Startseite Naturwissenschaften Finite element analysis of the soil and foundations of the Al-Kufa Mosque
Artikel Open Access

Finite element analysis of the soil and foundations of the Al-Kufa Mosque

  • Hasan Mahdi Al-Jiboury EMAIL logo und Mohammed Kadum Fakhraldin
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. Juli 2022

Abstract

The Great Mosque of Kufa, built in 639 CE and located in Al-Kufa, Iraq, is considered one of the most important mosques in the Islamic world. Because cracks appeared in the historical walls of the Al-Kufa Mosque during the construction of the Muslim Bin Aqeel Underpass, the values and locations of bending moment and shear force may be useful for wall maintenance. So, this study aims to determine the maximum and minimum values and locations of settlement, bending moment, and shear forces under the mosque walls’ foundations. Historical references are used to know the previous architectures of the mosque. Also, archaeological investigation reports are adopted to find out the characteristics of the foundations like their dimensions, depths, and materials. Soil investigation reports are used to know the soil layer’s properties and parameters. For non-mentioned soil parameters in soil investigation reports, they are determined depending on the theoretical equations, charts, statistical correlations, and models. A model of soil layers, foundations, and walls is conducted and analyzed using finite element software to determine the deformations of soil layers under the mosque’s brick foundations and walls. According to the analysis, maximum bending moment and shear force were found under the minaret near the Al-Thuaban gate.

1 Introduction

Al-Kufa Great Mosque is one of the most important and famous mosques in the Islamic world. It is the fourth mosque in Islam after Al-Masjid Al-Haram in Mecca, Al-Masjid Al-Nabawi in Al-Madina, and Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem. The Great Mosque of Kufa is considered one of the earliest mosques in Iraq, which was built in 639 CE (17 AH). Presently, Al-Kufa Great Mosque includes nine sanctuaries, four minarets, and seven entrances. (On the northern side, Al-Thuaban Gate and Al-Rahma Gate are located; on the western side, Al-Huja Gate is located; and on the eastern side, four small gates connecting the mosque courtyard and Muslim Bin Aqeel courtyard are located). On the eastern side of the mosque is the Muslim Bin Aqeel courtyard, which contains the holy shrines of Muslim Bin Aqeel, Hani Bin Erowa, and Al-Mukhtar Al-Thaqafi as shown in Plate 1, which shows Al-Kufa Great Mosque and the golden dome of Muslim Bin Aqeel holy shrine. Outside the mosque, on the southern side, lies Emirate Palace, which served as the ruler’s residence palace in the past. Al-Kufa Mosque is located in Al-Kufa city that is located about 160 km to the southwest of Baghdad, and about 10 km to the northeast of Imam Ali’s holy shrine in Al-Najaf Province. The Kufa city elevation is about 22 m above the sea level. The Euphrates River is located about 1 km from the west side of the great mosque. To the northeast side at about 20 km is located a lake locally called Baher Al-Najaf, which has salt water.

Plate 1 
               Al-Kufa Great Mosque.
Plate 1

Al-Kufa Great Mosque.

2 Historical background

Saad Bin Abi Waqass began the construction of the inclusive city in the middle of Iraq as per the orders of Khalifa Umar Ibn Al Khattab to be a military base for his army, after Al-Qadisiyyah Battle in 639 CE (17 AH) and to be the capital for the Muslims instead of Al-Madaen city. They first built the mosque, which could hold up to 40,000 soldiers, and then they planned and built the city [1]. At that time, they did not build any walls surrounding the mosque but just constructed a canopy in front of the mosque on the Qibla side [2] and dug a trench around the mosque as borders [3]. The mosque remained in its original dimensions and construction until the reign of Ziyad ibn Abihi in 672 CE (50 AH), when it was rebuilt, altered, extended, and developed. The mosque’s structure was strengthened and fixed by piercing and filling the columns with lead and iron. The roof was elevated to 30 arms (about 15 m) in height into the sky [3]. The traveler Bin Jubayr visited Al-Kufa city in 1184 (562 AH) and described the great mosque. He said that the mosque was large and on the Qibla side, there are five spans of roofing and on the other three sides, there are two spans. These roofs stand on very high columns made of stones and fixed by piercing and filling with lead [4].

