Bibliographic bias and information-density sampling

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2015. The art of grammar: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683215.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Allassonnière-Tang, Marc, Olof Lundgren, Maja Robbers, Sandra Cronhamn, Filip Larsson, One-Soon Her, Harald Hammarström & Gerd Carling. 2021. Expansion by migration and diffusion by contact is a source to the global diversity of linguistic nominal categorization systems. Nature: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8(331). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-01003-5.Search in Google Scholar

Bakker, Dik. 2010. Language sampling. In Jae Jung Song (ed.). Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 100–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0007Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Alan. 1978. Language samples. In Joseph H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson & E. A. Moravcsik (eds.). Universals of human language, Vol. 1, 123–156. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar. 2008. A refined sampling procedure for genealogical control. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61(3). 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2008.0022.Search in Google Scholar

Boas, Franz & Ella Deloria. 1941. Dakota grammar (National Academy of Science Memoirs 23:2). Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdin, Philippe. 1997. On Goal-bias across languages: Modal, configurational and orientation parameters. In Bohumil Palek, Osamu Fujimura & Jiří Václav Neustupný (eds.). Proceedings of LP’96: Typology, item orderings and universals, 185–218. Prague: Karolinum.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2006. Encoding the distinction between location, source and direction: A typological study. In Maya Hickman & Stephane Robert (eds.). Space in languages, 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.66.03creSearch in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2009. Spatial cases. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.). The Oxford handbook of case, 609–625. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0043Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Typology and universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2005. Quantitative methods in typology. In Gabriel Altmann, Reinhard Köhler & R. Piotrowski (eds.). Quantitative Linguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch, 554–578. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 2008. An exercise in a posteriori sampling. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61(3). 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2008.0021.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199571055.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1989. Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language 13. 257–292. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.2.03dry.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2000. Counting genera vs. counting languages. Linguistic Typology 4. 334–350.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2005. Genealogical language list. In Bernard Comrie, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). World atlas of language structures, 584–644. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig. 2021. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 24th edn. Dallas: SIL International.Search in Google Scholar

Fast, Karin E. 2015. Spatial language in Tungag (Studies in the Languages of Island Melanesia 4). Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald. 2009. Sampling and genealogical coverage in WALS. Linguistic Typology 13(1). 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2009.006.Search in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald. 2021a. Inventory and content separation in grammatical descriptions of languages of the world. In Gerd Berget, Mark Michael Hall, Daniel Brenn & Sanna Kumpulainen (eds.). Linking theory and practice of digital libraries: 25th international conference on theory and practice of digital libraries, TPDL 2021, virtual event, September 13–17, 2021, proceedings, 129–140. Berlin: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald. 2021b. Gramfinder: Human and machine reading of grammatical descriptions of the languages of the world. In Eduard C. Dragut, Yunyao Li, Lucian Popa & Slobodan Vucetic (eds.). 3rd Workshop on data science with human in the loop, DaSH@KDD, virtual conference, 15 August 2021. DBLP.Search in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald. 2022. The rise and fall of grammatical theories in descriptive grammars of the languages of the world. In Elena Volodina, Dana Dannélls, Aleksandrs Berdicevskis, Markus Forsberg & Shafqat Virk (eds.). Live and learn – Festschrift in honor of Lars Borin (GU-ISS Forskningsrapporter från Institutionen för svenska, flerspråkighet och språkteknologi), 55–59. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.Search in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald & Sebastian Nordhoff. 2011. LangDoc: Bibliographic infrastructure for linguistic typology. Oslo Studies in Language 3(2). 31–43. https://doi.org/10.5617/osla.75.Search in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald, Thom Castermans, Robert Forkel, Kevin Verbeek, Michel A. Westenberg & Bettina Speckmann. 2018. Simultaneous visualization of language endangerment and language description. Language Documentation & Conservation 12. 359–392.Search in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald, One-Soon Her & Marc Tang. 2021. Term-spotting: A quick-and-dirty method for extracting typological features of language from grammatical descriptions. In Simon Dobnik, Richard Johansson & Peter Ljunglöf (eds.). Selected contributions from the eighth Swedish language technology conference (SLTC-2020), 25–27 November 2020, 27–34. Linköping: Linköping Electronic Press.10.3384/ecp184172Search in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank. 2022. Glottolog 4.7. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at: http://glottolog.org.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2021a. Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form-frequency correspondences and predictability. Journal of Linguistics 57. 605–633. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226720000535.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2021b. Towards standardization of morphosyntactic terminology for general linguistics. In Luca Alfieri, Giorgio Francesco Arcodia & Paolo Ramat (eds.). Linguistic categories, language description and linguistic typology (Typological studies in language 132), 35–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.132.02hasSearch in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin & Sven Siegmund. 2006. Simulating the replication of some of Greenberg’s word order generalizations. Linguistic Typology 10(1). 74–82.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.). 2005. World atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kopecka, Anetta & Marine Vuillermet (eds.). 2021. Source-goal (a)symmetries across languages [special issue]. Studies in Language, Vol. 45.10.1075/sl.45.1Search in Google Scholar

Lestrade, Sander. 2010. The space of case. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti, Dik Bakker & Antti Arppe. 2016. Sampling for variety. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 233–296. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0006.Search in Google Scholar

Moseley, Christopher & R. E. Asher (eds.). 2006. Atlas of the world’s languages, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Nintemann, Julia, Maja Robbers & Nicole Hober. 2020. Here – hither – hence and related categories: A cross-linguistic study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110672640Search in Google Scholar

Pantcheva, Marina. 2009. Directional expressions cross-linguistically: Nanosyntax and lexicalization. Nordlyd 36(1). 7–39. https://doi.org/10.7557/12.214.Search in Google Scholar

Pantcheva, Marina. 2010. The syntactic structure of locations, goals, and sources. Linguistics 48(5). 1043–1081. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.034.Search in Google Scholar

Pantcheva, Marina. 2011. Decomposing Path: The nanosyntax of directional expressions. Tromsø: University of Tromsø doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Perkins, Revere D. 1989. Statistical techniques for determining language sample size. Studies in Language 13. 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.2.04per.Search in Google Scholar

Perkins, Revere D. 2001. Sampling procedures and statistical methods. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.). Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 20.1), 419–434. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Piantadosi, Steven T. & Edward Gibson. 2014. Quantitative standards for absolute linguistic universals. Cognitive Science 38(4). 736–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12088.Search in Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan & Dik Bakker. 1998. Language sampling. Linguistic Typology 2. 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.3.263.Search in Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan, Dik Bakker, Kees Hengeveld & Peter Kahrel. 1993. Statistical techniques for determining language sample size. Studies in Language 17. 169–203. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17.1.07rij.Search in Google Scholar

Robbers, Maja & Nicole Hober. 2018. Verb-framed spatial deixis in Mesoamerican languages and the increasing complexity of SOURCE via Spanish de. Language Typology and Universals 71(3). 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2018-0016.Search in Google Scholar

Skirgård, Hedvig, Hannah J. Haynie, Damián E. Blasi, Harald Hammarström, Jeremy Collins, Jay J. Latarche, Jakob Lesage, Tobias Weber, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Sam Passmore, Angela Chira, Luke Maurits, Russell Dinnage, Michael Dunn, Ger Reesink, Ruth Singer, Claire Bowern, Patience Epps, Jane Hill, Outi Vesakoski, Martine Robbeets, Noor Karolin Abbas, Daniel Auer, Nancy A. Bakker, Giulia Barbos, Robert D. Borges, Swintha Danielsen, Luise Dorenbusch, Ella Dorn, John Elliott, Giada Falcone, Jana Fischer, Yustinus Ghanggo Ate, Hannah Gibson, Hans-Philipp Göbel, Jemima A. Goodall, Victoria Gruner, Andrew Harvey, Rebekah Hayes, Heer Leonard, Roberto E. Herrera Miranda, Nataliia Hübler, Biu Huntington-Rainey, Jessica K. Ivani, Marilen Johns, Erika Just, Eri Kashima, Carolina Kipf, Janina V. Klingenberg, Nikita König, Aikaterina Koti, Richard G. A. Kowalik, Olga Krasnoukhova, Nora L. M. Lindvall, Mandy Lorenzen, Hannah Lutzenberger, Tânia R. A. Martins, Celia Mata German, Suzanne van der Meer, Jaime Montoya Samamé, Michael Müller, Saliha Muradoglu, Kelsey Neely, Johanna Nickel, Miina Norvik, Cheryl Akinyi Oluoch, Jesse Peacock, India O. C. Pearey, Naomi Peck, Stephanie Petit, Sören Pieper, Mariana Poblete, Daniel Prestipino, Linda Raabe, Amna Raja, Janis Reimringer, Sydney C. Rey, Julia Rizaew, Eloisa Ruppert, Kim K. Salmon, Jill Sammet, Rhiannon Schembri, Lars Schlabbach, Frederick W. P. Schmidt, Amalia Skilton, Wikaliler Daniel Smith, Hilário de Sousa, Kristin Sverredal, Daniel Valle, Javier Vera, Judith Voß, Tim Witte, Henry Wu, Stephanie Yam, Jingting Ye, Maisie Yong, Tessa Yuditha, Roberto Zariquiey, Robert Forkel, Nicholas Evans, Stephen C. Levinson, Martin Haspelmath, Simon J. Greenhill, Quentin D. Atkinson & Russell D. Gray. 2023. Grambank reveals the importance of genealogical constraints on linguistic diversity and highlights the impact of language loss. Science Advances 9(16). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg6175.Search in Google Scholar

Song, Jae Jung. 2001. Linguistic typology: Morphology and syntax. Harlow: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas, Nataliya Levkovych, Aina Urdze, Julia Nintemann & Maja Robbers. 2017. Spatial interrogatives in Europe and beyond: Where, whither, whence. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110539516Search in Google Scholar

Velupillai, Viveka. 2012. An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.176Search in Google Scholar

Verkerk, Annemarie. 2017. The Goal-over-Source principle in European languages: Preliminary results from a parallel corpus study. In Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.). Space in diachrony, 1–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.188.01verSearch in Google Scholar

Virk, Shafqat Mumtaz, Lars Borin, Anju Saxena & Harald Hammarström. 2017. Automatic extraction of typological linguistic features from descriptive grammars. In Kamil Ekštein & Václav Matoušek (eds.). Text, speech, and dialogue: 20th international conference (TSD 2017) (Lecture Notes in computer science 10415), 111–119. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-64206-2_13Search in Google Scholar

Virk, Shafqat Mumtaz, Harald Hammarström, Markus Forsberg & Wichmann Søren. 2020. The DReaM corpus: A multilingual annotated corpus of grammars for the world’s languages. In Proceedings of the 12th language resources and evaluation conference, 871–877. Marseille: European Language Resources Association.Search in Google Scholar

Widmann, Thomas. 2001. Language sampling for typological studies. Aarhus: University of Aarhus MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Widmann, Thomas & Peter Bakker. 2006. Does sampling matter? A test in replicability. Linguistic Typology 10(1). 83–95.Search in Google Scholar

Xia, Fei, William D. Lewis, Michael Wayne Goodman, Glenn Slayden, Ryan Georgi, Joshua Crowgey & Emily M. Bender. 2016. Enriching a massively multilingual database of interlinear glossed text. Language Resources and Evaluation 50(2). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-015-9325-4.Search in Google Scholar