Home A modified quasi-boundary value method for an abstract ill-posed biparabolic problem
Article Open Access

A modified quasi-boundary value method for an abstract ill-posed biparabolic problem

  • Khelili Besma , Boussetila Nadjib EMAIL logo and Rebbani Faouzia
Published/Copyright: December 29, 2017

Abstract

In this paper, we are concerned with the problem of approximating a solution of an ill-posed biparabolic problem in the abstract setting. In order to overcome the instability of the original problem, we propose a modified quasi-boundary value method to construct approximate stable solutions for the original ill-posed boundary value problem. Finally, some other convergence results including some explicit convergence rates are also established under a priori bound assumptions on the exact solution. Moreover, numerical tests are presented to illustrate the accuracy and efficiency of this method.

MSC 2010: 47A52; 65J22

1 Formulation of the problem

Throughout this paper H denotes a complex separable Hilbert space endowed with the inner product 〈.,.〉 and the norm ∥.∥, 𝓛(H) stands for the Banach algebra of bounded linear operators on H.

Let A : 𝓓(A) ⊂ HH be a positive, self-adjoint operator with compact resolvent, so that A has an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors (ϕn) ⊂ H with real eigenvalues (λn) ⊂ ℝ+, i.e.,

Aϕn=λnϕn,nN,ϕi,ϕj=δij=1,if i=j0,if ij,0<νλ1λ2λ3,limnλn=,hH,h=n=1hnϕn,hn=h,ϕn.

In this paper, we consider the following inverse source problem of determining the unknown source term u(0) = f and the temperature distribution u(t) for 0 ≤ t < T, of the following biparabolic problem

B2u=(ddt+A)2u(t)=u(t)+2Au(t)+A2u(t)=0,0<t<T,u(T)=g,u(0)=0, (1)

where 0 < T < ∞ and g is a given H-valued function.

To our knowledge, the literature devoted to this class of problems is quite scarce, except the papers [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. The study of this case is caused not only by theoretical interest, but also by practical necessity. In particular, the biparabolic model is used in mathematical modeling to describe specials features of the dynamics of deformable water-saturated porous media during their filtration consolidation subject to applied loads [7, 8, 9].

It is well-known that the classical heat equation does not accurately describe the conduction of heat [10, 11]. Numerous models have been proposed for better describing this phenomenon. Among them, we can cite the biparabolic model proposed in [12], the fractional biparabolic model [13], for a more adequate mathematical description of heat and diffusion processes than the classical heat equation. For physical motivation and other models we refer the reader to [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21].

This work is a continuity of the work developed recently by Lakhdari and Boussetila [2], where the strategy of regularization which will be used is completely different that used in [2]. Our new strategy is motivated by the simplicity of the method, as well as the numerical results obtained, which are better compared to those obtained using a variant of an iterative regularization [2]. More precisely, we propose an improved modified quasi-boundary-value method with two parameters α > 0 and r ≥ 0, where the parameter α is introduced to filter the high frequencies, and the second parameter r to include the regularity of the solution of the original problem. The advantage of the multi-parameter regularization is such that it gives more freedom in attaining order optimal accuracy [22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29].

The quasi-boundary value method, also called non-local auxiliary boundary condition, introduced and developed by Showalter [30, 31], is a regularization technique by replacing the final condition or boundary condition by a nonlocal condition such that the perturbed problem is well-posed.

The main advantage of the quasi-boundary-value method is that it gives a well-posed problem, where the differential equation has not been changed, only the boundary values have been modified. Therefore, we can exploit various numerical methods to approach the problem in question, for arbitrary geometry [0, T] × Ω, where Ω is a sub-set of ℝn, n ≥ 1.

This method has been used to solve some ill-posed problems for parabolic, hyperbolic and elliptic equations; for more details, see [22, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44] and the references therein.

2 Ill-posedness of the problem and a conditional stability result

We point out here some results established in [2].

Let use consider the following well-posed problem.

B2w=(ddt+A)2w(t)=w(t)+2Aw(t)+A2w(t)=0,0<t<T,w(T)=ξ,w(0)=0, (2)

where ξ ∈ 𝓓(A).

Theorem 2.1

([2]). For any ξ ∈ 𝓓(A), problem (2) admits an unique solution

wC2]0,+[;HC1[0,+[;HC[0,+[;D(A)C1]0,+[;D(A)C2]0,+[;D(A2)

given by

w(t)=R(t;A)ξ=(I+tA)etAξ=n=1(1+tλn)etλnξ,ϕnϕn. (3)

Remark 2.2

It is easy to check that

R(t;A)=supλλ1(1+tλ)etλ(1+tλ1)etλ1, (4)

sup0tTR(t;A)=sup0tT(1+tλ1)etλ1=1. (5)

2.1 Ill-posedness of the problem (1)

Theorem 2.3

([2]). Let gH, then the unique formal solution of the problem (1) is given by

u(t)=n=11+tλn1+Tλne(Tt)λng,ϕnϕn. (6)

In this case,

f=u(0)=n=111+TλneTλng,ϕnϕn. (7)

From this representation we see that u(t) is unstable in [0,T[. This follows from the high-frequency

σ(t,λn)=1+tλn1+Tλne(Tt)λn+,n+.

Remark 2.4

  1. In the classical backward parabolic problem

    vt+Av=0,0<t<T,v(T)=g, (8)

    the unique formal solution is given by

    v(t)=n=1θn(t,λn)g,ϕnϕn, (9)

    where

    θn(t,λn)=e(Tt)λn+,n+.

    In this case, the high-frequency θn(t,λn) is equal to e(Tt)λn and the problem is severely ill-posed.

  2. In the case of biparabolic model, we have σn = rnθn, where

    rn=1+tλn1+Tλn,

    is the relaxation coefficient resulting from the hyperbolic character of the biparabolic model.

    Observe that

    tTrn1+tλ11+Tλ11, (10)

    and

    u(t)=R(t)v(t), (11)

    where

    R(t)=supn1{rn}=r1=1+tλ11+Tλ1. (12)

    From this remark, we observe that the degree of ill-posedness in the biparabolic model is relaxed compared to the classical parabolic case.

