Startseite Effect of magnetization of saline irrigation water of Almasab Alam on some physical properties of soil
Artikel Open Access

Effect of magnetization of saline irrigation water of Almasab Alam on some physical properties of soil

  • Kadhim N. Kadhim EMAIL logo und Najm O. Alghazali
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 31. Mai 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The effect of magnetization of saline irrigation water from Almasab Alam on some soil physical properties was investigated in this study. The soil was taken from the study site and placed in pots that were identical in all aspects and planted with onion plants in three replications for each case, with the average results taken. The only difference is the quality of the water used in irrigation, which was tested in seven different ways, including irrigating with Almasab Alam drainage salty water without magnetization (NMW), irrigating with river water (CW) from the Mashroa Almusyyab Al-Kabeer river, and irrigating with magnetized Almasab Alam water with five different magnetic intensities (1,000, 2,000, 3,000, 5,000, and 7,000  gauss). When magnetized water with a strength of 3,000 gauss is used, the highest decrease in the bulk density of the soil is 27.30%, and the highest increase in the porosity and permeability of the soil is 64.52 and 651.54%, respectively. Using magnetic technology has made saline Almasab Alam water and drainage water suitable for irrigating crops and also overcome the study area’s water scarcity. Using the magnetic technique of irrigation water also improved the physical properties of the soil, including density, porosity, and permeability, in the study area by washing or planting it with crops.

1 Introduction

Studies have proven the possibility of using saltwater in irrigation by magnetizing it, as this process reduces the effect of harmful ions on the plant, improves soil properties, and reduces its salinity by washing salts away and ridding the irrigated area of its damage [1].

1.1 Soil salts leaching

Magnetically treated water can remove 50–80% of soil salts, compared to 30% with regular irrigation water. It also improves the properties of the soil and reduces the harmfulness of its salinity by increasing the speed of washing salts and ridding the root zone of its harmfulness [2]. Magnetized water is used to remove salts from the soil and wash them. It restores the matter of the soil destroyed due to the use of high concentrations of synthetic fertilizers, as the ability to remove salts from magnetized water is twice that of ordinary water [3]. Soil salinity is one of the biggest problems in agriculture as the accumulation of salts in the soil pores leads to a severe decrease in its energy and in the concentration of salts in the capillaries of the roots of plants, which leads to a reduction in the plant’s yield over the amount of its nutritional needs, which leads to wilting and then the death of the plant.

The task of the magnetic systems is to break the large crystals into small crystals and allow them to pass easily through the capillaries of the roots of plants and the pores of the soil. Therefore, the amount of salt in the water does not decrease. Still, it is not harmful because the plant will take all the nutrients it needs for its growth from this type of water and throw the rest of the salt crystals and other components that are useless into the drains. The small salt crystals and their components will be easier to pass through the soil pores to reach the groundwater drains in the lower layers of the soil. Some research has indicated that the magnetic technique is followed to obtain magnetically treated water. In agriculture, it increases the solubility of water and leaches salts from the soil [4,5].

1.2 Fertility of the soil

The magnetism technique adapts the water and makes it more capable of dissolving and has a high ability to wash salts from the soil as well as increase the readiness of the nutrients in the soil, as it was found that irrigation with magnetized water increases the speed of washing chloride by 50–80% compared to normal water at 30% and bicarbonate by a percentage of 30%, in addition to doubling the sulfate washing as the increase in the dissolved oxygen content is 10% [5,6]. The magnetized water improves the soil surface by reducing the surface tension and reducing the viscosity and osmotic pressure. It also helps to enhance the building of the soil, increase the solubility with water, and works to break up the soil masses surrounding the roots. Thus, it encourages the roots to penetrate into the soil, which in turn increases the growth and productivity of the conductive plant [2,7]. Magnetically treated water increases the readiness of nutrients in the soil through its role in dissolving salts and minerals, and this leads to an increase in the absorption of the basic elements needed by the plant, which results in increased productivity [8,9].

