Home Effect of temperature on matrix multicracking evolution of C/SiC fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites
Article Open Access

Effect of temperature on matrix multicracking evolution of C/SiC fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites

  • Longbiao Li EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 9, 2020

Abstract

In this paper, the temperature-dependent matrix multicracking evolution of carbon-fiber-reinforced silicon carbide ceramic-matrix composites (C/SiC CMCs) is investigated. The temperature-dependent composite microstress field is obtained by combining the shear-lag model and temperature-dependent material properties and damage models. The critical matrix strain energy criterion assumes that the strain energy in the matrix has a critical value. With increasing applied stress, when the matrix strain energy is higher than the critical value, more matrix cracks and interface debonding occur to dissipate the additional energy. Based on the composite damage state, the temperature-dependent matrix strain energy and its critical value are obtained. The relationships among applied stress, matrix cracking state, interface damage state, and environmental temperature are established. The effects of interfacial properties, material properties, and environmental temperature on temperature-dependent matrix multiple fracture evolution of C/SiC composites are analyzed. The experimental evolution of matrix multiple fracture and fraction of the interface debonding of C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures are predicted. When the interface shear stress increases, the debonding resistance at the interface increases, leading to the decrease of the debonding fraction at the interface, and the stress transfer capacity between the fiber and the matrix increases, leading to the higher first matrix cracking stress, saturation matrix cracking stress, and saturation matrix cracking density.

1 Introduction

Ceramic-matrix composites (CMCs) possess low density, high strength and modulus, and wear and corrosion resistance at elevated temperatures and have already been applied on hot-section components of aeroengines [1,2]. The CMC exhaust cone demonstrator that was designed, built, and tested by SAFRAN was certified for use on commercial aircraft by European Aviation Safety Agency and completed the first commercial flight on A320 jetliner on 2015. The application of CMCs on aeroengines has the following advantages: (1) as the specific strength of CMCs is higher than that of nickel-based alloys, the weight of turbine components made of nickel-based alloys can be reduced by 61% if CMCs are used; (2) due to the high-temperature resistance of CMCs, the turbine temperature can be increased up to 1,650°C, which is beneficial to increase the thrust–weight ratio of the aeroengine; (3) compared with ceramics, the strain tolerance of CMCs is greatly improved, which would not cause catastrophic damage, and it is possible to detect the mechanical degradation before materials failure and improve the reliability of life prediction; and (4) replacing the existing high-temperature metal materials with CMCs that can reduce the weight, pollution emission, and noise level of the aeroengine.

At elevated temperatures, the occurrence of the evolution of matrix multicracking affects the mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced CMCs [3,4,5,6,7]. When the applied stress increases, the evolution of matrix multicracking and debonding of the interface dissipate the energy entered into the composite and the tensile behavior of CMCs exhibits obvious nonlinear behavior [8,9,10,11,12]. Multiple matrix fracture and debonding of the interface and pullout of the fracture fibers at the matrix crack plane are the main damage mechanisms for the nonlinear behavior of CMCs [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. The evolution rate of matrix multicracking, debonding fraction at the interface, and the broken fraction of the fibers affect the deformation characteristics of CMCs. For the problem of first matrix cracking, the energy balance relationship before and after steady-state matrix cracking can be established, the first matrix cracking stress for long-steady-state matrix cracking can be solved [22,23,24,25,26,27,28], and the stress intensity factor is used for determining propagation of short matrix cracking stress [29,30,31,32,33,34]. The stress for short matrix cracking increases with flaw size inside the matrix and approaches the long matrix cracking stress [35,36]. Under tensile loading, short matrix cracking appears first at the linear region of the tensile curve; with increasing applied stress, the short matrix cracking propagates and evolves into long matrix cracking, leading to the decrease of composite modulus and the nonlinear behavior of tensile curves [37]. For the problem of matrix multicracking, the maximum stress criterion is first used to predict the generation of matrix multicracking; however, the predicted matrix multicracking approaches the saturation at single applied stress, leading to the step behavior on the predicted tensile stress–strain curve [22,38]; the interaction matrix cracking model calculates the steady-state strain energy release rate considering the change of energy before and after steady-state matrix cracking and matrix flaw density [39]; the energy balance approach is also used to predict the matrix multicracking by establishing the energy balance relationship between two different matrix cracking spaces or configurations [40,41,42,43]; the critical matrix strain energy (CMSE) criterion presumes that the matrix strain energy exists a critical value, when the matrix strain energy is higher than the critical value, the additional matrix strain energy is dissipated through forming new crackings and debonding propagation of the interface [44,45,46,47,48]; the matrix statistical cracking model considers the matrix flaw distribution using the Weibull model and divides the matrix cracking space into three cases, i.e., long matrix crack spacing, medium matrix crack spacing, and short matrix crack spacing; with increasing applied stress, the long and medium matrix crack spacing continually transfers into the short matrix crack spacing, due to the interaction effect between neighboring cracks, when all the matrix crack spacings are less than debonding length at the interface and the evolution of matrix cracking approaches the saturation [49,50]. However, there are few theoretical and experimental investigations on matrix multiple fracture of CMCs at elevated temperatures [51,52,53,54]. The temperature-dependent material properties of the interface, matrix, and fiber affect the evolution of matrix multicracking in fiber-reinforced CMCs [55]. Li [56] investigated matrix multiple fractures of SiC/SiC composites at elevated temperatures. Li [57] developed a micromechanical approach to predict the fatigue life of fiber-reinforced CMCs with different fiber preforms at room and elevated temperatures. Under cyclic fatigue loading, multiple fatigue damage mechanisms degrade the interface performance and fiber strength. The broken fiber fraction is determined considering fatigue damage mechanisms using Global Load Sharing criterion. The composite fatigue fracture occurs when the broken fiber fraction approaches the critical value. However, for C/SiC composites, the temperature-dependent matrix multifracture behavior is much different from that of SiC/SiC composites. The principal objective of the present study is to develop a temperature-dependent matrix multicracking model for C/SiC composites.

In this paper, the temperature-dependent evolution of the matrix multicracking of C/SiC composites is investigated using the CMSE criterion. The temperature-dependent material properties of the interface, fiber, and matrix are considered in the analysis of the microstress field and damage models. The temperature-dependent matrix strain energy and its critical values are determined. The effects of the interface properties, matrix properties, and environmental temperature on the temperature-dependent evolution of the matrix multicracking and the debonding at the interface of C/SiC composites are discussed. The relationships among the evolution of matrix cracking, debonding of the interface, and environmental temperature are established. The experimental evolution of the matrix multicracking and debonding at the fiber/matrix interface of unidirectional C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures are predicted.

2 Theoretical analysis

The ceramic composite system of C/SiC is used for the case study, and its material properties are given by Vf = 30%, rf = 3.5 µm, γm = 6 J/m2 (at room temperature), γd = 0.4 J/m2 (at room temperature), and τi = 20 MPa (at room temperature).

The temperature-dependent elastic modulus of the carbon fiber is given by [58]

(1)Ef(T)=230[12.86×104exp(T324)],T<2,273K.

The temperature-dependent elastic modulus of the SiC matrix is obtained as follows: [59]

(2)Em(T)=350460[4600.04Texp(962T)],T[3001,773K].

The temperature-dependent axial and radial thermal expansion coefficients of carbon fiber are [60]

(3)αlf(T)=2.529×1021.569×104T+2.228×107T21.877×1011T31.288×1014T4,T[3002,500K]
(4)αrf(T)=1.86×101+5.85×104T1.36×108T2+1.06×1022T3,T[3002,500K].

The temperature-dependent axial and radial thermal expansion coefficient of SiC matrix is [59]

(5)αlm(T)=αrm(T)={1.8276+0.0178T1.5544×105T2+4.5246×109T3,T[1251,273K]5.0×106/K,T>1,273K.

The temperature-dependent interface debonding energy γd(T) and matrix fracture energy γm(T) are [61]

(6)γd(T)=γd0[1T0TCP(T)dTT0TmCP(T)dT]
(7)γm(T)=γm0[1T0TCP(T)dTT0TmCP(T)dT],

where T0 denotes the reference temperature, which is set as room temperature [61], Tm denotes the fabricated temperature, γd0 and γm0 denote the interface debonding energy and matrix fracture energy at the reference temperature of T0, and CP(T) is

(8)CP(T)=76.337+109.039×103T6.535×105T227.083×106T2.

The temperature-dependent matrix strain energy is

(9)Um(T)=12Em(T)Am0lc(T)σm2(T)dxdAm,

where Am is the cross-sectional area of the matrix in the unit cell, lc(T) is the temperature-dependent matrix crack spacing, and σm(T) is the temperature-dependent matrix axial stress.

The temperature-dependent fiber and matrix axial stress and interface shear stress are given in Appendix A, and the temperature-dependent interface debonding length is given in Appendix B.

Substituting the temperature-dependent matrix axial stresses in equation (A.2) into equation (9), the matrix strain energy Um(T) for the condition of partial interface debonding is given by

(10)Um(T)=AmEm(T){43[Vfτi(T)Vmrfld(T)]2ld(T)+σmo2(T)[lc(T)2ld(T)]+2rfσmo(T)ρ[2Vfτi(T)ld(T)Vmrfσmo(T)][1exp(ρlc(T)/2ld(T)rf)]+rf2ρ[2Vfτi(T)ld(T)Vmrfσmo(T)]2[1exp(2ρlc(T)/2ld(T)rf)]},

where Am is the cross-sectional area of the matrix in the unit cell, Em(T) is the temperature-dependent matrix elastic modulus, which can be determined using equation (2), Vf and Vm are the fiber and matrix volume, rf is the fiber radius, ld(T) is the temperature-dependent interface debonding length, which can be determined by equation (B.6); σmo(T) is the temperature-dependent matrix axial stress in the bonding region, which can be determined using equation (5), ρ is the shear-lag model parameter, and τi(T) is the temperature-dependent interface shear stress, which is given by [62]

(11)τi(T)=τ0+μ|αrf(T)αrm(T)|(TmT)A,

where τ0 is the steady-state interface shear stress, µ is the interface frictional coefficient, and A is a constant depending on the elastic properties of the matrix and fibers.

For the condition of complete debonding at the interface, the matrix strain energy is given by

(12)Um(T)=Amlc3(T)6Em(T)[Vfτi(T)rfVm]2.

The CMSE Umcr at the critical cracking stress of the matrix σcr is determined as

(13)Umcr(T)=12kAml0σmocr2(T)Em(T),

where k (k ∈ [0, 1]) is the CMSE parameter, l0 is the initial matrix crack spacing, and σmocr(T) is given by

(14)σmocr(T)=Em(T)Ec(T)σcr(T)+Em(T)[αlc(T)αlm(T)]ΔT,

where σcr(T) is the temperature-dependent critical stress for matrix cracking using the ACK model [22].

(15)σcr(T)=[6Vf2Ef(T)Ec2(T)τi(T)γm(T)rfVmEm2(T)]1/2Ec(T)[αlc(T)αlm(T)]ΔT,

where γm(T) is the temperature-dependent matrix fracture energy.

The evolution of matrix multicracking in CMCs can be determined as

(16)Um(σ>σcr,T)=Ucrm(σcr,T).

3 Results and discussion

In the present analysis, the effects of interface properties, matrix properties, and environmental temperature on the temperature-dependent evolution of matrix multicracking and debonding propagation at the interface of unidirectional C/SiC composites are discussed.

3.1 Effect of interface shear stress on matrix multicracking of C/SiC composites

The effect of interface shear stress (i.e., τ0 = 30 and 35 MPa) on temperature-dependent evolution of the matrix multicracking and debonding fraction at the interface of C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures of T = 773, 873, 973, and 1,073 K is shown in Figure 1. When the interface shear stress increases, the debonding resistance at the interface increases, leading to the decrease of the debonding fraction at the interface; the stress transfer capacity between the fiber and the matrix increases, leading to the higher first matrix cracking stress, saturation matrix cracking stress, and saturation matrix cracking density.

Figure 1 (a) The matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves when τ0 = 30 MPa; (b) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves when τ0 = 30 MPa; (c) the matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves when τ0 = 35 MPa; and (d) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves when τ0 = 35 MPa of C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures of T = 773, 873, 973, and 1,073 K.
Figure 1

(a) The matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves when τ0 = 30 MPa; (b) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves when τ0 = 30 MPa; (c) the matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves when τ0 = 35 MPa; and (d) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves when τ0 = 35 MPa of C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures of T = 773, 873, 973, and 1,073 K.

When τ0 = 30 MPa at an elevated temperature of T = 773 K, the density of matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.08/mm at σcr = 53 MPa to λ = 1.2/mm at σsat = 107 MPa; the fraction of the interface debonding increases from η = 0.9% to η = 30.2%. At an elevated temperature of T = 873 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.07/mm at σcr = 77 MPa to λ = 1.5/mm at σsat = 154 MPa and the fraction of the interface debonding increases from η = 0.9% to η = 40.6%. At an elevated temperature of T = 973 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.07/mm at σcr = 104 MPa to λ = 1.9/mm at σsat = 209 MPa and the fraction of the interface debonding increases from η = 0.98% to η = 51.9%. At an elevated temperature of T = 1,073 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.08/mm at σcr = 134 MPa to λ = 2.2/mm at σsat = 268 MPa and the fraction of the interface debonding increases from η = 1% to η = 62.8%.

When τ0 = 35 MPa at an elevated temperature of T = 773 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.09/mm at σcr = 73 MPa to λ = 1.7/mm at σsat = 146 MPa and the fraction of the interface debonding increases from η = 0.9% to η = 36.6%. At an elevated temperature of T = 873 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.09/mm at σcr = 95 MPa to λ = 2.0/mm at σsat = 189 MPa and the fraction of the interface debonding increases from η = 0.9% to η = 45.3%. At an elevated temperature of T = 973 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.09/mm at σcr = 121 MPa to λ = 2.3/mm at σsat = 242 MPa and the fraction of the interface debonding increases from η = 0.98% to η = 55.3%. At an elevated temperature of T = 1,073 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.09/mm at σcr = 149 MPa to λ = 2.7/mm at σsat = 298 MPa and the fraction of the interface debonding increases from η = 1% to η = 65.3%.

3.2 Effect of interface debonding energy on matrix multicracking of C/SiC composites

The effect of interface debonding energy (i.e., γd = 0.5 and 1.0 J/m2) on the temperature-dependent evolution of the matrix multicracking and debonding fraction at the interface of C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures of T = 773, 873, 973, and 1,073 K are shown in Figure 2. When the interface debonding energy increases, the debonding resistance at the interface increases, leading to the decrease of the debonding fraction at the interface and the increase of the evolution rate during matrix multicracking.

Figure 2 (a) The matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves when γd = 0.5 J/m2; (b) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves when γd = 0.5 J/m2; (c) the matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves when γd = 1.0 J/m2; and (d) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves when γd = 1.0 J/m2 of C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures of T = 773, 873, 973, and 1,073 K.
Figure 2

(a) The matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves when γd = 0.5 J/m2; (b) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves when γd = 0.5 J/m2; (c) the matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves when γd = 1.0 J/m2; and (d) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves when γd = 1.0 J/m2 of C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures of T = 773, 873, 973, and 1,073 K.

When γd = 0.5 J/m2 at an elevated temperature of T = 773 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.1/mm at σcr = 88 MPa to λ = 2.2/mm at σsat = 176 MPa and fraction of the interface debonding increases from η = 0.93% to η = 40.5%. At an elevated temperature of T = 873 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.1/mm at σcr = 109 MPa to λ = 2.5/mm at σsat = 218 MPa and the fraction of the interface debonding increases from η = 0.95% to η = 48.4%. At an elevated temperature of T = 973 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.1/mm at σcr = 134 MPa to λ = 2.8/mm at σsat = 269 MPa and the fraction of the interface debonding increases from η = 0.98% to η = 57.5%. At an elevated temperature of T = 1,073 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.1/mm at σcr = 162 MPa to λ = 3.1/mm at σsat = 324 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 1% to η = 66.7%.

When γd = 1.0 J/m2 at an elevated temperature of T = 773 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.12/mm at σcr = 88.4 MPa to λ = 2.3/mm at σsat = 176.8 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 0.9% to η = 40.1%. At an elevated temperature of T = 873 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.12/mm at σcr = 109 MPa to λ = 2.6/mm at σsat = 218 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 0.93% to η = 47.8%. At an elevated temperature of T = 973 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.11/mm at σcr = 134 MPa to λ = 2.9/mm at σsat = 269 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 0.95% to η = 56.4%. At an elevated temperature of T = 1,073 K, the evolution of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.12/mm at σcr = 162 MPa to λ = 3.3/mm at σsat = 324 MPa and the debonding fraction of the interface increases from η = 0.97% to η = 65%.

3.3 Effect of matrix fracture energy on matrix multicracking of C/SiC composites

The effect of matrix fracture energy (i.e., γm = 20 and 30 J/m2) on the temperature-dependent evolution of the matrix multicracking and the debonding fraction at the interface of C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures of T = 773, 873, 973, and 1,073 K are shown in Figure 3. When the matrix fracture energy increases, the energy needed for the matrix multicracking increases, leading to the higher first matrix cracking stress, saturation matrix cracking stress, and saturation matrix cracking density.

Figure 3 (a) The matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves when γm = 20 J/m2; (b) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves when γm = 20 J/m2; (c) the matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves when γm = 30 J/m2; and (d) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves when γm = 30 J/m2 of C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures of T = 773, 873, 973, and 1,073 K.
Figure 3

(a) The matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves when γm = 20 J/m2; (b) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves when γm = 20 J/m2; (c) the matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves when γm = 30 J/m2; and (d) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves when γm = 30 J/m2 of C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures of T = 773, 873, 973, and 1,073 K.

When γm = 20 J/m2 at an elevated temperature of T = 773 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.14/mm at σcr = 78 MPa to λ = 2.4/mm at σsat = 156 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 0.9% to η = 37.2%. At an elevated temperature of T = 873 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.13/mm at σcr = 97 MPa to λ = 2.8/mm at σsat = 195 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 0.9% to η = 44.9%. At an elevated temperature of T = 973 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.13/mm at σcr = 122 MPa to λ = 3.2/mm at σsat = 243 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 0.93% to η = 53.8%. At an elevated temperature of T = 1,073 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.13/mm at σcr = 148 MPa to λ = 3.5/mm at σsat = 296 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 0.95% to η = 62.6%.

When γm = 30 J/m2 at an elevated temperature of T = 773 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.1/mm at σcr = 97.3 MPa to λ = 2.2/mm at σsat = 194 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 0.93% to η = 42.5%. At an elevated temperature of T = 873 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.1/mm at σcr = 119 MPa to λ = 2.5/mm at σsat = 238 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 0.95% to η = 50.1%. At an elevated temperature of T = 973 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.1/mm at σcr = 146 MPa to λ = 2.8/mm at σsat = 292 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 0.96% to η = 58.5%. At an elevated temperature of T = 1,073 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 0.1/mm at σcr = 174 MPa to λ = 3.1/mm at σsat = 349 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 0.98% to η = 66.9%.

4 Experimental comparisons

Li et al. [63] investigated the tensile behavior of unidirectional T-700™ C/SiC composites at room temperature. C/SiC composites were manufactured using the hot-pressing method at ∼1,000°C, which offered the ability to fabricate dense composites via a liquid-phase sintering method at a low temperature. Low-pressure chemical vapor infiltration was employed to deposit approximately 5–20 layer PyC/SiC with the mean thickness of 0.2 µm to enhance the desired nonlinear/noncatastrophic tensile behavior. The nano-SiC powder and sintering additives were ball milled for 4 h using SiC balls. After drying, the powders were dispersed in xylene with polycarbonsilane to form the slurry. Carbon fiber tows were infiltrated by the slurry and wound to form aligned unidirectional composite sheets. The tensile experiments were conducted on an MTS Model 809 servo-hydraulic loadframe (MTS Systems Corp., Minneapolis, MN, USA) equipped with edge-loaded grips, operated at a loading rate of 10 MPa/s. Gage-section strains were measured using a clip-on extensometer (Model No. 634.12F-24, MTS systems Corp.; modified for a 25 mm gage-length). Direct observations of matrix cracking were made using HiROX optical microscope. Matrix crack densities were determined by counting the number of cracks at a length of about 15 mm.

The experimental and theoretical densities of the matrix multicracking and the debonding fraction at the interface of unidirectional C/SiC composites at room temperature and elevated temperatures of T = 773 and 873 K are predicted, as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4 (a) The experimental and theoretical matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves and (b) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves of unidirectional C/SiC composites.
Figure 4

(a) The experimental and theoretical matrix multicracking density versus applied stress curves and (b) the interface debonding fraction versus applied stress curves of unidirectional C/SiC composites.

At room temperature, the evolution of the matrix multicracking starts from σcr = 100 MPa and approaches saturation at σsat = 125 MPa and the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 4.2/mm to λ = 9.4/mm. At an elevated temperature of T = 773 K, the density of the matrix multicracking increases from λ = 1.3/mm at σcr = 140 MPa to λ = 8.7/mm at σsat = 220 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 0.5% to η = 43%; at an elevated temperature of T = 873 K, the density of matrix multicracking increases from λ = 1.1/mm at σcr = 182 MPa to λ = 9.4/mm at σsat = 280 MPa and the debonding fraction at the interface increases from η = 0.6% to η = 52.2%.

For the C/SiC composites, when environmental temperature increases, both the first matrix cracking stress and saturation matrix cracking stress increase and the saturation matrix cracking density also increases.

5 Conclusion

In this paper, the temperature-dependent evolution of the matrix multicracking and debonding fraction at the interface of C/SiC composites is investigated. The relationships among applied stress, multicracking density, debonding fraction at the interface, interface/fiber/matrix properties, and environmental temperature are established. The effects of interface properties, matrix properties, and environmental temperature on temperature-dependent evolution of the matrix multicracking and debonding fraction at the interface of C/SiC composites are discussed. The experimental evolution of the matrix multicracking and the debonding fraction at the interface curves of unidirectional C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures are predicted.

For the SiC/SiC composites, when environmental temperature increases, both the first matrix cracking stress and saturation matrix cracking stress decrease and the saturation matrix cracking density also decreases. However, for the C/SiC composites, when environmental temperature increases, both the first matrix cracking stress and saturation matrix cracking stress increase and the saturation matrix cracking density also increases.

6 Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the paper.


tel: +86-25-84895963

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. NS2019038). The author also wishes to thank the anonymous reviewer and editors for their helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper.

Appendix A

The temperature-dependent fiber axial stress σf(x, T), matrix axial stress σm(x, T), and the interface shear stress τi(x, T) can be described using the following equations:

(A.1)σf(x,T)={σVf2τi(T)rfx,x[0,ld(T)]σfo+[VmVfσmo2ld(T)rfτi(T)]exp[ρxld(T)rf],x[ld(T),lc(T)2]
(A.2)σm(x,T)={2τi(T)VfVmxrf,x[0,ld(T)]σmo[σmo2τi(T)VfVmld(T)rf]exp[ρ(xld(T))rf],x[ld(T),lc(T)2]
(A.3)τi(x,T)={τi(T),x[0,ld(T)]ρ2[VmVfσmo2τi(T)ld(T)rf]exp[ρ(xld(T))rf],x[ld(T),lc(T)2]

where

(A.4)σfo(T)=Ef(T)Ec(T)σ+Ef(T)[αlc(T)αlf(T)]ΔT
(A.5)σmo(T)=Em(T)Ec(T)σ+Em(T)[αlc(T)αlm(T)]ΔT.

