Home Assessment of impact mechanical behaviors of rock-like materials heated at 1,000°C
Article Open Access

Assessment of impact mechanical behaviors of rock-like materials heated at 1,000°C

  • Shi Liu EMAIL logo , Jinyu Xu and Xinyu Fang
Published/Copyright: September 18, 2020

Abstract

Rock acts as a natural brittle material and demonstrates reactions to various dynamic disturbances and high temperature. Mechanical property fluctuations under high temperature and dynamic load for rock materials including marble, sandstone and granite are studied in an underground project of Qinling Mountain in China, exposed to 1,000°C treatments and different strain rate impact loadings. Two main research issues are explored: (1) variations of strength and failure modes of the same high-temperature rock type under different strain rate impact loadings. (2) Comparison of strength and failure modes of three high-temperature rock types under same strain rate impact loadings. Experimental results indicate that both 1,000°C temperature and the strain rate exert significant influence on dynamic compressive strength, and dynamic compressive increase factor and failure modes of three rock types. However, the influences of high temperature and strain rate on different rock types have obvious differences.

1 Introduction

Rock has been widely utilized as a natural building material in engineering practices such as buildings, roads and tunnels throughout the history of architecture and civil works, with most cultural heritage historic buildings constructed from stone [1,2,3]. Strength is an integral mechanical property to be determinate in building materials in which cement, concrete, rocks or bricks are used [4,5]. Brittle fracture is a failure phenomenon occurring in rock materials and has been intensively investigated in rock physics and geotechnical engineering [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. The application of rock in various high-temperature environments, such as the disposal of high-level nuclear waste and fire protection engineering, where temperature near the fire source reaches 1,000°C, has prompted experimental investigations with findings that strength and failure modes of rock exposed to high-temperature treatments are distinct from those exposed only to room temperature conditions [14,15,16,17,18].

Rock-related engineering projects, e.g. blast explosions, earthquakes and underground excavation, often subject high strain rate loadings inducing severe degradations in rock materials and creating strain rate effects and responses that differ from materials under static loading conditions [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Accurate characterizations of rock strengths and failure modes under high strain rate loadings are crucial to rock engineering applications.

Understanding mechanical responses of rock exposed to high temperature to impact or explosive loading is important for effective protection of underground rock engineering. But the strength and failure modes of rock exposed to high temperature and high strain rate loadings are far from those of the single high-temperature condition or single impact load condition. Fundamental questions related to strength and failure modes of rock remain unanswered due to lack of experimental information. Mechanical parameters obtained by conventional static high temperature or dynamic impact room temperature mechanical testing cannot be applied in design and construction of underground rock engineering. Conducting mechanical tests on rock exposed to high temperature and high strain rate loadings can accurately reflect the actual stress state, providing estimates for reliable simulation of underground structural response to blast loading.

In this study, three rock types were subjected to different high strain rate impact loadings after treatment at 1,000°C to experimentally determine the effects of high-temperature and high strain rate impact loadings on dynamic compressive strength (DCS), DCS increase factor and failure modes. The objectives of this research are as follows:

  1. To assess variation characteristics of strength and failure modes of the same high-temperature rock type under different strain rate impact loadings.

  2. To draw comparisons of strength and failure modes among three different high-temperature rock types under the same strain rate impact loading.

2 Materials and experimental program

2.1 Apparatus

The Φ 100 mm split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing device is the core of the testing system (see Figure 1), which is an experimental technique commonly used in the study of the constitutive laws of materials at high strain rates. It consists of three components.

  1. The main equipment: The striker bar, incident bar and transmission bar were 500, 4,500 and 2,500 mm long, respectively, and both of the bars were 100 mm in diameter.

  2. The energy system, made up of air compressor, high pressure air bag and piping.

  3. The testing system, made up of strain gauges and ultra-dynamic apparatus as well as the dynamic test and analysis equipment.

Figure 1 Apparatus of 100 mm diameter SHPB.
Figure 1

Apparatus of 100 mm diameter SHPB.

A projectile impacts the free end of the incident bar, thus developing a compressive longitudinal incident wave. Once this wave reaches the bar–specimen interface, part of it is reflected, whereas the other part travels through the specimen and develops the transmitted wave in the incident bar. With the strain gauges that are glued on the incident bar and transmission bars, these three basic waves are recorded. These strains are then used to compute the strain rate, strain and stress in the specimen as follows [25,26]:

(1)σs(t)=EA2Asεi(t)+εr(t)+εt(t)ε̇s(t)=clsεi(t)εr(t)εt(t)εs(t)=0tε̇s(τ)dτ,

where E is Young’s modulus of bars; c is wave velocity in bars; A and As are cross-sectional areas of bars and specimen, respectively; ls is original length of specimen; εi, εr and εt are incident, reflected and transmitted strain, respectively; and τ1 and τ2 are time delays of reflected and transmitted pulses, respectively.

