Home CCTs as new biomarkers for the prognosis of head and neck squamous cancer
Article Open Access

CCTs as new biomarkers for the prognosis of head and neck squamous cancer

  • Yanbo Dong , Siyu Lu , Zhenxiao Wang and Liangfa Liu ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 13, 2020

Abstract

The chaperonin-containing T-complex protein 1 (CCT) subunits participate in diverse diseases. However, little is known about their expression and prognostic values in human head and neck squamous cancer (HNSC). This article aims to evaluate the effects of CCT subunits regarding their prognostic values for HNSC. We mined the transcriptional and survival data of CCTs in HNSC patients from online databases. A protein–protein interaction network was constructed and a functional enrichment analysis of target genes was performed. We observed that the mRNA expression levels of CCT1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8 were higher in HNSC tissues than in normal tissues. Survival analysis revealed that the high mRNA transcriptional levels of CCT3/4/5/6/7/8 were associated with a low overall survival. The expression levels of CCT4/7 were correlated with advanced tumor stage. And the overexpression of CCT4 was associated with higher N stage of patients. Validation of CCTs’ differential expression and prognostic values was achieved by the Human Protein Atlas and GEO datasets. Mechanistic exploration of CCT subunits by the functional enrichment analysis suggests that these genes may influence the HNSC prognosis by regulating PI3K-Akt and other pathways. This study implies that CCT3/4/6/7/8 are promising biomarkers for the prognosis of HNSC.

1 Introduction

Head and neck squamous cancer (HNSC) is the sixth leading malignancy worldwide, with an annual incidence of more than 6,00,000 cases [1]. Despite considerable advancements in diagnostic and treatment methods, the 5 year overall survival (OS) rate of HNSC remains less than 50% [2]. Hence, prognostic markers and potential drug targets should be identified to enhance the prognosis and individualized treatments.

Molecular chaperones are key molecular complexes in the process of correct folding of proteins to produce energetically stable and functionally competent protein conformations. They are essential in maintaining protein homeostasis and proteome integrity, and in cell growth and survival [3]. They can be classified into two mechanistic classes – chaperones such as HSP70 and HSP90, and chaperonins. The eukaryotic chaperonin family includes the type I chaperonin, HSP60, and the type II hetero-oligomeric chaperonin, TRiC (T-complex protein-1 ring complex, also known as CCT). CCT is a multiprotein complex that functions to assist polypeptides in achieving a functional three-dimensional configuration. CCT is estimated to interact with 5–10% of proteome [4] and is the obligate chaperone for both actin and tubulin [5,6,7].

CCT features a cylindrical architecture composed of two rings stacked opposite one another. Each ring contains eight different subunits, namely CCT1–CCT8 [8,9], which recognize different motifs within substrate proteins. The specific arrangement of these subunits provides the ability to fold certain proteins and let them gain expected functions, leading to protein homeostasis. Disrupted protein homeostasis underlies various diseases and conditions including cancers. Researches have shown that CCTs mediate the folding of a number of proteins implicated in oncogenesis such as prooncogenic proteins signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), p53, cell cycle regulatory proteins cell division cycle protein 20 (CDC20), and tumor suppressor Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) [10,11,12,13].

It is evident that CCT subunits promote the development of several tumor types, including breast cancer [14,15,16], colorectal cancer [17,18,19], uterine sarcoma [20], lung carcinoma [19], ovarian cancer [21], hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [22], and multitudinous tumor cells [23,24]. And HSP70, another member of the chaperone family, proves to be a biomarker of head and neck cancer [25]. However, the involvement of CCT subunits in head and neck cancer remains unknown.

To the best of our knowledge, bioinformatics analysis is yet to be applied to explore the role of CCT subunits in HNSC. RNA and DNA research, an essential component of the biological and biomedical studies, has been revolutionized with the development of microarray technology [26]. On the basis of the analyses of thousands of gene expressions or variations in copy numbers published online, we analyzed in detail the expression and mutations of different CCTs in patients with HNSC to determine the expression patterns, potential functions, and distinct prognostic values.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 mRNA transcriptional levels of CCT subunits

The mRNA transcriptional levels of CCT subunits in cancers were analyzed by the ONCOMINE database (www.oncomine.org). ONCOMINE is currently the world’s largest oncogene chip database and integrated data mining platform [27]. The mRNA expressions of CCTs in clinical cancer specimens were compared with those in normal controls, using a Student’s t-test to generate a P value. The cutoff of P value and fold change were defined as 0.0001 and 2, respectively. The mRNA transcriptional levels of CCTs in HNSC were also analyzed. CCTs expression was assessed in a HNSC tissue relative to its expression in a normal tissue, and the differences associated with P ˂ 0.01 were considered significant. Transcriptional levels of CCTs between head and neck cancer tissues and normal samples were also analyzed by Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) dataset (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/). GEPIA is an interactive web server for analyzing the RNA sequencing expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, using a standard processing pipeline [28]. The unmatched normal and tumor tissues were compared. The raw data were filtered based on the cutoffs |log2FC| > 1 and P < 0.01. The log2(TPM + 1) transformed expression data were used for plotting and one-way ANOVA for differential analysis.

2.2 Relationship between the mRNA levels of CCTs and clinicopathological parameters

To identify the comparability between the tumor group and the normal group of TCGA HNSC, we downloaded the level-3 RNA sequence (RNA Seq) data (fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads upper quartile data) of HNSC and the corresponding normal tissue samples from the TCGA database (https://www.cancer.gov/tcga). Clinical characteristics of patients from the tumor group and the normal group were compared. The Fisher exact test and t-test were used, respectively, to determine the differences in gender and age between patients in different groups. Furthermore, the impact of age and gender on each CCT mRNA expression was calculated by the LinkedOmics database. The LinkedOmics database (http://www.linkedomics.org/login.php) is a web-based platform for analyzing TCGA datasets [29]. The statistical methods were Pearson correlation test and t-test for age and gender, respectively.

The expression of CCTs with tumor stage for HNSC was also analyzed using GEPIA databases. The statistical method for differential gene expression analysis was one-way ANOVA. Relationship between the mRNA expression levels and patients’ N stage was analyzed by the LinkedOmics database. The method for differential gene expression analysis is Jonckheere’s trend test.

2.3 Survival analysis

The prognostic value of CCTs mRNA expression was evaluated using the LinkedOmics database. The HNSC patient samples were split into two groups by median expression (high vs low expression) and assessed by Kaplan–Meier survival plots and log-rank test. In cases when two survival curves crossed each other – a clear violation of the assumption of proportional hazard rates for log-rank test [30], a two-stage procedure was used. The two-stage procedure includes the log-rank test as the first stage and a proposed procedure for addressing the crossing hazard rates as the second stage [31]. In brief, we set the significance level of the two-stage procedure at 0.05. If the P value in the first stage (P1) was less than 0.0253, then the total P value = P1; otherwise, the P value in the second stage (P2) was calculated, and the total P value = 0.0253 + (1 − 0.0253) × P2. This procedure was conducted using the R package ComparisonSurv.

2.4 Validation of CCTs’ expression level and prognostic value

IHC images of CCTs protein expression in clinical specimens of patients with HNSC and normal tissues were obtained from the Human Protein Atlas database (https://www.proteinatlas.org/) [32]. The HNSC datasets of GSE30784 and GSE41613 were obtained from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). GSE30784 consists of 167 HNSC samples, 17 dysplasia samples, and 45 normal samples. This dataset was used to validate the expression level of CCTs between tumor and normal samples. GSE41613 consists of 97 HNSC patients with follow-up information. The R packages affy and annotate were used to process the raw data, make expression matrix, and match the probe to their gene symbol. Patient samples were split into two groups by median expression (high vs low expression) and assessed by the log-rank test and two-stage procedure, as mentioned above. Survival curves and the expression level of CCTs were visualized by GraphPad® PRISM version 8.0 (Graph Pad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) with P values.

2.5 TCGA data and cBioPortal

TCGA had both sequencing and pathological data on 30 different cancers. The head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (TCGA, Firehose Legacy) dataset including data from 530 cases with pathology reports was selected for further analyses of CCTs using cBioPortal (www.cbioportal.org) [33,34]. The genomic profiles included mutations, copy-number variance from GISTIC, mRNA expression z-scores (RNA Seq V2 RSEM), and protein expression z-scores (reverse-phase protein arrays). Pearson correlation coefficient of co-expression was calculated according to the cBioPortal’s online instruction and visualized by R environment. For the other comparisons of correlations between CCTs mRNA transcriptional levels, the co-expression heatmaps with Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated and visualized by R packages – ggcorrplot and ggthemes.

2.6 Pathway commons and STRING

Pathway commons (https://www.pathwaycommons.org) is an integrated resource of publicly available information about biological pathways [35]. The Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) is an online database used to predict PPIs, which are essential for interpreting the molecular mechanisms of key cellular activities in carcinogenesis. In this study, Pathway Commons was used to identify the 50 most frequently altered neighbor genes of the CCTs family and the STRING database was used to build a PPI network of these genes mentioned above. Cytoscape (version 3.7.1), an open source bioinformatics software platform, was used to visualize molecular interaction networks [36].

2.7 Functional and pathway enrichment analysis

The Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID, https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) was used to perform the gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis. DAVID is an online tool for systematic and integrative annotation and enrichment analysis that reveals the biological meaning related to large gene lists [37]. GO analysis for the cellular component (CC), biological process (BP), and molecular function (MF) categories [38] and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis [39] were performed for the selected genes (CCTs and the 50 most frequently altered neighbor genes) using the DAVID. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The results were visualized using R packages.

3 Results

3.1 mRNA transcriptional levels of CCTs in patients with HNSC

Eight CCT subunits have been identified in mammalian cells. We compared the transcriptional levels of CCTs in cancers with those in normal samples by using ONCOMINE databases (Figure 1). Red cell with a number in it indicated the number of datasets with a statistically significant (P < 0.0001) mRNA overexpression of CCTs in different types of cancers vs the corresponding normal tissue. There are 13 datasets regarding HNSC in total on ONCOMINE. Statistical details of Figure 1 are presented in Table 1. For instance, the mRNA expression levels of CCT3 were significantly upregulated in patients with HNSC in seven datasets. According to Pyeon’s study [40], CCT3 was overexpressed, compared with those in the normal samples in all of the HNSC types: tonsillar carcinoma with a fold change of 2.534, oral cavity carcinoma with a fold change of 3.115, floor of the mouth carcinoma with a fold change of 3.68, oropharyngeal carcinoma with a fold change of 3.001, and tongue carcinoma with a fold change of 2.529 (Table 1). In Estilo’s study [41] and Talbot’s study [42], CCT3 was also overexpressed in tongue squamous cell carcinoma with fold changes of 2.143 and 2.117, respectively. Similarly, the comparisons of other CCTs mRNA expression levels in HNSC and normal tissues are listed in Table 1. No significant difference was found between the mRNA transcriptional levels of CCT8 in head and neck cancer tissues and normal samples.

Figure 1 The mRNA transcriptional levels of CCTs in different types of cancers (ONCOMINE). This graphic was generated from ONCOMINE, indicating the numbers of datasets with statistically significant (P < 0.0001) mRNA overexpression (red) or downexpression (blue) of CCTs (different types of cancers vs corresponding normal tissue). Cell color was determined by the best gene rank percentile for the analyses within the cell, and the gene rank was analyzed by the percentile of target gene in the top of all genes measured in each research.
Figure 1

The mRNA transcriptional levels of CCTs in different types of cancers (ONCOMINE). This graphic was generated from ONCOMINE, indicating the numbers of datasets with statistically significant (P < 0.0001) mRNA overexpression (red) or downexpression (blue) of CCTs (different types of cancers vs corresponding normal tissue). Cell color was determined by the best gene rank percentile for the analyses within the cell, and the gene rank was analyzed by the percentile of target gene in the top of all genes measured in each research.

Table 1

The significant changes in CCTs expression in mRNA transcriptional level between different types of head and neck squamous cancers and normal tissues (ONCOMINE database)

Types of head and neck squamous cancers vs normal tissueFold changeP valuet-TestRef.
CCT1Oral cavity carcinoma2.5057.21 × 10−65.987Pyeon [40]
CCT2Tongue squamous cell carcinoma2.1045.29 × 10−96.749Estilo[41]
Tongue squamous cell carcinoma2.1611.45 × 10−97.065Talbot [42]
Oropharyngeal carcinoma3.1372.43 × 10−55.405Pyeon [40]
Floor of the mouth carcinoma3.1469.32 × 10−65.823Pyeon [40]
Tongue carcinoma2.1227.05 × 10−54.437Pyeon [40]
CCT3Tonsillar carcinoma2.5346.24 × 10−54.52Pyeon [40]
Oral cavity carcinoma3.1158.2 × 10−65.543Pyeon [40]
Floor of the mouth carcinoma3.689.87 × 10−76.287Pyeon [40]
Oropharyngeal carcinoma3.0016.02 × 10−54.755Pyeon [40]
Tongue carcinoma2.5292.44 × 10−54.795Pyeon [40]
Tongue squamous cell carcinoma2.1431.94 × 10−86.605Estilo [41]
Tongue squamous cell carcinoma2.1171.00 × 10−76.051Talbot [42]
CCT4Floor of the mouth carcinoma3.0359.47 × 10−87.405Pyeon [40]
Oropharyngeal carcinoma2.762.89 × 10−55.516Pyeon [40]
CCT5Tongue squamous cell carcinoma3.0091.64 × 10−128.836Talbot [42]
Tongue squamous cell carcinoma2.9651.38 × 10−118.354Estilo [41]
Floor of the mouth carcinoma2.1426.40 × 10−79.206Pyeon [40]
CCT6Nasopharyngeal carcinoma2.2875.59 × 10−66.21Sengupta [73]
Floor of the mouth carcinoma2.8452.31 × 10−56.025Pyeon [40]
Tongue carcinoma2.3628.23 × 10−65.027Pyeon [40]
CCT7Floor of the mouth carcinoma2.8728.37 × 10−87.159Pyeon [40]
Oral cavity carcinoma2.1132.95 × 10−54.922Pyeon [40]
Oropharyngeal carcinoma2.2735.85 × 10−54.731Pyeon [40]
CCT8NANANANANA

3.2 Relationship between the mRNA levels of CCTs and the clinicopathological parameters of patients with HNSC

Using GEPIA dataset (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/), we compared the mRNA expression of CCTs between head and neck cancer tissues and normal samples. The results indicated that the expression levels of CCTs were higher in head and neck cancer tissues than in normal tissues (Figure 2). To identify the comparability between the tumor group and the normal group of TCGA HNSC, clinical characteristics of patients from the tumor group and the normal group were compared. There were no differences in gender or age between patients in the two groups (Table S1, ESI). Furthermore, the impact of age and gender on each CCT mRNA expression in TCGA HNSC samples was calculated. The results showed that CCT4 mRNA expression was related to gender statistically, with a higher expression level in male than in female (Table S2).

Figure 2 The expression level of CCTs in HNSC (GEPIA). Boxplots showing the relative expression of eight CCTs in HNSC and normal samples. The red and blue boxes represent cancer and normal tissues, respectively.
Figure 2

The expression level of CCTs in HNSC (GEPIA). Boxplots showing the relative expression of eight CCTs in HNSC and normal samples. The red and blue boxes represent cancer and normal tissues, respectively.

The expression of CCTs with tumor stage for HNSC was also analyzed. CCT4 and CCT7 groups significantly varied, whereas the other groups did not significantly differ (Figure 3a and b and Supplement Figure 1). Furthermore, there were differences for CCT4 (P = 0.0123) and CCT7 (P = 0.09886) in the mRNA expression levels and patients’ N stage, a staging system developed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer to classify patients by the involvement of regional lymph nodes (Figure 3c and d).

Figure 3 Correlation between the CCT4/7 expression and tumor stage in HNSC patients (GEPIA and LinkedOmics). (a and b) Violin plots showing the relative expression of CCT4/7 in HNSC patients in stage I, II, III, or IV. (c and d) Boxplots indicating the relative expression of CCT4/7 in HNSC patients with N stage of 0, 1, 2, or 3.
Figure 3

Correlation between the CCT4/7 expression and tumor stage in HNSC patients (GEPIA and LinkedOmics). (a and b) Violin plots showing the relative expression of CCT4/7 in HNSC patients in stage I, II, III, or IV. (c and d) Boxplots indicating the relative expression of CCT4/7 in HNSC patients with N stage of 0, 1, 2, or 3.

3.3 Association of the decreased mRNA expression of CCTs with the improved prognosis of patients with HNSC

We further explored the critical efficiency of CCTs in the survival of patients with HNSC using the LinkedOmics database. The log-rank test and two-stage procedure analyses for Kaplan–Meier curves from LinkedOmics revealed that the decreased CCT3/4/5/6/7/8 mRNA levels were significantly associated with the OS (Figure 4).

Figure 4 The prognosis value of CCTs in HNSC patients (LinkedOmics). The prognosis value of mRNA expression levels of CCTs in HNSC patients, analyzed by LinkedOmics.
Figure 4

The prognosis value of CCTs in HNSC patients (LinkedOmics). The prognosis value of mRNA expression levels of CCTs in HNSC patients, analyzed by LinkedOmics.

3.4 Validation of the expression status and prognosis value of CCTs

We used multiple datasets from the GEO database to validate the expression status and prognosis value of CCTs. Figure 5a demonstrates the expression status of CCT subunits in normal, dysplasia, and OSCC samples of GSE30784. As shown in the figure, the expression status of CCTs was positively correlated with the disease status. Furthermore, GSE41613 was used to validate CCTs’ prognosis value. This dataset contained not only gene transcriptional data but also follow-up information, including 97 patients of HNSC. Patient samples were split into two groups by median expression (high vs low expression) and assessed by the log-rank test and two-stage procedure, as mentioned in the Materials and methods section. Survival analysis was conducted and significant differences were observed between high CCTs and low CCTs groups (Figure 5b). Moreover, immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining obtained from The Human Protein Atlas database also demonstrated the expression status of CCTs family genes and the patient data, as shown in Figure 6 and Supplement Figure 2. We found that CCT2, CCT5, CCT6, and CCT8 proteins were more highly expressed in the HNSC tissues than in the normal tissues (Supplement Figure 2). Notably, the expressions of CCT4 and CCT7 were higher in HNSC lymph node metastasis than in the primary site or normal tissue (Figure 7), which indicated their potential role in tumor metastasis process. These results confirmed that CCTs were closely related to HNSC and were of prognosis value.

Figure 5 Validation of CCTs’ differential expression and prognostic values using GEO datasets. (a) Validation of CCTs expression level in GSE30784. The expression status of eight CCTs was positively correlated with the disease status. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. (b) Validation of CCTs’ prognostic value in GSE41613. High CCTs expression groups had significantly lower OS than low CCTs expression groups. Shown is the log-rank P value.
Figure 5

Validation of CCTs’ differential expression and prognostic values using GEO datasets. (a) Validation of CCTs expression level in GSE30784. The expression status of eight CCTs was positively correlated with the disease status. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. (b) Validation of CCTs’ prognostic value in GSE41613. High CCTs expression groups had significantly lower OS than low CCTs expression groups. Shown is the log-rank P value.

Figure 6 Validation of CCT4/7 in the translational level. IHC staining for CCTs in HNSC and normal tissue from the Human Protein Atlas Portal. (a and b) Validation of CCT4 and CCT7 in HNSC primary site, lymph node metastasis, and normal tissue by The Human Protein Atlas database (IHC).
Figure 6

Validation of CCT4/7 in the translational level. IHC staining for CCTs in HNSC and normal tissue from the Human Protein Atlas Portal. (a and b) Validation of CCT4 and CCT7 in HNSC primary site, lymph node metastasis, and normal tissue by The Human Protein Atlas database (IHC).

Figure 7 Genetic expression and alteration analysis associated with CCTs in TCGA HNSC (cBioPortal). (a) The total alteration frequency of eight CCT genes in TCGA HNSC is illustrated. (b) Co-expression heatmap of CCT genes in TCGA HNSC, visualized by the R environment. (c) Oncoprint in the cBioPortal represented the proportion and distribution of samples with alterations in CCTs.
Figure 7

Genetic expression and alteration analysis associated with CCTs in TCGA HNSC (cBioPortal). (a) The total alteration frequency of eight CCT genes in TCGA HNSC is illustrated. (b) Co-expression heatmap of CCT genes in TCGA HNSC, visualized by the R environment. (c) Oncoprint in the cBioPortal represented the proportion and distribution of samples with alterations in CCTs.

3.5 Predicted functions and pathways of the changes in CCTs and their frequently altered neighbor genes in patients with HNSC

We analyzed the CCTs alterations by using the cBioPortal online tool for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (TCGA, Firehose Legacy). CCTs were altered in 276 samples out of 530 patients with HNSC (52%) (Figure 7a). Two or more alterations were detected in almost one third of the samples (93 samples) (Figure 7c). We also calculated the correlations of CCTs with each other by analyzing their mRNA expression (RNA Seq V2 RSEM) via the cBioPortal online tool for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (TCGA, Firehose Legacy), and Pearson’s correlation was included (Figure 7b). The results indicated significant and positive correlations in the following CCTs: CCT1 with CCT3, CCT4, and CCT8; CCT3 with CCT1, CCT4, and CCT7; CCT4 with CCT1, CCT3, CCT5, and CCT7; CCT7 with CCT3, CCT4, and CCT8; and CCT8 with CCT1 and CCT7 (Figure 7b). More correlation heatmaps are presented in Figure S3, which calculated and compared CCT subunits’ correlations in head and neck normal tissues (Figure S3A), in another dataset GSE41613 (Figure S3B), and at different cancer stages (Figure S3C and D). We then constructed the network for CCTs and the 50 most relevant genes on Pathway Commons (https://www.pathwaycommons.org) [35]. In detail, we input the eight CCT subunits to Pathway Commons and chose HNSC as the cancer type of interest. Seventy-seven relevant genes were calculated and presented by the website ranking by relevance. We chose 50 most relevant genes for further analysis. And a matched functional protein association network of the 50 genes was visualized on The Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) (Figure 8). The results showed that cancer pathway-related genes, such as TP53, STAT3, CCNE1, and CCNE2, were closely associated with CCTs alterations, just as previously reported by others [43].

Figure 8 Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network. The PPI network of CCTs and 50 most frequently altered neighbor genes, which includes 58 nodes and 591 edges (PPI enrichment P value < 1.0 × 10−16), visualized by Cytoscape software.
Figure 8

Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network. The PPI network of CCTs and 50 most frequently altered neighbor genes, which includes 58 nodes and 591 edges (PPI enrichment P value < 1.0 × 10−16), visualized by Cytoscape software.

The functions of CCTs and the genes significantly associated with their alterations were predicted by analyzing GO and KEGG in the DAVID. The GO enrichment analysis predicted the functional roles of target genes on the basis of three aspects, including BPs, CCs, and MFs. We found that protein folding, microtubule-based process, and cytoskeleton organization were significantly regulated by the CCTs alterations in HNSC (Figure 9a and Table S3). These genes were largely related to microtubule and extracellular exosome, and were mostly located in cytoplasm or cytosol (Figure 9b and Table S4). Their MF was significantly related to protein binding and ATP binding (Figure 9c and Table S5). The predicted functions and locations were consistent with CCTs’.

Figure 9 Functional enrichment analysis of CCTs and neighbor genes in HNSC. The bubble diagrams display the enrichment results of CCTs and top 50 genes altered in the CCTs neighborhood in HNSC. (a) Biological processes. (b) Cellular components. (c) Molecular functions. (d) KEGG pathways.
Figure 9

Functional enrichment analysis of CCTs and neighbor genes in HNSC. The bubble diagrams display the enrichment results of CCTs and top 50 genes altered in the CCTs neighborhood in HNSC. (a) Biological processes. (b) Cellular components. (c) Molecular functions. (d) KEGG pathways.

KEGG analysis can define the pathways related to the functions of CCTs alterations and the frequently altered neighbor genes. Ten pathways related to the functions of CCTs alterations in HNSC were found through the KEGG analysis (Figure 9d and Table S6). Among these pathways, gap junction, pathways in cancer, phagosome, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway were closely related to the tumorigenesis and pathogenesis of cancer.

4 Discussion

CCTs dysregulation has been reported in many cancers. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to explore the mRNA expression and prognostic values of different CCT genes in head and neck squamous cancer. We hope that our findings will contribute to the available knowledge, improve treatment designs, and enhance the accuracy of prognosis for patients with HNSC.

In the present study, we applied ONCOMINE and TCGA databases to identify the mRNA expression differences of CCTs in HNSC samples and normal tissues. GEPIA and LinkedOmics contributed to comparing the relationship between the mRNA levels of CCTs and the clinicopathological parameters and prognosis. Multiple GEO datasets were used to validate the expression status and prognosis value of CCTs. IHC staining obtained from the HPA database was used to validate the expression difference on a protein level. Functional enrichment analysis of CCTs and most frequently altered genes predicted by Pathway Commons was performed by DAVID.

ONCOMINE consisted of multiple datasets, including DNA-seq data of TCGA, some data from GEO, and many other datasets from literature [44]. It is difficult for us to make comparisons of its comprehensive data. GEPIA and LinkedOmics were both based on the TCGA RNA-seq data [28,29], so the results from these two databases were merely different. Each of these interactive web servers had advantages and disadvantages in terms of application. For example, LinkedOmics could be used to compare detailed clinical information such as age, gender, N stage, etc., while GEPIA could be used to compare the mRNA expression level between the tumor tissue and the normal tissue. These webs simplified the work of downloading and reprocessing the raw data from TCGA and could serve as good assistants for researchers. Distinguishing from the TCGA data, GEO datasets were used for validation. The comparability between the tumor group and the normal group of TCGA HNSC was identified by comparing patients’ gender and age. The impact of age and gender on each CCT mRNA expression in TCGA HNSC samples was also calculated. The results showed that only the CCT4 mRNA expression was related to gender statistically, while others were not related to gender or age. However, the age distribution and gender composition of the patients were similar among different groups. Hence, gender or age has no impact on the CCTs mRNA expression between groups.

In this study, transcriptional levels of CCTs in cancers with those in normal samples indicated that CCTs’ significant overexpression was observed in various types of cancers, including liver cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, and so on. This was consistent with the result of literature review, suggesting that CCTs overexpression was not a tissue-specific phenomenon [15,18,45]. According to GEPIA, the expression level of CCTs in HNSC was all higher than normal tissues, but none of them showed significant differences. The expression levels of CCT4 and CCT7 demonstrated to be significantly associated with the tumor stage of HNSC, and only CCT4 was related to patients’ N stage. Interestingly, most of the CCTs were significantly associated with patients’ OS, as confirmed by GSE41613.

Validation of expression status and prognosis value of CCTs was done using datasets from the GEO database and IHC pictures from the HPA. As shown in Figure 5a, there were significant differences in CCTs expression level among normal, dysplasia, and cancer tissue. The result reflected that the expression status of CCTs was positively correlated with the disease status. On a translational level, the IHC showed that CCT4 and CCT7 were less expressed in HNSC samples than in oral mucosa, but their expressions in lymph node metastasis samples were significantly higher than that of a normal tissue, which further indicated their potential role in cancer migration and metastasis. Furthermore, survival analysis between high and low CCTs groups from the GEO database definitely showed their prognostic values in HNSC.

We cannot ignore the fact that the IHC staining for some CCTs was not higher in HNSC tissues than in normal tissues, despite their mRNA transcription being higher in HNSC tissues. The IHC data were obtained from The Human Protein Atlas database. Although the mRNA expression data of CCTs were from large sample sizes, the IHC data of each CCT were from one or two patients’ tumor tissue. The heterogeneity of biological samples in studying RNA and protein expression levels might be one of the causes. In addition, the translation process from mRNA to proteins might be hampered by mRNA modifications in cancer [46]. The phenomenon of inconsistency of RNA and protein expression levels did exist [47], and further experiments were needed to unveil the possible reasons. Genetic expression and alteration analysis associated with CCTs in TCGA HNSC showed that more than half of the patients possessed at least one CCT subunit alteration. Correlations between CCTs mRNA transcriptional levels in head and neck normal tissues revealed a strong correlation among the eight CCT subunits, which was consistent with their biological function of a multiprotein complex [8]. While the correlation heatmaps in HNSC, from TCGA or GSE41613, differed from those in normal tissues, some CCT subunits barely correlated with each other, suggesting an abnormal function of CCTs in tumor. Such correlations were similar at different cancer clinical stages. Pathway analysis showed that pathways related to the functions of CCTs and neighbor genes included pathways in cancer, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, gap junction, and phagosome, other than expected pathways such as protein folding and microtubule-based process.

PI3K-Akt signaling pathway was one of the most important pathways in HNSC, which was a critical regulatory axis for cell growth, survival, motility, and metabolism in both normal physiology and cancer. TCGA and other studies revealed that the majority of HNSCCs possess alterations in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway [48,49]. In addition, the members of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis interacted with and contributed to the regulation of several other signaling molecules in HNSC, including tumor suppressor, TP53, NF-κB, and MAPK/ERK. Since CCTs were predicted to interact with the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway by a functional enrichment analysis, we presumed that the potential mechanism underlying CCTs’ differential expression and prognostic values in HNSC was a cross talk with the PI3K-Akt pathway. Further experiments were needed to better confirm the findings of this study.

The molecular chaperone network (including chaperons and chaperonins) played a central role in maintaining protein homeostasis and proteome integrity [50,51]. The main substrates for CCT seemed to be involved in the folding of cytoskeletal proteins, such as actins and tubulins [5,6,7], and other intracellular proteins, such as protein phosphatase PP2A regulatory subunit B [52], histone deacetylase [53], and cyclin E1 [54]. In addition, CCT was involved in the regulation of cell cycle progression and cytoskeletal organization [55]. The transcriptions of CCT subunits were apparently increased from the G1/S phase transition to the early phase in the process of cell cycle in murine and human cell lines [13,56]. Reduction of the CCT or CCT subunit could lead to a growth arrest, with a great change in cell morphology and motility [57]. Scientists also deemed that CCT’s function in assisting the folding of actin and tubulin could enhance cell migration related to cancer metastasis [58,59]. Moreover, CCT may be overexpressed in cancer cells [24]. Inevitably, members of the molecular chaperone pathway have been implicated in the development of cancers [60,61,62]. Researches have shown that prooncogenic proteins, such as STAT3, p53, CDC20, and tumor suppressor VHL [10,11,12,13], were mediated by CCTs, which partly explained their role in oncogenesis.

The CCTs are essential for cell survival, correct folding and for the function of diverse proteins. Each CCT subunit is the product of an individual gene [63]. However, at present, it is still unclear whether or not the eight subunits form a single particle and cover all functions, and whether they exist as individual subunits or smaller complexes. For example, CCT4 and CCT5 homo-oligomers have been found to form 8-fold double rings without the other subunits. And the CCT4 or CCT5 oligomer rings exhibited activities of ATP hydrolysis and protein folding, comparable to the TRiC ring [64]. CCT4 associates with the plasma membrane and alters the cell shape [65], whereas CCT5 regulates actin expression via the serum response factor pathway [66]. As increasing information on the individual roles played by CCTs components is being accumulated, the possibility of subunit-specific roles for these proteins in cell growth and tumorigenesis also needs to be considered [67].

CCT subunits are also irregulated in different types of cancers. For instance, CCT1 and CCT2 are upregulated in patients with HCC and colonic cancer and correlate with tumor proliferation and poor prognosis [56]. CCT3 is widely studied in different cancers. CCT3 is overexpressed in gastric cancer, and CCT3 knockdown can also suppress the proliferation and induce cell apoptosis in gastric cancer [68] and papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) [45]. CCT4 participates in protein CCT6A as a potential prognostic biomarker in glioblastoma [69]. CCT7 effectively regulates VHL proteostasis, which is responsible for sporadic renal cell carcinoma [70]. CCT8 can promote the migration and invasion of esophageal squamous carcinoma by regulating actin and tubulin [71]. And CCT8 has been reported to be upregulated in colon cancer and HCC [56,72]. These studies concluded, as we do, that CCT subunit expression could be a marker of cancer.

We acknowledge that there were some limitations and shortcomings in this study. First, head and neck squamous cancer consists of various types of cancers derived from different anatomic sites, such as pharynx, oral cavity, tongue, larynx, upper esophagus, etc. They have the same histological type of squamous cell carcinoma, but also have different prognoses and responses to treatment due to anatomic differences. This study was mainly focused on the available data of ONCOMINE and TCGA, whose HNSCs were mostly comprised of cancer from the oral cavity and tongue. Hence, a data bias of the cancer type was difficult to be avoided. Second, this study was mainly conducted by the data mining of an online public database. The results were analyzed by the methodology but not validated fully by experiments. Third, more datasets should be involved to obtain a solid result. The datasets for validation, GSE30784 and GSE41613, were from the same departments and using the same array in analysis. Although they had different sets of data and different roles for validation, datasets with demographic diversity were of better reliability.

Here, we systemically analyzed the expression and prognostic values of CCTs in HNSC and provided a better understanding of the heterogeneity and complexity of the molecular biological properties of HNSC. Our results implied that CCT3/4/6/7/8 were promising prognostic biomarkers for the improvement of HNSC survival and prognostic accuracy.

Abbreviations

CCT

Chaperonin-containing T-complex protein 1

TRiC

T-complex protein-1 ring complex

HNSC

Head and neck squamous cancer

DAVID

Database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery

PPI

Protein–protein interaction

GEPIA

Gene expression profiling interactive analysis

STRING

Search tool for the retrieval of interacting genes

OS

Overall survival

STAT3

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

CDC20

Cell cycle regulatory proteins cell division cycle protein 20

VHL

Von Hippel–Lindau

HCC

Hepatocellular carcinoma

TCGA

The cancer genome atlas

LN

Lymph node

IHC

Immunohistochemistry

HPA

Human protein atlas

GO

gene ontology

CC

Cellular component

BP

Biological process

MF

Molecular function

KEGG

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes

HSP

Heat shock protein

PI3K

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase

Akt

Protein kinase B

mTOR

Mammalian target of rapamycin

NF-κB

Nuclear factor-kappa B

MAPK

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

ERK

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase


tel: +86 13126606616, fax: +86-10-68230869

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Research and Development Project of Scientific Research Instruments and Equipment of the Chinese Academy of Sciences – major instruments project (YJKYYQ20180039) and the Digestive Medical Coordinated Development Center of Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals (No. XXZ0604).

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

  2. Author contributions: YD and LL conceived and designed the research. YD and ZW acquired and analyzed the data. YD, ZW, and SL interpreted the results. YD and SL prepared figures and tables. YD and LL drafted, edited, and revised manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work is appropriately investigated and resolved.

  3. Availability of data and materials: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the ONCOMINE (www.oncomine.org), the Human Protein Atlas (http://www.proteinatlas.org), TCGA (https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/ccg/research/structural-genomics/tcga), and GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds/) repositories.

  4. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Approval by a local Ethics Committee was not needed because all data used in this study were publicly available and open-access. All the datasets were retrieved from the publishing literature, so it was confirmed that all written informed consent was obtained.

  5. Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.

References

[1] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA A Cancer J Clinic. 2018;68(1):7–30.10.3322/caac.21442Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bose P, Brockton NT, Dort JC. Head and neck cancer: from anatomy to biology. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(9):2013–23.10.1002/ijc.28112Search in Google Scholar

[3] Hartl FU, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature. 2011;475(7356):324–32.10.1038/nature10317Search in Google Scholar

[4] Yam AY, Xia Y, Lin H-TJ, Burlingame A, Gerstein M, Frydman J. Defining the TRiC/CCT interactome links chaperonin function to stabilization of newly made proteins with complex topologies. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15(12):1255–62.10.1038/nsmb.1515Search in Google Scholar

[5] Gao Y, Thomas JO, Chow RL, Lee GH, Cowan NJ. A cytoplasmic chaperonin that catalyzes beta-actin folding. Cell. 1992;69(6):1043–50.10.1016/0092-8674(92)90622-JSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Frydman J, Nimmesgern E, Erdjument-Bromage H, Wall JS, Tempst P, Hartl FU. Function in protein folding of TRiC, a cytosolic ring complex containing TCP-1 and structurally related subunits. EMBO J. 1992;11:4767–78.10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05582.xSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Ursic D, Culbertson MR. The yeast homolog to mouse Tcp-1 affects microtubule-mediated processes. Mol Cell Biol. 1991;11(5):2629–40.10.1128/MCB.11.5.2629Search in Google Scholar

[8] Spiess C, Meyer AS, Reissmann S, Frydman J. Mechanism of the eukaryotic chaperonin: protein folding in the chamber of secrets. Trends Cell Biol. 2004;14:598–604.10.1016/j.tcb.2004.09.015Search in Google Scholar

[9] Carrascosa JL, Llorca O, Valpuesta JM. Structural comparison of prokaryotic and eukaryotic chaperonins. Micron. 2001;32(1):43–50.10.1016/S0968-4328(00)00027-5Search in Google Scholar

[10] McClellan AJ, Scott MD, Frydman J. Folding and quality control of the VHL tumor suppressor proceed through distinct chaperone pathways. Cell. 2005;121(5):739–48.10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Trinidad AG, Muller PAJ, Cuellar J, Klejnot M, Nobis M, Valpuesta JM, et al. Interaction of p53 with the CCT complex promotes protein folding and wild-type p53 activity. Mol Cell. 2013;50(6):805–17.10.1016/j.molcel.2013.05.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Kasembeli M, Lau WCY, Roh S-H, Eckols TK, Frydman J, Chiu W, et al. Modulation of STAT3 folding and function by TRiC/CCT chaperonin. PLoS Biol. 2014;12:e1001844.10.1371/journal.pbio.1001844Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Yokota S, Yanagi H, Yura T, Kubota H. Cytosolic chaperonin is up-regulated during cell growth. Preferential expression and binding to tubulin at G(1)/S transition through early S phase. J Biol Chem. 1999;52:37070–8.10.1074/jbc.274.52.37070Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Chen L, Zhang Z, Qiu J. Chaperonin CCT-mediated AIB1 folding promotes the growth of ER alpha-positive breast cancer cells on hard substrates. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e96085.10.1371/journal.pone.0096085Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Guest ST, Kratche ZR, Bollig-Fischer A, Haddad R, Ethier SP. Two members of the TRiC chaperonin complex, CCT2 and TCP1 are essential for survival of breast cancer cells and are linked to driving oncogenes. Exp Cell Res. 2015;332(2):223–35.10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.02.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Bassiouni R, Nemec KN, A, Iketani, Flores O, Showalter A, et al. Chaperonin containing TCP-1 protein level in breast cancer cells predicts therapeutic application of a cytotoxic peptide. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(17):4366–79.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2502Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Seiden-Long IM, Brown KR, Shih W, Wigle DA, Radulovich N, Jurisica I, et al. Transcriptional targets of hepatocyte growth factor signaling and Ki-ras oncogene activation in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25(1):91–102.10.1038/sj.onc.1209005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Coghlin C, Carpenter B, Dundas SR, Lawrie LC, Telfer C, Murray GI. Characterization and over-expression of chaperonin t-complex proteins in colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 2006;210:351–7.10.1002/path.2056Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] LLeonart ME, Vidal F, Gallardo D, Diaz-Fuertes M, Rojo F, Cuatrecasas M, et al. New p53 related genes in human tumors: significant downregulation in colon and lung carcinomas. Oncol Rep. 2006;16:603–8.10.3892/or.16.3.603Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Lin Y-F, Tsai W-P, Liu H-G, Liang P-H. Intracellular β-tubulin/chaperonin containing TCP1-β complex serves as a novel chemotherapeutic target against drug-resistant tumors. Cancer Res. 2009;69(17):6879–88.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4700Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Macleod K, Mullen P, Sewell J, Rabiasz G, Lawrie S, Miller E, et al. Altered ErbB receptor signaling and gene expression in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;(15):6789–800.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2684Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wei Y, Wu J, Zhang P, Shen S, et al. Molecular chaperone CCT3 supports proper mitotic progression and cell proliferation in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2016;372(1):101–9.10.1016/j.canlet.2015.12.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Myung J-K, Afjehi-Sadat L, Felizardo-Cabatic M, Slavc I, Lubec G. Expressional patterns of chaperones in ten human tumor cell lines. Proteome Sci. 2004;2:8.10.1186/1477-5956-2-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Boudiaf-Benmammar C, Cresteil T, Melki R. The cytosolic chaperonin CCT/TRiC and cancer cell proliferation. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60895.10.1371/journal.pone.0060895Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Gehrmann M, Specht HM, Bayer C. Hsp70 – a biomarker for tumor detection and monitoring of outcome of radiation therapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:131.10.1186/1748-717X-9-131Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[26] Sealfon SC, Chu TT. RNA and DNA microarrays. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;671:3–34.10.1007/978-1-59745-551-0_1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Rhodes DR, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Mahavisno V, Varambally R, Yu J, Briggs BB, et al. Oncomine 3.0: genes, pathways, and networks in a collection of 18,000 cancer gene expression profiles. Neoplasia. 2007;9(2):166–80.10.1593/neo.07112Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C, Zhang Z. GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(W1):W98–W102.10.1093/nar/gkx247Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Vasaikar S, Straub P, Wang J, Zhang B. LinkedOmics: analyzing multi-omics data within and across 32 cancer types. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D956–63.10.1093/nar/gkx1090Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Bouliotis G, Billingham L. Crossing survival curves: alternatives to the logrank test. Trials. 2011;12:A137.10.1186/1745-6215-12-S1-A137Search in Google Scholar

[31] Li H, Han D, Hou Y, Chen H, Chen Z. Statistical inference methods for two crossing survival curves: a comparison of methods. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0116774.10.1371/journal.pone.0116774Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[32] Ponten F, Jirstrom K, Uhlen M. The Human Protein Atlas – a tool for pathology. J Pathol. 2008;216(4):387–93.10.1002/path.2440Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Gao J, Aksoy B, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer S, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6(269):pl1.10.1126/scisignal.2004088Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[34] Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discovery. 2012;2(5):401–4.10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Rodchenkov I, Babur O, Luna A, Aksoy BA, Wong JV, Fong D, et al. Pathway commons 2019 update: integration, analysis and exploration of pathway data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;48(D1):D489–97.10.1093/nar/gkz946Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[36] Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang P-L, Ideker T. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics. 2010;27(3):431–2.10.1093/bioinformatics/btq675Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[37] Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44–57.10.1038/nprot.2008.211Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Gene Ontology Consortium. The gene ontology (GO) project in 2006. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D322–6.10.1093/nar/gkj021Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[39] Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D457–62.10.1093/nar/gkv1070Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[40] Pyeon D, Newton MA, Lambert PF, den Boon JA, Sengupta S, Marsit CJ, et al. Fundamental differences in cell cycle deregulation in human papillomavirus-positive and human papillomavirus-negative head/neck and cervical cancers. Cancer Res. 2007;67(10):4605–19.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3619Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[41] Estilo CL, Oc P, Talbot S, Socci ND, Carlson DL, Ghossein R, et al. Oral tongue cancer gene expression profiling: identification of novel potential prognosticators by oligonucleotide microarray analysis. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:11.10.1186/1471-2407-9-11Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[42] Talbot SG, Estilo C, Maghami E, Sarkaria IS, Pham DK, Oc P, et al. Gene expression profiling allows distinction between primary and metastatic squamous cell carcinomas in the lung. Cancer Res. 2005;65(8):3063–71.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1985Search in Google Scholar

[43] Roh S-H, Kasembeli M, Bakthavatsalam D, Chiu W, Tweardy DJ. Contribution of the type II chaperonin, TRiC/CCT, to oncogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;(11):26706–20.10.3390/ijms161125975Search in Google Scholar

[44] Rhodes DR, Yu J, Shanker K, Deshpande N, Varambally R, Ghosh D, et al. ONCOMINE: a cancer microarray database and integrated data-mining platform. Neoplasia. 2004;6:1–6.10.1016/S1476-5586(04)80047-2Search in Google Scholar

[45] Shi X, Cheng S, Wang W. Suppression of CCT3 inhibits malignant proliferation of human papillary thyroid carcinoma cell. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(6):9202–8.10.3892/ol.2018.8496Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[46] Frye M, Harada BT, Behm M, He C. RNA modifications modulate gene expression during development. Science. 2018;361(6409):1346–9.10.1126/science.aau1646Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[47] Klooster R, Straasheijm K, Shah B, Sowden J, Frants R, Thornton C, et al. Comprehensive expression analysis of FSHD candidate genes at the mRNA and protein level. Eur J Hum Genet EJHG. 2009;17(12):1615–24.10.1038/ejhg.2009.62Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[48] Hayes DN, Grandis J, El-Naggar AK. Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the Cancer Genome Atlas. Cancer Res. 2013;73(Suppl 8):1117.10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-1117Search in Google Scholar

[49] Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature. 2015;517(7536):576–82.10.1038/nature14129Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[50] Balch WE, Morimoto RI, Dillin A, Kelly JW. Adapting proteostasis for disease intervention. Science. 2008;319:916–9.10.1126/science.1141448Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Morimoto RI. Proteotoxic stress and inducible chaperone networks in neurodegenerative disease and aging. Genes Dev. 2008;22(11):1427–38.10.1101/gad.1657108Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[52] Siegers K, Bölter B, Schwarz JP, Böttcher UM, Guha S, Hartl FU. TRiC/CCT cooperates with different upstream chaperones in the folding of distinct protein classes. EMBO J. 2003;22(19):5230–40.10.1093/emboj/cdg483Search in Google Scholar

[53] Guenther MG, Yu J, Kao GD, Yen TJ, Lazar MA. Assembly of the SMRT-histone deacetylase 3 repression complex requires the TCP-1 ring complex. Genes Dev. 2002;16(24):3130–5.10.1101/gad.1037502Search in Google Scholar

[54] Won KA, Schumacher RJ, Farr GW, Horwich AL, Reed SI. Maturation of human cyclin E requires the function of eukaryotic chaperonin CCT. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18(12):7584–9.10.1128/MCB.18.12.7584Search in Google Scholar

[55] Thulasiraman V, Yang CF, Frydman J. In vivo newly translated polypeptides are sequestered in a protected folding environment. EMBO J. 1999;18(1):85–95.10.1093/emboj/18.1.85Search in Google Scholar

[56] Yokota S, Yamamoto Y, Shimizu K, Momoi H, Kamikawa T, Yamaoka Y, et al. Increased expression of cytosolic chaperonin CCT in human hepatocellular and colonic carcinoma. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2001;6(4):345–50.10.1379/1466-1268(2001)006<0345:IEOCCC>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[57] Grantham J, Brackley KI, Willison KR. Substantial CCT activity is required for cell cycle progression and cytoskeletal organization in mammalian cells. Exp Cell Res. 2006;12:2309–24.10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.03.028Search in Google Scholar

[58] Poon TCW, Wong N, Lai PBS, Rattray M, Johnson PJ, Sung JJY. A tumor progression model for hepatocellular carcinoma: bioinformatic analysis of genomic data. Gastroenterology. 2007;131(4):1262–70.10.1053/j.gastro.2006.08.014Search in Google Scholar

[59] Gu J, Xuan Z. Inferring the perturbed microRNA regulatory networks in cancer using hierarchical gene co-expression signatures. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e81032.10.1371/journal.pone.0081032Search in Google Scholar

[60] Calderwood SK, Khaleque MA, Sawyer DB, Ciocca DR. Heat shock proteins in cancer: chaperones of tumorigenesis. Trends Biochemical Sci. 2006;31:164–72.10.1016/j.tibs.2006.01.006Search in Google Scholar

[61] Santagata S, Hu R, Lin NU, Mendillo ML, Collins LC, Hankinson SE, et al. High levels of nuclear heat-shock factor 1 (HSF1) are associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(45):18378.10.1073/pnas.1115031108Search in Google Scholar

[62] Whitesell L, Lindquist SL. HSP90 and the chaperoning of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(10):761–72.10.1038/nrc1716Search in Google Scholar

[63] Kubota H, Hynes G, Carne A, Ashworth A, Willison K. Identification of six Tcp-1-related genes encoding divergent subunits of the TCP-1-containing chaperonin. Curr Biol. 1994;4(2):89–99.10.1016/S0960-9822(94)00024-2Search in Google Scholar

[64] Sergeeva OA, Chen B, Haase-Pettingell C, Ludtke SJ, Chiu W, King JA. Human CCT4 and CCT5 chaperonin subunits expressed in Escherichia coli form biologically active homo-oligomers. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(24):17734–44.10.1074/jbc.M112.443929Search in Google Scholar

[65] Spiess M, Echbarthi M, Svanström A, Karlsson R, Grantham J. Over-expression analysis of all eight subunits of the molecular chaperone CCT in mammalian cells reveals a novel function for CCT delta. J Mol Biol. 2015;427(17):2757–64.10.1016/j.jmb.2015.06.007Search in Google Scholar

[66] Elliott KL, Svanstrom A, Spiess M, Karlsson R, Grantham J. A novel function of the monomeric CCT epsilon subunit connects the serum response factor pathway to chaperone-mediated actin folding. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;26(15):2801–9.10.1091/mbc.E15-01-0048Search in Google Scholar

[67] Lawrie LC, Fothergill JE, Murray GI. Spot the differences: proteomics in cancer research. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2(5):270–7.10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00321-1Search in Google Scholar

[68] Li L-J, Zhang L-S, Han Z-J, He Z-Y, Chen H, Li Y-M. Chaperonin containing TCP-1 subunit 3 is critical for gastric cancer growth. Oncotarget. 2017;(67):111470–81.10.18632/oncotarget.22838Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[69] Liu Y, Yu L, Wu X, Chen Y, Ge J, Li Q, et al. Silencing CCT6A suppresses cell migration and invasion in glioblastoma in vitro. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2017;10(9):13263–71.Search in Google Scholar

[70] Ding Z, German P, Bai S, Sun M, Liu X, Jonasch E. Modulation of TRiC/CCT and proteasome regulates VHL proteostasis and functionality. BJU Int. 2012;17–8.10.1177/1087057112436557Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[71] Yang X, Ren H, Shao Y. Chaperonin-containing T-complex protein 1 subunit 8 promotes cell migration and invasion in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by regulating alpha-actin and beta-tubulin expression. Int J Oncol. 2018;52(6):2021–30.10.3892/ijo.2018.4335Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[72] Huang X, Wang X, Cheng C, Cai J, He S, Wang H, et al. Chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 8 (CCT8) is upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma and promotes HCC proliferation. APMIS Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand; 2014.10.1111/apm.12258Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[73] Sengupta S, den Boon JA, Chen IH, Newton MA, Dahl DB, Chen M, et al. Genome-wide expression profiling reveals EBV-associated inhibition of MHC class I expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2006;66(16):7999–6.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4399Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-03-27
Revised: 2020-05-30
Accepted: 2020-06-18
Published Online: 2020-07-13

© 2020 Yanbo Dong et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Article
  2. MicroRNA-451b participates in coronary heart disease by targeting VEGFA
  3. Case Report
  4. A combination therapy for Kawasaki disease with severe complications: a case report
  5. Vitamin E for prevention of biofilm-caused Healthcare-associated infections
  6. Research Article
  7. Differential diagnosis: retroperitoneal fibrosis and oncological diseases
  8. Optimization of the Convolutional Neural Networks for Automatic Detection of Skin Cancer
  9. NEAT1 promotes LPS-induced inflammatory injury in macrophages by regulating miR-17-5p/TLR4
  10. Plasma matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 as prognostic biomarkers in critically ill patients
  11. Effects of extracorporeal magnetic stimulation in fecal incontinence
  12. Case Report
  13. Mixed germ cell tumor of the endometrium: a case report and literature review
  14. Bowel perforation after ventriculoperitoneal-shunt placement: case report and review of the literature
  15. Research Article
  16. Prognostic value of lncRNA HOTAIR in colorectal cancer : a meta-analysis
  17. Case Report
  18. Treatment of insulinomas by laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation: case reports and literature review
  19. Research Article
  20. The characteristics and nomogram for primary lung papillary adenocarcinoma
  21. Undiagnosed pheochromocytoma presenting as a pancreatic tumor: A case report
  22. Bioinformatics Analysis of the Expression of ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 3 (ABCC3) in Human Glioma
  23. Diagnostic value of recombinant heparin-binding hemagglutinin adhesin protein in spinal tuberculosis
  24. Primary cutaneous DLBCL non-GCB type: challenges of a rare case
  25. LINC00152 knock-down suppresses esophageal cancer by EGFR signaling pathway
  26. Case Report
  27. Life-threatening anaemia in patient with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (Rendu-Osler-Weber syndrome)
  28. Research Article
  29. QTc interval predicts disturbed circadian blood pressure variation
  30. Shoulder ultrasound in the diagnosis of the suprascapular neuropathy in athletes
  31. The number of negative lymph nodes is positively associated with survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients in China
  32. Differentiation of pontine infarction by size
  33. RAF1 expression is correlated with HAF, a parameter of liver computed tomographic perfusion, and may predict the early therapeutic response to sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients
  34. LncRNA ZEB1-AS1 regulates colorectal cancer cells by miR-205/YAP1 axis
  35. Tissue coagulation in laser hemorrhoidoplasty – an experimental study
  36. Classification of pathological types of lung cancer from CT images by deep residual neural networks with transfer learning strategy
  37. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Lung Cancer Patients
  38. Case Report
  39. Streptococcus pneumoniae-associated thrombotic microangiopathy in an immunosuppressed adult
  40. Research Article
  41. The characterization of Enterococcus genus: resistance mechanisms and inflammatory bowel disease
  42. Case Report
  43. Inflammatory fibroid polyp: an unusual cause of abdominal pain in the upper gastrointestinal tract A case report
  44. Research Article
  45. microRNA-204-5p participates in atherosclerosis via targeting MMP-9
  46. LncRNA LINC00152 promotes laryngeal cancer progression by sponging miR-613
  47. Can keratin scaffolds be used for creating three-dimensional cell cultures?
  48. miRNA-186 improves sepsis induced renal injury via PTEN/PI3K/AKT/P53 pathway
  49. Case Report
  50. Delayed bowel perforation after routine distal loopogram prior to ileostomy closure
  51. Research Article
  52. Diagnostic accuracy of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for the direct identification of clinical pathogens from urine
  53. The R219K polymorphism of the ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 1 gene and susceptibility to ischemic stroke in Chinese population
  54. miR-92 regulates the proliferation, migration, invasion and apoptosis of glioma cells by targeting neogenin
  55. Clinicopathological features of programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
  56. NF2 inhibits proliferation and cancer stemness in breast cancer
  57. Body composition indices and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes. CV biomarkers are not related to body composition
  58. S100A6 promotes proliferation and migration of HepG2 cells via increased ubiquitin-dependent degradation of p53
  59. Review Article
  60. Focus on localized laryngeal amyloidosis: management of five cases
  61. Research Article
  62. NEAT1 aggravates sepsis-induced acute kidney injury by sponging miR-22-3p
  63. Pericentric inversion in chromosome 1 and male infertility
  64. Increased atherogenic index in the general hearing loss population
  65. Prognostic role of SIRT6 in gastrointestinal cancers: a meta-analysis
  66. The complexity of molecular processes in osteoarthritis of the knee joint
  67. Interleukin-6 gene −572 G > C polymorphism and myocardial infarction risk
  68. Case Report
  69. Severe anaphylactic reaction to cisatracurium during anesthesia with cross-reactivity to atracurium
  70. Research Article
  71. Rehabilitation training improves nerve injuries by affecting Notch1 and SYN
  72. Case Report
  73. Myocardial amyloidosis following multiple myeloma in a 38-year-old female patient: A case report
  74. Research Article
  75. Identification of the hub genes RUNX2 and FN1 in gastric cancer
  76. miR-101-3p sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells to irradiation
  77. Distinct functions and prognostic values of RORs in gastric cancer
  78. Clinical impact of post-mortem genetic testing in cardiac death and cardiomyopathy
  79. Efficacy of pembrolizumab for advanced/metastatic melanoma: a meta-analysis
  80. Review Article
  81. The role of osteoprotegerin in the development, progression and management of abdominal aortic aneurysms
  82. Research Article
  83. Identification of key microRNAs of plasma extracellular vesicles and their diagnostic and prognostic significance in melanoma
  84. miR-30a-3p participates in the development of asthma by targeting CCR3
  85. microRNA-491-5p protects against atherosclerosis by targeting matrix metallopeptidase-9
  86. Bladder-embedded ectopic intrauterine device with calculus
  87. Case Report
  88. Mycobacterial identification on homogenised biopsy facilitates the early diagnosis and treatment of laryngeal tuberculosis
  89. Research Article
  90. The will of young minors in the terminal stage of sickness: A case report
  91. Extended perfusion protocol for MS lesion quantification
  92. Identification of four genes associated with cutaneous metastatic melanoma
  93. Case Report
  94. Thalidomide-induced serious RR interval prolongation (longest interval >5.0 s) in multiple myeloma patient with rectal cancer: A case report
  95. Research Article
  96. Voluntary exercise and cardiac remodeling in a myocardial infarction model
  97. Electromyography as an intraoperative test to assess the quality of nerve anastomosis – experimental study on rats
  98. Case Report
  99. CT findings of severe novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A case report of Heilongjiang Province, China
  100. Commentary
  101. Directed differentiation into insulin-producing cells using microRNA manipulation
  102. Research Article
  103. Culture-negative infective endocarditis (CNIE): impact on postoperative mortality
  104. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome
  105. Plasma microRNAs in human left ventricular reverse remodelling
  106. Bevacizumab for non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis: A meta-analysis
  107. Risk factors for cerebral vasospasm in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
  108. Problems and solutions of personal protective equipment doffing in COVID-19
  109. Evaluation of COVID-19 based on ACE2 expression in normal and cancer patients
  110. Review Article
  111. Gastroenterological complications in kidney transplant patients
  112. Research Article
  113. CXCL13 concentration in latent syphilis patients with treatment failure
  114. A novel age-biomarker-clinical history prognostic index for heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction
  115. Case Report
  116. Clinicopathological analysis of composite lymphoma: A two-case report and literature review
  117. Trastuzumab-induced thrombocytopenia after eight cycles of trastuzumab treatment
  118. Research Article
  119. Inhibition of vitamin D analog eldecalcitol on hepatoma in vitro and in vivo
  120. CCTs as new biomarkers for the prognosis of head and neck squamous cancer
  121. Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on adipokine level of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in rats fed high-fat diet
  122. 72 hour Holter monitoring, 7 day Holter monitoring, and 30 day intermittent patient-activated heart rhythm recording in detecting arrhythmias in cryptogenic stroke patients free from arrhythmia in a screening 24 h Holter
  123. FOXK2 downregulation suppresses EMT in hepatocellular carcinoma
  124. Case Report
  125. Total parenteral nutrition-induced Wernicke’s encephalopathy after oncologic gastrointestinal surgery
  126. Research Article
  127. Clinical prediction for outcomes of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure associated with HBV infection: A new model establishment
  128. Case Report
  129. Combination of chest CT and clinical features for diagnosis of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia
  130. Research Article
  131. Clinical significance and potential mechanisms of miR-223-3p and miR-204-5p in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: a study based on TCGA and GEO
  132. Review Article
  133. Hemoperitoneum caused by spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma in noncirrhotic liver. A case report and systematic review
  134. Research Article
  135. Voltage-dependent anion channels mediated apoptosis in refractory epilepsy
  136. Prognostic factors in stage I gastric cancer: A retrospective analysis
  137. Circulating irisin is linked to bone mineral density in geriatric Chinese men
  138. Case Report
  139. A family study of congenital dysfibrinogenemia caused by a novel mutation in the FGA gene: A case report
  140. Research Article
  141. CBCT for estimation of the cemento-enamel junction and crestal bone of anterior teeth
  142. Case Report
  143. Successful de-escalation antibiotic therapy using cephamycins for sepsis caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia: A sequential 25-case series
  144. Research Article
  145. Influence factors of extra-articular manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis
  146. Assessment of knowledge of use of electronic cigarette and its harmful effects among young adults
  147. Predictive factors of progression to severe COVID-19
  148. Procedural sedation and analgesia for percutaneous trans-hepatic biliary drainage: Randomized clinical trial for comparison of two different concepts
  149. Acute chemoradiotherapy toxicity in cervical cancer patients
  150. IGF-1 regulates the growth of fibroblasts and extracellular matrix deposition in pelvic organ prolapse
  151. NANOG regulates the proliferation of PCSCs via the TGF-β1/SMAD pathway
  152. An immune-relevant signature of nine genes as a prognostic biomarker in patients with gastric carcinoma
  153. Computer-aided diagnosis of skin cancer based on soft computing techniques
  154. MiR-1225-5p acts as tumor suppressor in glioblastoma via targeting FNDC3B
  155. miR-300/FA2H affects gastric cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis
  156. Hybrid treatment of fibroadipose vascular anomaly: A case report
  157. Surgical treatment for common hepatic aneurysm. Original one-step technique
  158. Neuropsychiatric symptoms, quality of life and caregivers’ burden in dementia
  159. Predictor of postoperative dyspnea for Pierre Robin Sequence infants
  160. Long non-coding RNA FOXD2-AS1 promotes cell proliferation, metastasis and EMT in glioma by sponging miR-506-5p
  161. Analysis of expression and prognosis of KLK7 in ovarian cancer
  162. Circular RNA circ_SETD2 represses breast cancer progression via modulating the miR-155-5p/SCUBE2 axis
  163. Glial cell induced neural differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells
  164. Case Report
  165. Moraxella lacunata infection accompanied by acute glomerulonephritis
  166. Research Article
  167. Diagnosis of complication in lung transplantation by TBLB + ROSE + mNGS
  168. Case Report
  169. Endometrial cancer in a renal transplant recipient: A case report
  170. Research Article
  171. Downregulation of lncRNA FGF12-AS2 suppresses the tumorigenesis of NSCLC via sponging miR-188-3p
  172. Case Report
  173. Splenic abscess caused by Streptococcus anginosus bacteremia secondary to urinary tract infection: a case report and literature review
  174. Research Article
  175. Advances in the role of miRNAs in the occurrence and development of osteosarcoma
  176. Rheumatoid arthritis increases the risk of pleural empyema
  177. Effect of miRNA-200b on the proliferation and apoptosis of cervical cancer cells by targeting RhoA
  178. LncRNA NEAT1 promotes gastric cancer progression via miR-1294/AKT1 axis
  179. Key pathways in prostate cancer with SPOP mutation identified by bioinformatic analysis
  180. Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparins in thromboprophylaxis of major orthopaedic surgery – randomized, prospective pilot study
  181. Case Report
  182. A case of SLE with COVID-19 and multiple infections
  183. Research Article
  184. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0007121 regulates proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition of trophoblast cells by miR-182-5p/PGF axis in preeclampsia
  185. SRPX2 boosts pancreatic cancer chemoresistance by activating PI3K/AKT axis
  186. Case Report
  187. A case report of cervical pregnancy after in vitro fertilization complicated by tuberculosis and a literature review
  188. Review Article
  189. Serrated lesions of the colon and rectum: Emergent epidemiological data and molecular pathways
  190. Research Article
  191. Biological properties and therapeutic effects of plant-derived nanovesicles
  192. Case Report
  193. Clinical characterization of chromosome 5q21.1–21.3 microduplication: A case report
  194. Research Article
  195. Serum calcium levels correlates with coronary artery disease outcomes
  196. Rapunzel syndrome with cholangitis and pancreatitis – A rare case report
  197. Review Article
  198. A review of current progress in triple-negative breast cancer therapy
  199. Case Report
  200. Peritoneal-cutaneous fistula successfully treated at home: A case report and literature review
  201. Research Article
  202. Trim24 prompts tumor progression via inducing EMT in renal cell carcinoma
  203. Degradation of connexin 50 protein causes waterclefts in human lens
  204. GABRD promotes progression and predicts poor prognosis in colorectal cancer
  205. The lncRNA UBE2R2-AS1 suppresses cervical cancer cell growth in vitro
  206. LncRNA FOXD3-AS1/miR-135a-5p function in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells
  207. MicroRNA-182-5p relieves murine allergic rhinitis via TLR4/NF-κB pathway
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/med-2020-0114/html
Scroll to top button