2.2 Conditional stability estimate

We would like to have estimates of the form

u(t)Ψ(g),

for some function Ψ(.) such that Ψ(s) ⟶ 0 as s ⟶ 0.

Since the problem of determining u(t) from the knowledge of {u(T) = g, u′(0) = 0} is ill-posed, an estimate such as the above will not be possible unless we restrict the solution u(t) to certain source set 𝓜 ⊂ H.

In our model, we will see that we can employ the method of logarithmic convexity to identify this source set:

Mρ={w(t)H:wobeys(1)andAw(0)ρ<}. (13)

On the basis {ϕn} we introduce the Hilbert scale (Hs)s∈ℝ (resp. (𝔈s)s∈ℝ) induced by A as follows

Hs=D(As)={hH:hHs2=n=1λn2s|h,ϕn|2<+},Es=D(esTA)={hH:hEs2=n=1e2Tsλn|h,ϕn|2<+},

We give here a result of conditional stability. The demonstration is given in the paper [2].

Theorem 2.5

The problem 1 is conditionally well-posed on the set

M={w(t)H:Aw(0)<}

if and only if

gE1={hH:n=1e2Tλn|(h,ϕn)|2<}.

Moreover, if u(t) ∈ Mρ, then we have the following Hölder continuity

u(t)Ψ(g)=γρTtTgtT, (14)

where γ=1+Tλ1λ1TtT.

3 Regularization and error estimates

In this work, we propose a modified quasi-boundary value method (MQBVM) to solve the inverse problem 1, i.e., replacing the final condition u(T) = g with the functional time nonlocal condition,

αAru0+uT=g, (15)

to form an approximate regularized problem

ddt+A2ut=ut+2Aut+A2ut=0,0<t<T,αAru0+uT=g,u0=0, (16)

where r > 0 is a real parameter and α > 0 is the regularization parameter.

Remark 3.1

The case r = 0, corresponds to the classical quasi-boundary value method.

Denoting by uα(t) the solution of 16. By the separation of variables and the formula (3), we show the well-posedness of (16), and its solution can be expressed by

uαt=I+tAαAr+1+TAeTA1etAg=n=1+1+tλnαλnr+1+TλneTλnetλng,ϕnϕn (17)

Theorem 3.2

For all gD(A) and r > 0, the approximate problem 16 admits an unique solution uα given by

uαt=I+tAαAr+1+TAeTA1etAg=n=1+1+tλnαλnr+1+TλneTλnetλngnϕn,gn=g,ϕn (18)

Moreover, the following inequality holds

sup0tTuαtuα0C3καg, (19)

where

κα=1α1rln1α,0<r<1,1αln1αr,r1, (20)

and C3 = max (C1,C2), C1 = (rT)r, C2 = r.

Proof

We compute

uαt2=n=1+1+tλnetλnαλnr+1+TλneTλn2gn2

Putting

Gλn=1+tλnetλnsupn1Gλn=1+tλ1etλ11, (21)

and

H~λn=1αλnr+1+TλneTλn. (22)

Our goal here is to prove that

supλλ1H~λ=κα=1α1rln1α,0<r<1,1αln1αr,r1, (23)

Indeed, we have

Hλn=1+tλnetλnαλnr+1+TλneTλn1αλnr+1+TλneTλn=H~λn.

Now to estimate (λ), we proceed as follows

supλλ1H~λmaxA,B,whereA=supλλH~λ,B=supλλH~λ,λ=1Trln1α,0<α<1.

For 0 < νλλ*, we have

H~λn11+TλneTλn=eTλn1+Tλn

We denote s = n and the function

fs=es1+s.

The function attains its maximum at λ*,

supλλH~λ=eTλ1+TλeTλTλ=eT1Trln1αT1Trln1α.

Hence, we get

supλλH~λrα1rln1α. (24)

If λλ, we can write

H~λ=1αλr+1+TλeTλ1α1λr1α1λr

which implies that

supλλH~λ1α11Trln1αr=rTr1αln1αr. (25)

Putting C1 = (rT)r, C2 = r, C3 = max (C1,C2).

  • If 0 < r < 1 and 0 < α < 1, we observe that

    1α1rln1α1αln1αr1=αln1αrα1rln1α=αr1rln1αr1=1α1rrln1α1r=γα+,asα0.

    limα0γα = +∞ ⟹ for ε = 1, ∃ α0 such as αα0γ(α) ≥ ε = 1. Then, for α sufficiently small, we have

    1α1rln1α1αln1αr.

    Therefore,

    maxA,B=C31α1rln1α. (26)
  • If r ≥ 1 and 0 < α < 1, we have limα0γα = 0 ⟹ for ε = 1, ∃α0 such that αα0γ(α) ≤ ε = 1. Then, for α sufficiently small, we have

    1α1rln1α1αln1αr,

    and thus

    maxA,B=C31αln1αr. (27)

    From (26) and (27), we obtain the desired estimate:

    sup0tTuαtuα0C3καg,

    where

    κα=1α1rln1α,0<r<1,1αln1αr,r1.

Theorem 3.3

If u(0) ∈ H and u(0) ∈ 𝓓(A), i.e., ∥u(0)∥ + ∥Au(0)∥ < ∞, then we have

sup0tTutuαt+Autuαtu0uα0+Au0uα00,asα0 (28)

Remark 3.4

We recall here that

u(0)+Au(0)<gE1.

Proof

We have

u(0)=n=111+TλneTλng,ϕnϕn,uα(0)=n=1+1αλnr+1+TλneTλng,ϕnϕn,

and

u(0)uα(0)2=n=1+αλnreTλn1+Tλnαλnr+1+TλneTλn2gn2.

