Startseite An overview of methods for production and detection of silver nanoparticles, with emphasis on their fate and toxicological effects on human, soil, and aquatic environment
Artikel Open Access

An overview of methods for production and detection of silver nanoparticles, with emphasis on their fate and toxicological effects on human, soil, and aquatic environment

  • Mohamed Mohamady Ghobashy EMAIL logo , Mohamed Abd Elkodous , Soha Hamdy Shabaka , Sherif A. Younis , Dalal Mohamed Alshangiti , Mohamed Madani , Samera Ali Al-Gahtany , Walid F. Elkhatib , Ayman M. Noreddin , Norhan Nady und Gharieb S. El-Sayyad
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 30. August 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been extensively used in various industries; however, this is accompanied by several implications to humans and the environment. This review focuses on different aspects of AgNPs including the production and detection techniques, their fate, and dynamics in response to different environmental factors. In addition, this review illustrates the toxicity mechanism and the interaction of AgNPs with different matrices, such as aquatic environment, soil, crops, and humans. Reduction measures and future research are discussed.

Graphical abstract

Practically, AgNPs are converted to the positively charged Ag+ ions by dissolution process and will react with the negatively charged oxygen and nitrogen atoms in the vital organelles like DNA, mitochondrion, and the thiol group presented in protein structures and enzymes, which in terms interrupts the normal cell reproduction, and finally, the death of cell will occur according to the toxicity limit of (Ag+) silver ions level of each organ.

1 Introduction

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are one of the fastest-growing products in the nanotechnology industry, due to their distinctive physicochemical properties and antimicrobial activity [1,2,3,4]. Accordingly, the use of AgNPs has become extensive with an estimated global production of approximately 500 tons per year [5]. AgNPs have been widely used in medical applications, including wound dressings, contraceptive devices, surgical instruments, and bone prostheses [6,7,8], in addition to water purifications and indoor air quality management [9,10]. Moreover, AgNPs are used in the aquaculture industry for rapid disease detection, vaccines, hormones, nutrients, and nanosensors [11,12]. Eventually, AgNPs enter the soil and aquatic environment mainly through wastewater effluents, accidental spillages, industrial runoffs, and agricultural drainage water, where they exhibited substantial toxic effects on different organisms and humans.

However, to date, there have not been conclusive statements about their toxicity due to the lack of studies on the fate of AgNPs under laboratory conditions [13]. Three main mechanisms that explain AgNPs toxicity have been suggested: (1) AgNPs can directly damage cell membranes due to the nano-size (physical impact), (2) AgNPs and silver ions generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), and (3) AgNPs can release Ag ions. The latter mechanism was suggested by many studies [14,15,16,17]. Some researchers suggest that AgNPs could serve as a “Trojan horse,” avoiding common barriers, releasing Ag+ ions, and causing damage to the cells [18,19]. AgNPs are converted from Ago form to dissolution or ionization (Ag+) form [20]. Some researches indicate that cysteine is vital to remove Ag+ ion toxicity which is a free chelating agent for (Ag+) ions [21]. While other results are somewhat conflicting, all evidence suggests that both silver ions and AgNPs cause toxicity in human cells [22,23]. Several research papers evaluated the antimicrobial and antifungal activity of AgNPs [24,25] which was attributed to the release of Ag+ to the medium [26,27]. Several studies used AgNPs for many applications, but they did not study their side effect on the environment. There remain wide information gaps concerning the potential risks of exposure to AgNPs, considering the increasingly rising proportion of AgNPs in our societies. Although some reviews dealt with the toxicity of AgNPs, there was a lack of information about the mechanism of the ecotoxicology in addition to the lack of reduction measures. This review aims to depict how the manufacturing techniques of AgNPs and receiving environment affect the fate and impact of AgNPs on the aquatic environment and humans; in addition, reduction measures are suggested.

2 Overview of the different applications used for the synthesis of AgNPs

AgNPs have been used in various applications since ancient times, for instance, they were used for the conservation of mummies in Ancient Egypt [28] (Figure 1). Nowadays, silver is used in smart nano-systems by developing AgNPs for various functions, e.g., imaging contrast, drug delivery, cell targeting, etc. [29]. By searching the Scopus for the words “AgNPs synthesis,” one can find 42,100 publications covering the period between 2160 BC and 2020. Varied preparation methodologies of AgNPs have been reported, including, chemical, physical, biosynthesis, and photochemical methods. Forty two percent of the published researches used chemical methods, while physical, biological, and photochemical syntheses represented 33, 18, and 7%, respectively, of the scholarly output (Figure 2).

Figure 1 
               Historical timeline of AgNPs.
Figure 1

Historical timeline of AgNPs.

Figure 2 
               The published research articles on the topic of synthesis of AgNPs. The databases were collected from “Scopus” using the keyword “AgNPs,” up to 30 May, 2021.
Figure 2

The published research articles on the topic of synthesis of AgNPs. The databases were collected from “Scopus” using the keyword “AgNPs,” up to 30 May, 2021.

2.1 Chemical synthesis

Chemical synthesis is mainly used for the preparation of AgNPs since it allows for the preparation of stabilizing monodisperse AgNPs with various nanostructure shapes. Usually, the AgNPs were synthesized chemically based on the following three major compounds: (i) silver nitrate (AgNO3) as silver precursors, (ii) an appropriate reducing agent, and (iii) a capping agent [30,31]. The production of colloidal silver solutions from silver ions reduction involves two steps: nucleation and grain growth. It has been shown that the shape and size of the synthesized AgNPs depend largely on these stages. The nucleation and grain growth of the first nuclei can be regulated by changing the parameters of the reaction, like ion precursors, temperature, pH, and types of both stabilizing and reducing agents. In several studies, stabilizing and reducing agents are the same. For example, AgNPs can be prepared by thermally reducing silver ions in the existence of polymer. This process is called in situ AgNPs formation [32]. Spherical AgNPs were synthesized in situ with controllable size and high monodispersity by heating a mixture of polyvinylpyrrolidone and silver nitrate [PVP]/[AgNO3] with weight ratios of 5:1, 10:1, and 1:20 at a temperature of 70°C [33]. In this case, PVP severed both as a stabilizing and reducing agent. It has been shown that the shape and size of the obtained AgNPs are strongly affected by the PVP weight fraction in the mixture of [PVP]/[AgNO3]. Significant amounts of monodisperse triangular silver nanoplates were synthesized in situ by heating a mixture of PVP and AgNO3 dissolved in N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) at a temperature of 100°C [34]. Another nanostructure form of silver nanocubes was produced in the existence of PVP as a stabilizer and ethylene glycol (EG) as a reducing agent of AgNO3 [35]. This process is known as the “Polyol” methodology; in that case, EG acted as both a reducer and solvent, while PVP served as a stabilizer. [35] showed that PVP and its molar ratio, compared to AgNO3, played important roles in determining the amount, size, and geometric form of the product. According to [36], the experimental conditions, such as different temperatures ranges of the mixture (PEG, PVP, and AgNO3), affected the size and shape of the obtained AgNPs, where at heating rates of 1 and 7.5°C min−1, the mean sizes of AgNPs were 42 and 18 nm, respectively. They were inclined to be more mono-dispersive, which means that rapid nucleation with temperature occurred in a short time. The in situ colloidal AgNPs formation from the reduction of their salts depends on the nucleation and grain growth. It was also revealed that the shape and the size of synthesized AgNPs are mainly dependent on experimental parameters like reactants ratio [37], the temperature of reaction [38], and pH [39].

A microwave irradiation method is another fast method, known also as one-pot, which is used to synthesize colloidal AgNPs from the reduction of AgNO3 solution at a temperature within 80–128°C [40,41,42]. The reducing agent in the microwave irradiation method may be natural such as cuminum cyminum [43] and glucose [44]. Cai et al. [45] used the microwave irradiation method to synthesize a uniform size (20 nm) of AgNPs coated by polyacrylic acid. The source of the silver ions was AgNO3 and monoethanolamine (MEA) was used as a reducing reagent. Liu et al. demonstrated that the microwave irradiation approach assisted the synthesis of a uniform structure of colloidal silver nano-rods in the absence of a polymer or surfactant [46]. In contrast, the synthesis of the AgNPs using the one-pot method was characterized by different levels of aggregation and a variety of particle shapes by adjusting the time of microwave irradiation [47]. In conjunction, AgNPs can be synthesized using the emulsions method, where the reactants of the metal precursor and reduction agents were put in two immiscible phases [6,48].

2.2 Physical synthesis

In brief, the physical synthesis method of AgNPs typically uses physical energies such as arc discharge and electric and thermal powers to generate narrow-sized AgNPs in powder form [49]. Generally, AgNPs may be synthesized via evaporation/condensation through a tube furnace at ambient conditions. Lee and Kang formed silver nanocrystallites 9.5 nm by the thermal decomposition of a complex of Ag-oleate at a temperature of 290°C [50].

2.3 Biological and green synthesis

The biosynthesis of AgNPs has been explored by utilizing various biological agents; bacteria have received great interest through both the extracellular and intracellular synthesis pathways due to the ease of bacterial evolution, short generation period, and light culture procedures [51]. Fast biosynthesis of AgNPs can occur with a nonpathogenic bacterium, Thiosphaera pantotropha, seeded with a solution of 2 mM AgNO3 [52]. This bacterium has an unusual ability to use nitrogen oxide or nitrate as an electron acceptor and was able to perform heterotrophic nitrification exhibiting the activity of both nitrate-reductase enzymes (NaR) and nitrite-reductase enzymes (NiR). In another study, the use of Penicillium oxalicum fungal metabolites for the extracellular biosynthesis of AgNPs from AgNO3 solution was reported [53]. Morphology of the obtained AgNPs yielded an irregular spherical shape with high variability in a particle diameter ranging from 60 to 80 nm. Green synthesis is a new alternative AgNPs synthesis eco-friendly approach. This eco-friendly technique used biological agents, plants agents, or microbial agents which can act as capping and reducing agents at the same time. AgNPs synthesized by green chemistry offers a novel and potential alternative to chemically synthesized nanoparticles. In the green process of AgNPs synthesis, the biological agents not only reduce the silver salts, but also can form a protected layer on the surface of AgNPs; beside, they can act as reducing agents. This protected layer has several advantages such as it (i) prevents the agglomeration of the nanoparticles, (ii) reduces AgNPs dissolution and their toxicity, and (iii) improves their antimicrobial property [54].

2.4 Photochemical synthesis

Another one-step in situ AgNPs formation is carried out by the irradiation technique. The γ-irradiation method at a dose of 30 kGy provided a convenient and uniform reduction process in the existence of PVP as a stabilizer [55]. The effect of γ-irradiation stems from the water radiolysis that releases six species (˙OH, ˙H, H2O2, e hy , H2, and O2) where three of them are powerful reducing agents such as ˙H, e hy , and H2. Furthermore, UV-initiated photoreduction has been reported by Huang and Yang for the synthesis of AgNPs via AgNO3 photoreduction in the existence of collagen, PVP, citrate, and polyacrylic acid, which served as stabilizing agents [56].

3 Physicochemical properties of AgNPs

AgNPs can be obtained in different sizes, shapes, and surface charges (positive, neutral, and negative) depending on the method of synthesis. The stabilizers and capping agents are usually used to modify the AgNPs’ surface charges, beside influencing their physicochemical properties [57]. The shape of AgNPs can be of isotropic structure (0D) or anisotropic structure, such as 1D, 2D, and 3D. The morphologies of anisotropic AgNPs exhibit new physicochemical properties due to the high surface area when compared to isotropic AgNPs of inorganic NPs. Additionally, several significant parameters control the anisotropic morphology of AgNPs during seed processes such as the concentration of precursors, reaction temperature, pH, and reaction time. Almost all silver particles have a small size, high surface area, and, therefore, great toxic potential [58].

Localized surface Plasmon resonance (SPR) of AgNPs depends on the shape, size, and mutual interactions between particles of silver in close proximity [59]. The shape and size of AgNPs can tune the AgNPs Plasmon peak in the range of 393–738 nm [60].

4 Toxicity and fate of AgNPs in aquatic systems

For Drinking Water Quality (DWQ), the World Health Organization (WHO) noted that there are insufficient data to deduce a health benefit for silver in drinking water. These guidelines state that “amounts of up to 0.1 mg L−1 of silver can be accepted without health hazard.” Silver usage is governed by the National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In sources discussing drinking water, the permissible silver contaminant level is 0.1 mg L−1, a non-enforceable standard due to potential health effects, such as skin discoloration. In aquatic environments, the stability, and therefore toxicity, of AgNPs is inseparable from the chemistry of water, including parameters like dissolved organic matter (DOM), pH, ionic strength, and composition [61]. High ionic strength encourages the agglomeration of nanoparticles by screening double-layer electrostatic repulsion among similar particles, thereby reducing dissolution, toxicity, and ROS production of (Ag+) ions [62].

The effect of inorganic aquatic chemistry on the stability of AgNPs (precipitation, dissolution, and aggregation) and their bacterial viability was elucidated by [63]. Little is known about both the mobility and ultimate fate of AgNPs in freshwater ecosystems. Jin and coauthors prepared various mixtures of anions and cations dissolved in water at a fixed ionic strength. The results indicated that the AgNPs seemed to be in a highly dispersed form in the ions with the absence of Mg2+ and Ca2+. With Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions’ presence, AgNPs’ aggregation was enhanced regardless of the other ions’ presence due to the divalent ions such as Mg2+ and Ca2+ reducing the electrostatic repulsion among AgNPs that have negative zeta potentials in aqueous media. The negative charge of AgNPs is due to the adsorption of anions on the silver surface, like sulfate hydroxide and chloride. Usually, AgNPs in water systems are not only found in metallic form, but also in a salt form such as silver sulfide (Ag2S) and silver chloride (AgCl) (Figure 3) [64].

Figure 3 
               Behavior of AgNPs in freshwater ecosystem.
Figure 3

Behavior of AgNPs in freshwater ecosystem.

The dissolution of AgNPs by the oxidation process has been reported in several studies. Kittler et al. [65] prepared AgNPs stabilized with poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) and citrate to gain the silver particles’ different surface fictionalization and studied the dissolution of coated silver particles in water at three temperatures of 5, 25, and 37°C for several days. The results obtained suggested that depending on their surface fictionalization (if citrate or PVP) and reaction temperature, the degree of silver dissolution was higher for nanoparticles of PVP-stabilized silver than nanoparticles of citrate-stabilized silver. This could be due to the citrate layer which serves as a chemical shield to reduce the outgoing silver ions. Liu and Hurt [66] measured the rate of silver ions’ dissolution from citrate-stabilized AgNPs in different temperatures and pH values. The results indicated that the rate of silver ions’ dissolution increased with temperature and decreased with the reduction of pH or with the addition of fulvic acid or humic acid. The results confirmed that organic compounds such as fulvic or humic acids in natural waters do not dissolve silver. Gao et al. also observed lower toxicity of AgNPs in water samples as the concentration of DOM increased [67,68]. The effects of different environmental parameters, such as the salinity dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature, and pH, on the dissolution rate of citrate-stabilized AgNPs have been studied. High salinity promotes silver particle aggregation and hinders silver dissolution [66]. In addition, the increase of DO and temperature and lower pH values enhanced the rate of silver dissolution.

Li et al. [69] evaluated the stability of AgNPs citrate coated in natural freshwater from six separate sites. The results showed that citrate-coated AgNPs remained stable in low-salinity waters due to the impacts of DOM which promoted the stability of NPs (Figure 4). Free ions concentrations of sulfide S 2 2 , chlorine Cl, and sulfate SO4− in waters of high salinity cause rapid dissolution and sedimentation of citrate-coated AgNPs. Also, the results revealed that AgNPs remain stable for a long period in waters of low salinity. AgNPs can cause serious implications on the environment and organisms in freshwater ecosystems than in estuarine or seawater systems. Zou et al. [70] investigated the effect of natural organic matter (NOM) and DO in natural and synthetic freshwaters on the stability and dissolution of AgNPs for seven days; aggregations of AgNPs in synthetic freshwater were observed, where they resulted from the contraction of the electric double layers, followed by the dissolution of silver NPs. Nevertheless, the maximum concentration of dissolved silver (Agdis) significantly decreased from 356.5 to 272.1 mg L−1 under anoxic conditions. The addition of NOM mitigated the aggregation, prevented the oxidative dissolution effect, and enhanced the AgNPs’ transformation into Ag2S due to the adsorbed layers’ formation of NOM. Similarly, the inhibition of oxidative dissolution occurred in oxygen-deficient natural freshwaters compared with oxygenated freshwaters, resulting in a decrease in the concentration of Agdis from 137.6 and 57.0 mg L−1 to 83.3 and 42.4 mg L−1, respectively, in two natural freshwater locations. This indicates that AgNPs pose more serious environmental risks in freshwaters. As silver ions are found to be one of the main causes of the toxicity of AgNPs, the toxicity of Ag ions is strongly linked to the viability of nanoparticles [71]. The exposure of the freshwater alga Microcystis aeruginosa to AgNPs led to toxic repercussions and reduction of α chlorophyll and membrane damages [72]. The toxicity was due to the dissolved Ag ions, which emerged from the internalized AgNPs that directly targeted the photosynthetic system of the alga. AgNPs can readily transform once in water depending on many environmental factors, which included complexation with organic and inorganic species, agglomeration, and oxidizing changes which all contribute to the fate of AgNPs in water bodies.

Figure 4 
               The effect of DOM on AgNPs’ dissolutions.
Figure 4

The effect of DOM on AgNPs’ dissolutions.

5 Toxicity of AgNPs in aquatic organisms

Silver ions (Ag+) have high reactivity with anionic and sweater species as well as with negative ligands found either on DOM or living cell surfaces [73]. Organic matter (OM) and sulfide may dominate silver speciation in freshwater systems and could reduce its bioavailability [74]. Neutral chemical complexes like AgCl (aq.) and AgHS (aq.) are formed at lower salt concentrations, and AgNPs dissolution occurs slowly [73]. With the increase of salinity in oceans, the supply of silver ions changes while AgCl becomes dominant [73].

Aquatic organisms exposed to AgNPs causing cytotoxic and genotoxic impacts can reach humans via the food chain [75]. The general mechanism of animal toxicity relies on its phase of transformation in environmental and biological products. Silver ions release the oxidative force of the surface and they interact with biomolecules like lipids, proteins, nucleic acids, etc. [76,77]. Silver NPs can produce toxins by triggering signaling pathways by interacting with protein molecules, entering the cell directly through endocytosis or diffusion to damage the mitochondria and generate ROS that damages DNA and causes necrosis and apoptosis [78,79]. Many studies have measured silver ions toxicity in freshwater fish [80,81]. LC10 was reported at concentrations of 0.8 μg L−1 for several fish species [82]. However, physiological changes like blood acidosis causing circulatory collapse and death were recorded in fathead minnows and trout at higher concentrations [83,84]. The effects and fate of AgNPs in rainbow trout juveniles (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were investigated (Figure 5), where they were exposed to 50 μg L−1 AgNPs (20 nm) and dissolved 1 μg L−1 of silver ions [85]. The results showed that water with a high organic carbon level (7 mg L−1) encouraged the production of bioaccumulated AgNPs in the livers and gills of fish. AgNPs of 10–80 nm influence the development of early life stage negative effects that involve deformities of the spinal cord, cardiac arrhythmia, and zebrafish death [86,87]. AgNPs often accumulate in the tissues of the liver and gills, which impairs fish’s ability to cope with low oxygen value and causes oxidative stress [88]. The exposure of the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus, to AgNPs’ (40 nm) quantity of 10 and 100 μg L−1 caused serious hepatotoxic effects after being exposed for 15 days [89]. Rajkumar et al. [90] exposed rohu (Labeo rohita) to 5–100 mg kg−1 of AgNPs for seven days. The results showed a substantial reduction in hematological parameters compared to control samples.

Figure 5 
               The effect of AgNPs’ dissolutions on aquatic organisms.
Figure 5

The effect of AgNPs’ dissolutions on aquatic organisms.

Filter feeders tend to accumulate AgNPs with other food. A toxicity study of AgNPs on embryonic development of the oyster, Crassostrea virginica, revealed adverse impacts on embryonic development [91]. Multiple cellular mechanisms linked to silver ions and AgNPs were observed at concentrations of 100 mg L−1 in juvenile sea urchin, with series of cellular responses like spherocyte and amebocyte cell coagulation, oxidative stress, and expression of 70 kDa chaperone [92].

Phytoplankton is the primary producer in the food chain of aquatic ecosystems. Accordingly, studying the effect of AgNPs on their vitality and dynamics is a priority, where they are the first target for most pollutants in seawater. The toxic effect of AgNPs on marine phytoplankton has been extensively reported [93]. Interestingly, the exposure of phytoplankton to AgNPs not only caused toxic effects, but also showed taxa-specific effects, where the composition of the community changed in response: negatively diminishing cyanobacterial functions at concentrations of Ag ions ≥200 ng L−1 and altering the domains of dinoflagellate and their composition concentration of Ag ions at a 2,000 ng L−1; either decrease or increase of diatom (Climacosphenia and Nitzschia, Navicula) and Dinoflagellate (Prorocentrumand Gyrodinium and Gymnodinium) [94]. Other research showed that the particle size of AgNPs was important in determining the hazardous impact of AgNPs in the gills and intestines of adult zebrafish [95]. Zebrafish have a similar genetic composition to human cells, and their larvae and embryos are transparent which allows for easier observations. A prominent Ag+ deposition in the basolateral membranes for 20 nm Ag silver particles disrupted the Na+/K+ ion channel, as Ag+ can compete for Na+ and disrupt the function and integrity of the channel; this was confirmed by a reduction in ATPase activity, the 20 nm particles caused significantly higher inhibition and disruption than the larger size particles.

6 The fate-life cycle of AgNPs in soil

It is known that AgNPs can reach soil from the discharge of waste liquid effluents or sludges during their synthesis or industrial production (either intentionally or unintentionally) and/or the disposal and recycling of goods containing AgNPs (Figure 6) [96,97]. Industrially, once AgNPs are discharged in waste streams, they accumulate in sewage sludge in advanced waste treatment plants. A large portion of sewage sludge is utilized in agricultural soil as fertilizers in various countries, e.g., UK, USA, and Egypt. In some other European countries, these sewages are incinerated. Naturally formed AgNPs have also been documented in soil and aquatic environments through the reduction of geogenic (Ag+) traces in the existence of (S2−) ions, as a reducing agent, under some atmospheric conditions, e.g., dark/light, temperature, and anoxic/aerobic conditions [98].

Figure 6 
               The fate-life cycle of nanoparticles (e.g., silver nanoparticles; AgNPs) from industrialization to soil and agriculture systems.
Figure 6

The fate-life cycle of nanoparticles (e.g., silver nanoparticles; AgNPs) from industrialization to soil and agriculture systems.

When AgNPs reach natural soil systems, they are exposed to many transformation mechanisms like dissolution, oxidative stress, aggregation, agglomeration, destabilization, chlorination, and sulfidation reactions. The soil environmental conditions (soil texture, moisture, ionic strength, pH, inorganic/organic matter, microbial diversity, etc.) can significantly affect the surface properties and fate-life cycle of AgNPs, in terms of their surface charge, size, shape, agglomeration, uptake, migration, and dissolution processes [99]. For example, the sulfur-rich soil contaminated with AgNPs can initiate a sulfidation reaction to form Ag°/Ag2S core–shell particles with low biological toxicity relative to AgNPs [100,101]. This is because the solubility of Ag2S particles is lower than the AgNPs themselves; hence, the dissolution process and release of toxic silver ions into the environment are limited.

It was also demonstrated that sedimentary humic acids (SHAs, especially aliphatic-based SHAs) accelerated the formation of colloidally stabilized AgNPs by the reduction of silver ions in soil when allowed to react for 25 days at 22°C or 3 h at 90°C [102]. It was noted that an increase of ionic strength leads to an increase in the aggregation of AgNPs, i.e., hydrodynamic radius, and their dissolution process to Ag+ ions with a high toxicity effect (alleviate oxidative stress) on Escherichia coli (E. coli) [103]. High chloride contents can also mediate significant changes in the toxicity and morphology of AgNPs by forming AgCl0 (s) bridging and species of negatively charged Ag Cl x (x−1) with less toxicity on E. coli. Similarly, an increase of monovalent (K+ or Na+) cations could alter the behavior of AgNPs, e.g., morphological transformation, size, dissolution, and aggregation, and their related toxicity to Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) [104]. In particular, the higher concentration of K+ or Na+ cations (from 1–10 mM) significantly decreased the size of AgNPs (<5 nm). In this case, the smaller size of AgNPs increased their destabilization and toxicity against C. elegans, as determined by broad size, lifespan, and germ cell apoptosis [104]. The high contents of natural organic capping like PVP, citrate, and polyethylene glycol (PEG) could also increase the stabilization of AgNPs in the environment, causing a decrease in the production of Ag+ ions [105,106]. When a high content of oxygen occurs, the oxidative dissolution of AgNPs will be enhanced to produce silver ions, causing high toxicity to E. coli [107]. Soil organic matter and redox potential (Eh) may also induce speciation of AgNPs and the release of silver (Ag+) ions after 28 days of incubation, while other species like metallic AgCl and AgNPs emerged after two days of incubation from the initial aging of silver to soil [108]. These results indicate that the soil nature and composition significantly affected the fate of AgNPs and their associated risks to environments. However, it is noteworthy that the related toxicity of these transformed species in the in vivo cells is still not clear.

From the above findings, it can be concluded that the fate-life cycles (transformation, migration, dissolution, aggregations, and toxicity) of AgNPs and their intrinsic characteristics and toxicity in the soil are governed by many parameters, such as the disposal routes (liquid or sewage solids) and the surrounding environmental conditions. These parameters should be accurately considered while assessing AgNPs’ toxicity on the environment and human health.

AgNPs are often used as nano-pesticide and antifungals in agriculture [109111]. Since crops acquire their micronutrients from the irrigation water and soil, the direct contact of AgNPs in the soil/irrigated water with the plant roots could lead to their absorption and transportation to the plant organs (roots, shoots, stems, or leaves). Hence, it is crucial to identify the fate, localization, and toxicity of AgNPs in soil and their consequent physiological effects on soil biota, human health, and food safety [112]. Moreover, there are several pathways for the fate and transportation of nanomaterials, e.g., AgNPs, from soil to plants’ organs (Figure 7), including (1) the diffusion into seeds, then to the root and migration to plant organs, (2) absorption/uptake by the plant roots, then migration to other organs, and (3) the direct migration/movement to plant organs and their localization in the epidermal or xylem cells [113,114]. These distribution/migration pathways from soil/water to plant cells are known to be size-, concentration-, and AgNPs’ physicochemical features-dependent, along with the nature of crops and the soil structure (composition and thickness).

Figure 7 
               Migration paths of nanomaterials (e.g., silver nanoparticles; AgNPs) from soil to the plant organs and the corresponding TEM images of AgNPs in the mitochondria (leaf cells) and the cytoplasm (stem cell) of wormwood (Artemisia absinthium) [113].
Figure 7

Migration paths of nanomaterials (e.g., silver nanoparticles; AgNPs) from soil to the plant organs and the corresponding TEM images of AgNPs in the mitochondria (leaf cells) and the cytoplasm (stem cell) of wormwood (Artemisia absinthium) [113].

Generally, the major findings in this area suggested that the toxicity effects of AgNPs in agriculture are mainly dose-dependent [98]. Also, AgNPs in irrigated water can move and penetrate soil layers up to 5 cm thickness, then migrate to seed tissues within the first 24 h of irrigation [113]. Also, AgNPs can quickly diffuse and translocate into plant cells during germination, as confirmed by TEM analysis of leaf and stem cells of wormwood grown in soil contaminated by AgNPs (Figure 7). Such observation indicates that the crops with fibrous roots are more susceptible to uptake toxic nanoparticles from contaminated soil [113].

The seedling growth in grass shoots and roots of Lolium multiflorum can be inhibited when exposed to a high concentration of small-sized gum arabic (GA)-coated AgNPs (6 nm) due to the cell damage resulting from the toxicity effect of Ag+ ions released from the AgNPs’ dissolution [115]. However, such toxicity effect can be decreased by sunlight irradiation that induces irreversible aggregation of AgNPs [116].

Abnormalities in the levels of antioxidant enzymes and fatty acids in peanut plants were also observed upon exposure to citrate-caped AgNPs in sandy soil (50–2,000 mg kg–1) for 98 days due to the cell damage and accumulation of AgNPs in shoots and edible portions, confirming the unsafety of crops [117]. In another work, the chemical transformation (homeostasis) of commercial nanoparticles of Ago and Ag2S into Ag+ ions inside the roots/epidermis of wheat (Triticum aestivum) was also reported as a result of the gene defense function of plants [118].

These observations demonstrated the complexity of assessing AgNPs’ toxicity in crops due to their transformation mechanisms, which depend on AgNPs’ shape and concentrations and the nature of plant cells. Hence, in ecotoxicological investigations, it is important to define another monitoring system for the toxicity effect of AgNPs (or other nanomaterials) based on different biological biomarkers (enzymes, fatty acids, lipids, nutrients, etc.) to assess the protection of edible plants for the sake of human health.

Soils are complex matrices containing wide biodiversity of microbial communities and organic/inorganic contents, which control the fate-life cycle and toxicity of AgNPs in soil [119]. In this regard, it was demonstrated that the negative impacts of AgNPs on soil microbial communities are dependent on concentration, size, agglomeration, dissolution, the transformation of AgNPs, and their residence time in soil, as well as the chemical nature and texture properties of the soil itself [120,121].

For example, the toxicity of AgNPs significantly decreased in the microbial community in the soil in the case of (i) a sulfur-rich soil, i.e., transformation to sulfurized Ag2S from low-solubility [122] and (ii) the presence of fulvic acid as a reducing agent, i.e., dissolution decreased [123,124]. Further, it was reported that the low concentrations of AgNPs (<1 mg kg−1) in the soil had no major impact on soil microbial communities after a short duration of exposure (days to a month), while, after one year, soil nitrification was greatly changed [125]. However, it should be noted that the microbial communities may protect themselves against AgNPs’ toxicity by forming microbial aggregates as a defense mechanism [126].

Also, it was reported that soil microorganisms might develop other extrinsic/intrinsic defense mechanisms, e.g., extrinsic like adaptive/point mutations of resistance genes or intrinsic like downregulation of porins, efflux pumps, and chromosomal resistance genes, to mitigate the toxicity of AgNPs after repeated exposure to AgNPs at low concentrations [127,128]. On the other hand, it is not expected to rule out the toxicity behavior of AgNPs against soil microorganisms using these intrinsic/extrinsic defense mechanisms, especially at high silver concentrations, because AgNPs are not naturally distributed in the soil system. These findings suggest that AgNPs may negatively affect soil fertility (biological distribution) and plant safety (crop damages), and hence, the probability of their consequence negative impacts may increase on human health and wild animals.

7 Toxicity of AgNPs against different cell lines

Several studies have shown that AgNPs would penetrate the membranes of cells [129] and the blood-brain barrier; [130] thus, AgNPs can be deposited and interact with biological processes in organs. AgNPs have been shown to induce a toxic response of various mammalian cell lines [16]. The exposure to AgNPs, therefore, led to reduced viability or lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) production in cells of rats’ liver [131], stem cells in mice germline [132], in fibroblasts of humans [133], and adrenal cells in rats [134]. In vitro damaging caused via AgNPs on lung carcinoma (A-549) cells of humans was investigated by Chairuangkitti et al. and a direct association was identified with the production of ROS [16] as shown in Table 1.

Table 1

The summary of the recent reports of the cytotoxicity of silver NPs against different cell lines

Preparation route Particle size (nm) Shape Concentration (µg mL−1) Coating materials Tested cell line Cytotoxicity assay Recorded effect Duration of incubation (h) References
Green synthesis using Eucalyptus tereticornis leaf extract 24–54 Spherical 63.257 Eucalyptus tereticornis leaf extract MCF-7 MTT assay 50% inhibition of total cell number 48 [141]
Biological synthesis using chitosan as capping and reducing agent 17–50 Spherical 48 Chitosan HepG2 – MTT assay 50% inhibition of total cell number 24 [142]
– Trypan blue exclusion assay
Green synthesis using Delonix regia leaf extract 72.77 Nonuniform (anisotropic) – 14.96 for A549 and Delonix regia leaf extract – A459 MTT assay 50% inhibition of total cell number 48 [143]
– 15.96 for SiHa – SiHa
Biological synthesis using Asian spider flower leaf extract <50 Spherical 40 Asian spider flower leaf extract MCF-7 – MTT assay 50% inhibition of total cell number 48 [144]
– Apoptosis assay
Green synthesis by Cassia roxburghii extract 10–30 Spherical 20 Cassia roxburghii extract Vero normal cells MTT assay 50% inhibition of total cell number 24 [145]
Green synthesis by Pistacia atlantica leaf extract 40–60 Spherical 200 Pistacia atlantica leaf extract HUVEC MTT assay 20% inhibition of total cell number 48 [146]
Chemical reduction of AgNO3 by chitosan 10–230 Spherical Chitosan L929 fibroblast cells MTT assay 3% inhibition of total cell number 24 [147]

AgNPs triggered toxic effects that can be categorized into ROS-independent and ROS-dependent pathways. Several experiments have demonstrated that AgNPs can be toxic to the vital organs of humans and especially to the lung [135]. Porntipa Chairuangkitti et al. [16] evaluated the in vitro mechanism of AgNPs’ (<100 nm) toxicity in relation to the generation of ROS in A549 cells. Ag NPs caused ROS formation in the cells, a reduction in their cell viability and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), an increase in the proportion of cells in the sub-G1 (apoptosis) population, S phase arrest, and downregulation of the cell cycle-associated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) protein, in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. Pretreatment of the A549 cells with N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC), an antioxidant, decreased the effects of AgNPs on the reduced cell viability, change in the MMP, and proportion of cells in the sub-G1population, but had no effect on the AgNPs-mediated S phase arrest or downregulation of PCNA. These observations allow us to propose that the in vitro toxic effects of AgNPs on A549 cells are mediated via both ROS-dependent (cytotoxicity) and ROS-independent (cell cycle arrest) pathways [16].

Cytotoxicity of silver NPs can be controlled by many factors including the synthetic route (chemical, physical, and biological) and physicochemical properties (size, shape, concentration, and aggregation/agglomeration) [136]. AgNPs possess powerful oxidative activity that releases Ag ions. Ag ions can induce serious effects on biological macromolecules like DNA and mitochondria through some actions such as induced cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, immunological responses, and eventually, cell death [137140].

8 The mechanisms of AgNPs’ accumulation in human cells and their related diseases

Accumulation of Ag ions inside cells, through either endocytosis or diffusion, leads to mitochondrial dysfunction through glutathione (GSH) reduction, lipid peroxidation, ROS-derived DNA damage, apoptosis, and necrosis [77,148]. The mode of action begins with AgNPs’ interaction with cell membrane proteins and activation of signaling pathways that produce ROS, which in turn contributes to protein and nucleic acid degradation and eventual inhibition of cell proliferation [148]. Another induced mechanism is thought to be related to oxidative stress. H2O2 and superoxide radical (O2 ) can act as ROS that is important for keeping normal physiological responses. Even so, excessive ROS can harm the antioxidant defense system, resulting in protein, lipid, and DNA damage [149].

Apparently, after entering the cell, AgNPs usually produce ROS [150]. After increasing ROS levels, GSH level dramatically decreases, and LDH increases in the medium, which eventually leads to apoptosis [151]. Moreover, redox homeostasis can be affected by ROS generation at the intracellular level. Consequently, protein carbonylation and lipid peroxidation take place. Simultaneously, antioxidant enzyme activity and the glutathione level are decreased. Thus, protein-bound sulfhydryl group depletion, antioxidant enzyme activity, and glutathione level promote apoptosis [152]. Therefore, apoptosis-mediated cell death is the main cytotoxic impact of silver NPs [153]. Apoptotic pathways like AKT, p53, and MAPK which activate cell death are also reported [154].

8.1 Trojan horse effect

The Trojan horse effect was suggested as the toxicity mechanism of AgNPs [155]. Some metal oxide nanoparticles affect lung epithelial cells by this effect [156]. According to the Trojan horse theory, if silver NPs with very small size (≤40 nm) cross through the cell membrane, they may continuously release (Ag+) silver ions once inside [157]. Inside the cell, the silver ions (Ag+) can form ROS and cause lipid peroxidation [158]. Ag+ ions attach to the host cell, consumed by the cells before reaching the vital organelles inside the normal cells [159] as shown in Figure 8a. In a defense response to the Ag+ ions, the normal cells secrete the reductase enzyme to reduce the dangerous effect of Ag+ ions and finally engulf silver NPs, which also carries the liberated Ag+ ions outside their surface [160] as displayed in Figure 8b. AgNPs with the formed Ag+ ions inside the normal cells are considered to be the beginning point of the toxic behavior and the hazardous effect starting inside the normal cell [15] as exhibited in Figure 8c. Figure 8b and c displayed the Trojan horse effect [161].

Figure 8 
                  Toxicity of AgNPs and silver ions on the normal cells and Trojan horse effect. (a) cell defense response to Ag+ (b) engulf AgNPs and Ag+ ions (c) excite of Ag ions inside cell and (d) death cell occur.
Figure 8

Toxicity of AgNPs and silver ions on the normal cells and Trojan horse effect. (a) cell defense response to Ag+ (b) engulf AgNPs and Ag+ ions (c) excite of Ag ions inside cell and (d) death cell occur.

Finally, the positively charged Ag+ ions will react with the negatively charged oxygen and nitrogen atoms in the vital organelles like DNA, mitochondrion, and the thiol group presented in protein structures and enzymes, which in turn interrupts the normal cell reproduction, and finally, the death of cell will occur [162] as presented in Figure 8d.

The evaluation of AgNPs toxicity is essentially affected by their movement inside the human body [163]. Additionally, because of the high surface area of AgNPs, pollutants may be adsorbed on the surface of AgNPs [164]. In the synthesis of nanomaterials-based compounds, a growing aggregation of AgNPs in the water and/or the atmosphere may happen [165]. Also, AgNPs can be absorbed and utilized by some crops or different living animals; the present AgNPs can arrive at the food series [166]. Through the past ten years, it was believed that AgNPs and silver ions are nonlethal to animal and human cells, but severe argyria and blue skin coloration were observed after contact with nano silver-based materials [138].

The principal AgNPs’ uptake probabilities inside the human body are by the first-line defense: skin by direct contact, or the respiratory region through inhalation, or finally through the gastrointestinal tract by AgNPs-contaminated foods [167]. Thus, AgNPs’ quantity, configuration, and exterior adjustment perform an essential function in human organs [168]. AgNPs present in the respiratory region can transfer to the lymph stream, then the blood circulation [168]. Recent studies showed that AgNPs can move into the blood-brain barrier [169] and penetrate cell membranes [129 thus accumulating in vital organs and biological systems [129]. Because AgNPs were the subject of various earlier investigations, the potentially dangerous impacts of AgNPs were revealed. It is significant to examine the lethal effect more strongly. Accordingly, Figure 9 shows the toxic impact of AgNPs and Ag ions on human organs and their related diseases. The different diseases in various human organs were displayed in Figure 9, after the exposure to the toxic levels of AgNPs in drinking water, determined to be above 5.0 µg kg−1 body weight/day (according to the EPA) [170].

Figure 9 
                  The related diseases after exposure to the toxic level of silver NPs.
Figure 9

The related diseases after exposure to the toxic level of silver NPs.

Despite a notable uptake within the normal cells, AgNPs possessed an entirely irrelevant hazardous effect on kidney cells at concentrations more than 25.0 µg mL−1 [171] as displayed in Figure 10. Brain cells subjected to 2.0 µg mL−1 of AgNPs did not reveal any important difference in the levels of total glutathione, reduced glutathione, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and glutathione peroxidase activity. On the contrary, above 4.0 µg mL−1, AgNPs revealed a notable decrease in the levels of all the brain enzymes, reduced glutathione, and total glutathione [172] as shown in Figure 10. In severe oral and dermal toxicity experiments, none of the tested models displayed any unusual symptoms or death at a dosage level less than 2.0 µg mL−1 [173] as exhibited in Figure 10. After examining the cytotoxicity of AgNPs (50 μg mL−1) on the lung cells, the results indicate that there was no difference in the level of surfactant protein-B in the bronchoalveolar lavage. After seven days of the introduction of AgNPs (at concentration more than 50 µg mL−1), an increase in bronchoalveolar lavage cell numbers and a reduction in lung function were recognized [174].

Figure 10 
                  The toxicity levels of AgNPs in different organs.
Figure 10

The toxicity levels of AgNPs in different organs.

Scientific information on the potentially harmful effects of AgNPs on human health severely lags behind their exponentially growing applications in consumer products [175]. In assessing the toxic risk of AgNP usage, the liver, as a detoxifying organ, is particularly important. Different studies [176,177] were aimed to explore the toxicity mechanisms of nano and ionic forms of silver on human cells. Their results showed that silver ions and AgNPs reduced cell viability in a dose-dependent manner. The IC50 values of silver ions and AgNPs were 0.5 and 50 mg L−1, respectively. AgNPs affected the transform toxic metabolites (TTM); the LDH leakage and inhibition of albumin synthesis, along with decreased alanine transaminase (ALT) activity, indicated that treatment with either AgNP or Ag ions resulted in membrane damage and reduced the cell function of human liver cells. Evaluation of oxidative stress markers demonstrating depletion of glutathione (GSH), increased ROS production, and increased SOD activity indicated that oxidative stress might contribute to the toxicity effects of nano and ionic forms of silver. The observed toxic effect of AgNPs on human hepatic cells was substantially weaker than that caused by ionic silver, while the uptake of nano and ionic forms of silver by HepG2 cells was nearly the same [176].

9 Different methods for silver ions detection

Different detection methods for Ag+ ions detection were developed for the nanomolar (nM) level. There are several strategies for silver (Ag+) ions detection that rely on the combination of metal ion analysis with enzymatic or oxidative amplifying strategies. It was recognized and developed as a powerful tool for improving the sensitivity of metal ion detection. The biosensors approach gained attention due to their high sensitivity, less time consumption, and operational convenience [178]. These methods are based on nucleic acid interaction with metal ions in very low concentrations which can be detected.

For instance, in the past few years, significant advances have been made in the analysis of nanoparticles using single-particle ICP-MS methods, and methods have also been developed for analysis in tissues. These methods were developed due to the increased production of nanoparticles which leads to increased volume of these substances in the environment, in particular in sewage and sewage sludge, and also in water, sediments, and soils. The methods must be widely available, uncomplicated, and inexpensive, as well as accurate and reliable to become commonly used by both research and control laboratories. Hence, it is necessary to develop some new methodological solutions and subsequent applications for analytical practice. It would allow researchers to obtain repeatable and reliable results which could provide the basis for adequate analytical interpretation [179]. Mitrano et al. [180] tracked the AgNPs’ dissolution at environmentally relevant concentrations in the laboratory, natural, and processed waters using single-particle ICP-MS. The track changes in particle diameter over time for 60 and 100 nm Ag NPs coated by citrate, tannic acid, and PVP were quantitatively demonstrated using ICP-MS by direct measurement of Ag+ (aq.). Montano et al. [181] used ICP-MS for fast detection time ((∼500 μs)) of Ag+ (aq.) in very low concentration (ng L−1). Although an increasing number of analytical techniques and methods are becoming available for the detection, characterization, and quantification of AgNPs, their application to complex samples is still very limited and far from being incorporated into routine analysis. AgNPs can be transformed into different four complex environmental matrices during anaerobic treatment of wastewater and post-processing of sewage sludge such as Ag carbonate (Ag2CO3), Ag oxide (Ag2O), Ag sulfide (Ag2S), and “bulk” AgCl [182]. To rid silver ions complexion, additional development of standard ICP methods was needed to get information about inorganic nanoparticles, the use of ICP-MS in combination with field-flow fractionation (FFF) separations or in single-particle detection mode are finding their way in the most recent analytical approaches, because of the supplementary information that can provide [183]. In addition, there have been advances in determining the speciation of Ag and the transformation products of AgNPs using X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) techniques: [184] used microalga Coccomyxa actinabiotis to take up and cope with Ag+ that was detected using XAS; X-ray diffraction over the concentration range of 10–7 to 10–2 M. Lombi et al. [182] used XANES spectroscopy to investigate the behavior and transformation of AgNPs. XANES data were collected at the Materials Research Collaborative Access Team (MRCAT) beamline 10-ID, Sector 10 located at the Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL [185].

9.1 Biosensors

Ono et al. [186] stated that silver ions (Ag+) could selectively connect via coordinating bonds with cytosine (C) molecules to form a strong C–Ag+–C framework and transform single-stranded DNA into the double-helix structure. The C–Ag+–C interaction is highly selective because the C–C mismatching interaction with silver ions is stronger than other metal ions. Xie et al. [187] used an electrochemical-based biosensors method to design a fluorescent FAM-labeled DNA for silver ions detection. The interaction of cytosine and silver ions (C–Ag+–C) in the existence of graphene oxide results in the mismatch of C–C that leads to increasing the intensity of FAM fluorescence and a red shift of the emission wavelength (λ em) of FAM fluorescence.

Li et al. [188] prepared a sensitive silver ions detection method based on a fluorescence biosensor using cytosine (C). Since oligo-1 implies C–C mismatches in cytosine (C) molecules, the existence of Ag+ ions can be collected to form pairs of C–Ag+–C that result in a blunt terminus with a structure of double helix. The obtained double-helix shape can be destroyed by exonuclease III to release silver ions and trigger DNA. The released silver ions bind with (oligo-1) and (oligo-2) that may be produced in the digestion cycles and promote the plentiful G-quadruplex DNA generation. Hybridization N-methylmesoporphyrin IX (NMM) fluorochrome with the G-quadruplex DNA allows Ag+ to be detected in the concentration from 5 up to 1,500 pM L−1, with a limit of detection at 2 pM L−1.

Xu et al. [189] developed a colorimetric approach for silver ions (Ag+) detection based on the interaction among Methylene Blue (MB) and C-rich Single-Stranded DNA (ssDNA). When the MB was absorbed on the S-SDNA surface, the MB color changed from blue to purple. However, in the existence of Ag+ ions, the specific C–Ag+–C pair is formed and removed the interaction among S-SDNA and MB, returning to the blue color. For DNA duplexes, pairs of cytosine–cytosine (C–C) can catch Ag+ exclusively to form base pairs C–Ag+–C. Based on this feature, Li et al. [190] developed a method for silver ions’ detection by adding cysteine that removed base pairs C–Ag+–C because it binds to Ag+ instead of cytosine. The amount of free cysteine was critical for colorimetric detection using ABTS–H2O2 (ABTS = 2, 2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonate)). Li et al. [191] developed a biosensor based on electro-chem-iluminescence (ECL) of Ru(bpy)2(mcbpy-O-Su-ester)(PF6)2 for a highly sensitive and selective Ag+ detection. This process, based on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA tetrahedron TS primer (STTS)), consists of three hybridized oligonucleotides forming three dual-stranded DNAs, close to a Y-shaped DNA structure. The formation of DNA-TS makes signal intensity change of Ru(bpy)2(mcbpy-O-Su-ester)(PF6)2 at different concentrations of Ag+ ions.

9.2 Chemical sensors

The highly sensitive chemical colorimetric sensor approach for silver ions’ detection in the Picomolar (pM) range was established by Gao et al. [192]. This approach uses Pt nanocubes coated by PVP as artificial peroxidases. The peroxidase substrates generate a colored signal that diminishes the existence of Ag+ ions. This colorimetric approach will achieve an 80 pM as an ultralow detection limit and a 10–2–104 nM as a wide dynamic range.

Alizadeh et al. [193] described a colorimetric approach for silver ions’ (Ag+) detection that comprises measuring the changes in SPR of modified gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with furfuryl alcohol (Fu-AuNPs). The silver ion (Ag+) detection occurred within the limit of 12 nM.

Selva Sharma et al. [194] developed a colorimetric sensor based on Ascorbic Acid (AA) and AuNPs for silver ions’ detection at concentrations of 2–28 μM in aqueous solutions. The mechanism of sensing depends on the Ag+ reduction to Ago on the surface of AuNPs/AA. The reduction of silver ions resulted in the SPR blue shift from AuNPs at 512 nm and it is accompanied by a new peak observed at around 385 nm.

Ghobashy and Mohamed [195] prepared a nanocomposite membrane of Cu–(PAAc/PVA) by gamma radiation for Rapid Colorimetric Detection (RCD) of silver Ag+ and mercury Hg2+ ions associated with significant changes of color of the Cu–(PAAc/PVA) membrane from yellow to dark green and pale gray color, respectively. A detection limit of Hg2+ and Ag+ as low as 10−5 and 10−6 M, respectively, occurred.

Wang et al. [196] describe a simple colorimetric sensor employing cationic polymer single-stranded AuNPs and ligand of DNA (ssDNA) to detect silver ions (Ag+). The cationic polymer is combined with ssDNA leading to AuNP aggregation, thus changing color. When the silver ions are present, they bind to cytosine (C) that prevents polymers’ interaction with ssDNA. The AuNPs strategy used as a colorimetric sensor for silver ions is in several studies [197200]. Another nonmetal ion used as a colorimetric sensor of silver ions is carbon dot. Carbon dots (CDs) have fluorescence emission properties that quench when its surface is attached to metal ions such as silver ions [201203]. Murugesan et al. [204] synthesized CDs with strong fluorescent emission at 479 nm when excited over 370 nm. This fluorescent emission was quenched in the existence of silver ion (Ag+) in an aqueous solution.

10 Recommendations for future research

The toxicity of AgNPs is caused by the release of (Ag+) silver ions. Silver widely disperses throughout the body and in laboratory animals regardless of form or exposure and can cross both the placental and blood-brain barriers. Silver, in exposed humans, was found abundantly across the body. To limit the toxicity of (Ag+) silver ions released from AgNPs, it is recommended to coat AgNPs to prevent their dissolution (Figure 11).

Figure 11 
               A scheme explaining how to limit the toxicity of silver ions.
Figure 11

A scheme explaining how to limit the toxicity of silver ions.

AgNPs coating is an excellent technique to improve their advantages and limit their toxicity. Of course, the coating technique can enhance the AgNPs’ stability via the electrostatic stabilization between silver particles and can reduce their particles’ agglomeration. One of the main functions of coating is to avoid the cytotoxic impact of AgNPs on living cells [205]. Most of the coating substances have proved successful in stabilizing AgNPs, preserving their distinctive structure, and reducing silver ions dissolution which are major contributing factors of AgNPs toxicity. The role of the coating depends heavily on the characteristics of the coating substances, including organic coating materials such as synthetic polymer and natural polymer and inorganic coating materials such as carbon dot, TiO2, graphene, etc. Zook et al. investigated the dissolution of AgNPs in cell culture medium (DMEM) and observed a fractional dissolution of various polymer-coated AgNPs. The dissolution was increased in the biological medium in comparison to inorganic salt solutions which is presumably owing to the complexation of the liberated silver ions [206].

The behavior of polymer-coated AgNPs in two simulated biological fluids representative of the fluids present in lungs, as inhalation is regarded as an important uptake route in humans [207], was studied by Stebounova et al. [208]. The results showed that the initial concentration of nanoparticles has a significant impact on their stability and sedimentation. The authors use Dejaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek (DLVO) theory as a basis for theoretical calculations explaining nanoparticles’ behavior in solution, and their experimental results concur with the theory used. According to DLVO theory, the stability of particles is determined by the net electrostatic surface interactions of the particles and their Van der Waals forces. Polymer-coated AgNPs (with higher surface charge) were more stable than the other studied type (with unspecified coating) in both water and simulated biological fluids. The release of Ag ions into interstitial or lysosomal fluids appears to be negligible as determined by ICP analysis in these simulated fluids. Samberg et al. (2010) identified the toxicity of AgNPs in vitro and in vivo human epidermal keratinocytes [209]. The cells were subjected to different concentrations of coated and uncoated silver carbon, individually. The cells subjected to uncoated silver showed decreased viability. On the contrary, there was no toxicity observed in the cells treated with coated silver carbon [210].

11 Conclusion

Although AgNPs have been extensively used in several applications including water treatment, health, and industry, silver ions immobilized by AgNPs are harmful to humans and the environment. Various preparation methodologies and the effect of environmental factors largely affect the fate of AgNPs (precipitation, dissolution, aggregation). These observations demonstrated the complexity of assessing AgNPs’ toxicity in crops due to their transformation mechanisms, which are dependent on the AgNPs’ shape and concentration and the nature of plant cells. The previous research study deals with the toxicity of AgNPs and related diseases in the human body confirmed that the (Ag+) ions can induce serious effects on biological macromolecules like DNA and mitochondria through some actions such as induced cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, immunological responses, and eventually cell death. Some researchers suggested that AgNPs could serve as a “Trojan horse,” avoiding common barriers and releasing Ag+ ions, and causing damage to the cells. In a defense response to the Ag+ ions, the normal cells had been secreted by the reductase enzyme to reduce the dangerous effect of Ag+ ions, and finally engulfs AgNPs which also carries outside their surface the liberated Ag+ ions. The toxicity mechanism of AgNPs depends on the degree of silver ions’ dissolution from their nanoparticles form; the AgNPs’ coating alerts their cytotoxicity. The coated AgNPs stabilized with PVP and other organic compounds could decrease the dissolution of coated silver particles in water for several days than AgNPs uncoated.



Acknowledgments

All the figures presented in this review article were created with BioRender.com. The authors appreciate the support of BioRender.com software.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors shared equally in writing the manuscript and accepted the responsibility of the entire contents of this manuscript and approved the submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Capek I. Preparation of metal nanoparticles in water-in-oil (w/o) microemulsions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;110:49–74.10.1016/j.cis.2004.02.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Frattini A, Pellegri N, Nicastro D, de Sanctis O. Preparation of amine coated silver nanoparticles using triethylenetetramine. Mater Chem Phys. 2005;94:148–52.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.04.023Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Arora S, Jain J, Rajwade J, Paknikar K. Interactions of silver nanoparticles with primary mouse fibroblasts and liver cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;236:310–8.10.1016/j.taap.2009.02.020Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Ghobashy MM, Sayed WAA, El-Helaly A. Impact of silver nanoparticles synthesized by irradiated polyvinylpyrrolidone on spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrosis virus activity. J Polym Env. 2021. 10.1007/s10924-021-02116-3 Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Mueller NC, Nowack B. Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Env Sci Technol. 2008;42:4447–53.10.1021/es7029637Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Zhang W, Qiao X, Chen J. Synthesis of nanosilver colloidal particles in water/oil microemulsion. Colloids Surf, A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2007;299:22–8.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.11.012Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Cohen MS, Stern JM, Vanni AJ, Kelley RS, Baumgart E, Field D, et al. In vitro analysis of a nanocrystalline silver-coated surgical mesh. Surg Infect. 2007;8:397–404.10.1089/sur.2006.032Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Lee HY, Park HK, Lee YM, Kim K, Park SB. A practical procedure for producing silver nanocoated fabric and its antibacterial evaluation for biomedical applications. Chem Comm. 2007;28:2959–61.10.1039/b703034gSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Zhang Y, Sun J. A study on the bio-safety for nano-silver as anti-bacterial materials. Chin Med J. 2007;31(36–38):16.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Cheng D, Yang J, Zhao Y. Antibacterial materials of silver nanoparticles application in medical appliances and appliances for daily use. Chin Med Equip J. 2004;4:26–32.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Aklakur M, Asharf Rather M, Kumar N. Nanodelivery: an emerging avenue for nutraceuticals and drug delivery. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;56:2352–61.10.1080/10408398.2013.839543Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Rather M, Sharma R, Aklakur M, Ahmad S, Kumar N, Khan M, et al. Nanotechnology: a novel tool for aquaculture and fisheries development. A prospective mini-review. J Fish Aquat Sci. 2011;16:3.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Ahamed M, AlSalhi MS, Siddiqui M. Silver nanoparticle applications and human health. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:1841–8.10.1016/j.cca.2010.08.016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Beer C, Foldbjerg R, Hayashi Y, Sutherland DS, Autrup H. Toxicity of silver nanoparticles-nanoparticle or silver ion. Toxicol Lett. 2012;208:286–92.10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.11.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Kim S, Choi JE, Choi J, Chung KH, Park K, Yi J, et al. Oxidative stress-dependent toxicity of silver nanoparticles in human hepatoma cells. Toxicol Vitro. 2009;23:1076–84.10.1016/j.tiv.2009.06.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Chairuangkitti P, Lawanprasert S, Roytrakul S, Aueviriyavit S, Phummiratch D, Kulthong K, et al. Silver nanoparticles induce toxicity in A549 cells via ROS-dependent and ROS-independent pathways. Toxicol Vitro. 2013;27:330–8.10.1016/j.tiv.2012.08.021Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] De Matteis V, Malvindi MA, Galeone A, Brunetti V, De Luca E, Kote S, et al. Negligible particle-specific toxicity mechanism of silver nanoparticles: the role of Ag+ ion release in the cytosol. Nanomed-Nanotechnol. 2015;11:731–9.10.1016/j.nano.2014.11.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Lubick N. Nanosilver toxicity: ions, nanoparticles-or both. Env Sci Technol. 2008;42:8617.10.1021/es8026314Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Park EJ, Yi J, Kim Y, Choi K, Park K. Silver nanoparticles induce cytotoxicity by a Trojan-horse type mechanism. Toxicol Vitro. 2010;24:872–8.10.1016/j.tiv.2009.12.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Maurer-Jones MA, Mousavi MP, Chen LD, Bühlmann P, Haynes CL. Characterization of silver ion dissolution from silver nanoparticles using fluorous-phase ion-selective electrodes and assessment of resultant toxicity to Shewanella oneidensis. Chem Sci. 2013;4:2564–72.10.1039/c3sc50320hSuche in Google Scholar

[21] Chen X, Chen Y, Zhou X, Hu J. Detection of Ag+ ions and cysteine based on chelation actions between Ag+ ions and guanine bases. Talanta. 2013;107:277–83.10.1016/j.talanta.2013.01.025Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Ferdous Z, Nemmar A. Health impact of silver nanoparticles: a review of the biodistribution and toxicity following various routes of exposure. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:2375.10.3390/ijms21072375Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Gliga AR, Skoglund S, Wallinder IO, Fadeel B, Karlsson HL. Size-dependent cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human lung cells: the role of cellular uptake, agglomeration and Ag release. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2014;11:1–17.10.1186/1743-8977-11-11Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Kumar D, Kumar G, Das R, Agrawal V. Strong larvicidal potential of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) synthesized using Holarrhena antidysenterica (L.) Wall. bark extract against malarial vector, Anopheles stephensi Liston. Process Saf Env Prot. 2018;116:137–48.10.1016/j.psep.2018.02.001Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Hajji S, Salem RBSB, Hamdi M, Jellouli K, Ayadi W, Nasri M, et al. Nanocomposite films based on chitosan-poly (vinyl alcohol) and silver nanoparticles with high antibacterial and antioxidant activities. Process Saf Env Prot. 2017;111:112–21.10.1016/j.psep.2017.06.018Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Khoshnamvand M, Hao Z, Fadare OO, Hanachi P, Chen Y, Liu J. Toxicity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles to aquatic organisms of different trophic levels. Chemosphere. 2020;258:127346.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127346Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Lapresta-Fernández A, Fernández A, Blasco J. Nanoecotoxicity effects of engineered silver and gold nanoparticles in aquatic organisms. Trends Anal Chem TRAC. 2012;32:40–59.10.1016/j.trac.2011.09.007Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Helmi FM, Ali NM, Ismael SM. Nanomaterials for the inhibition of microbial growth on ancient Egyptian funeral masks. Mediterr Archaeol Archaeom. 2015;15:87–95.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] He X, Peng C, Qiang S, Xiong LH, Zhao Z, Wang Z, et al. Less is more: Silver-AIE core@ shell nanoparticles for multimodality cancer imaging and synergistic therapy. Biomaterials. 2020;238:1–7.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119834Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Zielińska A, Skwarek E, Zaleska A, Gazda M, Hupka J. Preparation of silver nanoparticles with controlled particle size. Procedia Chem. 2009;1:1560–6.10.1016/j.proche.2009.11.004Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Li M, Yu H, Cheng Y, Guo Y, Yao W, Xie Y. Simultaneous and rapid determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by facile and green synthesis of silver nanoparticles as effective SERS substrate. Ecotoxicol Env Saf. 2020;200:110780.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110780Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Parida D, Simonetti P, Frison R, Bülbül E, Altenried S, Arroyo Y, et al. Polymer-assisted in-situ thermal reduction of silver precursors: A solventless route for silver nanoparticles-polymer composites. Chem Eng Sci. 2020;389:123983.10.1016/j.cej.2019.123983Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Kim JS. Reduction of silver nitrate in ethanol by poly (N-vinylpyrrolidone). J Ind Eng Chem. 2007;13:566–70.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Kim MH, Lee JJ, Lee JB, Choi KY. Synthesis of silver nanoplates with controlled shapes by reducing silver nitrate with poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) in N-methylpyrrolidone. Cryst Eng Comm. 2013;15:4660–6.10.1039/c3ce40096dSuche in Google Scholar

[35] Sun Y, Xia Y. Shape-controlled synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles. Science. 2002;298:2176–9.10.1126/science.1077229Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Kim D, Jeong S, Moon J. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using the polyol process and the influence of precursor injection. J Nanotechnol. 2006;17:4019.10.1088/0957-4484/17/16/004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Chen M, Feng YG, Wang X, Li TC, Zhang JY, Qian DJ. Silver nanoparticles capped by oleylamine: formation, growth, and self-organization. Langmuir. 2007;23:5296–304.10.1021/la700553dSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Yin H, Yamamoto T, Wada Y, Yanagida S. Large-scale and size-controlled synthesis of silver nanoparticles under microwave irradiation. Mater Chem Phys. 2004;83:66–70.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2003.09.006Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Dong X, Ji X, Wu H, Zhao L, Li J, Yang W. Shape control of silver nanoparticles by stepwise citrate reduction. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:6573–6.10.1021/jp900775bSuche in Google Scholar

[40] Dong Z, Richardson D, Pelham C, Islam MR. Rapid synthesis of silver nanoparticles using a household microwave and their characterization: a simple experiment for nanoscience laboratory. J Chem Educ. 2008;13:240–3.Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Kumar SV, Bafana AP, Pawar P, Rahman A, Dahoumane SA, Jeffryes CS. High conversion synthesis of <10 nm starch-stabilized silver nanoparticles using microwave technology. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–10.10.1038/s41598-018-23480-6Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[42] Bafana A, Kumar SV, Temizel-Sekeryan S, Dahoumane SA, Haselbach L, Jeffryes CS. Evaluating microwave-synthesized silver nanoparticles from silver nitrate with life cycle assessment techniques. Sci Total Env. 2018;636:936–43.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.345Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] Kudle KR, Donda MR, Alwala J, Koyyati R, Nagati V, Merugu R, et al. Biofabrication of silver nanoparticles using Cuminum cyminum through microwave irradiation. Dig J Nanomater Biostructures. 2012;2:65–9.Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Pal J, Deb MK. Microwave synthesis of polymer coated silver nanoparticles by glucose as reducing agent. Indian J Chem. 2012;51:821–4.Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Cai Y, Piao X, Gao W, Zhang Z, Nie E, Sun Z. Large-scale and facile synthesis of silver nanoparticles via a microwave method for a conductive pen. RSC Adv. 2017;7:34041–48.10.1039/C7RA05125ESuche in Google Scholar

[46] Liu FK, Huang PW, Chang YC, Ko FH, Chu TC. Microwave-assisted synthesis of silver nanorods. J Mater Res. 2011;19:469–73.10.1557/jmr.2004.19.2.469Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Lee SH, Jun BH. Silver nanoparticles: synthesis and application for nanomedicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1–24.10.3390/ijms20040865Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[48] Krutyakov YA, Olenin AY, Kudrinskii AA, Dzhurik PS, Lisichkin GV. Aggregative stability and polydispersity of silver nanoparticles prepared using two-phase aqueous organic systems. Nanotechnol Russ. 2008;3:303–10.10.1134/S1995078008050054Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Tran QH, Nguyen VQ, Le AT. Silver nanoparticles: synthesis, properties, toxicology, applications and perspectives. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2013;4:1–23.10.1088/2043-6262/4/3/033001Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Lee DK, Kang YS. Synthesis of silver nanocrystallites by a new thermal decomposition method and their characterization. ETRI J. 2004;26:252–6.10.4218/etrij.04.0103.0061Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Jeevan P, Ramya K, Rena A. Extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles by culture supernatant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ind J Biotechnol. 2012;11:72–6.Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Bharti S, Mukherji S, Mukherji S. Extracellular synthesis of silver nanoparticles by Thiosphaera pantotropha and evaluation of their antibacterial and cytotoxic effects. 3 Biotech. 2020;10:1–12.10.1007/s13205-020-02218-0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[53] Feroze N, Arshad B, Younas M, Afridi MI, Saqib S, Ayaz A. Fungal mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and evaluation of antibacterial activity. Microsc Res Tech. 2020;83:72–80.10.1002/jemt.23390Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[54] Roy A, Bulut O, Some S, Mandal AK, Yilmaz MD. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: biomolecule-nanoparticle organizations targeting antimicrobial activity. RSC Adv. 2019;9:2673–702.10.1039/C8RA08982ESuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[55] Flores-Rojas GG, López-Saucedo F, Bucio E. Gamma-irradiation applied in the synthesis of metallic and organic nanoparticles: a short review. Radiat Phys Chem. 2020;169:107962.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.08.011Suche in Google Scholar

[56] Huang H, Yang Y. Preparation of silver nanoparticles in inorganic clay suspensions. Compos Sci Technol. 2008;68:2948–53.10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.003Suche in Google Scholar

[57] Powers CM, Badireddy AR, Ryde IT, Seidler FJ, Slotkin TA. Silver nanoparticles compromise neurodevelopment in PC12 cells: critical contributions of silver ion, particle size, coating, and composition. Env Health Perspect. 2011;119:37–44.10.1289/ehp.1002337Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[58] Johnston HJ, Hutchison G, Christensen FM, Peters S, Hankin S, Stone V. A review of the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of silver and gold particulates: Particle attributes and biological mechanisms responsible for the observed toxicity. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2010;40:328–46.10.3109/10408440903453074Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[59] Ren J, Tilley RD. Preparation, self-assembly, and mechanistic study of highly monodispersed nanocubes. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:3287–91.10.1021/ja067636wSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[60] Huang T, Xu XHN. Synthesis and characterization of tunable rainbow colored colloidal silver nanoparticles using single-nanoparticle plasmonic microscopy and spectroscopy. J Mater Chem. 2010;20:9867–76.10.1039/c0jm01990aSuche in Google Scholar

[61] Yu SJ, Yin YG, Liu JF. Silver nanoparticles in the environment. Env Sci Process Impacts. 2013;15:78–92.10.1039/C2EM30595JSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[62] Dorjnamjin D, Ariunaa M, Shim YK. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using hydroxyl functionalized ionic liquids and their antimicrobial activity. Int J Mol Sci. 2008;9:807–20.10.3390/ijms9050807Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[63] Jin X, Li M, Wang J, Marambio-Jones C, Peng F, Huang X, et al. High-throughput screening of silver nanoparticle stability and bacterial inactivation in aquatic media: influence of specific ions. Env Sci Technol. 2010;44:7321–8.10.1021/es100854gSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[64] Ribeiro F, Gallego-Urrea JA, Jurkschat K, Crossley A, Hassellöv M, Taylor C, et al. Silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate induce high toxicity to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Daphnia magna and Danio rerio. Sci Total Env. 2014;466–467:232–41.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.101Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[65] Kittler S, Greulich C, Diendorf J, Köller M, Epple M. Toxicity of silver nanoparticles increases during storage because of slow dissolution under release of silver ions. Chem Mater. 2010;22:4548–54.10.1021/cm100023pSuche in Google Scholar

[66] Liu J, Hurt RH. Ion release kinetics and particle persistence in aqueous nano-silver colloids. Env Sci Technol. 2010;44:2169–75.10.1021/es9035557Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[67] Gao J, Youn S, Hovsepyan A, Llaneza VL, Wang Y, Bitton G, et al. Dispersion and toxicity of selected manufactured nanomaterials in natural river water samples: effects of water chemical composition. Env Sci Technol. 2009;43:3322–8.10.1021/es803315vSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[68] Zhang W, Yao Y, Sullivan N, Chen Y. Modeling the primary size effects of citrate-coated silver nanoparticles on their ion release kinetics. Env Sci Technol. 2011;45:4422–8.10.1021/es104205aSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[69] Li P, Su M, Wang X, Zou X, Sun X, Shi J, et al. Environmental fate and behavior of silver nanoparticles in natural estuarine systems. J Env Sci. 2020;88:248–59.10.1016/j.jes.2019.09.013Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[70] Zou X, Li P, Lou J, Fu X, Zhang H. Stability of single dispersed silver nanoparticles in natural and synthetic freshwaters: effects of dissolved oxygen. Env Pollut. 2017;230:674–82.10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.007Suche in Google Scholar

[71] Yang X, Gondikas AP, Marinakos SM, Auffan M, Liu J, Hsu-Kim H, et al. Mechanism of silver nanoparticle toxicity is dependent on dissolved silver and surface coating in caenorhabditis elegans. Env Sci Technol. 2012;46:1119–27.10.1021/es202417tSuche in Google Scholar

[72] Xiang L, Fang J, Cheng H. Toxicity of silver nanoparticles to green algae M. aeruginosa and alleviation by organic matter. Env Monit Assess. 2018;190:1–9.10.1007/s10661-018-7022-7Suche in Google Scholar

[73] Magesky A, Pelletier É. Cytotoxicity and physiological effects of silver nanoparticles on marine invertebrates. Cellular and molecular toxicology of nanoparticles. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 285–309.10.1007/978-3-319-72041-8_17Suche in Google Scholar

[74] Fabrega J, Luoma SN, Tyler CR, Galloway TS, Lead JR. Silver nanoparticles: behaviour and effects in the aquatic environment. Env Int. 2011;37:517–31.10.1016/j.envint.2010.10.012Suche in Google Scholar

[75] Rather MA, Bhat IA, Sharma N, Sharma R. Molecular and cellular toxicology of nanomaterials with related to aquatic organisms. in: Cellular and Molecular Toxicology of Nanoparticles. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 263–84.10.1007/978-3-319-72041-8_16Suche in Google Scholar

[76] Varner KE, El-Badawy A, Feldhake D, Venkatapathy R. State Sci review: everything nanosilver more. Washington. DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2010. p. 363.Suche in Google Scholar

[77] Reidy B, Haase A, Luch A, Dawson KA, Lynch I. Mechanisms of silver nanoparticle release, transformation and toxicity: a critical review of current knowledge and recommendations for future studies and applications. Materials. 2013;6:2295–350.10.3390/ma6062295Suche in Google Scholar

[78] Roh J-Y, Sim SJ, Yi J, Park K, Chung KH, Ryu D-Y, et al. Ecotoxicity of silver nanoparticles on the soil nematode caenorhabditis elegans using functional ecotoxicogenomics. Env Sci Technol. 2009;43:3933–40.10.1021/es803477uSuche in Google Scholar

[79] Gopinath P, Gogoi SK, Sanpui P, Paul A, Chattopadhyay A, Ghosh SS. Signaling gene cascade in silver nanoparticle induced apoptosis. Colloids Surf B. 2010;77:240–5.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.01.033Suche in Google Scholar

[80] Wood CM, Hogstrand C, Galvez F, Munger RS. The physiology of waterborne silver toxicity in freshwater rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) 1. The effects of ionic Ag. Aquat Toxicol. 1996;35:93–109.10.1016/0166-445X(96)00003-3Suche in Google Scholar

[81] Zhou B, Nichols J, Playle RC, Wood CM. An in vitro biotic ligand model (BLM) for silver binding to cultured gill epithelia of freshwater rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005;202:25–37.10.1016/j.taap.2004.06.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[82] Birge WJ, Zuiderveen JA. The comparative toxicity of silver to aquatic biota. In: Andren AW, Bober TW, editors. Transport, Fate and Effects of Silver in the Environment Abstracts of 3rd International Conference, 6–9 August 1995. Washington, DC: University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, Madison; 1995.Suche in Google Scholar

[83] Hogstrand C, Wood CM. Toward a better understanding of the bioavailability, physiology, and toxicity of silver in fish: Implications for water quality criteria. Env Toxicol Chem. 1998;17:547–61.10.1002/etc.5620170405Suche in Google Scholar

[84] Grosell M, De Boeck G, Johannsson O, Wood CM. The effects of silver on intestinal ion and acid-base regulation in the marine teleost fish. Parophrys vetulus Comp Biochem Physiol Part - C: Toxicol Pharmacol. 1999;124:259–70.10.1016/S0742-8413(99)00073-0Suche in Google Scholar

[85] Bruneau A, Turcotte P, Pilote M, Gagné F, Gagnon C. Fate of silver nanoparticles in wastewater and immunotoxic effects on rainbow trout. Aquat Toxicol. 2016;174:70–81.10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.02.013Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[86] Yeo MK, Kang M. Effects of nanometer sized silver materials on biological toxicity during zebrafish embryogenesis. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2008;29:1179–84.10.5012/bkcs.2008.29.6.1179Suche in Google Scholar

[87] Scown TM, Santos EM, Johnston BD, Gaiser B, Baalousha M, Mitov S, et al. Effects of aqueous exposure to silver nanoparticles of different sizes in rainbow trout. Toxicol Sci. 2010;115:521–34.10.1093/toxsci/kfq076Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[88] Bilberg K, Malte H, Wang T, Baatrup E. Silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate cause respiratory stress in Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis). Aquat Toxicol. 2010;96:159–65.10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.10.019Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[89] Naguib M, Mahmoud UM, Mekkawy IA, Sayed AEDH. Hepatotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles on Clarias gariepinus; biochemical, histopathological, and histochemical studies. Toxicol Rep. 2020;7:133–41.10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.01.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[90] Rajkumar KS, Kanipandian N, Thirumurugan R. Toxicity assessment on haemotology, biochemical and histopathological alterations of silver nanoparticles-exposed freshwater fish Labeo rohita. Appl Nanosci. 2016;6:19–29.10.1007/s13204-015-0417-7Suche in Google Scholar

[91] Ringwood AH, McCarthy M, Bates TC, Carroll DL. The effects of silver nanoparticles on oyster embryos. Mar Env Res. 2010;69:S49–51.10.1016/j.marenvres.2009.10.011Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[92] Magesky A, de Oliveira Ribeiro CA, Beaulieu L, Pelletier É. Silver nanoparticles and dissolved silver activate contrasting immune responses and stress-induced heat shock protein expression in sea urchin. Env Toxicol Chem. 2017;36:1872–86.10.1002/etc.3709Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[93] Moreno-Garrido I, Pérez S, Blasco J. Toxicity of silver and gold nanoparticles on marine microalgae. Mar Env Res. 2015;111:60–73.10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.05.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[94] Tsiola A, Pitta P, Callol AJ, Kagiorgi M, Kalantzi I, Mylona K, et al. The impact of silver nanoparticles on marine plankton dynamics: dependence on coating, size and concentration. Sci Total Env. 2017;601–602:1838–48.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.042Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[95] Osborne OJ, Lin S, Chang CH, Ji Z, Yu X, Wang X, et al. Organ-specific and size-dependent Ag nanoparticle toxicity in gills and intestines of adult zebrafish. ACS Nano. 2015;9:9573–84.10.1021/acsnano.5b04583Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[96] Courtois P, Rorat A, Lemiere S, Guyoneaud R, Attard E, Levard C, et al. Ecotoxicology of silver nanoparticles and their derivatives introduced in soil with or without sewage sludge: a review of effects on microorganisms, plants and animals. Env Pollut. 2019;253:578–98.10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.053Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[97] Pachapur VL, Dalila Larios A, Cledón M, Brar SK, Verma M, Surampalli RY. Behavior and characterization of titanium dioxide and silver nanoparticles in soils. Sci Total Env. 2016;563–564:933–43.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.090Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[98] Tortella GR, Rubilar O, Durán N, Diez MC, Martínez M, Parada J, et al. Silver nanoparticles: toxicity in model organisms as an overview of its hazard for human health and the environment. J Hazard Mater. 2020;390:121974.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121974Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[99] Yang Y, Xu S, Xu G, Liu R, Xu A, Chen S, et al. Effects of ionic strength on physicochemical properties and toxicity of silver nanoparticles. Sci Total Env. 2019;647:1088–96.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.064Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[100] Devi GP, Ahmed KBA, Varsha MKNS, Shrijha BS, Lal KKS, Anbazhagan V, et al. Sulfidation of silver nanoparticle reduces its toxicity in zebrafish. Aquat Toxicol. 2015;158:149–56.10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.11.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[101] Fletcher ND, Lieb HC, Mullaugh KM. Stability of silver nanoparticle sulfidation products. Sci Total Env. 2019;648:854–60.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.239Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[102] Akaighe N, MacCuspie RI, Navarro DA, Aga DS, Banerjee S, Sohn M, et al. Humic acid-induced silver nanoparticle formation under environmentally relevant conditions. Env Sci Technol. 2011;45:3895–3901.10.1021/es103946gSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[103] Chambers BA, Afrooz ARMN, Bae S, Aich N, Katz L, Saleh NB, et al. Effects of chloride and ionic strength on physical morphology, dissolution, and bacterial toxicity of silver nanoparticles. Env Sci Technol. 2014;48:761–9.10.1021/es403969xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[104] Yang Y, Xu G, Xu S, Chen S, Xu A, Wu L. Effect of ionic strength on bioaccumulation and toxicity of silver nanoparticles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Ecotoxicol Env Saf. 2018;165:291–8.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.09.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[105] Schultz CL, Lahive E, Lawlor A, Crossley A, Puntes V, Unrine JM, et al. Influence of soil porewater properties on the fate and toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Caenorhabditis elegans. Env Toxicol Chem. 2018;37:2609–18.10.1002/etc.4220Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[106] Rolim WR, Lamilla C, Pieretti JC, Nascimento MHM, Ferreira FF, Tortella GR, et al. Antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity of silver chloride/silver nanocomposite synthesized by a bacterium isolated from antarctic soil. BioNanoScience. 2020;10:136–48.10.1007/s12668-019-00693-1Suche in Google Scholar

[107] Le Ouay B, Stellacci F. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles: a surface science insight. Nano Today. 2015;10:339–54.10.1016/j.nantod.2015.04.002Suche in Google Scholar

[108] Li M, Wang P, Dang F, Zhou D-M. The transformation and fate of silver nanoparticles in paddy soil: effects of soil organic matter and redox conditions. Env Sci Nano. 2017;4:919–28.10.1039/C6EN00682ESuche in Google Scholar

[109] Bhattacharyya A, Duraisamy P, Govindarajan M, Buhroo AA, Prasad R. Nano-biofungicides: emerging trend in insect pest control. Advances and applications through fungal nanobiotechnology. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 307–19.10.1007/978-3-319-42990-8_15Suche in Google Scholar

[110] Jo Y-K, Kim BH, Jung G. Antifungal activity of silver ions and nanoparticles on phytopathogenic fungi. Plant Dis. 2009;93:1037–43.10.1094/PDIS-93-10-1037Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[111] Yokesh Babu M, Janaki Devi V, Ramakritinan C, Umarani R, Taredahalli N, Kumaraguru A. Application of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles in agricultural and marine pest control. Curr Nanosci. 2014;10:374–81.10.2174/15734137113096660103Suche in Google Scholar

[112] Pérez‐Hernández H, Fernández‐Luqueño F, Huerta‐Lwanga E, Mendoza‐Vega J, Álvarez‐Solís, José D. Effect of engineered nanoparticles on soil biota: do they improve the soil quality and crop production or jeopardize them. Land Degrad Dev. 2020;31:2213–30.10.1002/ldr.3595Suche in Google Scholar

[113] Ahmadov IS, Ramazanov MA, Gasimov EK, Rzayev FH, Veliyeva SB. The migration study of nanoparticles from soil to the leaves of plants. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2020;10:6101–11.10.33263/BRIAC105.61016111Suche in Google Scholar

[114] Das P, Barua S, Sarkar S, Chatterjee SK, Mukherjee S, Goswami L, et al. Mechanism of toxicity and transformation of silver nanoparticles: inclusive assessment in earthworm-microbe-soil-plant system. Geoderma. 2018;314:73–84.10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.008Suche in Google Scholar

[115] Yin L, Cheng Y, Espinasse B, Colman BP, Auffan M, Wiesner M, et al. More than the ions: the effects of silver nanoparticles on Lolium multiflorum. Env Sci Technol. 2011;45:2360–7.10.1021/es103995xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[116] Cheng Y, Yin L, Lin S, Wiesner M, Bernhardt E, Liu J. Toxicity reduction of polymer-stabilized silver nanoparticles by sunlight. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:4425–32.10.1021/jp109789jSuche in Google Scholar

[117] Rui M, Ma C, Tang X, Yang J, Jiang F, Pan Y, et al. Phytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): physiological responses and food safety. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2017;5:6557–67.10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00736Suche in Google Scholar

[118] Pradas del Real AE, Vidal V, Carrière M, Castillo-Michel H, Levard C, Chaurand P, et al. Silver nanoparticles and wheat roots: a complex interplay. Env Sci Technol. 2017;51:5774–82.10.1021/acs.est.7b00422Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[119] Simonin M, Richaume A. Impact of engineered nanoparticles on the activity, abundance, and diversity of soil microbial communities: a review. Env Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:13710–23.10.1007/s11356-015-4171-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[120] Grün AL, Manz W, Kohl YL, Meier F, Straskraba S, Jost C, et al. Impact of silver nanoparticles (AgNP) on soil microbial community depending on functionalization, concentration, exposure time, and soil texture. Env Sci Eur. 2019;31:1–22.10.1186/s12302-019-0196-ySuche in Google Scholar

[121] Parada J, Rubilar O, Fernández-Baldo MA, Bertolino FA, Durán N, Seabra A, et al. The nanotechnology among US: are metal and metal oxides nanoparticles a nano or mega risk for soil microbial communities. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2019;39:157–72.10.1080/07388551.2018.1523865Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[122] Doolette CL, Gupta VV, Lu Y, Payne JL, Batstone DJ, Kirby JK, et al. Quantifying the sensitivity of soil microbial communities to silver sulfide nanoparticles using metagenome sequencing. PLoS one. 2016;11(8):1–20.10.1371/journal.pone.0161979Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[123] Schultz CL, Gray J, Verweij RA, Busquets-Fité M, Puntes V, Svendsen C, et al. Aging reduces the toxicity of pristine but not sulphidised silver nanoparticles to soil bacteria. Environ Science: Nano. 2018;5:2618–30.10.1039/C8EN00054ASuche in Google Scholar

[124] Jung Y, Metreveli G, Park C-B, Baik S, Schaumann GE. Implications of pony lake fulvic acid for the aggregation and dissolution of oppositely charged surface-coated silver nanoparticles and their ecotoxicological effects on Daphnia magna. Env Sci Technol. 2018;52:436–45.10.1021/acs.est.7b04635Suche in Google Scholar

[125] Grün AL, Emmerling C. Long-term effects of environmentally relevant concentrations of silver nanoparticles on major soil bacterial phyla of a loamy soil. Env Sci Eur. 2018;30:1–13.10.1186/s12302-018-0160-2Suche in Google Scholar

[126] Tang J, Wu Y, Esquivel-Elizondo S, Sørensen SJ, Rittmann BE. How microbial aggregates protect against nanoparticle toxicity. Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36:1171–82.10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.06.009Suche in Google Scholar

[127] Ellis DH, Maurer-Gardner EI, Sulentic CE, Hussain SM. Silver nanoparticle antibacterial efficacy and resistance development in key bacterial species. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2018;5:015013.10.1088/2057-1976/aad5a7Suche in Google Scholar

[128] Salas-Orozco M, Niño-Martínez N, Martínez-Castañón G-A, Méndez FT, Jasso MEC, Ruiz F. Mechanisms of resistance to silver nanoparticles in endodontic bacteria: a literature review. J Nanomater. 2019;2019:1–11.10.1155/2019/7630316Suche in Google Scholar

[129] Kashiwada S. Distribution of nanoparticles in the see-through medaka (Oryzias latipes). Env Health Perspect. 2006;114:1697–702.10.1289/ehp.9209Suche in Google Scholar

[130] Foley S, Crowley C, Smaihi M, Bonfils C, Erlanger BF, Seta P, et al. Cellular localisation of a water-soluble fullerene derivative. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;294:116–9.10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00445-XSuche in Google Scholar

[131] Hussain S, Hess K, Gearhart J, Geiss K, Schlager J. In vitro toxicity of nanoparticles in BRL 3A rat liver cells. Toxicol Vitro. 2005;19:975–83.10.1016/j.tiv.2005.06.034Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[132] Braydich-Stolle L, Hussain S, Schlager JJ, Hofmann M-C. In vitro cytotoxicity of nanoparticles in mammalian germline stem cells. Toxicol Sci. 2005;88:412–9.10.1093/toxsci/kfi256Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[133] Wen HC, Lin YN, Jian SR, Tseng SC, Weng MX, Liu YP, et al. Observation of growth of human fibroblasts on silver nanoparticles. J Phys Conf Ser. 2007;61:445–9.10.1088/1742-6596/61/1/089Suche in Google Scholar

[134] Hussain SM, Javorina AK, Schrand AM, Duhart HM, Ali SF, Schlager JJ. The interaction of manganese nanoparticles with PC-12 cells induces dopamine depletion. Toxicol Sci. 2006;92:456–63.10.1093/toxsci/kfl020Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[135] Li Y, Cummins E. Hazard characterization of silver nanoparticles for human exposure routes. J Env Sci Health A. 2020;55:704–25.10.1080/10934529.2020.1735852Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[136] Akter M, Sikder MT, Rahman MM, Ullah AA, Hossain KFB, Banik S, et al. A systematic review on silver nanoparticles-induced cytotoxicity: physicochemical properties and perspectives. J Adv Res. 2018;9:1–16.10.1016/j.jare.2017.10.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[137] Chernousova S, Epple M. Silver as antibacterial agent: ion, nanoparticle, and metal. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:1636–53.10.1002/anie.201205923Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[138] Chen X, Schluesener HJ. Nanosilver: a nanoproduct in medical application. Toxicol Lett. 2008;176:1–12.10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.10.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[139] Simon-Deckers A, Gouget B, Mayne-L’Hermite M, Herlin-Boime N, Reynaud C, Carriere M. In vitro investigation of oxide nanoparticle and carbon nanotube toxicity and intracellular accumulation in A549 human pneumocytes. J Toxicol. 2008;253:137–46.10.1016/j.tox.2008.09.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[140] Cho JG, Kim KT, Ryu TK, Lee J-W, Kim JE, Kim J. Stepwise embryonic toxicity of silver nanoparticles on Oryzias latipes. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:1–7.10.1155/2013/494671Suche in Google Scholar

[141] Kiran M, Betageri VS, Kumar CR, Vinay S, Latha M. In-vitro antibacterial, antioxidant and cytotoxic potential of silver nanoparticles synthesized using novel Eucalyptus tereticornis leaves extract. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater. 2020;30:2916–25.10.1007/s10904-020-01443-7Suche in Google Scholar

[142] Priya K, Vijayakumar M, Janani B. Chitosan-mediated synthesis of biogenic silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), nanoparticle characterisation and in vitro assessment of anticancer activity in human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;149:844–52.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[143] Siddiquee MA, ud din Parray M, Mehdi SH, Alzahrani KA, Alshehri AA, Malik MA. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Delonix regia leaf extracts: In-vitro cytotoxicity and interaction studies with bovine serum albumin. Mater Chem Phys. 2020;242:122493.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122493Suche in Google Scholar

[144] Pannerselvam B, Durai P, Thiyagarajan D, Song HJ, Kim KJ, Jung YS, et al. Facile synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Asian spider flower and its in vitro cytotoxic activity against human breast carcinoma cells. Processes. 2020;8:1–17.10.3390/pr8040430Suche in Google Scholar

[145] Pannerselvam B, Alagumuthu TS, Cinnaiyan SK, Al-Dhabi NA, Ponmurugan K, Saravanan M, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of optimized silver nanoparticles against wound infectious bacteria and their morphological studies. J Clust Sci. 2020;32:63–76.10.1007/s10876-020-01759-xSuche in Google Scholar

[146] Hamelian M, Zangeneh MM, Shahmohammadi A, Varmira K, Veisi H. Pistacia atlantica leaf extract mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their antioxidant, cytotoxicity, and antibacterial effects under in vitro condition. Appl Organomet Chem. 2020;34:5278.10.1002/aoc.5278Suche in Google Scholar

[147] Dara PK, Mahadevan R, Digita PA, Visnuvinayagam S, Kumar LRG, Mathew S, et al. Synthesis and biochemical characterization of silver nanoparticles grafted chitosan (Chi-Ag-NPs): in vitro studies on antioxidant and antibacterial applications. J SN Appl Sci. 2020;2:665.10.1007/s42452-020-2261-ySuche in Google Scholar

[148] Haase A, Rott S, Mantion A, Graf P, Plendl J, Thünemann AF, et al. Effects of silver nanoparticles on primary mixed neural cell cultures: uptake, oxidative stress and acute calcium responses. Toxicol Sci. 2012;126:457–68.10.1093/toxsci/kfs003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[149] Sriram MI, Kalishwaralal K, Barathmanikanth S, Gurunathani S. Size-based cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in bovine retinal endothelial cells. Nanosci Meth. 2012;1:56–77.10.1080/17458080.2010.547878Suche in Google Scholar

[150] van Aerle R, Lange A, Moorhouse A, Paszkiewicz K, Ball K, Johnston BD, et al. Molecular mechanisms of toxicity of silver nanoparticles in zebrafish embryos. Env Sci Technol. 2013;47:8005–14.10.1021/es401758dSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[151] He D, Dorantes-Aranda JJ, Waite TD. Silver nanoparticle-algae interactions: oxidative dissolution, reactive oxygen species generation and synergistic toxic effects. Env Sci Technol. 2012;46:8731–8.10.1021/es300588aSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[152] Miethling-Graff R, Rumpker R, Richter M, Verano-Braga T, Kjeldsen F, Brewer J, et al. Exposure to silver nanoparticles induces size- and dose-dependent oxidative stress and cytotoxicity in human colon carcinoma cells. Toxicol Vitro. 2014;28:1280–9.10.1016/j.tiv.2014.06.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[153] De Gusseme B, Hennebel T, Christiaens E, Saveyn H, Verbeken K, Fitts JP, et al. Virus disinfection in water by biogenic silver immobilized in polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. Water Res. 2011;45:1856–64.10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.046Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[154] Li Y, Guo M, Lin Z, Zhao M, Xiao M, Wang C, et al. Polyethylenimine-functionalized silver nanoparticle-based co-delivery of paclitaxel to induce HepG2 cell apoptosis. Int J Nanomed. 2016;11:6693–702.10.2147/IJN.S122666Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[155] Hsiao IL, Hsieh YK, Wang CF, Chen IC, Huang YJ. Trojan-Horse mechanism in the cellular uptake of silver nanoparticles verified by direct intra- and extracellular silver speciation analysis. Env Sci Technol. 2015;49:3813–21.10.1021/es504705pSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[156] Limbach LK, Wick P, Manser P, Grass RN, Bruinink A, Stark WJ. Exposure of engineered nanoparticles to human lung epithelial cells:  influence of chemical composition and catalytic activity on oxidative stress. Env Sci Technol. 2007;41:4158–63.10.1021/es062629tSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[157] Gliga AR, Skoglund S, Odnevall Wallinder I, Fadeel B, Karlsson HL. Size-dependent cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human lung cells: the role of cellular uptake, agglomeration and Ag release. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2014;11:1–17.10.1186/1743-8977-11-11Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[158] Quadros ME, Marr LC. Environmental and human health risks of aerosolized silver nanoparticles. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2010;60:770–81.10.3155/1047-3289.60.7.770Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[159] Ramalingam M, Kumar T, Ramakrishna S, Soboyejo W. Biomaterials: a nano approach. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 2016.10.1201/b15739Suche in Google Scholar

[160] Abd Elkodous M, El-Sayyad GS, Abdelrahman IY, El-Bastawisy HS, Mohamed AE, Mosallam FM, et al. Therapeutic and diagnostic potential of nanomaterials for enhanced biomedical applications. Colloids Surf B. 2019;180:411–28.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.05.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[161] Abdolahpur Monikh F, Vijver MG, Guo Z, Zhang P, Darbha GK, Peijnenburg WJGM. Metal sorption onto nanoscale plastic debris and trojan horse effects in Daphnia magna: role of dissolved organic matter. Water Res. 2020;186:116410.10.1016/j.watres.2020.116410Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[162] El-Batal AI, Mosallam FM, El-Sayyad GS. Synthesis of metallic silver nanoparticles by fluconazole drug and gamma rays to inhibit the growth of multidrug-resistant microbes. J Clust Sci. 2018;29:1003–15.10.1007/s10876-018-1411-5Suche in Google Scholar

[163] Unrine JM, Colman BP, Bone AJ, Gondikas AP, Matson CW. Biotic and abiotic interactions in aquatic microcosms determine fate and toxicity of ag nanoparticles. Part 1. aggregation and dissolution. Env Sci Technol. 2012;46:6915–24.10.1021/es204682qSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[164] Hu C, Peng T, Hu X, Nie Y, Zhou X, Qu J, et al. Plasmon-induced photodegradation of toxic pollutants with Ag−AgI/Al2O3 under visible-light irradiation. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:857–62.10.1021/ja907792dSuche in Google Scholar

[165] García-Alonso J, Rodriguez-Sanchez N, Misra SK, Valsami-Jones E, Croteau M-N, Luoma SN, et al. Toxicity and accumulation of silver nanoparticles during development of the marine polychaete Platynereis dumerilii. Sci Total Env. 2014;476–477:688–95.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.039Suche in Google Scholar

[166] Wang P, Menzies NW, Lombi E, Sekine R, Blamey FPC, Hernandez-Soriano MC, et al. Silver sulfide nanoparticles (Ag2S-NPs) are taken up by plants and are phytotoxic. Nanotoxicology. 2015;9:1041–9.10.3109/17435390.2014.999139Suche in Google Scholar

[167] Dos Santos CA, Seckler MM, Ingle AP, Gupta I, Galdiero S, Galdiero M, et al. Silver nanoparticles: therapeutical uses, toxicity, and safety issues. J Pharm Sci. 2014;103:1931–44.10.1002/jps.24001Suche in Google Scholar

[168] Hussain N, Jaitley V, Florence AT. Recent advances in the understanding of uptake of microparticulates across the gastrointestinal lymphatics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;50:107–42.10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00152-1Suche in Google Scholar

[169] Kim JS, Yoon TJ, Yu KN, Kim BG, Park SJ, Kim HW, et al. Toxicity and tissue distribution of magnetic nanoparticles in mice. Toxicol Sci. 2005;89:338–47.10.1093/toxsci/kfj027Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[170] Sambale F, Wagner S, Stahl F, Khaydarov RR, Scheper T, Bahnemann D. Investigations of the toxic effect of silver nanoparticles on mammalian cell lines. J Nanomaterials. 2015;16:1–9.10.1155/2015/136765Suche in Google Scholar

[171] El Badawy AM, Silva RG, Morris B, Scheckel KG, Suidan MT, Tolaymat TM. Surface charge-dependent toxicity of silver nanoparticles. Env Sci Technol. 2011;45:283–7.10.1021/es1034188Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[172] Milić M, Leitinger G, Pavičić I, Zebić Avdičević M, Dobrović S, Goessler W, et al. Cellular uptake and toxicity effects of silver nanoparticles in mammalian kidney cells. J Appl Toxicol. 2015;35:581–92.10.1002/jat.3081Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[173] Afifi M, Saddick S, Abu Zinada OA. Toxicity of silver nanoparticles on the brain of Oreochromis niloticus and Tilapia zillii. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2016;23:754–60.10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.06.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[174] Kim JS, Song KS, Sung JH, Ryu HR, Choi BG, Cho HS, et al. Genotoxicity, acute oral and dermal toxicity, eye and dermal irritation and corrosion and skin sensitisation evaluation of silver nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology. 2013;7:953–60.10.3109/17435390.2012.676099Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[175] Viswanath B, Kim S. Influence of nanotoxicity on human health and environment: the alternative strategies. Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. Vol. 242. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 61–104.10.1007/398_2016_12Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[176] Vrček IV, Žuntar I, Petlevski R, Pavičić I, Dutour, Sikirić M, et al. Comparison of in vitro toxicity of silver ions and silver nanoparticles on human hepatoma cells. Env Toxicol. 2016;31:679–92.10.1002/tox.22081Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[177] Jennifer M, Maciej W. Nanoparticle technology as a double-edged sword: cytotoxic, genotoxic and epigenetic effects on living cells. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol. 2013;4:53–64.10.4236/jbnb.2013.41008Suche in Google Scholar

[178] Miao P, Tang Y, Wang L. DNA modified Fe3O4@Au magnetic nanoparticles as selective probes for simultaneous detection of heavy metal ions. ACS Appl Mater. 2017;9:3940–7.10.1021/acsami.6b14247Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[179] Rabajczyk A. Possibilities for analysis of selected nanometals in solid environmental samples. Desalination Water Treat. 2016;57:1598–610.10.1080/19443994.2015.1030109Suche in Google Scholar

[180] Mitrano DM, Ranville JF, Bednar A, Kazor K, Hering AS, Higgins CP. Tracking dissolution of silver nanoparticles at environmentally relevant concentrations in laboratory, natural, and processed waters using single particle ICP-MS (spICP-MS). Env Sci Nano. 2014;1:248–59.10.1039/C3EN00108CSuche in Google Scholar

[181] Montaño MD, Badiei HR, Bazargan S, Ranville JF. Improvements in the detection and characterization of engineered nanoparticles using spICP-MS with microsecond dwell times. Env Sci Nano. 2014;1:338–46.10.1039/C4EN00058GSuche in Google Scholar

[182] Lombi E, Donner E, Taheri S, Tavakkoli E, Jämting ÅK, McClure S, et al. Transformation of four silver/silver chloride nanoparticles during anaerobic treatment of wastewater and post-processing of sewage sludge. Env Pollut. 2013;176:193–7.10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.029Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[183] Laborda F, Bolea E, Cepriá G, Gómez MT, Jiménez MS, Pérez-Arantegui J, et al. Detection, characterization and quantification of inorganic engineered nanomaterials: a review of techniques and methodological approaches for the analysis of complex samples. Analytica Chim Acta. 2016;904:10–32.10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[184] Leonardo T, Farhi E, Pouget S, Motellier S, Boisson AM, Banerjee D, et al. Silver accumulation in the green microalga coccomyxa actinabiotis: toxicity, in situ speciation, and localization investigated using synchrotron XAS, XRD, and TEM. Env Sci Technol. 2016;50:359–67.10.1021/acs.est.5b03306Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[185] Segre CU, Leyarovska NE, Chapman LD, Lavender WM, Plag PW, King AS, et al. The MRCAT insertion device beamline at the advanced photon source. AIP Conf Proc. 2000;521:419–22.10.1063/1.1291825Suche in Google Scholar

[186] Ono A, Cao S, Togashi H, Tashiro M, Fujimoto T, Machinami T, et al. Specific interactions between silver(i) ions and cytosine- cytosine pairs in DNA duplexes. Chem Comm. 2008;39:4825–7.10.1039/b808686aSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[187] Xie WY, Huang WT, Li NB, Luo HQ. Design of a dual-output fluorescent DNA logic gate and detection of silver ions and cysteine based on graphene oxide. Chem Comm. 2012;48:82–4.10.1039/C1CC15449DSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[188] Li Y, Yuan J, Xu Z. A sensitive fluorescence biosensor for silver ions (Ag+) detection based on C-Ag+-C structure and exonuclease III-assisted dual-recycling amplification. J Anal Methods Chem. 2019;2019:3712032.10.1155/2019/3712032Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[189] Xu S, Chen X, Chen X, Liang Y. Methylene blue-based distinguishing DNA conformation for colorimetric detection of silver ions. Microchem J. 2019;147:995–8.10.1016/j.microc.2019.04.019Suche in Google Scholar

[190] Li T, Shi L, Wang E, Dong S. Silver-Ion-mediated DNAzyme switch for the ultrasensitive and selective colorimetric detection of aqueous Ag+ and cysteine. Chem Eur J. 2009;15:3347–50.10.1002/chem.200900056Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[191] Li Z, Fan X, Cao B, Yuan F, Chen F, Wang S. Electrochemiluminescence detection of silver ion based on trigeminal structure of DNA. J Braz Chem Soc. 2019;30:1222–8.10.21577/0103-5053.20190017Suche in Google Scholar

[192] Gao Z, Liu GG, Ye H, Rauschendorfer R, Tang D, Xia X. Facile colorimetric detection of silver ions with picomolar sensitivity. J Anal Chem. 2017;89:3622–9.10.1021/acs.analchem.6b05026Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[193] Alizadeh A, Abdi G, Khodaei MM. Colorimetric and visual detection of silver(I) using gold nanoparticles modified with furfuryl alcohol. Microchim Acta. 2016;183:1995–2003.10.1007/s00604-016-1830-7Suche in Google Scholar

[194] Selva Sharma A, SasiKumar T, Ilanchelian M. A rapid and sensitive colorimetric sensor for detection of silver ions based on the non-aggregation of gold nanoparticles in the presence of ascorbic acid. J Clust Sci. 2018;29:655–62.10.1007/s10876-018-1375-5Suche in Google Scholar

[195] Ghobashy MM, Mohamed TM. Radiation preparation of conducting nanocomposite membrane based on (Copper/Polyacrylic Acid/Poly Vinyl Alcohol) for rapid colorimetric sensor of mercury and silver ions. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater. 2018;28:2297–2305.10.1007/s10904-018-0882-zSuche in Google Scholar

[196] Wang F, Wu Y, Zhan S, He L, Zhi W, Zhou X, et al. A simple and sensitive colorimetric detection of silver ions based on cationic polymer-directed AuNPs aggregation. Aust J Chem. 2013;66:113–8.10.1071/CH12375Suche in Google Scholar

[197] Xie YF, Cheng YY, Liu ML, Zou HY, Huang CZ. A single gold nanoprobe for colorimetric detection of silver(i) ions with dark-field microscopy. Analyst. 2019;144:2011–6.10.1039/C8AN02397BSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[198] Wang Z, Ding S. A simple colorimetric detection of silver ion based on uric acid for plasmonic silver nanoparticle. Taiwan: CRC Press; 2015. p. 123–7.10.1201/b18135-27Suche in Google Scholar

[199] Liu B, Tan H, Chen Y. Visual detection of silver(I) ions by a chromogenic reaction catalyzed by gold nanoparticles. Microchim Acta. 2013;180:331–9.10.1007/s00604-012-0936-9Suche in Google Scholar

[200] Fu L, Wang A, Xie K, Zhu J, Chen F, Wang H, et al. Electrochemical detection of silver ions by using sulfur quantum dots modified gold electrode. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2020;304:127390.10.1016/j.snb.2019.127390Suche in Google Scholar

[201] Li H, Zhai J, Sun X. Sensitive and selective detection of silver(I) ion in aqueous solution using carbon nanoparticles as a cheap, effective fluorescent sensing platform. Langmuir. 2011;27:4305–8.10.1021/la200052tSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[202] Wang Y, Hu A. Carbon quantum dots: synthesis, properties and applications. J Mater Chem C. 2014;2:6921–39.10.1039/C4TC00988FSuche in Google Scholar

[203] Cayuela A, Soriano ML, Kennedy SR, Steed JW, Valcárcel M. Fluorescent carbon quantum dot hydrogels for direct determination of silver ions. Talanta. 2016;151:100–5.10.1016/j.talanta.2016.01.029Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[204] Murugesan P, Moses JA, Anandharamakrishnan C. One step synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots from neera for the detection of silver ions. Spectrosc Lett. 2020;53:407–15.10.1080/00387010.2020.1764589Suche in Google Scholar

[205] Fahmy HM, Mosleh AM, Elghany AA, Shams-Eldin E, Abu Serea ES, Ali SA, et al. Coated silver nanoparticles: synthesis, cytotoxicity, and optical properties. RSC Adv. 2019;9:20118–36.10.1039/C9RA02907ASuche in Google Scholar

[206] Zook JM, Long SE, Cleveland D, Geronimo CLA, MacCuspie RI. Measuring silver nanoparticle dissolution in complex biological and environmental matrices using UV-visible absorbance. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;401:1993.10.6028/NIST.SP.1200-13Suche in Google Scholar

[207] Lorenz C, Hagendorfer H, von Goetz N, Kaegi R, Gehrig R, Ulrich A, et al. Nanosized aerosols from consumer sprays: experimental analysis and exposure modeling for four commercial products. J Nanopart Res. 2011;13:3377–91.10.1007/s11051-011-0256-8Suche in Google Scholar

[208] Stebounova LV, Guio E, Grassian VH. Silver nanoparticles in simulated biological media: a study of aggregation, sedimentation, and dissolution. J Nanopart Res. 2011;13:233–44.10.1007/s11051-010-0022-3Suche in Google Scholar

[209] Samberg ME, Oldenburg SJ, Monteiro-Riviere NA. Evaluation of silver nanoparticle toxicity in skin in vivo and keratinocytes in vitro. Env Health Perspect. 2010;118:407–13.10.1289/ehp.0901398Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[210] Pandiarajan J, Balaji S, Mahendran S, Ponmanickam P, Krishnan M. Synthesis and toxicity of silver nanoparticles, in nanoscience in food and agriculture 3. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 73–98.10.1007/978-3-319-48009-1_3Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-13
Revised: 2021-07-31
Accepted: 2021-08-04
Published Online: 2021-08-30

© 2021 Mohamed Mohamady Ghobashy et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Improved impedance matching by multi-componential metal-hybridized rGO toward high performance of microwave absorption
  3. Pure-silk fibroin hydrogel with stable aligned micropattern toward peripheral nerve regeneration
  4. Effective ion pathways and 3D conductive carbon networks in bentonite host enable stable and high-rate lithium–sulfur batteries
  5. Fabrication and characterization of 3D-printed gellan gum/starch composite scaffold for Schwann cells growth
  6. Synergistic strengthening mechanism of copper matrix composite reinforced with nano-Al2O3 particles and micro-SiC whiskers
  7. Deformation mechanisms and plasticity of ultrafine-grained Al under complex stress state revealed by digital image correlation technique
  8. On the deformation-induced grain rotations in gradient nano-grained copper based on molecular dynamics simulations
  9. Removal of sulfate from aqueous solution using Mg–Al nano-layered double hydroxides synthesized under different dual solvent systems
  10. Microwave-assisted sol–gel synthesis of TiO2-mixed metal oxide nanocatalyst for degradation of organic pollutant
  11. Electrophoretic deposition of graphene on basalt fiber for composite applications
  12. Polyphenylene sulfide-coated wrench composites by nanopinning effect
  13. Thermal conductivity and thermoelectric properties in 3D macroscopic pure carbon nanotube materials
  14. An effective thermal conductivity and thermomechanical homogenization scheme for a multiscale Nb3Sn filaments
  15. Friction stir spot welding of AA5052 with additional carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composite interlayer
  16. Improvement of long-term cycling performance of high-nickel cathode materials by ZnO coating
  17. Quantum effects of gas flow in nanochannels
  18. An approach to effectively improve the interfacial bonding of nano-perfused composites by in situ growth of CNTs
  19. Effects of nano-modified polymer cement-based materials on the bending behavior of repaired concrete beams
  20. Effects of the combined usage of nanomaterials and steel fibres on the workability, compressive strength, and microstructure of ultra-high performance concrete
  21. One-pot solvothermal synthesis and characterization of highly stable nickel nanoparticles
  22. Comparative study on mechanisms for improving mechanical properties and microstructure of cement paste modified by different types of nanomaterials
  23. Effect of in situ graphene-doped nano-CeO2 on microstructure and electrical contact properties of Cu30Cr10W contacts
  24. The experimental study of CFRP interlayer of dissimilar joint AA7075-T651/Ti-6Al-4V alloys by friction stir spot welding on mechanical and microstructural properties
  25. Vibration analysis of a sandwich cylindrical shell in hygrothermal environment
  26. Water barrier and mechanical properties of sugar palm crystalline nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic sugar palm starch (TPS)/poly(lactic acid) (PLA) blend bionanocomposites
  27. Strong quadratic acousto-optic coupling in 1D multilayer phoxonic crystal cavity
  28. Three-dimensional shape analysis of peripapillary retinal pigment epithelium-basement membrane layer based on OCT radial images
  29. Solvent regulation synthesis of single-component white emission carbon quantum dots for white light-emitting diodes
  30. Xanthate-modified nanoTiO2 as a novel vulcanization accelerator enhancing mechanical and antibacterial properties of natural rubber
  31. Effect of steel fiber on impact resistance and durability of concrete containing nano-SiO2
  32. Ultrasound-enhanced biosynthesis of uniform ZnO nanorice using Swietenia macrophylla seed extract and its in vitro anticancer activity
  33. Temperature dependence of hardness prediction for high-temperature structural ceramics and their composites
  34. Study on the frequency of acoustic emission signal during crystal growth of salicylic acid
  35. Controllable modification of helical carbon nanotubes for high-performance microwave absorption
  36. Role of dry ozonization of basalt fibers on interfacial properties and fracture toughness of epoxy matrix composites
  37. Nanosystem’s density functional theory study of the chlorine adsorption on the Fe(100) surface
  38. A rapid nanobiosensing platform based on herceptin-conjugated graphene for ultrasensitive detection of circulating tumor cells in early breast cancer
  39. Improving flexural strength of UHPC with sustainably synthesized graphene oxide
  40. The role of graphene/graphene oxide in cement hydration
  41. Structural characterization of microcrystalline and nanocrystalline cellulose from Ananas comosus L. leaves: Cytocompatibility and molecular docking studies
  42. Evaluation of the nanostructure of calcium silicate hydrate based on atomic force microscopy-infrared spectroscopy experiments
  43. Combined effects of nano-silica and silica fume on the mechanical behavior of recycled aggregate concrete
  44. Safety study of malapposition of the bio-corrodible nitrided iron stent in vivo
  45. Triethanolamine interface modification of crystallized ZnO nanospheres enabling fast photocatalytic hazard-free treatment of Cr(vi) ions
  46. Novel electrodes for precise and accurate droplet dispensing and splitting in digital microfluidics
  47. Construction of Chi(Zn/BMP2)/HA composite coating on AZ31B magnesium alloy surface to improve the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility
  48. Experimental and multiscale numerical investigations on low-velocity impact responses of syntactic foam composites reinforced with modified MWCNTs
  49. Comprehensive performance analysis and optimal design of smart light pole for cooperative vehicle infrastructure system
  50. Room temperature growth of ZnO with highly active exposed facets for photocatalytic application
  51. Influences of poling temperature and elongation ratio on PVDF-HFP piezoelectric films
  52. Large strain hardening of magnesium containing in situ nanoparticles
  53. Super stable water-based magnetic fluid as a dual-mode contrast agent
  54. Photocatalytic activity of biogenic zinc oxide nanoparticles: In vitro antimicrobial, biocompatibility, and molecular docking studies
  55. Hygrothermal environment effect on the critical buckling load of FGP microbeams with initial curvature integrated by CNT-reinforced skins considering the influence of thickness stretching
  56. Thermal aging behavior characteristics of asphalt binder modified by nano-stabilizer based on DSR and AFM
  57. Building effective core/shell polymer nanoparticles for epoxy composite toughening based on Hansen solubility parameters
  58. Structural characterization and nanoscale strain field analysis of α/β interface layer of a near α titanium alloy
  59. Optimization of thermal and hydrophobic properties of GO-doped epoxy nanocomposite coatings
  60. The properties of nano-CaCO3/nano-ZnO/SBR composite-modified asphalt
  61. Three-dimensional metallic carbon allotropes with superhardness
  62. Physical stability and rheological behavior of Pickering emulsions stabilized by protein–polysaccharide hybrid nanoconjugates
  63. Optimization of volume fraction and microstructure evolution during thermal deformation of nano-SiCp/Al–7Si composites
  64. Phase analysis and corrosion behavior of brazing Cu/Al dissimilar metal joint with BAl88Si filler metal
  65. High-efficiency nano polishing of steel materials
  66. On the rheological properties of multi-walled carbon nano-polyvinylpyrrolidone/silicon-based shear thickening fluid
  67. Fabrication of Ag/ZnO hollow nanospheres and cubic TiO2/ZnO heterojunction photocatalysts for RhB degradation
  68. Fabrication and properties of PLA/nano-HA composite scaffolds with balanced mechanical properties and biological functions for bone tissue engineering application
  69. Investigation of the early-age performance and microstructure of nano-C–S–H blended cement-based materials
  70. Reduced graphene oxide coating on basalt fabric using electrophoretic deposition and its role in the mechanical and tribological performance of epoxy/basalt fiber composites
  71. Effect of nano-silica as cementitious materials-reducing admixtures on the workability, mechanical properties and durability of concrete
  72. Machine-learning-assisted microstructure–property linkages of carbon nanotube-reinforced aluminum matrix nanocomposites produced by laser powder bed fusion
  73. Physical, thermal, and mechanical properties of highly porous polylactic acid/cellulose nanofibre scaffolds prepared by salt leaching technique
  74. A comparative study on characterizations and synthesis of pure lead sulfide (PbS) and Ag-doped PbS for photovoltaic applications
  75. Clean preparation of washable antibacterial polyester fibers by high temperature and high pressure hydrothermal self-assembly
  76. Al 5251-based hybrid nanocomposite by FSP reinforced with graphene nanoplates and boron nitride nanoparticles: Microstructure, wear, and mechanical characterization
  77. Interlaminar fracture toughness properties of hybrid glass fiber-reinforced composite interlayered with carbon nanotube using electrospray deposition
  78. Microstructure and life prediction model of steel slag concrete under freezing-thawing environment
  79. Synthesis of biogenic silver nanoparticles from the seed coat waste of pistachio (Pistacia vera) and their effect on the growth of eggplant
  80. Study on adaptability of rheological index of nano-PUA-modified asphalt based on geometric parameters of parallel plate
  81. Preparation and adsorption properties of nano-graphene oxide/tourmaline composites
  82. A study on interfacial behaviors of epoxy/graphene oxide derived from pitch-based graphite fibers
  83. Multiresponsive carboxylated graphene oxide-grafted aptamer as a multifunctional nanocarrier for targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics and bioactive compounds in cancer therapy
  84. Piezoresistive/piezoelectric intrinsic sensing properties of carbon nanotube cement-based smart composite and its electromechanical sensing mechanisms: A review
  85. Smart stimuli-responsive biofunctionalized niosomal nanocarriers for programmed release of bioactive compounds into cancer cells in vitro and in vivo
  86. Photoremediation of methylene blue by biosynthesized ZnO/Fe3O4 nanocomposites using Callistemon viminalis leaves aqueous extract: A comparative study
  87. Study of gold nanoparticles’ preparation through ultrasonic spray pyrolysis and lyophilisation for possible use as markers in LFIA tests
  88. Review Articles
  89. Advance on the dispersion treatment of graphene oxide and the graphene oxide modified cement-based materials
  90. Development of ionic liquid-based electroactive polymer composites using nanotechnology
  91. Nanostructured multifunctional electrocatalysts for efficient energy conversion systems: Recent perspectives
  92. Recent advances on the fabrication methods of nanocomposite yarn-based strain sensor
  93. Review on nanocomposites based on aerospace applications
  94. Overview of nanocellulose as additives in paper processing and paper products
  95. The frontiers of functionalized graphene-based nanocomposites as chemical sensors
  96. Material advancement in tissue-engineered nerve conduit
  97. Carbon nanostructure-based superhydrophobic surfaces and coatings
  98. Functionalized graphene-based nanocomposites for smart optoelectronic applications
  99. Interfacial technology for enhancement in steel fiber reinforced cementitious composite from nano to macroscale
  100. Metal nanoparticles and biomaterials: The multipronged approach for potential diabetic wound therapy
  101. Review on resistive switching mechanisms of bio-organic thin film for non-volatile memory application
  102. Nanotechnology-enabled biomedical engineering: Current trends, future scopes, and perspectives
  103. Research progress on key problems of nanomaterials-modified geopolymer concrete
  104. Smart stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for the cancer therapy – nanomedicine
  105. An overview of methods for production and detection of silver nanoparticles, with emphasis on their fate and toxicological effects on human, soil, and aquatic environment
  106. Effects of chemical modification and nanotechnology on wood properties
  107. Mechanisms, influencing factors, and applications of electrohydrodynamic jet printing
  108. Application of antiviral materials in textiles: A review
  109. Phase transformation and strengthening mechanisms of nanostructured high-entropy alloys
  110. Research progress on individual effect of graphene oxide in cement-based materials and its synergistic effect with other nanomaterials
  111. Catalytic defense against fungal pathogens using nanozymes
  112. A mini-review of three-dimensional network topological structure nanocomposites: Preparation and mechanical properties
  113. Mechanical properties and structural health monitoring performance of carbon nanotube-modified FRP composites: A review
  114. Nano-scale delivery: A comprehensive review of nano-structured devices, preparative techniques, site-specificity designs, biomedical applications, commercial products, and references to safety, cellular uptake, and organ toxicity
  115. Effects of alloying, heat treatment and nanoreinforcement on mechanical properties and damping performances of Cu–Al-based alloys: A review
  116. Recent progress in the synthesis and applications of vertically aligned carbon nanotube materials
  117. Thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of mono and hybrid organic- and synthetic-based nanofluids: A critical review
  118. Recent advances in waste-recycled nanomaterials for biomedical applications: Waste-to-wealth
  119. Layup sequence and interfacial bonding of additively manufactured polymeric composite: A brief review
  120. Quantum dots synthetization and future prospect applications
  121. Approved and marketed nanoparticles for disease targeting and applications in COVID-19
  122. Strategies for improving rechargeable lithium-ion batteries: From active materials to CO2 emissions
Heruntergeladen am 11.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2021-0066/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen