Home Statistical model used to assessment the sulphate resistance of mortars with fly ashes
Article Open Access

Statistical model used to assessment the sulphate resistance of mortars with fly ashes

  • Julia Marczewska EMAIL logo and Monika Jaworska
Published/Copyright: November 10, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The use of low (LCFA) and high (HCFA) calcium fly ashes in the cement industry allows the implementation of European Union proposals on waste management and energy saving. However, the possibility of using HCFA is limited, because the properties of such waste from coal-fired power plants must comply with national regulations. The paper shows the effect of partial replacement of Portland cement (OPC) by these fly ashes on the resistance of the sulphate attack of the mortars immersed in a 5% solution of sodium sulphate. In order to determine the optimal amount of ash additive, a research plan was designed using statistical methods using the Gibbs triangle for mixtures. Samples of control mortars of OPC, binary mixtures of HCFA or LCFA and ternary mixtures of HCFA/LCFA were made. The composition of the blends was designed in accordance with the statistical plan of the experiment for mixtures. The testing program included linear strains, compressive strength and microstructure tests using SEM with EDXA and XRD analysis. The results of laboratory tests and statistical analyzes have shown that fly ash has a positive effect on the sulphate resistance of cementitious composites.

1 Introduction

The fly ashes from waste are widely used in construction as an active ingredient in the binder of cementitious composites. The fly ashes (FA) play a great importance in the modern concrete engineering and their use allow for economic and environmental benefits. High and low calcium

fly ashes, as components of concrete modify the properties of both concrete mixture, fresh mortars as well as concrete and mortars. Properly used, they enable the production of high-quality and durable concrete in an ecological and economical way. The use of fly ashes for cement or concrete mixture allows to reduce the consumption of cement clinker to produce concrete, which results in a reduction of carbon dioxide emissions to the environment and a reduction in the consumption of fossil fuels and natural resources. Low calcium fly ashes are widely used as additives for cement and concrete. Around 675 million tons of fly ashes are produced every year around the world, of which only 16% [1, 2] are used. In Poland, about 20 million tons of fly ash is generated every year, half of which is from the combustion of lignite [3]. Due to the existing legal provisions [4, 5, 6] HCFA is used only in 20%. The percentage of using the total Polish production of fly ash is 60% [7]. The composition of fly ash is unfortunately quite variable, because it depends on many factors [8, 9]. Fly ash is used for masonry cements as a hydraulic binder in road engineering to stabilize the ground, substructure of low traffic and strengthening embankment slopes [10].

In the international literature [11, 12, 13] there have been found attempts to use HCFA for cementitious composites exposed to sulfate attack. These authors found that the additive was less effective than low calcium fly ash. However, the influence of various amounts of ash addition on sulfate resistance has not been investigated. The sulphate resistance of fly ash depends on the content of reactive crystalline phases and amorphous phases (calcium and aluminosilicate) [14, 15]. The higher content of CaO and SO3 as well as the reduced amount of SiO2 and Fe2O3 in high calcium fly ash reduce the sulphate resistance of cementitious composites. Tishmack et al. [16] explains the low resistance of HCFA to sulfate attack smaller ratio of SO4/Al2O3, which promotes the formation of monosulphate. When the mortar is subjected to sulfate attack, the monosulphate is transformed into expansive ettringite. Attempts have been made to increase the HCFA sulfate resistance by adding gypsum to the mortar to optimize the SO4/Al2O3 ratio [17, 18] or silica fume [17, 19]. Current research focuses largely on the durability of cementitious composites in the presence of sulphates [20, 21], because the sulphate resistance is a component of durability, which concerns the servicing of materials used in construction. Cement composites show deterioration after immersion in a sulphate solution due to expansion and cracking of the cement paste [22]. The loss of durability results from the formation of ettringite and gypsum due to the destruction of the C-S-H phase [23]. However, it has been proven that the use of fly ash causes a significant improvement in sulphate resistance [24]. Pozzolanic reaction reduces the amount of calcium hydroxide and the formation of low-calcium phase C-S-H and C-S-A-H,which were the most sulfate resistant [25].

1.1 Purpose and scope of the study

The aim of the research included in this article was to investigate the effect of using HCFA for cementitious composites exposed to sulphate attack in relation to the effect of LCFA. It was also considered important to determine the optimal amount of HCFA and LCFA and their mixture, which can be introduced into the binder while maintaining high sulphate resistance of cementitious composites. Due to the variety of problems and research results, statistical methods of experiment planning and development of obtained research results were used. The statistical methods and models used are described in detail in the following chapters.

1.2 Materials and methods used for testing

The samples for testing were made of Portland cement CEM I 42.5 R (OPC). The chemical composition of Portland clinker given by the manufacturer is presented in the Table 1. The phase composition of Portland cement clinker: 54%C3S, 17%C2S, 11.5%C3A, 10.1%C4AF The authors purposely chose cement with a high content of C3A phase for research because of the faster time of progress of destruction of samples under the influence of sodium sulphate.

Table 1

Chemical composition of Portland cement clinker and fly ashes [%].

SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOCaO(free)MgOSO3ClNa2Oeq
OPC19,56,03,162,11,751,72,60,030,8
LCFA50,526,17,44,52,90,50,01
HCFA45,220,84,620,61,53,00,0140,230,19

For the preparation of mortar used low calcium fly ash (LCFA) with a roasting loss of 2.5%, specific surface area of 3233.00 [cm2/g] on the Blaine’s scale and high calcium fly ash (HCFA) with roasting losses of 2.7% and the specific surface of the ash equal to 2860.00 [cm2/g] on the scale according to Blaine. Phase composition of low and high calcium fly ashes determined using XRD was presented on the diffraction patterns in Figure 1.

Figure 1 X-ray diffractogram of (a) low calcium fly ash, (b) high calcium fly ash.
Figure 1

X-ray diffractogram of (a) low calcium fly ash, (b) high calcium fly ash.

The fly ash used for the tests had a high content of reactive silica. The SiO2 content in both low and high calcium fly ashes was above 25%, which influences their increased pozzolanic activity. In the case of HCFA, an increased content of CaO calcium above 15% was also observed, which may affect their greater hydraulic activity.

Seven series of mortars were performed in which the ratio of water to binder (w/s) was constant 0.6. The proportions of components in the fresh mortars were as follows binder:sand:water = 1:3:0.6. Natural quartz sand with a grain diameter of 0-2mm was used for the mortar. For each series of mortars, 6 samples with dimensions of 4×4×16 cm were made, on which, according to PN-EN 196-1:2005 [26] a compressive strength test and 6 samples with dimensions of 2×2×16 cm were made, which after 28 days of curing under conditions air-dry were immersed in a 5% solution of sodium sulphate as recommended by PN-B-19707 attachment C [27]. Table 2 shows the percentage of cement materials tested. The sulphate solution was replaced every 28 days.

Table 2

Blends prepared to evaluate sulphate resistance.

Mix IDPC (%)LCFA (%)HCFA (%)
M1100
M2-18020
M2-26040
M3-18020
M3-26040
M4-173,413,313,3
M4-2602020

The research program was designed based on a statistical experiment plan for ternary mixtures. The composition of the cement mortar binder was selected on the basis of the Gibbs triangle covering the area of up to 40% replacement of Portland cement by LCFA and HCFA or a mixture of them (Figure 2). The binder composition of the tested mortars was developed on the basis of the simplex plan of the experiment, which is used when testing the properties of a mixture depending on its composition. The rules for the selection of the composition of the mixture can be described using the variable vector:

Figure 2 Plan of cement mortar mixtures.
Figure 2

Plan of cement mortar mixtures.

(1)x=[x1,x2,,xs]

the variables are imposed by the following physical limitations:

  1. the volume of the mixture is constant regardless of its composition:

    (2)xk=const
  2. the content of each component in the mixture is nonzero:

    (3)xk0,k=1,2,,s.

In the case of cement mortar containing three components such as: Portland cement, low and high calcium fly ashes, all possible compositions of the mixture lie in a plane delimited by a triangle (Figure 2).