In 1256 (656 AH), the Mongol Ilkhanate empire was created in Iraq. During the era of ruler Abaqa Khan, the Mongol Ilkhanate empire took care of the Al-Kufa Mosque after it had been neglected throughout the Abbasid era. One of the most important things got from this architecture is the walls of the current mosque [5]. Sayed Mohammed Mahdi Baher Al-Eloom in 1767 (1181 AH) filled the mosque’s ground with new and clean soil after groundwater appeared on the surface. The soil used to fill the mosque was around 5–6 m deep [1]. The Dawoodi Bohra carried out a large renovation project in Al-Kufa Mosque from 1998 to 2009. The renovation included destroying the rooms, columns, sanctuaries, pavement, roofing, and gates except for the historic walls that surrounded the mosque and the gate and minaret of Al-Thuaban Gate. The Dawoodi Bohra built a new concrete structure from the ground up, including foundations, columns, and roofing. The mosque courtyard was also excavated to a depth of roughly 1.5 m, filled with new soil, reinforced and then poured with concrete, and finished with white marbles. The renovation also included the construction of two new square-shaped minarets with a height of about 30.8 m [5].

3 Archaeological investigations

In 1938, the Iraqi Directorate of General Antiquities conducted archaeological excavations in and around Al-Kufa Mosque. The investigations revealed that the mosque was built on the roughly square ground with a 17-degree deviation from the Qibla angle. Minor discrepancies between the mosque’s four walls were also discovered. The southern side (facing the Qibla) stretched about 110 m. The back wall was 109 m long, while the other two side walls were 116 m long. These four walls were tall and were supported from the outside by semi-circular towers. There were five semi-cylindrical towers on the southern side, seven on the northern side, seven on the eastern side, five on the western side, and one in each corner [6]. Figure 1 shows the as-built drawing plan of the Al-Kufa Mosque.

Figure 1 
               As-built drawing plan of Al-Kufa Mosque.
Figure 1

As-built drawing plan of Al-Kufa Mosque.

4 The foundations and the walls

The archaeological excavations revealed the foundation under the wall as follows:

  1. The wall’s foundations run down to a depth of almost 5.5 m.

  2. When the foundation ascends to the height of 2.6 m, the wall is pushed back, leaving a 60 cm wide bench alongside it.

  3. The tower’s foundation rises in a square form to a height of 3.76 m and then turns around as shown in Plate 2.

  4. The current mosque’s floor is approximately 4.5 m higher than the foundations.

  5. A square brick with dimensions of about 37 cm × 37 cm × 9 cm and a gypsum mortar was used for the construction works [5].

Plate 2 
               The foundation of a tower in Al-Kufa Mosque according to the archaeological investigation in 1938.
Plate 2

The foundation of a tower in Al-Kufa Mosque according to the archaeological investigation in 1938.

Drawings of the sections of the wall, towers, and foundations that surround the Al-Kufa Mosque based on the as-built drawing and archaeological investigation data are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 
               The wall and foundation details of Al-Kufa Mosque.
Figure 2

The wall and foundation details of Al-Kufa Mosque.

5 Soil profile

In 2004, the Iraqi National Center for Research and Construction Laboratories – Babylon Department conducted two site investigations at Dawoodi Bohra’s request in Al-Kufa Mosque. First site investigations were conducted inside the mosque (in the mosque’s courtyard), with ten boreholes bored to a depth of 10 m from the courtyard surface (at that time, the elevation of the courtyard surface was about 2 m below the outside elevation). The second site investigation took place outside the mosque with two boreholes drilled near Al-Huja Gate and one borehole drilled near Al-Rahma Gate to a depth of 7 m below the surface level. In February 2012, the Al-Najaf Technical Institute’s Consultant and Scientific Services Bureau conducted site investigations near the Al-Kufa Mosque for the designing and construction of the Muslim Bin Aqeel Underpass. Five boreholes were drilled down to a depth of 20–25 m below street level. Figure 3 shows the soil profiles of the strata of the Al-Kufa Mosque. Plate 3 shows the Al-Kufa Mosque and Muslim Bin Aqeel Underpass which is about 50 m away from the historical walls.

