Home Performance of concrete thrust block at several burial conditions under the influence of thrust forces generated in the water distribution networks
Article Open Access

Performance of concrete thrust block at several burial conditions under the influence of thrust forces generated in the water distribution networks

  • Murtadha Hardan Dawood EMAIL logo , Amer Farouq Izzet and Basim Hussien Khudair
Published/Copyright: July 11, 2022

Abstract

This study was prepared to investigate the performance and behavior of concrete thrust blocks supporting pipe fittings. In the water distribution networks, it is always necessary to change the path of the pipes at different degrees or to create new branches. In these regions, an unbalanced force called the thrust force is generated. In order to counter this force, these regions are supported with concrete blocks. In this article, the system components (soil, pipe with its bend and thrust blocks) have been numerically modeled and simulated by the ABAQUS CAE/2019 software program in order to study the behavior and stability of the thrust block with different burial conditions (several burial depths) by the soil under the influence of the thrust force. Accordingly, 45° bend angles were studied with a specified pipe diameter placed on soil with known properties under the influence of internal hydrostatic test pressure. The obtained results that were relied upon to describe the behavior and stability of the block are (the lateral displacement of the block in the direction of the thrust force, as well as the vertical displacement of the block in addition to the Von Mises stresses transmitted by the block to the soil). It was concluded that the case in which the block is fully supported from its back side represents the optimum state of the block as it provides marginal sliding of the block and the least transmitted stress to the soil. It was also concluded that the transition from the first case (thrust block without soil behind it) to the second case (a quarter of the block is supported by soil), in which the maximum change in the performance of the concrete block was recorded, but after shifting to the other cases, the effect was reduced gradually.

1 Introduction

Pipes are the traditional way to transport water and other liquids over distances [1,2]. The generation of thrust forces is very common in water distribution networks due to the bends in the pipe paths stipulated in the network layout [3]. Retaining thrust blocks, as well as the method of restraining joints, are the most popular methods of counteracting thrust forces [4]. Each of these methods is considered scientifically and economically feasible in specific circumstances [5].

The design of concrete thrust blocks depends on fluid mechanics and soil mechanics, regardless of the type of pipe material or its application [6]. Concrete thrust blocks come in several shapes, according to the approved code. In Egyptian code, the thrust blocks are L-shaped, while in the American waterwork association, they are pyramidal [1]. The main objective of the design of the thrust blocks is to find the area of the base of the hierarchical shape that is in contact with soil, but there are infinite values for the base dimensions of the block that provide the same area, so the best dimensions that provide the least possible size of block that can be stable under the influence of thrust force must be found [3]. From a structural point of view, before any judgment on the validity of the block and before examining any activities, the concrete must be cured for 3 days in the case of high early strength concrete or 7 days in the case of using normal concrete [7]. According to [4], the minimum compressive strength of concrete used for thrust blocks at 28 days should be 13.8 MPa. [8] states that the thrust blocks can be unreinforced because the concrete is only under compressive stresses without tensile stresses and has high compressive strength compared to tensile strength [9]. In the case of vertical bends, the block must be under the joint and be supported by a steel rod that is suspended in the joint [10].

2 Case study description

In this section, a comprehensive description of the details and characteristics of the soil, pipe, and concrete thrust block that will be studied is provided. A ductile iron pipe with a horizontal bend angle of 45° with properties listed in Table 1 below will be modeled and studied.

Table 1

Pipe properties

Property Magnitude
Outer diameter (mm) 330.48
Inner diameter (mm) 300
Wall thickness (mm) 15.24
Modulus of elasticity (MPa) 170,000
Poisson ratio 0.27

While for internal pressure of the pipe, the operating pressure in water distribution networks is usually from 60 to 75 psi, according to [11], but according to [12], test pressure which is equal to about one and a half times the operating pressure, and in many cases, it is tested under a test pressure of 10 bar, which is approximately equal to 150 psi. Therefore, this value of the internal pressure will be adopted as a worst-case in this study.

As mentioned previously, it is possible for the thrust block to be in different shapes, but the hierarchical form adopted in the American code will be relied upon. Figure 1 shows the preferable shape of the thrust block in the American code.

