Home Evaluation of the convolution sum involving the sum of divisors function for 22, 44 and 52
Article Open Access

Evaluation of the convolution sum involving the sum of divisors function for 22, 44 and 52

  • Ebénézer Ntienjem EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 21, 2017

Abstract

The convolution sum, (l,m)N02αl+βm=nσ(l)σ(m), where αβ = 22, 44, 52, is evaluated for all natural numbers n. Modular forms are used to achieve these evaluations. Since the modular space of level 22 is contained in that of level 44, we almost completely use the basis elements of the modular space of level 44 to carry out the evaluation of the convolution sums for αβ = 22. We then use these convolution sums to determine formulae for the number of representations of a positive integer by the octonary quadratic forms a(x12+x22+x32+x42)+b(x52+x62+x72+x82), where (a, b) = (1, 11), (1, 13).

MSC 2010: 11A25; 11E20; 11E25; 11F11; 11F20; 11F27

1 Introduction

Let in the sequel ℕ, ℕ0, ℤ, ℚ, ℝ and ℂ denote the sets of positive integers, non-negative integers, integers, rational numbers, real numbers and complex numbers, respectively.

Suppose that k, n∊ ℕ. Then the sum of positive divisors of n to the power of k, σk(n), is defined by

σk(n)=0<d|ndk. (1)

We write σ(n) as a synonym for σ1(n). For m ∉ ℕ we set σk(m) = 0.

Suppose now that α, β ∊ ℕ are such that αβ. Then the convolution sum, W(α, β) (n), is defined as follows:

W(α,β)(n)=(l,m)N02αl+βm=nσ(l)σ(m).(2)

We write Wβ(n) as a synonym for W(1,β) (n). Given α, β ∊ ℕ, if for all (l, m) ∊ N02 it holds that α l + β mn then we set W(α, β) (n) = 0.

For those convolution sums W(α, β)(n) that have so far been evaluated, the levels αβ are given in Table 1.

Table 1

Known convolution sums W(α,β)(n)

Level αβ Authors References
1 M. Besge, J. W. L. Glaisher, S. Ramanujan [13]

2, 3, 4 J. G. Huard & Z. M. Ou & B. K. Spearman & K. S. Williams [4]

5, 7 M. Lemire & K. S. Williams, S. Cooper & P. C. Toh [5, 6]

6 S. Alaca & K. S. Williams [7]

8, 9 K. S. Williams [8, 9]

10, 11, 13, 14 E. Royer [10]

12, 16, 18, 24 A. Alaca & S. Alaca & K. S. Williams [1114]

15 B. Ramakrishman & B. Sahu [15]

20, 10 S. Cooper & D. Ye [16]

23 H. H. Chan & S. Cooper [17]

25 E. X. W. Xia & X. L. Tian & O. X. M. Yao [18]

27, 32 S. Alaca & Y. Kesicioğlu [19]

36 D. Ye [20]

14, 26, 28, 30 E. Ntienjem [21]

We discuss the evaluation of the convolution sums of level αβ = 22, 44 and αβ = 52, i.e., (α, β) = (1,22), (2, 11), (1, 44), (4, 11), (1, 52), (4, 13). Convolution sums of these levels have not been evaluated yet as one can notice from Table 1.

As an application, convolution sums are used to determine explicit formulae for the number of representations of a positive integer n by the octonary quadratic forms

a(x12+x22+x32+x42)+b(x52+x62+x72+x82), (3)

and

c(x12+x1x2+x22+x32+x3x4+x42)+d(x52+x5x6+x62+x72+x7x8+x82), (4)

respectively, where a, b, c, d ∊ ℕ.

So far known explicit formulae for the number of representations of n by the octonary form Equation 3 are referenced in Table 2.

Table 2

Known representations of n by the form Equation 3

(a, b) Authors References

(1,2) K. S. Williams [8]

(1,4) A. Alaca & S. Alaca & K. S. Williams [12]

(1,5) S. Cooper & D. Ye [16]

(1,6) B. Ramakrishman & B. Sahu [15]

(1,8) S. Alaca & Y. Kesicioğlu [19]

(1,7) E. Ntienjem [21]

We determine formulae for the number of representations of a positive integer n by the octonary quadratic form Equation 3 for which (a, b) = (1, 11), (1, 13). These formulae for the number of representations are also new according to Table 2.

This paper is organized in the following way. In Section 2 we discuss modular forms, briefly define eta functions and convolution sums, and prove the generalization of the extraction of the convolution sum. Our main results on the evaluation of the convolution sums are discussed in Section 3. The determination of formulae for the number of representations of a positive integer n is discussed in Section 4.

Software for symbolic scientific computation is used to obtain the results of this paper. This software comprises the open source software packages GiNaC, Maxima, REDUCE, SAGE and the commercial software package MAPLE.

2 Modular forms and convolution sums

Let ℍ be the upper half-plane, that is ℍ = {z ∊ ℂ| Im(z) > 0}, and let G = SL2(ℝ) be the group of 2 × 2-matrices abcd such that a, b, c, d ∊ ℝ and adbc = 1 hold. Let furthermore Γ = SL2(ℤ) be the full modular group which is a subgroup of SL2(ℝ). Let N ∊ ℕ. Then

Γ(N)=abcdSL2(Z)|abcd1001(modN)

is a subgroup of G and is called the principal congruence subgroup of level N. A subgroup H of G is called a congruence subgroup of level N if it contains Γ(N).

Relevant for our purposes is the following congruence subgroup:

Γ0(N)=abcdSL2(Z)|c0(modN).

Let k, N ∊ ℕ and let Γ′ ⊆ Γ be a congruence subgroup of level N ∊ ℕ. Let k ∊ ℤ, γ∊ SL2(ℤ) and f : ℍ∪ ℚ∪{∞}→ ℂ∪ {∞}. We denote by f[γ]k the function whose value at z is (cz+d)k f(γ(z)), i.e., f[γ]k(z) = (cz+d)k f(γ(z)). The following definition is based on the textbook by N. Koblitz [22, p. 108].

Definition 2.1

Let N ∊ ℕ, k ∊ ℤ, f be a meromorphic function onand Γ′ ⊂ Γ a congruence subgroup of level N.

  1. f is called a modular function of weight k for Γ′ if

    (a1)for all γ∊ Γ′ it holds that f[γ]k = f.

