Home Rings in which elements are the sum of a nilpotent and a root of a fixed polynomial that commute
Article Open Access

Rings in which elements are the sum of a nilpotent and a root of a fixed polynomial that commute

  • Ali H. Handam EMAIL logo and Hani A. Khashan
Published/Copyright: April 17, 2017

Abstract

An element in a ring R with identity is said to be strongly nil clean if it is the sum of an idempotent and a nilpotent that commute, R is said to be strongly nil clean if every element of R is strongly nil clean. Let C(R) be the center of a ring R and g(x) be a fixed polynomial in C(R)[x]. Then R is said to be strongly g(x)-nil clean if every element in R is a sum of a nilpotent and a root of g(x) that commute. In this paper, we give some relations between strongly nil clean rings and strongly g(x)-nil clean rings. Various basic properties of strongly g(x) -nil cleans are proved and many examples are given.

MSC 2010: 16N40; 16U99

1 Introduction

Let R be an associative ring with identity. Following [10], we define an element r of a ring R to be clean if there is an idempotent eR and a unit uR such that r = u + e. A clean ring is defined to be one in which every element is clean. Clean rings were first introduced by Nicholson [10] as a class of exchange rings. In [11], an element r of a ring R is defined to be strongly clean provided that there exist an idempotent eR and a unit uR such that r = e + u and eu = ue. Analogously, a strongly clean ring is one in which every element is strongly clean. In [7], Diesl introduced the concept of strongly nil cleanness. An element rR is strongly nil clean provided that there exist an idempotent eR and a nilpotent element nR such that r = n + e and ne = en. Recently, the concept of nil clean rings was generalized to g(x)-nil clean rings (see Khashan and Handam [9]). We refer the reader to [1, 46, 14] for a survey on nil clean rings.

Let C(R) denote the center of a ring R and g(x) be a polynomial in C(R)[x]. Following Camillo and Simón [2], R is called g(x)-clean if for each rR, there exist a unit uR and sR such that r = s + u and g(s) = 0. Of course (x2x)-clean rings are clean rings.

Nicholson and Zhou [12] proved that if g(x) ∈ (xa)(xb)C(R)[x] where a, bC(R) are such that b and ba are both units in R and RM is a semisimple left R-module, then End(RM) is g(x)-clean. In 2008, Fan and Yang [8], studied more properties of g(x)-clean rings. Among many conclusions, they proved that if g(x) ∈ (xa)(xb)C(R)[x] where a, bC(R) with ba a unit in R, then R is a clean ring if and only if R is (xa)(xb)-clean. Recently, Khashan and Handam [9] completely determined the relation between nil clean rings and g(x)-nil clean rings.

In this paper, we define and study strongly g(x)-nil clean rings. For a ring R and g(x) ∈ C(R)[x], We say that rR is strongly g(x)-nil clean provided that there exist a nilpotent bR and sR such that r = s + b, g(s) = 0 and sb = bs. Moreover, R is called strongly g(x)-nil clean if every element in R is strongly g(x)-nil clean.

In section 2, we define the concept of strongly g(x)-nil clean and some general properties of strongly g(x)-nil clean rings are given. In section 3, we determine the relation between strongly nil clean rings and strongly g(x)-nil clean rings and we give many characterizations for a strongly nil clean ring R in terms of some strongly g(x)-nil clean rings.

Throughout this article, U(R), Id(R) and N(R) will denote, respectively, the group of units, the set of idempotents and the set of nilpotent elements in R. We write Mn(R) and Tn(R) for the rings of all n × n matrices and all upper triangular matrices over R, respectively. The ring of integers modulo n is denoted by ℤn.

2 Strongly g(x)-nil clean rings

We study in this section the basic properties of strongly g(x)-nil clean rings, and some examples are given.

Definition 2.1

Let R be a ring and g(x) be a fixed polynomial in C(R)[x]. An element rR is called strongly g(x)-nil clean if r = n + s where nN(R), g(s) = 0 and ns = sn. A ring R is called strongly g(x)-nil clean if each of its elements is strongly g(x)-nil clean.

Clearly, every strongly g(x)-nil clean ring is g(x)-nil clean. Moreover, the two concepts coincide in the commutative case. However, the converse need not be true in non commutative rings. For example, one can see that the ring M2(ℤ2) is (x4 + x2)-nil clean which is not strongly (x4 + x2)-nil clean.

Proposition 2.2

Every strongly g(x)-nil clean ring is strongly g(x)-clean.

Proof

Suppose R is a strongly g(x)-nil clean ring and let rR. Write r − 1 = n + s where nN(R), g(s) = 0 and ns = sn. Then r = (n + 1) + s where n + 1 ∈ U(R) and (n + 1)s = s(n + 1) . Hence, R is strongly g(x)-clean.     □

The converse of Proposition 2.2 is not true in general. For example, simple computations show that the non strongly (x4 + x2)-nil clean ring M2(ℤ2) is strongly (x4 + x2)-clean.

For any two rings R and S, consider the ring homomorphism η : C(R) → C(S) with η(1R) = 1S. If g(x)= i=0naixiC(R)[x], we let gη(x):=i=0nη(ai)xiC(S)[x]. In particular, if g(x) ∈ ℤ[x], then gη(x) = g(x).

Next, we give some properties of the class of strongly g(x)-nil clean rings. The proof of the following proposition is straightforward.

Proposition 2.3

Let R and S be two rings, η : RS be a ring epimorphism and g(x) ∈ C(R)[x]. If R is strongly g(x)-nil clean, then S is strongly gη(x)-nil clean.

Corollary 2.4

Let R be a ring.

  1. If R is a strongly g(x)-nil clean ring and I is an ideal of R, then R/I is strongly gη(x)-nil clean where η : RR/I is defined by η(r) = r + I.

  2. If the formal power series ring R[[t]] is strongly g(x)-nil clean, then R is strongly gη(x)-nil clean where

    η : R[[t]] → R is defined by η(i=0aiti)=a0.

Corollary 2.5

Let R be a ring and 1 < n ∈ ℕ. If Tn(R) is strongly g(x)-nil clean, then R is strongly gη(x)-nil clean.

Proof

Define η : Tn(R) → R by η(A) = a11 where A = (aij) ∈ Tn(R). Then clearly η is a ring epimorphism and R is strongly gη(x)-nil clean.     □

Proposition 2.6

Let R1, R2, Rk be rings and g(x) ∈ ℤ[x]. Then R=i=1kRi is strongly g(x)-nil clean if and only if Ri is strongly g(x)-nil clean for all i ∈ {1, 2, …, k}.

Proof

⇒) : For each i ∈ {1, 2, …, k}, Ri is a homomorphic image of i=1kRi under the projection homomorphism. Hence, Ri is strongly g(x)-nil clean by Proposition 2.3.

⇐) : Let r=(x1,x2,...,xk)i=1kRi. For each i, write xi = ni + si where niN(Ri), g(si) = 0 and nisi = sini. Let n = (n1, n2, nk) and s = (s1, s2, sk). Then r = n + s where clearly nN(R), g(s) = 0 and ns = sn. Therefore, R is strongly g(x)-nil clean.     □

Proposition 2.7

If R is a commutative ring, then the ring of polynomials R[t] is not strongly nil clean (and hence not strongly (x2x)-nil clean).

Proof

It is well known that N(R[t]) = {a0 + a1t + … + aktk : aiN(R)} and Id(R[t]) = Id(R). Suppose t = (a0 + a1t + … + aktk) + e where aiN(R) and e2 = e. Then a1 = 1 ∈ N(R) which is a contradiction. Therefore, R[t] is not strongly nil clean.     □

The converse of (1) in Corollary 2.4 is not true in general. For example, the field ℤ2 ≃ ℤ2[x]/〈x〉 is strongly (x2x)-nil clean but ℤ2[x] is not strongly (x2x)-nil clean by Proposition 2.7.

Let A and B be rings, BMA be a bimodule and consider the formal triangular matrix T=A0MB. If g(x)= a00m0b0+a10m1b1x+...+an0mnbnxnC(T)[x], then clearly gA(x) = a0 + a1x + … + anxnC(A)[x] and gB(x) = b0 + b1x + … + bnxnC(B)[x].

Proposition 2.8

Let A and B be rings and let BMA be a bimodule. If T=A0MB is strongly g(x)-nil clean for some g(x) ∈ C(T)[x], then A is strongly gA(x)-nil clean and B is strongly gB(x)-nil clean.

Proof

Suppose that T=A0MB is strongly g(x)-nil clean. For every aA, bB, mM, write a0mb=n10n2n3+s10s2s3wheren10n2n3N(T),g(s10s2s3)=0andn10n2n3s10s2s3=s10s2s3n10n2n3. Then a = n1 + s1 and b = n3 + s3. It is easy to see that n1N(A), n3N(B), gA(s1) = gB(s3) = 0, n1s1 = s1n1 and n3s3 = s3n3. Therefore, A is a strongly gA(x)-nil clean and B is a strongly gB(x)-nil clean.     □

3 Strongly (x2 + cx + d)-nil clean rings

In this section, we consider some types of strongly (x2 + cx + d)-nil clean rings and we will investigate the relation between strongly g(x)-nil clean rings and strongly nil clean rings.

Theorem 3.1

Let R be a ring and a, bC(R). Then R is strongly nil clean with baN(R) if and only if R is strongly (x − (a + 1))(xb)-nil clean.

Proof

⇒) : Suppose R is strongly nil clean with baN(R) and let rR. Then r(a+1)(ba)1=e+n, where e2 = e, nN(R) and en = ne. Therefore, r = [e((ba) − 1) + (a + 1)] + n((ba) − 1). Write s = [e((ba) − 1) + (a + 1)] and v = n((ba) − 1). Then r = s + v where clearly vN(R) and sv = vs. Moreover, s is a root of (x − (a + 1))(xb) since

[e((ba)1)+(a+1)(a+1)][e((ba)1)+(a+1)b]=e2((ba)1)2e((ba)1)((ba)1)=0

Hence, R is strongly (x − (a + 1))(xb)-nil clean.

⇐) : Suppose R is a strongly (x − (a + 1))(xb)-nil clean. Write a = s + n where nN(R), (s − (a + 1))(sb) = 0 and sn = ns. Then, saN(R) and so s − (a + 1) ∈ U(R). Therefore, s = b and baN(R). Now, let rR. By the assumption, we can write r((ba) − 1) + (a + 1) = s + n where nN(R), s is a root of (x − (a + 1))(xb) and sn = ns. Thus, r = t + m where t = (s − (a + 1))((ba) − 1)−1 and m = n((ba) − 1)− 1. Since a, bC(R), it is clear that mN(R) and tm = mt. Moreover,

t2=((s(a+1))((ba)1)1)2=(s(a+1))(sb+b(a+1))((ba)1)2=(s(a+1))(sb)+(s(a+1))(b(a+1))((ba)1)2=(s(a+1))((ba)1)1=t

Therefore, R is strongly nil clean.     □

Lemma 3.2

([7]). If a ring R is nil clean, then 2 is a (central) nilpotent element in R.

As 2 is a central nilpotent in any (strongly) nil clean ring R, then 2nN(R) for any integer n. On the other hand, a non zero strongly g(x)-nil clean ring can’t have a nilpotent of the form 2n + 1 since otherwise 1 ∈ N(R) which is a contradiction. Next, we give some special cases of Theorem 3.1.

Corollary 3.3

Let R be a ring and n ∈ ℤ. For any bC(R), the following conditions are equivalent

  1. R is strongly nil clean.

  2. R is strongly (x2 − (2b + 1)x + b(b + l))-nil clean.

  3. R is strongly (x2 − (2b + 1 − 2n)x + (b2 + b(1 − 2n))-nil clean.

  4. R is strongly (x2 − (2b + 1 + 2n) x + (b2 + b(1 + 2n))-nil clean.

Proof

In Theorem 3.1, we take a = b to get (1) ⇔ (2), a = b − 2n to get (1) ⇔(3) and a = b + 2n to get (1) ⇔(4).     □

For example, strongly nil clean, strongly (x2 − 3x + 2)-nil clean, strongly (x2 − 5x + 6)-nil clean, strongly (x2 + x)-nil clean, strongly (x2 + 3x)-nil clean and strongly (x2 − 3x)-nil clean rings are all equivalent.

Remark 3.4

The equivalence in Theorem 3.1 of strongly nil clean rings and (x − (a + 1))(xb)-nil clean rings is a global property. That is, it holds for a ring R but it may fail for a single element. For example, 1 ∈ ℤ10 is (strongly) nil clean but it is not (strongly) (x2 + x)-nil clean in10.

Let R be a strongly g(x)-nil clean ring and suppose 0 = s + n where nN(R), g(s) = 0 and ns = sn. If s is a unit, then clearly R = {0}. In particular, if g(x) = xn − 1 or g(x) = xn + 1, then the only strongly g(x)-nil clean ring is the zero ring. Therefore, we give the following definition.

Definition 3.5

A ring R is called strongly g(x)-nil* clean if for every 0 ≠ rR, r = s + n where nN(R), g(s) = 0 and ns = sn.

It is clear that every strongly g(x)-nil clean ring is strongly g(x)-nil*clean. Moreover, the converse is true if there is a non unit root s of g(x) such that 0 = s + b for some bN(R). In particular, strongly g(x)-nil clean rings and strongly g(x)-nil* clean rings coincide if all roots of g(x) are non unit. However, there are examples of strongly g(x)-nil*clean rings which are not strongly g(x)-nil clean.

Example 3.6

For any prime integer p, the fieldp is strongly (xp − 1 − 1)-nil* clean which is not strongly (xp − 1 − 1)-nil clean. In fact by Fermat’s Theorem, any non zero element inp is a root of xp − 1−1 and sop is strongly (xp − 1−1)-nil* clean. On the other hand, the element 0 can’t be written as a sum of a nilpotent and a root of xp − 1 − 1. Therefore, ℤp is not (xp − 1 − 1)-nil clean.

In general, we prove in the next example that for any polynomial g(x) ∈ C(R)[x] with a unit constant term, R is not strongly g(x)-nil clean.

Example 3.7

Let g(x) = xn + an − 1xn − 1 + … + a1x + a0C(R)[x] where R is a non zero ring and n ∈ ℕ. If a0U(R), then R is not strongly g(x)-nil clean. In particular, R is not strongly (xn ± 1)-nil clean.

Proof

Suppose R is strongly g(x)-nil clean. If we write 0 = s + r where rN(R), g(s) = 0 and rs = sr, then s(sn − 1 + an − 1sn−2 + … + a1) = −a0U(R) and so sU(R) . But, also s = −rN(R), so 1 = 0 and R = {0}, a contradiction.     □

Next, for any n ∈ ℕ, we give in the following proposition a characterization of strongly (xn − 1)-nil*clean rings. The proof is trivial.

Proposition 3.8

Let R be a ring and n ∈ ℕ. Then R is strongly (xn − 1)-nil* clean if and only if for every 0 ≠ rR, r = v + b where bN(R), vn = 1 and vb = bv.

Since in any ring, the sum of a unit and a nilpotent that commute is again a unit, then we conclude by Proposition 3.8 that any strongly (xn − 1)-nil* clean ring is a division ring.

Proposition 3.9

Let R be a ring and 2 ≤ n ∈ ℕ. If R is strongly (xn − 1 − 1)-nil* clean, then R is strongly (xnx)- nil clean. Moreover, the converse is true if for every 0 ≠ aR, (a + 1)R (or\ R(a + 1)) does not contain non trivial idempotents.

Proof

Suppose R is strongly (xn − 1 − 1)-nil*clean. If r = 0, then clearly r is a strongly (xnx)-nil clean element. Suppose 0 ≠ rR. Then r = v + a where aN(R) and vn − 1 = 1 and so v is a root of xnx. Therefore, R is strongly (xnx)-nil clean. Now, suppose that for every aR, (a + 1)R contains no non trivial idempotents and R is strongly (xnx)-nil clean. Let 0 ≠ rR and write r = s + a where aN(R), sn = s and sa = as. Then rsn − 1 = s + asn − 1 and so r (1 − sn − 1) = a(1 − sn − 1). If we set y = 1 + a, then yU(R) and (r + 1)(1 − sn − 1) = (a + 1)(1 − sn − 1) = y (1 − sn − 1). Now, clearly y(1 − sn − 1)y− 1 is an idempotent with y(1 − sn − 1)y− 1 = (r + 1)(1 − sn − 1)y− 1 ∈ (r + 1)R. By assumption, y(1 − sn − 1)y− 1 = 0 and so 1 − sn − 1 = 0. Therefore, s is a root of xn − 1 − 1 and R is strongly (xn − 1 − 1)-nil*clean.     □

For a ring R and n ∈ ℕ, let Un (R) denotes the set of elements in R that can be written as a sum of no more than n units.

Proposition 3.10

Let R be a ring and g(x) = xn + an−1xn − 1 + … + a1x + a0C(R)[x] where n ∈ ℕ and a0U(R). If R is strongly g(x)-nil* clean, then R = U2(R). In particular if R is strongly (xn − 2 + xn − 3 + … + x + 1)-nil* clean, then R = U2(R) is strongly (xnx)-nil clean.

Proof

Let 1 ≠ rR and write r − 1 = s + b where bN(R), sn + an − 1 sn − 1 + … + a1s + a0 = 0 and sb = bs. Then r = s + (b + 1) where b + 1 ∈ U(R). Since also, s(sn − 1 + an − 1 sn − 2 + … +a1) = −a0U(R), then sU(R). Thus, rU2(R). Since also 1 ∈ U2(R), then R = U2(R). Now, suppose R is strongly (xn − 2 + xn − 3 + … + x + 1)-nil* clean. Then R = U2(R) by taking a0=1 ∈ U(R). If r = 0, then r is clearly a strongly (xnx)-nil clean element. Let 0 ≠ rR and write r = s + b where bN(R), sn − 2 + sn − 3 + … + s + 1 = 0 and sb = bs. Then sns = s(s − 1)(sn − 2 + sn − 3 + … + s + 1) = 0 and so R is strongly (xnx)-nil clean.     □

By choosing n = 4 in Proposition 3.10, we conclude that if R is strongly (x2 + x + 1)-nil*clean, then R = U2(R) is strongly (x4x)-nil clean. Also, we have R = U2(R) if R is strongly (xn ± 1)-nil*clean.

Lemma 3.11

Let R be a Boolean ring and G any cyclic group of order p (prime). Then all elements of the group ring RG are roots of g(x) = x2p−1x.

By taking for example p = 3 in Lemma 3.11, we see that the group ring ℤ2(C3) is (strongly) (x4x)-nil clean which is not strongly nil clean. Moreover, the field ℤ3 is (strongly) (x3x)-nil clean which is not strongly nil clean. Therefore, strongly (xnx)-nil cleanness of a ring R does not imply strongly nil cleanness of R whether n is odd or even.

In the following proposition, we can see that (xnx)-nil clean and (xn + x)-nil clean rings coincide for any even integer n. The proof can be easily verified.

Proposition 3.12

Let R be a ring, n ∈ ℕ and a, bR. Then R is strongly (ax2nbx)-nil clean if and only if R is strongly (ax2n + bx)-nil clean.

By Proposition 3.12 and Lemma 3.11, we conclude that ℤ2(Cp) is also (x2p−1 + x)-nil clean for any prime p. However, one can see that Proposition 3.12 need not be true for odd degrees. For example, the field ℤ3 is strongly (x3x)-nil clean which is not strongly (x3 + x)-nil clean.

Recall that an element p in a ring R is called periodic if pk = pm for some distinct positive integers k and m. Equivalently, p is periodic if p is a root of g(x) = x2nxn for some positive integer n. R is called periodic if every element in R is periodic. In the following Lemma, we can see a sufficient condition for a ring to be periodic.

Lemma 3.13

([3]). Let R be a ring. If for each xR, there is n ∈ ℕ and p(x) ∈ ℤ[x] such that xn = xn+1p(x), then R is periodic.

In the following Theorem, periodic rings are characterized as strongly (xnx)-nil clean rings for some n ∈ ℕ. This Theorem is essentially proved in [13]. However, for the sake of completeness, we shall give the proof.

Theorem 3.14

The following are equivalent for a ring R.

  1. R is periodic.

  2. R is a strongly (xnx)-nil clean rings for some n ∈ ℕ.

  3. For every rR, there exists k ∈ ℕ and a ∈ 〈rsuch that rk = rk+1a.

Proof

(1) ⇒ (2) : Suppose R is periodic and let rR. Then there exists k ∈ ℕ such that r2k = rk. Let s = rk+1 and b = rrk+1. Then r = s + b where clearly s is a root of g(x) = xk+1x, bk = 0 and sb = bs. Therefore, R is a strongly (xk+1x)-nil clean.

(2)⇒ (3) : Suppose R is strongly (xnx)-nil clean for some n ∈ ℕ. Let rR and write r = s + b where sns = 0, bN(R) and sb = bs. Now, rrn = (s + b) − (s + b)n = b + bt where t ∈ 〈s, b〉 and so rrnN(R). By simple computations, there exists k ∈ ℕ such that rk = rk+1 a where a ∈ 〈r〉.

(3) ⇒ (1) : Lemma 3.13. □

References

[1] Breaz S., Călugăreanu G., Danchev P., Micu T., Nil-clean matrix rings, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 2013, 439(10), 3115–3119.10.1016/j.laa.2013.08.027Search in Google Scholar

[2] Camillo V.P., Simón J.J., The Nicholson-Varadarajan theorem on clean linear transformations, Glasgow Math. J., 2002, 44, 365-369.10.1017/S0017089502030021Search in Google Scholar

[3] Chacron M., On a theorem of Herstein, Cand. J. Math., 1969, 21, 1348-1353.10.4153/CJM-1969-148-5Search in Google Scholar

[4] Chen H., Strongly nil clean matrices over R[x]/(x2 – 1), Bull. Korean Math. Soc, 2012, 49(3), 589-599.10.4134/BKMS.2012.49.3.589Search in Google Scholar

[5] Chen H., On Strongly Nil Clean Matrices, Communications in Algebra, 2013, 41(3), 1074-1086.10.1080/00927872.2011.637265Search in Google Scholar

[6] Diesl A.J., Classes of Strongly Clean Rings, PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Diesl A.J., Nil clean rings, Journal of Algebra, 2013, 383, 197-211.10.1016/j.jalgebra.2013.02.020Search in Google Scholar

[8] Fan L., Yang X., On rings whose elements are the sum of a unit and a root of a fixed polynomial, Communications in Algebra, 2008, 36, 269-278.10.1080/00927870701665461Search in Google Scholar

[9] Khashan H.A., Handam A.H, g(x)- nil clean rings, Scienticae Mathematicae Japonicae, 2016, 2, 145-154.10.12732/ijpam.v114i2.3Search in Google Scholar

[10] Nicholson W.K., Lifting idempotents and exchange rings, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 1977, 229, 269–278.10.1090/S0002-9947-1977-0439876-2Search in Google Scholar

[11] Nicholson W.K., Strongly clean rings and Fitting’s lemma, Communications in Algebra, 1999, 27, 3583–3592.10.1080/00927879908826649Search in Google Scholar

[12] Nicholson W.K., Zhou ., Endomorphisms that are the sum of a unit and a root of a fixed polynomial, Canad. Math. Bull., 2006, 49, 265-269.10.4153/CMB-2006-027-6Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ôhori M., On strongly π-regular rings and periodic rings, Mathematical Journal of Okayama University, 1985, 27(1), 49-52.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Sahebi S., Jahandar M., A note on uniquely (nil) clean ring, Journal of Linear and Topological Algebra, 2012, 1(2), 65-67.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-1-12
Accepted: 2017-2-2
Published Online: 2017-4-17

© 2017 Handam and Khashan

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Integrals of Frullani type and the method of brackets
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Edge of chaos in reaction diffusion CNN model
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Calculus using proximities: a mathematical approach in which students can actually prove theorems
  7. Regular Articles
  8. An investigation on hyper S-posets over ordered semihypergroups
  9. Regular Articles
  10. The Leibniz algebras whose subalgebras are ideals
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Fixed point and multidimensional fixed point theorems with applications to nonlinear matrix equations in terms of weak altering distance functions
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Matrix rank and inertia formulas in the analysis of general linear models
  15. Regular Articles
  16. The hybrid power mean of quartic Gauss sums and Kloosterman sums
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Tauberian theorems for statistically (C,1,1) summable double sequences of fuzzy numbers
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Some properties of graded comultiplication modules
  21. Regular Articles
  22. The characterizations of upper approximation operators based on special coverings
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Bi-integrable and tri-integrable couplings of a soliton hierarchy associated with SO(4)
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Dynamics for a discrete competition and cooperation model of two enterprises with multiple delays and feedback controls
  27. Regular Articles
  28. A new view of relationship between atomic posets and complete (algebraic) lattices
  29. Regular Articles
  30. A class of extensions of Restricted (s, t)-Wythoff’s game
  31. Regular Articles
  32. New bounds for the minimum eigenvalue of 𝓜-tensors
  33. Regular Articles
  34. Shintani and Shimura lifts of cusp forms on certain arithmetic groups and their applications
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Empirical likelihood for quantile regression models with response data missing at random
  37. Regular Articles
  38. Convex combination of analytic functions
  39. Regular Articles
  40. On the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank-two matrices
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Uniform topology on EQ-algebras
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Integrations on rings
  45. Regular Articles
  46. The quasilinear parabolic kirchhoff equation
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Avoiding rainbow 2-connected subgraphs
  49. Regular Articles
  50. On non-Hopfian groups of fractions
  51. Regular Articles
  52. Singularly perturbed hyperbolic problems on metric graphs: asymptotics of solutions
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Rings in which elements are the sum of a nilpotent and a root of a fixed polynomial that commute
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Superstability of functional equations related to spherical functions
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Evaluation of the convolution sum involving the sum of divisors function for 22, 44 and 52
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Weighted minimal translation surfaces in the Galilean space with density
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Complete convergence for weighted sums of pairwise independent random variables
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Binomials transformation formulae for scaled Fibonacci numbers
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Growth functions for some uniformly amenable groups
  67. Regular Articles
  68. Hopf bifurcations in a three-species food chain system with multiple delays
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Oscillation and nonoscillation of half-linear Euler type differential equations with different periodic coefficients
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Osculating curves in 4-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index 2
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Some new facts about group 𝒢 generated by the family of convergent permutations
  75. Regular Articles
  76. lnfinitely many solutions for fractional Schrödinger equations with perturbation via variational methods
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Supersolvable orders and inductively free arrangements
  79. Regular Articles
  80. Asymptotically almost automorphic solutions of differential equations with piecewise constant argument
  81. Regular Articles
  82. Finite groups whose all second maximal subgroups are cyclic
  83. Regular Articles
  84. Semilinear systems with a multi-valued nonlinear term
  85. Regular Articles
  86. Positive solutions for Hadamard differential systems with fractional integral conditions on an unbounded domain
  87. Regular Articles
  88. Calibration and simulation of Heston model
  89. Regular Articles
  90. One kind sixth power mean of the three-term exponential sums
  91. Regular Articles
  92. Cyclic pairs and common best proximity points in uniformly convex Banach spaces
  93. Regular Articles
  94. The uniqueness of meromorphic functions in k-punctured complex plane
  95. Regular Articles
  96. Normalizers of intermediate congruence subgroups of the Hecke subgroups
  97. Regular Articles
  98. The hyperbolicity constant of infinite circulant graphs
  99. Regular Articles
  100. Scott convergence and fuzzy Scott topology on L-posets
  101. Regular Articles
  102. One sided strong laws for random variables with infinite mean
  103. Regular Articles
  104. The join of split graphs whose completely regular endomorphisms form a monoid
  105. Regular Articles
  106. A new branch and bound algorithm for minimax ratios problems
  107. Regular Articles
  108. Upper bound estimate of incomplete Cochrane sum
  109. Regular Articles
  110. Value distributions of solutions to complex linear differential equations in angular domains
  111. Regular Articles
  112. The nonlinear diffusion equation of the ideal barotropic gas through a porous medium
  113. Regular Articles
  114. The Sheffer stroke operation reducts of basic algebras
  115. Regular Articles
  116. Extensions and improvements of Sherman’s and related inequalities for n-convex functions
  117. Regular Articles
  118. Classification lattices are geometric for complete atomistic lattices
  119. Regular Articles
  120. Possible numbers of x’s in an {x, y}-matrix with a given rank
  121. Regular Articles
  122. New error bounds for linear complementarity problems of weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrices
  123. Regular Articles
  124. Boundedness of vector-valued B-singular integral operators in Lebesgue spaces
  125. Regular Articles
  126. On the Golomb’s conjecture and Lehmer’s numbers
  127. Regular Articles
  128. Some applications of the Archimedean copulas in the proof of the almost sure central limit theorem for ordinary maxima
  129. Regular Articles
  130. Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  131. Regular Articles
  132. Corrigendum to: Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  133. Regular Articles
  134. Convergence and stability of generalized φ-weak contraction mapping in CAT(0) spaces
  135. Regular Articles
  136. Triple solutions for a Dirichlet boundary value problem involving a perturbed discrete p(k)-Laplacian operator
  137. Regular Articles
  138. OD-characterization of alternating groups Ap+d
  139. Regular Articles
  140. On Jordan mappings of inverse semirings
  141. Regular Articles
  142. On generalized Ehresmann semigroups
  143. Regular Articles
  144. On topological properties of spaces obtained by the double band matrix
  145. Regular Articles
  146. Representing derivatives of Chebyshev polynomials by Chebyshev polynomials and related questions
  147. Regular Articles
  148. Chain conditions on composite Hurwitz series rings
  149. Regular Articles
  150. Coloring subgraphs with restricted amounts of hues
  151. Regular Articles
  152. An extension of the method of brackets. Part 1
  153. Regular Articles
  154. Branch-delete-bound algorithm for globally solving quadratically constrained quadratic programs
  155. Regular Articles
  156. Strong edge geodetic problem in networks
  157. Regular Articles
  158. Ricci solitons on almost Kenmotsu 3-manifolds
  159. Regular Articles
  160. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions sharing two finite sets
  161. Regular Articles
  162. On the fourth-order linear recurrence formula related to classical Gauss sums
  163. Regular Articles
  164. Dynamical behavior for a stochastic two-species competitive model
  165. Regular Articles
  166. Two new eigenvalue localization sets for tensors and theirs applications
  167. Regular Articles
  168. κ-strong sequences and the existence of generalized independent families
  169. Regular Articles
  170. Commutators of Littlewood-Paley gκ -functions on non-homogeneous metric measure spaces
  171. Regular Articles
  172. On decompositions of estimators under a general linear model with partial parameter restrictions
  173. Regular Articles
  174. Groups and monoids of Pythagorean triples connected to conics
  175. Regular Articles
  176. Hom-Lie superalgebra structures on exceptional simple Lie superalgebras of vector fields
  177. Regular Articles
  178. Numerical methods for the multiplicative partial differential equations
  179. Regular Articles
  180. Solvable Leibniz algebras with NFn Fm1 nilradical
  181. Regular Articles
  182. Evaluation of the convolution sums ∑al+bm=n lσ(l) σ(m) with ab ≤ 9
  183. Regular Articles
  184. A study on soft rough semigroups and corresponding decision making applications
  185. Regular Articles
  186. Some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions with applications
  187. Regular Articles
  188. Deficiency of forests
  189. Regular Articles
  190. Perfect codes in power graphs of finite groups
  191. Regular Articles
  192. A new compact finite difference quasilinearization method for nonlinear evolution partial differential equations
  193. Regular Articles
  194. Does any convex quadrilateral have circumscribed ellipses?
  195. Regular Articles
  196. The dynamic of a Lie group endomorphism
  197. Regular Articles
  198. On pairs of equations in unlike powers of primes and powers of 2
  199. Regular Articles
  200. Differential subordination and convexity criteria of integral operators
  201. Regular Articles
  202. Quantitative relations between short intervals and exceptional sets of cubic Waring-Goldbach problem
  203. Regular Articles
  204. On θ-commutators and the corresponding non-commuting graphs
  205. Regular Articles
  206. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of Laplace (1, 1) for GARCH models
  207. Regular Articles
  208. Multiple and sign-changing solutions for discrete Robin boundary value problem with parameter dependence
  209. Regular Articles
  210. Fundamental relation on m-idempotent hyperrings
  211. Regular Articles
  212. A novel recursive method to reconstruct multivariate functions on the unit cube
  213. Regular Articles
  214. Nabla inequalities and permanence for a logistic integrodifferential equation on time scales
  215. Regular Articles
  216. Enumeration of spanning trees in the sequence of Dürer graphs
  217. Regular Articles
  218. Quotient of information matrices in comparison of linear experiments for quadratic estimation
  219. Regular Articles
  220. Fourier series of functions involving higher-order ordered Bell polynomials
  221. Regular Articles
  222. Simple modules over Auslander regular rings
  223. Regular Articles
  224. Weighted multilinear p-adic Hardy operators and commutators
  225. Regular Articles
  226. Guaranteed cost finite-time control of positive switched nonlinear systems with D-perturbation
  227. Regular Articles
  228. A modified quasi-boundary value method for an abstract ill-posed biparabolic problem
  229. Regular Articles
  230. Extended Riemann-Liouville type fractional derivative operator with applications
  231. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  232. The algebraic size of the family of injective operators
  233. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  234. The history of a general criterium on spaceability
  235. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  236. On sequences not enjoying Schur’s property
  237. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  238. A hierarchy in the family of real surjective functions
  239. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  240. Dynamics of multivalued linear operators
  241. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  242. Linear dynamics of semigroups generated by differential operators
  243. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  244. Isomorphism theorems for some parabolic initial-boundary value problems in Hörmander spaces
  245. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  246. Determination of a diffusion coefficient in a quasilinear parabolic equation
  247. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  248. Homogeneous two-point problem for PDE of the second order in time variable and infinite order in spatial variables
  249. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  250. A nonlinear plate control without linearization
  251. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  252. Reduction of a Schwartz-type boundary value problem for biharmonic monogenic functions to Fredholm integral equations
  253. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  254. Inverse problem for a physiologically structured population model with variable-effort harvesting
  255. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  256. Existence of solutions for delay evolution equations with nonlocal conditions
  257. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  258. Comments on behaviour of solutions of elliptic quasi-linear problems in a neighbourhood of boundary singularities
  259. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  260. Coupled fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces endowed with a directed graph and application
  261. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  262. Existence of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic degenerate anisotropic equations
  263. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  264. Integro-differential systems with variable exponents of nonlinearity
  265. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  266. Elliptic operators on refined Sobolev scales on vector bundles
  267. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  268. Multiplicity solutions of a class fractional Schrödinger equations
  269. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  270. Determining of right-hand side of higher order ultraparabolic equation
  271. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  272. Asymptotic approximation for the solution to a semi-linear elliptic problem in a thin aneurysm-type domain
  273. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  274. Learnheuristics: hybridizing metaheuristics with machine learning for optimization with dynamic inputs
  275. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  276. Nature–inspired metaheuristic algorithms to find near–OGR sequences for WDM channel allocation and their performance comparison
  277. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  278. Monomial codes seen as invariant subspaces
  279. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  280. Expert knowledge and data analysis for detecting advanced persistent threats
  281. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  282. Feedback equivalence of convolutional codes over finite rings
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2017-0031/html
Scroll to top button