Figure 3 
               Soil profile of Al-Kufa Mosque.
Figure 3

Soil profile of Al-Kufa Mosque.

Plate 3 
               Aerial photo in 2021 illustrates Al-Kufa Mosque and Muslim Bin Aqeel Underpass.
Plate 3

Aerial photo in 2021 illustrates Al-Kufa Mosque and Muslim Bin Aqeel Underpass.

6 Soil parameters

6.1 Poisson’s ratio (µ)

Bowles [7] suggested the values of Poisson’s ratio (µ) depending on the type of soil. Kumar et al. [8] proposed charts and correlations depending on 300 pairs of data for calculating the Poisson’s ratio (µ) depending on SPT N value and soil type. Depending on refs. [7,8], we can estimate Poisson’s ratio (µ) for the soil profile as summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Poisson’s ratio (µ) and modulus of elasticity (E) for the soil profiles in Al-Kufa Mosque

Soil layer Depth (m) Soil type SPT N value Poisson’s ratio (µ) Selected modulus of elasticity (E) in MPa
1 0–4 Loose silty sand 8 0.28 10
2 4–5.5 Medium silty sand 11 0.31 20
3 5.5–10 Very dense silty sand 46 0.43 70
4 10–13 Very dense silty sand >50 0.45 80
5 13–21.5 Hard silty clay >50 0.45 100
6 21.5–25 Hard silty clay >50 0.45 100

6.2 Modulus of elasticity (E)

Budhu [9] proposed a table for the range of modulus of elasticity (E) based on its type and compactness. The modulus of elasticity (E) for the soil profiles in the Al-Kufa Mosque may be estimated by using ref. [9], as shown in Table 1.

6.3 Void ratio (e)

Fratta et al. [10] presented a table for the range values of dry density, saturated density, void ratio, and porosity according to the soil type. For the soil profile of Al-Kufa Mosque, we can calculate the void ratio (e) depending on ref. [10] for dry soil and for saturated soil we can use the following equation:

(1) e = Gs W S ,

and for saturated soil (s) it equals to (1). So, the equation will be:

(2) e = Gs W .

The void ratio for the soil profile layers of the Al-Kufa Mosque are illustrated in Table 2.

Table 2

Soil properties of the soil layers for the Al-Kufa Mosque profile

Soil layer Gs W (%) Dry unit weight (kN/m3) Saturated unit weight (kN/m3) Void ratio (e) Selected coefficient of permeability (k) in cm/s c (kN/m2) Ø
1 2.7 17 15 19.444 0.8 0.002 0 28
2 2.81 26 16.242 20.462 0.73 0.0015 5 30
3 2.73 26 15.965 20.117 0.71 0.001 10 41
4 2.81 26 16.242 20.462 0.73 0.001 10 43
5 2.81 25 16.53 20.647 0.7 0.000001 290
6 2.81 25 16.53 20.647 0.7 0.000001 290

6.4 Unit weight (γ)

Budhu [9] provided the following theoretical Eqs. (3) and (4) for calculating the dry and saturated unit weight of the soil layers:

(3) γ dry = Gs γ w 1 + e ,

(4) γ sat = Gs + e 1 + e γ w .

Depending on Eqs. (3) and (4), the dry soil and saturated unit weights were calculated for the soil profile layers of the Al-Kufa Mosque as listed in Table 2.

6.5 Coefficient of permeability (k)

Harr [11] proposed a range of the coefficient of permeability for common soil types. Depending on ref. [11], the coefficient of permeability for the Al-Kufa Mosque's soil profile may be estimated as shown in Table 2.

6.6 Shear strength parameters

The shear strength parameters (c and Ø) depending on the direct shear test are provided in the soil profile but not to all layers. Puri et al. [12] developed models and statistical correlations to estimate many soil parameters by employing the SPT N values. Puri et al. [12] used 2,067 datasets from 1,053 boreholes bored to the depth of 50 m in Haryana, India. Turner [13] proposed a table for the range of cohesion and unconfined compression strength of the soil depending on the SPT N values. The results from the direct shear test for the layers provided in the site profile report may be used for the soil profiles of the Al-Kufa Mosque. For layers 5 and 6, the statistical correlations proposed by Puri et al. [12] were applied to estimate the cohesion (c) based on the SPT N values then the estimated values were compared with the range of cohesion described in [13] as shown in Table 2.

7 Analysis

The analysis of the Al-Kufa Mosque walls and foundations was done by using the finite element method with the finite element software. The representation of the walls and foundations in finite element software was achieved for the western and northern walls because the other two walls (southern and eastern walls) are symmetric to the western and northern walls. Figure 4 shows the representation of the soil layers, foundations, and walls. The representation of the soil profile depends on the soil parameters calculated above with the Mohr–Coulomb Model.

Figure 4 
               The soil layers, foundations, and walls of Al-Kufa Mosque represented in finite element software.
Figure 4

The soil layers, foundations, and walls of Al-Kufa Mosque represented in finite element software.

Also, the dimensions of the footing of the walls and towers of the mosque with brick material are calculated with the Linear Elastic Model. Khalifa and Al-Wazni [14] made testing and comparisons between historical and traditional masonry brick for different properties like its compressive strength for brick unit and mortar, density, and modulus of elasticity. The historical brick units were taken from the structure of Imam Ali’s holy shrine (built 300 years ago). The testing of the historical brick revealed the following:

  1. Modulus of elasticity (E) = 3387 MPa

  2. Unit weight (γ) = 15.24 kN/m3, and

  3. Poisson’s ratio (µ) = 0.25.

These values were adopted in the analysis.

8 Results and discussion

The deformations, bending moment, and shear force for the soil layers, foundations, and the walls for the northern wall and western wall of the Al-Kufa Mosque are calculated and summarized in Figures 58 and Table 3.

Table 3

Deformation, bending moment, and shear force values for the northern wall and western wall of the Al-Kufa Mosque

Northern wall Western wall
Deformation x-Direction Max. value = 10.3 mm x-Direction Max. value = 8.15 mm
Min. value = –8.43 mm Min. value = –8.14 mm
y-Direction Max. value = 5.33 mm y-Direction Max. value = 4.47 mm
Min. value = –21 mm Min. value = –17.7 mm
Bending moment Max. value = 1,229 kN m/m Max. value = 152.54 kN m/m
Min. value = –1,172 kN m/m Min. value = –280.89 kN m/m
Shear force Max. value = 866 kN/m Max. value = 752 kN/m
Min. value = –822 kN/m Min. value = –738.9 kN/m

For the northern wall, the maximum positive bending moment was under the minaret with the value of 1,229 kN m and the maximum negative bending moment value was –1,172 kN m which is located under the footing before the minaret as shown in Figure 5. The maximum positive shear force was under the minaret with the value of 866 kN/m and the maximum negative shear force was under the seventh tower before the gate with the value of –822 kN/m as shown in Figure 6. For deformation, the maximum settlement was 21 mm and located under the second tower near the minaret.

Figure 5 
               Bending moment distribution under the footing of the northern wall.
Figure 5

Bending moment distribution under the footing of the northern wall.

Figure 6 
               Shear force distribution under the footing of the northern wall.
Figure 6

Shear force distribution under the footing of the northern wall.

For the western wall, the maximum positive bending moment was under the fifth tower after the gate with the value of 152.54 kN m and the maximum negative bending moment value was –280.89 kN m, which is located before the last tower as shown in Figure 7. The maximum positive shear force was under the fifth tower with the value of 752.9 kN/m and the maximum negative shear force was under the second tower with the value of –738.9 kN/m as shown in Figure 8. For deformation, the maximum settlement was 17.7 mm and located near the gate under the fifth tower.

Figure 7 
               Bending moment distribution under the footing of the western wall.
Figure 7

Bending moment distribution under the footing of the western wall.

Figure 8 
               Shear force distribution under the footing of the western wall.
Figure 8

Shear force distribution under the footing of the western wall.

Figures 58 show that the values of shear force and bending moment are fluctuating from negative to positive and vice versa near the towers due to the huge weight of the towers, and subsequently increase toward the gates and minaret. For the deformation, the values of the settlement are (21 mm) in the northern wall under the minaret and (17.7 mm) near the Al-Huja gate in the western wall, and these values occurred because of the high forces that are applied to the foundations in these places. According to the Iraqi Code of Foundations and Retaining Walls [15], the total settlement of shallow foundations must not exceed 32 mm in sandy soil and 45 mm in clayey soil. When the findings of the analysis are compared to the limitations in [15], it is regarded as permissible.

9 Conclusion

  1. Historical references and archaeological investigation reports are essential for understanding the historical architecture of antiquity structures, as well as foundation characteristics such as materials, size, and depth. While the as-built drawings are required to provide accurate dimensions of the building elements.

  2. If the soil investigation report does not provide all the soil values, then additional properties can be determined using theoretical formulae, tables, charts, statistical correlations, and models based on the SPT N value or soil types.

  3. The analysis showed that the bending moment and shear force varied under the towers that are surrounding the walls of the mosque due to the high weight of the towers.

  4. The maximum values of bending moment, shear force, and settlement are under the minaret near the Al-Thuaban gate.

  5. The values of deformations (settlement) are accepted according to the Iraqi Code of Foundations and Retaining Walls (2015).

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the General Secretariat of Al-Kufa Mosque for assisting them and providing all of the required data and reports for the completion of this work.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Al-Jiboury KS. Al-Kufa Mosques: An illustrated historical study of the mosques of Kufa from the first century AH to the present. Printed by Dar Al-Nuaman; 1977.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Al-Hamawi Y. Dictionary of countries. Printed by Dar Sadir; Beirut, Lebanon; 1993.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Al-Tabari MI. History of the nations, the Messengers and the Kings. Printed by Dar Ehiaa Al-Turath Al-Arabi; Beirut Lebanon; 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Ibn Jubayr M. The Journey of Ibn Jubayr. Printed by Dar Sadir; Beirut, Lebanon; 1993.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Nabil Abdul Hussein Rahi. Al-Kufa Mosque, the architectural development with a comparative study of the current architecture with the historical accounts of the planning and architecture of the mosque. Al-Adab J. 2018 Sep 1;126:178–91.10.31973/aj.v1i126.60Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Al-Janabi K. Planning the city of Kufa from historical and archaeological references. Printed by The Iraqi Complex; Baghdad, Iraq; 1967.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Bowles JE. Foundation analysis and design. 5th ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. 1997.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Kumar R, Bhargava K, Choudhury D. Estimation of engineering properties of soils from field SPT using random number generation. INAE Lett. 2016 Dec;1(3):77–84.10.1007/s41403-016-0012-6Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Budhu M. Soil mechanics and foundations. 3rd ed. New York, United States: John Wiley & Sons, inc; 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Fratta D, Aguettant J, Roussel-Smith L. Introduction to soil mechanics laboratory testing. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press; 2007 May 21.10.1201/9781420045659Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Harr ME. Groundwater and seepage. New York, USA: Dover Publications Inc.; 1991.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Puri N, Prasad HD, Jain A. Prediction of geotechnical parameters using machine learning techniques. Proc Comput Sci. 2018 Jan 1;125:509–17.10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.066Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Turner JM. Excavation systems planning design, and safety. New Yourk, USA: McGraw Hill Professional; 2008 Jul 1.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Khalifa H, Al-Wazni S. Experimental testing and comparison between historical and traditional masonry brick. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2021;1973:012214.10.1088/1742-6596/1973/1/012214Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Iraqi Code of Foundations and Retaining Walls, IBC 302; 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-03-16
Revised: 2022-04-14
Accepted: 2022-04-15
Published Online: 2022-07-05

© 2022 Hasan Mahdi Al-Jiboury and Mohammed Kadum Fakhraldin, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Calcium carbonate nanoparticles of quail’s egg shells: Synthesis and characterizations
  3. Effect of welding consumables on shielded metal arc welded ultra high hard armour steel joints
  4. Stress-strain characteristics and service life of conventional and asphaltic underlayment track under heavy load Babaranjang trains traffic
  5. Corrigendum to: Statistical mechanics of cell decision-making: the cell migration force distribution
  6. Prediction of bearing capacity of driven piles for Basrah governatore using SPT and MATLAB
  7. Investigation on microstructural features and tensile shear fracture properties of resistance spot welded advanced high strength dual phase steel sheets in lap joint configuration for automotive frame applications
  8. Experimental and numerical investigation of drop weight impact of aramid and UHMWPE reinforced epoxy
  9. An experimental study and finite element analysis of the parametric of circular honeycomb core
  10. The study of the particle size effect on the physical properties of TiO2/cellulose acetate composite films
  11. Hybrid material performance assessment for rocket propulsion
  12. Design of ER damper for recoil length minimization: A case study on gun recoil system
  13. Forecasting technical performance and cost estimation of designed rim wheels based on variations of geometrical parameters
  14. Enhancing the machinability of SKD61 die steel in power-mixed EDM process with TGRA-based multi criteria decision making
  15. Effect of boron carbide reinforcement on properties of stainless-steel metal matrix composite for nuclear applications
  16. Energy absorption behaviors of designed metallic square tubes under axial loading: Experiment-based benchmarking and finite element calculation
  17. Synthesis and study of magnesium complexes derived from polyacrylate and polyvinyl alcohol and their applications as superabsorbent polymers
  18. Artificial neural network for predicting the mechanical performance of additive manufacturing thermoset carbon fiber composite materials
  19. Shock and impact reliability of electronic assemblies with perimeter vs full array layouts: A numerical comparative study
  20. Influences of pre-bending load and corrosion degree of reinforcement on the loading capacity of concrete beams
  21. Assessment of ballistic impact damage on aluminum and magnesium alloys against high velocity bullets by dynamic FE simulations
  22. On the applicability of Cu–17Zn–7Al–0.3Ni shape memory alloy particles as reinforcement in aluminium-based composites: Structural and mechanical behaviour considerations
  23. Mechanical properties of laminated bamboo composite as a sustainable green material for fishing vessel: Correlation of layer configuration in various mechanical tests
  24. Singularities at interface corners of piezoelectric-brass unimorphs
  25. Evaluation of the wettability of prepared anti-wetting nanocoating on different construction surfaces
  26. Review Article
  27. An overview of cold spray coating in additive manufacturing, component repairing and other engineering applications
  28. Special Issue: Sustainability and Development in Civil Engineering - Part I
  29. Risk assessment process for the Iraqi petroleum sector
  30. Evaluation of a fire safety risk prediction model for an existing building
  31. The slenderness ratio effect on the response of closed-end pipe piles in liquefied and non-liquefied soil layers under coupled static-seismic loading
  32. Experimental and numerical study of the bulb's location effect on the behavior of under-reamed pile in expansive soil
  33. Procurement challenges analysis of Iraqi construction projects
  34. Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations
  35. Response of composite steel-concrete cellular beams of different concrete deck types under harmonic loads
  36. The effect of using different fibres on the impact-resistance of slurry infiltrated fibrous concrete (SIFCON)
  37. Effect of microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) on the strength of soil contaminated with lead nitrate
  38. The effect of using polyolefin fiber on some properties of slurry-infiltrated fibrous concrete
  39. Typical strength of asphalt mixtures compacted by gyratory compactor
  40. Modeling and simulation sedimentation process using finite difference method
  41. Residual strength and strengthening capacity of reinforced concrete columns subjected to fire exposure by numerical analysis
  42. Effect of magnetization of saline irrigation water of Almasab Alam on some physical properties of soil
  43. Behavior of reactive powder concrete containing recycled glass powder reinforced by steel fiber
  44. Reducing settlement of soft clay using different grouting materials
  45. Sustainability in the design of liquefied petroleum gas systems used in buildings
  46. Utilization of serial tendering to reduce the value project
  47. Time and finance optimization model for multiple construction projects using genetic algorithm
  48. Identification of the main causes of risks in engineering procurement construction projects
  49. Identifying the selection criteria of design consultant for Iraqi construction projects
  50. Calibration and analysis of the potable water network in the Al-Yarmouk region employing WaterGEMS and GIS
  51. Enhancing gypseous soil behavior using casein from milk wastes
  52. Structural behavior of tree-like steel columns subjected to combined axial and lateral loads
  53. Prospect of using geotextile reinforcement within flexible pavement layers to reduce the effects of rutting in the middle and southern parts of Iraq
  54. Ultimate bearing capacity of eccentrically loaded square footing over geogrid-reinforced cohesive soil
  55. Influence of water-absorbent polymer balls on the structural performance of reinforced concrete beam: An experimental investigation
  56. A spherical fuzzy AHP model for contractor assessment during project life cycle
  57. Performance of reinforced concrete non-prismatic beams having multiple openings configurations
  58. Finite element analysis of the soil and foundations of the Al-Kufa Mosque
  59. Flexural behavior of concrete beams with horizontal and vertical openings reinforced by glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars
  60. Studying the effect of shear stud distribution on the behavior of steel–reactive powder concrete composite beams using ABAQUS software
  61. The behavior of piled rafts in soft clay: Numerical investigation
  62. The impact of evaluation and qualification criteria on Iraqi electromechanical power plants in construction contracts
  63. Performance of concrete thrust block at several burial conditions under the influence of thrust forces generated in the water distribution networks
  64. Geotechnical characterization of sustainable geopolymer improved soil
  65. Effect of the covariance matrix type on the CPT based soil stratification utilizing the Gaussian mixture model
  66. Impact of eccentricity and depth-to-breadth ratio on the behavior of skirt foundation rested on dry gypseous soil
  67. Concrete strength development by using magnetized water in normal and self-compacted concrete
  68. The effect of dosage nanosilica and the particle size of porcelanite aggregate concrete on mechanical and microstructure properties
  69. Comparison of time extension provisions between the Joint Contracts Tribunal and Iraqi Standard Bidding Document
  70. Numerical modeling of single closed and open-ended pipe pile embedded in dry soil layers under coupled static and dynamic loadings
  71. Mechanical properties of sustainable reactive powder concrete made with low cement content and high amount of fly ash and silica fume
  72. Deformation of unsaturated collapsible soils under suction control
  73. Mitigation of collapse characteristics of gypseous soils by activated carbon, sodium metasilicate, and cement dust: An experimental study
  74. Behavior of group piles under combined loadings after improvement of liquefiable soil with nanomaterials
  75. Using papyrus fiber ash as a sustainable filler modifier in preparing low moisture sensitivity HMA mixtures
  76. Study of some properties of colored geopolymer concrete consisting of slag
  77. GIS implementation and statistical analysis for significant characteristics of Kirkuk soil
  78. Improving the flexural behavior of RC beams strengthening by near-surface mounting
  79. The effect of materials and curing system on the behavior of self-compacting geopolymer concrete
  80. The temporal rhythm of scenes and the safety in educational space
  81. Numerical simulation to the effect of applying rationing system on the stability of the Earth canal: Birmana canal in Iraq as a case study
  82. Assessing the vibration response of foundation embedment in gypseous soil
  83. Analysis of concrete beams reinforced by GFRP bars with varying parameters
  84. One dimensional normal consolidation line equation
Heruntergeladen am 12.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0037/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen