Home Hopf bifurcation analysis for liquid-filled Gyrostat chaotic system and design of a novel technique to control slosh in spacecrafts
Article Open Access

Hopf bifurcation analysis for liquid-filled Gyrostat chaotic system and design of a novel technique to control slosh in spacecrafts

  • Muhammad Sabir , Salman Ahmad and Muhammad Marwan EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 1, 2021

Abstract

In this article, a fuel tank is coupled with gyrostat in a moving spacecraft to discuss its dynamical behaviour and bringing stability in velocity vectors. Parametric study is performed using Hopf bifurcation to find the bifurcation parameter for a considered mechanical model. Furthermore, a region is constructed in which negligible limit cycles appear around unstable spirals for angular momentum greater than bifurcation point. Based on local dynamical analysis, trajectories of angular velocities are observed with respect to damping constant, which is formulated in the form of bifurcation parameter. Moreover, a controller is designed in this article for considered dynamical system by achieving global stability, with the help of Lyapunov theory, into the spacecraft coupled with filled fuel tank, and their results are compared with effective spacecraft control strategies to observe the effectiveness of our proposed control technique. Finally, in presented research, numerical simulations are performed using MATLAB for validation of analytical results, which the authors have achieved for Hopf bifurcation and designed controller.

1 Now, for discussing its dynamics around originIntroduction

In 1852, Leon Foucault invented a device, used for investigating rotation of the earth, named as gyrostat. This device worked in a manner that plane of rotation depends on latitude of its location. Later on, gyrostat is used in aerial vehicle to detect path and attitude control. There are various shapes of gyrostat that has many advantages in aerial vehicles [1], satellites and robots [2]. The first governing equation for discussing dynamics of gyrostat was introduced by Wittenburg [3] in 1977, whereas Chatys and Koruba [4] used mini gyro as controller in mini aerial vehicles for the first time. A dual-spin spacecraft [5] is established in the presence of damping factor with the aid of Lie–Poison structures. A gyrostat is a rigid body consisting of rotors to a main platform of the body. In Figure 1, one can observe that this frame is further categorized into three axisymmetric rotors, which are rotating about their respective axis with respect to body frame. Euler dynamical equations of rotational dynamics for a disturbed gyrostat system given by ref. [6] are as follows:

(1) I x x ˙ = ( I y I z ) y z h z y + h y z μ x x + L x I y y ˙ = ( I z I x ) z x + h z x + μ y y + L y I z z ˙ = ( I x I y ) x y h y x μ z z + L z .

Now, by shifting inertial terms I x , I y and I z to the right side of system (1), we get:

(2) x ˙ = ( I y I z ) I x y z h z I x y + h y I x z μ x I x x + L x I x y ˙ = ( I z I x ) I y z x + h z I y x + μ y I y y + L y I y I z z ˙ = ( I x I y ) I z x y h y I z x μ z I z z + L z I z .

Throughout this article, the authors have used the following parameter values for simplicity:

(3) μ θ θ = μ θ I θ for θ = x , y and z h x z = h z I x h x y = h y I x h y z = h z I y h z y = h y I z I x y z = I y I z I x I y x z = I x I z I y I z x y = I x I y I z L x x = L θ I θ for θ = x , y , z .

Hence, substituting parameter values (3) in system (2), we get the following system:

(4) x ˙ = μ x x x h x z y + h x y z + I x y z y z + L x x y ˙ = h y z x + μ y y y + I y x z z x + L y y z ˙ = h z y x μ z z z + I z x y x y + L z z ,

where X = [ x y z ] T is the angular velocity vector; I x , I y and I z are the principal moments of inertia of the gyrostat in the body axis frame; h x , h y and h z are constants of total angular momentum, whereas L x , L y and L z are external torques applied on gyrostat. System (4) shows unpredictability in trajectories for I = [ 0.85 0.45 0.2 ] T , μ = [ 6 6.43 5.8 ] T , h = [ 0 0.57416 2.38 ] T and L = [ 0 0 22.8 ] T .

Figure 1 
               Satellite attached with partially filled fuel tank and three rotors.
Figure 1

Satellite attached with partially filled fuel tank and three rotors.

A phenomenon, in which given dynamical system changes its structure with the variation in parameter values is famous as bifurcation [7]. Hopf bifurcation [8] is one of the important types of bifurcation, in which one can seek appearance and disappearance of oscillatory solutions for various values of parameter around bifurcation point. A variety of research exist for observing oscillatory solutions in dynamical systems. Recently, Marwan et al. have considered forced Chen system and discussed existence of Hopf bifurcation [9] for non-zero equilibria. In 2020, Marwan and Ahmad [10] discussed Bogdanov–Takens bifurcation for energy and resource transportation model between two cities in China. Existence of oscillatory solutions is not only limited to mechanical systems but also has a variety of impact on biological models. In 2019, Mondal and Samanta [11] utilized MATCONT for observing Hopf bifurcation in the predator–prey model, when predator is harvested at a constant rate. The same biological model is analysed in the presence of fear effect [12] for the existence of oscillatory solutions, whereas two different food chain models are considered by Sahoo and Samanta in their work [13], with the effect of delay parameter, to investigate switching of stability through Hopf bifurcation. In 2020, several bifurcations including generalized Hopf and codimension 2 bifurcations are studied in the predator–prey model under the assumption that prey population is infected by a disease [14]. Apart from importance of Hopf bifurcation in biological models, it has great impact on spacecraft models. A specific case of gyrostat-based satellite moving on circular path is examined for two different cases with the help of local bifurcation by Sontos and Melicio [15]. Similarly, various shaped gyrostats, such as spheroid gyrostat [16] and axial gyrostat [17], are studied for the existence of bifurcations. There are many ways to prove the existence of chaos in dynamical system, such as monotone, co-existing attractors, hidden attractors and self-existed attractors [18], but the basic way of obtaining chaos is bringing negligible changes in initial conditions and bifurcation parameters in given dynamical system. Qi and Yang [6] introduced chaotic gyrostat model for the first time and determined unpredictability of angular momentum for fixed parameter values. Qi et al. also discussed its dynamics with the aid of external and internal torques, forces and energies.

The term chaos has applications in numerous engineering-based systems, but unpredictability in gyrostat proceeds to disturbance in attitude control and communication loss. Therefore, controllability [19,20] in such systems seek attention of many researchers. Chai considered six degrees of freedom vehicle [21] and designed its attitude control. In 2012, Aslanov and Yudintsev considered free gyrostat chaotic system [22] along with three-dimensional inertial components and asymmetric rotors. A chaotic gyrostat dynamical system is synchronized with identical derive system with the help of newly designed controller [23], named as variable substitution and feedback controller (VSFC) for achieving global stability. In 2018, Chai et al. [24] introduced receding horizen control for spacecraft path planning. They have also decreased computational cost with the aid of of two nested gradient methods by embedding in control scheme. A new three-layer hybrid control [25] is designed for space vehicles based on stochastic algorithm to enhance global stability. Abtahi derived a gyrostat model [26] based on the Hamiltonian method for orbital motion of spacecraft with the aid of extended Deprit transformation and showed its chaotic effect using the Melnikov technique. Doroshin [27] generalized case of V. A. Stekloff’s rigid body motion and investigated its angular motion, whereas Wang et al. [28] worked on its controllability using Fuzzy controller based on fuzzy logic. Several researchers worked on attitude dynamics and control of spacecraft models [29,30,31].

We have studied dynamical systems derived for spacecrafts using Hamiltonian mechanics [32] and devices attached within it [33,34]. We have noticed that several biological models are taken into account for oscillatory solutions [35,36] in the aforementioned citations, but impact of seeking local oscillatory solutions using Andronov–Hopf bifurcation for spacecraft with attached fuel tank is never discussed. Moreover, the review work of Chai [37], in which authors have discussed path planning and controllability of spacecraft models using different techniques in detail, has motivated us to work on the design of controller for bringing stability in sloshing effect which arises inside coupled tank and leads to havoc in dynamics of gyrostat.

This article is organized as follows: in Section 2.1, the existence of Hopf bifurcation is shown using singularity condition. Moreover, Section 3 consists of our proposed controller; M chaotic and its algorithm, which is applied to gyrostat chaotic system in Section 4. Finally, numerical simulation, discussion of Hopf bifurcation and M chaotic controller are provided in Section 5.

2 Dynamical analysis

2.1 Hopf bifurcation in gyro chaotic system

A physical phenomenon in which trajectory of any nonlinear dynamical system changes with the change in parameter values involved in system is famous as bifurcation. Similar to the concept of clear blue sky given in ref. [38], limit cycles around equilibrium points can be created, destroyed or changes its stability and such type of concept is famous as Hopf bifurcation. In this section, we have discussed Hopf bifurcation and its impact on our considered dynamical system.

A spherical filled fuel tank is attached with original gyro chaotic system [6] under the consideration of circular liquid movement given in system (4), which is chaotic for the aforementioned parameter values. Jacobian matrix is the fundamental step in tools related to local and global bifurcations. Therefore, Jacobian matrix for system (4) is as follows:

(5) J = μ x x h x z + I x y z z h x y + I x y z y h y z + I y x z z μ y y I y x z x h z y + I z x y y I z x y x μ z z .

System (4) has five equilibrium points including origin under the absence of external torques:

E 1 = [ 0 , 0 , 0 ] , E 2 = [ 10.6 , 13.1 , 8.5 ] , E 3 = [ 13.5 , 23.9 , 21.1 ] , E 4 = [ 12.6 , 25.5 , 23.5 ] , E 5 = [ 9.7 , 13.2 , 9.8 ] .

Hence, Jacobian matrix (5) of system (4) at E 1 is as follows:

(6) J = μ x x h x z h x y h y z μ y y 0 h z y 0 μ z z .

Now, for discussing its dynamics around origin; O , characteristic polynomial equation is derived using eigenvalues for equation (6);

(7) λ 3 + ð 1 a λ 2 + ð 2 a λ + ð 3 a = 0 ,

where

(8) ð 1 a = μ x x μ y y + μ z z ð 2 a = h x z h y z μ x x μ y y + μ x x μ z z + h x y h z y μ y y μ z z ð 3 a = μ x x μ y y μ z z + h x z h y z μ z z h x y μ y y h z y .

For Hopf bifurcation the basic condition is ð 1 a ð 2 a = ð 3 a ;

(9) ( μ x x μ y y + μ z z ) ( h x z h y z μ x x μ y y + μ x x μ z z + h x y h z y μ y y μ z z ) = μ x x μ y y μ z z + h x z h y z μ z z h x y μ y y h z y .

Simplifying equation (9), we get:

(10) h x y [ ( μ x x + μ z z ) h z y ] = ( μ y y μ x x ) ( h x z h y z + μ x x μ z z + μ y y μ z z + μ z z 2 ) + μ y y ( μ z z h x z μ x x μ y y ) .

It is tedious to discuss Hopf bifurcation from equation (10). Therefore, using μ y y = μ x x into equation (9) yields:

(11) h x y = μ x x ( μ z z h x z μ x x 2 ) ( μ x x + μ z z ) h z y .

Substituting μ z z = μ x x and h z y = 1 into equation (11) we get equation (10) in the simplified form:

(12) h x y = μ x x 2 ( h x z μ x x ) .

Hence, several cases arise for selection of h x z , but we have chosen h x z = 2 μ x x such that h x y become positive;

(13) h y = μ x 2 2 I x .

Substituting equations (11)–(13) into (7) and (8), we get:

(14) λ 3 + ð 1 b λ 2 + ð 2 b λ + ð 3 b = 0 ,

where

(15) ð 1 b = μ x x ð 2 b = μ x x ( 4 μ x x ) 2 ð 3 b = 2 μ x x 2 3 μ x x 3 2 .

Substituting λ = ι ω [39] into (14) for achieving fundamental condition of Hopf bifurcation:

(16) ω = ð 2 b and ð 1 b ð 2 b = ð 3 b ,

where ð 2 b is given in equation (15). Therefore, for Hopf bifurcation μ x x must be greater than 4. Phase portrait for verification of equations (11)–(16) is given in Section 5.1.

3 Algorithm and limitations of M chaotic controller

In this section, we used the concept of Lyapunov stability based on the classical control theory to design algorithm for M chaotic controller. This controller works in a manner that estimated parameters start approaching towards their original values. Then, unpredictable trajectories start moving to their desired values as t approaches to infinity. It is important to mention that we have selected stable equilibria of system (4), for the sake of convergence, instead of any desired values.

