Home Does any convex quadrilateral have circumscribed ellipses?
Article Open Access

Does any convex quadrilateral have circumscribed ellipses?

New insight into innate connection of conic sections and beauty of geometry
  • Jia Hui Li EMAIL logo , Zhuo Qun Wang , Yi Xi Shen and Zhong Yuan Dai
Published/Copyright: December 16, 2017

Abstract

The past decades have witnessed several well-known beautiful conclusions on four con-cyclic points. With highly promising research value, we profoundly studied circumscribed ellipses of convex quadrilaterals in this paper. Using tools of parallel projective transformation and analytic geometry, we derived several theorems including the proof of the existence of circumscribed ellipses of convex quadrilaterals, the properties of its minimal coverage area, and locus center, respectively. This simple approach lays a solid foundation for its application to three-dimensional situations, which is namely the circumscribed quadric surface of a solid figure and its wide-range utility in construction engineering. Meanwhile, we have a new insight into innate connection of conic sections as well as a taste of beauty and harmony of geometry.

MSC 2010: 51M04; 51M05; 51M09; 51N15; 51N20

1 Introduction

Since the development of Euclidean geometry, circumscribed and inscribed circle related problems have been at the center of widespread interests. Several well-known beautiful conclusions such as the circle-power theorem and Ptolemy’s theorem were of particular interest [1, 2]. Con-cyclic points, from four to six, were proposed to extend the original solutions [3, 4]. Enlightened by these elegant studies, we took a step further to unravel the relationship between ellipse and polygon [5,6,7,8,9]. Herein, the properties of circumscribed ellipses of convex quadrilaterals were studied using tools of parallel projective transformation [10, 11] and analytic geometry [12, 13], and the procedures were always from the particular to the general, from square, parallelogram, trapezium to a general convex quadrilateral. Moreover, for the sake of integrity, we also focused on the cases of other two kinds of conics and concave quadrilaterals.

2 The existence of circumscribed ellipses of convex quadrilaterals

It is universally acknowledged that there is no ellipse crossing four points if these four points form a concave quadrilateral or any three points of them is on a line. However, does any convex quadrilateral have circumscribed ellipses [14]?

Theorem 1

There exist circumscribed ellipses of any convex quadrilateral.

Given a convex quadrilateral ABDC on Plane α, we first define the following sets (Figure 1a):

Figure 1 
Proof of the existence of circumscribed ellipses of convex quadrilaterals. (a) Area M of a scalene triangle. (b) Proof of Lemma 1. (c) A rectangular coordinate system set up for an isosceles triangle. (d) The circumscribed ellipses of whose one of the main diameters is coincide with x-axis can cover the shaded part.
Figure 1

Proof of the existence of circumscribed ellipses of convex quadrilaterals. (a) Area M of a scalene triangle. (b) Proof of Lemma 1. (c) A rectangular coordinate system set up for an isosceles triangle. (d) The circumscribed ellipses of whose one of the main diameters is coincide with x-axis can cover the shaded part.

M ≜ {D ∈ α| AD⃗ = aAC⃗, a > 0, b > 0, a + b > 1,}

M1 ≜ {σ ⊂ α| σ is a circumscribed ellipse of quadrilateral ABDC};

≜ ⋃σM σ

Then for any point P on α, we have

  1. A, B, C, P are vertices of a convex quadrilateral ⇔ PM.

  2. If PM, then there exists a circumscribed ellipse of quadrilateral ABPC.

Hence Theorem 1. can be restated as for any Δ ABC, M.

For simplicity, we first prove the following result.

Lemma 1

For any scalene triangle Δ ABC, there exists a parallel projective transformation which maps Δ ABC onto an isosceles triangle.

Proof of Lemma 1

Let Δ ABC be a scalene triangle and Δ ABC′ be its projection on Plane Q. BB′, CC′ are both perpendicular to Plane Q (Figure 1b). Let cosBABcosCAC=AC¯AB¯, then we have AB′ = AC′.  □

Proof of Theorem 1

Note that in Lemma 1, Area M of Δ ABC is projected to be that of Δ ABC′, and the circumscribed ellipses of ΔABC are projected to be those of Δ ABC′. Thus, without loss of generality, we assume AB = AC in ΔABC.

Set up a rectangular coordinate system in which A is the origin and B, C are symmetric about x-axis (Figure 1c). Let B(x1, y1), C(x1, –y1) . For any D (x2, y2) ∈ M fixed, without loss of generality, assume x2 > x1 > 0, y1 > 0, y2 ≥ 0 and y2x2<y1x1.

For a general quadratic equation in two variables x and y

a11x2+2a12xy+a22y2+2b1x+2b2y+c=0 (2.1)

where a11, a12, a22, b1, b2, c are constants, define its discriminants I1=a11+a22,I2=a11a22a122,I3=a11a12b1a12a22b2b1b2c.

Let ξ=x1y12, the problem is discussed on three cases with respect to coordinates of D.

Case 1 x2y22>ξ,

Define σ1 : A1x2 + C1y2 + x = 0,

where A1=x1y12x2y22x12y12x22y22,C1=x12x1x22x2x12y12x22y22.

Claim: σ1 is a circumscribed ellipse of quadrilateral ABDC.

Since KM, we have

x12y12x22y22<0.

First, we check A, B, D, Cσ1.

For A, it’s trivial.

For B and D, it suffices to show that

x1x12y12x22y22=x12x1y12x2y22+y12x12x1x22x2. (2.2)

In Equation (2.2), RHS=x120y12x12x1y12x22x2y22=x120y12x12x1y12x220y22=x120y120x10x220y22=LHS.

Hence B, Cσ1.

For D, it suffices to show that

x2x12y12x22y22=x22x1y12x2y22+y22x12x1x22x2. (2.3)

In Equation (2.3), RHS=x220y22x12x1y12x22x2y22=x220y22x120y12x22x2y22=x220y22x120y120x20=x120y120x20x220y22=LHS.

Hence, Dσ1.

Next, we show that σ1 is an ellipse by checking its discriminants. Since

I1=A1+C1<0,I2=A1C1>0,I3=A10120C101200>0, (2.4)

σ1 is an ellipse.

In conclusion, if D(x2, y2) ∈ M and x2y22>ξ, then D (x2, y2) ∈ . (Figure 1d)

Case 2 x2y22<;ξ

Without loss of generality, assume y2 ≥ 0.

According to Equation (2.1), we have

a11=2(x1y22x2y12)b1+2y12y2x2x1x1b2x22y12x12y22a12=b2x1a22=2x1(x2x1)(x2b1+y2b2)x22y12x12y22 (2.5)

Assume b1 > 0, from y2y1<x2x1<y22y12 we have x1y22x2y12y12y2x2x1x1>x2y2.Letx1y22x2y12y12y2x2x1x1b1>b2>x2y2b1, we have, a11 < 0, a22 < 0. Then

I1=a11+a22<0,I2=a11a22a122>0,I3=2b1b22x1a22b12a11b22>0 (2.6)

Therefore, for D(x2, y2) ∈ M, if x2y22 < ζ, then D.