    (a2)for any δ ∊ Γ it holds that f[δ]k(z) can be expressed in the form nZane2πiznN, wherein an ≠ 0 for finitely many n ∊ ℤ such that n < 0.

  2. f is called a modular form of weight k for Γ′ if

    (b1)f is a modular function of weight k for Γ′,

    (b2)f is holomorphic on ℍ,

    (b3)for all δ ∊ Γ and for all n ∊ ℤ such that n < 0 it holds that an = 0.

  3. f is called a cusp form of weight k for Γ′ if

    (c1)f is a modular form of weight k for Γ′,

    (c2)for all δ ∊ Γ it holds that a0 = 0.

For k, N ∊ ℕ, let 𝔐k0(N)) be the space of modular forms of weight k for Γ0(N), 𝔖k0(N)) be the subspace of cusp forms of weight k for Γ0(N), and 𝔈k0(N)) be the subspace of Eisenstein forms of weight k for Γ0(N). Then the decomposition of the space of modular forms as a direct sum of the space generated by the Eisenstein series and the space of cusp forms, i.e., 𝔐k0(N)) = 𝔈k0(N))⊕ 𝔖k0(N)), is well-known; see for example W. A. Stein’s book (online version) [23, p. 81].

As noted in Section 5.3 of W. A. Stein’s book [23, p. 86] if the primitive Dirichlet characters are trivial and 2 ≤ k is even, then Ek(q) = 12kBkn=1σk1(n)qn, where Bk are the Bernoulli numbers.

For the purpose of this paper we only consider trivial Dirichlet characters and 2 ≤ k even. Theorems 5.8 and 5.9 in Section 5.3 of [23, p. 86] also hold for this special case.

2.1 Eta functions

The Dedekind eta function, η(z), is defined on the upper half-plane ℍ by η(z)=e2πiz24n=1(1e2πinz). We set q = e2π iz. Then η(z)=q124n=1(1qn)=q124F(q), where F(q)=n=1(1qn).

M. Newman [24, 25] systematically used the Dedekind eta function to construct modular forms for Γ0(N). M. Newman determined when a function f(z) is a modular form for Γ0(N) by providing conditions (i)-(iv) in the following theorem. G. Ligozat [26] determined the order of vanishing of an eta function at the cusps of Γ0(N), which is condition (v) or (v′) in Theorem 2.2.

The following theorem is proved in L. J. P. Kilford’s book [27, p. 99] and G. Köhler’s book [28, p. 37]; we will apply that theorem to determine eta quotients, f(z), which belong to 𝔐k0(N)), and especially those eta quotients which are in 𝔖k0(N)).

Theorem 2.2

(M. Newman and G. Ligozat). Let N ∊ ℕ, D(N) be the set of all positive divisors of N, δ∊ D(N) and rδ∊ ℤ. Let furthermore f(z) = δD(N)ηrδ(δz) be an η-quotient. If the following five conditions are satisfied

  1. δ D ( N ) δ r δ 0 ( m o d 24 ) ,

  2. δ D ( N ) N δ r δ 0 ( m o d 24 ) ≡(mod 24),

  3. δD(N)δrδ is a square in ℚ,

  4. 0<δD(N)rδ ≡ 0 (mod 4)

  5. for each dD(N) it holds that δD(N)gcd(δ,d)2δrδ0,

    then f(z)∊ 𝔐k0(N)), where k=12δD(N)rδ.

    Moreover, the η-quotient f(z) belongs to 𝔖k0(N)) if (v) is replaced by

    (v’) for each dD(N) it holds that δD(N)gcd(δ,d)2δrδ>0.

2.2 Convolution sums W(α, β)(n)

Recall that given α, β ∊ ℕ such that αβ, the convolution sum is defined by Equation 2.

As observed by A. Alaca et al. [11], we can assume that gcd(α, β) = 1. Let q ∊ ℂ be such that |q| < 1. Then the Eisenstein series L(q) and M(q) are defined as follows:

L(q)=E2(q)=124n=1σ(n)qn, (5)

M(q)=E4(q)=1+240n=1σ3(n)qn. (6)

The following two relevant results are essential for the sequel of this work and are a generalization of the extraction of the convolution sum using Eisenstein forms of weight 4 for all pairs (α, β) ∊ ℕ2. Their proofs are given by E. Ntienjem [21].

Lemma 2.3

Let α, β ∊ ℕ. Then

(αL(qα)βL(qβ))2M4(Γ0(αβ)).

Theorem 2.4

Let α, β ∊ ℕ be such that α and β are relatively prime and α < β. Then

( α L ( q α ) β L ( q β ) ) 2 = ( α β ) 2 + n = 1 240 α 2 σ 3 ( n α ) + 240 β 2 σ 3 ( n β ) + 48 α ( β 6 n ) σ ( n α ) + 48 β ( α 6 n ) σ ( n β ) 1152 α β W ( α , β ) ( n ) q n . (7)

3 Evaluation of the convolution sums W(α,β)(n), where αβ = 22, 44, 52

In this section, we give explicit formulae for the convolution sums W(1,22)(n), W(2,11)(n), W(1,44)(n), W(4,11)(n), W(1,52)(n) and W(4,13)(n).

3.1 Bases for 𝔈40(αβ)) and 𝔖40(αβ)) with αβ = 44, 52

We observe the following inclusion relations

M4(Γ0(11))M4(Γ0(22))M4(Γ0(44)) (8)

M4(Γ0(13))M4(Γ0(26))M4(Γ0(52)). (9)

Therefore, it suffices to correspondingly determine the basis of the spaces 𝔐40(44)) and 𝔐40(52)), respectively.

We use the dimension formulae for the space of Eisenstein forms and the space of cusp forms in T. Miyake’s book [29, Thrm 2.5.2, p. 60] or W. A. Stein’s book [23, Prop. 6.1, p. 91] to deduce that dim(𝔈40(44))) = dim(𝔈40(52))) = 6, dim(𝔖40(44)) = 15 and dim(𝔖40(52)) = 18.

Let D(44) = {1, 2, 4, 11, 22, 44} and D(52) = {1, 2, 4, 13, 26, 52} be the sets of all positive divisors of 44 and 52, respectively.

Theorem 3.1

  1. The sets 𝔅E,44 = {M(qt)| tD(44)} and 𝔅E,52 = {M(qt)|tD(52)} are bases of 𝔈40(44)) and 𝔈40(52)), respectively

  2. Let 1 ≤ i ≤15 and 1 ≤ j ≤ 18 be positive integers.

    Let δ1D(44) and (r(i, δ1))i, δ1 be the Table 3 of the powers of η(δ1z).

    Let δ2D(52) and (r(j, δ2))j, δ2 be the Table 4 of the powers of η(δ2z).

    Table 3

    Exponents of η-functions being basis elements of 𝔖40(44))

    1 2 4 11 22 44
    1 6 −2 0 6 −2 0
    2 4 0 0 4 0 0
    3 2 2 0 2 2 0
    4 0 4 0 0 4 0
    5 −2 6 0 −2 6 0
    6 0 2 2 0 2 2
    7 0 −3 5 0 5 1
    8 0 0 4 0 0 4
    9 3 0 1 −1 0 5
    10 0 −2 6 0 −2 6
    11 1 −3 4 −3 5 4
    12 2 0 0 2 −4 8
    13 0 2 0 0 −2 8
    14 −3 9 0 1 1 0
    15 0 0 2 0 −4 10
    Table 4

    Exponents of η-functions being basis elements of 𝔖40(52))

    1 2 4 13 26 52
    1 1 5 0 3 −1 0
    2 3 3 0 1 1 0
    3 1 3 0 3 1 0
    4 3 1 0 1 3 0
    5 1 1 0 3 3 0
    6 3 −1 0 1 5 0
    7 1 −1 0 3 5 0
    8 0 3 1 0 1 3
    9 2 1 1 −2 3 3
    10 0 1 1 0 3 3
    11 2 −1 1 −2 5 3
    12 0 3 −1 0 1 5
    13 2 1 −1 −2 3 5
    14 0 1 −1 0 3 5
    15 −1 5 0 5 −1 0
    16 0 −1 5 0 5 −1
    17 7 −3 0 −3 7 0
    18 0 7 −3 0 −3 7

    Let furthermore Ai(q)=δ1D(44)ηr(i,δ1)(δ1z)andBj(q)=δ2D(52)ηr(j,δ2)(δ2z) be selected elements of 𝔖40(44)) and 𝔖40(52)), respectively.

    Then the sets 𝔅S,44 = {Ai(q)| 1 ≤i≤15} and 𝔅S,52 = {Bj(q)| 1 ≤ j ≤ 18} are bases of 𝔖40(44)) and 𝔖40(52)), repectively.

  3. The sets 𝔅M,44 = 𝔅E,44 ∪ 𝔅S,44 and 𝔅M,52 = 𝔅E,52∪ 𝔅S,52 constitute bases of 𝔐40(44)) and 𝔐40(52)), respectively.

For 1 ≤ i ≤ 15 and 1 ≤ j ≤ 18 let in the sequel Ai(q) be expressed in the form n=1ai(n)qn and Bj(q) be expressed in the form n=1bj(n)qn.

Proof

We give the proof for the case αβ = 44. The case αβ = 52 is proved similarly.

  1. By Theorem 5.8 in Section 5.3 of W. A. Stein [23, p. 86] M(qt) is in 𝔐40(t)) for each t which is an element of D(44). Since 𝔈40(44)) has a finite dimension, it suffices to show that M(qt) with tD(44) are linearly independent. Suppose that xt ∈ ℂ with tD(44). We prove this by induction on the elements of the set D(44) which is assumed to be ascendantly ordered.

    The case t = 1 ∈ D(44) is obvious since comparing the coefficients of qt on both sides of the equation xtM(qt) = 0 clearly gives xt = 0.

    Suppose now that the cardinality of the set D(44) is greater than 1 and that M(qt) are linearly independent for all t|44 and tt1 for a given t1 with 1 < t1 < 44. Let C be the proper non-empty subset of D(44) which contains all positive divisors of 44 less than or equal to t1. Note that all positive divisors of t1 constitute a subset of C. Let us consider the non-empty subset C ∪ {t} of D(44), wherein t is the next ascendant element of D(44) which is greater than t1 the greatest element of the set C. Then

    tC{t}xtM(qt)=tCxtM(qt)+xtM(qt)=0.

    By the induction hypothesis it holds that xt = 0 for all tC. So, we obtain from the above equation that xt = 0 when we compare the coefficient of qt on both sides of the equation.

    Hence, the solution is xt = 0 for all t such that t is a positive divisor of 44. Therefore, the set 𝔅E,44 is linearly independent. Hence, the set 𝔅E,44 is a basis of 𝔈40(44)).

  2. The Ai(q) with 1 ≤ i ≤ 15 are obtained from an exhaustive search using Theorem 2.2 (i) − (v). Hence, each Ai(q) is an element of the space 𝔖40(44)).

    Since the dimension of 𝔖40(44)) is 15, it suffices to show that the set {Ai(q)| 1 ≤ i ≤ 15} is linearly independent. Suppose that xiCandi=115xiAi(q)=0. Then

    i=115xiAi(q)=n=1(i=115xiai(n))qn=0

    which gives the following homogeneous system of linear equations

    i=115ai(n)xi=0,1n15. (10)

    A simple computation using software for symbolic scientific computation shows that the determinant of the matrix of this homogeneous system of linear equations is non-zero. So, xi = 0 for all 1 ≤ i ≤ 15. Hence, the set {Ai(q)| 1 ≤ i ≤ 15} is linearly independent and therefore a basis of 𝔖40(44)).

  3. Since 𝔐40(44)) = 𝔈40(44)) ⊕ 𝔖40(44)), the result follows from (a) and (b).     □

    According to Equation 8 the basis elements Ai(q), where 1 ≤ i ≤ 5, are contained in 𝔖40(22)). The basis element A2(q) is the only element of the space 𝔖40(11)) that we are able to generate with the help of Theorem 2.2. Even though the basis element A14(q) looks like an element of 𝔖40(22)), it cannot be generated at level 22 using Theorem 2.2.

To evaluate the convolution sums W(1,22)(n) and W(2,11)(n), we determine two additional basis elements of 𝔖40(22)) which are

A6(q)=η(2z)η3(11z)η5(22z)η(z)=n=1a6(n)qn,A7(q)=η9(2z)η7(11z)η5(z)η3(22z)=n=1a7(n)qn.