Appendix B

The temperature-dependent interface debonding criterion can be described using the following equation: [64]

(B.1)γd(T)=F4πrfwf(T)ld120ldτi(T)v(T)lddx,

where F(=πrf2σ/Vf) is the fiber load at the matrix cracking plane, wf(T) is the temperature-dependent fiber axial displacement at the matrix cracking plane, and v(T) is the temperature-dependent relative displacement between the fiber and the matrix. The temperature-dependent axial displacements of the fiber and matrix, i.e., wf(x, T) and wm(x, T), can be described using the following equations:

(B.2)wf(x,T)=xlc2σf(T)Ef(T)dx=σVfEf(T)(ldx)τi(T)rfEf(T)(ld2x2)2τi(T)ρEf(T)ld+rfVmEm(T)ρVfEf(T)Ec(T)σ+σEc(T)(lc/2ld)
(B.3)wm(x)=xlc2σm(T)Em(T)dx+2Vfτi(T)ρVmEm(T)ldrfρEc(T)σ+σEc(T)(lc2ld).

The temperature-dependent relative displacement between the fiber and the matrix, i.e., v(x, T), can be described using the following equation:

(B.4)v(x,T)=|wf(x,T)wm(x,T)|=σVfEf(T)(ldx)τi(T)Ec(T)VmEm(T)Ef(T)rf(ld2x2)2τi(T)Ec(T)ldρVmEm(T)Ef(T)+rfρVfEf(T)σ.

Substituting wf(x = 0, T) and v(x, T) into equation (B.1), it leads to the following equation:

(B.5)Ec(T)τi2(T)VmEm(T)Ef(T)rfld2+[Ec(T)τi2(T)ρVmEm(T)Ef(T)τi(T)σVfEf(T)]ld+rfVmEm(T)σ24Vf2Ef(T)Ec(T)rfτi(T)2ρVfEf(T)σγd(T)=0.

Solving equation (B.5), the temperature-dependent interface debonding length ld(T) can be described using the following equation:

(B.6)ld(T)=rf2[VmEm(T)σVfEc(T)τi(T)1ρ](rf2ρ)2+rfVmEm(T)Ef(T)Ec(T)τi2(T)γd.

References

[1] Padture, N. P. Advanced structural ceramics in aerospace propulsion, Nature Materials, Vol. 15, 2016, pp. 804–809.10.1038/nmat4687Search in Google Scholar

[2] DiCarlo, J. A., and M. Roode.Ceramic composite development for gas turbine hot section components, Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Vol. 2, 2006, pp. 221–231.10.1115/GT2006-90151Search in Google Scholar

[3] Li, L. B. Modeling first matrix cracking stress of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites considering fiber fracture, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 92, 2017, pp. 24–32.10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.05.004Search in Google Scholar

[4] Choi, S. R., and J. P. Gyekenyesi. Load-rate dependency of ultimate tensile strength in ceramic matrix composites at elevated temperatures, International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 27, 2005, pp. 503–510.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[5] Liu, S., L. Zhang, X. Yin, Y. Liu, and L. Cheng. Proportional limit stress and residual thermal stress of 3D SiC/SiC composite, Journal of Materials Science & Technology, Vol. 30, 2014, pp. 959–964.10.1016/j.jmst.2014.08.004Search in Google Scholar

[6] Sevener, K. M., J. M. Tracy, Z. Chen, J. D. Kiser, and S. Daly. Crack opening behavior in ceramic matrix composites, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 100, 2017, pp. 4734–4747.10.1111/jace.14976Search in Google Scholar

[7] Parthasarathy, T. A., B. Cox, O. Surde, C. Przybyla, and M. K. Cinibulk. Modeling environmentally induced property degradation of SiC/BN/SiC ceramic matrix composites, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 101, 2018, pp. 973–997.10.1111/jace.15325Search in Google Scholar

[8] Sun, Y., and R. N. Singh. The generation of multiple matrix cracking and fiber-matrix interfacial debonding in a glass composite, Acta Materialia, Vol. 46, 1998, pp. 1657–1667.10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00347-9Search in Google Scholar

[9] Cheng, T., R. Qiao, and Y. Xia. A Monte Carlo simulation of damage and failure process with crack saturation for unidirectional fiber reinforced ceramic composites, Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 64, 2004, pp. 2251–2260.10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.001Search in Google Scholar

[10] Morscher, G. N., M. Y. Hee, and J. A. DiCarlo. Matrix cracking in 3D orthogonal melt-infiltration SiC/SiC composite with various Z-fiber types, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 88, 2005, pp. 146–153.10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00029.xSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Rajan, V. P., and F. W. Zok. Matrix cracking of fiber-reinforced ceramic composites in shear, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 73, 2014, pp. 3–21.10.1016/j.jmps.2014.08.007Search in Google Scholar

[12] Gowayed, Y., G. Ojard, U. Santhosh, and G. Jefferson. Modeling of crack density in ceramic matrix composites, Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 49, 2015, pp. 2285–2294.10.1177/0021998314545188Search in Google Scholar

[13] Li, L. B. Modeling for monotonic and cyclic tensile stress–strain behavior of 2D and 2.5D woven C/SiC ceramic-matrix composites, Mechanics of Composite Material, Vol. 54, 2018, pp. 165–178.10.1007/s11029-018-9729-5Search in Google Scholar

[14] Li, L. B. Micromechanical modeling for tensile behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites, Applied Composite Materials, Vol. 22, 2015, pp. 773–790.10.1007/s10443-014-9435-ySearch in Google Scholar

[15] Li, L. B., Y. Song, and Y. Sun. Modeling tensile behavior of cross-ply C/SiC ceramic-matrix composites, Mechanics of Composite Material, Vol. 51, 2015, pp. 358–376.10.1007/s11029-015-9507-6Search in Google Scholar

[16] Li, L. B., Y. Song, and Y. Sun. Modeling tensile behavior of unidirectional C/SiC ceramic matrix composites, Mechanics of Composite Material, Vol. 49, 2014, pp. 659–672.10.1007/s11029-013-9382-ySearch in Google Scholar

[17] Guo, S., and Y. Kagawa. Tensile fracture behavior of continuous SiC fiber-reinforced SiC matrix composites at elevated temperatures and correlation to in situ constituent properties, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Vol. 22, 2002, pp. 2349–2356.10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00028-6Search in Google Scholar

[18] Chen, Z., G. Fang, J. Xie, and J. Liang. Experimental study of high-temperature tensile mechanical properties of 3D needled C/C-SiC composites, Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 654, 2016, pp. 271–277.10.1016/j.msea.2015.12.010Search in Google Scholar