Figure 1 
               Thrust block of a horizontal bend for AAWA (American Water Works Association 1999, 2004, 2008, 2009) [1].
Figure 1

Thrust block of a horizontal bend for AAWA (American Water Works Association 1999, 2004, 2008, 2009) [1].

This shape of the block will be adopted and represented in the study with the characteristics shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Thrust block properties

Property Magnitude
Compressive strength of concrete (MPa) 25
Poisson ratio 0.17
Modulus of elasticity (c) 23,500
Mass density (kg/m3) 2,400

The native soil, which will support the concrete block from the bottom and the back sides, its characteristics, which have been calculated on the site and in the laboratory by making investigations for the soil, and the most important characteristics that enter into the design of the thrust block system are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3

Soil properties

Property Magnitude
Soil type (USCS) SM
0.17 Of native soil (kN/m3) 15
Soil cohesive (MPa) 0.006
Internal friction angle (degree) 28.7
Modulus of elasticity (MPa) 12
Poisson ratio 0.3

The recommended values of the modulus of elasticity of the soil were adopted from [13], while the Poisson’s ratio was taken from [14].

3 Modeling work

In this section, modeling and simulation of a concrete thrust block system that supports the pipes will be modeled. Five cases will be simulated, and the required results will be extracted related to the structural stability of the block, as well as the transferring stresses to the supporting soil behind.

In all the five cases, the system consists of three parts first, the pipe which is represented as a shell element with a total length of 6.3 m on each side of the bend, meshed using 3,493 linear quadrilateral elements of type S4R, as illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2 
               Pipe mesh.
Figure 2

Pipe mesh.

The second part is the soil, as it was represented as a three-dimensional solid element with cross-section dimensions of (6 m × 2 m), and the third dimension was 8 m, meshed with 12,000 linear hexahedral elements of type C3D8R (Figure 3).

Figure 3 
               Soil mesh.
Figure 3

Soil mesh.

The third part of the system is the concrete block, which is modeled by a three-dimensional solid element in a hierarchical shape and with the base dimensions of (1.05 m × 2 m) with a vertex small base of (0.3 m × 0.6 m) and length of (1.05 m), these dimensions produce a reference volume of the block equal to 1 m3. The block meshed with 1,183 linear hexahedral elements of type C3D8R (Figure 4).

Figure 4 
               Thrust block mesh.
Figure 4

Thrust block mesh.

These three parts (the pipe, the soil, and the block) are assembled to form a system of concrete thrust blocks.

The five cases that will be simulated are as follows:

  1. Case 1: Thrust block without supporting soil behind it.

This case was simulated relying on the block weight without any supporting soil behind it, in order to provide structural stability to it under the influence of the thrust force that was generated inside the pipe at the bend as in Figure 5.

Figure 5 
               General view of Case 1.
Figure 5

General view of Case 1.

After conducting the structural analysis under the influence of thrust force. Figures 6 and 7 show the results obtained from the analysis:

Figure 6 
               Vertical displacement of thrust block (mm).
Figure 6

Vertical displacement of thrust block (mm).

Figure 7 
               Horizontal displacement of thrust block (mm).
Figure 7

Horizontal displacement of thrust block (mm).

Results reveal that the maximum horizontal displacement occurred in the concrete block toward the thrust force was approximately 1,073 mm, while the maximum vertical displacement in the block was approximately 3.1 mm downward.

  1. Case 2: Quarter of the block is supported by soil.

In this case, a quarter of the block height was supported by soil with the same characteristics as the native soil (the height of the supporting soil 0.26 m), which was formed as a second soil part and merged with the original soil to form final soil part as shown in Figure 7.

After the structural analysis, the results obtained from the analysis are shown in Figures 810.

Figure 8 
               General view of Case 2.
Figure 8

General view of Case 2.

Figure 9 
               Vertical displacement of thrust block (mm).
Figure 9

Vertical displacement of thrust block (mm).

Figure 10 
            Horizontal displacement of thrust block (mm).
Figure 10

Horizontal displacement of thrust block (mm).

It can be observed that the maximum stress in the soil behind the thrust block is 58 kPa and the maximum horizontal displacement of the thrust block is reduced to approximately 46.2 mm, whereas the results showed that the part of the block adjacent to the soil had a vertical movement opposite to its own weight, where the displacement was 2.4 mm upward and decreases as we approach the pipe.

  1. Case 3: Half of the block is supported by soil.

In this case, half of the block height was supported by soil (the height of the supporting soil 0.5 m), which was also represented as a second soil that was merged with the soil under the block and pipe, as shown in the Figure 11.

Figure 11 
               Stress distribution on soil behind thrust block (MPa).
Figure 11

Stress distribution on soil behind thrust block (MPa).

Also, the structural analysis of the system was performed in order to extract the results of this case, and they were as shown in Figures 1214.

Figure 12 
               General view of Case 3.
Figure 12

General view of Case 3.

Figure 13 
               Vertical displacement of thrust block (mm).
Figure 13

Vertical displacement of thrust block (mm).

Figure 14 
            Horizontal displacement of thrust block (mm).
Figure 14

Horizontal displacement of thrust block (mm).

The results showed that the Von Mises stresses in the soil supporting the block decreased to 31 kPa, also, the horizontal displacement of thrust block in the direction of the thrust force decreased from 46.2 to 3.3 mm, while the maximum vertical displacement of the block due to self-weight was approximately 3.2 mm.

  1. Case 4: Three-quarters of the block is supported by soil.

In this case, the burial depth of the concrete block was increased to three-quarters of its height (0.78 m), and in the same way, the soil behind the block was merged with the soil below it. Figure 15 illustrates the view of this model.

Figure 15 
               Stress distribution on soil behind thrust block (MPa).
Figure 15

Stress distribution on soil behind thrust block (MPa).

After simulating this model, the results are shown in Figures 1618.

Figure 16 
               General view of Case 4.
Figure 16

General view of Case 4.

Figure 17 
               Vertical displacement of thrust block (mm).
Figure 17

Vertical displacement of thrust block (mm).

Figure 18 
            Horizontal displacement of thrust block (mm).
Figure 18

Horizontal displacement of thrust block (mm).

As it is clear in the results, the Von Mises stresses that transmitted to the soil through the concrete block decreased from 31 to 29 kPa with increasing burial depth, while the maximum horizontal displacement that occurred in the block was reduced to 2.4 mm, and for the vertical displacement, its maximum value reached to approximately 3.4 mm downward.

  1. Case 5: Entire block backed by soil.

In the last case of the study, the entire block height was supported by the soil by increasing the burial behind the block as in Figure 19.

Figure 19 
               Stress distribution on soil behind thrust block (MPa).
Figure 19

Stress distribution on soil behind thrust block (MPa).

After simulation and structural analysis of the model, Figures 2022 show the results extracted from the analysis:

Figure 20 
               General view of Case 5.
Figure 20

General view of Case 5.

Figure 21 
               Vertical displacement of thrust block (mm).
Figure 21

Vertical displacement of thrust block (mm).

After the transition to the last case, the greatest stress transferred by the concrete block to the soil is 28 kPa, while the greatest horizontal displacement occurred in the block decreased from 2.4 to 2.2 mm

As for the vertical displacement due to the self-weight of the block, it reached 3.5 mm.

4 Results and discussion

After modeling and simulating the five cases and extracting the required results for each case, a comparison was made between the results of the cases to know the changing in the behavior and structural stability of the concrete thrust block by the transition from one case to another.

The results of the cases will be compared based on the horizontal displacement of the concrete block toward the effect of the thrust force generated in the pipe bend, as well as based on the vertical movement of the block in addition to the Von Mises stresses that the block will transfer to the soil supporting it.

Table 4 shows the variations of the obtained results in comparison with Case 1 for horizontal displacement and with Case 2 for Von Mises stresses at the soil.

Table 4

Comparison between five cases

Studied case Horizontal displacement (mm) (%) Decrease Von mises stresses at soil (kPa) (%) Decrease
Case 1 1,073
Case 2 46.2 95.69 58
Case 3 3.3 99.69 31 46.55
Case 4 2.4 99.77 29 50.00
Case 5 2.2 99.79 28 51.72

Figures 22 and 23 show the path of the decrease in the lateral displacement and in the stresses transmitted to the soil behind the block by changing the case studied (burial depth).

Figure 22 
               Horizontal displacement of thrust block (mm).
Figure 22

Horizontal displacement of thrust block (mm).

Figure 23 
               Stress distribution on soil behind thrust block (MPa).
Figure 23

Stress distribution on soil behind thrust block (MPa).

The results showed that the conditions of burial of the thrust block clearly affect the structural stability of the concrete block and the amount of stress that the block transmits to the soil supporting it.

It was observed that the greatest enhancement in the performance of the block in terms of sliding stability occurs when shifting from Case 1 to Case 2, where the lateral displacement of the block decreased from 1,073 to 46 mm with percentage up to 95.69, but when transiting to the third case, then the fourth and the fifth cases, the decrease in block sliding was reduced gradually, where when shifting from the second to the third and then to the fourth and then the fifth, the decreasing in the lateral displacement for each case relative to the previous case is 92.85, 27.27, and 8.3%, respectively (Figures 24 and 25).

Figure 24 
            Lateral displacement variation.
Figure 24

Lateral displacement variation.

Figure 25 
            Von Mises stresses variation.
Figure 25

Von Mises stresses variation.

As for the vertical movement, in all cases, it was stable, as the downward displacement was due to its self-weight with a value of approximately 3 mm in all cases, except for the second case, where another instability type of block occurred, where it was noted that the block moves with differential movement as the side of the block close to the supporting soil had an upward displacement of 2.4 mm and decreases by approaching the pipe.

While, for the amount of stress transferred by the block to the soil supporting it as a result of the effect of the thrust force, the stresses decrease when the depth of burial is increased, as the maximum decrease occurred between two cases when shifting from the second case to the third with a percentage reaching to 46.

5 Conclusion

After viewing and discussing the results, the following main points were concluded:

  1. The fifth case of full soil behind supporting represents the optimal condition of the concrete block, as it provides the best performance of the block in terms of stability and reducing the stresses transmitted to the soil.

  2. The use of the first case (block without backing soil) is not feasible, as a huge amount of concrete will be needed in order to achieve the required stability, which makes the work uneconomic.

  3. The use of burial at a depth of less than half the block (the second case) may cause instability, represented by the occurrence of the block overturning as a result of the upward displacement.

  4. The greatest change in the performance of the concrete block in terms of stability has occurred when shifting from the first case to the second, where the change was 95.69%, then the percentage is reduced to 92.85, 27.27, and 8.3 when shifting to the third, fourth, and fifth cases, respectively, while in terms of the transferring of stresses to the soil is when changing from the second case to the third where the changing was 46.55%, then the percentage is reduced to 6.89, and 3.45 when shifting to the fourth and fifth cases, respectively.

Acknowledgment

At the end of this work, I would like to thank the staff of the Civil Engineering Department/College of Engineering-University of Baghdad and everyone who helped in completing this work.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Hussien OS. Comparative study for designing the horizontal thrust blocks in pipelines for water and sewage networks. Water Sci Technol. 2021 Sep 1;84(5):1302–8.10.2166/wst.2021.307Search in Google Scholar

[2] Fattah MY, Zbar BS, Al-Kalali HH. Three-dimensional finite element simulation of the buried pipe problem in geogrid reinforced soil. J Eng. 2016 May 1;22(5):60–73.10.31026/j.eng.2016.05.05Search in Google Scholar

[3] Anwar A, Abdul Fatah A, Abdulkadir T. Direct search for optimal design of thrust block in Nigeria. Webs J Sci Eng Application. 2013;2(2):88–95.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association. Design Thrust Restraint Design for Ductile Iron Pipe. 7th ed. Birmingham: DIPRA; 2016. p. 6.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Dawood M, Izzet AF, Khudair BH. Comparative study between the behavior of the concrete thrust block and the restraint joint in a water distribution system; review. J Eng. 2022 May 1;28(5):1.10.31026/j.eng.2022.05.01Search in Google Scholar

[6] Jeyapalan JK, Rajah SK. Unified approach to thrust restraint design. J Transp Eng. 2007 Jan;133(1):57–61.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:1(57)Search in Google Scholar

[7] City of Edmonton Design and Construction Standards. Water. EPCOR; 2021;4:124.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission. Thrust restraint for buried pipelines. Common Design Guidlines; 2008. Part three. Section 27C-27.1–C-27. p. 26.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Al-Quraishi H, Ghanim G, Asaad Z. Compressive strength of bottle-shaped compression fields of fiber reinforced concrete members. J Eng. 2017 Nov 1;23(11):56–69.10.31026/j.eng.2017.11.05Search in Google Scholar