From this equality we can write

utuαt2=n=1+1+tλn1+TλneTtλn1+tλnαλnr+1+TλneTλnetλn2gn2=n=1+1+tλnαλnr+1+TλneTλneTλn1+Tλn1+Tλnαλnr+1+TλneTλnetλn2gn2=n=1+1+tλnαλnreTλn1+Tλnαλnr+1+TλneTλnetλn2gn2n=1+αλnreTλn1+Tλnαλnr+1+TλneTλn2gn2=u0uα02,

and

Autuαt2=n=1+λn1+tλn1+TλneTtλn1+tλnαλnr+1+TλneTλnetλn2gn2=n=1+λn1+tλnαλnreTλn1+Tλnαλnr+1+TλneTλnetλn2gn2n=1+λnαλnreTλn1+Tλnαλnr+1+TλneTλn2gn2=Au0uα02,

thus we get

sup0tTutuαt+Autuαtu0uα0+Au0uα0.

Now, we show that

u0uα0+Au0uα00,asα0.

We have

u0=I+TA1eTAg=n=1+eTλn1+Tλng,ϕnϕn,

and

uα0=αAr+I+TAeTA1g=n=1+1αλnr+1+TλneTλng,ϕnϕn,

then we get

u0uα02=n=1+αλnreTλnαλnr+1+TλneTλn1+Tλn2gn2=n=1+αλnrαλnr+1+TλneTλn2eTλn1+Tλn2gn2=n=1+αλnrαλnr+1+TλneTλn2un02=n=1+F~λn2un02,

where

F~λn=αλnrαλnr+1+TλneTλn.

We assume that u(0) ∈ H.

u(0)Hn=1+eTλn1+Tλn2gn2=n=1+un02=u02<+

For ε > 0, we choose N > 0 such that n=N+eTλn1+Tλn2gn2ε22. Thus

u0uα02=n=1NF~λ2un02+n=N+F~λn2un02. (29)

We observe that F~λn=αλnrαλnr+1+TλneTλn1, then we can write

n=N+F~λn2un02n=N+un02ε22.

The other quantity can be estimated as follows

n=1NαλnreTλnαλnr+1+TλneTλn1+Tλn2gn2=n=1Nαλnrαλnr+1+TλneTλn2un02=n=1NF~λn2un02sup1nNF~λn2n=1Nun02.

It is clear that

F~λn=αλnrαλnr+1+TλneTλnαλnr1+TλneTλnαλnreTλn1+Tλn,

and λnλN implies that

F~λnαλnr1+TλneTλnαλNreTλN.

It follows that

sup1nNF~λnαλNreTλN,

and consequently

n=1NF~λn2un(0)2αλNreTλN2u02.

If we choose the parameter α such that αλNreTλNu0ε2, we obtain

u0uα02αλNreTλN2u02+ε22ε22+ε22=ε2.

Which shows that

uα0u0,asα0.

To complete the proof, it remains to show that

Au0uα00,asα0.

We compute

Au0uα02=n=1+αλnr+1eTλnαλnr+1+TλneTλn1+Tλn2gn2=n=N+F~λn2λnun02.

We have

u(0)D(A)Au02=n=1+λneTλn1+Tλn2gn2<+.

For ε > 0, we choose N > 0 such that

n=N+λnun02=n=N+λneTλn1+Tλn2gn2<ε22.

Then, we can write

n=N+F~λn2λnun02n=N+λnun02ε22.

and

n=1NF~λn2λnun02sup1nNF~λnn=1Nλnun02αλNreTλN2Au02.

If we choose the parameter α such that αλNreTλNAu0ε2, we get

Au0uα02αλNreTλN2Au02+ε22ε22+ε22=ε2.

Which shows that

Au0uα00,asα0.

In conclusion,

sup0tTutuαt+Autuαtu0uα0+Au0uα00,α0 (30)

Theorem 3.5

If u(0) ∈ 𝓓(A(θ+1)) such thatA(θ+1)u(0)∥ ≤ Eθ, and 1 ≤ rθ, then we have the following estimate

sup0tTutuαt+Autuαtu0uα0+Au0uα0C5lnC4αθEθ (31)

Proof

We have

u0uα02=n=1+αλnreTλnλnθ+1λnθ+1αλnr+1+TλneTλn1+Tλn2gn2=n=1+αλnrλnθ+1αλnr+1+TλneTλn2λnθ+1eTλn1+Tλn2gn2=n=1+αλnθ+1α+1+TλnλnreTλn2λnθ+1eTλn1+Tλn2gn2=n=1+αG^αλn2λnθ+1un02,

where

G^αλn=λnθ+1α+1+TλnλnreTλn=1λnαλnθ+1+TλnλnθreTλn.

If rθ, then

G^αλn1λ1αλnθ+1+Tλnλ1θreTλn=1λ1θ+1rαλ1θrλnθ+1+TλneTλn=1λ1θ+1rH~β(λn),

where β=αλ1θr. Now by (23), we conclude that

supn11λ1θ+1rαλ1θrλnθ+1+TλneTλn=1λ1θ+1rsupλλ1H~β(λn)=λ1θλ111θrα1θlnλ1θrα,0<θ<1,λ11αlnλ1θrαθ,θ1. (32)

If θ ≥ 1, we can write

u0uα02n=1+αG^αλn2λnθ+1un02 (33)

λ11lnλ1θrαθ2n=1+λnθ+1un02 (34)

λ11lnλ1θrαθ2Aθ+1u(0)2, (35)

and

Au0uα02=n=1+αλnrλnθαλnr+1+TλneTλn2λnθ+1eTλn1+Tλn2gn2n=1+ααλnθ+1+TλnλnθreTλn2λnθ+1un02n=1+αλ1θrαλ1θrλnθ+1+TλneTλn2λnθ+1un02αsupn11λ1θrαλ1θrλnθ+1+TλneTλn2n=1+λnθ+1un02.

By virtue of (23), we obtain

Au0uα021lnλ1θrα2θAθ+1u02. (36)

Combining (33) and (36), we obtain

sup0tTutuαt+Autuαtu0uα0+Au0uα01lnλ1θrαθλ11+1Aθ+1u0 (37)

C5lnC4αθEθ, (38)

where C4=λ1θr and C5=λ11+1.

We conclude this paper by constructing a family of regularizing operators for the problem 1.

