Home Uniform topology on EQ-algebras
Article Open Access

Uniform topology on EQ-algebras

  • Jiang Yang , Xiao Long Xin EMAIL logo and Peng Fei He
Published/Copyright: April 14, 2017

Abstract

In this paper, we use filters of an EQ-algebra E to induce a uniform structure (E, 𝓚), and then the part 𝓚 induce a uniform topology 𝒯 in E. We prove that the pair (E, 𝒯) is a topological EQ-algebra, and some properties of (E, 𝒯) are investigated. In particular, we show that (E, 𝒯) is a first-countable, zero-dimensional, disconnected and completely regular space. Finally, by using convergence of nets, the convergence of topological EQ-algebras is obtained.

MSC 2010: 06F99; 54E15

1 Introduction

EQ-algebras were proposed by Novák [1] with the introduction of developing an algebraic structure of truth values for fuzzy type theory (F T T). It has three basic binary operations (meet, multiplication and a fuzzy equality) and a top element. In Novák et al. [2], the study of EQ-algebras has been further deepened. Moreover, the axioms originally introduced in [1] have been slightly modified. Motivated by the assumption that the truth values in F T T were either an IMTL-algebra, a BL-algebra or an MV-algebra, all the algebras above are special kinds of residuated lattices with monoidal operation (multiplication) and its residuum. The latter is a natural interpretation of implication in fuzzy logic; the equivalence is then interpreted by the biresiduum, a derived operation. From the algebraic point of view, the class of EQ-algebras generalizes, in a certain sense, the class of residuated lattices and so, they may become an interesting class of algebraic structures as such. Some interesting consequences of EQ-algebras were obtained (see [3-5]).

The concept of a uniform space can be considered either as axiomatizations of some geometric notions, close to but quite independent of the concept of a topological space, or as convenient tools for an investigation of topological space. In the paper [6], Haveshki et al. considered a collection of filters and used the congruence relation with respect to filters to define a uniformity and turned the BL-algebra into a uniform topological space. Then Ghorbani and Hasankhani [7] defined uniform topology and quotient topology on a quotient residuated lattice and proved these topologies coincide. Furthermore, many mathematicians have endowed a number of algebraic structures associated with logical systems with topology and have found some of their properties. In [8], Hoo introduced topological MV-algebras and obtained some interesting results. Hoo’s mainly work reveals that the essential ingredients are the existence of an adjoint pair of operations and the fact that ideals of MV-algebras correspond to their congruences. Nganou and Tebu [9] generalized Hoo’s work to FLew-algebras. They considered a similar approach to study FLew-algebras. Ciungu [10] investigated some concepts of convergence in the class of perfect BL-algebras. Mi Ko and Kim [11] studied relationships between closure operators and BL-algebras. In [12, 13], Borzooei et al. studied metrizability on (semi)topological BL-algebras and the relationship between separation axioms and (semi)topological quotient BL-algebras. As EQ-algebras are the generalizations of residuated lattices which the adjoint property failed, our study of uniform topologies in EQ-algebras is meaningful.

This paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we recall some facts about EQ-algebras and topologies, which are needed in the sequel. In Section 3, in order to induce uniform topology, we use the class of filters of EQ-algebras to construct uniform structures. In Section 4, using the given concept of topological EQ-algebras, we show that EQ-algebras with the uniform topology are topological EQ-algebras, and also some properties are obtained.

2 Preliminaries

In this section, we summarize some definitions and results about EQ-algebras, which will be used in the following sections of this paper.

Definition 2.1

([2, 14]). An EQ-algebra is an algebra E = (E, ∧, ⊗, ∼, 1) of type (2,2,2,0) satisfying the following axioms:

(E1) (E, ∧, 1) is a ∧-semilattice with top element 1. We put xy if and only if xy = x;

(E2) (E, ⊗, 1) is a monoid andis isotone in both arguments with respect to ≤;

(E3) xx = 1, (reflexivity axiom);

(E4) ((xy) ∼ z) ⊗ (tx) ≤ z ∼ (ty), (substitution axiom);

(E5) (xy) ⊗ (zt) ≤ (xz) ∼ (yt), (congruence axiom);

(E6) (xyz) ∼ x ≤ (xy) ∼ x, (monotonicity axiom);

(E7) xyxy. (boundedness axiom).

For the convenience of readers, we mention some basic properties of the operations on EQ-algebras in the following proposition.

Proposition 2.2

([2, 14]). Let E be an EQ-algebra, xy := (xy) ∼ x and := x ∼ 1. Then the following properties hold for all x, y, zE:

  1. xyxyx, y;

  2. z ⊗ (xy) ≤ (zx) ∧ (zy);

  3. xyxy;

  4. xx = 1;

  5. (xy) ⊗ (yz) ≤ xz;

  6. (xy) ⊗ (yz) ≤ xz;

  7. x. 1̄ = 1;

  8. x ⊗ (xy) ≤ ȳ;

  9. (xy) ⊗ (yx) ≤ xy ≤ (xy) ∧ (yx);

  10. if xyz, then xy;

  11. if xy < z, then zxzy and xzxy.

Definition 2.3

([2, 14]). Let E be an EQ-algebra. We say that it is

  1. separated if for all a, bE, ab = 1 implies a=b;

  2. good if for all aE, a ∼ 1 = a.

Definition 2.4

([2, 14]). Let E be an EQ-algebra. A subset F of E is called an EQ-filter(filter for short) of E if for all a, b, cE we have that:

  1. 1 ∈ F;

  2. if a, abF; then bF,

  3. if abF, then acbcF and cacbF.

Remark 2.5

Note that Definition 2.4 differs from the original definition of filters (see [2, Definition 4]). In Definition 2.4, we do not need this condition: (ii)′ if a, bF, then abF (see [2, Definition 4]) because it follows from the other conditions. In fact, let F be a filter of an EQ-algebra E. First, we show that F satisfies the condition that if xF and xy, then yF. From xy = x it follows that xy = 1. By Definition 2.4 (i) and (ii), it follows that yF. Let a, bF. From Proposition 2.2 (vii), it follows that b ≤ 1 → b. From Definition 2.4 (iii), it then follows that (a ⊗ 1) → (ab) ∈ F. Hence, by Definition 2.4 (i) and (ii), abF.

Proposition 2.6

([2, 14]). Let F be a filter of an EQ-algebra E. For all a, b, a′ ,b′, c, e, 𝑓 ∈ F such that ab and a′b′F, the following holds:

  1. if eF and e ≤ 𝑓, then 𝑓 ∈ F;

  2. if e, e ∼ 𝑓 ∈ F, then 𝑓 ∈ F;

  3. abF, (ab) ⊗ (bc) ∈ F, where ab := (ab) ∧ (ba);

  4. (aa′) ∼ (bb′) ∈ F;

  5. (ac) ∼ (bc) ∈ F and (ca) ∼ (cb) ∈ F,

  6. (aa′) ∼ (bb′) ∈ F.

As is usually done, given a filter F of an EQ-algebra E, we can define a binary relation on E by

aFbifandonlyifabF.

From Proposition 2.6, we immediately have the following theorem.

Theorem 2.7

([2, 14]). Let F be a filter of an EQ-algebra E. The relationF is a congruence relation on E.

Definition 2.8

([15]). A poset (D, ≤) is called an upward directed set if for any x,yD there exists zD such that xz and yz.

We recall some basic notions of general topology which will be needed in the sequel.

Recall that a set A with a family 𝒯 of its subsets is called a topological space, denoted by (A, 𝒯), if A, ∅ ∈ 𝒯, the intersection of any finite number of the members of 𝒯 is in 𝒯, and the arbitrary union of members of 𝒯 is in 𝒯. The members of 𝒯 are called open sets of A, and the complement of an open set U, AU, is a closed set. A subfamily {Uα }α∈I of 𝒯 is called a base of 𝒯 if for each xU ∈ 𝒯 there is an α ∈ I such that xUαU .A subset P of A is a neighborhood of xA, if there exists an open set U such that xUP. Let 𝒯x denote the totality of all neighborhoods of x in A, then subfamily 𝓥x of 𝒯x is a fundamental system of neighborhoods of x, if for each Ux in 𝒯x, there exists a Vx in Vx such that VxUx. If every point x in A has a countable fundamental system of neighborhoods, then we say that the space (A, 𝒯) satisfies the first axiom of countability or is first-countable. A topological space (A, 𝒯) is a zero-dimensional space if 𝒯 has a clopen base. A topological space (A, 𝒯) is called a regular space if for any closed subset C of A and xA such that xC, then there exist disjoint open sets U, V such that xU and CV, or equivalently, for any open subset U containing x, there exists open subset V such that xVU .A topological space (A, 𝒯) is called a completely regular space, if for every xX and every closed set FA such that xF there exists a continuous function 𝑓 : A → [0,1] such that 𝑓(x) = 0 and 𝑓(y) = 1 for yF. Let (A, 𝒯) and (B, 𝓥) be two topological spaces, a mapping 𝑓 of A to B is continuous if 𝑓−1(U) ∈ 𝒯 for any U ∈ 𝓥. The mapping 𝑓 from (A, 𝒯) to (B, 𝓥) is called a homeomorphism if 𝑓 is bijective, and 𝑓 and 𝑓−1 are continuous, or equivalently, if 𝑓 is bijective, continuous and open (closed). The mapping 𝑓 from (A, 𝒯) to (B, 𝓥) is called a quotient map if 𝑓 is surjective, and V ∈ 𝓥 if and only if 𝑓−1(V) ∈ 𝒯. A topological space (A, 𝒯) is compact if each open cover of A is reducible to a finite subcover, and locally compact if for every xA there exists a neighborhood U of x such that Ū is a compact subspace of A.

Let (X, 𝒯) be a topological space. We have following separation axioms in (X, 𝒯):

  1. T0 : For each x, yX and xy, there is at least one of them has a neighborhood excluding the other.

  2. T1 : For each x, yX and xy each has neighborhood not containing the other.

  3. T2 : For each x, yX and xy both have disjoint neighborhoods U, V ∈ τ such that xU and yV.

A topological space satisfying Ti is called a Ti-space, for any i = 0, 1, 2. A T2-space is also known as a Hausdorff space.

Let (A, ∗) be an algebra of type 2 and 𝒯 be a topology on A. Then (A, ∗, 𝒯) is called a left (right) topological algebra, if for all aA the map ∗ : AA is defined by xax (xxa) is continuous, or equivalently, for any xA and any open subset V containing ax(xa) there exists an open subset W containing x such that aWV (WaV). A right and left topological algebra (A, ∗, 𝒯) is called a semitopological algebra. Moreover, if the operation ∗ is continuous, or equivalently, for each x, yA and each open subset W containing xy, there exist two open subsets V1 and V2 containing x and y respectively, such that V1V2W, then (A, ∗, 𝒯) is called a topological algebra.

3 Uniformity in EQ-algebras

From now on, we write E instead of the EQ-algebra < E, ∧, ⊗, ∼, 1 > for convenience, unless otherwise stated.

Let X be a nonempty set and U, V be any subsets of X × X. We have the following notation:

  1. UV = {(x, y) ∈ X × X : (x, z) ∈ U, (y, z) ∈ V, for some zX};

  2. U−1 = {(x, y) ∈ X × X : (y, x) ∈ U};

  3. Δ = {(x, x) ∈ X × X : xX}.

Definition 3.1

([16]). By a uniformity on X we shall mean a nonempty collection 𝓚 of subsets of X × X which satisfies the following conditions:

(U1) Δ ⊆ U for any U ∈ 𝓚;

(U2) if U ∈ 𝓚, then U−1 ∈ 𝓚;

(U3) if U ∈ 𝓚, then there exists V ∈ 𝓚 such that VVU;

(U4) if U, V ∈ 𝓚, then UV ∈ 𝓚;

(U5) if U ∈ 𝓚 and UVX × X, then V ∈ 𝓚.

The pair (X, 𝓚) is then called a uniform structure(uniform space) on X.

In the following we use the filters of EQ-algebras to induce uniform structures.

Theorem 3.2

Letbe an arbitrary family of filters of E which is closed under intersection. If UF = {(x, y) ∈ E × E : xF y} and 𝓚 = {UF : F ∈ ∧}, then 𝓚 satisfies conditions (U1)-(U4).

Proof

(U1): Since F is a filter of E, we have xF x, for any xE. Hence Δ ⊆ UF for all UF ∈ 𝓚.

(U2): For any UF ∈ 𝓚, we have

(x,y)(UF)1(y,x)UFyFxxFy(x,y)UF.

(U3): For any UF ∈ 𝓚, the transitivity of ≡F implies that UFUFUF.

(U4): For any UF, UJ ∈ 𝓚, we claim that UFUJ = UFJ. If (x, y) ∈ UFUJ, then xF y and xJ y. Hence xyF and xyJ. Then xyFJ and so (x, y) ∈ UFJ. Conversely, let (x, y) ∈ UFJ. Then xFJ y, hence xyFJ, and thus xyF, xyJ. Therefore xF y and xJ y, which means that (x, y) ∈ UFUJ. So UFUJ = UFJ. Since F, J ∈ ∧, then FJ ∈ ∧ and so UFUJ ∈ 𝓚. □

Theorem 3.3

Let 𝓚 = {UE × E : ∃ UF ∈ 𝓚 s.t. UFU }, where 𝓚 comes from Theorem 3.2. Then 𝓚 satisfies a uniformity on E and the pair (E, 𝓚) is a uniform structure.

Proof

By Theorem 3.2, the collection 𝓚 satisfies the conditions (U1)-(U4). It suffices to show that 𝓚 satisfies (U5). Let U ∈ 𝓚 and UVE × E. Then there exists UFUV, which means that V ∈ 𝓚. □

Let xE and U ∈ 𝓚. Define U[x] := {yE : (x, y) ∈ U}. Clearly, if VU, then V[x] ⊆ U[x].

Theorem 3.4

Let E be an EQ-algebra. Then

T = { G E : ( x G ) ( U K ) s . t . U [ x ] G }

is a topology on E, where K comes from Theorem 3.3.

Proof

Clearly, ∅ and the set E belong to 𝒯. It is clear that 𝒯 is closed under arbitrary union. Finally to show that 𝒯 is closed under finite intersection, let G, H ∈ 𝒯 and suppose that xGH. Then there exist U, V ∈ 𝓚 such that U[x] ⊆ G and V[x] ⊆ H. If W = UV, then W ∈ 𝓚. Also W[x] ⊆ U[x] ∩ V[x] and so W[x] ⊆ GH, hence GH ∈ 𝒯. Thus 𝒯 is a topology on E. □

Note that for any x in E, U[x] is a neighborhood of x.

Definition 3.5

Letbe an arbitrary family of filters of an EQ-algebra E which is closed under intersection. Then the topology 𝒯 comes from Theorem 3.4 is called a uniform topology on E induced by ∧.

We denote the uniform topology 𝒯 obtained from an arbitrary family of filters ∧ by 𝒯Λ, and if ∧ = {F}, we denote it by 𝒯F.

Example 3.6

Let E = {0, a, b, 1} be a chain with Cayley tables as follows:

We can easily check that < E, ∧, ⊗, ∼, 1 > is an EQ-algebra. Consider the filter F = {b, 1}, and ∧ = {F}. Therefore as in Theorem 3.2, we construct 𝓚 = {UF} = {{(x, y) : xF y}} = {{(0,0), (a, a), (b, b), (b, 1), (1, b), (1, 1)}}. We can check that (E, 𝓚) is a uniform space, where 𝓚 = {U : UFUF}. Neighborhoods are UF [0] = {0}, UF[a] = {a}, UF [b] = {b, 1}, UF [1] = {b, 1}. From above we get that 𝒯F = {∅, {0}, {a}, {b, 1}, {0, a}, {0, b, 1}, {a, b, 1}, {0, a, b, 1}}. Thus (E, 𝓣F) is a uniform topological space.

4 Topological properties of the space (E, 𝒯Λ)

Note that from Theorem 3.4 giving the ∧ family of filters of an EQ-algebra E which is closed under intersection. We can induce a uniform topology 𝒯Λ on E. In this section we study topological properties on (E, 𝒯Λ).

Let E be an EQ-algebra and C, D be subsets of E. Then we define CD as follows: CD = {xy : xC, yD}, where ∗ ∈ {∧, ⊗, ∼}.

Definition 4.1

Let 𝓤 be a topology on E. Then (E, 𝓤) is called a topological EQ-algebra(TEQ-algebra for short) if the operations ∧, ⊗ andare continuous with respect to 𝓤.

Recall that a topological space (X, 𝓤) is a discrete space if for any xX, {x} is an open set.

Example 4.2

Every EQ-algebra with a discrete topology is a TEQ-algebra.

Theorem 4.3

The pair (E, 𝒯Λ) is a TEQ-algebra.

Proof

By Definition 4.1, it suffices to show that ∗ is continuous, where ∗ ∈ {∧, ⊗, ∼}. Indeed, assume that xyG, where x, yE and G is an open subset of E. Then there exist U ∈ 𝓚, U[xy] ⊆ G, and a filter F such that UF ∈ 𝓚 and UFU. We claim that the following relation holds:

UF[x]UF[y]UF[xy]U[xy].

Let hkUF [x]∗UF [y]. Then hUF [x] and kUF [y] we get that xF h and yF k. Hence xyF hk. From that we obtain (xy, hk) ∈ UFU. Hence hkUF [xy] ⊆ U[xy]. Then hkG. Clearly, UF [x] and UF [y] are neighborhoods of x and y, respectively. Therefore, the operation ∗ is continuous. □

Example 4.4

In Example 3.6, it is easy to check that (E, 𝒯F) is a TEQ-algebra.

Theorem 4.5

Letbe a family of filters of E which is closed under intersection. Any filter in the collectionis a clopen subset of E for the topology 𝒯Λ.

Proof

Let F be a filter of E in ∧ and yFc. Then yUF [y] and we get Fc ⊆ ∪{UF[y] : yFc}. We claim that for all yFc, UF [y] ⊆ Fc. If zUF [y], then zF y. Hence zyF .If zF, by Lemma 2.6 (i), we get that yF, which is a contradiction. So zFc and we get ∪{UF [y] : yFc} ⊆ Fc. Hence Fc = ∪{UF [y] : yFc}. Since UF [y] is open for all yE, it follows that F is a closed subset of E. We show that F = ∪{UF [y] : yF}. If yF, then yUF [y] and we get F ⊆ ∪{UF [y] : yF}. Let yF .If zUF [y], then zF y and so yzF. Since yF, by Lemma 2.6 (i), zF, and we get ∪{UF [y] : yF} ⊆ F .So F is also an open subset of E. □

Theorem 4.6

Letbe a family of filters of E which is closed under intersection. For any xE and F ∈ ∧, UF [x] is a clopen subset of E for the topology 𝒯Λ.

Proof

First we show that (UF [x])c is open. If y ∈ (UF [x])c, then yxFc. We claim that UF [y] ⊆ (UF [x])c. If zUF [y], then z ∈ (UF [x])c, otherwise zUF [x], we get that zyF and zxF. Since F is a filter, we get that (xz) ⊗ (zy) ∈ F. By (xz) ⊗ (zy) < xy and F is a filter, it follows that xyF, which is a contradiction. Hence UF [y] ⊆ (UF [x])c for all y ∈ (UF [x])c, and so UF [x] is closed. It is clear that UF [x] is open. So UF [x] is a clopen subset of E. □

A topological space X is connected if and only if X has only X and ∅ as clopen subsets. Therefore we have the following corollary.

Corollary 4.7

The space (E, 𝒯Λ) is not, in general, a connected space.

Proof

It clearly follows from Theorem 4.6. □

Theorem 4.8

𝒯 = 𝒯J, where J = ∩{F : F ∈ ∧}.

Proof

Let 𝓚 and 𝓚 be as in Theorems 3.2 and 3.3. Now consider ∧0 = {J}, define (𝓚0) = {UJ} and 𝓚0 = {U : UJU}. Let G ∈ 𝒯Λ. So for each xG, there is U ∈ 𝓚 such that U[x] ⊆ G. From JF we get that UJUF for any filter F of ∧. Since U ∈ 𝓚, there exists F ∈ ∧ such that UFU. Hence UJ [x] ⊆ UF [x] ⊆ G. Since UJ ∈ 𝓚0, we get that G ∈ 𝒯J. So 𝒯Λ ⊆ 𝒯J. Conversely, let H ∈ 𝒯J. Then for any xH there is U ∈ 𝓚0 such that U[x] ⊆ H. Hence UJ [x] ⊆ H. Since ∧ is closed under intersection, so J ∈ ∧. Then we get UJ ∈ 𝓚 and so H ∈ 𝒯Λ. Therefore, 𝒯J ⊆ 𝒯Λ. □

Corollary 4.9

Let F and J be filters of E and FJ. Then J is clopen in the topological space (E, 𝒯F).

Proof

Consider ∧ = {F, J}. Then by Theorem 4.8, 𝒯Λ = 𝒯F. Hence by Theorem 4.5, J is clopen in the topological space (E, 𝒯F). □

Remark 4.10

Letbe a family of filters of E which is closed under intersection and J = ∩{F : F ∈ ∧}. We have the following statements:

  1. By Theorem 4.8, we know that 𝒯Λ = 𝒯J. For any U ∈ 𝓚, xE, we can get that UJ [x] ⊆ U[x]. Hence 𝒯Λ is equivalent to {AE : ∀xA, UJ [x] ⊆ A}. So AE is open set if and only if for all xA, UJ [x] ⊆ A if and only if A = ∪xA UJ [x];

  2. For all xE, by (i), we know that UJ [x] is the smallest neighborhood of x;

  3. Let 𝓑J = {UJ [x] : xE}. By (i) and (ii), it is easy to check that 𝓑J is abase of 𝒯J;

  4. For all xE, {UJ [x]} is a denumerable fundamental system of neighborhoods of x.

Lemma 4.11

If F is a filter of E, then for all xE, UF [x] is a clopen compact set in the topological space (E, 𝒯F).

Proof

By Theorem 4.6, it is enough to show that UF [x] is a compact set. Let UF [x] ⊆ ∪α∈I Oα, where each Oα is an open set of E. Since xUF [x], there exists α ∈ I such that xOα. Then UF [x] ⊆ Oα. Hence UF [x] is compact. Therefore UF [x] is a clopen compact set in the topological space (E, 𝒯F). □

Theorem 4.12

Letbe a family of filters of E which is closed under intersection. Then (E, 𝒯Λ) is a first-countable, zero-dimensional, disconnected and completely regular space.

Proof

By Theorem 4.8, it is suffices to show that (E, 𝒯J) is a first-countable, zero-dimensional, disconnected and completely regular space. Let xE. By Remark 4.10 (iv), {UJ [x]} is a denumerable fundamental system of neighborhoods of x, so (E, 𝒯J) is first-countable. Let 𝓑J = {UJ [x] : xE}. By Remark 4.10 (iii) and Theorem 4.6, we get that BJ is a clopen basis of (E, 𝒯J), hence (E, 𝒯J) is a zero-dimensional space. By Corollary 4.7, we get that (E, 𝒯J) is a disconnected space. By Lemma 4.11 and Remark 4.10 (ii), UJ [x] is a compact neighborhood of x. Hence (E, 𝒯J) is a locally compact space. Let xE and V be a neighborhood of x. By Remark 4.10 (ii) and Lemma 4.11, there exists closed neighborhood UJ [x] of x such that UJ [x] ⊆ V. Therefore, (E, 𝒯J) is a regular space. Since (E, 𝒯J) is a locally compact space, we get that it is completely regular. □

Theorem 4.13

Letbe a family of filters of E which is closed under intersection. Then (E, 𝒯Λ) is a discrete space if and only if there exists F ∈ ∧ such that UF [x] = {x} for all xE.

Proof

Let 𝒯Λ be a discrete topology on E. If for any F ∈ ∧, there exists xE such that UF [x] ≠ {x}. Let J = ∩∧. Then J ∈ ∧, there exists x0E such that UJ [x0] ≠ {x0}. It follows that there exists y0UF [x0] and x0y0. By Remark 4.10 (ii), UJ [x0] is the smallest neighborhood of x0. Hence {x0} is not an open subset of E, which is a contradiction. Conversely, for any xE, there exists F ∈ ∧ such that UF [x] = {x}. Hence {x} is an open set of E. Therefore, (E, 𝒯Λ) is a discrete space. □

Theorem 4.14

Letbe a family of filters of E which is closed under intersection, J = ∩∧ and E be a separated EQ-algebra. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. (E, 𝒯J) is a discrete space;

  2. J = {1}.

Proof

  1. ⇒ (ii): By Theorem 4.13, we have UJ [1] = {1}. We show that JUJ[1]. Let xJ. By Proposition 2.2 (vii), we get that xx ∼ 1. Since J is a filter and xJ, hence x ∼ 1 ∈ J. So xUJ [1]. It follows that JUJ [1]. Since UJ [1] = {1} and 1 ∈ J. Therefore, J = {1}.

  2. ⇒ (i): Let J = {1}. Since E is separated, we can get that UJ [x] = {x}. It follows that (E, 𝒯J) is discrete. □

Corollary 4.15

Letbe a family of filters of E which is closed under intersection, J = ∩∧ and E be a separated EQ-algebra. Then (E, 𝒯J) is a Hausdorff space if and only if J = {1}.

Proof

Let (E, 𝒯J) be a Hausdorff space. First we show that for any xE, UJ [x] = {x}. If there exists xyUJ [x], then yUJ [x] ∩ UJ [y]. By Remark 4.10 (ii), UJ [x] and UJ [y] are the smallest neighborhoods of x and y, respectively. Hence for any neighborhood U of x and neighborhood V of y, we have that yUJ [x] ∩ UJ [y] ⊆ UV ≠ ∅, which is a contradiction. Hence by Theorems 4.13 and 4.14, J = {1}. The other side of the proof directly follows from Theorem 4.14. □

Definition 4.16

Let E1 and E2 be EQ-algebras. A mapping φ : E1E2 is called an EQ-morphism from E1 to E2 if

φ(xy)=φ(x)φ(y)

for any ∗ ∈ {∧, ⊗, ∼}. If, in addition, the mapping φ is bijective, then we call φ an EQ-isomorphism. Note that φ(1) = 1 when φ is an EQ-morphism.

Proposition 4.17

Let φ : E1E2 be an EQ-morphism. Then the following properties hold:

  1. if F is a filter of E2, then the set φ−1(F) is a filter of E1;

  2. if φ is surjective and F is a filter of E1, then φ(F) is a filter of E2.

Proof

It is easy to prove by definition of filters. □

Lemma 4.18

Let E1 and E2 be EQ-algebras and F be a filter of E2. If φ : E1E2 is an EQ-isomorphism, then

(a,b)Uφ1(F)ifandonlyif(φ(a),φ(b))UF,foranya,bE.

Proof

For any (a, b) ∈ Uφ−1(F)abφ−1(F) ⇔ φ(a) ∼ φ(b) ∈ F ⇔ (φ(a), φ(b)) ∈ UF. □

Theorem 4.19

Let E1 and E2 be EQ-algebras and F be a filter of E2. If φ : E1E2 is an EQ-isomorphism, then the following properties hold:

  1. for any aE1, φ(Uφ−1(F) [a]) = UF [φ(a)];

  2. for any bE2, φ−1(UF[b]) = Uφ−1(F)[φ−1(b)].

Proof

(i) Let bφUφ−1(F)[a]). Then there exists cUφ−1(F)[a] such that b = φ(c). It follows that acφ−1(F) ⇒ φ(a) ∼ φ(c) ∈ Fφ(a) ∼ bFbUF [φ(a)].

Conversely, bUF [φ(a)] ⇒ φ(a) ∼ bFφ−1(φ(a) ∼ b) ∈ φ−1(F) ⇒ aφ−1(b) ∈ φ−1(F) ⇒ φ−1(b) ∈ Uφ−1(F)[a] ⇒ bφ(Uφ−1(F)[a]).

(ii) aφ−1(UF[b]) ⇔ φ(a) ∈ UF[b] ⇔ φ(a) ∼ bFφ−1(φ(a) ∼ b) ∈ φ−1(F) ⇔ aφ−1(b) ∈ φ−1(F) ⇔ aUφ−1(F)[φ−1(b)]. □

Theorem 4.20

Let E1 and E2 be EQ-algebras and F be a filter of E2. If φ : E1E2 is an EQ-isomorphism, then φ is a continuous map from (E1, 𝒯φ−1(F)) to (E2, 𝒯F).

Proof

Let A ∈ 𝒯F. By Remark 4.10 (i), we can get that A = ∪aA UF [a]. It follows that φ−1(A) = φ−1(∪aA UF [a]) = ∪aA φ−1(UF [a]). We claim that if bφ−1 (UF [a]), then Uφ−1(F)[b] ⊆ φ−1(UF [a]). Indeed, let cUφ−1(F)[b], we get that cbφ−1 (F), so φ(c) ∼ φ(b) ∈ F. Since φ(b) ∈ UF [a], we get that φ(b) ∼ aF. It follows that φ(c) ∼ aF. Thus we have that φ(c) ∈ UF [a]. So cφ−1(UF [a]). Hence φ−1(UF [a]) = ∪bφ−1(UF[a]) Uφ−1(F) [b] ∈ 𝒯φ−1(F). Therefore φ−1(A) = ∪aA φ−1 (UF [a]) ∈ 𝒯φ−1(F). So φ is a continuous map. □

Theorem 4.21

Let E1 and E2 be EQ-algebras and F be a filter of E2. If φ : E1E2 is an EQ-isomorphism, then φ is a quotient map from (E1, 𝒯φ−1(F)) to (E2, 𝒯F).

Proof

From Theorem 4.20 we get that φ is a continuous surjective map. It is enough to show that φ is an open map. Let A be an open set of (E1, 𝒯φ−1(F)). We claim that φ(A) is an open set of (E2, 𝒯F). Let aφ(A). We shall show that UF [a] ⊆ φ(A). Indeed, for any bUF [a], we get that baF. By Lemma 4.15, we have φ−1(a) ∼ φ−1(b) ∈ φ−1(F). Hence φ−1(b) ∈ Uφ−1(F)[φ(a)]. Since aφ(A) and φ is injective we get that φ−1(a) ∈ A. By Remark 4.10 (i), it follows that Uφ−1(F)[φ−1(a)] ⊆ A. So φ−1(b) ∈ A, we get that bφ(A). Therefore, UF [a] ⊆ φ(A). So φ is a quotient map. □

Corollary 4.22

Let E1 and E2 be EQ-algebras and F be a filter of E2. If φ : E1E2 is an EQ-isomorphism, then φ is a homeomorphism map from (E1, 𝒯φ−1(F)) to (E2, 𝒯F).

Proof

It clearly follows from Theorem 4.21. □

Recall that a uniform space (X, 𝓚) is totally bounded if for each U ∈ 𝓚, there exist x1,..., x1X such that X=i=1nU[xi] .

Theorem 4.23

Let F be a filter of E. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. the topological space (E, 𝒯F) is compact;

  2. the topological space (E, 𝒯F) is totally bounded;

  3. there exists P = {x1, ... , xn} ⊆ E such that for all aE there exists xiP such that aF xi.

Proof

  1. ⇒ (2): The proof is straightforward.

  2. ⇒ (3): Since (E, 𝒯F) is totally bounded, there exist x1,..., xnE such that E=i=1nUF[xi] . Now let aE. Then there exists xi, such that aUF [xi], therefore axi, ∈ F i.e. aF xi.

  3. ⇒ (1): For any aE, by hypothesis, there exists xiP such that axiF. We can get that a ∈ ∪F [xi], hence E=i=1nUF[xi] . Now let E = ∪α∈I Oα, where each Oα is an open set of E. Then for any xiE there exists αiI such that xi, ∈ Oαi. Since Oαi is an open set, UF [xi] ⊆ Oαi, so we have that

    E=iIUF[xi]i=1nOαi.

    Therefore E=i=1nOαi , whence (E, 𝒯F) is compact.