2 Test results and discussion

Mortars made of Portland cement showed the least resistance to the influence of the sulphate solution (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Expansion of mortars immersed in the 5% Na2SO4 solution.
Figure 3

Expansion of mortars immersed in the 5% Na2SO4 solution.

Mortars in which 20% cement was replaced by LCFA were damaged faster than mortars with 20% high calcium fly ash. It should also pay attention to the positive effect fly ashes mixtures for sulphate resistance of cement composites. Mortars with 40% content of fly ashes (low nad high calcium fly ashes as well as their mixture) showed practically no signs of damage, and the value of strain during the entire test period did not exceed 1%0.

The compressive strength was tested after 28 days of curing and after 170 and 360 days of immersion of the samples in the sodium sulphate solution and at the end of the test, respectively, when the samples showed signs of damage. The average strength changes on a percentage scale are shown in Figure 4. For each tested series, the value of the strength tested after 28 days of curing is 100%.

Figure 4 Strength for the mortars expressed as percentage at 28 days for each mortars series.
Figure 4

Strength for the mortars expressed as percentage at 28 days for each mortars series.

The compressive strength of Portland cement mortars after 28 days of curing was higher than mortars with low and high calcium fly ashes. The lower 28-day mortar strength with a mineral admixture is associated with a relatively slow course of pozzolanic reaction in the initial hydration period. Despite the impact on the mortar of the aggressive solution for the first 170 days, the compressive strength of the samples in which 20%, 26.6% and 40% Portland cement were replaced respectively by low and high calcium fly ashes increased significantly. The mortars which 20% cement OPC was replaced with HCFA after 170 days immersed in 5%Na2SO4, compressive strength increased by about 20%, while in the case of mortars with a 20% percentage of silica ash an increase of about 10% was observed. In mortars in which 40% of OPC was replaced by LCFA or / and HCFL, an increase in strength by 15% was observed. In the case of an increased amount of ash in the binder, i.e. 40%, the decrease in strength after 360 days of residence in the solution was no more than 10% for each mortar in relation to strength after 170 days.

2.1 Microstructure of mortars immersed in 5% Na2SO4 solution

In order to identify changes in the microstructure of cement mortars with the low and high calcium fly ashes or their mixtures X-ray diffraction was carried out at the moment of sample damage (Figure 5). The test time was different for each type of mortar. Samples made of OPC were taken for testing after 220 days in a 5% Na2SO4 solution. In the case of specimens in which the binder had a mineral admixture, this time was extended accordingly.

Figure 5 Diffraction pattern of mortars exposed to sodium sulphate (a) OPC mortar after 220 days in the solution, (b) M2-1 after 450 days, (c) M3-1 after 700 days, (d) M4-1 after 560 days, (e) M2-2 after 700 days, (f) M3-2 after 700 days, (g) M4-2 after 700 days in the solution.
Figure 5

Diffraction pattern of mortars exposed to sodium sulphate (a) OPC mortar after 220 days in the solution, (b) M2-1 after 450 days, (c) M3-1 after 700 days, (d) M4-1 after 560 days, (e) M2-2 after 700 days, (f) M3-2 after 700 days, (g) M4-2 after 700 days in the solution.

The analysis of diffractograms has shown that the main products of sulphate attack are ettringite and gypsum. In the sample with low calcium fly ash, small reflections of portlandite were found. In mortars with 40% content of LCFA, the intensity of the gypsum phase reflections was less significant than in the case of mortars with 20% LCFA. This suggests slower reactions of sulphate ions with leaven in mortars with a larger amount of LCFA in which portlandite was also observed. Due to the fact that the test on mortars in which 40% Portland cement was replaced with fly ashes or their mixture was made while mortars with 20% ash content were damaged. The portlandite peaks and relatively low intensity of gypsum and ettrinigt peaks are clearly visible, which indicates a slight progress of corrosion.

The results of the test (Figure 6) carried out using the scanning electron microscope confirmed the presence of the same products that were identified by X-ray diffraction. In mortar samples, in which 20% LCFA, the most frequently observed corrosion product was gypsum. Figure 6a and 6b show the image and chemical analysis at the gypsum and ettringite points respectively in the samples tested. The common occurrence of sulfur, aluminum and calcium confirms that the corrosion products observed in this area are ettringite crystals.

Figure 6 Gypsum (a) and ettringite (b) in mortars in which 20% cement was replaced by LCFA immersed with 5% Na2SO4 with analysis of the chemical composition at point.
Figure 6

Gypsum (a) and ettringite (b) in mortars in which 20% cement was replaced by LCFA immersed with 5% Na2SO4 with analysis of the chemical composition at point.

2.2 Statistical analysis of linear deformations and compressive strength of mortars

Statistical analysis was performed based on the simplex plan of the experiment for ternary mixtures [28, 29]. The calculations were performed in the R computing environment in version 3.3.1 (2016-06-21). The level of significance of all performed tests was assessed against the usual level of α = 0.05.

In order to determine the sulphate resistance of cement composites and the influence of fly ash included in the binder, an analysis of linear strains of samples subjected to sulfate attack and their compressive strength tested after 170 days in solution. The analyzes were carried out in accordance with the experimental design described on the second degree Simplex Lattice Design for three factors – i.e. the content of: cement (OPC), low calcium fly ash (LCFA) and high calcium fly ash (HCFL). The acceptance of the diagram (Figure 2) allowed to examine the effect of mortar composition on linear strain measure and strength taking into account possible synergistic effects (interactions) between individual components of the cement mortar binder. The coefficients for individual effects in models based on the adopted experiment plan will mean a change in the level of the dependent variable in the case where the content of Portland cement in the binder ranges from 60% to 100%. To calculate the level of variability of the variable depending on the mortar binder composition, the level of all three components (HCFA, LCFA, OPC) and all interactions between them was taken into account. The analysis of linear strain measure of samples subjected to the attack of sodium sulphate, showed a significant effect of the type and quantity of fly ashes used in the mortar. The model created for the sulfate attack explains 98.1% of the variance of linear strains of samples. Statistical analysis of the compressive strength results of samples immersed in a 5% Na2SO4 solution showed that the model explains only 67.7% of the variance of the compressive strength of samples.

Models of multiple linear regression allow to predict the level of linear strain (equation 4) and compressive strength (equation 5) of mortars immersed in 5% Na2SO4 solution:

(4)YL=6.133OPC+37.248LCFA+32.178HCFA75.433LCFAOPC68.983HCFAOPC
(5)YS=38.511OPC+116.841HCFA131.633HCFAOPC195.383LCFAHCFA

The analysis of the equations indicates that the use of fly ash has a significant impact on the final linear strain measure, indicate high coefficients for mortar made with the addition of LCFA and HGFA in comparison with mortars made of OPC. The linear regression model confirms the conclusions of the mean linear strain measure and average compressive strength of mortars immersed in sodium sulphate solution, that samples where a part of Portland cement was replaced by fly ashes or a mixture of them have a better sulphate resistance than samples made of Portland cement. Table 3 presents the model of multiple linear regression depending on the composition of the binder.

Table 3

Multiple linear regression model depending on the composition of cement bond binder after 170 days immersed in sulphate solution.

EffectSulphate attack (linear strain measure) (F (11. 58) = 271.00; p < 0.001)
bDGGGP
OPC6.1135.7526.474< 0.001
LCFA37.24830.90143.595< 0.001
HCFA32.17825.83138.525< 0.001
LCFA*OPC75.43385.79465.072< 0.001
HCFA*OPC68.98379.34458.622< 0.001
LCFA*HCFA0.392−9.96910.7530.940
R20.981

For the above model, a contour chart was created showing the predicted level of the dependent variable depending on the mortar binder composition (Figure 7). When analyzing contour diagrams, it is clearly visible that in the case of the sulphate solution impacting cement mortars, the smallest values of linear deformations are characteristic for the centroid region, i.e. for mortars in which a part of the cement was replaced by a mixture of fly ashes (26.6% and 40%) and around 40% HCFA (i.e., mortars in which 40% Portland cement has been replaced with fly ash).

Figure 7 A contour chart for the model from Table 3 - linear strain measure of cement mortars immersed in 5% sulphate sodium solution.
Figure 7

A contour chart for the model from Table 3 - linear strain measure of cement mortars immersed in 5% sulphate sodium solution.

Analysis of the above equations indicates that in the case of sulfate attack, the level of high calcium fly ashes have positive effect on strength weakens the level of low calcium fly ashes.

Additional insight into the nature of the mortar binder composition effects on the strength of mortars subjected to a sulphate attack give contour diagrams that show the predicted level of the dependent variable depending on the composition of the mortar (Figure 8).

Figure 8 A contour chart for the model from Table 4 for the strength of the samples immersed in sodium sulphate.
Figure 8

A contour chart for the model from Table 4 for the strength of the samples immersed in sodium sulphate.

Table 4

Relations between the mortar binder composition and strength - multiple linear regression models.

EffectSulphate attack (compressive strength) (F (11. 58) = 11.10; p < 0.001)
BDGGGp
OPC38.51134.84542.177< 0.001
LCFA−20.959−85.48043.5610.518
HCFA116.84152.320181.3610.001
LCFA*OPC84.867−20.457190.1920.112
HCFA*OPC131.633236.95726.3080.015
LCFA*HCFA195.383300.70790.058< 0.001
R20.677

Analyzing the contour diagrams, The smaller values of linear strain around the centroid, i.e. for mortars in which part of the cement was replaced by a mixture of fly ash (26.6% and 40%) and the region around 40% HCFA were observed.

3 Conclusions

  1. The admixture of fly ashes to cementitious composites significantly improves the resistance to sulphate attack. Mortar, in which 40% of Portland cement was replaced with LCFA, HCFA or their mixture, showed the best resistance to the solution of sodium sulphate.

  2. Less-used HCFA compared to LCFA showed a similar effect on the sulphate resistance of mortars.

  3. Bearing in mind the high variability of ash composition, it should be clearly indicated that the results obtained are not of a general nature. However, they contribute to understanding the possibilities of using waste material in cement composites with simultaneous improvement of mortar and concrete properties.

  4. Properly selected plan of the experiment associated with statistical analysis allowed to determine the optimal amount of low or high calcium fly ashes or their mixtures, which can be introduced into the binder in order to improve the sulphate resistance of cement composites.

  5. Statistical analysis is only the development of broad and long-term results of laboratory tests regarding mortar durability in a sulphate environment. Nevertheless, due to the very large number of test results and many variable factors, it seems to be necessary for proper assessment of sulphate resistance.

References

[1] Ahmaruzzaman M. (2010). A review on the utilization of fly ash, Prog. Energy Combust.Sci. 36, 327–363.10.1016/j.pecs.2009.11.003Search in Google Scholar

[2] International Energy Agency (IEA) (2017). Cement sustainability initiative, Technology Roadmap: Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry, p. 66.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Feuerborn H. (2009). Calcareous Ash in Europe – A Reflection on Technical and Legal Issues.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Papayianni I., Tsimas S., Moutsatsou A. (2009). Standardization aspects concerning high calcium fly ashes, 3rd World Coal Ash, WOCA Conf.Search in Google Scholar

[5] EN 450-1:2013, UNE- EN 450-1:2013 (2013). Fly Ash for Concrete – Part 1: Definition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria.Search in Google Scholar

[6] EN 197-1:2011 (2011). Cement. Part 1: Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cement.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Uliasz-Bochenczyk A., Mokrzycki E. (2006). Fly ashes from polish power plants and combined heat and power plants and conditions of their application for carbon dioxide utilization, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 84, 837–842.10.1205/cherd.05145Search in Google Scholar

[8] Dong Y., Jow J., Su J., Lai S. (2013). Fly ash separation technology and its potential applications; 2013 WOCA, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Koukouzas N., Hämäläinen J., Papanikolaou D., Tourunen A., Jäntti T. (2007). Mineralogical and elemental composition of fly ash from pilot scale fluidised bed combustion of lignite, bituminous coal, wood chips and their blends, Fuel 86, 2186–2193.10.1016/j.fuel.2007.03.036Search in Google Scholar