Definition 3.6

A family {Rα(t), α > 0, t ∈ [0,T]} ⊂ 𝓛(H) is called a family of regularizing operators for the problem (1) if for each solution u(t), 0 ≤ tT of (1) with final element g, and for any η > 0, there exists α(η) > 0, such that

α(η)0,η0, (39)

Rα(η)(t)gηu(t)0,η0, (40)

for each t ∈ [0,T] provided that gη satisfiesgη𠈒g∥ ≤ η.

Define Rα(t) = (I + tA) [α Ar + (1 + TA) eTA]−1etA. It is clear that Rα(t) ∈ 𝓛(H) (see (19)). In the following we will show that Rα(t) is a family of regularizing operators for the problem 1.

Theorem 3.7

Under the assumption g ∈ 𝔈1, the condition (40) holds.

Proof

We have

Δα(t)=Rα(t)gηu(t)Rα(t)(gηg)+Rα(t)gu(t)=Δ1(t)+Δ2(t),

where

Δ1(t)=Rα(t)(gηg)κ(α)η,Δ2(t)=Rα(t)gu(t).

We observe that

Δ1(t)ηα1rln1α,0<r<1,ηαln1αr,r1.

Choose α=ηr2 if 0 < r < 1, and α=η if r ≥ 1, it follows

Δ1(t)ηln1η1/r,0<r<1,ηln1ηr,r1,0,as η0. (41)

Now, by Theorem 3.3 we have

Δ2(t)=uα(η)(t)u(t)0,as η0, (42)

uniformly in t. Combining (41) and (42) we obtain

sup0tTRα(t)gηu(t)0,asη0.

This shows that Rα(t) is a family of regularizing operators for the problem 1. □

4 Numerical results

In this section we give a two-dimensional numerical test to show the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed method. Numerical experiments where carried out using MATLAB.

We consider the following inverse problem

t2x22u(x,t)=0,x(0,π),t(0,1),u(0,t)=u(π,t)=0,t(0,1),u(x,1)=g(x),ut(x,0)=0,x[0,π], (43)

where f(x) = u(x,0) is the unknown initial condition and u(x,1) = g(x) is the final condition.

It is well known that the operator

A=2x2,D(A)=H01(0,π)H2(0,π)H=L2(0,π),

is positive, self-adjoint with compact resolvent (A is diagonalizable).

The eigenpairs (λn, ϕn) of A are

λn=n2,ϕn(x)=2πsin(nx),nN.

In this case, the formula (7) takes the form

f(x)=u(x,0)=2πn=1+11+n2en20πg(x)sin(nx)dxsin(nx). (44)

In the following, we consider an example which has an exact expression of solutions (u(x,t), f(x)).

Example

If u(x,0)=ϕ1(x)=2πsin(x), then the function

u(x,t)=n=1(1+tλn)etλnϕ1,ϕnϕn(x)=(1+tλ1)etλ1ϕ1(x)=2π(1+tλ1)etλ1sin(x)

is the exact solution of the problem (43). Consequently, the data function is g(x)=u(x,1)=2π2esin(x).

By using the central difference with step length h=πN+1 to approximate the first derivative ux and the second derivative uxx, we can get the following semi-discret problem (ordinary differential equation):

ddtAh2u(xi,t)=0,xi=ih,i=1,N,t(0,1),u(x0=0,t)=u(xN+1=π,t)=0,t(0,1),u(xi,0)=g(xi),ut(xi,0)=0,xi=ih,i=1,N, (45)

where 𝔸h is the discretisation matrix stemming from the operator A=d2dx2 :

Ah=1h2Tridiag(1,2,1)MN(R)

is a symmetric, positive definite matrix. We assume that it is fine enough so that the discretization errors are small compared to the uncertainty δ of the data; this means that 𝔸h is a good approximation of the differential operator A=d2dx2 , whose unboundedness is reflected in a large norm of 𝔸h. The eigenpairs (μk, ek) of 𝔸h are given by

μk=4N+1π2sin2kπ2(N+1),ek=sinjkπN+1j=1N,k=1N.

Adding a random distributed perturbation (obtained by the Matlab command randn) to each data function, we obtain the vector gδ:

gδ=g+εrandn(size(g)),

where ε indicates the noise level of the measurement data and the functionrandn(.)” generates arrays of random numbers whose elements are normally distributed with mean 0, variance σ2 = 1, and standard deviation σ = 1. “randn(size(g))” returns an array of random entries that is the same size as g. The bound on the measurement error δ can be measured in the sense of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) according to

δ=gδg=1Ni=1Ng(xi)gδ(xi)21/2.

The discret approximation of (18) takes the form

uαδ(xj,0)=fα,δ(xj)=(αAhr+(IN+Ah)eAh)1gδ(xj),j=1N, (46)

where 𝕀N is the identity matrix.

In our numerical computations we always take N = 40 and consider only the cases when ε = 0.001, 0.01. The regularization parameter (α, r) is chosen in the following way: for any fixed r ∈ {0,1,2,3}, we try to find a satisfactory error by varying the second parameter α = εs with step length s = 0.1. We note α0 one of the best choice which gives this result. Now, for α = α0 fixed, we try to find an acceptable error by varying the first parameter r = 0, 1, 2, 3 in order to obtain the best possible convergence rate. It is important to note that this choice is of heuristic nature and the multiparameter discrepancy principle is quite scarce in the literature.

The relative error RE(f) is given by

RE(f)=fα,δff.

Conclusion and discussion

Numerical results are shown in Figures 1-8 and Tables 1-2.