1.3 Reducing soil surface crust

The crust formed on the surface of the soil is usually characterized by high hardness, which is reflected in poor aeration conditions in the soil and some physical characteristics that are not suitable for plant growth and development. In recent times, magnetically treated water has been used to control the crust formed on the soil due to the change in its physical and chemical properties as a result of magnetic treatment. It works to increase the solubility by changing the ionic state of some and reducing the concentrations of others, especially sodium salts, thus preventing the sodium ion from sticking to the soil. It reduces the negative effect of increasing the hardness of the surface crust of soil, meaning that the water is magnetically treated, which reduces the hardness of the surface crust. Also, it has the ability to remove the negative effect of sodium salts and improve some of the soil characteristics related to construction [5].

2 Materials and methods

The project, Almasab Alam, is a major development project in Iraq because it is essential to transfer saltwater extracted from land reclamation in central and southern Iraq through the interconnected network of drainage starting from all drainage fields covered to collected drainage. The study area is located between the stations 360 + 000 with coordinates (519,159, 3,563,531) and 441 + 000 with coordinates (461,006, 3,630,087), representing the site of Almasab Alam in the governorate of Babylon, Iraq, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 
               Study area.
Figure 1

Study area.

The soil was taken from the study site and placed in pots that were similar in all specifications and planted with onion plants, with three replications for each case, and the average results were taken. The only difference is in the quality of the irrigation water with which these pots were irrigated. Seven types of irrigating water were used. They are: Almasab Alam drainage salty water without magnetization; irrigating with river water located in the study area, which is the Mashroa Al-Musayyab Al-Kabeer; as well as irrigating with magnetized Almasab Alam water with five magnetic intensities (1,000, 2,000, 3,000, 5,000, and 7,000 G). The samples are identified as magnetic water (MW), no magnetic water (NMW) for Almasab Alam water, control water (CW) for river water, MW1 (1,000 G), MW2 (2,000 G), MW3 (3,000 G), MW4 (5,000 G), and MW5 (7,000 G), and the soil before the experiment (SBE).

3 Magnetized water device

The magnetized water equipment was developed at Al-Nahrain University with five different intensities (1,000, 2,000, 3,000, 5,000, and 7,000 G). The magnetic device is constructed from a 16 mm diameter plastic tube and surrounded by a constant magnetic strength required for each device. Figure 2 shows the experimental setup, which was packed from the outside by another plastic tube. The velocity of water through the system is constant for all tests and equal to 0.67 m/s. The tests were conducted for the samples in three laboratories, and the results were very close so that the average of these readings was taken for analysis. Table 1 shows the specifications of the irrigation water used in the study.

Figure 2 
               Schematic diagram of the experiment.
Figure 2

Schematic diagram of the experiment.

Table 1

The average characteristics of the studied river and saltwater from Almasab Alam drainage before and after the magnetization

Water type River Almasab 1,000 G 2,000 G 3,000 G 5,000 G 7,000 G
Ec (µs/cm) 0.97 5.84 5.85 5.86 5.88 5.90 5.96
TDS (ppm) 665 3,700 3,704 3,711 3,715 3,741 3,774
Cl (ppm) 68 568 568 554 501 516 565
SO4 (ppm) 295 823 824 829 839 844 848
Na+ (ppm) 142 392 392 395 399 401 403
K (ppm) 8.1 9.5 9.50 9.50 9.75 9.50 9.60
Mg2+ (ppm) 50 110.5 111 114 126 128 130
Ca2+ (ppm) 164 254.5 255 263 290 295 301
NO3 (ppm) 1.4 1.3 1.30 1.53 1.85 1.32 1.39
PO4 (ppm) 0.72 0.27 0.27 0.32 0.66 0.40 0.45
pH 7.62 7.90 7.90 7.97 8.10 8.20 8.25
T.H (pm) 441 966 1,014 1,043 1,146 1,162 1,189
Do (ppm) 14.50 9.50 9.50 9.96 10.90 10.10 10.35

The physical properties of the soil were examined before the beginning of the experiment, as shown in Table 2. After the end of the winter agricultural season of onion plants, the effect of magnetized water (MW) on soil physical properties of the soil of the study area are investigated. This soil is characterized by silty clay loam.

