Home The characterizations of upper approximation operators based on special coverings
Article Open Access

The characterizations of upper approximation operators based on special coverings

  • Pei Wang and Qingguo Li EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 4, 2017

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the approximation operators apr¯NS and apr¯S which are based on NS(U) and S. We not only obtain some properties of NS(U) and S, but also give examples to show some special properties. We also study sufficient and necessary conditions when they become closure operators. In addition, we give general and topological characterizations of the covering for two types of covering-based upper approximation operators being closure operators.

MSC 2010: 54-00; 54A10; 54A99

1 Introduction

The concept of rough set which was first proposed by Pawlak [11] is an extension of set theory for the study of the intelligent systems characterized by insufficient and incomplete information in 1982. It is a useful and powerful tool in many fields, such as data analysis, granularity or vagueness. It has also been applied successfully in process control, economics, medical diagnosis, biochemistry, environmental science, biology, chemistry, psychology, conflict analysis, and so on. Many researchers have made some significant contributions to developing the rough theory [3,4,7-8,12,14-15,17-26]. However, a problem with Pawlak's rough set theory is that partition or equivalence relation is explicitly used in the definition of the lower and upper approximations. Such a partition or equivalence relation is too restrictive for many applications because it can only deal with complete information systems. To address this issue, generalizations of rough set theory were considered by scholars. One approach was to extend equivalence relation to tolerance [5-6,32] and others [20-21,33-34]. Another important approach was to relax the partition to a covering of the universe. In 1983, W.Zakowski generalized the classical rough set theory by using coverings of a universe instead of partitions [27]. The covering-based rough sets is one of the most important generalization of the classical Pawlak rough sets. Such generalization leads to various covering approximation operators that are both of theoretical and practical importance [28-30]. The relationships between properties of covering-based approximation and their corresponding coverings have attracted intensive research. Based on the mutual correspondence of the concepts of extension and intension, E.Bryniarski [36] and Z.Bonikowski et al. [37] gave the second type of covering-based rough sets. The third and the fourth type of covering-based rough sets were introduced in [38]. Subsequently, W.Zhu utilized the topological method to characterize covering rough sets [18]. W.Zhu and F. Wang discussed the relationship between properties of four types of covering-based upper approximation operators and their corresponding coverings [21-23]. T. Yang et al. researched attribute reduction of covering information systems [39]. G. Liu studied the two types of rough sets induced by coverings and obtained some interesting results. G. Cattaneo, D. Ciucci, and G. Liu obtained the algebraic structures of generalized rough set theory [1,2,40,44]. G. Liu also used axiomatic method to characterize covering-based rough sets [41-43]. X. Bian et al. gave characterizations of covering-based approximation spaces being closure operators [31]. Ge et al. proposed not only general but also topological characterizations of coverings for these operators being closure operators [25,29-30]. T.Lin et al. defined some approximation operators which are based on neighborhood systems and did some research on them [52]. In addition, Y. Zhang et al. discussed the relationships between generalized rough sets based on covering and reflexive neighborhood system [49] and proposed the operator apr¯S . Based on their works, we will investigate the properties of NS(U) and S. We also give characterizations for apr¯NS , apr¯S being closure operators.

This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 recalls the main ideas of generalized rough set and covering approximations. Section 3 gives the properties of NS(U) and some examples. Section 4 studies the characterization of NS(U) for apr¯NS being a closure operator, while Section 5 considers the properties of S and apr¯S and obtains the general and topological characterizations of special covering S for covering-based upper approximation operator apr¯S to be a closure operator. Finally, Section 6 concludes the paper.

2 Background

In this section, we introduce the fundamental concepts that are used in this paper. U is the universe of discourse and P(U) denotes the family of all subsets of U. If C is a family of subsets of U, none of sets in C is empty, and C=U , then C is called a covering of U.

Definition 2.1

([46]). A mapping n : UP(U) is called a neighborhood operator If n(x) ≠ ∅ for all xU, n is called a serial neighborhood operator If xn(x) for all xU, n is called a reflexive neighborhood operator

Definition 2.2

([50-51]). A neighborhood system of an object xU, denoted by NS(x), is a non-empty family of neighborhoods of x. The set {NS(x) : xU} is called as a neighborhood system of U, and it is denoted by NS(U). Let NS(U) be a neighborhood system of U.

NS(U) is said to be serial if for any xU and n(x) ∈ NS(x), n(x) is non-empty (called Fré(V) Space in [32]).

NS(U) is said to be reflexive, if for any xU and n(x) ∈ NS(x), xn(x).

NS(U) is said to be symmetric, if for any x, yU, n(x) ∈ NS(x) and n(y) ∈ NS(y), xn(y) ⇒ yn(x).

NS(U) is said to be transitive, if for any x, y, zU, n(y) ∈ NS(y) and n(z) ∈ NS(z), xn(y) and yn(z) ⇒ xn(z).

Definition 2.3

(Covering approximation space [23]). If U is an universe and C is a covering of U, then we call U together with covering C a covering approximation space, denoted by (U,C) .

Definition 2.4

([52]). Let NS(U) be a neighborhood system of U. The lower and upper operators of X are defined as follows:

apr_NS(X)={xU:n(x)NS(x),n(x)X};apr¯NS(X)={xU:n(x)NS(x),n(x)X}.

Definition 2.5

([49]). Let NS(U) be a neighborhood system of U.

NS(U) is referred to as weak-unary, if for any xU and n1(x), n2(x) ∈ NS(x), there exists an n3(x) ∈ NS(x) such that n3(x)⊆ n1(x)∩ n2(x);

NS(U) is referred to as weak-transitive, if for any xU and n(x) ∈ NS(x), there exists an n1(x) ∈ NS(x) satisfying thatfor any yn1(x), there exists an n(y) ∈NS(y) such that n(y)⊆ n(x);

NS(U) is referred to as a weak-S4 neighborhood system, if NS(x) is reflexive and weak-transitive.

The following topological concepts and facts are elementary and can be found in[47,51]. We list them below for the purpose of this paper being self-contained.

  1. A topological space is a pair (U, τ) consisting of a set U and a family τ of subsets of U satisfying the following conditions: (a) ∅ ∈ τ and U ∈ τ (b) If U1, U2 ∈ τ, then U1U2 ∈ τ; (c)If Aτ , then Aτ.τ is called a topology on U and the members of τ are called open sets of (U, τ). The complementary set of an open set is called a closed set.

  2. A set F is called a clopen set, if F in (U, τ) is both an open set and a closed set.

  3. A family Bτ is called a base for (U, τ) if for every non-empty open subset O of U and each xO, there exists a set BB such that xBO. Equivalently, a family Bτ if every non-empty open subset O of U can be represented as the union of a subfamily of B .

  4. For any xU, a family Bτ is called alocal base at x for (U τ) if xB for each BB , and for every open subset O of U with xO, there exists a set BB such that BO.

  5. If P is a partition of U, the topology τ = { OU O} is the union of some members of P{} is called a pseudo-discrete topology in [13](also called a closed-open topology in [12]).

  6. Let (U, τ) be a topological space. If for each pair of points x, yU with xy, there exist open sets O, O' such that xO, yO′ and OO′ = ∅, then (U, τ) is called a T2-space and τ is called a T2-topology.

Definition 2.6

(Induced topology and subspace). Let (U, τ) be a topological space and XU. It is easy to check that τ′ = {OX : O ∈ τ} is a topology on X. τ′ is called a topology induced by X, and the topology space (X, τ′) is called a subspace of (U, τ).

Definition 2.7

(Closure operator). An operator H: P(U) → P(U)ia called a closure operator on U if it satisfies the following conditions: for any X, YU,

(H1)H(XY)=H(X)H(Y) ;

(H2)XH(X) ;

(H3)H()= ;

(H4)H(H(X))=H(X) .

Definition 2.8

(Interior operator). An operator I: P(U) → P(U)ia called a interior operator on U if it satisfies the following conditions: for any X, YU,

(I1)I(XY)=I(X)I(Y) ;

(I2)I(X)X ;

(I3)I(U)=U ;

(I4)I(I(X))=I(X) .

Definition 2.9

(Dual operator). Assume that H, I: P(U) → P(U) are two operators on U. If for any XU, H(X) = ∼ I(∼ X). We say that H, I are dual operators or H is the dual operator of I.

Proposition 2.10

([49]). Let NS(U) be a neighborhood system of U. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. apr¯NS(XY)=apr¯NS(X)apr¯NS(Y)forallX,YU ;

  2. apr_NS(XY)=apr_NS(X)apr_NS(Y)forallX,YU ;

  3. NS(U) is weak-unary.

Proposition 2.11

([49]). Let NS(U) be a neighborhood system of U. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. apr¯NS(apr¯NS(X))apr¯NS(X)forallXU

  2. apr_NS(X)apr_NS(apr_NS(Y))forallXU

  3. NS(U) is weak-transitive.

3 Some propositions of NS(U)

In this section, we will discuss some properties of NS(U).

Definition 3.1

Let NS(U) be a neighborhood system of U. NS(U) is said to be Euclidean, if for any x, yU, and n(x) ∈ NS(x), yn(x) ⇒ n(x) ⊆ n(y).

Proposition 3.2

Let NS(U) be a neighborhood system of U. If NS(U) is Euclidean, then apr¯NS(apr_NS(X))apr_NS(X) and apr¯NS(X)apr_NS(apr¯NS(X)) for any XU.

Proof

For any xU, if xapr¯NS(apr_NS(X)) and n(x)∈ NS(U), We have n(x)apr_NS(X) . Pick yn(x)apr_NS(X) , then there exists an n(y) ∈ NS(y) such that n(y) ⊆ X. Since NS(U) is Euclidean, we have n(x) ⊆ n(y). It follows that n(x) ⊆ X. From the Definition 2.4, We have xapr_NS(X) , therefore apr¯NS(apr_NS(X))apr_NS(X) .

We can get apr¯NS(X)apr_NS(apr¯NS(X)) by the duality between apr¯NS and apr_NS . □

The inverse of Proposition 2.10 does not hold. An example is given as follows:

Example 3.3

Let U = {a, b, c}, NS(a) = {{a}}, NS(b) = {{b}, {a, b}} and NS(c) = {{c}}. Then:

apr_NS()==apr¯NS(apr_NS());apr_NS({a})={a}=apr¯NS(apr_NS({a}));apr_NS({b})={b}=apr¯NS(apr_NS({b}));apr_NS({c})={c}=apr¯NS(apr_NS({c}));apr_NS({a,b})={a,b}=apr¯NS(apr_NS({a,b}));apr_NS({a,c})={a,c}=apr¯NS(apr_NS({a,c}));apr_NS({b,c})={b,c}=apr¯NS(apr_NS({b,c}));apr_NS(U)=U=apr¯NS(apr_NS(U)).

Hence apr¯NS(apr_NS(X))apr_NS(X) for any XU. Since an(b) = {a, b} ∈ NS(b) and n(b) ⊈ n(a). We obtain that NS(U) is not Euclidean.

Proposition 3.4

Let NS(U) be a neighborhood system of U. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. NS(U) is transitive;

  2. For any x, yU, if xn(y), then n(x)⊆ n(y).

Proof

(1) ⇒ (2) For any x, yU and xn(y), if n(x) ⊈ n(y), there exists pn(x) and pn(y). Since xn(y) and NS(U) is transitive, we have pn(y). It is contradictory to pn(y).

(2) ⇒ (1) for any x, y, zU, n(y) ∈ NS(y) and n(z) ∈ NS(z), xn(y) and yn(z). It is easy to prove NS(U) is transitive. □

Proposition 3.5

Let NS(U) be a neighborhood system of U and n : UP(U) is a reflexive mapping. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. {n(x) : xU} forms a partition of U;

  2. NS(U) is reflexive, transitive and Euclidean.

Proof

(1) ⇒ (2) For any x,yU and yn(x). Since {n(x) : xU} forms a partition of U and n : UP(U) is a reflexive mapping, then n(x) = n(y). By the Definition 3.1 and Proposition 2.11, it is easy to prove NS(U) is reflexive, transitive and Euclidean.

(2) ⇒ (1) for any x, yU, if n(x) ≠ n(y), then n(x)>∩ n(y) = ∅. Otherwise, we take a zn(x)∩ n(y), since NS(U) is reflexive, transitive and Euclidean, then n(z) = n(x) = n(y). It is contradictory to n(x) ≠ n(y). □

Proposition 3.6

Let NS(U) be a reflexive neighborhood system of U. NS(U) is weak-unary if and only if there is a topology on U such that NS(x) is a local base for any xU.

Proof

(1) ⇒ (2) For any xU, n1(x), n2(x) ∈ NS(x) and xn1(x) ∩ n2(x), since NS(U) is weak-unary, there exists n3(x) such that n3(x) ⊆ n1(x) ∩ n2(x). We have xn3(x) because NS(U) is a reflexive neighborhood system of U. So NS(x) is alocal base for any xU.

(2) ⇒ (1) By the definition of local base, it is easy to prove NS(U) is weak-unary. □

4 Characterization of NS(U) for apr¯NS being a closure operator

In Section 3, we discuss the properties of NS(U). One natural question thus arise: When is apr¯NS a closure operator?

Theorem 4.1

(General characterization of of NS(U) for apr¯NS being a closure operator). Let NS(U) be a neigh- borhood system of U. apr¯NS is a closure operator if and only if NS(U) is reflexive, weak-unary and weak- transitive.

Proof

(⊆) Assume that apr¯NS is a closure operator. By the Definition 2.7, we get Xapr¯NS(X) , apr¯NS(apr¯NS(X))=apr¯NS(X) and apr¯NS(XY)=apr¯NS(X)apr¯NS(Y) for all X, YU. According to Proposition 6 [49] and Proposition 7 [49], we obtain NS(U) is weak-unary and weak-transitive.

(⇐) Assume that NS(U) is weak-unary and weak-transitive. We prove that apr¯NS satisfies the conditions (Hi)(for i = 1, 2, 3, 4). By the Definition of apr¯NS , it is easy to check that apr¯NS()= . Hence (H3) is satisfied. We prove (H1) and (H4). Since NS(U) is weak-unary and weak-transitive, by the Proposition 6 [49] and Proposition 7 [49], we obtain apr¯NS(apr¯NS(X))apr¯NS(X) and apr¯NS(XY)=apr¯NS(X)apr¯NS(Y) for all X, YU. Since NS(U) is a reflexive neighborhood system of U, so apr¯NS(X)apr¯NS(apr¯NS(X)) for any XU. Therefore apr¯NS(X)=apr¯NS(apr¯NS(X)) for any XU. It is obvious that (H2) holds. Thus apr¯NS is a closure operator. □

Theorem 4.2

(Topological characterization of of NS(U) for apr¯NS being a closure operator). Let NS(U) be a reflexive neighborhood system of U. Then apr¯NS is a closure operator if and only if N={n(x):n(x)NS(x),xU} is a base for some topology τ on U.

Proof

(⇒) Assume that apr¯NS is a closure operator. We prove N={n(x):n(x)NS(x),xU} is a base for some topology τ on U. Since NS(U) is a reflexive neighborhood system of U. It is easy to prove xn(x) for each n(x) ∈ NS(x) and xU. Thus N is a cover of U. For any x, y, zU, n(y) ∈ NS(y), n(z) ∈ NS(z) and xn(y) ∩ n(z). Since apr¯NS is a closure operator, then NS(U) is weak-unary. Therefore, there exists a n0(x) ∈ NS(x) such that n0 (x) ⊆ n(y) ∩ (z). By the definition of base, we have N={n(x):n(x)NS(x),xU} is a base for some topology τ on U.

(⇐) Assume that N={n(x):n(x)NS(x),xU} is a base for some topology τ on U. We prove that apr¯NS satisfies the conditions (Hi)(i = 1,2,3,4). By Definition of apr¯NS , it is easy to check that apr¯NS()= . Hence (H3) is satisfied. So to prove (H1), we prove (H1) holds. Since N={n(x):n(x)NS(x),xU} is a base for some topology τ on U, by Definition 2.5, for any xU and n1(x), n2(x) ∈ NS(x), there exists an n3(x) ∈ NS(x) such that n3(x) ⊆ n1(x) ∩ n2(x); so NS(U) is weak-unary. By Proposition 2.10, we have apr¯NS(XY)=apr¯NS(X)apr¯NS(Y) for all X, YU. Since NS(U) is a reflexive neighborhood system of U, apr¯NS(X)apr¯NS(apr¯NS(X)) for any XU. So to prove (H1), we only need to prove apr¯NS(apr¯NS(A))apr¯NS(A) for any AU. Let xapr¯NS(apr¯NS(A)) , by Definition of the apr¯NS , n(x)apr¯NS(A) for any n(x) ∈ NS(x). Pick pn(x)apr¯NS(A) . Then pn(x) and n(p) ∩ A ≠ ∅ for any n(p) ∈ NS(p). From pn(x), we obtain n(p) ⊆ n(x), therefore n(x) ∩ A ≠ ∅. By the arbitrariness of n, we have xapr¯NS(A) . Thus apr¯NS(A)=apr¯NS(apr¯NS(A)) for any AU. Since NS(U) is a reflexive neighborhood system of U, (H2) is obvious satisfied. Therefore apr¯NS is a closure operator. □

Corollary 4.3

Let NS(U) be a reflexive neighborhood system of U. Then apr¯NS is a closure operator if and only if N={NS(x):xU} is a base for some topology τ on U and NS(U) is transitive.

Proof

It is easy to prove by Proposition 3.4 and Theorem 4.2. □

5 Characterization of covering S for apr¯S being a closure operator

Zhang, Li and Lin defined a special covering S and investigated twenty-three types of covering-based rough sets proposed in [49] which can be treated as the generalized rough sets based on neighborhood systems. In this section, we will discuss the properties of apr¯S and give the Characterization of covering S for apr¯S being a closure operator.