A high-temperature heating experimental setup is outlined in Figure 2. It consists of three components:

  1. RX3-20-12 box-type resistance furnace: the device has six built-in thermocouples used for heating, with silicon carbon rod elements used in heating, high-performance fiber used in insulation.

  2. The temperature control box: automatic in temperature control and heating, with the design maximum operating temperature up to 1,200°C.

  3. A rail: to provide convenience for taking or placing specimens at high temperatures.

Figure 2 High-temperature heating experimental setup.
Figure 2

High-temperature heating experimental setup.

2.2 Samples and heating process

The Qinling Mountains stretch across central China, 1,500 km from east to west and 100–150 km from north to south. In this study, the rock samples were cored from fresh intact rock blocks belonging to an excavation of 50–150 m underground from the Qinling Mountains. The surface of the rock sample is complete without obvious defects such as holes and cracks. The rock samples are air dried in the natural state at room temperature. Three cylindrical specimens of 100 mm diameter rock samples of marble, sandstone and granite were used in this study. By using a high-speed rotary saw, the drilled specimens were cut into lengths of 50 mm with the ratio of length to diameter maintained at 0.5. An end face grinder was then used to grind the specimens, and inspections were conducted to confirm evenness and perpendicularity with respect to the vertical axis [27]. No bedding plane was observed in the specimens. The average density of marble, sandstone and granite samples are 2,600, 2,750 and 2,650 kg/m3, respectively, and complete mineral composition of the three rock types are listed in Table 1. The specimens were subjected to longitudinal wave velocity testing utilizing a RSM-SY5N nonmetal ultrasonic testing analyzer after dimensions were measured. The specimens were then heated in the heating setup at the rate of 10°C/min until 1,000°C and were kept at constant temperature for 3 h. The 1,000°C high-temperature specimens were then placed in the heating setup to cool to room temperature. Each temperature group is equipped with no less than three specimens. Three rock types exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment are shown in Figures 3 and 4.

Table 1

Summary table of mineralogical composition of rock specimens. All values in wt%

Mineral composition/%QuartzCalcitePlagioclaseK-feldsparMontmorilloniteChloriteIllite
Marble13
Sandstone522786123
Granite17378
Mineral composition/%BiotiteAmphiboleDiopsideMagnetiteDolomiteMuscoviteTalc
Marble29031
Sandstone1
Granite181244
Figure 3 Three rock samples exposed to room temperature.
Figure 3

Three rock samples exposed to room temperature.

Figure 4 Three rock samples exposed to 1,000°C treatment.
Figure 4

Three rock samples exposed to 1,000°C treatment.

3 Static compressive test

The test samples used in static compressive test are prepared using the same processing method specified in Section 2.2. Cylindrical specimens of the length-to-diameter ratio equal to 2 (50 mm diameter) were cored for uniaxial static compression tests [27]. The typical static compressive stress–strain curves of three rock types are shown in Figure 5. The static compressive strengths are shown in Figure 6. The longitudinal wave velocities are shown in Figure 7. Static compressive strengths of marble, sandstone and granite samples at room temperature are 60.2, 59.7, 90.4 MPa, respectively. Static compressive strengths of three rock types after 1,000°C treatment are 10.9, 10.9 and 30.5 MPa, and when compared with room temperature, it decrease by about 81.89%, 81.74% and 66.26%, respectively. Longitudinal wave velocities of marble, sandstone and granite samples at room temperature are 5,173, 2,060 and 4,262 m/s, respectively. Longitudinal wave velocities of three rock types after 1,000°C treatment are 1,456, 360 and 557 m/s, and when compared with room temperature, it decrease by about 71.85%, 82.52% and 86.93%, respectively.

Figure 5 Typical static compressive stress–strain curves of three rock types.
Figure 5

Typical static compressive stress–strain curves of three rock types.

Figure 6 Static compressive strength of three rock types exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment.
Figure 6

Static compressive strength of three rock types exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment.

Figure 7 Longitudinal wave velocity of three rock types exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment.
Figure 7

Longitudinal wave velocity of three rock types exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment.