Table 2

The physical properties of the soil before the beginning of the experiment

Physical property Bulk density (g/cm3) Porosity (%) Permeability (cm/s)
SBE 1.87 31 1.18 × 10−6

4 Results of tests

Table 3 shows the results of the tests for some important physical properties such as the bulk density, porosity, and permeability of the soil of the study area before the start of the experiments (SBE) and after the end of the onion-planting season.

Table 3

The physical properties of the soil before and after the experiments

Physical properties Bulk density (g/cm3) Porosity (%) Permeability (cm/s)
SBE 1.87 31 1.18 × 10−6
NMW 1.98 28 1.0 × 10−6
CW 1.70 45 2.98 × 10−4
MW1 1.82 32 1.20 × 10−6
MW2 1.67 46 3.80 × 10−4
MW3 1.36 51 7.70 × 10−4
MW4 1.78 40 4.30 × 10−5
MW5 1.50 48 5.12 × 10−4

4.1 Bulk density

The results in Table 4 indicate that the values of the bulk density of the soil decreased when irrigated with river water, and in all cases of magnetized Almasab Alam saline water. The value of the bulk density of the soil in the study area increased when it was irrigated with saline Almasab Alam water without magnetization. The percentages of decrease and increase in soil density are shown in Table 4 and Figure 3.

Table 4

The percentage of decrease and increase in the amount of bulk density of the soil

Soil case Bulk density (g/cm3) The difference with bulk density for SBE (%)
SBE 1.87
NMW 1.98 +5.90
CW 1.70 –9.10
MW1 1.82 –2.70
MW2 1.67 –10.70
MW3 1.36 –27.30
MW4 1.78 –4.80
MW5 1.50 –19.80
Figure 3 
                  Bulk density of the soil.
Figure 3

Bulk density of the soil.

The decrease in bulk density ranged from 2.70% to 27.30%. The lowest value of the reduction in the bulk density of the soil occurs in the case of magnetized water with a strength of 1,000 G (MW1), while the highest percentage of decrease (27.30%) occurs in the case of irrigation with magnetized water of a strength of 3,000  G (MW3). In the case of irrigation with river water (CW), the percentage decrease is 9.10%. The bulk density of the soil increases when irrigated with the saline, non-magnetized Almasab Alam water (NMW) (5.90%) due to the salt content increase in the soil, which in turn leads to a decrease in porosity and an increase in the hardening of the surface crust of the soil. This finding is consistent with refs. [9,11].

4.2 Porosity

The results in Table 5 indicate that the porosity of the soil is increased when irrigated with river water and when irrigated in all the cases of magnetized Almasab Alam saline water. The value of the porosity of the soil in the study area decreases when it is irrigated with saline Almasab Alam water without magnetization. The percentages of increase and decrease in the porosity of the soil are shown in Table 5 and Figure 4.

Table 5

The percentage of increase and decrease in the amount of porosity of the soil

Soil case Porosity (%) The difference with bulk density for SBE (%)
SBE 31
NMW 28 –9.60
CW 45 +45.16
MW1 32 +3.23
MW2 46 +48.39
MW3 51 +64.52
MW4 40 +29.03
MW5 48 +54.48
Figure 4 
                  The porosity of the soil.
Figure 4

The porosity of the soil.

The increase ranged from 3.23 to 64.52%. The lowest value (3.23%) of the increase in the porosity of the soil occurred in the case of magnetized water with a strength of 1,000 G (MW1), while the highest percentage of increase (64.52%) occurred in the case of irrigation with magnetized water of a strength of 3,000 G (MW3). In the case of irrigation with river water (CW), the increase is 45.16%. The porosity of the soil decreases when irrigated with the saline, non-magnetized Almasab Alam water (NMW) (9.60%) due to the increase in salts in the soil, which in turn leads to a decrease in porosity and an increase in the hardening of the surface crust of the soil And this goes back to the role of magnetized water in improving the physical properties of the soil, as mentioned previously, and as mentioned in [11], which was reflected in reducing the bulk density as shown in Table 4.

The magnetization also helps to reduce the salinity effects near the root area as a result of washing salts from the root area. The increase in plant activity, penetration, and improvement of the root system in the soil led to an increase in its porosity. Improving the soil structure and increasing its volume led to a decrease in its bulk density and, thus, an increase in its porosity. This is what we have noticed at the end of the planting season compared to before planting. These results are consistent with what was obtained in [13], which indicated that improving soil structure leads to an increase in porosity, and the increase in the penetration and spread of the root system in the soil makes it more porous [5,9,13].

4.3 Permeability

The results in Table 6 indicate that the permeability of the soil is increased when irrigated with river water and when irrigated in all the cases of magnetized Almasab Alam saline water. The value of the porosity of the soil in the study area decreased when it was irrigated with saline Almasab Alam water without magnetization. The percentages of increase and decrease in the amount of permeability of the soil are shown in Table 6 and Figure 5.

Table 6

The percentage of increase and decrease in the amount of permeability of the soil

Soil case Permeability (%) The difference with bulk density for SBE (%)
SBE 1.18 × 10−6
NMW 1.0 × 10−6 –15.25
CW 2.98 × 10−4 +251.54
MW1 1.20 × 10−6 +16.95
MW2 3.80 × 10−4 +321
MW3 7.70 × 10−4 +651.54
MW4 4.30 × 10−5 +35.44
MW5 5.12 × 10−4 +432.89
Figure 5 
                  The permeability of the soil.
Figure 5

The permeability of the soil.

The increase in permeability ranged from 16.95 to 651.54%. The lowest value (16.95%) of the increase in the permeability of the soil occurs in the case of magnetized water with a strength of 1,000 G (MW1), while the highest percentage of growth (651.54%) occurs in the case of irrigation with magnetized water of a strength of 3,000 G (MW3). In the case of irrigation with river water (CW), the increase is 251.54%. The permeability of the soil decreased when irrigated with the saline, non-magnetized Almasab Alam water (NMW) (15.25%) due to the increase in salts in the soil and its high bulk density, which in turn leads to a decrease in porosity and an increase in the hardening of the surface crust of the soil It goes back to the role of magnetized water in improving the physical properties of the soil, as mentioned previously and mentioned in [12], which was reflected in reducing the bulk density, as shown in Table 4.

The magnetization also helps to reduce the salinity effects near the root area because it washes salts from the root area. The increase in plant activity, penetration, and improvement of the root system in the soil led to the rise in its porosity and permeability. Improving the soil structure and increasing its volume led to a decrease in its bulk density and thus increased the porosity and permeability, which is what we noticed at the end of the planting season compared to before planting. These results are consistent with those obtained in [12], which indicated that improving soil structure leads to an increase in porosity. The increase in the penetration and spread of the root system in the soil makes it more porous [5,9,14].

5 Discussion

The results found that irrigation with magnetized water from the Almasab Alam in cases of 2,000, 3,000, and 7,000 G outperformed irrigation with river water, and found that the best percentage of the increase occurred when irrigating with magnetized water at a strength of 3,000 G. This is due to the source of magnetized water in improving the physical properties of the soil by improving its structure and pushing the negative effects of salts away from the root area [12,14,15]. As the use of magnetized water increases the volume of pore spaces per unit volume when the roots penetrate into the soil, it increases the porosity and decreases the values of the bulk density.

It is noted above that the reason for the increase in the permeability of the soil in the study area is the increase in the porosity of the soil and the decrease in the bulk density. Also, it confirmed that plant roots reduce the bulk density of the surface layer, increase its porosity, and secrete some resinous materials that improve its structure. Thus, it causes an increase in the value of permeability as the plant progresses in growth as a result of moisture treatments. And that is what we have noticed at the end of the planting season. By analyzing the results of the effect of the magnetization of saline waters of the general estuary on the physical properties of the soil of the study area, it is possible to take advantage of this saline water, which is not suitable for irrigating, especially sensitive crops, after each growing season. The use of the magnetization technology on this water turned it into water suitable for irrigation and even for sensitive crops, as well as improved the physical properties of the soil so that it became arable soil after it was highly saline soil and not suitable for agriculture. It is concluded that by using water magnetization technology, saline water can be used for irrigation purposes and overcome severe water scarcity, especially in Iraq.

