Home Evaluation of the wettability of prepared anti-wetting nanocoating on different construction surfaces
Article Open Access

Evaluation of the wettability of prepared anti-wetting nanocoating on different construction surfaces

  • Mustafa H. Omar EMAIL logo , Wissam A. Hussian and Mays A. Ahmed
Published/Copyright: November 4, 2022

Abstract

Generally, the major problems of moisture damage are caused by wetting, and particularly in construction, which has led to extensive research for the production of hydrophobic (anti-wetting) coatings. The aim of this research is to prepare an anti-wetting (hydrophobic) nanocomposite coating for different construction surfaces (ceramic, brick and gypsum). Hydrophobic nanocomposite coating was synthesized using electrospinning technique. Polymethyl methacrylate and polystyrene (PS) solutions were prepared in different ratios and then separately reinforced with ZrO2 and ZnO nanoparticles. Contact angle, surface roughness, surface free energy and weathering effects were calculated for all specimens after being coated. All previously selected materials surfaces showed superhydrophobic and hydrophobic properties. The best results were obtained on ceramic surfaces after coating with PS/ZrO2. The water contact angle was 153° while the surface roughness was 0.491 µm and also showed the lowest surface free energy which was 5.5 mJ/m2. Weathering conditions tend to decrease the values of contact angle and this is due to the environmental effect of the weathering but they still have their hydrophobic properties. SEM test was used to determine the surface morphology and nanoparticle size for ceramic surfaces coated with PS and nano-ZrO2.

1 Introduction

Most developing countries are more interested in and focused on nanotechnology because of the benefits that provide in terms of environmental protection, military, industrial, and research. The materials surfaces’ coating provides many advantages in different applications including biocompatibility, wear protection, thermal and mechanical stability and the reduction of friction and corrosion [1]. The hydrophobic coatings become a very important technique to avoid wetting problems in surfaces due to the capability of the coated surface to hydrophobize water and does not absorb it. Surfaces with a droplet water angle above 90° are defined as hydrophobic, while surfaces with an angle above 150° are defined as superhydrophobic. Hydrophobicity provides self-cleaning, anti-corrosion, anti-wetting, antibacterial, etc. [2].

The surface wettability of a solid material is determined by its surface energy. The contact angle given by Young’s equation is used to determine the wettability of a solid surface. There are three separate phases when examining a drop of liquid on a substrate. As a result, three surface tensions must be considered: solid–liquid, liquid–vapor, and solid–vapor (SV). Young’s equation describes the relationship between the cosine of the drop’s contact angle with the surface and the three surface tensions:

(1) γ SV = γ SL + γ LV cos θ .

Inorganic ceramic surfaces, such as metal oxides, are considered to have higher surface energy than an organic material surface since the hydroxyl groups and molecular water are adsorbed on the surface at ambient air atmosphere. Surface organic contamination can alter wettability under normal circumstances [3].

The surface roughness is tested in this research on all coated specimens to define the changes over the concerned substrate and how to interact within different environments, high amount of roughness is unfavorable and would be difficult to control the preparation process, also giving undesirable properties for the hydrophobic coating which known generally having very smooth surface characteristics [4].

Young’s equation is applied to the surface energy. This equation, however, does not apply to rough surfaces because water cannot form a droplet on a porous surface since it gets absorbed into pores by the capillary effect. However, even on a dense surface, roughness affects the contact angle. The roughness factor r increases both hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity, according to Wenzel’s modification of Young’s equation.

(2) cos θ = r ( γ SV γ SL ) / γ LV = r cos θ .

According to this equation, the hydrophobicity is increased when the water contact angle is greater than 90°. On the other hand, when the water contact angle is less than 90°, the surface’s hydrophilicity is increased. Figure S1 depicts the change in water contact angle for different metal oxides under ultraviolet (UV) illumination; it is obvious that the UV has a massive effect.

The electrospinning technique (E-spin) is considered one of the best processes for the fabrication of nanocoating and nanofibers. Last few years, the interest of researchers has risen in nanotechnology due to the possibility of nanofibers production with a diameter in nanosize [5]. The selected surfaces’ materials were chosen due to their industrial needs in common and daily people’s life in particular for construction and building [6].