Fig. 1 
ε (noise level) = 0.001, α (regularization parameter) = 0.015849, r (relaxation parameter) = 0
Fig. 1

ε (noise level) = 0.001, α (regularization parameter) = 0.015849, r (relaxation parameter) = 0

Fig. 2 
ε (noise level) = 0.001, α (regularization parameter) = 0.015849,r (relaxation parameter) = 1
Fig. 2

ε (noise level) = 0.001, α (regularization parameter) = 0.015849,r (relaxation parameter) = 1

Fig. 3 
ε (noise level) = 0.001, α (regularization parameter) = 0.015849,r (relaxation parameter) = 2
Fig. 3

ε (noise level) = 0.001, α (regularization parameter) = 0.015849,r (relaxation parameter) = 2

Fig. 4 
ε (noise level) = 0.001, α (regularization parameter) = 0.015849,r (relaxation parameter) = 3
Fig. 4

ε (noise level) = 0.001, α (regularization parameter) = 0.015849,r (relaxation parameter) = 3

Fig. 5 
ε (noise level) = 0.01, α (regularization parameter) = 0.025119, r (relaxation parameter) = 0
Fig. 5

ε (noise level) = 0.01, α (regularization parameter) = 0.025119, r (relaxation parameter) = 0

Fig. 6 
ε (noise level) = 0.01, α (regularization parameter) = 0.025119, r (relaxation parameter) = 1
Fig. 6

ε (noise level) = 0.01, α (regularization parameter) = 0.025119, r (relaxation parameter) = 1

Fig. 7 
ε (noise level) = 0.01, α (regularization parameter) = 0.025119, r (relaxation parameter) = 2
Fig. 7

ε (noise level) = 0.01, α (regularization parameter) = 0.025119, r (relaxation parameter) = 2

Fig. 8 
ε (noise level) = 0.01, α (regularization parameter) = 0.025119, r (relaxation parameter) = 3
Fig. 8

ε (noise level) = 0.01, α (regularization parameter) = 0.025119, r (relaxation parameter) = 3

Table 1

The absolute errors Era for fixed α and for various value of r

N ε α r RE
40 0.001 0.015849 0 0.0920
40 0.001 0.015849 1 0.0035
40 0.001 0.015849 2 0.0019
40 0.001 0.015849 3 0.0003501

Table 2

The absolute errors Era for fixed α and for various value of r

N ε α r RE
40 0.01 0.025119 0 0.1707
40 0.01 0.025119 1 0.0103
40 0.01 0.025119 2 0.0070
40 0.01 0.025119 3 0.0061

In this paper, we have proposed an improved two-parameter regularization method (MQBVM) to solve an ill-posed biparabolic problem. The convergence and stability estimates have been obtained under a priori bound assumptions for the exact solution. Finally, some numerical tests show that our proposed regularization method is effective and stable.

According to the numerical tests, we observe the following regularizing effect:

  • In the case r = 0, ε = 0.001 and α = 0.015849 (resp. r = 0, ε = 0.01 and α = 0.025119), the approximate solution is far from the exact solution. But for the case r = 1,2,3, we observe that the solution becomes precise and very near to the exact solution (in particular for r = 2,3).

This shows that our approach has a nice regularizing effect and gives a better approximation with comparison to the classical QBV-method.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the referees for their constructive comments which improved this paper.

References

[1] Atakhadzhaev M.A., Egamberdiev O.M., The Cauchy problem for the abstract bicaloric equation, Sibirskii Matematicheskii Zhurnal, 1990, 31(4), 187-191.10.1007/BF00970642Search in Google Scholar

[2] Lakhdari A., Boussetila N., An iterative regularization method for an abstract ill-posed biparabolic problem, Boundary Value Problems, 2015, 55, 1-17.10.1186/s13661-015-0318-4Search in Google Scholar

[3] Egamberdiev O.M., An ill-posed problem for an abstract bicaloric equation, Izv. Akad. Nauk UzSSR Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauk., 1988, 3, 42-46 (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar

[4] Orynbasarov M.O., A nonlocal boundary value problem of Samarskii type for a biparabolic equation, Izv. Nats. Akad. Nauk Resp. Kaz. Ser. Fiz.-Mat., 2008, 5, 8-13 (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar

[5] Egamberdiev O.M., A continuation problem for an abstract bicaloric equation, Uzbek. Mat. Zh., 2011, 4, 211-217 (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar

[6] Zouyed F., Djemoui S., An Iterative Regularization Method for Identifying the Source Term in a Second Order Differential Equation, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, Article ID 713403, 1-9.10.1155/2015/713403Search in Google Scholar

[7] Bulavatsky V. M., Biparabolic mathematical model of the filtration consolidation problem, Dopov. NAN Ukrainy, 1997, 8, 13-17.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Bulavatsky V.M., Mathematical modeling of filtrational consolidation of soil under motion of saline solutions on the basis of biparabolic model, J. Autom. Inform. Sci., 2003, 35(8), 13-22.10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v35.i8.60Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bulavatsky V.M., Skopetsky V.V., Generalized mathematical model of the dynamics of consolidation processes with relaxation, Cybern. Syst. Analysis, 2008, 44(5), 646-654.10.1007/s10559-008-9036-6Search in Google Scholar

[10] Fichera G., Is The Fourier Theory of Heat Propagation Paradoxical?, Rendicont 1 Del Circolo Matematico Di Palermo, 1992, Serie II. Tomo XLI, 5-28.10.1007/BF02844459Search in Google Scholar

[11] Joseph L., Preziosi D.D., Heat Waves, Rev.Mod. Physics, 1989, 41-73.10.1103/RevModPhys.61.41Search in Google Scholar

[12] Fushchich V.L., Galitsyn A.S., Polubinskii A.S., A new mathematical model of heat conduction processes, Ukrainian Math. J., 1990, 42, 210-216.10.1007/BF01071016Search in Google Scholar

[13] Bulavatsky V.M., Fractional differential analog of biparabolic evolution equation and some its applications, Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 2016, 52(5), 337-347.10.1007/s10559-016-9875-5Search in Google Scholar

[14] Radu P., Todorova G., Yordanov B., Diffusion phenomenon in Hilbert spaces and applications, J. Differential Equations, 2001, 250, 4200-4218.10.1016/j.jde.2011.01.024Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ekoue F., D’Halloy A.F., Gigon D., Plantamp G., Zajdman E., Maxwell-Cattaneo Regularization of Heat Equation, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2013, 7, 05-23.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Auriault J.-L., The paradox of fourier heat equation: A theoretical refutation, International Journal of Engineering Science, 2017, 118, 82-88.10.1016/j.ijengsci.2017.06.006Search in Google Scholar

[17] Eidelman S.D., Ivasyshen S.D., Kochubei A.N., Analytic Methods in the Theory of Differential and Pseudo-Differential Equations of Parabolic Type, Springer Basel AG 2004.10.1007/978-3-0348-7844-9Search in Google Scholar

[18] Carasso A.S., Bochner Subordination, Logarithmic Diffusion Equations, and Blind Deconvolution of Hubble Space Telescope Imagery and Other Scientific Data, SIAM J. Imaging Sciences, 2010, 3(4), 954-980.10.6028/NIST.IR.7632Search in Google Scholar

[19] Payne L.E., On a proposed model for heat conduction, IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2006, 71, 590-599.10.1093/imamat/hxh112Search in Google Scholar

[20] Saporaa A., Codegonea M., Barbero G., Diffusion phenomenon in the hyperbolic and parabolic regimes, Physics Letters A, 2013, 377, 2416-2421.10.1016/j.physleta.2013.07.009Search in Google Scholar

[21] Wang L., Zhou X., Wei X., Heat Conduction: Mathematical Models and Analytical Solutions, Springer-Verlag 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Boussetila N., Rebbani F., Optimal regularization method for ill-posed Cauchy problems, Electron. J. Differential Equations, 2006, 147, 1-15.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Boussetila N., Hamida S., Rebbani F., Spectral regularization methods for an abstract ill-posed elliptic problem, Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2013, Article ID 947379, 1-11.10.1155/2013/947379Search in Google Scholar

[24] Bousssetila N., Rebbani F., A modified quasi-reversibility method for a class of ill-posed Cauchy problems, Georgian Mathematical Journal, 2007, 14(4), 627-642.10.1515/GMJ.2007.627Search in Google Scholar

[25] Benrabah A., Boussetila N., Rebbani F., Regularization method for an ill-posed Cauchy problem for elliptic equations, Journal of Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems, 2017, 25(3), 01-19.10.1515/jiip-2015-0075Search in Google Scholar

[26] Hoa N.V., Khanh T.Q., Two-parameter regularization method for an axisymmetric inverse heat problem, Boundary Value Problems, 2017, 25, 1-12.10.1186/s13661-017-0750-8Search in Google Scholar

[27] Chen Z., Lu Y., Xu Y., Yang H., Multi-parameter Tikhonov regularization for linear ill-posed operator equations, J. Comput. Math., 2008, 26, 37–55.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Lu S., Pereverzev S.V., Shao Y., Tautenhahn U., Discrepancy curves for multi-parameter regularization, J. Inverse Ill-Posed Prob., 2010, 18, 655–676.10.1515/jiip.2010.030Search in Google Scholar

[29] Lu S., Pereverzev S.V., Multi-parameter regularization and its numerical realization, Numer. Math., 2011, 118, 1-31.10.1007/s00211-010-0318-3Search in Google Scholar

[30] Showalter R.E., The final value problem for evolution equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 1974, 47, 563–572.10.1016/0022-247X(74)90008-0Search in Google Scholar

[31] Showalter R.E., Quasi-reversibility of first and second order parabolic evolution equations, In: Improperly Posed Boundary Value Problems. Pitman, London, 1975, 76–84.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Abdulkerimov L.S., Regularization of an ill-posed Cauchy problem for evolution equations in a Banach space, Azerbaidzan. Gos. Univ. Ucen. Zap. Fiz. Mat., 1977, 1, 32-36 (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar

[33] Ames K.A., Payne L.E., Asymptotic for two regularizations of the Cauchy problem for the backward heat equation, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 1998, 8, 187-202.10.1142/S0218202598000093Search in Google Scholar

[34] Feng X.L., Eldén L., Fu C.L., A quasi-boundary-value method for the Cauchy problem for elliptic equations with nonhomogeneous Neumann data, J. Inv. Ill-Posed Problems, 2010, 18, 617-645.10.1515/jiip.2010.028Search in Google Scholar

[35] Hào D.N., Duc N.V., Lesnic D., A non-local boundary value problem method for the Cauchy problem for elliptic equations, Inverse Problems, 2009, 25, 1-27.10.1088/0266-5611/25/5/055002Search in Google Scholar

[36] Hào D.N., Duc N.V., Lesnic D., Regularization of parabolic equations backward in time by a non-local boundary value problem method, IMA J. Appl. Math., 2010, 75, 291-315.10.1093/imamat/hxp026Search in Google Scholar

[37] Hào D.N., Nguyen V.D., Sahli H., A non-local boundary value problem method for parabolic equations backward in time, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 2008, 345, 805- 815.10.1080/00036811.2014.970537Search in Google Scholar

[38] Melnikova I.V., Regularization of ill-posed differential problems, Siberian Math. J., 1992, 33, 289-298.10.1007/BF00971100Search in Google Scholar

[39] Melnikova I.V., Freiberg A.YU., Regularization of a boundary value problem for an oscillation equation, U.S.S.R. Comput.Maths.Matb.Phys., 1985, 25(3), 90-94.10.1016/0041-5553(85)90079-5Search in Google Scholar

[40] Quan P.H., Trong D.D., Triet Le.M., Tuan N.H., A modified quasi-boundary value method for regularizing of a backward problem with time-dependent coefficient, Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 2011, 19(3), 409–423.10.1080/17415977.2011.552111Search in Google Scholar

[41] Samarskii A.A., Vabishchevich P.N., Numerical Methods for Solving Inverse Problems of Mathematical Physics, Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems Series, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin. New York, 2007.10.1515/9783110205794Search in Google Scholar

[42] Zhang H.W., Modified quasi-boundary value method for cauchy problems of elliptic equations with variable coefficients, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, 2011, 106, 1-10.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Zhang H.W., Wei T., An improved non-local boundary value problem method for a cauchy problem of the Laplace equation, Numer Algor., 2012, 59, 249-269.10.1007/s11075-011-9487-0Search in Google Scholar

[44] Zhang H. W., Modified quasi-boundary value method for a Cauchy problem of semi-linear elliptic equation, International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 2012, 89(12), 1689-1703.10.1080/00207160.2012.693174Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-8-29
Accepted: 2017-11-16
Published Online: 2017-12-29