It is also possible to cultivate highly saline soils and turn them into arable land, especially in central and southern Iraq, because the soils of these areas are highly saline. In most cases, magnetized water has outperformed river water in changing the properties of the soil for the better, and the best case is magnetized water with a strength of 3,000 G. Using magnetic technology, we can say that any soil can be cultivated, regardless of its salinity, and sewage water can be used for irrigation, regardless of its salinity.

6 Conclusion

Based on the results of the experimental test, the following main conclusions can be drawn:

  • The bulk density decreases, and the porosity and permeability of the soil increase after it is irrigated with magnetized Almasab Alam water and river water.

  • The highest percentage of decrease in the bulk density of the soil is 27.30%, and the highest increase in the porosity and permeability of the soil is 64.52 and 651.54%, respectively, when using magnetized water with a strength of 3,000 G.

  • We recommend the use of magnetized water of 3,000 G for irrigation in the study area, and it is considered the best of all irrigation conditions, including irrigation with river water.

  • The use of saline Almasab Alam water without magnetization in the study area leads to damage to the properties of the soil. It increases the hardening of its surface crust.

  • Providing water suitable for irrigating crops from the saline Almasab Alam water and drainage water using magnetic technology and overcoming the water scarcity in the study area.

  • Improving the physical properties of soil density, porosity, and permeability of the study area by washing it or planting it with agricultural crops using the magnetic technique of irrigation water.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding is involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Amin SKM, Qassem AF. Effect of salinity of magnetized irrigation water on growth characteristics vegetative gerbera plant. Damascus Univ J Agric Sci. 2009;25(1):63–74.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Abdel-Ani MM, Abdel-Gawad I, Marei NA. Impact of technology applications magnetism in the treatment of saline well water for use in the irrigation of wheat and barley. Northern Iraq, Babylon University. J Pure Appl Sci. 2015;23(1):278–86.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Kazem RJM. The use of magnetized water in the reclamation of salt-affected soils. Mag Al-Furat Agric Sci. 2010;2(2):97–10.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Kadhim NK, Hameed A. Experimental study of magnetization impact on ground water characteristics. Jordan J Civ Eng. 2018;12(2):254–62.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Hassan DF, Mohammed RJ, Akol AM, Abd EH, Kadhim TF. Effect of magnetization of fresh and salt water for irrigation in some of the physical characteristics of the soil and the growth of wheat. Int J Innovative Res Sci Eng Technol. 2016;5(12):20861–72.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] AL-Ani S, Karkush MO, Zhussupbekov A, Al-Hity AA. Influence of magnetized water on the geotechnical properties of expansive soil. In Modern applications of geotechnical engineering and construction. Singapore: Springer; 2021. p. 39–50.10.1007/978-981-15-9399-4_5Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Kadhim KN, Alghazali NO. Effect of magnetization on some physical properties of Almasab Alam salty water. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 856. Issue 1. IOP Publishing; 2021 Sep 1. p. 012045.10.1088/1755-1315/856/1/012045Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Karkush MO, Ahmed MD, Al-Ani SM. Magnetic field influence on the characteristics of water treated by reverse osmosis. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res. 2019;9(4):4433–9.10.48084/etasr.2855Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Karkush MO, Ali SD. Effects of copper sulfate contamination on the geotechnical behavior of clayey soils. J Geoengin. 2019 Mar 1;14(1):47–52.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Al-Zubaidi RAO. Effect of soil moisture content and method of adding phosphate fertilizer on phosphorous availability and its relationship to growth and water consumption of barley [dissertation]. Basrah: University of Basrah; 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Al-Wali RSS. Using indicators of mixed soil erosion in determining the sites threatened by desertification in the south of Basra Governorate and its effects and methods of treatment [dissertation]. Basrah: University of Basrah; 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Gallon PA. The magnetizer and water, internet, life streams international Mfg. Iraq: Febko Company; 2004.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Al-Kubaisi WM. Correlation between factors affecting the vegetation of soil aggregates and the speed of wetting [dissertation]. Baghad: University of Baghdad; 1982.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Al-Atab SMS. Effect of soil aggregate sizes on soil physical properties, water movement and maize plant growth [dissertation]. Basrah: University of Basrah; 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-03-22
Revised: 2022-04-11
Accepted: 2022-04-11
Published Online: 2022-05-31