 □

Theorem 4.24

If F is a filter of E such that Fc is a finite set, then the topological space (E, 𝒯F) is compact.

Proof

Let E = ∪α∈I Oα, where each Oα is an open subset of E. Let Fc = {x1,... ,xn}. Then there exist α, α1,...,αnI such that 1 ∈ Oα, x1Oα1,...,xnOαn. Then UF [1] ⊆ Oα, but UF [1] = F. Hence E=i=1nOαiOα . □

Theorem 4.25

If F is a filter of E, then F is a compact set in the topological space (E, 𝒯F).

Proof

Let F ⊆ ∪αI Oα, where each Oα is open set of E. Since 1 ∈ F, there is α ∈ I such that 1 ∈ Oα. Then F = UF [1] ⊆ Oα. Hence F is a compact set in the topological space (E, 𝒯F). □

Our next target is to establish the convergence of EQ-algebras using the convergence of nets.

Definition 4.26

Let E be an EQ-algebra and (D, ≤) be an upward directed set. If for any α ∈ D we have aαE, then we call {aα}α∈D a net of E.

Definition 4.27

Let {aα}α∈D be a net of E. In the topological space (E, 𝒯F), say that {aα}α∈D

  1. converges to the point a of E if for any neighborhood U of a, there exists d0D such that aαU for any α ≥ d0;

  2. Cauchy sequence if there exists d0D such aαF aβ for any α, βd0.

A net {aα}iD, which converges to a is said to be convergent. For simplicity, we write limaα = a and we say that a is a limit of {aα}α∈D.

Example 4.28

Consider the TEQ-algebra (E, 𝒯F) in Example 4.4. Clearly, (ℕ, ≤) is an upward directed set, whereis a natural number set. We define {an}n∈ℕ as a0 = 0, a1 = a, a2 = b, an = 1, n ≥ 3. It is easy to check that {an}n∈ℕ is a net of E. Let n0 = 3. For any neighborhood U of 1, if n ≥ 3, then 1 ∈ U. Therefore, liman = 1.

Theorem 4.29

Let {aα}α∈D and {bα}α∈D be nets of E and F be a filter of E. Then in the topological space (E, 𝒯F) we have:

  1. if limbα = b and limaα = a, for some a, bE, then the sequence {aαbα}α∈D is convergent and limaαbα = ab, for any operation ∗ ∈ {∧, ⊗, ∼};

  2. any convergent sequence of E is a Cauchy sequence.

Proof

  1. Let limaα = a, limbα = b and ∗ ∈ {∧, ⊗, ∼}, for some a, bE. For any neighborhood W of ab we get that UF [ab] ⊆ W. Clearly, UF [a] and UF [b] are neighborhoods of a and b, respectively. By hypothesis, there exist d1, d2D such that aαUF [a] and bαUF [b], for any α ≥ d1 and α ≥ d2. Since D is an upward directed set, then there exists d0D such that d0d1 and d0d2. By Theorem 4.3, we get that UF [a] ∗ UF [a] ⊆ UF [ab]. So aαUF [a] and bαUF [b], for any α ≥ d0. It follows that abUF [a] ∗ UF [a] ⊆ UF [ab] ⊆ U, for any α ≥ d0D. Therefore, lim aαbα = ab.

  2. Let {aα}α∈D be a net of E and limaα = a. For the neighborhood UF [a] of a, there exists dD such that aαD, for any α ≥ d. So if α, βd, then aα, aβUF [a] that is aαF a and aβF a. It follows that aαF aβ. Therefore, {aα}α∈D is a Cauchy sequence.

 □

5 Conclusion

It is well known that EQ-algebras play an important role in investigating the algebraic structures of logical systems. In this study, we endowed an EQ-algebra with uniform topology 𝒯Λ and proposed the concept of the topological EQ-algebra. We then stated and proved special properties of (E, 𝒯Λ). Especially, we proved that (E, 𝒯Λ) is a first-countable, zero-dimensional, disconnected and completely regular space. From the category point of view, the role of isomorphism in algebra is the same as the role of homeomorphism in topology. Hence we also studied the relationship between isomorphism(algebraic invariant) and homeomorphism(topological invariant) in topological EQ-algebras. Finally, we investigated the convergent properties of topological EQ-algebras.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions in improving this paper. This research is supported by a grant of National Natural Science Foundation of China (11571281), Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2016M602761) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (GK201603004).

References

[1] Novák V., EQ-algebras: primary concepts and properties, In: Proc. Czech-Japan Seminar, Ninth Meeting(August 2006, Kitakyushu and Nagasaki, Graduate School of Information, Waseda University, Japan), Kitakyushu and Nagasak, 2006, 18-22Search in Google Scholar

[2] Novák V., De Baets B., EQ-algebras, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 2009, 160, 2956-297810.1016/j.fss.2009.04.010Search in Google Scholar

[3] Borzooei R.A., Saffar B.G., States on EQ-algebras, J Intell Fuzzy Syst., 2015, 29, 209-21110.3233/IFS-151588Search in Google Scholar

[4] Dyba M., El-Zekey M., Novak V., Non-commutative first-order EQ-algebras, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 2016, 292, 215-24110.1016/j.fss.2014.11.019Search in Google Scholar

[5] Liu L.Z., Zhang X.Y., Implicative and positive prefilters of EQ-algebras, J Intell Fuzzy Syst., 2014, 26, 2087-209710.3233/IFS-130884Search in Google Scholar

[6] Haveshki M., Eslami E., Saeid A.B., A topology induced by uniformity on BL-algebras, Math. Log. Q., 2007, 53, 162-16910.1002/malq.200610035Search in Google Scholar

[7] Ghorbani S., Hasankhani A., Some properties of quotient topology on residuated lattices, Pure Math Appl., 2010, 21, 15-26Search in Google Scholar

[8] Hoo C.S., Topological MV-algebras, Topol. Appl., 1997, 81, 103-12110.1016/S0166-8641(97)00027-8Search in Google Scholar

[9] Nganou J.B., Tebu S.F.T., Topological FLew-algebras, J Appl Log., 2015, 13, 259-26910.1016/j.jal.2015.04.004Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ciungu L.C., Convergences in perfect BL-algebras, Mathw Soft Comput., 2007, 14, 67-80Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ko J.M, Kim Y.C., Closure operators on BL-algebras, Commun. Korean Math. Soc., 2004, 19, 219-23210.4134/CKMS.2004.19.2.219Search in Google Scholar

[12] Borzooei R.A., Rezaei G.R., Kuhestani N., Separation axioms in (semi)top-ological quotient BL-algebras, Soft Comput., 2012, 16, 1219-122710.1007/s00500-012-0808-6Search in Google Scholar

[13] Borzooei R.A., Rezaei G.R., Metrizability on (semi)topological BL-algebras, Soft Comput., 2012, 16, 1681-169010.1007/s00500-012-0852-2Search in Google Scholar

[14] El-Zekey M., Novák V., Mesiar R., On good EQ-algebras, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 2011, 178, 1-2310.1016/j.fss.2011.05.011Search in Google Scholar

[15] Davey B.A., Priestley H.A., Introduction to Lattice and Order, Cambridge University Press, U.K., 200210.1017/CBO9780511809088Search in Google Scholar

[16] Joshi K.D., Introduction to General Topology, New Age International Publisher, India, 1983Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-9-17
Accepted: 2017-1-26
Published Online: 2017-4-14

© 2017 Yang et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Integrals of Frullani type and the method of brackets
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Edge of chaos in reaction diffusion CNN model
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Calculus using proximities: a mathematical approach in which students can actually prove theorems
  7. Regular Articles
  8. An investigation on hyper S-posets over ordered semihypergroups
  9. Regular Articles
  10. The Leibniz algebras whose subalgebras are ideals
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Fixed point and multidimensional fixed point theorems with applications to nonlinear matrix equations in terms of weak altering distance functions
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Matrix rank and inertia formulas in the analysis of general linear models
  15. Regular Articles
  16. The hybrid power mean of quartic Gauss sums and Kloosterman sums
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Tauberian theorems for statistically (C,1,1) summable double sequences of fuzzy numbers
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Some properties of graded comultiplication modules
  21. Regular Articles
  22. The characterizations of upper approximation operators based on special coverings
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Bi-integrable and tri-integrable couplings of a soliton hierarchy associated with SO(4)
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Dynamics for a discrete competition and cooperation model of two enterprises with multiple delays and feedback controls
  27. Regular Articles
  28. A new view of relationship between atomic posets and complete (algebraic) lattices
  29. Regular Articles
  30. A class of extensions of Restricted (s, t)-Wythoff’s game
  31. Regular Articles
  32. New bounds for the minimum eigenvalue of 𝓜-tensors
  33. Regular Articles
  34. Shintani and Shimura lifts of cusp forms on certain arithmetic groups and their applications
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Empirical likelihood for quantile regression models with response data missing at random
  37. Regular Articles
  38. Convex combination of analytic functions
  39. Regular Articles
  40. On the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for rank-two matrices
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Uniform topology on EQ-algebras
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Integrations on rings
  45. Regular Articles
  46. The quasilinear parabolic kirchhoff equation
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Avoiding rainbow 2-connected subgraphs
  49. Regular Articles
  50. On non-Hopfian groups of fractions
  51. Regular Articles
  52. Singularly perturbed hyperbolic problems on metric graphs: asymptotics of solutions
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Rings in which elements are the sum of a nilpotent and a root of a fixed polynomial that commute
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Superstability of functional equations related to spherical functions
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Evaluation of the convolution sum involving the sum of divisors function for 22, 44 and 52
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Weighted minimal translation surfaces in the Galilean space with density
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Complete convergence for weighted sums of pairwise independent random variables
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Binomials transformation formulae for scaled Fibonacci numbers
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Growth functions for some uniformly amenable groups
  67. Regular Articles
  68. Hopf bifurcations in a three-species food chain system with multiple delays
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Oscillation and nonoscillation of half-linear Euler type differential equations with different periodic coefficients
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Osculating curves in 4-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index 2
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Some new facts about group 𝒢 generated by the family of convergent permutations
  75. Regular Articles
  76. lnfinitely many solutions for fractional Schrödinger equations with perturbation via variational methods
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Supersolvable orders and inductively free arrangements
  79. Regular Articles
  80. Asymptotically almost automorphic solutions of differential equations with piecewise constant argument
  81. Regular Articles
  82. Finite groups whose all second maximal subgroups are cyclic
  83. Regular Articles
  84. Semilinear systems with a multi-valued nonlinear term
  85. Regular Articles
  86. Positive solutions for Hadamard differential systems with fractional integral conditions on an unbounded domain
  87. Regular Articles
  88. Calibration and simulation of Heston model
  89. Regular Articles
  90. One kind sixth power mean of the three-term exponential sums
  91. Regular Articles
  92. Cyclic pairs and common best proximity points in uniformly convex Banach spaces
  93. Regular Articles
  94. The uniqueness of meromorphic functions in k-punctured complex plane
  95. Regular Articles
  96. Normalizers of intermediate congruence subgroups of the Hecke subgroups
  97. Regular Articles
  98. The hyperbolicity constant of infinite circulant graphs
  99. Regular Articles
  100. Scott convergence and fuzzy Scott topology on L-posets
  101. Regular Articles
  102. One sided strong laws for random variables with infinite mean
  103. Regular Articles
  104. The join of split graphs whose completely regular endomorphisms form a monoid
  105. Regular Articles
  106. A new branch and bound algorithm for minimax ratios problems
  107. Regular Articles
  108. Upper bound estimate of incomplete Cochrane sum
  109. Regular Articles
  110. Value distributions of solutions to complex linear differential equations in angular domains
  111. Regular Articles
  112. The nonlinear diffusion equation of the ideal barotropic gas through a porous medium
  113. Regular Articles
  114. The Sheffer stroke operation reducts of basic algebras
  115. Regular Articles
  116. Extensions and improvements of Sherman’s and related inequalities for n-convex functions
  117. Regular Articles
  118. Classification lattices are geometric for complete atomistic lattices
  119. Regular Articles
  120. Possible numbers of x’s in an {x, y}-matrix with a given rank
  121. Regular Articles
  122. New error bounds for linear complementarity problems of weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrices
  123. Regular Articles
  124. Boundedness of vector-valued B-singular integral operators in Lebesgue spaces
  125. Regular Articles
  126. On the Golomb’s conjecture and Lehmer’s numbers
  127. Regular Articles
  128. Some applications of the Archimedean copulas in the proof of the almost sure central limit theorem for ordinary maxima
  129. Regular Articles
  130. Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  131. Regular Articles
  132. Corrigendum to: Dual-stage adaptive finite-time modified function projective multi-lag combined synchronization for multiple uncertain chaotic systems
  133. Regular Articles
  134. Convergence and stability of generalized φ-weak contraction mapping in CAT(0) spaces
  135. Regular Articles
  136. Triple solutions for a Dirichlet boundary value problem involving a perturbed discrete p(k)-Laplacian operator
  137. Regular Articles
  138. OD-characterization of alternating groups Ap+d
  139. Regular Articles
  140. On Jordan mappings of inverse semirings
  141. Regular Articles
  142. On generalized Ehresmann semigroups
  143. Regular Articles
  144. On topological properties of spaces obtained by the double band matrix
  145. Regular Articles
  146. Representing derivatives of Chebyshev polynomials by Chebyshev polynomials and related questions
  147. Regular Articles
  148. Chain conditions on composite Hurwitz series rings
  149. Regular Articles
  150. Coloring subgraphs with restricted amounts of hues
  151. Regular Articles
  152. An extension of the method of brackets. Part 1
  153. Regular Articles
  154. Branch-delete-bound algorithm for globally solving quadratically constrained quadratic programs
  155. Regular Articles
  156. Strong edge geodetic problem in networks
  157. Regular Articles
  158. Ricci solitons on almost Kenmotsu 3-manifolds
  159. Regular Articles
  160. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions sharing two finite sets
  161. Regular Articles
  162. On the fourth-order linear recurrence formula related to classical Gauss sums
  163. Regular Articles
  164. Dynamical behavior for a stochastic two-species competitive model
  165. Regular Articles
  166. Two new eigenvalue localization sets for tensors and theirs applications
  167. Regular Articles
  168. κ-strong sequences and the existence of generalized independent families
  169. Regular Articles
  170. Commutators of Littlewood-Paley gκ -functions on non-homogeneous metric measure spaces
  171. Regular Articles
  172. On decompositions of estimators under a general linear model with partial parameter restrictions
  173. Regular Articles
  174. Groups and monoids of Pythagorean triples connected to conics
  175. Regular Articles
  176. Hom-Lie superalgebra structures on exceptional simple Lie superalgebras of vector fields
  177. Regular Articles
  178. Numerical methods for the multiplicative partial differential equations
  179. Regular Articles
  180. Solvable Leibniz algebras with NFn Fm1 nilradical
  181. Regular Articles
  182. Evaluation of the convolution sums ∑al+bm=n lσ(l) σ(m) with ab ≤ 9
  183. Regular Articles
  184. A study on soft rough semigroups and corresponding decision making applications
  185. Regular Articles
  186. Some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions with applications
  187. Regular Articles
  188. Deficiency of forests
  189. Regular Articles
  190. Perfect codes in power graphs of finite groups
  191. Regular Articles
  192. A new compact finite difference quasilinearization method for nonlinear evolution partial differential equations
  193. Regular Articles
  194. Does any convex quadrilateral have circumscribed ellipses?
  195. Regular Articles
  196. The dynamic of a Lie group endomorphism
  197. Regular Articles
  198. On pairs of equations in unlike powers of primes and powers of 2
  199. Regular Articles
  200. Differential subordination and convexity criteria of integral operators
  201. Regular Articles
  202. Quantitative relations between short intervals and exceptional sets of cubic Waring-Goldbach problem
  203. Regular Articles
  204. On θ-commutators and the corresponding non-commuting graphs
  205. Regular Articles
  206. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of Laplace (1, 1) for GARCH models
  207. Regular Articles
  208. Multiple and sign-changing solutions for discrete Robin boundary value problem with parameter dependence
  209. Regular Articles
  210. Fundamental relation on m-idempotent hyperrings
  211. Regular Articles
  212. A novel recursive method to reconstruct multivariate functions on the unit cube
  213. Regular Articles
  214. Nabla inequalities and permanence for a logistic integrodifferential equation on time scales
  215. Regular Articles
  216. Enumeration of spanning trees in the sequence of Dürer graphs
  217. Regular Articles
  218. Quotient of information matrices in comparison of linear experiments for quadratic estimation
  219. Regular Articles
  220. Fourier series of functions involving higher-order ordered Bell polynomials
  221. Regular Articles
  222. Simple modules over Auslander regular rings
  223. Regular Articles
  224. Weighted multilinear p-adic Hardy operators and commutators
  225. Regular Articles
  226. Guaranteed cost finite-time control of positive switched nonlinear systems with D-perturbation
  227. Regular Articles
  228. A modified quasi-boundary value method for an abstract ill-posed biparabolic problem
  229. Regular Articles
  230. Extended Riemann-Liouville type fractional derivative operator with applications
  231. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  232. The algebraic size of the family of injective operators
  233. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  234. The history of a general criterium on spaceability
  235. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  236. On sequences not enjoying Schur’s property
  237. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  238. A hierarchy in the family of real surjective functions
  239. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  240. Dynamics of multivalued linear operators
  241. Topical Issue on Topological and Algebraic Genericity in Infinite Dimensional Spaces
  242. Linear dynamics of semigroups generated by differential operators
  243. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  244. Isomorphism theorems for some parabolic initial-boundary value problems in Hörmander spaces
  245. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  246. Determination of a diffusion coefficient in a quasilinear parabolic equation
  247. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  248. Homogeneous two-point problem for PDE of the second order in time variable and infinite order in spatial variables
  249. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  250. A nonlinear plate control without linearization
  251. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  252. Reduction of a Schwartz-type boundary value problem for biharmonic monogenic functions to Fredholm integral equations
  253. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  254. Inverse problem for a physiologically structured population model with variable-effort harvesting
  255. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  256. Existence of solutions for delay evolution equations with nonlocal conditions
  257. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  258. Comments on behaviour of solutions of elliptic quasi-linear problems in a neighbourhood of boundary singularities
  259. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  260. Coupled fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces endowed with a directed graph and application
  261. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  262. Existence of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic degenerate anisotropic equations
  263. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  264. Integro-differential systems with variable exponents of nonlinearity
  265. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  266. Elliptic operators on refined Sobolev scales on vector bundles
  267. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  268. Multiplicity solutions of a class fractional Schrödinger equations
  269. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  270. Determining of right-hand side of higher order ultraparabolic equation
  271. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  272. Asymptotic approximation for the solution to a semi-linear elliptic problem in a thin aneurysm-type domain
  273. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  274. Learnheuristics: hybridizing metaheuristics with machine learning for optimization with dynamic inputs
  275. Topical Issue on Metaheuristics - Methods and Applications
  276. Nature–inspired metaheuristic algorithms to find near–OGR sequences for WDM channel allocation and their performance comparison
  277. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  278. Monomial codes seen as invariant subspaces
  279. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  280. Expert knowledge and data analysis for detecting advanced persistent threats
  281. Topical Issue on Cyber-security Mathematics
  282. Feedback equivalence of convolutional codes over finite rings
Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2017-0032/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button