Home Shintani and Shimura lifts of cusp forms on certain arithmetic groups and their applications
Article Open Access

Shintani and Shimura lifts of cusp forms on certain arithmetic groups and their applications

  • SoYoung Choi and Chang Heon Kim EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 30, 2017

Abstract

For an odd and squarefree level N, Kohnen proved that there is a canonically defined subspace S κ + 1 2 n e w ( N ) S κ + 1 2 ( N ) , and S κ + 1 2 n e w ( N ) and S 2 k n e w ( N ) are isomorphic as modules over the Hecke algebra. Later he gave a formula for the product a g ( m ) a g ( n ) ¯ of two arbitrary Fourier coefficients of a Hecke eigenform g of halfintegral weight and of level 4N in terms of certain cycle integrals of the corresponding form f of integral weight. To this end he first constructed Shimura and Shintani lifts, and then combining these lifts with the multiplicity one theorem he deduced the formula in [2, Theorem 3]. In this paper we will prove that there is a Hecke equivariant isomorphism between the spaces S 2 k + ( p ) and S k + 1 2 ( p ) . We will also construct Shintani and Shimura lifts for these spaces, and prove a result analogous to [2, Theorem 3].

MSC 2010: 11F11; 11F67; 11F37

1 Introduction and statement of results

For a positive integer N, we let

Γ 0 ( N ) := { a b c d S L 2 ( Z ) | c 0 ( m o d N ) }

be the Hecke subgroup of Γ(1):=SL2(ℤ), and Γ 0 + ( N ) be the group generated by the Hecke group Γ0(N) and the Fricke involution W N := 0 1 / N N 0 . If k is a positive integer, then we write S2k(N)(resp. S 2 k + ( N ) ) for the space of cusp forms of weight 2k on Γ0(N)(resp. Γ 0 + ( N ) ). We also denote by s k + 1 2 ( N ) the space of cusp forms of weight k + 1 2 on Γ0(4N), which have a Fourier expansion Σn≥1 a(n)qn with a(n) = 0 unless (–1)kn ≡ 0, 1 (mod 4). Let S k + 1 2 ( N ) be the subspace of S k + 1 2 ( N ) , in which the Fourier expansion of each form is supported only on those n ∈ ℤ for which (–1)kn ≡ □ (mod 4N). For each prime divisor p of N we define s k + 1 2 ± , p ( N ) as the subspace of S k + 1 2 ( N ) consisting of forms whose n-th Fourier coefficients vanish for ( 1 ) k n p = 1. In [1, Proposition 4] Kohnen defines, for each prime divisor p of N, a Hermitian involution w p , k + 1 2 N on S k + 1 2 ( N ) and shows that its (±)-eigenspace is equal to S k + 1 2 ± , p ( N ) . Thus we have an orthogonal decomposition

s κ + 1 2 ( N ) = s κ + 1 2 + , p ( N ) s κ + 1 2 , p ( N ) .

We then observe that

S k + 1 2 + , p ( p ) = S k + 1 2 ( p ) .

Let S 2 k n e w ( N ) be the subspace of newforms in S2k(N). We assume that the level N is odd and squarefree. In [1, page 65] Kohnen proved that there is a canonically defined subspace S k + 1 2 n e w ( N ) S k + 1 2 ( N ) , and S k + 1 2 n e w ( N ) and S 2 k n e w ( N ) are isomorphic as modules over the Hecke algebra. Later in [2, Theorem 3] he gave a formula for the product a g ( m ) a g ( n ) ¯ of two arbitrary Fourier coefficients of a Hecke eigenform g of half-integral weight and of level 4N in terms of certain cycle integrals of the corresponding form f of integral weight. To this end he first constructed Shimura and Shintani lifts, and then combining these lifts with the multiplicity one theorem [1, Theoerm 2] he deduced the formula in [2, Theorem 3].

In this paper we will prove in Theorem 1.10 that there is a Hecke equivariant isomorphism between the spaces S 2 k + ( p ) and S k + 1 2 ( p ) . We will also construct Shintani and Shimura lifts for these spaces (see Theorems 1.6 and 1.9), and prove in Theorem 1.11 a result analogous to [2, Theorem 3].

In the following, we introduce Poincaré series, Petersson scalar products, Shintani and Shimura lifts, and develop their properties relavant to our settings. Let ℌ denote the complex upper half plane. If f and g are cusp forms of weight κ 1 2 Z on some subgroup Γ of finite index in Γ(1) we denote their Petersson product by

f , g = f , g Γ = 1 [ Γ ( 1 ) : Γ ] Γ H f ( z ) g ( z ) ¯ y κ 2 d x d y ( x = R e z , y = I m z ) .

Let m be a positive integer such that (— 1)km = □ (mod 4p). Following [3], for z ∈ ℌ, we let P m + ( z ) S k + 1 2 ( p ) be a Poincaré series such that

g , P m + ( z ) = a g ( m ) c ( m ) for all g = n 1 a g ( n ) q n S k + 1 2 ( p ) ,

where c ( m ) = Γ ( k 1 2 ) i 4 p 1 ( 4 π m ) k 1 2 . Here iN stands for [Γ(1) : Γ0(N)]. Let α be a positive integer with (–1)k α ≡ 0, 1 (mod 4). As described in [2, (4)], for z ∈ ℌ, let P k , p , α ( z ) S k + 1 2 ( p ) be the Poincaré series characterized by

g , P k , p , α ( z ) = a g ( α ) c ( α ) for all g = n 1 a g ( n ) q n S k + 1 2 ( p ) .

Write

P k , p , α = P k , p , α + P k , p , α S k + 1 2 ( p ) S k + 1 2 , p ( p ) .

Proposition 1.1

Let α be a positive integer with (–1)k α ≡ 0, 1 (mod 4).

(i) If (–1)k α ≡ □ (mod 4p), then P k , p , α + = P α + .

(ii) (ii) If (–1)k α ≢ D (mod 4p), then P k , p , α + is identically zero.

(iii) If (–1)k α ≡ □ (mod 4p) with p α then P k , p , α = P α + .

The motivation of this paper is as follows. In [3] we have shown that the space S k + 1 2 ( p ) is spanned by the Poincaré series P α + . In [1, 2] Kohnen constructed Shimura lift by making use of the Poincaré series Pk,p,α in the space S k + 1 2 ( p ) . So we expect that these Poincaré series P α + can be used to find certain space of cusp forms of integral weight corresponding to the space S k + 1 2 ( p ) under Shimura and Shintani lifts.

Let 𝔇 be the set of all discriminants, i.e.