Zirconia’s high mechanical properties, chemical inertness, toughness, high fatigue and wear resistance, low thermal conductivity and high heat resistance, and corrosion resistance [7]. As well as zinc oxide is used for coating surfaces due to its chemical and physical properties, as it is characterized by its high electrochemical correlation coefficient, and high optical and chemical stability as well. It also has the ability to absorb moisture and is resistant to sunlight and high quality has put these ceramic oxides on the radar in many industries and application areas ranging from refractory to medical products, pigments, electronics, and coatings [8].

Many researchers have investigated the hydrophobic properties of different materials. In (2020), Małgorzata and Danuta evaluated the protection of porous lightweight concrete using two organosilicons hydrophobic coatings. The water contact angle of the prepared concrete was used to determine the wettability of the surface. The results showed that the lowest contact angle of 40.2° was obtained before hydrophobization, while 102.3° and 112.2° after hydrophobization with a water-based methylsilicone resin and organic solvent-based methylsilicone resin, respectively [9]. In 2021, Soulios et al. evaluated the effect of artificial aging cycles (635 cycles of alternating UV light (102 min) and water spray (18 min)) on the durability of the hydrophobic treatment on bricks and mortars. The samples were treated with two different water-repellent coatings, cream silane with 40% water (FC), and cream silane with 80% water (BS). The results showed that the contact angle for brick before aging was 130 and 128° and after aging was 104 and 111° for FC and BS, respectively. For mortar, the contact angle before aging was 130 and 125° for FC and BS, respectively, while after aging the contact angle of mortar with FC coating was significantly reduced and unmeasurable but for BS coating it was 111° [10], While in 2022, Zhang et al. fabricated self-cleaning superhydrophobic coatings using fluorine resin reinforced with carbon nanotubes nanoparticles (CNTs) and SiO2. The mixing ratio of CNTs to SiO2 is 2–3. The results showed that the prepared coating possesses a contact angle of 156.8° and demonstrates good chemical resistance, thermal stability, and mechanical stability [11].

The purpose of this article was to study the hydrophobic characteristic by preparing an anti-wetting coating composite for different hydrophilic surfaces (ceramic, brick and gypsum) and evaluate it using the contact angle and surface roughness tests to find out if the coated surfaces became hydrophobic or remained hydrophilic.

2 Experimental part

Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and polystyrene (PS) granules were used to prepare hydrophobic coatings. PMMA was mixed with its solvent tetrahydrofuran (THF) in different ratios (1–5%) while PS was mixed with its solvent dimethylformamide DMF from 5 to 20% to achieve the best contact angle (best hydrophobic surface), after that ZrO2 and ZnO nanoparticles were separately added to the mixture to enhance the properties of the prepared anti-wetting nanocomposite coating. Different surfaces with a hydrophilic nature such as (ceramic, brick and gypsum) were used as a substrate to evaluate the wetting problems. The specimens were prepared by crashing the ceramic tile, building brick and gypsum into smaller parts with 100 mm × 40 mm × 10 mm in dimension. The selected surfaces were cleaned with ethanol and then dried at (35°) to obtain a surface with the smooth and soft surface with no scratches [12]. After that, a magnetic stirrer was used for a few hours to obtain complete homogeneity. At first, a piece of glass was coated with the prepared solution by the E-spin process to specify the PMMA and PS ratios that give the optimum contact angle; 4% of PMMA and 20% of PS were the best ratios which achieved contact angles of (133°) and (141°), respectively; then, ZrO2 and ZnO nanoparticles were added to enhance the contact angle of the prepared solutions [13].

The electrospinning process contains three major important tools (syringe, voltage and collector); also, it owns positive and negative electrodes, one of them is connected to a tip of the needle and the other with a plate collector. The prepared solution was set up in a 3 mL syringe with a very small output micro–nano-size needle, while the used voltage was (6.5 kV) [14]. After turning on the voltage up to 6.5 kV, an electric current passes through the needle and generates an electrostatic force which in turn regulates the droplet of the solution (surface tension of solution). By rising the voltage higher than 6.5 kV, it will generate an electrospray that gives larger micro size. Therefore, the voltage must not exceed 6.5 kV. When the current stabilized, it will evaporate the solute and only the polymer remains on the coated surface [15]. Figure 1 shows the process of electrospinning.