Definition 5.1

([49]). A family of subsets of universe U is called a closure system over U if it contains U and is closed under set intersection. Given a closure system S¯ , one can define its dual system S_ as follows:

S_={X:XS¯}

Definition 5.2

(Subsystem based definition [49]). Suppose S=(S¯,S_) is a pair of subsystems of P(U),S¯ is a closure system and S_ is the dual system of S¯ . A pair of lower and upper approximation operators (apr¯S,apr_S) with respect to S is defined as:

a p r ¯ S ( X ) = { K S ¯ : X K } ; a p r _ S ( X ) = { K S _ : K X } f o r a n y X U .

Remark 5.3

  1. (S¯,) is a complete lattice.

  2. S¯ may not have element ∅. Fig.?? gives an intuitive illustration (2) of the Remark 5.3:

    Fig. 1
    Fig. 1
  3. If S¯ has no less than two single sets, then S¯ . The converse may not hold:

    Fig. 2
    Fig. 2

By Definition 5.2, it is easy to obtain properties of lower and upper approximation operators as follows:

Proposition 5.4

Let S = (S̅, S̲ be a pair of subsystems of P(U) , for any X, YU, we have:

  1. apr_S()= ;

  2. apr¯S(U)=U ;

  3. XYapr¯S(X)apr¯S(Y),apr_S(X)apr_S(Y) ;

  4. apr¯S(apr¯S(X))=apr¯S(X) for any XU;

  5. apr¯S(X)=apr_S(X),apr_S(X)=apr¯S(X) .

However, the following properties may not hold:

(1) apr¯S()= ;

Example 5.5

Let U={a,b,c},S¯={{a},{a,b},U} . It is easy to see S¯ contains U and is closed under set intersection. But apr¯S()={a} .

(2) apr_S(U)=U ;

Example 5.6

Let U={a,b,c},S¯={{a},{a,b},U},S_={{b,c},{c},} . Then apr_S(U)={b,c}U .

(3) apr¯S(XY)apr¯S(X)apr¯S(Y) for any X, YU.

Example 5.7

Let U={a,b,c},S¯={,{a},{b},U} . Let X = {a}, Y = {b}, then apr¯S(X)={a},apr¯S(Y)={b},apr¯S(XY)=U . Hence apr¯S(XY)apr¯S(X)apr¯S(Y) .

Definition 5.8

([53]). Suppose R is an arbitrary relation on U. With respect to R, we can define the left neighborhoods of an element x in U as follows:

lR(x)={yU:yRx}

Definition 5.9

([53]). For an arbitrary relation R, by substituting equivalence class [x]R with right neighborhood lR(x), we define the operators R¯ and R_ (Lin, 1992) from P(U) to itselfas follows:

R¯(X)={xU:lR(x)X}.

Lemma 5.10

([53]). If S is another binary relation on U and R¯(X)=S¯(X) for any XU, then R = S.

Proposition 5.11

Let S=(S¯,S_) be a pair of subsystems of P(U) and U is finite. If apr¯S(XY)=apr¯S(X)apr¯S(Y) for any X, YU, then there exists a unique reflexive and transitive relation R on U such that apr¯S(X)=R¯(X) for any XU.

Proof

Using S¯ of U, for any xU, we choose all SS¯ such that {x} ⊆ S which forms the family S′, via left neighborhood of an element xU, we construct the binary R on U as follows:

lR(x) = {yU : y ∈ ∩ S It is clear that R is a reflexive relation. Since apr¯S({x})=lR(x) and apr¯S(XY)=apr¯S(X)apr¯S(Y) for any X, YU, we have a p r ¯ S ( X ) = x x a p r ¯ S ( { x } ) = X X l R ( x ) = R ¯ ( X ) . Since apr¯S(apr¯S(X))=apr¯S(X) for any XU, this means that R¯(R¯(X))=R¯(X) . This implies R is transitive. Thus R is a reflexive and transitive relation. The unique R comes from Lemma 5.10. □

Proposition 5.12

Let S = (S̅ S̲) be a pair of subsystems of P(U) , then the following are equivalent:

  1. S¯ has element ∅;

  2. apr¯S()= ;

  3. apr_S(U)=U .

Proof

(1) ⇒ (2) By the Definition 5.2, it is easy to prove.

(2) ⇔ (3). It can be obtained by the duality.

(2) ⇒ (1) If S¯ . We can choose S¯S¯,S for any SS̅. Thus ∅ ⊆ ∩ S̅. Since S¯ is closed for intersection, then ∩S̅ ∈ S̅ and ∩S̅≠∅. From the Definition 5.2, we have apr¯S() . It is a contradiction to (2). □

Lemma 5.13

For any X, YU, apr¯S(XY)=apr¯S(X)apr¯S(Y) if and only if ABS̅ for any A, BS̅.

Proof

(⇒) Suppose there exists S1, S2S̅, it is easy to prove S1S2S̅.

(⇐) For any X, YU, we have:

apr¯S(XY)={SS¯:(XY)S}S¯;apr¯S(X)={SS¯:XS}=S1S¯;apr¯S(Y)={SS¯:YS}=S2S¯.

Thus, we have XYS1S2S̅. Hence apr¯S(XY)S1S2apr¯S(X)apr¯S(Y).apr¯S(X)apr¯S(Y)apr¯S(XY) is obvious. Therefore apr¯S(XY)=apr¯S(X)apr¯S(Y) . □

Theorem 5.14

(General characterization of coverings S for apr¯S being a closure operator). Let S=(S¯,S_) be a pair of subsystems of P(U) . apr¯S is a closure operator if and only if S¯ and S1S2S¯ for any S1,S2S¯ .

Proof

(⇒) Assume apr¯S is a closure operator. By the Proposition 5.4 and Lemma 5.13, we have S¯ and S1S2S̅ for any S1, S2S̅.

(⇐) Assume ∅ ∈ S̅ and S1S2S̅ for any S1, S2S̅. We need to prove apr¯S is a closure operator. By the Proposition 5.12, we have apr¯S()= . Hence, (H3) is satisfied. By the Lemma 5.13, we have apr¯S(XY)=apr¯S(X)apr¯S(Y) for any X, YU. Thus, (H1) is satisfied. By the Definition 5.2, it is easy to prove Xapr¯S(X) for any XU.

Then we only need to prove (H4) holds. For any XU, apr¯S(X)apr¯S(apr¯S(X)) is obvious, we prove apr¯S(apr¯S(X))apr¯S(X) for any XU. By the Definition 5.2, we have apr¯S(X)={SS¯:XS} . Denote S1={SS¯:XS} . Since S¯ is closed for intersection, so apr¯S(apr¯S(X))=S1 , thus S1S̅. Therefore apr¯S(apr¯S(X))=apr¯S(X) for any XU. Hence apr¯S is a closure operator. □

Lemma 5.15

Let S = (S̅, S̲ be a pair of subsystems of P(U) . ∅ ∈ S̅ and ABS̅ for any A, BS̅ if and only if S^={US:SS¯} is a topology on U.

Proof

(⇒) Assume S¯ satisfies the condition, we need to prove ŝ is a topology on U. Since ∅, US̅, so ∅, U ∈ ŝ.

For any X, Y ∈ ŝ, we prove XY ∈ ŝ. There exists S1, S1S̅ such that X = U\ S1 and Y = U\ S2. Thus XY = (U\ S1) ∩ (U\ S2) = U\ (S1S2). By the condition, we obtain (S1S2) ∈ S̅. From the definition of ŝ, we have U\ (S1S2) ∈ ŝ.

Let {Ai : iI} ⊆ ŝ, there exists {Sj : iI} ⊆ S̅ such that Ai = U\ Sj for each iI, thus iIAi=iI(USi)=UiISi . Since S¯ is closed for intersection, so iISiS¯ , therefore UiISiS^ . Thus ŝ = {U S : SS̅} is a topology on U.

(⇐) Similarly, we can prove the converse. □

From the Lemma 5.15, we have the following conclusion:

Theorem 5.16

(Topological characterization of coverings S for apr¯S being a closure operator). Let S = (S̅, S̲ is a pair of subsystems of P(U).apr¯S is a closure operator if and only if ŝ = {U\ S : SS̅} is a topology on U.

6 Conclusions

In this paper, we not only obtained the properties of NS(U) and S, but also investigated two type approximation operators. We give general characterization of covering S for covering-based upper approximation operator apr¯S being a closure operator. Besides this, We obtain topological characterizations of two types of upper approximation operators apr¯NS and apr¯S to be a closure operators. In our future work, we will investigate the intuitive characterizations of covering S for apr¯S or apr¯NS to be a closure operator and describe covering-based approximation space as some special types of information exchange systems when apr¯S or apr¯NS is a closure operator respectively.

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11371130), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (No. 2014GXNSFBA118015), Guangxi Universities Key Lab of Complex System optimization and Big Data Processing (No.2016CSOBDP0004) and Key research and development of Hunan province (No.2016JC2014).

References

[1] Cattaneo G., Abstract approximation spaces for rough theory in: Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery 1: Methodology and Applications. 1998,59-98.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Cattaneo G., D.Ciucci, AIgebraic structures for rough sets, in: LNCS. 2004,3135,208-252.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Kondo M., On the structure of generalized rough sets, Information Sciences. 2005,176,589-600.10.1016/j.ins.2005.01.001Search in Google Scholar

[4] Oin K., Pei Z., On the topological properties of fuzzy rough sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 2005,151,601-613.10.1016/j.fss.2004.08.017Search in Google Scholar

[5] Skowron A., Stepaniuk J., Tolerance approximation spaces, Fundamenta Informaticae.1996,27,245-253.10.3233/FI-1996-272311Search in Google Scholar

[6] Slowinski R., Vanderpooten D., A generalized definition of rough approximations based on similarity IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and DataEngineering. 2000,12,331-33610.1109/69.842271Search in Google Scholar

[7] Y.Yao, A comparative study of fuzzy sets and rough sets, Information Sciences. 1998,109,227-242.10.1016/S0020-0255(98)10023-3Search in Google Scholar

[8] Y.Yao, Constructive and algebraic methods of theory of rough sets, Information Sciences. 1998,109,21-47.10.1016/S0020-0255(98)00012-7Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zadeh L.A., Fuzzy sets, Information and Control. 1965,8,338-353.10.21236/AD0608981Search in Google Scholar

[10] Oin K., Gao y., Pei Z., On covering rough sets, Lecture Notes inAl. 2007,4481,34-41.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Z.Pawlak, Rough sets, International Journal of Computer and Informa-tion Sciences. 1982,11,341-356.10.1007/BF01001956Search in Google Scholar

[12] Pawlak Z., Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, KIuwer Academic Publishers, Boston. 1991.10.1007/978-94-011-3534-4Search in Google Scholar

[13] Pawlak Z., A. Skowron, Rudiments of rough sets, Information Sciences. 2007,177,3-27.10.1016/j.ins.2006.06.003Search in Google Scholar

[14] Pawlak Z., A. Skowron, Rough sets: some extensions, Information Sciences. 2007,177,28-40.10.1016/j.ins.2006.06.006Search in Google Scholar

[15] Pawlak Z., A. Skowron, Rough sets and boolean reasoning, Information Sciences. 2007,177,41-73.10.1016/j.ins.2006.06.007Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zadeh L., Fuzzy logic = computing with words, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 1996,4,103-111.10.1007/978-3-7908-1873-4_1Search in Google Scholar

[17] W.Zhu, F.Wang, Properties of the third type of covering-based rough sets, in: ICMLC07.2007,3746-3751.10.1109/ICMLC.2007.4370799Search in Google Scholar

[18] W.Zhu, Topological approaches to covering rough sets, Information Sciences.2007, 177,1499-1508.10.1016/j.ins.2006.06.009Search in Google Scholar

[19] W.Zhu, F.Y. Wang, On three types of covering rough sets, IEEE Trans-actions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 2007,19,1131-1144.10.1109/TKDE.2007.1044Search in Google Scholar

[20] W.Zhu, Generalized rough sets based on relations, Information Sciences. 2007,177,4997-5011.10.1016/j.ins.2007.05.037Search in Google Scholar

[21] W.Zhu, Relationship between generalized rough sets based on binary relation and covering, Information Sciences. 2009,179,210-225.10.1016/j.ins.2008.09.015Search in Google Scholar

[22] W.Zhu, Relationship among basic concepts in covering-based rough sets, Information Sciences. 2009,179,2478-2486.10.1016/j.ins.2009.02.013Search in Google Scholar

[23] W.Zhu, F.Y.Wang, The fourth type of covering-based rough sets, Information Sciences. 2012,1016,1-13.10.1109/HIS.2006.264926Search in Google Scholar

[24] N. Fan, G. Hu, H. Liu, Study of definable subsets in covering approximation space of rough sets. Proceedings of the 2011IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration. 2011,1,21-24.10.1109/IRI.2011.6009514Search in Google Scholar

[25] X.Ge, Z. Li, Definable subset in covering approximation spaces. International Journal of Computational and Mathematical Sciences. 2011,5,31-34.Search in Google Scholar

[26] N.Fan, G.Hu, W.Zhang, Study on conditions of neighborhoods forming a partition, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD). 2012,256-259.10.1109/FSKD.2012.6233789Search in Google Scholar

[27] Zakowski W., Approximations in the Space(U, Π), Demonstratio Mathematica 1983,16,761-769.10.1515/dema-1983-0319Search in Google Scholar

[28] D.Chen, C.Wang, A new aooproach to arrtibute reduction of consistent and inconsistent covering decision systems with covering rough sets, Information Sciences.2007,176,3500-351810.1016/j.ins.2007.02.041Search in Google Scholar

[29] X.Ge, An application of covering approximation spaces on network security Computer and Mathematics with Applications.2010,60,1191-1199.10.1016/j.camwa.2010.05.043Search in Google Scholar

[30] X.Ge, Connectivity of covering approximation spaces and its applications onepidemiological issue, Applied Soft computing.2014,25,445-451.10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.053Search in Google Scholar

[31] X. Bian, P.Wang, Z.Yu, X. Bai, B.Chen, Characterizations of coverings for upper approximation operators being closure operators, Information Sciences 2015,314,41-54.10.1016/j.ins.2015.03.060Search in Google Scholar

[32] Y.Yao, Relational interpretations of neighborhood operators and rough set approximation operators, Information Sciences.1998,111,239-259.10.1016/S0020-0255(98)10006-3Search in Google Scholar

[33] W.Zhu, W.X.Zhang, Neighborhood operators systems and approximations, Information Sciences. 2002,144,201-217.10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00180-9Search in Google Scholar

[34] Y.L. Zhang, M.K. Luo, Relationships beween covering-based rough sets and relation-based rough sets, Information Sciences. 2013,225,55-71.10.1016/j.ins.2012.10.018Search in Google Scholar

[35] Pomykala J.A., Approximation operations in approximation space, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Science Mathematics. 1987,35,653-662.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Bryniarski E., A calculus of rough sets of the first order, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Science Mathematics. 1989,16,71-78.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Bonikowski Z., Bryniarski E., U.W.Skardowska, Extensions and intentions in the rough set theory, Information Sciences. 1998,107,149-167.10.1016/S0020-0255(97)10046-9Search in Google Scholar

[38] Thomas G.B., Thomas’Calculus(10th Edition), Addison Wesley Publishing Cmpany.2003Search in Google Scholar

[39] T.Yang, O.Li, B.Zhou, Reduction about approximation spaces of covering generalized rough sets, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning.2010,51,335-345.10.1016/j.ijar.2009.11.001Search in Google Scholar

[40] G. Liu, Y.Sai, A comparison of two types of rough sets induced by coverings, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning.2009,50,521-528.10.1016/j.ijar.2008.11.001Search in Google Scholar

[41] G. Liu, Using one axiom to characterize rough set and fuzzy rough set approximations, Information Sciences. 2013,223,285-296.10.1016/j.ins.2012.10.004Search in Google Scholar

[42] G. Liu, The axiomatization of the rough set upper approximation operations, Fundamenta Informaticae. 2006,69,331-342.Search in Google Scholar

[43] G. Liu, Axiomatic systems for rough sets and fuzzy rough sets, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 2008,48,857-867.10.1016/j.ijar.2008.02.001Search in Google Scholar

[44] G. Liu, W.Zhu, The algebraic structures of generalized rough set theory, Information Sciences. 2008,178,4105-4113.10.1016/j.ins.2008.06.021Search in Google Scholar

[45] X.Ge, X. Bai, Z.Yun, Topological characterizaitons of covering for special covering-based upper spproximation operators, Information Sciences. 2012,204,70-81.10.1016/j.ins.2012.04.005Search in Google Scholar

[46] Y.Yao, B.Yao, Covering based rough set approximation, Information Sciences. 2012,200,91-107.10.1016/j.ins.2012.02.065Search in Google Scholar

[47] Engelking R., General topology, Heldermann Verlag, Berlin,1989.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Samanta P., Chakraborty M, K., Covering based approaches to rough sets and inplication lattices, in: RSFDGRC 2009, LANI, 2009,5908, 127-134.10.1007/978-3-642-10646-0_15Search in Google Scholar

[49] Y.Zhang, C. Li, M. Lin, Y.Lin, Relationships between generalized rough sets based on covering and reflexive neighborhood system, Information Sciences. 2015,319,56-67.10.1016/j.ins.2015.05.023Search in Google Scholar

[50] T. Lin, Neighborhood systems-application to qualitative fuzzy and rough sets, in:P.P. Wang(ed.), Advanced in machine intelligence and soft computing IV, Department of EIectrical Engineering Durham North Carolina,1997,130-141.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Sierpiński W., General topology, University of Toronto, Toronto,1956.Search in Google Scholar

[52] T. Lin, Y.Yao, Mining soft rules using rough sets and neighborhoods, in:Proceeding of the symposium on dodeling analysis and simulation, comptatinal engineering in systems application, INASCS Multi Conference, Lille, France, 1996,9-12.Search in Google Scholar