© 2017 Besma et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Integrals of Frullani type and the method of brackets
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Edge of chaos in reaction diffusion CNN model
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Calculus using proximities: a mathematical approach in which students can actually prove theorems
  7. Regular Articles
  8. An investigation on hyper S-posets over ordered semihypergroups
  9. Regular Articles
  10. The Leibniz algebras whose subalgebras are ideals
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Fixed point and multidimensional fixed point theorems with applications to nonlinear matrix equations in terms of weak altering distance functions
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Matrix rank and inertia formulas in the analysis of general linear models
  15. Regular Articles
  16. The hybrid power mean of quartic Gauss sums and Kloosterman sums
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Tauberian theorems for statistically (C,1,1) summable double sequences of fuzzy numbers
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Some properties of graded comultiplication modules
  21. Regular Articles
  22. The characterizations of upper approximation operators based on special coverings
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Bi-integrable and tri-integrable couplings of a soliton hierarchy associated with SO(4)
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Dynamics for a discrete competition and cooperation model of two enterprises with multiple delays and feedback controls
  27. Regular Articles
  28. A new view of relationship between atomic posets and complete (algebraic) lattices
  29. Regular Articles
  30. A class of extensions of Restricted (s, t)-Wythoff’s game
  31. Regular Articles
  32. New bounds for the minimum eigenvalue of 𝓜-tensors
  33. Regular Articles
  34. Shintani and Shimura lifts of cusp forms on certain arithmetic groups and their applications
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Empirical likelihood for quantile regression models with response data missing at random
  37. Regular Articles
  38. Convex combination of analytic functions
  39. Regular Articles
  40. On the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank-two matrices
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Uniform topology on EQ-algebras
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Integrations on rings
  45. Regular Articles
  46. The quasilinear parabolic kirchhoff equation
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Avoiding rainbow 2-connected subgraphs
  49. Regular Articles
  50. On non-Hopfian groups of fractions
  51. Regular Articles
  52. Singularly perturbed hyperbolic problems on metric graphs: asymptotics of solutions
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Rings in which elements are the sum of a nilpotent and a root of a fixed polynomial that commute
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Superstability of functional equations related to spherical functions
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Evaluation of the convolution sum involving the sum of divisors function for 22, 44 and 52
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Weighted minimal translation surfaces in the Galilean space with density
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Complete convergence for weighted sums of pairwise independent random variables
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Binomials transformation formulae for scaled Fibonacci numbers
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Growth functions for some uniformly amenable groups
  67. Regular Articles
  68. Hopf bifurcations in a three-species food chain system with multiple delays
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Oscillation and nonoscillation of half-linear Euler type differential equations with different periodic coefficients
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Osculating curves in 4-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index 2
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Some new facts about group 𝒢 generated by the family of convergent permutations
  75. Regular Articles
  76. lnfinitely many solutions for fractional Schrödinger equations with perturbation via variational methods
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Supersolvable orders and inductively free arrangements
  79. Regular Articles
  80. Asymptotically almost automorphic solutions of differential equations with piecewise constant argument
  81. Regular Articles
  82. Finite groups whose all second maximal subgroups are cyclic
  83. Regular Articles
  84. Semilinear systems with a multi-valued nonlinear term
  85. Regular Articles
  86. Positive solutions for Hadamard differential systems with fractional integral conditions on an unbounded domain
  87. Regular Articles
  88. Calibration and simulation of Heston model
  89. Regular Articles
  90. One kind sixth power mean of the three-term exponential sums
  91. Regular Articles
  92. Cyclic pairs and common best proximity points in uniformly convex Banach spaces
  93. Regular Articles
  94. The uniqueness of meromorphic functions in k-punctured complex plane
  95. Regular Articles
  96. Normalizers of intermediate congruence subgroups of the Hecke subgroups
  97. Regular Articles
  98. The hyperbolicity constant of infinite circulant graphs
  99. Regular Articles
  100. Scott convergence and fuzzy Scott topology on L-posets
  101. Regular Articles
  102. One sided strong laws for random variables with infinite mean
  103. Regular Articles
  104. The join of split graphs whose completely regular endomorphisms form a monoid
  105. Regular Articles
  106. A new branch and bound algorithm for minimax ratios problems
  107. Regular Articles
  108. Upper bound estimate of incomplete Cochrane sum
  109. Regular Articles
  110. Value distributions of solutions to complex linear differential equations in angular domains
  111. Regular Articles
  112. The nonlinear diffusion equation of the ideal barotropic gas through a porous medium
  113. Regular Articles
  114. The Sheffer stroke operation reducts of basic algebras
  115. Regular Articles
  116. Extensions and improvements of Sherman’s and related inequalities for n-convex functions
  117. Regular Articles
  118. Classification lattices are geometric for complete atomistic lattices
  119. Regular Articles
  120. Possible numbers of x’s in an {x, y}-matrix with a given rank
  121. Regular Articles
  122. New error bounds for linear complementarity problems of weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrices
  123. Regular Articles
  124. Boundedness of vector-valued B-singular integral operators in Lebesgue spaces
  125. Regular Articles
  126. On the Golomb’s conjecture and Lehmer’s numbers
  127. Regular Articles
  128. Some applications of the Archimedean copulas in the proof of the almost sure central limit theorem for ordinary maxima
  129. Regular Articles
  130. Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  131. Regular Articles
  132. Corrigendum to: Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  133. Regular Articles
  134. Convergence and stability of generalized φ-weak contraction mapping in CAT(0) spaces
  135. Regular Articles
  136. Triple solutions for a Dirichlet boundary value problem involving a perturbed discrete p(k)-Laplacian operator
  137. Regular Articles
  138. OD-characterization of alternating groups Ap+d
  139. Regular Articles
  140. On Jordan mappings of inverse semirings
  141. Regular Articles
  142. On generalized Ehresmann semigroups
  143. Regular Articles
  144. On topological properties of spaces obtained by the double band matrix
  145. Regular Articles
  146. Representing derivatives of Chebyshev polynomials by Chebyshev polynomials and related questions
  147. Regular Articles
  148. Chain conditions on composite Hurwitz series rings
  149. Regular Articles
  150. Coloring subgraphs with restricted amounts of hues
  151. Regular Articles
  152. An extension of the method of brackets. Part 1
  153. Regular Articles
  154. Branch-delete-bound algorithm for globally solving quadratically constrained quadratic programs
  155. Regular Articles
  156. Strong edge geodetic problem in networks
  157. Regular Articles
  158. Ricci solitons on almost Kenmotsu 3-manifolds
  159. Regular Articles
  160. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions sharing two finite sets
  161. Regular Articles
  162. On the fourth-order linear recurrence formula related to classical Gauss sums
  163. Regular Articles
  164. Dynamical behavior for a stochastic two-species competitive model
  165. Regular Articles
  166. Two new eigenvalue localization sets for tensors and theirs applications
  167. Regular Articles
  168. κ-strong sequences and the existence of generalized independent families
  169. Regular Articles
  170. Commutators of Littlewood-Paley gκ -functions on non-homogeneous metric measure spaces
  171. Regular Articles
  172. On decompositions of estimators under a general linear model with partial parameter restrictions
  173. Regular Articles
  174. Groups and monoids of Pythagorean triples connected to conics
  175. Regular Articles
  176. Hom-Lie superalgebra structures on exceptional simple Lie superalgebras of vector fields
  177. Regular Articles
  178. Numerical methods for the multiplicative partial differential equations
  179. Regular Articles
  180. Solvable Leibniz algebras with NFn Fm1 nilradical
  181. Regular Articles
  182. Evaluation of the convolution sums ∑al+bm=n lσ(l) σ(m) with ab ≤ 9
  183. Regular Articles
  184. A study on soft rough semigroups and corresponding decision making applications
  185. Regular Articles
  186. Some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions with applications
  187. Regular Articles
  188. Deficiency of forests
  189. Regular Articles
  190. Perfect codes in power graphs of finite groups
  191. Regular Articles
  192. A new compact finite difference quasilinearization method for nonlinear evolution partial differential equations
  193. Regular Articles
  194. Does any convex quadrilateral have circumscribed ellipses?
  195. Regular Articles
  196. The dynamic of a Lie group endomorphism
  197. Regular Articles
  198. On pairs of equations in unlike powers of primes and powers of 2
  199. Regular Articles
  200. Differential subordination and convexity criteria of integral operators
  201. Regular Articles
  202. Quantitative relations between short intervals and exceptional sets of cubic Waring-Goldbach problem
  203. Regular Articles
  204. On θ-commutators and the corresponding non-commuting graphs
  205. Regular Articles
  206. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of Laplace (1, 1) for GARCH models
  207. Regular Articles
  208. Multiple and sign-changing solutions for discrete Robin boundary value problem with parameter dependence
  209. Regular Articles
  210. Fundamental relation on m-idempotent hyperrings
  211. Regular Articles
  212. A novel recursive method to reconstruct multivariate functions on the unit cube
  213. Regular Articles
  214. Nabla inequalities and permanence for a logistic integrodifferential equation on time scales
  215. Regular Articles
  216. Enumeration of spanning trees in the sequence of Dürer graphs
  217. Regular Articles
  218. Quotient of information matrices in comparison of linear experiments for quadratic estimation
  219. Regular Articles
  220. Fourier series of functions involving higher-order ordered Bell polynomials
  221. Regular Articles
  222. Simple modules over Auslander regular rings
  223. Regular Articles
  224. Weighted multilinear p-adic Hardy operators and commutators
  225. Regular Articles
  226. Guaranteed cost finite-time control of positive switched nonlinear systems with D-perturbation
  227. Regular Articles
  228. A modified quasi-boundary value method for an abstract ill-posed biparabolic problem
  229. Regular Articles
  230. Extended Riemann-Liouville type fractional derivative operator with applications
  231. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  232. The algebraic size of the family of injective operators
  233. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  234. The history of a general criterium on spaceability
  235. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  236. On sequences not enjoying Schur’s property
  237. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  238. A hierarchy in the family of real surjective functions
  239. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  240. Dynamics of multivalued linear operators
  241. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  242. Linear dynamics of semigroups generated by differential operators
  243. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  244. Isomorphism theorems for some parabolic initial-boundary value problems in Hörmander spaces
  245. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  246. Determination of a diffusion coefficient in a quasilinear parabolic equation
  247. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  248. Homogeneous two-point problem for PDE of the second order in time variable and infinite order in spatial variables
  249. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  250. A nonlinear plate control without linearization
  251. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  252. Reduction of a Schwartz-type boundary value problem for biharmonic monogenic functions to Fredholm integral equations
  253. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  254. Inverse problem for a physiologically structured population model with variable-effort harvesting
  255. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  256. Existence of solutions for delay evolution equations with nonlocal conditions
  257. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  258. Comments on behaviour of solutions of elliptic quasi-linear problems in a neighbourhood of boundary singularities
  259. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  260. Coupled fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces endowed with a directed graph and application
  261. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  262. Existence of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic degenerate anisotropic equations
  263. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  264. Integro-differential systems with variable exponents of nonlinearity
  265. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  266. Elliptic operators on refined Sobolev scales on vector bundles
  267. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  268. Multiplicity solutions of a class fractional Schrödinger equations
  269. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  270. Determining of right-hand side of higher order ultraparabolic equation
  271. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  272. Asymptotic approximation for the solution to a semi-linear elliptic problem in a thin aneurysm-type domain
  273. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  274. Learnheuristics: hybridizing metaheuristics with machine learning for optimization with dynamic inputs
  275. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  276. Nature–inspired metaheuristic algorithms to find near–OGR sequences for WDM channel allocation and their performance comparison
  277. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  278. Monomial codes seen as invariant subspaces
  279. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  280. Expert knowledge and data analysis for detecting advanced persistent threats
  281. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  282. Feedback equivalence of convolutional codes over finite rings
Downloaded on 17.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2017-0140/html
Scroll to top button