Figure 1 
               Electrospinning process: (A) homogeneity process using magnetic stirrer, (B) Electrospinning set up [16].
Figure 1

Electrospinning process: (A) homogeneity process using magnetic stirrer, (B) Electrospinning set up [16].

The contact angle of the coated surfaces was measured using the image of a sessile drop method which is illustrated in [17]. Figure S2 shows the contact angle variation from hydrophilic to hydrophobic. The TR200 roughness gauge with the random signal-μm method was used to determine the surface roughness and also the effect of the nano-additives on the prepared coating. The surface free energy was determined using the Neumann model which is illustrated in [18,19], while the morphology of the coated surfaces was tested by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Finally, the coated specimens were exposed to weathering effects that included cycles of UV light, temperature at 50° and Rains using the accelerated weathering test device system. The coated specimens were placed inside the apparatus and weatherized for 180 h, knowing that each 1 h represents one day inside the system. Averages of six specimens were evaluated for each test.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Contact angle test

Contact angle was calculated for all selected surfaces. At first, all surfaces (ceramic, brick and gypsum) were tested before coating, and all of them showed contact angles below 90°, because of the porosity and the roughness which absorb the droplet water faster and also keep these droplets inside the material and lead to wetting problems. After coating with the prepared solution, all surfaces were tested using the CA test. The CA results of the coated surfaces (ceramic, brick and gypsum) revealed high improvement, where the ceramic specimens coated with PS/ZrO2 showed superhydrophobic properties. Whereas specimens coated with (PMMA), (PMMA/ZrO2), (PMMA/ZnO), (PS) and (PS/ZnO) showed hydrophobic properties. The PS coating shows higher CA results in comparison with PMMA. The specimens which coated with ZrO2 show the highest contact angles, which means the nano-ZrO2 causes a high decrement in the roughness of the surface, also due to the great bonding between the polymers chains, also because ZrO2 nanoparticles provide a high surface area which makes the surface more uniform to repel water. Additionally, the presence of nanoparticles improves bonding and adhesion with the surface and prevents humidity and moisture to accumulate inside the pores of the substrate [20]. After coating the tested surfaces showed CA values ranging from (95.213–129.312°) with PMMA and (107.865–153.879) with PS coatings. Figure 2 shows the CA results after coating with PMMA and PS for (ceramic, brick and gypsum) surfaces, respectively.

Figure 2 
                  CA results for different coated surfaces.
Figure 2

CA results for different coated surfaces.

3.2 Surface roughness test

Roughness of the surface was examined for all nanocoating types. The results revealed that there was a good enhancement in surface roughness after the coating process. Figure 3 shows the surface roughness results for the coated surfaces (ceramic, brick and gypsum) with PMMA and PS, respectively. Before coating the highest roughness value was (6.753 µm) on the brick surface, while the PS/ZrO2 coating provided the best roughness values which showed 0.491 µm in ceramic. For all specimens, the PS coating shows higher results in comparison with PMMA. After coating the tested surfaces showed surface roughness values ranging 3.129–0.653 µm with PMMA and 2.944–0.491 µm with PS coatings. This behavior occurred due to the decreasing of porosity in the surface after coating which completely close the pores at the surface, also these nanoparticles filled the pores and flaws in the surface by creating a thin hydrophobic layer, while in the higher roughness values, the nanoparticles may be partially filled the pores of the rougher surfaces.

Figure 3 
                  Roughness surface results for different coated surfaces.
Figure 3

Roughness surface results for different coated surfaces.

3.3 Surface free energy test (SFE)

The results showed that the SFE values decrease with increasing contact angles. As a result of that, the PS coatings give lower SFE values in comparison with PMMA which means less spreading of the droplet on the surface. The lowest value in PS coating was 5.5 mJ/m2 while in PMMA coating was 9.4 mJ/m2 with nano-ZrO2. The other coating ratios showed higher SFE ranging (11.2–30.9 mJ/m2) and (6.9–17.9 mJ/m2) for PMMA and PS, respectively. This occurred due to two reasons. The first reason is the high ratio of the molecules of free solvent, where the molecules will mix with each other and form the beads on the surface and the second is the molecular weight and the concentration of the polymer that used in the solution also has an effect on the SFE [9]. Figure 4 shows the SFE results for the coated surfaces (ceramic, brick and gypsum) with PMMA and PS, respectively.

Figure 4 
                  Surface free energy results for different coated surfaces.
Figure 4

Surface free energy results for different coated surfaces.

3.4 Weathering effects

The coated specimens were exposed to weathering effects that involve cycles of UV light, temperature at 50° and Rains using the accelerated weathering test device system. The contact angle values were relatively comfortably maintained for long periods of time with little decrease in these values. Physical changes generated by the environmental exposure are initiated by breaking the chemical bond due to the absorption of UV light; also, the ceramic surface showed a low amount of moisture which proves the hydrophobic properties of the coating. The contact angle results for gypsum surface coated with PMMA showed a chemical breakdown when exposed to the UV light. Meanwhile, gypsum specimens that were coated with PS/ZrO2 and PS/ZnO maintained their properties after exposure to the same weathering conditions due to the great bonding between the polymer chains within the prepared coating and the presence of nanoparticles of ZrO2 and ZnO that serve as bridges between resultant nanofibers coating. It was also noticed that by comparing these results with the results of PMMA, it concluded that the rate of influence by weathering conditions was higher for both PS/ZrO2 and PS/ZnO, this behavior occurred because PMMA possesses higher resistance to UV and temperature effects. Figure 5 shows the CA results after coating with PMMA and PS for (ceramic, brick and gypsum) surfaces, respectively, after exposure to weathering effects.

Figure 5 
                  CA results for different coated surfaces after exposure to weathering effects.
Figure 5

CA results for different coated surfaces after exposure to weathering effects.

3.5 Microscope tests

The best coating results which obtained with PS reinforced with ZrO2 for ceramic surface were scanned by SEM to investigate the morphology of the surface. Figure 6a shows the SEM of PS coating which reveals some aggregate of beads and various defect which is composed due to the polymer solution that possesses lower viscosity which directly adhere to the surface [21]. Figure 6b shows the SEM of PS/ZrO2 which reveals a good bond mechanism due to the presence of nano-ZrO2 which make it strongly stick and adhere to the surface while Figure 6c shows the SEM of PS/ZnO coating which reveals more beads with medium viscosity resulting in a blend of beads and many aggregates [20]. The particle size of PS/ZrO2 and PS/ZnO was measured using the atomic force microscopy (AFM) test. The resulting images showed that a different distribution at the surface was observed, ranging from micro- to nano-altitude, and the nano-altitude takes more area which shows a perfect pyramid rough structure form which is about (3.33 nm) for PS/ZrO2 and (22.62 nm) for PS/ZnO as illustrated in Figure 7.

Figure 6 
                  SEM image of the prepared specimens: (a) PS, (b) PS/ZrO2, and (c) PS/ZnO.
Figure 6

SEM image of the prepared specimens: (a) PS, (b) PS/ZrO2, and (c) PS/ZnO.

Figure 7 
                  AFM images for PS/ZrO2 and PS/ZnO.
Figure 7

AFM images for PS/ZrO2 and PS/ZnO.

4 Conclusions

This work attends to treatment of the wetting problem that occurs in buildings. Based on this issue the surfaces of (ceramic, brick and gypsum) were chosen due to their high porosity to prepare nanocoating from nanocomposite materials that possess hydrophobicity properties. Hydrophobic and superhydrophobic nanocomposites coating were successfully fabricated by electrospinning technique using PS and PMMA polymer solution with the addition of nano-ZrO2 and ZnO nanoparticles. The results showed excellent enhancement of surface for all selected surfaces after coating with the prepared nanocoating, which turns their characteristics from hydrophilic to superhydrophobic and hydrophobic, and the coated surfaces possess a high ability to repel the water and give anti-wetting properties. Another improvement was discovered in this work is the roughness of the surface which resulted in good enhancement for all nanocoating that gives anti-dust and anti-smudge properties to the surface due to its high smoothness; also under weathering effects, PS/ZrO2 specimens maintained their high hydrophobic properties.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: This is to inform you that there are no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The data sets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] National Association of Corrosion Engineers. International measures of prevention, application and economics of corrosion technology (IMPACT). Vancouver, B.C. Corrosion; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Liu H, Ding X, Zhou G, Li P, Wei X, Fan Y. Electrospinning of nanofibers for tissue engineering applications. J Nanomater. 2013;1155(10):495708.10.1155/2013/495708Search in Google Scholar

[3] Watanabe T. Wettability of ceramic surfaces -A wide range control of surface wettability from super hydrophilicity to super hydrophobicity, from static wettability to dynamic wettability. J Ceram Soc Jpn. 2009;117(10):1285–92.10.2109/jcersj2.117.1285Search in Google Scholar

[4] Cui J, Cui Y. Effects of surface wettability and roughness on the heat transfer performance of fluid flowing through microchannels. Energy J. 2015;8:5704–24. 10.3390/en8065704.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Huan S, Liu G, Han G, Cheng W, Fu Z, Wu Q, et al. Effect of experimental parameters on morphological, mechanical and hydrophobic properties of electrospun polystyrene fibers. Materials. 2015;8:2718–34.10.3390/ma8052718Search in Google Scholar

[6] Thenmozhi S, Dharmaraj N, Kadirvelu K, Hak K. Electrospun nanofibers: New generation materials for advanced applications. Mater Sci Eng B. 2017;217:36–48.10.1016/j.mseb.2017.01.001Search in Google Scholar

[7] de Souza Leão R, de Moraes SLD, de Luna Gomes J, Lemos CAA, de Silva Casado B, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, et al. Influence of addition of zirconia on PMMA: A systematic review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;106:110292.10.1016/j.msec.2019.110292Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Asture A, Rawat V, Srivastava C, Vaya D. Investigation of properties and applications of ZnO polymer nanocomposites. Polym Bull. 2022;79:1–39.10.1007/s00289-022-04243-wSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Szafraniec M, Barnat-Hunek D. Evaluation of the contact angle and wettability of hydrophobised lightweight concrete with sawdust. Bud i Arch. 2020;19(2):19–32.10.35784/bud-arch.1644Search in Google Scholar

[10] Soulios V, de Place Hansen EJ, Peuhkuri R, Møller E, Ghanbari-Siahkali A. Durability of the hydrophobic treatment on brick and mortar. Build Env. 2021;201:107994.10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107994Search in Google Scholar

[11] Zhang Y, Zhou S, Lv Z, Fan L, Huang Y, Liu X. A facile method to prepare superhydrophobic coatings for various substrates. Appl Sci. 2022;12:1240.10.3390/app12031240Search in Google Scholar

[12] Yuan Y, Lee TR. Contact Angle and Wetting Properties. In: Bracco B, Holst B, editors. Surface Science Techniques. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p. 3–34. ISBN: 978-3-642-34242-4.10.1007/978-3-642-34243-1_1Search in Google Scholar

[13] Omar MH, Amin MH, Younis HA. Comparison of using nano-ZnO and nano-Al2O3 to improve the properties of prepared polymethyl methacrylate denture base. Appl Phys A. 2022;128:313.10.1007/s00339-022-05359-6Search in Google Scholar

[14] Azimirad R, Safa S. Electrospun polystyrene fibers on TiO2 nanostructured film to enhance the hydrophobicity and corrosion resistance of stainless steel substrates. Pramana. 2016;86(3):653–60.10.1007/s12043-015-1021-9Search in Google Scholar

[15] Garg VR, Singh RN. Hydrophobic coating of polymethylmetha- crylate (PMMA) on glass substrate for reduced bacterial adhesion. J Polym Mater. 2015;32(4):503–12.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Jaafar HT, Aldabbagh BM. Investigation of superhydrophobic/hydrophobic materials properties using electrospinning technique. Baghdad Sci J. 2019;16(3):632–8.10.21123/bsj.2019.16.3.0632Search in Google Scholar

[17] Bachmann J, Horton R, van der Ploeg RR, Woche S. Modified sessile drop method for assessing initial soil–water contact angle of sandy soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2000;64:564–7.10.2136/sssaj2000.642564xSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Barnat-Hunek D, Smarzewski P. Influence of hydrophobisation on surface free energy of hybrid fiber reinforced ultra-high performance concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2016;1(102):367–77.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.008Search in Google Scholar