[10] Giergiczny Z., Garbacik A., Baran T. (2010). Popioły lotne wapienne jako składnik pucolanowo-hydrauliczny cementów i aktywny dodatek do betonu, Monografia: Energia i środowisko w technologiach materiałów budowlanych, ceramicznych, szklarskich i ogniotrwałych, Praca zbiorowa, rozdział 14, 186-200.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Tikalsky P.J., Carrasquillo R.L. (1992). Influence of fly ash on the sulphate resistance of concrete. ACI Struct J 89(1), 69–75.10.14359/1247Search in Google Scholar

[12] Shashiprakash S.G., Thomas M.D.A. (2001). Sulphate resistance of mortars containing high calcium fly ashes and combinations of highly reactive pozzolans and fly ash. In: Proceedings of the 7th CANMET/ACI international conference on fly ash, silica fume, slag, and natural pozzolan in concrete. Chennai, India 221–237.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Shehata M.H., Thomas M.D.A., Bleszynski R.F. (1999). The effects of fly ash composition on the chemistry of pore solution in hydrated cement pastes. Cement Concr Res 29, 1915–20.10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00190-8Search in Google Scholar

[14] Tikalsky P.J., Carrasquillo R.L. (1993). Fly ash evaluation and selection for use in sulphate-resistant concrete. ACI Mater J 90(6), 545–551.10.14359/4428Search in Google Scholar

[15] Kruse K.A. (2012). Characterization of high-calcium fly ash for evaluating the sulfate resistance of concrete, Masters Thesis, University of Texas, AustinSearch in Google Scholar

[16] Tishmack J.K., Olek J., Diamond S. (1999). Characterization of high calcium fly ashes and their potential influence on ettringite formation in cementitous systems. Cement Concr Aggr 21(1), 82– 92.10.1520/CCA10512JSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Freeman R.B., Carrasquillo R.L. (1995). Adjustments in gypsum content for production of sulphate-resistant blended cements containing high-calcium fly ash. ACI Mater J 92(4), 411–418.10.14359/976Search in Google Scholar

[18] Shehata M.H., Adhikari G., Radomski S. (2008). Long-term durability of blended cement against sulphate attack. ACI Mater J 105(6), 594–602.10.14359/20201Search in Google Scholar

[19] Thomas M.D.A., Shehata M.H., Shashiprakash S.G., Hopkins D.S., Cail K. (1999). Use of ternary cementitious systems containing silica fume and fly ash in concrete. Cement Concr Res 29(8), 1207–1214.10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00096-4Search in Google Scholar

[20] Chotetanorm C., Chindaprasirt P., Sata V., Rukzon S., Sathonsaowaphak A. (2013). High-calcium bottom ash geopolymer: sorptivity, pore size, and resistance to sodium sulfate attack, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25, 105-111.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000560Search in Google Scholar

[21] Sukmak P., De Silva P., Horpibulsuk S., Chindaprasirt P. (2015). Sulfate resistance of clay-portland cement and clay high-calcium fly ash geopolymer, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27(5), 1-11.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001112Search in Google Scholar

[22] Piasta W., Marczewska J., Jaworska M.. (2015). Durability of air entrained cement mortars under combined sulphate and freeze-thaw attack, Procedia Engineering 108, 55-62.10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.119Search in Google Scholar

[23] Bakharev T. (2005). Durability of geopolymermaterials in sodium and magnesium sulfate solutions, Cem. Concr. Res. 35, 1233– 1246.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.002Search in Google Scholar

[24] Škvára F., Jílek T., Kopecky´ L. (2005). Geopolymer materials based on fly ash, Ceram. Silik. 49(3), 195–204.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Piasta W., Łukawska M. (2016). The effect of sewage sludge ash on properties of cement composites, Procedia Engineering 161, 1018-1024.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.842Search in Google Scholar

[26] PN-EN 196-1:2005 (2005). Metody badania cementu – Część 1: Oznaczanie wytrzymałości.Search in Google Scholar

[27] PN-B-19707:2013-10 (2013). Cement. Cement specjalny. Skład, wymagania i kryteria zgodności. Załącznik C: Oznaczanie odporności cementu na agresję siarczanową.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Komsta Ł. (2004). Wprowadzenie do środowiska R, http://cran.rproject.org/doc/contrib/Komsta-Wprowadzenie.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[29] Bondari K. (2005). Mixture Experiments and Their applications in Agricultural Research Experimental Statistics, Proceedings of the 30th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference (SUGI 30), Statistics and Data Analysis 209-230.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-02-10
Accepted: 2019-06-05
Published Online: 2019-11-10

© 2019 J.Marczewska and M. Jaworska, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Article
  2. Exploring conditions and usefulness of UAVs in the BRAIN Massive Inspections Protocol
  3. A hybrid approach for solving multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem in construction
  4. Identification of geodetic risk factors occurring at the construction project preparation stage
  5. Multicriteria comparative analysis of pillars strengthening of the historic building
  6. Methods of habitat reports’ evaluation
  7. Effect of material and technological factors on the properties of cement-lime mortars and mortars with plasticizing admixture
  8. Management of Innovation Ecosystems Based on Six Sigma Business Scorecard
  9. On a Stochastic Regularization Technique for Ill-Conditioned Linear Systems
  10. Dynamic safety system for collaboration of operators and industrial robots
  11. Assessment of Decentralized Electricity Production from Hybrid Renewable Energy Sources for Sustainable Energy Development in Nigeria
  12. Seasonal evaluation of surface water quality at the Tamanduá stream watershed (Aparecida de Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil) using the Water Quality Index
  13. EFQM model implementation in a Portuguese Higher Education Institution
  14. Assessment of direct and indirect effects of building developments on the environment
  15. Accelerated Aging of WPCs Based on Polypropylene and Plywood Production Residues
  16. Analysis of the Cost of a Building’s Life Cycle in a Probabilistic Approach
  17. Implementation of Web Services for Data Integration to Improve Performance in The Processing Loan Approval
  18. Rehabilitation of buildings as an alternative to sustainability in Brazilian constructions
  19. Synthesis Conditions for LPV Controller with Input Covariance Constraints
  20. Procurement management in construction: study of Czech municipalities
  21. Contractor’s bid pricing strategy: a model with correlation among competitors’ prices
  22. Control of construction projects using the Earned Value Method - case study
  23. Model supporting decisions on renovation and modernization of public utility buildings
  24. Cements with calcareous fly ash as component of low clinker eco-self compacting concrete
  25. Failure Analysis of Super Hard End Mill HSS-Co
  26. Simulation model for resource-constrained construction project
  27. Getting efficient choices in buildings by using Genetic Algorithms: Assessment & validation
  28. Analysis of renewable energy use in single-family housing
  29. Modeling of the harmonization method for executing a multi-unit construction project
  30. Effect of foam glass granules fillers modification of lime-sand products on their microstructure
  31. Volume Optimization of Solid Waste Landfill Using Voronoi Diagram Geometry
  32. Analysis of occupational accidents in the construction industry with regards to selected time parameters
  33. Bill of quantities and quantity survey of construction works of renovated buildings - case study
  34. Cooperation of the PTFE sealing ring with the steel ball of the valve subjected to durability test
  35. Analytical model assessing the effect of increased traffic flow intensities on the road administration, maintenance and lifetime
  36. Quartz bentonite sandmix in sand-lime products
  37. The Issue of a Transport Mode Choice from the Perspective of Enterprise Logistics
  38. Analysis of workplace injuries in Slovakian state forestry enterprises
  39. Research into Customer Preferences of Potential Buyers of Simple Wood-based Houses for the Purpose of Using the Target Costing
  40. Proposal of the Inventory Management Automatic Identification System in the Manufacturing Enterprise Applying the Multi-criteria Analysis Methods
  41. Hyperboloid offset surface in the architecture and construction industry
  42. Analysis of the preparatory phase of a construction investment in the area covered by revitalization
  43. The selection of sealing technologies of the subsoil and hydrotechnical structures and quality assurance
  44. Impact of high temperature drying process on beech wood containing tension wood
  45. Prediction of Strength of Remixed Concrete by Application of Orthogonal Decomposition, Neural Analysis and Regression Analysis
  46. Modelling a production process using a Sankey diagram and Computerized Relative Allocation of Facilities Technique (CRAFT)
  47. The feasibility of using a low-cost depth camera for 3D scanning in mass customization
  48. Urban Water Infrastructure Asset Management Plan: Case Study
  49. Evaluation the effect of lime on the plastic and hardened properties of cement mortar and quantified using Vipulanandan model
  50. Uplift and Settlement Prediction Model of Marine Clay Soil e Integrated with Polyurethane Foam
  51. IoT Applications in Wind Energy Conversion Systems
  52. A new method for graph stream summarization based on both the structure and concepts
  53. “Zhores” — Petaflops supercomputer for data-driven modeling, machine learning and artificial intelligence installed in Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
  54. Economic Disposal Quantity of Leftovers kept in storage: a Monte Carlo simulation method
  55. Computer technology of the thermal stress state and fatigue life analysis of turbine engine exhaust support frames
  56. Statistical model used to assessment the sulphate resistance of mortars with fly ashes
  57. Application of organization goal-oriented requirement engineering (OGORE) methods in erp-based company business processes
  58. Influence of Sand Size on Mechanical Properties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Concrete
  59. Architecture For Automation System Metrics Collection, Visualization and Data Engineering – HAMK Sheet Metal Center Building Automation Case Study
  60. Optimization of shape memory alloy braces for concentrically braced steel braced frames
  61. Topical Issue Modern Manufacturing Technologies
  62. Feasibility Study of Microneedle Fabrication from a thin Nitinol Wire Using a CW Single-Mode Fiber Laser
  63. Topical Issue: Progress in area of the flow machines and devices
  64. Analysis of the influence of a stator type modification on the performance of a pump with a hole impeller
  65. Investigations of drilled and multi-piped impellers cavitation performance
  66. The novel solution of ball valve with replaceable orifice. Numerical and field tests
  67. The flow deteriorations in course of the partial load operation of the middle specific speed Francis turbine
  68. Numerical analysis of temperature distribution in a brush seal with thermo-regulating bimetal elements
  69. A new solution of the semi-metallic gasket increasing tightness level
  70. Design and analysis of the flange-bolted joint with respect to required tightness and strength
  71. Special Issue: Actual trends in logistics and industrial engineering
  72. Intelligent programming of robotic flange production by means of CAM programming
  73. Static testing evaluation of pipe conveyor belt for different tensioning forces
  74. Design of clamping structure for material flow monitor of pipe conveyors
  75. Risk Minimisation in Integrated Supply Chains
  76. Use of simulation model for measurement of MilkRun system performance
  77. A simulation model for the need for intra-plant transport operation planning by AGV
  78. Operative production planning utilising quantitative forecasting and Monte Carlo simulations
  79. Monitoring bulk material pressure on bottom of storage using DEM
  80. Calibration of Transducers and of a Coil Compression Spring Constant on the Testing Equipment Simulating the Process of a Pallet Positioning in a Rack Cell
  81. Design of evaluation tool used to improve the production process
  82. Planning of Optimal Capacity for the Middle-Sized Storage Using a Mathematical Model
  83. Experimental assessment of the static stiffness of machine parts and structures by changing the magnitude of the hysteresis as a function of loading
  84. The evaluation of the production of the shaped part using the workshop programming method on the two-spindle multi-axis CTX alpha 500 lathe
  85. Numerical Modeling of p-v-T Rheological Equation Coefficients for Polypropylene with Variable Chalk Content
  86. Current options in the life cycle assessment of additive manufacturing products
  87. Ideal mathematical model of shock compression and shock expansion
  88. Use of simulation by modelling of conveyor belt contact forces
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2019-0063/html
Scroll to top button