Home Growth functions for some uniformly amenable groups
Article Open Access

Growth functions for some uniformly amenable groups

  • Janusz Dronka , Bronislaw Wajnryb EMAIL logo , Paweł Witowicz and Kamil Orzechowski
Published/Copyright: April 26, 2017

Abstract

We present a simple constructive proof of the fact that every abelian discrete group is uniformly amenable. We improve the growth function obtained earlier and find the optimal growth function in a particular case. We also compute a growth function for some non-abelian uniformly amenable group.

MSC 2010: 20F65; 20K21; 22D40

1 Introduction

A discrete group G (group G with the discrete topology) is amenable if and only if for every finite subset AG and every t > 0, there exists a non-empty finite subset UG such that |AU| ≤ (1 + t)|U| where |U| denotes the cardinality of U.

A group G is uniformly amenable if the cardinality of the set U in the definition of amenability depends only on t and on the cardinality of A and not on the particular finite set A. More precisely (see [1]).

Definition 1.1

A group G is uniformly amenable if there exists a growth function q : ℝ+ × ℕ → ℕ such that for every finite subset AG and every t > 0,

(*) there exists a non-empty finite subset UG, |U| ≤ q(t, |A|) and |AU| ≤ (1 + t)|U|.

The condition in Definition 1.1 is called the uniform Følner condition. There is another approach to uniform amenability due to H. Kesten. It was originally introduced while considering so called symmetric random walks on groups, which are a kind of Markov chains with G as the state space (see [2]). However, Kesten’s approach can be reformulated in a combinatorial manner involving only the group structure without referring to probabilistic issues.

Let A be a finite symmetric subset of G (that means A−1 = A). By m2n(A) we denote the number of all (ordered) 2n-tuples (a1, …, a2n) with aiA, i = 1, …,2n such that the product a1a2n equals e (the identity element of the group). The group G is uniformly amenable if and only if for any natural number k and for any A with |A| = k,

(m2n(A))12nk,

where the convergence is uniform for all symmetric subsets with the same cardinality k. This condition is called the uniform Kesten condition. The equivalence between the uniform Følner and Kesten conditions was proved by Wysoczański in [10] using ultrapowers of groups.

There is an interesting relationship between the growth function q and values of m2n, namely, according to Kaimanovich, Vershik ([3] and [4]), for a uniformly amenable group G the following inequality holds for all symmetric subsets A with cardinality k

m2n(A)k2nsup0<t<14,2t<h<1(1h)n14th2q(t,k+1).

If additionally A does not contain e and elements of order two, the estimation can be refined to

m2n(A)k2nsup0<t<14,2t<h<1(1h)n14th2q(t,k2+1).

Uniformly amenable groups are obviously amenable. The group S of permutations of ℕ which move only a finite number of elements is an example of a group which is amenable but not uniformly. It is known ([5]) that the class of uniformly amenable groups is closed under extensions and taking subgroups.

More recently some results on uniformly amenable groups were obtained in [6].

Uniformly amenable groups are related to invariant uniform approximation in Banach spaces. We recall briefly this connection in order to motivate our results.

Let G be a compact abelian group, let Γ be the discrete abelian group of the characters of G. Let X = L1(G) be the Banach space of complex functions on G absolutely integrable functions with respect to Haar measure on G. For gX and γ ∈ Γ let g^(γ)=g(x)γ(x)dx. We treat ĝ as a functional on Γ. We say that X has an invariant uniform approximation property (inv. ubap) if there exists a uniform bound β : ℝ × ℕ → ℕ, such that for every ϵ > 0 and every finite subset M ⊂ Γ there exists a function gX with ∥g1 ≤ (1 + ϵ) and |supp(ĝ)| ≤ β(ϵ, |M|).

In [7], Lemma 2.1 it was proven that if Γ has a growth function q(t, k) then X has a uniform bound β(ϵ, k) ≤ q(ϵ, k)2. It was also proven that every Γ has a growth function q(t, k) = (k / t)k and therefore X has a uniform bound β(ϵ, k) ≤ (k / ϵ)2k.

J. Bourgain gave a direct proof in [8] that X has inv. ubap but his proof is difficult to understand and the result is described in terms of entropy numbers.

P. Wojtaszczyk interpreted in [9] (page 209, Theorem 13) the result of Bourgain as a uniform bound β(ϵ, k)≤ (c / ϵ)2k where c is a constant depending on the group G. He also gave a proof of this fact using functional analysis.

In the present paper we give an elementary simple proof that every discrete abelian group has a growth function q(t,k+1)=n+k1k, where t = k / n. By the Stirling formula this is smaller than (2e / t)k. By Lemma 2.1 in [7] it gives a universal bound β(ϵ, k) = (2e / ϵ)2(k − 1) with a small explicit constant c = 2e independant of the group G.

We prove in Lemma 2.5 that our q(t, k + 1) is the minimal growth function if k = 2. We also present an example of a group M of matrices with arbitrary ring coefficients and prove that it is uniformly amenable and we find a growth function for this group. It follows that the group G given in [10] is uniformly amenable because G is a subgroup of M.

2 Abelian groups

It is known that every discrete abelian group is uniformly amenable. In this section we shall give a very simple proof of this fact.

We denote by Cnk the binomial coefficient Cnk=nk.

We start with a lemma.

Lemma 2.1

If a group G satisfies the condition (*) for every finite subset A containing e, then it satisfies (*) for every finite subset A with the same growth function q(t, k).

Proof

Let A = {a1, a2, …, ak} ⊂ G and let bi=a11ai for i = 1, 2, …, k. Let B = {b1, b2, …, bk}. Suppose that U is a finite subset of G such that |BU| ≤ (1 + t)|U|. Then a1BU = AU has the same cardinality as BU so |AU| ≤ (1 + t)|U|.  □

We now pass to the abelian groups. We denote the composition law by + and we denote the neutral element by 0.

Lemma 2.2

Let G be an abelian group and let A = {0, a1, …, ak} ⊂ G. Let U={i=1kniai:ni {0, 1, …, n − 1}, ∑nin − 1}. Then |(A+U)U|(kn)|U|.

Proof

Consider all elements in (A + U) \ U. Every such element can be represented by a sum w = ∑nsas where 0 ≤ nsn and s=1kns=n}. Consider such sums representing all distinct elements of (A + U) \ U.

(A+U)U={wi=s=1kni,sas:s=1kni,s=nfori=1,2,...,d}.

We fix j ∈ {1, 2, …, k}. We shall prove that the elements {ui,m = wimaj : i = 1, 2, …, d, m = 1, …, ni,j} are distinct elements of U (if ni,j = 0 there are no elements ui,m.)

Since ni,j ≥ 1 and 1 ≤ mni,j the coefficients of ui,m are non-negative and their sum is at most n − 1 so the elements ui,m have the form of the elements in U and they belong to U. Suppose that ui,m = us,r for distinct pairs (i,m) ≠ (s, r). That means wimaj = wsraj. If m = r then wi = ws, which contradicts the assumption that wiws. If mr we may assume 0 < mr < ni,j. Then

ws = wsraj + raj = wimaj + raj = wi − (mr)ajU because 0 < mr < mni,j so wi − (mr)aj has the form of the elements in U. But this contradicts the assumptions that wsU. So we have at least i=1dni,j distinct elements in U.

This is true for j = 1, 2, …, k. On the other hand j=1k(i=1dni,j)=i=1d(j=1kni,j)=dn. Therefore there exists j such that |U|i=1dni,jdnk. Since |(A + U) \ U| = d we have |(A+U)U|(kn)|U|.  □

Theorem 2.3

Every abelian group is uniformly amenable with the growth function which satisfies q(kn,k+1)=Cn+k1k for natural k and n.

Proof

Let k and t=kn be given. Consider a subset A of G with k + 1 elements. By Lemma 2.1 we may assume that A = {0, a1, …, ak}. Let U be as in Lemma 2.2 for the set A. A sequence of the coefficients (n1, n2, …, nk) of a point in U represents an integer point of a simplex cut off from the non-negative cone of the Euclidean space ℝk (e.g. the non-negative quarter of the plane or the non-negative octant of the space) by the hyperplane i=1kni=n1. There are Cn+k1k integer points in this simplex (an easy induction argument) and therefore there are at most Cn+k1k elements in U. By Lemma 2.2 we have |(A+U)U|kn|U|hence|A+U|(1+kn)|U| as required.  □

Remark 2.4

For the other values of t we can choose the smallest n such that kn<t and let q(t,k+1)=q(kn,k+1). We believe that the value of q(t,k + 1) in the theorem is the smallest possible. We have not enough evidence to make it a conjecture. We can prove it for k = 2.

Lemma 2.5

For every abelian group G (when G has elements of the infinite order or of an arbitrarily high order) the minimal growth function q(t, k) has values q(2n,3)=Cn+12 (and for every uniformly amenable group G which has elements of the infinite order or of an arbitrarily high order every growth function satisfies q(2n,3)Cn+12 ).

Proof

We know by Theorem 2.3 that if G is abelian, there exists a growth function with these values. Let us fix k = 2 and n. We choose an element gG of a sufficiently high order (at least of order 2n4). We choose a1 = g, a2 = n2g and A = {0, a1, a2}. Suppose U is a finite subset of G such that |A+U|(1+2n)|U|. Since 0 ∈ A we have U ⊂ (A + U) and therefore |(A+U)U|2n|U|. We shall prove that |(A + U) \ U| ≥ n + 1 and therefore |U|Cn+12=n(n+1)2.

We partition the group G into cosets with respect to the cyclic subgroup H = < g > generated by the element g (the left cosets H b if G is not abelian) and we partition U into the non-empty pieces Ui contained in different cosets. Then A + Ui is contained in the same coset as Ui. If for every Ui we have |A+Ui)|>(1+2n)|Ui|, then |(A+U)|>(1+2n)|U| which contradicts our assumptions. Therefore for some Ui we have |(A+Ui)|(1+2n)|Ui|. We shall prove that this implies |Ui|Cn+12 and therefore |U|Cn+12 . So we may restrict the argument to one coset and we may assume that G = < g >.

We need to prove that |U|n(n+1)2 so we may assume that |U|≤n2 − 1. If g is of a finite order, let ord(g) = r ≥ 2n4. Every element of U can be written as u = mg = n1a1 + n2a2 where 0 ≤ n1n2 − 1 and if ord(g) = r then 0 ≤ n2 and m = n1 + n2n2r − 1. So every element of U can be identified with a point (n1, n2) in the plane and different pairs (n1, n2) correspond to different elements of UG. If u = mg then the first coordinate of u is the remainder of m modulo n2.

When we translate U in G we get a different correspondence of the elements of U with the points of the plane and different set of pairs (n1, n2) corresponds to the elements of U.

If u = (n1, n2) ∈ U then a1 + u = (n1 + 1, n2) and a2 + u = (n1, n2 + 1).

Claim. After a suitable translation of U we may assume that U is not a union of two subsets U1 and U2 in the plane in a distance more than 2 (we say that U is connected).

Proof

If subsets U1 and U2 in the plane are in a distance more than 2 from each other, then sets A + U1 and A + U2 are disjoint as subsets of the plane but some points in the plane coincide as elements of G. We shall prove that sets A + U1 and A + U2 are disjoint as subsets of G.

Since |U| < n2 not every remainder modulo n2 is equal to the first coordinate of some point in U. If G is infinite we first translate U so that the first coordinate of every point in U is different from n2 − 1. Suppose U = U1U2 as in the claim. Two distinct points in the plane (n1, n2) and (p1, p2) represent the same element of G if p1n1 = n2(n2p2), but this does not happen for the points of the sets A + U1 and A + U2.

If ord(g) = r the same claim requires an additional translation of U. We first translate U so that 0 ∈ U. Since |U| < n2 and r ≥ 2 n4 there must exist a gap of length at least 2n2 between some pair of consecutive values m1, m2 such that m1g, m2gU and m2m1 ≥ 2n2. After another translation we may assume that the gap is at the end so mgU for m > r − 2n2. After another suitable translation by less than n2 − 1 we may assume that the first coordinate of every point in U is different from n2 − 1 and mgU for mrn2. Suppose U = U1U2 as in the claim. Now two distinct points in the plane (n1, n2) and (p1, p2) represent the same element of G if either p1n1 = n2(n2p2) or p1 + n2p2n1n2n2 is a multiple of r, but none of these may happen for the points of the sets A + U1 and A + U2.

Since A + U1 and A + U2 are disjoint and |(A+U)U|2n|U| we must have |(A+Ui)Ui|2n|Ui| for i = 1 or for i = 2 and we may restrict the discussion to this smaller set Ui and prove that |Ui|Cn+12. So we may assume that U is connected.  □

We assume that U is connected. We make another translation, if necessary, to get min{n1 : (∃n2)(n1, n2) ∈ U} = 0 and min{n2 : (∃ n1)(n1, n2) ∈ U} = 0. This does not change the shape of U, it is still connected.