[19] Neumann AW, Good RJ, Hope CJ, Sejpal M. An equation-of-state approach to determine surface tensions of low-energy solids from contact angles. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1974;49:291–304.10.1016/0021-9797(74)90365-8Search in Google Scholar

[20] Diaa BM, Jaafar HT. Superhydrophobic nanocomposites coating using electrospinning technique on different materials. Int J Appl Eng Res. 2017;12(24):16032–8.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Manar AN, Akram RJ, Emad SA. Preparation and characterization of an artificial tissue using polymer blend by electrospinning method [dissertation]. Baghdad: University of Technology; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-05-12
Revised: 2022-08-31
Accepted: 2022-09-21
Published Online: 2022-11-04

© 2022 Mustafa H. Omar et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Calcium carbonate nanoparticles of quail’s egg shells: Synthesis and characterizations
  3. Effect of welding consumables on shielded metal arc welded ultra high hard armour steel joints
  4. Stress-strain characteristics and service life of conventional and asphaltic underlayment track under heavy load Babaranjang trains traffic
  5. Corrigendum to: Statistical mechanics of cell decision-making: the cell migration force distribution
  6. Prediction of bearing capacity of driven piles for Basrah governatore using SPT and MATLAB
  7. Investigation on microstructural features and tensile shear fracture properties of resistance spot welded advanced high strength dual phase steel sheets in lap joint configuration for automotive frame applications
  8. Experimental and numerical investigation of drop weight impact of aramid and UHMWPE reinforced epoxy
  9. An experimental study and finite element analysis of the parametric of circular honeycomb core
  10. The study of the particle size effect on the physical properties of TiO2/cellulose acetate composite films
  11. Hybrid material performance assessment for rocket propulsion
  12. Design of ER damper for recoil length minimization: A case study on gun recoil system
  13. Forecasting technical performance and cost estimation of designed rim wheels based on variations of geometrical parameters
  14. Enhancing the machinability of SKD61 die steel in power-mixed EDM process with TGRA-based multi criteria decision making
  15. Effect of boron carbide reinforcement on properties of stainless-steel metal matrix composite for nuclear applications
  16. Energy absorption behaviors of designed metallic square tubes under axial loading: Experiment-based benchmarking and finite element calculation
  17. Synthesis and study of magnesium complexes derived from polyacrylate and polyvinyl alcohol and their applications as superabsorbent polymers
  18. Artificial neural network for predicting the mechanical performance of additive manufacturing thermoset carbon fiber composite materials
  19. Shock and impact reliability of electronic assemblies with perimeter vs full array layouts: A numerical comparative study
  20. Influences of pre-bending load and corrosion degree of reinforcement on the loading capacity of concrete beams
  21. Assessment of ballistic impact damage on aluminum and magnesium alloys against high velocity bullets by dynamic FE simulations
  22. On the applicability of Cu–17Zn–7Al–0.3Ni shape memory alloy particles as reinforcement in aluminium-based composites: Structural and mechanical behaviour considerations
  23. Mechanical properties of laminated bamboo composite as a sustainable green material for fishing vessel: Correlation of layer configuration in various mechanical tests
  24. Singularities at interface corners of piezoelectric-brass unimorphs
  25. Evaluation of the wettability of prepared anti-wetting nanocoating on different construction surfaces
  26. Review Article
  27. An overview of cold spray coating in additive manufacturing, component repairing and other engineering applications
  28. Special Issue: Sustainability and Development in Civil Engineering - Part I
  29. Risk assessment process for the Iraqi petroleum sector
  30. Evaluation of a fire safety risk prediction model for an existing building
  31. The slenderness ratio effect on the response of closed-end pipe piles in liquefied and non-liquefied soil layers under coupled static-seismic loading
  32. Experimental and numerical study of the bulb's location effect on the behavior of under-reamed pile in expansive soil
  33. Procurement challenges analysis of Iraqi construction projects
  34. Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations
  35. Response of composite steel-concrete cellular beams of different concrete deck types under harmonic loads
  36. The effect of using different fibres on the impact-resistance of slurry infiltrated fibrous concrete (SIFCON)
  37. Effect of microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) on the strength of soil contaminated with lead nitrate
  38. The effect of using polyolefin fiber on some properties of slurry-infiltrated fibrous concrete
  39. Typical strength of asphalt mixtures compacted by gyratory compactor
  40. Modeling and simulation sedimentation process using finite difference method
  41. Residual strength and strengthening capacity of reinforced concrete columns subjected to fire exposure by numerical analysis
  42. Effect of magnetization of saline irrigation water of Almasab Alam on some physical properties of soil
  43. Behavior of reactive powder concrete containing recycled glass powder reinforced by steel fiber
  44. Reducing settlement of soft clay using different grouting materials
  45. Sustainability in the design of liquefied petroleum gas systems used in buildings
  46. Utilization of serial tendering to reduce the value project
  47. Time and finance optimization model for multiple construction projects using genetic algorithm
  48. Identification of the main causes of risks in engineering procurement construction projects
  49. Identifying the selection criteria of design consultant for Iraqi construction projects
  50. Calibration and analysis of the potable water network in the Al-Yarmouk region employing WaterGEMS and GIS
  51. Enhancing gypseous soil behavior using casein from milk wastes
  52. Structural behavior of tree-like steel columns subjected to combined axial and lateral loads
  53. Prospect of using geotextile reinforcement within flexible pavement layers to reduce the effects of rutting in the middle and southern parts of Iraq
  54. Ultimate bearing capacity of eccentrically loaded square footing over geogrid-reinforced cohesive soil
  55. Influence of water-absorbent polymer balls on the structural performance of reinforced concrete beam: An experimental investigation
  56. A spherical fuzzy AHP model for contractor assessment during project life cycle
  57. Performance of reinforced concrete non-prismatic beams having multiple openings configurations
  58. Finite element analysis of the soil and foundations of the Al-Kufa Mosque
  59. Flexural behavior of concrete beams with horizontal and vertical openings reinforced by glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars
  60. Studying the effect of shear stud distribution on the behavior of steel–reactive powder concrete composite beams using ABAQUS software
  61. The behavior of piled rafts in soft clay: Numerical investigation
  62. The impact of evaluation and qualification criteria on Iraqi electromechanical power plants in construction contracts
  63. Performance of concrete thrust block at several burial conditions under the influence of thrust forces generated in the water distribution networks
  64. Geotechnical characterization of sustainable geopolymer improved soil
  65. Effect of the covariance matrix type on the CPT based soil stratification utilizing the Gaussian mixture model
  66. Impact of eccentricity and depth-to-breadth ratio on the behavior of skirt foundation rested on dry gypseous soil
  67. Concrete strength development by using magnetized water in normal and self-compacted concrete
  68. The effect of dosage nanosilica and the particle size of porcelanite aggregate concrete on mechanical and microstructure properties
  69. Comparison of time extension provisions between the Joint Contracts Tribunal and Iraqi Standard Bidding Document
  70. Numerical modeling of single closed and open-ended pipe pile embedded in dry soil layers under coupled static and dynamic loadings
  71. Mechanical properties of sustainable reactive powder concrete made with low cement content and high amount of fly ash and silica fume
  72. Deformation of unsaturated collapsible soils under suction control
  73. Mitigation of collapse characteristics of gypseous soils by activated carbon, sodium metasilicate, and cement dust: An experimental study
  74. Behavior of group piles under combined loadings after improvement of liquefiable soil with nanomaterials
  75. Using papyrus fiber ash as a sustainable filler modifier in preparing low moisture sensitivity HMA mixtures
  76. Study of some properties of colored geopolymer concrete consisting of slag
  77. GIS implementation and statistical analysis for significant characteristics of Kirkuk soil
  78. Improving the flexural behavior of RC beams strengthening by near-surface mounting
  79. The effect of materials and curing system on the behavior of self-compacting geopolymer concrete
  80. The temporal rhythm of scenes and the safety in educational space
  81. Numerical simulation to the effect of applying rationing system on the stability of the Earth canal: Birmana canal in Iraq as a case study
  82. Assessing the vibration response of foundation embedment in gypseous soil
  83. Analysis of concrete beams reinforced by GFRP bars with varying parameters
  84. One dimensional normal consolidation line equation
Downloaded on 5.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0260/html
Scroll to top button