Home Physical Sciences Shannon entropy for Feinberg–Horodecki equation and thermal properties of improved Wei potential model
Article Open Access

Shannon entropy for Feinberg–Horodecki equation and thermal properties of improved Wei potential model

  • Clement Atachegbe Onate EMAIL logo , Michael Chukwudi Onyeaju and Ituen Bassey Okon
Published/Copyright: September 22, 2021

Abstract

We solved a one-dimensional time-dependent Feinberg–Horodecki equation for an improved Wei molecular energy potential function using the parametric Nikiforov–Uvarov method. The quantized momentum and the corresponding wave functions were obtained. With the help of the wave functions obtained, we calculated Shannon entropy for both the position space and momentum space. The results were used to study four molecules. The results of Shannon entropy were found to be in excellent agreement with those found in the literature. For more usefulness of these studies, the quantized momentum obtained was transformed into an energy equation with certain transformations. The energy equation was then used to calculate some thermodynamic properties such as vibrational mean energy, vibrational specific heat, vibrational mean free energy, and vibrational entropy via computation of the partition function. The thermodynamic properties studied for CO, NO, CH, and ScH showed that for a certain range of the temperature studied, the molecules exhibited similar features except for the vibrational entropy.

1 Introduction

The wave equations studied in quantum mechanics are basically categorized into relativistic and non-relativistic wave equations. The solutions of the Schrödinger equation occupy the main position in the non-relativistic quantum mechanics, while the Dirac equation and Klein−Gordon equation occupy the main positions in the relativistic quantum mechanics. The Schrödinger equation describes non-relativistic spinless particles, the Klein−Gordon equation describes the relativistic spin-zero particles, the Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau (DKP) equation describes the relativistic spin-zero and spin-one particles, and the Dirac equation focuses on the relativistic spin-half particles. These equations were solved by adopting different methodologies such as asymptotic iteration method [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], Nikiforov−Uvarov (NU) method [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], supersymmetry quantum mechanics [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44], factorization method [45], exact and proper quantization rule [46,47,48,49], shifted 1/N expansion method [50], and others. Over the years, many authors have dedicated their time to study the coordinate-like counterpart (time-independent part) of the Schrӧdinger wave equation with different physical potential models such as the Kratzer potential, Morse potential, Rosen−Morse potential, Manning−Rosen potential, Deng−Fan potential, and Pӧschl−Teller potential among others [51,52,53,54,55,56]. However, the time-dependent counterpart has not been given much attention. This could be probably because it was assumed that the time-dependent counterpart could not be applied to wider studies, unlike the time-independent counterpart. However, the report on Feinberg–Horodecki for some vector potentials was given in refs. [57,58]. In this study, we aim to obtain a solution to the time-dependent counterpart of the Schrӧdinger wave equation and apply it to study Shannon entropy, which has not been studied yet to the best of our knowledge. Entropy, generally, is the measure of a system’s thermal energy per unit temperature that is unavailable for doing useful work. The amount of entropy is a measure of molecular disorder or randomness since the work obtained is ordered from molecular motion. Shannon entropy has been given attention in statistical mechanics and mathematics. In 1948, Shannon [59] used Shannon entropy to study fundamental limits on signal processing operations. Entropic systems in the past few years have been deeply studied in statistical mechanics. The entropic systems measure the spread of the electron density. Shannon entropy precisely is the probabilistic measure of uncertainty that is used to determine the stability of a system. The computations of these entropies are based on the probability density function that is obtained from the wave function. In the present work, the Feinberg–Horodecki equation will be studied with a new expression for molecular Wei potential energy function. In 1990, Wei H. [60] proposed a four-parameter diatomic molecular potential function of the form

(1) V 1 ( t ) = D e 1 e b ( t t e ) 1 h e b ( t t e ) 2 , h < 1 ,

where D e is the dissociation parameter, t e is the equilibrium time point, b is the screening parameter that characterizes the range of the potential, and h is the potential parameter. This potential function has been studied very well and has been used to investigate the rotational vibrating levels of diatomic molecules [61,62,63,64,65,66]. The Wei potential given in equation (1) has been modified by Jia et al. [67] in one of their works as

(2) V 2 ( t ) = D e 1 e b t e h e b t e e b t h e b t e 2 .

The potentials given in equations (1) and (2) are time-dependent vector potential. These potentials are obtained by replacing r with t in the time-independent potential. The time-dependent vector potential has been used in the probability distribution for the scintillations caused by an electron hitting a screen after diffraction. The vector potential function given in equation (2) is a good molecular potential as it possesses molecular spectroscopic parameters. This potential has not received much attention due to its complexity when it comes to applications. This work is organized as follows: Section 2 is a brief review of the parametric Nikiforov–Uvarov method. Section 3 deals with the solutions of the Feinberg–Horodecki equation with the new expression for molecular Wei energy potential function while in Section 4, the computation of the entropic system is presented. In Section 5, we present the thermodynamic properties. In Section 6, we discuss the results of this work and give the concluding remarks in Section 7.

2 Parametric Nikiforov–Uvarov method

The parametric Nikiforov–Uvarov method derived by Tezcan and Sever [26] is the simplification of the original Nikiforov–Uvarov method. Without any derivation in this work, the general equation of the form [26] is given by

(3) d 2 d s 2 + c 1 c 2 s s ( 1 c 3 s ) d ds + ξ 1 s 2 + ξ 2 s ξ 3 s 2 ( 1 c 3 s ) 2 ψ ( s ) = 0 .

The conditions for the energy equation and the corresponding wave function of the above equation are

(4) c 2 n ( 2 n + 1 ) c 5 + n ( n 1 ) c 3 + c 7 + 2 c 3 c 8 + ( 2 n + 1 ) ( c 9 + c 3 c 8 ) + 2 c 8 c 9 = 0 ,

(5) ψ ( s ) = s c 12 ( 1 c 3 s ) c 12 c 13 c 3 P n c 10 1 , c 11 c 3 c 10 1 ( 1 2 c 3 s ) .

The parameters in equations (4) and (5) are obtained as

(6) c 4 = 1 2 ( 1 c 1 ) , c 5 = 1 2 ( c 2 2 c 3 ) , c 6 = c 5 2 + ξ 1 , c 7 = 2 c 4 c 5 ξ 2 , c 8 = c 4 2 + ξ 3 , c 9 = c 6 + c 3 c 7 + c 3 2 c 8 , c 10 = c 1 + 2 c 4 + 2 c 8 , c 11 = c 2 2 c 5 + 2 ( c 9 + c 3 c 8 ) , c 12 = c 4 + c 8 , c 13 = c 5 c 9 c 3 c 8 .

3 Feinberg–Horodecki equation and the Wei energy potential function

In this section, we calculate the quantized momentum and the wave function. The Feinberg–Horodecki equation with the time-dependent vector potential V ( t ) function is given by

(7) 2 2 m c 2 d 2 d t 2 + V ( t ) + ( + 1 ) 2 2 m c 2 t 2 ψ n ( t ) = c p n ψ n ( t ) ,

where c is the speed of light, m is the mass, is the angular momentum quantum number, ψ n ( t ) is the wave function, and p n is the quantized momentum.

To approximate the term ( + 1 ) t 2 , in equation (7), we use the formula [66]

(8) ( + 1 ) t 2 ( + 1 ) t e 2 ρ 0 + ρ 1 e b t h e b t e + ρ 2 ( e b t h e b t e ) 2 ,

where

(9) ρ 0 = 1 + 3 ( 1 b t e ) + 2 h ( 3 b t e ) e b t e + h 2 ( 3 h + b t e ) e 2 b t e b 2 t e 2 ,

(10) ρ 1 = 6 h ( b t e 3 ) 18 h 2 e b t e + 2 ( 2 b t e 3 ) e b t e 2 h 2 ( 3 + h b ) e 2 b t e b 2 t e 2 ,

(11) ρ 2 = 18 h 2 + 2 h 3 ( 6 + b t e ) e b t e + 2 h ( 6 b t e ) e b t e + h 4 ( 3 + b t e ) e 2 b t e + ( 3 b t e ) e 2 b t e b 2 t e 2 .

Substituting equations (2) and (8) into equation (7), we have

(12) d 2 d t 2 + 2 m c 2 ( p n D e ) 2 ρ 0 ( + 1 ) t e 2 + V T 1 e b t 1 λ h e b t V T 2 e 2 b t ( 1 λ h e b t ) 2 ψ n ( t ) = 0 ,

where

(13) V T 1 = 4 m c 2 λ D e ( 1 h ) 2 ρ 1 ( + 1 ) t e 2 ,

(14) V T 2 = 2 m c 2 λ 2 D e ( 1 h ) 2 2 + ρ 2 ( + 1 ) t e 2 ,

and e b r e is replaced by λ . To obtain the solutions of equation (12) with the parametric Nikiforov–Uvarov method, we define a variable of the form y = λ h e b t . On using this transformation into equation (12), we have another differential equation of the form

(15) d 2 ψ n ( y ) d y 2 + 1 y y ( 1 y ) d ψ n ( y ) d y + V A y 2 + V B y V C [ y ( 1 y ) ] 2 ψ n ( y ) = 0 ,

where

(16) V A = 2 m c 2 ( D e h 2 c p n h 2 + 2 h ( 1 h ) + ( h + 1 ) 2 ) b 2 h 2 2 + ( + 1 ) b 2 t e 2 ρ 0 ρ 1 λ h + ρ 2 λ 2 h 2 ,

(17) V B = 4 m c 2 ( D e h c p n h + 1 h ) h b 2 2 + ( + 1 ) b 2 t e 2 2 ρ 0 ρ 1 λ h ,

(18) V C = 2 m c 2 ( c p n D e ) b 2 2 ( + 1 ) ρ 0 b 2 t e 2 .

Comparing equation (15) with equation (3), we have the parametric constant values in equation (6) as follows

(19) c 1 = c 2 = c 3 = 1 , c 4 = 0 , c 5 = 1 2 , c 6 = 1 4 + V A , c 7 = V B , c 8 = V C , c 9 = V A V B + V C + 1 4 , c 10 = 1 + 2 V C , c 11 = 2 ( 1 + V A B + C + V C ) , c 12 = V C , c 13 = 1 2 ( 1 + V A B + C ) V C , V A B + C = V A V B + V C .

Substituting the values of the parametric constants into equation (19) into equations (4) and (5) respectively, we have the quantized momentum and its corresponding wave function as

(20) p n = D e c + ρ 0 ( + 1 ) 2 2 m c 3 b 2 2 2 m c 3 ϒ 0 n ( n + 1 ) 1 2 n + 1 2 ϒ 1 1 + 2 n + ϒ 1 2 ,

(21) ψ n ( y ) = N n y ϒ 2 ( 1 y ) 0.5 ( 1 + ϒ 1 ) P n ( 2 ϒ 2 , ϒ 1 ) ( 1 2 y ) ,

(22) ϒ 0 = 4 m c 2 D e ( 1 h ) b 2 2 ρ 1 ( + 1 ) λ h b 2 2 ,

(23) ϒ 1 = 1 + 4 ρ 2 ( + 1 ) λ 2 h 2 b 2 2 + 8 m c 2 D e ( 1 h ) 2 b 2 h 2 2 ,

(24) ϒ 2 = V C ,

and N n is the normalization constant. Using the normalization condition, we can easily determine the normalization constant. Thus

(25) 0 ψ n ( t ) 2 d t = 1 .

(26) 1 b h λ 1 0 ψ n ( y ) 2 d y y = 1 , y = λ h e b t .

Using another transformation s = 1 2 y in equation (26), equation (26) then becomes

(27) 1 b h λ 1 1 ψ n ( y ) 2 2 1 s d s = 1 ,

where

(28) ψ n ( s ) 2 = N n 2 1 s 2 ϒ 3 1 + s 2 1 + ϒ 1 [ P n ( ϒ 3 , ϒ 1 ) ( s ) ] 2 ,

(29) ϒ 3 = 2 ϒ 2 .

Using the integral given in the appendix, we have the normalization constant as

(30) N n 2 = n ! ( ϒ 3 1 ) Γ ( ϒ 3 + ϒ 1 + n + 1 ) b h λ 2 Γ ( ϒ 3 + n ) Γ ( ϒ 1 + n + 1 ) .

4 Shannon entropy

In the concept of this work, Shannon entropy will be studied for the time point and momentum space using the probability density function ρ ( t ) = ψ n ( t ) 2 . The Shannon entropies for the time point and momentum space, respectively, are given by refs. [68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77]

(31) S ( ρ ) = 4 π 0 ρ ( t ) log ρ ( t ) d t ,

(32) S ( γ ) = 4 π 0 γ ( t ) log γ ( t ) d t .

To calculate the Shannon entropy for the time point, we define a new variable of the form s = 1 y , which now changes equation (31) to the form

(33) S ( ρ ) = 4 π b h λ 0 1 N n 2 s ϒ 1 + 1 ( 1 s ) ϒ 3 Φ log [ N n 2 s ϒ 1 + 1 ( 1 s ) ϒ 3 Φ ] d s ,

where we have defined

(34) P n ( ϒ 3 , ϒ 1 ) ( s 1 ) = F 1 2 ( n , n + 2 ( ϒ 3 + ϒ 1 ) ; 2 ϒ 3 + 1 ; s ) ,

(35) Φ = F 1 2 ( n , n + 2 ( ϒ 3 + ϒ 1 ) ; 2 ϒ 3 + 1 ; s ) ,

Equation (33) is the final simplified form by using equation (30), the formula, and the integral in the appendix.

To obtain the Shannon entropy for the momentum space, we further define x = 1 2 y , and use this in equation (32) to obtain

(36) S ( γ ) = 4 π N n 2 b h λ 1 1 ( 1 + x ) ϒ 3 1 ( 1 x ) 1 + ϒ 1 log [ ( 1 + x ) ϒ 3 1 ( 1 x ) 1 + ϒ 1 ] d x ,

(37a) = [ P n ( ϒ 3 , ϒ 1 ) ( s ) ] 2 .

In equation (36), we have also defined 1 x = 1 1 x 2 . The Shannon entropy for the momentum space is simplified using equations (30) and (36), a relation, and integral given in the appendix.

5 Thermodynamic properties

In this section, we studied the improved Wei molecular energy potential function in the domain of thermodynamic properties. The energy equation used for the computations is obtained from the quantized momentum obtained in equation (20). Some simple transformations c 1 and p n E n used in equation (20) result in

(37b) E n = D e + b 2 2 2 m ρ 0 ( + 1 ) b 2 4 m D e ( 1 h ) b 2 2 + ϒ E n + 1 2 1 + 4 ρ 2 ( + 1 ) λ 2 h 2 b 2 2 + 8 m D e ( 1 h ) 2 b 2 h 2 2 1 + 2 n + 1 + 4 ρ 2 ( + 1 ) λ 2 h 2 b 2 2 + 8 m D e ( 1 h ) 2 b 2 h 2 2 2 ,

(37c) ϒ E = ρ 1 ( + 1 ) λ h b 2 2 n ( n + 1 ) 1 2 .

To solve the thermodynamic properties, we consider the pure vibrational states of the molecules by deriving the eigenstates as

(38) E n = b 2 2 2 m Λ 1 Λ 2 2 2 ( n + τ ) 2 + ( n + τ ) 2 2 , n = 0 , 1 , 2 , < n max = [ ϖ ] ,

where

(39) Λ 1 = 2 m D e b 2 2 , Λ 2 = 1 2 1 + 8 m D e ( 1 h ) b 2 2 1 + m D e ( 1 h ) 2 h 2 , τ = 1 2 1 + 1 + 8 m D e ( 1 h ) 2 b 2 h 2 2 .

In equation (38), we have introduced ϖ = τ + Λ 1 ± Λ 1 Λ 2 for mathematical simplicity so that [ ϖ ] is the largest integer inferior to ϖ .

The vibrational partition function for the molecule is obtained as

(40) Z ( β , ϖ ) = n = 0 ϖ e β E n , β = 1 kT ,

where k is the Boltzmann constant. On substituting equation (38) into equation (40), we obtain

(41) Z ( β , ϖ ) = n = 0 ϖ e β b 2 2 2 m ( Λ 2 2 Λ 1 ) + β b 2 2 Λ 2 2 8 m ( n + τ ) 2 + β b 2 2 Λ 1 8 m ( n + τ ) 2 .

In the classical limit, the summation in equation (41) can be replaced by an integral

(42) Z ( β , ϖ ) = 0 ϖ e β b 2 2 2 m ( Λ 2 2 Λ 1 ) + β b 2 2 Λ 2 2 8 m ρ 2 + β b 2 2 Λ 1 8 m ρ 2 d ρ , ρ = ( n + τ ) .

so that

(43) Z ( β , ϖ ) = Λ 3 Λ 4 2 ,

where

(44) a = b 2 2 ( Λ 1 2 Λ 1 ) 8 m , c = b 2 2 Λ 1 8 m , d = b 2 2 Λ 2 2 8 m , Λ 3 = e β ( a c ρ ) d β , Λ 4 = 2 ϖ e d β ϖ 2 d β 2 d β π erfi d β ϖ d β 2 π .

Using equation (43), other thermodynamic systems for the diatomic molecules will be computed

I. Vibrational mean energy U :

(45) U ( β , ϖ ) = β ln z ( β , ϖ ) = 1 2 Λ 3 Λ 4 b Λ 3 Λ 5 Λ 3 Λ 4 ,

where

(46) Λ 5 = ϖ e d β ϖ 2 d ( d β ) 3 2 ( d ) 3 2 β π erfi d β ϖ ( d β ) 3 2 d π erfi d β ϖ d β β .

II . Vibrational specific heat capacity C :

C ( β , ϖ ) = T U = k β 2 β U ,

(47) = k β 4 Λ 4 ( β ) d ( d β ) + 4 Λ 5 d 4 Λ 6 d + 1 ( d β ) 2 2 Λ 5 + 2 ( d β ) Λ 4 Λ 5 d Λ 4 Λ 5 ,

where

(48) Λ 6 = 3 2 ϖ e d β ϖ 2 d 2 ( d β ) 5 2 ( d ) 5 2 β π erfi d β ϖ ( d β ) 5 2 ( d ) 3 2 π erfi d β ϖ ( d β ) 3 2 β + d π erfi d β ϖ 2 ( β ) 3 2 d β d e d β ϖ 2 d β β ϖ .

III. Vibrational mean free energy F :

(49) F ( β , ϖ ) = k T lnZ( β , ϖ ) = 1 β ln Z ( β , ϖ ) .

And, finally,

IV. Vibrational entropy S :

(50) S ( β , ϖ ) = k ln Z ( β , ϖ ) + k T T ln Z ( β , ϖ ) = k ln Z ( β , ϖ ) k β β ln Z ( β , ϖ ) .

6 Discussion of results

Table 1 presents the quantized momentum for various n and with four values of h . For h = 1 , the quantized momentum varies inversely with both n and . For h = 0 , the quantized momentum varies directly with both n and . The spectroscopic parameters for four molecules studied here are given in Table 2. In Table 3, we presented the quantized momentum for three values of b with different states of CO , NO, CH , and ScH molecules. The effect observed in Table 1 was also observed in Table 3. The Shannon entropy for the time point, momentum space, and their sum for various values of the dissociation energy are presented in Table 4. The two entropies vary inversely with each other. The results in Table 4 confirmed and satisfied Bialynicki–Birula and Mycielski inequalities. The minimum bound for the sum of the entropies is 6.663738148, which is greater than 1 + log π (1.497206180) for a one-dimensional system. This is the entropic uncertainty relation, i.e., S(ρ) + S(γ) ≥ D(1 + log π), which is the major test of accuracy for a calculated Shannon entropy of any physical potential model. The results in Table 4 revealed that a diffused density distribution in the momentum space is associated with a localized density distribution at the time point. In Tables 5 and 6, we numerically presented the Shannon entropies for four molecules. In Table 5, where computation is done by varying the value of b , the entropies vary inversely with each other that obeys Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation. However, in Table 6 where the computation is done by varying the value of h , the entropies vary in the same direction.

Table 1

Quantized momentum for various n and with c = m = = 1 , b = 0.55 , t e = 0.9 , and D e = 5

n p n ( h = 1 ) p n ( h = 0 )
0 0 1.211140806 −636.3082748
1 −4.329463900 −629.1252322
2 −27.94193417 −614.7591472
3 −94.46366812 −593.2100195
1 0 2.975293030 −59.84189164
1 −4.087240940 −52.65884910
2 −28.88930203 −38.29276400
3 −92.60772679 −16.74363636
2 0 4.104462269 −14.73633099
1 −4.165884112 −7.553288445
2 −29.91236645 6.812796648
3 −91.40467022 28.36192429
3 0 4.742617832 −2.752592343
1 −4.502301818 4.430450204
2 −31.01110903 18.79653530
3 −90.70633416 40.34566294
Table 2

Spectroscopic parameters for the molecules studied in this work [77]

Parameters CO NO CH ScH
m ( a m u ) 6.860586000 7.468441000 0.929931 0.986040
t e ( n s ) 1.1283 1.1508 1.1198 1.776
D e ( e V ) 10.845073641 8.084329855 3.947418665 2.25
Table 3

Quantized momentum for various n , , and the three values of b with c = m = = h = 1

State b CO NO CH ScH
1s 0.25 0.330546997 0.273271253 0.525462924 0.380921760
0.55 0.719724601 0.594330400 1.101797647 0.787222946
0.75 0.974664736 0.804229817 1.453854878 1.028140906
2p 0.25 −2.608080696 −2.458144378 −69.23657497 −10.72422961
0.55 0.320494191 0.237723458 −2.412848315 −0.005991969
0.75 0.813961399 0.663441313 0.140152958 0.872347400
3p 0.25 −2.111200979 −2.062372529 −68.81629539 −10.54747667
0.55 1.627509393 1.305760548 −1.480665156 0.935591575
0.75 2.555568068 2.082837277 1.685051062 1.907815421
3d 0.25 −10.36047652 −9.671067467 −499.6520557 −37.05908994
0.55 −0.487636036 −0.484079959 −10.89346362 −1.594830312
0.75 0.492031263 0.381430375 −2.563757849 0.560081564
Table 4

Shannon entropy for the time point and momentum space at the ground state with c = m = = 1 , b = 0.2 , h = 0.99 , and = 0

D e S ( ρ ) S ( γ ) S ( ρ ) + S ( γ )
2 −0.910709094 7.574447242 6.663738148
4 −5.290234031 66.35443672 61.06420269
6 −13.20334940 360.5664776 347.3631282
8 −24.69425650 1744.336256 1719.642000
10 −39.77768912 8028.577257 7988.799568
Table 5

Shannon entropy for the time point and momentum space at the ground state with c = = 1 , h = 0.99 , and = 0 for some molecules

b CO NO
S ( γ ) S ( ρ ) S ( γ ) S ( ρ )
0.2 40907774.37 −337.6784452 54217222.45 −205.9275934
0.4 688862.4775 −106.6322526 35960.26846 −58.45996173
0.6 799.9223990 −18.50035117 360.5664776 −13.20334940
0.8 25.39000293 −2.664297923 7.574447242 −0.910709093
Table 6

Shannon entropy for the time point and momentum space at the ground state with c = = 1 , b = 0.2 , and = 0 for some molecules

h CH ScH
S ( γ ) S ( ρ ) S ( γ ) S ( ρ )
1 7.574447242 −0.910709093 7.574447242 −0.910709093
3 61.55538773 −0.269839731 17.89073044 −0.091367385
5 815.6195175 −0.043079826 84.09702899 −0.007212749
7 7664.092235 −0.004868439 636.1148601 −0.009047365
9 193905.8494 −0.004610239 7664.092235 −0.004868440

We have computed the thermodynamic properties of the improved Wei molecular energy potential function for four molecules, i.e., CO, NO, CH, and ScH. The computations were done using the spectroscopic parameters in Table 2. The variation of each of the thermodynamic properties against the temperature (β) is examined. In Figure 1(a–d), we plotted the partition function Z(β) against β for CO, NO, CH, and ScH, respectively. The partition function increases as the temperature increases. The increase in temperature is highly noticeable after some temperature increase from the origin (−K). In the case of NO (Figure 1b), the partition function remains almost constant from –K to −0.3K. In Figure 2(a–d), we have plotted the vibrational mean energy U against β for the same molecules. It is noted that the mean energy decreases gradually from –K to −2K before a sharp decrease occurred. In each case, the vibrational mean energy becomes zero at 273°C. At 273°C, the mean energy for various quantum states is equal. In Figure 3(a–d), we have plotted vibrational specific heat C against β. As it can be seen, the vibrational specific heat increases monotonically as the temperature changes positively for all the molecules. At a temperature of about −2.85 K, the specific heat at different quantum states converged for the four molecules studied. The variation of vibrational mean free energy F against β is shown in Figure 4(a–d). As we can see from the figures, the vibrational mean free energy increases gradually from –K to −0.5K. A more gradual increase is seen between 0.5 to 0.25K before a very sharp increase that occurred for the four molecules studied. In Figure 5(a–d), we examined the behaviour of vibrational entropy against β. It is clearly observed that the variation of entropy with β has similar behaviour for CO and NO molecules (Figure 5a and b) where entropy increases as β increases. However, for CH and ScH molecules (Figure 5c and d), the behaviour of the entropy is similar but different from those of CO and NO. In CH and ScH, the vibrational entropy decreases as the temperature increases. The differences in the variation of entropy with β for these molecules probably result due to a significant difference in the mass of the molecules. CO and NO with higher mass values have the same behaviour while CH and ScH with lower mass values have the same behaviour.

Figure 1 
               Partition function against β for CO, NO, CH, and ScH at different vibrational quantum states for various values of largest integer inferior to ϖ: (a) CO, (b) NO, (c) CH, and (d) ScH.
Figure 1

Partition function against β for CO, NO, CH, and ScH at different vibrational quantum states for various values of largest integer inferior to ϖ: (a) CO, (b) NO, (c) CH, and (d) ScH.

Figure 2 
               The vibrational mean energy (U) against β for CO, NO, CH, and ScH at different vibrational quantum states for various values of largest integer inferior to ϖ: (a) CO, (b) NO, (c) CH, and (d) ScH.
Figure 2

The vibrational mean energy (U) against β for CO, NO, CH, and ScH at different vibrational quantum states for various values of largest integer inferior to ϖ: (a) CO, (b) NO, (c) CH, and (d) ScH.

Figure 3 
               The vibrational specific heat (C) against β for CO, NO, CH, and ScH at different vibrational quantum states for various values of largest integer inferior to ϖ: (a) CO, (b) NO, (c) CH, and (d) ScH.
Figure 3

The vibrational specific heat (C) against β for CO, NO, CH, and ScH at different vibrational quantum states for various values of largest integer inferior to ϖ: (a) CO, (b) NO, (c) CH, and (d) ScH.

Figure 4 
               The vibrational mean free energy (F) against β for CO, NO, CH, and ScH at different vibrational quantum states for various values of largest integer inferior to ϖ: (a) CO, (b) NO, (c) CH, and (d) ScH.
Figure 4

The vibrational mean free energy (F) against β for CO, NO, CH, and ScH at different vibrational quantum states for various values of largest integer inferior to ϖ: (a) CO, (b) NO, (c) CH, and (d) ScH.

Figure 5 
               The vibrational entropy (S) against β for CO, NO, CH, and ScH at different vibrational quantum states for various values of largest integer inferior to ϖ: (a) CO, (b) NO, (c) CH, and (d) ScH.
Figure 5

The vibrational entropy (S) against β for CO, NO, CH, and ScH at different vibrational quantum states for various values of largest integer inferior to ϖ: (a) CO, (b) NO, (c) CH, and (d) ScH.

7 Conclusions

In this study, we have solved the Feinberg–Horodecki equation for a given molecular energy potential function. The result of the Feinberg–Horodecki equation was used to study Shannon entropy as a theoretic quantity and the results were found to obey the Bialynicki–Birula and Mycielski inequalities, which is in agreement with the study under the time-independent Schrödinger equation. The thermodynamic properties of the molecular energy potential function were calculated for CO, NO, CH, and ScH molecules using their molecular spectroscopic parameters. Each of the thermodynamic properties studied in this work has similar features for the four molecules except for the entropy. To the best of our knowledge, this appears to be the first time, Shannon entropy is studied under the time-dependent Feinberg–Horodecki equation.

  1. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

Appendix

0 1 y α ( 1 y ) β F 1 2 ( n , n + 2 ( α + β ) ; 2 α + 1 ; y ) 2 d z = n ! Γ ( α + 1 ) 2 Γ ( β + n + 2 ) β Γ ( α + n + 1 ) Γ ( α + β + n + 2 )

1 1 ( 1 x ) 2 η ( 1 + x ) 2 υ × [ P n ( η , υ ) ( x ) ] 2 d x = ( η + n + 1 ) Γ ( υ + n + 1 ) η ! η Γ ( η + υ + 2 n + 1 ) Γ ( η + υ + n + 1 )

1 1 ( 1 x ) 2 s ( 1 + x ) 2 υ × [ P n ( s , υ ) ( x ) ] 2 d x = ( s + n + 1 ) Γ ( υ + n + 1 ) n ! s Γ ( s + υ + n + 1 )

P n a , b ( 1 2 x ) = Γ ( a + n + 1 ) n ! Γ ( a + 1 ) F 1 2 ( n , n + a + b + 1 ; a + 1 ; x )

F 1 2 ( a , b ; c ; y ) = Γ ( c ) Γ ( a ) Γ ( b ) n = 0 Γ ( a + n ) Γ ( b + n ) Γ ( c + n ) y n n !

1 1 ( 1 s ) a 1 ( 1 + s ) b [ P n ( a , b ) ( s ) ] 2 d s = Γ ( a + n + 1 ) Γ ( b + n + 1 ) η ! a Γ ( a + b + n + 1 )

F 1 2 ( a , b ; c ; y ) = Γ ( c ) Γ ( a ) Γ ( b ) n = 0 Γ ( a + n ) Γ ( b + n ) Γ ( c + n ) y n n !

F 1 2 n , n + v + u + 1 ; v + 1 ; 1 x 2 = Γ ( n + v + 1 ) Γ ( v + 1 )

P n ( v , u ) ( x ) = F 1 2 n , n + v + u + 1 ; v + 1 ; 1 x 2 .

Reference

[1] Çiftçi H, Hall RL, Saad N. Perturbation theory in a framework of iteration methods. Phys Lett A. 2005;340:388.10.1016/j.physleta.2005.04.030Search in Google Scholar

[2] Boztosun I, Karakoç M, Yasuk F, Durmus A. Asymptotic iteration method solutions to the relativistic Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau equation. J Math Phys. 2006;47:062301.10.1063/1.2203429Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bayrak IO, Boztosun I. Bound state solutions of the Hulthén potential by asymptotic iteration method. Phys Scr. 2007;76:92–8.10.1088/0031-8949/76/1/016Search in Google Scholar

[4] Barakat T, Abodayeh K, Mukheimer A. The asymptotic iteration method for the angular spheroidal eigenvalues. J Phys A: Math Gen. 2005;38:1299.10.1088/0305-4470/38/6/009Search in Google Scholar

[5] Aygun M, Bayrak O, Boztosun I. Solution of the radial Schrӧdinger equation for the potential family using the asymptotic iteration method. J Phys B: At Mol Opt Phys. 2007;40:537–44.10.1088/0953-4075/40/3/009Search in Google Scholar

[6] Çiftçi H, Hall RL, Saad N. Asymptotic iteration method for eigenvalue problems. J Phys A: Math Gen. 1807;36(47):1.10.1088/0305-4470/36/47/008Search in Google Scholar

[7] Falaye BJ, Ikhdair SM. Relativistic symmetries with the trigonometric Pöschl—teller potential plus Coulomb-like tensor interaction. Chin Phys B. 2013;22:060305.10.1088/1674-1056/22/6/060305Search in Google Scholar

[8] Falaye BJ. Arbitrary ℓ-state solutions of the hyperbolical potential by the asymptotic iteration method. Few-Body Syst. 2012;53:557–62.10.1007/s00601-012-0440-0Search in Google Scholar

[9] Falaye BJ, Oyewumi KJ, Ibrahim TT, Punyasena MA, Onate MA. Bound state solutions of the Manning–Rosen potential. Can J Phys. 2013;91:97–104.10.1139/cjp-2012-0330Search in Google Scholar

[10] Barakat T. The asymptotic iteration method for Dirac and Klein–Gordon equations with a linear scalar potential. Int J Mod Phys A. 2006;21:4127–35.10.1142/S0217751X06030916Search in Google Scholar

[11] Durmus A, Yasuk F, Boztosun I. Exact analytical solution of the Klein–Gordon equation for the pionic atom by asymptotic iteration method I. Int J Mod Phys E. 2006;15:1243–51.10.1142/S0218301306004788Search in Google Scholar

[12] Fernandez FM. On an iteration method for eigenvalue problems. J Phys A: Math Gen. 2004;37:6173–80.10.1088/0305-4470/37/23/014Search in Google Scholar

[13] Oyewumi KJ, Falaye BJ, Onate CA, Oluwadare OJ, Yahya WA. κ state solutions for the fermionic massive spin-½ particles interacting with double ring-shaped Kratzer and oscillator potentials. Int J Mod Phys E. 2014;23:1450005–1.10.1142/S0218301314500050Search in Google Scholar

[14] Falaye BJ. The Klein–Gordon equation with ring-shaped potentials: asymptotic iteration method. J Math Phys. 2012;53:082107.10.1063/1.4746697Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ikhdair SM, Falaye BJ. Approximate relativistic bound states of a particle in Yukawa field with Coulomb tensor interaction. Phys Scr. 2013;87:035002.10.1088/0031-8949/87/03/035002Search in Google Scholar

[16] Oyewumi KJ, Falaye BJ, Onate CA, Oluwadare OJ, Yahya WA. Thermodynamic properties and the approximate solutions of the Schrödinger equation with the shifted Deng–Fan potential model. Mol Phys. 2014;112:127–41.10.1080/00268976.2013.804960Search in Google Scholar

[17] Ikhdair SM, Falaye BJ, Hamzavi M. Approximate Eigensolutions of the deformed woods – saxon potential via AIM. Chin Phys Lett. 2013;30:020305.10.1088/0256-307X/30/2/020305Search in Google Scholar

[18] Nikiforov SK, Uvarov VB. Special functions of mathematical physics. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser Verlag; 1988.10.1007/978-1-4757-1595-8Search in Google Scholar

[19] Ikhdair SM, Sever R. Two approximation schemes to the bound states of the Dirac–Hulthén problem. J Phys A: Math Theor. 2011;44:355301.10.1088/1751-8113/44/35/355301Search in Google Scholar

[20] Zhang MC, Sun GH, Dong SH. Exactly complete solutions of the Schrödinger equation with a spherically harmonic oscillatory ring-shaped potential. Phys Lett A. 2010;374:704–8.10.1016/j.physleta.2009.11.072Search in Google Scholar

[21] Oluwadare OJ, Oyewumi KJ, Akoshile CO, Babalola OA. Approximate analytical solutions of the relativistic equations with the Deng–Fan molecular potential including a Pekeris-type approximation to the (pseudo or) centrifugal term. Phys Scr. 2012;86:035002.10.1088/0031-8949/86/03/035002Search in Google Scholar

[22] Falaye BJ, Oyewumi KJ. Solutions of the Dirac equation with spin and pseudospin symmetry for the trigonometric scarf potential in D-dimensions. Afr Rev Phys. 2011;6:211.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Yahya WA, Oyewumi KJ, Akoshile CO, Ibrahim TT. Bound state solutions of the relativistic Dirac equation with equal scalar and vector Eckart potentials using the Nikiforov–Uvarov method. J Vec Rel. 2010;5:27–34.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Hassanabadi H, Zarrinkamar S, Hamzavi M, Rajabi AA. Relativistic spinless bosons in Exponential Fields. Few-Body Syst. 2011;51:69–75.10.1007/s00601-011-0224-ySearch in Google Scholar

[25] Hamzavi M, Movahedi M, Thylwe KE. The rotation‐vibration spectrum of diatomic molecules with the Tietz‐Hua rotating oscillator. Int J Quant Chem. 2012;112:2701–5.10.1002/qua.23285Search in Google Scholar

[26] Tezcan C, Sever R. A general approach for the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation. Int J Theor Phys. 2009;48:337–50.10.1007/s10773-008-9806-ySearch in Google Scholar

[27] Onate CA, Onyeaju MC, Ikot AN. Analytical solutions of the Dirac equation under Hellmann–Frost–Musulin potential. Ann Phys. 2016;375:239–50.10.1016/j.aop.2016.10.006Search in Google Scholar

[28] Hamzavi M, Ikhdair SM. Approximate l-state solution of the trigonometric Pöschl–Teller potential. Mol Phys. 2012;110:3031–9.10.1080/00268976.2012.695029Search in Google Scholar

[29] Sun GH, Dong SH. Exact solutions of Dirac equation for a new spherically asymmetrical singular oscillator. Mod Phys Lett A. 2010;25:2849–57.10.1142/S0217732310033785Search in Google Scholar

[30] Witten E. Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry. Nucl Phys B. 1981;188:513–54.10.1016/0550-3213(81)90006-7Search in Google Scholar

[31] Gendenshtein L. Derivation of exact spectra of the Schrodinger equation by means of supersymmetry. JETP Lett. 1983;38:356.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Hassanabadi H, Maghsoodi E, Zarrinkamar S. Relativistic symmetries of Dirac equation and the Tietz potential. Eur Phys J Plus. 2012;127:31.10.1140/epjp/i2012-12031-1Search in Google Scholar

[33] Cooper F, Freedman B. Aspects of supersymmetric quantum mechanics. Ann Phys. 1983;146:262–88.10.1016/0003-4916(83)90034-9Search in Google Scholar

[34] Cooper F, Khare A, Sukhatme U. Supersymmetry and quantum mechanics. Phys Rep. 1995;251:267–385.10.1142/4687Search in Google Scholar

[35] Oyewumi KJ, Akoshile CO. Bound-state solutions of the Dirac-Rosen-Morse potential with spin and pseudospin symmetry. Eur Phys J A. 2010;45:311–8.10.1140/epja/i2010-11007-0Search in Google Scholar

[36] Khare A, Maharana J. Supersymmetry quantum mechanics in one, two and three dimensions. Nucl Phys B. 1984;244:409.10.1016/0550-3213(84)90321-3Search in Google Scholar

[37] Sukumar CV. Supersymmetric quantum mechanics and the inverse scattering method. J Phys A: Math Gen. 1985;18:2917–36.10.1088/0305-4470/18/15/021Search in Google Scholar

[38] Onate CA, Onyeaju MC, Ikot AN, Ojonubah JO. Analytical solutions of the Klein–Gordon equation with a combined potential. Chin J Phys. 2016;54:820–9.10.1016/j.cjph.2016.08.007Search in Google Scholar

[39] Onate CA, Onyeaju MC, Ikot AN, Ebomwonyi. O. Eigen solutions and entropic system for Hellmann potential in the presence of the Schrödinger equation. Eur Phys J Plus. 2017;132:462.10.1140/epjp/i2017-11729-8Search in Google Scholar

[40] Hassanabadi H, Rahimov H, Lu LL, Zarrinkamar S, Liu GH. Approximate solutions of Schrödinger equation under Manning-Rosen potential in arbitrary dimension via SUSYQM. Acta Phys Polo. 2012;122:650–4.10.12693/APhysPolA.122.650Search in Google Scholar

[41] Balantekin AB. Accidental degeneracies and supersymmetric quantum mechanics. Ann Phys. 1985;164:277–87.10.1016/0003-4916(85)90017-XSearch in Google Scholar

[42] Kostelecky A, Nieto MM. Evidence for a phenomenological supersymmetry in atomic physics. Phys Rev Lett. 1984;53:2285.10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2285Search in Google Scholar

[43] Maghsoodi E, Hassanabadi H, Aydoğdu O. Dirac particles in the presence of the Yukawa potential plus a tensor interaction in SUSYQM framework. Phys Scr. 2012;86:015005.10.1088/0031-8949/86/01/015005Search in Google Scholar

[44] Dong SH. Factorization method in quantum mechanics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2007.10.1007/978-1-4020-5796-0Search in Google Scholar

[45] Qiang WC, Dong SH. Proper quantization rule. Eur Phys Lett. 2010;89:10003.10.1209/0295-5075/89/10003Search in Google Scholar

[46] Ma ZQ, Xu BW. Quantum correction in exact quantization rules. Eur Phys Lett. 2005;69:685.10.1209/epl/i2004-10418-8Search in Google Scholar

[47] Dong SH, Gonzalez-Cisneros A. Energy spectra of the hyperbolic and second Pöschl–Teller like potentials solved by new exact quantization rule. Ann Phys. 2008;323:1136–49.10.1016/j.aop.2007.12.002Search in Google Scholar

[48] Qiang WC, Dong SH. Arbitrary l-state solutions of the rotating Morse potential through the exact quantization rule method. Phys Lett A. 2007;363:169–76.10.1016/j.physleta.2006.10.091Search in Google Scholar

[49] Hammed RH. Approximate solution of Schrӧdinger equation with Manning-Rosen potential in two dimensions by using the shifted 1/N expansion method. J. Basrah. Research. 2012;38:51–9.10.5402/2012/201525Search in Google Scholar

[50] Liu J-Y, Hu X-T, Jia C-S. Molecular energies of the improved Rosen-Morse potential energy model. Can J Phys. 2014;92:40–4.10.1139/cjc-2013-0396Search in Google Scholar

[51] Kaur S, Mahajan CG. Some new four-parameter potentials and their use in the study of vibrational thermodynamical quantities of diatomic molecules. Pramana J Phys. 1999;52:459–77.10.1007/BF02830093Search in Google Scholar

[52] Khordad R, Ghanbari A. Theoretial prediction of the thermodynamic functions of TiC: Morse ring-shape potential. J Low Tempt Phys 10.1007/s10909-020-02368-8.Search in Google Scholar

[53] Zhang L-H, Li X-P, Jia C-S. Approximate solutions of the Schrӧdinger equation with the generalized Morse potential model including the centrifugal term. Int J Quant Chem. 2011;111:1870–8.10.1002/qua.22477Search in Google Scholar

[54] Rong Z, Kjaergaad HG, Sage ML. Comparision of the Morse and Deng-Fan potentials for X-H bonds in small molecules. Mol Phys. 2003;101:2285–94.10.1080/0026897031000137706Search in Google Scholar

[55] Berkdemir C, Berkdemir A, Han J. Bound state solutions of the Schrӧdinger equation for modified Kratzer’s molecular potential. Chem Phys Lett. 2006;417:326–9.10.1016/j.cplett.2005.10.039Search in Google Scholar

[56] Onate CA, Akanbi TA, Okon IB. Ro-vibrational energies of Cesium dimer and Lithium dimer with molecular attractive potential. Sci Rep. 2021;11:6198.10.1038/s41598-021-85761-xSearch in Google Scholar

[57] Farout M, Ikhdair SM. Momentum eigensolution of Feinberg–Horodecki equation with time-dependent screened Kratze-Hellmann potential. J Appl Math Phys. 2020;8:1207–21.10.4236/jamp.2020.87091Search in Google Scholar

[58] Farout M, Bassalat A, Ikhdair SM. Exact quantized momentum eigenvalues and eigenstates of a general potential model. J Appl Math Phys. 2020;08:1434–47.10.4236/jamp.2020.87109Search in Google Scholar

[59] Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication – Shannon. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27:379–423.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.xSearch in Google Scholar

[60] Wei H. Four-parameter exactly solvable potential for diatomic molecules. Phys Rev A. 1990;42:2524–9.10.1103/PhysRevA.42.2524Search in Google Scholar

[61] Kunc JA, Gordilo-Vázquez FJ. Rotational−vibrational levels of diatomic molecules represented by the Tietz−Hua rotating oscillato. J Phys Chem A. 1997;101:1595–1602.10.1021/jp962817dSearch in Google Scholar

[62] Gordilo-Vázquez FJ, Kunc JA. Statistical–mechanical calculations of thermal properties of diatomic gases. J Appl Phys. 1998;84:4693.10.1063/1.368712Search in Google Scholar

[63] Gorbachev Y, Gordilo-Vázquez FJ, Kunc JA. Diameters of rotationally and vibrationally excited diatomic molecules. Physica A. 1997;247:108–20.10.1016/S0378-4371(97)00389-0Search in Google Scholar

[64] Gordilo-Vázquez FJ, Kunc JA. High-accuracy expressions for rotational-vibrational energies of O, N, NO, and CO molecules. J Thermophys Heat Transfer. 1998;12:52.10.2514/2.6301Search in Google Scholar

[65] Agreev AN, Davgdov S, Chirkov AG. Magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect under time-dependent vector potential. Tech Phys Lett. 2000;26:392–3.10.1134/1.1262854Search in Google Scholar

[66] Yahya WA, Issa K. Approximate analytical solutions of the improved Tietz and improved Rosen-Morse potential models. Chin J Phys. 2015;53:060401.Search in Google Scholar

[67] Jia CS, Diao YF, Liu XJ, Wang PQ, Liu JY. Equivalence of the Wei potential model and Tietz potential model for diatomic molecules. J Chem Phys. 2012;137:014101.10.1063/1.4731340Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[68] Najafizade SA, Hassanabadi H, Zarrinkamar S. Nonrelativistic Shannon information entropy for Killingbeck potential. Can J Phys. 2016;94:1085–92.10.1139/cjp-2016-0113Search in Google Scholar

[69] Najafizade SA, Hassanabadi H, Zarrinkamar S. Nonrelativistic Shannon information entropy for Kratzer potential. Chin Phys B. 2016;25:040301.10.1088/1674-1056/25/4/040301Search in Google Scholar

[70] Najafizade SA, Hassanabadi H, Zarrinkamar S. Theoretical information measurement in nonrelativistic time-dependent approach. Indian J Phys. 2018;92:183–96.10.1007/s12648-017-1092-1Search in Google Scholar

[71] Onate CA, Idiodi JOA. Fisher information and complexity measure of generalized Morse potential model. Commun Theor Phys. 2016;66:275–9.10.1088/0253-6102/66/3/275Search in Google Scholar

[72] Onate CA, Ikot AN, Onyeaju MC, Ebomwonyi O, Idiodi JOA. Effect of dissociation energy on Shannon and Rényi entropies. Karb Int J Mod Scien. 2018a;4:134–42.10.1016/j.kijoms.2017.12.004Search in Google Scholar

[73] Onate CA, Adebimpe O, Adebesin BO, Lukman AF. Information-theoretic measure of the hyperbolical exponential-type potential. Turk J Phys. 2018;42:402–14.10.3906/fiz-1802-40Search in Google Scholar

[74] Yahya WA, Oyewumi KJ, Sen KO. Position and momentum information‐theoretic measures of the pseudoharmonic potential. Int J Quant Chem. 2015;115:1543–52.10.1002/qua.24971Search in Google Scholar

[75] Yahya WA, Oyewumi KJ, Sen KD. Information and complexity measures for the ring-shaped modified Kratzer potential. Indian J Chem. 2014;53:1307–16.Search in Google Scholar

[76] Yahya WA, Oyewumi KJ, Sen KD. Information and complexity measures for the ring-shaped modified Kratzer potential. Quantum information entropies for the -state Pöschl–Teller-type potential. J Math Chem. 2016;54:1810–21.10.1007/s10910-016-0650-7Search in Google Scholar

[77] Oyewumi KJ, Sen KD. Exact solutions of the Schrӧdinger equation for the pseudoharmonic potential: an application to some diatomic molecules. J Math Chem. 2012;50:1039–59.10.1007/s10910-011-9967-4Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-02-26
Revised: 2021-04-08
Accepted: 2021-05-11
Published Online: 2021-09-22

© 2021 Clement Atachegbe Onate et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Circular Rydberg states of helium atoms or helium-like ions in a high-frequency laser field
  3. Closed-form solutions and conservation laws of a generalized Hirota–Satsuma coupled KdV system of fluid mechanics
  4. W-Chirped optical solitons and modulation instability analysis of Chen–Lee–Liu equation in optical monomode fibres
  5. The problem of a hydrogen atom in a cavity: Oscillator representation solution versus analytic solution
  6. An analytical model for the Maxwell radiation field in an axially symmetric galaxy
  7. Utilization of updated version of heat flux model for the radiative flow of a non-Newtonian material under Joule heating: OHAM application
  8. Verification of the accommodative responses in viewing an on-axis analog reflection hologram
  9. Irreversibility as thermodynamic time
  10. A self-adaptive prescription dose optimization algorithm for radiotherapy
  11. Algebraic computational methods for solving three nonlinear vital models fractional in mathematical physics
  12. The diffusion mechanism of the application of intelligent manufacturing in SMEs model based on cellular automata
  13. Numerical analysis of free convection from a spinning cone with variable wall temperature and pressure work effect using MD-BSQLM
  14. Numerical simulation of hydrodynamic oscillation of side-by-side double-floating-system with a narrow gap in waves
  15. Closed-form solutions for the Schrödinger wave equation with non-solvable potentials: A perturbation approach
  16. Study of dynamic pressure on the packer for deep-water perforation
  17. Ultrafast dephasing in hydrogen-bonded pyridine–water mixtures
  18. Crystallization law of karst water in tunnel drainage system based on DBL theory
  19. Position-dependent finite symmetric mass harmonic like oscillator: Classical and quantum mechanical study
  20. Application of Fibonacci heap to fast marching method
  21. An analytical investigation of the mixed convective Casson fluid flow past a yawed cylinder with heat transfer analysis
  22. Considering the effect of optical attenuation on photon-enhanced thermionic emission converter of the practical structure
  23. Fractal calculation method of friction parameters: Surface morphology and load of galvanized sheet
  24. Charge identification of fragments with the emulsion spectrometer of the FOOT experiment
  25. Quantization of fractional harmonic oscillator using creation and annihilation operators
  26. Scaling law for velocity of domino toppling motion in curved paths
  27. Frequency synchronization detection method based on adaptive frequency standard tracking
  28. Application of common reflection surface (CRS) to velocity variation with azimuth (VVAz) inversion of the relatively narrow azimuth 3D seismic land data
  29. Study on the adaptability of binary flooding in a certain oil field
  30. CompVision: An open-source five-compartmental software for biokinetic simulations
  31. An electrically switchable wideband metamaterial absorber based on graphene at P band
  32. Effect of annealing temperature on the interface state density of n-ZnO nanorod/p-Si heterojunction diodes
  33. A facile fabrication of superhydrophobic and superoleophilic adsorption material 5A zeolite for oil–water separation with potential use in floating oil
  34. Shannon entropy for Feinberg–Horodecki equation and thermal properties of improved Wei potential model
  35. Hopf bifurcation analysis for liquid-filled Gyrostat chaotic system and design of a novel technique to control slosh in spacecrafts
  36. Optical properties of two-dimensional two-electron quantum dot in parabolic confinement
  37. Optical solitons via the collective variable method for the classical and perturbed Chen–Lee–Liu equations
  38. Stratified heat transfer of magneto-tangent hyperbolic bio-nanofluid flow with gyrotactic microorganisms: Keller-Box solution technique
  39. Analysis of the structure and properties of triangular composite light-screen targets
  40. Magnetic charged particles of optical spherical antiferromagnetic model with fractional system
  41. Study on acoustic radiation response characteristics of sound barriers
  42. The tribological properties of single-layer hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric/phenolic resin composites underwater
  43. Research on maintenance spare parts requirement prediction based on LSTM recurrent neural network
  44. Quantum computing simulation of the hydrogen molecular ground-state energies with limited resources
  45. A DFT study on the molecular properties of synthetic ester under the electric field
  46. Construction of abundant novel analytical solutions of the space–time fractional nonlinear generalized equal width model via Riemann–Liouville derivative with application of mathematical methods
  47. Some common and dynamic properties of logarithmic Pareto distribution with applications
  48. Soliton structures in optical fiber communications with Kundu–Mukherjee–Naskar model
  49. Fractional modeling of COVID-19 epidemic model with harmonic mean type incidence rate
  50. Liquid metal-based metamaterial with high-temperature sensitivity: Design and computational study
  51. Biosynthesis and characterization of Saudi propolis-mediated silver nanoparticles and their biological properties
  52. New trigonometric B-spline approximation for numerical investigation of the regularized long-wave equation
  53. Modal characteristics of harmonic gear transmission flexspline based on orthogonal design method
  54. Revisiting the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations
  55. Time-periodic pulse electroosmotic flow of Jeffreys fluids through a microannulus
  56. Exact wave solutions of the nonlinear Rosenau equation using an analytical method
  57. Computational examination of Jeffrey nanofluid through a stretchable surface employing Tiwari and Das model
  58. Numerical analysis of a single-mode microring resonator on a YAG-on-insulator
  59. Review Articles
  60. Double-layer coating using MHD flow of third-grade fluid with Hall current and heat source/sink
  61. Analysis of aeromagnetic filtering techniques in locating the primary target in sedimentary terrain: A review
  62. Rapid Communications
  63. Nonlinear fitting of multi-compartmental data using Hooke and Jeeves direct search method
  64. Effect of buried depth on thermal performance of a vertical U-tube underground heat exchanger
  65. Knocking characteristics of a high pressure direct injection natural gas engine operating in stratified combustion mode
  66. What dominates heat transfer performance of a double-pipe heat exchanger
  67. Special Issue on Future challenges of advanced computational modeling on nonlinear physical phenomena - Part II
  68. Lump, lump-one stripe, multiwave and breather solutions for the Hunter–Saxton equation
  69. New quantum integral inequalities for some new classes of generalized ψ-convex functions and their scope in physical systems
  70. Computational fluid dynamic simulations and heat transfer characteristic comparisons of various arc-baffled channels
  71. Gaussian radial basis functions method for linear and nonlinear convection–diffusion models in physical phenomena
  72. Investigation of interactional phenomena and multi wave solutions of the quantum hydrodynamic Zakharov–Kuznetsov model
  73. On the optical solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equation with second-order spatiotemporal dispersion
  74. Analysis of couple stress fluid flow with variable viscosity using two homotopy-based methods
  75. Quantum estimates in two variable forms for Simpson-type inequalities considering generalized Ψ-convex functions with applications
  76. Series solution to fractional contact problem using Caputo’s derivative
  77. Solitary wave solutions of the ionic currents along microtubule dynamical equations via analytical mathematical method
  78. Thermo-viscoelastic orthotropic constraint cylindrical cavity with variable thermal properties heated by laser pulse via the MGT thermoelasticity model
  79. Theoretical and experimental clues to a flux of Doppler transformation energies during processes with energy conservation
  80. On solitons: Propagation of shallow water waves for the fifth-order KdV hierarchy integrable equation
  81. Special Issue on Transport phenomena and thermal analysis in micro/nano-scale structure surfaces - Part II
  82. Numerical study on heat transfer and flow characteristics of nanofluids in a circular tube with trapezoid ribs
  83. Experimental and numerical study of heat transfer and flow characteristics with different placement of the multi-deck display cabinet in supermarket
  84. Thermal-hydraulic performance prediction of two new heat exchangers using RBF based on different DOE
  85. Diesel engine waste heat recovery system comprehensive optimization based on system and heat exchanger simulation
  86. Load forecasting of refrigerated display cabinet based on CEEMD–IPSO–LSTM combined model
  87. Investigation on subcooled flow boiling heat transfer characteristics in ICE-like conditions
  88. Research on materials of solar selective absorption coating based on the first principle
  89. Experimental study on enhancement characteristics of steam/nitrogen condensation inside horizontal multi-start helical channels
  90. Special Issue on Novel Numerical and Analytical Techniques for Fractional Nonlinear Schrodinger Type - Part I
  91. Numerical exploration of thin film flow of MHD pseudo-plastic fluid in fractional space: Utilization of fractional calculus approach
  92. A Haar wavelet-based scheme for finding the control parameter in nonlinear inverse heat conduction equation
  93. Stable novel and accurate solitary wave solutions of an integrable equation: Qiao model
  94. Novel soliton solutions to the Atangana–Baleanu fractional system of equations for the ISALWs
  95. On the oscillation of nonlinear delay differential equations and their applications
  96. Abundant stable novel solutions of fractional-order epidemic model along with saturated treatment and disease transmission
  97. Fully Legendre spectral collocation technique for stochastic heat equations
  98. Special Issue on 5th International Conference on Mechanics, Mathematics and Applied Physics (2021)
  99. Residual service life of erbium-modified AM50 magnesium alloy under corrosion and stress environment
  100. Special Issue on Advanced Topics on the Modelling and Assessment of Complicated Physical Phenomena - Part I
  101. Diverse wave propagation in shallow water waves with the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili–Benjamin–Bona–Mahony and Benney–Luke integrable models
  102. Intensification of thermal stratification on dissipative chemically heating fluid with cross-diffusion and magnetic field over a wedge
Downloaded on 4.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2021-0038/html
Scroll to top button