Let (a, b) be a point in U such that a + b is maximal. Since U is connected every vertical line n1 = c with 0 < c < a meets U and every horizontal line n2 = d with 0 < d < b meets U.

If u1 = (n1, n2) ∈ U is the rightmost element of U in its row then u1 + a1 = (n1 + 1, n2) ∈ (A + U) \ U. We call u1 + a1 a horizontal boundary point of U. If u2 = (m1, m2) ∈ U is the top element of U in its column then u2 + a2 = (m1, m2 + 1) ∈ (A + U) \ U. We call u2+a2 a vertical boundary point of U.

Observe that if u = (n1, n2)∈ U then, by the connectivity of U, there are at least n1 + 1 vertical boundary points in (A + U) \ U and at least n2 + 1 horizontal boundary points in (A + U) \ U. We need only n + 1 points therefore we may assume that n1 < n and n2 < n. If a1 + u or a2 + u is a boundary point, then its coordinates (m1, m2) still satisfy m1 < n2 and m1 + n2m2 is smaller than the order of g. It follows that distinct pairs of coordinates define distinct elements of G also for the boundary points.

We shall prove that each horizontal boundary point (n1 + 1, n2) with n2b is distinct from any vertical boundary point (m1, m2 + 1) with m1a.

Suppose (n1 + 1, n2) = (m1, m2 + 1) is a horizontal and a vertical boundary point. If n2 = b then n1 = a and m1 = n1 + 1 = a + 1. If m1 = a then m2 = b and n2 = m2 + 1 = b + 1. If n2 < b and m1 < a then there are no points of U on the vertical line above this point and on the horizontal line to the right of this point and the top right corner U1 = {(c1, c2) ∈ U : c1 > m1, c2 > n2} splits off, U is not connected.

This means that there are at least a + b + 2 points in (A + U) \ U.

Let d = |(A + U) \ U| ≥ a + b + 2. The set U lies in the triangle {(n1, n2) : 0 ≤ n1, 0 ≤ n2, n1 + n2a + b}, so (a+b+1)(a+b+2)|2|U| and by our assumptions |U|n2dn(a+b+2)2. It follows that a + b + 1 ≥ n and |(A + U) \ U| = da + b + 2 ≥ n + 1.  □

3 Some linear uniformly amenable groups

Let R be a commutative ring with a unit 1.

We consider the following group of matrices over R

M={A=1xz01y001:x,y,zR}.

An element of M can be identified with a triple (x, y, z) of elements of R. Then the composition (the product) of the triples is defined by (x1, y1, z1)(x, y, z) = (x1 + x, y1 + y, z1 + z + x1y).

Later we shall also perform the addition of the triples as elements of RRR.

The elements (0,0, z) lie in the center of M and form an abelian normal subgroup C of M. The quotient M/C is abelian so the group M is solvable and it is known that solvable groups are uniformly amenable. We want to find a growth function q(t, k) for this group, which will also give a direct proof of the fact, that M is uniformly amenable.

This example was inspired by a paper [10] by J. Wysoczański. He considered a group G which is a direct sum of groups M over all prime fields Fp = ℤ/ pℤ. If we take for the ring R the direct sum of the fields Fp and we adjoin a unit - the element with each coordinate equal to 1 in the corresponding field we get a ring R1 with a unit. The group G is a subgroup of the group M over R1.

We now consider the group M over an arbitrary commutative ring R with a unit. Let A = {a0, a1, …, ak−1} ⊂ M where ai = (−xi, −yi, −zi) for i = 0, 1, …, k − 1.

The minus sign is for the convenience of the subsequent description where the negative coefficients play a special role.

We want to estimate the number |AU|. By Lemma 2.1 we may assume that a0 = (0, 0, 0) is the unit of the group M. For a fixed n ∈ ℕ we define UnM,

Un={u=(u1,u2,u3):u1=Σitixi,u2=Σitiyi,u3=Σitizi+Σi,jti,jxiyj}

where i, j ∈ {1, 2, …, k − 1}, ti ∈ {0, 1, …, n − 1}, ti,j ∈ {0, 1, …, n2 − 1}.

An element of Un is determined by (k − 1)2 + (k − 1) integer coefficients. The set J of indices of these coefficients consists of integers and pairs of integers J = {i : 1 ≤ ik − 1, (i, j) : 1 ≤ i, jk − 1}.

We shall denote an element uU by u = (tα)αJ. Then, by the definition of the composition law in M, w = asu has a similar form, w = (fα), where fs = ts − 1, fs,j = ts,jtj and fα = tα for other αJ. In particular fα may be negative if α = s or α = (s, j) and fs ≥ − 1 and fs,j ≥ 1 − n.

Lemma 3.1

For any s ∈ {1, 2, …, k − 1} we have |asUnUn|<(2kn)|Un|.

Proof

We fix an integer s ∈ {1, 2, …, k − 1}. We consider elements of asUn \ Un and for each such element we choose one representative w = (fα). For any non-empty subset of indices I ⊂ {s,(s, 1), (s, 2), …, (s, k − 1)} we consider the set BI of all chosen representatives w = (fα) of the elements in asUn \ Un which have the negative coefficients fα exactly for αI. Suppose that BI = {w1, w2, wd}.

Let eI = (b1, b2, b3) ∈ RRR where b1 = xs, b2 = ys, b3 = zs + n(s, j) ∈ Ixsyj if sI and b1 = 0, b2 = 0, b3 = n(s, j)∈Ixsyj if sI.

We shall prove that the elements wi + meI, i = 1, 2, …, d, m = 1, 2, …,n belong to Un and are distinct. Only the coefficients fα, αI of w change. If sI then fs = −1 and it increases by m when we add meI where 1mn so fs falls into the proper range for the elements in Un. If (s, j) ∈ I then 1nfs, j ≤ −1 and fs, j increases by mn so it also falls into the proper range for the elements in Un.

Suppose that wi + meI = wj + reI for different pairs (i,m) and (j, r). If m = r then wi = wj which contradicts the assumptions. If mr we may assume that m > r. Then wj = wj + reIreI = wi + (mr)eIUn which contradicts our assumptions. Therefore |Un| ≥ nd and |BI|1n|Un|. There are (2k − 1) non-empty subsets of {s, (s, 1), (s, 2), …, (s, k − 1)} and each element of asUn \ Un lies in one of them so |asUn \ Un| < (2kn)|Un|.  □

Corollary 3.2

For every commutative ring R with unit the group M is uniformly amenable with a growth function

q(ϵ,k)=(1+(k1)(2k)ϵ)2(k1)2+k1

Proof

For a given k and ϵ choose n=[(k1)2kϵ]+1.Then(k1)2kϵ<nand(k1)2kn<ϵ. Let A = {a0 = (0, 0, 0), a1, …, ak−1} ⊂ M. We choose the set Un as in the previous lemma. Then |Un| ≤ n2(k − 1)2+k − 1 (1+(k1)2kϵ)2(k1)2+k1=q(ϵ,k). It suffices to prove that |AUn| < (1 + ϵ)|Un|. We have a0Un = Un and by the previous lemma |AUn||Un|+(k1)(2kn)|Un|<(1+ϵ)|Un|.  □

Remark 3.3

Many of the sets BI in the proof of the previous lemma may have very small contribution to the ″boundary″ AUn \ Un. In particular if different sets of coefficients (tα) represent different elements of Un then for n large |AUn \ Un| is of order k2n|Un|. Indeed if a set I in the proof of Lemma 3.1 has only one element then |BI| is equal about n2(k − 1)2+k−2. There are k such sets for each s = 1, 2, …, k − 1. If I has more than one element then |BI| is at least n times smaller therefore for n large |A Un \ Un| is equal about k2n2(k − 1)2+k−2. Moreover |Un| = n2(k − 1)2+k − 1 therefore |A Un \ Un| is equal about k2n|Un|. In this case (when n is large and ais areindependent″) it suffices to have n>k2ϵand|Un|=(k2ϵ)2(k1)2+k1. Probably this is the correct size of q(ϵ, k) but we cannot prove it.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Marek Bożejko and Jakub Gismatulin for many helpful remarks.

References

[1] Keller G., Amenable groups and varieties of groups, Illinois J.Math., 1972, 16, 257-268.10.1215/ijm/1256052282Search in Google Scholar

[2] Kesten P., Full Banach mean values on countable groups, Math. Scand., 1959, 7, 146-156.10.7146/math.scand.a-10568Search in Google Scholar

[3] Kaimanovich V. A., The spectral measure of transition operator and harmonic functions connected with the random walks on discrete groups, LOMI, Leningrad, 1980.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Kaimanovich V. A., Vershik A. M., Random Walks on Discrete Groups: Boundary and Entropy, The Annals of Probability, 1983, 11, 457-490.10.1214/aop/1176993497Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bożejko M., Uniformly Amenable Discrete Groups, Math. Ann., 1980, 51, 1-6.10.1007/BF01420276Search in Google Scholar

[6] Drutu C., Sapir M., Tree-graded spaces and asymptotic cones of groups, Topology, 2005, 44, 959-1058.10.1016/j.top.2005.03.003Search in Google Scholar

[7] Bożejko M., Pełczyński, A., An analogue in commutative harmonic analysis of the uniform bounded approximation property of Banach space, Seminaire D’Analyse Fonctionnel, 1978-79, Expose 6 No. IX.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Bourgain J., A remark on entropy of abelian groups and the invariant uniform approximation property, Studia Math., 1987, 86, 79-84.10.4064/sm-86-1-79-84Search in Google Scholar

[9] Wojtaszczyk P., Banach spaces for analysts, Cambridge UP, 1991.10.1017/CBO9780511608735Search in Google Scholar

[10] Wysoczański J., On uniformly amenable groups, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 1988, 102, 933–938.10.1090/S0002-9939-1988-0934870-XSearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-8-2
Accepted: 2016-12-13
Published Online: 2017-4-26

© 2017 Dronka et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Integrals of Frullani type and the method of brackets
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Edge of chaos in reaction diffusion CNN model
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Calculus using proximities: a mathematical approach in which students can actually prove theorems
  7. Regular Articles
  8. An investigation on hyper S-posets over ordered semihypergroups
  9. Regular Articles
  10. The Leibniz algebras whose subalgebras are ideals
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Fixed point and multidimensional fixed point theorems with applications to nonlinear matrix equations in terms of weak altering distance functions
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Matrix rank and inertia formulas in the analysis of general linear models
  15. Regular Articles
  16. The hybrid power mean of quartic Gauss sums and Kloosterman sums
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Tauberian theorems for statistically (C,1,1) summable double sequences of fuzzy numbers
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Some properties of graded comultiplication modules
  21. Regular Articles
  22. The characterizations of upper approximation operators based on special coverings
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Bi-integrable and tri-integrable couplings of a soliton hierarchy associated with SO(4)
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Dynamics for a discrete competition and cooperation model of two enterprises with multiple delays and feedback controls
  27. Regular Articles
  28. A new view of relationship between atomic posets and complete (algebraic) lattices
  29. Regular Articles
  30. A class of extensions of Restricted (s, t)-Wythoff’s game
  31. Regular Articles
  32. New bounds for the minimum eigenvalue of 𝓜-tensors
  33. Regular Articles
  34. Shintani and Shimura lifts of cusp forms on certain arithmetic groups and their applications
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Empirical likelihood for quantile regression models with response data missing at random
  37. Regular Articles
  38. Convex combination of analytic functions
  39. Regular Articles
  40. On the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank-two matrices
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Uniform topology on EQ-algebras
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Integrations on rings
  45. Regular Articles
  46. The quasilinear parabolic kirchhoff equation
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Avoiding rainbow 2-connected subgraphs
  49. Regular Articles
  50. On non-Hopfian groups of fractions
  51. Regular Articles
  52. Singularly perturbed hyperbolic problems on metric graphs: asymptotics of solutions
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Rings in which elements are the sum of a nilpotent and a root of a fixed polynomial that commute
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Superstability of functional equations related to spherical functions
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Evaluation of the convolution sum involving the sum of divisors function for 22, 44 and 52
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Weighted minimal translation surfaces in the Galilean space with density
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Complete convergence for weighted sums of pairwise independent random variables
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Binomials transformation formulae for scaled Fibonacci numbers
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Growth functions for some uniformly amenable groups
  67. Regular Articles
  68. Hopf bifurcations in a three-species food chain system with multiple delays
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Oscillation and nonoscillation of half-linear Euler type differential equations with different periodic coefficients
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Osculating curves in 4-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index 2
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Some new facts about group 𝒢 generated by the family of convergent permutations
  75. Regular Articles
  76. lnfinitely many solutions for fractional Schrödinger equations with perturbation via variational methods
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Supersolvable orders and inductively free arrangements
  79. Regular Articles
  80. Asymptotically almost automorphic solutions of differential equations with piecewise constant argument
  81. Regular Articles
  82. Finite groups whose all second maximal subgroups are cyclic
  83. Regular Articles
  84. Semilinear systems with a multi-valued nonlinear term
  85. Regular Articles
  86. Positive solutions for Hadamard differential systems with fractional integral conditions on an unbounded domain
  87. Regular Articles
  88. Calibration and simulation of Heston model
  89. Regular Articles
  90. One kind sixth power mean of the three-term exponential sums
  91. Regular Articles
  92. Cyclic pairs and common best proximity points in uniformly convex Banach spaces
  93. Regular Articles
  94. The uniqueness of meromorphic functions in k-punctured complex plane
  95. Regular Articles
  96. Normalizers of intermediate congruence subgroups of the Hecke subgroups
  97. Regular Articles
  98. The hyperbolicity constant of infinite circulant graphs
  99. Regular Articles
  100. Scott convergence and fuzzy Scott topology on L-posets
  101. Regular Articles
  102. One sided strong laws for random variables with infinite mean
  103. Regular Articles
  104. The join of split graphs whose completely regular endomorphisms form a monoid
  105. Regular Articles
  106. A new branch and bound algorithm for minimax ratios problems
  107. Regular Articles
  108. Upper bound estimate of incomplete Cochrane sum
  109. Regular Articles
  110. Value distributions of solutions to complex linear differential equations in angular domains
  111. Regular Articles
  112. The nonlinear diffusion equation of the ideal barotropic gas through a porous medium
  113. Regular Articles
  114. The Sheffer stroke operation reducts of basic algebras
  115. Regular Articles
  116. Extensions and improvements of Sherman’s and related inequalities for n-convex functions
  117. Regular Articles
  118. Classification lattices are geometric for complete atomistic lattices
  119. Regular Articles
  120. Possible numbers of x’s in an {x, y}-matrix with a given rank
  121. Regular Articles
  122. New error bounds for linear complementarity problems of weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrices
  123. Regular Articles
  124. Boundedness of vector-valued B-singular integral operators in Lebesgue spaces
  125. Regular Articles
  126. On the Golomb’s conjecture and Lehmer’s numbers
  127. Regular Articles
  128. Some applications of the Archimedean copulas in the proof of the almost sure central limit theorem for ordinary maxima
  129. Regular Articles
  130. Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  131. Regular Articles
  132. Corrigendum to: Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  133. Regular Articles
  134. Convergence and stability of generalized φ-weak contraction mapping in CAT(0) spaces
  135. Regular Articles
  136. Triple solutions for a Dirichlet boundary value problem involving a perturbed discrete p(k)-Laplacian operator
  137. Regular Articles
  138. OD-characterization of alternating groups Ap+d
  139. Regular Articles
  140. On Jordan mappings of inverse semirings
  141. Regular Articles
  142. On generalized Ehresmann semigroups
  143. Regular Articles
  144. On topological properties of spaces obtained by the double band matrix
  145. Regular Articles
  146. Representing derivatives of Chebyshev polynomials by Chebyshev polynomials and related questions
  147. Regular Articles
  148. Chain conditions on composite Hurwitz series rings
  149. Regular Articles
  150. Coloring subgraphs with restricted amounts of hues
  151. Regular Articles
  152. An extension of the method of brackets. Part 1
  153. Regular Articles
  154. Branch-delete-bound algorithm for globally solving quadratically constrained quadratic programs
  155. Regular Articles
  156. Strong edge geodetic problem in networks
  157. Regular Articles
  158. Ricci solitons on almost Kenmotsu 3-manifolds
  159. Regular Articles
  160. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions sharing two finite sets
  161. Regular Articles
  162. On the fourth-order linear recurrence formula related to classical Gauss sums
  163. Regular Articles
  164. Dynamical behavior for a stochastic two-species competitive model
  165. Regular Articles
  166. Two new eigenvalue localization sets for tensors and theirs applications
  167. Regular Articles
  168. κ-strong sequences and the existence of generalized independent families
  169. Regular Articles
  170. Commutators of Littlewood-Paley gκ -functions on non-homogeneous metric measure spaces
  171. Regular Articles
  172. On decompositions of estimators under a general linear model with partial parameter restrictions
  173. Regular Articles
  174. Groups and monoids of Pythagorean triples connected to conics
  175. Regular Articles
  176. Hom-Lie superalgebra structures on exceptional simple Lie superalgebras of vector fields
  177. Regular Articles
  178. Numerical methods for the multiplicative partial differential equations
  179. Regular Articles
  180. Solvable Leibniz algebras with NFn Fm1 nilradical
  181. Regular Articles
  182. Evaluation of the convolution sums ∑al+bm=n lσ(l) σ(m) with ab ≤ 9
  183. Regular Articles
  184. A study on soft rough semigroups and corresponding decision making applications
  185. Regular Articles
  186. Some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions with applications
  187. Regular Articles
  188. Deficiency of forests
  189. Regular Articles
  190. Perfect codes in power graphs of finite groups
  191. Regular Articles
  192. A new compact finite difference quasilinearization method for nonlinear evolution partial differential equations
  193. Regular Articles
  194. Does any convex quadrilateral have circumscribed ellipses?
  195. Regular Articles
  196. The dynamic of a Lie group endomorphism
  197. Regular Articles
  198. On pairs of equations in unlike powers of primes and powers of 2
  199. Regular Articles
  200. Differential subordination and convexity criteria of integral operators
  201. Regular Articles
  202. Quantitative relations between short intervals and exceptional sets of cubic Waring-Goldbach problem
  203. Regular Articles
  204. On θ-commutators and the corresponding non-commuting graphs
  205. Regular Articles
  206. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of Laplace (1, 1) for GARCH models
  207. Regular Articles
  208. Multiple and sign-changing solutions for discrete Robin boundary value problem with parameter dependence
  209. Regular Articles
  210. Fundamental relation on m-idempotent hyperrings
  211. Regular Articles
  212. A novel recursive method to reconstruct multivariate functions on the unit cube
  213. Regular Articles
  214. Nabla inequalities and permanence for a logistic integrodifferential equation on time scales
  215. Regular Articles
  216. Enumeration of spanning trees in the sequence of Dürer graphs
  217. Regular Articles
  218. Quotient of information matrices in comparison of linear experiments for quadratic estimation
  219. Regular Articles
  220. Fourier series of functions involving higher-order ordered Bell polynomials
  221. Regular Articles
  222. Simple modules over Auslander regular rings
  223. Regular Articles
  224. Weighted multilinear p-adic Hardy operators and commutators
  225. Regular Articles
  226. Guaranteed cost finite-time control of positive switched nonlinear systems with D-perturbation
  227. Regular Articles
  228. A modified quasi-boundary value method for an abstract ill-posed biparabolic problem
  229. Regular Articles
  230. Extended Riemann-Liouville type fractional derivative operator with applications
  231. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  232. The algebraic size of the family of injective operators
  233. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  234. The history of a general criterium on spaceability
  235. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  236. On sequences not enjoying Schur’s property
  237. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  238. A hierarchy in the family of real surjective functions
  239. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  240. Dynamics of multivalued linear operators
  241. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  242. Linear dynamics of semigroups generated by differential operators
  243. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  244. Isomorphism theorems for some parabolic initial-boundary value problems in Hörmander spaces
  245. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  246. Determination of a diffusion coefficient in a quasilinear parabolic equation
  247. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  248. Homogeneous two-point problem for PDE of the second order in time variable and infinite order in spatial variables
  249. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  250. A nonlinear plate control without linearization
  251. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  252. Reduction of a Schwartz-type boundary value problem for biharmonic monogenic functions to Fredholm integral equations
  253. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  254. Inverse problem for a physiologically structured population model with variable-effort harvesting
  255. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  256. Existence of solutions for delay evolution equations with nonlocal conditions
  257. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  258. Comments on behaviour of solutions of elliptic quasi-linear problems in a neighbourhood of boundary singularities
  259. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  260. Coupled fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces endowed with a directed graph and application
  261. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  262. Existence of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic degenerate anisotropic equations
  263. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  264. Integro-differential systems with variable exponents of nonlinearity
  265. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  266. Elliptic operators on refined Sobolev scales on vector bundles
  267. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  268. Multiplicity solutions of a class fractional Schrödinger equations
  269. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  270. Determining of right-hand side of higher order ultraparabolic equation
  271. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  272. Asymptotic approximation for the solution to a semi-linear elliptic problem in a thin aneurysm-type domain
  273. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  274. Learnheuristics: hybridizing metaheuristics with machine learning for optimization with dynamic inputs
  275. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  276. Nature–inspired metaheuristic algorithms to find near–OGR sequences for WDM channel allocation and their performance comparison
  277. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  278. Monomial codes seen as invariant subspaces
  279. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  280. Expert knowledge and data analysis for detecting advanced persistent threats
  281. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  282. Feedback equivalence of convolutional codes over finite rings
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2017-0049/html
Scroll to top button