Case 3 x2y22 = ζ

Similarly, we have

a11=2y12y2x2x1x1b2x22y12x12y22a12=b2x1a22=2x1(x2x1)(x2b1+y2b2)x22y12x12y22 (2.7)

Assume b1 > 0, x2y2 b1 < b2 < 0. Then

I1=a11+a22<0,I2=a11a22a122,I3=2b1b22x1a22b12a11b22>0. (2.8)

Therefore, for D(x2, y2) ∈ M, if x2y22 = ζ, then D.

From the above discussion, we have that for any D(x2, y2) ∈ M, D. I.e., M.

3 The Coverage Area of Circumscribed Ellipses

The necessary and sufficient condition for four con-elliptic points is that they can form a convex quadrilateral. Here we discuss the situation of five points on the same ellipse. If four of them are fixed, we can describe this problem as the coverage area of the circumscribed ellipse of a convex quadrilateral.

3.1 Parallelogram

We simplified the problem to study the coverage area of the circumscribed ellipse of a parallelogram. It is common knowledge that any parallelogram can be an oblique section of a column with a square bottom (since the ratio between line segments is certain in a parallel projection, the two diagonals bisecting each other can make it), we can take a step further and change it into a simpler and more specific case, which is known as a square, by using the powerful tool of parallel projective transformation.

Set up a rectangular coordinate system in which A is the origin and the axes are parallel to the sides of the square (Figure 2a). Set B(x0, x0), and the equation of circumscribed ellipses is expressed by

x2a2+y2b2=1 (3.1)
Figure 2 
The coverage area of circumscribed ellipses. (a) Set up a rectangular coordinate system for a square. (b) The coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of a square is the shaded part. (c) The coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of a parallelogram is the shaded part. (d) Set up a rectangular coordinate system for an isosceles trapezium. (e) The coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of an isosceles trapezium is the light grey part. (f) The coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of a trapezium is the light grey part. (g) Set up a rectangular coordinate system for a general convex quadrilateral. (h) The coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of a general convex quadrilateral is the light grey part.
Figure 2

The coverage area of circumscribed ellipses. (a) Set up a rectangular coordinate system for a square. (b) The coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of a square is the shaded part. (c) The coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of a parallelogram is the shaded part. (d) Set up a rectangular coordinate system for an isosceles trapezium. (e) The coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of an isosceles trapezium is the light grey part. (f) The coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of a trapezium is the light grey part. (g) Set up a rectangular coordinate system for a general convex quadrilateral. (h) The coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of a general convex quadrilateral is the light grey part.

Set the ellipse crosses the fifth point E(x1, y1), and we have

a2=x02y12x12y02y12y02>0b2=x02y12x12y02x02x12>0 (3.2)

According to Equation (3.2), we have (x12x02)(y12y02). Therefore, the area of point E, which also means the coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of the square, is shown as the shaded part in Figure 2b. Through parallel projective transformation, ellipses are still ellipses and squares change into any parallelograms, the coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of a parallelogram is shown as the shaded part in Figure 2c.

3.2 Trapezium

Similarly, we studied properties of trapezium first on a simplified shape: isosceles trapezium. Let the coordinates of the four vertices of an isosceles trapezium be P1(x1, y1), P2(x2, −y1), P3(−x2, −y1), P4(−x1, y1) (Figure 2d). We might as well assume x2 > x1 > 0, y1 > 0, and the equations of the four sides are P1P2 : 2y1x + (x2x1) γ − (x1+x2)y1 = 0, P2P3 : γ+y1=0, P1P4 : γy1 = 0, and P3P4 : 2y1x+(x2x1)γ+(x1+x2)y1=0.

From the theorems of analytic geometry, if four points P1, P2, P3 and P4 are given, the family of conic sections crossing these four points can be expressed by

[2y1x+(x2x1)y(x1+x2)y1][2y1x(x2x1)y+(x1+x2)y1]+m(yy1)(y+y1)=0 (3.3)

Then plug the fifth point into P5(x5, y5) Equation (3.3), we have

m=4y12x52(x1x2)2y52+2(x22x12)y1y5(x1+x2)2y12y12y52 (3.4)

Plug Equation (3.4) into Equation (3.3) and rearrange it, we have the general quadratic equation. Since the locus of the above equation represents an ellipse, we have an inequation for it by using the discriminant I2=AC=4y14y1x52+2(x22x12)y52(x22+x12)y1y12y52>0. Then we have that if −y1 < y5 < y1, y5 > 2y1x22x12x52+x22+x12x22x12y1, if y5 < −y1 or y5 > y1, y5 < 2y1x22x12x52+x22+x12x22x12y1.y=2y1x22x12x2+x22+x12x22x12y1 is the parabola crossing the four vertices P1(x1, y1), P2(x2, −y1), P3(−x2, −y1), P4(−x1, y1). Therefore, the coverage area is shown as the light grey part in Figure 2e.

Besides, it is worth noting that the area enclosed by the parabola and side P1P2 or side P3P4 cannot be covered.

Next, we check I1 and I3. As 4y1 > 0, I2 = ACB2 = AC > 0, we have C > 0, I1 = A + C > 0. To make I1I3 < 0, which is namely I3=a11a12b1a12a22b2b1b2c=a11(a22cb22)<0, it suffices to have that a22c b22 < 0. If −y1 < y5 < y1, we have F=2y12y12x52+(x22x12)y1y5(x22+x12)y52y12y52 and F<2y14y12x52+(x22+x12)y12y52y12y52<0. If y5 < −y1 or y5 > y1, we have F < 0 as well.

Hence, for any P5 in the light grey part shown in Figure 2e, we have I3 = a11(a22c b22 ) < 0. Now we can prove that the coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of the isosceles trapezium is the light grey part in Figure 2e. Parallelism does not change through parallel projective transformation, the coverage area of circumscribed ellipses of trapezium is shown as the light grey part in Figure 2f.

3.3 General Convex Quadrilateral

From the discussion about the coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses of the two kinds of special convex quadrilaterals, we find if a pair of opposite sides is parallel, the boundary of the coverage area takes place on the parallel lines where the two sides are located. On the other hand, if the two opposite sides are not parallel, the boundary is the parabola crossing its four vertices. In this case, we can regard the parallel lines as a degenerated form of a parabola. Therefore, we guess that for a general convex quadrilateral whose opposite sides are both not parallel, the boundaries of its coverage area are two parabolas crossing its four vertices.