[19] Guo, S., and Y. Kagawa. Effect of matrix modification on tensile mechanical behavior of Tyranno Si-Ti-C-O fiber-reinforced SiC matrix minicomposite at room and elevated temperatures, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Vol. 24, 2004, pp. 3261–3269.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2003.10.044Search in Google Scholar

[20] Almansour, A., E. Maillet, R. Ramasamy, and G. N. Morscer. Effect of fiber content on single tow SiC minicomposite mechanical and damage properties using acoustic emission, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Vol. 35, 2015, pp. 3389–3399.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.06.001Search in Google Scholar

[21] Morscher, G. N., M. Singh, J. D. Kiser, M. Freedman, and R. Bhatt. Modeling stress-dependent matrix cracking and stress–strain behavior in 2D woven SiC fiber reinforced CVI SiC composites, Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 67, 2007, pp. 1009–1017.10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.007Search in Google Scholar

[22] Aveston, J., G. A. Cooper, and A. Kelly. The Properties of Fiber Composites, Conference on Proceedings. National Physical Laboratory, IPC Science and Technology Press, Guildford, 1971, pp. 15–26.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Aveston, J., and A. Kelly. Theory of multiple fracture of fibrous composites, Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 8, 1973, pp. 352–362.10.1007/BF00550155Search in Google Scholar

[24] Budiansky, B., J. W. Hutchinson, and A. G. Evans. Matrix fracture in fiber-reinforced ceramics, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 34, 1986, pp. 167–189.10.1016/0022-5096(86)90035-9Search in Google Scholar

[25] Kuo, W. S., and T. W. Chou. Multiple cracking of unidirectional and cross-ply ceramic matrix composites, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 78, 1995, pp. 745–755.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08242.xSearch in Google Scholar

[26] Sutcu, M., and W. B. Hillig. The effect of fiber-matrix debonded energy on the matrix cracking strength and the debonded shear strength, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia, Vol. 38, 1990, pp. 2653–2662.10.1016/0956-7151(90)90278-OSearch in Google Scholar

[27] Chiang, Y. On fiber debonding and matrix cracking in fiber-reinforced ceramics, Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 61, 2001, pp. 1743–1756.10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00078-1Search in Google Scholar

[28] Li, L. B. Synergistic effects of fiber debonding and fracture on matrix cracking in fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites, Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 682, 2017, pp. 482–490.10.1016/j.msea.2016.11.077Search in Google Scholar

[29] Marshall, D. B., B. N. Cox, and A. G. Evans. The mechanics of matrix cracking in brittle-matrix fiber composites, Acta Metallurgica et Materiali, Vol. 33, 1985, pp. 2013–2021.10.1016/0001-6160(85)90124-5Search in Google Scholar

[30] Marshall, D. B., and B. N. Cox. Tensile fracture of brittle matrix composites: influence of fiber strength, Acta Metallurgic, Vol. 35, 1987, pp. 2607–2619.10.1016/0001-6160(87)90260-4Search in Google Scholar

[31] McCartney, L. N. Mechanics of matrix cracking in brittle-matrix fiber-reinforced composites, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 409, 1987, pp. 329–350.10.1098/rspa.1987.0019Search in Google Scholar

[32] Chiang, Y. C., A. S. D. Wang, and T. W. Chou. On matrix cracking in fiber reinforced ceramics, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 41, 1993, pp. 1137–1154.10.1016/0022-5096(93)90087-VSearch in Google Scholar

[33] Danchaivijit, S. D., and D. K. Shetty. Matrix cracking in ceramic matrix composites, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 76, 1993, pp. 2497–2504.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03972.xSearch in Google Scholar

[34] Thouless, M. D., and A. G. Evans. Effects of pull-out on the mechanical properties of ceramic-matrix-composites, Acta Materialia, Vol. 36, 1988, pp. 517–522.10.1016/0001-6160(88)90083-1Search in Google Scholar

[35] Kim, R. Y., and N. J. Pagano. Crack initiation in unidirectional brittle-matrix composites, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 74, 1991, pp. 1082–1090.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb04346.xSearch in Google Scholar

[36] Dutton, R. E., N. J. Pagano, R. Y. Kim, and T. A. Parthasarathy. Modeling the ultimate tensile strength of unidirectional glass-matrix composites, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 83, 2000, pp. 166–174.10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01166.xSearch in Google Scholar

[37] Barsoum, M. W., P. Kangutkar, and A. S. D. Wang. Matrix crack initiation in ceramic matrix composites part i: experiments and test results, Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 44, 1992, pp. 257–269.10.1016/0266-3538(92)90016-VSearch in Google Scholar

[38] Daniel, I. M., G. Anastassopoulos, and J. W. Lee. The behavior of ceramic matrix fiber composites under longitudinal loading, Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 46, 1993, pp. 105–113.10.1016/0266-3538(93)90166-ESearch in Google Scholar

[39] Zok, F. W., and S. M. Spearing. Matrix crack spacing in brittle matrix composites, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia, Vol. 40, 1992, pp. 2033–2043.10.1016/0956-7151(92)90189-LSearch in Google Scholar

[40] Weitsman, Y., and H. Zhu. Multi-fracture of ceramic composites, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 41, 1993, pp. 351–388.10.1016/0022-5096(93)90012-5Search in Google Scholar

[41] Erdman, D. L., and Y. Weitsman. The multi-fracture response of cross-ply ceramic composites, International Journal of Solids and Structure, Vol. 35, 1998, pp. 5051–5083.10.1002/9780470314876.ch14Search in Google Scholar

[42] Takeda, N., and M. Kiriyama. Matrix crack evolution in SiC fiber/glass matrix cross-ply laminates, Composites, Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Vol. 30, 1999, pp. 593–597.10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00155-9Search in Google Scholar

[43] Li, L. B. Modeling for matrix multicracking evolution of cross-ply ceramic-matrix composites using energy balance approach, Applied Composite Materials, Vol. 22, 2015, pp. 733–755.10.1007/s10443-014-9433-0Search in Google Scholar

[44] Solti, J. P., S. Mall, and D. D. Robertson. Modeling of matrix failure in ceramic matrix composites, Journal of Composites Technology and Research, Vol. 19, 1997, pp. 29–40.10.1520/CTR10011JSearch in Google Scholar

[45] Li, L. B. Effect of fiber Poisson contraction on matrix multicracking evolution of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites, Applied Composite Materials, Vol. 22, 2015, pp. 583–598.10.1007/s10443-014-9426-zSearch in Google Scholar

[46] Li, L. B. Synergistic effects of fiber/matrix interface wear and fibers fracture on matrix multiple cracking in fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites, Composite Interfaces, Vol. 26, 2018, pp. 193–219.10.1080/09276440.2018.1488490Search in Google Scholar

[47] Li, L. B. Modeling matrix multicracking development of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites considering fiber debonding, International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, Vol. 16, 2019, pp. 97–107.10.1111/ijac.13068Search in Google Scholar

[48] Li, L. B. Damage, fracture and fatigue of ceramic-matrix composites, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, Singapore, 2018. ISBN: 978-981-13-1782-8.10.1007/978-981-13-1783-5Search in Google Scholar

[49] Curtin, W. A. Multiple matrix cracking in brittle matrix composites, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia, Vol. 41, 1993, pp. 1369–1377.10.1016/0956-7151(93)90246-OSearch in Google Scholar

[50] Curtin, W. A., B. K. Ahn, and N. Takeda. Modeling brittle and toughness stress–strain behavior in unidirectional ceramic matrix composites, Acta Materialia, Vol. 46, 1998, pp. 3409–3420.10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00041-XSearch in Google Scholar

[51] Smith, C. E., G. N. Morscher, and Z. H. Xia. Monitoring damage accumulation in ceramic matrix composites using electrical resistivity, Scripta Materialia, Vol. 59, 2008, pp. 463–466.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.033Search in Google Scholar

[52] Morscher, G. N., and N. A. Gordon. Acoustic emission and electrical resistance in SiC-based laminate ceramic composites tested under tensile loading, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Vol. 37, 2017, pp. 3861–3872.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.05.003Search in Google Scholar

[53] Simon, C., F. Rebillat, V. Herb, and G. Camus. Monitoring damage evolution of SiCf/[Si-B-C]m composites using electrical resistivity: Crack density-based electromechanical modeling, Acta Materialia, Vol. 124, 2017, pp. 579–587.10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.036Search in Google Scholar

[54] Racle, E., N. Godin, P. Reynaud, and G. Fantozzi. Fatigue lifetime of ceramic matrix composites at intermediate temperature by acoustic emission, Materials, Vol. 10, 2017, pp. 658.10.3390/ma10060658Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[55] Guo, S., and Y. Kagawa. Temperature dependence of in situ constituent properties of polymer-infiltration-pyrolysis-processed NicalonTM SiC fiber-reinforced SiC matrix composite, Journal of Materials Research, Vol. 15, 2000, pp. 951–960.10.1557/JMR.2000.0136Search in Google Scholar

[56] Li, L. B. Modeling matrix multi-fracture in SiC/SiC ceramic-matrix composites at elevated temperatures, Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society, 2019, Vol. 55, 2019, pp. 1115–1126.10.1007/s41779-019-00326-6Search in Google Scholar

[57] Li, L. B. Fatigue life prediction of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites with different fiber preforms at room and elevated temperatures, Materials, Vol. 9, 2016, pp. 207.10.3390/ma9030207Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[58] Sauder, C., J. Lamon, and R. Pailler. The tensile behavior of carbon fibers at high temperatures up to 2,400°C, Carbon, Vol. 42, 2004, pp. 715–725.10.1016/j.carbon.2003.11.020Search in Google Scholar

[59] Snead, L. L., T. Nozawa, Y. Katoh, T. S. Byun, S. Kondo, and D. A. Petti. Handbook of SiC properties for fuel performance modeling, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Vol. 371, 2007, pp. 329–377.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.016Search in Google Scholar

[60] Pradere, C., and C. Sauder. Transverse and longitudinal coefficient of thermal expansion of carbon fibers at high temperatures (300–2,500 K), Carbon, Vol. 46, 2008, pp. 1874–1884.10.1016/j.carbon.2008.07.035Search in Google Scholar

[61] Wang, R. Z., W. G. Li, D. Y. Li, and D. N. Fang. A new temperature dependent fracture strength model for the ZrB2-SiC composites, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Vol. 35, 2015, pp. 2957–2962.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.03.025Search in Google Scholar

[62] Reynaud, P., D. Douby, and G. Fantozzi. Effects of temperature and of oxidation on the interfacial shear stress between fibers and matrix in ceramic-matrix composites, Acta Materialia, Vol. 46, 1998, pp. 2461–2469.10.1016/S1359-6454(98)80029-3Search in Google Scholar

[63] Li, L. B., Y. Song, and Y. Sun. Modeling the tensile behavior of unidirectional C/SiC ceramic-matrix composite, Mechanics of Composite Material, Vol. 49, 2014, pp. 659–672.10.1007/s11029-013-9382-ySearch in Google Scholar

[64] Gao, Y. C., Y. Mai, and B. Cotterell. Fracture of fiber-reinforced materials, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, Vol. 39, 1988, pp. 550–572.10.1007/BF00948962Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-02-04
Revised: 2020-02-10
Accepted: 2020-02-12
Published Online: 2020-06-09

© 2020 Longbiao Li, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Article
  2. Electrochemical reduction mechanism of several oxides of refractory metals in FClNaKmelts
  3. Study on the Appropriate Production Parameters of a Gas-injection Blast Furnace
  4. Microstructure, phase composition and oxidation behavior of porous Ti-Si-Mo intermetallic compounds fabricated by reactive synthesis
  5. Significant Influence of Welding Heat Input on the Microstructural Characteristics and Mechanical Properties of the Simulated CGHAZ in High Nitrogen V-Alloyed Steel
  6. Preparation of WC-TiC-Ni3Al-CaF2 functionally graded self-lubricating tool material by microwave sintering and its cutting performance
  7. Research on Electromagnetic Sensitivity Properties of Sodium Chloride during Microwave Heating
  8. Effect of deformation temperature on mechanical properties and microstructure of TWIP steel for expansion tube
  9. Effect of Cooling Rate on Crystallization Behavior of CaO-SiO2-MgO-Cr2O3 Based Slag
  10. Effects of metallurgical factors on reticular crack formations in Nb-bearing pipeline steel
  11. Investigation on microstructure and its transformation mechanisms of B2O3-SiO2-Al2O3-CaO brazing flux system
  12. Energy Conservation and CO2 Abatement Potential of a Gas-injection Blast Furnace
  13. Experimental validation of the reaction mechanism models of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming in the roasting steelmaking zinc-rich dust process
  14. Effect of substituting fine rutile of the flux with nano TiO2 on the improvement of mass transfer efficiency and the reduction of welding fumes in the stainless steel SMAW electrode
  15. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of Hastelloy X alloy produced by Selective Laser Melting
  16. Study on the structure activity relationship of the crystal MOF-5 synthesis, thermal stability and N2 adsorption property
  17. Laser pressure welding of Al-Li alloy 2198: effect of welding parameters on fusion zone characteristics associated with mechanical properties
  18. Microstructural evolution during high-temperature tensile creep at 1,500°C of a MoSiBTiC alloy
  19. Effects of different deoxidization methods on high-temperature physical properties of high-strength low-alloy steels
  20. Solidification pathways and phase equilibria in the Mo–Ti–C ternary system
  21. Influence of normalizing and tempering temperatures on the creep properties of P92 steel
  22. Effect of temperature on matrix multicracking evolution of C/SiC fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites
  23. Improving mechanical properties of ZK60 magnesium alloy by cryogenic treatment before hot extrusion
  24. Temperature-dependent proportional limit stress of SiC/SiC fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites
  25. Effect of 2CaO·SiO2 particles addition on dephosphorization behavior
  26. Influence of processing parameters on slab stickers during continuous casting
  27. Influence of Al deoxidation on the formation of acicular ferrite in steel containing La
  28. The effects of β-Si3N4 on the formation and oxidation of β-SiAlON
  29. Sulphur and vanadium-induced high-temperature corrosion behaviour of different regions of SMAW weldment in ASTM SA 210 GrA1 boiler tube steel
  30. Structural evidence of complex formation in liquid Pb–Te alloys
  31. Microstructure evolution of roll core during the preparation of composite roll by electroslag remelting cladding technology
  32. Improvement of toughness and hardness in BR1500HS steel by ultrafine martensite
  33. Influence mechanism of pulse frequency on the corrosion resistance of Cu–Zn binary alloy
  34. An interpretation on the thermodynamic properties of liquid Pb–Te alloys
  35. Dynamic continuous cooling transformation, microstructure and mechanical properties of medium-carbon carbide-free bainitic steel
  36. Influence of electrode tip diameter on metallurgical and mechanical aspects of spot welded duplex stainless steel
  37. Effect of multi-pass deformation on microstructure evolution of spark plasma sintered TC4 titanium alloy
  38. Corrosion behaviors of 316 stainless steel and Inconel 625 alloy in chloride molten salts for solar energy storage
  39. Determination of chromium valence state in the CaO–SiO2–FeO–MgO–CrOx system by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
  40. Electric discharge method of synthesis of carbon and metal–carbon nanomaterials
  41. Effect of high-frequency electromagnetic field on microstructure of mold flux
  42. Effect of hydrothermal coupling on energy evolution, damage, and microscopic characteristics of sandstone
  43. Effect of radiative heat loss on thermal diffusivity evaluated using normalized logarithmic method in laser flash technique
  44. Kinetics of iron removal from quartz under ultrasound-assisted leaching
  45. Oxidizability characterization of slag system on the thermodynamic model of superalloy desulfurization
  46. Influence of polyvinyl alcohol–glutaraldehyde on properties of thermal insulation pipe from blast furnace slag fiber
  47. Evolution of nonmetallic inclusions in pipeline steel during LF and VD refining process
  48. Development and experimental research of a low-thermal asphalt material for grouting leakage blocking
  49. A downscaling cold model for solid flow behaviour in a top gas recycling-oxygen blast furnace
  50. Microstructure evolution of TC4 powder by spark plasma sintering after hot deformation
  51. The effect of M (M = Ce, Zr, Ce–Zr) on rolling microstructure and mechanical properties of FH40
  52. Phase evolution and oxidation characteristics of the Nd–Fe–B and Ce–Fe–B magnet scrap powder during the roasting process
  53. Assessment of impact mechanical behaviors of rock-like materials heated at 1,000°C
  54. Effects of solution and aging treatment parameters on the microstructure evolution of Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al alloy
  55. Effect of adding yttrium on precipitation behaviors of inclusions in E690 ultra high strength offshore platform steel
  56. Dephosphorization of hot metal using rare earth oxide-containing slags
  57. Kinetic analysis of CO2 gasification of biochar and anthracite based on integral isoconversional nonlinear method
  58. Optimization of heat treatment of glass-ceramics made from blast furnace slag
  59. Study on microstructure and mechanical properties of P92 steel after high-temperature long-term aging at 650°C
  60. Effects of rotational speed on the Al0.3CoCrCu0.3FeNi high-entropy alloy by friction stir welding
  61. The investigation on the middle period dephosphorization in 70t converter
  62. Effect of cerium on the initiation of pitting corrosion of 444-type heat-resistant ferritic stainless steel
  63. Effects of quenching and partitioning (Q&P) technology on microstructure and mechanical properties of VC particulate reinforced wear-resistant alloy
  64. Study on the erosion of Mo/ZrO2 alloys in glass melting process
  65. Effect of Nb addition on the solidification structure of Fe–Mn–C–Al twin-induced plasticity steel
  66. Damage accumulation and lifetime prediction of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites under thermomechanical fatigue loading
  67. Morphology evolution and quantitative analysis of β-MoO3 and α-MoO3
  68. Microstructure of metatitanic acid and its transformation to rutile titanium dioxide
  69. Numerical simulation of nickel-based alloys’ welding transient stress using various cooling techniques
  70. The local structure around Ge atoms in Ge-doped magnetite thin films
  71. Friction stir lap welding thin aluminum alloy sheets
  72. Review Article
  73. A review of end-point carbon prediction for BOF steelmaking process
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/htmp-2020-0044/html
Scroll to top button