caused by introducing software-defined automation, increases vulnerability within production [6].

Enforcing an organization‘s security policies centrally is a fundamental requirement for operational resilience [7]. The convergence of IT and operational technology (OT) that comes with software-defined automation also presents the opportunity to unify and standardize security measures across organizations and beyond [5]. This approach supports unified system governance with significantly lower system administration costs [8]. The EU’s NIS2 (Network and Information Security) directive will play an increasingly important role here [9]. Although it is primarily aimed at IT operations and management, it can also be used to improve security measures in companies in general. Thus, it can be assumed that the NIS2 will seriously impact the OT in production too.

Digital Twins at the Core

Digital twins form the backbone of software-defined automation. They are virtual representations of real objects, maintaining live synchronization with their physical counterparts (Figure 1). This bidirectional connection allows real-time monitoring and control of production processes [10]. Digital twins are indispensable for applications like condition monitoring, prescriptive maintenance, as well as anomaly detection and safety assurance, enabling efficient production control, whether via cloud or edge computing.

Figure 1 How ChatGPT might envision itself within a production setting if it had a physical form
Figure 1

How ChatGPT might envision itself within a production setting if it had a physical form

Digital twins offer the capability to interact directly with AI. They can provide precise, context-based data from the production process, enabling AI to make accurate decisions [5]. Suggested process changes and optimizations can then be implemented in actual production through digital twins [4].

AI in Production

Introducing AI into production promises significant efficiency gains and innovation (Figure 1). However, successful AI integration requires a deep understanding of the technology and a targeted strategy that considers economic, technical, organizational, and cultural aspects. The following outline key requirements and steps for companies starting AI implementations.

Categorization and Fundamentals

AI refers to systems that independently learn from data through algorithms, handling cognitive tasks such as problem-solving and decision-making. Unlike Large Language Models (LLMs), which primarily focus on language-based tasks [11], a realization of an AI application essentially comprises three steps: Systematic data collection, model training, and integration into the production environment. You can find a more detailed breakdown in [12].

Implementing AI requires technical and domain-specific knowledge to adapt AI solutions to production requirements. Additionally, it should be considered to provide structured data in the process context rather than the mere provision of semantically poor data [13]. The „Periodic Table of AI“ offers helpful guidance on industry application areas [14].

Successful AI Implementation

For companies beginning with AI, proof of concepts (PoC) can be used to test specific applications. The PoC approach aims to develop use cases with minimal effort and evaluate data availability and potential business benefits. Furthermore, the PoC phase reveals whether the project team possesses the necessary skills and how employees can be integrated into the process. Employee involvement is key, as close collaboration between the AI team and specialist departments is a foundation for success.

After a successful PoC phase, companies need to plan for the operation and scalability of AI solutions. Important questions include whether to use cloud-based or on-premises solutions, open or closed source, and whether to develop in-house or rely on external expertise [15]. Cost management is also crucial, especially with cloud solutions, where ongoing costs vary. In the long term, it is essential to establish mechanisms for maintaining and updating machine learning models to ensure consistent performance. Figure 2 presents this process in a flowchart.

Figure 2 Flowchart for successful AI project implementation
Figure 2

Flowchart for successful AI project implementation

Technical, Organizational, and Legal Constraints

Implementing AI in production is complex, involving numerous technical and organizational requirements. Verifying data availability and quality is essential. High data quality is crucial, as poor data can undermine model accuracy and jeopardize AI project success. Transparent data management and maintenance standards are needed to ensure a stable and reliable system. Data Mesh is a particularly effective standard for integrating AI systems into companies [16]. Risk management strategies also help to identify and address common pitfalls such as bias or overfitting.

Another key aspect is data protection, compliance with legal regulations, and the previously discussed cybersecurity measures. When handling personal or sensitive data, complying with the EU’s GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) is crucial. Wherever possible, data should be hosted within the EU. The EU AI Act also provides valuable guidance on legal risks [17].

Finally, transparent internal decisionmaking in AI models is essential to ensure traceability of errors and foster employee acceptance. Considerations around sustainability and ethics, such as efficient resource use and privacy protection, are also gaining importance as they reflect the company’s social responsibility.

AI-Enabled Software-Defined Production

The convergence of software-defined automation with AI offers numerous advantages for modern production. For example, AI enables prescriptive analytics and process optimizations, reducing downtime, cutting costs, and improving efficiency [12]. Software-defined automation provides AI with necessary process-contextual data and can directly execute AI-driven insights. Both technologies are valuable on their own; together, they form the critical foundation for realizing future production. In the following, promising fields of application are given.

Quality Control and Process Agility

AI visual inspection and quality control applications reduce human errors and improve precision [18]. Image processing algorithms quickly and reliably detect defects, reducing waste and production costs – a considerable advantage in precision-focused industries such as automotive or electronics and pharmaceutical or food industries. Automated and digitally available results shorten processing times and increase efficiency.

In addition to visual inspection, supplementary sensors can be used to monitor processes more comprehensively. By combining data sources, AI gains more profound insights into process quality. For instance, inaccuracies from earlier process steps can be compensated for in subsequent steps [19].

Regarding this, software-defined automation provides the mechanisms to gather and communicate current and historical production-related data to AI. It provides the mechanisms to take the related feedback from AI for reconfiguring processes or providing actionable recommendations to personnel. In [5], a related application is described, where quality-related process information is gathered from a Body-in-White line and fed to the associated algorithms. The results are then applied at the line.

Anomaly Detection and Safety

AI will play an increasingly crucial role in anomaly detection in the highly regulated process industry to prevent production disruptions and accidents. As process complexity grows and unforeseen events become more frequent, AI algorithms demonstrate advantages over conventional analytics [4, 20]. This is particularly important in sectors with stringent safety and environmental regulations, where accidents can endanger lives and cause significant environmental and financial damage.

Real-time sensor data from software-defined automation enables AI to identify non-linear patterns indicating potential leaks, pressure spikes, or other hazardous states and recommend appropriate countermeasures. Software-defined automation can then directly implement these measures. In [21], more details on AI-based anomaly detection are given, and a case study is introduced. Meaningful publications from the industry currently seem to be kept secret to protect competitive advantage.

A further relevant aspect is „industrial aging“: Aging equipment poses additional challenges, which AI addresses by predicting aging behavior and potential partial failures [22]. Software-defined automation can communicate context-specific data (current and historical sensor data, maintenance information, etc.) to the AI and execute the optimizations suggested by the AI.

Prescriptive Maintenance and Self-Healing

Predictive and prescriptive maintenance are essential for the manufacturing and process industries [5]. Unplanned downtime can be costly in continuous production environments, such as refineries or pharmaceutical plants. A single minute of downtime in the automotive industry can cost up to 20,000 euros. Combining AI and software-defined automation provides substantial advantages over traditional automation technologies.

As depicted in Figure 3, AI and software-defined automation go far beyond traditional automation technologies’ possibilities. Implementation requires deep expertise, a trained AI model, data from current and past production runs, and the integration of relevant systems (e. g., maintenance, ERP, MES). It also requires the ability to influence the production process actively.

Figure 3 Unlocking new possibilities in maintenance through AI
Figure 3

Unlocking new possibilities in maintenance through AI

There are several stages of implementation. AI generally analyzes sensor data from machines and systems, e. g., to predict failures or wear before they occur. The stages differ in terms of what additional information is thereby considered by the AI and how the results are used in production actively.

Prescriptive maintenance incorporates dynamic strategies for specific aging and degradation behaviors. Based on this information, AI suggests targeted maintenance actions to ensure system reliability, allowing for more flexible and efficient maintenance planning than traditional static strategies [23]. Whereas related realizations can be found frequently in industrial applications (e.g. [5]), the following two can be seen as promising future trends. A review and a case study regarding the necessary self-reconfiguration capabilities are given in [24].

Proactive maintenance integrates maintenance and logistics knowledge, dynamically steering production to optimize maintenance timing. Self-healing advances this process by automatically detecting and resolving disruptions through corrective actions, process adjustments, or alternative logistics without manual intervention. These approaches require a bi-directional interaction between AI and software-defined automation.

Process Optimization, Supply Chains, and Sustainability

Machine-learning algorithms within software-defined automation enable real-time adjustments to process parameters to improve efficiency, product quality, and energy savings. In the process industry, AI-supported systems help reduce raw material consumption and maximize energy efficiency, reducing operational costs and the ecological footprint [25]. Similar benefits are observed in the manufacturing sector. A notable example is the publicly funded project E-KISS, which achieved nearly 30 percent savings in resources and energy [4].

AI can also optimize complex supply chains and enhance production processes. It improves demand forecasting, optimizes inventory, and enables flexible production adjustments. Software-defined automation provides the mechanisms for creating agile production and logistics environments.

New regulatory requirements further increase the need for real-time data availability. Real-time data, made available through software-defined automation services, can populate data spaces like Catena-X or Manufacturing-X in a structured and production-accompanying manner. In the future, such services and appropriately developed AI may also be used to achieve a global minimum of CO2 emissions for specific products while simultaneously providing data relevant to future product passports.

Copilots in Production Planning

The application of AI delivers operational advantages in production and substantial benefits in production planning. AI-based copilots support planners by accessing experiential knowledge from past projects, providing helpful recommendations and handling repetitive tasks, allowing planners to focus on strategic decisions.

Production planning is a complex process that cannot be fully captured solely through the reasoning capabilities of a single language model [26]. However, it benefits significantly from enhanced reasoning abilities, enabling precise and efficient planning. The close integration of AI with cross-domain models creates a foundation on which changes in one domain can be automatically reflected in others. Figure 4 illustrates an example architecture for an agent-based logic system in production planning. This architecture incorporates vector embeddings to capture the nuanced relationships between different planning concepts and uses multiple specialized agents to handle various aspects of the complex planning process. It also includes a feedback loop using Reinforcement Learning from Artificial Intelligence Feedback (RLAIF) [27], which further sharpens the reasoning of the agent-based logic. The architecture was developed and successfully validated in a prototype, and an industry-ready application is in progress.

Figure 4 Architecture of an LLM-based agent system in production planning
Figure 4

Architecture of an LLM-based agent system in production planning

Active AI involvement can be structured so that a plan serves as a final output and seamless input for subsequent phases. When results—from engineering outputs, through production planning and virtual commissioning, to the services of software-defined automation—are bidirectionally interconnected, a well-trained AI system can ensure that changes in one domain are automatically updated in others. Such a solution could lead to an unprecedented efficiency boost in production.

Overview and Classification of AI Technologies

To illustrate and summarize the diverse applications of AI within the context of software-defined automation we discussed in this paper, Figure 5 presents the primary application areas and corresponding AI technologies in a compact table. It serves as a micro-overview, offering a quick reference for the various AI application areas, the respective goals, and the specific advantages achieved by integrating computer vision, large language models (LLM), outlier detection, supervised learning, unsupervised learning, reinforcement learning, and time series forecasting in production.

Figure 5 Overview of AI technologies in production
Figure 5

Overview of AI technologies in production

This illustration highlights how AI technologies can be strategically utilized to optimize processes, enhance operational safety, and achieve sustainability goals. Figure 5 shows that the intelligent use of AI can increase efficiency and quality in production, achieve significant cost savings, and reduce environmental footprints. An „x“ indicates where the AI technology applies to the specified automation application.

Summary and Outlook

Successful AI projects in the industry are characterized by addressing use cases with clear business benefits. The project team must possess the necessary skills, and employees should be involved initially. Additionally, data must be available at the required quality level, and IT security considerations are always relevant when it comes to data. Furthermore, the scalability and operational costs of AI in production must also be considered.

Insights from AI implementations offer valuable strategic and operational advantages. However, a much greater leap in innovation can be achieved by using these insights to enable the automated reconfiguration of production processes. This is made possible by software-defined automation solutions, which provide AI with real-time access to production-related data (both current and historical) as well as data from other systems (ERP, MES, maintenance, etc.) and enable the execution of the AI’s resulting insights directly in production. This approach addresses the rapidly increasing demands for flexibility, resilience, and sustainability, helping to make the production of the future a reality.

Despite the extensive possibilities that technology offers, it’s important to remember that humans will continue to play a critical role in the production environment of the future. Work itself will undergo fundamental changes. Software-defined automation and AI applications present enormous opportunities for the industry. However, beyond the technical challenges that must be overcome for widespread industrial use, a comprehensive, industry-wide change management strategy is essential. AI can play a crucial role in supporting humans and helping to accelerate progress in this transformative era.


Note

This article is peer reviewed by the members of the ZWF Special Issue Advisory Board.



Tel.: +49 (0) 711 258589–0

About the authors

Dr. Steven Vettermann

Dr. Steven Vettermann studied mechanical engineering at the Technical University of Darmstadt, where he also earned his doctorate in IT Security in Collaborative Product Data Management. Since 2022, he has been leading research activities at Ascon Systems with full responsibility. He is an author and speaker, dedicated to establishing solutions for AI, software-defined automation, and the industrial metaverse within the industry.

Marcus Röper

Marcus Röper studied computer science and physics at the University of Bonn and was involved in developing an award-winning AI product before assuming responsibility for AI strategy and innovations at Ascon Systems in 2024. His technical focus is on LLM agent systems in complex domains. He is committed to integrating the latest developments in AI into industrial applications and creating innovative solutions for complex challenges.

Literature

1 Ciupek, M.: KI nur mit solider Automatisierung. VDI Nachrichten 13 (2024) DOI:10.51202/0042-1758-2024-13-510.51202/0042-1758-2024-13-5Suche in Google Scholar

2 Plünnecke, A.; Haag, M.; Rauhut, I.: Ingenieurmonitor 2024/I. Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft e.V. und VDI Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V., 2024Suche in Google Scholar

3 Baumert, J.: Wir denken unsere Prozesse neu! Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb ZWF 119 (2024) 1–2 DOI:10.1515/zwf-2024-100810.1515/zwf-2024-1008Suche in Google Scholar

4 Vettermann, S.: Realization Examples of Software-defined Production. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb ZWF 119 (2024) 10 DOI:10.1515/zwf-2024-114110.1515/zwf-2024-1141Suche in Google Scholar

5 Knaup, M.; Müller, J.; Vettermann, S.: Die Fabrik der Zukunft ist ein Rechenzentrum. Automation 2024, VDI-Berichte (2024) 2437 DOI:10.51202/9783181024379-26110.51202/9783181024379-261Suche in Google Scholar

6 Caindec, K.; Buchheit, M.; Zarkout, B. et al.: Industry Internet of Things Security Framework (IISF). Industry IoT Consortium, 2023Suche in Google Scholar

7 IEC 62443 – Security for Industrial Automation and Control Systems. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)Suche in Google Scholar

8 System Security Design Guidelines. Rockwell Automation Publication SECURE-RM001H-EN-P – 10/2024, Rockwell Automation, 2024Suche in Google Scholar

9 European Union (eds.): Directive 2022/2555 on Measures for a High Common Level of Cybersecurity. 2022Suche in Google Scholar

10 Vettermann, S.: Digitization without Programming. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb ZWF 118 (2023) 3 DOI:10.1515/zwf-2023-103810.1515/zwf-2023-1038Suche in Google Scholar

11 Agüera y Arcas, B.: Do Large Language Models Understand Us? Daedalus 151 (2022) 2, pp. 183–197 DOI:10.1162/daed_a_0190910.1162/daed_a_01909Suche in Google Scholar

12 Gründel, L.; Brecher, C.; Herfs, W. et al.: Künstliche Intelligenz in der Produktion. Werkzeugmaschinenlabor WZL, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, 2024Suche in Google Scholar

13 Krüger, J.; Fleischer, J.; Franke, J. Groche, P.: WGP-Standpunkt: KI in der Produktion. Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Produktionstechnik e.V. (WGP), 2019Suche in Google Scholar

14 Hartmann, T.; Holtel, S.; Weber, M.: Digitalisierung gestalten mit dem Periodensystem der Künstlichen Intelligenz. Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft, Telekommunikation und neue Medien e. V. (Bitkom), 2018Suche in Google Scholar

15 Beck, N.; Martens, C.; Sylla, K.-H. et al.: Zukunftssichere Lösungen für Maschinelles Lernen. Fraunhofer-Institut für Intelligente Analyse- und Informationssysteme IAIS, Sankt Augustin 2020Suche in Google Scholar

16 Machado, I. A.; Costa, C.; Santos, M. Y.: Data Mesh: Concepts and Principles of a Paradigm Shift in Data Architectures. Procedia Computer Science (2022) 196, pp. 263–271 DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.01310.1016/j.procs.2021.12.013Suche in Google Scholar

17 Eurpean Union (eds.): Regulation 2024/1689 for Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence. European Union, 2024Suche in Google Scholar

18 Luarn, P.; Su, W. C.: Real-Time Color Recognition-Based Computer Vision Technology Refines Traditional Manufacturing Factory Processes. 2023 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.449723810.2139/ssrn.4497238Suche in Google Scholar

19 Lenz, B.; Barak, B.: Data Mining and Support Vector Regression Machine Learning in Semiconductor Manufacturing to Improve Virtual Metrology. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2013 DOI:10.1109/HICSS.2013.16310.1109/HICSS.2013.163Suche in Google Scholar

20 Ciupek, M.: So kommt KI-Wissen aus der Forschung in die Praxis. VDI Verlag, VDI Nachrichten (2024) 20 DOI:10.51202/0042-1758-2024-2010.51202/0042-1758-2024-20Suche in Google Scholar

21 Scholz, J.; Holtkemper, M.; Graß, A.; Beecks, C.: Anomaly Detection in Manufacturing. In: Soldatos, J. (eds.): Artificial Intelligence in Manufacturing. Springer, Cham 2024 DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-46452-2_2010.1007/978-3-031-46452-2_20Suche in Google Scholar

22 Bogojeski, M.; Sauer, S.; Horn, F.; Müller, K. R.: Forecasting Industrial Aging Processes with Machine Learning Methods. Computers & Chemical Engineering 144 (2021) DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2002.0176810.48550/arXiv.2002.01768Suche in Google Scholar

23 Liu, B.; Lin, J.; Zhang, L.; Kumar, U.: A Dynamic Prescriptive Maintenance Model Considering System Aging and Degradation. IEEE Access 7 (2019) DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.292858710.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928587Suche in Google Scholar

24 Cruz, Y. J. et al.: Self-Reconfiguration for Smart Manufacturing Based on Artificial Intelligence: A Review and Case Study. In: Soldatos, J. (eds.): Artificial Intelligence in Manufacturing. Springer, Cham 2024 DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-46452-2_810.1007/978-3-031-46452-2_8Suche in Google Scholar

25 Walther, J.; Weigold, M.: A Systematic Review on Predicting and Forecasting the Electrical Energy Consumption in the Manufacturing Industry. Energies 14 (2021) 4 DOI:10.3390/en1404096810.3390/en14040968Suche in Google Scholar

26 Du, Y.; Li, S.; Torralba, A. et al.: Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models Through Multiagent Debate. 2023 DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2305.1432510.48550/arXiv.2305.14325Suche in Google Scholar

27 Lee, H.; Phatale, S.; Mansoor, H. et al.: RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback. 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024 DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2309.0026710.48550/arXiv.2309.00267Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-03-27
Published in Print: 2025-03-20

© 2025 Steven Vettermann and Marcus Röper, publiziert von De Gruyter

Dieses Werk ist lizensiert unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Grußwort
  2. Grußwort
  3. Inhalt
  4. Künstliche Intelligenz
  5. Künstliche Intelligenz (KI)
  6. Menschzentrierte Einführung von Künstlicher Intelligenz in Produktion und Engineering
  7. Generative AI and Agentic Architecture in Engineering and Manufacturing
  8. Intelligent Industry
  9. Von Piloten zu skalierbaren Lösungen
  10. KI in Engineering
  11. KI-Anwendungen im Engineering
  12. KI-Adaption in der Produktentwicklung
  13. KI-Transformation im Engineering
  14. Code the Product – Vision für die Produktentstehung der Zukunft
  15. Machine Learning in Transmission Design
  16. AI Enables Data-Driven Product Design
  17. Optimierung von Entwicklungsprozessen durch KI-gestütztes Generatives Engineering und Design
  18. Human-AI Teaming in a Digital Twin Model for Virtual Product Development
  19. Kundenorientierte Innovationspotenziale durch KI
  20. Scheitert Systems Engineering an seiner eigenen Komplexität?
  21. AI-Augmented Model-Based Systems Engineering
  22. Prompt Engineering im Systems Engineering
  23. Sustainable Product Development and Production with AI and Knowledge Graphs
  24. AI-Driven ERP Systems
  25. Optimale Produktion dank Künstlicher Intelligenz
  26. KI in PLM-Systemen
  27. KI in Produktion
  28. Durchblick in der Produktion
  29. Production of the Future
  30. Der Use-Case-First-Ansatz zum Einsatz von Künstlicher Intelligenz in der Produktion
  31. Überwindung der Programmierkluft in der Produktion und Fertigung
  32. Lean Data – Anwendungsspezifische Reduktion großer Datenmengen im Produktionsumfeld
  33. KI-Zuverlässigkeit in der Produktion
  34. KI in der Smart Factory: Warum Standardanwendungen besser sind
  35. Data-Driven Decision-Making: Leveraging Digital Twins for Reprocessing in the Circular Factory
  36. Extended Intelligence for Rapid Cognitive Reconfiguration
  37. Erfahrungsbasierte Bahnoptimierung von Montagerobotern mittels KI und Digitalen Zwillingen
  38. Integration of Machine Learning Methods to Calculate the Remaining Useful Life of Mandrels
  39. AI-Driven Load Sensing for Wind Turbine Operations
  40. ChatPLC – Potenziale der Generativen KI für die Steuerungsentwicklung
  41. Developing and Qualifying an ML Application for MRO Assistance
  42. Applying AI in Supporting Additive Manufacturing Machine Maintenance
  43. Kollaboratives Modelltraining und Datensicherheit
  44. KI-basierte Partikelgrößenbestimmung in Suspensionen
  45. Intelligente Prozessüberwachung für die flexible Produktion
  46. Robuste Bauteilidentifikation mittels digitaler Fingerabdrücke
  47. Herausforderungen der Digitalisierung in der Klebetechnik
  48. Vom Webshop zum Shopfloor
  49. Scoring-Prozess mit Vorhersagemodell
  50. Automatisierte Optimierung von Metamaterialien im Leichtbau
  51. KI-gestützte Prozessoptimierung in der Massivumformung
  52. AI-Supported Process Monitoring in Machining
  53. Federated Learning in der Arbeitsplanung
  54. KI in der Kommissionierung
  55. KI-basiertes Assistenzsystem zur Qualitätskontrolle
  56. Qualitätssteigerung durch Digitalisierung
  57. Qualitative und wirtschaftliche Vorteile des KI-gestützten 8D-Prozesses
  58. KI-gestützte Prognose von Durchlauf- und Lieferzeiten in der Einzel- und Kleinserienfertigung
Heruntergeladen am 3.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zwf-2025-0003/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen