Home On the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank-two matrices
Article Open Access

On the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank-two matrices

  • Duanmei Zhou , Guoliang Chen EMAIL logo and Jiu Ding
Published/Copyright: March 29, 2017

Abstract

Let A = PQT, where P and Q are two n × 2 complex matrices of full column rank such that QTP is singular. We solve the quadratic matrix equation AXA = XAX. Together with a previous paper devoted to the case that QTP is nonsingular, we have completely solved the matrix equation with any given matrix A of rank-two.

MSC 2010: 15A18; 15A24; 65F15

1 Introduction

Recently [1], the authors have found all the solutions of the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation

AXA=XAX, (1)

where the given n × n complex matrix A = PQT, with two n × 2 matrices P and Q, satisfies the assumption that the 2 × 2 matrix QTP is nonsingular. In the above situation, the eigenvalue 0 of A is semi-simple with multiplicity n − 2. This leaves the case unsolved that QTP is singular, which makes it much more challenging to solve the corresponding matrix equation. The purpose of this paper is to find all the solutions of (1) for the remaining case that the algebraic multiplicity of the eigenvalue 0 of A is more than n − 2.

The equation (1) has a similar format to the classical Yang-Baxter equation [2]. Yang [3] in 1967 first considered a one dimensional quantum mechanical many body problem with a combination of delta functions as the potential and found a factorization of the scattering matrix, and the Yang-Baxter equation was obtained as a consistence property for the factorization. Then Baxter in 1972 solved an eight-vertex model in statistical mechanics, resulting in a similar matrix equation, which, together with that from [3], was first called the Yang-Baxter equation by Russian researchers at the end of the 1970s. Since then the Yang-Baxter equation has been extensively investigated by mathematicians and physicists in knot theory, braid group theory, and quantum group theory in the past thirty years; see, e.g., [2, 4-8] and the references therein. In the past several years, the quadratic matrix equation (1) has been studied with linear algebra techniques; see, for example, the references [9-14].

Solving (1) is a tough job in general since we need to solve a large system of n2 quadratic equations with n2 variables if we multiply out its both sides. By restricting the task to only finding the solutions that commute with A, several solution results have been obtained in [10] for matrices A of special Jordan forms, and a more general result was proved in [15] for the class of diagonalizable matrices. However, no general result has been found so far for non-commuting solutions for arbitrary matrices. Thus, it is our hope to find all the solutions of (1) for general matrices A. When A is a rank one matrix, all the solutions of (1) have been found in [13]. The case of A being of rank-two turns out to be much more tedious to analyze, and some special cases have been solved in our previous paper [1]. In the current paper we continue to study the rank two case to find all the solutions for the remaining Jordan form structure of A.

Matrices A of rank at most two in the equation (1) have appeared in the classic Yang-Baxter equation (see, e.g., the references in [2, 5]). For example, the two classes of 4 × 4 matrices

a00c0bd00eb0f00aandt110t1200t110t12t210t2200t210t22 (2)

with certain values of the given parameters have been studied in [16-18] for completely integrable systems and inverse scattering problems. Each matrix in the second class is actually the tensor product TI2 of the 2 × 2 matrix T = [tij] with the 2 × 2 identity matrix I2, which constitutes a basic operation in the context of the classical Yang-Baxter equation. Our complete solutions to the quadratic matrix equation with a given rank-two matrix are expected to find applications in such physical applications. We shall pick up one matrix from (2) to apply our result in Section 5.

It is well known [10] that solving the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for any given matrix A is equivalent to solving the same equation with A replaced by a matrix that is similar to A, and all the solutions of the first equation are similar to those of the second one with the same similarity matrix. Thus, solving (1) for the given A can be reduced to solving the same equation with the Jordan form of A. Our approach in this paper will follow the above principle. That is, since any matrix is similar to its simplest possible canonical form J, the Jordan form of the matrix, which is called a Jordan matrix here for simplicity, is to be found. For the purpose of the present paper that will supplement the work of [1], we shall solve the following simpler Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation

JYJ=YJY (3)

with J satisfying the conditions:

  1. J is a Jordan matrix of rank-2.

  2. The eigenvalue 0 of J has algebraic multiplicity at least n − 1.

If we can find the solutions of (3) for such Jordan matrices, then the solutions of (1) are available immediately for any A that is similar to J.

It turns out that the Jordan matrices J that satisfy the conditions (i) and (ii) above are

J=diag(0,Λ) (4)

such that Λ is one of the following three matrices

Λ1010001000,Λ201000000λ,λ0;Λ30100000000010000 (5)

and the diagonal block 0 in (4) is either (n − 3) × (n − 3) or (n − 4) × (n − 4) accordingly. With respect to each of the three cases for J, there exists a corresponding nonsingular similarity matrix W = [w1, …, wn] connecting A to J, so that

A=PQT=WJW1. (6)

More specifically, in the case that Λ = Λ1, the columns w1,…, wn − 2 of W are eigenvectors of A and the columns wn − 1 and wn of W are generalized eigenvectors of A with degrees 2 and 3 respectively, namely

Awn10,A2wn1=0,A2wn0,A3wn=0,

all associated with eigenvalue 0. When Λ = Λ2, the first n − 2 columns of W are eigenvectors of A associated with eigenvalue 0, the column wn − 1 is a generalized eigenvector of degree 2 with respect to eigenvalue 0, and the column wn is an eigenvector of A associated with eigenvalue λ ≠ 0. If Λ = Λ3, then the columns w1, …, wn − 3, and wn − 1 of W are eigenvectors of A, and the columns wn − 2 and wn of W are generalized eigenvectors of degrees 2, all with respect to eigenvalue 0.

In the next three sections we look for the solutions of the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation (1) when the corresponding Jordan matrix J of A is given by (4) with Λ = Λ1, Λ2, Λ3, respectively; such cases will be referred to as type I, type II, and type III for the given matrix A. We present two examples of our solution result in Section 5 and conclude with Section 6.

2 Solutions when A is of type I

In this and subsequent sections we let A = PQT in (1) with P = [p1, p2] and Q = [q1, q2] of rank-2 such that det QTP = 0. Let J be the Jordan form of A given by (4), where the diagonal zero sub-matrix 0 is either (n − 3) × (n − 3) and the sub-matrix Λ = Λ1 or Λ2 defined by (5), or the zero sub-matrix 0 is (n − 4) × (n − 4) and Λ = Λ3 in (5). As pointed out in Section 1, it is enough to find all the solutions of the equation (3) with J the Jordan form of A, so we just focus on solving (3).

Let Y be partitioned the same way as J into the 2 × 2 block matrix

Y=[MUVTK], (7)

where M is (n − 3) × (n − 3) or (n − 4) × (n − 4), U = [u1, u2, u3] or [u1, u2, u3, u4], V = [v1, v2, v3] or [v1, v2, v3, v4], and K is 3 × 3 or 4 × 4, depending on the size of Λ. Then (3) with J partitioned by (4) is

000TΛMUVTK000TΛ=MUVTK000TΛMUVTK,

which is equivalent to the system

U Λ V T = 0 , U Λ K = 0 , K Λ V T = 0 , Λ K Λ = K Λ K . (8)

In the current section we assume that J = diag (0, Λ1), and the other two cases that J = diag (0, Λ2) and J = diag (0, Λ3) will be investigated in Sections 3 and 4, respectively. So we solve (8) with Λ = Λ1. Because of the special zero structure of Λ1, the two unknown vectors u3 and v1 actually do not appear at all in the above system, so they always appear as free variables in the solutions. In addition, the first equation is independent of K and is in fact

u1v2T+u2v3T=0.

The last equation of (8),

ΛKΛ=KΛK, (9)

is itself a Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation of small size when Λ = Λj with j = 1, 2, 3, and finding all of its solutions is the first step for solving (8).

Lemma 2.1

The solutions K of the equation (9) with Λ = Λ1 are

K1=xyz00cyx00c,x0;K2=00z00g00c,c0;K3=0yz00g000.

Proof

Write

K=xyzefgabc.

Then, the matrix equation Λ1KΛ1 = KΛ1K becomes

0ef0ab000=ex+ayfx+bygx+cye2+afef+bfeg+cfae+abaf+b2ag+bc.

Note that there is no z in the above equation, so all the solutions have z as an arbitrary parameter. The two equations ef + bf = a and ae + ab = 0 imply a = 0, so b = 0 from 0 = af + b2 = b2 and e = 0 since 0 = e2 + af = e2. Thus we have the remaining three equations

fx=0,gx+cy=f,cf=0

from which f = 0. Hence gx + cy = 0. If x ≠ 0, then g = −cy/x, which gives the first matrix K1 in the lemma. When x = 0, we have cy = 0. So c ≠ 0 or c = 0, resulting in the other two matrices K2 and K3, respectively. □

By Lemma 2.1, all the solutions of the last equation of (8) are K1, K2, and K3. Substituting such matrices into the first three equations of (8) and solving them respectively, we obtain the following result.

Theorem 2.2

Suppose A = PQT is such that Λ = Λ1 in its Jordan form (4). Then all the solutions of (1) are X = WYW−1, where W is as given by (6) and Y is partitioned as (7) in which M is an arbitrary (n − 3) × (n − 3) matrix such that Y =

Mu1yxu1u3v1Txyzyxv3T00yxcv3T00c,Mu1u2u3v1Txyz0T0000T000,x0,u2yxu1, (10)

M00u3v1T00zv2T00gv3T00c,Mu1gcu1u3v1T00zgcv3T00gv3T00c,c0,u10, (11)

M00u3v1T00zv2T00gv3T000,M0u2u3v1T0yzv2T00g0T000, (12)

Mu1u2u3v1T00zu1Hu2u12v3T000v3T000,Mu1u2u3v1T0yz0T0000T000,y0,u10. (13)

Here uH is the conjugate transpose of u.

Proof

We just solve the first three equations of (8) with K = K1, K2, and K3 in succession. When K = K1, those equations of (8) are

( u 2 y x u 1 ) v 3 T = 0 , ( u 2 y x u 1 ) c = 0 , v 2 = y x v 3

after simplification. From the first equation, u2yu1/x = 0 or v3 = 0. If the former is satisfied, then u2 = yu1/x and the second equation is satisfied. This gives the first solution matrix of (10). In the case that v3 = 0, either u2 = yu1/x or c = 0 from the second equation. The former case still leads to the first matrix of (10), while the latter gives the second matrix of (10).

Suppose K = K2. Then K2Λ1VT = 0, so (8) is reduced to

u1v2T+u2v3T=0,gu1+cu2=0. (14)

Thus z is a free variable in the solutions. Since c ≠ 0, (14) is equivalent to u2 = −gu1/c and u1(v2gv3/c)T = 0. Letting u1 = 0 gives the first matrix of (11), the second matrix of (11) is the consequence of u1 ≠ 0, and v2gv3/c = 0.

If K = K3, then (8) becomes

u1v2T+u2v3T=0,gu1=0,yv3T=0. (15)

Letting u1 = 0, u2 = 0, and y = 0 gives the first matrix of (12), and the choice of u1 = 0 and v3 = 0 produces the second matrix of (12). If u1 ≠ 0, then the first equation of (15) implies that v2=(u1Hu2)v3/u12, and the other two equations give that either g = 0 and y = 0, from which we get the first matrix of (13), or g = 0 and y ≠ 0, which gives the second one. □

3 Solutions when A is of type II

We now consider the second case that the Jordan form of the matrix A is J = diag (0, Λ2), so we solve (8) with Λ = Λ2. Clearly, the structure of Λ makes u2 and v1 free vectors in all the solutions of (8), and the first equation of (8) is now

u1v2T+λu3v3T=0.

Lemma 3.1

The solutions K of the equation (9) with Λ = Λ2 are

K40y00f00b0;K50yz0f0000,z0;K6xyz0λbzx00b0,x0;K7λyz00g000,g0;K80y00f000λ;K9xy000000λ,x0;K100y00λ0ab0,a0.

Proof

The equation Λ2KΛ2 = KΛ2K now becomes

0eλg0000λaλ2c=ex+λazfx+λbzgx+λcze2+λagef+λbgeg+λcgae+λacaf+λbcag+λc2. (16)

Since the unknown y does not appear in the above, it is a free variable in all the solutions. To solve for all the other unknowns, let a = 0 first. Then e = 0 from e2 + λag = 0. Because of the equation λ2c = ag + λc2, there are two possibilities that c = 0 or c = λ. Assume first that c = 0. Since a = 0 and e = 0, the system (16) is reduced to

fx=λbz,bg=0,g(xλ)=0.

If g = 0, then the above is just fx = −λbz. When x = 0, we get K4 and K5, and x ≠ 0 implies K6. In the case that g ≠ 0, we obtain K7. The other possibility of c = λ implies K8 and K9.

Now let a ≠ 0. Then e = −λ c via equating entries (3, 1) of the both sides of (16). Since ag = −e2/λ from comparing the (2, 1) entries, it follows from equating entries (3, 3) in (16) that

λ2c=ag+λc2=(λc)2/λ+λc2=0.

So c = 0 and then e = 0. By equating (3, 2) entries, we have f = λ. Also z = 0 and g = 0 from comparing entries (1, 1) and (2, 1) of (16). Finally x = 0 via comparing the entries (1, 2) of (16), thus arriving at the corresponding solution matrix K10. □

Lemma 3.1 gives all the solutions K4, …, K10 of the last equation of (8) with Λ = Λ2. Substituting them for K in the system and solving the resulting three equations in succession, we are lead to the next theorem.

Theorem 3.2

Suppose A = PQT is such that its Jordan form is given by (4) with Λ = Λ2. Then all the solutions of (1) are X = WYW−1, where W is given by (6) and Y is partitioned as (7) in which M is an arbitrary (n − 3) × (n − 3) matrix such that Y=

M0u20v1T0y0v2T0f0v3T0b0,Mu1u20v1T0y00T000v3T0b0,Mu1u2u3v1T0y0v2T0f0u3Hu1λu32v2T0fu3Hu1λu320, (17)

with u3 ≠ 0,

M0u2u3v1T0yzv2T0f00T000,Mu1u2u3v1T0yz0T0000T000,z0,u10, (18)

Mu1u2u3v1Txyz0T0000T000,Mu1u2zxu1v1Txyzλzxv3T0λbzx0v3T0b0,M0u2u3v1Tλyz0T00g0T000 (19)

with x ≠ 0 and g ≠ 0,

M0u20v1T0y0v2T0f00T00λ,Mu1u20v1T0y00T0000T00λ,u10, (20)

Mu1u20v1Txy00T0000T00λ,M0u20v1T0y00T0λ0v3Tab0,x0,a0. (21)

Proof

When K = K4, the system (8) is reduced to

u1v2T+λu3v3T=0,fu1+λbu3=0,

which does not contain y so it will appear in all the solutions. Letting u3 = 0. Then v3 and b can be arbitrary, and the above system becomes u1v2T=0 and fu1 = 0. If u1 = 0, then v2 and f are arbitrary, giving the first solution matrix of (17). If v2 = 0, then u1 is arbitrary and f = 0, which results in the second matrix of (17). Now let u3 ≠ 0. Then from the above system,

v3T=u3Hu1λu32v2T,b=fu3Hu1λu32.

This gives the third matrix of (17).

Next suppose K = K5. Then (8) is simply u1v2T=0,fu1=0,v3=0 since λ ≠ 0 and z ≠ 0. All the solutions are those in (18). Assume K = K6. Then (8) can be written as

u1v2T+λu3v3T=0,bu3bzxu1=0,xv2+λzv3=0.

Since x ≠ 0, we can solve v2 out from the last equation and substitute it into the first one in the above system, getting

(u3Zxu1)v3T=0,(u3Zxu1)b=0,v2=λzxv3.

Letting b = 0 and v3 = 0 above gives the first matrix of (19), and if u3 = zu1/x, then b and v3 are arbitrary, giving the second one of (19).

For K = K7, the system is simplified to u1v2T+λu3v3T=0,u1=0,v2+zv3T=0,v3=0 since g ≠ 0, whose solutions are given by the third matrix of (19). When K = K8, the system (8) is actually u3 = 0, v3 = 0, u1v2T=0,fu1=0 since λ ≠ 0. The solutions are the two matrices of (20). With K = K9, the system becomes v2=0,v3=0,u1v2T+λu3v3T=0,u3=0 since λ ≠ 0 and x ≠ 0, so the first matrix of (21) is obtained. Finally, as K = K10, we have u1=0,v2=0,u1v2T+λu3v3T=0,u3=0 since a ≠ 0, thus obtaining the second matrix of (21). □

4 Solutions when A is of type III

Unlike the previous two cases that involve only 3 × 3 matrices Λ1 and Λ2, the third case that we shall study involves the 4 × 4 matrix Λ3. The zero structure of Λ3 ensures that u2, u4, v1,v3 are not present in the equations, so they are free vectors in the solutions. The following lemma gives all the solutions of the last equation of (8).

Lemma 4.1

The solutions K of the equation (9) with Λ = Λ3 are

K110a120a140a220a240a320a340a420a44;K120a120a140a220a240a32a33a340000,a330;K130a12a13a140a220a240a32a33a340000,a130;K140a12a13a140000a31a32a33a340000,a13a310;K150a120a140a33a42a310a33a44a31a31a32a33a340a420a44,a310;K16a11a12a13a140a13a42a110a13a44a11a31a32a13a31a11a340a420a44,a110;K17a11a12a13a140000a31a32a33a340000,a110,a11a13a31a330.

Proof

Denote

K=a11a12a13a14a21a22a23a24a31a32a33a34a41a42a43a44.

Then the equation K Λ3 K = Λ3KΛ3 is just

a11a21+a13a41a11a22+a13a42a11a23+a13a43a11a24+a13a44a21a21+a23a41a21a22+a23a42a21a23+a23a43a21a24+a23a44a31a21+a33a41a31a22+a33a42a31a23+a33a43a31a24+a33a44a41a21+a43a41a41a22+a43a42a41a23+a43a43a41a24+a43a44=0a210a2300000a410a430000. (22)

Comparing the (2,1),(4,3),(2,3),(4,1) entries above gives the four equations

a212=a23a41,a432=a23a41,a23(a21+a43)=0,a41(a21+a43)=0. (23)

We discuss two cases separately. First assume a41 = 0. Then a21 = a43 = 0 from (23). If a23 ≠ 0, then a11 = a31 = a44 = 0 from equating entries (1,3),(3,3),(2,4) of both sides in (22), from which a23 = a11 a24 + a13a44 = 0, a contradiction. Thus a23 = 0 and (22) is reduced to

a11a22+a13a42=0,a31a22+a33a42=0,a11a24+a13a44=0,a31a24+a33a44=0 (24)

with a21 = a23 = a41 = a43 = 0.

Now we assume a41≠ 0. Then the last equation of (23) implies that a21 = −a43. On the other hand, the entries (4,2) and (1,1) equations of (22) gives that a22 = −a43a42/a41 and a13 = −a11a21/a41. Hence

a21=a11a22+a13a42=a11a43a42a41a11a21a42a41=a11a21a42a41a11a21a42a41=0,

and so a43 = 0. On the other hand, the entries (3,1) and (4,2) equalities give a33 = a22 = 0, so a41 = a31a22 + a33a42 = 0 from the entry (3,2) equality of (22), contradictory to the assumption that a41≠ 0.

Therefore, (24) is the only equation for us to solve. Let a11 = 0. Then (24) becomes a13a42 = 0,a31a22 + a42 = 0,a13a44 = 0, a31a24 + a33a44 = 0. If a13 = 0, then the above system is a31a22 + a33a42 = 0, a31a24 + a33a44 = 0. The first case is a31 = 0. Then a33a42 = 0 and a33a44 = 0. If a33 = 0, then we have solution matrix K11; otherwise K12 occurs. For the second case a31 ≠ 0, there hold a22 = −a33a42/a31 and a24 = −a33a44/a31, giving K15. If a13 ≠ 0, then a42 = 0 and a44 = 0, so a31a22 = 0, a31a24 = 0. The case that a31 = 0 implies K13 and when a31 ≠ 0, we obtain K14.

Now assume that a11 ≠ 0. Then a22 = −a13a42/a11 and a24= −a13a44/a11, so a31a22 + a33a42 = 0 and a31a24 + a33a44 = 0, or equivalently,

a42a33a13a31a11=0,a44a33a13a31a11=0.

In the case that a33 = a13a31/a11, the numbers a42 and a44 are arbitrary and the matrix K16 appears, and otherwise a42 = a44 = 0, so a22 = a24 = 0, resulting in K17. This completes the proof. □

Lemma 4.1 gives all the solutions K11, …, K17 of the last equation of (8) with Λ = Λ3, which can be used to prove the next result.

Theorem 4.2

Suppose Λ = Λ3 in the Jordan form (4) of A = PQT. Then all the solutions of (1) are X = WYW−1, where Y is partitioned as (7) in which M is an arbitrary (n − 4) × (n − 4) matrix such that Y =

M0u20u4v1T0a120a14v2T0a220a24v3T0a320a34v4T0a420a44,M0u2u3u4v1T0a120a14v2T0a220a24v3T0a320a340T0000,u30, (25)

Mu1u2u3u4v1T0a120a14u1Hu3u12v4T0u1Hu3u12a420u1Hu3u12a44v3T0a320a34v4T0a420a44,u10, (26)

M0u2u3u4v1T0a120a14v2T0a220a24v3T0a32a33a340T0000,Mu1u2u3u4v1T0a120a140T0000v3T0a32a33a340T0000,u10,a330, (27)

M0u2u3u4v1T0a12a13a14v2T0a220a24v3T0a32a33a340T0000,Mu1u2u3u4v1T0a12a13a140T0000v3T0a32a33a340T0000,u10,a130, (28)

Mu1u2u3u4v1T0a12a13a140T0000v3Ta31a32a33a340T0000,Mu1u2a33a31u1u4v1T0a120a14a33a31v4T0a33a42a310a33a44a31v3Ta31a32a33a34v4T0a420a44 (29)

with a13 ≠ 0; a31 ≠ 0,

Mu1u2u3u4v1T0a120a140T0000v3Ta31a32a33a340T0000,Mu1u2u3u4v1Ta11a12a13a140T0000v3Ta31a32a13a31a11a340T0000 (30)

with a31 ≠ 0, u3a33u1/a31 in the left matrix, and a11 ≠ 0, u3a13u1/a11 in the second one,

Mu1u2a13a11u1u4v1Ta11a12a13a14a13a11v4T0a13a42a110a13a44a11v3Ta31a32a13a31a11a34v4T0a420a44,Mu1u2u3u4v1Ta11a12a13a140T0000v3Ta31a32a33a340T0000 (31)

with a11 ≠ 0,a33a13a31/a11.

Proof

Clearly the system (8) does not involve u2, u4, v1,v3, so they are free vectors in all the solutions. The first equation of (8) is u1v2T+u3v4T=0. Now we solve the first three equations of (8) with K = K11, …, K17 separately.

When K = K11, the system (8) is reduced to

u1v2T+u3v4T=0,a22U1+a42u3=0,a24u1+a44u3=0.

Assume that u1 = 0. Then u3v4T = 0, a42u3 = 0, a44u3 = 0. If we let u3 = 0, then v4, a42, a44 can be arbitrary, getting the first matrix of (25). Otherwise v4 = 0, a42 = a44 = 0, which results in the second matrix in (25). Now assume that u1 ≠ 0. Then v2=(u1Hu3)v4/u12,a22=(u1Hu3)a42/u12,a24=(u1Hu3)a44/u12. This gives (26).

For K = K12, (8) becomes

u1v2T+u3v4T=0,a22U1=0,a24U1=0,a33v4T=0.

Since a33≠ 0, we have v4 = 0, so the above is simplified to u1v2T=0,a22u1=0,a24u1=0. Letting u1 = 0 gives the first matrix of (27), and otherwise we have v2 = 0, a22 = a24 = 0, leading to the second matrix in (27).

If K = K13, then (8) is simplified to

v4=0,u1v2T=0,a22U1=0,a24u1=0.

u1 = 0 produces the left matrix of (28) and otherwise, v2 = 0, a22 = a24 = 0, so the second matrix in (28).

With K = K14, we have

u1v2T+u3v4T=0,a13v4T=0,a31v2T+a33v4T=0.

Since a13 ≠ 0 and a31 ≠ 0, we have v2 = v4 = 0, and the first matrix of (29) is obtained.

The choice of K = K15 gives the system

u1v2T+u3v4T=0,a42u3a 33a 31u1=0,a44u3a 33a 31u1=0,a31v2T+a33v4T=0.

Since a31 ≠ 0, from the last equation, v2 = −a33v4/a31. Substituting into the first equation, we obtain (u3a33u1/a31) v4T=0. So if u3a33u1/a31 = 0, then v4, a42, a44 are arbitrary and the second matrix of (29) is true. Otherwise, v4 = 0,a42 = a44 = 0, which gives the first matrix of (30).

In the case K = K16, (8) can be written as

u1v2T+u3v4T=0,a42u3a13a11u1=0,a44u3a13a11u1=0,a11v2T+a13v4T=0,a31v2T+a13a11v4T=0.

By the forth equation, v2 = −a13v4/a11. Substituting into the first one gives (u3a13u1/a11)v4T=0. Hence, if U3a13u1/a11, then v4 = 0, a42 = a44 = 0 and we get the right matrix of (30). Otherwise v4, a42 a44 are arbitrary, so the left matrix of (31).

The last case is K = K17. Then

u1v2T+u3v4T=0,a11v2T+a13v4T=0,a31v2T+a33v4T=0,

the solutions of which are given by the last matrix of (31). □

5 Examples

We give two examples to illustrate our results. The first one is artificial for the use of Theorem 3.1. Let p1 = [0, 1, 1, 0]T, p2 = [0, 0, 0, 1]T, q1 = [1, −1, 1, 0]T, and q2 = [−1, 1, −1, 1]T, so that

A=p1q1T+p2q2T=0000111011101111=WJW1=100011000110001100000010000000011000110011101111.

By Theorem 3.1 and multiplying WYW−1 out, all the solutions of (1) are

X=m+u2u2u20m+v1+u2+yu2yu2+y0v1+v2+y+fyfy+f0v2+v3+f+bfbf+b0,X=mu1+u2u1u2u20m+v1u1+u2+yu1u2yu2+y0v1+yyy0v3+bbb0,X=mu1+u2u3u1u2+u3u2u3u3m+v1u1+u2+yu3u1u2y+u3u2+yu3u3v1+v2+y+fyfy+f0(v2+f)(1u1/u3)f(u1/u31)f(1u1/u3)0,u30,X=m+u2u3u3u2u2u3u3m+v1+u2+yu3zu3+zu2yu2+yu3zu3+zv1+v2+y+fzzyfy+fzzv2+fff0,z0,X=mu1+u2u3u1u2+u3u2u3u3m+v1u1+u2+yu3zu1u2y+u3+zu2+yu3zu3+zv1+yzzyyzz0000,u10,z0,X=mu1+u2u3u1u2+u3u2u3u3m+v1u1x+u2+yu3zu1+xu2y+u3+zu2+yu3zu3+zv1x+yzx+zyyzz0000,x0,X=mu1+u2zxu1u1u2+zxu1u2zxu1zxu1m+v1u1x+u2+yzxu1zu1+xu2y+zxu1+zu2+yzxu1zzxu1+zv1zxv3x+y+zxbzx+zy+zxbyzzxbzv3(1zx)zxbzxbzxb0,x0,X=m+u2u3u3u2u2u3u3m+v11+u2+yu3z1u2y+u3+zu2+yu3zu3+zv11+yzg1+zy+gyzgz+ggggg,g0,X=m+u2u2u20m+v1+u2+yu2yu2+y0v1+v2+y+fyfy+f0v2+f11ff11,X=mu1+u2u1u2u20m+v1u1+u2+yu1u2yu2+y0v1+yyy01111,u10,X=mu1+u2u1u2u20m+v1u1x+u2+yu1+xu2yu2+y0v1x+yxyy01111,x0,X=m+u2u2u20m+v1+u2+yu2yu2+y0v1+y+1y1y+10v3a+b+1ab1b+10,a0.

The matrix in our second example has appeared in the application of the classical Yang-Baxter equation to the inverse scattering theory [18]. Let p1 = [1, 0, 0, 0]T, p2 = [0, 1, 0, 0]T, q1 = [0, 0, 1, 0]T, and q2 = [0, 0, 0, 1]T, so

A=p1q1T+p2q2T=0010000100000000=WJW1=100000100100000101000000000100001000001001000001.

Note that A is a member of the second matrix class in (2) as the tensor product J0I2 of the 2 × 2 Jordan block J0 with eigenvalue 0 and I2. Since J = Λ3 in this example, all the solutions Y of (3) are exactly K11, …, K17 as given by Lemma 4.1. Multiplying X = WYW−1 = WKkW out with k = 11, …, 17, we find all the solutions of (1):

X=00a12a1400a32a3400a22a2400a32a34;00a12a140a33a32a3400a22a240000,a330;X=0a13a12a140a33a32a3400a22a240000,a130;0a13a12a14a31a33a32a3400000000,a13a310;X=00a12a14a31a33a32a3400a33a42a31a33a44a3100a42a44,a310;X=a11a13a12a14a31a13a31a11a32a3400a13a42a11a13a44a1100a42a44,a110;X=a11a13a12a14a31a33a32a3400000000,a110,a11a13a31a330.

6 Conclusions

As continuation of our earlier paper in which all the solutions of the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation (1) were found when A = PQT, with P and Q being n × 2 and of rank-two such that QTP is nonsingular, we have found in this paper all the solutions of (1) when QTP is singular. For each of the resulting three kinds of Jordan forms of A we solved the corresponding simplified matrix equation, thus obtaining all the structures of the solution matrices.

The various structures of the solution matrices reflect the complicated structure of the algebraic varieties as solutions of polynomial systems of multi-variable. Although we were not able to use algebraic geometry to find all the solutions of (1) in the general case, we have been successful in finding all the solutions when the rank of A is at most 2. Our future work will be devoted to the exploration of solving the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation with a given matrix A of rank-k.

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11501126, 11471122, 11661007, 11661008), the Youth Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (Nos. 20151BAB211011, 20161BAB211025), the Science Foundation of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education (Nos. GJJ150979, GJJ150982), the 111 Project, and the Foundation for Supporting Local Colleges and Universities of China— Applied Mathematics Innovative Team Building.

References

[1] D. Zhou, G. Chen, and J. Ding, “Solving the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank two matrices,” J. Comput. Appl. Math., 313 (2017), 142-151.10.1016/j.cam.2016.09.007Search in Google Scholar

[2] C. Yang and M. Ge (ed.), Braid Group, Knot Theory and Statistical Mechanics, World Scientific, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

[3] C. N. Yang, “Some exact results for the many-body problem in one dimension with repulsive delta-function interaction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967), 1312-1315.10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1312Search in Google Scholar

[4] D. Bachiller and F. Cedó, “A family of solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation,” J. Algb. 412 (2014), 218-229.10.1016/j.jalgebra.2014.05.011Search in Google Scholar

[5] F. Felix, Nonlinear Equations, Quantum Groups and Duality Theorems: A Primer on the Yang-Baxter Equation, VDM Verlag, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[6] T. Gateva-Ivanova, “Quadratic algebras, Yang-Baxter equation, and Artin-Schelter regularity,” Adv. Math. 230 (2012), 2153-2175.10.1016/j.aim.2012.04.016Search in Google Scholar

[7] J. Hietarinta, “All solutions to the constant quantum Yang-Baxter equation in two dimensions,” Phys. Lett. A 165 (1992), 245-251.10.1016/0375-9601(92)90044-MSearch in Google Scholar

[8] M. Jimbo (ed.), Yang-Baxter Equation in Integrable Systems, Adv. Series in Math. Phys. 10, World Scientific, 1990.10.1142/1021Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. Ding and N. Rhee, “Spectral solutions of the Yang-Baxter matrix equation,” J. Math. Anal. Appl. 402 (2013), 567-573.10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.01.054Search in Google Scholar

[10] J. Ding, N. Rhee, and C. Zhang, “Further solutions of a Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation,” East Asian J. Applied Math. 2(4) (2013), 352-362.10.4208/eajam.130713.221113aSearch in Google Scholar

[11] J. Ding, N. Rhee, and C. Zhang, “Commuting solutions of the Yang-Baxter matrix equation,”Applied Math. Lett. 44 (2015), 1-4.10.1016/j.aml.2014.11.017Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Ding and C. Zhang, “On the structure of the spectral solutions of the Yang-Baxter matrix equation,”Applied Math. Lett. 35 (2014), 86-89.10.1016/j.aml.2013.11.007Search in Google Scholar

[13] H. Tian, “All solutions of the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank-one matrices,”Applied Math. Lett., 51 (2016), 55-59.10.1016/j.aml.2015.07.009Search in Google Scholar

[14] D. Zhou, J. Ding, “Commuting solutions of the Yang-Baxter matrix equation for rank-three matrices,” Journal of Gannan Normal University, 6 (2016), 1-7.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Q. Dong and J. Ding, “Commuting solutions of the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for diagonalizable matrices,” Comput. Math. Appl., 72 (2016), 194-201.10.1016/j.camwa.2016.04.047Search in Google Scholar

[16] R. J. Baxter, “Partition function of the eight-vertex lattice model,”Ann. Phys. 70 (1972), 193-228.10.1142/9789812798336_0003Search in Google Scholar

[17] R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical mechanics, Longdon Academic Press, 1981.Search in Google Scholar

[18] E. K. Sklyanin, “Quantum version of the method of inverse scattering problem,” in Yang-Baxter Equation in Integrable Systems, M. Jimbo (ed.), Adv. Series in Math. Phys. 10 (1990), World Scientific, 121-171.10.1142/9789812798336_0006Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-8-13
Accepted: 2017-2-7
Published Online: 2017-3-29

© 2017 Zhou et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Integrals of Frullani type and the method of brackets
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Edge of chaos in reaction diffusion CNN model
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Calculus using proximities: a mathematical approach in which students can actually prove theorems
  7. Regular Articles
  8. An investigation on hyper S-posets over ordered semihypergroups
  9. Regular Articles
  10. The Leibniz algebras whose subalgebras are ideals
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Fixed point and multidimensional fixed point theorems with applications to nonlinear matrix equations in terms of weak altering distance functions
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Matrix rank and inertia formulas in the analysis of general linear models
  15. Regular Articles
  16. The hybrid power mean of quartic Gauss sums and Kloosterman sums
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Tauberian theorems for statistically (C,1,1) summable double sequences of fuzzy numbers
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Some properties of graded comultiplication modules
  21. Regular Articles
  22. The characterizations of upper approximation operators based on special coverings
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Bi-integrable and tri-integrable couplings of a soliton hierarchy associated with SO(4)
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Dynamics for a discrete competition and cooperation model of two enterprises with multiple delays and feedback controls
  27. Regular Articles
  28. A new view of relationship between atomic posets and complete (algebraic) lattices
  29. Regular Articles
  30. A class of extensions of Restricted (s, t)-Wythoff’s game
  31. Regular Articles
  32. New bounds for the minimum eigenvalue of 𝓜-tensors
  33. Regular Articles
  34. Shintani and Shimura lifts of cusp forms on certain arithmetic groups and their applications
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Empirical likelihood for quantile regression models with response data missing at random
  37. Regular Articles
  38. Convex combination of analytic functions
  39. Regular Articles
  40. On the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank-two matrices
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Uniform topology on EQ-algebras
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Integrations on rings
  45. Regular Articles
  46. The quasilinear parabolic kirchhoff equation
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Avoiding rainbow 2-connected subgraphs
  49. Regular Articles
  50. On non-Hopfian groups of fractions
  51. Regular Articles
  52. Singularly perturbed hyperbolic problems on metric graphs: asymptotics of solutions
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Rings in which elements are the sum of a nilpotent and a root of a fixed polynomial that commute
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Superstability of functional equations related to spherical functions
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Evaluation of the convolution sum involving the sum of divisors function for 22, 44 and 52
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Weighted minimal translation surfaces in the Galilean space with density
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Complete convergence for weighted sums of pairwise independent random variables
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Binomials transformation formulae for scaled Fibonacci numbers
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Growth functions for some uniformly amenable groups
  67. Regular Articles
  68. Hopf bifurcations in a three-species food chain system with multiple delays
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Oscillation and nonoscillation of half-linear Euler type differential equations with different periodic coefficients
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Osculating curves in 4-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index 2
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Some new facts about group 𝒢 generated by the family of convergent permutations
  75. Regular Articles
  76. lnfinitely many solutions for fractional Schrödinger equations with perturbation via variational methods
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Supersolvable orders and inductively free arrangements
  79. Regular Articles
  80. Asymptotically almost automorphic solutions of differential equations with piecewise constant argument
  81. Regular Articles
  82. Finite groups whose all second maximal subgroups are cyclic
  83. Regular Articles
  84. Semilinear systems with a multi-valued nonlinear term
  85. Regular Articles
  86. Positive solutions for Hadamard differential systems with fractional integral conditions on an unbounded domain
  87. Regular Articles
  88. Calibration and simulation of Heston model
  89. Regular Articles
  90. One kind sixth power mean of the three-term exponential sums
  91. Regular Articles
  92. Cyclic pairs and common best proximity points in uniformly convex Banach spaces
  93. Regular Articles
  94. The uniqueness of meromorphic functions in k-punctured complex plane
  95. Regular Articles
  96. Normalizers of intermediate congruence subgroups of the Hecke subgroups
  97. Regular Articles
  98. The hyperbolicity constant of infinite circulant graphs
  99. Regular Articles
  100. Scott convergence and fuzzy Scott topology on L-posets
  101. Regular Articles
  102. One sided strong laws for random variables with infinite mean
  103. Regular Articles
  104. The join of split graphs whose completely regular endomorphisms form a monoid
  105. Regular Articles
  106. A new branch and bound algorithm for minimax ratios problems
  107. Regular Articles
  108. Upper bound estimate of incomplete Cochrane sum
  109. Regular Articles
  110. Value distributions of solutions to complex linear differential equations in angular domains
  111. Regular Articles
  112. The nonlinear diffusion equation of the ideal barotropic gas through a porous medium
  113. Regular Articles
  114. The Sheffer stroke operation reducts of basic algebras
  115. Regular Articles
  116. Extensions and improvements of Sherman’s and related inequalities for n-convex functions
  117. Regular Articles
  118. Classification lattices are geometric for complete atomistic lattices
  119. Regular Articles
  120. Possible numbers of x’s in an {x, y}-matrix with a given rank
  121. Regular Articles
  122. New error bounds for linear complementarity problems of weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrices
  123. Regular Articles
  124. Boundedness of vector-valued B-singular integral operators in Lebesgue spaces
  125. Regular Articles
  126. On the Golomb’s conjecture and Lehmer’s numbers
  127. Regular Articles
  128. Some applications of the Archimedean copulas in the proof of the almost sure central limit theorem for ordinary maxima
  129. Regular Articles
  130. Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  131. Regular Articles
  132. Corrigendum to: Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  133. Regular Articles
  134. Convergence and stability of generalized φ-weak contraction mapping in CAT(0) spaces
  135. Regular Articles
  136. Triple solutions for a Dirichlet boundary value problem involving a perturbed discrete p(k)-Laplacian operator
  137. Regular Articles
  138. OD-characterization of alternating groups Ap+d
  139. Regular Articles
  140. On Jordan mappings of inverse semirings
  141. Regular Articles
  142. On generalized Ehresmann semigroups
  143. Regular Articles
  144. On topological properties of spaces obtained by the double band matrix
  145. Regular Articles
  146. Representing derivatives of Chebyshev polynomials by Chebyshev polynomials and related questions
  147. Regular Articles
  148. Chain conditions on composite Hurwitz series rings
  149. Regular Articles
  150. Coloring subgraphs with restricted amounts of hues
  151. Regular Articles
  152. An extension of the method of brackets. Part 1
  153. Regular Articles
  154. Branch-delete-bound algorithm for globally solving quadratically constrained quadratic programs
  155. Regular Articles
  156. Strong edge geodetic problem in networks
  157. Regular Articles
  158. Ricci solitons on almost Kenmotsu 3-manifolds
  159. Regular Articles
  160. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions sharing two finite sets
  161. Regular Articles
  162. On the fourth-order linear recurrence formula related to classical Gauss sums
  163. Regular Articles
  164. Dynamical behavior for a stochastic two-species competitive model
  165. Regular Articles
  166. Two new eigenvalue localization sets for tensors and theirs applications
  167. Regular Articles
  168. κ-strong sequences and the existence of generalized independent families
  169. Regular Articles
  170. Commutators of Littlewood-Paley gκ -functions on non-homogeneous metric measure spaces
  171. Regular Articles
  172. On decompositions of estimators under a general linear model with partial parameter restrictions
  173. Regular Articles
  174. Groups and monoids of Pythagorean triples connected to conics
  175. Regular Articles
  176. Hom-Lie superalgebra structures on exceptional simple Lie superalgebras of vector fields
  177. Regular Articles
  178. Numerical methods for the multiplicative partial differential equations
  179. Regular Articles
  180. Solvable Leibniz algebras with NFn Fm1 nilradical
  181. Regular Articles
  182. Evaluation of the convolution sums ∑al+bm=n lσ(l) σ(m) with ab ≤ 9
  183. Regular Articles
  184. A study on soft rough semigroups and corresponding decision making applications
  185. Regular Articles
  186. Some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions with applications
  187. Regular Articles
  188. Deficiency of forests
  189. Regular Articles
  190. Perfect codes in power graphs of finite groups
  191. Regular Articles
  192. A new compact finite difference quasilinearization method for nonlinear evolution partial differential equations
  193. Regular Articles
  194. Does any convex quadrilateral have circumscribed ellipses?
  195. Regular Articles
  196. The dynamic of a Lie group endomorphism
  197. Regular Articles
  198. On pairs of equations in unlike powers of primes and powers of 2
  199. Regular Articles
  200. Differential subordination and convexity criteria of integral operators
  201. Regular Articles
  202. Quantitative relations between short intervals and exceptional sets of cubic Waring-Goldbach problem
  203. Regular Articles
  204. On θ-commutators and the corresponding non-commuting graphs
  205. Regular Articles
  206. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of Laplace (1, 1) for GARCH models
  207. Regular Articles
  208. Multiple and sign-changing solutions for discrete Robin boundary value problem with parameter dependence
  209. Regular Articles
  210. Fundamental relation on m-idempotent hyperrings
  211. Regular Articles
  212. A novel recursive method to reconstruct multivariate functions on the unit cube
  213. Regular Articles
  214. Nabla inequalities and permanence for a logistic integrodifferential equation on time scales
  215. Regular Articles
  216. Enumeration of spanning trees in the sequence of Dürer graphs
  217. Regular Articles
  218. Quotient of information matrices in comparison of linear experiments for quadratic estimation
  219. Regular Articles
  220. Fourier series of functions involving higher-order ordered Bell polynomials
  221. Regular Articles
  222. Simple modules over Auslander regular rings
  223. Regular Articles
  224. Weighted multilinear p-adic Hardy operators and commutators
  225. Regular Articles
  226. Guaranteed cost finite-time control of positive switched nonlinear systems with D-perturbation
  227. Regular Articles
  228. A modified quasi-boundary value method for an abstract ill-posed biparabolic problem
  229. Regular Articles
  230. Extended Riemann-Liouville type fractional derivative operator with applications
  231. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  232. The algebraic size of the family of injective operators
  233. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  234. The history of a general criterium on spaceability
  235. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  236. On sequences not enjoying Schur’s property
  237. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  238. A hierarchy in the family of real surjective functions
  239. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  240. Dynamics of multivalued linear operators
  241. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  242. Linear dynamics of semigroups generated by differential operators
  243. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  244. Isomorphism theorems for some parabolic initial-boundary value problems in Hörmander spaces
  245. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  246. Determination of a diffusion coefficient in a quasilinear parabolic equation
  247. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  248. Homogeneous two-point problem for PDE of the second order in time variable and infinite order in spatial variables
  249. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  250. A nonlinear plate control without linearization
  251. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  252. Reduction of a Schwartz-type boundary value problem for biharmonic monogenic functions to Fredholm integral equations
  253. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  254. Inverse problem for a physiologically structured population model with variable-effort harvesting
  255. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  256. Existence of solutions for delay evolution equations with nonlocal conditions
  257. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  258. Comments on behaviour of solutions of elliptic quasi-linear problems in a neighbourhood of boundary singularities
  259. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  260. Coupled fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces endowed with a directed graph and application
  261. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  262. Existence of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic degenerate anisotropic equations
  263. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  264. Integro-differential systems with variable exponents of nonlinearity
  265. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  266. Elliptic operators on refined Sobolev scales on vector bundles
  267. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  268. Multiplicity solutions of a class fractional Schrödinger equations
  269. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  270. Determining of right-hand side of higher order ultraparabolic equation
  271. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  272. Asymptotic approximation for the solution to a semi-linear elliptic problem in a thin aneurysm-type domain
  273. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  274. Learnheuristics: hybridizing metaheuristics with machine learning for optimization with dynamic inputs
  275. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  276. Nature–inspired metaheuristic algorithms to find near–OGR sequences for WDM channel allocation and their performance comparison
  277. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  278. Monomial codes seen as invariant subspaces
  279. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  280. Expert knowledge and data analysis for detecting advanced persistent threats
  281. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  282. Feedback equivalence of convolutional codes over finite rings
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2017-0026/html
Scroll to top button