[53] G. Liu, Approximations in rough sets vs granular computing for coverings, International Journal of Cognitive Infromatics and Natural Intelligence. 2010,4,61-74.10.4018/978-1-4666-1743-8.ch011Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-7-23
Accepted: 2017-1-17
Published Online: 2017-3-4

© 2017 Wang and Li

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Integrals of Frullani type and the method of brackets
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Edge of chaos in reaction diffusion CNN model
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Calculus using proximities: a mathematical approach in which students can actually prove theorems
  7. Regular Articles
  8. An investigation on hyper S-posets over ordered semihypergroups
  9. Regular Articles
  10. The Leibniz algebras whose subalgebras are ideals
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Fixed point and multidimensional fixed point theorems with applications to nonlinear matrix equations in terms of weak altering distance functions
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Matrix rank and inertia formulas in the analysis of general linear models
  15. Regular Articles
  16. The hybrid power mean of quartic Gauss sums and Kloosterman sums
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Tauberian theorems for statistically (C,1,1) summable double sequences of fuzzy numbers
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Some properties of graded comultiplication modules
  21. Regular Articles
  22. The characterizations of upper approximation operators based on special coverings
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Bi-integrable and tri-integrable couplings of a soliton hierarchy associated with SO(4)
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Dynamics for a discrete competition and cooperation model of two enterprises with multiple delays and feedback controls
  27. Regular Articles
  28. A new view of relationship between atomic posets and complete (algebraic) lattices
  29. Regular Articles
  30. A class of extensions of Restricted (s, t)-Wythoff’s game
  31. Regular Articles
  32. New bounds for the minimum eigenvalue of 𝓜-tensors
  33. Regular Articles
  34. Shintani and Shimura lifts of cusp forms on certain arithmetic groups and their applications
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Empirical likelihood for quantile regression models with response data missing at random
  37. Regular Articles
  38. Convex combination of analytic functions
  39. Regular Articles
  40. On the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank-two matrices
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Uniform topology on EQ-algebras
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Integrations on rings
  45. Regular Articles
  46. The quasilinear parabolic kirchhoff equation
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Avoiding rainbow 2-connected subgraphs
  49. Regular Articles
  50. On non-Hopfian groups of fractions
  51. Regular Articles
  52. Singularly perturbed hyperbolic problems on metric graphs: asymptotics of solutions
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Rings in which elements are the sum of a nilpotent and a root of a fixed polynomial that commute
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Superstability of functional equations related to spherical functions
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Evaluation of the convolution sum involving the sum of divisors function for 22, 44 and 52
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Weighted minimal translation surfaces in the Galilean space with density
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Complete convergence for weighted sums of pairwise independent random variables
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Binomials transformation formulae for scaled Fibonacci numbers
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Growth functions for some uniformly amenable groups
  67. Regular Articles
  68. Hopf bifurcations in a three-species food chain system with multiple delays
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Oscillation and nonoscillation of half-linear Euler type differential equations with different periodic coefficients
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Osculating curves in 4-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index 2
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Some new facts about group 𝒢 generated by the family of convergent permutations
  75. Regular Articles
  76. lnfinitely many solutions for fractional Schrödinger equations with perturbation via variational methods
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Supersolvable orders and inductively free arrangements
  79. Regular Articles
  80. Asymptotically almost automorphic solutions of differential equations with piecewise constant argument
  81. Regular Articles
  82. Finite groups whose all second maximal subgroups are cyclic
  83. Regular Articles
  84. Semilinear systems with a multi-valued nonlinear term
  85. Regular Articles
  86. Positive solutions for Hadamard differential systems with fractional integral conditions on an unbounded domain
  87. Regular Articles
  88. Calibration and simulation of Heston model
  89. Regular Articles
  90. One kind sixth power mean of the three-term exponential sums
  91. Regular Articles
  92. Cyclic pairs and common best proximity points in uniformly convex Banach spaces
  93. Regular Articles
  94. The uniqueness of meromorphic functions in k-punctured complex plane
  95. Regular Articles
  96. Normalizers of intermediate congruence subgroups of the Hecke subgroups
  97. Regular Articles
  98. The hyperbolicity constant of infinite circulant graphs
  99. Regular Articles
  100. Scott convergence and fuzzy Scott topology on L-posets
  101. Regular Articles
  102. One sided strong laws for random variables with infinite mean
  103. Regular Articles
  104. The join of split graphs whose completely regular endomorphisms form a monoid
  105. Regular Articles
  106. A new branch and bound algorithm for minimax ratios problems
  107. Regular Articles
  108. Upper bound estimate of incomplete Cochrane sum
  109. Regular Articles
  110. Value distributions of solutions to complex linear differential equations in angular domains
  111. Regular Articles
  112. The nonlinear diffusion equation of the ideal barotropic gas through a porous medium
  113. Regular Articles
  114. The Sheffer stroke operation reducts of basic algebras
  115. Regular Articles
  116. Extensions and improvements of Sherman’s and related inequalities for n-convex functions
  117. Regular Articles
  118. Classification lattices are geometric for complete atomistic lattices
  119. Regular Articles
  120. Possible numbers of x’s in an {x, y}-matrix with a given rank
  121. Regular Articles
  122. New error bounds for linear complementarity problems of weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrices
  123. Regular Articles
  124. Boundedness of vector-valued B-singular integral operators in Lebesgue spaces
  125. Regular Articles
  126. On the Golomb’s conjecture and Lehmer’s numbers
  127. Regular Articles
  128. Some applications of the Archimedean copulas in the proof of the almost sure central limit theorem for ordinary maxima
  129. Regular Articles
  130. Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  131. Regular Articles
  132. Corrigendum to: Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  133. Regular Articles
  134. Convergence and stability of generalized φ-weak contraction mapping in CAT(0) spaces
  135. Regular Articles
  136. Triple solutions for a Dirichlet boundary value problem involving a perturbed discrete p(k)-Laplacian operator
  137. Regular Articles
  138. OD-characterization of alternating groups Ap+d
  139. Regular Articles
  140. On Jordan mappings of inverse semirings
  141. Regular Articles
  142. On generalized Ehresmann semigroups
  143. Regular Articles
  144. On topological properties of spaces obtained by the double band matrix
  145. Regular Articles
  146. Representing derivatives of Chebyshev polynomials by Chebyshev polynomials and related questions
  147. Regular Articles
  148. Chain conditions on composite Hurwitz series rings
  149. Regular Articles
  150. Coloring subgraphs with restricted amounts of hues
  151. Regular Articles
  152. An extension of the method of brackets. Part 1
  153. Regular Articles
  154. Branch-delete-bound algorithm for globally solving quadratically constrained quadratic programs
  155. Regular Articles
  156. Strong edge geodetic problem in networks
  157. Regular Articles
  158. Ricci solitons on almost Kenmotsu 3-manifolds
  159. Regular Articles
  160. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions sharing two finite sets
  161. Regular Articles
  162. On the fourth-order linear recurrence formula related to classical Gauss sums
  163. Regular Articles
  164. Dynamical behavior for a stochastic two-species competitive model
  165. Regular Articles
  166. Two new eigenvalue localization sets for tensors and theirs applications
  167. Regular Articles
  168. κ-strong sequences and the existence of generalized independent families
  169. Regular Articles
  170. Commutators of Littlewood-Paley gκ -functions on non-homogeneous metric measure spaces
  171. Regular Articles
  172. On decompositions of estimators under a general linear model with partial parameter restrictions
  173. Regular Articles
  174. Groups and monoids of Pythagorean triples connected to conics
  175. Regular Articles
  176. Hom-Lie superalgebra structures on exceptional simple Lie superalgebras of vector fields
  177. Regular Articles
  178. Numerical methods for the multiplicative partial differential equations
  179. Regular Articles
  180. Solvable Leibniz algebras with NFn Fm1 nilradical
  181. Regular Articles
  182. Evaluation of the convolution sums ∑al+bm=n lσ(l) σ(m) with ab ≤ 9
  183. Regular Articles
  184. A study on soft rough semigroups and corresponding decision making applications
  185. Regular Articles
  186. Some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions with applications
  187. Regular Articles
  188. Deficiency of forests
  189. Regular Articles
  190. Perfect codes in power graphs of finite groups
  191. Regular Articles
  192. A new compact finite difference quasilinearization method for nonlinear evolution partial differential equations
  193. Regular Articles
  194. Does any convex quadrilateral have circumscribed ellipses?
  195. Regular Articles
  196. The dynamic of a Lie group endomorphism
  197. Regular Articles
  198. On pairs of equations in unlike powers of primes and powers of 2
  199. Regular Articles
  200. Differential subordination and convexity criteria of integral operators
  201. Regular Articles
  202. Quantitative relations between short intervals and exceptional sets of cubic Waring-Goldbach problem
  203. Regular Articles
  204. On θ-commutators and the corresponding non-commuting graphs
  205. Regular Articles
  206. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of Laplace (1, 1) for GARCH models
  207. Regular Articles
  208. Multiple and sign-changing solutions for discrete Robin boundary value problem with parameter dependence
  209. Regular Articles
  210. Fundamental relation on m-idempotent hyperrings
  211. Regular Articles
  212. A novel recursive method to reconstruct multivariate functions on the unit cube
  213. Regular Articles
  214. Nabla inequalities and permanence for a logistic integrodifferential equation on time scales
  215. Regular Articles
  216. Enumeration of spanning trees in the sequence of Dürer graphs
  217. Regular Articles
  218. Quotient of information matrices in comparison of linear experiments for quadratic estimation
  219. Regular Articles
  220. Fourier series of functions involving higher-order ordered Bell polynomials
  221. Regular Articles
  222. Simple modules over Auslander regular rings
  223. Regular Articles
  224. Weighted multilinear p-adic Hardy operators and commutators
  225. Regular Articles
  226. Guaranteed cost finite-time control of positive switched nonlinear systems with D-perturbation
  227. Regular Articles
  228. A modified quasi-boundary value method for an abstract ill-posed biparabolic problem
  229. Regular Articles
  230. Extended Riemann-Liouville type fractional derivative operator with applications
  231. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  232. The algebraic size of the family of injective operators
  233. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  234. The history of a general criterium on spaceability
  235. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  236. On sequences not enjoying Schur’s property
  237. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  238. A hierarchy in the family of real surjective functions
  239. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  240. Dynamics of multivalued linear operators
  241. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  242. Linear dynamics of semigroups generated by differential operators
  243. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  244. Isomorphism theorems for some parabolic initial-boundary value problems in Hörmander spaces
  245. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  246. Determination of a diffusion coefficient in a quasilinear parabolic equation
  247. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  248. Homogeneous two-point problem for PDE of the second order in time variable and infinite order in spatial variables
  249. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  250. A nonlinear plate control without linearization
  251. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  252. Reduction of a Schwartz-type boundary value problem for biharmonic monogenic functions to Fredholm integral equations
  253. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  254. Inverse problem for a physiologically structured population model with variable-effort harvesting
  255. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  256. Existence of solutions for delay evolution equations with nonlocal conditions
  257. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  258. Comments on behaviour of solutions of elliptic quasi-linear problems in a neighbourhood of boundary singularities
  259. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  260. Coupled fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces endowed with a directed graph and application
  261. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  262. Existence of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic degenerate anisotropic equations
  263. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  264. Integro-differential systems with variable exponents of nonlinearity
  265. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  266. Elliptic operators on refined Sobolev scales on vector bundles
  267. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  268. Multiplicity solutions of a class fractional Schrödinger equations
  269. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  270. Determining of right-hand side of higher order ultraparabolic equation
  271. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  272. Asymptotic approximation for the solution to a semi-linear elliptic problem in a thin aneurysm-type domain
  273. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  274. Learnheuristics: hybridizing metaheuristics with machine learning for optimization with dynamic inputs
  275. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  276. Nature–inspired metaheuristic algorithms to find near–OGR sequences for WDM channel allocation and their performance comparison
  277. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  278. Monomial codes seen as invariant subspaces
  279. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  280. Expert knowledge and data analysis for detecting advanced persistent threats
  281. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  282. Feedback equivalence of convolutional codes over finite rings
Downloaded on 31.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2017-0015/html
Scroll to top button