[10] MacKenzie K. Halifax Regional Water Commission. Design and construction specifiations (water, wastewater & stormwater systems). HRWC; 2016. p. 33.Search in Google Scholar

[11] City of Keizer Design Standards. Water system design and standards. 2021. p. 2Search in Google Scholar

[12] AWWA C-600 Hydrostatic Testing. Hydrostatic Testing; 2009. Sec. 5.2. p. 24.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kézdi Á, Rétháti L. Handbook of soil mechanics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1974.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Marchenko M, Mosicheva I, Aniskin A. Estimation of Poisson’s ratio of soil using stiffness of loose soils. Adv Civ Architect Eng. 2018;9(16):85–94.10.13167/2018.16.8Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-04-13
Revised: 2022-05-10
Accepted: 2022-05-10
Published Online: 2022-07-11

© 2022 Murtadha Hardan Dawood et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Calcium carbonate nanoparticles of quail’s egg shells: Synthesis and characterizations
  3. Effect of welding consumables on shielded metal arc welded ultra high hard armour steel joints
  4. Stress-strain characteristics and service life of conventional and asphaltic underlayment track under heavy load Babaranjang trains traffic
  5. Corrigendum to: Statistical mechanics of cell decision-making: the cell migration force distribution
  6. Prediction of bearing capacity of driven piles for Basrah governatore using SPT and MATLAB
  7. Investigation on microstructural features and tensile shear fracture properties of resistance spot welded advanced high strength dual phase steel sheets in lap joint configuration for automotive frame applications
  8. Experimental and numerical investigation of drop weight impact of aramid and UHMWPE reinforced epoxy
  9. An experimental study and finite element analysis of the parametric of circular honeycomb core
  10. The study of the particle size effect on the physical properties of TiO2/cellulose acetate composite films
  11. Hybrid material performance assessment for rocket propulsion
  12. Design of ER damper for recoil length minimization: A case study on gun recoil system
  13. Forecasting technical performance and cost estimation of designed rim wheels based on variations of geometrical parameters
  14. Enhancing the machinability of SKD61 die steel in power-mixed EDM process with TGRA-based multi criteria decision making
  15. Effect of boron carbide reinforcement on properties of stainless-steel metal matrix composite for nuclear applications
  16. Energy absorption behaviors of designed metallic square tubes under axial loading: Experiment-based benchmarking and finite element calculation
  17. Synthesis and study of magnesium complexes derived from polyacrylate and polyvinyl alcohol and their applications as superabsorbent polymers
  18. Artificial neural network for predicting the mechanical performance of additive manufacturing thermoset carbon fiber composite materials
  19. Shock and impact reliability of electronic assemblies with perimeter vs full array layouts: A numerical comparative study
  20. Influences of pre-bending load and corrosion degree of reinforcement on the loading capacity of concrete beams
  21. Assessment of ballistic impact damage on aluminum and magnesium alloys against high velocity bullets by dynamic FE simulations
  22. On the applicability of Cu–17Zn–7Al–0.3Ni shape memory alloy particles as reinforcement in aluminium-based composites: Structural and mechanical behaviour considerations
  23. Mechanical properties of laminated bamboo composite as a sustainable green material for fishing vessel: Correlation of layer configuration in various mechanical tests
  24. Singularities at interface corners of piezoelectric-brass unimorphs
  25. Evaluation of the wettability of prepared anti-wetting nanocoating on different construction surfaces
  26. Review Article
  27. An overview of cold spray coating in additive manufacturing, component repairing and other engineering applications
  28. Special Issue: Sustainability and Development in Civil Engineering - Part I
  29. Risk assessment process for the Iraqi petroleum sector
  30. Evaluation of a fire safety risk prediction model for an existing building
  31. The slenderness ratio effect on the response of closed-end pipe piles in liquefied and non-liquefied soil layers under coupled static-seismic loading
  32. Experimental and numerical study of the bulb's location effect on the behavior of under-reamed pile in expansive soil
  33. Procurement challenges analysis of Iraqi construction projects
  34. Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations
  35. Response of composite steel-concrete cellular beams of different concrete deck types under harmonic loads
  36. The effect of using different fibres on the impact-resistance of slurry infiltrated fibrous concrete (SIFCON)
  37. Effect of microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) on the strength of soil contaminated with lead nitrate
  38. The effect of using polyolefin fiber on some properties of slurry-infiltrated fibrous concrete
  39. Typical strength of asphalt mixtures compacted by gyratory compactor
  40. Modeling and simulation sedimentation process using finite difference method
  41. Residual strength and strengthening capacity of reinforced concrete columns subjected to fire exposure by numerical analysis
  42. Effect of magnetization of saline irrigation water of Almasab Alam on some physical properties of soil
  43. Behavior of reactive powder concrete containing recycled glass powder reinforced by steel fiber
  44. Reducing settlement of soft clay using different grouting materials
  45. Sustainability in the design of liquefied petroleum gas systems used in buildings
  46. Utilization of serial tendering to reduce the value project
  47. Time and finance optimization model for multiple construction projects using genetic algorithm
  48. Identification of the main causes of risks in engineering procurement construction projects
  49. Identifying the selection criteria of design consultant for Iraqi construction projects
  50. Calibration and analysis of the potable water network in the Al-Yarmouk region employing WaterGEMS and GIS
  51. Enhancing gypseous soil behavior using casein from milk wastes
  52. Structural behavior of tree-like steel columns subjected to combined axial and lateral loads
  53. Prospect of using geotextile reinforcement within flexible pavement layers to reduce the effects of rutting in the middle and southern parts of Iraq
  54. Ultimate bearing capacity of eccentrically loaded square footing over geogrid-reinforced cohesive soil
  55. Influence of water-absorbent polymer balls on the structural performance of reinforced concrete beam: An experimental investigation
  56. A spherical fuzzy AHP model for contractor assessment during project life cycle
  57. Performance of reinforced concrete non-prismatic beams having multiple openings configurations
  58. Finite element analysis of the soil and foundations of the Al-Kufa Mosque
  59. Flexural behavior of concrete beams with horizontal and vertical openings reinforced by glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars
  60. Studying the effect of shear stud distribution on the behavior of steel–reactive powder concrete composite beams using ABAQUS software
  61. The behavior of piled rafts in soft clay: Numerical investigation
  62. The impact of evaluation and qualification criteria on Iraqi electromechanical power plants in construction contracts
  63. Performance of concrete thrust block at several burial conditions under the influence of thrust forces generated in the water distribution networks
  64. Geotechnical characterization of sustainable geopolymer improved soil
  65. Effect of the covariance matrix type on the CPT based soil stratification utilizing the Gaussian mixture model
  66. Impact of eccentricity and depth-to-breadth ratio on the behavior of skirt foundation rested on dry gypseous soil
  67. Concrete strength development by using magnetized water in normal and self-compacted concrete
  68. The effect of dosage nanosilica and the particle size of porcelanite aggregate concrete on mechanical and microstructure properties
  69. Comparison of time extension provisions between the Joint Contracts Tribunal and Iraqi Standard Bidding Document
  70. Numerical modeling of single closed and open-ended pipe pile embedded in dry soil layers under coupled static and dynamic loadings
  71. Mechanical properties of sustainable reactive powder concrete made with low cement content and high amount of fly ash and silica fume
  72. Deformation of unsaturated collapsible soils under suction control
  73. Mitigation of collapse characteristics of gypseous soils by activated carbon, sodium metasilicate, and cement dust: An experimental study
  74. Behavior of group piles under combined loadings after improvement of liquefiable soil with nanomaterials
  75. Using papyrus fiber ash as a sustainable filler modifier in preparing low moisture sensitivity HMA mixtures
  76. Study of some properties of colored geopolymer concrete consisting of slag
  77. GIS implementation and statistical analysis for significant characteristics of Kirkuk soil
  78. Improving the flexural behavior of RC beams strengthening by near-surface mounting
  79. The effect of materials and curing system on the behavior of self-compacting geopolymer concrete
  80. The temporal rhythm of scenes and the safety in educational space
  81. Numerical simulation to the effect of applying rationing system on the stability of the Earth canal: Birmana canal in Iraq as a case study
  82. Assessing the vibration response of foundation embedment in gypseous soil
  83. Analysis of concrete beams reinforced by GFRP bars with varying parameters
  84. One dimensional normal consolidation line equation
Downloaded on 5.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0048/html
Scroll to top button