© 2022 Kadhim N. Kadhim and Najm O. Alghazali, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Calcium carbonate nanoparticles of quail’s egg shells: Synthesis and characterizations
  3. Effect of welding consumables on shielded metal arc welded ultra high hard armour steel joints
  4. Stress-strain characteristics and service life of conventional and asphaltic underlayment track under heavy load Babaranjang trains traffic
  5. Corrigendum to: Statistical mechanics of cell decision-making: the cell migration force distribution
  6. Prediction of bearing capacity of driven piles for Basrah governatore using SPT and MATLAB
  7. Investigation on microstructural features and tensile shear fracture properties of resistance spot welded advanced high strength dual phase steel sheets in lap joint configuration for automotive frame applications
  8. Experimental and numerical investigation of drop weight impact of aramid and UHMWPE reinforced epoxy
  9. An experimental study and finite element analysis of the parametric of circular honeycomb core
  10. The study of the particle size effect on the physical properties of TiO2/cellulose acetate composite films
  11. Hybrid material performance assessment for rocket propulsion
  12. Design of ER damper for recoil length minimization: A case study on gun recoil system
  13. Forecasting technical performance and cost estimation of designed rim wheels based on variations of geometrical parameters
  14. Enhancing the machinability of SKD61 die steel in power-mixed EDM process with TGRA-based multi criteria decision making
  15. Effect of boron carbide reinforcement on properties of stainless-steel metal matrix composite for nuclear applications
  16. Energy absorption behaviors of designed metallic square tubes under axial loading: Experiment-based benchmarking and finite element calculation
  17. Synthesis and study of magnesium complexes derived from polyacrylate and polyvinyl alcohol and their applications as superabsorbent polymers
  18. Artificial neural network for predicting the mechanical performance of additive manufacturing thermoset carbon fiber composite materials
  19. Shock and impact reliability of electronic assemblies with perimeter vs full array layouts: A numerical comparative study
  20. Influences of pre-bending load and corrosion degree of reinforcement on the loading capacity of concrete beams
  21. Assessment of ballistic impact damage on aluminum and magnesium alloys against high velocity bullets by dynamic FE simulations
  22. On the applicability of Cu–17Zn–7Al–0.3Ni shape memory alloy particles as reinforcement in aluminium-based composites: Structural and mechanical behaviour considerations
  23. Mechanical properties of laminated bamboo composite as a sustainable green material for fishing vessel: Correlation of layer configuration in various mechanical tests
  24. Singularities at interface corners of piezoelectric-brass unimorphs
  25. Evaluation of the wettability of prepared anti-wetting nanocoating on different construction surfaces
  26. Review Article
  27. An overview of cold spray coating in additive manufacturing, component repairing and other engineering applications
  28. Special Issue: Sustainability and Development in Civil Engineering - Part I
  29. Risk assessment process for the Iraqi petroleum sector
  30. Evaluation of a fire safety risk prediction model for an existing building
  31. The slenderness ratio effect on the response of closed-end pipe piles in liquefied and non-liquefied soil layers under coupled static-seismic loading
  32. Experimental and numerical study of the bulb's location effect on the behavior of under-reamed pile in expansive soil
  33. Procurement challenges analysis of Iraqi construction projects
  34. Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations
  35. Response of composite steel-concrete cellular beams of different concrete deck types under harmonic loads
  36. The effect of using different fibres on the impact-resistance of slurry infiltrated fibrous concrete (SIFCON)
  37. Effect of microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) on the strength of soil contaminated with lead nitrate
  38. The effect of using polyolefin fiber on some properties of slurry-infiltrated fibrous concrete
  39. Typical strength of asphalt mixtures compacted by gyratory compactor
  40. Modeling and simulation sedimentation process using finite difference method
  41. Residual strength and strengthening capacity of reinforced concrete columns subjected to fire exposure by numerical analysis
  42. Effect of magnetization of saline irrigation water of Almasab Alam on some physical properties of soil
  43. Behavior of reactive powder concrete containing recycled glass powder reinforced by steel fiber
  44. Reducing settlement of soft clay using different grouting materials
  45. Sustainability in the design of liquefied petroleum gas systems used in buildings
  46. Utilization of serial tendering to reduce the value project
  47. Time and finance optimization model for multiple construction projects using genetic algorithm
  48. Identification of the main causes of risks in engineering procurement construction projects
  49. Identifying the selection criteria of design consultant for Iraqi construction projects
  50. Calibration and analysis of the potable water network in the Al-Yarmouk region employing WaterGEMS and GIS
  51. Enhancing gypseous soil behavior using casein from milk wastes
  52. Structural behavior of tree-like steel columns subjected to combined axial and lateral loads
  53. Prospect of using geotextile reinforcement within flexible pavement layers to reduce the effects of rutting in the middle and southern parts of Iraq
  54. Ultimate bearing capacity of eccentrically loaded square footing over geogrid-reinforced cohesive soil
  55. Influence of water-absorbent polymer balls on the structural performance of reinforced concrete beam: An experimental investigation
  56. A spherical fuzzy AHP model for contractor assessment during project life cycle
  57. Performance of reinforced concrete non-prismatic beams having multiple openings configurations
  58. Finite element analysis of the soil and foundations of the Al-Kufa Mosque
  59. Flexural behavior of concrete beams with horizontal and vertical openings reinforced by glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars
  60. Studying the effect of shear stud distribution on the behavior of steel–reactive powder concrete composite beams using ABAQUS software
  61. The behavior of piled rafts in soft clay: Numerical investigation
  62. The impact of evaluation and qualification criteria on Iraqi electromechanical power plants in construction contracts
  63. Performance of concrete thrust block at several burial conditions under the influence of thrust forces generated in the water distribution networks
  64. Geotechnical characterization of sustainable geopolymer improved soil
  65. Effect of the covariance matrix type on the CPT based soil stratification utilizing the Gaussian mixture model
  66. Impact of eccentricity and depth-to-breadth ratio on the behavior of skirt foundation rested on dry gypseous soil
  67. Concrete strength development by using magnetized water in normal and self-compacted concrete
  68. The effect of dosage nanosilica and the particle size of porcelanite aggregate concrete on mechanical and microstructure properties
  69. Comparison of time extension provisions between the Joint Contracts Tribunal and Iraqi Standard Bidding Document
  70. Numerical modeling of single closed and open-ended pipe pile embedded in dry soil layers under coupled static and dynamic loadings
  71. Mechanical properties of sustainable reactive powder concrete made with low cement content and high amount of fly ash and silica fume
  72. Deformation of unsaturated collapsible soils under suction control
  73. Mitigation of collapse characteristics of gypseous soils by activated carbon, sodium metasilicate, and cement dust: An experimental study
  74. Behavior of group piles under combined loadings after improvement of liquefiable soil with nanomaterials
  75. Using papyrus fiber ash as a sustainable filler modifier in preparing low moisture sensitivity HMA mixtures
  76. Study of some properties of colored geopolymer concrete consisting of slag
  77. GIS implementation and statistical analysis for significant characteristics of Kirkuk soil
  78. Improving the flexural behavior of RC beams strengthening by near-surface mounting
  79. The effect of materials and curing system on the behavior of self-compacting geopolymer concrete
  80. The temporal rhythm of scenes and the safety in educational space
  81. Numerical simulation to the effect of applying rationing system on the stability of the Earth canal: Birmana canal in Iraq as a case study
  82. Assessing the vibration response of foundation embedment in gypseous soil
  83. Analysis of concrete beams reinforced by GFRP bars with varying parameters
  84. One dimensional normal consolidation line equation
Heruntergeladen am 1.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0031/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen