Home Oscillation and nonoscillation of half-linear Euler type differential equations with different periodic coefficients
Article Open Access

Oscillation and nonoscillation of half-linear Euler type differential equations with different periodic coefficients

  • Adil Misir EMAIL logo and Banu Mermerkaya
Published/Copyright: May 4, 2017

Abstract

In this paper, we compute explicitly the oscillation constant for certain half-linear second-order differential equations having different periodic coefficients. Our result covers known result concerning half-linear Euler type differential equations with α—periodic positive coefficients. Additionally, our result is new and original in case that the least common multiple of these periods is not defined. We give an example and corollaries which illustrate cases that are solved with our result.

MSC 2010: 34C10

1 Introduction

An equation of the form

(1) ( r ( t ) Φ ( x ) ) + c ( t ) Φ ( x ) = 0 , Φ ( s ) = | s | p 2 s , p > 1 ,

is called half-linear differential equation, where r, c are continuous functions and r (t) > 0 was introduced for the first time in [1]. During the last decades, these equations have been widely studied in the literature. The name half-linear equation was introduced in [2]. This term is motivated by the fact that the solution space of these equations is homogeneous (likewise in the linear case) but not additive. Since the linear Sturmian theory extends verbatim to half-linear case (for details, we refer to Section 1.2 in [3]), we can classify Eq.(1) as oscillatory or nonoscillatory. It is well known that oscillation theory of Eq.(1) is very similar to that of the linear Sturm-Liouville differential equation, which is the special case of Eq.(1) for p = 2 ( see [4]).

Actually, we are interested in the conditional oscillation of half-linear differential equations with different periodic coefficients. We say that the equation

(2) ( r ( t ) Φ ( x ) ) + γ c ( t ) Φ ( x ) = 0

with positive coefficients is conditionally oscillatory if there exists a constant γ0 such that Eq.(2) is oscillatory for all γ > γ0 and nonoscillatory for all γ < γ0. The constant γ0 is called an oscillation constant (more precisely, oscillation constant of c with respect to r)of this equation.

Considerable effort has been made over the years to extend oscillation constant theory of half linear differential equation (1), see [5-10] and reference therein. According to our knowledge, the first attempt to this problem was made by Kneser in [11], where the oscillation constant for Cauchy-Euler differential equation

(3) x + γ t 2 x = 0 ,

(which is special case of Eq.(1) for p = 2 , r ( t ) = 1 and c ( t ) = 1 t 2 has been identified γ 0 = 1 4 and Eq.(3) is oscillatory if γ > 1 4 , nonoscillatory if γ > 1 4 . Additionally, x ( t ) = c 1 t + c 2 t log t is the general solution of Eq.(3) and nonoscillatory for γ > 1 4 .

The conditional oscillation of linear equations is studied, e.g., in [9, 10]. In [9, 12], the oscillation constant was obtained for linear equation with periodic coefficients. Using the notion of the principle solution, the main result of [9] was generalized in [8], where periodic half-linear equations were considered.

In [7] the half-linear Euler differential equation of the form

(4) ( Φ ( x ) ) + γ t p Φ ( x ) = 0 ,

and the half-linear Riemann-Weber differential equation of the form

(5) ( Φ ( x ) ) + 1 t p γ + μ log 2 t Φ ( x ) = 0 ,

was considered and it was shown that Eq.(4) is nonoscillatory if and only if γ γ p := p 1 p p and Eq.(5), with is nonoscillatory if μ < μ p := 1 2 p 1 p p 1 and oscillatory if μ > μp:

In [8], the half-linear differential equation of the form

(6) ( r ( t ) Φ ( x ) ) + γ c ( t ) t p Φ ( x ) = 0 ,

was considered for r, c being α—periodic, positive functions and it was shown that Eq.(6) is oscillatory if γ > K and nonoscillatory if γ < K, where K is given by

K = q p 1 α 0 α d τ r q 1 1 p 1 α 0 α c ( τ ) d τ 1

for p and q are conjugate numbers, i.e., 1 p + 1 q = 1. If the functions r, c are positive constants, then Eq.(6) is reduced to the half-linear Euler equation (4), whose oscillatory properties were studied in detail [4, 7] and references given therein.

In [6], Eq.(6) and the half-linear differential equation of the form

(7) ( r ( t ) Φ ( x ) ) + 1 t p γ c ( t ) + μ d ( t ) log 2 t Φ ( x ) = 0 ,

was considered positive, α—periodic functions r; c and d; which are defined on [0, ∞) and it was shown that Eq.(6) is oscillatory if and only if γγrc , where γrc is given by

γ r c := α p γ p 0 α r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 0 α c ( t ) d t ,

and in the limiting case γ = γrc Eq.(7) is nonoscillatory if μ < μrd and it is oscillatory if μ > μrd where μrd is given by

μ r d = α p μ p 0 α r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 0 α d ( t ) d t .

If the functions r, c, and d are positive constants, then Eq.(7) is reduced to the half-linear Rimann-Weber equation (5), whose oscillatory properties are studied in detail [4, 7] and references given therein.

In [13], the half-linear differential equation of the form

(8) ( r ( t ) Φ ( x ) ) + c ( t ) t p Φ ( x ) = 0

was considered for r: [a, ∞) → ℝ ,(a > 0) where r is a continuous function for which mean value M ( r 1 q ) := lim t 1 1 t a a + t r 1 q ( τ ) d τ exists and for which

0 < inf t [ a , ) r ( t ) sup t [ a , ) r ( t ) < h o l d s ,

and c: [a, ∞) → ℝ ,(a > 0), be a continuous function having mean value M ( c ) := lim t 1 1 t a a + t c ( τ ) d τ and it was shown that Eq.(8) is oscillatory if M (c) > Γ and nonoscillatory if M (c) > Γ, where Γ is given by

Γ = q p [ M ( r 1 q ) ] 1 p .

Our goal is to find the explicit oscillation constant for Eq.(7) with periodic coefficients having different periods. We point out that the main motivation of our research comes from the paper [6], where the oscillation constant was computed for Eq.(7) with the periodic coefficients having the same α—period. But in that paper the oscillation constant wasn’t obtained for the periodic functions having different periods and consequently for the case when the least common multiple of these periodic coefficients is not defined. Thus in this paper we investigate the oscillation constant for Eq.(7) with periodic coefficients having different periods. For the sake of simplicity, we usually use the same notations as in the paper [6].

This paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we recall the concept of half-linear trigonometric functions and their properties. In section 3 we compute the oscillation constant for Eq.(7) with periodic coefficients having different periods. Additionally, we show that if the same periods are taken, then our result compiles with the known result in [4] or if the same period α, given in [6] can be chosen as the least common multiple of periods of the coefficients (which have different periods), then our result coincides with the result of [6]. Thus, our results extend and improve the results of [6]. Finally in the last section, we give an example to illustrate the importance of our result.

2 Preliminaries

We start this section with the recalling the concept of half-linear-trigonometric functions, see [3] or [4]. Consider the following special half-linear equation of the form

(9) ( Φ ( x ) ) + ( p 1 ) Φ ( x ) = 0 ,

and denote by x = x (t) its solution given by the initial conditions x (0) = 0, x′(0) = 1: We see that the behavior of this solution is very similar to the classical sine function. We denote this solution by sinp t and its derivative as (sinp t)′ =cosp t. These functions are pperiodic; where π p := 2 π p sin π p and satisfy the half-linear Pythagorean identity

(10) | sin p t | p + | cos p t | p = 1 , t R .

All solutions of Eq.(9) are of the form x (t) = C sinp (t + φ), where C, φ are real constants. All these solutions and their derivatives are bounded and periodic with the period p. The function u = Φ (cosp t) is a solution of the reciprocal equation to Eq.(9);

Φ 1 ( u ) + ( p 1 ) q 1 Φ 1 ( u ) = 0 , Φ 1 ( u ) = | u | q 2 u , q = p p 1 ,

which is an equation of the form as in Eq.(9), so the functions u and u' are also bounded.

Let x be a nontrivial solution of Eq.(1) and we consider the half-linear Prüfer transformation which is introduced using the half-linear trigonometric functions

(11) x ( t ) = ρ ( t ) sin p φ ( t ) , x ( t ) = r 1 q ( t ) ρ ( t ) t cos p φ ( t ) ,

where ρ ( t ) = | x ( t ) | p + r q ( t ) | x ( t ) | p and Prüfer angle φ is a continuous function defined at all points where x (t)≠0.

Let w ( t ) = r ( t ) Φ x ( t ) x ( t ) then w(t) is the solution of Riccati equation

(12) w + c ( t ) + ( p 1 ) r 1 q ( t ) | w | q = 0 ,

associated with Eq.(1).

Let v ( t ) = t p 1 w ( t ) = t p 1 r ( t ) Φ x ( t ) x ( t ) , then by using Eq.(11) we obtain v = Φ (cotp φ), where cot p φ = cos p φ sin p φ . If we use the fact that sinp t is a solution of Eq.(9), the function v satisfies the associated Riccati type equation

v = [ 1 p + ( 1 p ) | Φ ( cot p ) | q ] φ .

At the same time, using the fact that w solves Eq.(12), we obtain

v = ( p 1 ) t p 2 w t p 1 c ( t ) + ( p 1 ) r 1 q ( t ) | w | q = v t ( p 1 ) t p 1 c ( t ) ( p 1 ) t p 1 r 1 q ( t ) t 1 p w q = p 1 t v t p c ( t ) p 1 r 1 q ( t ) | cot p φ | p .

Combinig the last equation with Eq.(12) we get

( p 1 ) 1 + | cos p φ | p | sin p φ | p φ = p 1 t t p c ( t ) p 1 + r 1 q ( t ) | cos p φ | p | sin p φ | p Φ ( cos p φ ) Φ ( sin p φ ) .

Multiplying both sides of this equation by | sin p φ | p p 1 and using the half-linear Pythagorean identity Eq.(10), we obtain the equation

φ = 1 t [ r 1 q ( t ) | cos p φ | p Φ ( cos p φ ) sin p φ + t p c ( t ) p 1 | sin p φ | p ] ,

which will play the fundamental role in our investigation.

It is well-known that the nonoscillation of Eq.(7) is equivalent to the boundedness from above of the Prüfer angle φ given by Eq.(11) (see [6, 10]). Next, we briefly mention the principal solution of nonoscillatory equation Eq.(1) in [5], which is defined via the minimal solution of the associated Riccati equation Eq.(12). Nonoscillation of Eq.(1) implies that there exist T ∈ ℝ and a solution w ~ of Eq.(12) defined on some interval [ T w ~ , ) . w ~ is called the minimal solution of all solutions of Eq.(12) and it satisfies the inequality w ( t ) > w ~ ( t ) where w is any other solution of Eq.(12) defined on some interval [Tw, ∞) and then x ~ is the principal solution of Eq.(1) via the formula w ~ ( t ) = r ( t ) Φ x ~ ( t ) x ~ ( t ) .

We finish this section with a lemma without proof, to be used in the next section.

Lemma 2.1

  1. Eq.(1) is non-oscillatory if and only if there exists a positive differentiable function h such that

    ( r ( t ) Φ ( h ) ) + c ( t ) Φ ( h ) 0

    for large t.

  2. Let μ > 1 4 , then for every positive,the linear differential equation

    ( t x ) + log 2 t x + μ t log 2 t x = 0

    is oscillatory.

  3. Suppose that r 1 q ( t ) d t = , c ( t ) > 0 for large t in Eq.(1) and this equation is non-oscillatory. Then the minimal solution of associate Riccati equation (12) is positive for large t [6].

3 Main results

To prove the main result, we need the following lemmas.

Lemma 3.1

Let φ = φ1 + φ2 + φ3, + φ4 + Μ, (Μ is a suitable constant) be a solution of the equation

φ ( t ) = φ 1 ( t ) + φ 2 ( t ) + φ 3 ( t ) + φ 4 ( t ) ,

where

φ 1 = 1 t r 1 q ( t ) | cos p φ ( t ) | p , φ 2 = 1 t Φ ( cos p φ ( t ) ) sin p φ ( t ) , φ 3 = c ( t ) ( p 1 ) t | sin p φ ( t ) | p , φ 4 = d ( t ) ( p 1 ) t log 2 t | sin p φ ( t ) | p ,

with r, c and d are positive defined functions having different periods β1, β2, and β3, respectively and let

θ ( t ) = 1 β 1 t t + β 1 φ 1 ( s ) d s + 1 ξ t t + ξ φ 2 ( s ) d s + 1 β 2 t t + β 2 φ 3 ( s ) d s + 1 β 3 t t + β 3 φ 4 ( s ) d s ,

where ξ is one of the periods β1, β2, or β3 Then θ is a solution of

θ = 1 t R | cos p θ | p Φ ( cos p θ ) sin p θ + 1 p 1 ( C + D log 2 t ) | sin p θ | p + O l t log 2 t ,

where

R = 1 β 1 0 β 1 r 1 q ( τ ) d τ , C = 1 ( p 1 ) β 2 0 β 2 c ( τ ) d τ a n d D = 1 ( p 1 ) β 3 0 β 3 d ( τ ) d τ

and φ (τ) — θ (t) = o (1) as t → ∞.

Proof

Taking derivative of θ (t ), we have

θ ( t ) = [ 1 β 1 t t + β 1 φ 1 ( s ) d s + 1 ξ t t + ξ φ 2 ( s ) d s + 1 β 2 t t + β 2 φ 3 ( s ) d s + 1 β 3 t t + β 3 φ 4 ( s ) d s ] = 1 β 1 t t + β 1 1 s r 1 q ( s ) | cos p φ ( s ) | p d s

1 ξ t t + ξ 1 s Φ ( cos p φ ( s ) ) sin p φ ( s ) d s + 1 β 2 t t + β 2 c ( s ) ( p 1 ) s | sin p φ ( s ) | p d s + 1 β 3 t t + β 3 d ( s ) ( p 1 ) s log 2 s | sin p φ ( s ) | p d s .

Using integration by parts, we get

θ ( t ) = 1 β 1 t t t + β 1 r 1 q ( τ ) | cos p φ ( τ ) | p d τ 1 ξ t t t + ξ Φ ( cos p φ ( τ ) ) sin p φ ( τ ) d τ + 1 β 2 t t t + β 2 c ( τ ) ( p 1 ) | sin p φ ( τ ) | p d τ + 1 β 3 t t t + β 3 d ( τ ) ( p 1 ) log 2 τ | sin p φ ( τ ) | p d τ 1 β 1 t t + β 1 1 s 2 s t + β 1 r 1 q ( τ ) | cos p φ ( τ ) | p d τ d s + 1 ξ t t + ξ 1 s 2 s t + ξ Φ ( cos p φ ( τ ) ) sin p φ ( τ ) d τ d s 1 β 2 t t + β 2 1 s 2 s t + β 2 c ( τ ) ( p 1 ) | sin p φ ( τ ) | p d τ d s 1 β 3 t t + β 3 1 s 2 s t + β 3 d ( τ ) ( p 1 ) log 2 τ | sin p φ ( τ ) | p d τ d s .

By the fact that, t t + T f ( s ) d s = 0 T f ( s ) d s ds for any T–periodic function and half-linear Pythagorean identity, the expressions

r 1 q ( t ) | cos p φ | p , Φ ( cos p , φ ) sin p , φ c ( t ) p 1 | sin p φ | p and d ( t ) p 1 | sin p φ | p

are bounded. Thus we get

θ ( t ) = 1 β 1 t t t + β 1 r 1 q ( τ ) | cos p φ ( τ ) | p d τ 1 ξ t t t + ξ Φ ( cos p φ ( τ ) ) sin p φ ( τ ) d τ + 1 β 2 t t t + β 2 c ( τ ) ( p 1 ) | sin p φ ( τ ) | p d τ + 1 β 3 t t t + β 3 d ( τ ) ( p 1 ) log 2 τ | sin p φ ( τ ) | p d τ + O ( l t log 2 t ) .

We can rewrite this equation as

θ ( t ) = 1 β 1 t t t + β 1 r 1 q ( τ ) | cos p θ ( t ) | p d τ 1 ξ t t t + ξ Φ ( cos p θ ( t ) ) sin p θ ( t ) d τ + 1 β 2 t t t + β 2 c ( τ ) ( p 1 ) | sin p θ ( t ) | p d τ + 1 β 3 t t t + β 3 d ( τ ) ( p 1 ) log 2 τ | sin p θ ( t ) | p d τ + 1 β 1 t t t + β 1 r 1 q ( τ ) { | cos p φ ( τ ) | p | cos p θ ( t ) | p } d τ 1 ξ t t t + ξ { Φ ( cos p φ ( τ ) ) sin p φ ( τ ) Φ ( cos p θ ( t ) ) sin θ ( t ) } d τ + 1 β 2 t t t + β 2 c ( τ ) ( p 1 ) { | sin p φ ( t ) | p | sin p θ ( t ) | p } d τ + 1 β 3 t t t + β 3 d ( τ ) ( p 1 ) log 2 τ { | sin p φ ( t ) | p | sin p θ ( t ) | p } d τ + O l t log 2 t .

Similarly as in [6] if we use integration by parts, we get

t t + β 3 d ( s ) log 2 s d s = ( p 1 ) β 3 D log 2 t + O l t log 3 t

and by using the definition of R, C and D we get

θ ( t ) = 1 t [ R | cos p θ ( t ) | p Φ ( cos p θ ( t ) ) sin p θ ( t ) + 1 p 1 ( C + D log 2 t ) | sin p θ ( t ) | p ] + 1 β 1 t t t + β 1 r 1 q ( τ ) { | cos p φ ( τ ) | p | cos p θ ( t ) | p } d τ 1 ξ t t t + ξ { Φ ( cos p φ ( τ ) ) sin p φ ( τ ) Φ ( cos p θ ( t ) ) sin θ ( t ) } d τ + 1 β 2 t t t + β 2 c ( τ ) ( p 1 ) { | sin p φ ( τ ) | p | sin p θ ( t ) | p } d τ

+ 1 β 3 t t t + β 3 d ( τ ) ( p 1 ) log 2 τ { | sin p φ ( t ) | p | sin p θ ( t ) | p } d τ + O l t log 2 t .

And using the half-linear trigonometric functions, we have

| cos p φ ( τ ) | p | cos p θ ( t ) | p p θ ( t ) φ ( τ ) | Φ ( cos p s ) ( cos p s ) | d s c o n s t | φ ( τ ) θ ( t ) | ,

| Φ ( cos p φ ( τ ) ) sin p φ ( τ ) Φ ( cos p θ ( t ) ) sin p θ ( t ) | θ ( t ) φ ( τ ) | ( Φ ( cos p s ) sin p s ) | d s c o n s t | φ ( τ ) θ ( t ) |

and

| | sin p φ ( t ) | p | sin p θ ( t ) | p c o n s t | φ ( τ ) θ ( t ) | .

By the mean value theorem we can write

θ ( t ) = φ 1 ( t 1 ) + φ 2 ( t 2 ) + φ 3 ( t 3 ) + φ 4 ( t 4 )

for t1∈ [t, t + β1], t2 ∈ [t, t + ξ], t3 ∈ [t, t + β2], t4 ∈ [t, t + β3]. Thus

| φ ( τ ) θ ( t ) | | φ 1 ( τ ) φ 1 ( t 1 ) | + | φ 2 ( τ ) φ 2 ( t 2 ) | + | φ 3 ( τ ) φ 3 ( t 3 ) | + | φ 4 ( τ ) φ 4 ( t 4 ) | .

This implies that

| φ ( τ ) θ ( t ) | o 1 t as t , φ ( τ ) θ ( t ) = o ( 1 ) .

Hence we get

θ = 1 t R | cos p θ | p Φ ( cos p θ ) sin p θ + 1 p 1 ( C + D log 2 t ) | sin p θ | p + O ( l t log 2 t ) .

 □

The computation of oscillation constant μ in Eq.(7) is based on the following lemma

Lemma 3.2

Let 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 0 β 2 c ( t ) d t = γ p β 1 p 1 β 2 and θ is a solution of the differential equation

(13) θ = 1 t R | cos p θ | p Φ ( cos p θ ) sin p θ + 1 p 1 ( C + D log 2 t ) | sin p θ | p + o l t log 2 t ,

where R,C, D are as in Lemma 3.1.

I f 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 0 β 3 d ( t ) d t > μ p β 1 p 1 β 3 , t h e n θ ( t ) a s t

and

I f 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 0 β 3 d ( t ) d t < μ p β 1 p 1 β 3 , t h e n θ ( t ) i s b o u n d e d .

Proof

We rewrite Eq.(13) in the form

θ = 1 t R | cos p θ | p Φ ( cos p θ ) sin p θ + 1 p 1 ( C + D log 2 t ) | sin p θ | p

+ o ( 1 ) t log 2 t ( | cos p θ | p + | sin p θ | p ) .

This is the equation for Prüfer angle θ, which corresponds to the differential equation

R + o ( 1 ) log 2 t 1 p Φ x + p 1 t p C + D + o ( 1 ) log 2 t Φ ( x ) = 0 ,

which is the same (using the formula (1 + x)α = 1 + αx + ο (x) as x →0) as the equation

(14) 1 + o ( 1 ) log 2 t Φ x + p 1 t p R p 1 C + R p 1 D + o ( 1 ) log 2 t Φ ( x ) = 0 ,

i.e., the same as

1 + o ( 1 ) log 2 t Φ x + 1 t p γ p + ( p 1 ) R p 1 D + o ( 1 ) log 2 t Φ ( x ) = 0.

First, suppose that

1 β 1 p 1 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 1 β 3 0 β 3 d ( t ) d t < μ p

and denote

δ := 1 2 μ p 1 β 1 p 1 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 1 β 3 0 β 3 d ( t ) d t .

Let ε > 0 be sufficiently small and let Τ be so large that

| o ( 1 ) | < ϵ and μ p 1 β 1 p 1 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 1 β 3 0 β 3 d ( t ) d t + o ( 1 ) > δ

for tT. Then, the equation

(15) 1 ϵ log 2 t Φ x + 1 t p γ p + μ p δ log 2 t Φ ( x ) = 0

is a Sturmian majorant of Eq.(14), i.e., nonoscillation of Eq.(15) implies nonoscillation of Eq.(14).

We will show that the function h ( t ) = t p 1 p log 1 p t satisfies

(16) 1 ϵ log 2 t Φ h + 1 t p γ p + μ p δ log 2 t Φ ( h ) 0

for large t, then nonoscillation of Eq.(15) follows from Lemma 2.1. According to [5] ,we have for h ( t ) = t p 1 p log 1 p t

h ( t ) Φ h + 1 t p γ p + μ p log 2 t Φ ( h ) H t log 2 t

for t →∞, where Η is a real constant. At the same time, by a direct computation,

h ϵ Φ ( h ) log 2 t δ h p t p log 2 t ϵ γ p δ t log t < 0

for large t, if ε < δ γ p , so we see that Eq.(16) really holds, hence Eq.(13) is non-oscillatory, i.e., the “Prüfer angle” of its solution is bounded.

Now suppose that

1 β 1 p 1 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 1 β 3 0 β 3 d ( t ) > μ p

and denote

δ := 1 2 1 β 1 p 1 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 1 β 3 0 β 3 d ( t ) d t μ p .

Let ε > 0 be again sufficiently small and let Τ be so large that

o ( 1 ) < ε and 1 β 1 p 1 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 1 β 3 β 3 d ( t ) d t μ p + o ( 1 ) > δ

for tT. Then the equation

(17) 1 + ε log 2 t Φ x + 1 t p γ p + μ p + δ log 2 t Φ ( x ) = 0

is a Sturmian minorant of Eq.(14), i.e., oscillation of Eq.(17) implies oscillation of Eq.(14).

Suppose, by contradiction, that Eq.(17) is nonoscillatory and let w be the minimal solution of its associated Riccati equation

w + 1 t p γ p + μ p + δ log 2 t + ( p 1 ) ( 1 + R ( t ) ) 1 q | w | q = 0 ,

where we denote R ( t ) := ε log 2 t .

Let h ( t ) = t , p 1 p w h = Φ h h = p 1 p p 1 t 1 p and denote λ p = p 1 p p 1 and v = hp (w – wh).

Then by a direct computation v is a solution of the equation

(18) v + μ p + δ t log 2 t + ( p 1 ) t ( 1 + R ( t ) ) 1 q | v + λ p | q q ( 1 + R ( t ) ) q 1 Φ 1 ( λ p ) v λ q q ( 1 + R ( t ) ) q 1 Φ 1 ( λ p ) v λ q + ( p 1 ) t λ p q 1 ( 1 + R ( t ) ) 1 q = 0.

Denote now ƒ (t) := (1 + R(t)q-1, and F ( v ) := | v + λ p | q q Φ 1 ( λ p ) f v λ p q . Then we have

F ( v ) = q [ Φ 1 ( v + λ p ) Φ 1 ( λ p ) f ] = 0 v = v = λ p ( Φ ( f ) 1 ) .

At this extremal point

F ( v ) = λ p q [ f p ( 1 q ) + f q 1 ] .

Substituting f (t) = (1 + R(t))q-1into F (v*) and using again the formula (1 + x)α = 1 +αx + o(x)as x → 0,

we obtain

F ( v ) = λ p q ( 1 + R ( t ) ) p ( q 1 ) ( 1 q ) + q ( 1 + R ( t ) ) q 1 1 = λ p q o ( R ) = o ( R ) , as t .

Consequently, F ( v ) η log 2 t for sufficiently large t, where η is any positive constant. Using this estimate in Eq.(18)

we get

v + μ p + δ t log 2 t + ( p 1 ) t 1 + ε log 2 t 1 q | v + λ p | q 1 + ε log 2 t q 1 Φ 1 ( λ p ) v λ p q } + ( p 1 ) t λ p q [ 1 1 + ( q 1 ) ε log 2 t + o ( 1 ) log 2 t ] = 0

and we see that

v + μ p + δ t log 2 t ζ log 2 t 0 ,

for large t, where the constant ζ > 0 depends on ε and η and μρ + δζ > 0 if ε, η are sufficiently small. Hence v' (t) < 0 for large t, which means that there exists the limit v0= limt→∞ v (t). This limit is finite, because of Lemma 2.1, w (t) > 0, i.e., v (t) = hp (t) (w (t) – wh (t)) ≥ -hp (t) wh(t) = –λρ.

Next, we show that v0 = 0. If v0 ≠0, then | v 0 + λ p | q q Φ 1 ( λ p ) v 0 λ p q =: ω > 0 , i.e.,

| v ( t ) + λ p | q q Φ 1 ( λ p ) v ( t ) λ p q > ω 2

for large t. From Eq.(18), using the fact that

F ( v ) = | v + λ p | q q Φ 1 ( λ p ) v λ p q + q ( q 1 ) Φ 1 ( λ p ) ϵ log 2 t + o ( 1 ) log 2 t v

we have

v ( t ) v ( T ) + T t μ p + δ s log 2 s d s + T t ( p 1 ) ω 2 s d s + T t O ( 1 ) s log 2 s 0

i.e., since v (t) > – λρ

T t μ p + δ s log 2 s d s + T t ( p 1 ) ω 2 s d s + T t O ( 1 ) s log 2 s λ p + v ( T )

for sufficiently large Τ. When t → ∞, we obtain the convergence of the integral t 1 d t which is a contradiction, so necessarily ω must be equal to zero, which means that v0 = 0. Using second order Taylor’s expansion , we have

( p 1 ) | v + λ p | q q Φ 1 ( λ p ) v λ p q ( 1 ε ) q 2 λ p q 2 v 2

for |v| sufficiently small. Hence, for t sufficiently large

v + μ p + δ t log 2 t + ( 1 ε ) q 2 t λ p q 2 v 2 + o ( 1 ) t log 2 t v 0.

The last inequality is the Riccati type inequality associated with the linear second order differential equation

(19) ( t x ) + o ( 1 ) log 2 t x + ( 1 ε ) q λ p q 2 ( μ p + δ ) 2 t log 2 t x = 0 ,

which means that Eq.(19) is nonoscillatory. However, if we compute the value of the coefficient by x in Eq.(19), we get the value

q 2 p 1 p ( p 1 ) ( q 2 ) 1 2 p 1 p ( p 1 ) 1 + δ μ p ( 1 ε ) = 1 4 1 + δ μ p ( 1 ε )

and the value of this constant is greater than 1 4 if ε is sufficiently small, i.e., Eq.(19) is oscillatory by Lemma 2.1 which is the required contradiction implying that Eq.(13) is oscillatory.

The main results of this paper are as follows

Theorem 3.3

  1. Let r, c and d be positive defined functions in Eq.(6) and Eq.(7) having different periods β1, β2 and β3, respectively. Then Eq.(6) is nonoscillatory if and only if

    γ γ := β 1 p 1 β 2 γ p 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 0 β 2 c ( t ) d t ,

    where γ p := p 1 p p .

  2. In the limiting case γ = γ*, Eq.(7) is nonoscillatory if

    μ < μ := β 1 p 1 β 3 μ p 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 0 β 3 d ( t ) d t

    and it is oscillatory if μ > μ*, where μ p := 1 2 p 1 p p 1 .

Proof

The statement (i) is proved in [13] when γ γ*.

(ii) We consider Eq.(7), let x be the nontrivial solution of Eq.(7) and φ is the Prüfer angle of Eq.(7) given by Eq.(11). Then φ is a solution of

φ = 1 t r 1 q ( t ) | cos p φ | p Φ ( cos p , φ ) sin p φ + 1 ( p 1 ) γ c ( t ) + μ d ( t ) log 2 t | sin p φ | p .

By the help of Lemma 3.1, θ is a solution of

θ = 1 t R | cos p θ | p Φ ( cos p θ ) sin p θ + γ C + μ D log 2 t | sin p φ | p + o l t log 2 t ,

where R, C and D are as in Lemma 3.1. By the help of Lemma 3.2 if

μ < μ := μ p β 1 p 1 β 3 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 0 β 3 d ( t ) d t

holds, then θ is bounded and by the help of Lemma 3.1, φ is bounded. Then from Eq.(11), Eq.(7) is nonoscillatory. Again by the help of Lemma 3.2, if

μ > μ := μ p β 1 p 1 β 3 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 0 β 3 d ( t ) d t ,

holds, then θ (t)⊒∞as t ⊒∞and by the help of Lemma 3.1, φ is unbounded. Then from Eq.(11), Eq.(7) is oscillatory. This result also shows that Eq.(6) is nonoscillatory in the limiting case γ = γ* since this case corresponds to Eq.(7) with μ = 0 < μ*. The proof is now complete.  □

Corollary 3.4

If the periods of the functions r, c and d in Eq.(7) coincide with α-period, which is given in [6] we get for β1 = β2 = β3 = α

μ > μ := μ p β 1 p 1 β 3 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 0 β 3 d ( t ) d t = α p μ p 0 α r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 0 α d ( t ) d t = μ r d .

Thus in this case our oscillation constant μ* reduces to μrd given in [6] and the main result compiles with the result given by [6].

Corollary 3.5

In a similar way it is easy to see that if there exists a 1cm (β1, β2, β3) and the period a, given in [6] is chosen as the number 1cm (β1, β2, β3), then there exist some natural numbers m,l, and s such as α = mβ1 = 2 = 3 and by the help of periodic functions properties we get

μ := β 1 p 1 β 3 μ p 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 0 β 3 d ( t ) d t = ( α m ) p 1 ( α s ) μ p 1 m 0 α r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 1 s 0 α d ( t ) d t = μ r d .

Thus in this case our, oscillation constant μ* reduces to μrd given in [6] and the main result compiles with the result given by [6].

Remark 3.6

If 1cm(β1, β23) is not defined, then we can not use the results of Remark 3.4 and Remark 3.5. However, only our result can be applied while the result given in [6, 8] cannot be applied.

Example 3.7

Consider the equation

(20) 1 2 + cos 6 t Φ x + 1 t p γ ( 2 + cos 8 t ) + μ ( 2 + cos ( a x + b ) ) log 2 t Φ ( x ) = 0

which is Eq.(7) for q = 3 , r ( t ) = 1 2 + cos 6 t , c ( t ) = 2 + cos 8 t and d (t) = 2 + cos (ax + b),(a,b ∈ ℝ). In this case r ( t ) = 1 2 + cos 6 t defined for all t ∈with period π 3 , c ( t ) = 2 + cos 8 t is positive defined for all t ∈ R with period π 4 , and d (t) = 2 + cos (ax + b) > 0 can be considered as positive defined function with period 2 π | a | .

Thus we can apply Theorem 3.3 for all a ≠0 and we obtain an oscillation constant for the differential equation Eq.(20)

μ = β 1 p 1 β 3 μ p ( 0 β 1 r 1 q ( t ) d t ) p 1 0 β 3 d ( t ) d t = ( π 3 ) 1 2 2 π | a | 1 2 ( 1 3 ) 1 2 0 π 3 ( 2 + cos 6 t ) 2 d t 1 2 0 2 π | a | ( 2 + cos ( a x + b ) ) d t = 1 12 2 .

and equation Eq.(20) is nonoscillatory if and only if μ < 1 12 2 . This computation shows that we can compute the oscillation constant μ* for every period 2 π | a | > 0 . If the functions r (t) , c (t) , and d(t) are having an α = 1cm π 3 , π 4 , 2 π | a | period it is well known that there exists some m, l and s natural numbers such as α = m π 4 = l π 3 = s 2 π | a | . In this case we use the fact of the remark 3.4 and we can apply Theorem 3.1 in [6] to the above example and we get oscillation constant as

μ r d = α p μ p 0 α r 1 q ( t ) d t p 1 0 α d ( t ) d t 1 2 3 s 2 π | a | 3 2 l 0 π 3 ( 2 + cos 6 t ) 2 d t 1 2 s 0 2 π | a | ( 2 + cos ( a x + b ) ) d t = 1 12 2 .

Here the important point to note is that while we cannot apply the Theorem 3.1 in [6] for this example if we choose a = 3 t h e n lcm π 3 , π 4 , 2 π | a | is not defined, we can apply our theorem Theorem 3.3.

Finally, as a future work this paper can be improved if we replace the periodic coefficient functions, having different periods, with asymptotically almost periodic coefficients or having different mean values coefficients functions. The conditional oscillation of half-linear equations with asymptotically almost periodic coefficient or coefficients having mean values are studied in [13-15].

  1. Conflict of interests

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the referees for a number of valuable comments and suggestions which led to significant improvement of the final version of the paper.

References

[1] Beesack R.R., Hardy’s inequality and its extensions, Pac. J. Math. 1961, 11(1), 39-61.10.2140/pjm.1961.11.39Search in Google Scholar

[2] Binari I., An oscillation theorem concerning the half-linear differential equation of second order, Magy. Tud. Akad.Mat. Kut. Intéz. Közl., 1964, 8, 275-280.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Dosly O., Rehak P., Half-linear Differential Equations, Elsevier, 2005, Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Elbert A., Asymtotic behaviour of autonomous half-linear differential systems on the plane, Studia Sci. Math. Hungar., 1984, 19, 447-464.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Dosly O., Perturbations of the half-linear Euler-Weber type differential equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 2006, 323, 426-440.10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.10.051Search in Google Scholar

[6] Dosly O., Hasil P., Critical oscillation constant for half-linear differential equations with periodic coefficient, Ann. Math. Pur. Appl., 2011, 190, 395-408.10.1007/s10231-010-0155-0Search in Google Scholar

[7] Elbert A., Scneider A., Perturbations of half-linear Euler differential equation, Results Math., 2000, 37, 56-83.10.1007/BF03322512Search in Google Scholar

[8] Hasil P., Conditional oscillation of half-linear differential equations with periodic coefficients, Arch. Math., 2008, 44, 119-131.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Schmidt K.M., Oscillation of perturbed Hill equation and lower spectrum of radially periodic Schrödinger operators in the plane, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc, 1999, 127, 2367-2374.10.1090/S0002-9939-99-05069-8Search in Google Scholar

[10] Schmidt K.M., Critical coupling constant and eigenvalue asymtotics perturbed periodic Sturm-Liouville operators, Commun. Math. Phys., 2000, 211, 465-485.10.1007/s002200050822Search in Google Scholar

[11] Kneser A., Untersuchungen uber die reellen Nullstellen der Integrale linearer Differentialgleichungen, Mathematische Annalen, 1893, 42 no.3, 409-435.10.1007/BF01444165Search in Google Scholar

[12] Gesztesy F., Ünal M., Perturbative oscillation criteria and Hard-type inequalities, Math. Nachr., 1998, 189, 121-144.10.1002/mana.19981890108Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hasil P., Marik R., Vesely M., Conditional oscillation of half-linear differential equations with coefficients having mean value, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2014, Art. ID 258159, 14 pages.10.1155/2014/258159Search in Google Scholar

[14] Hasil P., Vesely M., Conditional oscillation of Riemann-Weber half-linear differential equations with asymptotically almost periodic coefficients, Studia Sci. Math. Hungar., 2014, 51 no. 3, 303-321.10.1556/sscmath.51.2014.3.1283Search in Google Scholar

[15] Hasil P., Vesely M., Oscillation of half-linear differential equations with asymptotically almost periodic coefficients, Adv. Difference Equ.,2013, 122, 15 pages.10.1186/1687-1847-2013-122Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-11-7
Accepted: 2017-2-28
Published Online: 2017-5-4

© 2017 Misir and Mermerkaya

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Integrals of Frullani type and the method of brackets
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Edge of chaos in reaction diffusion CNN model
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Calculus using proximities: a mathematical approach in which students can actually prove theorems
  7. Regular Articles
  8. An investigation on hyper S-posets over ordered semihypergroups
  9. Regular Articles
  10. The Leibniz algebras whose subalgebras are ideals
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Fixed point and multidimensional fixed point theorems with applications to nonlinear matrix equations in terms of weak altering distance functions
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Matrix rank and inertia formulas in the analysis of general linear models
  15. Regular Articles
  16. The hybrid power mean of quartic Gauss sums and Kloosterman sums
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Tauberian theorems for statistically (C,1,1) summable double sequences of fuzzy numbers
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Some properties of graded comultiplication modules
  21. Regular Articles
  22. The characterizations of upper approximation operators based on special coverings
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Bi-integrable and tri-integrable couplings of a soliton hierarchy associated with SO(4)
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Dynamics for a discrete competition and cooperation model of two enterprises with multiple delays and feedback controls
  27. Regular Articles
  28. A new view of relationship between atomic posets and complete (algebraic) lattices
  29. Regular Articles
  30. A class of extensions of Restricted (s, t)-Wythoff’s game
  31. Regular Articles
  32. New bounds for the minimum eigenvalue of 𝓜-tensors
  33. Regular Articles
  34. Shintani and Shimura lifts of cusp forms on certain arithmetic groups and their applications
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Empirical likelihood for quantile regression models with response data missing at random
  37. Regular Articles
  38. Convex combination of analytic functions
  39. Regular Articles
  40. On the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank-two matrices
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Uniform topology on EQ-algebras
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Integrations on rings
  45. Regular Articles
  46. The quasilinear parabolic kirchhoff equation
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Avoiding rainbow 2-connected subgraphs
  49. Regular Articles
  50. On non-Hopfian groups of fractions
  51. Regular Articles
  52. Singularly perturbed hyperbolic problems on metric graphs: asymptotics of solutions
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Rings in which elements are the sum of a nilpotent and a root of a fixed polynomial that commute
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Superstability of functional equations related to spherical functions
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Evaluation of the convolution sum involving the sum of divisors function for 22, 44 and 52
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Weighted minimal translation surfaces in the Galilean space with density
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Complete convergence for weighted sums of pairwise independent random variables
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Binomials transformation formulae for scaled Fibonacci numbers
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Growth functions for some uniformly amenable groups
  67. Regular Articles
  68. Hopf bifurcations in a three-species food chain system with multiple delays
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Oscillation and nonoscillation of half-linear Euler type differential equations with different periodic coefficients
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Osculating curves in 4-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index 2
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Some new facts about group 𝒢 generated by the family of convergent permutations
  75. Regular Articles
  76. lnfinitely many solutions for fractional Schrödinger equations with perturbation via variational methods
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Supersolvable orders and inductively free arrangements
  79. Regular Articles
  80. Asymptotically almost automorphic solutions of differential equations with piecewise constant argument
  81. Regular Articles
  82. Finite groups whose all second maximal subgroups are cyclic
  83. Regular Articles
  84. Semilinear systems with a multi-valued nonlinear term
  85. Regular Articles
  86. Positive solutions for Hadamard differential systems with fractional integral conditions on an unbounded domain
  87. Regular Articles
  88. Calibration and simulation of Heston model
  89. Regular Articles
  90. One kind sixth power mean of the three-term exponential sums
  91. Regular Articles
  92. Cyclic pairs and common best proximity points in uniformly convex Banach spaces
  93. Regular Articles
  94. The uniqueness of meromorphic functions in k-punctured complex plane
  95. Regular Articles
  96. Normalizers of intermediate congruence subgroups of the Hecke subgroups
  97. Regular Articles
  98. The hyperbolicity constant of infinite circulant graphs
  99. Regular Articles
  100. Scott convergence and fuzzy Scott topology on L-posets
  101. Regular Articles
  102. One sided strong laws for random variables with infinite mean
  103. Regular Articles
  104. The join of split graphs whose completely regular endomorphisms form a monoid
  105. Regular Articles
  106. A new branch and bound algorithm for minimax ratios problems
  107. Regular Articles
  108. Upper bound estimate of incomplete Cochrane sum
  109. Regular Articles
  110. Value distributions of solutions to complex linear differential equations in angular domains
  111. Regular Articles
  112. The nonlinear diffusion equation of the ideal barotropic gas through a porous medium
  113. Regular Articles
  114. The Sheffer stroke operation reducts of basic algebras
  115. Regular Articles
  116. Extensions and improvements of Sherman’s and related inequalities for n-convex functions
  117. Regular Articles
  118. Classification lattices are geometric for complete atomistic lattices
  119. Regular Articles
  120. Possible numbers of x’s in an {x, y}-matrix with a given rank
  121. Regular Articles
  122. New error bounds for linear complementarity problems of weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrices
  123. Regular Articles
  124. Boundedness of vector-valued B-singular integral operators in Lebesgue spaces
  125. Regular Articles
  126. On the Golomb’s conjecture and Lehmer’s numbers
  127. Regular Articles
  128. Some applications of the Archimedean copulas in the proof of the almost sure central limit theorem for ordinary maxima
  129. Regular Articles
  130. Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  131. Regular Articles
  132. Corrigendum to: Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  133. Regular Articles
  134. Convergence and stability of generalized φ-weak contraction mapping in CAT(0) spaces
  135. Regular Articles
  136. Triple solutions for a Dirichlet boundary value problem involving a perturbed discrete p(k)-Laplacian operator
  137. Regular Articles
  138. OD-characterization of alternating groups Ap+d
  139. Regular Articles
  140. On Jordan mappings of inverse semirings
  141. Regular Articles
  142. On generalized Ehresmann semigroups
  143. Regular Articles
  144. On topological properties of spaces obtained by the double band matrix
  145. Regular Articles
  146. Representing derivatives of Chebyshev polynomials by Chebyshev polynomials and related questions
  147. Regular Articles
  148. Chain conditions on composite Hurwitz series rings
  149. Regular Articles
  150. Coloring subgraphs with restricted amounts of hues
  151. Regular Articles
  152. An extension of the method of brackets. Part 1
  153. Regular Articles
  154. Branch-delete-bound algorithm for globally solving quadratically constrained quadratic programs
  155. Regular Articles
  156. Strong edge geodetic problem in networks
  157. Regular Articles
  158. Ricci solitons on almost Kenmotsu 3-manifolds
  159. Regular Articles
  160. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions sharing two finite sets
  161. Regular Articles
  162. On the fourth-order linear recurrence formula related to classical Gauss sums
  163. Regular Articles
  164. Dynamical behavior for a stochastic two-species competitive model
  165. Regular Articles
  166. Two new eigenvalue localization sets for tensors and theirs applications
  167. Regular Articles
  168. κ-strong sequences and the existence of generalized independent families
  169. Regular Articles
  170. Commutators of Littlewood-Paley gκ -functions on non-homogeneous metric measure spaces
  171. Regular Articles
  172. On decompositions of estimators under a general linear model with partial parameter restrictions
  173. Regular Articles
  174. Groups and monoids of Pythagorean triples connected to conics
  175. Regular Articles
  176. Hom-Lie superalgebra structures on exceptional simple Lie superalgebras of vector fields
  177. Regular Articles
  178. Numerical methods for the multiplicative partial differential equations
  179. Regular Articles
  180. Solvable Leibniz algebras with NFn Fm1 nilradical
  181. Regular Articles
  182. Evaluation of the convolution sums ∑al+bm=n lσ(l) σ(m) with ab ≤ 9
  183. Regular Articles
  184. A study on soft rough semigroups and corresponding decision making applications
  185. Regular Articles
  186. Some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions with applications
  187. Regular Articles
  188. Deficiency of forests
  189. Regular Articles
  190. Perfect codes in power graphs of finite groups
  191. Regular Articles
  192. A new compact finite difference quasilinearization method for nonlinear evolution partial differential equations
  193. Regular Articles
  194. Does any convex quadrilateral have circumscribed ellipses?
  195. Regular Articles
  196. The dynamic of a Lie group endomorphism
  197. Regular Articles
  198. On pairs of equations in unlike powers of primes and powers of 2
  199. Regular Articles
  200. Differential subordination and convexity criteria of integral operators
  201. Regular Articles
  202. Quantitative relations between short intervals and exceptional sets of cubic Waring-Goldbach problem
  203. Regular Articles
  204. On θ-commutators and the corresponding non-commuting graphs
  205. Regular Articles
  206. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of Laplace (1, 1) for GARCH models
  207. Regular Articles
  208. Multiple and sign-changing solutions for discrete Robin boundary value problem with parameter dependence
  209. Regular Articles
  210. Fundamental relation on m-idempotent hyperrings
  211. Regular Articles
  212. A novel recursive method to reconstruct multivariate functions on the unit cube
  213. Regular Articles
  214. Nabla inequalities and permanence for a logistic integrodifferential equation on time scales
  215. Regular Articles
  216. Enumeration of spanning trees in the sequence of Dürer graphs
  217. Regular Articles
  218. Quotient of information matrices in comparison of linear experiments for quadratic estimation
  219. Regular Articles
  220. Fourier series of functions involving higher-order ordered Bell polynomials
  221. Regular Articles
  222. Simple modules over Auslander regular rings
  223. Regular Articles
  224. Weighted multilinear p-adic Hardy operators and commutators
  225. Regular Articles
  226. Guaranteed cost finite-time control of positive switched nonlinear systems with D-perturbation
  227. Regular Articles
  228. A modified quasi-boundary value method for an abstract ill-posed biparabolic problem
  229. Regular Articles
  230. Extended Riemann-Liouville type fractional derivative operator with applications
  231. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  232. The algebraic size of the family of injective operators
  233. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  234. The history of a general criterium on spaceability
  235. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  236. On sequences not enjoying Schur’s property
  237. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  238. A hierarchy in the family of real surjective functions
  239. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  240. Dynamics of multivalued linear operators
  241. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  242. Linear dynamics of semigroups generated by differential operators
  243. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  244. Isomorphism theorems for some parabolic initial-boundary value problems in Hörmander spaces
  245. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  246. Determination of a diffusion coefficient in a quasilinear parabolic equation
  247. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  248. Homogeneous two-point problem for PDE of the second order in time variable and infinite order in spatial variables
  249. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  250. A nonlinear plate control without linearization
  251. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  252. Reduction of a Schwartz-type boundary value problem for biharmonic monogenic functions to Fredholm integral equations
  253. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  254. Inverse problem for a physiologically structured population model with variable-effort harvesting
  255. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  256. Existence of solutions for delay evolution equations with nonlocal conditions
  257. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  258. Comments on behaviour of solutions of elliptic quasi-linear problems in a neighbourhood of boundary singularities
  259. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  260. Coupled fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces endowed with a directed graph and application
  261. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  262. Existence of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic degenerate anisotropic equations
  263. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  264. Integro-differential systems with variable exponents of nonlinearity
  265. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  266. Elliptic operators on refined Sobolev scales on vector bundles
  267. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  268. Multiplicity solutions of a class fractional Schrödinger equations
  269. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  270. Determining of right-hand side of higher order ultraparabolic equation
  271. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  272. Asymptotic approximation for the solution to a semi-linear elliptic problem in a thin aneurysm-type domain
  273. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  274. Learnheuristics: hybridizing metaheuristics with machine learning for optimization with dynamic inputs
  275. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  276. Nature–inspired metaheuristic algorithms to find near–OGR sequences for WDM channel allocation and their performance comparison
  277. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  278. Monomial codes seen as invariant subspaces
  279. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  280. Expert knowledge and data analysis for detecting advanced persistent threats
  281. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  282. Feedback equivalence of convolutional codes over finite rings
Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2017-0046/html
Scroll to top button