D = { d Z | d 0 , 1 ( m o d 4 ) } .

For d ∈ 𝔇, we let 𝓠d,N be the set of all integral binary quadratic forms Q(x,y) = ax2 + bxy + cy2 = [a, b, c] with N | a and b2 — 4ac = d. We observe that 𝓠d,N is an empty set unless d is congruent to a square modulo 4N. For M = α β γ δ Γ 0 + ( N ) , we set X′ = αX + βY, Y′ = γ X+ δY, and Q(X, Y)∘ M = Q(X′, Y′). This defines an action of the group Γ 0 + ( N ) on the set 𝓠d,N. Following [2, page 239], for integers k ≥ 2, N ≥ 1 and D, D′ ∈ 𝔇 with DD′ > 0 we set

f k , N ( z ; D , D ) := Q Q D D , N χ D ( Q ) Q ( z , 1 ) k ( z H ) ,

where 𝓧d(Q)is the generalized genus character defined as follows: for Q = [a, b, c],

χ D ( Q ) := 0 i f ( a , b , c , D ) > 1 D r i f ( a , b , c , D ) = 1 , w h e r e [ a , b , c ] r e p r e s e n t s r , ( r , D ) = 1.

The series converges absolutely uniformly on compact sets, and fk,N(z; D, D′) is a cusp form of weight 2k on Γ0(N).

Remark 1.2

(i) The series fk,N(z; D, D’) is a cusp form of weight 2k on Γ 0 + ( N ) since the character χD is invariant under the Fricke involution WN (see [4, Proposition 1 in p.508]).

(ii) The series fk,N(z; D, D′) is identically zero unless DD′ ≡ □ .(mod 4N) and (–1)kD > 0.

Proposition 1.3

For cusp forms f and g of weight κ 1 2 Z o n Γ 0 + ( p ) , we have

Γ 0 ( p ) H f g ¯ y κ 2 d x d y = 2 Γ 0 + ( p ) H f g ¯ y κ 2 d x d y .

If d ∈ 𝔇 is positive and is not a perfect square, then the group

Γ 0 + ( p ) Q / { ± 1 } = { g Γ 0 + ( p ) | Q g = Q } / { ± 1 }

is infinite cyclic with a distinguished generator gQ which is explicitly described in [5, Theorem 1.3]. For Q = [a, b, c]∈ 𝓠d.p let SQ be the oriented semi-circle defined by a|z|2 + (Re z) b + c = 0, directed counterclockwise if a > 0 and clockwise if a < 0. For f S 2 k + ( p ) and ∈ 𝓠d,p we define

r Q + ( f ) := c Q + f ( z ) d Q , k z

where c Q + = c Q + ( z 0 ) is the directed arc on SQ from z0SQ to gQz0, and dQ,kz = Q(z, 1)k1 dz. Then the value r Q + ( f ) is both independent of z0SQ and a class invariant.

For each f S 2 k + ( p ) and integers D, m satisfying the following condition

(1) ( 1 ) k m D , ( 1 ) k D > 0 , m > 0 , | D | m , and | D | m ( m o d 4 p ) ,

we set

r k , p + ( f ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) := Q Q | D | m , p / Γ 0 + ( p ) χ D ( Q ) r Q + ( f ) .

We also define for cusp forms f and g of weight 2k ∈ 2ℤ on Γ 0 + ( p ) ,

f , g Γ 0 + ( p ) = 2 i p Γ 0 + ( p ) H f g ¯ y 2 k 2 d x d y so that f , g Γ 0 + ( p ) = f , g Γ 0 ( p ) .

Proposition 1.4

For any f S 2 k + ( p ) and integers D, m satisfying (1) we have

f , f k , p ( ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) = f , f k , p ( ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) Γ 0 + ( p ) = 2 i p π 2 k 2 k 1 2 2 k + 2 ( | D | m ) 1 2 k r k , p + ( f ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) .

Proposition 1.5

For D ∈ 𝔇 with (–1)k D > 0, we let

φ k , p ( z , τ ) := m 1 ( 1 ) k m 0 , 1 ( 4 ) m k 1 2 f k , p ( z ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) e 2 π i m τ .

Then for fixed z, φk,p(z, τ) is an element of S k + 1 2 ( p ) .

Let w p := w p , k + 1 2 p be the Hermitian involution (with respect to τ) on the space S k + 1 2 ( p ) . We then have a decomposition

φ k , p ( z , τ ) = φ k , p + ( z , τ ) φ k , p ( z , τ ) S k + 1 2 ( p ) S k + 1 2 , p ( p ) .

Theorem 1.6

Let D ∈ 𝔇 with (1)k D > 0 and D ≡ □ (mod 4p). Define for each f S 2 k + ( p ) , , the D-th Shintani lift

f | S + := i p c k , D f , φ k , p + ( , τ ¯ ) S k + 1 2 ( p ) ,

with c k , D = i p ( 1 ) [ k 2 ] 3 ( 2 π ) k ( k 1 ) ! c ( | D | ) . If we write the Fourier expansion of g := f | S + as

g ( τ ) = m 1 ( 1 ) k m ( m o d 4 p ) a g ( m ) e 2 π i m τ ,

then for a positive integer m satisfying p m and (–1)km ≡ □ .(mod 4p) one has

a g ( m ) = 2 r k , p + ( f ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) .

Remark 1.7

(i) In the case p = 1 and k = 0, cycle integrals of the modular invariant j -function were considered in [6] and their generating function was shown to be a mock modular form of weight 1/2 on Γ0(4).

(ii) In [5, 7] cycle integrals of weakly holomorphic modular forms were used to construct modular integrals for certain rational period functions related to indefinite binary quadratic forms.

We have

φ k , p + ( z , τ ) = φ k , p ( z , τ ) + φ k , p ( z , τ ) | w p 2 .

Alternatively, we can find φ k , p + ( z , τ ) by means of Poincaré series as follows. Following [2, (3)], for z ∈ ℌ and D ∈ 𝔇 with (–1)k D > 0, we let

Ω k , p ( z , τ ; D ) = i p c k , D 1 m 1 ( 1 ) k m 0 , 1 ( 4 ) m k 1 2 t | p μ ( t ) D t t k 1 f k , p t ( t z ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) e 2 π i m τ

where c k , D = ( 1 ) [ k 2 ] | D | k + 1 2 π 2 k 2 k 1 2 3 k + 2 and μ(t) is the Möbius μ-function. By [2, (3)] or (5) one has

φ k , p ( z , τ ) = i p 1 c k , D Ω k , p ( z , τ ; D ) + p k 1 i p D p Ω k , 1 ( p z , τ ; D ) = ( 1 ) [ k 2 ] 3 ( 2 π ) k ( k 1 ) ! n 1 n k 1 d | n p d D d n d k P k , p , n 2 | D | / d 2 ( τ ) e 2 π i n z + p k 1 ( D p ) ( 1 ) [ k 2 ] 3 ( 2 π ) k ( k 1 ) ! n 1 n k 1 d | n D d n d k P k , 1 , n 2 | D | / d 2 ( τ ) e 2 π i n p z .

This gives rise to the following theorem.

Theorem 1.8

Let D ∈ 𝔇 with (–1)kD > 0 and D ≡ □ (mod 4p). We have

(2) φ k , p + ( z , τ ) = ( 1 ) [ k 2 ] 3 ( 2 π ) k ( k 1 ) ! n 1 n k 1 d | n p d D d n d k P k , p , n 2 | D | / d 2 + ( τ ) e 2 π i n z + p k 1 D p ( 1 ) [ k 2 ] 3 ( 2 π ) k ( k 1 ) ! n 1 n k 1 d | n D d n d k P k , 1 , n 2 | D | / d 2 + ( τ ) e 2 π i n p z .

Let D ∈𝔇with (–1)k D > 0 and D ≡ □ (mod 4p). Now we define for each g S k + 1 2 ( p ) , the D-th Shimura lift

g | S + := i p c k , D g , φ k , p + ( z ¯ , τ ) τ S 2 k + ( p ) .

It then follows from (2) that

g | S + = i p c k , D ( 1 ) [ k 2 ] 3 ( 2 π ) k ( k 1 ) ! n 1 n k 1 d | n p d D d ( n d ) k a g ( n 2 | D | / d 2 ) c ( n 2 | D | / d 2 ) e 2 π i n z + p k 1 i p c k , D D p ( 1 ) [ k 2 ] 3 ( 2 π ) k ( k 1 ) ! n 1 n k 1 d | n D d n d k g , P k , 1 , n 2 | D | / d 2 + ( τ ) τ e 2 π i n p z .

Theorem 1.9

(i) Our Shimura lift is Hecke equivariant, i.e. for each g S k + 1 2 ( p ) and a prime r(≠ p), we have

( g | S + ) | T ( r ) = ( g | T ( r 2 ) ) | S +

(ii) Our Shintani lift is Hecke equivariant, i.e. for each f S 2 k + ( p ) and a prime r(≠ p), we have

( f | S + ) | T ( r 2 ) = ( f | T ( r ) ) | S + .

Theorem 1.10

Let p be an odd prime. There exists a Hecke equivariant isomorphism

L ´ ( = L ´ p ) : S 2 k + ( p ) S k + 1 2 ( p ) .

Theorem 1.11

Let D ∈ 𝔇) with (1)k D > 0 and D ≡ □ (mod 4p). Let p be an odd prime and L ´ ( = L ´ p ) : S 2 k + ( p ) S k + 1 2 ( p ) . be the Hecke equivariant isomorphism discussed in Theorem 1.10 and let {f1, . . . , ft} be a basis for S 2 k + ( p ) consisting of normalized Hecke eigenforms. For each j ∈ {1, . . . ,t} we put gj := Ĺ (fj) Then the following assertions are true.

(i) Let 𝓢+ denote the D -th Shimura lift. Then

g j | S + = c j ( | D | ) f j

where cj.(|D|) denotes the Fourier coefficient of q|D| in gj.

(ii) For each positive integer n, the Fourier coefficients cj (n) of qn in gj satisfy

c j ( n ) ¯ = c c j ( n )

for some nonzero constant c.

(iii) Let S + denote the D -th Shintani lift. Then

f j | S + = c j ( | D | ) ¯ f j , f j g j , g j 1 g j .

(iv) For each positive integer m such that (–1)km ≡ □ (mod 4p) and p m, we have

r k , p + ( f j , D , ( 1 ) k m ) = 1 2 c j ( | D | ) ¯ c j ( m ) f j , f j g j , g j 1

(v) For each f S 2 k + ( p ) a n d g S k + 1 2 ( p ) , one has

g | S + , f = g , f | S + ,

i.e. 𝓢+ and S + are adjoint.

Remark 1.12

(i) Let S k , p , D denote the Kohnen’s Shintani lift [2, (8)] and f be a newform in S 2 k + ( p ) . Then our Shintani lift f | S + is the projection of Kohnen’s Shintani lift f | S k , p , D o n S k + 1 2 ( p ) up to multiplication. But they are different for oldforms.

(ii) Let 𝓢k,p,D denote the Kohnen’s Shimura lift [2, (6)] and g be a newform in S k + 1 2 ( p ) Our Shimura lift g |𝓢+ and Kohnen’s Shimura lift g |𝓢k,p,D are the same up to multiplication. But they are different for oldforms.

(iii) Kohnen’s results [1] do not give a Hecke equivariant isomorphism between the spaces S 2 k + ( p ) a n d S k + 1 2 ( p ) while we give it in Theorem 1.10.

(iv) The results in Theorem 1.11 hold for all Hecke eigenforms in S 2 k + ( p ) o r S k + 1 2 ( p ) But when we consider the spaces S 2 k + ( p ) a n d S k + 1 2 ( p ) Kohnen’s results hold only for newforms.

Throughout this paper, given a modular form f we denote by af (n), the Fourier coefficient of qn in f. This paper is organized as follows. The proofs of Propositions 1.1, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5 are given in Section 2. In Section 3 the proofs of Theorems 1.6 and 1.9 are given. In Section 4 and Section 5 we prove Theorems 1.10 and 1.11, respectively.

2 Proofs of Propositions 1.1,1.3,1.4 and 1.5

Proof of Proposition 1.1. We observe that for f S k + 1 2 ( p ) a n d g h S k + 1 2 ( p ) = S k + 1 2 ( p ) s k + 1 2 , p ( p ) ,

f , g + h = f , g .

Write P k , p , α + ( τ ) = ( 1 ) k l ( 4 p ) a P k , p , α + ( l ) e 2 π i l τ . We then have for each positive integer l with (–1)kl ≡ □ (mod 4p),

a P l + ( α ) c ( α ) = P l + , P k , p , α = P l + , P k , p , α + = P k , p , α , + P l + ¯ = c ( l ) a P k , p , α + ( l ) ¯ ,

so that

(3) a P k , p , α + ( l ) = c ( α ) c ( l ) a P l + ( α ) ¯ ,

which is zero unless (–1)k α ≡ □ (mod 4p). This proves the second assertion. To prove the first assertion we observe that

(4) a P l + ( α ) c ( α ) = P l + , P α + = P α + , P l + ¯ = a P α + ( l ) ¯ c ( l ) .

Combining (3) and (4) we get that a P k , p , α + ( l ) = a P α + ( l ) , , from which the first assertion is immediate. Now we prove the third assertion. For each positive integer α and β with (–1)k α ≡ □ (mod 4p)and (–1)k β ≡ □ (mod 4p), we consider

P k , p , α , P k , p , β = P k , p , α P α + , P k , p , β P β + = c ( β ) a P k , p , α ( β ) c ( α ) a P β + ( α ) ¯ = c ( β ) a P k , p , α ( β ) c ( β ) a P α + ( β ) by (4) = c ( β ) a P k , p , α ( β ) .

Thus

P k , p , α , P k , p , β = P α + + P k , p , α , P k , p , β = P k , p , α , P k , p , β

= c ( β ) a P k , p , α ( β ) = c ( α ) a P k , p , β ( α ) ¯ = 0 since p α and ( 1 ) k α p = 1.

This implies that a P k , p , α ( β ) = 0 for arbitrary positive integer β with (–1)k β ≡ □ (mod 4p)so that P k , p , α = P α + .

Proof of Proposition 1.3. Let F p + be a fundamental domain of Γ 0 + ( p ) . Then F p + W p F p + is a fundamental domain of Γ0(p). Thus we see that

Γ 0 ( p ) H f g ¯ y κ 2 d x d y = F p + f g ¯ y κ 2 d x d y + W p F p + f g ¯ y κ 2 d x d y = F p + f g ¯ y κ 2 d x d y + F p + f | κ W p g | κ W p ¯ y κ 2 d x d y = 2 F p + f g ¯ y κ 2 d x d y = 2 Γ 0 + ( p ) H f g ¯ y κ 2 d x d y ,

as desired.

Proof of Proposition 1.4. For a Γ 0 + ( p ) -class 𝔘 of forms Q ∈ 𝓠|D|m,p, we define

f k , p ( z ; U ) = Q U Q ( z , 1 ) k .

We then have f k , p ( z ; U ) S 2 k + ( p ) and

i p f , f k , p ( ; U ) Γ 0 + ( p ) = 2 Γ 0 + ( p ) H γ Γ Q Γ 0 + ( p ) ( Q γ ) ( z ¯ , 1 ) k f ( z ) y 2 k 2 d x d y = 2 Γ Q H Q ( z ¯ , 1 ) k f ( z ) y 2 k 2 d x d y ,

where Q is any element of 𝔘 and ΓQ is the stabilizer of Q in Γ 0 + ( p ) . By similar argument in [2, Proposition 7], we obtain

f , f k , p ( ; U ) Γ 0 + ( p ) = 2 i p ( | D | m ) 1 2 k 0 π sin 2 k 2 θ d θ c Q + f ( z ) d Q , k Z

and hence

f , f k , p ( ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) Γ 0 + ( p ) = 2 i p π 2 k 2 k 1 2 2 k + 2 ( | D | m ) 1 2 k r k , p + ( f ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) .

Proof of Proposition 1.5. We observe that

Ω k , p ( z , τ ; D ) = i p c k , D 1 m 1 ( 1 ) k m 0 , 1 ( 4 ) m k 1 2 f k , p ( z ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) e 2 π i m τ i p c k , D 1 m 1 ( 1 ) k m 0 , 1 ( 4 ) m k 1 2 D p p k 1 f k , 1 ( p z ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) e 2 π i m τ S k + 1 2 ( p ) .

Since

Ω k , 1 ( z , τ ; D ) = c k , D 1 m 1 ( 1 ) k m 0 , 1 ( 4 ) m k 1 2 f k , 1 ( z ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) e 2 π i m τ

belongs to S k + 1 2 ( 1 ) S k + 1 2 ( p ) for fixed τ, one has

Ω k , 1 ( p z , τ ; D ) = c k , D 1 m 1 ( 1 ) k m 0 , 1 ( 4 ) m k 1 2 f k , 1 ( p z ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) e 2 π i m τ S k + 1 2 ( p ) .

Thus we obtain that

(5) φ k , p ( z , τ ) = m 1 ( 1 ) k m 0 , 1 ( 4 ) m k 1 2 f k , p ( z ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) e 2 π i m τ = i p 1 c k , D Ω k , p ( z , τ ; D ) + p k 1 i p D p Ω k , 1 ( p z , τ ; D ) S k + 1 2 ( p ) ,

as desired.

3 Proofs of Theorems 1.6 and 1.9

Proof of Theorem 1.6. We note that for each positive integer m such that (–1)km ≡ □ (mod 4p)and p m,

a φ k , p + ( z , τ ) ( m ) = m k 1 2 f k , p ( z ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) .

Thus we have

g ( τ ) f | S + = i p c k , D f , φ k , p + ( , τ ¯ ) = i p c k , D f , m 1 , p m ( 1 ) k m ( 4 p ) m k 1 2 f k , p ( ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) e 2 π i m τ ¯ + m 1 , p | m ( 1 ) k m ( 4 p ) a g ( m ) e 2 π i m τ = i p c k , D m 1 , p m ( 1 ) k m ( 4 p ) m k 1 2 f , f k , p ( ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) e 2 π i m τ + m 1 , p | m ( 1 ) k m ( 4 p ) a g ( m ) e 2 π i m τ = 2 m 1 , p m ( 1 ) k m ( 4 p ) r k , p + ( f ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) e 2 π i m τ + m 1 , p | m ( 1 ) k m ( 4 p ) a g ( m ) e 2 π i m τ

by Proposition 1.4

from which the assertion is immediate.

Proof of Theorem 1.9. First we need a lemma.

Lemma 3.1

One has

(6) ( φ k , p | T ( r 2 ) ) + = φ k , p + | T ( r 2 )

and

(7) ( φ k , p | T ( r ) ) + = φ k , p + | T ( r ) .

Proof

We observe that

( φ k , p = φ k , p + φ k , p ) | T ( r 2 ) = φ k , p + | T ( r 2 ) φ k , p | T ( r 2 ) S k + 1 2 ( p ) S k + 1 2 , p ( p ) ,

from which (6) is immediate. By a similar reasoning one obtains (7).

For the proof of the first assertion of Theorem 1.9 we observe that for l ∈ {1, p} and each g S k + 1 2 ( l ) ,

g , Ω k , l ( z ¯ , , D ) | T ( r 2 ) = { g | T ( r 2 ) , Ω k , l ( z ¯ , , D ) } = ( g , Ω k , l ( z ¯ , , D ) ) | T ( r ) b y [ 2 , p .241 ] = g , Ω k , l ( z ¯ , , D ) | T ( r ) .

Thus one obtains

(8) Ω k , l ( z ¯ , τ , D ) | T ( r 2 ) = Ω k , l ( z ¯ , τ , D ) | T ( r )

where the operator T(r2)(resp. T(r))acts on a function with variable τ(resp. z). In particular,

(9) Ω k , 1 ( p z ¯ , τ , D ) | T ( r 2 ) = Ω k , 1 ( z ¯ , τ , D ) | T ( r 2 ) | V ( p ) = Ω k , 1 ( z ¯ , τ , D ) | T ( r ) | V ( p ) = Ω k , 1 ( z ¯ , τ , D ) | V ( p ) | T ( r ) = Ω k , 1 ( p z ¯ , τ , D ) | T ( r )

where the operator V(p) acts on a function with variable z. Consequently, for g S k + 1 2 ( p ) ,

( g | S + ) | T ( r ) = ( g , φ k , p + ( z ¯ , τ ) τ ) | T ( r ) = ( g , φ k , p ( z ¯ , τ ) τ ) | T ( r ) = g , i p 1 c k , D Ω k , p ( z ¯ , τ , D ) | T ( r ) + g , p k 1 c k , D D p Ω k , 1 ( p z ¯ , τ , D ) | T ( r ) b y ( 5 ) = g , i p 1 c k , D Ω k , p ( z ¯ , τ , D ) | T ( r ) + g , p k 1 c k , D D p Ω k , 1 ( p z ¯ , τ , D ) | T ( r ) = g , i p 1 c k , D Ω k , p ( z ¯ , τ , D ) | T ( r 2 ) + g , p k 1 c k , D D p Ω k , 1 ( p z ¯ , τ , D ) | T ( r 2 ) b y ( 8 ) a n d ( 9 ) = g | T ( r 2 ) , φ k , p ( z ¯ , τ ) = g | T ( r 2 ) , φ k , p + ( z ¯ , τ ) = ( g | T ( r 2 ) ) | S +

Next we will prove the second assertion of Theorem 1.9. For fS2k(l), let f |S*denote the D-th Shintani lifting of f, defined in [2, p.240]. We then remark from [2, Theorem 2] that

(10) f , Ω k , l ( , τ ¯ , D ) = f | S f o r a l l f S 2 k ( l )

and

(11) ( f | T ( r ) ) | S = ( f | S ) | T ( r 2 ) f o r a l l p r i m e r ( l ) .

Thus for all f ∈ S2k(l), we have that

f , Ω k , l ( , τ ¯ , D ) | T ( r ) = f | T ( r ) , Ω k , l ( , τ ¯ , D ) = f , Ω k , l ( , τ ¯ , D ) | T ( r 2 ) b y ( 10 ) a n d ( 11 ) = f , Ω k , l ( , τ ¯ , D ) | T ( r 2 ) ,

which implies that

Ω k , l ( z , τ ¯ , D ) | T ( r ) = Ω k , l ( z , τ ¯ , D ) | T ( r 2 ) .

In particular,

Ω k , 1 ( p z , τ ¯ , D ) | T ( r ) = Ω k , 1 ( z , τ ¯ , D ) | V ( p ) | T ( r ) = Ω k , 1 ( z , τ ¯ , D ) | T ( r ) | V ( p ) = Ω k , 1 ( p z , τ ¯ , D ) | T ( r 2 ) .

Hence we obtain that for all f S 2 k + ( p ) ,

c k , D i p ( f | S + ) | T ( r 2 ) = f , φ k , p + ( , τ ¯ ) | T ( r 2 ) = f , φ k , p + ( , τ ¯ ) | T ( r 2 ) = f , ( φ k , p ( , τ ¯ ) | T ( r 2 ) ) + b y ( 6 ) = f , ( φ k , p ( , τ ¯ ) | T ( r ) ) + = f , φ k , p + ( , τ ¯ ) | T ( r ) b y ( 7 ) = f | T ( r ) , φ k , p + ( , τ ¯ ) = c k , D i p ( f | T ( r ) ) | S + .

4 Proof of Theorem 1.10

Following [1, p.64 lines 7-9], let S k + 1 2 o l d ( p ) be the set of oldforms in S k + 1 2 ( p ) . Let S k + 1 2 o l d ( p ) := S k + 1 2 o l d ( p ) S k + 1 2 ( p ) .

Lemma 4.1

Define a map

Φ : S k + 1 2 ( 1 ) S k + 1 2 o l d ( p )

by Ф (f) = f + f |wp. Then Ф is a Hecke equivariant isomorphism.

Proof

According to [1, p.65 line 4], the Hermitian involution wp leaves the space of oldforms stable. Let f S k + 1 2 ( 1 ) . It then follows from [1, p.66 line 5] that f | wp is an oldform, too. Therefore we have an inclusion

{ f + f | w p | f S k + 1 2 ( 1 ) } S k + 1 2 o 1 d ( p ) S k + 1 2 ( p ) = S k + 1 2 ol d ( p ) .

While [8, Theorem 5.11 in p.2612] says

S k + 1 2 ( p ) = S k + 1 2 n e w ( p ) { f + f | w p | f S k + 1 2 ( 1 ) } ,

in [1] it is shown that

S k + 1 2 ( p ) = S k + 1 2 n e w ( p ) S k + 1 2 o l d ( p ) .

Thus we have

(12) S k + 1 2 o l d ( p ) = { f + f | w p | f S k + 1 2 ( 1 ) } .

It follows from (12) that the map Ф is surjective. Next we will show that Φ is injective. Indeed if we assume Ф (f) = f + f | wp = 0 for f = n 1 a ( n ) q n S k + 1 2 ( 1 ) , then we have

0 = f + f | w p = n 1 a ( n ) q n + n 1 ( 1 ) k n p a ( n ) + p k a ( n / p 2 ) q n b y [ 1 , ( 44 ) ] .

Comparing the coefficients of q p 2 m we obtain that a(p2m) = –pk a(m)for all positive integers m, which means that f | U (p2) = –pk f. But it follows from [1, Theorem 2] that

S k + 1 2 ( p ) = S k + 1 2 ( 1 ) S k + 1 2 ( 1 ) | U ( p 2 ) S k + 1 2 n e w ( p ) ,

from which we deduce that f = 0. This shows that Ф is injective. Finally we will show that Ф is Hecke equivariant. By [1, lines 2-3 in p.66] we have

f | w p = p 1 k ( f | U ( p 2 ) + f | T k + 1 2 , 1 ( p 2 ) .

Thus for any prime r(≠ p), one has

Φ ( f ) | T ( r 2 ) = ( f + f | w p ) | T ( r 2 ) = f | T ( r 2 ) + ( f | w p ) | T ( r 2 ) = f | T ( r 2 ) + ( f | T ( r 2 ) ) | w p s i n c e U ( p 2 ) a n d T ( p 2 ) c o m m u t e w i t h T ( r 2 ) = Φ ( f | T ( r 2 ) .

Let Φ 1 : S 2 k ( 1 ) S k + 1 2 ( 1 ) be the Kohnen-Shimura isomorphism which is Hecke equivariant, and we let S 2 k ( 1 ) S 2 k + o l d ( p ) be a Hecke equivariant isomorphism defined by Ф2(f) = f + f |Wp. These facts combined with Lemma 4.1 show that the map φ := Φ Φ 1 Φ 2 1 defines a Hecke equivariant isomorphism from S 2 k + o l d ( p ) to S k + 1 2 + o l d ( p ) . Meanwhile, according to [1, page 71] there exists a Hecke equivariant isomorphism from S 2 k + n e w ( p ) to S k + 1 2 n e w ( p ) . Now we see that the map

L ´ : S 2 k + ( p ) ( = S 2 k + o l d ( p ) S 2 k + n e w ( p ) ) S k + 1 2 ( p )

defined by

L ´ ( f g ) = φ ( f ) ψ ( g )

is a Hecke equivariant isomorphism.

5 Proof of Theorem 1.11

(i) Utilizing Theorems 1.9 and 1.10 we get that for each prime r(∘ p),

( g j | S + ) | T ( r ) = ( g j | T ( r 2 ) ) | S + = L ´ ( f j | T ( r ) ) | S + = λ j ( r ) L ´ ( f j ) | S + = λ j ( r ) g j | S + ,

for some λj (r)∈ ℂ By multiplicity one theorem we have

(13) g j | S + = c f j for some c C .

Comparing Fourier cofficient of q on both sides of (13) we obtain c = cj (| D |), which proves the assertion.

(ii) We note that for each prime r(≠ p),

L ´ 1 ( g j | T ( r 2 ) ) = L ´ 1 ( g j ) | T ( r ) = f j | T ( r ) = λ j ( r ) f j = L ´ 1 ( λ j ( r ) g j ) ,

so that

(14) g j | T ( r 2 ) = λ j ( r ) g j

Thus we have

g j ( τ ¯ ) ¯ | T ( r 2 ) = ( g j | T ( r 2 ) ) ( τ ¯ ) ¯ = λ j ( r ) g j ( τ ¯ ) ¯

and therefore

L ´ 1 ( g j ( τ ¯ ) ¯ ) | T ( r ) = L ´ 1 ( g j ( τ ¯ ) ¯ | T ( r 2 ) ) = λ j ( r ) L ´ 1 ( g j ( τ ¯ ) ¯ ) .

This implies that

L ´ 1 ( g j ( τ ¯ ) ¯ ) = c f j = c L ´ 1 ( g j ) for some nonzero c C .

Hence we have

g j ( τ ¯ ) ¯ = c g j ( τ )

and therefore

c j ( n ) ¯ = c c j ( n ) .

(iii) We note that g1, . . . , gt are mutually orthogonal with respect to Petersson scalar product. Write

φ k , p + ( z , τ ) = j = 1 t h j ( z ) g j ( τ ) .

We then have

φ k , p + ( z ¯ , τ ) = j = 1 t h j ( z ¯ ) g j ( τ ) ,

so that

g j | S + = g j , φ k , p + ( z ¯ , τ ) τ = h j ( z ¯ ) ¯ g j , g j .

Meanwhile by the assertion (i), one has gj| S+ = cj (| D|) fj. Thus we come up with

h j ( z ) = c j ( | D | ) ¯ g j , g j ¯ f j ( z ¯ ) ¯ = c j ( | D | ) ¯ g j , g j ¯ f j ( z ) ,

since fj has real Fourier coefficients. Hence we get that

φ k , p + ( z , τ ) = j = 1 t c j ( | D | ) ¯ g j , g j ¯ f j ( z ) g j ( τ ) ,

and therefore

c k , D i p f j | S + = f j ( z ) , φ k , p + ( z , τ ¯ ) z = c j ( | D | ) f j , f j g j , g j g j ( τ ¯ ) ¯ = c j ( | D | ) f j , f j g j , g j g j by the assertion (ii) .

(iv) Recalling from Theorem 1.6 that

F j := f j | S + = m 1 , p m ( 1 ) k m ( 4 p ) 2 r k , p + ( f j ; D , ( 1 ) k m ) e 2 π i m τ + m 1 , p | m ( 1 ) k m ( 4 p ) a F j ( m ) e 2 π i m τ ,

we see that the assertion (iv) is immediate from (iii). (v) First we claim that for each i, j ∈ {1, . . . , t}, one has

g i | S + , f j = g i , f j | S + .

Indeed we obtain that

g i | S + , f j = c j ( | D | ) f i , f j = c j ( | D | ) δ i j f i , f j

and by the assertion (iii)

g i , f j | S + = g i , g j c j ( | D | ) f j , f j g j , g j = c j ( | D | ) δ i j f i , f j .

More generally if we write g = i = 1 t a i g i and f = j = 1 t b j f j , then

g | S + , f = i = 1 t a i g i | S + , j = 1 t b j f j = i , j a j b j ¯ g i | S + , f j = i , j a j b j ¯ g i , f j | S + by the claim = g , f | S + .

Acknowledgement

We appreciate the referees for their valuable comments. We also would like to thank KIAS (Korea Institute for Advanced Study) for its hospitality.

Choi was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2014R1A1A2054915). Kim was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIP) (NRF-2015R1D1A1A01057428 and 2016R1A5A1008055).

References

[1] W. Kohnen, Newforms of half-integral weight, J. reine angew. Math. 333 (1982), 32–72.Search in Google Scholar

[2] W. Kohnen, Fourier coefficients of modular forms of half-integral weight, Math. Ann. 271 (1985), 237–268.10.1007/BF01455989Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. Choi and C. H. Kim, Linear relations among half-integral weight Poincaré series, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 432 (2015), 1077–1094.10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.07.031Search in Google Scholar

[4] B. Gross, W. Kohnen and D. Zagier, Heegner points and Derivatives of L-series. II, Math. Ann. 278 (1987), 497–562.10.1007/BF01458081Search in Google Scholar

[5] S. Choi and C. H. Kim, Rational period functions and cycle integrals in higher level cases, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 427 (2015), 741–758.10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.02.069Search in Google Scholar

[6] W. Duke, Ö. Imamoḡlu, and Á. Tóth, Cycle integrals of the j-function and mock modular forms, Ann. Math. 173 (2) (2011), 947–981.10.4007/annals.2011.173.2.8Search in Google Scholar

[7] W. Duke, Ö. Imamoḡlu, and Á. Tóth, Rational period functions and cycle integrals, Abh. Math. Semin. Univ. Hambg. 80 (2010), no.2, 255-264.10.1007/s12188-010-0038-8Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Manickam and B. Ramakrishnan, On Shimura, Shintani and Eichler-Zagier Correspondences, Tran. Amer. Math. Soc. 352(2000), 2601–2617.10.1090/S0002-9947-00-02423-5Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-8-2
Accepted: 2017-1-3
Published Online: 2017-3-30

© 2017 Choi and Kim

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Integrals of Frullani type and the method of brackets
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Edge of chaos in reaction diffusion CNN model
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Calculus using proximities: a mathematical approach in which students can actually prove theorems
  7. Regular Articles
  8. An investigation on hyper S-posets over ordered semihypergroups
  9. Regular Articles
  10. The Leibniz algebras whose subalgebras are ideals
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Fixed point and multidimensional fixed point theorems with applications to nonlinear matrix equations in terms of weak altering distance functions
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Matrix rank and inertia formulas in the analysis of general linear models
  15. Regular Articles
  16. The hybrid power mean of quartic Gauss sums and Kloosterman sums
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Tauberian theorems for statistically (C,1,1) summable double sequences of fuzzy numbers
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Some properties of graded comultiplication modules
  21. Regular Articles
  22. The characterizations of upper approximation operators based on special coverings
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Bi-integrable and tri-integrable couplings of a soliton hierarchy associated with SO(4)
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Dynamics for a discrete competition and cooperation model of two enterprises with multiple delays and feedback controls
  27. Regular Articles
  28. A new view of relationship between atomic posets and complete (algebraic) lattices
  29. Regular Articles
  30. A class of extensions of Restricted (s, t)-Wythoff’s game
  31. Regular Articles
  32. New bounds for the minimum eigenvalue of 𝓜-tensors
  33. Regular Articles
  34. Shintani and Shimura lifts of cusp forms on certain arithmetic groups and their applications
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Empirical likelihood for quantile regression models with response data missing at random
  37. Regular Articles
  38. Convex combination of analytic functions
  39. Regular Articles
  40. On the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank-two matrices
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Uniform topology on EQ-algebras
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Integrations on rings
  45. Regular Articles
  46. The quasilinear parabolic kirchhoff equation
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Avoiding rainbow 2-connected subgraphs
  49. Regular Articles
  50. On non-Hopfian groups of fractions
  51. Regular Articles
  52. Singularly perturbed hyperbolic problems on metric graphs: asymptotics of solutions
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Rings in which elements are the sum of a nilpotent and a root of a fixed polynomial that commute
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Superstability of functional equations related to spherical functions
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Evaluation of the convolution sum involving the sum of divisors function for 22, 44 and 52
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Weighted minimal translation surfaces in the Galilean space with density
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Complete convergence for weighted sums of pairwise independent random variables
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Binomials transformation formulae for scaled Fibonacci numbers
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Growth functions for some uniformly amenable groups
  67. Regular Articles
  68. Hopf bifurcations in a three-species food chain system with multiple delays
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Oscillation and nonoscillation of half-linear Euler type differential equations with different periodic coefficients
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Osculating curves in 4-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index 2
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Some new facts about group 𝒢 generated by the family of convergent permutations
  75. Regular Articles
  76. lnfinitely many solutions for fractional Schrödinger equations with perturbation via variational methods
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Supersolvable orders and inductively free arrangements
  79. Regular Articles
  80. Asymptotically almost automorphic solutions of differential equations with piecewise constant argument
  81. Regular Articles
  82. Finite groups whose all second maximal subgroups are cyclic
  83. Regular Articles
  84. Semilinear systems with a multi-valued nonlinear term
  85. Regular Articles
  86. Positive solutions for Hadamard differential systems with fractional integral conditions on an unbounded domain
  87. Regular Articles
  88. Calibration and simulation of Heston model
  89. Regular Articles
  90. One kind sixth power mean of the three-term exponential sums
  91. Regular Articles
  92. Cyclic pairs and common best proximity points in uniformly convex Banach spaces
  93. Regular Articles
  94. The uniqueness of meromorphic functions in k-punctured complex plane
  95. Regular Articles
  96. Normalizers of intermediate congruence subgroups of the Hecke subgroups
  97. Regular Articles
  98. The hyperbolicity constant of infinite circulant graphs
  99. Regular Articles
  100. Scott convergence and fuzzy Scott topology on L-posets
  101. Regular Articles
  102. One sided strong laws for random variables with infinite mean
  103. Regular Articles
  104. The join of split graphs whose completely regular endomorphisms form a monoid
  105. Regular Articles
  106. A new branch and bound algorithm for minimax ratios problems
  107. Regular Articles
  108. Upper bound estimate of incomplete Cochrane sum
  109. Regular Articles
  110. Value distributions of solutions to complex linear differential equations in angular domains
  111. Regular Articles
  112. The nonlinear diffusion equation of the ideal barotropic gas through a porous medium
  113. Regular Articles
  114. The Sheffer stroke operation reducts of basic algebras
  115. Regular Articles
  116. Extensions and improvements of Sherman’s and related inequalities for n-convex functions
  117. Regular Articles
  118. Classification lattices are geometric for complete atomistic lattices
  119. Regular Articles
  120. Possible numbers of x’s in an {x, y}-matrix with a given rank
  121. Regular Articles
  122. New error bounds for linear complementarity problems of weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrices
  123. Regular Articles
  124. Boundedness of vector-valued B-singular integral operators in Lebesgue spaces
  125. Regular Articles
  126. On the Golomb’s conjecture and Lehmer’s numbers
  127. Regular Articles
  128. Some applications of the Archimedean copulas in the proof of the almost sure central limit theorem for ordinary maxima
  129. Regular Articles
  130. Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  131. Regular Articles
  132. Corrigendum to: Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  133. Regular Articles
  134. Convergence and stability of generalized φ-weak contraction mapping in CAT(0) spaces
  135. Regular Articles
  136. Triple solutions for a Dirichlet boundary value problem involving a perturbed discrete p(k)-Laplacian operator
  137. Regular Articles
  138. OD-characterization of alternating groups Ap+d
  139. Regular Articles
  140. On Jordan mappings of inverse semirings
  141. Regular Articles
  142. On generalized Ehresmann semigroups
  143. Regular Articles
  144. On topological properties of spaces obtained by the double band matrix
  145. Regular Articles
  146. Representing derivatives of Chebyshev polynomials by Chebyshev polynomials and related questions
  147. Regular Articles
  148. Chain conditions on composite Hurwitz series rings
  149. Regular Articles
  150. Coloring subgraphs with restricted amounts of hues
  151. Regular Articles
  152. An extension of the method of brackets. Part 1
  153. Regular Articles
  154. Branch-delete-bound algorithm for globally solving quadratically constrained quadratic programs
  155. Regular Articles
  156. Strong edge geodetic problem in networks
  157. Regular Articles
  158. Ricci solitons on almost Kenmotsu 3-manifolds
  159. Regular Articles
  160. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions sharing two finite sets
  161. Regular Articles
  162. On the fourth-order linear recurrence formula related to classical Gauss sums
  163. Regular Articles
  164. Dynamical behavior for a stochastic two-species competitive model
  165. Regular Articles
  166. Two new eigenvalue localization sets for tensors and theirs applications
  167. Regular Articles
  168. κ-strong sequences and the existence of generalized independent families
  169. Regular Articles
  170. Commutators of Littlewood-Paley gκ -functions on non-homogeneous metric measure spaces
  171. Regular Articles
  172. On decompositions of estimators under a general linear model with partial parameter restrictions
  173. Regular Articles
  174. Groups and monoids of Pythagorean triples connected to conics
  175. Regular Articles
  176. Hom-Lie superalgebra structures on exceptional simple Lie superalgebras of vector fields
  177. Regular Articles
  178. Numerical methods for the multiplicative partial differential equations
  179. Regular Articles
  180. Solvable Leibniz algebras with NFn Fm1 nilradical
  181. Regular Articles
  182. Evaluation of the convolution sums ∑al+bm=n lσ(l) σ(m) with ab ≤ 9
  183. Regular Articles
  184. A study on soft rough semigroups and corresponding decision making applications
  185. Regular Articles
  186. Some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions with applications
  187. Regular Articles
  188. Deficiency of forests
  189. Regular Articles
  190. Perfect codes in power graphs of finite groups
  191. Regular Articles
  192. A new compact finite difference quasilinearization method for nonlinear evolution partial differential equations
  193. Regular Articles
  194. Does any convex quadrilateral have circumscribed ellipses?
  195. Regular Articles
  196. The dynamic of a Lie group endomorphism
  197. Regular Articles
  198. On pairs of equations in unlike powers of primes and powers of 2
  199. Regular Articles
  200. Differential subordination and convexity criteria of integral operators
  201. Regular Articles
  202. Quantitative relations between short intervals and exceptional sets of cubic Waring-Goldbach problem
  203. Regular Articles
  204. On θ-commutators and the corresponding non-commuting graphs
  205. Regular Articles
  206. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of Laplace (1, 1) for GARCH models
  207. Regular Articles
  208. Multiple and sign-changing solutions for discrete Robin boundary value problem with parameter dependence
  209. Regular Articles
  210. Fundamental relation on m-idempotent hyperrings
  211. Regular Articles
  212. A novel recursive method to reconstruct multivariate functions on the unit cube
  213. Regular Articles
  214. Nabla inequalities and permanence for a logistic integrodifferential equation on time scales
  215. Regular Articles
  216. Enumeration of spanning trees in the sequence of Dürer graphs
  217. Regular Articles
  218. Quotient of information matrices in comparison of linear experiments for quadratic estimation
  219. Regular Articles
  220. Fourier series of functions involving higher-order ordered Bell polynomials
  221. Regular Articles
  222. Simple modules over Auslander regular rings
  223. Regular Articles
  224. Weighted multilinear p-adic Hardy operators and commutators
  225. Regular Articles
  226. Guaranteed cost finite-time control of positive switched nonlinear systems with D-perturbation
  227. Regular Articles
  228. A modified quasi-boundary value method for an abstract ill-posed biparabolic problem
  229. Regular Articles
  230. Extended Riemann-Liouville type fractional derivative operator with applications
  231. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  232. The algebraic size of the family of injective operators
  233. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  234. The history of a general criterium on spaceability
  235. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  236. On sequences not enjoying Schur’s property
  237. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  238. A hierarchy in the family of real surjective functions
  239. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  240. Dynamics of multivalued linear operators
  241. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  242. Linear dynamics of semigroups generated by differential operators
  243. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  244. Isomorphism theorems for some parabolic initial-boundary value problems in Hörmander spaces
  245. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  246. Determination of a diffusion coefficient in a quasilinear parabolic equation
  247. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  248. Homogeneous two-point problem for PDE of the second order in time variable and infinite order in spatial variables
  249. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  250. A nonlinear plate control without linearization
  251. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  252. Reduction of a Schwartz-type boundary value problem for biharmonic monogenic functions to Fredholm integral equations
  253. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  254. Inverse problem for a physiologically structured population model with variable-effort harvesting
  255. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  256. Existence of solutions for delay evolution equations with nonlocal conditions
  257. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  258. Comments on behaviour of solutions of elliptic quasi-linear problems in a neighbourhood of boundary singularities
  259. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  260. Coupled fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces endowed with a directed graph and application
  261. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  262. Existence of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic degenerate anisotropic equations
  263. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  264. Integro-differential systems with variable exponents of nonlinearity
  265. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  266. Elliptic operators on refined Sobolev scales on vector bundles
  267. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  268. Multiplicity solutions of a class fractional Schrödinger equations
  269. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  270. Determining of right-hand side of higher order ultraparabolic equation
  271. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  272. Asymptotic approximation for the solution to a semi-linear elliptic problem in a thin aneurysm-type domain
  273. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  274. Learnheuristics: hybridizing metaheuristics with machine learning for optimization with dynamic inputs
  275. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  276. Nature–inspired metaheuristic algorithms to find near–OGR sequences for WDM channel allocation and their performance comparison
  277. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  278. Monomial codes seen as invariant subspaces
  279. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  280. Expert knowledge and data analysis for detecting advanced persistent threats
  281. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  282. Feedback equivalence of convolutional codes over finite rings
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2017-0020/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button