Due to Equation 9 the basis elements Bj(q), where 1 ≤ j ≤ 7 and j = 15, 17, belong to 𝔖40(26)). We are unable to generate any elements of the space 𝔖40(13)) using Theorem 2.2. We note that B2j(q) = Bj(q2), where 4 ≤ j ≤ 7, B16(q) = B15(q2) and B18(q) = B17(q2). Therefore, one can easily replicate the evaluation of the convolution sums W(1,26)(n) and W(2,13)(n) shown by E. Ntienjem [21].

3.2 Evaluation of W(α,β)(n) where αβ = 22, 44, 52

Lemma 3.2

We have

(L(q2)22L(q22))2=441+n=1(331261σ3(n)+1267261σ3(n2)11088061σ3(n11)+655776061σ3(n22)+1209661a1(n)+4579261a2(n)+1987261a3(n)+7372861a4(n)5068861a5(n)+22176a6(n)+864a7(n))qn, (11)

(2L(q2)11L(q11))2=81+n=1(1584061σ3(n)+3744061σ3(n2)+162676861σ3(n11)49420861σ3(n22)+3686461a1(n)+35740861a2(n)+116035261a3(n)+153907261a4(n)+83404861a5(n)22176a6(n)864a7(n))qn, (12)

(L(q)44L(q44))2=1849+n=1(12446461σ3(n)57766233640565σ3(n2)+689863685795σ3(n4)17424061σ3(n11)+620642885795σ3(n22)+25256901125795σ3(n44)+144061a1(n)829278725795a2(n)8873455685795a3(n)16764295685795a4(n)28040071685795a5(n)+37533807365795a6(n)1335628819a7(n)+42266096645795a8(n)63360019a9(n)5273326081159a10(n)+767923219a11(n)1523174495a12(n)13107916895a13(n)+31795219a14(n)1259596895a15(n))qn, (13)

(4L(q4)11L(q11))2=49+n=1(11088061σ3(n)+801218885795σ3(n2)483386885795σ3(n4)+181790461σ3(n11)984804485795σ3(n22)273208325795σ3(n44)+11088061a1(n)+1748574725795a2(n)+11694271685795a3(n)+21141895685795a4(n)+30255137285795a5(n)35110805765795a6(n)+1331827219a7(n)36417623045795a8(n)+63360019a9(n)+6639137281159a10(n)767923219a11(n)+1523174495a12(n)+13107916895a13(n)31795219a14(n)+1259596895a15(n))qn, (14)

(L(q)52L(q52))2=2601+n=1(61090081243σ3(n)4565040848166064597σ3(n2)+25459241σ3(n4)73619521243σ3(n13)48295288273446064597σ3(n26)+43473830441σ3(n52)30661441243b1(n)+4981571790486064597b2(n)+9273270707046064597b3(n)4425775005606064597b4(n)85304136696486064597b5(n)101616997322886064597b6(n)103883663521243b7(n)+104083241b8(n)+7488b9(n)+329100929664147917b10(n)+27456b11(n)152492885101446064597b12(n)+17472b13(n)+4700966441b14(n)25166713896551327b15(n)+41670318268806064597b16(n)1264250239206064597b17(n)+86860841b18(n))qn, (15)

(4L(q4)13L(q13))2=81+n=1(30661441243σ3(n)2400612306726064597σ3(n2)+13939241σ3(n4)+457986721243σ3(n13)539220318246064597σ3(n26)+2029017641σ3(n52)30661441243b1(n)+2127358198806064597b2(n)+2518488510246064597b3(n)4005610378086064597b4(n)51524598204006064597b5(n)54087483121926064597b6(n)54893553121243b7(n)+15033641b8(n)7488b9(n)+151016538432147917b10(n)27456b11(n)82248324316806064597b12(n)17472b13(n)54489641b14(n)11115614088551327b15(n)+20569536096006064597b16(n)647456933286064597b17(n)230441b18(n))qn. (16)

Proof

We just prove the case (4L(q4) − 11L(q11))2. The other cases are proved similarly.

It follows from Lemma 2.3 that (4L(q4) − 11L(q11))2 ∈ 𝔐40(44)). Hence, by Theorem 3.1 (c), there exist Xδ, Yj ∈ ℂ, 1 ≤ j ≤ 15 and δD(44), such that

(4L(q4)11L(q11))2=δD(44)XδM(qδ)+j=115YjAj(q)=δD(44)Xδ+n=1(240δD(44)σ3(nδ)Xδ+j=1mSaj(n)Yj)qn. (17)

We equate the right hand side of Equation 17 with that of Equation 7 when setting (α, β) = (4,11) to obtain

n=1(240δD(44)σ3(nδ)Xδ+j=115aj(n)Yj)qn=n=1(3840σ3(n4)+29040σ3(n11)+192(116n)σ(n4)+528(46n)σ(n11)50688W(4,11)(n))qn.

We now take the coefficients of qn for which n is in

{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,20,22,44}.

This results in a system of linear equations whose unique solution determines the values of the unknown Xδ for all δD(44) and the values of the unkown Yj for all 1 ≤ j ≤ 15. Hence, we obtain the stated result.     □

Our main result of this section is as follows.

Theorem 3.3

Let n be a positive integer Then

W(1,22)(n)=171464σ3(n)1122σ3(n2)+35488σ3(n11)+125366σ3(n22)+(124188n)σ(n)+(12414n)σ(n22)212684a1(n)1595368a2(n)695368a3(n)32671a4(n)+261a5(n)78a6(n)388a7(n), (18)

W(2,11)(n)=5488σ3(n)+5366σ3(n2)+1371464σ3(n11)+39122σ3(n22)+(124144n)σ(n2)+(12418n)σ(n11)16671a1(n)12415368a2(n)40295368a3(n)668671a4(n)362671a5(n)+78a6(n)+388a7(n), (19)

W(1,44)(n)=13366σ3(n)+5014431784860σ3(n2)13615795σ3(n4)+55976σ3(n11)1959192720σ3(n22)+987817385σ3(n44)+(1241176n)σ(n)+(12414n)σ(n44)510736a1(n)+35993127490a2(n)+30810611019920a3(n)+6614711590a4(n)+1217017127490a5(n)3258143254980a6(n)+52738a7(n)91723363745a8(n)+2538a9(n)+208072318a10(n)30338a11(n)+601190a12(n)+258695a13(n)69209a14(n)+497190a15(n), (20)

W(4,11)(n)=35976σ3(n)2529192720σ3(n2)+417817385σ3(n4)11732σ3(n11)+1554346360σ3(n22)+5395795σ3(n44)+(124144n)σ(n4)+(124116n)σ(n11)35976a1(n)75893127490a2(n)40605111019920a3(n)917617127490a4(n)1313157127490a5(n)+3047813254980a6(n)105176a7(n)+79031363745a8(n)2538a9(n)28815725498a10(n)+30338a11(n)601190a12(n)258695a13(n)+69209a14(n)497190a15(n), (21)

W(1,52)(n)=971243σ3(n)+731577059582201312σ3(n2)17164σ3(n4)+589959664σ3(n13)+7739629531582201312σ3(n26)81757492σ3(n52)+(1241208n)σ(n)+(12414n)σ(n52)+31939775632b1(n)69188497095045744704b2(n)193193139737568617056b3(n)+236419605194067104b4(n)+4556844909194067104b5(n)+135706460148516776b6(n)+554934139776b7(n)139328b8(n)18b9(n)-659256671775004b10(n)1124b11(n)+203649686348516776(n)b12(n)724b13(n)3139164b14(n)+349537693458704064b15(n)55649463548516776b16+67534735194067104b17(n)2982b18(n), (22)

W(4,13)(n)=31939775632σ3(n)+50012756397568617056σ3(n2)+476396σ3(n4)+24049387816σ3(n13)+11233756637568617056σ3(n26)176132132σ3(n52)+(124152n)σ(n4)+(124116n)σ(n13)+31939b775632b1(n)29546641655045744704b2(n)52468510637568617056b3(n)+83450216217568617056b4(n)+357809709752522872352b5(n)+4695094021315359044b6(n)+38120523517088b7(n)2614264b8(n)+18b9(n)78654447146150104b10(n)+1124b11(n)+428376689151892154264b12(n)+724b13(n)+4732132b14(n)+154383529458704064b15(n)5356650025946077132b16(n)+13488686117568617056b17(n)+11066b18(n). (23)

Proof

We prove the case W(4,13)(n) as the other cases are proved similarly.

We equate the right hand side of Equation 16 with that of Equation 7 when setting (α, β) = (4,13), namely

n=1(3840σ3(n4)+40560σ3(n13)+192(136n)σ(n4)+624(46n)σ(n13)59904W(4,13)(n))qn=n=1(30661441243σ3(n)2400612306726064597σ3(n2)+13939241σ3(n4)+457986721243σ3(n13)539220318246064597σ3(n26)+2029017641σ3(n52)30661441243b1(n)+2127358198806064597b2(n)+2518488510246064597b3(n)4005610378086064597b4(n)51524598204006064597b5(n)54087483121926064597b6(n)54893553121243b7(n)+15033641b8(n)7488b9(n)+151016538432147917b10(n)27456b11(n)82248324316806064597b12(n)17472b13(n)54489641b14(n)11115614088551327b15(n)+20569536096006064597b16(n)647456933286064597b17(n)230441b18(n))qn.

We then solve for W(4,13)(n) to obtain the stated result.     □

4 Number of representations of a positive integer n by the qctonary quadratic form using W(α,β)(n) when αβ = 44, 52

Let n ∈ ℕ0 and the number of representations of n by the quaternary quadratic form x12+x22+x32+x42 be denoted by r4(n). That means,

r4(n)=card({(x1,x2,x3,x4)Z4|m=x12+x22+x32+x42}).

We set r4(0) = 1. For all n ∈ ℕ, the following Jacobi’s identity is proved in K. S. Williams’ book [30, Thrm 9.5, p. 83]

r4(n)=8σ(n)32σ(n4). (24)

Let furthermore the number of representations of n by the octonary quadratic form

a(x12+x22+x32+x42)+b(x52+x62+x72+x82)

be denoted by N(a,b)(n). That means,

N(a,b)(n)=card({(x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8)Z8|n=a(x12+x22+x32+x42)+b(x52+x62+x72+x82)}).

We infer the following result:

Theorem 4.1

Let n ∈ ℕ and (a, b) = (1, 11), (1, 13). Then

N(1,11)(n)=8σ(n)32σ(n4)+8σ(n11)32σ(n44)+64W(1,11)(n)+1024W(1,11)(n4)256(W(4,11)(n)+W(1,44)(n)),N(1,13)(n)=8σ(n)32σ(n4)+8σ(n13)32σ(n52)+64W(1,13)(n)+1024W(1,13)(n4)256(W(4,13)(n)+W(1,52)(n)).

Proof

We only prove N(1, 11)(n) since that for N(1, 13)(n) is done similarly.

It holds that

N(1,11)(n)=(l,m)N02l+11m=nr4(l)r4(m)=r4(n)r4(0)+r4(0)r4(n11)+(l,m)N2l+11m=nr4(l)r4(m).

We make use of Equation 24 to derive

N(1,11)(n)=8σ(n)32σ(n4)+8σ(n11)32σ(n52)+(l,m)N2l+11m=n(8σ(l)32σ(l4))(8σ(m)32σ(m4)).

We observe that

(8σ(l)32σ(l4))(8σ(m)32σ(m4))=64σ(l)σ(m)256σ(l4)σ(m)256σ(l)σ(m4)+1024σ(l4)σ(m4).

The evaluation of

W(1,11)(n)=(l,m)N2l+11m=nσ(l)σ(m)

is shown by E. Royer [10, Thrm 1.3]. We map l to 4l to infer

W(4,11)(n)=(l,m)N2l+11m=nσ(l4)σ(m)=(l,m)N24l+11m=nσ(l)σ(m).

The evaluation of W(4,11)(n) is given in Equation 21. We next map m to 4m to conclude

W(1,44)(n)=(l,m)N2l+11m=nσ(l)σ(m4)=(l,m)N2l+44m=nσ(l)σ(m).

The evaluation of W(1,44)(n) is provided by Equation 20. We simultaneously map l to 4l and m to 4m to deduce

(l,m)N2l+11m=nσ(l4)σ(m4)=(l,m)N2l+11m=n4σ(l)σ(m)=W(1,11)(n4).

Again, E. Royer [10, Thrm 1.3] has proved the evaluation of W(1, 11)(n).

We then put these evaluations together to obtain the stated result for N(1, 11)(n).     □



Acknowledgement

I am indebtedly thankful to the anonynuous referee for fruitful comments and suggestions on a draft of this paper.

References

[1] M. Besge. Extrait d’une lettre de M Besge à M Liouville. J Math Pure Appl, 1885, 7, 256.10.2307/2369448Search in Google Scholar

[2] James Whitbread Lee Glaisher. On the square of the series in which the coefficients are the sums of the divisors of the exponents. Messenger Math, 1862, 14, 156–163.Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. Ramanujan. On certain arithmetical functions. T Cambridge Phil Soc, 1916, 22, 159–184.Search in Google Scholar

[4] J. G. Huard, Z. M. Ou, B. K. Spearman, and Kenneth S. Williams. Elementary evaluation of certain convolution sums involving divisor functions. Number Theory Millenium, 2002, 7, 229–274. A K Peters, Natick, MA.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Mathieu Lemire and Kenneth S. Williams. Evaluation of two convolution sums involving the sum of divisors function. Bull Aust Math Soc, 2006, 73, 107–115.10.1017/S0004972700038661Search in Google Scholar

[6] S. Cooper and P. C. Toh. Quintic and septic Eisenstein series. Ramanujan J, 2009, 19, 163–181.10.1007/s11139-008-9123-3Search in Google Scholar

[7] Şaban Alaca and Kenneth S. Williams. Evaluation of the convolution sums l+6m=nσ(l)σ(m)and2l+3m=nσ(l)σ(m). J Number Theory, 2007, 124(2), 490–510.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kenneth S. Williams. The convolution sum m<n8σ(m)σ(n8m). Pac J Math, 2006, 228, 387–396.10.2140/pjm.2006.228.387Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kenneth S. Williams. The convolution sum m<n9σ(m)σ(n9m). Int J Number Theory, 2005, 1(2), 193–205.10.1142/S1793042105000091Search in Google Scholar

[10] Emmanuel Royer. Evaluating convolution sums of divisor function by quasimodular forms. Int J Number Theory, 2007, 3(2), 231–261.10.1142/S1793042107000924Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ayşe Alaca, Şaban Alaca, and Kenneth S. Williams. Evaluation of the convolution sums l+12m=nσ(l)σ(m)and3l+4m=nσ(l)σ(m). Adv Theor Appl Math, 2006, 1(1), 27–48.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Ayşe Alaca, Şaban Alaca, and Kenneth S. Williams. Evaluation of the convolution sums l+18m=nσ(l)σ(m)and2l+9m=nσ(l)σ(m). Int Math Forum, 2007, 2(2), 45–68.10.12988/imf.2007.07003Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ayşe Alaca, Şaban Alaca, and Kenneth S. Williams. Evaluation of the convolution sums l+24m=nσ(l)σ(m)and3l+8m=nσ(l)σ(m). Math J Okayama Univ, 2007, 49, 93–111.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ayşe Alaca, Şaban Alaca, and Kenneth S. Williams. The convolution sum m<n16σ(m)σ(n16m). Canad Math Bull, 2008, 51(1), 3–14.10.4153/CMB-2008-001-1Search in Google Scholar

[15] B. Ramakrishnan and B. Sahu. Evaluation of the convolution sums l+15m=nσ(l)σ(m)and3l+5m=nσ(l)σ(m). Int J Number Theory, 2013, 9(3), 799–809.10.1142/S179304211250162XSearch in Google Scholar

[16] Shaun Cooper and Dongxi Ye. Evaluation of the convolution sums l+20m=nσ(l)σ(m),4l+5m=nσ(l)σ(m)and2l+5m=nσ(l)σ(m). J Number Theory, 2014, 10(6), 1386–1394.10.1142/S1793042114500341Search in Google Scholar

[17] H. H. Chan and Shaun Cooper. Powers of theta functions. Pac J Math, 2008, 235, 1–14.10.2140/pjm.2008.235.1Search in Google Scholar

[18] E. X. W. Xia, X. L. Tian, and O. X. M. Yao. Evaluation of the convolution sum l+25m=nσ(l)σ(m). Int J Number Theory, 2014, 10(6), 1421–1430.10.1142/S1793042114500365Search in Google Scholar

[19] Şaban Alaca and Yavuz Kesicioğlu. Evaluation of the convolution sums l+27m=nσ(l)σ(m)andl+32m=nσ(l)σ(m). Int J Number Theory, 2016, 12(1), 1–13.10.1142/S1793042116500019Search in Google Scholar

[20] Dongxi Ye. Evaluation of the convolution sums l+36m=nσ(l)σ(m)and4l+9m=nσ(l)σ(m). Int J Number Theory, 2015, 11(1), 171–183.10.1142/S1793042115500104Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ebénézer Ntienjem. Evaluation of the convolution sums αl+βm=nσ(l)σ(m), where (α, β) is in {(1, 14), (2, 7), (1, 26), (2, 13), (1, 28), (4, 7), (1, 30), (2, 15), (3, 10), (5, 6)}. Master’s thesis, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Carleton University, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Neal Koblitz. Introduction to Elliptic Curves and Modular Forms, volume 97 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer Verlag, New York, 2nd edition, 1993.10.1007/978-1-4612-0909-6Search in Google Scholar

[23] William A. Stein. Modular Forms, A Computational Approach, volume 79. American Mathematical Society, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 2011. http://wstein.org/books/modform/modform/.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Morris Newman. Construction and application of a class of modular functions. Proc Lond Math Soc, 1957, 7(3), 334–350.10.1112/plms/s3-7.1.334Search in Google Scholar

[25] Morris Newman. Construction and application of a class of modular functions II. Proc Lond Math Soc, 1959, 9(3), 373–387.10.1112/plms/s3-9.3.373Search in Google Scholar

[26] Gérard Ligozat. Courbes modulaires de genre 1. Bull Soc Math France, 1975, 43, 5–80.10.24033/msmf.178Search in Google Scholar

[27] L. J. P. Kilford. Modular forms: A classical and computational introduction. Imperial College Press, London, 2008.10.1142/p564Search in Google Scholar

[28] G. Köhler. Eta Products and Theta Series Identities, volume 3733 of Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.10.1007/978-3-642-16152-0Search in Google Scholar

[29] Toshitsune Miyake. Modular Forms. Springer monographs in Mathematics. Springer Verlag, New York, 1989.10.1007/3-540-29593-3Search in Google Scholar

[30] Kenneth S Williams. Number Theory in the Spirit of Liouville, volume 76 of London Mathematical Society Student Texts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-8-30
Accepted: 2017-2-28
Published Online: 2017-4-21

© 2017 Ntienjem

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Integrals of Frullani type and the method of brackets
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Edge of chaos in reaction diffusion CNN model
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Calculus using proximities: a mathematical approach in which students can actually prove theorems
  7. Regular Articles
  8. An investigation on hyper S-posets over ordered semihypergroups
  9. Regular Articles
  10. The Leibniz algebras whose subalgebras are ideals
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Fixed point and multidimensional fixed point theorems with applications to nonlinear matrix equations in terms of weak altering distance functions
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Matrix rank and inertia formulas in the analysis of general linear models
  15. Regular Articles
  16. The hybrid power mean of quartic Gauss sums and Kloosterman sums
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Tauberian theorems for statistically (C,1,1) summable double sequences of fuzzy numbers
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Some properties of graded comultiplication modules
  21. Regular Articles
  22. The characterizations of upper approximation operators based on special coverings
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Bi-integrable and tri-integrable couplings of a soliton hierarchy associated with SO(4)
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Dynamics for a discrete competition and cooperation model of two enterprises with multiple delays and feedback controls
  27. Regular Articles
  28. A new view of relationship between atomic posets and complete (algebraic) lattices
  29. Regular Articles
  30. A class of extensions of Restricted (s, t)-Wythoff’s game
  31. Regular Articles
  32. New bounds for the minimum eigenvalue of 𝓜-tensors
  33. Regular Articles
  34. Shintani and Shimura lifts of cusp forms on certain arithmetic groups and their applications
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Empirical likelihood for quantile regression models with response data missing at random
  37. Regular Articles
  38. Convex combination of analytic functions
  39. Regular Articles
  40. On the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank-two matrices
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Uniform topology on EQ-algebras
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Integrations on rings
  45. Regular Articles
  46. The quasilinear parabolic kirchhoff equation
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Avoiding rainbow 2-connected subgraphs
  49. Regular Articles
  50. On non-Hopfian groups of fractions
  51. Regular Articles
  52. Singularly perturbed hyperbolic problems on metric graphs: asymptotics of solutions
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Rings in which elements are the sum of a nilpotent and a root of a fixed polynomial that commute
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Superstability of functional equations related to spherical functions
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Evaluation of the convolution sum involving the sum of divisors function for 22, 44 and 52
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Weighted minimal translation surfaces in the Galilean space with density
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Complete convergence for weighted sums of pairwise independent random variables
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Binomials transformation formulae for scaled Fibonacci numbers
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Growth functions for some uniformly amenable groups
  67. Regular Articles
  68. Hopf bifurcations in a three-species food chain system with multiple delays
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Oscillation and nonoscillation of half-linear Euler type differential equations with different periodic coefficients
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Osculating curves in 4-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index 2
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Some new facts about group 𝒢 generated by the family of convergent permutations
  75. Regular Articles
  76. lnfinitely many solutions for fractional Schrödinger equations with perturbation via variational methods
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Supersolvable orders and inductively free arrangements
  79. Regular Articles
  80. Asymptotically almost automorphic solutions of differential equations with piecewise constant argument
  81. Regular Articles
  82. Finite groups whose all second maximal subgroups are cyclic
  83. Regular Articles
  84. Semilinear systems with a multi-valued nonlinear term
  85. Regular Articles
  86. Positive solutions for Hadamard differential systems with fractional integral conditions on an unbounded domain
  87. Regular Articles
  88. Calibration and simulation of Heston model
  89. Regular Articles
  90. One kind sixth power mean of the three-term exponential sums
  91. Regular Articles
  92. Cyclic pairs and common best proximity points in uniformly convex Banach spaces
  93. Regular Articles
  94. The uniqueness of meromorphic functions in k-punctured complex plane
  95. Regular Articles
  96. Normalizers of intermediate congruence subgroups of the Hecke subgroups
  97. Regular Articles
  98. The hyperbolicity constant of infinite circulant graphs
  99. Regular Articles
  100. Scott convergence and fuzzy Scott topology on L-posets
  101. Regular Articles
  102. One sided strong laws for random variables with infinite mean
  103. Regular Articles
  104. The join of split graphs whose completely regular endomorphisms form a monoid
  105. Regular Articles
  106. A new branch and bound algorithm for minimax ratios problems
  107. Regular Articles
  108. Upper bound estimate of incomplete Cochrane sum
  109. Regular Articles
  110. Value distributions of solutions to complex linear differential equations in angular domains
  111. Regular Articles
  112. The nonlinear diffusion equation of the ideal barotropic gas through a porous medium
  113. Regular Articles
  114. The Sheffer stroke operation reducts of basic algebras
  115. Regular Articles
  116. Extensions and improvements of Sherman’s and related inequalities for n-convex functions
  117. Regular Articles
  118. Classification lattices are geometric for complete atomistic lattices
  119. Regular Articles
  120. Possible numbers of x’s in an {x, y}-matrix with a given rank
  121. Regular Articles
  122. New error bounds for linear complementarity problems of weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrices
  123. Regular Articles
  124. Boundedness of vector-valued B-singular integral operators in Lebesgue spaces
  125. Regular Articles
  126. On the Golomb’s conjecture and Lehmer’s numbers
  127. Regular Articles
  128. Some applications of the Archimedean copulas in the proof of the almost sure central limit theorem for ordinary maxima
  129. Regular Articles
  130. Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  131. Regular Articles
  132. Corrigendum to: Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  133. Regular Articles
  134. Convergence and stability of generalized φ-weak contraction mapping in CAT(0) spaces
  135. Regular Articles
  136. Triple solutions for a Dirichlet boundary value problem involving a perturbed discrete p(k)-Laplacian operator
  137. Regular Articles
  138. OD-characterization of alternating groups Ap+d
  139. Regular Articles
  140. On Jordan mappings of inverse semirings
  141. Regular Articles
  142. On generalized Ehresmann semigroups
  143. Regular Articles
  144. On topological properties of spaces obtained by the double band matrix
  145. Regular Articles
  146. Representing derivatives of Chebyshev polynomials by Chebyshev polynomials and related questions
  147. Regular Articles
  148. Chain conditions on composite Hurwitz series rings
  149. Regular Articles
  150. Coloring subgraphs with restricted amounts of hues
  151. Regular Articles
  152. An extension of the method of brackets. Part 1
  153. Regular Articles
  154. Branch-delete-bound algorithm for globally solving quadratically constrained quadratic programs
  155. Regular Articles
  156. Strong edge geodetic problem in networks
  157. Regular Articles
  158. Ricci solitons on almost Kenmotsu 3-manifolds
  159. Regular Articles
  160. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions sharing two finite sets
  161. Regular Articles
  162. On the fourth-order linear recurrence formula related to classical Gauss sums
  163. Regular Articles
  164. Dynamical behavior for a stochastic two-species competitive model
  165. Regular Articles
  166. Two new eigenvalue localization sets for tensors and theirs applications
  167. Regular Articles
  168. κ-strong sequences and the existence of generalized independent families
  169. Regular Articles
  170. Commutators of Littlewood-Paley gκ -functions on non-homogeneous metric measure spaces
  171. Regular Articles
  172. On decompositions of estimators under a general linear model with partial parameter restrictions
  173. Regular Articles
  174. Groups and monoids of Pythagorean triples connected to conics
  175. Regular Articles
  176. Hom-Lie superalgebra structures on exceptional simple Lie superalgebras of vector fields
  177. Regular Articles
  178. Numerical methods for the multiplicative partial differential equations
  179. Regular Articles
  180. Solvable Leibniz algebras with NFn Fm1 nilradical
  181. Regular Articles
  182. Evaluation of the convolution sums ∑al+bm=n lσ(l) σ(m) with ab ≤ 9
  183. Regular Articles
  184. A study on soft rough semigroups and corresponding decision making applications
  185. Regular Articles
  186. Some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions with applications
  187. Regular Articles
  188. Deficiency of forests
  189. Regular Articles
  190. Perfect codes in power graphs of finite groups
  191. Regular Articles
  192. A new compact finite difference quasilinearization method for nonlinear evolution partial differential equations
  193. Regular Articles
  194. Does any convex quadrilateral have circumscribed ellipses?
  195. Regular Articles
  196. The dynamic of a Lie group endomorphism
  197. Regular Articles
  198. On pairs of equations in unlike powers of primes and powers of 2
  199. Regular Articles
  200. Differential subordination and convexity criteria of integral operators
  201. Regular Articles
  202. Quantitative relations between short intervals and exceptional sets of cubic Waring-Goldbach problem
  203. Regular Articles
  204. On θ-commutators and the corresponding non-commuting graphs
  205. Regular Articles
  206. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of Laplace (1, 1) for GARCH models
  207. Regular Articles
  208. Multiple and sign-changing solutions for discrete Robin boundary value problem with parameter dependence
  209. Regular Articles
  210. Fundamental relation on m-idempotent hyperrings
  211. Regular Articles
  212. A novel recursive method to reconstruct multivariate functions on the unit cube
  213. Regular Articles
  214. Nabla inequalities and permanence for a logistic integrodifferential equation on time scales
  215. Regular Articles
  216. Enumeration of spanning trees in the sequence of Dürer graphs
  217. Regular Articles
  218. Quotient of information matrices in comparison of linear experiments for quadratic estimation
  219. Regular Articles
  220. Fourier series of functions involving higher-order ordered Bell polynomials
  221. Regular Articles
  222. Simple modules over Auslander regular rings
  223. Regular Articles
  224. Weighted multilinear p-adic Hardy operators and commutators
  225. Regular Articles
  226. Guaranteed cost finite-time control of positive switched nonlinear systems with D-perturbation
  227. Regular Articles
  228. A modified quasi-boundary value method for an abstract ill-posed biparabolic problem
  229. Regular Articles
  230. Extended Riemann-Liouville type fractional derivative operator with applications
  231. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  232. The algebraic size of the family of injective operators
  233. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  234. The history of a general criterium on spaceability
  235. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  236. On sequences not enjoying Schur’s property
  237. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  238. A hierarchy in the family of real surjective functions
  239. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  240. Dynamics of multivalued linear operators
  241. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  242. Linear dynamics of semigroups generated by differential operators
  243. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  244. Isomorphism theorems for some parabolic initial-boundary value problems in Hörmander spaces
  245. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  246. Determination of a diffusion coefficient in a quasilinear parabolic equation
  247. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  248. Homogeneous two-point problem for PDE of the second order in time variable and infinite order in spatial variables
  249. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  250. A nonlinear plate control without linearization
  251. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  252. Reduction of a Schwartz-type boundary value problem for biharmonic monogenic functions to Fredholm integral equations
  253. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  254. Inverse problem for a physiologically structured population model with variable-effort harvesting
  255. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  256. Existence of solutions for delay evolution equations with nonlocal conditions
  257. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  258. Comments on behaviour of solutions of elliptic quasi-linear problems in a neighbourhood of boundary singularities
  259. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  260. Coupled fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces endowed with a directed graph and application
  261. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  262. Existence of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic degenerate anisotropic equations
  263. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  264. Integro-differential systems with variable exponents of nonlinearity
  265. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  266. Elliptic operators on refined Sobolev scales on vector bundles
  267. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  268. Multiplicity solutions of a class fractional Schrödinger equations
  269. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  270. Determining of right-hand side of higher order ultraparabolic equation
  271. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  272. Asymptotic approximation for the solution to a semi-linear elliptic problem in a thin aneurysm-type domain
  273. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  274. Learnheuristics: hybridizing metaheuristics with machine learning for optimization with dynamic inputs
  275. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  276. Nature–inspired metaheuristic algorithms to find near–OGR sequences for WDM channel allocation and their performance comparison
  277. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  278. Monomial codes seen as invariant subspaces
  279. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  280. Expert knowledge and data analysis for detecting advanced persistent threats
  281. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  282. Feedback equivalence of convolutional codes over finite rings
Downloaded on 17.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2017-0041/html
Scroll to top button