Algorithm 1. Algorithm for M chaotic controller

  1. Suppose a closed loop system with M = M A + M W :

    (17) y ˙ = g ( y , M )

    for an open loop system:

    (18) x ˙ = f ( x ) .

  2. Add a controller; M to the right side of open loop system (18), where, number of controllers depends on the nature of chaotic system.

  3. Derive error dynamical system:

    (19) e ˙ = y ˙ x ˙ ,

    using error term between the state variables of systems (18) and (17).

  4. As M = M A + M W given in step 1. Therefore, select M A on the basis of active control technique [18], in which all terms, excluding error terms, are eliminated.

  5. For M W , consider the remaining parameters involved in error dynamical system (19) as unknown or anonymous.

  6. Select a positive definite quadratic energy function in terms of error trajectories and estimated parameters:

    (20) V ( e ) = i = 1 n e i 2 + e Φ i 2

    for finding anonymous parameters using updated parameter law, where Φ i shows estimated parameters.

  7. If V ˙ is less than zero, then we are done, else go to step 1 again.

Algorithm 1 is utilized in Section (4) for Gyrostat chaotic system (4) to achieve global stability in its velocity vectors. We also have the following limitation for our designed controller:

  1. Chaos in dynamical systems occurs due to negligible change in initial solution or bifurcation parameter and sometimes due to both reasons. But, if chaos occurs due to initial conditions only, then our designed controller fails to be implemented in such case.

  2. If estimated parameters existed in any chaotic system are in complicated way, then it may be difficult to design a suitable controller.

4 M chaotic controller for gyro chaotic system

Theorem 4.1

An open loop system (4) is controlled at t = 1 , with control input M i = A i + W i for i = 1 , 2 , 3 , where A i = S x + N ( e i ) + κ with A i = ( A 1 , A 2 , A 3 ) T ,

(21) S = μ x x h x z h x y h y z μ y y 0 h z y 0 μ z z , N ( e i ) = I x y z ( e 2 e 3 + e 2 z + e 3 y ) I y x z ( e 1 e 3 + e 1 z + e 3 x ) I z x y ( e 1 e 2 + e 1 y + e 2 x ) ,

(22) κ = I x y z y z L x x I y x z x z L y y I z x y x y L z z , W 1 W 2 W 3 = μ ¯ x x ( t ) ρ h ¯ x z ( t ) h ¯ x y ( t ) h ¯ y z ( t ) μ ¯ y y ( t ) ρ 0 h ¯ z y ( t ) 0 μ ¯ z z ( t ) ρ

and suitable updated law (33).

Proof

We begin proof of Theorem 4.1 by adding time-dependant control inputs; M i ( t ) with all equations given in system (4):

(23) x ˙ = μ x x x h x z y + h x y z + I x y z y z + L x x + M 1 ( t ) y ˙ = h y z x + μ y y y + I y x z z x + L y y + M 2 ( t ) z ˙ = h z y x μ z z z + I z x y x y + L z z + M 3 ( t ) .

First step for finding control input is derivation of error dynamical systems using error terms:

(24) e i = x x for i = 1 , 2 , 3 and x = ( x , y , z ) .

Hence, error dynamical system of equation (23) is achieved by differentiating equation (24):

(25) e 1 ˙ = μ x x e 1 h x z e 2 + h x y e 3 μ x x x h x z y + h x y z + I x y z y z + L x x + M 1 ( t ) e 2 ˙ = h y z e 1 + μ y y e 2 + h y z x + μ y y y + I y x z z x + L y y + M 2 ( t ) e 3 ˙ = h z y e 1 μ z z e 3 h z y x μ z z z + I z x y x y + L z z + M 3 ( t ) ,

where

M i = A i + W i for i = 1 , 2 , 3 .

Here, control input M i is divided into two parts. First, we find A i using the basic active control strategy [18]:

(26) A 1 = μ x x x + h x z y h x y z I x y z y z L x x A 2 = h y z x μ y y y I y x z z x L y y A 3 = h z y x + μ z z z I z x y x y L z z .

Hence, we get S , N ( e i ) and κ mentioned in equation (21). Therefore, substituting equation (26) into equation (25), we get the simplified form of error dynamical system:

(27) e 1 ˙ = μ x x e 1 h x z e 2 + h x y e 3 + W 1 e 2 ˙ = h y z e 1 + μ y y e 2 + W 2 e 3 ˙ = h z y e 1 μ z z e 3 + W 3 .

Second portion of our proposed controller include W i for i = 1 , 2 , 3 , which can be obtained on the assumption that parameters remaining in equation (27) are anonymous. Therefore, we have introduced estimated parameters and negative eigenvalue ρ for W i :

(28) W 1 W 2 W 3 = μ ¯ x x ( t ) ρ h ¯ x z ( t ) h ¯ x y ( t ) h ¯ y z ( t ) μ ¯ y y ( t ) ρ 0 h ¯ z y ( t ) 0 μ ¯ z z ( t ) ρ .

Hence, substituting equation (28) into equation (27) yields:

(29) e 1 ˙ = ( e μ x x + ρ ) e 1 e h x z e 2 + e h x y e 3 e 2 ˙ = e h y z e 1 + ( e μ y y ρ ) e 2 e 3 ˙ = e h z y e 1 ( e μ z z + ρ ) e 3 ,

where e i , i = 1 , 2 , 3 are error terms between state variable and desired point, whereas e k = k k ¯ ( t ) for k = μ x x , h x z , h x y , h y z , μ y y , h z y and μ z z . Finally, we need to find anonymous time-dependant parameter values involved in equation (29). Therefore, we use quadratic energy-type function:

(30) V = 1 2 ( e 1 2 + e 2 2 + e 3 2 + e μ x x 2 + e h x z 2 + e h x y 2 + e h y z 2 + e μ y y 2 + e h z y 2 + e μ z z 2 ) ,

and must be dissipative. Hence, for verification we differentiate V along trajectories to get:

(31) V ˙ = ( e 1 e 1 ˙ + e 2 e 2 ˙ + e 3 e 3 ˙ + e μ x x e ˙ μ x x + e h x z e ˙ h x z + e h x y e ˙ h x y + e h y z e ˙ h y z + e μ y y e ˙ μ y y + e h z y e ˙ h z y + e μ z z e ˙ μ z z ) .

Rearranging and making groups of all variables involved in equation (31) yield:

(32) V ˙ = e 1 2 e 2 2 e 3 2 e μ x x ( e 1 2 + μ ¯ ˙ x x ) e h x z ( e 1 e 2 + h ¯ ˙ x z ) e h x y ( e 1 e 3 + h ¯ ˙ x y ) e h y z ( e 1 e 2 + h ¯ ˙ y z ) e μ y y ( e 2 2 + μ ¯ ˙ y y ) e h z y ( e 1 e 3 + h ¯ ˙ z y ) e μ z z ( e 3 2 + μ ¯ ˙ z z ) .

In view of equation (32), one can achieve the following dynamical system of estimated parameters [10]:

(33) μ ¯ ˙ x x = e 1 2 + k 1 e μ x x h ¯ ˙ x z = e 1 e 2 + k 2 e h x z h ¯ ˙ x y = e 1 e 3 + k 3 e h x y h ¯ ˙ y z = e 1 e 2 + k 4 e h y z μ ¯ ˙ y y = e 2 2 + k 5 e μ y y h ¯ ˙ z y = e 1 e 3 + k 6 e h z y μ ¯ ˙ z z = e 3 2 + k 7 e μ z z ,

which is our desired result. In Section 5.2, we have briefly discussed analytical results given in Theorem 4.1 that how chaotic trajectories start moving towards their stable equilibria as estimated parameters start approaching their original values in chaotic way instead of linear.□

5 Results and discussion

In this section, we have verified analytical results given in Sections 24 with the aid of simulations. Moreover, we have divided this portion into two sub-sections.

5.1 Hopf bifurcation

Gyrostat is a rigid body, used for detecting path and helps in stabilizing movement of spacecrafts [6]. Here, we have proved the existence of Hopf bifurcation for two parameters involved in system (4).

In Figure 2(a)–(d), we have noticed the existence of oscillation which changes its shape by adjusting parameter values given in equation (13). We have selected different values to observe trajectories for confirmation of Hopf bifurcation. In Figure 2(a) and (b), one can observe if damping constant is less than Hopf bifurcation point; h y = μ x 2 2 I x , it shows if disturbance in torques of gyro and components of total angular momentum along y -axis are small enough. Then, there exists a stable spiral which starts shrinking into origin with selection of value equals to Hopf bifurcation point, which can be seen in Figure 2(c). These trajectories change into an unstable spiral, given in Figure 2(d), surrounding stable limit cycle for parameter value greater than h y . Hence, qualitative behaviour of such trajectories confirms the existence of supercritical Hopf bifurcation.

Figure 2 
                  Parametric study of gyrostat chaotic system for seeking oscillatory solutions: (a) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              <
                              <
                              
                                 
                                    B
                                 
                                 
                                    H
                                 
                              
                           
                           {h}_{x}^{y}\lt \lt {B}_{H}
                        
                     , (b) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              <
                              
                                 
                                    B
                                 
                                 
                                    H
                                 
                              
                           
                           {h}_{x}^{y}\lt {B}_{H}
                        
                     , (c) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              =
                              
                                 
                                    B
                                 
                                 
                                    H
                                 
                              
                           
                           {h}_{x}^{y}={B}_{H}
                        
                     , (d) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              >
                              
                                 
                                    B
                                 
                                 
                                    H
                                 
                              
                           
                           {h}_{x}^{y}\gt {B}_{H}
                        
                     .
Figure 2

Parametric study of gyrostat chaotic system for seeking oscillatory solutions: (a) h x y < < B H , (b) h x y < B H , (c) h x y = B H , (d) h x y > B H .

Further working on studying various aspects of dynamical behaviour of the gyro chaotic system, in our another paper, it leads us to the point that there also exists Hopf bifurcation for our considered system, with different parametric values.

In Figure 3, one can observe damping of oscillation in trajectories of gyrostat chaotic system. From Figure 4(a)–(c), the existence of subcritical Hopf bifurcation is confirmed. In Figure 4(a), we have selected μ x as bifurcation parameter. For value less than bifurcation point, unstable spiral can be observed in Figure 4(a), which vanishes in Figure 4(b) and emerges again with stable spiral in Figure 4(c).

Figure 3 
                  Time history of system (4) indicating damping oscillation.
Figure 3

Time history of system (4) indicating damping oscillation.

Figure 4 
                  Existence of Hopf bifurcation from both ends: (a) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                              
                              <
                              
                                 
                                    B
                                 
                                 
                                    H
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\mu }_{x}^{x}\lt {B}_{H}
                        
                     , (b) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                              
                              =
                              
                                 
                                    B
                                 
                                 
                                    H
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\mu }_{x}^{x}={B}_{H}
                        
                     , (c) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                              
                              >
                              
                                 
                                    B
                                 
                                 
                                    H
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\mu }_{x}^{x}\gt {B}_{H}
                        
                     .
Figure 4

Existence of Hopf bifurcation from both ends: (a) μ x x < B H , (b) μ x x = B H , (c) μ x x > B H .

5.2 M chaotic controller

We have already discussed analytical results for our proposed control technique in Sections 3 and 4. Therefore, we have considered system (4), for applying M chaotic controller, which is chaotic for the aforementioned fixed parameter values. Figure 5(a)–(c) is phase portraits and Figure 5(d) is time history for the existence of chaos in gyrostat system. An attached spherical cylinder with spacecraft can be seen in Figure 1. Therefore, negligible disturbance in movement of spacecraft can bring sloshing around walls inside fuel tank. Due to this effect, one can observe frequent unstable changes in centre of mass and exert pressure on walls of attached tank. Hence, gyro device is attached within spacecrafts for continuous stability and path planning for spacecrafts. Moreover, chaos in gyrostat can lead to create disconnection between satellite and spacecraft and can lose its position in space before reaching to its desired destination.

Figure 5 
                  (a)–(c) Phase portraits and (d) time history of system (4): (a) 
                        
                           
                           
                              x
                              y
                           
                           xy
                        
                     -axis, (b) 
                        
                           
                           
                              y
                              z
                           
                           yz
                        
                     -axis, (c) 
                        
                           
                           
                              x
                              z
                           
                           xz
                        
                     -axis, (d) time history.
Figure 5

(a)–(c) Phase portraits and (d) time history of system (4): (a) x y -axis, (b) y z -axis, (c) x z -axis, (d) time history.

Therefore, we have introduced new control function for surpassing unpredictability in system (4). However, many researchers have proved that chaotic trajectories start converging towards desired point as estimated parameters approach their original values for time approaches to infinity. But, after introducing control technique given in this article for chaotic systems, we have observed that the same result of controllability is achieved with chaotic updated law. This means, when the control inputs designed in this article are applied to chaotic system (4) using Algorithm 1, then randomness in trajectories, which can be seen in Figure 5(d), is controlled and can be observed in Figure 6 at t = 1.2 .

Figure 6 
                  Controlled state variables of gyro chaotic system.
Figure 6

Controlled state variables of gyro chaotic system.

In Figure 6, we can see that solutions of angular velocities begin with oscillations but with advancement in time, our proposed control inputs start its function at t = 0.5 . Hence, chaos in gyrostat dynamical system is controlled. Interestingly, Figure 7 is not any other chaotic system, but is numerical simulation of updated law given in equation (33). Moreover, the results achieved in Figure 7 are negation of the fundamental updated law, especially, used in adaptive control technique. Hence, in our case, as estimated parameters start approaching towards their original values in random way. Then, angular velocities of all coordinates start moving in controlled way after some oscillation.

Figure 7 
                  Chaotic updated law (33).
Figure 7

Chaotic updated law (33).

The authors have included almost all phase portraits Figure 8(a)–(l) for chaotic updated law to clarify their new findings. Moreover, in comparison with various other techniques, it has been observed that, in 2019, Marwan et al. [40] used three controllers for double convection model in which adaptive controller is activated at t = 2 , sliding control technique works at t = 5.5 and backstepping technique acquire the same result for t = 6 . Similarly, in the work of Moysis et al. [18] active controller is used for hyperjerk system and chaos is surpassed at t = 3 . But, controller designed in our work is activated at t = 1 (can be seen in Figure 6), which shows our proposed controller give better results in comparison.

Figure 8 
                  Chaotic behaviour of updated law for controlling chaos in system (4): (a) 3D Phase portrait of 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                              
                              −
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                              
                              −
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\mu }_{x}^{x}-{h}_{x}^{z}-{h}_{x}^{y}
                        
                     , (b) 3D phase portrait of 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                              
                              −
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              −
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                           
                           {h}_{y}^{z}-{\mu }_{y}^{y}-{h}_{z}^{y}
                        
                     , (c) 3D Phase portrait of 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              −
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              −
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\mu }_{y}^{y}-{h}_{z}^{y}-{\mu }_{z}^{z}
                        
                     , (d) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                              
                              
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                 -axis
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\mu }_{x}^{x}\hspace{0.33em}{h}_{x}^{z}\hspace{0.1em}\text{-axis}\hspace{0.1em}
                        
                     , (e) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                              
                              
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                 -axis
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\mu }_{x}^{x}\hspace{0.33em}{h}_{x}^{z}\hspace{0.1em}\text{-axis}\hspace{0.1em}
                        
                     , (f) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                 -axis
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\mu }_{y}^{y}\hspace{0.33em}{h}_{z}^{y}\hspace{0.1em}\text{-axis}\hspace{0.1em}
                        
                     , (g) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                              
                              
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                 -axis
                                 
                              
                           
                           {h}_{x}^{z}\hspace{0.33em}{h}_{x}^{y}\hspace{0.1em}\text{-axis}\hspace{0.1em}
                        
                     , (h) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                 -axis
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\mu }_{y}^{y}\hspace{0.33em}{h}_{z}^{y}\hspace{0.1em}\text{-axis}\hspace{0.1em}
                        
                     , (i) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                 -axis
                                 
                              
                           
                           {h}_{z}^{y}\hspace{0.33em}{\mu }_{z}^{z}\hspace{0.1em}\text{-axis}\hspace{0.1em}
                        
                     , (j) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                              
                              
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    x
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                 -axis
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\mu }_{x}^{x}\hspace{0.33em}{h}_{x}^{y}\hspace{0.1em}\text{-axis}\hspace{0.1em}
                        
                     , (k) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                              
                              
                              
                                 
                                    h
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                 -axis
                                 
                              
                           
                           {h}_{y}^{z}\hspace{0.33em}{h}_{z}^{y}\hspace{0.1em}\text{-axis}\hspace{0.1em}
                        
                     , and (l) 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                                 
                                    y
                                 
                              
                              
                              
                                 
                                    μ
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                                 
                                    z
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                 -axis
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\mu }_{y}^{y}\hspace{0.33em}{\mu }_{z}^{z}\hspace{0.1em}\text{-axis}\hspace{0.1em}
                        
                     .
Figure 8

Chaotic behaviour of updated law for controlling chaos in system (4): (a) 3D Phase portrait of μ x x h x z h x y , (b) 3D phase portrait of h y z μ y y h z y , (c) 3D Phase portrait of μ y y h z y μ z z , (d) μ x x h x z -axis , (e) μ x x h x z -axis , (f) μ y y h z y -axis , (g) h x z h x y -axis , (h) μ y y h z y -axis , (i) h z y μ z z -axis , (j) μ x x h x y -axis , (k) h y z h z y -axis , and (l) μ y y μ z z -axis .

6 Conclusion

In this work, normal form theory was utilized to show oscillatory solutions in mechanical model coupled with fuel filled tank. It was observed that Hopf bifurcation was not only limited to biological models but had great impact in spacecraft models. Furthermore, appearance and disappearance of negligible limit cycle around stable spiral were observed with changes in parameter values. On the other hand, a new controller based on active control technique and estimated parameter law was designed to bring stability in the considered model. Moreover, these results were also compared with other latest techniques and observed that our proposed technique took less time in comparison.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] MazmanyanL, Ayoubi AA. Proceedings of the AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference; 2013. p. 793–812. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Gutnik SA, Santos LF, Sarychev VA, Silva AR. Dynamics of a gyrostat satellite subjected to the action of gravity moment. Equilibrium attitudes and their stability. J Comput Syst Sci Int. 2015;54(3):469–82. 10.1134/S1064230715030107Search in Google Scholar

[3] Wittenburg J. Basic principles of rigid body dynamics. In: Dynamics of systems of rigid bodies. Vieweg, Teubner Verlag; 1977. p. 33–43. 10.1007/978-3-322-90942-8_3Search in Google Scholar

[4] Chatys R, Koruba Z. Gyroscope‐based control and stabilization of unmanned aerial mini‐vehicle (mini‐UAV). Aviation. 2005;9(2):10–16.10.3846/16487788.2005.9635898Search in Google Scholar

[5] Krishnaprasad S. Lie-Poisson structures, dual-spin spacecraft and asymptotic stability. Nonlin Anal Theory Methods & Appl. 1985;9(10):1011–35. 10.1016/0362-546X(85)90083-5Search in Google Scholar

[6] Qi G, Yang X. Modeling of a chaotic gyrostat system and mechanism analysis of dynamics using force and energy. Complexity. 2019;2019(5):1–13. 10.1155/2019/5439596Search in Google Scholar

[7] Tian H, Han M. Bifurcation of periodic orbits by perturbing high-dimensional piecewise smooth integrable systems. J Differ Equ. 2017;263(11):7448–74. 10.1016/j.jde.2017.08.011Search in Google Scholar

[8] Jin Z, Yuan R. Hopf bifurcation in a reaction-diffusion-advection equation with nonlocal delay effect. J Differ Equ. 2021;271:533–62. 10.1016/j.jde.2020.08.026Search in Google Scholar

[9] Marwan M, Mehboob M, Ahmad S, Aqeel M. Hopf bifurcation of forced Chen system and its stability via adaptive control with arbitrary parameters. Soft Comput. 2020;24(6):4333–41. 10.1007/s00500-019-04197-8Search in Google Scholar

[10] Marwan M, Ahmad S. Bifurcation analysis for energy transport system and its optimal control using parameter self-tuning law. Soft Comput. 2020;24:17221–31. 10.1007/s00500-020-05014-3Search in Google Scholar

[11] Mondal S, Samanta GP. Dynamics of an additional food provided predator-prey system with prey refuge dependent on both species and constant harvest in the predator. Physica A Stat Mech Appl. 2019;534:122301. 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122301Search in Google Scholar

[12] Mondal S, Samanta GP. Dynamics of a delayed predator-prey interaction incorporating nonlinear prey refuge under the influence of fear effect and additional food. J Phys A Math Theor. 2020;53(29):295601. 10.1088/1751-8121/ab81d8Search in Google Scholar

[13] Sahoo D, Samanta GP. Comparison between two tritrophic food chain models with multiple delays and anti-predation effect. Int J Biomath. 2021;14(3):2150010. 10.1142/S1793524521500108Search in Google Scholar

[14] Saha S, Samanta GP. A prey-predator system with disease in prey and cooperative hunting strategy in the predator. J Phys A Math Theor. 2020;53(48):485601. 10.1088/1751-8121/abbc7bSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Santos LF, Melicio R. Bifurcation of equilibria for general case of gyrostat satellite on a circular orbit. Aerospace Sci Technol. 2020;105:106058. 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106058Search in Google Scholar

[16] Sandfry RA, Hall CD. Bifurcations of relative equilibria of an oblate gyrostat with a discrete damper. Nonlinear Dyn. 2007;48(3):319–29. 10.1007/s11071-006-9090-4Search in Google Scholar

[17] Elipe A, Arribas M, Riaguas A. Complete analysis of bifurcations in the axial gyrostat problem. J Phys A Math General. 1997;30(2):587. 10.1088/0305-4470/30/2/021Search in Google Scholar

[18] Moysis L, Petavratzis E, Marwan M, Volos C, Nistazakis H, Ahmad S. Analysis, synchronization, and robotic application of a modified hyperjerk chaotic system. Complexity. 2020;2020:2826850. 10.1155/2020/2826850Search in Google Scholar

[19] Pinaud MF, Henriquez HR. Controllability of systems with a general nonlocal condition. J Differ Equ. 2020;269(6):4609–42. 10.1016/j.jde.2020.03.029Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hernandez-Santamaria V, Zuazua E. Controllability of shadow reaction-diffusion systems. J Differ Equ. 2020;268(7):3781–818. 10.1016/j.jde.2019.10.012Search in Google Scholar

[21] Chai R, Tsourdos A, Savvaris A, Chai S, Xia Y, Chen CP. Six-DOF spacecraft optimal trajectory planning and real-time attitude control: a deep neural network-based approach. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Sys. 2019;31(11):5005–13. 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2955400Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Aslanov V, Yudintsev V. Dynamics and chaos control of gyrostat satellite. Chaos Solit Fractal. 2012;45(9–10):1100–7. 10.1016/j.chaos.2012.06.008Search in Google Scholar

[23] Chen Y, Xu Y, Lin Q, Zhang X. Model and criteria on the global finite-time synchronization of the chaotic gyrostat systems. Math Comput Simulat. 2020;178:515–33. 10.1016/j.matcom.2020.06.022Search in Google Scholar

[24] Chai R, Savvaris A, Tsourdos A, Chai S, Xia Y. Optimal tracking guidance for aeroassisted spacecraft reconnaissance mission based on receding horizon control. IEEE Trans Aerospace Electr Sys. 2018;54(4):1575–88. 10.1109/TAES.2018.2798219Search in Google Scholar

[25] Chai R, Savvaris A, Tsourdos A, Chai S, Xia Y. Trajectory optimization of space maneuver vehicle using a hybrid optimal control solver. IEEE Trans Cybernet. 2017;49(2):467–80. 10.1109/TCYB.2017.2778195Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Abtahi SM. Melnikov-based analysis for chaotic dynamics of spin-orbit motion of a gyrostat satellite. Proc Institut Mech Eng Part K: J Multi-body Dynam. 2019;233(4):931–41. 10.1177/1464419319842024Search in Google Scholar

[27] Doroshin AV. Regimes of regular and chaotic motion of gyrostats in the central gravity field. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat. 2019;69:416–31. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.10.004Search in Google Scholar

[28] Wang Y, Tang S, Guo J, Wang X, Liu C. Fuzzy-logic-based fixed-time geometric backstepping control on SO (3) for spacecraft attitude tracking. IEEE Trans Aerospace Electr Sys. 2019;55(6):2938–50. 10.1109/TAES.2019.2896873Search in Google Scholar

[29] Doroshin AV. Attitude dynamics of gyrostat-satellites under control by magnetic actuators at small perturbations. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numerical Simulat. 2017;49:159–75. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.01.029Search in Google Scholar

[30] Abtahi SM, Sadati SH, Salarieh H. Nonlinear analysis and attitude control of a gyrostat satellite with chaotic dynamics using discrete-time LQR-OGY. Asian J Control. 2016;18(5):1845–55. 10.1002/asjc.1278Search in Google Scholar

[31] Doroshin AV. Analytical solutions for dynamics of dual-spin spacecraft and gyrostat-satellites under magnetic attitude control in omega-regimes. Int J Non-Linear Mech. 2017;96:64–74. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.08.004Search in Google Scholar

[32] Ahmad S, Yue B. Motion stability dynamics for spacecraft coupled with partially filled liquid container. Theoret Appl Mech Lett. 2012;2(1):013002. 10.1063/2.1201302Search in Google Scholar

[33] Wu WJ, Yue BZ, Huang H. Coupling dynamic analysis of spacecraft with multiple cylindrical tanks and flexible appendages. Acta Mechanica Sinica. 2016;32(1):144–55. 10.1007/s10409-015-0497-3Search in Google Scholar

[34] Deng M, Yue B. Attitude dynamics and control of spacecraft with multiple liquid propellant tanks. J Aerospace Eng. 2016;29(6):04016042. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000636Search in Google Scholar

[35] Mondal S, Samanta GP. Pelican-Tilapia interaction in Salton sea: an eco-epidemiological model with strong Allee effect and additional food. Model Earth Syst Environ. 2021:1–24. 10.1007/s40808-021-01097-5. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Mondal S, Samanta GP. Impact of fear on a predator-prey system with prey-dependent search rate in deterministic and stochastic environment. Nonlinear Dynam. 2021;29:1–29. 10.1007/s11071-021-06435-x. Search in Google Scholar

[37] Chai R, Tsourdos A, Savvaris A, Chai S, Xia Y, Chen CP. Review of advanced guidance and control algorithms for space/aerospace vehicles. Progress Aerospace Sci. 2021;122:100696. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100696Search in Google Scholar

[38] Strogatz SH. Nonlinear dynamics and chaos with student solutions manual: with applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018 Sep 21. 10.1201/9780429399640Search in Google Scholar

[39] Das A, Das S, Das P. Hopf bifurcation analysis and existence of heteroclinic orbit and homoclinic orbit in an extended lorenz system. Diff Equ Dyn Sys. 2020;9:1–7. 10.1007/s12591-020-00556-2Search in Google Scholar

[40] Marwan M, Ahmad S, Aqeel M, Sabir M. Control analysis of Rucklidge chaotic system. J Dynam Syst Measurement Control. 2019;141(4):0410101–7. 10.1115/1.4042030Search in Google Scholar

[41] Yang Y, Qi G, Hu J, Faradja P. Finding method and analysis of hidden chaotic attractors for plasma chaotic system from physical and mechanistic perspectives. Int J Bifurcat Chaos. 2020;30(05):2050072. 10.1142/S0218127420500728Search in Google Scholar

[42] Chen X, Xiao L, Kingni ST, Moroz I, Wei Z, Jahanshahi H. Coexisting attractors, chaos control and synchronization in a self-exciting homopolar dynamo system. Int J Intell Comput Cybernet. 2020 Apr 6:1–17. 10.1108/IJICC-11-2019-0123Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-04-09
Revised: 2021-06-08
Accepted: 2021-07-13
Published Online: 2021-10-01

© 2021 Muhammad Sabir et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Circular Rydberg states of helium atoms or helium-like ions in a high-frequency laser field
  3. Closed-form solutions and conservation laws of a generalized Hirota–Satsuma coupled KdV system of fluid mechanics
  4. W-Chirped optical solitons and modulation instability analysis of Chen–Lee–Liu equation in optical monomode fibres
  5. The problem of a hydrogen atom in a cavity: Oscillator representation solution versus analytic solution
  6. An analytical model for the Maxwell radiation field in an axially symmetric galaxy
  7. Utilization of updated version of heat flux model for the radiative flow of a non-Newtonian material under Joule heating: OHAM application
  8. Verification of the accommodative responses in viewing an on-axis analog reflection hologram
  9. Irreversibility as thermodynamic time
  10. A self-adaptive prescription dose optimization algorithm for radiotherapy
  11. Algebraic computational methods for solving three nonlinear vital models fractional in mathematical physics
  12. The diffusion mechanism of the application of intelligent manufacturing in SMEs model based on cellular automata
  13. Numerical analysis of free convection from a spinning cone with variable wall temperature and pressure work effect using MD-BSQLM
  14. Numerical simulation of hydrodynamic oscillation of side-by-side double-floating-system with a narrow gap in waves
  15. Closed-form solutions for the Schrödinger wave equation with non-solvable potentials: A perturbation approach
  16. Study of dynamic pressure on the packer for deep-water perforation
  17. Ultrafast dephasing in hydrogen-bonded pyridine–water mixtures
  18. Crystallization law of karst water in tunnel drainage system based on DBL theory
  19. Position-dependent finite symmetric mass harmonic like oscillator: Classical and quantum mechanical study
  20. Application of Fibonacci heap to fast marching method
  21. An analytical investigation of the mixed convective Casson fluid flow past a yawed cylinder with heat transfer analysis
  22. Considering the effect of optical attenuation on photon-enhanced thermionic emission converter of the practical structure
  23. Fractal calculation method of friction parameters: Surface morphology and load of galvanized sheet
  24. Charge identification of fragments with the emulsion spectrometer of the FOOT experiment
  25. Quantization of fractional harmonic oscillator using creation and annihilation operators
  26. Scaling law for velocity of domino toppling motion in curved paths
  27. Frequency synchronization detection method based on adaptive frequency standard tracking
  28. Application of common reflection surface (CRS) to velocity variation with azimuth (VVAz) inversion of the relatively narrow azimuth 3D seismic land data
  29. Study on the adaptability of binary flooding in a certain oil field
  30. CompVision: An open-source five-compartmental software for biokinetic simulations
  31. An electrically switchable wideband metamaterial absorber based on graphene at P band
  32. Effect of annealing temperature on the interface state density of n-ZnO nanorod/p-Si heterojunction diodes
  33. A facile fabrication of superhydrophobic and superoleophilic adsorption material 5A zeolite for oil–water separation with potential use in floating oil
  34. Shannon entropy for Feinberg–Horodecki equation and thermal properties of improved Wei potential model
  35. Hopf bifurcation analysis for liquid-filled Gyrostat chaotic system and design of a novel technique to control slosh in spacecrafts
  36. Optical properties of two-dimensional two-electron quantum dot in parabolic confinement
  37. Optical solitons via the collective variable method for the classical and perturbed Chen–Lee–Liu equations
  38. Stratified heat transfer of magneto-tangent hyperbolic bio-nanofluid flow with gyrotactic microorganisms: Keller-Box solution technique
  39. Analysis of the structure and properties of triangular composite light-screen targets
  40. Magnetic charged particles of optical spherical antiferromagnetic model with fractional system
  41. Study on acoustic radiation response characteristics of sound barriers
  42. The tribological properties of single-layer hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric/phenolic resin composites underwater
  43. Research on maintenance spare parts requirement prediction based on LSTM recurrent neural network
  44. Quantum computing simulation of the hydrogen molecular ground-state energies with limited resources
  45. A DFT study on the molecular properties of synthetic ester under the electric field
  46. Construction of abundant novel analytical solutions of the space–time fractional nonlinear generalized equal width model via Riemann–Liouville derivative with application of mathematical methods
  47. Some common and dynamic properties of logarithmic Pareto distribution with applications
  48. Soliton structures in optical fiber communications with Kundu–Mukherjee–Naskar model
  49. Fractional modeling of COVID-19 epidemic model with harmonic mean type incidence rate
  50. Liquid metal-based metamaterial with high-temperature sensitivity: Design and computational study
  51. Biosynthesis and characterization of Saudi propolis-mediated silver nanoparticles and their biological properties
  52. New trigonometric B-spline approximation for numerical investigation of the regularized long-wave equation
  53. Modal characteristics of harmonic gear transmission flexspline based on orthogonal design method
  54. Revisiting the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations
  55. Time-periodic pulse electroosmotic flow of Jeffreys fluids through a microannulus
  56. Exact wave solutions of the nonlinear Rosenau equation using an analytical method
  57. Computational examination of Jeffrey nanofluid through a stretchable surface employing Tiwari and Das model
  58. Numerical analysis of a single-mode microring resonator on a YAG-on-insulator
  59. Review Articles
  60. Double-layer coating using MHD flow of third-grade fluid with Hall current and heat source/sink
  61. Analysis of aeromagnetic filtering techniques in locating the primary target in sedimentary terrain: A review
  62. Rapid Communications
  63. Nonlinear fitting of multi-compartmental data using Hooke and Jeeves direct search method
  64. Effect of buried depth on thermal performance of a vertical U-tube underground heat exchanger
  65. Knocking characteristics of a high pressure direct injection natural gas engine operating in stratified combustion mode
  66. What dominates heat transfer performance of a double-pipe heat exchanger
  67. Special Issue on Future challenges of advanced computational modeling on nonlinear physical phenomena - Part II
  68. Lump, lump-one stripe, multiwave and breather solutions for the Hunter–Saxton equation
  69. New quantum integral inequalities for some new classes of generalized ψ-convex functions and their scope in physical systems
  70. Computational fluid dynamic simulations and heat transfer characteristic comparisons of various arc-baffled channels
  71. Gaussian radial basis functions method for linear and nonlinear convection–diffusion models in physical phenomena
  72. Investigation of interactional phenomena and multi wave solutions of the quantum hydrodynamic Zakharov–Kuznetsov model
  73. On the optical solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equation with second-order spatiotemporal dispersion
  74. Analysis of couple stress fluid flow with variable viscosity using two homotopy-based methods
  75. Quantum estimates in two variable forms for Simpson-type inequalities considering generalized Ψ-convex functions with applications
  76. Series solution to fractional contact problem using Caputo’s derivative
  77. Solitary wave solutions of the ionic currents along microtubule dynamical equations via analytical mathematical method
  78. Thermo-viscoelastic orthotropic constraint cylindrical cavity with variable thermal properties heated by laser pulse via the MGT thermoelasticity model
  79. Theoretical and experimental clues to a flux of Doppler transformation energies during processes with energy conservation
  80. On solitons: Propagation of shallow water waves for the fifth-order KdV hierarchy integrable equation
  81. Special Issue on Transport phenomena and thermal analysis in micro/nano-scale structure surfaces - Part II
  82. Numerical study on heat transfer and flow characteristics of nanofluids in a circular tube with trapezoid ribs
  83. Experimental and numerical study of heat transfer and flow characteristics with different placement of the multi-deck display cabinet in supermarket
  84. Thermal-hydraulic performance prediction of two new heat exchangers using RBF based on different DOE
  85. Diesel engine waste heat recovery system comprehensive optimization based on system and heat exchanger simulation
  86. Load forecasting of refrigerated display cabinet based on CEEMD–IPSO–LSTM combined model
  87. Investigation on subcooled flow boiling heat transfer characteristics in ICE-like conditions
  88. Research on materials of solar selective absorption coating based on the first principle
  89. Experimental study on enhancement characteristics of steam/nitrogen condensation inside horizontal multi-start helical channels
  90. Special Issue on Novel Numerical and Analytical Techniques for Fractional Nonlinear Schrodinger Type - Part I
  91. Numerical exploration of thin film flow of MHD pseudo-plastic fluid in fractional space: Utilization of fractional calculus approach
  92. A Haar wavelet-based scheme for finding the control parameter in nonlinear inverse heat conduction equation
  93. Stable novel and accurate solitary wave solutions of an integrable equation: Qiao model
  94. Novel soliton solutions to the Atangana–Baleanu fractional system of equations for the ISALWs
  95. On the oscillation of nonlinear delay differential equations and their applications
  96. Abundant stable novel solutions of fractional-order epidemic model along with saturated treatment and disease transmission
  97. Fully Legendre spectral collocation technique for stochastic heat equations
  98. Special Issue on 5th International Conference on Mechanics, Mathematics and Applied Physics (2021)
  99. Residual service life of erbium-modified AM50 magnesium alloy under corrosion and stress environment
  100. Special Issue on Advanced Topics on the Modelling and Assessment of Complicated Physical Phenomena - Part I
  101. Diverse wave propagation in shallow water waves with the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili–Benjamin–Bona–Mahony and Benney–Luke integrable models
  102. Intensification of thermal stratification on dissipative chemically heating fluid with cross-diffusion and magnetic field over a wedge
Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2021-0058/html
Scroll to top button