Let the coordinates of the four vertices of a general convex quadrilateral be P1(x1, y1), P2(x2, 0), P3(0, 0), P4(x4,y4),y1y4,y4x4y1x1x2 (Figure 2g). Based on the same procedure, we first listed the equations of the four sides, P1P2 : y1x + (x2x1)yx2y1 = 0, P3P4 : y4xx4y = 0, P2P3 : y = 0 and P1P4 : (y1y4)x − (x1x4)yx4y1+y4x1 = 0. Then, the family of conic sections crossing these four points can be expressed by

[y1x+(x2x1)yx2y1](y4xx4y)+my[(y1y4)x(x1x4)yx4y1+y4x1]=0 (3.5)

Then plug the fifth point P5(x5, y5) into Equation (3.5), and we have

m=[y1x5+(x2x1)y5x2y1](y4x5x4y5)y5[(y1y4)x5(x1x4)y5x4y1+y4x1] (3.6)

Since the locus of the Equation (3.6) is an ellipse, we have an inequation for it by using the discriminant I2 = y1y4[x4(x1x2) − m(x1x4)] − 14 [− x4y1y4x1+y4x2+m(y1y4)]2 > 0. Namely, we have

(y1y4)2m2+[2(x4y1y4x1+y4x2)(y1y4)+4y1y4(x1x4)]+(x4y1y4x1+y4x2)24y1y4x4(x1x2)<0 (3.7)

Since y1y4 Inequation (3.7) is a quadratic one of m. Because of the existence of circumscribed ellipse of any convex quadrilateral, Inequation (3.7) has solution. As the coefficient of the quadratic term (y1y4)2 > 0, we can assume the solution of Inequation (3.7) is k1 < m < k2.

Since y4x4y1x1x2, the constant term (−x4y1y4x1+y4x2)2 − 4y1y4x4(x1x2)≠ 0. Hence, k1, k2 ≠ 0.

Plug Equation (3.6) into k1 < m < k2, we have k1<[y1x5+(x2x1)y5x2y1](y4x5x4y5)y5[(y1y4)x5(x1x4)y5x4y1+y4x1]<k2.

If y5[(y1y4)x5 − (x1x4)y5x4y1+y4x1] > 0, which means P5 is above P1P4 or below P2P3, we have

[y1x5+(x2x1)y5x2y1](y4x5x4y5)+k1y5[(y1y4)x5(x1x4)y5x4y1+y4x1]<0 (3.8)

[y1x5+(x2x1)y5x2y1](y4x5x4y5)+k2y5[(y1y4)x5(x1x4)y5x4y1+y4x1]>0 (3.9)

Since Equation (3.5) is the quadratic curve crossing four points, if m = k1, k2, I2 = 0. Hence, the left side of Inequation (3.8) and Inequation (3.9) represent the two parabolas crossing P1, P2, P3 and P4. In other words, P5 is in the parabola whose equation is

[y1x5+(x2x1)y5x2y1](y4x5x4y5)+k1y5[(y1y4)x5(x1x4)y5x4y1+y4x1]=0 (3.10)

and P5 is also out of the parabola whose equation is

[y1x5+(x2x1)y5x2y1](y4x5x4y5)+k2y5[(y1y4)x5(x1x4)y5x4y1+y4x1]=0 (3.11)

It is worth mentioning that since I2 = 0 is a quadratic equation of m, it has only two roots, which means there are only two parabolas crossing the four vertices of the convex quadrilateral.

Using the same argument, when y5[(y1y4)x5 − (x1x4)y5x4y1+y4x1] < 0, which means P5 is between P1P4 and P2P3, we can have the same conclusion.

In conclusion, the coverage area of circumscribed ellipses of general convex quadrilateral is shown as the light grey part in Figure 2h. Similar to the case of trapezium, the area enclosed by two parabolas and four sides cannot be covered.

3.4 Circumscribed Conics of Convex Quadrilaterals

Through the studies above, we conclude that the boundaries of the coverage area of circumscribed ellipses are another conic, which is parabola. Here we discuss the third conic, hyperbola. We will generalize the conclusion about the coverage area of circumscribed ellipses to the coverage area of circumscribed conics.

For a general quadratic equation in two variables, we can use discriminants to determine its locus (Table 1). We conclude that the light grey part in Figure 2h is the coverage area of the circumscribed ellipses, where I2 > 0. Therefore, the area which cannot be covered by the circumscribed ellipse (except the boundary region) can be covered by the circumscribed hyperbolas (including the degenerated condition, namely two intersecting lines), where I2 < 0 (as shown the shaded part in Figure 3a). Besides, the boundary of these two coverage areas is the parabola crossing the four vertices, where I2=0.

Figure 3 
Circumscribed conics of convex quadrilaterals. (a) The coverage area of the circumscribed hyperbolas of a general convex quadrilateral is the shaded part. (b, c) “2+2” hyperbola, which means two vertices are on one branch while the other two are on the other branch. (d) “4+0” hyperbola, which means all of four vertices are on one branch. (e) There exists no “3+1” hyperbola which is circumscribed about a convex quadrilateral. (f) The “2+2” hyperbolas cover the light grey area, while the “4+0” hyperbolas cover the dark grey area.
Figure 3

Circumscribed conics of convex quadrilaterals. (a) The coverage area of the circumscribed hyperbolas of a general convex quadrilateral is the shaded part. (b, c) “2+2” hyperbola, which means two vertices are on one branch while the other two are on the other branch. (d) “4+0” hyperbola, which means all of four vertices are on one branch. (e) There exists no “3+1” hyperbola which is circumscribed about a convex quadrilateral. (f) The “2+2” hyperbolas cover the light grey area, while the “4+0” hyperbolas cover the dark grey area.

Table 1

Using discriminants l1, l2 and l3 to determine the locus of a general quadratic equation containing two variables x and y.

Condition of Discriminant l2 Condition of Discriminants l1 and l3 Geometry Interpretation
I2 > 0 I1I3 < 0 Ellipse
I3 ≠ 0 Parabola
I2 = 0 I3 = 0 Two Parallel Lines
I3 ≠ 0 Hyperbola
I2 < 0 I3 = 0 Two Intersecting Lines

So far, we can divide the plane where a convex quadrilateral is located into three parts. One part is con-elliptic with its four vertices (Figure 2h). The second part is con-parabolic with the vertices (namely two parabolas crossing the four vertices of the convex quadrilateral). The third part is con-hyperbolic with the vertices (Figure 3a).

Normally, the circumscribed hyperbolas should be classified into three categories (The demo video was provided in Supplementary 1):

“2+2” hyperbola: Two vertices are on one branch of the hyperbola, while the other two are on the other branch (Figure 3b).

“3+1” hyperbola: Three vertices are on one branch of the hyperbola, while the forth is on the other branch (Figure 3c).

“4+0” hyperbola: All of four vertices are on one branch of the hyperbola (Figure 3d).

However, not all of these three kinds can be circumscribed hyperbolas of a convex quadrilateral. So the following proposition was proposed:

Proposition 1

There exists no “3+1” hyperbola which is circumscribed about a convex quadrilateral.

Proof

Suppose the vertex of P1 is on the left branch of the hyperbola, and the other three vertices P2, P3 and P4 are on the right branch. According to the definition of convex quadrilaterals, we can infer that P4 must be located in the area enclosed by rays formed by any two of the sides of ΔP1P2P3 and its third side (the light grey part in Figure 3e). Each line has and only has two intersections with the hyperbola, and the slope of P2P3 is greater than the asymptote while that of P1P3 is smaller than it, we can infer that the right branch must be out of the light grey area which is to the right of P1P3 (as shown in Figure 3e). We can prove the rest in the same way. Therefore, the right branch must be outside of the light grey area, and therefore the proposition holds true. □

In conclusion, the circumscribed hyperbolas only can be classified into two categories: “2+2” hyperbolas (Figure 3b, 3c) & “4+0” hyperbolas (Figure 3d).

Furthermore, we have discussed the coverage area of these two kinds of hyperbolas by using limit thought, and the results are shown in Figure 3f. The “2+2” hyperbolas cover the light grey area, while the “4+0” hyperbolas cover the dark grey area.

4 The Locus of the Center of Circumscribed Conics

4.1 Convex Quadrilateral

For a parallelogram, the center of its circumscribed conics is necessarily the center of the parallelogram. For an isosceles trapezium, since conics and isosceles trapeziums are both mirror-symmetrical graphs, the center of its circumscribed conics must locate at the line, which crosses the midpoints of its bases. Through parallel projective projection, the ratio of segments and parallelism do not change, the center of circumscribed conics of a trapezium must locate at the line, which crosses the midpoints of its bases. Next, we try to figure out the locus of the center of circumscribed conics of a general convex quadrilateral.

Theorem 2

The locus of the center of circumscribed conics of a convex quadrilateral is its nine-point curve, which is a hyperbola. Moreover, the locus of the center of circumscribed ellipses is a branch of it, and the locus of the center of circumscribed hyperbolas is the other branch (Figure 4a) (The demo video was provided in Supplementary 2).

Figure 4 
The locus of the center of circumscribed conics. (a) The locus of the center of circumscribed conics of a convex quadrilateral is its nine-point curve, which is a hyperbola. (b) The axes of symmetry of a general convex quadrilateral’s two circumscribed parabolas are parallel to the asymptotic lines of its nine-point curve, respectively. (c) The center 0 of the circumscribed conics of a concave quadrilateral is on its nine-point curve, which is an ellipse.
Figure 4

The locus of the center of circumscribed conics. (a) The locus of the center of circumscribed conics of a convex quadrilateral is its nine-point curve, which is a hyperbola. (b) The axes of symmetry of a general convex quadrilateral’s two circumscribed parabolas are parallel to the asymptotic lines of its nine-point curve, respectively. (c) The center 0 of the circumscribed conics of a concave quadrilateral is on its nine-point curve, which is an ellipse.

For a quadrilateral, the intersection of the diagonals, two intersections of the opposite sides, four midpoints of the sides and two midpoints of diagonals are necessarily on a conic, which is called the nine-point curve of it. The nine-point curve is always a centered conic. Whether it is a hyperbola or an ellipse depends on whether the quadrilateral is convex or concave. Moreover, the center of the nine-point curve is the barycenter of the quadrilateral.

The following situations are two special cases of nine-point curve: When the quadrilateral has a circumscribed circle, its nine-point curve is a rectangular hyperbola; When the four vertices of the quadrilateral form an orthocentric system, its nine-point curve is a circle, which is known as the nine-point circle [15, 16].

To prove the theorem, we can use Equation (3.5) to express the circumscribed conics of the quadrilateral, and figure out the equation of the center of the conics. The equation is quadratic, and the nine special points, which the nine-point curve crosses, satisfy the equation. Since the nine point can and only can determine one quadratic curve, the locus of the center of circumscribed conics is the nine-point curve.

Corollary 1

The axes of symmetry of a general convex quadrilateral’s two circumscribed parabolas are parallel to the asymptotic lines of its nine-point curve, respectively (Figure 4b).

Proof

A parabola is a non-centered conic, and it can also be regarded as the critical situation of an ellipse or a hyperbola. Hence, if we also regard it as a centered conic, we can have the following definition:

Definition

The center of a parabola is the point at infinity, which is determined by its axis of symmetry.

From Theorem 2, we know that the locus of the center of a general convex quadrilateral is its nine-point curve. Therefore, the centers of the two circumscribed parabolas are necessarily on the nine-point curve. On the other hand, since the nine-point curve of a convex quadrilateral is a hyperbola, it is infinitely near its asymptotic lines at infinity. Therefore, the asymptotic lines cross the centers of the two circumscribed parabolas.

In conclusion, the axes of symmetry of the two circumscribed parabolas of a general convex quadrilateral are parallel to the asymptotic lines of its nine-point curve respectively. □

4.2 Concave Quadrilateral

As mentioned before, a concave quadrilateral also has a nine-point curve, which is an ellipse. Taking a step further, we generalized Theorem 2 to concave quadrilaterals.

Theorem 3

The locus of the center of circumscribed conic of a concave quadrilateral is its nine-point curve, which is an ellipse (Figure 4c) (The demo video was provided in Supplementary 3).

It is worth mentioning that the circumscribed conics of a concave quadrilateral can only be “3+1” hyperbolas, while the circumscribed conics of a convex quadrilateral only cannot be “3+1” hyperbolas, which is proved before.

5 The Minimal Area of Circumscribed Ellipses

5.1 Parallelogram

It is well known that among the inscribed parallelograms of an ellipse, the area of the parallelogram is maximal when its diagonals are the conjugate diameters of the ellipse. In that way, among the circumscribed ellipses of a parallelogram, it is doubted that whether the area of the ellipse is minimal when its conjugate diameters are the diagonals of the parallelogram.

Theorem 4

When the conjugate diameters of the circumscribed ellipse are the diagonals of the parallelogram, the area of the circumscribed ellipse is minimal.

Proof

As mentioned before, any parallelogram can be an oblique section of a column with a square bottom. Let θ be the dihedral angle between the oblique section and the bottom and θ is unique. Suppose E is a circumscribed ellipse of the parallelogram, so its projection on the oblique section E′ is a circumscribed ellipse of the square, which is the bottom. According to the fundamental theorem in projective geometry, we know that SE = SE⋅cosθ. Therefore, if and only if SE is minimal, SE is minimal. Thus we drew the following lemma. □

Lemma 2

Among the circumscribed ellipses of a square, the area of the circumscribed circle is the minimum.

Proof

Since squares and ellipses are both central symmetry, the center of its circumscribed conics is necessarily the center of the parallelogram. Suppose a square ABCD, and its center is O. Set up a rectangular coordinate system in which the center O is the origin. We first consider the situation where the axes of the circumscribed ellipses are not parallel to the square’s sides (Figure 5a). Let A(x1, y1), B(x2, y2), and the circumscribed ellipses are expressed by x2a2+y2b2=1. Since A, B are on the ellipse, we have

a2=x12y22x22y12y22y12b2=x12y22x22y12x12x22 (5.1)
Figure 5 
The minimal area of circumscribed ellipses. (a) The axes of the circumscribed ellipses are not parallel to the square’s sides. (b) The axes of the circumscribed ellipses are parallel to the square’s sides. (c) If the projections of an ellipse’s two diameters on its bottom are perpendicular, these two diameters must be conjugate. (d) The drawing method of the minimal circumscribed ellipse of a parallelogram. (e) The minimal circumscribed ellipse of a trapezium. (f) Set up a rectangular coordinate system for an isosceles trapezium. (g) The minimal circumscribed ellipse of an isosceles trapezium. (h) Set up a rectangular coordinate system for a cyclic quadrilateral.
Figure 5

The minimal area of circumscribed ellipses. (a) The axes of the circumscribed ellipses are not parallel to the square’s sides. (b) The axes of the circumscribed ellipses are parallel to the square’s sides. (c) If the projections of an ellipse’s two diameters on its bottom are perpendicular, these two diameters must be conjugate. (d) The drawing method of the minimal circumscribed ellipse of a parallelogram. (e) The minimal circumscribed ellipse of a trapezium. (f) Set up a rectangular coordinate system for an isosceles trapezium. (g) The minimal circumscribed ellipse of an isosceles trapezium. (h) Set up a rectangular coordinate system for a cyclic quadrilateral.

Plug x12+y12=x22+y22 into Equations (5.1), and we have a2 = b2.

Hence, there exists one and only one circumscribed ellipse of the square, which is the circumscribed circle. Next, we consider the situation where the axes of the circumscribed ellipses are parallel to the square’s sides (Figure 5b). Let B(x0, y0) and the circumscribed ellipses are expressed by x02a2+y02b2=1. By using the fundamental inequations, we have 1x02=1a2+1b221a2b2=2ab. Namely, we have ab2x02, so S = π ab 2πx02. If and only if a = b = x0, the equality holds, which namely means the area is the minimum. At this time, the circumscribed ellipse of the square is the circumscribed circle. In conclusion, among the circumscribed ellipses of a square, the area of the circumscribed circle is the minimum.

It is obvious that the diagonals of the square are the perpendicular diameters of its circumscribed circle. So what about their projections on the section?

Lemma 3

If the projections of an ellipse’s two diameters on its bottom are perpendicular, these two diameters must be conjugate (Figure 5c).

Proof

Suppose there is a cylinder. Let AB′ and CD′ be the perpendicular diameters of the bottom. Draw MN′//AB′. Let K′ be the midpoint of chord MN′, so its projection K is the midpoint of MN. Since parallelism does not change through projection, we also have MN//AB. Thus AB and CD are conjugate.

From Lemma 3, we can conclude that the projections of the circle’s two diameters on its section are conjugate. Hence, we can prove Theorem 4. Moreover, to figure out the value of the minimal area, we drew the following theorem. □

Theorem 5

The minimal area is π2 times of the area of the parallelogram.

Proof

From Lemma 2, when E is the minimal circumscribed ellipse of the parallelogram, which is a section, its projection E′ is the circumscribed circle of the square, which is the bottom. Let the area of the parallelogram be S, while the area of the square is S′. According to the fundamental theorem in projective geometry, we know that SE = SE⋅cosθ. Thus, we have sEs=sEs=πr22r2=π2.

The drawing method of the minimal circumscribed ellipse of a parallelogram was provided:

Since we have found out the minimal circumscribed ellipse of parallelograms, we need to find the drawing method. According to Theorem 4, this proposition is equivalent to drawing an ellipse of which the conjugate diameters are the diagonals of the parallelogram. So next we will point out the drawing method of the ellipse when we know a pair of conjugate diameters of it (Figure 5d).

If we set up a corresponding relationship between AD, BC and a pair of conjugate diameters of a circle, the corresponding ellipse to the circle is namely what we want.

  1. Let BC coincide with BC′ and draw another diameter AD′⊥ BC′. Then we can determine the corresponding relationship between the circle and the ellipse by the axis BC(BC′) and a pair of corresponding points AA′.

  2. Through any point N′ on the circle, draw Δ NNMΔAAO.N is on the ellipse and M is on the axis BC.

  3. Same as above, draw a series of points similar to point N and join them together with a smooth curve. This is namely the ellipse we want.

Theorem 5

There exists one and only one ellipse of which the conjugate diameters are the diagonals of a parallelogram.

Corollary 2

There exists one and only one minimal circumscribed ellipse of a parallelogram.

5.2 Trapezium

Theorem 6

Let M, N be the midpoints of the bases of a trapezium. The center O of the minimal circumscribed ellipse of a trapezium is on MN, and it satisfies the ratio MOON=(12m2)+m4m2+1(2m2)m4m2+1 where m is the ratio between two bases (Figure 5e).

Proof

If an isosceles trapezium and the shape of its circumscribed ellipse (namely the eccentricity) are given, the ellipse is determined. In order to facilitate the research, the paper uses the ratio between major and minor axes to describe the shape of a circumscribed ellipse. Suppose the equation of the circumscribed ellipses is x2a2+y2b2=1, and k=ba(kR+). Due to the fact that ellipses and isosceles trapeziums are both graphs of axial symmetry, the symmetry axis of the isosceles trapezium must be the major or minor axis of the circumscribed ellipses. We might as well assume y-axis is its symmetry axis (Figure 5f). Let P1(x1, y1), P2(x2, y2), P3(−x2, y2), P4(−x1, y1) and x2>x1 > 0, y1 > 0, y2 < 0. In this case, x1 and x2, which are half of the two bases of the isosceles trapezium, are fixed values. y1 and y2 are non-fixed values, while they must satisfy y1y2 = y0. Here y0 is the height of the isosceles trapezium, which is also a fixed value.

Since the four vertices are on the ellipse, we have y1by2b=y0b=1x12a2+1x22a2. Plug b = ak into it, we have a2=y04+k4(x22x12)2+2k2y02(x22+x12)4k2y02. Thus the area of the circumscribed ellipses can be expressed by S=πab=πa2k=πy04+k4(x22x12)2+2k2y02(x22+x12)4ky02.

Set f(k)=4y02πS=(x22x12)2k3+2y02(x22+x12)k+y04k, to minimize S, we calculate derivative of f:

f(k)=3(x22x12)2k2+2y02(x22+x12)y04k2=0 (5.2)

Solve Equation (5.2) and we have

k2=y02(x22+x12)+2y02x14+x24x12x223(x22x12)2 (5.3)

On the other hand, x22x12a2=y12y22b2=(y1y2)(y1+y2)a2k2=y0(y1+y2)a2k2. Since y1y2 = y0, we have

y1y2=y02+k2(x22x12)y02k2(x22x12) (5.4)

Let m=x1x2 and plug m, Equation (5.3), Equation (5.4) together, we have

y1y2=(12m2)+m4m2+1(2m2)m4m2+1 (5.5)

For an isosceles trapezium, the center of its circumscribed conics must locate at the line which crosses the midpoints of its bases. Therefore, the value of |y1y2| indicates the location of the center of the minimal circumscribed ellipse. Now we can prove Theorem 6 holds in this special case of isosceles trapeziums (Figure 5g). Because parallelism and ratio between line segments do not change through parallel projective transformation, we can prove Theorem 6 holds in all cases of trapeziums.

6 Circumscribed Ellipses of Cyclic Quadrilaterals

Since any convex quadrilateral can be transformed to a cyclic quadrilateral through parallel projection, it is helpful to research the connection between cyclic quadrilaterals and their circumscribed ellipses.

Theorem 7

Let A, B, C, D be four points on the given ellipse of which the major diameters are parallel to the coordinate axis. If A, B, C, D are cyclic, the opposite sides of the quadrilateral formed by these four points will locate on two lines of which the slope angles are complementary (Figure 5h).

Proof

For a given ellipse, set up a rectangular coordinate system of which the coordinate axis is parallel to its major axis (Figure 5h), then the equation of the ellipse can be expressed by A1x2 + C1y2 + D1x+E1y+F1 = 0. Suppose a cyclic quadrilateral ABCD, whose vertices are on the ellipse above. Let the four vertices be on the circle x2 + y2 + D0x+E0y+F0 = 0. Then, we can express the quadratic curve crossing these four points by

A1x2+C1y2+D1x+E1y+F1+λ(x2+y2+D0x+E0y+F0)=0 (6.1)

On the other hand, we can express the equation of a quadratic curve crossing the four points by

(a1x+b1y+c1)(a2x+b2y+c2)=0 (6.2)

Obviously, there are no terms containing xy in Equation (6.1). By comparing Equation (6.1) and (6.2), we have a1b2+a2b1 = 0. Since the curve expressed in Equation (6.1) crosses all the four given points A, B, C, D and there are no collinear points, the two lines expressed by Equation (3.4) each respectively crosses two of the points. In brief, Equation (6.2) can express any quadratic curve made up of the two lines where any pair of opposite sides of the quadrilateral A, B, C, D is located.

Therefore, we can know that any pair of opposite sides of the complete quadrilateral A, B, C, D locates on two lines of which the slope angles are complementary. And the slopes of the two lines are opposite numbers if they exist, namely a1b1=a2b2.

From the theorem above, we can infer two corollaries as following:

Corollary 3

For a circumscribed ellipse of a cyclic quadrilateral, the included angles between its axis and the opposite sides of the quadrilateral are equal.

Corollary 4

For the circumscribed ellipses of a cyclic quadrilateral, their major axes are parallel to each other.

7 Conclusion

To summarize, the properties of circumscribed ellipses of convex quadrilaterals were unraveled in this research, using tools of parallel projective transformation and analytic geometry. A totally novel geometric proof of the existence of circumscribed ellipses of convex quadrilaterals was derived considering three different cases. From the particular to the general, from square, parallelogram, trapezium to a general convex quadrilateral, the coverage area of the circumscribed conics calculated, respectively, which is equivalent to dividing the plane where a convex quadrilateral is located into three parts: con-elliptic, con-parabolic and con-hyperbolic with the four vertices of the quadrilateral. We found the locus of the center of circumscribed conics, both of convex quadrilaterals and concave quadrilaterals, respectively. What’s more, we found the minimal area of circumscribed ellipse of convex quadrilaterals.We hope to extend the above results to threedimensional situations, which is namely the circumscribed quadric surface of a solid figure. Since quadrics are widely applied to construction engineering, we believe such a study has bright perspective in the future. Meanwhile, we have an insight into the innate connection of conic sections as well as a taste of the beauty and harmony of geometry.

Acknowledgement

We are deeply indebted to Prof. Shing-Tung Yau for providing critical comments as well as constructive suggestionswhen attending Yau’s award and wining the global bronze medal.We express our sincerest gratitude to Prof. Jia Xing Hong and Prof. Yi Jun Yao from School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University for filling us with the passion to move on when we were at a loss in our research, and providing fundamentally valuable suggestions on the manuscript. Special thanks to Science Talent Program of China Association for Science and Technology and Scientific Research Program of No.2 Secondary School Attached to East China Normal University for supporting our research. We are grateful to Mr.Wei Cheng Yang for inspiring us to view the study in various perspectives. We also appreciate the enthusiastic help from anonymous referee for his/her comments and remarks, which helps us to improve the presentation of the manuscript.

  1. Competing interests: we have no competing interests.


Supplementary Materials

Movies S1# Demo video of circumscribed hyperbolas (“2+2” hyperbolas and “4+0” hyperbolas).

Movies S2# Demo video of the locus of the center of circumscribed conics of a convex quadrilateral (its ninepoint curve formed a hyperbola)

Movies S3# Demo video of the locus of the center of circumscribed conic of a concave quadrilateral (its ninepoint curve formed an ellipse)


References

[1] Langley, E. M., Further use of Ptolemy’s theorem (Euclid, VI. d.) for a problem in maxima and minima, Nature, 1888, 38, 14910.1038/038149b0Search in Google Scholar

[2] Gueron, S., Two applications of the generalized Ptolemy theorem, Am. Math. Mon., 2002, 109, 362–37010.1080/00029890.2002.11920897Search in Google Scholar

[3] Kolar, R., Six concyclic points, Math. Commun., 2007, 12Search in Google Scholar

[4] Jeurissen, R. H., Sets in the plane with many concyclic subsets, Electron. J. Comb., 2005, 12, 110.37236/1938Search in Google Scholar

[5] Ismailescu, D., Circumscribed polygons of small area, Discrete. Comput. Geom., 2009, 41, 583–58910.1007/s00454-008-9072-zSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Kallrath, J., Cutting circles and polygons from area-minimizing rectangles, J. Global Opitm., 2009, 42, 299–32810.1007/s10898-007-9274-6Search in Google Scholar

[7] Horwitz, A., Ellipses of minimal area and of minimal eccentricity circumscribed about a convex quadrilateral, Aust. J. Math. Anal. & Appl., 2010, 7, 12Search in Google Scholar

[8] Zhang, W., Yi, H. B., Wang, X. W., Coal dust recognition based on concave point extraction and ellipse fitting, Appl. Mech. & Mater., 2014, 654, 296–29910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.654.296Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ternullo, M., Two new sets of ellipse-related concyclic points, J. Geom., 2009, 94, 159–17310.1007/s00022-009-0005-7Search in Google Scholar

[10] Feng, K. Q., Projective geometry, Harbin Institution of Technology Press, Harbin, 2012Search in Google Scholar

[11] Shi, B. C., Introduction of space analytic geometry, Nankai Universty Press, Tianjing, 1979Search in Google Scholar

[12] Wen, J., Structure and thought of conic section, Zhejiang University Press, Zhejiang, 2010Search in Google Scholar

[13] Wang, G. P., Properties of conjugate diameters of ellipses, High-School Math. Mon., 2010, 5, 36–38Search in Google Scholar

[14] Wang., Q. M., An elementary proof of the existence of circumscribed ellipses of convex quadrilaterals, Fujian High-School Math., 2015, 10, 1Search in Google Scholar

[15] Wang., Q. Z., The nine-point conic to a triangle, Math. Pract. Theor., 2006, 2, 270–277.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Johnson., R. A., Advanced Euclidean Geometry, Dover Publications Inc., New York, 2007Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-7-18
Accepted: 2017-11-2
Published Online: 2017-12-16

© 2017 Jia Hui Li et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Integrals of Frullani type and the method of brackets
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Edge of chaos in reaction diffusion CNN model
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Calculus using proximities: a mathematical approach in which students can actually prove theorems
  7. Regular Articles
  8. An investigation on hyper S-posets over ordered semihypergroups
  9. Regular Articles
  10. The Leibniz algebras whose subalgebras are ideals
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Fixed point and multidimensional fixed point theorems with applications to nonlinear matrix equations in terms of weak altering distance functions
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Matrix rank and inertia formulas in the analysis of general linear models
  15. Regular Articles
  16. The hybrid power mean of quartic Gauss sums and Kloosterman sums
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Tauberian theorems for statistically (C,1,1) summable double sequences of fuzzy numbers
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Some properties of graded comultiplication modules
  21. Regular Articles
  22. The characterizations of upper approximation operators based on special coverings
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Bi-integrable and tri-integrable couplings of a soliton hierarchy associated with SO(4)
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Dynamics for a discrete competition and cooperation model of two enterprises with multiple delays and feedback controls
  27. Regular Articles
  28. A new view of relationship between atomic posets and complete (algebraic) lattices
  29. Regular Articles
  30. A class of extensions of Restricted (s, t)-Wythoff’s game
  31. Regular Articles
  32. New bounds for the minimum eigenvalue of 𝓜-tensors
  33. Regular Articles
  34. Shintani and Shimura lifts of cusp forms on certain arithmetic groups and their applications
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Empirical likelihood for quantile regression models with response data missing at random
  37. Regular Articles
  38. Convex combination of analytic functions
  39. Regular Articles
  40. On the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank-two matrices
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Uniform topology on EQ-algebras
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Integrations on rings
  45. Regular Articles
  46. The quasilinear parabolic kirchhoff equation
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Avoiding rainbow 2-connected subgraphs
  49. Regular Articles
  50. On non-Hopfian groups of fractions
  51. Regular Articles
  52. Singularly perturbed hyperbolic problems on metric graphs: asymptotics of solutions
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Rings in which elements are the sum of a nilpotent and a root of a fixed polynomial that commute
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Superstability of functional equations related to spherical functions
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Evaluation of the convolution sum involving the sum of divisors function for 22, 44 and 52
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Weighted minimal translation surfaces in the Galilean space with density
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Complete convergence for weighted sums of pairwise independent random variables
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Binomials transformation formulae for scaled Fibonacci numbers
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Growth functions for some uniformly amenable groups
  67. Regular Articles
  68. Hopf bifurcations in a three-species food chain system with multiple delays
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Oscillation and nonoscillation of half-linear Euler type differential equations with different periodic coefficients
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Osculating curves in 4-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index 2
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Some new facts about group 𝒢 generated by the family of convergent permutations
  75. Regular Articles
  76. lnfinitely many solutions for fractional Schrödinger equations with perturbation via variational methods
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Supersolvable orders and inductively free arrangements
  79. Regular Articles
  80. Asymptotically almost automorphic solutions of differential equations with piecewise constant argument
  81. Regular Articles
  82. Finite groups whose all second maximal subgroups are cyclic
  83. Regular Articles
  84. Semilinear systems with a multi-valued nonlinear term
  85. Regular Articles
  86. Positive solutions for Hadamard differential systems with fractional integral conditions on an unbounded domain
  87. Regular Articles
  88. Calibration and simulation of Heston model
  89. Regular Articles
  90. One kind sixth power mean of the three-term exponential sums
  91. Regular Articles
  92. Cyclic pairs and common best proximity points in uniformly convex Banach spaces
  93. Regular Articles
  94. The uniqueness of meromorphic functions in k-punctured complex plane
  95. Regular Articles
  96. Normalizers of intermediate congruence subgroups of the Hecke subgroups
  97. Regular Articles
  98. The hyperbolicity constant of infinite circulant graphs
  99. Regular Articles
  100. Scott convergence and fuzzy Scott topology on L-posets
  101. Regular Articles
  102. One sided strong laws for random variables with infinite mean
  103. Regular Articles
  104. The join of split graphs whose completely regular endomorphisms form a monoid
  105. Regular Articles
  106. A new branch and bound algorithm for minimax ratios problems
  107. Regular Articles
  108. Upper bound estimate of incomplete Cochrane sum
  109. Regular Articles
  110. Value distributions of solutions to complex linear differential equations in angular domains
  111. Regular Articles
  112. The nonlinear diffusion equation of the ideal barotropic gas through a porous medium
  113. Regular Articles
  114. The Sheffer stroke operation reducts of basic algebras
  115. Regular Articles
  116. Extensions and improvements of Sherman’s and related inequalities for n-convex functions
  117. Regular Articles
  118. Classification lattices are geometric for complete atomistic lattices
  119. Regular Articles
  120. Possible numbers of x’s in an {x, y}-matrix with a given rank
  121. Regular Articles
  122. New error bounds for linear complementarity problems of weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrices
  123. Regular Articles
  124. Boundedness of vector-valued B-singular integral operators in Lebesgue spaces
  125. Regular Articles
  126. On the Golomb’s conjecture and Lehmer’s numbers
  127. Regular Articles
  128. Some applications of the Archimedean copulas in the proof of the almost sure central limit theorem for ordinary maxima
  129. Regular Articles
  130. Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  131. Regular Articles
  132. Corrigendum to: Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  133. Regular Articles
  134. Convergence and stability of generalized φ-weak contraction mapping in CAT(0) spaces
  135. Regular Articles
  136. Triple solutions for a Dirichlet boundary value problem involving a perturbed discrete p(k)-Laplacian operator
  137. Regular Articles
  138. OD-characterization of alternating groups Ap+d
  139. Regular Articles
  140. On Jordan mappings of inverse semirings
  141. Regular Articles
  142. On generalized Ehresmann semigroups
  143. Regular Articles
  144. On topological properties of spaces obtained by the double band matrix
  145. Regular Articles
  146. Representing derivatives of Chebyshev polynomials by Chebyshev polynomials and related questions
  147. Regular Articles
  148. Chain conditions on composite Hurwitz series rings
  149. Regular Articles
  150. Coloring subgraphs with restricted amounts of hues
  151. Regular Articles
  152. An extension of the method of brackets. Part 1
  153. Regular Articles
  154. Branch-delete-bound algorithm for globally solving quadratically constrained quadratic programs
  155. Regular Articles
  156. Strong edge geodetic problem in networks
  157. Regular Articles
  158. Ricci solitons on almost Kenmotsu 3-manifolds
  159. Regular Articles
  160. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions sharing two finite sets
  161. Regular Articles
  162. On the fourth-order linear recurrence formula related to classical Gauss sums
  163. Regular Articles
  164. Dynamical behavior for a stochastic two-species competitive model
  165. Regular Articles
  166. Two new eigenvalue localization sets for tensors and theirs applications
  167. Regular Articles
  168. κ-strong sequences and the existence of generalized independent families
  169. Regular Articles
  170. Commutators of Littlewood-Paley gκ -functions on non-homogeneous metric measure spaces
  171. Regular Articles
  172. On decompositions of estimators under a general linear model with partial parameter restrictions
  173. Regular Articles
  174. Groups and monoids of Pythagorean triples connected to conics
  175. Regular Articles
  176. Hom-Lie superalgebra structures on exceptional simple Lie superalgebras of vector fields
  177. Regular Articles
  178. Numerical methods for the multiplicative partial differential equations
  179. Regular Articles
  180. Solvable Leibniz algebras with NFn Fm1 nilradical
  181. Regular Articles
  182. Evaluation of the convolution sums ∑al+bm=n lσ(l) σ(m) with ab ≤ 9
  183. Regular Articles
  184. A study on soft rough semigroups and corresponding decision making applications
  185. Regular Articles
  186. Some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions with applications
  187. Regular Articles
  188. Deficiency of forests
  189. Regular Articles
  190. Perfect codes in power graphs of finite groups
  191. Regular Articles
  192. A new compact finite difference quasilinearization method for nonlinear evolution partial differential equations
  193. Regular Articles
  194. Does any convex quadrilateral have circumscribed ellipses?
  195. Regular Articles
  196. The dynamic of a Lie group endomorphism
  197. Regular Articles
  198. On pairs of equations in unlike powers of primes and powers of 2
  199. Regular Articles
  200. Differential subordination and convexity criteria of integral operators
  201. Regular Articles
  202. Quantitative relations between short intervals and exceptional sets of cubic Waring-Goldbach problem
  203. Regular Articles
  204. On θ-commutators and the corresponding non-commuting graphs
  205. Regular Articles
  206. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of Laplace (1, 1) for GARCH models
  207. Regular Articles
  208. Multiple and sign-changing solutions for discrete Robin boundary value problem with parameter dependence
  209. Regular Articles
  210. Fundamental relation on m-idempotent hyperrings
  211. Regular Articles
  212. A novel recursive method to reconstruct multivariate functions on the unit cube
  213. Regular Articles
  214. Nabla inequalities and permanence for a logistic integrodifferential equation on time scales
  215. Regular Articles
  216. Enumeration of spanning trees in the sequence of Dürer graphs
  217. Regular Articles
  218. Quotient of information matrices in comparison of linear experiments for quadratic estimation
  219. Regular Articles
  220. Fourier series of functions involving higher-order ordered Bell polynomials
  221. Regular Articles
  222. Simple modules over Auslander regular rings
  223. Regular Articles
  224. Weighted multilinear p-adic Hardy operators and commutators
  225. Regular Articles
  226. Guaranteed cost finite-time control of positive switched nonlinear systems with D-perturbation
  227. Regular Articles
  228. A modified quasi-boundary value method for an abstract ill-posed biparabolic problem
  229. Regular Articles
  230. Extended Riemann-Liouville type fractional derivative operator with applications
  231. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  232. The algebraic size of the family of injective operators
  233. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  234. The history of a general criterium on spaceability
  235. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  236. On sequences not enjoying Schur’s property
  237. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  238. A hierarchy in the family of real surjective functions
  239. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  240. Dynamics of multivalued linear operators
  241. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  242. Linear dynamics of semigroups generated by differential operators
  243. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  244. Isomorphism theorems for some parabolic initial-boundary value problems in Hörmander spaces
  245. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  246. Determination of a diffusion coefficient in a quasilinear parabolic equation
  247. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  248. Homogeneous two-point problem for PDE of the second order in time variable and infinite order in spatial variables
  249. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  250. A nonlinear plate control without linearization
  251. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  252. Reduction of a Schwartz-type boundary value problem for biharmonic monogenic functions to Fredholm integral equations
  253. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  254. Inverse problem for a physiologically structured population model with variable-effort harvesting
  255. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  256. Existence of solutions for delay evolution equations with nonlocal conditions
  257. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  258. Comments on behaviour of solutions of elliptic quasi-linear problems in a neighbourhood of boundary singularities
  259. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  260. Coupled fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces endowed with a directed graph and application
  261. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  262. Existence of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic degenerate anisotropic equations
  263. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  264. Integro-differential systems with variable exponents of nonlinearity
  265. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  266. Elliptic operators on refined Sobolev scales on vector bundles
  267. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  268. Multiplicity solutions of a class fractional Schrödinger equations
  269. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  270. Determining of right-hand side of higher order ultraparabolic equation
  271. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  272. Asymptotic approximation for the solution to a semi-linear elliptic problem in a thin aneurysm-type domain
  273. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  274. Learnheuristics: hybridizing metaheuristics with machine learning for optimization with dynamic inputs
  275. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  276. Nature–inspired metaheuristic algorithms to find near–OGR sequences for WDM channel allocation and their performance comparison
  277. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  278. Monomial codes seen as invariant subspaces
  279. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  280. Expert knowledge and data analysis for detecting advanced persistent threats
  281. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  282. Feedback equivalence of convolutional codes over finite rings
Downloaded on 30.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2017-0117/html
Scroll to top button