4 Dynamic compressive test results and discussions

In recent years, most studies have focused on simulating high-strain rate loading in laboratory tests [28,29,30,31]. Dynamic behavior of rock after high-temperature treatment at high strain rates differs considerably from that observed at room temperature, and practical applications often require mechanical operation of high-temperature rock under dynamic conditions. Impact loading rate of projectiles is controlled at 11.0, 12.0, 13.0, 14.0 and 15.0 m/s by adjusting the air pressure and the specific location of projectiles in the launch barrel, corresponding to five different strain rates of rock material.

The T2 red copper sheet with a thickness of 1 mm is used as the waveform shaper, and the diameter is 30–45 mm corresponding to the impact compression test. Before the test, the copper piece is pasted at the center of the contact end of the incident bar and the bullet. During the impact loading test, the copper material with the lower yield strength absorbs the energy of a part of the incident pulse and then filters the high-frequency oscillation of the incident wave. A smoother sine wave or a half sine wave can be obtained. Waveform shaping technology can effectively extend the rising time of the incident stress wave and ensure the stress uniformity of the sample. Figures 8 and 9 illustrate the typical waveforms of rock impact compression tests exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment. The SHPB test results on rock exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment are summarized in Tables 2–4. Figures 10 and 11 illustrate the typical dynamic compressive stress–strain curves of rock (only list stress–strain curves of marble).

Figure 8 Typical waveforms of rock exposed to room temperature.
Figure 8

Typical waveforms of rock exposed to room temperature.

Figure 9 Typical waveforms of rock exposed to 1,000°C treatment.
Figure 9

Typical waveforms of rock exposed to 1,000°C treatment.

Table 2

Summary of mechanical parameters of marble exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment

MarbleTemperatureStrain rate (S−1)DCS (MPa)DCS increase factorAverage static compressive strength (MPa)Average longitudinal wave velocity (m/s)
Room temperature65.1169.42.8460.25,173
95.0201.23.37
101.4241.84.05
115.2259.84.35
123.8284.94.77
T = 1,000°C114.944.84.1010.91,456
175.646.24.22
180.547.94.38
186.149.54.52
191.450.64.63
Table 3

Summary of mechanical parameters of sandstone exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment

SandstoneTemperatureStrain rate (S−1)DCS (MPa)DCS increase factorAverage static compressive strength (MPa)Average longitudinal wave velocity (m/s)
Room temperature93.1173.52.9159.72,060
123.5179.43.01
135.2203.73.41
154.9218.93.67
166.0226.83.80
T = 1,000°C145.357.35.2410.9360
190.051.04.66
224.156.55.16
237.856.65.17
248.456.85.19
Table 4

Summary of mechanical parameters of granite exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment

GraniteTemperatureStrain rate (S−1)DCS (MPa)DCS increase factorAverage static compressive strength (MPa)Average longitudinal wave velocity (m/s)
Room temperature65.5201.82.2390.44,262
75.6220.02.43
98.6245.82.72
108.0289.43.20
116.9347.23.84
T = 1,000°C187.5149.44.9030.5557
194.2143.24.70
198.8154.45.06
202.6158.65.20
220.1163.45.36
Figure 10 Dynamic compressive stress–strain curves of marble exposed to room temperature.
Figure 10

Dynamic compressive stress–strain curves of marble exposed to room temperature.

Figure 11 Dynamic compressive stress–strain curves of marble exposed to 1,000°C treatment.
Figure 11

Dynamic compressive stress–strain curves of marble exposed to 1,000°C treatment.

4.1 DCS

Variation characteristics of DCS of three rock types exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment under different strain rates are presented in Figure 12. DCS exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment exhibit concentration in two different regions with nearly no overlap, indicating that under the same impact velocity, two different temperature conditions exert an exceptional influence on DCS and strain rate of the three rock types. The DCS sharply reduces, and the strain rates significantly increase following 1,000°C treatment, indicating that 1,000°C treatment produces severe degradations in DCS and strain rate. Specific test and analysis results are as follows: strain rate-enhanced performance on DCS of three rock types at room temperature is obvious with influences of strain rate on marble and granite much greater than on sandstone. Under the same impact velocity, the DCS of granite is greatest, followed by marble, with DCS of sandstone the least. Alterations in the strain rate-enhanced performance on DCS occur following 1,000°C treatment as DCS of marble and granite experience increases, with the increase significantly less than at room temperature, while DCS of sandstone experiences little change. In addition, unlike room temperature conditions, under the same impact velocity, DCS of granite is greatest, while DCS of marble and sandstone is minimal. But, in general, the DCS of sandstone is slightly greater than marble, showing that the weakening effect due to 1,000°C on marble DCS is most serious.

Figure 12 Dynamic compression strength of three rock types exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment.
Figure 12

Dynamic compression strength of three rock types exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment.

Dynamic compressive increase factor (DCIF) is the ratio of the dynamic and static compressive strength of rock material, reflecting the increased amplitude in DCS of rock under impact loading. Variation characteristics of DCIF of three rock types exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment under different strain rates impact loadings are presented in Figure 13. Compared with the static compressive strength, DCIF of the three rock types increases partially independently of temperature conditions as DCIF is generally greater than 1. Strain rate-enhanced performance on DCIF is apparent at room temperature with the influence of strain rate on marble and granite much greater than sandstone. DCIF of marble is greatest under the same impact velocity followed by sandstone with DCIF of granite the least, indicating that the increased amplitude in DCS of marble is the greatest. Modifications occur in strain rate-enhanced performance on DCIF following 1,000°C treatment. DCIF of marble and granite exhibit slight increases with the increase of strain rate although significantly less than at room temperature, whereas DCIF of sandstone remains nearly unchanged.

Figure 13 Dynamic compression strength increase the factor of three rock types exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment.
Figure 13

Dynamic compression strength increase the factor of three rock types exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment.

4.2 Failure modes

Failure mode variation characteristics of the three rock types exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment under different strain rates impact loadings are presented in Figures 14–16. Failure mode reflects the rock stress state as a result of interactions among rock micro-cracks. High temperature of 1,000°C and the strain rate exert significant influence on failure modes of the three rock types as shown in Figures 14–16. Failure modes of each rock type at room temperature, when subjected to impact loading exceeding the ultimate rock strength, demonstrate tensile splitting failure characterized by tensile fracturing in parallel to the axial direction rather than axial compression failure. Differences exist in failure modes for marble and granite as samples are typically broken into pieces with the increasing strain rate with the amounts of failure pieces gradually increasing and pieces tend to be uniform. Sandstone failure modes manifest typically as samples exhibiting an intact core and corroded edges. Sandstone samples will not be destroyed immediately after the axial tensile failure occurred and may still bear certain axial pressure in the shear plane formation throughout the sample. The failure of sandstone samples is significant with the increasing strain rate, often rapidly disintegrating after reaching the peak strength. Because the sample failure process lasts shorter, end effect limits the vertical development of splitting cracks, thus resulting in the failure modes characterized by edge avalanche and shear buckling in the central area of rock pillar treatment. Internal damage in rock, after 1,000°C treatment, is extensive and induces significant changes in failure modes of each rock type compared with room temperature. The failure mode for marble and sandstone is far more severe than with room temperature as failure pieces rapidly increase, and pieces tend to be in the powder form. Failure modes for granite exhibit tensile splitting failure similar to that of sandstone at room temperature with a typical intact middle core and edge corrosion.

Figure 14 Failure modes of marble exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment. (a) 65.1 s−1, (b) 95.0 s−1, (c) 101.4 s−1, (d) 115.2 s−1 and (e) 123.8 s−1. Room temperature: (a) 114.9 s−1, (b) 175.6 s−1, (c) 180.5 s−1, (d) 186.1 s−1 and (e) 191.4 s−1.
Figure 14

Failure modes of marble exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment. (a) 65.1 s−1, (b) 95.0 s−1, (c) 101.4 s−1, (d) 115.2 s−1 and (e) 123.8 s−1. Room temperature: (a) 114.9 s−1, (b) 175.6 s−1, (c) 180.5 s−1, (d) 186.1 s−1 and (e) 191.4 s−1.

Figure 15 Failure modes of sandstone exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment. (a) 93.1 s−1, (b) 123.5 s−1, (c) 135.2 s−1, (d) 154.9 s−1 and (e) 166.0 s−1. Room temperature: (a) 145.3 s−1, (b)190.0 s−1, (c) 224.1 s−1, (d) 237.8 s−1 and (e) 248.4 s−1.
Figure 15

Failure modes of sandstone exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment. (a) 93.1 s−1, (b) 123.5 s−1, (c) 135.2 s−1, (d) 154.9 s−1 and (e) 166.0 s−1. Room temperature: (a) 145.3 s−1, (b)190.0 s−1, (c) 224.1 s−1, (d) 237.8 s−1 and (e) 248.4 s−1.

Figure 16 Failure modes of granite exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment. (a) 65.5 s−1, (b) 75.6 s−1, (c) 98.6 s−1, (d) 108 s−1 and (e) 116.9 s−1. Room temperature: (a) 168.6 s−1, (b) 174.1 s−1, (c) 184.8 s−1, (d) 214.1 s−1 and (e) 255.9 s−1.
Figure 16

Failure modes of granite exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment. (a) 65.5 s−1, (b) 75.6 s−1, (c) 98.6 s−1, (d) 108 s−1 and (e) 116.9 s−1. Room temperature: (a) 168.6 s−1, (b) 174.1 s−1, (c) 184.8 s−1, (d) 214.1 s−1 and (e) 255.9 s−1.

As a structural medium containing various defects, rock exhibits original and spontaneous defects in the deformation process leading to stress nonuniformity. Local tensile stress concentration occurs as a result in the sample rendering stress nonuniformity, which is the decisive factor in tension failure. Splitting failure mode is often then presented as tensile strength of the rock that is extremely low in the compression process.

The comparative analysis of the DCS and failure modes of rock types exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment under different strain rate impact loadings reveals that the failure mode and strength correlations are nearly nonexistent for the same rock type subjected to different temperature treatments and strain rates and for different rock types subjected to the same external environment. Variation characteristics of failure modes and strength affected by temperature and strain rate are also revealed to be dissimilar.

4.3 Microstructure characteristics

The microstructure characteristics of rock directly determine its macroscopic mechanical response. Taking marble as an example, the typical scanning electron microscope images of fracture failure of rock samples exposed to room temperature and 1,000°C treatment under impact loading are shown in Figures 17 and 18.

Figure 17 Fracture morphology of marble exposed to room temperature.
Figure 17

Fracture morphology of marble exposed to room temperature.

Figure 18 Fracture morphology of marble exposed to 1,000°C treatment.
Figure 18

Fracture morphology of marble exposed to 1,000°C treatment.

At room temperature, the fracture forms of marble under impact loading are very rich and contain a lot of information about the crystal structure and micro-crack changes in the rock. The failure form is mainly transgranular fracture. Temperature has a significant influence on the mineral composition and crystal structure of rocks, so the microstructure characteristics of rocks under the influence of high temperature are obviously different from those under normal temperature. After 1,000°C treatment, the fracture morphology of marble is dominated by obvious plastic fracture, with a large number of plastic fracture characteristics such as slip separation and dimples. This indicates that the marble has begun to undergo a brittle-plastic transition, which is also reflected in macroscopic mechanical tests.

5 Conclusions

The influence of the strain rate on DCS and DCIF of marble and granite at room temperature is much greater than sandstone. Under the same impact velocity, the DCS of granite is superior, followed by marble, with DCS of sandstone exhibiting the least; the DCIF of marble is superior, with granite exhibiting the least. Following 1,000°C treatment, with the increase of the strain rate, the DCS and DCIF of marble and granite demonstrate some increase, although significantly less than at room temperature, while DCS and DCIF of sandstone change only minimally. The DCS of granite is superior under the same impact velocity, while DCS of marble and sandstone are minimal. The DCS of sandstone is typically slightly more than marble, indicating that the weakening effect of high temperature 1,000°C on marble DCS is most significant.

Failure mode reflects the stress state of rock as a result of interaction among rock micro-cracks. Failure modes of the three rock types at room temperature reveal tensile splitting failure characterized by tensile fracturing in parallel to the axial direction rather than axial compression failure. Samples are typically broken into pieces for marble and granite, and in case of sandstone, samples typically exhibit an intact middle core and edge corrosion. Failure modes of the three rock types change significantly compared with room temperature following 1,000°C treatment. For marble and sandstone, failure pieces rapidly increase and tend to be powder like for marble and sandstone, and for granite, failure modes exhibit tensile splitting failure similar to that of sandstone at room temperature with an intact middle core and edge corrosion.


tel: +86-180-9245-9542

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51378497).

References

[1] Akkurt, I., R. Altindag, T. Onargan, C. Basyigit, S. Kilincarslan, M. Kun, et al. The properties of various igneous rocks for c-ray shielding. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 21, 2007, pp. 2078–2082.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.059Search in Google Scholar

[2] Ludovico-Marques, M., C. Chastre, and G. Vasconcelos. Modelling the compressive mechanical behaviour of granite and sandstone historical building stones, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 28, 2012, pp. 372–381.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.083Search in Google Scholar

[3] Brotóns, V., R. Tomás, S. Ivorra, and J. C. Alarcón. Temperature influence on the physical and mechanical properties of a porous rock: San Julian’s calcarenite. Engineering Geology, Vol. 167, 2013, pp. 117–127.10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.10.012Search in Google Scholar

[4] Kalantari, S., A. Baghbanan, and H. Hashemalhosseini. An analytical model for estimating rock strength parameters from small-scale drilling data. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 11, 2019, pp. 135–145.10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.09.005Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bozorgzadeh, N., M. D. Escobar, and J. P. Harrison. Comprehensive statistical analysis of intact rock strength for reliability-based design. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 106, 2018, pp. 374–387.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.03.005Search in Google Scholar

[6] Wong, T. F., H. C. W. Robina, K. T. Chau, and C. A. Tang. Microcrack statistics, Weibull distribution and micromechanical modeling of compressive failure in rock. Mechanics of Materials, Vol. 38, 2006, pp. 664–681.10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.12.002Search in Google Scholar

[7] Das, S. K., and P. K. Basudhar. Comparison of intact rock failure criteria using various statistical methods. Acta Geotechnica, Vol. 4, 2016, pp. 223–231.10.1007/s11440-009-0088-1Search in Google Scholar

[8] Wang, W., F. Wang, X. Huang, and J. Song. Rock fracture image acquisition using two kinds of lighting and fusion on a wavelet transform. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, Vol. 75, 2016, pp. 311–324.10.1007/s10064-015-0747-4Search in Google Scholar

[9] Wang, X., and M. Cai. A comprehensive parametric study of grain-based models for rock failure process simulation. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 115, 2019, pp. 60–76.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.01.008Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ikari, M. J., A. R. Niemeijer, and C. Marone. Experimental investigation of incipient shear failure in foliated rock. Journal of Structural Geology, Vol. 77, 2015, pp. 82–91.10.1016/j.jsg.2015.05.012Search in Google Scholar

[11] Duan, K., Y. Ji, W. Wu, and C. Y. Kwok. Unloading-induced failure of brittle rock and implications for excavation-induced strain burst. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 84, 2019, pp. 495–506.10.1016/j.tust.2018.11.012Search in Google Scholar

[12] Yin, T., S. Zhang, X. Li, and L. Bai. A numerical estimate method of dynamic fracture initiation toughness of rock under high temperature. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 204, 2018, pp. 87–102.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.09.034Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ma, Q., D. Ma, and Z. Yao. Influence of freeze-thaw cycles on dynamic compressive strength and energy distribution of soft rock specimen. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 153, 2018, pp. 10–17.10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.04.014Search in Google Scholar

[14] Jha, M. K., A. K. Verma, S. Maheshwar, and A. Chauhan. Study of temperature effect on thermal conductivity of Jhiri shale from Upper Vindhyan, India. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, Vol. 75, 2016, pp. 1657–1668.10.1007/s10064-015-0829-3Search in Google Scholar

[15] Lu, Y., L. Wang, X. Sun, and J. Wang. Experimental study of the influence of water and temperature on the mechanical behavior of mudstone and sandstone. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, Vol. 76, 2017, pp. 645–660.10.1007/s10064-016-0851-0Search in Google Scholar

[16] Mahmutoglu, Y. Mechanical behaviour of cyclically heated fine grained rock. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 31, 1998, pp. 169–179.10.1007/s006030050017Search in Google Scholar

[17] Tian, H., T. Kempka, N. X. Xu, and M. Ziegler. Physical properties of sandstones after high temperature treatment. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 45, 2012, pp. 1113–1117.10.1007/s00603-012-0228-zSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Zhang, L. Y., X. B. Mao, R. X. Liu, X. Q. Guo, and D. Ma. The mechanical properties of mudstone at high temperatures: an experimental study, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 47, 2014, pp. 1479–1484.10.1007/s00603-013-0435-2Search in Google Scholar

[19] Wang, Q. Z., W. Li, and H. P. Xie. Dynamic split tensile test of flattened Brazilian disc of rock with SHPB setup. Mechanics of Materials, Vol. 41, 2009, pp. 252–260.10.1016/j.mechmat.2008.10.004Search in Google Scholar

[20] Li, J., R. B. Kaunda, and K. Zhou. Experimental investigations on the effects of ambient freeze–thaw cycling on dynamic properties and rock pore structure deterioration of sandstone. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 154, 2018, pp. 133–141.10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.06.015Search in Google Scholar

[21] Li, X. F., H. B. Li, Q. B. Zhang, J. L. Jiang, and J. Zhao. Dynamic fragmentation of rock material: characteristic size, fragment distribution and pulverization law. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 199, 2018, pp. 739–759.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.024Search in Google Scholar

[22] Brace, W. F., and A. H. Jones. Comparison of uniaxial deformation in shock and static loading of three rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 13, 1971, pp. 4913–4921.10.21236/AD0726748Search in Google Scholar

[23] Liu, S., and J. Y. Xu. Effect of strain rate on the dynamic compressive mechanical behaviors of rock material subjected to high temperatures. Mechanics of Materials, Vol. 82, 2015, pp. 28–38.10.1016/j.mechmat.2014.12.006Search in Google Scholar

[24] Liu, S., and J. Y. Xu. Investigation of impact compressive mechanical properties of sandstone after as well as under high temperature. High Temperatures and Materials Processes, Vol. 33, 2014, pp. 585–591.10.1515/htmp-2013-0125Search in Google Scholar

[25] Lindholm, U. S. Some experiments with the split Hopkinson pressure bar. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 12, 1964, pp. 317–335.10.1016/0022-5096(64)90028-6Search in Google Scholar

[26] Ravichandran, G., and G. Subhash. Critical appraisal of limiting strain rates for compression testing ceramics in a split Hopkinson pressure bar. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 77, No. 1, 1994, pp. 263–267.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb06987.xSearch in Google Scholar

[27] ISRM. SM for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials. ISRM suggest, Methods, Vol. 2, 1979, pp. 137–140.10.1016/0148-9062(79)91450-5Search in Google Scholar

[28] Fan, L. F., F. Ren, and G. W. Ma. Experimental study on viscoelastic behavior of sedimentary rock under dynamic loading. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 45, 2012, pp. 433–438.10.1007/s00603-011-0197-7Search in Google Scholar

[29] Liu, S., and J. Y. Xu. Study on dynamic characteristics of marble under impact loading and high temperature. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 62, 2013, pp. 51–58.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.03.014Search in Google Scholar

[30] Li, X. F., X. Li, H. B. Li, Q. B. Zhang, and J. Zhao. Dynamic tensile behaviours of heterogeneous rocks: the grain scale fracturing characteristics on strength and fragmentation. International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 118, 2018, pp. 98–118.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.04.006Search in Google Scholar

[31] Zhang, Q. B., and J. Zhao. A review of dynamic experimental techniques and mechanical behaviour of rock materials. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 47, 2014, pp. 1411–1478.10.1007/s00603-013-0463-ySearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-11-18
Revised: 2020-01-03
Accepted: 2020-01-17
Published Online: 2020-09-18

© 2020 Shi Liu et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Article
  2. Electrochemical reduction mechanism of several oxides of refractory metals in FClNaKmelts
  3. Study on the Appropriate Production Parameters of a Gas-injection Blast Furnace
  4. Microstructure, phase composition and oxidation behavior of porous Ti-Si-Mo intermetallic compounds fabricated by reactive synthesis
  5. Significant Influence of Welding Heat Input on the Microstructural Characteristics and Mechanical Properties of the Simulated CGHAZ in High Nitrogen V-Alloyed Steel
  6. Preparation of WC-TiC-Ni3Al-CaF2 functionally graded self-lubricating tool material by microwave sintering and its cutting performance
  7. Research on Electromagnetic Sensitivity Properties of Sodium Chloride during Microwave Heating
  8. Effect of deformation temperature on mechanical properties and microstructure of TWIP steel for expansion tube
  9. Effect of Cooling Rate on Crystallization Behavior of CaO-SiO2-MgO-Cr2O3 Based Slag
  10. Effects of metallurgical factors on reticular crack formations in Nb-bearing pipeline steel
  11. Investigation on microstructure and its transformation mechanisms of B2O3-SiO2-Al2O3-CaO brazing flux system
  12. Energy Conservation and CO2 Abatement Potential of a Gas-injection Blast Furnace
  13. Experimental validation of the reaction mechanism models of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming in the roasting steelmaking zinc-rich dust process
  14. Effect of substituting fine rutile of the flux with nano TiO2 on the improvement of mass transfer efficiency and the reduction of welding fumes in the stainless steel SMAW electrode
  15. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of Hastelloy X alloy produced by Selective Laser Melting
  16. Study on the structure activity relationship of the crystal MOF-5 synthesis, thermal stability and N2 adsorption property
  17. Laser pressure welding of Al-Li alloy 2198: effect of welding parameters on fusion zone characteristics associated with mechanical properties
  18. Microstructural evolution during high-temperature tensile creep at 1,500°C of a MoSiBTiC alloy
  19. Effects of different deoxidization methods on high-temperature physical properties of high-strength low-alloy steels
  20. Solidification pathways and phase equilibria in the Mo–Ti–C ternary system
  21. Influence of normalizing and tempering temperatures on the creep properties of P92 steel
  22. Effect of temperature on matrix multicracking evolution of C/SiC fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites
  23. Improving mechanical properties of ZK60 magnesium alloy by cryogenic treatment before hot extrusion
  24. Temperature-dependent proportional limit stress of SiC/SiC fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites
  25. Effect of 2CaO·SiO2 particles addition on dephosphorization behavior
  26. Influence of processing parameters on slab stickers during continuous casting
  27. Influence of Al deoxidation on the formation of acicular ferrite in steel containing La
  28. The effects of β-Si3N4 on the formation and oxidation of β-SiAlON
  29. Sulphur and vanadium-induced high-temperature corrosion behaviour of different regions of SMAW weldment in ASTM SA 210 GrA1 boiler tube steel
  30. Structural evidence of complex formation in liquid Pb–Te alloys
  31. Microstructure evolution of roll core during the preparation of composite roll by electroslag remelting cladding technology
  32. Improvement of toughness and hardness in BR1500HS steel by ultrafine martensite
  33. Influence mechanism of pulse frequency on the corrosion resistance of Cu–Zn binary alloy
  34. An interpretation on the thermodynamic properties of liquid Pb–Te alloys
  35. Dynamic continuous cooling transformation, microstructure and mechanical properties of medium-carbon carbide-free bainitic steel
  36. Influence of electrode tip diameter on metallurgical and mechanical aspects of spot welded duplex stainless steel
  37. Effect of multi-pass deformation on microstructure evolution of spark plasma sintered TC4 titanium alloy
  38. Corrosion behaviors of 316 stainless steel and Inconel 625 alloy in chloride molten salts for solar energy storage
  39. Determination of chromium valence state in the CaO–SiO2–FeO–MgO–CrOx system by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
  40. Electric discharge method of synthesis of carbon and metal–carbon nanomaterials
  41. Effect of high-frequency electromagnetic field on microstructure of mold flux
  42. Effect of hydrothermal coupling on energy evolution, damage, and microscopic characteristics of sandstone
  43. Effect of radiative heat loss on thermal diffusivity evaluated using normalized logarithmic method in laser flash technique
  44. Kinetics of iron removal from quartz under ultrasound-assisted leaching
  45. Oxidizability characterization of slag system on the thermodynamic model of superalloy desulfurization
  46. Influence of polyvinyl alcohol–glutaraldehyde on properties of thermal insulation pipe from blast furnace slag fiber
  47. Evolution of nonmetallic inclusions in pipeline steel during LF and VD refining process
  48. Development and experimental research of a low-thermal asphalt material for grouting leakage blocking
  49. A downscaling cold model for solid flow behaviour in a top gas recycling-oxygen blast furnace
  50. Microstructure evolution of TC4 powder by spark plasma sintering after hot deformation
  51. The effect of M (M = Ce, Zr, Ce–Zr) on rolling microstructure and mechanical properties of FH40
  52. Phase evolution and oxidation characteristics of the Nd–Fe–B and Ce–Fe–B magnet scrap powder during the roasting process
  53. Assessment of impact mechanical behaviors of rock-like materials heated at 1,000°C
  54. Effects of solution and aging treatment parameters on the microstructure evolution of Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al alloy
  55. Effect of adding yttrium on precipitation behaviors of inclusions in E690 ultra high strength offshore platform steel
  56. Dephosphorization of hot metal using rare earth oxide-containing slags
  57. Kinetic analysis of CO2 gasification of biochar and anthracite based on integral isoconversional nonlinear method
  58. Optimization of heat treatment of glass-ceramics made from blast furnace slag
  59. Study on microstructure and mechanical properties of P92 steel after high-temperature long-term aging at 650°C
  60. Effects of rotational speed on the Al0.3CoCrCu0.3FeNi high-entropy alloy by friction stir welding
  61. The investigation on the middle period dephosphorization in 70t converter
  62. Effect of cerium on the initiation of pitting corrosion of 444-type heat-resistant ferritic stainless steel
  63. Effects of quenching and partitioning (Q&P) technology on microstructure and mechanical properties of VC particulate reinforced wear-resistant alloy
  64. Study on the erosion of Mo/ZrO2 alloys in glass melting process
  65. Effect of Nb addition on the solidification structure of Fe–Mn–C–Al twin-induced plasticity steel
  66. Damage accumulation and lifetime prediction of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites under thermomechanical fatigue loading
  67. Morphology evolution and quantitative analysis of β-MoO3 and α-MoO3
  68. Microstructure of metatitanic acid and its transformation to rutile titanium dioxide
  69. Numerical simulation of nickel-based alloys’ welding transient stress using various cooling techniques
  70. The local structure around Ge atoms in Ge-doped magnetite thin films
  71. Friction stir lap welding thin aluminum alloy sheets
  72. Review Article
  73. A review of end-point carbon prediction for BOF steelmaking process
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/htmp-2020-0040/html
Scroll to top button